Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Thor - Page 3

7

Rox22Mar 19, 2013

I didn't really expect too much from this movie, as I was never too much a fan of the comic or the character. But, to my surprise, it was somewhat decent. Effects were first rate, the characters were well played (perhaps a bit hammy atI didn't really expect too much from this movie, as I was never too much a fan of the comic or the character. But, to my surprise, it was somewhat decent. Effects were first rate, the characters were well played (perhaps a bit hammy at points) and story was a pretty good origin story for Thor. Overall: A good, but not great, movie. My least favorite of the Avenger characters.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BradySmithDec 21, 2013

Thor is an enjoyable superhero movie. It doesn't really try anything new, but it uses the standard ingredients well enough. It has a likeable hero, decent visual effects, and a very good finale. Sometimes it can even make you sad. InThor is an enjoyable superhero movie. It doesn't really try anything new, but it uses the standard ingredients well enough. It has a likeable hero, decent visual effects, and a very good finale. Sometimes it can even make you sad. In places the script and direction do need some work though. It's no Dark Knight ,but what else is? Well to be honest Iron Man, and the first two Spider-Man films were also better than Thor. So it's not exactly one of its genre's best. It's just above average entertainment. I can live with that.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Movie1997Dec 19, 2013

While it's not the best super hero ever made, it still showcases some good old super hero starts! While some say the sequel is way better than the this first installment, I disagree. "Thor" brings in an interesting plot with good charactersWhile it's not the best super hero ever made, it still showcases some good old super hero starts! While some say the sequel is way better than the this first installment, I disagree. "Thor" brings in an interesting plot with good characters and some good storytelling. It never felt too goofy, but never brought anything more than it could have. Overall, it's still a pretty good marvel movie. I give it a B.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Azid_AlexDeSmalApr 8, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Thor is a mighty superhero motion picture in the service of having a direction by Kenneth Branath. The film was written by Ashley Edward Miller, Zack Stentz and Don Payne and starring talented players like Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Tom Hiddleston and the stellar Anthony Hopkins. Thor is vividly ambitious having employed mega special effects and it is somehow a financial and critical success but it didn't worked out much for me, I just felt that Thor could have been much better.

The plot surrounds the character Thor (Played by Chris Hemsworth), whose character is well occupied with arrogance, courage, aggressiveness and those unpopular self-abilities were responsible for his own exile from Asgard to earth. Upon his exile, his evil brother, Loki (Played by Tom Hiddleston), intends to become the new king of Asgard and to consolidate all powers for his own self. I have absolutely nothing to against its main plot here, not very much of simplicity it is complex to a very small extent and it varies important themes like family and loyalty and it instantly tells me that Kenneth Branath injected some kind of Shakespearean elements in it. I approved its storyline here, it is good.

Acting-wise, it is amazing. Chris Hemsworth plays the tough character Thor and he navigated it very well. He is highly commanding in his acting performance and there is ultra-strength in it and yes, he did accomplished. Tom Hiddleston is very promising in the movie, perhaps I would say, Chris Hemsworth is overshadowed by him. Hiddleston's control on his facial expression every time he is performing is so precise, he exactly knows on when to 'turn to the left', or when to 'turn to the right', and with a perfect combination with his wonderful voice, he is sublime in this film. Perhaps his best moment is when his character Loki, a very inspirational villain, realised that he is adopted. Upon his discoveries, he screamed 'TELL ME!!' for the sake of finding the truth further and literally, backed up with fine acting skills, I could see so much pain and anger in Loki, and this enlightens me that Tom Hiddleston knows on how to manage a character. Anthony Hopkins plays Odin, the father of Thor, and as usual, brings his masterful game for his part and Natalie Portman too brought for us a fine performance.

The first quarter of this movie is very splendid. Anchored with excellent fighting/action scene, excellent editing, beautiful colourful special effects, great dialogues and I would like to reiterate, powerful acting performances but it did not lasted till the end. It literally went down the hill during the last quarter of the movie. Fighting scenes between Loki and Thor are purely messy and too ambitious, and I don't enjoy messiness. Tons of special effects are being employed and it loses my interest of it, and I guess it lacked much audience involvement during that period of time. I'm not trying to suggest that Thor is way over the top but its special effects somehow blinded my eyes that I could not focus much.

Thor is good, but not great, and I am very much in love to repeat that this movie could have been much, much, much, better.

(http://www.rottentomatoes.com/member/AlexDesmall) (http://facebook.com/alex.desmall) Twitter (Alex_DeSmall)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

gracjanskiMay 20, 2022

On the one side the Nine Worlds and the background story of Thor are interesting. So the visual effects are great.

On the other side the characters are a bit superficial and one-sided. And some of the scenes look easy.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

dougaussieNov 5, 2013

Great eye candy. Lots of explosiony dusty dark stuff. bit of a story line. very little yukky romance, the side kick to thors girlfriend was good light relief humor. Lots of destruction, I like the destruction bits. You just like loki more andGreat eye candy. Lots of explosiony dusty dark stuff. bit of a story line. very little yukky romance, the side kick to thors girlfriend was good light relief humor. Lots of destruction, I like the destruction bits. You just like loki more and more. Great spaceship design. Now the bad: if the dark stuff is imprisoned in the core of some planet how can thors girlfriend accidently get to it, that's just stretching it too far, poor writing. And give me a break, a scientist on earth has some techno sticks that will stop the alignment of planets. Theres some good ideas and effects let down by logic gaps.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SuperheroMoviesApr 17, 2014

Bolstered by an enthusiastic cast and a broad sense of humor, Thor is one Marvel film that delivers on many levels and is delivered with an honest, fun spirit that will spark the sense of adventure.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

cag11Nov 29, 2013

I can understand if someone didn't like this movie. It has a shallow plot that doesn't have much action in it. I did like it because I'm more focused on whether or not the plot was executed good. It did good for a part one.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

mrjoneseznNov 28, 2013

This is a comic-book movie (duh) and doesn't have aspirations to be any more than that. In that regard, it's a really good comic-book movie. Yeah, some of the dialogue is wooden, and some characters are underdeveloped, but it stays true toThis is a comic-book movie (duh) and doesn't have aspirations to be any more than that. In that regard, it's a really good comic-book movie. Yeah, some of the dialogue is wooden, and some characters are underdeveloped, but it stays true to its source material, and ends up being a pretty fun film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

marcmyworksNov 27, 2013

Thor is fast paced, enjoyable and fun and only suffers when he is brought to Earth. There he is not nearly as interesting as he is on Asgard, but hey, those effects are expensive.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

cumoviesJul 26, 2014

this movie to me was very good acting special effects action story was all good but not great this movie is better than a 7 but not good enough to be an 8.
my ratting 7.7/10 action 8/10 story 7.5/10 acting 8/10 comedy 7/10this movie to me was very good acting special effects action story was all good but not great this movie is better than a 7 but not good enough to be an 8.
my ratting 7.7/10 action 8/10 story 7.5/10 acting 8/10 comedy 7/10 characters/character development 8/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Kai82Jul 5, 2022

The introduction movie for Thor in the MCU. It is weaker than the first Iron Man and Captain America but still enjoyable. After a flashback slightly over 1000 years before that shows the last war between Asgard and the frost giants ofThe introduction movie for Thor in the MCU. It is weaker than the first Iron Man and Captain America but still enjoyable. After a flashback slightly over 1000 years before that shows the last war between Asgard and the frost giants of Jotunheim we switch to current times. It is Thor's big day as he is named successor to the throne of Asgard in a big ceremony making his oath as ruler. However a group of frost giant uses this distraction to infiltrate Asgard to get back a mayor artifact that was lost during the end of the war. Thor springs into action after this as he is too hotblooded, impatient and wants to prove himself. This causes a mayor fallout between Thor and his father Odin that ends not well for him. Here I stop with this vague lead up to avoid spoilers. It is a heroes journey that is close to the comic sources. It works well enough but there should be a bit more cause for character development. Other Marvel movies did more to be fair. In total it is fine for an introduction movie. The fight scenes are excellent and entertain. Now for the actors we got a solid to good performance. Chris Hemsworth as Thor and Tom Hiddleston as Loki are truly excellent and it became their signature roles. They work well together and the other MCU movies use this well. Natalie Portman as Jane Foster is also great and it is a shame they did not much with her character in later movies. The warriors three, Frigga and Lady Sif are a bit pale or not characterized well but that is the fault of the script not the actors. Idris Elba as Heimdall is great. He has not much screen time but rocks all his scenes. Finally Anthony Hopkins works well as Odin and is also the definite character for this role. So we have some great performances and some characters that are not well used by the script. I rated this a solid to good because of this. Visually the special effects are good but some scenes at the beginning needed a bit of better lighting. Also Asgard looks a bit pale and empty. Overall this is an enjoyable movie. Not the best MCU movie but entertaining. Was also a bit forgotten fast as other MCU movies took the spot lights.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ShiningLionMar 26, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This film's greatest strength is its visual art, particularly in the world of Asgard. The plot and characters are stereotypical, and the Asgardians' personalities border on self-parody. Perhaps that's what gives this film an air of silliness about it that lets me not take it as seriously as other MCU films expect me to take them. The dynamic between Loki and Thor is the linchpin of the film, despite an attempt to shoehorn in an unconvincing romance with Natalie Portman's character (guess I didn't get enough of that in Star Wars). The CGI is erratic... one moment stunning, and at the next moment having the finesse of a 90s made for TV tornado movie (Night of the Twisters I'm looking at you). There's a moment or two that are hard to swallow (like Thor's "sacrifice" against the iron giant), but the film is just cute enough for me to forgive it. It really is a bit of fun. Don't take it too seriously and you'll probably enjoy it. Some moments made me feel like I was watching some nerds at a comic book shop doing a LARP but to be honest I kind of enjoyed that. I was surprised by how much I liked the character Loki and am looking forward to how the story progresses in future films.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DudeFromIcelandApr 13, 2019

