There Will Be Blood
Paramount Vantage | Release Date: December 26, 2007
8.1
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 1708 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,396
Mixed:
134
Negative:
178
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
7
SteveT.Jan 19, 2008
Of course, Day-Lewis is fantastic. Loved Paul Dano, too, but the plot moves along fairly slowly and is oftentimes predictable. The music (if you call it that...it is frequently "sound") is pretty cool as the movie's backdrop. Overall, Of course, Day-Lewis is fantastic. Loved Paul Dano, too, but the plot moves along fairly slowly and is oftentimes predictable. The music (if you call it that...it is frequently "sound") is pretty cool as the movie's backdrop. Overall, worth seeing but not the best movie of the year.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
SeanP.Jan 21, 2008
It stunned me. 2007 had its share of great movies. I didn't think stuff like No Country For Old Men and The Diving Bell And The Butterfly could be beat, but this movie knocked me out like no other film from the last few years. Maybe It stunned me. 2007 had its share of great movies. I didn't think stuff like No Country For Old Men and The Diving Bell And The Butterfly could be beat, but this movie knocked me out like no other film from the last few years. Maybe even longer. The ending was over-the-top and bizarre, but it was also 10 minutes of some of the best one-person acting I've ever seen. Day-Lewis is spectacular throughout the whole film, but he just went all out at the end. A crazy masterpiece.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
WilliamBJan 2, 2008
A masterpiece from PTA. Every shot is beautifully composed and in effect places you directly into the film. I don't even know where to begin with the acting performances. This may be Daniel Day-Lewis' greatest acting performance, A masterpiece from PTA. Every shot is beautifully composed and in effect places you directly into the film. I don't even know where to begin with the acting performances. This may be Daniel Day-Lewis' greatest acting performance, which says a lot. If you thought Bill The Butcher was intense, merciless, and dynamic, wait until you see Daniel Plainview. Jonny Greenwood's score is creates an uneasy anticipation throughout. It is perfect. There Will Be Blood is a must see film for cinephiles, but the average movie goer might leave the theater feeling empty or perhaps dirty inside. It has that kind of affect.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
GeneV.Jan 2, 2008
Great acting - especially Day-Lewis who carries the film with a performance just slightly more restrained and less threatening that Gangs of NY. Great cinematography and set making a gripping visual portrait of depression era Southwest. The Great acting - especially Day-Lewis who carries the film with a performance just slightly more restrained and less threatening that Gangs of NY. Great cinematography and set making a gripping visual portrait of depression era Southwest. The only problems are those of the Anderson as scriptwriter [unfocused at times] and visuals [some scenes are included solely for the purposes of showing off the director's skills]. Both of these problems are characteristics of Anderson's film making efforts. All in all a must see, especially given the current run of cartoon extravaganzas, mellow-dramas, and shopping mall teen films.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
EricH.Jan 23, 2008
It is very rare that I will give a movie a ten out of ten. This film deserves it, hands down. Some say it's too slow, too boring, or too pointless. The opposite is the case. Sure; it does ride heavily on the back of Day-Lewis, but there It is very rare that I will give a movie a ten out of ten. This film deserves it, hands down. Some say it's too slow, too boring, or too pointless. The opposite is the case. Sure; it does ride heavily on the back of Day-Lewis, but there are plenty of other fantastic actors to keep the movie afloat. What really needs to be taken into account here is character and theme. Put quite simply, the character development is spectacular and the numerous themes have you leaving the theater shaken and, quite frankly, changed. Sit this movie out and you will be rewarded.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
TomJan 24, 2008
The single greatest acting performance of my lifetime. For the life of me, I can't see how you'd rate this movie any less than a 9. I suppose if your attention span is more "Fast and the Furious 2" than "There Will Be Blood" you The single greatest acting performance of my lifetime. For the life of me, I can't see how you'd rate this movie any less than a 9. I suppose if your attention span is more "Fast and the Furious 2" than "There Will Be Blood" you might find this a bit dull. But if you ever enjoyed a serious work of fiction, see this post-haste. It rewards thoughtfulness, understanding of character, and a sober assessment of what simultaneously makes our country great, and yet corrupts it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
CussR.Jan 24, 2008
Does savage ambition inevitably breed insanity? Is true success earned only upon complete deprivation of human emotion? These are among the uncertainties haunting Paul Thomas Anderson
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
StaciaM.Jan 26, 2008
One of the most amazing films in a long time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
SteveFJan 29, 2008
One of the most brilliant screen performances that I have ever seen! Daniel Day and Paul Thomas have together made the ultimate masterpiece!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
StevenMJan 30, 2008
A masterpiece, but a sure-fire audience splitter similar to the (near equally) "No Country for Old Men." On one side you have people who love to go to the cinema and be challenged, surprised, perplexed, even dare say, confused. We want to A masterpiece, but a sure-fire audience splitter similar to the (near equally) "No Country for Old Men." On one side you have people who love to go to the cinema and be challenged, surprised, perplexed, even dare say, confused. We want to debate the film, what it means, what motivated the characters. To, you know, think. We are the people voting 9 and 10 here. The other side are folks who want to go to the movies. To be spoon fed sugary treats, patted on the head, given a good night kiss and sent off to bed without a thought ringing in their heads. These are the folks slamming this film, and who probably just loved "National Treasure 2" and "Alvin and the Chipmunks". It's not wrong. Some people spend their hard earned cash on something and want exactly what they want -- to be entertained but without the hassles. Seriously, does anyone who's seen "National Treasure 2" remember if the next week, the next day, the next ... hour. No. "There Will be Blood" settles inside you like oil, and I know I'll be wrestling with it for weeks and months to come, until I see it again. You've read the plot posts already, Daniel Day-Lewis -- never more brilliant -- is an oil tycoon with oil for blood. He loves nothing but his ambition. He is the corruption of capitalism, which was meant to help all people but has been hijacked by the greed of a few. Paul Dano, who by God looks exactly like my brother who's now in Iraq, represents the corruption of America's other greatest gift, religion. He is an evangelist for himself, not God above. Both men destroy and push away every thing close to themselves until they have nothing but each other -- then they start tearing down again. One stands at the end, or rather slumps. This is a brilliant, methodical film that is as one poster here said, a brilliant disaster film. The disaster of the soul. Again like in "No Country," there is an innocent -- the adopted son of Daniel Planview (the Day-Lewis character). In a brilliant twist, the boy has his ear drums blown out by an oil rig accident and he goes deaf. It's heart-breaking to think a son will never hear his father say, "I love you." The irony is that Planview, when he tells his son exactly that, doesn't mean it. Alas, it's not worth hearing. Yes, it's long, yes, it's challenging, and hard to get a grip of, yes, there's deep, deep thought in every scene. Cinema, lovers: enjoy. All others, do pass. One final note: The score, by Johnny Greenwood of Radiohead, is the best this decade.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
SteveGJan 4, 2008
Art is very subjective. And the medium of film has perhaps the widest range of any art form. For example, one critic on this site's list of the best movies of the year has "The Borne Ultimatum" at #1. A young woman in front of me at the Art is very subjective. And the medium of film has perhaps the widest range of any art form. For example, one critic on this site's list of the best movies of the year has "The Borne Ultimatum" at #1. A young woman in front of me at the store last night told someone on the phone that "I am Legend" was the best movie ever made and that WIll Smith is the best actor in the history of film. And a number of users here viscerally hate this film. Opinions are like noses (or any other body part) -- everyone has one. The reason this movie is so well received by critics is that it is stunningly shot and edited, very well acted and tackles a number of important issues. Not everyone has the attention span necessary to enjoy a film like this. Anderson's films tend to be a bit long in the tooth, and this is no exception. But as with "Boogie Nights" and "Magnolia," the long ride is worthwhile, not just for the destination, but for the ride itself. This movie is bearutiful and powerful and tragic and, at times, disturbing. It is also magnificent. I am often dumbfounded as to how people adore some of the movies that are popular. I am equally surprised by the few, but very adament, negative reviews of this film. Paul Thomas Anderson and Daniel Day Lewis will be nominated for Academy Awards again. Those acolades will be deserved. I loved this movie. If you have an attention span not dulled by music videos and sitcoms, and are not a pretentious film school malcontent, you should appreciate this movie too.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
antoniom.Jan 4, 2008
Daniel Day Lewis' performance is riveting.......easily the best performance by an actor this past year......every thing about the film is beautiful executed......a wonderful ride!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JackB.Jan 4, 2008
I read metacritic constantly and rarely vote, but I just wanted to say that this is one of the finest films I've ever seen in my entire life.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
GeorgeH.Jan 5, 2008
Inspiringly beautiful movie making on all levels. Don't be afraid of the misleading title and critics mistakingly pigeon-holing it as simply a Western; "There Will Be Blood" is one of the best films in years and will be remembered for Inspiringly beautiful movie making on all levels. Don't be afraid of the misleading title and critics mistakingly pigeon-holing it as simply a Western; "There Will Be Blood" is one of the best films in years and will be remembered for many years to come.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
NeilKJan 5, 2008
Best movie of the year. Hands down. See it now.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
PatrickBJan 5, 2008
Best film of DDL's career, and the year's best. A must see in theaters. Well worth price of admission. I can't say enough about the acting on all accounts, but the writing too really is something, and the story twists and Best film of DDL's career, and the year's best. A must see in theaters. Well worth price of admission. I can't say enough about the acting on all accounts, but the writing too really is something, and the story twists and turns in gut-wrenching ways that you will be thinking about weeks after.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
leannem.Jan 7, 2008
A morality tale on a very big scale, a story told in bold strokes, cinematograthy and a sound track to jar your nerves (in a good way), evil vs evil in your face, There Willl Be Blood is terriffic entertianment and enlightening.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JohnGuyJan 7, 2008
It gave me nightmares... I havent slept since the night I saw it... O.K, I just got back from seeing it. "I'm Finished"
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JonSJan 8, 2008
The film-making is astonishing, the music haunting, and Daniel Day-Lewis' performance is unforgettable. There are missteps (Dano is only okay) but this is a masterful movie and will long be remembered and savored by everyone who loves The film-making is astonishing, the music haunting, and Daniel Day-Lewis' performance is unforgettable. There are missteps (Dano is only okay) but this is a masterful movie and will long be remembered and savored by everyone who loves film. Surely it's churlish to note that the negative reviews on this message board feature many misspellings and grammatical mistakes, but it should be mentioned that this movie is not for the impatient or the unimaginative.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MattS.Jan 9, 2008
Possibly the best American film of the decade thus far, Day-Lewis is flawless, Greenwood's soundtrack enthralls, and Anderson reinvents himself as a director. A must see!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
IainF.Oct 9, 2008
This film is amazing. A relentless, brutal, gripping, psycologichally moving film. This and No Country For Old Men were two of the best films I've ever seen, the only difference in the two is that There Will Be Bloo has a distinct lead This film is amazing. A relentless, brutal, gripping, psycologichally moving film. This and No Country For Old Men were two of the best films I've ever seen, the only difference in the two is that There Will Be Bloo has a distinct lead character. And this is Daniel Day Lewis' character, Daniel Plainview, a relentless and brutal oil man who cares about no one but himself and his own image. The anti-hero he plays is a interesting and complicated character, but whats most intriguing about this film is DDL's performance. If you've seen any of his other films such as My Left Foot, you'll be familiar with his work. He's absolutely amazing. However, after viewing metacritic and seeing the user reviews on NCFOM and TWBB, I realised something. These films I thought as brilliant aren't perfect. Far from it. They have one gigantic floor, and this is... Dumb people. Pathetic people who don't have the patience and brain capacity to appreciate the films magnificance and deeply moving narrative. They can't appreciate the script, the characters and there motives, the cinematography or anything. They just think, oh there hasn't been anyone slaughtered to death, or any sexy women yet, so i'm gonna give this film a zero. Think about it. It makes sense. And who are you gonna believe, film critics, who aren't dumb and can actually appreciate the film in it's entiretym or audiences who find anything other than porn stale, dull and boring. This film is a work of brilliance... Unmissable.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
GaryM.Jan 9, 2008
Are you an angry man? Are you envious? Do you get envious? I have a competition in me. I want no one else to succeed. I hate most people. There are times when I look at people and I see nothing worth liking. I've built my hatreds up Are you an angry man? Are you envious? Do you get envious? I have a competition in me. I want no one else to succeed. I hate most people. There are times when I look at people and I see nothing worth liking. I've built my hatreds up over the years, little by little. I see the worst in people. I don't need to look past seeing them to get all I need. I want to earn enough money I can get away from everyone. I can't keep doing this on my own... with these... people.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
WilliamCFeb 11, 2008
Absolutely awesome in every way. There was nothing i would change about this movie. The forced Baptism scene was one of the greatest moments of cinema in the past century.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RB.Feb 10, 2008
No sugar coating here. Simply a dark movie with a hell of a story. If you see movies on a regular basis, you have to see this one-even if you know you won't like it. The performance of Daniel Day-Lewis is one for the ages. Just as you No sugar coating here. Simply a dark movie with a hell of a story. If you see movies on a regular basis, you have to see this one-even if you know you won't like it. The performance of Daniel Day-Lewis is one for the ages. Just as you think of George C. Scott when you think of WWll and General Patton, you will thing of Day-Lewis everytime you fill up your gas tank.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MarkCW.C.Feb 15, 2008
I find it interesting how many people loathe this movie, however I am not against it. While it is one of the more overt and slow paced movies of out times, it is one of the most subtle and interrogative. I do have some problems with its I find it interesting how many people loathe this movie, however I am not against it. While it is one of the more overt and slow paced movies of out times, it is one of the most subtle and interrogative. I do have some problems with its length(I think PT could have filled some areas with something of interest) and I do not have yet any conviction on its ending I admire it for the degrees it reaches. The allegory is so self referential and all encompassing and yet it achieves nothing but poignancy. PT is a subtle master of building the drama-he is very patient and very crafty and I often think he intends to test his audience (Magnolia with the frogs-why? I hated that decision at first and as time went on I began to admire it for his brazen decision, which has no parallel in cinema) I was underwhelmed when I first left the movie and as the days went on it propagated throughout my bones and I felt like I had to see it again, and did, and while it might not be my favorite movie, I have never been so thankful for a piece of art. PT and DDl seem to have invented emotions, however, the do not. They uncover things that I don not believe anyone has ever expressed at least not with a comparable eloquence. DDL's performance is BIG, and thats why I think some people think it is over the top. His presence is big when he doesn't bat an eye. The most memorable part of the movie is his stare right before he threatens to slice the mans throat. The whole production is big and subtle-typically an either or concept, however not here. Its is the execution of an exquisite and surreal histrionics that is needed to enrapture a part in our history that reveals a timelessness in our soul with an acuity and honesty that I is without analogy, save the allusions in found in music.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MikeL.Feb 17, 2008
The fastest 2:38 movie you'll ever watch. Keeps you waiting for what could possibly come next and the ending will get you. Best most intense movie in a long time and DDL does it again! What a master!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
CliffBFeb 17, 2008
Just my two cents. Great film. If your attention span has been shortened by our world of instant gratification, don't go see it, but it gripped my attention from beginning to end. If you are one of the hollywood sheeple, you will simply Just my two cents. Great film. If your attention span has been shortened by our world of instant gratification, don't go see it, but it gripped my attention from beginning to end. If you are one of the hollywood sheeple, you will simply expect to have everything laid out for you to follow so that you won't have to use that space between your ears. I know it is hard you big babies, but c'mon. As for overacting ..... have you ever seen an episode of "Cops?" People can act pretty crazy, and I thought DDL did a great job of portraying a guy who spends most of his life repressing his emotions only to suddenly let them burst forth from time to time. The music .... hello it is supposed to be creepy. As for the supposed indictment of capitalism, oil, the gilded age, etc, I just didn't really see it that way. That was just the setting, and though it was a great one, the story that was being told could have taken place elsewhere and in another time. Go see it and form your own opinion, but see it again after you have some different life experience, and see if you don't get something else out of it. I usually say to each their own, but if you can't dig past the surface of this film, well yes indeed, you are pretty stupid. And deep inside, I think you know it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
PaulA.Feb 2, 2008
Best film I have seen in years. Daniel Day Lewis has performed the best acting job since David Thewlis in Naked 1993. Its a performance that happens but once a decade. The film itself conjures Kubrick at his best, pure intense genius.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
SamN.Feb 22, 2008
Wayne W., you mean you spoke to 6 people and they hated it? Well, that must mean that the vast majority didn't really 'love' it! I guess the acting wasn't really brilliant! I guess the music wasn't really perfect! I Wayne W., you mean you spoke to 6 people and they hated it? Well, that must mean that the vast majority didn't really 'love' it! I guess the acting wasn't really brilliant! I guess the music wasn't really perfect! I guess the direction wasn't really astounding! See how it works, you stupid fuck?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
Martak.Feb 24, 2008
While DD Lewis' acting was, of course, great and I enjoyed the cinematography, the film missed several opportunites for insightful character development and story context. OK I get the greed and the need for revenge but please give more While DD Lewis' acting was, of course, great and I enjoyed the cinematography, the film missed several opportunites for insightful character development and story context. OK I get the greed and the need for revenge but please give more insight to help me make sense of the horrific ending. The film took place during a historically fascinating time with ramifications still felt today. Don't hint at it, take us there. Just a bit more effort to replace the sometimes tedious and non-sensical sections with insight would have made this film great.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JoeBFeb 27, 2008
Wow. This movie was amazing. At first, I wasn't sure how I'd feel about it, but after seeing it, I was talking with the person I went with--asking what he thought of this and that and what this meant to him and did he notice x, y, Wow. This movie was amazing. At first, I wasn't sure how I'd feel about it, but after seeing it, I was talking with the person I went with--asking what he thought of this and that and what this meant to him and did he notice x, y, or z--it's been a long time since I've left a movie with that kind of feeling, and it's been following me around all night. Definitely the indicator of a fantastic flick.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
CarlosR.Feb 28, 2008
Beginning with P.T. Anderson's prior films, Boogie Nights was humourous but I could only enjoy it once. Magnolia had a powerful replay value and moved its images through pity, weakness, sadness, and beautiful cinematography in its Beginning with P.T. Anderson's prior films, Boogie Nights was humourous but I could only enjoy it once. Magnolia had a powerful replay value and moved its images through pity, weakness, sadness, and beautiful cinematography in its vignette of personalities. Punch-Drunk Love was unexpectedly enjoyable, yet it also weighed on pity, sadness, weakness, in other words, the very common, all-too human, pathologies with an injection of splendid, raw humor. Emotionally, There Will Be Blood was unlike anything P.T. Anderson had ever done before; and, in comparison to other films, something most directs would never dare. This film's emotional foundation is a cold and gleaming gold, a sense of power, a depreciation of everything egalitarian, handicap, and democratic. I was blown away, he is the best living director and this particular film affirmed this rank. However, in terms of this rarely used emotion of esoterism and power, Ingmar Bergman will always remain both father and master.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
GuyHFeb 28, 2008
Brilliant performance by Daniel Day Lewis. In an age of sadistic, exploitative guff that passes for horror like 'The Hostel', 'Wolf Creek',etc, etc this is truly frightening - a man who finds it impossible to connect with Brilliant performance by Daniel Day Lewis. In an age of sadistic, exploitative guff that passes for horror like 'The Hostel', 'Wolf Creek',etc, etc this is truly frightening - a man who finds it impossible to connect with those around him and in fact actively wants everyone around him to fail. To him 'these people' are just 'COM-PET-TI-TORS'. Chilling… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ScottM.Feb 5, 2008
I have to disagree with Mike N. I believe this movie deserves comparison with "Citizen Kane", though i believe this film is far more poetic and powerful than "..Kane". I see how some are disappointed, it truly is a one-of-a-kind film, albeit I have to disagree with Mike N. I believe this movie deserves comparison with "Citizen Kane", though i believe this film is far more poetic and powerful than "..Kane". I see how some are disappointed, it truly is a one-of-a-kind film, albeit for better or worse. I personally believe for the better.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
NickFeb 6, 2008
A movie all about drilling for oil in the early nineteenth century...and not about drilling for oil at all. Daniel Day-Lewis gives a intriguing performance as Daniel Plainview, constantly allowing the viewer to be torn between excitement for A movie all about drilling for oil in the early nineteenth century...and not about drilling for oil at all. Daniel Day-Lewis gives a intriguing performance as Daniel Plainview, constantly allowing the viewer to be torn between excitement for his success and business flair, and sickness at his greed and cold-heartedness. The movie tackles many social values as it winds its course through history, including religion, prophecy (or the lack thereof), and trust. At almost three hours long, the movie begins at some points to border on excess, yet each time pulls the viewer back through the use of gritty action, tense dialogue, and an excellent soundtrack. It may leave readers of Upton Sinclair's "Oil!" slightly confused, but does capture points from the book most relevant (and understandable) in today's world. The final three minutes of the movie leave audiences scratching their heads if they are interpreting much of the movie correctly, but this is a small price to pay for an excellent showcase of the American experience. It will most likely not win best picture, due largely to its massive scope and strongly suggestive subject matter, but Daniel Day-Lewis and Paul Dano both deserve Oscars for their performances. This movie shines as not just a movie experience, but as an achievement in cinematography as well.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
NicoleG.Mar 15, 2008
My favorite films are character studies. With that said, this may be one of the finest I've ever witnessed.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
EdTMar 17, 2008
Russ T- there's a good reason Day-Lewis sounds like John Huston- he was actually emulating Huston's cadences and speech and had used recordings of Huston speaking to research the role.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ChrisS.Mar 31, 2008
This Is a great movie. Probably the best movie of 2007. I felt that it deserved to win best picture, though so did No Country for Old Men. There Will Be Blood is an epic story of greed and corruption. This movie is a true satire about what This Is a great movie. Probably the best movie of 2007. I felt that it deserved to win best picture, though so did No Country for Old Men. There Will Be Blood is an epic story of greed and corruption. This movie is a true satire about what happens when greed takes over someone entirley. Daniel Plainview goes from a good business man to a greedy robber baron. Daniel Day-Lewis gives the greatest proformance I have ever seen, and the way Paul Dano and Daniel Day-Lewis play off each other is incredible. Paul Thomas Anderson is one of the greatest director's of our gerneration. The people giving this movie a zero just want to see blood and guts, and don't know a good movie when they see one. They were thinking "hey it says Blood in the title, lets go see it". Hey guys, this isn't SAW.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
CSMar 4, 2008
Very engaging character acting, after that this movie is WAAAAAY overrated.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
MichaelMMar 4, 2008
I have not yet seen this movie, therefore I will give it the average rating. I am writing this to let the others posting on this board know that all of you who are praising the film for it's aesthetic appeal or it's amazing acting I have not yet seen this movie, therefore I will give it the average rating. I am writing this to let the others posting on this board know that all of you who are praising the film for it's aesthetic appeal or it's amazing acting just sound like a bunch of pretentious douche bags who are trying to impress one another with how sophisticated you are, that you can see the inner allegorical meaning of a movie etc. etc. I'm sorry to say that I believe you have lost site of what movies are supposed to do and that is of course entertain. From what I have heard this film was made by film nerds for film nerds, thus making it unfit for mass consumption.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JPriceMar 5, 2008
It's been a few months now, and the more I reflect upon it...the better it becomes.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
CalebB.Mar 8, 2008
I thought that this was a very well constructed film. Daniel Day-Lewis did a wonderful job of acting. The characters were engaging and the story just pulled me in that much more. All in all it was an overall good movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BrandonApr 10, 2008
It's unlike anything I've ever seen and a movie that I appreciate more every time I watch it. P.T. Anderson is THE best director of his era. Killer score from Radiohead's Jonny Greenwood!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
SteveAApr 12, 2008
I loved this movie. Daniel Day-Lewis was awesome. However, I didn't care for Dano's acting in this movie. In some scenes, his voice was straining and cracking, and his actions were overdone and unconvincing. I also didn't care I loved this movie. Daniel Day-Lewis was awesome. However, I didn't care for Dano's acting in this movie. In some scenes, his voice was straining and cracking, and his actions were overdone and unconvincing. I also didn't care for the Henry subplot. It seemed more like an unnecessary and lengthy detour than character development. However, it was still an awesome movie. I felt like it deserved the Oscar for best movie. It had a lot going for it, instead of just a hell of a good bad guy.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
SeanF.Apr 12, 2008
A pretty good movie, a little bit overrated by the critics, and the Hollywood establishment. Very good acting, excellent cinematography, but the plot left many unanswered questions, and was quite confusing at times (including the ending).A pretty good movie, a little bit overrated by the critics, and the Hollywood establishment. Very good acting, excellent cinematography, but the plot left many unanswered questions, and was quite confusing at times (including the ending). There were many better movies in '07, but this movie (even though deeply flawed) definitely fell at the top of the heap.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
AkisP.Apr 13, 2008
Very slow movie...but very good work from the cast and crew.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RoryD.Apr 19, 2008
An excellent film. With out doubt one of the best films of the decade. The three main components ( direction, script, acting), are supported by equally excellent technique: cinematography, score, editing/pacing. I love the parallel of Daniel An excellent film. With out doubt one of the best films of the decade. The three main components ( direction, script, acting), are supported by equally excellent technique: cinematography, score, editing/pacing. I love the parallel of Daniel and Eli. The play between them that leads to the terrifcally to the climax. There was blood.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RobbyT.Apr 20, 2008
Daniel Day-Lewis gives the best performance I've seen in a decade. The movie isn't perfect but it deserves a 10 for not playing it safe and exposing the darkest side of humanity.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MattG.Apr 23, 2008
I thought this move was excellent. I have to say though it was for sure not what I expected it to be. I felt intrigue throughout the whole movie. Daniel Day-Lewis gave an incredible performance as always. The role was one of my favorite I thought this move was excellent. I have to say though it was for sure not what I expected it to be. I felt intrigue throughout the whole movie. Daniel Day-Lewis gave an incredible performance as always. The role was one of my favorite characters yet. Wow what a crazy guy.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AdamP.Apr 26, 2008
I came into this movie not knowing what to expect - would it be exciting, boring, overrated? But I was stunned; it was amazing. Daniel Day-Lewis was terrific, one of the best performances I've seen by an actor. His character's I came into this movie not knowing what to expect - would it be exciting, boring, overrated? But I was stunned; it was amazing. Daniel Day-Lewis was terrific, one of the best performances I've seen by an actor. His character's megalomaniac-esque attitudes are both honest and real, showing what can really happen when greed and a need for power are thrown into the kufe of an average man, a man trying to live the American Dream. The music was fantastic, both riveting and deep. The landscapes were beautiful. This movie WILL be a classic.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BrentBApr 26, 2008
Could be slightly tightened (trimming ~5 minutes) but still a great portrayal of the ambiguities of capitalism and ambition.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
TylerG.Apr 9, 2008
I watched No Country For Old Men in theaters because it came relatively close. I thought that it won Best Picture because I hadn't seen There Will Be Blood. But now I see the light, There Will Be Blood is a flawless film in my eyes. I watched No Country For Old Men in theaters because it came relatively close. I thought that it won Best Picture because I hadn't seen There Will Be Blood. But now I see the light, There Will Be Blood is a flawless film in my eyes. There isn't anything I would change in this movie. Daniel Day-Lewis showed just how amazing of an actor he really is with his portrayal of Daniel Plainview. It is such a moving performance you just might be a different person after watching it. Now I am by no means saying No Country For Old Men isn't worthy of Best Picture, but There Will Be Blood should have gotten it… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
SharonHApr 9, 2008
Brilliant. A masterpiece. One of the most artful and elegant films I've seen. It's exploration of the human condition is magnificent, underscored by the most intriguing and innovative use of music in a film to come around in a long time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MattR.May 17, 2008
A truly excellent movie, one with a compelling story, a musical score that casts this movie in a layer of impenetrable darkness, and Daniel Day-Lewis in one of the most striking performances I've ever seen. This movie is one of the best A truly excellent movie, one with a compelling story, a musical score that casts this movie in a layer of impenetrable darkness, and Daniel Day-Lewis in one of the most striking performances I've ever seen. This movie is one of the best of 2007, and probably one of the best for a good while to come.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RoryP.May 21, 2008
A slow film that is remarkably hypnotic for reasons beyond this viewer, this is an essential american film. Whether its greenwood's score or Thomas Andersons inspired direction (which was always remarkable, but now feels like it is no A slow film that is remarkably hypnotic for reasons beyond this viewer, this is an essential american film. Whether its greenwood's score or Thomas Andersons inspired direction (which was always remarkable, but now feels like it is no longer trying to impress) the erriness of the film overwhelms, and stays with the viewer for days after. Thoroughly recommended.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
SOMay 27, 2008
Very good but could use just a little more action to keep the suspense audience interested longer.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RyanN.May 4, 2008
A really bizarre and wonderful film. The cinematography, acting, and story were spectacular, all set at a gloriously steady churning pace. I loved it!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
WesLyonsJul 14, 2008
An American classic. There has been a lot of complaining that the film is boring, pointless, and the ending: horrendous; but what those that think that fail to realize is that this is a definitive character study. The film is not constructed An American classic. There has been a lot of complaining that the film is boring, pointless, and the ending: horrendous; but what those that think that fail to realize is that this is a definitive character study. The film is not constructed on the basis of telling a linear story, it is merely a 2.5 hour analysis on the deranged persona of Daniel Plainview. The running time, for me, is enough time to fully flesh out this strange character and director P.T. Anderson doesn't waste his directorial skills on doing so. As a result, we get a relentless, at times sadistic, tragic American-dream-tale of a film. By all means, the film comes out strange and offbeat at times, but that does not deny the brilliance of the acting, directing and cinematography -- all of which are wisely used in this landmark of a film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
BenM.Jan 12, 2009
Great that there are still directors out there who aren't either playing to the lowest common denominator or just hitting the same old emotional cues.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
CurtisBNov 24, 2009
Probably the best piece cinema out of the U.S. in the last 5 years.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
russellj.Jan 21, 2009
There will be blood divides opinion. Some people say it's painfully slow and has nothing to say. Others say it's a masterpiece which shows that ambition and wealth can be your own undoing if you are not rich in forming meaningful There will be blood divides opinion. Some people say it's painfully slow and has nothing to say. Others say it's a masterpiece which shows that ambition and wealth can be your own undoing if you are not rich in forming meaningful bonds with people around you. If it did have nothing to say then the Christian majority wouldn't have been so disapproving of the nihilist tone of the movie and it's negative view of the church (and capitalism and pretty much everything else). The film is slow admittedly and as sudden jumps in the narrative which leads the audience to infer what has happened. Daniel Day Lewis is incredible and carries the movie. I love the sedate pace it reminds me when epic movies had faith in their audience and not to barrage them with over the top CGI explosions. The final scene in Plainviews mansion in the bowling alley will go down as one of the best and most random final scenes ever.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JimHDec 20, 2009
An absolute masterpiece. There Will Be Blood is sure to make cinema history.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
JohnWDec 24, 2009
While I see the points that they were trying to make about power, capitalism, and religion, I just wasn't very entertained while watching it. In my mind, that what makes this movie good, but No Country For Old Men great.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LeoBAug 12, 2009
Anyone who deems this work of art a 'movie' is truly mistaken - a film of the highest caliber.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MarvinS.Aug 5, 2009
This film is outstanding in every sense. What troubles me, though, are the reactions of some of my fellow TWBB fans - Iain F and Nikko C ? . . . did some boorish prol torment you as children? Didn't you two make this same sort ofThis film is outstanding in every sense. What troubles me, though, are the reactions of some of my fellow TWBB fans - Iain F and Nikko C ? . . . did some boorish prol torment you as children? Didn't you two make this same sort of display on the board for NCFOM too (an excellent film, certainly, but not as good as TWBB)? . . . I mean, just what is it you think you're accomplishing? Shaming people for being uncultured? The only thing you've accomplished is showing us how to be a dick… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ChristelleV.Sep 19, 2009
Existentialist and honest. Mesmerizing. After the 3rd time watching I am again left disquieted - just as I should be.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AndyG.Jan 13, 2010
Gripping, compelling stuff - for the right audience.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JoshPMar 19, 2010
After finally watching this movie, i can see why it is so highly claimed. Paul Thomas Anderson directed his masterpiece around Daniel Plainfield, and Daniel Day-Lewis created a character I could watch for hours on end.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
CraigTMar 24, 2010
First let me say some may see this movie as a slow starter but that is deliberate and highlights key themes within the film. Brilliant-brilliant performance by Day-Lewis, truly one of the best acting performance I have ever seen a genius First let me say some may see this movie as a slow starter but that is deliberate and highlights key themes within the film. Brilliant-brilliant performance by Day-Lewis, truly one of the best acting performance I have ever seen a genius method actor. The soundtrack fantastic from Radiohead guitarist Jonny Greenwood, he has re-inforced his musical talents and understanding a fantastic score. This film has a mighty strong story and that is what holds it above other films.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RobertH.Dec 21, 2007
About once a decade a flilm changes the face of cinema. How lucky we are to witness the vision and brillance of Paul Thomas Anderson's masterpiece "There Will Be Blood".
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
GeorgeM.Dec 26, 2007
Terrance Malleck meets Orson Welles in this contemplation of a movie. Great acting all around.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JimK.Dec 26, 2007
Best movie I have seen this year! Better than No Country for Old Men & Before the Devil Knows You're Dead!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
NathanT.Dec 28, 2007
A feverishly provocative epic that happens to be the best Paul Thomas Anderson's best effort since the great "Boogie Nights" in 1997 (and when you remember that his last two films were "Magnolia" and "Punch Drunk Love" that's a A feverishly provocative epic that happens to be the best Paul Thomas Anderson's best effort since the great "Boogie Nights" in 1997 (and when you remember that his last two films were "Magnolia" and "Punch Drunk Love" that's a pretty big statement), "There Will Be Blood" is a big departure from his past material. As Daniel Plainview, the wicked single minded oil man at the start of a new century, Daniel Day-Lewis gives a ferocious, layered performance that ranks as the best of the year. This one strange and great film that literally made my jaw drop.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
PaulK.Dec 30, 2007
The pacing is sluggish at times, and I wanted more character/relationship development between Daniel and HW, but otherwise, this is a great film. Superb acting, great cinematography, and a compelling story. See it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RyanC.Dec 30, 2007
2007's great movie is There Will Be Blood. Day-Lewis puts on one of the greatest performances in American cinema history. With a terrific all-around cast, coupled with Paul Thomas Anderson's ingenious writing and direction, this 2007's great movie is There Will Be Blood. Day-Lewis puts on one of the greatest performances in American cinema history. With a terrific all-around cast, coupled with Paul Thomas Anderson's ingenious writing and direction, this film has no visible weakness.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
michaelcJan 12, 2008
Immediately after seeing it I was amazed. Not only was it by far the best movie of the year. But it might be one of the best movies I have ever seen. Paul Thomas Anderson's directing is masterful, and Daniel Day Lewis' performance Immediately after seeing it I was amazed. Not only was it by far the best movie of the year. But it might be one of the best movies I have ever seen. Paul Thomas Anderson's directing is masterful, and Daniel Day Lewis' performance is unbelievable. Its just magnificent.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
TerryA.Jan 12, 2008
A "10" does not do this film justice. Rarely does a movie so exceed the conventions of todays film making as this one does. A true masterpiece.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BarbaraL.Jan 12, 2008
Amazing, haunting, thought provoking, and worth every minute of an film goer's time!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JohnBarkerJan 12, 2008
There Will Be Blood is simply the best American movie all year, perhaps ever. While No Country For Old Men was fantastic as well, Anderson puts his own original daring ideas into the mix to create something completely unique. It is better There Will Be Blood is simply the best American movie all year, perhaps ever. While No Country For Old Men was fantastic as well, Anderson puts his own original daring ideas into the mix to create something completely unique. It is better because it is imperfect. It is funner for its awkward scenes and twisted sense of direction. It is more exciting for its very real clashing of strong characters set to an equally relevant background.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AlexS.CarterJan 13, 2008
i need to be honest right from the start - i listed 'there will be blood' as my favourite film of 2007 before i had even seen it. luckily, i couldn't have been more right. last night, i sat in a sold-out theatre at the varsity,i need to be honest right from the start - i listed 'there will be blood' as my favourite film of 2007 before i had even seen it. luckily, i couldn't have been more right. last night, i sat in a sold-out theatre at the varsity, the only one in canada and one of only a handful across north america currently screening the film. the show was to begin at 8.45pm but by 8pm, all the tickets had been sold and there was a lineup outside the theatre unlike anything i've seen for any film other than blockbusters like star wars, harry potter or lotr. as the previous show emptied, i watched the faces of the patrons as they came out of the darkness, some in excited conversation as if they had just gotten off an amusement park ride, others in quiet contemplation as if having just visited the grave of someone dear to them. one young man exclaimed to those of us in line as he walked by 'you're in for a treat!' while others simple nodded their heads to acknowledge us before we embarked on the journey from which they were just returning. i have been to many films on opening night and there is quite often a lot of excitement, but i must reiterate that i have never experienced this kind of anticipation for an art film.

and then the film began. i'm not someone who gives a synopsis of a film in my reviews since i feel it can infringe on the viewer's experience. i prefer to explore the various creative elements of the piece and my experience/reaction to those elements. i had no doubt going into 'there will be blood' that daniel-day lewis would be incredible as a nihilistic oil magnate driven by ambition and greed. i was also not worried about the direction since i really enjoyed paul thomas anderson's previous three films ('boogie nights', 'magnolia' and 'punch-drunk love'). i had no way of knowing that this film would not only be both anderson's and lewis' best film to date, but also a master work in music (radiohead's jonny greenwood), cinematography (robert elswit - 'good night, and good luck', 'syriana'), editing, art direction, sound editing, costumes and makeup. no other film in recent memory has impressed me on every level as this film has.

i also want to specially recognise paul dano who plays a young preacher and is lewis' only real adversary in the film. dano orginally had only a small role and another actor was initially cast in the role of the preacher [http://www.calendarlive.com/movies/cl-en-dano2jan02,0,924101.story?coll=cl-movies]. dano stepped in at the last minute due partially to his previous work with lewis and i am grateful that he was up for the task. since winning best debut performance at the independent spirit awards back in 2001 for playing howie blitzer in l.i.e., dano has had memorable roles in 'the girl next door', 'the king', 'fast food nation' and of course 2006's 'little miss sunshine'. this is one young actor that deserves to be watched and i hope he at least gets a nomination for his incredible work in 'there will be blood'.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
jimrJan 14, 2008
The terse dialog and stark visuals really highlight and outstanding storyline. This is the only time I've seen huge numbers of an audience burst into spontaneous nervous laughter because the tension in a scene is so palpable. This isThe terse dialog and stark visuals really highlight and outstanding storyline. This is the only time I've seen huge numbers of an audience burst into spontaneous nervous laughter because the tension in a scene is so palpable. This is great film not for its art house merit but for the punch its story packs.
reviewers who launch into a diatribe of other reviews and then conclude with an argument such as "...was like being a proctologist for two hours- go see it if you like staring at a$$h()les." are the ones who deserve to be mocked.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ChristopherC.Jan 16, 2008
After seeing this film, I felt refreshed. I needed a movie like this to remind me why I love film. I needed a film like this to give me faith that there are still film makers that use the medium as more than just a profit center, but toAfter seeing this film, I felt refreshed. I needed a movie like this to remind me why I love film. I needed a film like this to give me faith that there are still film makers that use the medium as more than just a profit center, but to express ideas and situations artistically. I needed a film like this to reaffirm my faith that not all actors are self-indulgent talking heads. I needed a film like this to proof that proves that films are not just formulas but a means to creative independence. I love this film, and hope that some out there will feel the same way I've felt.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
CherylD.Jan 17, 2008
Okay people!!! What's the matter here? I can't believe that people are dissing this film because they can't find any CONTENT in it. A fundamental idea in this film is the following: PEOPLE ARE IGNORING THEIR OWN CHILDREN inOkay people!!! What's the matter here? I can't believe that people are dissing this film because they can't find any CONTENT in it. A fundamental idea in this film is the following: PEOPLE ARE IGNORING THEIR OWN CHILDREN in some vain pursuit for money, prestige and status. THEIR OWN CHILDREN people! It happens ALL the time. Divorce rates are higher than ever, the average person is less happy than they would like to be (just take the time to ask around), but our society is more materialistic than it ever has been and that is due primarily (and no one can argue against this -) to BIG OIL. This film is a sincere attempt, and the only attempt I've yet to witness, to bring the big oil narrative to as many people as possible in the most uncompromising way. People who aren't 'getting' this film have their heads way up their behinds, and choose to ignore our present predicament as a corrupted, ignorant species that is primed for disaster. People should wake up, turn off the mind-numbing television and ride a bicycle to the film. See how good it feels. Then talk about this film or take a film course and start changing things from the inside out. STAND people!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ChadS.Jan 18, 2008
In order to get financing for "Plan 9 from Outer Space", filmmaker Ed Wood agreed to be baptized by a Baptist church. It happened in a swimming pool as depicted in Tim Burton's 1994 biopic about a man who believed in cinema more than In order to get financing for "Plan 9 from Outer Space", filmmaker Ed Wood agreed to be baptized by a Baptist church. It happened in a swimming pool as depicted in Tim Burton's 1994 biopic about a man who believed in cinema more than God. Daniel Plainview(Daniel Day-Lewis) is all about the almighty dollar, about building a pipeline to the ocean, so he gets baptized, gets slapped around by Paul Sunday(Paul Dano) because spiritual enlightenment for this oil man comes from a crack in the dirt. Interestingly enough, the original title for "Plan 9..." was "Grave Diggers from Outer Space". Daniel is a sort of grave digger from inner space. When the oil man buries a man he just murdered, he throws dirt not only on the evidence, but on his secret desires as well. "There Will Be Blood" asks the viewer to determine whose higher calling is more righteous.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
StefaniaSJan 18, 2008
to Joe K.: you're an idiot. if you're rating reviews, go elsewhere. wow no comma. some one pull out a gun and shoot that person. this movie is clearly above and beyond the quality and perceptual genius of most films out there to to Joe K.: you're an idiot. if you're rating reviews, go elsewhere. wow no comma. some one pull out a gun and shoot that person. this movie is clearly above and beyond the quality and perceptual genius of most films out there to date. get a life. stop reading other's reviews and critiquing them, just relax. the script, the actors, the cinematography...fine if you didn't enjoy the movie. but you're an absolute fool if you cannot appreciate its mastery of the medium.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JayKJan 19, 2008
One of the best films I've ever seen. Daniel Day Lewis is incredible.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RL.Jan 21, 2008
This film was just as good as I hoped it might be. It can rightfully be compared to "Citizen Kane" intersected with "McCabe and Mrs Miller", with a hint of "Treasure of the Sierra Madre." But don't worry about comparisons when you see This film was just as good as I hoped it might be. It can rightfully be compared to "Citizen Kane" intersected with "McCabe and Mrs Miller", with a hint of "Treasure of the Sierra Madre." But don't worry about comparisons when you see it. It presents a whole world of its own. Clear your mind, sink back in your chair, and soak it in. Highly recommended.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
TaylorM.Jan 21, 2008
Absolutely jarring and relentless cinema that treats its characters and subject matter with the utmost of care and gumption. The men who did (and do) the "legwork" that made modern American capitalism possible were ruthless in their malice Absolutely jarring and relentless cinema that treats its characters and subject matter with the utmost of care and gumption. The men who did (and do) the "legwork" that made modern American capitalism possible were ruthless in their malice toward those whom them fleeced. Henry Plainview is the finest embodiment of capitalist violence ever committed to film. Bravo to Paul Thomas Andersen, and the fine cast that brings his story to life.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AlexHJan 25, 2008
there isn't much character development because people don't change. there isn't a traditional story arc because life's stories are too f***ed up to arc. this is a masterpiece in the same way cormac mccarthy's "the there isn't much character development because people don't change. there isn't a traditional story arc because life's stories are too f***ed up to arc. this is a masterpiece in the same way cormac mccarthy's "the road" is a masterpiece. flawless acting, a merciless score, breathtaking cinematography, and one of the very few perfect endings to a film. picture of the decade.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JesseDJan 25, 2008
I'm sitting at my computer not 20 minutes removed from one of the most thought provoking films I've ever seen. There were moments honestly, where I couldn't hold back a belly laugh. A few times I braced myself for a dreadingly I'm sitting at my computer not 20 minutes removed from one of the most thought provoking films I've ever seen. There were moments honestly, where I couldn't hold back a belly laugh. A few times I braced myself for a dreadingly dark sequence. By the end I took all the things from the movie that the Director was wanting to place in my mind as...something more. The reason for the 'average' score, is that it was pretty long with what felt like less of a real "eureka" moment than I'd of hoped. Daniel-Day Lewis is everything advertised and more. If he does not win best actor it will be a crime. Paul Dano is eerily violent and a superb actor in his own right. Solid film you should watch this as soon as possible while it's on the big screen.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MarkKJan 26, 2008
Daniel Day Lewis is amazing his best performance. A dark gritty film that is both sad and angry at the same time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
Jonny99Jan 28, 2008
Like being served a grand, sumptuous, banquet only to find out desert is tepid, rainbow-flavored, Jello. I have to go back to 1997's "Contact" to find dissapointment with an ending on this scale. The real tragedy is how unnecessary this Like being served a grand, sumptuous, banquet only to find out desert is tepid, rainbow-flavored, Jello. I have to go back to 1997's "Contact" to find dissapointment with an ending on this scale. The real tragedy is how unnecessary this derailment was; if the director were to cut out everything that happens in 1927, a fully realized, great movie would be left. Having said all this, I would still encourage you to see the film for no other reason than Daniel Day-Lewis is the best living actor.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
EnriqueJan 28, 2008
Nothing less than a masterpiece. One of the most important American films in years.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DNJan 29, 2008
Awesome!!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AlexGJan 29, 2008
Fantastic movie. One person mentioned no sense of humor was present in this film. I honestly thought this movie was hilarious at moments... The overall drama masked everything else. I believe Daniel Day Lewis deserves an Oscar for this Fantastic movie. One person mentioned no sense of humor was present in this film. I honestly thought this movie was hilarious at moments... The overall drama masked everything else. I believe Daniel Day Lewis deserves an Oscar for this one... Amazing performance.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
AriK.Jan 31, 2008
Powerful and meaningful, this is a film that can be discussed for hours. The levels of malice, egoism, paranoia, and greed are brought to such high levels, that it is easy to think of this as an absurdest tale - but in fact when viewed in Powerful and meaningful, this is a film that can be discussed for hours. The levels of malice, egoism, paranoia, and greed are brought to such high levels, that it is easy to think of this as an absurdest tale - but in fact when viewed in light of actual events taking place all around us, it suddenly seems more like a stark reminder of the fact that we're not too far past this vision of a wild west dominated by paranoid, selfish oilmen and pious clergymen. The first thing I noticed watching this film was the score. Without it, the film is nowhere near as disturbing as it might otherwise be (except of course for the end). In fact, I found the music so disturbing, that I almost had an anxiety attack in the theater. That is, however, par for the course when engaging a PT Anderson flick.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MaxH.Feb 11, 2008
I can't express my relief that a film as stark and uncompromising as There WIll Be Blood has received so many academy accolades this season; Hollywood tends to favor movies that include elements of romance and redemption, qualities I can't express my relief that a film as stark and uncompromising as There WIll Be Blood has received so many academy accolades this season; Hollywood tends to favor movies that include elements of romance and redemption, qualities Anderson quite deliberately eschews in his fifth feature. John S. epitomizes how misguided some people's opinions are regarding this film. Plainview (not Plainfield, btw) DOESN'T show compassion at the outset; this is the story of one of the great salesmen in cinema history. He sees only betrayal in human relationships and treats others as a mere means to an end. The penultimate scene where his son, now a young man finally confronts him doesn't reveal any sort of "transformation" in Plainview but rather clarifies his earlier actions. I also don't understand the continued use of "boring" to describe this film; are audiences so accustomed to The Fast and the Furious and the Saw franchises that they can't shift down to a film that actually studies human beings? And YES, Michael Sragow, "any hint of romance, nobility, or fun" would soften the film! Anderson shows us a man who understands absolutely nothing of those qualities. Astoundingly good.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
MichaelEFeb 12, 2008
Not greater than the sum of its parts, but some of those parts are amazing. It's best to think of it as a black comedy that gets out of hand.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JosefVFeb 14, 2008
Salon.com and Sanfran gave this movie bad reviews. What a surprise, two film critics giving this powerful film bad reviews and Baltimore suns opinion is as good as a ski shop in California. honestly if this movie doesn't make your top Salon.com and Sanfran gave this movie bad reviews. What a surprise, two film critics giving this powerful film bad reviews and Baltimore suns opinion is as good as a ski shop in California. honestly if this movie doesn't make your top 10, please don't comment because obviously your an idiot.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
EdC.Feb 17, 2008
how can 'b shanchez' say that he didnt like the film that much because daniel day lewis attacks christians!! it was in his character! what a totally ubsurd thing to say! 'if the movie hadnt showed blasphemy'...(it also how can 'b shanchez' say that he didnt like the film that much because daniel day lewis attacks christians!! it was in his character! what a totally ubsurd thing to say! 'if the movie hadnt showed blasphemy'...(it also showed murder and alcholholism by the way....) idiot. anyway.... the film wasnt really what i expected, although not in a bad way, and Day lewis is exceptional. the film has a slow and brooding intensity and good performances from the support cast. for a film to last as long as it did and be based almost solely on psychological degeneration they must have done something right… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
Page:
More From This Movie

93 Critic Reviews

8.1 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL