Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Thor - Page 4

6

BullyMaguireDec 2, 2021

I recently rewatched this movie and seeing how thor is now the movie feels very strange to watch. his character is completely different. the movie is kind of cheesy but in a bad way (unlike Sam Raimi's Spiderman 1 and 2) and the villains areI recently rewatched this movie and seeing how thor is now the movie feels very strange to watch. his character is completely different. the movie is kind of cheesy but in a bad way (unlike Sam Raimi's Spiderman 1 and 2) and the villains are so forgettable and meh. Chris as thor is great and Tom as Loki is also great but the story is overall just okay and there is nothing really special about this film with the acceptance of a couple of things.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

ChanekeCholoDec 13, 2021

A film with a lot of potential but with a bad vision. All about Asgard was totally wasted, incredibly was more interesting the little town in New Mexico. It has some great shots and others very bad. In general, it's a entertaining film, but IA film with a lot of potential but with a bad vision. All about Asgard was totally wasted, incredibly was more interesting the little town in New Mexico. It has some great shots and others very bad. In general, it's a entertaining film, but I think its wasted all the cast, except for Tom Hiddleston as Loki, who was the only one with a very well development.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Fixer84Mar 15, 2023

The underlying problem with the Thor movies is tone. When it's too serious or when it's too comical. At this juncture, I have to say it's a perfect 50/50. So perfect, it's neither fish nor fowl. An adaptation that leaves you practicallyThe underlying problem with the Thor movies is tone. When it's too serious or when it's too comical. At this juncture, I have to say it's a perfect 50/50. So perfect, it's neither fish nor fowl. An adaptation that leaves you practically nothing, asking you, at the end of watching almost two hours of film, what you saw and what you didn't see. Political vote.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

finelllaJun 23, 2023

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Thor, dirigida por Kenneth Branagh, es la primera incursión en solitario del carismático dios del trueno dentro del Universo Cinematográfico de Marvel. Aunque la película tiene sus momentos destacados y una sólida actuación del elenco, se queda un poco corta en términos de profundidad y cohesión narrativa.

El mayor punto fuerte de Thor es, sin duda, el carisma y el talento de Chris Hemsworth en el papel principal. Su interpretación del arrogante pero encantador Thor es convincente y logra capturar la esencia del personaje de los cómics. Hemsworth lleva consigo una presencia imponente y una química palpable con el resto del elenco, lo que hace que sea fácil involucrarse en su viaje de humildad y redención.

La película también destaca por sus impresionantes escenas de acción y efectos visuales. Las batallas entre dioses y las secuencias que involucran los poderes de Thor son visualmente impactantes y mantienen al espectador al borde de su asiento. Además, el diseño de Asgard, el reino celestial de Thor, es deslumbrante y transporta al público a un mundo mitológico fascinante.

Sin embargo, donde Thor se queda un poco corto es en su desarrollo narrativo. A pesar de tener una premisa intrigante y prometedora, la historia se siente algo apresurada y no explora a fondo ciertos aspectos clave. La transición de Thor de un príncipe arrogante a un héroe humilde y compasivo se siente un tanto abrupta, lo que dificulta la conexión emocional con su arco de personaje.

Además, algunos de los personajes secundarios no reciben el desarrollo necesario. Natalie Portman interpreta a Jane Foster, el interés amoroso de Thor, pero su personaje se siente unidimensional y carece de profundidad. La relación entre ellos también se desarrolla de manera algo apresurada, lo que dificulta la conexión emocional entre los dos personajes.

A pesar de sus defectos, Thor sigue siendo una película entretenida y un primer paso sólido para el dios del trueno en el mundo del cine. La actuación carismática de Chris Hemsworth, las impresionantes escenas de acción y los efectos visuales hacen que valga la pena verla, especialmente para los fanáticos de Marvel. Aunque no alcanza las alturas de otras entregas del Universo Cinematográfico de Marvel, Thor sienta las bases para futuras aventuras del dios asgardiano y deja a los espectadores ansiosos por más.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

MarcDoyleMay 7, 2011

While Chris Hemsworth does a solid job and is charming, and his band of buddies is fun, the movie as a whole is just flat. Way too much focus on the solely CGI "other" world, and not enough on the human (or superhuman) interactions. KatWhile Chris Hemsworth does a solid job and is charming, and his band of buddies is fun, the movie as a whole is just flat. Way too much focus on the solely CGI "other" world, and not enough on the human (or superhuman) interactions. Kat Dennings is terrific, but Natalie Portman's character just seems starstruck throughout, and she doesn't do much acting. Probably the best acting job in the film is done by Idris Elba as the guardian of "the bridge." The movie pales in comparison to the best of the new generation of superhero movies - Batman Begins, Iron Man, and Dark Knight - but it is fun, and much better than the crap-fest that was Iron Man II. I'd say it's worth a look to acquire the knowledge necessary to watch The Avengers next year....… Expand

10 of 22 users found this helpful1012

All this user's reviews

5

nauticoMay 11, 2011

I saw this flick in a brand new IMAX 3D theatre with 28,000 watts of audio and was more impressed by the sheer power of the sound track than what was transpiring on screen.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

jadeiaAug 30, 2011

It's harmless fun and a good way to zone out for an hour and a half one evening - but it's not going to win any awards :) Thor is actually a good actor - Portman is good and the supporting cast are fun too.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

TonyMay 28, 2011

I love superhero films, but this is certainly one of the weaker Marvel entries. The film suffers from wildly inconsistent changes in tone, going from silly to deadly serious sometimes in the midst of a scene. The special effects also wereI love superhero films, but this is certainly one of the weaker Marvel entries. The film suffers from wildly inconsistent changes in tone, going from silly to deadly serious sometimes in the midst of a scene. The special effects also were inconsistent, sometimes looking cartoonish.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

5

beelzie14Oct 26, 2011

Could have been worse ... should have been better. Redeeming features: Idris Elba, Natalie Portman and Chris Hemsworth. Disappointing: poor acting by Anthony Hopkins (never thought I would say that but the role was too empty for him),Could have been worse ... should have been better. Redeeming features: Idris Elba, Natalie Portman and Chris Hemsworth. Disappointing: poor acting by Anthony Hopkins (never thought I would say that but the role was too empty for him), unimpressed by Tom Hiddleston as Loki, whilst Kat Dennings was too under-utilised. She is an excellent young actress who only got a bit part.
Less God of Thunder, and more God of Drizzle.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