People love to rag on the first two Thor films but this one is pretty solid. This type of story, the fish out water story, has been done a million times but it's still enjoyable. It's got good humor and some decent action scenes. ChrisPeople love to rag on the first two Thor films but this one is pretty solid. This type of story, the fish out water story, has been done a million times but it's still enjoyable. It's got good humor and some decent action scenes. Chris Hemsworth and along with Tom Hiddleston put in the standout performances as Thor and Loki.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MrMovieBuffJul 8, 2015

'Thor' follows the story of a once arrogant God named Thor (Chris Hemsworth), who is banished from his world, Asgard by his father and king, Odin (Anthony Hopkins). Along the way, at Earth, Thor meets three scientists; Jane (Natalie Portman),'Thor' follows the story of a once arrogant God named Thor (Chris Hemsworth), who is banished from his world, Asgard by his father and king, Odin (Anthony Hopkins). Along the way, at Earth, Thor meets three scientists; Jane (Natalie Portman), Eric Selvig (Stellan Skarsgard) and Darcy (Kat Dennings).

At Earth, Thor learns what it is and how to be worthy in order for him to become a mighty God again, but all that doesn't go according to plan when his scheming and jealous brother, Loki (Tom Hiddleston) plans to jeopardize Thor's return to Asgard and become King once again.

Kenneth Branagh directs this movie with such visual ambition, the actors commit to their roles very well despite looking and often sounding ridiculous what with the costumes and constant Shakespeare-like dialogue. It definitely doesn't feel like a comic book movie, instead, more like a tone-down version of "The Lord of the Rings" and "Game of Thrones".

The film does suffer from predictability and, possibly, just a short and thinly written plot, but it is a lot of fun, it may not rank among some great comic book films like; 'Superman' (1978), 'X2: X-Men United' (2003), or even 'The Dark Knight' (2008), but if you are a fan of the "Thor " comics...then you will like this for what it is.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

Termin8terApr 13, 2018

Thor has quite recently been mightily overshadowed by the resounding success of the third and final Thor film: Thor: Ragnarok. Which was a great film, don't get me wrong, but the first Thor shouldn't be hated or cast aside just becauseThor has quite recently been mightily overshadowed by the resounding success of the third and final Thor film: Thor: Ragnarok. Which was a great film, don't get me wrong, but the first Thor shouldn't be hated or cast aside just because Raganarok was the best. Thor is a good movie. It's not great, but it's not decent either, it sits squarely at good. The soundtrack has some great tracks, Tom Hiddleson and Chris Hemsworth play an amazing Loki and Thor, and Anthony Hopkins plays a great Odin too. The acting from most of the cast is great, and Thor's character arc is very straightforward, but satisfying. The CGI is awesome as well. In conclusion, definitely give this film a watch if the opportunity arises, but don't go out of your way to see it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

CineAutoctonoOct 28, 2017

"Thor" was a good movie, in short they tell us the origins of one of the most powerful superheroes of Marvel, the special effects were good, the performances, and the story, the leaning camera was almost unnecessary but the film, itself, it was good.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DanBurritoOct 9, 2015

Unique among superhero films. For one thing, it's got a fantasy feel to it and for another thing, the main character has been stripped of his powers for most of the movie so it's more of a fish out of water story. Tom Hiddleson's Loki wasUnique among superhero films. For one thing, it's got a fantasy feel to it and for another thing, the main character has been stripped of his powers for most of the movie so it's more of a fish out of water story. Tom Hiddleson's Loki was brilliant (looks like the MCU has found their Heath Ledger) and Chris Hemsworth was very good as the title character. It's a pretty good movie, different from most films of its kind.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

Cinemassacre94Mar 20, 2016

Kenneth Branagh invests this comicbook epic with a weighty yet never overbearing Shakespearean dimension.

Neither the star pupil nor the dunce of the Marvel superhero-to-screen class, “Thor” delivers the goods so long as butt is beingKenneth Branagh invests this comicbook epic with a weighty yet never overbearing Shakespearean dimension.

Neither the star pupil nor the dunce of the Marvel superhero-to-screen class, “Thor” delivers the goods so long as butt is being kicked and family conflict is playing out in celestial dimensions, but is less thrilling during the Norse warrior god’s rather brief banishment on Earth. With Aussie hunk Chris Hemsworth impressive in the lead and helmer Kenneth Branagh investing the dramatic passages with a weighty yet never overbearing Shakespearean dimension, pic looks sure to reap big B.O. on the strength of its ready-made audience, but faces a tougher time attracting viewers for whom this type of fare is the exception rather than the rule.

Although the comicbook has been in print since 1962, Thor hasn’t scored much more than supporting roles and guest spots in various toons and telepics since. With this in mind, scripters Ashley Edward Miller, Zack Stentz and Don Payne have wisely penned an unhurried but engrossing half-hour setup of the lesser-known Marvel character and the three worlds he inhabits.

Opening snapshot in New Mexico finds astrophysicist Jane Foster (Natalie Portman), her gal-pal/assistant Darcy Lewis (Kat Dennings) and Jane’s mentor, Dr. Erik Sevig (Stellan Skarsgard) investigating a twister-like atmospheric disturbance. In their haste to discover what’s come down in the storm, their RV knocks down Thor (Hemsworth), a buff and bearded stranger.

Bulk of the action in the first couple of reels sets up Thor’s fall from grace in his homeland, Asgard, a heavenly realm ruled by his supremely wise but aging father, Odin (Anthony Hopkins). Just moments away from peacefully ascending the throne ahead of brother Loki (Tom Hiddleston), Thor leaps into an eye-popping interdimensional portal and leads an unauthorized attack on Jotunheim, home to their enemies, the Frost Giants, led by reptile-like Laufey (Colm Feore). Odin’s punishment: Thor is dispatched to Midgard (Earth) with his magical hammer, Mjolnir, but cannot use the mighty instrument until he overcomes the classic mythological shortcomings of arrogance and impetuosity.

Speckled with amusing fish-out-of-water humor as Thor marches around a dusty New Mexico town like he’s still in Asgard, the story promises much from the attentions of government agent Coulson (Clark Gregg) and Thor’s brewing confrontation with the Destroyer, a hulking creation that resembles a high-tech suit of armor and shoots fire from its eyes. He’s joined in this endeavor by Asgard warrior pals Sif (Jaimie Alexander), Volstagg (Ray Stevenson), Fandral (Josh Dallas), and Hogun (Tadanobu Asano).

Yet Thor’s smackdown with the Destroyer is all too brief and anticlimactic when stacked up against the spectacularly rendered rumbles in other dimensions. Though Thor’s romance with Jane is passable, thanks largely to Portman’s sterling work in a thinly written role, the couple isn’t given enough alone time or meaningful dialogue to raise the relationship above the ordinary.

It’s a different matter in the heavens. Hopkins rises to the occasion with a restrained yet powerful portrayal of a father forced by conscience to deal the bitterest of judgments upon his chosen heir, and Hiddleston gives a finely tuned perf as the sibling whose loyalty or otherwise to Thor remains a tantalizing question until deep into proceedings. Almost unrecognizable as the star of Aussie soap “Home and Away” in the mid-2000s, Hemsworth holds his own in distinguished company and will serve the series well in any sequels and “The Avengers,” Marvel’s all-star superhero bash skedded for 2012 release. Given only a handful of lines, Rene Russo is under-used as Odin’s wife, Frigga.

As the living actor and director most closely associated with Shakespeare, Branagh may seem a surprise choice for such material. A childhood reader of the comics, he brings a fan’s enthusiasm and his skill as an actor’s director to the table here. Fitting Hemsworth out with a classical but never pompous British accent and shooting emotionally charged sequences with elegant simplicity, Branagh succeeds in rendering his mythological characters deeply human.

While no fatal missteps are taken along Thor’s path to redemption, pic has a slightly choppy feel, as if it’s trying to squeeze an origin tale and at least part of its sequel into a single entity. Most of the material motors along just fine, though the editing occasionally seems a bit too hurried in moving from one dimension to the next. An extra reel of Earth-bound story might not have gone astray.

Effects work is on the money, with the suspended, glowing Bitfrost gateway from Asgard to other worlds an eye-catching highlight. All other technical credits are thoroughly pro.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

ElectroNickMay 1, 2016

Thor hd always been one of the more boring characters in the Marvel universe since there wasn't really more to him outside of being a Norse God. This film though really fixed that as Thor has a similar character arc to Tony Stark but thereThor hd always been one of the more boring characters in the Marvel universe since there wasn't really more to him outside of being a Norse God. This film though really fixed that as Thor has a similar character arc to Tony Stark but there are a few differences. Thor starts as a prideful prince who lets the power get to his head but later learns the value of mortal life. He goes to Earth after being cast out from Asgard which gives way to interesting character interactions. Chris Hemsworth is a perfect choice to play the God of Thunder and he has great chemistry with Natalie Portman as Jane Foster. There is also a nice comrade re with the Warriors three much like their comic book counter parts. Anthony Hopkins carries a strong presence as Odin which is standard for such a powerhouse actor. The one actor who really steals the show is Tom Hiddleton as Loki. He is a devious character hence why he is called the God of Mischief but he is sympathetic as well in this incarnation. He is so good as the god of mischief that he even fooled me on more than one occasion which makes him a great villain since he is manipulative and unpredictable. Kenneth Branagh directs this film with his trademark visual flare making this film not only fun to watch but also beautiful to behold. This film made me a new Thor fan and I can't wait to see what awaits him in the future.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

HTGamerApr 24, 2018

Thor is a good origin story for the God of Thunder. The story is about a young prince who has to learn the hard way how to be a proper King. The CGI art style in rendering the world of Asgard and Jotunheim is wonderful. And the story hasThor is a good origin story for the God of Thunder. The story is about a young prince who has to learn the hard way how to be a proper King. The CGI art style in rendering the world of Asgard and Jotunheim is wonderful. And the story has plenty of situational jokes. The star of the show though is neither Thor nor Odin, it's actually Loki. Tom Hiddleston did a wonderful job in portraying the character of the God of Mischief and was even selected to be the main villain in The Avengers and keeps appearing in new MCU movies. But Chris Hemsworth's portrayal of Thor is a bit stiff, no wonder they had to overhaul the character in Ragnarok.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

superbatMay 26, 2020

Thor was a somewhat enjoyable movie. The humor was good, as were the visuals. However, there wasn't a tone of action, the Asgard scenes were quite boring, and the pacing was uneven. Chris Hemsworth was solid as the lead hero, though.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MovieLover123Jul 17, 2016

Not going to lie, I know the plot is nonsensical and the CGI sometimes is mediocre, however the MCU finally has a good villain character in Loki and the hammer is pretty awesome. Overall, it is a great summer popcorn flick and nothing more.Not going to lie, I know the plot is nonsensical and the CGI sometimes is mediocre, however the MCU finally has a good villain character in Loki and the hammer is pretty awesome. Overall, it is a great summer popcorn flick and nothing more. It will definitely not age well, but I definitely enjoyed it while in the moment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ZerpnosMar 4, 2017

Dünyaya ışınlanan Thor ilk başta olayları araştıran birileriyle tanışır ve kıza aşık olur. Güzel zamanlar geçiren Thor artık çekici bulmanın vaktini geldiğini anlamıştır fakat biraz geç kalmıştır. Agents of Shield denen ekip çoktan çekicinDünyaya ışınlanan Thor ilk başta olayları araştıran birileriyle tanışır ve kıza aşık olur. Güzel zamanlar geçiren Thor artık çekici bulmanın vaktini geldiğini anlamıştır fakat biraz geç kalmıştır. Agents of Shield denen ekip çoktan çekicin etrafını çevirmiş ve incelemeye başlamıştır. Sonunda çekicine kavuşan Thor, Dünyaya gönderilen Yokediciyi ardından Asgarda saldırmak isteyen kötüleri durdurur.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

higgins404Feb 14, 2018

The beginning of this movie felt like it was moving at a snails pace. Once we started learning about the Norse Mythology and how it was going to play into the universe, I was hooked. Great acting by Hemsworth and Portman really helped thisThe beginning of this movie felt like it was moving at a snails pace. Once we started learning about the Norse Mythology and how it was going to play into the universe, I was hooked. Great acting by Hemsworth and Portman really helped this movie grow. My true rating is 6.5, but I'll round up. Obviously, if you are a Marvel fan... must watch.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JPKFeb 25, 2018

Fun Introduction To Thor
It Isn't Fantastic, But It's Fairly Well Done For Both A Movie And Origin Story In General.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Kes4278Jul 31, 2017

Well, can't say I am a little disappointed. I mean the movie is descent.Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddelston were great.Natalie Portman was alright. I would give it a fair 7/10

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Bugger217Sep 13, 2017

Thor is essentially split into two parts. One taking place in Asgard, the realm where Thor comes from, and the other taking place on Earth. The Asgard portion of the film is magical. It's visually spectacular and there's a genuine sense ofThor is essentially split into two parts. One taking place in Asgard, the realm where Thor comes from, and the other taking place on Earth. The Asgard portion of the film is magical. It's visually spectacular and there's a genuine sense of place. Chris Hemsworth has the right kind of swagger as Thor. Tom Hiddleston is a revelation as Loki. Anthony Hopkins brings appropriate amounts of gravitas as Odin.

The Earth portion is less than magical. It looks a lot cheaper, and not just because it's literally more "down-to-Earth." The sets are poorly constructed, and it's here that the film's most uninteresting characters and plot points are introduced. Thor's fish-out-of-water moments are amusing, but Natalie Portman is terribly miscast as his love interest, and their chemistry isn't very strong. Kat Dennings' character is supposed to be funny, but comes off as annoying.

Regardless, there's more good than bad to be found here. The cast is mostly great, the action is a lot of fun, Asgard is a joy to spend time in, and it's here that Marvel Studios truly began to properly build their cinematic universe, bridging multiple franchises, without feeling overstuffed or incomplete.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

alexandreaDec 1, 2021

It is a cool movie. It probably has the best visuals in the MCU. And the tone is actually way better than most movies in the MCU but it fails in the pacing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

spacebear1Dec 7, 2017

Kenneth Branagh's Thor is an okay film. I loved the characters, especially Tom Hiddleston's Loki. I loved the story and I really loved the action sequences. However, I also don't love the characters, mainly the supporting characters. IKenneth Branagh's Thor is an okay film. I loved the characters, especially Tom Hiddleston's Loki. I loved the story and I really loved the action sequences. However, I also don't love the characters, mainly the supporting characters. I thought Natalie Portman did a pretty good job but the other two characters are so annoying. I also feel that this film started great and just seriously slowed down until the last 20 minutes or so. In the end, this is a fun superhero film and I'll give it a 7.8/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

tamcwlmmMay 1, 2018

It's a good movie, but not a good introduction movie to the character of Thor. We get to see THE Thor only a few minutes, in the beginning and the end. Throughout the movie Thor is considered a crazy person without powers. Tom Hiddleston isIt's a good movie, but not a good introduction movie to the character of Thor. We get to see THE Thor only a few minutes, in the beginning and the end. Throughout the movie Thor is considered a crazy person without powers. Tom Hiddleston is great as Loki, the god of mischief. Hemsworth is also great as Thor, and I'm glad it's Chris, and not Liam.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

blazeWFeb 20, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Thor is a good film, but could have been better in terms of visual film-making. Story is compelling and characters are fantastic, especially Thor. Thor does not "become" a hero in this story, he is born a hero, but not a righteous one. He finds his path to righteousness in this film. Overall the visuals on Asgard could have been better, as it is a very lively city in the comics it originated from.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

merijnjApr 18, 2018

(73/100)
Thor is a surprisingly original movie in the MCU. Gods, gateways and creatures from other worlds. It is a fresh breath of air to the MCU. However, Thor has it's problems. The CGI was sometimes distracting to look at, the Frost Giants(73/100)
Thor is a surprisingly original movie in the MCU. Gods, gateways and creatures from other worlds. It is a fresh breath of air to the MCU. However, Thor has it's problems. The CGI was sometimes distracting to look at, the Frost Giants in particular. The plot is pretty well set up in the way that Thor (Chris Hemsworth) needs to proof that he is worthy of holding Mjölnir. This sets up a pretty good conflict within Thor (Chris Hemsworth). Loki (Tom Hiddleston) also was a pretty good villain and not like any other villains we've seen so far in the MCU.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

lori007101Jan 6, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The first hammer throw of the Thunder God! The hammer-wielding and good-looking Thor in his first adventure in the MCU. Director Branagh passionately takes over the narrative style, from this comic book template. You can already see, however, that Branagh is a big Shakespeare fan. Almost monumental, he draws the figures of Thor, Odin or Loki. The city of Asgard is also more likely to come from Hamlet than Marvel. The story tells Branagh well and he also incorporates a lot of humour. For when Thor falls to earth, he has already lost the power of a God. It's not until the second half of the film that stands out. Therefore, it is amusing that the arrogant and beautiful Thor himself falls on the snout and remains equally entitled. Of course, Thor is the hero, so you have to disguise it that he is the same as a human being. He can still fight better and has more strength than three people combined.
In addition to Hemsworth as Thor, there are other confessed performers to his side. Natalie Portman gives the typical, chaotic scientist. While she's a bit cranky, she makes her likeable alongside the overpowering heroes. Stellan Skaarsgard is an old professor who is more than a father figure to Portman. And, of course, Anthony Hopkins as Konigsgott Odin, who still brings a bit of sparkle to this hero saga. Narratively and visually, Branagh has managed not to straddle the adventure on torture for long. You look at it to the performers, which was fun. But among the other Marvel heroes, Thor remains rather weak in content. Although Thor is like that, everything remains self-evident and remains superficial. Conclusion: A colorful adventure that is told briskly. Only character drawing is left behind!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

bertboy93Jun 28, 2020

this movie has some realy good action sequences, the character of thor was very wel developed, Loki in this movie is great. The casting for this movie was very good! At times the pacing is not that good and sometimes stuff that happends onthis movie has some realy good action sequences, the character of thor was very wel developed, Loki in this movie is great. The casting for this movie was very good! At times the pacing is not that good and sometimes stuff that happends on earth is not very interesting.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

criticssuckdickAug 3, 2018

This actually in my opinion pretty fun movie.
I understand why people don't like it.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

CooperReviews44Dec 5, 2018

Thor is a pretty good film. Thor is a lovable brute and the fish out of water humor really works well and it has a certain unique charm to it. Some of the jokes really do not work and some certain performances are awful. The plot is very slowThor is a pretty good film. Thor is a lovable brute and the fish out of water humor really works well and it has a certain unique charm to it. Some of the jokes really do not work and some certain performances are awful. The plot is very slow and not all that interesting but it is aided by the Villain, Loki's motives and intentions to make is father proud. Its something we can all relate to. The film is about making brash and selfish decisions and also about approval and love. It works well and the action bits where phenomenal. Overall a very good film with a lacking plot and lack of new interesting ideas.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DerekReideApr 23, 2019

Quite a classic superhero movie indeed. I liked it. Definitely much better than the weaker Phase 1 films.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

IsjanHamelJun 27, 2019

Very Nice movie!! Sometimes lacks a little bit of character building but love that it continues the Avengers story

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MoViEbUfF17Jul 6, 2019

Thor from what I’ve seen is the most mixed movie in the mcu it’s either like it or hate it I’m in the majority that like it in fact it’s the first marvel movie I would consider good so let’s go over the plot. So there is a place called AsgardThor from what I’ve seen is the most mixed movie in the mcu it’s either like it or hate it I’m in the majority that like it in fact it’s the first marvel movie I would consider good so let’s go over the plot. So there is a place called Asgard and the Ruler Odin tells his two sons Thor and Loki that one of them is worthy to be the ruler of Asgard we cut forward and were at the ceremony who Thor is crowned king until it’s interrupted by frost giants Thor is mad and convinces his friends and Loki to fight the dark elves Odin gets mad at Thor because he just started a war so Odin banishes him to earth with his hammer we then find out that Loki is a frost giant and is adopted with puts Odin in a coma type thing while on earth Thor runs into three scientists Jane, Darcy and Eric who study lightning and weather. Thor locates his hammer and tries to take it back but gets kidnapped by shield and escapes then on Asgard Loki releases a monster to earth which almost killed Thor but Odin cries and it gives Thor back his powers so he goes back to Asgard to defeat Loki but Loki commits suicide off the rainbow bridge and the movie ends. Similar story to iron man its rating went down over time as it was received fine by the public when it came out now people just realize how bad it is but I still think it holds up there are a lot of boring parts and I think some of the cg doesn’t hold up but I give the movie a solid 7/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JaneHallNov 6, 2019

Not a big fan of the action sequences but story-wise, this film did great. It really explains how Thor came to be and why he is the person he is now.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JeffreyYoungJan 2, 2020

Not a bad movie for the first film in a trilogy. Still expected a lot because this is Marvel but pretty decent.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JacobKing1Jan 2, 2020

I would give it a 7/10. A good superhero flick but I know they can do better than this.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SamuelSanchezJan 5, 2020

I don't mind cheesy superhero films but this one’s pacing was too slow for me.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

r96skJan 15, 2021

Kinda similar to how I feel about the two films that precede this in the MCU. 'Thor' is a good, solid watch.

It fails to set the world alight, so to speak, but there's entertainment there. It's my personal standout of the three films sinceKinda similar to how I feel about the two films that precede this in the MCU. 'Thor' is a good, solid watch.

It fails to set the world alight, so to speak, but there's entertainment there. It's my personal standout of the three films since 'Iron Man'. I enjoyed seeing the world of Asgard, though the stuff on Earth is a little run-of-the-mill.

Chris Hemsworth is enjoyable and looks the part as Thor, while Tom Hiddleston plays his role more than satisfactorily. Cool to see Idris Elba appear, even if he is underused in the grand scheme of things - as are Stellan Skarsgård and Natalie Portman in truth.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

pur__0_0__Jun 9, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I had been bingewatching all the MCU movies after the release of Infinity War, so that I could catch up before Endgame. This is the reason why I have a good hunch of which movies were very memorable and which ones were easily forgettable. This one here, however, comes under the same category as I'd put Guardians of the Galaxy under: It's memorable and forgettable at the same time. The only thing I remember from this movie is how awesome Loki was and Stan Lee's cameo appearance, but other than that, well, let's just say it all jumped over my head.

It's quite surprising to see how Thor has changed so much since the time we first saw him. Since I am writing this review 4 years after Thor: Ragnarok, I think my idea of Thor has changed a lot by now. Earlier I used to think Thor can never be an interesting character, thanks to this movie. But after seeing what Ragnarok, Infinity War and Endgame did to him, it seems the entire fault was of this movie's director. He made Thor a weird looking guy. Although there's no doubt everyone looks straightup ugly in this movie, the CGI is actually pretty good.

The story is pretty much straightforward: Thor has done a battle which he ruined because of his pompousness and so he has been banished on earth. His hammer has been put at some construction yard or something, and he's no longer worthy enough to lift it. It seems a lot like a copy of the first Assassin's Creed game, since there also Altaïr was the one whose post was stripped and he was sent back to the beginner's ranks. Meanwhile Loki found out he belonged to the enemy demon race and Odin had adopted him after killing his father. Loki teams up with those demons to attack Asgard.

The CGI, I'd admit, is pretty good. Every time I see the Asgard road I always feel like driving a sports car on it. Humans were really boring. All they did was talking, talking and more talking. This isn't something that one'd expect from MCU, and that's pretty obvious since MCU wasn't even decided until this point. But still there should have been a good tone. The twist in the end where Loki decided to save Odin and kill the monster after the monster mentioned Loki helped him was pretty good. I had always wanted a villain to do this: Don't leave yourself vulnerable after being exposed; try to defend yourself and show that the person is lying. And after Loki lost the battle, he pretended to commit suicide in order to show that he only wanted what he believed was justice.

Thor may have been a very forgettable movie, but I do remember it wasn't worth watching the second time. This movie made me fear that MCU could be boring in the future. It also ruined Thor's entire expectations for me. Throughout the movie I was only hoping it would end. The only reason I've given it a good rating is because of Loki, the CGI, and the way they were able to show Asgard's culture. Good movie, but a one time watch.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Onlyclassicvg1Dec 8, 2020

The Incredible Hulk isn't very Incredible.
Edward Norton gives a good performance but the concept of Hulk itself just seems tired. There is no new outlook on the hero just simply a repeatedly mediocre take on a very one dimensiona

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Fatbob15Oct 21, 2022

To be honest it's not as good as remembered when I went back to it, but it still kept me fully entertained. As a MCU fan I would never pass the opportunity to watch one.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MrPajamasSep 26, 2020

Thor is an amazing film, but it has one big ailment and that is predictability. It was clear to me from the beginning how the film would end, but otherwise it is an amazing Marvelkovka with a predictable but excellent story, soundtrack and action.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

TopoideDec 20, 2022

Un inicio del dios del Trueno a la altura con buenos personajes como Loki en una interesante película

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

I9gzMar 28, 2021

The character arc is solid, and the villain is interesting and understandable, but the film loses focus and suffers with pacing in its middle act, especially on Earth, pairing the main character with boring side characters that serve more asThe character arc is solid, and the villain is interesting and understandable, but the film loses focus and suffers with pacing in its middle act, especially on Earth, pairing the main character with boring side characters that serve more as plot vessels rather than actual characters. In concept, the storyline on Earth can be thematically interesting, but it loses focus and struggles to deliver. It also doesn't help that the theme holds on by a string with one line at the start of the movie. As a whole, it's just good enough to be worth your time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

cdougallJul 18, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Thor has lots of visual appeal, nice performances from the cast as a whole, and entertaining action sequences which should keep viewers engaged for the full runtime. Tom Hiddleston does a great job with Loki and gives us a convincing villain with a solid emotional backstory, Jeremy Renner’s Hawkeye cameo is welcome in the film, and it’s both cool and intimidating to hear Anthony Hopkins growl as Odin. The movie takes Thor on a nice character arc which Hemsworth supplements well with his take on the character, and sets Thor up for future installments. However, the fault of this movie for me is the timeline. It takes place over only a few days, and its slightly unbelievable that Thor changes that much during that short span of time. Normally growth and personality changes take months and sometimes even years to occur, and yet Thor is able to that in just a few days. This movie would’ve felt more realistic if it had a time jump of a few months following Thor’s banishment to Earth to truly give the character time to have an arc. With that said, Thor overall is entertaining and engaging and remains a solid enough entry in the franchise.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Josselin305Aug 29, 2021

Un film d'azione molto carino.
Thor è un personaggio con molto potenziale e sarà bello vedere i suoi prossimi capitoli.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

lennyiSep 18, 2021

I liked this movie. It was by no way even my favorite thor movie, its my least favorite one in fact, but the thor movies are just so solid. Here is the things i did not like in this movie: the frost giants or whatever they were called. Loki.I liked this movie. It was by no way even my favorite thor movie, its my least favorite one in fact, but the thor movies are just so solid. Here is the things i did not like in this movie: the frost giants or whatever they were called. Loki. Thor is ugly, at least compared to the newer looks of him.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JJ2FAS4UDec 30, 2021

----------------------------------7.0/10-----------------------------------

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

XathiahsJan 21, 2022

Epic plot, but the portayal of Thor similar to the comic books counterpart is poorly depicted on the big screen. Tom Hiddleston is the big pro of the franchise.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Rdneck00Aug 1, 2022

This is in my opinion the worst Thor movie. But its not bad. Loki is still the best anti hero.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Critic100rAug 6, 2022

A poorly directed, silly and kind of boring movie, it only gets average because of some pleasantries.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ArkonBladeSep 15, 2011

thor over all was a ok movie it had a ok plot , ok acting , and some pretty good action . the best part of the movie is probubly the first 30 min . it opens up great but then kinda goes down abit once thor gets to earth. mainly because hethor over all was a ok movie it had a ok plot , ok acting , and some pretty good action . the best part of the movie is probubly the first 30 min . it opens up great but then kinda goes down abit once thor gets to earth. mainly because he starts off as a ego maniac who cares for nothing but kicking ass . then all of a sudden he turns into this kind gentle man who wants to save every one with nothing in the film that explains why all of a sudden he makes this change in his life.like i said its a ok film that if you into the comic book films you will probubly find it alright .… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

DarkCriticMay 6, 2011

Thor is just okay superhero movie, but it's not that great just like the rest of the superhero movies. I did enjoy the action scenes and the setting looks pretty good, but I didn't see in 3D because it gets too much flashy scenes everywhereThor is just okay superhero movie, but it's not that great just like the rest of the superhero movies. I did enjoy the action scenes and the setting looks pretty good, but I didn't see in 3D because it gets too much flashy scenes everywhere and why everybody else wanted to see this movie in 3D? The new actor who played the Thor is okay and he's very over the top, but way too much over the top just like the rest of the cast. Some scenes are laughable and it could be much more fun. I didn't enjoy the story and the most of the characters, it gets fall flat, but not that bad. Okay movie and it's a little bit good, it wouldn't be near as Iron Man or The Incredible Hulk. I hope the new The Avengers will be good until next year.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

RienyeMay 19, 2011

There is something very distinctive about Thor's character that was missing in this movie. He wasn't as arrogant as he should have been and way too sappy towards the end. While Jane's character did not add anything to the overall plot. YesThere is something very distinctive about Thor's character that was missing in this movie. He wasn't as arrogant as he should have been and way too sappy towards the end. While Jane's character did not add anything to the overall plot. Yes her Jane is a major character in Thor-lore, it was just superfluous in this instance. The movie is fun to watch though, i wish the battles were a little bigger. And what happened to the cry "Have at thee ....."?… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

JasonGoalieMay 7, 2011

I'm right on par with the professional critics... When I first saw the trailers for Thor, I was surprised, underwhelmed, and BEYOND pessimistic. But I decided to feed the Big-Hollywood machine anyway, and go see it, because everyone else wasI'm right on par with the professional critics... When I first saw the trailers for Thor, I was surprised, underwhelmed, and BEYOND pessimistic. But I decided to feed the Big-Hollywood machine anyway, and go see it, because everyone else was going to. The result? I'll put it this way.... Considering the challenge of dealing with this particularly ridiculous comic-inspired storyline, while somehow tying in romantic interest and appealing to a broad audience... they did just about the best job they possibly could, which in my opinion, was "pretty decent." There are some continuity flaws and roll-your-eyes turning points, but most are manageable in this high-budget-low-brains context. I enjoyed the story, liked many of the battle scenes, and even laughed frequently as Thor stumbled to adjust to mortal life on Earth. Honestly, I feel that two of Hollywood's best talents, Portman and Hopkins, are really wasted here. You can get any pretty girl to spend two hours giggling and drooling at Hemsworth's muscles... and Hopkins's role, though executed flawlessly, perhaps should have been taken by a lesser-known actor, as to not overshadow Hemsworth's potential stardom. In sum: It's quite good, but not great. Certainly a worthy piece of entertainment, but not on the level with elite franchises such as the Spiderman and Batman movies.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

XtremeMay 7, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The movie didn't disappoint me in any way. Yet, it hasn't surprise me either.
For me, it was good, I like mythology and all that stuff and the movie makes the parallel in a very good way. But it was a normal super-hero movie.
It was good, but not that good.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Bravo21May 8, 2011

Well, it's not really a bad movie, it just has a hard time really deciding what it is trying to be, some of it was funny, some of it was action-y some of it seemed to be trying to be sad, and then there was some romance thrown in. Not a badWell, it's not really a bad movie, it just has a hard time really deciding what it is trying to be, some of it was funny, some of it was action-y some of it seemed to be trying to be sad, and then there was some romance thrown in. Not a bad movie, not an intellectual movie, but really not that bad.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

PurpleUrpNov 15, 2011

Thor's showing was mediocre at best. CGI was not up to date and action scenes contained nothing spectacular. It felt like the movie's focus was more on the character relationships rather than the action; which was what I was looking forward to.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

shokwaavMay 6, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. i didn't like it

SPOILERS AHEAD

i didn't understand how thor could become humble so quickly. he was basically arrogant until he finds that he cant use his hammer. then he meets his friends. then he 'sacrifices' himself to save the town. then he gets his hammer back. then he goes to fight his brother. i dont get what the other characters are for (apart from the king and brother). the friends are **** compared to thor. i dont see what natalie portman does in the entire movie. the only thing the natalie portman's dad's friend does is tell natalie portman to not help thor. the only thing the other woman does is provide a bit of humour. loki's frost giant heritage doesn't even factor into thor's decisions. i don't understand why odin goes to sleep when he's stressed. wth is odinsleep?

only good thing i liked was the graphics. Asgard was very nice. perhaps if i read the comics i would understand better. but that just makes the movie inaccessible to the greater public.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ZacharyMatsonMay 7, 2011

A bit disappointing. I'm a big comic book fan, and I did enjoy the comic book aspects of the film, but the movie aspects didn't really meet my standards. To me I thought the movie just kinda happened, there wasn't much to it, it just playedA bit disappointing. I'm a big comic book fan, and I did enjoy the comic book aspects of the film, but the movie aspects didn't really meet my standards. To me I thought the movie just kinda happened, there wasn't much to it, it just played and that was it. The action was fantastic, but the story was weak. The best part was the Avengers references, and Stan Lee's cameo.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

rotkuApr 22, 2012

Unfortunately I had high expectations for this movie and I was sorely disappointed. There was so much more scope for battle scene which and along with his band of merry friends I struggled to understand why Thor and co. were build up to beUnfortunately I had high expectations for this movie and I was sorely disappointed. There was so much more scope for battle scene which and along with his band of merry friends I struggled to understand why Thor and co. were build up to be this crack squad of warriors when they done so little battling.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

thinkbookJun 4, 2011

It works but itâ

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

FundamenskiMay 31, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Epic. Outstanding. Absolutely breathtaking. At long last, a superhero film that keeps things simple, coherent and cohesive. Technically brilliant. Pulse-pounding action with heart, that's not simply there for the sake of being there. Such words would probably resemble my rough draft of a one-paragraph reviewâ… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ViniaranhaJun 3, 2011

The first scene in Thor is a kind of unnecessary, but the screenplay starts very well. But after, with the appearance of Natalie Portman and the too conventional love story of her with Chris Hemsworth, we go down to extensive cliches. A thinkThe first scene in Thor is a kind of unnecessary, but the screenplay starts very well. But after, with the appearance of Natalie Portman and the too conventional love story of her with Chris Hemsworth, we go down to extensive cliches. A think that, from this moment to the after credits scene, the movie becomes just another Marvel Studios production, with good direction, funny moments, colors - lots of colors! -, special effects and not too much than it. A pure and honest fun.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

genxmoviegoerJun 26, 2011

Silly Marvel fun. My children (8 and 9) really enjoyed it. I did not have high expectations for the film but enjoyed it. I was not impressed by 3D rendering and found it distracting.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

EastonReviewsApr 11, 2012

I suppose it is not a bad film overall. However, Ebert is right, and in my opinion, Iron Man is the greatest super hero film of all time. Thor is entertaning and he is a cool character, but the plot is slightly boring but still stable. So II suppose it is not a bad film overall. However, Ebert is right, and in my opinion, Iron Man is the greatest super hero film of all time. Thor is entertaning and he is a cool character, but the plot is slightly boring but still stable. So I have mixed feelings for the concept of this movie. However, viewers, I recommend it overall.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

hoops2448Oct 2, 2011

The beauty of Thor in comparison to its other marvel counterparts of the last few years (Captain America and Iron Man 2) is that it has fun with the story that its telling. Superheroes don't have to be dark and brooding (unless it improvesThe beauty of Thor in comparison to its other marvel counterparts of the last few years (Captain America and Iron Man 2) is that it has fun with the story that its telling. Superheroes don't have to be dark and brooding (unless it improves the film like in Batman Begins, a film that still manages to have fun despite the subject matter). Thor's (Chris Hemsworth) story is a simple one with him being a selfish, arrogant heir to the throne of Asgard (a planet far from earth) who makes a terrible mistake and is banished from Asgard by his father Odin (played with great gravitas by Anthony Hopkins). The fact that Thor is an origins movie works in its favour as the whole film is about his growth into the king his father wants him to be and the hero that earth needs him to be. It also allows for something rarely seen in film, a thoroughly unpleasant lead character. However the film isn't really anything more than an action film, despite the beautiful landscapes used and the astounding visuals of Asgard it is still just an action film. However the film works in that regard unlike Iron Man 2 and Captain America because its funny, charming and well paced.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ZilcellNov 18, 2011

Thor is an okay superhero film but there is a lot like it that has been seen before. Although the acting was questionable, the story and the special effects were good.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Critic2012May 5, 2012

THOR is not perfect, by far. The story is somewhat lacking, and the acting is mediocre. But it makes up for all of that with humor and lots of fun action that is so typical of marvel films.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

LynnHardyApr 6, 2012

I was really looking forward to this movie. I love action, SF, Fantasy, as well as most other films. The special effects were awesome, and yes, when Thor (Chris Hemsworth) took off his shirt - my oh my.... but this film was definitely lackingI was really looking forward to this movie. I love action, SF, Fantasy, as well as most other films. The special effects were awesome, and yes, when Thor (Chris Hemsworth) took off his shirt - my oh my.... but this film was definitely lacking something. I think the romance thread was so poorly done that it left me wanting something more from the film. There was no chemistry between the actors.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

moonman1994Mar 7, 2015

Although a solid movie and certainly entertaining it never lives up to what marvel movies have shown they can be. Despite keeping your interest there are no points of the movie that are great or particularly memorable.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

dev92Aug 25, 2012

The film is solid fun with the cast doing a stellar job but both this film and Captain America just feel like they have been made to stop Avenger's from having any character introductions. Still most of this film is great and I always enjoyThe film is solid fun with the cast doing a stellar job but both this film and Captain America just feel like they have been made to stop Avenger's from having any character introductions. Still most of this film is great and I always enjoy Natalie Portman's performances.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

MeritCobaSep 3, 2015

That Thor was directed by Kenneth Branagh came as a surprise to me, as I know Branagh as a director of Shakespeare movies, such as Henry V. It seemed like a different cup of tea altogether, but then again: why not?
Thor is watchable becauseThat Thor was directed by Kenneth Branagh came as a surprise to me, as I know Branagh as a director of Shakespeare movies, such as Henry V. It seemed like a different cup of tea altogether, but then again: why not?
Thor is watchable because the main actor Chris Hemsworth instills an almost juvenile charm into the character that works well for the occasion. For Thor is a bit immature, as we soon find out. People probably have heard about Thor in one fashion or another, so it doesn't require much of a leap of faith to see the impulsive Norse god of thunder in this tall, muscled, blue-eyed, blond man.

It is Hemsworth therefore who carries most of the movie, with Tom Hiddleston(aka Loki: the trickster god) being a good second. The rest of the crew is mostly a side show, although Hopkins, being the great actor he is, usually tends to grab the attention anyway. And in a strange way, so does Idris Elba, who plays Heimdall, the guardian of the bridge that connects Asgard to the rest of the universe(on a side note: is it me, or has that-what-is-at-stake progressed from the earth to the whole universe of late?).

There is also Natalie Portman, who is an gifted actress, but in this male oriented and dominated movie she is just the female diversion that is meant to adorn Thor. It is not a role that that suits her well. She is too diminutive and too dark, which makes her disappear next to the tall Hemsworth and the role she plays doesn't offer her much to work with. Perhaps it would have been better if Kat Dennings, Portman's sidekick friend, had been the female lead, provided she had been snarky enough.

The script is pretty non-existent and filled with strange twists that make no sense. For instance, Thor is about to be appointed king by his father Odin, but then he shows his utter adolescence nature by invading the land of the frost-giants on a whim to find out who betrayed 'them' by using the astounding blunt force infiltration tactic that might have been inspired by US foreign policy. It is the kind of strategm in which you kill everyone first and then start to ask questions. But then: we never wanted to hear the answer anyway(because we already know it). But aside from this: did Thor just suddenly swap from mature to immature at the moment his father was about to make him king? Or was Odin willing to appoint this buffoon as ruler of Asgard despite him knowing this? But then why throw him out when he does what his nature demanded him to do? It makes no sense at all.

Somewhat later Odin interrupts the frost-giant massacre in time to safe his son and co. 'Just forget it ever happened', Odin proposes in a conciliatory manner to the frost-giant king. Forgetting that about 50+ frost-giants were killed by Thor and company for no reason at all and with only the loss of one wounded Asgardian. One wonders why them frost-giants are so upset as to decline this very reasonable peace offer.

The movie goes from one scene to next in a marvelous spirited fashion and logic, when it gets in the way, is just set aside. It is almost as if the script is made up on the spur of the moment by throwing a pair of dice. Perhaps this is tongue-in-cheek reference to the roleplay community?
The immature Thor matures in the nick of time to get back his powers so he can stop the evil that his way comes and the one that is about to overwhelm Asgard to boot. One hour later and it would have been in vain.
And when you are stuck in another realm there are always a bunch of loyal friends who open the inter-dimensional portal to pay you a visit, bring you up to speed with the latest news from home and allow you to return as well. All with odds than put sheer stupendous luck to shame and must have caused the laws of logic and chance to buckle under the strain of nonsense..

Perhaps Branagh tried to capture the mood that makes Marvel comics so incomprehensible. It all happens outside the boundaries of reason and humanity, but hey, it looks way cool! Any complexity gets resolved by brute force or, actually; temporarily fixed but never resolved, because there might be a sequel! Whether it is the Joker or Loki: villains never die! Or as the law of sequels has it: thy shalt allow for a sequel.

Thor is a fast, action packed superficial movie that therefore rightly belongs in the stable of the Marvel universe, which is totally at odds with the depth of the norse Sagas or, as a matter of fact of the works of, say, Wagner.
The movie incidentally made a profit two times over.
Ain't that marvelous?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

George-rootsJun 25, 2013

Thor is the first Marvel comic movie of 2011, Later this year we will have "X-Men: First Class","Captain America" and D.C comic's "Green Lantern".

I must explain that i have never been a big reader of "THOR", i acknoledge the character andThor is the first Marvel comic movie of 2011, Later this year we will have "X-Men: First Class","Captain America" and D.C comic's "Green Lantern".

I must explain that i have never been a big reader of "THOR", i acknoledge the character and accepted him for what he is but never really wanted to pick up a book and start reading, I knew the Origins, the Character's and all in all the fairly humourous cheese to it all.

Well aside from "X-men", I had no ambition to see any of the superhero films this year, My father decided to see "THOR" and I tagged along.

The result was obviously cheesy, yet it was a very well executed movie, both visually and acted.

THOR's Homeland looked STUNNING, in this new age of Cinematic CGI Landscaping it's getting better and more believable, However this film did not need to be 3-D, I stress that because nowdays it's being thrown in any movie like it was back in the 80's, it going back to a gimmick rather than an Art form.

Chris Hemsworth was a surprisingly good THOR, i'll admit he lost he's luster a bit when he ends up learning respect and new ways of life in a style done to death, but nevertheless a good solid job.

However the best performance is of course Anthony Hopkins as his father Odin, The name Hopkins with every passing movie is becoming more of an Enigma and more of a housing to all these fantastic characters.

Jane Foster in the comics was human THOR's nurse, in this version she's an Astrologist played by Natalie Portman, after how brilliant her performance was in "Black Swan" i feel she's slowly becoming the next "Audrey Hepburn" of the movies.

If i wanted to recommend this movie to anyone, I'd ultimately say if you liked "Clash Of The Titans" then this movie is for you, less monsters but all that good mythology stuff any person would and probably SHOULD like.

Final Verdict: Tweaking the Origin's a little, But neverthelss a really cheesy fun movie, very glad i went to see it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

joao1198pedroOct 16, 2013

not the best superhero movie ever made but it is a good movie despite showing a different side of the hero is a good movie but it can be forgotten in a little time.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Voodoo123Oct 2, 2019

2011's Thor uses the employ of a talented cast to tell one of the more challenging to express (and notably non terrestrial) marvel superhero stories.... I enjoyed this more than I expected, however when you compare it to the likes of Iron Man2011's Thor uses the employ of a talented cast to tell one of the more challenging to express (and notably non terrestrial) marvel superhero stories.... I enjoyed this more than I expected, however when you compare it to the likes of Iron Man or Captain America the story feels noticeably weaker (as if maybe they didn't know what to do tonally with the characters/world?). Despite the odd flaws in tone and pacing there is much to enjoy here for even the most casual of mcu fans and makes a great intro for loki and thor in preparation for watching Avengers.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

diogomendesOct 26, 2014

Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) Analysis: Thor (2011)

Okay, I’m going to be quite honest right here and say that… I thought this movie was going to suck. I really did. Not that I have a problem with the cast, I really don’t have. TheMarvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) Analysis: Thor (2011)

Okay, I’m going to be quite honest right here and say that… I thought this movie was going to suck. I really did. Not that I have a problem with the cast, I really don’t have. The problem is that Thor is my least favorite character and seeing a character walking around strange planets with magic and science related is something that I wouldn’t find enthusiastic or even entertaining. I’m more related to technology, maybe that’s why I think Iron Man is a way better character despite his latest movie (Iron Man 2, the one I saw lately) was semi-disappointing. However, after seeing “Thor”, I can at least say that I found myself satisfied. This movie is not better than “Captain America: The First Avenger” but comes close with wit, humor and human drama. I gave this movie an 8 when I saw it for the first time, but now I realize that it’s not worthy of it. Mainly because there’s some issues with the film itself that really made me question myself if I was watching a good movie or a boring one. There’s not much to say about this, but I’ll try to write a full detailed, well-reasoned review on this one.

The reckless Thor (Chris Hemsworth) son of Odin (Anthony Hopkins), challenges his brother's claim to the throne of Asgard. To teach him humility, Odin casts the young warrior down to Earth to live among humans. Robbed of his powers, Thor falls in love with a scientist Jane Foster (Natalie Portman). While Thor's brother; Loki usurps the throne of Asgard for evil gain and plans revenge, Thor's love for Jane and his lessons of humility turn him into the true hero and legendary and immortal warrior-defender of the peoples of the Earth saving them from destruction.

As you can see in the plot summary above, there’s really nothing much to say. The film’s narrative flows nicely throughout the movie (though sometimes is a little bit rushed). There’s a lot of lines in the movie that are, indeed, well-written. The dialogue between Asgardians is almighty (Pun fully intended) and even the interaction between humans seem grounded and believable. Again, like I said in my Iron Man’s review, it’s very difficult to capture belief in movies, especially if we are talking about super-heroes and Gods in general so if there’s something that this movie needs credit for, it’s the dialogue. The plot also introduces some action scenes (we’ll get to that later) but they are really short, perhaps the movie just wants to focus on its characters and the universe’s atmosphere, while also adding some comedic relief. And that’s my favorite bit.

The comedy is pretty good. There’s one scene where Thor enters into an animal’s shop—where there’s only cats, birds and dogs—and asks for a horse. And the manager is like “Oh we just have dogs and cats…” and Thor responds: “Give me one of those large enough to ride”. Or when Thor is drinking and says: “I like this drink! Another! *Smashes glass*”. There’s some really funny moments in this movie that just made my day while watching it. And not only the script provides it, but the actors also know how to perform it to make it even funnier.

Now, the action. If you haven’t seen this movie yet, please don’t expect too much action, because this movie has only few scenes with fights. However, when they appear, they are very well done. Director Kenneth Branagh clearly understands that action is not only about punches and kicks in the face. He brings panache and sense of fun to the action sequences and it’s more than promised.

Chris Hemsworth makes for a compelling hero, as his character Thor is very easy to understand. He’s arrogant, stupid and often dangerous. That’s another thing I like about this movie. It’s the character development. You can easily understand these characters through their emotions, their actions, their dreams and fears. The cast also helps it.

Of course, with all of this, we also get to see some few easter eggs related to Marvel Cinematic Universe. Hawkeye makes a special cameo and Agent Coulson has some scenes, while Nick Fury only appears in a post-credits scene, revealing a strange object with unlimited power. It’s very exciting to see all these storylines get tangled into one story. That’s why I am doing this big marathon, right?

Final Score to Thor (2011): 7/10. I couldn’t give this a higher score. Its narrative has its questionable flaws. However, this is a super-hero movie done right. It’s got charisma, heart, comedy and some action. Everything that any moviegoer or comic book fans would ask for. Its sequel is not that great, but this film, is good. Next MCU movie to review: The Incredible Hulk (2008).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SpiderPlayerMay 16, 2015

A good movie with some funny scenes, action scenes found through weak, has a history until interesting, but the film itself has nothing very special, but what I hated most in the film was the appearance of Hawkeye, it just appeared to showA good movie with some funny scenes, action scenes found through weak, has a history until interesting, but the film itself has nothing very special, but what I hated most in the film was the appearance of Hawkeye, it just appeared to show the public that it exists, but he did nothing, they could have used a lot more character.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

McCrumReviewsAug 15, 2014

Ehh. It's not the worst movie to come from Marvel, but it's far from the finest. It packs so many jokes into the two hour running time I might have mistaken it for a cheesy romance comedy, if it weren't for the dude in a red cape and the overEhh. It's not the worst movie to come from Marvel, but it's far from the finest. It packs so many jokes into the two hour running time I might have mistaken it for a cheesy romance comedy, if it weren't for the dude in a red cape and the over the top battle scenes. My advice: stay away from Thor, and watch "Captain America" instead. It's a surprisingly boring movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

thomasljoguesNov 13, 2014

Yes, its essential purpose is to introduce Thor so people will know him in the Avengers, but it is a decent movie. It has the most plot of the Phase 1 Marvel films and surprisingly, the least amount of plot-holes. Loki is amazing in the senseYes, its essential purpose is to introduce Thor so people will know him in the Avengers, but it is a decent movie. It has the most plot of the Phase 1 Marvel films and surprisingly, the least amount of plot-holes. Loki is amazing in the sense that he is the least generic villain of the MCU.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

JohnKristoferDec 22, 2014

Thor(2011) is funny and enjoyable for all ages.Thor is portrayed well by Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddleston did a great job portraying his role "Loki" but the other characters are just flat and boring.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

waronassermanMay 2, 2015

I had a fairly decent time watching this! chris hemsworth was an absolute delight to watch as Thor! this movie didnt look promising, but I was pleasantly surprised

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

RedeadhoodMar 28, 2016

Often pointed out as the worst in the marvel phase one, Thor is a movie that was not able to reach its full potential but still remained as an enjoyable ride from start to finish. It can be seen that Chris Hemsworth really tried, but his lackOften pointed out as the worst in the marvel phase one, Thor is a movie that was not able to reach its full potential but still remained as an enjoyable ride from start to finish. It can be seen that Chris Hemsworth really tried, but his lack of charisma really didn't make the title character interesting. Maybe its the character itself at fault here, but he really wasn't likable enough.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

6

RojodeKantoFeb 28, 2016

Tenía que verlo, luego del final de Iron Man 2, tenía curiosidad, la película no era lo que esperaba, pero tampoco es mala, es que no soy fan de Shakespare como el director, pero me gustó el diseño digital de Asgard, el Bifrost, todo estáTenía que verlo, luego del final de Iron Man 2, tenía curiosidad, la película no era lo que esperaba, pero tampoco es mala, es que no soy fan de Shakespare como el director, pero me gustó el diseño digital de Asgard, el Bifrost, todo está creíble como han hecho este fántastico mundo, Chris Hemsworth es digno de ser el dios del trueno, lo borda bien, Tom Hiddleston como el engañoso Loki, también excepcional, tal como en el material fuente, los demás personajes está bien, aunque Darcy (Kat Dennings) me parece mejor que Jar Jar Binks de Star Wars, Anthony Hopkins como el padre de todos, te hace olvidar su personaje carácteristico caníbal, en cuanto a la trama, el protagonista a diferencia de otros súperhéroes no tiene un origen fijo, aunque no se aleja tanto de su primer número de Journey into Mystery (hay una referencia), que es un arrogante que sólo pelea por necedad, por lo que necesita aprender una lección de humilidad, desterrándolo y despojarle de sus poderes, las partes entre Asgard y la Tierra están muy equilibradas y ambos mundos son diferentes en muchos sentidos, no hay mucha acción, el romance entre el protagonista y Jane Foster (Natalie Portman) lo vi muy forzado, combina bien dos de mis géneros preferidos, la ciencia ficción y la fantasía, el cual también fue la innovación en los cómics cuando Thor debutó, para terminar, como dije antes ninguna de las películas de Marvel Studios es mala, hay unas mejores que otras, Thor está en el fondo de mi lista, para los que admiran el trabajo de Kenneth Branagh, les recomiendo esta película.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

stgrunuApr 16, 2018

It wasn't great but I had fun. I don't mind for Thor as a character but the rest of the world around him was decent enough.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

tristan1Oct 12, 2017

Thor has an epic adventure That spans the Marvel Universe from present day Earth to the mystical realm of Asgard. In the miidle of the story is The Mighty Thor, a arrogant warrior whose reckless actions reignite an ancient war. Thor isThor has an epic adventure That spans the Marvel Universe from present day Earth to the mystical realm of Asgard. In the miidle of the story is The Mighty Thor, a arrogant warrior whose reckless actions reignite an ancient war. Thor is banished to Earth where he is forced to live among humans. I thought that this film was really good and that I don’t think it needs improving at all it was action packed and id definitely watch it again. Featuring characters taken from the Marvel universe, Thor stars Oscar winners Anthony Hopkins and Natalie Portman and is directed by Kenneth Branagh (a guy more normally associated with the Great Bard than with Stan Lee). The story has warrior Thor (Chris Hemsworth) exiled by his father Odin (Hopkins) to Earth from his fantastical home of Asgard. When his here, Thor falls for super-smart mortal scientist Jane Foster (Portman). But when Thor’s brother Loki takes over Asgard and sends a destroyer to attack Earth, Thor must become the hero he’s destined to be. Thor should be lauded for maintaining a tongue-in-cheek tone. It’s surprisingly literate and even sharp in places, while not ever getting too dark or disturbing and lighthearted appeal that makes Thor suitable for just about everyone.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

AKthaBeastApr 2, 2018

The first Thor movie imo is the 2nd weakest Marvel movie behind The Incredible Hulk. Casting is perfect however the horrendous cgi, generic plot points, and the lackluster final battle made this movie sub par.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

RaduAFeb 22, 2019

56/100

This movie is weird. It does not bring anything new, many scenes were filmed tilted ( I really didn't like that ) and I think I found the most useless character in a movie, Darcy...

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

GrantD243Sep 10, 2018

The Good:
- Chris Hemsworth IS Thor. He's pretty much perfect for the role.
- Sets up Asgard well for future MCU movies, and visually it looks fantastic. - Has some nice character progression for Thor; shows him grow into the superhero heThe Good:
- Chris Hemsworth IS Thor. He's pretty much perfect for the role.
- Sets up Asgard well for future MCU movies, and visually it looks fantastic. - Has some nice character progression for Thor; shows him grow into the superhero he needs to be for the MCU. - The Loki and Thor sibling rivalry is very believable and very well done. This film also sets up Loki as one of the MCU's most formidable villains. The Bad: - The pacing in Thor is never very good. The beginning sets up an intriguing world but then Thor is banished to Earth where he runs around without his powers for a while, and the characters he interacts with are nothing special. It essentially slows down to a crawl and struggles to find its feet for the final act. - The final "boss battle" was incredibly disappointing. - For a superhero film, Thor feels very bland throughout. There is not much excitement and little actual fun to be had. This is essentially a set-up movie that fits well in the grand scheme of the MCU, but isn't that great on its own.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

ErikTheCriticSep 25, 2018

This film is a decent setup, leading to "The Avengers". It has emotion, good visuals and a great villain, Loki, which is very well-played by Tom Hiddleston.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

DawdlingPoetNov 27, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is an action adventure film with obvious fantasy (in a mythological, almost science fiction sense) elements presents. It covers themes including father and son relationship and betrayal.

The first half an hour or so is set in the 'realm' or other world and I felt less bothered or interested in it during these scenes as everything just looked so clearly artificial. For me it was when Thor was sent to Earth and forced to get the help of humans, that it really started to interest me. There were definitely some awkward scenes with Thor, finding himself unsure of his surroundings and acting unsurprisingly peculiar to the eyes of onlookers and I found those scenes quite amusing. Of course the plot is somewhat ludicrous but to me it was a mostly enjoyable watch, a bit of fun. I felt that there were some quite impressive special effects used - the visuals are quite good (explosions etc.), with bright lights, fast paced scenes, and plenty to keep you watching. The camerawork is quite good too, with various angles used and quick cutting between them, meaning that it doesn't get especially boring (in terms of looking too bland or stale) while characters are in discussion.

Cast wise, Chris Hemsworth plays the title role of Thor - he very much looks the part in as much as he sounds quite reverential and looks to have a steely, determined expression on his face for most of the film. Jane Foster is portrayed by Natalie Portman, who plays a fairly typical somewhat air-headed young American adolescent. She seems quite excited by the prospect of finding some proof that things science say aren't real, are. She seemed pretty believable in her role. Anthony Hopkins plays Thors father, Odin, an aged yet wise man who clearly has learnt a lot in his time. I thought Hopkins role was particularly good and he was well suited to it. Tom Hiddleston plays Loki, Thors brother.I also thought he was well cast as he seemed very much to be enjoying playing the role of the somewhat meddling brother, who always has something to say and another way of seeing things. Other cast members include Clark Gregg as agent Coulson, Idris Elba as Heimdall, Ray Stevenson as Vostagg and Jaimie Alexander as Sif.

Yes this film is a bit silly and it does take itself seriously but I thought it was an entertaining watch. I'm no massive fan of Marvel comics per se but I can enjoy some film adaptations if made with good quality effects, cast and scripting. The effects and cast were all quite high quality and the camerawork was good too. The characterisation wasn't too bad either.

Content wise, this film contains some mild sex references and partial nudity (such as scenes in which Thor is topless). There is violence present, although it isn't particularly bloody, if anything its more comic in style, with people, or beings, attacked by blades and hammers. There are some scenes which may be relatively frightening to young children, with the music played in the background and the effects used making it clear that things are perilous, although nothing graphic is shown. Language wise, some fairly mild profanities are used but again nothing very explicit. The film has a 12a rating to reflect this content.

There is undeniably an amount of cheese present and I felt that, if anything, in one or two parts it was a bit too over the top, with loud booming/looming orchestral music pieces played, characters trying desperately to out wit one another with potentially worrying outcomes and the sense of doom is over done in my opinion but I did think that overall it was an adequately entertaining film, which was certainly mildly immersive and had its funny moments too.

Yes I'd recommend this as an entertaining watch. It features a good cast, some decent characterisation, good special effects and decent camerawork, although it is definitely relatively cheesy in parts and a bit over the top. I enjoyed it in any case and I'm not always keen on such types of film.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

SpanicOct 21, 2019

Performances sem carisma,roteiro fraco,direção previsível e personagens mal escritos e consequentemente mal desenvolvidos

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Cementer200Sep 22, 2020

it's an ok movie. but not as good as Iron Man or Iron Man 2. if you're a marvel fan you may like thor.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews