TriStar Pictures | Release Date: September 16, 2022
3.0
USER SCORE
Generally unfavorable reviews based on 482 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
129
Mixed:
25
Negative:
328
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
0
RDonnellNov 9, 2022
Lacks diversity, By the rules of wokeness it should not exist. Hollywood only make these movies for propoganda thats why the films are terrible.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
1
JackmachinneOct 9, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Lacração pura. Pq não usar o título Rainha? Ou Mulher Rainha?
Não tem que tentar SOBREPOR os homens e não lado a lado, já que defendem direitos iguais.
Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
0
LSUcajunNov 10, 2022
The makers of this movie should do a squeal on how Hilter was a good guy fighting to save the Jewish race.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
0
willmckassonNov 22, 2022
Hollywood liberal elites like to further racism, sexism and division by releasing distorted untrue and emotionally charged versions of history to further racism in america. This film is pure racists sexist trash and should be in the negativeHollywood liberal elites like to further racism, sexism and division by releasing distorted untrue and emotionally charged versions of history to further racism in america. This film is pure racists sexist trash and should be in the negative reviews as a sub 0 movie. You can't even get quality actors to spew your racist hate. pathetic movie terrible movie cast and director. Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
0
ChekanchikNov 12, 2022
Terrible acting, stupid plot, atrocious screenplay and fake accounts on RottenTomatoes, but this is 'the movie of the year'.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
0
MrEdinLawNov 20, 2022
Claims to be true story but all lies and Fabrication. Near 60 year old grandma Warrior. Truth is French slaughtered them with bayonets in minutes to help stop slavery.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
0
f3lipaoNov 14, 2022
Extremely historically unaccurate, history should be remembered so we can learn from it.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
0
VoltrenXytechNov 23, 2022
this has got to be one of the worst "inspired by true events" movie ive ever seen, they literally painted the French as the villain's, when in reality the French were the ones trying to get them to stop running and fueling the slavethis has got to be one of the worst "inspired by true events" movie ive ever seen, they literally painted the French as the villain's, when in reality the French were the ones trying to get them to stop running and fueling the slave trade...and worst of all its being pushed as a hero's tale of true events, when its about as accurate as saying Germany was the good guy in WWII and won.... Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
1
SoftwarePhilSep 17, 2022
This movie proudly proclaims it's "based on an historical event." If that's true, then the battles portrayed in the movie were fights to preserve the lucrative slave trade that the Dahomey society depended on.

According to Wikipedia, "The
This movie proudly proclaims it's "based on an historical event." If that's true, then the battles portrayed in the movie were fights to preserve the lucrative slave trade that the Dahomey society depended on.

According to Wikipedia, "The growth of Dahomey coincided with the growth of the Atlantic slave trade, and it became known to Europeans as a major supplier of slaves... Captives taken in warfare were sold to Europeans or became slaves in Dahomey, where they worked on royal plantations and were routinely mass executed in large-scale human sacrifices during the festival celebrations known as the Annual Customs of Dahomey."

Dahomey also is famous for being the birthplace of Voodoo. Lovely place.
Expand
14 of 19 users found this helpful145
All this user's reviews
0
Bonez0rOct 12, 2022
This movie is historically inaccurate. In reality the people of Dahomey were the worst slavers in the history of mankind. This movie somehow glorifies them as heroes. Absolutely disgusting how this movie twists the truth to be the opposite ofThis movie is historically inaccurate. In reality the people of Dahomey were the worst slavers in the history of mankind. This movie somehow glorifies them as heroes. Absolutely disgusting how this movie twists the truth to be the opposite of the historical facts. Expand
7 of 10 users found this helpful73
All this user's reviews
0
Game0fLifeSep 20, 2022
Bad writing and obnoxious Mary Sue characters, check all the PC quota.

Don’t make a “strong independent woman”, just make strong and independent character who is also a woman.
6 of 10 users found this helpful64
All this user's reviews
0
LibsAreTrashNov 6, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Then this movie is for you. Wokism run amuck. Forget the fact that this tribe sold their own people and slaves from other tribes into slavery to the white man. It's whitey who is evil. I could have a bowel movement and produce a more interesting movie than this. It would actually resemble many of the characters in the film too. I have no more thoughts on this garbage film so now I leave you with Shakespeare's Macbeth scene 1 act 1. Thunder and lightning; three witches enter.

First Witch When shall we three meet again - In thunder, lightning, or in rain?

Second Witch When the hurlyburly's done,

When the battle's lost, and won.

Third Witch That will be ere the set of sun.

First Witch Where the place?

Second Witch Upon the heath.

Third Witch There to meet with Macbeth.

First Witch I come, Graymalkin.

Second Witch Paddock calls.

Third Witch Anon.

All Fair is foul, and foul is fair.

Hover through the fog and filthy air.

Exit.
Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
0
WallncuzNov 29, 2022
If I could give this trash movie negative points I would lol the entire story is a lie, the movie was advertised as the true story of the female tribe, the movie itself was just another identity politics movie lol absolutely ridiculous.. notIf I could give this trash movie negative points I would lol the entire story is a lie, the movie was advertised as the true story of the female tribe, the movie itself was just another identity politics movie lol absolutely ridiculous.. not a single good actor in the entire movie.. john Boyega had clearly checked out before filming lol. Every woman was sized like a man, they walked and stood like men, they all did the tough guy head cock look like Michael b Jordan does lol which is cringe as all get out.. In real life these women killed and enslaved their own ppl and sold they're own families into slavery. This is another woke lie leftist blm dumpster fire.. oh and a total flop.. do not watch.. save your money.. Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
0
poduffyJan 10, 2023
It's basically a woman child's version of a disney movie that tries to pretend to be historically accurate with zero nuance, facts or realty. This movie is so self indulgent it should be considered porn... bad porn. You could have made a coolIt's basically a woman child's version of a disney movie that tries to pretend to be historically accurate with zero nuance, facts or realty. This movie is so self indulgent it should be considered porn... bad porn. You could have made a cool movie about a woman if you really wanted to. There are many. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
3
MetacriticOnurNov 29, 2022
bad
[ bad ]

adjective, worse, worst;(Slang) bad·der, bad·dest for 36.
not good in any manner or degree.
bad
[ bad ]

adjective, worse, worst;(Slang) bad·der, bad·dest for 36.
not good in any manner or degree.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
0
Im_FrancisDec 15, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Any man wondering, hmm.. the reviews are good. It's a lie it's more gay, woman empowered **** WE ARENT BUYING YOUR **** AND HISTORY WILL LAUGH AT YOU **** IF YOU DONT END UP IN CAGES. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
0
Smudge99Jan 10, 2023
This movie is entirely historically inaccurate, not to mention the glorification of literal slavers. Just another racist movie that will be lost to time and nobody will remember it.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
1
KamamuraSep 8, 2023
Say no to Netflix BS historical revisionism! And, for the record, there is a word for "woman king" - it's "queen".
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
WeAreVenom87Apr 29, 2023
gross revisionist history and an actually racist movie passed off as the usual woke propaganda that I'm sure your DEI division at work loves.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
Decoi7Sep 5, 2023
Boring not accurately depicted. Just a female empowerment movie. Like we need any more of that this year
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
LightpeinMar 9, 2023
Una completa alteración de la historia, basura de película woke y todavía se quejaban de no ser nominadas al Oscar.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
TotogroFeb 11, 2023
Générique et sans surprise.
Ce film n'est qu'un amat de cases cocher afin de rentrer dans un cahier des charges à la Disney ou autre Netflix.
CECI N'EST PAS DU CINÉMA
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
userhiljkJun 5, 2023
Woman King," a film marred by its forced adherence to a misguided "woke agenda," ultimately derails any chance of delivering an authentic portrayal of historical events. The filmmakers' ill-conceived attempt to inject contemporary ideologiesWoman King," a film marred by its forced adherence to a misguided "woke agenda," ultimately derails any chance of delivering an authentic portrayal of historical events. The filmmakers' ill-conceived attempt to inject contemporary ideologies into a narrative steeped in the past only serves to undermine the film's credibility and betray the rich history it purports to represent.

Right from the opening scenes, it becomes painfully evident that "Woman King" is more interested in promoting a specific political ideology than in accurately depicting the tribe's history. The narrative forcefully shoehorns modern concepts and agendas into a bygone era, sacrificing genuine historical integrity in the process. This heavy-handed approach does a disservice to both the subject matter and the audience's desire for a faithful account.

The film's characters suffer greatly due to this imposed "woke agenda." Rather than presenting them as authentic individuals with their own complexities and motivations, the script reduces them to mere vessels for pushing an agenda. This reductionist approach strips away any semblance of depth or realism, robbing the audience of the opportunity to engage with the characters on a meaningful level.

Furthermore, the blatant disregard for historical accuracy in favor of pushing a predetermined narrative is not only disrespectful but also insulting to the intelligence of viewers. "Woman King" trivializes the struggles and triumphs of the tribe it claims to represent, relegating them to a backdrop for promoting contemporary social and political viewpoints. By doing so, the film manipulates history to fit an agenda, distorting the true essence of the tribe's heritage.

The inclusion of the "woke agenda" in "Woman King" becomes increasingly apparent as the film progresses. Subtle nuances, cultural complexities, and historical context are sacrificed in favor of superficial and often polarizing messaging. Rather than encouraging a nuanced understanding of the tribe's experiences, the movie serves as a mouthpiece for a predetermined ideology, alienating those seeking a genuine exploration of history.

While some may argue that introducing contemporary themes into historical narratives can be thought-provoking and relevant, "Woman King" fails to strike a balance between historical accuracy and modern perspectives. Instead, it serves as a cautionary tale of how an imposed "woke agenda" can overshadow and undermine the very essence of a story, leading to a shallow and disingenuous portrayal.

In conclusion, "Woman King" succumbs to the pressures of an imposed "woke agenda," sacrificing historical integrity in favor of promoting contemporary ideologies. This misguided approach diminishes the authenticity of the film's narrative and reduces the characters to mere vessels for pushing a predetermined agenda. Ultimately, it leaves audiences yearning for a genuine exploration of history rather than a shallow and politically motivated interpretation.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
Trev4664May 17, 2023
Total rubbish from start to finish.Yet another "historical" film that ignores history. This rubbish has been made purely for some crackpot political reason. Not worth the effort watching.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews