There Will Be Blood

9

NoSugarTonightJul 2, 2012

Certainly eveyone is entitled to their opinion, and some may be praising it just to jump on the bandwagon. But I think there is some ridiculous accusations concerning this film. It must have been doing something right since almost everyCertainly eveyone is entitled to their opinion, and some may be praising it just to jump on the bandwagon. But I think there is some ridiculous accusations concerning this film. It must have been doing something right since almost every single magazine, newspaper, or awards show hailed it as one of the best films of 2007 and one of the best films of the decade. Just because a film isn't exactly what you expected doesn't mean you have to **** all over it. The film has a moral and a point! But it seems everyone here needs the film to shove it right in their face so they don't have to think. Pathetic. And I forgot to rate it last time sorry.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

SpangleJan 25, 2014

Just fantastic. This was my first film that I've seen directed by Paul Thomas Anderson and it did not disappoint in the least. The film is slow, but the acting from Daniel Day-Lewis, Paul Dano and cast, is just so engrossing that you cannotJust fantastic. This was my first film that I've seen directed by Paul Thomas Anderson and it did not disappoint in the least. The film is slow, but the acting from Daniel Day-Lewis, Paul Dano and cast, is just so engrossing that you cannot look away. The sets were brilliant and looked extremely realistic and fit in perfectly with the times they were depicting. Those who claim there is no story are missing the bigger picture. Sure, there is no direct story, but what we are seeing is so much bigger than that. The interaction of every character and the constant "peeling back of the onion" that is Daniel Plainview and how evil he truly is make up for any story people may be searching for. In fact, I dare say that is the story; the revealing of how far a man will go to make money and how cutthroat you had to be to make it in the the time period depicted. Fantastic film.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

9

Iky009Jan 3, 2014

Já começa com Daniel Day-Lewis dando show de interpretação, claro até o fim do filme. Bom Paul Thomas já tem meu eterno respeito, essa película fenomenal.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Nesbitt10Jul 31, 2013

The closing sequence delivers on the promise of the movie's title in a manner that keeps viewers discussing it long after the picture ends. “There Will Be Blood” is not a movie that disappears quietly. Paul Thomas Anderson's epic masterpieceThe closing sequence delivers on the promise of the movie's title in a manner that keeps viewers discussing it long after the picture ends. “There Will Be Blood” is not a movie that disappears quietly. Paul Thomas Anderson's epic masterpiece "There will be Blood" is a steadfast reflection of the very essence of capitalism in America, where domination, not gain, is the ultimate objective, and by any means necessary.

When we first meet Daniel Plainview (Daniel Day-Lewis) in 1898, he's mining for gold in a shaft he has dug into the ground of his Texas property. He finds what he's looking for, and perhaps more. Several years later, he has shifted his focus from gold to oil and he has been able to hire some hands. When an accident results in a death, Daniel finds himself with an infant orphan to care for. He raises the child, known as H.W., to be his own. By 1912, Daniel has become a well-known oilman, and he his looking to expand his empire. Accompanied by his partner, Fletcher (Ciarán Hinds), and his son (Dillon Freasier), he travels to California to follow a promising lead. What he finds there astonishes him. He seeks to buy large parcels of property, but he is impeded in his goal by the evangelist preacher Eli Sunday (Paul Dano), who wants Daniel to donate $10,000 to the local church before he sells. After the contract is signed, however, Daniel reneges on the deal. Shortly thereafter, once the first drill has become operational, there is an accident that results in an explosion that fuels a major oil fire and costs H.W. his hearing.

For most of the film, Daniel is a fascinating character. He's a mass of contradictions: charismatic, ugly, easygoing, ruthless, silver-tongued, plain-spoken, gentle, violent. He's smart and understands how to manipulate every situation to his advantage. He understands the business of oil and transforms himself from a poor miner into a wealthy businessman. Unfortunately, the more power Daniel amasses, the more corrupt and dissolute he becomes. Anderson chronicles Daniel's personality decay intelligently. He establishes the character as an admirable individual, but eventually his morality slowly erodes. The lives of these two, Daniel and Eli, are self-centered, cunning, and ruthless men who collide and lead us into the dark, unpaved path of madness of self-destruction driven by their unrelenting greed.

“There Will Be Blood” is a rich character study of a fascinating individual who is by turns likable, loathsome, admirable, monstrous, and driven. What Day-Lewis brings to the characterization is more exquisite and complex than anything even Anderson might have imagined at the outset. His Plainview is the most gripping film performance of the year, and as his religious foil, Dano also reveals unsuspected depths. Long, but so well crafted with terrific cinematography, and beautifully written/directed by Paul Thomas Anderson. Daniel Day-Lewis and Robert Elswit both earned Academy Awards.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

DarthnixaDec 14, 2012

This deep, brooding portrayal of a man motivated only by greed is a haunting movie that will both terrify and amaze you. I needn't say, Daniel Day-Lewis delivers one of the best performances of all time as Daniel Plainview.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

SummersausageJan 14, 2013

This movie was a classic depiction of the great storytelling of Paul Tom Anderson with incredible acting by Day-Lewis. It was an independent joy ride through the life of an oil man. A visual and written masterpiece.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

TomBeltranMay 27, 2013

Posted on 5/19/13 09:05 AM
Is there any doubt that Daniel day Lewis is the best actor to ever grace the screen, lets say you put his performance aside from this film you still have Paul Dano haunting performance Robert ewlisit cinematographyPosted on 5/19/13 09:05 AM
Is there any doubt that Daniel day Lewis is the best actor to ever grace the screen, lets say you put his performance aside from this film you still have Paul Dano haunting performance Robert ewlisit cinematography and gritty direction to me Lewis performance was enough but wow did I get more… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

ThefilmnerdJul 2, 2013

The performance by Daniel Day-Lewis is just fantastic, and the cinematography is beautiful to look at. Paul Thomas Anderson has made a brilliant movie which is beautiful shot, and the acting by Daniel Day-Lewis is amazing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

ragekoiSep 13, 2013

Masterful film. Contains an original and interesting narrative, a lot of unsubtle bashes at religion, an emotionally charged and holy-inspired (no pun intended) performance by Daniel Day-Lewis, and a dark ending that has spawned my personalMasterful film. Contains an original and interesting narrative, a lot of unsubtle bashes at religion, an emotionally charged and holy-inspired (no pun intended) performance by Daniel Day-Lewis, and a dark ending that has spawned my personal favorite quote of any movie. Has instantly become a favorite.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Viper8787Sep 10, 2014

I can see how many people find this movie boring but I found it really great, yes it does drag on at a lot of parts but it is just a fantastic movie. Daniel Day Lewis is amazing in this movie and deserved the best actor award at the Oscars.I can see how many people find this movie boring but I found it really great, yes it does drag on at a lot of parts but it is just a fantastic movie. Daniel Day Lewis is amazing in this movie and deserved the best actor award at the Oscars. The visuals are also very good as the scenery in this movie is cool. Also some great cinematography kept me into this film the whole time. Good supporting acting and a very good all around movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Raven25Sep 20, 2014

Do not watch this movie for the plot. Watch it for Daniel Day Lewis and his character. The character's interaction with the world is the plot, and it is amazing. True masterpiece.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

moslegend34Dec 3, 2014

A superb film. Day-Lewis commands the screen with superb facial expressions and well versed dialogue. Greenwood's soundtrack; particularly 'The Prospectors' is majestic. Thomas Andersen does a superb job exploiting the gorgeous scenery asA superb film. Day-Lewis commands the screen with superb facial expressions and well versed dialogue. Greenwood's soundtrack; particularly 'The Prospectors' is majestic. Thomas Andersen does a superb job exploiting the gorgeous scenery as well as the zoom in shot of the well, way beyond his years of experience. If I had to be hypercritical, I would suggest to things:
-Despite the original beginning with no dialogue, the movie was a little slow
-The lack of a strong female character (more to do with the story maybe?)
Overall, an excellent movie, a classic if not quite a masterpiece.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Matsoni93Jan 23, 2015

Not heavy on special effects, but rather focuses on strong acting, atmosphere and stylish cinematography. Daniel Day-Lewis's performance is absolutely amazing, and the movie delivers scene after scene.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

EpicLadySpongeApr 5, 2016

"Oh yes, there will be blood."

And so, there is only one true movie that will have blood and that's There Will Be Blood. Sorry, Saw II, but that tagline belongs in this movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Artist18Jul 3, 2016

This movie was amazing and i loved it.It has an incredible perfomance by Daniel-Day Lewis and incredible directing too.This movie shows us the madness and the sadness of a normal businessman and his relastionship with his son with anThis movie was amazing and i loved it.It has an incredible perfomance by Daniel-Day Lewis and incredible directing too.This movie shows us the madness and the sadness of a normal businessman and his relastionship with his son with an excellent way.I like this movie but it is a little boring.Great movie I recomend it!!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

alejandro970Jul 28, 2023

Oil as a symbol of wealth, and wealth as a symbol of all evils. Daniel Day Lewis in a memorable role, showing the moral decline of a man who rose to prosperity in almost the course of one night.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

zapVApr 2, 2018

PTA's masterpiece centred around Daniel Plainview - an oilman who is torn apart by his ambition and human feelings.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

Jaredc324Jul 18, 2019

A masterpiece that if released in any decade in cinema history would be revered. That's all I have to say about this piece of work. It's a phenomenal groundwork film for anyone knowing how to create atmosphere & style into a film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

NinteundoApr 21, 2018

Paul Thomas Anderson has once again proved himself to be one of the greatest movie creators of this generation.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

All_ButTrU4Aug 21, 2022

Visually this is perhaps one of the best films I've seen, a modern masterpiece! It has clear austere cinematography and crisp sound engineering and plays with those strengths rather well as shown in the opening scenes black oil shots withinVisually this is perhaps one of the best films I've seen, a modern masterpiece! It has clear austere cinematography and crisp sound engineering and plays with those strengths rather well as shown in the opening scenes black oil shots within the cave or H.W deafness. Paul Thomas Anderson is incomparable with his direction, detailed and authentic yo a point of non fiction. An analysis of the allure and trappings of greed and ambition, set near a time where such egotism would collide with post war optimism into a cataclysmic stock market crash. It's script is bare in that it doesn't try to say much and places most effort on the subtleties of the actors body language. Daniel Day Lewis is a centerpiece in this drama and captivates with a demure grandeur that constantly feels on the verge of madness, until the epic moment it finally gives way. Paul Dano is nondescript in his duel performance as twins Eli & Paul. Eli simmers with a madness anchored in religious self righteousness that casts a condescending veil of ego that corrodes against the thinning sanity of Daniel Plainview closing the movie is a bloody pulp. Watching these perspective spirals leaves you breathless not out of sympathy, I don't think anyone of the characters inspire that kind of attachment, but out of apprehension.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

AvishanHSep 1, 2019

Worth watching at least three times.Paul Anderson Created a masterpiece and needless to say what a great and magical actor Daniel is

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

AJ_13Jan 11, 2021

The production design, costumes and, of course, photography are out of this world. Nevertheless, Daniel Day-Lewis' performance and Paul Thomas Anderson's direction can't be described with any adjective but PERFECT

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

AgentLviJun 27, 2023

Excellent movie. The story is so enjoyable, scoring is really great, visual is decent, and the voice is stunning

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

pooopsFeb 3, 2023

although the movie is amazing, the thing that leaves me from given it a ten is the slow 1st half.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

KevinJan 10, 2008

Fantasitc acting. At times marvelous. At times too slow. Overall very good. One, Enchanted, and Juno are still my favorites of the year

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

LesterF.Mar 25, 2008

Oh for an eight and a half, but one must draw the line somewhere. An exercise in deconstructing the human psyche. Matching our innate frailty up against the dark challenge of power and money, the themes of this movie are borne of a well-worn Oh for an eight and a half, but one must draw the line somewhere. An exercise in deconstructing the human psyche. Matching our innate frailty up against the dark challenge of power and money, the themes of this movie are borne of a well-worn path. Nevertheless, quick have been so many to proclaim this film great. Is it the film that is great or the performance of one man? (Lest I detract from the excellent but - let's face it - secondary performance of Paul Dano.) The fragmented storytelling here is less effective than in its contemporary: No Country for Old Men. There is no reading between the lines to be done. Almost everything is a touch heavy-handed, overwrought. But this is nitpicking. A restrained use of colours, a brave, effective and intriguing score and an awkward bent for humour make this well-worth seeing. So, the movie is without a doubt grand, but if not for the running time and 'faux-historical' context are we just looking at a slightly predictable pop-cultural diatribe. Then again, some have said similar of The Godfather.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

WatermelanjelloP.Sep 2, 2008

I really enjoyed this movie, and I am not "going with the critics" as some may accuse. Sure, there it was drawn out at times and it could be dry, but this is still a great film. The cinematography was beautiful, the acting top notch, and it I really enjoyed this movie, and I am not "going with the critics" as some may accuse. Sure, there it was drawn out at times and it could be dry, but this is still a great film. The cinematography was beautiful, the acting top notch, and it was ambitious to say the least.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

BrianJan 19, 2008

I'm still trying to figure out what the film was actually about. None of you self-aggrandizing 'critics' are helping.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

PaulLJan 21, 2008

Oscar nomination caliber cinematography and acting by Daniel Day Lewis. Good direction by PTA and Paul Dano surprised on the upside at times. The movie is a bit long and is not "Godfather" great but serious movie viewers may want to see it Oscar nomination caliber cinematography and acting by Daniel Day Lewis. Good direction by PTA and Paul Dano surprised on the upside at times. The movie is a bit long and is not "Godfather" great but serious movie viewers may want to see it on the big screen.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

DylanP.Jan 20, 2008

I'm no movie critic (thank god ;) ), but the moview was thought provoking. Maybe it was more enjoyable because I watched it under the influence of some controlled substances (haha), but it did raise some interesting questions. Also, it I'm no movie critic (thank god ;) ), but the moview was thought provoking. Maybe it was more enjoyable because I watched it under the influence of some controlled substances (haha), but it did raise some interesting questions. Also, it does seem a little slow, but if you're willing to ride it out it has a good flow to it in a completely chaotic and impossible-to-follow kind of way. I liked it (as simple as I can get).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JeffJohnsonJan 27, 2008

This impressive film is an intelligent treatment of a time when hard physical work, relentless business acumen and pure greed were what got the oil industry off the ground in its early days. The movie is a bit confusing with regard to someThis impressive film is an intelligent treatment of a time when hard physical work, relentless business acumen and pure greed were what got the oil industry off the ground in its early days. The movie is a bit confusing with regard to some characters (Paul and Eli) and the passage of time. Day-Lewis is, as usual, amazing; all of the actors are very good. The movie is beautiful to watch. The story, however, moves a unevenly and takes an abrupt turn at the last 20 minutes when it jumps ahead many years and leaves the viewer guessing about a number of things. Overall, it's a fine, entertaining and thoughtful movie, but not clearly the best movie of the year, in my opinion.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

LarryHFeb 1, 2008

Great gritty movie about greed and self-righteousness. Anderson, Lewis and the film are all worthy of the Oscar. As with all of Anderson's movies, this is definitely not a film for everyone.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

TJN.Feb 20, 2008

Daniel-Day Lewis's performance makes it impossible to score lower, which I would [6? 7?]. Story arc uneven, motivations difficult to perceive, and photography seemed too dark. [Was it just the print that I saw?] I did not find Daniel-Day Lewis's performance makes it impossible to score lower, which I would [6? 7?]. Story arc uneven, motivations difficult to perceive, and photography seemed too dark. [Was it just the print that I saw?] I did not find Lewis's "hammy", as some critics have; thought it was a controlled performance. His performance should not be missed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

DanB.Feb 2, 2008

Citizen Kane w/out the Rosebud moment? Anyway, it's very good.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JayHigginsApr 3, 2008

7.5/10. Rich and well detailed production, superbly acted by all. I hadn't heard much about Paul Dano in the film, he was terrific. Visually, the film was remarkable, my favorite aspect of the film was the score, one of the best I have 7.5/10. Rich and well detailed production, superbly acted by all. I hadn't heard much about Paul Dano in the film, he was terrific. Visually, the film was remarkable, my favorite aspect of the film was the score, one of the best I have heard in a long time. It is a great film, but not without flaws. It was slow in parts and too long.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

TomM.Sep 14, 2008

Those familiar with the past work of Daniel Day-Lewis will not be surprised by his stunning performance in THERE WILL BE BLOOD. During the film I found myself comparing him with some of our classic masters, from Barrymore to Brando. There Those familiar with the past work of Daniel Day-Lewis will not be surprised by his stunning performance in THERE WILL BE BLOOD. During the film I found myself comparing him with some of our classic masters, from Barrymore to Brando. There are also excellent performances by many others in the cast, including Paul Dano as the primitive country minister and Kevin J. O'Connor as the (fraudulent?) half-brother. The story, based on an Upton Sinclair novel, is raw, rivetting, and unusual, and gradually becomes recognizable as driven and ruthless capitalist Americana. I hope to get to the library (or a favorite used bookstore) one of these days to see if I can find this 20th century gem sitting unread on a dusty shelf. Incidentally, the score and soundtrack by Jonny Greenwood of Radiohead is innovative, captivating, and, at times, seems to be suggesting the loose cannon we are following; unfortunately, there were moments when I thought the audio was attempting to upstage the visual.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

KevinL.Dec 27, 2007

Daniel Day-Lewis owns this film ... Paul Dano, not so much. But the baptism scene with both of them must be destined to be a classic.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JasonM.Jan 1, 2008

I think this a very good movie, but in the end I found that it lacked an overall punch. It's got such good acting and PTA is such a gifted director, that it's only after the movie is over that I wondered, "What is this movie really I think this a very good movie, but in the end I found that it lacked an overall punch. It's got such good acting and PTA is such a gifted director, that it's only after the movie is over that I wondered, "What is this movie really about?". It doesn't have a statement to make although many are saying it's about the rise of corporations over the individual, however, Day Lewis's character is his own demise, not the man.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

BillyS.Jan 19, 2008

There Will Be Oscar.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

GeneV.Jan 2, 2008

Great acting - especially Day-Lewis who carries the film with a performance just slightly more restrained and less threatening that Gangs of NY. Great cinematography and set making a gripping visual portrait of depression era Southwest. The Great acting - especially Day-Lewis who carries the film with a performance just slightly more restrained and less threatening that Gangs of NY. Great cinematography and set making a gripping visual portrait of depression era Southwest. The only problems are those of the Anderson as scriptwriter [unfocused at times] and visuals [some scenes are included solely for the purposes of showing off the director's skills]. Both of these problems are characteristics of Anderson's film making efforts. All in all a must see, especially given the current run of cartoon extravaganzas, mellow-dramas, and shopping mall teen films.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

SteveAApr 12, 2008

I loved this movie. Daniel Day-Lewis was awesome. However, I didn't care for Dano's acting in this movie. In some scenes, his voice was straining and cracking, and his actions were overdone and unconvincing. I also didn't care I loved this movie. Daniel Day-Lewis was awesome. However, I didn't care for Dano's acting in this movie. In some scenes, his voice was straining and cracking, and his actions were overdone and unconvincing. I also didn't care for the Henry subplot. It seemed more like an unnecessary and lengthy detour than character development. However, it was still an awesome movie. I felt like it deserved the Oscar for best movie. It had a lot going for it, instead of just a hell of a good bad guy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AkisP.Apr 13, 2008

Very slow movie...but very good work from the cast and crew.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JesseDJan 25, 2008

I'm sitting at my computer not 20 minutes removed from one of the most thought provoking films I've ever seen. There were moments honestly, where I couldn't hold back a belly laugh. A few times I braced myself for a dreadingly I'm sitting at my computer not 20 minutes removed from one of the most thought provoking films I've ever seen. There were moments honestly, where I couldn't hold back a belly laugh. A few times I braced myself for a dreadingly dark sequence. By the end I took all the things from the movie that the Director was wanting to place in my mind as...something more. The reason for the 'average' score, is that it was pretty long with what felt like less of a real "eureka" moment than I'd of hoped. Daniel-Day Lewis is everything advertised and more. If he does not win best actor it will be a crime. Paul Dano is eerily violent and a superb actor in his own right. Solid film you should watch this as soon as possible while it's on the big screen.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AriK.Jan 31, 2008

Powerful and meaningful, this is a film that can be discussed for hours. The levels of malice, egoism, paranoia, and greed are brought to such high levels, that it is easy to think of this as an absurdest tale - but in fact when viewed in Powerful and meaningful, this is a film that can be discussed for hours. The levels of malice, egoism, paranoia, and greed are brought to such high levels, that it is easy to think of this as an absurdest tale - but in fact when viewed in light of actual events taking place all around us, it suddenly seems more like a stark reminder of the fact that we're not too far past this vision of a wild west dominated by paranoid, selfish oilmen and pious clergymen. The first thing I noticed watching this film was the score. Without it, the film is nowhere near as disturbing as it might otherwise be (except of course for the end). In fact, I found the music so disturbing, that I almost had an anxiety attack in the theater. That is, however, par for the course when engaging a PT Anderson flick.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

GrantTFeb 17, 2008

What surprised me above all else is that anyone likes this difficult cerebral film at all. The two lead characters are so bad, nay evil, and the critique of America (and thus western civilization) so vicious and unremitting that it is hard What surprised me above all else is that anyone likes this difficult cerebral film at all. The two lead characters are so bad, nay evil, and the critique of America (and thus western civilization) so vicious and unremitting that it is hard to find much to like. A cathartic confronting experience. Thank God Hollywood can still find a place for directors like Anderson.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

LuisG.Feb 18, 2008

heres a film that take you on a ride with minimal information and stunning characterization by ...lewis and a score that just keep pushing you perfecting Andersons craft and narrating a course that unlike many films seem to be out of this world ..

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

ERG1008Sep 13, 2010

Oil that is, Black Gold, Texas Tea.
Daniel Day Lewis is "into" oil & makes his fortune, sometimes at the misfortune of others.
Weighs in at just over two & a half hours but I didn't think it dragged too much & the authenticity of the film isOil that is, Black Gold, Texas Tea.
Daniel Day Lewis is "into" oil & makes his fortune, sometimes at the misfortune of others.
Weighs in at just over two & a half hours but I didn't think it dragged too much & the authenticity of the film is superb.
As to be expected, Lewis is brilliant but so is Paul Dano as Eli.
Not to everyone's taste but I really enjoyed it.
I'm finished!… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

8

ScraperJun 28, 2016

There Will Be Blood's crescendo lies with this character, Daniel Plainview, and the rotting of his soul. At first, I was looking to his success or failure or that of the oil industry to deliver a climax/resolution. Not so. The cinematography,There Will Be Blood's crescendo lies with this character, Daniel Plainview, and the rotting of his soul. At first, I was looking to his success or failure or that of the oil industry to deliver a climax/resolution. Not so. The cinematography, wonderful acting, and dead-on feel of the period allow the perfect breeding ground for all these characters to writhe in their awful ways. Entertaining as hell to watch if you can stand the fact that Forrest and Jenny don't get back together and have a lovely son.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TokyochuchuMar 5, 2013

There Will Be Blood is fantastically photographed, written and acted. The central performance of Daniel Day Lewis is of legendary proportions. Better yet, the film is unbelievably funny, it's comedy blacker than the gushing oil that PlainviewThere Will Be Blood is fantastically photographed, written and acted. The central performance of Daniel Day Lewis is of legendary proportions. Better yet, the film is unbelievably funny, it's comedy blacker than the gushing oil that Plainview covets so badly. There Will be Blood is a truly unforgettable piece of cinema.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

8

JasonGMar 16, 2011

What an amazing film. Daniel Day Lewis is haunting. Each of the 156 minutes from the initial pioneering scenes to the final Kubrick-esque moments dazzles in it's intensity. Meanwhile, the loss of consciousness, of mind, of vision, of sanity,What an amazing film. Daniel Day Lewis is haunting. Each of the 156 minutes from the initial pioneering scenes to the final Kubrick-esque moments dazzles in it's intensity. Meanwhile, the loss of consciousness, of mind, of vision, of sanity, is so subtle, is so delicate and unassuming that hours after the final credits have rolled one can only blink and say 'wow'… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

8

grandpajoe6191Sep 18, 2011

The movie may be slow and tedious, but that is why "There will be Blood" enlightens and amazes the audience.

8 of 15 users found this helpful87

All this user's reviews

8

ReviewCriticDec 28, 2011

Daniel Day-Lewis gives the performance of his career in There Will Be Blood. Receiving several Oscar nods, including Best Picture, as well as a win for Best Actor, There Will Be Blood is a story about a wicked oil man who hits jackpot.

6 of 8 users found this helpful62

All this user's reviews

8

imthenoobNov 8, 2012

Only thing bad about this movie is that it's very slow paced and takes quite some time to really get into. By the end of it however, You will love it. Daniel Day-Lewis gives what is easily his best performance (and that's saying something) inOnly thing bad about this movie is that it's very slow paced and takes quite some time to really get into. By the end of it however, You will love it. Daniel Day-Lewis gives what is easily his best performance (and that's saying something) in this movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Gil8ertSep 14, 2012

It is definitely a slow movie, but that's life - some things are fast and some things are slow. But both can have an equal impact. I have seen it 3 or 4 times now - I find it is quite mesmorising and the story compelling. Daniel Day Lewis isIt is definitely a slow movie, but that's life - some things are fast and some things are slow. But both can have an equal impact. I have seen it 3 or 4 times now - I find it is quite mesmorising and the story compelling. Daniel Day Lewis is really sublime in his role, and I found the final scene to be absolute magic!
It is more bizarre than anything else, with the story taking some odd turns at times and playing strange scenarios which you don't expect. Which maybe why I enjoyed it so much - it seemed fresh, it didn't spoon feed me the standard film format and put all it's A,Bs ad Cs in the right order. It was 2 years after release that I watched this, and I didn't read any reviews before I did watch it. Just because it is long and slow with odd music and even stranger dialogue, doesn't necessarily mean it is pretentious - but if you look for it to be, you will most likely find it will be. I did not, I just found it interesting and enjoyable. But then I found the hangover boring so what do I know.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ThegodfathersonMay 26, 2013

Day Lewis kills. Bit by bit, he shapes There Will Be Blood into a masterpiece. The shades and story is tedious and slow but wait and see the drama and excitement you are in for.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Mothman13May 4, 2013

This movie is a bit on the long side, but overall it is a really enjoyable story to follow. A class drama. Especially the ending takes the cake! I'm finished.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ScorpionOct 14, 2013

The major problem of the film Daniel Day Lewis is that he is so good an actor that we were watching only him and his ways to embody the character, we almost forgot about the rest of the film, but the film in question is extremely good andThe major problem of the film Daniel Day Lewis is that he is so good an actor that we were watching only him and his ways to embody the character, we almost forgot about the rest of the film, but the film in question is extremely good and thoughtful (even that sometimes bombastic).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

heathermApr 12, 2015

This sprawling Western epic showed the compelling trajectory of a man who experienced incredibly professional success, but whose personal life was difficult. It was interesting to watch his character adapt to all his successes, but remainThis sprawling Western epic showed the compelling trajectory of a man who experienced incredibly professional success, but whose personal life was difficult. It was interesting to watch his character adapt to all his successes, but remain completely unable to compromise in the face of difficulties and conflicts. It was also a visually stunning movie, as the landscape of the oil fields provided a dramatic backdrop for the entire film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

RalfbergsFeb 2, 2018

Great acting from all the main cast and an interesting story about how a man achieves what he wants, but after achieving that it is not enough for him and his ambition and hunger for more power and money basically blinds him about the thingsGreat acting from all the main cast and an interesting story about how a man achieves what he wants, but after achieving that it is not enough for him and his ambition and hunger for more power and money basically blinds him about the things that actually matter.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

cine1Dec 29, 2016

A slow burn film about American capitalism and its ability to corrupt and isolate. Daniel Day Lewis towers through the entire film, and his ability to slowly wind his way towards explosive rage and violence is terrifying and fascinating atA slow burn film about American capitalism and its ability to corrupt and isolate. Daniel Day Lewis towers through the entire film, and his ability to slowly wind his way towards explosive rage and violence is terrifying and fascinating at the same time. Paul Thomas Anderson has recreated a period of American history that leaps off the screen and pulses with the ambition, violence, and progress of that time. I highly recommend this one to mature and intellectual audiences.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

KeithDowJul 17, 2017

Paul Thomas Anderson's 'There Will Be Blood' deservingly won 2 Oscars and was nominated for 6 more. Daniel Day-Lewis was given an entire year to prepare for the role of Daniel Plainview and it shows. Even more incredible is the fact thatPaul Thomas Anderson's 'There Will Be Blood' deservingly won 2 Oscars and was nominated for 6 more. Daniel Day-Lewis was given an entire year to prepare for the role of Daniel Plainview and it shows. Even more incredible is the fact that Paul Dano was given just 4 days (!) to prepare for his breakout role as Eli Sunday after he was originally cast to just play the smaller part of Paul Sunday (the script was quickly re-written to make the brothers twins so that Dano could pull double duty). While the Oscar for Day-Lewis' performance is a no-brainer, the other--for cinematography--is actually quite debatable. Sure, the Texas locations and landscapes were quite remarkable, but there were also plenty of times when the images on the screen were unnecessarily dark. I would've preferred if the film won the Oscar for best sound editing (for which it was indeed nominated) as the use of sound--including distinct moments of silence--heightened the overall viewing experience to an even greater degree.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

paperaquariumSep 6, 2018

Extremely gripping. A character study that you can't help but keep invested in, even though you know it will end badly. Although honestly the score was a bit jarring at times and I say this as a huge Radiohead fan. I liked it but I prefer itExtremely gripping. A character study that you can't help but keep invested in, even though you know it will end badly. Although honestly the score was a bit jarring at times and I say this as a huge Radiohead fan. I liked it but I prefer it when scores are a bit more subdued and support the film, not take attention away from it. Also, not related but the user who said it's a "very male" film can suck my nonexistent dick. Why do we have to bring gender politics into this? If you didn't like it it's not because you're female but because you have a personal preference. Smh. But yeah, great film!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

jonslowDec 9, 2018

A brilliant minimalist yet epic portrait of the oil industry's birth in the American West at the turn of the 20th century. Daniel Day-Lewis' unforgettable, riveting performance as an obsessed, greedy, cunning, cruel misanthrope reveals theA brilliant minimalist yet epic portrait of the oil industry's birth in the American West at the turn of the 20th century. Daniel Day-Lewis' unforgettable, riveting performance as an obsessed, greedy, cunning, cruel misanthrope reveals the darkest aspects of capitalism.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

DawdlingPoetNov 20, 2021

This is quite a long drawn out movie at over two and a half hours long, one which clearly and unsurprisingly focuses on the presumed need for power and effect of greed and financial motive on people, local communities caught up in the oilThis is quite a long drawn out movie at over two and a half hours long, one which clearly and unsurprisingly focuses on the presumed need for power and effect of greed and financial motive on people, local communities caught up in the oil game, prospectors etc. it has quite a haunting musical score, with what sounds like almost ghostly wail noises present around three quarters of an hour in. It really felt quite claustrophobic in parts with the low key yet somewhat spooky soundtrack, with heavy use of stringed instruments and low beat drumming creating a very tense feel at key points. Also featured are elements of one up manship, highlighting the competitive aspects of bidding for oil and as well as this, religion strongly plays a part, when a man dies in an accident while down one of the wells, a local priest come supposed healer warns that it could have been avoided, had the well been allowed to be given a simple blessing but he's told that this would have only slowed down the process of extracting the oil, so it was never going to be allowed. He also mentions having seen some of the men involved drinking, stating that it can't be a good idea when they need to be alert on site but again his worries are overlooked. Things get particularly heated as the plot develops and I couldn't help feeling sorry for him.

Paranoia also plays a part and I have to say it is a pretty gritty watch in parts, seeing how various characters react to set situations, getting an idea of how they interpret things as they see it, often (presumably) in a much different way to the way we'd see things. Its quite sad to see the toll thats paid in different forms, what such people went through but I suppose it has to be remembered that there was more poverty in those days - this being set in the past of course, it having quite a rural Wild West type feel to it. I suppose it is a case of every man for his own (hence the element of paranoia present), so that would make sense. Given the motives and even actions of the main cast, you'd be forgiven for thinking their pretty selfish and not especially caring but after another accident occurs, Daniels emotions really come in to play and he's faced with a tough decision, having to play different roles as a parent and a prospctor or site manager I suppose - anyway, his more caring nature is brought out. This makes it a more interesting watch, as I always find it difficult to stay keen on a movie that goes on for a long time when the characters don't appear to be particularly likeable.

I found this quite engrossing and atmospheric, almost too much so, being quite claustrophobic due to the camerawork (some quick changes of shot and interesting angles used at times) and the sinister score playing in the background. Among the spookiest and perhaps most atmospheric scenes, are those of Daniel and a previously unknown acquaintance he gives the benefit of the doubt to, who spend time together alone, the spookiest scenes being set at a campfire and indeed fire is very much present throughout the movie, in different scenes.

There was some interesting dialogue in this movie, although it could be seen to be a little bit bland in parts. The scenes involving the healer carrying out ceremonies in a local makeshift church are quite moving - indeed at first you'd think the locals mock the idea of religion but later on it becomes clear that those in need of healing rely on that as a form of obviously hope to them. Given the plot that develops, its quite a bleak movie but I liked how the different characters, family members and others adapted - things do change in time but I wouldn't call it necessarily a very Hollywood movie in the classical sense of that term.

The character portrayals really made this what it is - if the script was different or performances perhaps more wooden then it would be different but as it is, I thought this was a quality movie.

Just to add that cast and content wise, first off content - of course there's moderate violence present, quite bloody violence at times and there's also strong language present, as well as perhaps one or two sexual references but thats about all I can think of thats probably worth mentioning. Onto the cast, which give very good performances and Daniel Day-Lewis plays the main character, Daniel Plainview - coming across as a stern, no nonsense man who at times also isn't afraid to show his deeper side when battling emotions, while Paul Dano plays the religious healer, Eli Sunday. He seems quite plain by way of physical appearance but becomes very animated in certain scenes and the interaction between both of these key members of cast as their relevant characters, works well.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

TomB.Feb 20, 2008

Not as good as I expected, but still a very fine movie. DDLewis's performance is stunning, even if it's over the top in a few places, but I blame that on the director not the actor. This is a visual masterwork but the script/story Not as good as I expected, but still a very fine movie. DDLewis's performance is stunning, even if it's over the top in a few places, but I blame that on the director not the actor. This is a visual masterwork but the script/story was not as fulfilling.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JimmySoDec 22, 2008

Atheists must have some bad blood with movie directors. How else to explain their latest representative on the silver screen

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

ChadFeb 4, 2008

Long, slow, boring, and often uneventful, but overall Daniel day lewis manages to create a memorable and believable character opposite an interesting preacher played by Paul Dano which collide together in a very unexpected and, in my Long, slow, boring, and often uneventful, but overall Daniel day lewis manages to create a memorable and believable character opposite an interesting preacher played by Paul Dano which collide together in a very unexpected and, in my opinion, good ending. I've definitely seen better, and the critics have praised this a good bit too much, but i still liked there will be blood and it was without a doubt much better than no country and atonement.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

AdamA.Mar 5, 2008

It was a very entertaining movie. The visual were amazing and the characters were deep. However, the ending leaves much to be desired. A good movie, but I agree with others when they say it is overrated.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JimmyJamMar 3, 2009

Not as bad of a movie as some people are saying on this board, but definitely overrated. I'm not sure what exactly the critics were thinking on this film and No Country, but both movies failed to deliver. I will say that Lewis gives a Not as bad of a movie as some people are saying on this board, but definitely overrated. I'm not sure what exactly the critics were thinking on this film and No Country, but both movies failed to deliver. I will say that Lewis gives a phenomenal performance though.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

MikeN.Feb 1, 2008

PTA has made a "Citizen Kane" with the same ego but half the talent. (And DDL is brilliant,but overacted in the 1927 sequences).

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

MackJan 6, 2009

Not a movie you will necessarily enjoy watching but Lewis' performance is amazing. You won't soon forget it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

MarkDuffyJan 14, 2008

This is quite likely the most overrated film of the year. Overall, this film is very strongly character driven. Daniel Day-Lewis and Paul Bano create intriguing characters that save an otherwise lifeless plot. The soundtrack is great andThis is quite likely the most overrated film of the year. Overall, this film is very strongly character driven. Daniel Day-Lewis and Paul Bano create intriguing characters that save an otherwise lifeless plot. The soundtrack is great and the characters intriguing but I simply found myself wanting more. There is nothing to "get" in this movie. The film is rather heavy handed on its critiques of society, greed, etc. Succinctly, this film drags you through the rise and fall of an intriguing character at a slow pace with a hollow ending.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

SteveT.Jan 19, 2008

Of course, Day-Lewis is fantastic. Loved Paul Dano, too, but the plot moves along fairly slowly and is oftentimes predictable. The music (if you call it that...it is frequently "sound") is pretty cool as the movie's backdrop. Overall, Of course, Day-Lewis is fantastic. Loved Paul Dano, too, but the plot moves along fairly slowly and is oftentimes predictable. The music (if you call it that...it is frequently "sound") is pretty cool as the movie's backdrop. Overall, worth seeing but not the best movie of the year.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

DaleMFeb 10, 2008

Good character study and nice historical touches, but it lacks an engaging storyline and comes off as rather tedious and boring. There are basically no women in the film which may point to a rather interesting sub-text about repressed Good character study and nice historical touches, but it lacks an engaging storyline and comes off as rather tedious and boring. There are basically no women in the film which may point to a rather interesting sub-text about repressed homosexuality. This sub-text, though hinted at by numerous men being maimed or killed by blunt objects and by two men having a baby, is never very much developed in an overt manner. The only sub-text the film overtly develops very much is about ambition. There is nothing wrong with this. What's wrong is that the ambition theme is not developed very creatively (as in Citizen Kane, for example).… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

7

Martak.Feb 24, 2008

While DD Lewis' acting was, of course, great and I enjoyed the cinematography, the film missed several opportunites for insightful character development and story context. OK I get the greed and the need for revenge but please give more While DD Lewis' acting was, of course, great and I enjoyed the cinematography, the film missed several opportunites for insightful character development and story context. OK I get the greed and the need for revenge but please give more insight to help me make sense of the horrific ending. The film took place during a historically fascinating time with ramifications still felt today. Don't hint at it, take us there. Just a bit more effort to replace the sometimes tedious and non-sensical sections with insight would have made this film great.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

CSMar 4, 2008

Very engaging character acting, after that this movie is WAAAAAY overrated.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

MichaelMMar 4, 2008

I have not yet seen this movie, therefore I will give it the average rating. I am writing this to let the others posting on this board know that all of you who are praising the film for it's aesthetic appeal or it's amazing acting I have not yet seen this movie, therefore I will give it the average rating. I am writing this to let the others posting on this board know that all of you who are praising the film for it's aesthetic appeal or it's amazing acting just sound like a bunch of pretentious douche bags who are trying to impress one another with how sophisticated you are, that you can see the inner allegorical meaning of a movie etc. etc. I'm sorry to say that I believe you have lost site of what movies are supposed to do and that is of course entertain. From what I have heard this film was made by film nerds for film nerds, thus making it unfit for mass consumption.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

SeanF.Apr 12, 2008

A pretty good movie, a little bit overrated by the critics, and the Hollywood establishment. Very good acting, excellent cinematography, but the plot left many unanswered questions, and was quite confusing at times (including the ending).A pretty good movie, a little bit overrated by the critics, and the Hollywood establishment. Very good acting, excellent cinematography, but the plot left many unanswered questions, and was quite confusing at times (including the ending). There were many better movies in '07, but this movie (even though deeply flawed) definitely fell at the top of the heap.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JohnWDec 24, 2009

While I see the points that they were trying to make about power, capitalism, and religion, I just wasn't very entertained while watching it. In my mind, that what makes this movie good, but No Country For Old Men great.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

Jonny99Jan 28, 2008

Like being served a grand, sumptuous, banquet only to find out desert is tepid, rainbow-flavored, Jello. I have to go back to 1997's "Contact" to find dissapointment with an ending on this scale. The real tragedy is how unnecessary this Like being served a grand, sumptuous, banquet only to find out desert is tepid, rainbow-flavored, Jello. I have to go back to 1997's "Contact" to find dissapointment with an ending on this scale. The real tragedy is how unnecessary this derailment was; if the director were to cut out everything that happens in 1927, a fully realized, great movie would be left. Having said all this, I would still encourage you to see the film for no other reason than Daniel Day-Lewis is the best living actor.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

MichaelEFeb 12, 2008

Not greater than the sum of its parts, but some of those parts are amazing. It's best to think of it as a black comedy that gets out of hand.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

EdC.Feb 17, 2008

how can 'b shanchez' say that he didnt like the film that much because daniel day lewis attacks christians!! it was in his character! what a totally ubsurd thing to say! 'if the movie hadnt showed blasphemy'...(it also how can 'b shanchez' say that he didnt like the film that much because daniel day lewis attacks christians!! it was in his character! what a totally ubsurd thing to say! 'if the movie hadnt showed blasphemy'...(it also showed murder and alcholholism by the way....) idiot. anyway.... the film wasnt really what i expected, although not in a bad way, and Day lewis is exceptional. the film has a slow and brooding intensity and good performances from the support cast. for a film to last as long as it did and be based almost solely on psychological degeneration they must have done something right… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JMFeb 17, 2008

The main problem with the film is it opens a thousand doors for a profound statement about ambition and power and then totally misses each and every one of these opportunities. I already sensed P.T. Anderson's hackneyed and puerile The main problem with the film is it opens a thousand doors for a profound statement about ambition and power and then totally misses each and every one of these opportunities. I already sensed P.T. Anderson's hackneyed and puerile affectations in Magnolia, and even hints of it in the otherwise compelling Boogie Nights, but this film makes it painfully obvious that Anderson totally misses the potential depth of his own film (!) and instead leans on camp or soap opera pathos. For this film - it's all about the camp, which in a wierd way kinda makes, it cool (I gave it a 7 for glorious camp). Especially the gothic type film title before the final credits - what was he thinking? total camp!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

NickG.Dec 28, 2007

A movie I admired more than enjoyed. The acting is the best of the year and the thematics are great...but it's low budget shows...the most interesting areas of greed are not shown because they didn't have the budget. When it was A movie I admired more than enjoyed. The acting is the best of the year and the thematics are great...but it's low budget shows...the most interesting areas of greed are not shown because they didn't have the budget. When it was over I felt the story let the movie down..in the end I just didn't care.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

MantisJan 10, 2017

Daniel Day-Lewis portrays a sly oil seeker in this rather tragic story. The movie is slow paced with attention to the few characters it has, which benefit from that and results in great conversations and beautiful shots. Interesting movie toDaniel Day-Lewis portrays a sly oil seeker in this rather tragic story. The movie is slow paced with attention to the few characters it has, which benefit from that and results in great conversations and beautiful shots. Interesting movie to say the least!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

seancriswellOct 7, 2012

While I agree with most of what everyone who loves this movie says about it, I do feel that it doesn't succeed in a couple of areas where the true greats do. If there is such a thing as too much ambiguity, Blood has it. We learn so little ofWhile I agree with most of what everyone who loves this movie says about it, I do feel that it doesn't succeed in a couple of areas where the true greats do. If there is such a thing as too much ambiguity, Blood has it. We learn so little of Plainview that when he does interact with other characters it is impossible to know when he is lying or telling the truth. This gives Plainview little motivation as a character. In contrast to the people who love this movie I feel this is why some people find this movie boring. If we had just the smallest amount of back story on Plainview I think what he does would make this movie much more interesting to those that find it boring. Although Anderson does give us very small glimpses into his characters motivation in his movies, we fail to get even that small glimpse with Plainview. Of course on the positive side Anderson has created another set of characters that stay with you for weeks after viewing the movie. He moves his characters through these worlds he creates in such a way that we become entranced with the characters and the atmosphere. Of course Lewis is brilliant and deserves every bit of recognition he has received for this role. Last but not least the final scene in this movie is mesmerizing. The final confrontation between these two characters is brilliantly written and brilliantly acted. This is one of my top 5 endings for a movie ever, from the much hyped bowling pin, to the less talked about line. "I'm done".… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

adamSv94Feb 25, 2013

This is a roller-coaster and by that I mean that its quality is very uneven throughout the whole movie. It has some amazing moments but it has some really boring moments as well. The only constants in this movie are Daniel Day-Lewis in theThis is a roller-coaster and by that I mean that its quality is very uneven throughout the whole movie. It has some amazing moments but it has some really boring moments as well. The only constants in this movie are Daniel Day-Lewis in the leading role and Paul Thomas Anderson's directing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

AkashVijayJan 21, 2015

As an epic, there will be blood is dripping with innovative ideas about the clash between religion and capitalism and the fine line that separates idealism from greed.
But as a character study, it's flawed. In fact there will be blood justAs an epic, there will be blood is dripping with innovative ideas about the clash between religion and capitalism and the fine line that separates idealism from greed.
But as a character study, it's flawed. In fact there will be blood just doesn't work as a character study. We learn so much about who Daniel Plainview is but virtually nothing about why. From his initial hatred of humanity to his final descent into loner hell, we’re never given an understanding as to what’s behind it all. Early in the film, he seems like a rapacious capitalist. Then we begin to see him as more malicious and cruel. Then we come to see him as a raving lunatic. He works hard for reasons that are never explained- seemingly uninterested in pleasing God through his diligence or even himself for that matter. And the more I think about it, the more I begin to realise how severe this problem is. It doesn't just limit the character's impact, it greatly undermines Plainview's relationship with his son. He seems to love the boy, at times, a bit. Yet he also exploits the boy for his own purposes. He seems to feel guilty when being a rotten father, but is uncomfortable with the consequences of affectionate feelings. It just doesn't add up. I guess what I'm saying is we never get to see the humanity in Daniel Plainview or lack of humanity in him.
But I give it 7/10 because when the film works it really works.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

7

katharynmaryNov 9, 2014

After all the hoopla, I found the movie disappointing. It's about ambition, manipulation, power, greed, and the different forms they take in capitalism and religion. One character is a man so full of self loathing he tries to stamp out anyAfter all the hoopla, I found the movie disappointing. It's about ambition, manipulation, power, greed, and the different forms they take in capitalism and religion. One character is a man so full of self loathing he tries to stamp out any feeling of humanity he has ever had. The other is just as bad, but with hypocrisy added to the mix. Both very unpleasant, but sadly we've seen them too many times before. Thank goodness we were spared a redemptive ending.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

FilipeNetoMar 18, 2018

This film tells the story of an oil prospector who finds a huge deposit in unpromising region. Directed by Paul Thomas Anderson, which also provides the script, the film stars Daniel Day-Lewis and Paul Dano.

This is one of the mostThis film tells the story of an oil prospector who finds a huge deposit in unpromising region. Directed by Paul Thomas Anderson, which also provides the script, the film stars Daniel Day-Lewis and Paul Dano.

This is one of the most pessimistic films I've seen. The whole film's atmosphere is dark and negative, showing the saga of Daniel Plainview (Day-Lewis), who enriches after discovering oil in the lands next to a farm which belongs to Eli (Paul Dano), one wanabe- pastor with baby face from an evangelical cult. This film has no good guys or bad guys, is a vast gray area and wickedness is on everyone's mind. Plainview is obsessed with profits; Eli is a fanatical who mistreats the family and controls a congregation with an iron fist. Its the confrontation between these two men, with antagonistic visions and wills, which justifies the film title.

The two main actors did an exceptional job. Both are odious in their roles, the way they show to be bad people trying to look a certain hypocritical seriousness in their daily actions. Day-Lewis, however, is too similar with some characters who have starred in past films like "Gangs of New York" (and I refer to physical likeness and make- up, of course). Dillon Freasier also made a good performance in the role of HW, the little deaf child of Plainview. The costumes and sets goes well in the context of time and place of the action. The cinematography, dark and misty, combines harmoniously with the gloomy atmosphere of the film, and a deeply depressed soundtrack (written by Jonny Greenwood), very atonal, who perfectly embodies the visible (or implied) cruelty of this film.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

JamesDefoeSep 1, 2020

A few events in the narrative are inconsistent for the sake of getting a nice scene or impactful dialogue. Some of those things are very important to the story and would be better off with more coherent storytelling. Despite that, it is aA few events in the narrative are inconsistent for the sake of getting a nice scene or impactful dialogue. Some of those things are very important to the story and would be better off with more coherent storytelling. Despite that, it is a worth watching movie with nice elements to offer.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

TCFeb 7, 2008

One of the greatest movies ever until the plot starts to unravel late in its second hour. From then on, it gets worse, culminating in the most over-written and over-acted scene imaginable. Also, remember that many of these critics (like One of the greatest movies ever until the plot starts to unravel late in its second hour. From then on, it gets worse, culminating in the most over-written and over-acted scene imaginable. Also, remember that many of these critics (like David Denby) thought "Crash" was great too, so they are not always reliable.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

RussT.Mar 5, 2008

The film is inspired by Upton Sinclair

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

PedroS.Apr 3, 2008

It

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

syzygyJan 5, 2008

This is a performance driven pseudo-epic. The plot takes some wild, feverish turns in adapting one of upton sinclair's more rich-baiting novels. there is little of the crusader spirit in the either work, certainly nothing of the good or This is a performance driven pseudo-epic. The plot takes some wild, feverish turns in adapting one of upton sinclair's more rich-baiting novels. there is little of the crusader spirit in the either work, certainly nothing of the good or relishes sinclair's primitive old world socialism and does his best with daniel day-lewis to scream that across the screen.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

MarjorieW.Feb 24, 2008

My teeth are still clenched 12 hours after seeing this movie. Great acting, but ugly story.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

ChaseW.Feb 2, 2008

I have to completely agree with Matty J. on this one. This movie earns a six rating virtually on the sole acting performance of Daniel Day-Lewis. Despite some overacting in the latter parts of the movie, he carries this movie through its I have to completely agree with Matty J. on this one. This movie earns a six rating virtually on the sole acting performance of Daniel Day-Lewis. Despite some overacting in the latter parts of the movie, he carries this movie through its majority. Paul Dano has some brilliant scenes as well, but when PTA doesn't direct him in key scenes where he's allowed to go way over the top ending any suspension of disbelief. Quite simply this movie bored me. The only reason I didn't fall asleep was because the music was so jarring. Not in recent memory have I seen a movie that had music that so made me want to run out of the theater. It was like some failed attempt to appear classical or majestic but instead it was just obnoxious and as with much of this movie way over the top. The plot had little coherence and plodded along. To the point of Matty it also failed to convey the complexity of Sinclair's book. There was very little inspiration for the character's apparent drive to insanity or even the animosity that appears almost out of nowhere toward various characters. While I appreciate that Sinclair's book is long and you want to skim through some of its detail, that detail is what gives you a truer appreciation for the various characters motives. This was seriously lacking in the movie. If you're making a choice right now, defintely, definitely go see No Country for Old Man which clearly outpaces this movie for Best Picture of the year.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

rammJan 12, 2008

They should have named this " There will be Asshole" Sure, I get the message. But what's with the music? It seems that they were trying to make the story something it was not with all the abstract horror strings. Every scene was built They should have named this " There will be Asshole" Sure, I get the message. But what's with the music? It seems that they were trying to make the story something it was not with all the abstract horror strings. Every scene was built up with this omenous music that never led to anything. It had you thinking that diaster was eminent yet nothing ever happened. What was the story on Eli and Paul? They never resolved that to any satisfaction. DD Lewis was brilliant. But was it neccesary to portray him as the world largest colnic apature? I don't get it. Great cinematography. Great acting. But where's the beef?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

LindaL.Jan 28, 2008

Daniel Day-Lewis is mesmerizing in this movie -- although I got a jolt when it's revealed that his character hails from Wisconsin, since he sounds just like his character in "Gangs of New York." We haven't seen a story set in the Daniel Day-Lewis is mesmerizing in this movie -- although I got a jolt when it's revealed that his character hails from Wisconsin, since he sounds just like his character in "Gangs of New York." We haven't seen a story set in the oil boom for a long time, and this is a gritty, engrossing one with dark, complex characters. None of them very likable, which is a drawback for some of us. With so much calamity and grief, I missed having someone like Tommy Lee Jones (in "Old Men") as the anchor and "heart" of the story. And thought the score, with its plinky percussion and busy strings, was awful, actually a distraction.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

OliverC.Jan 6, 2008

Great use of sound, good acting and directing bring to life an otherwise mundane plot that we've all seen a million times.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

There Will Be Blood

User Reviews