FDT44May 12, 2011

When you look at "Thor" on paper, you see a film booming with all sorts of potential, intrigue, and an aptitude for something not yet seen from Marvel. Unfortunately, when you take the time to actually buy a ticket, sit down in your seat andWhen you look at "Thor" on paper, you see a film booming with all sorts of potential, intrigue, and an aptitude for something not yet seen from Marvel. Unfortunately, when you take the time to actually buy a ticket, sit down in your seat and prepare to relax, the film doesn't quite live up to such expectations. The film hem and haws at which time period it wants to delineate; the conjugality between ancient Norse mythology and the modern 21st century are muddled together very awkwardly. Aside from such befuddlement, "Thor" is highly entertaining and holds its Aryan head on the shoulders of Hemsworth, who does very well to steer the film's direction and provide ample laughs. After you begin to examine the film after abstaining from Hemworth's charisma and allure, you can't help but notice the amount of plot holes and ambiguity that are left lingering. The pace seemed rushed, omitting essential and "needed" elements to the film. Besides Thor's smashing of a coffee cup in the diner, the viewer is never introduced to the barbarism that is expected of a Norseman. Question concerning a multicultural Asgard also left me confused, but that was enough for me to shake off. Despite that tolerance, however, the film disregards any mention of how Thor is able to communicate and understand the jargon of 21st century America. The film begins to show the backwardness of Norse times (granted very poorly) as Hemsworth goes into a pet store looking for a horse. I found this to be a start in the right direction, until Portman's character yells "Need a lift?" To my surprise, Thor hops into a vehicle without any sort of amazement or consternation to the automotive advancement. Next, I can appreciate the film's attempts to include subtle humor to break up the, at times, constant ennui, but straying from the movie's ambiance to do so is brainless. When it is ever acceptable to mention the word "princess" as a means of insult in a Norse land, is the day that Batman is no longer rich. Yes, there are children at the movies too, this is true, but the rest of the scene into Odenheim is dreary, grave, and grim filled with grotesque, blood hungry Frost Giants--when is this a time to lower the film's rating to PG? I can't close without giving an honorable mention to two characters in the film: Loki and Jane Foster (Portman). With regards to Loki, I found him to be one of the most dynamic villains ever created in a Marvel film. In fact, he is so "well-rounded" that at times, I wasn't even sure if he was a villain. Yes, he was a trader, but you just couldn't help but feel sorry for him being the adopted and less-loved brother of Oden's real son; granted his character development was much greater than anyone else in the film. Jane Foster was also significant to the film's effectiveness in the captivating enchantment she feels for Thor. It is because of her (Portman)'s performance that Thor works so well and gives off such an amiable aura. All in all, "Thor" is Marvel's most intriguing comic book-to-movie creation yet to grace itself on the screen yet, however, it is also the most difficult to make. Because of the extreme degree of difficulty in explaining an entire mythology rather than one Gotham City, the film carries many plot holes, and for the exception of Loki, has a pretty basic character development. The CGI effects delineate an entricate world and make for a highly entertaining and "feel-good" action comic creation.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

Libra85May 24, 2011

I love the super-hero movie genre and I love fantasy action. I didn't think this movie would be much and I was right. First off, I never felt Thor as a god but more of an arrogant jock. Even at the end, that feeling never left. Action wise,I love the super-hero movie genre and I love fantasy action. I didn't think this movie would be much and I was right. First off, I never felt Thor as a god but more of an arrogant jock. Even at the end, that feeling never left. Action wise, it was great four years ago. Here it all felt dated especially coming behind two Iron Man movies and Incredible Hulk. The story didn't do it justice. On the one hand there is Thor and the jealous brother Loki. This could have been better except it feels like they are stuck at 12 years old. On the other hand, there is the relationship between Thor and Natalie Portman's character. It was really forced and cliched. Not to mention a love scene put in for no good reason. Idris Elba's character was great and should have been givin more to do. Odin was also really good and the only "god" in the movie. Special Effects looked awsome but a pretty picture wasn't enough to pull me in. I know this movie is only to provide insight as to how Thor becomes and Avenger, but it could have been better than this.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

5

asthobaskoroSep 16, 2011

I don't know how. Thor was goddamn awful and silly. Probably with the script and characters. But Hiddleston was great. I should worry with The Avengers now.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

DerHashermanMay 25, 2011

Thor, How would I review Thor.......Let's just say I'm suprised that Natalie Portman didn't Scream to the Heavens when Thor dies! God of Thunder?, More Like God of Cheesy! The Purpose of anyone making a movie is to make the audience believeThor, How would I review Thor.......Let's just say I'm suprised that Natalie Portman didn't Scream to the Heavens when Thor dies! God of Thunder?, More Like God of Cheesy! The Purpose of anyone making a movie is to make the audience believe that what they see before their eyes could possibly be true, to make the preposterous possible......Like in the First Iron Man, That movie made me believe that a man could make an Iron suit and hurl himself into the air at phenomenal speeds.....They had it, I believed..But Thor.....(Let me just say before I go on that the actor who played Thor was excellent! However, everything that was around him was not!)........Natalie Portman is Gorgeous, I love her, however, I could not stand her in this film, she is a wonderful actress, But such a cheesy role should not be her style......(+ Star Wars). The fact that Thor has a love interest in this film at all makes it weak.....And the scene where Thor's Band of Friends came to Earth to find him, was reminiscent of a Bad movie experience I had as a child, when I spent my hard earned money to see a film called "Masters of the Universe" As his friends were walking through the town streets, I'm thinking....."What happened? Did I make a mistake and purchase a ticket for the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers movie!? I'm sorry but this movie did not make me believe.....The only time I did believe is when Anthony Hopkins as Odin appeared on screen and narrated. I liked the Asgard scenes Which is why I gave the movie a five, but when the movie moves its plot to the earth it was a total disaster.......... Kat Dennings....What the hell was her purpose?!? Hollywood needs to develop some money management skills!!!!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

wordy_actionsFeb 7, 2012

Thor is a very uneven movie. Some parts are very entertaining, such as the initial fight between Thor and his companions and the frost giants. However, the entire middle of the film which takes place mostly on Earth is very uneventful andThor is a very uneven movie. Some parts are very entertaining, such as the initial fight between Thor and his companions and the frost giants. However, the entire middle of the film which takes place mostly on Earth is very uneventful and they don't really fill it with any meaningful character development. Chris Hemsworth is fine as Thor, but the best performance and most interesting character is definitely Tom Hiddleston who plays Loki. The attempts at humor in the movie are forced and rarely funny. The first 30 minutes and the last 30 minutes are fairly entertaining, but there's a lot of dead zones in the script.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Benjamin_BayerMay 15, 2011

Pretty much half of a good movie. While some aspects of the film were quite good (mostly the scenes taking place in Asgard,) they pail in comparison to the lack of true purpose the stars have in their roles, or that the film has in itsPretty much half of a good movie. While some aspects of the film were quite good (mostly the scenes taking place in Asgard,) they pail in comparison to the lack of true purpose the stars have in their roles, or that the film has in its message. It seems Marvel has truly been going through the motions in it's production since the first Iron Man film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

CAGUYCAMay 19, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Okay let me start with this i have given THOR a rating of 5 because its a terrible marvel film not a terrible film.They start the film off with the best fight scene then the rest of the fights are a load of rubbish in a small town then there's one mildly entertaining fight at the end besides that the movie is just following THOR around with Natalie Portman and her very annoying friend.THOR never comes close to dying which never gives the audience the feeling of cheering THOR on since he just kicks ass the whole time.Every hero needs a near death experience, now i know it is staying true to the comics and that the fanboys/girls will be happy with it. But coming from a normal audience like me its just not entertaining enough so that is my reason for giving THOR a terrible 5… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

SingingCactusJun 11, 2011

This was, in one word, mediocre. If you like action flicks with traditional romance and a band of not-so-witty cohorts, this will feed your craving. If you need a date night movie that you can start making out in the middle of, this won'tThis was, in one word, mediocre. If you like action flicks with traditional romance and a band of not-so-witty cohorts, this will feed your craving. If you need a date night movie that you can start making out in the middle of, this won't require your full attention. If you're a fan of the comics, this will give a new visual dimension to your beloved hero.

However, the best character in the movie is Heimdall. (And that's saying something,because Anthony Hopkins plays Odin.) Also, don't go into the film expecting to see any actual Norse mythology. Remember, this was based on a comic. (Well, unless that's how you get your laughs.)… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

Alexander_NOct 15, 2011

Thor was a fairly entertaining film, and I was not too disappointed as I did not have any high standard for it before watching. It fits into the category of quality that most comic book adaptations fall into, and this is not necessarily aThor was a fairly entertaining film, and I was not too disappointed as I did not have any high standard for it before watching. It fits into the category of quality that most comic book adaptations fall into, and this is not necessarily a very bad thing. The recent increase in film adaptations has brought down certain standards, and this particular film is a good example. Lame dialogue and a rather childish series of events is a given, but the film could have done with a slightly better cast in my opinion. Natalie Portman has never striked me as a good actress. The film is a mediocre watch to those who know what to expect.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

cabritaOct 12, 2011

Thor is a great example of a movie that is fairly etertaining but not a good movie. The characters are flat and static which leaves no room for character development.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

lahaineJul 1, 2011

This is anything but a bad movie...but at the some time it wasn't that fantastic iether. While it had fun quirks (particularly between thor and the main human cast), decent action sequences and a surprisingly compelling villain (loki), theThis is anything but a bad movie...but at the some time it wasn't that fantastic iether. While it had fun quirks (particularly between thor and the main human cast), decent action sequences and a surprisingly compelling villain (loki), the movie in its entirety didn't quite measure up. The story was fairly good but not great, the cgi-driven art direction was a bit cheesy, and the plot that centred around gods wasn't as grand and epic as it could have been. Overall a fun summer flick that I didn't regret seeing… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

CmdchrisJul 16, 2011

Ok movie, there's alot of scenes on earth that makes u think how the hell he get thru that security team but overall the movie is pretty entertaining with sum funny clips

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

dz9Jan 13, 2012

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Good: A perfectly casted Thor, nice visuals, and an awesome villain. The Bad: uninspired story, awfully casted love interest, and unbalanced character development. Did I just say that the great Natalie Portman sucked in this??? Yes I did, don't get me wrong... she's overall is a great actress but she just can't make the switch between seriously involved characters and light hearted comic movies... this movie and No Strings Attached show us this. Because of this, you never really buy into the love between her and Thor. Let alone buying into the idea that Thor would abandon his home to live here on Earth for her.. And this is the movie's main problem, the main plot is Thor's arrogance and Portman's character is the one that fuel's his reason to change and ultimately surpass his inner revelations.. which translates into one of the main struggles of the movie, and it's a shame that this completely fell flat making the movie lackluster in this area. Another serious problem is due to the fact that the movie gives Lokie too much of the audience's sympathy. They give Lokie the whole "villain that you feel for vibe," but they gave him too much sympathy. Seeing that Thor is a complete arrogant jerk, Odin completely robbed this man, and the entire kingdom forgets his existence because of the main protagonist, i found myself actually rooting for Lokie. Which is a BAD thing to project in a hero movie.... rooting for the bad guy. A few minor problems of the movie is that the climax is unsatisfying, the action is poorly directed, and the story feels a bit disjointed. The movie isn't a total loss, Chris Hemsworth knocks Thor's character out of the park, Ozgard looks fantastic and beautiful, and the movie seems to translate well into the Avengers movie. In the End: this movie was in-fact a good summer movie... I don't recommend spending more than a dollar blockbuster/redbox price upon it. Your main reason for renting this should be for getting ready for the Avengers movie. Which also makes me wonder, would any one actually cared as much and would this movie done so well if it wasn't for the avengers hype??? Hmmm....... My last thought: I hope this movie's flaws doesn't translate over into the Avengers movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

grandpajoe6191Sep 14, 2011

Pertaining heavily lethargic action, unfunny humor, and a flat story that contains only 2 backgrounds (human world and the world of gods), Marvel rewrites summer blockbuster "Thor"'s preposterous comic odyssey into a f***ed up one.

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

5

gaminkid05Nov 8, 2011

Fun, but incredibly stupid. The plot had more holes than swiss cheese. However, the action scenes were a blast, even though their meaning is shrouded in stupidity. Oh, did I mention the stupid costumes?

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

abathinghMay 17, 2012

They couldn't pronounce a lot of things right in the movie, me being Norwegian definitely changes my opinion. It was a decent movie, but the story should have focused more on Thor himself.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

dante_finnNov 20, 2012

The action scenes were great but the movie was to mythological

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

LinttaFlamingoJan 1, 2018

I think Thor would be a seriously great movie if it took place only in the realm of Asgard. I immediately loved that place. It was colorful, interesting and looked so cool when Thor and his friends were riding with their horses on the bigI think Thor would be a seriously great movie if it took place only in the realm of Asgard. I immediately loved that place. It was colorful, interesting and looked so cool when Thor and his friends were riding with their horses on the big glassy looking bridge. Unfortunately the movie decides to focus mostly on earth where Thor doesn't have his hammer nor any of his other godly capabilities. Instead he has this romance thing with Natalie Portman that just felt very tossed in. The movie does play around with the idea of an arrogant god going on earth and it was fun for what it was, but I never really cared about the other characters on earth that much in the end and I wanted to see more of Asgard. The movie stays interesting enough because the last 20 minutes have a lot more action and that colorful Asgard, but there's still a feeling of a wasted opportunity.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

aussiedude98May 19, 2018

Given the source material - it is probably as good as it could be. Overall great visual effects and action scenes, and good performances from the cast.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

eva3si0nApr 29, 2022

Thor is the most boring film of the first phase of the Marvel film universe. Most of the time, nothing happens in the film for the most part. The first part of Thor is loosely connected to the main cinereal universe. There are few actionThor is the most boring film of the first phase of the Marvel film universe. Most of the time, nothing happens in the film for the most part. The first part of Thor is loosely connected to the main cinereal universe. There are few action scenes, but what are local and not particularly impressive. Of course you can see, but only within the framework of the cinema universe. Well, to understand the second part of the trilogy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

4zaApr 12, 2018

The first act is amazing, everything with Asgard is pretty amazing actually. I'm just really not into any of the Earth scenes in this movie. Not a fan of the 'fish out of water' storyline in movies and I just feel like the comedy doesn'tThe first act is amazing, everything with Asgard is pretty amazing actually. I'm just really not into any of the Earth scenes in this movie. Not a fan of the 'fish out of water' storyline in movies and I just feel like the comedy doesn't always land. Better than Iron Man 2 but a very mixed movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

LivingTribunalApr 22, 2018

Thor hadn't failed as MCU movie or a super hero movie, but it will be forgotten when the time goes on and if they start to think Thor's CG is bad. Thor succeeded to show Loki and describe Asgard. Actually I want to give 54/100, but I don'tThor hadn't failed as MCU movie or a super hero movie, but it will be forgotten when the time goes on and if they start to think Thor's CG is bad. Thor succeeded to show Loki and describe Asgard. Actually I want to give 54/100, but I don't think I can give 6 for this.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

ARGzelderApr 14, 2019

Marvel Studios logra dar una buena presencia a Thor en su presentación cinematográfica donde se destacan las actuaciones de Chris Hemsworth y Tom Hiddlestone. Asgard termina siendo un sitio muy interesante a la vista y el folclor nórdicoMarvel Studios logra dar una buena presencia a Thor en su presentación cinematográfica donde se destacan las actuaciones de Chris Hemsworth y Tom Hiddlestone. Asgard termina siendo un sitio muy interesante a la vista y el folclor nórdico termina encajando con el mundo real, el cual era el material más riesgoso de lograr.
La historia nos presenta al dios del trueno en su búsqueda de reformar su honor ante su padre, Odín. Mientras en Asgard Loki revela su historia oculta e inicia su plan para hacerse con el trono de los dioses nórdicos.
Uno de los puntos interesantes es el rol de Thor, la del extranjero aprendiendo una nueva cultura. La acción es buena aunque es algo escasa, ya que una vez el protagonista esta en Midgard apenas hay amenazas hasta el climax final.
Entre los pormenores se debe destacar la oportunidad fallida de mostrar nuevos escenarios, de estar en un sitio fantástico como es Asgard se pasa a una ciudad desierta con paisajes muy aburridos. Otra replica es la entrega de Natalie Portman, pareciera estar forzada a participar por su pobre actuación.
En general es una película entretenida, tiene muchos puntos interesantes pero al final te deja con ganas de más. Me parece una presentación adecuada de Thor y puedo recomendar el film, tiene una comedia y acción gratificante.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

omnifaceMar 7, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. thor one pre disney only

pros
thor gets a good relation with jane
thor's team actually has a role in this movie loki is a villain here but does minor damage
odin allows thor back into asgard through the odin words cons
the destroyer
the frost box odin was a very stupid hero at first
banishing a demigod to earth even without powers
was incredibly bad to do even if thor was not odin's son cause thors words alone confused the other heroes
imagine if those were bad guys thor was talking to loki defeats heimdall for a bit which was kind of stupid since his power was far greater than loki's own power dark world was far better… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

DarkwingSchmuckMar 13, 2022

Kenneth Branagh was a bold choice to tackle a Marvel movie, but unfortunately it went more the way of Ang Lee's Hulk than Chris Nolan's Batman. Still, the casting of Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddleston as Thor and Loki would prove to beKenneth Branagh was a bold choice to tackle a Marvel movie, but unfortunately it went more the way of Ang Lee's Hulk than Chris Nolan's Batman. Still, the casting of Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddleston as Thor and Loki would prove to be perfect choices right out of the gate, and only more so as these characters would continue in later films.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

PierMay 6, 2011

Mediocre and boring. Visually it has some good and some bad, but the real failure is in the story and the direction of actors. The story is a complete frankenstein where none of the parts works even by itself, and much less in group.

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

4

KarthXLRMay 6, 2011

About as dumb as these type of movies get. Nothing in Thor is remotely memorable, jaw-dropping, or exciting. But at the same time, it's not mind-numbingly boring either. It has the bare minimum amount of effort put into the story, and CGIAbout as dumb as these type of movies get. Nothing in Thor is remotely memorable, jaw-dropping, or exciting. But at the same time, it's not mind-numbingly boring either. It has the bare minimum amount of effort put into the story, and CGI stuffed into all the parts where the story drags. Speaking of dragging, why is there a romance in this? Hell, why are there human characters in this? They're written flatter than cardboard. Calling their performances wooden is giving them too much credit. What else is wrong with it? The action scenes are shot clumsily, making it way to hard to see what's going on, the special effects seemt unfinished, many scenes were blurry and hard to see (may have been our print of film or projector, so I'll give that a pass). In the end, Thor is just and thunder and no lighting. If you're looking for the next Iron Man, look elsewhere.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

4

littlemanp32May 7, 2011

This was the worst of the Marvel Studio movies so far... let me list the ways: why are the frost giants sooo human-like and small? why do the action scenes suck? where are all the asgardians(there may have been 20 total)? And most importantlyThis was the worst of the Marvel Studio movies so far... let me list the ways: why are the frost giants sooo human-like and small? why do the action scenes suck? where are all the asgardians(there may have been 20 total)? And most importantly why was there no character in the entire movie that was an actual threat to Thor? Thor with his hammer could easily beat any of his nemesis in this flick...LAME!… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

4

Jquinn914May 15, 2011

As someone who's seen the majority of big movies from 70's-2000's I found this to be the epitome of mass production in movies. Use pre-made material (the comic) as base and add the standard storyline. I called the general plot within firstAs someone who's seen the majority of big movies from 70's-2000's I found this to be the epitome of mass production in movies. Use pre-made material (the comic) as base and add the standard storyline. I called the general plot within first 5-10 minutes of movie without knowing anything about Thor. From there on everything was predictable. Including the romance and so-called twists. Every other scene also had some ultra-cheesy humor which tied in with the cheesy action which was sub-par in itself. Graphically, Thor excelled, but as a gamer would know best, there's little use of eye-candy without the substance it composes.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

MoretoysMay 11, 2011

NOT GOING> SICK OF THE STUPID 3D GLASSES. NOTHING BUT ANOT GOING> SICK OF THE STUPID 3D GLASSES. NOTHING BUT A GIMMICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ALMOST EVERY 3D MOVIE I HAVE BEEN TO WOULD BE JUST AS GOOD IN 2D. ESPECIALLY WHEN SHOT WITH HIGH QUALITY FILM. GIMMICK TO SCRATCH MORE SCRATCH OUT OF YOUR POCKET.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

ImUnavailableFeb 10, 2012

Thor is definitely one of the weaker movies based on Marvel superheroes. The plot is decent but the problem is that it isn't told very well, creating a situation where dramatic moments often fall flat. The intense special effects used toThor is definitely one of the weaker movies based on Marvel superheroes. The plot is decent but the problem is that it isn't told very well, creating a situation where dramatic moments often fall flat. The intense special effects used to create Asgard can sometimes be overwhelming although other effects are quite good. Some characters are likeable but not lovable due to the fact that they are mostly one-dimensional. We don't even get a good insight into Thor himself and yet we are encouraged to root for him. Any character development that does happen appears to happen in stages instead of being a natural progression. The central romance feels forced although both actors try hard to make it work. The movie is fun, however, if you adjust your expectations. Certain fight scenes are exciting and the writing can sometimes be funny. Thor is not essential viewing and will not change your life but you might enjoy yourself.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

HedjaJul 8, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Metacritic really should have a way to delete reviews.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

MaxTravisMay 16, 2011

I find it amazing sometimes just how much faith a movie will have in the audienceâ

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

Daredevil6May 6, 2011

Great visuals, epic scenery and amazing CGI work, but it gets ruined by some mediocre script and awful plot (I watched it in 3D). Great start to the movie is ruined by predictable story. Its an entertaining flick if you don't mind spendingGreat visuals, epic scenery and amazing CGI work, but it gets ruined by some mediocre script and awful plot (I watched it in 3D). Great start to the movie is ruined by predictable story. Its an entertaining flick if you don't mind spending extra for 3D and are not looking for a great plotline. Has good jokes and overall a nice touch to it. Good casting , but could have been better. I'll give it 5/10… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

4

wolfritzJun 15, 2011

The actors/actresses in this film were good and so were the film crew. But the story and how they developed it scene by scene....not so much. I wouldn't recommend this movie to any of my friends.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

SpunkyMonkeyOct 8, 2012

Sorry, but the whole movie just reaks of style over substance - and when the style itself isn't that good you're on to a loser. Thor is the Norse god of strength and thunder, but in this film he's played either more for laughs, or as someSorry, but the whole movie just reaks of style over substance - and when the style itself isn't that good you're on to a loser. Thor is the Norse god of strength and thunder, but in this film he's played either more for laughs, or as some dickhead jock. There's very little respect for him and the whole **** vs brilliance/belly-fire falls flat when said brilliance and belly-fire fail to show their face to counter-balance Thor's nob-head side. There's little in the way of opposition for Thor to face either, with the Frost Giants being a pretty shoddy set of opponents, and few epic fight scenes to speak of, instead there's just CGI scraps that make you switch off. It doesn't flow well, the romance plot gets far more coverage than it needs, and the whole film is shot rather amateurishly with too many epic shots apparent, watering the whole thing down. Not good and in a word - flat.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

SrPepeNov 13, 2017

7.1? No entiendo a la gente. Esta película si la resumimos es Thor haciendo el idiota en la tierra durante una hora y luego va y salva el día. Aburrida.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

Aus_CriticXMar 27, 2018

A good cast , good comedy doesn’t make up for the absolute disgraces this movie has, but it’s still good!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

IrisKJan 26, 2019

Yeah not my favorite phase one film. The plot is fine, I particularly like the drama around Loki. I just personally don’t like Thor’s character, he’s just kinda boring for me. Other films rectify this but it isn’t really a good start forYeah not my favorite phase one film. The plot is fine, I particularly like the drama around Loki. I just personally don’t like Thor’s character, he’s just kinda boring for me. Other films rectify this but it isn’t really a good start for the character. Thor as a film has a weird feel, being a comic book super hero movie with high drama, sci-fi, and Norse fantasy, it just doesn’t mesh together well in this film. I do love the conflict between Thor and Loki that follows this film, but it does feel a bit forced. Otherwise the CGI looks good and the design and look of the worlds are great and refreshing in the greater MCU, especially at the time.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

4

TaisenZAug 2, 2019

Filme extremamente genérico e cheio de clichês. Jane Foster foi, para mim, o pior do filme, não por má atuação da atriz, e sim por tentarem forçar um romance completamente vazio em um filme em que isso não é o que queremos ver.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

Rickniks38May 8, 2022

Boring there isn't really anything I liked about this film besides Thor and Odin.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

moviefanSep 30, 2011

I was hoping this movie would follow in the path of movies like the dark knight, x-men, or spiderman series but instead it is more in line with the hulk, ugggh. The whole movie was a snore, lots of cgi that looks like you have seen aI was hoping this movie would follow in the path of movies like the dark knight, x-men, or spiderman series but instead it is more in line with the hulk, ugggh. The whole movie was a snore, lots of cgi that looks like you have seen a thousand time before. Thor's character was corny, the script was poor with lots of stupid dialog that made it more like a cartoon script. Definitely don't buy, maybe rent.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

MrMadrewMay 22, 2011

I wouldn't be surprised if someone told me this movie took only a couple weeks to make. The story was absolute garbage. None of the brother jealously got fleshed out until the end. The government cover up didn't add anything to the plot,I wouldn't be surprised if someone told me this movie took only a couple weeks to make. The story was absolute garbage. None of the brother jealously got fleshed out until the end. The government cover up didn't add anything to the plot, and the wishy washy romance was so unnecessary and shallow it just made you wonder why Natalie portman's character even needed to be in the movie. I believe the only reason they made this movie was to provide some sort of backstory for when they release The Avengers. But this was not well developed nor does there appear to be any time or effort spent by the writers. Acting and production quality was good but what an awful story.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

3

asylumspadezNov 26, 2011

While the main cast did a solid job, The CGI was absolutely terrible and looked very bad. The action was also pretty terrible as well. The franchise has a ton of potential though.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

emeraldstormMay 6, 2011

Not a very good movie. Acting was good. Everything else sucked. Costumes, sucked. Plot, sucked. Special effects weren't very special. I can't believe someone said that the emotional core of 'Thor' was deep. The "love" affair in theNot a very good movie. Acting was good. Everything else sucked. Costumes, sucked. Plot, sucked. Special effects weren't very special. I can't believe someone said that the emotional core of 'Thor' was deep. The "love" affair in the movie was as completely contrived as one might expect. Just not a very good movie.… Expand

6 of 18 users found this helpful612

All this user's reviews

3

SpanishiwaMay 9, 2011

This is just another Hollywood film, taking an already established and respected series and converting it to a movie with no depth at all. The story is so simple and shallow, and after 30mins into the movie, anyone can predict whats going toThis is just another Hollywood film, taking an already established and respected series and converting it to a movie with no depth at all. The story is so simple and shallow, and after 30mins into the movie, anyone can predict whats going to happen. Arrogant heir calls for war against the frost giants, inadvertently disrupts the weak truce, loses his power, meets and falls for local scientist, and through some apparent unknown reason, gets his power back through a valuable lesson and beats the bad guy. No originality here. The romance is weak, Portman and Hemsworth know each other for about 3days yet they are so smitten by each other and care about each other so much. There was also no character development. We really don't know who are Thor's 4 companions are. Action scenes had good effect, but it was nothing too special, just a lot of CGI. There were many cliches in the movie and no suspense at all. It is very obvious who let the frost giants in. Overall, storyline was weak, no character depth, and most scenes became dull. If you are into an action movie with very little story, weak dialogue, and a very basic & simple lot, but with some average actions but good CGI to go with it, this is your movie to go. A disappointment as a movie.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

3

tony_t01May 31, 2011

Horrible movie. To all Ultimate Advenger/Marvel fans, this movie was a disgrace. Quite unsure what Marvel was doing here, but this was a total embarrashment to the Marvel name. For people who do not kno anything about Thor, they mightHorrible movie. To all Ultimate Advenger/Marvel fans, this movie was a disgrace. Quite unsure what Marvel was doing here, but this was a total embarrashment to the Marvel name. For people who do not kno anything about Thor, they might enjoy this movie. Total bummer to Thor supporters!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

4toMillionsAug 26, 2011

I have enjoyed every marvel comic turned action adventure movie since X-Men. They haven't always been great but they have always been fun and entertaining. This movie was anything but. Chris Hemsworth is terrible. The relationship betweenI have enjoyed every marvel comic turned action adventure movie since X-Men. They haven't always been great but they have always been fun and entertaining. This movie was anything but. Chris Hemsworth is terrible. The relationship between Thor and his father is weakly developed even though it is critical to the plot. The chemistry between Natalie Portman and Hemsworth is nonexistent. The story moves at a snails pace and the action sequences are lacking any semblance of potency or originality. It looks like all the fight choreography was stole from a Jet Li movie. The battle with the giant red eyed robot is laughable. And, the final confrontation with Loki made me wish I had a bridge to jump off of as well. Hopefully, Hemsworth won't ruin The Avengers next year. With any luck, all of his speaking parts will find their way to the cutting room floor.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

3

RodrigoBGCOct 11, 2011

If you ever have a childhood and you watched Hercules of DisneyÂ´s you'll find that this movie is the same, is just too infantile, the humor is too stupid and the action is too short and for some moments you justIf you ever have a childhood and you watched Hercules of DisneyÂ´s you'll find that this movie is the same, is just too infantile, the humor is too stupid and the action is too short and for some moments you just donÂ´t know what is happening or why are they doing… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

rameshemOct 26, 2011

Chris H was absolutely spot on for the role of Thor...... What a waste.... the dialogue is wooden... There were better plots and effects in the old land of the lost tv series...... and if this wasnt bad enough, they had to force feed it theChris H was absolutely spot on for the role of Thor...... What a waste.... the dialogue is wooden... There were better plots and effects in the old land of the lost tv series...... and if this wasnt bad enough, they had to force feed it the usual formula love interest as well......… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

thenthomwaslikeMay 16, 2012

all of the female characters in this movie have bafflingly bad dialogue. the writing is especially underwhelming for natalie portman (who stumbles through this entire movie much as she did in star wars ep1) and kat dennings made me wannaall of the female characters in this movie have bafflingly bad dialogue. the writing is especially underwhelming for natalie portman (who stumbles through this entire movie much as she did in star wars ep1) and kat dennings made me wanna punch stuff for how stupid and unfunny her character was. at one point she takes a picture of thor on her phone and says "this is going straight to facebook." Loki was the best written character and had some complexity to him to a level that was completely off the charts compared to the rest of the characters. every other character is a cliche with the subtlety of a screaming baby… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

imthenoobJan 24, 2012

Hemsworth, Hopkins, and Hiddleston were great in this film and were perfectly casted for this film. However the rest of the film was terrible. The rest of the cast sucked and didnt sell their parts well, the action was terrible, and theHemsworth, Hopkins, and Hiddleston were great in this film and were perfectly casted for this film. However the rest of the film was terrible. The rest of the cast sucked and didnt sell their parts well, the action was terrible, and the director did a terrible job bringing Thor to life. Really disapointing film.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

3

amheretojudgeApr 9, 2019

Kenneth Branagh ignores the romance between the siblings and the film suffers.

Thor Branagh has a fluent zip in his vocab that can make even a tiresome script look easy. But then, there is always so much he can do. The script whose birthKenneth Branagh ignores the romance between the siblings and the film suffers.

Thor

Branagh has a fluent zip in his vocab that can make even a tiresome script look easy. But then, there is always so much he can do. The script whose birth seems more like an obligation than passion can only go so far. The film is a set-up to the big upcoming ergo has very little to stand on.. well, anything. Not only does the script rely upon cliched scenarios with daft one liners, but the irrelevant action on steroids, that may match Hemsworth's behemoth figure, doesn't bode well to the storytelling.

To narrate a tale of hotheads is one thing, but you still have to make sense at times but in here, there are no elements or tactics that drives this rage which each character is brimmed of, nor there is any lines to be read between the scenes, in fact, I think there is barely any editing in here. Natalie Portman, as an intense workaholic scientist is surprisingly funny and light on her feet. From her body language- it is always fascinating to experience the change in energy in the room when Chris Hemsworth takes out his shirt- to her subtle innuendos of leaning towards the god like creature, is some of the pure delights that the film has to offer.

A tourist entering a new arena and trying to blend in on their culture, is the best aspect of Hemsworth's role; something that Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman too goes through, and against all odds he is simply funny. Tom Hiddleston as the jealous trickster breathes commercial cinema in his performance, he craves for those cheesy moments- a loud vein-popping yell or a half ominous grin on his face- and you know what, you still are going to enjoy it, such is his persona on screen that he appeals so eminently and yet they call it Thor.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

beeanadouAug 13, 2018

The only purpose of this movie is to tell people keep watching the rest of the Thor's movies. The rest are adequate, but not this first one of this series.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

Dovakinxr7Aug 24, 2020

O filme mostra asgard de um forma muito boa, e o vilão é um dos melhores da Marvel, sem falar de asgard no filme.
O resto falha tudo, atuações ruins ou médias, romance tosco, quando se passa na terra nada funciona.
Decepcionante...

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

wishmasterOct 30, 2011

by Satan that movie more absurd, nonsensical, badly directed, badly acted, inconsistent and not at all entertaining, the special effects were nothing surprising.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

Shadow007May 9, 2011

Perhaps it's because I did not realise this was based on a comic before seeing the film, but I was just surprised by what this film ended up being. I'm not biased against comic book themed movies - in fact I generally like them - its justPerhaps it's because I did not realise this was based on a comic before seeing the film, but I was just surprised by what this film ended up being. I'm not biased against comic book themed movies - in fact I generally like them - its just that the melding of ancient mythology, comic style and the 21st century seemed so odd. The story just does not stand up - in fact, it makes very little sense. The motivations of Loki were just incomprehensible and the transformation - seemingly in 5 minutes - of Thor from an arrogant war monger to a great leader and peacemaker was poorly done. The special effects in the film were impressive - but that's not really a plus these days, it's just a given - however, I thought the sound effects were poor, especially the continued high pitched 'electrical storm' sound effects that happened regularly. I found myself regularly wincing. Overall - not a film I would recommend.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

2

Just1nsaneNov 12, 2011

By far the worst Marvel movie I have ever seen in my life... it was cheesy corny and im so glad i saw it for free because i wouldnt pay a dime to see it again... if you actually enjoyed this movie and is looking forward to thor 2 ....you needBy far the worst Marvel movie I have ever seen in my life... it was cheesy corny and im so glad i saw it for free because i wouldnt pay a dime to see it again... if you actually enjoyed this movie and is looking forward to thor 2 ....you need to recheck yourself.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

2

neuroitc-isopodMay 22, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Gaudy nonsense, Natalie Portman seems a bit like a fish out of water. Chis Hemsworth is attractive enough but he's all flash no BANG or substance to the character. There is no romantic atmosphere between the two mains. Very run of the mill plot and far too much special effects going on to even give the any of the crappy plot they had a chance. They could have had fun with Loki but they really didn't (he's supposed to be a trickster!) I'd have been happy with mediocre malevolent ursurper instead of emo jealous wimp. many of the characters seem quite pointless. By the end of the movie I just really was not enjoying it, not even as a popcorn flick.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

arevirebaMay 25, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I really don't understand the premise of this movie. I'm certainly no high-brow guy but good Lord this picture was just bad. The story was non-existent, the characters were clichÃ©d, the plot line was flat. Natalie Portman falls for a mysterious comic book-type superhero. Yeah, that's completely believable. An adopted pseudo-superhero has jealousy issues between himself and his brother as he takes over his home planet to fight for his daddy's approval.

Yowza. This movie is trash.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

dnbaileyOct 12, 2011

The cinematography and CGI are amazing, which is to be expected with a big budget film. However, the story is slow and plodding. The whole thing seemed like a back story for the Avengers film, which may be necessary but is far from entertaining.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

RikiegeSep 25, 2012

When I went to the cinema to see it not that eager tubiera ... But pay to see this crap? By God, you freak! It is very bad and ridiculous. With a plot that looks like the movie "Enchanted".

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

2

TEMP0Oct 7, 2020

This movie stands out like Morse Code messages from another better movie. Thor doesn’t have his powers for much of this film. Doesn’t feel like there is much going on in general. There are some memorable moments for sure and in my opinion itThis movie stands out like Morse Code messages from another better movie. Thor doesn’t have his powers for much of this film. Doesn’t feel like there is much going on in general. There are some memorable moments for sure and in my opinion it is still on a whole a good watch. Just lacks that re-watch value.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

ParadosiMay 8, 2011

This film is what happens when you take Norse Mythology and mess it up into an incomprehensible mess. The only good thing are the special effects. But that's to be expected with our current technology.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

1

trollface24Dec 12, 2011

that movie SUCKED! there was barely any action so i don't know WHY they said it was an action movie! Don't buy it! The only reason i gave it a one is because it was entertaining for the first five minutes, then it got confusing and boring.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

mrmonsterMay 31, 2012

Thor was by far the worst superhero movie of all time. The movie was like a science fiction version of Twilight. The movie will put you to sleep within like, two minutes. Unless you are a hardcore Thor fan, do not even consider renting this movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

JulienK06Dec 11, 2022

Worst MCU Movie, i almost remember nothing about this after watching it 3 days ago

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

austeniteMay 7, 2011

This movie was a complete waste of time. The action was uninspired and dull, the writing was nonexistent and the characters were completely flat. The only reason this movie existed was to give an origin story to Thor for next year's Avengers movie.

5 of 16 users found this helpful511

All this user's reviews

0

jctejadaMay 16, 2011

Looks like they sent in the B team to do this one, I hope that means that the A Team is responsible for making Captain America because it's going to be a real shame if they don't get that one right!!

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

0

Fatal787May 6, 2011

Thor is the God of Thunder , the movie was amazing , great cast and visual effect. I LOVE IT.I hope the C.America do the same with my mind lol and the Avengers.

2 of 19 users found this helpful217

All this user's reviews

0

SkydukeMay 17, 2011

Very weak movie. Subpar acting, plot not at all in the spirit of the comic! Since when was Thor about romance? And why, good gods, WHY is there a black man playing a Norse god? I suppose it's ok for asian communities to get their panties in aVery weak movie. Subpar acting, plot not at all in the spirit of the comic! Since when was Thor about romance? And why, good gods, WHY is there a black man playing a Norse god? I suppose it's ok for asian communities to get their panties in a twist over Avatar the last airbender and Caucasians, but the opposite? Not so much, I suppose...… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

0

WarVikingJun 3, 2011

Pathetic movie. People rating this movie extremely high had to be drunk when seeing this film. First off the movie was no better than your typical Tv Sci Fi flick. The humor was uninspired as were the action sequences which all only lastedPathetic movie. People rating this movie extremely high had to be drunk when seeing this film. First off the movie was no better than your typical Tv Sci Fi flick. The humor was uninspired as were the action sequences which all only lasted rougly 1-2 minutes. For Thor claiming himself to be "THE MIGHTY THOR" all throughout the film gee not much might was demonstrated. His great generic comeback sequence was over before it even began.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

0

Save_the_EarthOct 12, 2011

Honestly, ZERO is too high for this movie. Big shame artists like Portman and Hopkins take roles in such movies for money. Wasted two hours of my life watching it because of surprisingly high ratings of other people :-(

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

WiscoJoeMay 9, 2011

Bhoring. The sets are straight out of "Flash Gordon." The plot is straight out of "Masters of the Universe." The direction is straight out of the Joel Schumacher school of filmmaking.

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

0

becruxSep 28, 2011

I dont really think this movie rates a 0, but I'm trying in my small way to counteract the 10's given. 10? Are you kidding me? This movie was, at best, average and forgettable. It's a feel good movie, only good for children or easy to pleaseI dont really think this movie rates a 0, but I'm trying in my small way to counteract the 10's given. 10? Are you kidding me? This movie was, at best, average and forgettable. It's a feel good movie, only good for children or easy to please adults of low intelligence. It should have been a better movie. The only actors who were believable at all were Loki and the Laufey. And I thought both of them should have been much more formidable. I'm sure my small children would give this movie a 7 or 8, but as an adult, I'd give it maybe a 4. C'mon Hollywood, Thor is a great concept, cant you do better?… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

0

A_NorthernerJul 15, 2012

After Iron Man and Hulk, next up was Thor for introduction to the cinema-going masses in preparation for his role in The Avengers.

In comparison with most other superheroes, not only being from another world but a God at that, the story ofAfter Iron Man and Hulk, next up was Thor for introduction to the cinema-going masses in preparation for his role in The Avengers.

In comparison with most other superheroes, not only being from another world but a God at that, the story of Thor is probably one of the more difficult stories for adaptation. By dealing with other worlds and deities, as superhero stories go, Thor is more magical and less grounded than say Captain America or Batman. The result is a hit and miss comic book adaptation that suffers from a poor villain, too much mythology and fantasy, unmemorable fight scenes and an occasionally cheesy script. Chris Hemsworth is likeable as Thor, he delivers both the brash arrogance and later sincerity of the character and although I haven't seen The Avengers I hope his character is given a reasonable amount of time.

The story benefits most when Thor is exiled to Earth, the subsequent clash of cultures with scientist Natalie Portman is funny in places, although the line about a phone picture going straight onto Facebook may win 'cheesiest line of the year'.

Having read differing reviews of Tom Hiddleston's Loki, I side with the negative. Comparisons of the actor's portrayal with Heath Ledger's Joker are way wide of the mark. Thor's brother Loki is as unmemorable a villain as I can remember.

A must see for any comic book or Avengers fan but not the greatest superhero film.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

BroyaxDec 16, 2017

De toutes les marvelleries plus ou moins navrantes (mais plus souvent "plus" que "moins") celle-ci est à marquer d'une pierre blanche : Thor est en effet nul à chier des briques. Il faut le voir récupérer le folklore nordique et en faireDe toutes les marvelleries plus ou moins navrantes (mais plus souvent "plus" que "moins") celle-ci est à marquer d'une pierre blanche : Thor est en effet nul à chier des briques. Il faut le voir récupérer le folklore nordique et en faire absolument n'importe quoi, n'importe comment. On me dira qu'il est tiré du comics éponyme qui fait déjà de la merde mais ce n'est pas une excuse, c'est pire ! et puis cherche pas, de toute façon t'as thor.

Evidemment, cette marvellerie s'incline bien bas sur l'autel de la diversité et peu importe si ça devient grotesque dans les légendes des Vikings : ils n'en tout simplement rien à carrer. A cela on doit ajouter la mise en scène agitée lors du moindre combat, ce qui enterre définitivement le moindre intérêt qu'on aurait pu lui trouver, y compris dans le grand spectacle. Par ailleurs, c'est écrit avec le fion et les effets spéciaux et décors sont d'un mauvais goût stupéfiant...

Anthony Hopkins s'est fourvoyé là-dedans pour la gamelle et quant aux autres acteurs, ils sont stupéfiants eux aussi, de ridicule ! voilà donc une marvellerie de plus, con-çue et pensée à thor et à travers comme autant de jeux de mots pourraves.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews