Read User Reviews and Submit your own for The Trial of the Chicago 7

2

kirkenderOct 14, 2020

This makes me physically ill to see the legacy of Abbie Hoffman tarnished with Sorkin's ignorant and conservative view of history and social justice. Please do not give this views. This is like if David Duke made a film about MLK. ItsThis makes me physically ill to see the legacy of Abbie Hoffman tarnished with Sorkin's ignorant and conservative view of history and social justice. Please do not give this views. This is like if David Duke made a film about MLK. Its disgusting to see a legit leftist be reduced to nothing by the classic liberal (centrist, status quo supporting) Aaron Sorkin who doesn't understand the struggles of the lower/working class. Liberal hacks like Sorkin believe speeches and incrementalism work to better society, and that's exactly what has led to our society on the brink of fascism. Real change needs real action which is what Abbie Hoffman did and supported.… Expand

16 of 34 users found this helpful1618

All this user's reviews

6

TomWishOct 17, 2020

Despite the excellent cast and the witty script, I found the film not entirely convincing. Even if you are on the side of the activists on trial, it comes over a little too black and white for my taste. They are all the good and smart guysDespite the excellent cast and the witty script, I found the film not entirely convincing. Even if you are on the side of the activists on trial, it comes over a little too black and white for my taste. They are all the good and smart guys and victims of the evil establishment. Real life isn't that simple.… Expand

8 of 8 users found this helpful80

All this user's reviews

6

JalemanyOct 30, 2020

Unfortunately this film does not completely work. It wants to be something but it does not get there. There is a shameful manipulation of some facts in order to make things appear more epic and increase the opportunity for great speeches.Unfortunately this film does not completely work. It wants to be something but it does not get there. There is a shameful manipulation of some facts in order to make things appear more epic and increase the opportunity for great speeches. This becomes a little too much the untold goal of the film. The balance between the comedy elements and the serious film is not well maintained, and things end up being quite unconvincing. A lost opportunity with a good a promising cast.… Expand

7 of 7 users found this helpful70

All this user's reviews

5

Camwhit0196Feb 27, 2021

i forgot about this movie 5 mins after watching it, i feel like this should have been much better than it was

7 of 7 users found this helpful70

All this user's reviews

6

TheWaffleNov 29, 2020

It's a good retelling of an important story about how America's war in Vietnam turned the country against itself. And it's a potent reminder of the rampant thuggery among U.S. police forces, which have been abusing citizens for a long timeIt's a good retelling of an important story about how America's war in Vietnam turned the country against itself. And it's a potent reminder of the rampant thuggery among U.S. police forces, which have been abusing citizens for a long time before 2020. But this film falls into the common courtroom film trap of obsessing over legal maneuvering and mostly forgetting the real goals of the protagonists. While the protagonists talk a lot about the war and the soldiers sent to fight and die there, the film doesn't actually show any of that war's violence. There isn't a single line of dialogue from a draftee or a vet as far as I can recall. It's one thing to read a list of names of the fallen, but it's quite another to see a 19-year-old bleeding out in a ditch on the far side of the world in the service of a war waged for domestic politics.… Expand

6 of 6 users found this helpful60

All this user's reviews

5

Mauro_LanariNov 6, 2020

(Mauro Lanari)
Rhetoric of the dead and an approach so light and glossy as to prevent real involvement.

6 of 6 users found this helpful60

All this user's reviews

6

ArshiaBorjaliDec 26, 2020

It is important for a film to say what it wants to say correctly and to somehow overcome its claim. "The Trial of the Chicago 7" is one of these films. A coherent narrative with a perfectly acceptable script and no extra glamor. Adapting inIt is important for a film to say what it wants to say correctly and to somehow overcome its claim. "The Trial of the Chicago 7" is one of these films. A coherent narrative with a perfectly acceptable script and no extra glamor. Adapting in cinema has always been a difficult task, whether from another literary work or a real event. The film also manages to make this historical adaptation and not only shows the details well, which gives it a new spirit with the art of cinema, so that it has the necessary impact on the audience. An important point is that the film is successful in creating a feeling and does not seek to hide its weaknesses by crowding the film by using unnecessary Techniques or tricks. Throughout the film, we see a variety of emotional atmospheres that are sometimes very lively and sometimes very calm and quiet. The director, however, has been able to create emotion both in crowded spaces and in the silences, that sometimes take the audience to a deeper layer of the movie. The actors in the film are all acceptable, However, some of them do not become characters in the script, and in the meantime, “Langella” acting as the judge and “Sacha Baron Cohen” as Abbie was better than others. “Sorkin” has once again shown that he has an acceptable ability in screenwriting, and this time he has performed well in directing too. “The Trial of the Chicago 7” is a compact movie that works to the best of its ability And it tries to get closer to the form, though it cannot be said that it has done it completely, but in some places it gets close to the form. It should be noted that the film is very successful in its purpose and the use of old images and videos helps to convey this purpose to the viewer. What this film has done, that is, create a sense of criticism and sometimes hatred for a corrupt system, is something that not every film can easily do. In general, “The Trial of the Chicago 7” is a good movie that will be alive for a long time and anyone of any age and period can communicate with it.… Expand

6 of 6 users found this helpful60

All this user's reviews

10

alisinan17Oct 17, 2020

One of Sorkins best, maybe lacks the finesse of Fincher/Boyles direction but who cares when the script is this good.

4 of 15 users found this helpful411

All this user's reviews

8

HerickDienerOct 16, 2020

Necessário. Só consegui pensar nessa palavra quando terminei de assistir. Não é muito difícil pegar diversas cenas do filme e por em um conceito atual. Um dos melhores do ano, sem dúvidas.

2 of 9 users found this helpful27

All this user's reviews

10

JnewmOct 5, 2020

Amazing! A must see and very timely movie.
Excellent cast. Movie of the year.

2 of 13 users found this helpful211

All this user's reviews

10

HealingToolboxOct 19, 2020

Probably most MEANINGFUL film of 2020. Probably Best Picture 2020. For those too young to know, the first 20 minutes accurately expresses the vitality and energy of late 60s-early 70s Cultural Creatives. I was there. Sorkin began writingProbably most MEANINGFUL film of 2020. Probably Best Picture 2020. For those too young to know, the first 20 minutes accurately expresses the vitality and energy of late 60s-early 70s Cultural Creatives. I was there. Sorkin began writing this in 2007. In 2020, a terrific amount of writerly thought and creativity is on-screen. No, not the best FABLE for 2020, that's The Island (2005) by Michael Bay and friends.

I cried at the final scene of "7." It brought back all the promise and heartbreak of failures-shortcomings of cultural progressives in the era. As filmed, the ending is more articulate and truthful than what actually happened. ScreenRant.com runs downs what was actually said by who when. The real facts remind me how inarticulate we were back then. The movie is more articulate than we were ourselves back then. Progressive Historian at UCI, Jon Weiner (JonWeiner.com) says the movie is inaccurate yet is truthful. Thank you, Jon. In the less favorable pro reviews here, I think what is missed is how much thought went into consciously MODULATING the actual personalities to permit greater contrast--and a greater sense of their unity--than was on display in real life. This is why Abbie Hoffman is downplayed and other character changes.

I want to congratulate Frank Langela and Mark Rylance for holding the movie down to the ground. Frank does wonderful villainy here without over-doing it. He truthfully portrays the "out of control" control-freak which characterized many officals of that era and today. Mark's integrity and self-confidence balances the just-finding-out-who-I-am of all the the younger characters. Wonderful to see Michael Keaton playing a good guy after so many recent villain roles, a small crucial part.… Expand

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

10

alejandro970Oct 25, 2020

And justice for all? A courtroom movie based on one of the longest in history, with actors you won't recognize until the opening credits at least. The story is absorbing and you will be curious to find out more about this epic event.

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

9

CLeCromOct 17, 2020

Hot breaking news, the brutality of the Nixon-Trump system displayed in 2 hours. Nice balance between all the roles, and top screening of Sorkin.

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

8

ARSI33Oct 18, 2020

Great screenplay and great acting. Very entertaining from start to end. This said, the film feels cheap in terms of production design. Unfortunately the ending/resolution comes as conventional as any film made for television this days.

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

8

Brent_MarchantOct 9, 2020

While this superb docudrama takes some liberties with the facts of this landmark court case, Aaron Sorkin's latest offering gets much of it right, with what it invents making for some damn good theater. Admittedly, the picture is a tad talkyWhile this superb docudrama takes some liberties with the facts of this landmark court case, Aaron Sorkin's latest offering gets much of it right, with what it invents making for some damn good theater. Admittedly, the picture is a tad talky in the first half hour, but that shortcoming is covered well by the film's stellar cast, including Sacha Baron Cohen, Mark Rylance, Eddie Redmayne, Jeremy Strong, John Carroll Lynch, Frank Langella, Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Michael Keaton. And, once the picture hits its stride, it's a compelling watch from that point forward. The relevance of this story is by no means lost in light of the current sociopolitical climate, and the timing of the picture's release couldn't be more serendipitous. This is one we should all see -- and make a point of embracing its message.… Expand

1 of 10 users found this helpful19

All this user's reviews

10

Shin0bi12Oct 17, 2020

The performances were groundbreaking. The pacing was perfect, and the cinematography was well focused and excellently shot. And the fractured story telling was perfectly executed, which is not a easy thing for a film to achieve. Aside fromThe performances were groundbreaking. The pacing was perfect, and the cinematography was well focused and excellently shot. And the fractured story telling was perfectly executed, which is not a easy thing for a film to achieve. Aside from that the film manages to portray these historic events accurately despite taking libraries for comic purposes. This money is very relevant given the current climate of 2020, and it's message is something with carrying and honoring… Expand

1 of 10 users found this helpful19

All this user's reviews

8

ConairOct 16, 2020

This movie absolutely speaks to young people. As much as high brow critics want to say it's centrist, this movie really spoke to me and got me riled up as a far leftist. It's extremely relevant, intelligent and professional. My only critiqueThis movie absolutely speaks to young people. As much as high brow critics want to say it's centrist, this movie really spoke to me and got me riled up as a far leftist. It's extremely relevant, intelligent and professional. My only critique is that it was confusingly paced. It definitely could have benefitted from a longer run time.… Expand

1 of 10 users found this helpful19

All this user's reviews

9

Sweet_Old_BobSep 30, 2020

A very well made movie about a courtroom drama. Very little shown of the actual affair in Chicago, only in flashbacks. An excellent cast, which involved many principal players.

1 of 11 users found this helpful110

All this user's reviews

9

NsucatoSep 30, 2020

This movie, is stand up, amazing. It is a feel good movie, when you leave the theater or finish the movie on your couch, you are going to think now that was a good movie. Sorkin wrights an amazing screenplay as normal, also showing much moreThis movie, is stand up, amazing. It is a feel good movie, when you leave the theater or finish the movie on your couch, you are going to think now that was a good movie. Sorkin wrights an amazing screenplay as normal, also showing much more promise in his directing skills than he did in Molly's Game. The character change we see in the in Eddie Redmayne and Joseph Gordon Levitt's portrayals are incredible. This movie could not have came out at a better time, props to paramount fulfilling Sorkin's wish to put it on a streaming service before the election. Once the movie gets its pace going, its a edge of the seat kind of movie. Amazing work from Aaron Sorkin.… Expand

1 of 11 users found this helpful110

All this user's reviews

8

TVJerryOct 22, 2020

When Aaron Sorkin writes and directs a film, you can expect snappy dialogue and compelling drama. That’s the case (pun intended) with this examination of the notorious trial of the men who led the protests against the Vietnam War that turnedWhen Aaron Sorkin writes and directs a film, you can expect snappy dialogue and compelling drama. That’s the case (pun intended) with this examination of the notorious trial of the men who led the protests against the Vietnam War that turned violent at the 1968 Democratic National Convention. As the title suggests, this is set primarily during the months-long trial with numerous flashbacks to explain the actions discussed. However, this is never a boring courtroom drama. Scenes are short and concise, advancing the story with skill. The performances are top notch with Frank Langella’s judge proving especially despicable. The outrage and conspiracy continually builds throughout the movie to a gripping final few scenes. Ultimately, 50 years later this story resonates with today’s political strife.… Expand

0 of 7 users found this helpful07

All this user's reviews

7

bertobellamyOct 18, 2020

A legal drama seems like the best terrain for Aaron Sorkin to develop his meticulous dialogs. 'The Trial of the Chicago 7" is an entertaining film that resonates with today's climate, especially in the US. There are some compelling charactersA legal drama seems like the best terrain for Aaron Sorkin to develop his meticulous dialogs. 'The Trial of the Chicago 7" is an entertaining film that resonates with today's climate, especially in the US. There are some compelling characters here, especially the Sacha Baron Cohen one, but others are not very well developed. Overall, Sorkin does a good job with his new film.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

7

MarakaiOct 25, 2020

It’s fair to say that when Aaron Sorkin is involved in a film then you can expect an abundance of quality dialogue; A Few Good Men, Charlie Wilson’s War, The Social Network, Moneyball and Steve Jobs are all testament to this and The Trial ofIt’s fair to say that when Aaron Sorkin is involved in a film then you can expect an abundance of quality dialogue; A Few Good Men, Charlie Wilson’s War, The Social Network, Moneyball and Steve Jobs are all testament to this and The Trial of the Chicago 7 is no different. There’s a lot of characters involved in the telling of this 1960’s true story and a lot of quality actors to sink their teeth into Sorkin’s writing. In this respect, the film works very well but where it flounders is in Sorkin’s direction. This is only his second film behind the camera (after Molly’s Game) and I can’t help but feel that a more experienced director would’ve had a better handling on managing the pace and the dramatic moments. That said, there’s still plenty to enjoy here and it’s a part of American political history that I found quite enlightening and informative.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

EricOct 16, 2020

Outstanding movie accurately reflecting the times and the trial itself. Much of the trial is based on trial transcripts or verbatim trial testimony. For those that lived through that era, the film brings back many of the sounds, chants,Outstanding movie accurately reflecting the times and the trial itself. Much of the trial is based on trial transcripts or verbatim trial testimony. For those that lived through that era, the film brings back many of the sounds, chants, feelings and culture of the times. Unfortunately, the film has particular relevance today, during the run up to the election of 2020, 52 years later. Great cast and performances.… Expand

0 of 9 users found this helpful09

All this user's reviews

7

dharmaMar 19, 2021

Aaron Sorkin's flick is an Oscar contender that is good enough to qualify for the awards. His self directed works somehow lost the 'magic' that he usually has when he was screenwriting for other people. This film is no exception.

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

7

tropicAcesSep 29, 2020

The script doesn’t pop as much as Sorkin’s other works (and I’m sure that’s due in-part to his direction not being as clean as a Boyle or Fincher), but the performances are all solid.

0 of 10 users found this helpful010

All this user's reviews

8

foxgroveOct 18, 2020

For the first forty minutes or so the film comes over as inauthentic with characters mouthing dialogue that sounds phoney. However as things progress the film seems to ignite into action and the performances sparkle. Sacha Baron Cohen andFor the first forty minutes or so the film comes over as inauthentic with characters mouthing dialogue that sounds phoney. However as things progress the film seems to ignite into action and the performances sparkle. Sacha Baron Cohen and Frank Langella in particular are exciting to watch. The film threatens to be over rated but ultimately it delivers in spades.… Expand

0 of 7 users found this helpful07

All this user's reviews

10

MATMFeb 20, 2021

This movie did exactly what a movie is meant to do, it entertained me while getting me to reassess my understanding of the world. I probably wouldn't have enjoyed it as much if it wasn't based on true events, because it would have seemed soThis movie did exactly what a movie is meant to do, it entertained me while getting me to reassess my understanding of the world. I probably wouldn't have enjoyed it as much if it wasn't based on true events, because it would have seemed so outrageous that it wasn't believable. It is true that this is a 2 hour courtroom drama, but I was so invested in it because the characters are just so much fun to watch. I'm sure there was some foul language that I didn't notice, but otherwise, this should have been rated pg-13, so I wouldn't be too worried about watching it with teenagers. I give it an A - Make a point to go see this movie… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

7

moviemitch96Oct 19, 2020

This film chronicles the trial of 7 anti-Vietnam War protestors who are tried for conspiracy and the intention of inciting riots and violence in Chicago at the 1968 Narional Democratic Convention. Written and directed by Aaron Sorkin (writerThis film chronicles the trial of 7 anti-Vietnam War protestors who are tried for conspiracy and the intention of inciting riots and violence in Chicago at the 1968 Narional Democratic Convention. Written and directed by Aaron Sorkin (writer of 'The Social Network' and creator of 'The West Wing'), I've always admired his brilliant, sharp, and witty dialogue, and there's plenty of it to go around here, especially with such a large ensemble cast full of so many great A-listers I can't even begin to list them all out. If I had to single one out, however, I'd say that Sacha Baron Cohen ('Borat') is the MVP of this film, as it allows his signature humor to shine while also giving him a surprising amount of dramatic moments that he pulls off seamlessly. The film does feel standard in terms of a courtroom drama, but there are some moments of humor injected throughout to keep it entertaining enough. And even if the film wraps up with a standard-feeling sappy ending, it's the writing and performances that help keep it entertaining and worthwhile when all's said and done, not to mention many of its themes will feel especially timely to many viewers to keep their interests piqued. Overall, its brilliant writing and roundup of great talent, as well as its timeliness make it a compelling enough watch.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

10

bfoore90Dec 9, 2020

A powerful, unflinching and intense film and courtroom drama with fantastic performances, screenplay and direction that feels timeless, relevant, gripping and emotional. Based on this years slate of films, Trial of the Chicago Seven is one ofA powerful, unflinching and intense film and courtroom drama with fantastic performances, screenplay and direction that feels timeless, relevant, gripping and emotional. Based on this years slate of films, Trial of the Chicago Seven is one of the best films of the year.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

7

RalfbergsApr 25, 2021

I enjoyed it a lot and the script was nice and Sacha Baron Cohen was great in this too. Only what I didn't like is that when watching I thought it was like it really happened in the trial but found out many of it is just written by SorkinI enjoyed it a lot and the script was nice and Sacha Baron Cohen was great in this too. Only what I didn't like is that when watching I thought it was like it really happened in the trial but found out many of it is just written by Sorkin based on speeches of the people there etc. So I felt in a way a bit cheated about what actually happened there. Of course still nice message and everything. Good movie nonetheless… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

IndianaParkWarsOct 26, 2020

This was an excellent courtroom drama. It angered me and inspired me at the same time. I dread seeing the corruption and evil perpetuated by our own system and authorities and to see that something from the late 60's is still prevalent now isThis was an excellent courtroom drama. It angered me and inspired me at the same time. I dread seeing the corruption and evil perpetuated by our own system and authorities and to see that something from the late 60's is still prevalent now is very disheartening.
I am inspired though. I would like to continue learning more about politics and reading and becoming an activist. I really want to make a positive change in the world. As of now, this one is sitting at my number 1 movie of the year.

I think it's excellent but the only fault I would say it has is that it slightly comes off as Oscar bait or as a typical historical drama, almost commercialized and pushed out. But, the story is an excellent and relevant one that kept me interested the whole time and really showed how excellent writing is. Also, I adore movies that combine unlikely and different groups or types of people and put them in one room together. I also love when movies cover social issues like racial injustice or political activism. 11/12… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

PanchogulMay 25, 2021

Siento que esta cinta fue muy subestimada a nivel global a pesar de recibir importantes nominaciones a los premios más importantes de la industria cinematográfica ya que prácticamente no ganó ninguno, pero sinceramente la tenía muy difícil.Siento que esta cinta fue muy subestimada a nivel global a pesar de recibir importantes nominaciones a los premios más importantes de la industria cinematográfica ya que prácticamente no ganó ninguno, pero sinceramente la tenía muy difícil. Pese al argumento serio que tiene esta película, tiene bastante gracia y momentos involuntariamente cómicos sin caer en lo absurdo, el elenco hizo un magnífico trabajo, la historia está muy bien desarrollada manteniendo un ritmo relajado sin sentirse lenta ni aburrida en ningún momento. Quizás no presté suficiente atención pero no entendí que tenía que ver el nombrar a soldados caídos al final de la película con el juicio en cuestión, aún así fue un momento bastante satisfactorio.… Expand

0 of 7 users found this helpful07

All this user's reviews

10

DrBlahBlahOct 19, 2020

Exactly what America needs right now. Balanced, passionate, witty, insightful, inspiring, and more relevant than ever. Sorkin, as usual, outdoes himself.

0 of 7 users found this helpful07

All this user's reviews

7

JLuis_001Oct 18, 2020

Up to a point I was going to give it an 8, but I decided on 7 because of the patriotic cliches that Sorkin prints on the story.

Especially with the scene of Bobby Seale being bound and gagged in court, since in real life this happened forUp to a point I was going to give it an 8, but I decided on 7 because of the patriotic cliches that Sorkin prints on the story.

Especially with the scene of Bobby Seale being bound and gagged in court, since in real life this happened for several days.
I can't help but feel that even though Seale was not a fundamental part of the trial, Sorkin uses him as a manipulative maneuver.

In addition to the fact that despite how the narrative intersperses, to try to give it more agility, there comes a point where the situation is diluted due to repetition.

What remains of the trial until the endind is only to see situations in which the defendants and the lawyers antagonize the judge, and since the judge is only trying to screw them up with his clear lack of judgment and partiality, therefore, the matter becomes somewhat boring, because it comes and goes with the same narrative resource, until it is exhausted.

However, the film remains solid, mostly due to its strong cast.
Notable mentions to Sasha Baron Cohen, Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, Mark Rylance, Jeremy Strong and Frank Langella who even though was portraying his character as a dimensionless villain, he still manages to be quite convincing.

In general the film is quite satisfactory, and it's very well done.
I cannot blame Sorkin for anything as a writer, except his clichés but those are passable and he obviously grew as a director after Molly's Game.

One of the best offers in the Netflix catalog this year and in its entire catalog in general.
It's a shame that for every good film we get from them, we get stuffed with 30 bad ones.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

jaredwallace91Oct 23, 2020

A consequential film that puts America and liberalism on trial. Some of the best screenwriting in years.

0 of 9 users found this helpful09

All this user's reviews

8

theredskyOct 22, 2020

This feels like a Spielberg film with a really good script. I don’t mean that in a negative way, I mean that there is some Spielberg influence with an outstanding script. If you didn’t know, Steven Spielberg was originally supposed to directThis feels like a Spielberg film with a really good script. I don’t mean that in a negative way, I mean that there is some Spielberg influence with an outstanding script. If you didn’t know, Steven Spielberg was originally supposed to direct this film but dropped out and Writer/Director Aaron Sorkin took over. The writing and directing here are excellent. Sorkin knows how to keep your attention with simple scenes by having long monologues with unique camerawork and interesting framing. The performances here are great too especially Sacha Baren Cohen and Eddie Redmayne. I would say this is probably a career best for Redmayne and one of my favorite Cohen performances but his performance in Borat still has this film beat. The story is engaging and interesting which is weird because a lot of this is court room drama but I was invested for 95% of the time. The riot scenes are sprinkled throughout the film and those scenes are excellent. My issue with the film is its historical accuracy and certain dramatic moments. Like I said in the beginning, this feels like a Spielberg film and sometimes Spielberg tends to overdramatize events and there’s a little bit of that here and ties into historical accuracy. They had to take some creative liberties here and there and I really wish they hadn’t because this is a fascinating court case that will be looked back on for years to come. If you’re a fan of Sorkin’s writing style or want a riveting drama, then definitely check this film out.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

7

AJGo85Apr 21, 2021

The Trial of the Chicago 7 resonates as much as it does because even though it is a dramatization of events from 50 years ago, it feels like it could have been based on current events. I knew next to nothing about the Chicago 7 beforeThe Trial of the Chicago 7 resonates as much as it does because even though it is a dramatization of events from 50 years ago, it feels like it could have been based on current events. I knew next to nothing about the Chicago 7 before watching this movie, but I also know that good movies don’t always make for good history. However, The Trial of the Chicago 7 does the best thing a movie based on an important true story can do: it gives me a strong sense of what things were like for the people involved and it makes me want to learn more. I have never cared much for Aaron Sorkin’s TV projects, but I have really enjoyed his film writing (A Few Good Men, The Social Network) and even his work as a director (Molly’s Game). As with Molly’s Game, Sorkin writes and directs, but it is clear that Sorkin the writer is at the helm. Aaron Sorkin is aware that his forte is writing speeches and debates and that awareness can also be his problem. This based-on-true-events courtroom drama is in many ways what you expect, but it is no less satisfying to watch.

Protests against the Vietnam War at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago turned into riots and 7 people (actually 8) were arrested and charged with crossing state lines to intentionally start a riot, though, of course, this was not true. We see dramatizations of the trial, strategy sessions and arguments the 7 have with each other and their lawyer, and flashbacks of the events leading up to the protests turned riots and why that turn happened (it might be unfortunately no surprise or shock to find out that the police, not the accused 7, escalated the protests into riots). This is the epitome of an ensemble cast. Every role, major and minor, is a distinct one and played by recognizable name or face. It is an impressive and slightly distracting cast. When the defense team tracks down an important witness you spend the preceding scene wondering what celebrity will be waiting for them at the end of the hall. The standouts of the ensemble are Sacha Baron Cohen, who has earned a Best Supporting Actor Oscar nomination for his performance in the very showy role of Abbie Hoffman, Mark Rylance as William Kunstler, the determined lawyer for the 7, and Frank Langella as the prejudiced, frustrating, and incompetent Judge Julius Hoffman. Eddie Redmayne gives a good performance as Tom Hayden, the head of Students for a Democratic Society, but his best scenes are his arguments/debates with Cohen as Abbie Hoffman. I really enjoyed their scenes together; both are on the same side and want to achieve the same goal but are on different paths. The 8th person on trial is Bobby Seale, the national chairman of the Black Panthers, played by Yahya Abdul-Mateen II. who was not involved in the planning of any of the DNC protests but was charged nevertheless and lumped into the trial as part of the FBI’s campaign against the Panthers. The scenes with Seale are noteworthy not just for the injustice being dealt to him but for Mateen’s performance as well. Joseph Gordon Levitt plays the federal prosecutor and does a good job in a pretty restrained role. John Carol Lynch and others also turn in solid performances but in a cast this stacked it is difficult to stand out. The story of the Chicago 7 is perfect material for Sorkin. It allows for lengthy speeches, wordy arguments, memorable characters, and declarations about political and moral values. The runtime is just over two hours but for a dialogue heavy movie, it is well paced and engaging. I think Sorkin successfully makes this into something more than just another courtroom drama. The Trial of the Chicago 7 feels like a pageant at times but it is one that needs to be performed and is done so very well. This film doesn’t have the at times frenetic feel of Molly’s Game—which really feels like he was trying to recreate Danny Boyle’s lively aesthetic—or an especially distinct visual style. Here Sorkin lets the dialogue and performances shape the movie.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

MahmusOct 19, 2020

The Trial of the Chicago 7 deals with complex and timely topics with enough nuance and wit to make what could've been an overly overwhelming movie (which at times it is) into a moving and inspiring piece of courtroom cinema with incredibleThe Trial of the Chicago 7 deals with complex and timely topics with enough nuance and wit to make what could've been an overly overwhelming movie (which at times it is) into a moving and inspiring piece of courtroom cinema with incredible performances from its excellent ensemble cast.

( Best Supporting Actor Oscar winner Sacha Baron Cohen anyone? )

Sorkin's direction can be a bit flat, but he still more than makes up for it with his electrifying dialogue and amazingly stylish editing (also, I'm just biased towards court dramas).… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

GeoAlbumSundaysOct 25, 2020

I just thought it was really clever, really engaging, funny and heartfelt. I particularly like Sacha

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

ckeppnerOct 19, 2020

One of the most eye-opening films on protest I've seen. It shows how difficult peaceful protests are to pull off, and why all peaceful protests miss the mark to some extent. The writing, acting, and pacing are high-energy throughout. ThisOne of the most eye-opening films on protest I've seen. It shows how difficult peaceful protests are to pull off, and why all peaceful protests miss the mark to some extent. The writing, acting, and pacing are high-energy throughout. This film left me talking about it for long after the credits rolled.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

Stream2BigScreeOct 20, 2020

Well, Streamers, this weekend Netflix premiered one of its prestige pics, The Trial of the Chicago 7. Although set amongst the political unrest in the 1960s, the film seeks to echo today's political climate with a fraught election impending,Well, Streamers, this weekend Netflix premiered one of its prestige pics, The Trial of the Chicago 7. Although set amongst the political unrest in the 1960s, the film seeks to echo today's political climate with a fraught election impending, a partisan electorate, a pandemic, and daily protests - a political drama like this hits just right. Aaron Sorkin wrote and directed this courtroom drama that's destined to be in the conversation for major awards attention. Is such awards attention warranted? Here's how I see it.

The Trial of the Chicago 7 is about a trial of 7 activists who were charged with inciting a riot outside of the Democratic National Convention in Chicago in 1968. The defendants on trial include Tom Hayden, Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin and David Dellinger. In an unfortunate turn of events, Bobby Seale ends up on trial with the "7" even though he had nothing to do with the protests and was only in Chicago for 4 hours on the day of the riot. The trial also features the tireless work of the lawyer for the "7", William Kuntsler and the ultimate antagonist, Judge Julius Hoffman. This cast of characters is packed with actors giving it their all, including: Sacha Baron Cohen, Eddie Redmayne, Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, Jeremy Strong, Mark Rylance, and Frank Langella, among others.

As courtroom dramas go, The Trial of the Chicago 7 has all of the ingredients to be great, if only based on its screenplay. Aaron Sorkin is an accomplished writer, who won an Academy Award for The Social Network, and he wrote one of the best courtroom monologues of all time from A Few Good Men. If you are not familiar with the history that this story is based on, then there is a lot of foundation to be laid in order to understand where it's going. Sorkin does a good job in both the screenplay and direction in showing who the characters are, what their motivations may be and setting a tone for the film. The editing of all that is going on between the protests, the interactions of the characters and the procedures of the trial makes it all come together.

As far as the ensemble, Yahya Abdul-Mateen II plays Bobby Seale and he gives such a great performance. He is dynamic and emotional. Whenever he's on screen, the focus can't help but be on him. Unfortunately, he isn't on screen enough and disappears entirely at one point. Also, Mark Rylance is very powerful as William Kuntsler. He gets some of the best lines in the film and becomes a champion for the cause. I can definitely see Rylance and Abdul-Mateen as acting nominees for this. There also a fairly awesome cameo near the end.

The Trial of the Chicago 7 is worthy of a big box of popcorn. It is an easy watch that breezes by and is very entertaining. There is a powerful message that resonates in today's climate… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

ClappingFetus8Oct 19, 2020

The movie is a great and because of it I looked up what was embellished and from what I can tell not a whole lot other than how badly they treated the defendants one in particular

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

8

r96skMar 12, 2021

Very well made, up until that ending anyway.

It's not a bad conclusion, but man is it cringe-inducing. It seems they were going for an end to match 'A Few Good Men', which was also written by Aaron Sorkin of course. From the overly upliftingVery well made, up until that ending anyway.

It's not a bad conclusion, but man is it cringe-inducing. It seems they were going for an end to match 'A Few Good Men', which was also written by Aaron Sorkin of course. From the overly uplifting score, to the slow clap, to the freeze-frame. Per Esquire, the scene is not even how it went down IRL either. I'm all for 'Hollywood endings', just less of the cheese please.

The rest of 'The Trial of the Chicago 7' is, though, very good. Sacha Baron Cohen (Abbie) is the greatest performer, the role is mostly comedic - which he nails - but even in the more serious moments he is terrific. Jeremy Strong (Jerry) is notable alongside him, also. Eddie Redmayne, Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, Frank Langella, Mark Rylance and Joseph Gordon-Levitt merit props, too.

I did enjoy how it portrays the (true) story, one that is very interesting no doubt. Overall, I had a pleasant time watching this - though I'd rate it a tad higher if not for that (not negative, just a bit lame) ending.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

Movie_FreakFeb 1, 2021

The Trial of the Chicago 7 is a superb movie. Even on my second watch, it's as energetic and riveting as earlier. Aaron Sorkin's ability to create a setting in a simple courtroom but still keep tings fascinating and entertaining isThe Trial of the Chicago 7 is a superb movie. Even on my second watch, it's as energetic and riveting as earlier. Aaron Sorkin's ability to create a setting in a simple courtroom but still keep tings fascinating and entertaining is remarkable. This is a more screenplay than direction movie, but the direction is still top-class and makes the movie much more than an Oscar-bait biopic. The whole cast is amazing, with Frank Langella, Sacha Baron Cohen and Eddie Redmayne be the standout performers, and the other members of the cast are also very good. This film has great editing which manages to keep it fascinating and intriguing. While I don't think it's really that emotionally appealing or take sThe Social Network level risks, it's still amazing in it's own way. The Trial Of The Chicago 7 is riveting, exciting, entertaining, and is filled with great performances, screenplay and really good editing.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

7

DogeGamer2015Mar 21, 2021

La trama es intensa y dramática; además, los actores son excelentes; la recomiendo mucho.

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

henryzandtOct 29, 2020

What a great film this is. Gone before I knew it and I was sorry that it was over. This is a film set in the US, but it is a universal story about power and democracy. Fantasically acted, tight script, great directing. Top film.

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

GazMoviesOct 25, 2020

Really good court room drama with a good sense of humour throughout. Has an awesome cast with some big name actors coming in for a small part in the movie. It is another one of those films that Americans will probably know more about than theReally good court room drama with a good sense of humour throughout. Has an awesome cast with some big name actors coming in for a small part in the movie. It is another one of those films that Americans will probably know more about than the rest of us. I had only vaguely heard of the Chicago 7.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

8

MLLDOct 18, 2020

Excelent acting and writing. Aaron Sorkin is definately going to The Oscars with this picture.

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

8

FilmGuyDudeMar 31, 2021

Controversy knows no bounds, but this film certainly stays true on perspective. The editing is fantastic, and such a story was a long time coming, although executed a bit too intensely. Sacha Baron Cohen never fails to amaze me, and is aControversy knows no bounds, but this film certainly stays true on perspective. The editing is fantastic, and such a story was a long time coming, although executed a bit too intensely. Sacha Baron Cohen never fails to amaze me, and is a great flick overall.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

DeborahLANov 1, 2020

As someone who was a student during this time frame, I found The Trial of the Chicago 7 fairly faithful, not only to the facts, but to the exhilaration we felt when we stood up and spoke truth to power. Enormously enjoyable to watch the kidsAs someone who was a student during this time frame, I found The Trial of the Chicago 7 fairly faithful, not only to the facts, but to the exhilaration we felt when we stood up and spoke truth to power. Enormously enjoyable to watch the kids of the 60's figure out a way to tweak the establishment while adding to the development of a progressive agenda.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

10

JessyJesNov 3, 2020

Congratulations Netflix, this is one the Best movies you have created so far. All characters were played or portrayed very well. No dull moments, it’s like every scene counts. The Story was told and conveyed so well. Definitely deserves allCongratulations Netflix, this is one the Best movies you have created so far. All characters were played or portrayed very well. No dull moments, it’s like every scene counts. The Story was told and conveyed so well. Definitely deserves all praises … Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

xhenierNov 5, 2020

excelente película + un gran reparto que logra representar los hechos dejar un buen mensaje, sin mas que opinar

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

7

Dan_BMar 26, 2021

(español / English)

El juicio de los 7 de Chicago relata el juicio llevado adelante en esa ciudad en 1969 en el que se acusó de conspiración a siete activistas y dirigentes que habían concurrido a la Convención Demócrata para manifestarse(español / English)

El juicio de los 7 de Chicago relata el juicio llevado adelante en esa ciudad en 1969 en el que se acusó de conspiración a siete activistas y dirigentes que habían concurrido a la Convención Demócrata para manifestarse contra el envío de tropas a Vietnam, protesta que derivó en violentos incidentes con la policía.

Como es habitual en estas películas “basadas en hechos reales”, su introducción expone una abrumadora cantidad de información, presentando a los actores del drama antes de los incidentes que eran líderes o dirigentes de diversas agrupaciones estudiantiles, políticas y civiles: Estudiantes por una Sociedad Democrática (SDS), hippies del Youth International Party (Yippies), Mobilization to End the War in Vietnam (The Mobe) y un presidente de los Panteras Negras, entre otros.

Luego Aaron Sorkin (director y guionista) procede a una acertada elipsis que nos ubica directamente en el juicio. El desarrollo es el de un típico drama tribunalicio y son los flashbacks, a veces en montaje paralelo con las declaraciones testimoniales, los que van reconstruyendo los hechos y su cronología. El lenguaje no es altisonante y aparecen inesperados rasgos de humor durante las audiencias, pero lamentablemente, como película estadounidense no puede privarse de algún momento culminante efectista. También se abordan las disidencias (a veces profundas) entre los acusados en función de sus grupos de pertenencia.

Sólo hay dos situaciones de verdadera e inesperada tensión (una de ellas muy dura) durante un juicio que fue planteado desde el vamos como un montaje aleccionador y donde se manifiesta también el racismo de siempre.

A pesar de su longitud, no decaen ni el ritmo ni el interés, sobresaliendo las actuaciones de Frank Langella como un imponente y por momentos iracundo juez y la de Joseph Gordon-Levitt como el solvente y contenido fiscal que cumple instrucciones pero no carece de consciencia.

En suma, el juicio de los 7 de Chicago es el tipo de película “basada en hechos reales” y de “denuncia política” que les gusta a los electores de los Oscars pero que dista bastante de ser un gran film.
The Chicago 7 trial recounts the trial carried out in that city in 1969 in which seven activists and leaders who had attended the Democratic Convention to demonstrate against the sending of troops to Vietnam were accused of conspiracy, a protest that led to violent incidents with the police.

As is usual in these films "based on real events", their introduction exposes an overwhelming amount of information, presenting the actors of the drama before the incidents who were leaders or leaders of various student, political and civil groups: Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), hippies from the Youth International Party (Yippies), Mobilization to End the War in Vietnam (The Mobe) and a chairman of the Black Panthers, among others.

Then Aaron Sorkin (director and screenwriter) proceeds to a successful ellipsis that places us directly in the trial. The development is that of a typical courtroom drama and it is the flashbacks, sometimes in parallel montage with the testimonial statements, which reconstruct the events and their chronology. The language is not high-sounding and unexpected traits of humor appear during audiences, but sadly, as an American film it cannot be without some gimmicky climactic moment. Dissenting (sometimes deep) between the accused according to their group membership is also addressed.

There are only two situations of real and unexpected tension (one of them very hard) during a trial that was raised from the beginning as a sobering montage and where the usual racism is also manifested.

Despite its length, neither the pace nor the interest wane, standing out the performances of Frank Langella as an imposing and at times irate judge and that of Joseph Gordon-Levitt as the solvent and fiscal content who follows instructions but does not lack conscience. .

The Trial of the Chicago 7 is the kind of "fact-based" and "political denunciation" movie that Oscars voters like but is far from being a great movie.… Expand

0 of 7 users found this helpful07

All this user's reviews

10

DrandyDec 16, 2020

For me this was the best film of 2020 so far, often riveting, and with an ending which literally brought me to tears. I was especially affected by the acting of Sacha Baron Cohen, Eddie Redmayne, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Michael Keaton, FrankFor me this was the best film of 2020 so far, often riveting, and with an ending which literally brought me to tears. I was especially affected by the acting of Sacha Baron Cohen, Eddie Redmayne, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Michael Keaton, Frank Langella, Sir Mark Rylance, Jeremy Strong("ensorcell," he said}, John Carroll Lynch, and Yahya Abdul-Mateen. The writing was not uniformly good, but each of the aforementioned actors had powerful scenes. And listen for a great song over the closing credits. (Daniel Pemberton's Take the Hill (Hear My Screams) - vocals by Celeste)… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

10

gnovak03Dec 20, 2020

Great movie, needs more attention. Important part of US history and filmed very well.

0 of 7 users found this helpful07

All this user's reviews

10

KellysndDec 27, 2020

Um filme digno de indicações ao oscar
pode não ter entrado muito no aspecto politico mas ainda sim foi um grande acerto

0 of 7 users found this helpful07

All this user's reviews

7

AJ_13Jan 11, 2021

Great cast, great dialogues and great rythm. Hope Sacha wins the Oscar. Its a bit scaring how well it fits with nowadays society.

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

7

mikesgold2KJul 27, 2021

Film, świetnie pokazujący kulisy tytułowego procesu, tłumaczący co i jak jednocześnie całkiem nieźle zrealizowany. Gwazdorska obsada jest miejscami wyśmienita

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

8

MattFornerFeb 9, 2021

The Trial of the Chicago 7 tells an important story in American history. If you don't know about what happened during the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, this film is worth your time. Not the best work from Aaron Sorkin, but aThe Trial of the Chicago 7 tells an important story in American history. If you don't know about what happened during the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, this film is worth your time. Not the best work from Aaron Sorkin, but a story that needed telling, nonetheless.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

7

SedakoffMar 22, 2021

Довольно интересный фильм, места забавный. Смотрится на одном дыхании, рекомендую

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

gbferreiraApr 2, 2021

A great movie, excellently edited, with wonderful acting, and an amazing screenplay, that brings up many politically relevant questions.

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

8

drlowdonOct 28, 2022

Based on real life events, The Trial of the Chicago 7 tells the story of a group of anti–Vietnam War protesters who are charged with conspiracy and crossing state lines with the intention of inciting riots at the 1968 Democratic NationalBased on real life events, The Trial of the Chicago 7 tells the story of a group of anti–Vietnam War protesters who are charged with conspiracy and crossing state lines with the intention of inciting riots at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. A strong cast and Sorkin’s usual flair for writing dialogue help make for a fascinating and entertaining courtroom drama, and many of the themes remain just as relevant today.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

gracjanskiJan 2, 2022

Technically the movie is good, there are some popular actors with top performance and so on. But it is a court movie and I ve seen enough of them.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

CarlElmoreNov 24, 2022

It has a pretty good script and good performances but the story starts to drag after a little bit.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

nikTerryMay 26, 2023

whitey bad, ooh there's a shocker, another 1 sided movie telling a complex story, instead of the nuanced look at a turbulent time and let audience figure things out, this movie tells a decidedly one sided version.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews