Read User Reviews and Submit your own for True Grit (2010)

8

J42HmusicFeb 19, 2011

The best thing about this movie was the acting. Jeff Bridges was fantastic! The film was set in a believable location with long drawn-out silences which added plenty of suspense.

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

9

dogdanzJan 14, 2011

I haven't read the source novel, but I did see the 1969 movie and am not quite sure which I like better....I'll have to rent that one again. I did like this movie almost as much as some of my favorite Coen films, such as Fargo and BloodI haven't read the source novel, but I did see the 1969 movie and am not quite sure which I like better....I'll have to rent that one again. I did like this movie almost as much as some of my favorite Coen films, such as Fargo and Blood Simple, and much more than No Country For Old Men (to be fair, that movie was very faithful to the novel, which I read, and I felt the movie contained all the same problems as the book). The crafting of the film is excellent, with my only problem being that the actress portraying the older Mattie looks nothing like 14 year-old Mattie....Scanning the critics' reviews, I see the only one who really didn't like it is Rex Reed, and that is probably because there is no hint of male homosexuality in the movie.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

9

GuiveraFeb 28, 2011

Even if you struggle to understand what Bridges is saying (you will) it is impossible to deny his and the movie's charm. The movie is filled with great acting and scenes that don't scream HERE TAKE SOME ACTION ACTION ACTION but more rely onEven if you struggle to understand what Bridges is saying (you will) it is impossible to deny his and the movie's charm. The movie is filled with great acting and scenes that don't scream HERE TAKE SOME ACTION ACTION ACTION but more rely on great plot and acting, with of course enjoyable action in good dose's. I loved this movie and will no doubt watch it again!… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

Knicksfan7Jun 3, 2011

This movie was amazing. Going back to old cowboy movie style like the good ol' John Wayne days. Their hasn't been a good cowboy/western movie in quite sometime. True Grit was superb. Jeff Bridges with his successful job as the witty SheriffThis movie was amazing. Going back to old cowboy movie style like the good ol' John Wayne days. Their hasn't been a good cowboy/western movie in quite sometime. True Grit was superb. Jeff Bridges with his successful job as the witty Sheriff performed an Oscar worthy performance. Matt Damon did a great job as the lone Texas ranger, and the always awesome Josh Brolin as Tom Chaney, but the biggest breakout performance was by Hailee Steinfeld as Mattie Ross, she did an amazing job and shouldve won the Oscar, especially for being so young, she has a very promising future. This movie was so good it has to be illegal to give it a bad review, 10/10 without a doubt.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

moviegrabbagJun 12, 2011

This movie was a lot of fun to me. None of the characters are overally lickable but you find yourself cheering for them. The scenes are shot very well and the acting is solid throughout including a very strong performance by Hailee SteinfeldThis movie was a lot of fun to me. None of the characters are overally lickable but you find yourself cheering for them. The scenes are shot very well and the acting is solid throughout including a very strong performance by Hailee Steinfeld who plays Mattie Ross. There are some humorus scenes and they flow well from the plot. It is important to view this movie seperate from its 1969 counter part otherwise you may fall to much on your nostalga and miss a very well done film.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

TheDaveHimselfJul 13, 2011

Solid western that I would easily say is better than the original (sorry, Duke). Fantastic acting all around (Barry Pepper didn't get the credit he deserved) and the Coen's weave poetry in every inch the camera touches. Great film.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

StevenFAug 8, 2013

There isn't a remake here so much as there is a retelling of a classic story, someone else's interpretation if you will. Joel and Ethan Coen go down a different path from their unique storytelling and take on a Western, one which John WayneThere isn't a remake here so much as there is a retelling of a classic story, someone else's interpretation if you will. Joel and Ethan Coen go down a different path from their unique storytelling and take on a Western, one which John Wayne occupied in the original outing. The Coens take a very toned down approach to what we are accustomed to see in their films, but they still have an eccentric tone to the film when the dialogue comes into place. Hailee Steinfield delivers a confident and mature performance as Mattie Ross, a young girl travelling away from home to see justice take place after a ruthless man murders her father, she is a well read and surely individual, wanting the help of the local bounty hunter, Rooster Cogburn, played with grit and hardened experience by Jeff Bridges, who begrudgingly agrees to help this 14 year old girl track down Tom Chaney (Josh Brolin), the man who committed the murder.
Cogburn is a battle-hardned individual who doesn't care much for the consequences of his actions, he's getting old and doesn't care much for anything anymore, much to the dismay of LaBoeuf, a young ranger who enjoys bragging about his achievements in the wild. The three set out on a long and tiring journey in search of the criminal, facing various obstacles which most of the time is each other. The film has the polished touch of a Coen piece, it has strong accents, eccentric dialogue and exceptionally memorable characters throughout, creating a standalone film that shouldn't really be seen as anything other than a retelling.
Cogburn seemingly takes the place of the father the way the story unfolds, teaching Mattie about the ways of the wild and the decisions he has made, this film is very much about these two individuals, how their characters develop and how they react in each others company, but its also a very good Western through and through, combining the slow paced and character driven moments seen in many of the greats, but also a shoot em' up adventure that never fails to entertain.
It certainly has a different touch than the typical Coen picture, but it still brims with excitement, unpredictably and heart, but it also stays true to the classic Westerns of yesteryear to deliver a nostalgic plot with a modern kick to make this an entertaining film fromstart to finish.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

Trev29Jul 12, 2013

A great movie with some outstanding acting. A simple story that carries great depth. The Coen Brothers really understand how to craft a movie. A western that shines in a genre that is presumably gone. They have reinvented it.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

The3AcademySinsOct 31, 2018

The Coen Brother's spin on True Grit is a darker tale than the original, with it's own message to tell. The balance of honoring the original film and bringing new things to the table is done quite well here. All of the performances are great.The Coen Brother's spin on True Grit is a darker tale than the original, with it's own message to tell. The balance of honoring the original film and bringing new things to the table is done quite well here. All of the performances are great. There really is not a weak link in the cast. The cinematography is honestly impeccable. The silence of this film is handled with the utmost care. The only complaint that I have is that the Baroqian take on the language in the film comes off as clunky, and occasionally takes the steam out of an otherwise stirring scene. All in all, this is a great western that does deserve to be watched.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

NickTheCritickNov 2, 2021

This is a good remake of this new adaptation of the famous book. I have a slight spot for this over the Hathaway 1969 movie but Coen are amongst my favourite directors ever. It's a great western as Coen brothers are always a safe bet whenThis is a good remake of this new adaptation of the famous book. I have a slight spot for this over the Hathaway 1969 movie but Coen are amongst my favourite directors ever. It's a great western as Coen brothers are always a safe bet when they make westerns.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

harrisonMar 5, 2011

The first decent movie I have seen in years.

Matt Damon does his best acting since 'the talented mr ripley' as comedic relief. I liked all of the characters, even the villians. The film is beautifully shot, perfectly paced, and the finalThe first decent movie I have seen in years.

Matt Damon does his best acting since 'the talented mr ripley' as comedic relief.

I liked all of the characters, even the villians. The film is beautifully shot, perfectly paced, and the final shootout is intense.

I've seen the original film and this one must be a 1,000 times better.

I almost can't believe there's anyone who didn't like this movie, and then I realize this is America, and it all makes sense.

The film is perfect until the fake looking cg rattlesnakes, other than that.....… Expand

7 of 8 users found this helpful71

All this user's reviews

8

grandpajoe6191Sep 21, 2011

The Coen Brothers succeed in crushing the original 1969's and establish their own profound, ethnic translation of the western movie "True Grit". They erase the 'exaggeration' in western cinema and rewrites it as "legend" with their hands.The Coen Brothers succeed in crushing the original 1969's and establish their own profound, ethnic translation of the western movie "True Grit". They erase the 'exaggeration' in western cinema and rewrites it as "legend" with their hands. Followed with the Oscar worthy performances from Damon and Bridges, "True Grit" is overall decent (In the standard of the Coens) but a efficient, well made western movie.… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

8

ReviewCriticFeb 19, 2012

One of the great new westerns. Great directing, a good storyline, and great acting make this movie a worthwhile trip. Jeff Bridges and Hailee Steinfeld were both great in their own different ways, and Matt Damon was good as well. Even betterOne of the great new westerns. Great directing, a good storyline, and great acting make this movie a worthwhile trip. Jeff Bridges and Hailee Steinfeld were both great in their own different ways, and Matt Damon was good as well. Even better than the classic original!… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

10

oldfellaJan 1, 2011

My wife and I are getting up there in years, and it's great that there are still movies that fit our demographic. As for being a "remake" I feel the movie lived up to the hype and then some! All the performances ran circles around theMy wife and I are getting up there in years, and it's great that there are still movies that fit our demographic. As for being a "remake" I feel the movie lived up to the hype and then some! All the performances ran circles around the originals, no question. Leaving in the original "fill your hands" line intact was a nice (respectful) touch that seems to have flown over more than a few heads. As for rambling, seemingly inconsequential dialogue from Bridges, get over it! That's how aging people talk. The younger you are, the more bored you are by "old people" telling war stories. We ramble....because we have experiences. We are laconic and cynical.....because we earned that right.… Expand

10 of 15 users found this helpful105

All this user's reviews

10

AuraGuiderFeb 27, 2011

An amazing remake. Even without John Wayne, it is an amazing movie. So nicely down that it was totally worth the money i forked over for it. Cheers to Cowen Brothers. 10/10

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

TaplingerJan 4, 2011

I seldom give a movie "10" because it has to be wonderful in every way that cinema can be exciting and satisfying. This was it. I naively assumed that everyone would love this Coen extravaganza - how could they not? "True Grit" proves thereI seldom give a movie "10" because it has to be wonderful in every way that cinema can be exciting and satisfying. This was it. I naively assumed that everyone would love this Coen extravaganza - how could they not? "True Grit" proves there is no accounting for taste. Perhaps it is love of the English language that holds this movie together and for people who could care less about language spoken wonderfully, it seems a pretentious Western. But if you haven't seen it, love language, like the Coens, Jeff Bridges, Matt Damon, and young fresh amazingly talented young actors (Mattie), do yourself a favor - put up your spurs, tilt back your Stetson, pour a shot of raw, eye-smarting saloon whiskey, roll up a Bull Durham cigarette, and get ready for a wonderful treat.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

9

horrorboyDec 30, 2010

True Grit is the first western based film presented to us by the Coen brothers. The Coens combine their original and witty dialogue with incredible performances by top notch actors to create a film thats so engrossing that you're taken on aTrue Grit is the first western based film presented to us by the Coen brothers. The Coens combine their original and witty dialogue with incredible performances by top notch actors to create a film thats so engrossing that you're taken on a ride back in time with true outlaws. The plot centers on Mattie Ross (Hailee Steinfeld) whose father was shot and killed by a loner named Tom Chaney (Josh Brolin), who also made off with the father's 2 gold pieces. Mattie is determined at all costs to find her father's killer, and hires U.S. Marshal Rooster Cogburn (Jeff Bridges) to do the job. A Texas Ranger named La Boeuf (Matt Damon) arrives on the scene already hot on Chaney's trail over a murder he committed in Texas. The trio set off together in hopes of finding Tom Chaney before anyone else does. The plot delves in deeper than that of course, and it emerges as a true Western flick that actually works. While it doesn't involved all that heavily on action (minus a few great scenes), it's involved mostly on the characters and the experiences that they must face. With the Coen's classic dialogue (equivalent to Fargo) the slower paced scenes are genuinely enjoyable because the most random of conversations will occur and the outcome is either hilarious or heartwarming. Jeff Bridges is flawless and Oscar worthy portraying a Rooster Cogburn so exceptionally well that he completely overshadows John Wayne's portrayal multiple times over. Matt Damon is unrecognizable at first as a desperate Ranger though his times on the big screen are enjoyable especially the many quarrels with Bridges such as arguments on who is the better shot. Hailee Steinfeld is completely flawless as well. Her portrayal of a headstrong 14 year old determined to track one man down is so spot on that I actually tricked myself into thinking I was watching an adult in the same role. The supporting roles of Josh Brolin and Berry Pepper were great as always, although their screen time was dwindled down to only a small percentage, but both of their roles are great. The many different camera angles the Coens use really outlay a vast and open landscape to the many different types of crimes committed there. The pacing is slick and perfect. The many action scenes are great and house outstanding shootouts and they aren't as heavy on the violence as the earlier Coen brothers films. In between the few key action scenes, there are the funny and enjoyable dialogue moments that keep the momentum in place and this style never falls flat. All in all True Grit really delivers a stellar experience that zooms through quick from beginning to end thanks in part to the great action scenes, and the truly flawless characters and dialogue. If you're in to look for a great Western film, this is the one true and great modern experience.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

2

JasonGoalieJan 9, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I know I'm going against the grain... I know this movie is well liked by critics and patrons alike... But after watching this movie, I feel like the enlightened one in a sea of gullible moviegoers! Can anyone else appreciate just how TERRIBLE this movie was? First: the script plays on screen like it was written by a school child. Sure, there's some witty one-liners and laugh-inducing reparte now and then, but in the context of a (supposedly) serious film, these parts of the dialogue transpire with the feel of a cheap David Spade movie... (not that there's anything wrong with David Spade movies, it just doesn't belong here). Second: certain scenes of this move are ABSOLUTE GARBAGE, and do nothing in the way of character development or plot advancement! The man in the tree who Rooster Cogburn "does not know"... The painfully awkward, random meeting with the medicine man in the bearskin... the inane, often incomprehensible ramblings of Cogburn... the lame-ass cornbread shooting contest... Do you need another four WORTHLESS scenes from this film? I'd be happy to list them. Third: I think it would be fair to say that this movie *attempts* to portray a special bond between Cogburn and the little girl, Mattie Ross. To steal a line from today's youth: EPIC FAIL. Jeff Bridges is a (usually) great actor, and Hailee Steinfeld seems like a wonderful young actress. But taken together, these two have the chemistry of oil and water... Summary thoughts: This movie is boring, hamstrung by hollywood cliches, rather poorly acted, INCREDIBLY poorly written, has a very uninspiring "gotcha, bad guy!" moment, and perhaps shouldn't have even been (re)made in the first place. The 2 points I have awarded are for the (surely unintentional) entertainment value derived from the aforementioned campy one-liners, and overdone, humor-inducing melodrama... Enjoy, but probably if you're over 70.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

5

dubbleqJan 14, 2011

When i give this movie a five i am being kind because the absolute stupidity of this movie is unbearable to witness. It combines stupidity and bad acting into what is nothing more than a tart fruitcake

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

10

oscarrDec 26, 2011

Overall Movie: 7 Acting: 9 Storyline: 8. Jeff Bridges brings John Wayne's great performance even greater, and fuels this great western. One of those remakes that is actually better than the original.

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

fijarioJan 10, 2011

overall a good movie to watch if you like westerns..................................................................................................................................................

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

BulldogJan 13, 2011

The Coen Brothers are American and this movie speaks to the culture and value of our country. They are at the peak of their game and have been for quite a while. True Grit is about the attempt to be heroic in the face of the realities ofThe Coen Brothers are American and this movie speaks to the culture and value of our country. They are at the peak of their game and have been for quite a while. True Grit is about the attempt to be heroic in the face of the realities of life, that is, filled with violence, randomness, personal failings and our questionable chances to control what happens to us. There are potential traps with this story: if the girl is precious the movie can veer towards sentimentality and life is anything but sentimental. Each of the characters show the balance that exists in people. Rooster Cogburn is not heroic in most senses of the word. He admits that he was a terrible father, he kicks the Indian kids off of the porch, he sets up a plan to help the girl while he pursues his money by attempting to catch the leader villain. The Texas ranger is quite simply a doofus, and yet miraculously makes the shot with the rifle. He doesn't re-enter the story. Finally, the girl devotes her childish mind to revenge, which we should know, offers no reward but ashes. She finishes as a one armed spinster, she is not cute and she finds solace only in her grit. For me, I am old enough not to expect perfect heroic people or even a chance to act nobly in many situations, but the film shows perhaps what is the best that we can do. Finally, the cinematography, much like Fargo or No Country for Old Men, shows the open spaces in a way that immerses the audience and reminds us of the beauty, the physical beauty, of America. Most seriously considered art deals with the challenges that life presents us with, what to do with our lives, and as an American, I feel uplifted and excited each time I see the Coen Brothers attempt to illustrate the issue with a new filter, whether it be set in very un-Hollywood locations as Texas, Arkansas, Minnesota or North Dakota. My son suggested that for the United States, the art form that is ours the most (apart of course from Rock and Roll) is film and that the brothers are our true geniuses of that art form.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

iluvmoviesJan 14, 2011

This movie is purely amazing. At first thoughts I thought it would be a completely serious movie with absolutely no sense of humor. I was proven wrong as this movie has a good plot, perfect amount of humor, and great acting by Jeff BridgesThis movie is purely amazing. At first thoughts I thought it would be a completely serious movie with absolutely no sense of humor. I was proven wrong as this movie has a good plot, perfect amount of humor, and great acting by Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon. A very good way to end 2010 movies.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

EdgarJan 2, 2011

This is by far one of the best westerns in many years. I highly recommend this film to anyone who enjoys classic films with great dialogue. What truly makes this a special movie is the acting of Hailee Steinfeld, she interprets a characterThis is by far one of the best westerns in many years. I highly recommend this film to anyone who enjoys classic films with great dialogue. What truly makes this a special movie is the acting of Hailee Steinfeld, she interprets a character that is wise beyond her years, this is a must see.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

7

RyanGeeDec 27, 2010

Underneath the drawn out tension of the Coen's Brothers remake True Grit, is a subtle and lighthearted emotion led by the break out performance of Hailee Steinfeld. If you are expecting the eccentric storytelling and essential rawness seen inUnderneath the drawn out tension of the Coen's Brothers remake True Grit, is a subtle and lighthearted emotion led by the break out performance of Hailee Steinfeld. If you are expecting the eccentric storytelling and essential rawness seen in Fargo or No Country For Old Men, True Grit is ultimately uninspiring. But in this effort, the Coen brothers smooth out their usual sharp edges, in order to make a film that is pure and an effective homage to a once prominent genre in film.

True Grit as stated earlier, is a remake of John Hathaway's 1969 film starring John Wayne, which led to the legendary actor's only Oscar. After her father's death, we follow Mattie Ross (Hailee Steinfeld) , a precocious 14-year old who seeks retribution on the murderer John Chaney (Josh Brolin). Mattie decides to hire U.S Marshall Rooster Cogburn (Jeff Bridges) because of his merciless manner in dealing with the law. At the beginning of the hunt, Cogburn decides to team up with Texas Ranger LeBeouf (Matt Damon) in this often humorous and gritty journey.

While Bridges and Damon both put on respectable performances-with Bridges putting on a different twist to Wayne's character- it is newcomer Hailee Steinfeld who steals the show. Steinfeld's puts intensity and zeal into her character that emphasizes her independence and her presumptuous manner. The Coen brothers put more focus into Steinfeld's character rather than Bridge's Cogburn. I find this a wise decision as the film is able to blend an affable feeling with the somewhat dark humor reminiscent in Barton Fink or Fargo. While True Grit provides great performances, it is not the action adventure that its advertisements imply that it is. Rather, the film is extremely talky, which is one of the few film techniques similar to the Coens' previous efforts. This is not necessarily a bad aspect, as most of the lines are derived from the Charles Portis novel that the film is adapting. In other words, the dialogue still remains humorous and intriguing, but it lacks the action and zest of a contemporary Western. As a result, there is a whole lot of drawn out tension that is only somewhat released by the end. Overall, True Grit is visually beautiful and packs a punch in great acting. But as I have to emphasize again, the film is essentially a disappointing Coen film, but is a solid remake to a classic film.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

9

OscarPicks2010Dec 22, 2010

The book and the 1969 original set very high standards for this Coen Brothers' Western drama, but as high as the standards were set, the Coen Brothers managed achieve the goals or better yet exceeded them. True Grit is about a drunken USThe book and the 1969 original set very high standards for this Coen Brothers' Western drama, but as high as the standards were set, the Coen Brothers managed achieve the goals or better yet exceeded them. True Grit is about a drunken US Marshal and a **** Texas Ranger helping a stubborn 14 year-old finding her father's murderer. Rooster (Jeff Bridges) was offered $50 to find the murderer for Mattie, played by newcomer Hailee Steinfeld. Meanwhile, Texas Ranger Le Boeuf (Matt Damon) was offered a reward to find the same guy who also killed a Senator. Conflicting each other on the journey and finally catching the bad guy Tom Chaney (Josh Brolin), the three each developed their character skillfully. Jeff Bridges playing last year Crazy Heart's Bad Blake only with a gun and an eyepatch. Matt Damon used his own personal style to play this **** but humorous Texas Ranger. Hailee Steinfeld played a stubborn 14 year-old who's determined to find Tom Chaney and bring him to hang. Though expected performances from both Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon, newcomer Hailee Stenfeld was as good as her castmates. The one thing I kept in mind while going in this film was that Bridges and Damon are going to give applausable performances and Hailee Steinfeld was getting nominated for some major awards. But when I was finished, I didn't see what all the buzz was about. Sure, Steinfield was good, but compared to Bridges and Damon, she sure didn't have much. I have to say though, beating thousands of other girls for this role is impressive, but I'm sure other Hollywood stars had to do that as well. Even though I find her not as great as I hoped, she still delivered well.
The directors are the two and only Coen Brothers. With ten Oscar nominations and four wins for each Joel and Ethan Coen, they are Hollywood's most wanted in directing dark Western dramas. Well known for their lastest work "A Serious Man" and "No Country For Old Men', True Grit is another fine addition to their long and impressive resume. Directed with true grit and impressive performances, True Grit outsmarts the original and simply entertaining.
OscarBuzz: Best Picture (good chance), Best Director (good chance), Best Actor (Jeff Bridges, better chance), Best Supporting Actor (Matt Damon, a chance at a nod), Best Supporting Actress (Hailee Steinfeld, a chance at a nod), Best Adapted Screenplay (Coen Brothers, better chance)… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

5

mckillustratorDec 23, 2010

Unfortunately this movie falls short of being worthwhile. Perhaps my expectations were too high--though how could they be "too high" with Bridges, the Coens, and the western genre--but True Grit felt bland and uninspiring. It certainly wasn'tUnfortunately this movie falls short of being worthwhile. Perhaps my expectations were too high--though how could they be "too high" with Bridges, the Coens, and the western genre--but True Grit felt bland and uninspiring. It certainly wasn't a bad film but I felt no tingling sensation of mental excitement that I get after movies I really enjoyed like after that first watching of No Country, for instance. The best moments of True Grit are few and far between. Ultimately despite the fact that this film is well shot and (generally) well acted, I left the theatre disappointed. I'm still trying to figure out what or who is to blame for that feeling...because it obviously can't be me:)… Expand

5 of 13 users found this helpful58

All this user's reviews

5

txrangersfan72Dec 26, 2010

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Being a huge Coen Brothers fan, I was surprised to hear they were remaking True Grit. I know they were fans of the original, but my experience with them made me believe they were going to take the original and improve it dramatically the Coen Brothers way. Well...they didn't. In fact, this was the most un-Coen Brothers movie I've ever seen. Not to say that is a bad thing, but having just watched the original, I could have not seen this version entirely and not missed anything. Being fans of the original, they clearly wanted to pay homage to the original. In fact, dialogue and setting-wise, it was about a 90% carbon copy of the original, down to the shots, the script and the way the characters were portrayed. The Coen Brothers really didn't do much to put their stamp on the film, except maybe the perfect casting. Aside from very minor differences throughout the film (such as Mattie covering the chimney to smoke out the first couple of ruffians rather than LaBoeuf and having LaBoeuf interact with Ned Pepper the first time instead of Rooster), the only meaningful change in the script is the last 30 minutes. I've never read the book, but the compliments given to this version is that it is more like the book. That must mean the ending. It is very different, and honestly, better than the original. However, anyone could have done this film the way it was done. The Coen Brothers didn't do anything to make this film special, so I'm grading it as an average film. I hope they enjoyed making it more than I enjoyed watching it and I look forward to them returning to their style soon.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

0

EthanPeterDec 27, 2010

Infuriatingly bad, it's the worst Oscar bait in years. The story's essentially a one-act play that's so boring I fell asleep. Thankfully(?) the characters are so hollow that I didn't care what happened to them. The dialogue is a mix ofInfuriatingly bad, it's the worst Oscar bait in years. The story's essentially a one-act play that's so boring I fell asleep. Thankfully(?) the characters are so hollow that I didn't care what happened to them. The dialogue is a mix of poorly delivered olde timey "urgency" and inane one-liners. It wasn't funny, suspenseful, insightful, thrilling, or engaging in any way aside from a few seconds of nice cinematography. It wasn't snubbed by the HFPA for Golden Globe nominations; they saw that it was a horrible crapfest of a movie totally worthy of zero accolades in exchange for the zero amount of entertainment it contained.… Expand

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

2

David_HDec 29, 2010

I'm old enough to have seen the original and its not just an issue of "why remake a John Wayne movie?". I have to give Jeff Bridges some credit, he certainly has skill. Matt Damon however seemed to be an odd casting choice and a bit awkwardI'm old enough to have seen the original and its not just an issue of "why remake a John Wayne movie?". I have to give Jeff Bridges some credit, he certainly has skill. Matt Damon however seemed to be an odd casting choice and a bit awkward in this kind of movie. Overall, the whole thing moved slow and therefore seemed to drag on. I left the theater feeling like I had wasted an afternoon and that there was no point in remaking this film. The original was excellent and this version brought nothing new.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

4

AllisonJan 8, 2011

What I loved: Matt Damon, the cinematography, the premise. What I liked: Jeff Bridges. What I didn't like: the incredibly slow story and the one-note main character (Mattie Ross). What confuses me: why this movie is getting such rave reviews.What I loved: Matt Damon, the cinematography, the premise. What I liked: Jeff Bridges. What I didn't like: the incredibly slow story and the one-note main character (Mattie Ross). What confuses me: why this movie is getting such rave reviews. I suggest seeing it as a rental.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

4

VypurrJan 11, 2011

I didn't really like this movie. Jeff Bridges voice was annoying (too much groveling in his voice), and the scenery looked pretty bland (no vibrant sky colors or grass colors). The town scenes looked unauthentic and it seems as if some of theI didn't really like this movie. Jeff Bridges voice was annoying (too much groveling in his voice), and the scenery looked pretty bland (no vibrant sky colors or grass colors). The town scenes looked unauthentic and it seems as if some of the background was intentionally a bit off or blurry, so someone wouldn't focus on it I suppose. The girl, Maggie spoke too sophisticated for a 14 year old, and seemed too rehearsed at times. The old vigilante cowboys even seemed to speak this way at times, and it came off as unauthentic. Maggie looked mixed race (white/black) and I'm wondering if this was intentional to appeal to a wider audience? I definitely don't think that was the "norm" in the 1800's. Whole thing seemed unauthentic and stiff. Thumbs down on the scenery and acting. Definitely didn't hold up to the original. A much better western is The Quick and the Dead with Sharon Stone and Gene Hackman. Hackman was born to play a cowboy and the scenery is perfect for that era and there was so much put into the visual effects of this movie.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

2

HEI5ENBERGFeb 13, 2011

Man I can't believe this movie is in the running for best picture at this years Oscar!!! This movie was so BORING and un-entertaining! The acting was OK at best. I found that I couldn't Jeff Bridges! The way the movie was filmed was like itMan I can't believe this movie is in the running for best picture at this years Oscar!!! This movie was so BORING and un-entertaining! The acting was OK at best. I found that I couldn't Jeff Bridges! The way the movie was filmed was like it was filmed in the early 60's! Nothing in this movie impressed me even the 11 years old girl, whose been given great reviews from the movies critics failed to impress me!

When you look at this movie on paper, you just can't wait to watch it. Jeff Bridges, Matt Damon, Josh Brolin stars, Cohen Brothers Direct! Gets your mouth watering! Trust me people this movie was very very boring!… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

8

elliott23Jan 20, 2011

Jeff Bridges was a great actor. He really put this movie on his shoulders. Matt Damon was also a great actor in his respective part. The dialogue dragged on a bit in the end but still a good movie in all. Good action scenes (especially whenJeff Bridges was a great actor. He really put this movie on his shoulders. Matt Damon was also a great actor in his respective part. The dialogue dragged on a bit in the end but still a good movie in all. Good action scenes (especially when taking quality over quantity). Jeff and Matt for the Oscars!… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

4

s053714Jun 13, 2011

Compared to the John Wayne original, this version was so very ordinary. Where the original had great scenery, music, acting and scriptwriting, this new version is very dull. Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon are fine actors but their lines areCompared to the John Wayne original, this version was so very ordinary. Where the original had great scenery, music, acting and scriptwriting, this new version is very dull. Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon are fine actors but their lines are very wooden and unemotional - a sign of poor direction. The girl was pretty good but she couldn't save the movie. Although the original is one of my favorite movies, I truly saw this version with an open mind, and didn't much care for it. Why is this movie so highly regarded ? I'm sorry but I think the Coen's are greatly overrated.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

3

podriscoll27Jan 28, 2011

Sucked. It is over-hyped, badly predictable, easily forgettable, utterly missable. Don't bother with it.

_______________________________________________________________________________

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

1

davidp1045Dec 31, 2010

After reading all the glowing reviews from both critics and users on the website I was really expecting an amazing movie that would keep me entertained throughout. Instead, I was bored out of mind my for about 85% of the movie. The last tenAfter reading all the glowing reviews from both critics and users on the website I was really expecting an amazing movie that would keep me entertained throughout. Instead, I was bored out of mind my for about 85% of the movie. The last ten minutes were decent, and that's it. I do not recommend.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

2

shaunmedJan 10, 2011

Huge fan of the Coens but this film is an ineffectual copy of the original classic. The story line is barely changed and for the worse i must say. There is no chemistry of kinship between any of the over acting actors who all fall prey to theHuge fan of the Coens but this film is an ineffectual copy of the original classic. The story line is barely changed and for the worse i must say. There is no chemistry of kinship between any of the over acting actors who all fall prey to the pitfall of their own stardom or that of the directors.… Expand

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

1

enigma13Dec 25, 2010

You'll need "true grit" to get through this one. In a word - monotone. Slow pace, too much dialogue (monologues), gratuitous violence, poor editing. Scenes that should/could have been surprises were simply confusing because the film lackedYou'll need "true grit" to get through this one. In a word - monotone. Slow pace, too much dialogue (monologues), gratuitous violence, poor editing. Scenes that should/could have been surprises were simply confusing because the film lacked story development. We plodded from one ho-hum conversation to the next with a shot of violence dropped in now and then to [try to] break the monotony. I'm a major Coen brothers fan but afraid they missed the mark here. Spend your money if you need a nap.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

1

LukeTravisDec 26, 2010

You can put frosting on a turd, but it doesn't make it a cupcake. This movie has no redeeming qualities. I went in with great expectations and came out shaking my head in disgust. Everything that made the original great is missing.You can put frosting on a turd, but it doesn't make it a cupcake. This movie has no redeeming qualities. I went in with great expectations and came out shaking my head in disgust. Everything that made the original great is missing. Bridges is no John Wayne. I never knew just how well Kim Darby and Glenn Campbell played their parts until I saw Hailee Steinfeld's and Matt Damon's performances. I have a collection of over 5,000 movies and there's no way I'd ever buy this turd.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

10

DarkCriticJan 3, 2011

True Grit was extremely awesome! This western film has everything that is so cool to watch and I really like the action scenes,some cool western dialogue with funny and seriously dark.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

savagesophiaDec 22, 2010

Excellent characters brought to life by skilled actors. They have fun, we have fun. The parts are greater than the whole. With such a simple story, it would be hard for the plot to live up to the likes of Cogburn, LaBoeuf andExcellent characters brought to life by skilled actors. They have fun, we have fun. The parts are greater than the whole. With such a simple story, it would be hard for the plot to live up to the likes of Cogburn, LaBoeuf and fourteen-going-on-you're-no-matched-for-me Mattie Ross. Sadly, by the end I was left wanting more.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

BOYDBOB64Dec 24, 2010

Joel and Ethan Coen have done it again!.. This time they take a John Wayne "oater" and create a masterpiece study in human character. The entire cast give a scintillating performance. The Coen's depict life as it really was. The goodJoel and Ethan Coen have done it again!.. This time they take a John Wayne "oater" and create a masterpiece study in human character. The entire cast give a scintillating performance. The Coen's depict life as it really was. The good guys and the bad guys were cut from the same bolt of dirty cloth. The only difference is that one got "paid" when they stole a person's possessions; the other got paid when they brought them to justice. The only one who was clean was Mattie Ross, and she by the force of her righteous will made them all toe the line. Well done Joel. Well done Ethan.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

allystewJan 4, 2011

A very good movie. Typical Coen brothers film, great acting, great script and dialogue, laugh out loud moments followed by some dark and edgy monents. A great Western as well, as it shows the "Old West" for what it really was, harsh andA very good movie. Typical Coen brothers film, great acting, great script and dialogue, laugh out loud moments followed by some dark and edgy monents. A great Western as well, as it shows the "Old West" for what it really was, harsh and unforgiving. Bridges, Damon and a brilliant Hailee Steinfeld all work well together and you feel like being on the trail with them. A must see if you like the Coen brothers, westerns or just great acting. However my only negitive point is just don't expect it to live up No Country For Old Men.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

whitJan 3, 2011

One of my favorite movies of the year. It's not an action movie but rather a dark, western themed comedy-- and more than that, it's an excuse for some very good actors to chew scenery.

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

0

marco34laJan 1, 2011

This movie sucked for the first hour!! It was about as exciting and interesting as a heinz ketchup commercial. The last hour was okay. Overall, I'd say skip it. If you want to see a movie where they put adult words in children's mouths...This movie sucked for the first hour!! It was about as exciting and interesting as a heinz ketchup commercial. The last hour was okay. Overall, I'd say skip it. If you want to see a movie where they put adult words in children's mouths... then go see 'Kick Ass" instead. A precocious 14 yr girl just doesn't work. Damon and Brolin are just supporting roles... so don't go for them. In case you're wondering... I loved 'No Country for Old Men". This movie was a HUGE disappointment.… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

0

critical1Dec 25, 2010

Got to give it a "one" mostly for my errant expectations. Those who are looking for a typical Coen brothers film will be very disapointed. Terrific acting by Jeff Bridges although he does seem to reprising his previous role in "Crazy Heart."Got to give it a "one" mostly for my errant expectations. Those who are looking for a typical Coen brothers film will be very disapointed. Terrific acting by Jeff Bridges although he does seem to reprising his previous role in "Crazy Heart." Matt Damon is unrecognizable and wasted. Hailie Steinfield is getting rave reviews and it is hard to understand why. She appears to be acting in every scene. Merely a good straight-ahead western. The Coen Brothers should go back to making Coen brothers movies unless they are getting worn out and lacking the true grit necessary for inspiration..… Expand

2 of 12 users found this helpful210

All this user's reviews

1

fantasyJan 9, 2011

This movie was awful. I am sorry I saw the original with John Wayne but this was a pointless boring piece of trash. It made absolutely no sense because you knew where this was going 5 minutes into the flick. The professional criticisThis movie was awful. I am sorry I saw the original with John Wayne but this was a pointless boring piece of trash. It made absolutely no sense because you knew where this was going 5 minutes into the flick. The professional criticis raving about this simply blows my mind. Just a waste of two hours.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

3

monkeymanDec 22, 2010

Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon were really great in this movie. However everything else was bad and boring. Characters would talk about things that had nothing to do with the plot or development of the story. When I went into this movie iJeff Bridges and Matt Damon were really great in this movie. However everything else was bad and boring. Characters would talk about things that had nothing to do with the plot or development of the story. When I went into this movie i thought i was there to see an action movie. What i saw was a bunch of cowboys talking about their crappy jobs and money. Even though the acting was good the characters that these great actors were made into were over all bad. The girl was whining the entire movie. And both Matt Damon's and Jeff Bridges characters were both boring and underdeveloped.… Expand

6 of 39 users found this helpful633

All this user's reviews

0

MrMooveyFeb 13, 2011

This was a waste of time. The original was a classic western. This was a weak attempt to recreate
True Grit. The characters were forgettable, the story was drawn out, the performances were okay but compared to the classic, in every case thisThis was a waste of time. The original was a classic western. This was a weak attempt to recreate
True Grit. The characters were forgettable, the story was drawn out, the performances were okay but compared to the classic, in every case this came up short.. This may have been the worst movie I have
seen in a long time. i usually pride myself on seeing quality movies. Maybe the rent was due......… Expand

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

9

Bullet97Jan 23, 2011

Wow. I went into this movie with decent expectations, but...whoa. This movie is awesome. The Coen Brothers have delivered one awesomely solid western. The performances, especially from Jeff Bridges and Halie Steinfield, were amazing. TheWow. I went into this movie with decent expectations, but...whoa. This movie is awesome. The Coen Brothers have delivered one awesomely solid western. The performances, especially from Jeff Bridges and Halie Steinfield, were amazing. The script was great. Even though it's a dramatic western, there's some hilarious moments. The direction was great, the cinematography was great, and the shootouts were pretty cool. The only problem is that it is a bit slow. But other than that, True Grit is an awesome Western that I'm definetly buying on blu-ray.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Lopez17Dec 29, 2010

When you walk into "True Grit,â

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

7

Frmz84Dec 28, 2010

Pretty solid western flick. The most surprising thing about this movie is that it felt like it was made 20 years ago and doesn't really change up the western formula. Thought we were in for a new/modern twist on westerns, but it's a prettyPretty solid western flick. The most surprising thing about this movie is that it felt like it was made 20 years ago and doesn't really change up the western formula. Thought we were in for a new/modern twist on westerns, but it's a pretty cliche story. Jeff Bridges is pretty funny and the little action you actually see is entertaining. One thing that I didn't enjoy was the western slang. I just didn't have the patience to dissect what they were saying and at times i just zoned out to the conversation. In particular, the trial scene kind of went on and on and I didn't understand half the things they said. Maybe that's just me..

Enjoyable and re-watchable for sure. Coming from a guy who didn't like "No Country for Old Men" I'd say that's a win.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

ShiiraJan 8, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The original "True Grit", directed by Henry Hathaway, and starring, no less than "The Duke" himself, made its initial theatrical run in 1969, just two years after Arthur Penn's "Bonnie and Clyde" blew away the production code. Once Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway went down spasmodically in a hail of gunfire, that was that, and there would be blood forevermore. No more smuggling. The days of "beating around the bush" were over. No more fade to black. You could "hump the hostess". In Elia Kazan's "Baby Doll", released in 1956, smack dab in the middle of a sexually repressed era, the handcuffed filmmaker somehow managed to adapt "27 Wagons Full of Cotton", the Tennessee Williams play that depicted a middle-aged man's eroticization of his underage wife, without getting arrested on indecency charges. While neither Archie Lee(Karl Malden) nor Silva(Eli Wallach) get anywhere near first base with the titular character(Carroll Baker) in the official narrative, the first generation Italian does have implied sex with her, twice, suggested by a phallic symbol in one instance, and the cotton baron's dry humping performance(while mounted on her hobby horse) in another. Whereas "Baby Doll" predictably focuses on the man's needs, and likewise, in the John Wayne vehicle, LaBoeuf's libido is on display when he expresses his wish to kiss Mattie Ross(Kim Darby), this seemingly square western, with the utmost subtlety, delves into the fourteen-year-old girl's growing pains, in which her crush on the Texas Ranger runs deeper than the stealing glances she aims his way at the boarding house dinner table. When LaBoeuf inquires Mattie about her name, the young girl excuses herself from his company and adjourns to bed. Away from the menfolk, the recently bereaved girl and the boarding house owner gab about the strapping young lad, both agreeing, do the smitten pair, that the federal marshal is handsome. Before the lights are turned out, the girl cries, the waterworks being attributed to her slain father, no doubt, but also, perhaps, out of guilt, for feeling the first pangs of lust. Suggested by the snake pit she later falls into, in all likelihood, Mattie touched herself. There's a sin involved, but it can't be murder, since Cheney(Jeff Corey) is still breathing after the recoil due to Mattie's firing, which only grazes his head, so the snake bite that the girl endures must correspond to some earlier transgression. (Rooster Cogburn kills Cheney. John Wayne has to be the hero, even a deeply flawed one.) In the remake, Mattie pays for the self-induced orgasm with her hand. Seen as an adult, the moviegoer can't help but perceive Mattie's missing appendage as a scarlet limb. Unlike the original, it's Cogburn(Jeff Bridges) whom Mattie(Hailee Steinfeld) admires, initially anyways, as indicated by her divulgence to LaBoeuf(Matt Damon) that she had chosen the wrong man. Bridges' rendering of the one-eyed marshal contains none of the inappropriate feelings that may have stirred in his predecessor's heart. As Mattie bandages the Texas Ranger's hand at the McAllister homestead, Cogburn appears miffed by her charity. Why? Does he have sex on his mind? Maybe. Because Darby was twenty-two at the time, to a certain extent, "True Grit" could get away with its pedophilic undertones. Conversely, Steinfeld is age-appropriate, so when Damon repeats Campbell's line about stealing kisses, he comes across more strongly as a child molester. The filmmaker leaves out Wayne's original comment about LaBoeuf "enjoying it too much"; the Texan's spanking of Mattie's behind, probably out of fear that the hunting party would resemble some sort of unseemly threesome, a malodorous "Jules & Jim" playing wet nurse to a lolita. Ultimately, the most striking feature about this otherwise well-dressed mounting of the ultimate John Wayne experience("The Searchers" was John Ford's bag) is its political incorrectness, or rather, the arch self-awareness that many westerns were shameless in their depiction of Native Americans. Right away, "True Grit" announces itself as the anti-"Dances with Wolves", in which an Indian's speech is cut-off by the executioner's hooding of the tribesman, disturbingly enough, to comic effect, just before he dangles at the public hanging. Later, at the site of an abandoned house, the liquored up law officer kicks two small "red-skinned" children off from the structure's wooden foundation without any protestation from his female companion. (Mattie names her horse Blackie in front of a "Negro" stable-boy.) In another sense, Mattie loses her fingers because she didn't lift a single finger to stop the needless cruelty of those innocents.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

DalemJan 1, 2011

Though there is something timeless about the characters, they talk and act in a dated historical way that no longer exists nowadays. This film has a great story, great acting, humor, and both a sense of time and timelessness. If you expect aThough there is something timeless about the characters, they talk and act in a dated historical way that no longer exists nowadays. This film has a great story, great acting, humor, and both a sense of time and timelessness. If you expect a typical Western you won't find it, yet you won't find an atypical revisionist Western either. The focus is on the characters and how they relate, and the film succeeds wonderfully.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

sapient254Dec 24, 2010

I know nothing of the remake or book regarding this movie. All I know is that I was highly entertained (something that movies haven't done for me in a while, recently). Being a western, I expected gun fights, horse-riding, booze drinking,I know nothing of the remake or book regarding this movie. All I know is that I was highly entertained (something that movies haven't done for me in a while, recently). Being a western, I expected gun fights, horse-riding, booze drinking, outlaws vs. marshals, etc; and this movie delivered that, and more. Hailee Steinfeld plays a very smart and determined young girl that will not stop until her father's murder is brought to justice. She hires an old, beat-up, drunkard of a marshal that manages to find ways to bring men to justice, that few can do (though his methods are questionable, often unorthodox, impromptu, and frequently lead to someone getting hurt or injured.) Matt Damon's character is a Texas Ranger that's come to Arkansas (the setting of the movie) to hunt down the same criminal that killed ms. Steinfeld's father for a different crime that occurred in Texas. These actions bring the three together in a terrific story that manages to be traditional, yet hold a lot of its own originality at the same time.
In true coen-brother-fashion, the comedy was engaging and hilarious. Matt Damon stays true to his lack of speaking roles (which is a plus). But the one who steals the show, is Jeff Bridges. His role is played exceptionally well, and he manages to find a way to bring laughter to the audience, even in the most tense and action-packed scenes. His banter between the young girl, as well as Matt Damon's character makes for very classic scenes that will resonate with me for a long while. I found this movie thoroughly entertaining, hilarious, dramatic, meaningful, and action-packed all at once. Very few movies (especially those that have come out recently) can pull that off. If you enjoy being entertained (and who doesn't?) then I highly recommend this movie. True Grit will be a must-have purchase by me upon it's release to blu-ray.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

martinexJan 6, 2011

Jeff Bridges is no John Wayne......Thank god. Wayne was such an over the top character that he kind of overshadowed the role. Bridges, Damon and Steinfeld immerse themselves in the roles drawing the viewers into the story. I can truly sayJeff Bridges is no John Wayne......Thank god. Wayne was such an over the top character that he kind of overshadowed the role. Bridges, Damon and Steinfeld immerse themselves in the roles drawing the viewers into the story. I can truly say that I never saw this movie until now. Kudos to those Coen boys.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

10

Rob274Jan 11, 2011

The Coen Brothers have really done their best film since No Country For Old Men, and Jeff Bridges has done yet another fantastic performance as Marshall Cogburn. Not only that, Matt Damon also performed very well and Hailee Steinfeld has doneThe Coen Brothers have really done their best film since No Country For Old Men, and Jeff Bridges has done yet another fantastic performance as Marshall Cogburn. Not only that, Matt Damon also performed very well and Hailee Steinfeld has done a fabulous acting for a 14 year old! I was quite surpriesed by all of this! Not only that the Coens have directed this beautifully, but have brought the Western genre back into cinema since Unforgiven.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

jeremypDec 28, 2010

Iâ

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

9

FUNTALKJan 27, 2011

I see this western partially as a play-fight on time and continuity of Film;True Grit is well-crafted and rather pointed by metaphors and a narrator that only speaks at the end,and at the beginning.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

LynJan 28, 2011

Very enjoyable Western: I admired John Wayne in the earlier film but have absolutely no complaints about Jeff Bridges or anyone else in this cast of characters -- except for a rather ho-hum Matt Damon. Best change for me was the use of theVery enjoyable Western: I admired John Wayne in the earlier film but have absolutely no complaints about Jeff Bridges or anyone else in this cast of characters -- except for a rather ho-hum Matt Damon. Best change for me was the use of the haunting gospel song "Leaning on the Everlasting Arms" rather than the Rhinestone Cowboy-ish song by Glenn Campbell. Some inconsistencies were disappointing, the worst being a character who's almost totally submerged while crossing a river on horseback, yet emerges totally dry!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

movieboyJan 1, 2011

It could be my favorite film of the year. I usually love the Coen Brothers work. I'm not really a Western fan, and don't care if it's a sort of remake. But I was enthralled from beginning to end. Finally we get to see a great film. As to whyIt could be my favorite film of the year. I usually love the Coen Brothers work. I'm not really a Western fan, and don't care if it's a sort of remake. But I was enthralled from beginning to end. Finally we get to see a great film. As to why it was snubbed by the Golden Globes, unbelievable - but then they nominated The Tourist, which was mildly entertaining. And what's up with Black Swan? So over the top. Anyways the Coens have done it again. Fantastic performance by Hailee Steinfeld, who commands the screen. Wonderful to see "The Dude" back. Superior film making in every way, from script to cinematography and soundtrack.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

StevieGJDJan 4, 2011

This retelling is darker and deeper than the 1969 John Wayne version. Both films are adapted from the same novel, and have basically the same general plot. But the new Cohen brothers film is, for me, a far more interesting film. The threeThis retelling is darker and deeper than the 1969 John Wayne version. Both films are adapted from the same novel, and have basically the same general plot. But the new Cohen brothers film is, for me, a far more interesting film. The three main actors (Bridges, Damon and Steinfeld) are well cast and do a great job. The cinematography is wonderful, as are all the technical elements. The limitations of this film are the limitations of the source material - the story is what it is. This is a "hunt down the bad guy western," a genre which has great potential for excitement and character development (this film has both), but also usually great potential for an ending that is unfullfilling (which this film also has). This is a good movie, but not in the category of "Unforgiven," for example.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

gunnyartJan 7, 2011

I rented the original so it would be fresh in my mind. I had the luddite view that you can't remake a masterpiece. I am not a Co-Bro fan so my expectations were not high to say the least. I haven't been so glad to be wrong in a long time.I rented the original so it would be fresh in my mind. I had the luddite view that you can't remake a masterpiece. I am not a Co-Bro fan so my expectations were not high to say the least. I haven't been so glad to be wrong in a long time. Old or first doesn't always mean best. I loved it!!!… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

mpgJan 27, 2011

this one ranks with the best westerns ever made and Ive seen most of them since 1935. great script, great acting and the young girl was outstanding. don't miss it

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

BairdoJan 5, 2011

A serious western with some serious laughs. That's a great combination. My favourite parts were when they cut to that Dude-like stupor (eyes half closed, mouth agape) that only Bridges can summon. He's like a drunken, one-eyed Gandalf with aA serious western with some serious laughs. That's a great combination. My favourite parts were when they cut to that Dude-like stupor (eyes half closed, mouth agape) that only Bridges can summon. He's like a drunken, one-eyed Gandalf with a gun. A Stoner, thrown into a genre film. Very funny. This film will stand beside the best of the Coens.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

Forrestgump1Dec 29, 2010

"The Coen Brothers True Grit is a brilliant remake of a classic story led with outstanding performances from Bridges & Damon and is captivating and more risquÃ© then the original but the real stealer is newcomer Hailee Steinfield"The Coen Brothers True Grit is a brilliant remake of a classic story led with outstanding performances from Bridges & Damon and is captivating and more risquÃ© then the original but the real stealer is newcomer Hailee Steinfield who deserves an Oscar nomination" .. A-… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

8

TVJerryJan 8, 2011

The Coen Brothers have put their unmistakable spin on this Charles Portis novel (a better reference than the John Wayne movie). A plucky young woman (Hailee Steinfeld) hires a crusty, drunken Marshall (Jeff Bridges) to bring her father'sThe Coen Brothers have put their unmistakable spin on this Charles Portis novel (a better reference than the John Wayne movie). A plucky young woman (Hailee Steinfeld) hires a crusty, drunken Marshall (Jeff Bridges) to bring her father's murderer to justice. This film spends more time on character (always humorous & interesting) and dialogue (entertainingly stilted) than on action. It sets up the period and plot nicely, drags a bit in the middle, but ends with a hit of action. It's not their best film, but still enjoyable to watch these two masters work their cinematic skills.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

brewcrewprideDec 23, 2010

Lead by absolutely fantastic performances "True Grit" could be considered the best Western since "Unforgiven". The Coen Brothers have made this dark, gritty, and at times comedic drama into a memorable film that can stand up for itself andLead by absolutely fantastic performances "True Grit" could be considered the best Western since "Unforgiven". The Coen Brothers have made this dark, gritty, and at times comedic drama into a memorable film that can stand up for itself and take straight aim.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

6

BroncosOwnYouJan 20, 2011

For any one to say that this version of True Grit is more faithful to the book by Charles Portis is ridiculous. This version changed just as much, if not more than the original did. I understand that the book is narrated through Mattie'sFor any one to say that this version of True Grit is more faithful to the book by Charles Portis is ridiculous. This version changed just as much, if not more than the original did. I understand that the book is narrated through Mattie's eyes but they left out so much of what made the book so great that it was almost a different story. Too many characters spoke lines in the movie that other characters in the book had actually spoken. Parts of the movie were out of order and the role of Rooster Cogburn himself was literally relegated to second fiddle.

This movie gets a 6 because it was a decent western. But if you want to watch True Grit stick with the original.

"The Dude" just couldn't pull off what the "The Duke" did over 40 years ago.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

TonyJan 2, 2011

Marvelously shot by Deakins (who's likely to finally win his well-overdue Oscar) and with exceptional performances by Steinfeld, Bridges, and Damon, the Coen Brothers have created another masterpiece. On the surface this might seem like theMarvelously shot by Deakins (who's likely to finally win his well-overdue Oscar) and with exceptional performances by Steinfeld, Bridges, and Damon, the Coen Brothers have created another masterpiece. On the surface this might seem like the least Coen Brothers-y movie of their oeuvre, bur the tone and themes of their previous films are still present and should please any sort of audience.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

BikerjamesJan 18, 2011

I have to start by stating that I love most of the Coen brothers films, their style just appeals to me. They have a knack for getting great performances from actors and this film is certainly no exception. Jeff Bridges, Matt Damon, andI have to start by stating that I love most of the Coen brothers films, their style just appeals to me. They have a knack for getting great performances from actors and this film is certainly no exception. Jeff Bridges, Matt Damon, and especially Hailee Steinfeld are great and have great chemistry together. I like that they chose to use the dialect of the time. Sometimes I didn't quite understand all the words, especially from Jeff Bridges who is drunk and mumbles, but the story was easy to follow anyway. There is always some humor in a Coen Brothers film, but this one is the funniest one they have made in awhile. As usual the cinematography is excellent as well. I saw this the day after seeing the overrated "The Black Swan" - what a breath of fresh air after that movie.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

4

asylumspadezNov 26, 2011

The acting was pretty poor and I expected far more however the teenage girl who played opposite of Bridges was amazing and made the film bareable. Overall its a very disapointing remake.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

moviefreak12Jan 12, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. one of the must sees in 2010 or now 2011 haha, great acting and scirpt as it was filled with great humor. there are shootouts but not as much as i thought going to see it . They also really dont fight with bad guys till about the last 25 minutes or so. but the sharp and funny diologe keeps you interested and makes the pace of the movie go by fast. so go out and see the one of the best movies of 2010… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

Lambo442Jan 4, 2011

all these westerns are much the same. An injustice is done and a jaded, anti-hero type mercenary gets hired to track someone down. All a bit dull and rehashed really. The Unforgiven was the first film to use the formula and it hasn't beenall these westerns are much the same. An injustice is done and a jaded, anti-hero type mercenary gets hired to track someone down. All a bit dull and rehashed really. The Unforgiven was the first film to use the formula and it hasn't been equalled since, with the exception of maybe apaloosa, which is leagues above this film. The Coen brothers should start directing porn instead.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

quackerJan 16, 2011

True Grit does not tell a traditional archetype-based story. We don't see Mattie Ross start out naive and powerless and grow stronger on her journey. She's intelligent, driven, and capable from the beginning. Rooster Cogburn never reallyTrue Grit does not tell a traditional archetype-based story. We don't see Mattie Ross start out naive and powerless and grow stronger on her journey. She's intelligent, driven, and capable from the beginning. Rooster Cogburn never really loses his wild, do-as-I-please attitude, nor does LaBoeuf really lose his arrogant superiority. instead the movie shows what I think is a more realistic depiction of a cowboy/western adventure. Yes, it was paced slow. Yes, there were scenes where they are just babbling or doing nothing. Yes, it lacks the theatrics and (overdone) aesthetics of recent movies. But I don't imagine a western journey being fast - paced, easy or pleasurable, or very exciting. Why were there boring and slow scenes? That's all they could do while they traveled. In terms of the acting, I think Matt Damon was miscast - not a terrible job on his part, but it was lacking in believability. He does the accent pretty well, but he's just not a cowboy. Hallie Steinfeld was great - the maturity and stubbornness was spot on. But Jeff Bridges was my favorite portrayal. I thought he was perfect for the role. He pulled off a messy, throaty, alcoholic marshall with a bit of a spark, and had some of my favorite one-liners. Overall I enjoyed the movie and it had a decent message and a dramatic finish. Definitely a gem shining in a load of Hollywood's fresh manure.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

RumblebeeloveJan 7, 2011

The acting is great here, as is the tone and setting of this film. While it doesn't have the same feel as the original, and can stand on its own and it is very hard to compare the two because they are so different in characterizaton. My onlyThe acting is great here, as is the tone and setting of this film. While it doesn't have the same feel as the original, and can stand on its own and it is very hard to compare the two because they are so different in characterizaton. My only qualm is with Josh Brolin as Tom Chaney. He seems so dazed the entire time, and I am not sure if it is on purpose or not... Tip of the hat to Barry Pepper as Lucky Ned, who is a great character and I wished we could have had a bit longer with this gentlemanly bad man.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

podunk411Dec 26, 2010

On the surface, the story is very simple, but underneath there is a lot going on (aside from the black comedy of the book). The skill with which the Coen bros orchestrate this film is really awesome. From casting, acting, plot, theme,On the surface, the story is very simple, but underneath there is a lot going on (aside from the black comedy of the book). The skill with which the Coen bros orchestrate this film is really awesome. From casting, acting, plot, theme, allegory, cinematography and the best of all--dialogue---they really should be proud of True Grit as I'm sure the original author would be given how closely they followed his book (as opposed to the John Wayne version). I loved every minute of this film and am pretty excited to see it again actually.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

VladimirLeninDec 25, 2010

If you like Arnold one liners, good plot, and something different, this is the movie to watch. I love Mr La Beef, he was super funny and so was Bridges.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

Ruler101Jan 5, 2011

This movie was a good take on a "new age" western. Some of the terms were not of that of the time but I think the story kept moving. The humor was good in parts and others weren't so hot but over time it stuck onto you. The scenery was greatThis movie was a good take on a "new age" western. Some of the terms were not of that of the time but I think the story kept moving. The humor was good in parts and others weren't so hot but over time it stuck onto you. The scenery was great and well used in each of the scenes. Overall I thought this movie was entertaining and a good movie for people to enjoy.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

cinemaquoteJan 30, 2011

I ask you to please address me as Mattie Ross. This film is Coen Bros at their best. Damon is truly surprising as a fat, never shutting up-antihero. Bridges is as good with one eye as most of us with both. And, obviously Hailee a refreshingI ask you to please address me as Mattie Ross. This film is Coen Bros at their best. Damon is truly surprising as a fat, never shutting up-antihero. Bridges is as good with one eye as most of us with both. And, obviously Hailee a refreshing role, so interesting and rich. Cinematography and story owe much to Cormac McCarthey, thank you dear Coens. Must, must see. Dont have to be a guy to love it. @cinemaquote… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

mittalraman01Jan 22, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Extremely bad movie to watch in recent history. How can this be a oscar nominee. It is difficult to understand what the story is all about and what characters say and talk has nothing to do with movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

movieswithmitchJan 7, 2011

4 Mitchâ

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

jhall1128Dec 30, 2010

I loved True Grit. The dialogue was snappy and well delivered. The action was well spaced and didn't clog the movie up. The characters felt like real people and I was wondering the entire time what would happen next. The only complaint II loved True Grit. The dialogue was snappy and well delivered. The action was well spaced and didn't clog the movie up. The characters felt like real people and I was wondering the entire time what would happen next. The only complaint I have, is that it couldn't go on forever. =]… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

jsowersDec 26, 2010

A slow first 20 minutes pays off as the film develops into a rather hysterical adventure. A great child performance along with expectantly impressive turns by Bridges and Damon make for an entertaining way to spend 2 hours.

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

8

DarkKnightVDec 25, 2010

I think the best word to describe "True Grit" is entertaining. The dialogue throughout is clever and I was surprised by how many times I laughed throughout. At the same time, the main plot (a fourteen-year-old girl tries to catch the man whoI think the best word to describe "True Grit" is entertaining. The dialogue throughout is clever and I was surprised by how many times I laughed throughout. At the same time, the main plot (a fourteen-year-old girl tries to catch the man who killed her father by enlisting an aging lawman with little regard for rules or niceties) is serious, exciting, and suspenseful. I enjoyed the western feel, with impressive landscapes matched by its musical score, and I thought the acting was great all around.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

182crazykingDec 31, 2010

True Grit was a great movie with some very, very strong actors, characters, and a wonderful story. So why am I giving it a 7/10? Because of the ending. For such an uplifting middle portion, it seems wrong to end the film with tragedy like inTrue Grit was a great movie with some very, very strong actors, characters, and a wonderful story. So why am I giving it a 7/10? Because of the ending. For such an uplifting middle portion, it seems wrong to end the film with tragedy like in the beginning. The ending was really the part that ruined it for me. And the god-awful song at the end did not help either.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

DarkZXJan 8, 2011

I took my friend on a date to see this movie, she and I both had very high expectations, given the amazing cast and the reviews I had already read about it. We enjoyed it, and when I say enjoy it I don't mean we thought it was extremely good,I took my friend on a date to see this movie, she and I both had very high expectations, given the amazing cast and the reviews I had already read about it. We enjoyed it, and when I say enjoy it I don't mean we thought it was extremely good, we just enjoyed it. The acting was the biggest highlight of this movie by far. With absolutely exceptional performances by Jeff Bridges, Josh Brolin, Matt Damon and Hailee Steinfeld. The group of these four amazing actors in my opinion is what made the film.
However a good film does not come without its flaws, and in this case, this movies biggest major flaw was the slow progression of the storyline, the dull setting (It felt like it was just a dusty desert town, nothing really that drew me into the scenery. Hailee did an amazing job in her breakout role, that's the main thing I noticed, she seemed like she was an absolute natural. Continuing, as the story continued onward, I was noticing that the film was trying to draw us to the characters, make us relate to them, however it was not the cinematography that brought me closer to the characters, it was the acting of the characters themselves. However I felt at the same time that the characters themselves were undeveloped.
As for action... Well It seems as if the Coen Brothers tried a little too hard on story rather than actually having qualities that would keep people interested, because the story seemed to be strained in all cases, making it hard to watch this in the way that I personally thought the Coen Brothers wanted us to watch the film like.

All in all it was a pretty good movie, I congratulate the Coen Brothers on making a movie with this much promise and nearly living up to the expectations (acting was amazing, story.... not so much).

Final Rating: 7.2/10
Closing Words:
If you want to see amazing acting and follow the characters of this movie, go see it, if your looking for an action packed wild west gunfight cowboy brawl, this isn't for you.

If you would like more reviews like this, please sign up at http://gamerspurgatory.darkbb.com, contact me (my username is DarkZX on there as well) and say which movie/video game/music album you would like me to review.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

jdolan74Dec 22, 2010

The best way I can describe this movie is that it's like one of your favorite songs covered by one of your favorite bands. And it's a helluva cover.

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

10

shakyDec 23, 2010

The Coens' adaptation of True Grit left me well satisfied, but critically I was puzzled.
The film script remains nearly exactly true to the book, but the minor deviations made me wonder why those if those choices were necessary. The book wasThe Coens' adaptation of True Grit left me well satisfied, but critically I was puzzled.
The film script remains nearly exactly true to the book, but the minor deviations made me wonder why those if those choices were necessary. The book was written almost as a screenplay, with plenty of quirky dialogue and humorous characters, so the Coens' slight additions and changes, although cleverly done, seemed irrelevant, and detracted from the overall effect. Nevertheless, the actors', filmmaker's, and make-up artists' excesses will be forgiven or simply overlooked.
As a whole, I feel that this film will be one of the Coens' most powerful mainstream success stories.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

TENCATIJADec 23, 2010

Well first off, I am a huge John Wayne fan. I have watched almost all of his movies, with this being one of my favorites. I was a little nervous on how Jeff Bridges was going to do in regards to taking on John Wayne's previous role andWell first off, I am a huge John Wayne fan. I have watched almost all of his movies, with this being one of my favorites. I was a little nervous on how Jeff Bridges was going to do in regards to taking on John Wayne's previous role and surprisingly, I thought he did a pretty good job. As a whole, I thought all of the acting was well done and particularly thought Hailee Steinfeld did an excellent job with portraying the role of Mattie Ross. I also thought some scenes were better than the original, like the scene where Rooster is trying to squeeze the information out of the two men in the cabin and one guy chops the other guys fingers off and stabs him in the heart and Rooster blows that guy's head off. I thought that seen kept the suspense moving and really moved the audience. However, I thought the first half of the movie really didn't build up the story at all and the fact that an hour of the movie took place in the town, I felt like that made the second half of the movie (the action scenes) feel rushed and we, the audience, didn't get the feeling of evil that is supposed to be portrayed through the rival gang of cowboys. The other thing that I felt really hurt the movie was the focus that was on how Rooster is a drunk. There was probably 3 different scenes that was focusing on how he's a drunk and I felt like that really hurt the plot. Overall, I thought the movie was good but most definitely not as good as the original. Hats off to you John Wayne...… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

MikeABDec 30, 2010

One of my favorite Cohen Bros. efforts, and I've seen them all. This is my favorite film of the year, other than perhaps "Toy Story 3". Everyone involved here has risen to the challenge. Having just viewed the original John Wayne version,One of my favorite Cohen Bros. efforts, and I've seen them all. This is my favorite film of the year, other than perhaps "Toy Story 3". Everyone involved here has risen to the challenge. Having just viewed the original John Wayne version, this one is far superior in almost every way, starting with the sharp, witty script, which often prompts the viewer to ponder over the sometimes antiquated, but always revealing turns-of-phrases. Perhaps this is why some viewers have suggested the film is too talky and slow. In fact, much of the film's action takes place in the dialogue between the characters, rather than merely in the form of physical action. The performances, as noted by all the reviews, are uniformly memorable, but Jeff Bridges is truly great here. The cinematography is beautiful in a stark and haunting way, and the score, by the Cohen Bros. consistent collaborator Carter Burwell, is stirring. The characters here, unlike most westerns, have shades of gray, and all but the most vile of them retain a sense of humanity. This is probably the most emotionally effecting, and also one of the wittiest westerns I've ever seen.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

kormac66Dec 31, 2010

Solid entertainment. Matt Damon seemed miscast. He couldn't deliver the subtle comedy the situations were presenting. But Steinfeld and Bridges were strong and the story moved along well. kept me engaged.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

tim99999Jan 1, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This funny, entertaining remake is among the Coen brothers' best work. Jeff Bridges' acting is worthy of the classic John Wayne movie. The new, young actress Hailee Stienfeld debuts with a acting performance that will likely give her several upcoming jobs.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

Jim_SJan 2, 2011

With its amusing dialogue, engaging characters, and visually striking vistas, True Grit was not a disappointing movie, but it was a disappointing Coen brothers movie. Regression to the mean? I hope not.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

twainfileJan 5, 2011

It seems axiomatic by now that remakes of good films usually fall well short of the mark. With the often brilliant Coen brothers at the helm, Steven Spielberg producing and Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon starring, this film promised to be theIt seems axiomatic by now that remakes of good films usually fall well short of the mark. With the often brilliant Coen brothers at the helm, Steven Spielberg producing and Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon starring, this film promised to be the exception---especially if you read the critics. I don't know what film they thought they saw, but the one I saw was decidedly not the exception that proves the rule. Gritty it was, but truly entertaining, engrossing and exciting it decidedly was not. Jeff Bridges was a cross between Wallace Beery and Lee Marvin's "Kid Sheleen"---in either case his unintelligible dialogue needed subtitles. Matt Damon's bland performance almost had one longing for the original's Glen Campbell. A disappointing dud.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

criticalrangerJan 8, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The acting was brilliant. The cinematography often stunning. The story enjoyable. Joel and Ethan Coen have once again produced a visceral film, with moments of intensity (particular with the indoor scenes) and characters that are unforgettable (like that instant when the narrator is left behind with her father's killer). But there are moments that really concern you, and you wonder who it is that you're supposed to care about most. And, as a result, the film falls flat - its feels incomplete and without heart, despite the amazing quality of everything that went into its production. Would I recommend it? Absolutely - but only in the hopes that you discover what is there that I didn't see.

Admittedly, I think the best story was that told by Jeff Bridges' character. If only his was the main reason to watch the film. Haillie Steinfeld - well casted and well acted - doesn't quite fill the needs of a protagonist. You don't notice anything change in her... you don't feel anything change in her. At the end you wonder why it is that you've just watched the film - because Jeff Bridges' character would've been the best protagonist to make the film have a purpose.

As it stands it doesn't provide anything other than a story that doesn't make you feel. And that is not a good thing - even when you consider Joel and Ethan Coen's hard-style of directing and lack of interest in "feelings" in the past they have always managed to produce something more magical than this...… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

MojoJan 6, 2011

Coen brothers following generics of the Old-American Western brings out a much different True Grit , than the 1969 classic. It is not experimental , it doesnâ

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

MrRiggsJan 9, 2011

Well...nothing beats the original True grit. This movie has a well supported cast, its the ONLY thing the movie has tho. Its well acted, the sights/sounds/horses/scenery is all fine but I just found the movie boring and somewhat just rambledWell...nothing beats the original True grit. This movie has a well supported cast, its the ONLY thing the movie has tho. Its well acted, the sights/sounds/horses/scenery is all fine but I just found the movie boring and somewhat just rambled on without much action, they could have done wayyy more with this and I have to say my expectations were somewhat high for this when I seen the trailers for it, but I have to say they make the movie far better then it is by those trailers...not bad but not the best remake of a western by far, 6/10 for me for just didnt keep me entertained throughout, didnt keep me wanting to watch it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

ZorglyJan 12, 2011

A fantastic remake of an already great western. 'True Grit' is a must see for any fan of the genre. Jeff Bridges manages to outperform even John Wayne's Oscar winning performance. With many truly surprising and hilarious moments. One of theA fantastic remake of an already great western. 'True Grit' is a must see for any fan of the genre. Jeff Bridges manages to outperform even John Wayne's Oscar winning performance. With many truly surprising and hilarious moments. One of the overall best films of 2010. My only complaint would be the slightly out of place ending.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews