The Theory of Everything
Focus Features | Release Date: November 7, 2014
7.8
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 573 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
481
Mixed:
66
Negative:
26
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
4
benuttyNov 16, 2014
It's curious how a film about a man who wrote his graduate thesis on time manages to treat time with such disregard--Marsh flutters through this man's extraordinary life with utter disregard for cause & effect, showing us the end results of aIt's curious how a film about a man who wrote his graduate thesis on time manages to treat time with such disregard--Marsh flutters through this man's extraordinary life with utter disregard for cause & effect, showing us the end results of a number of events in Hawking's life without showing us how he got there or what it means to him when he does. Surely the central romance is important to his work, but it's a shame Marsh isn't able make the connection in a more intriguing way.

And enough with the glow effect on the lens. ENOUGH.… Expand
4 of 4 users found this helpful40
All this user's reviews
6
grandpajoe6191Aug 25, 2015
"The Theory of Everything" tells the story of acclaimed professor Steven Hawking and his relationship between his wife Jane as she helps him fight through his illness till the very end. Although well crafted with some memorable scenes here"The Theory of Everything" tells the story of acclaimed professor Steven Hawking and his relationship between his wife Jane as she helps him fight through his illness till the very end. Although well crafted with some memorable scenes here and there, I did find the movie to lack the love chemistry between the main characters; I mean, isn't this the kind of romance movie you'd watch with your girlfriend? If so, get ready to get bored out of your mind.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
5
AkashVijayJan 21, 2015
A terrific performance by Redmayne in a decent movie. But this movie just feels too neatly tied and a bit too angelic. Everyone in this movie is so perfect. There are no character flaws whatsoever. Even when Stephen and Jane separated, JaneA terrific performance by Redmayne in a decent movie. But this movie just feels too neatly tied and a bit too angelic. Everyone in this movie is so perfect. There are no character flaws whatsoever. Even when Stephen and Jane separated, Jane just fell on her knees and said "I'm sorry I wasn't of better service to you. I did my best". That's just manipulative and mawkish beyond belief. It was an insult to the audiences' intelligence. But that being said, the movie does balance Stephen Hawking's marriage, his illness and his work very well. But it's disappointing to see this film following the quintessential trite, mundane and conventional biopic formula, given that it's about a truly unconventional and exceptional man.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
5
nicholasbertJan 26, 2015
Apart from excellent acting performances (and I daresay Felicity Jones's one is better than Eddie Redmayne's), The Theory of Everything does nothing to pull the audience into a subtler, less clichéd story. Those of you who expected scienceApart from excellent acting performances (and I daresay Felicity Jones's one is better than Eddie Redmayne's), The Theory of Everything does nothing to pull the audience into a subtler, less clichéd story. Those of you who expected science can stop watching immediately - unfortunately, the love story that is the substitute central plot element is not interesting enough to draw the attention of romantic-movie fans.

The Theory of Everything makes Hawking's disabilities basically the only thing worth mentioning, flying over his achievements and even his general way of picturing the world - and rather focusing on his wife and his love story, despite the lack of the amount of drama this would require to be effective.

In general, a clumsily edited picture with no pretenses and presented as an unfortunate series of clichés about scientists, handicap and extramarital relationships, in this order.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
CherryxldApr 11, 2015
The Theory of Everything es una película encantadora que logra encontrar exitosamente la ecuación correcta.

Esta película sobre la historia del matemático Stephen Hawking es un film que resulta bastante agradable, y logra abarcar en buenaThe Theory of Everything es una película encantadora que logra encontrar exitosamente la ecuación correcta.

Esta película sobre la historia del matemático Stephen Hawking es un film que resulta bastante agradable, y logra abarcar en buena forma la parte romántica y la parte instructiva. Además, su banda sonora es totalmente increíble, dando un toque más sentimental y encajando bien con la trama de este largometraje inteligente, entrañable y con una ecuación que resulta correcta.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
NerdConsultantMay 12, 2015
the film is excellent and well deserving of all it's oscar nominations particularly Eddie Redmayne's win for best actor. his performance as Stephen Hawking is one unbelievably good and felicity jones is his perfect counterpart and their onthe film is excellent and well deserving of all it's oscar nominations particularly Eddie Redmayne's win for best actor. his performance as Stephen Hawking is one unbelievably good and felicity jones is his perfect counterpart and their on screen chemistry is very well done.the witting and direction are also exceptional delivering stephen Hawking's life in a way that's very accessible to a wide ranging audience. my only complaint if i had to nitpick is that I personally feel it goes on slightly too long and that 10-20 minutes of the film could have been cut despite it's excellent early pacing.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
BackstabberDCMar 4, 2015
A beautiful and emotional drama about one of the most brillant people. Eddie Redmayne deserved the Oscar for this portrayal of Stephen Hawking. Music is also beautiful and the whole movie is a pure 10 in my opinion. And yes, buy The BriefA beautiful and emotional drama about one of the most brillant people. Eddie Redmayne deserved the Oscar for this portrayal of Stephen Hawking. Music is also beautiful and the whole movie is a pure 10 in my opinion. And yes, buy The Brief History of Time if you haven't already. ;)… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
david23Feb 16, 2015
First things first: if you watch this movie expecting the focus to be on Stephen Hawking and his work - like I did - then you will likely be greatly disappointed (like I was).
So much screen time is spent upon his then-wife, Jane, and theirFirst things first: if you watch this movie expecting the focus to be on Stephen Hawking and his work - like I did - then you will likely be greatly disappointed (like I was).
So much screen time is spent upon his then-wife, Jane, and their relationship that, on the few occasions that we actually see him presenting his theories, you feel completely disconnected from those accomplishments because absolutely none of the work behind them is portrayed on-screen. So we end up with a few odd scenes (amongst all the love-stuff) where Stephen speaks to a room full of people about his theories and then everyone stands up and starts applauding him and how brilliant he is. But, for the unintelligent people in the cinema like me who don't have a clue what he's on about because the movie doesn't provide a single iota of the background work or thoughts then went into these theories, you're left feeling like he may as well have said 'Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah'. And everyone still would have stood up and cheered, because the Movie Director needed a few uplifting moments.
And, boy, does it need those uplifting scenes in amongst the grey, depressing story of a man diagnosed with Motor Neurone Disease. Yes, Stephen Hawking has accomplished a great deal in his lifetime so far but so much of this movie focuses on the struggles of his wife, Jane, to cope with looking after him as his condition worsens that the film ends up feeling more informative than entertaining (and what do we go to the cinema/movie theatre for if not to be entertained?)
My other issue with the movie is that, especially when you find out that it's based on a book by Jane, it feels distinctly like it glosses over the foibles of his then-wife and yet highlights the flaws of others. Her being unfaithful garners five seconds of screen time but when Elaine (Maxine Peake) shows up later in the movie to help Stephen, she's portrayed as something like a naughty nurse from a 'Carry On' movie who tries (in several scenes) to undermine Jane. It's these things that - especially when considering whose book this movie is based upon - make it feel like it may be a slightly biased version of events.
However, there are positives about the movie that need to be highlighted. There are some greatly funny moments and these are often provided by Stephen's university room-mate Brian (played wonderfully by Harry Lloyd). He brings some much-needed laughter to a sometimes otherwise dreary movie.
Of course, the main highlight of the film is the performance of Eddie Redmayne as Stephen Hawking. As I write this review, he is Oscar-nominated for it and I would be shocked if he does not win the award. Without such an outstanding job by the leading actor, I feel that 'The Theory of Everything' would have fallen completely flat but his outstanding performance is absolutely spot on.
Overall, if you're interested in Stephen Hawking then - by all means - you may find 'The Theory of Everything' worth watching. Otherwise, there's not much to be gained here other than seeing a tired, generic love story in a different setting.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
4
hotfromcauldronNov 17, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. What orbits around Redmayne’s stellar performance sucks the air out of this Hawking’s biopic. Hairdos change, couples swap, time passes- but nothing happens. Until a touching two minute reverse recap at the very end. Even if love is the answer- the question remains- why is this movie relatively mediocre.… Expand
6 of 7 users found this helpful61
All this user's reviews
7
foxgroveDec 10, 2014
The Theory of Everything is basically a very conventional love story at its core. Based on the memoir by Jane Hawking it is at first surprising to find how much the screenplay concentrates on her. It is to the credit of Felicity Jones thatThe Theory of Everything is basically a very conventional love story at its core. Based on the memoir by Jane Hawking it is at first surprising to find how much the screenplay concentrates on her. It is to the credit of Felicity Jones that she becomes the film’s ace card. She truly shines here as Jane and it is almost totally due to her subtly understated performance that the story’s emotions feel honest and not overly manipulated. Eddie Redmayne is also very good, especially with the physicality the role demands, but surprisingly his role seems somewhat underwritten. The screenplay pays scant attention to his professional achievements concentrating instead on his disability and the challenges this posed to the couple’s marriage. Anyone not knowing anything about Stephen Hawking going in to this film would be hard pressed to understand the reverence in which he is held, the tragedy of his physical battles notwithstanding. Ironically, criticism levelled at 'The Imitation Game' and the lack of personal details about Alan Turing's personal life would be more pertinently aimed here at Hawking's professional one. Montages are adopted to delineate time lines to mixed success, but probably the biggest indication of the film’s failure is due to the fact that one is more interested in the love story between Jane and Jonathan than in the one between Jane and Stephen.… Expand
6 of 8 users found this helpful62
All this user's reviews
10
TotallyEpicHDNov 7, 2014
Being a fan of Hawking myself, I was impressed by James Marsh's Hawking flick, with great acting and brilliant screenplay, although some information was a little inaccurate, it is still the only Stephen Hawking film that I have ever seen, soBeing a fan of Hawking myself, I was impressed by James Marsh's Hawking flick, with great acting and brilliant screenplay, although some information was a little inaccurate, it is still the only Stephen Hawking film that I have ever seen, so I didn't know what to expect.… Expand
8 of 14 users found this helpful86
All this user's reviews
7
richardradNov 23, 2014
Great acting in a good movie: Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones are terrific. The Theory of Everything is at its best when Stephen Hawking comes down with ALS. Redmayne's portrayal of Hawking's mighty physical struggle is remarkable. TheGreat acting in a good movie: Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones are terrific. The Theory of Everything is at its best when Stephen Hawking comes down with ALS. Redmayne's portrayal of Hawking's mighty physical struggle is remarkable. The chemistry between the two stars is believable and the movie does a very nice job of recreating Cambridge in the early 1960's. Much of the script is first-rate, but the quick and almost breezy treatment or their marital breakup is unfortunate.… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
10
TheFilmFanaticDec 8, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Theory of Everything is an intelligent biographical dramady about the life of Stephen and Jane Hawking depicting the struggles and accomplishments they faced together. Everything from the production design and costumes to the cinematography and editing helped accent the emotional struggle of the characters. With Oscar-worthy performances by Redmayne and Jones and brilliant direction by James Marsh the audience is taken on a charmingly humorous and emotional ride through the life of the Hawkings.

I was a bit disappointed with the story in two aspects. Firstly, I believe that the film was subjected to some restricted narrative construction to appease the still living subjects of the film. In biographies of deceased people the filmmakers tend to push the boundaries and add a bit of controversy or increased tension. If Marsh was going for a more biographical, documentary film than a biographical drama, then he certainly succeeded. However, I feel even with the restrictions that this film delivered. Secondly, I was not pleased with the lack of science in the film. This film is about Stephen Hawking, one of the greatest minds to ever walk this Earth, and yet we are more interested in his personal life? Yes the film is a recount of Stephen's life through the eyes of his ex-wife Jane, but being the only film about Stephen Hawking they could have at least explained some of the interesting theories and research he worked on throughout his life.

Regardless this film delivers a brilliantly charming biopic about a man whose dynamism was hidden by his overachieving mind. Although Stephen is the star of the film, the true star of the story is Jane whose strength and dedication to Stephen helped bring us The Theory of Everything. His mind changed our world, her love changed his.… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
10
LynJan 18, 2015
A beautiful movie that revolves around Eddie Redmayne's astonishing performance as Stephen Hawking. When he's younger and healthier, you can see hints of the severely handicapped man he will become ... yet when he's older and frailer, you canA beautiful movie that revolves around Eddie Redmayne's astonishing performance as Stephen Hawking. When he's younger and healthier, you can see hints of the severely handicapped man he will become ... yet when he's older and frailer, you can still see the wry humor of the college-age wunderkind he was. Some reviewers seem to feel cheated that they didn't get a good enough physics lesson from the film. But I came away convinced that it was that wry, full-of-life humor, portrayed with subtle brilliance, that must have enabled Hawking to survive and achieve so many decades longer than anyone had thought possible.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
4
LamontRaymondNov 9, 2014
I'd never recommend this movie. I'd read that the emphasis would be on Hawking's school life and his romance with his first wife. Unfortunately, that only comprises the first half of the film. The second half is entirely too slow. TheI'd never recommend this movie. I'd read that the emphasis would be on Hawking's school life and his romance with his first wife. Unfortunately, that only comprises the first half of the film. The second half is entirely too slow. The sequences of Hawking struggling to pull himself up his staircase - looking at his son at the top of the stairs - mirrored many of the people in our theater struggling to get to the end of this film. Sure, Redmayne is awesome, but when he gets into his "My Left Foot" mode, that's no longer acting, in my opinion. I'd much rather award an actor for subtle, true moments - not pretending like he or she is physically disabled. Seems far too easy. Pandering. The movie simply needs editing. And I would have loved to hear more about the Quantum Physics vs. Astro Physics relationship that they merely touch upon.… Expand
6 of 15 users found this helpful69
All this user's reviews
7
BHBarryNov 16, 2014
"Theory of Everything" is, as most people know, the story of Stephen Hawking and his adult life-long battle with a motor deficiency disease (ALS). It is also the story of self-sacrifice and dedication as told through the eyes of his wife of"Theory of Everything" is, as most people know, the story of Stephen Hawking and his adult life-long battle with a motor deficiency disease (ALS). It is also the story of self-sacrifice and dedication as told through the eyes of his wife of 25 years, Jane, who, together with Anthony McClaren, co authored the screenplay based on her book "My Life With Stephen". The film was directed by James Marsh and stars Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones. One must approach this film as both a factual summary of the trials and efforts of a genius confined to the prison of his voiceless and motionless body and, also, as an entertainment vehicle. For the former the film serves its purpose well and is made even more believable by Mr. Redmayne’s remarkable likeness to Mr. Hawkng and the performances given by both he and Ms. Jones. As to the latter, the film is certainly not "entertaining" in the true sense of the word but represents one of those "should see" see films because of its biographical data and the efforts of its two stars. This is indeed a difficult film to rate for much depends on the needs and desires of the viewer and whether he or she considers watching Mr. Redmayne’s character struggle with a catastrophic disability for over 2 hours worth the effort. My experience of the film may well have been affected by the fact that I saw a PBS documentary with the real life Hawkings a few days earlier. That being said, I give the film a 7 rating because it basically is locked to the actual story of the subjects with little or no poetic license or interest creating insertions.. Remember, though, as with "My Left Foot",also a fairly difficult film to watch, it did earn Danel Day Lewis an Oscar and I wouldn’t be surprised if the same fate awaited Mr. Redmayne.… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
1
jobin1988Jan 16, 2015
what a piece of crap....i hated this formulaic stupid movie....it was the 'oh my love conquers all' garbage we've seen a million times and then love doesn't conquer all...maybe if they actually made a movie about the dillemma of that realwhat a piece of crap....i hated this formulaic stupid movie....it was the 'oh my love conquers all' garbage we've seen a million times and then love doesn't conquer all...maybe if they actually made a movie about the dillemma of that real circumstance rather than this inspirational bull hogwash....it ends up not even being inspirational....they don't end up together people....so why this 'ain't love grand....can't it move mountains'....real life set in and love left town...this is a sappy afterschool special only admired because of it's veddy english connection and all that royal academy theatuh tripe and shakespeare babies.....they still have a queen, people...no power ...but they still have one......and the acting does nothing new...nothing fresh....it is nothing more than a boring film with english accents, so of course the academy rewards it because they are pretentious morons who buy into the myth that only the english are true actors....that is not to say there aren't amazing brittish film....28 days later....the long good friday....gregory's girl....educating rita.....billy elliot....billy liar....this sporting life....anything by mike leigh....any monty python.....time bandits.....brazil....trainspotting....anything kubrick....saturday night and sunday morning....don't look now....sammy and rosie.....my beautiful laundrette......hunger.....and so very many more....if redmayne wins it's the academy rewarding the disease and why is jones even in here....so so acting at best....a terrible move....birdman deserves everything.....… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
1
thelloydfamilyJan 18, 2015
Not been this bored by a movie since watching the Expendables and vowing never to watch one of the sequels. Eddie Redmayne is the most wooden actor I have ever seen, from the Pillars of the Earth to Les Miserables his habit of staring offNot been this bored by a movie since watching the Expendables and vowing never to watch one of the sequels. Eddie Redmayne is the most wooden actor I have ever seen, from the Pillars of the Earth to Les Miserables his habit of staring off into the near distance, blatantly reading autocue and lack of emotion means that his playing of Stephen Hawking must not receive the Oscar. Why, because he isn't acting!!!! Also, the blatant use of Americanisms to sell it to the US. In the UK it is Leg or Breast, not light meat or dark meat. Also it is Motor Neurone Disease in the UK and ALS in the US, until Ice Bucket no-one here would have referred to Lou Gehrigs Disease and certainly not in 1963.… Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
6
jeremypNov 30, 2014
As a made for TV biopic it would be passable but as a movie it's insistence on pursuing a pastel course makes it tame stuff indeed. Redmayne does yeoman work with the physicality, but has little else to do. Is there a personality under thatAs a made for TV biopic it would be passable but as a movie it's insistence on pursuing a pastel course makes it tame stuff indeed. Redmayne does yeoman work with the physicality, but has little else to do. Is there a personality under that shell? Or just a brain. Far too much is left for the imagining, almost as if getting deeper into the reality of Hawking's life would detract from the hagiography.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
8
NedRyerson1Jan 14, 2015
The Theory of Everything tells for the first time the story of Stephen Hawking and its surprising that nobody came up with this idea before. What makes the movie more interesting is the way of approaching his life, not focused in one aspect,The Theory of Everything tells for the first time the story of Stephen Hawking and its surprising that nobody came up with this idea before. What makes the movie more interesting is the way of approaching his life, not focused in one aspect, it shows the scientific part, the family part and the illness part. The first one is very impressive, starting by the epiphanies that he experiences, how he developed his theories and how he breaks with current knowledge. The family part gives us a more human image of this genius and his relationship with his wife Jane. And finally, the illness and how the couple deals with it is very well achieved. These last two are unknown for the viewer and James Marsh is not afraid to show the most dramatic episodes making it a heartbreaking story but always realistic. This whole thing goes hand by hand with a breathtaking performances of Eddie Redmayne, it is unbelievable what he has created and Felicity Jones is perfect in her role. Then we have the script, the score (so captivating that distracted me from the movie several times) and the work with the cameras; all very coherent with the protagonist obsession: time, and its sublimation in that magnificent sequence at the end.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
amboyJan 5, 2015
Some people are resisting this film because they fear it is more about a disease than a man. Somehow this extraordinary film avoids this; instead of Hawking's suffering, you see his brilliance, his courage, his humor, his honesty, and oddlySome people are resisting this film because they fear it is more about a disease than a man. Somehow this extraordinary film avoids this; instead of Hawking's suffering, you see his brilliance, his courage, his humor, his honesty, and oddly his normalcy. At the end of the film, I felt not that I'd seen the story of a hero or a victim but of a man--lucky to have a superior mind, unlucky to have a stricken body. Eddie Redmayne's performance is beyond praise. He doesn't rely on a contorted body or slurred speech; his eyes tell the story of his ambition, wit, and brilliance. Bravo to all--especially to him.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
BshopDec 7, 2014
Good movie, did not expect this emotional rollercoaster.
I'm a fan on science (whether fiction or non-fiction) and there's not much theory in here, just barely whetting an appetite for knowledge.
Initial reaction is to feel empathy orGood movie, did not expect this emotional rollercoaster.
I'm a fan on science (whether fiction or non-fiction) and there's not much theory in here, just barely whetting an appetite for knowledge.
Initial reaction is to feel empathy or sympathy for Hawking, but later you realize he's persevering, well past anyone's expectations (even his own, with the help of his wife).
Great biopic of a genius among us, portraying the real struggles we all can relate to.
In summary, good date movie, see it in theaters if nothing else is available, otherwise wait for it on Redbox or rental.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
8
ApolscFeb 15, 2015
This is how Eddie Redmayne won the academy award for best actor. It helps to have such a specific character to portray but he is superb.

Y así fue como Eddie Redmayne ganó el Oscar al mejor actor. Ayuda tener un personaje tan específicoThis is how Eddie Redmayne won the academy award for best actor. It helps to have such a specific character to portray but he is superb.

Y así fue como Eddie Redmayne ganó el Oscar al mejor actor. Ayuda tener un personaje tan específico que interpretar, pero su actuación realmente es soberbia.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
royphishoohJan 19, 2015
A magnificent film, with astonishing performances from Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones. The story of a complex man overcoming enormous difficulty to excel in his field. No guns, no military murderers, no American navel-gazing, no blood onA magnificent film, with astonishing performances from Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones. The story of a complex man overcoming enormous difficulty to excel in his field. No guns, no military murderers, no American navel-gazing, no blood on the drum kit, so it probably won't win an Oscar; nonetheless this is easily the best film of the year.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
8
DokaluJan 30, 2015
The Theory of Everything is a very emotional movie. It'll make you be sometimes happy and sometimes sad, as it's revealed in front of your eyes the incredible life of Stephen Hawking, and the especial relationship that he had with his partnerThe Theory of Everything is a very emotional movie. It'll make you be sometimes happy and sometimes sad, as it's revealed in front of your eyes the incredible life of Stephen Hawking, and the especial relationship that he had with his partner Jane Wilde. All the performances in the film are incredibly astonishing, especially by Eddie Redmayne, being by far the best performance in his career, and one of the best performances of the year. The script captures perfectly the emotional essence of Stephen Hawking's life, making you never feel bored (if you like drama, romance movies). It's also really nice how it's filmed in this classical British kind of format. It really helps to capture the essence.
On the bad side, the movie doesn't has that much science as I would expect it to have for being Stephen Hawking's life. It obviously has some, but there's not much protagonism from physics in it, and that's sad.
Real score: 8.5… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
funnygirl26Jan 16, 2015
Critics should be aware that this is not a biopic of Hawking's work, it's an ADAPTATION of the book Jane Wilde wrote about her marriage to Stephen. Stop saying that this movie should be about science.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
9
cheenuFeb 18, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. great movie
the most beautiful part of this movie is the ease with which hawking answers his life ,in my opinion that is the most original way of living ones life ,director has been successful in showing with hawking's life the true beauty of life itself.a unique piece of work , i won't say it to be inspirational as the idea it suggest me is that try to answer the problems of your life in your own unique way, originality.mesmerized by the simplicity of answers for the, so thought massively complicated questions.the only extra thing that i would have wished for would be a little more inclination towards hawking's scientific work.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
9
lyonsd78Feb 22, 2015
This very subtle telling of an unimaginable real-life tale is superbly executed. Eddie Redmayne's portrayal of Stephen Hawking is about as spot on as any real life biopic performance I've ever sen and Felicity Jones shines (as she has alwaysThis very subtle telling of an unimaginable real-life tale is superbly executed. Eddie Redmayne's portrayal of Stephen Hawking is about as spot on as any real life biopic performance I've ever sen and Felicity Jones shines (as she has always promised to) in her role as Jane Hawking. Worthy of the Oscar buzz, you can not be disappointing with this production...… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
0
RuPaulNov 18, 2014
Contrived, poorly written, and executed by someone who clearly struggles to convey melodrama over documentaries. Redmayne's performance is greatly overrated--lower your expectations lest you be as disappointed as I. Far from the next My LeftContrived, poorly written, and executed by someone who clearly struggles to convey melodrama over documentaries. Redmayne's performance is greatly overrated--lower your expectations lest you be as disappointed as I. Far from the next My Left Foot, he shows greatest success in mimicry but fails to convey any consistent character beyond. Felicity Jones is nice and works well with all the cliches, but it is pointless in this ultimately purposeless BBC-grade drama.… Expand
4 of 13 users found this helpful49
All this user's reviews
8
MovieGuysDec 6, 2014
Better than I expected, The Theory of Everything is not some skin-deep, superficial biopic with a good-looking actor in the central role (ahem ahem "Jobs", ahem ahem), but rather a fascinating account of Stephen Hawking's personal life andBetter than I expected, The Theory of Everything is not some skin-deep, superficial biopic with a good-looking actor in the central role (ahem ahem "Jobs", ahem ahem), but rather a fascinating account of Stephen Hawking's personal life and career, which even today in 2014 is still continuing. The film focuses on Hawking's relationship through the years with his first wife, and on his theory of black holes and how time works; this may be leaving some parts of his life out, but the man has done so much that the scope of the film suited itself. Redmayne is amazingly accurate in his portrayal of the physicist, and the rest of the cast, including Felicity Jones and David Thewlis, gave brilliant performances as well. I would not be surprised if it didn't show up at the Oscars in some form.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
Derek1101Dec 10, 2014
I have always been one to put movies such as this on a high pedestal, and I think that Eddie Redmayne really gave a remarkable performance of Stephen Hawking. The authenticity and places that one must reach to pull off a person such asI have always been one to put movies such as this on a high pedestal, and I think that Eddie Redmayne really gave a remarkable performance of Stephen Hawking. The authenticity and places that one must reach to pull off a person such as Stephen is really seen here in this movie. We get to see the journey and heartbreak that Stephen and Jane had to go through from the diagnosis of his disease to the crumbling of their marriage in a very smooth transition. I recommend this movie to anyone that has followed Stephen's work, and shares his ideas, and anyone who needs a refreshing take on a love story.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
10
francisrgoNov 10, 2014
What makes "The Theory of Everything" a sure Best Picture contender is it's brilliant storytelling and captivating performances by each actors/actresses. The film is played like a love letter by the way the movie danced around its tone andWhat makes "The Theory of Everything" a sure Best Picture contender is it's brilliant storytelling and captivating performances by each actors/actresses. The film is played like a love letter by the way the movie danced around its tone and dialogues. The screenplay is very concise and direct; there is a clear beginning and an end. The film utilizes music effectively by allowing it to be the narrative. Sometimes just a moving picture and sound can tell a story like in Pixar's "Up" and Michel Hazanavicius' "The Artist," simplicity is at most always better. The movie is inspiring and beautiful.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
0
Pelen23Feb 24, 2015
This fairy tale like bio pic is is poorly written and emotionally manipulative with its overused cheesy score, Felicity Jones completed the film with only two facial impressions and got an oscar nomination for this , wow! Eddie Redmayne wasThis fairy tale like bio pic is is poorly written and emotionally manipulative with its overused cheesy score, Felicity Jones completed the film with only two facial impressions and got an oscar nomination for this , wow! Eddie Redmayne was slightly better but I don't find his performance powerful . There was absolutely no screen chemistry between redmayne and jones.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
9
TVJerryDec 3, 2014
Eddie Redmayne always has a captivating screen presence, characterized by that sparkle in his eye and his expressive mouth. Those traits still reveal themselves in his remarkable portrayal of Stephen Hawking. The film starts when he was aEddie Redmayne always has a captivating screen presence, characterized by that sparkle in his eye and his expressive mouth. Those traits still reveal themselves in his remarkable portrayal of Stephen Hawking. The film starts when he was a promising Cambridge student, where he meets the woman who became his wife (Felicity Jones, who's also wonderful). Even though he was diagnosed with ALS at age 21, they continued their relationship, as he went on to become the famous physicist. Throughout the dramatic challenges of their life, the screenplay manages to inject humor and hope. Redmayne transforms himself into an Oscar-worthy performance and the film tells Hawking's story with warmth and honor.… Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
10
lilkillpappyApr 13, 2015
I completely agree that a film focused on his science instead of his love life would have been more interesting to me, but that being said, this is still a great movie. Great acting and great script. I don't need anything more.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
duncan1964Feb 13, 2015
This Oscar nominated biography of the life of Stephen Hawkins and his wife is perfectly serviceable, and made above average by powerhouse performances by Redmayne and Jones, but it all feels just a little safe. Told in a standard film bioThis Oscar nominated biography of the life of Stephen Hawkins and his wife is perfectly serviceable, and made above average by powerhouse performances by Redmayne and Jones, but it all feels just a little safe. Told in a standard film bio structure it has no surprises and hits all the genre beats perfectly, but what it needed was to be just a little more cinematic. It feels like something you would watch on BBC1 on a Sunday afternoon, which is no bad thing, but for the big screen you feel it needed a little something extra.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
vmd1020Dec 15, 2014
The movie itself is OK, the acting is what prompts a higher rating. The film did seem a bit top heavy (first half was more intriguing/character development focused) while the second half (although well acted) definitely dragged on.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
rafa14Jan 2, 2015
Incredible it is the word that best describe this movie, because it was perfectly made, the actors, the screenplay and etc. But for me the most good thing in this film is Eddie Redmayne, he was perfect playing Stephen Hawking, if he won theIncredible it is the word that best describe this movie, because it was perfectly made, the actors, the screenplay and etc. But for me the most good thing in this film is Eddie Redmayne, he was perfect playing Stephen Hawking, if he won the Academy Award it wouldn't be a surprise… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
ledaumasDec 6, 2014
Eddie Redmaye will probably be oscar nominated. As for the movie, if only there were more people as loyal, noble and good-hearted as Jane and Jonathan who helped take care of Stephen. It's truly amazing how Stephen didn't lose his will toEddie Redmaye will probably be oscar nominated. As for the movie, if only there were more people as loyal, noble and good-hearted as Jane and Jonathan who helped take care of Stephen. It's truly amazing how Stephen didn't lose his will to live and instead thrived. But I think that's due to Jane. It's a wonderful story about human will and human good will.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
lasttimeisawFeb 15, 2015
Personally I have been suffering from a certain degree of biopic fatigue, those annual staples blatantly pandering to academy recognition are often dazzling with Oscar-hankering performances, but its narrative structure and skill usually arePersonally I have been suffering from a certain degree of biopic fatigue, those annual staples blatantly pandering to academy recognition are often dazzling with Oscar-hankering performances, but its narrative structure and skill usually are all laboriously conventional and monotonous. James Marsh’s THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING is the quintessential archetype of this sort and it is going to give Eddie Redmayne the coveted Oscar for such a taxing mission to imitate Stephen Hawking, the still alive-and-kicking bigwig cosmologist. However, Marsh conducts the film with a fluid pace and it wondrously invigorated by its technical crew, particularly Jóhann Jóhannsson’s engrossing soundtrack and the ever-pervasive subdued light from lighting department.

keep reading my review on my blog, google: cinema omnivore, thanks… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
beingryanjudeNov 7, 2014
Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones give two of the finest performances of the year. The Theory of Everything is a heartfelt and honest look at life, love and everything in between.
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
8
csw12Nov 23, 2014
The two leads, Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones give performances that are simply remarkable with a score that is surprisingly good and important to the story.
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
7
Trev29Dec 24, 2014
If this movie has anything going for it, it is definitely the fantastic acting. There is something also to be said of the well crafted direction and score. As far as biopics go, this is a better one.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
talhalafciDec 17, 2014
There may be some problems about its script and the way they told the story of Hawking, but The Theory of Everything is an exceptional film because of its acting.Eddie Redmayne gives an astonishing performance that makes you forget you areThere may be some problems about its script and the way they told the story of Hawking, but The Theory of Everything is an exceptional film because of its acting.Eddie Redmayne gives an astonishing performance that makes you forget you are watching a film. Such an extraordinary work.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
UkalaFeb 23, 2015
Ok so let me start of by saying that Eddie Redmayne, Felicity Jones and Harry lloyd did a wonderful performance in this movie.

The Theory of Everything for the first hour of the film captures an amazing part of Steven's life, but after theOk so let me start of by saying that Eddie Redmayne, Felicity Jones and Harry lloyd did a wonderful performance in this movie.

The Theory of Everything for the first hour of the film captures an amazing part of Steven's life, but after the first hour you are left feeling disappointed, I know this is what happens but Jane dancing around with this christian man and building a tent together does not qualify as character development, the same goes with Steven's nurse, they fail to gave that charm which an audience needs to connect with, I know this movie it trying to stick with the facts but changing the plot a little would not have hurt at all.

Harry lloyd's character that in the moments we saw him really gave that best friend vibe, and it's really upsetting his character was not given a bigger role because it would've really helped saved this film in the last hour.

Eddie Redmayne was fantastic as Steven but after an hour there was no longer a connection with him, I found myself having to listen really carefully to what he was saying, and I was very upset because his performance was great and then cut short, it's like the final hour of the film was rushed and not thought about at all, and as for the nurse he falls in love with, I did not see how Eddie pretending to be a dalek is enough to announce a break up 5 minutes later. These parts were Steven and Jane had their moments with their future partners felt so cliché it was like watching a Disney movie because it was like they just gave up on trying to make a great final hour as opposed to the first hour which was great.

Finally, Felicity Jones who had such a great start and gave such a great performance, at first her character was shy and coming out and wanting to help Steven even though his condition was worsening, but then she meets a man who can play the piano (Who comes off as very dis-likable, as does Steven's nurse) and 3 minutes of montage time and all that connection that we built up with that character was just ended, making the audience feel for her but dislike the character at the same time.

This film was great seriously, it's just the final hour that becomes unbearable, there is not enough character development, and I don't see why these characters were given more screen time than Harry lloyd's character because I think if they used him instead of the two most annoying characters in this movie then the final hour would've been saved. I don't see why they didn't change the story a little.

The last part I have a problem with is the ending, it's trying to do something phenomenal and great, and that would've worked and became truly emotional if they had not ruined the story after the first hour.

I do recommend people to watch this though, it is a good movie for the first half… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
Compi24Feb 1, 2015
Though it may tread on some traditional biopic tropes here and there, a traditional biopic it is not. "The Theory Of Everything" excels, thanks in no small part to its captivating lead turns and some oneirically beautiful images andThough it may tread on some traditional biopic tropes here and there, a traditional biopic it is not. "The Theory Of Everything" excels, thanks in no small part to its captivating lead turns and some oneirically beautiful images and camerawork throughout.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
SimpleMethodDec 2, 2014
This a well-told, sweet story. The two leads have excellent chemistry and Eddy Redmayne knocks it out of the park Stephen Hawking. He's really fantastic. The plot gets a bit slow here and there, but overall I really liked this movie.
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
8
moviemitch96Feb 9, 2015
Yet another marvelous British biopic (after The Imitation Game.) Overall, I was quite satisfied with how this film turned out. Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones both deliver touching lead performances. The story was also heartfelt andYet another marvelous British biopic (after The Imitation Game.) Overall, I was quite satisfied with how this film turned out. Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones both deliver touching lead performances. The story was also heartfelt and captivating to watch. Overall, it certainly does great justice to Mr. Hawking and all of his brilliant contributions over the years.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
6
ScribeHardDec 28, 2014
If the acting tandem of Redmayne and Jones is the film’s irresistible force, then the fading presentation of the story of The Theory of Everything is the immovable object that that force has the unfortunate circumstance to meet. I don’t knowIf the acting tandem of Redmayne and Jones is the film’s irresistible force, then the fading presentation of the story of The Theory of Everything is the immovable object that that force has the unfortunate circumstance to meet. I don’t know the outcome of a meeting like that in the realm of physics, but in the realm of film, it isn’t pretty.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
Brent_MarchantNov 14, 2014
A generally well-crafted and engaging biopic about the personal and professional life of world-famous physicist Stephen Hawking. Despite an occasional tendency to be overly earnest in its delivery and some slow pacing in the last half-hour,A generally well-crafted and engaging biopic about the personal and professional life of world-famous physicist Stephen Hawking. Despite an occasional tendency to be overly earnest in its delivery and some slow pacing in the last half-hour, the picture is an informative and enjoyable time at the show, with a positively stellar performance by Eddie Redmayne in the lead role.… Expand
0 of 6 users found this helpful06
All this user's reviews
7
ydnar4Feb 12, 2015
I have never been one to know much about Stephen Hawking but it is hard not to find a biopic on his life appeal because he overcame such odds. I like the idea o focus more on Hawking's personal life because if you focused too much on hisI have never been one to know much about Stephen Hawking but it is hard not to find a biopic on his life appeal because he overcame such odds. I like the idea o focus more on Hawking's personal life because if you focused too much on his professional accomplishment the film would go on and on and go over everyone's head. Eddie Redmayne certainly did an excellent job playing Hawking I wouldn't say he is my pick for the best actor Oscar but it is still a worthy performance. His speaking parts start to decrease the longer the movie goes on, but he certainly looked a lot like Hawking. Felicity Jones however I feel should be getting an Oscar for this role. Hawking's wife is basically as responsible for his accomplishments just as much as he is because she allowed him to think critically and she stood by him regardless.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
1
Eilidh2Apr 4, 2015
A paint-by-numbers biopic with a lead performane from Eddie Redmayne which won an Oscar.. now to my astonishment having seen the film. He contorts his face and body. He speaks unintelligibly. Oh yeah, he wears his glasses lopsided before heA paint-by-numbers biopic with a lead performane from Eddie Redmayne which won an Oscar.. now to my astonishment having seen the film. He contorts his face and body. He speaks unintelligibly. Oh yeah, he wears his glasses lopsided before he falls ill. That's it. His wife miraculously remains looking 22ish throughout the film.
Not recommended.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
0
Sebe2012Feb 24, 2015
Another mediocre film with okay performances. Redmaynes performance is ok but not amazing . However felicity jones is way too weak and hard to understand the hype.i hated the films tone , that Disneyish tone was awful and a serious biopicAnother mediocre film with okay performances. Redmaynes performance is ok but not amazing . However felicity jones is way too weak and hard to understand the hype.i hated the films tone , that Disneyish tone was awful and a serious biopic should be told like that… Expand
0 of 9 users found this helpful09
All this user's reviews
10
christine-999Feb 19, 2015
Spoiler alert!

At the end of The Theory of Everything.... Stephen Hawking stops and says look at what we made.... He looks back at his life as if to enjoy every moment until the beginning. His entire life he was searching for Time, and atSpoiler alert!

At the end of The Theory of Everything.... Stephen Hawking stops and says look at what we made.... He looks back at his life as if to enjoy every moment until the beginning. His entire life he was searching for Time, and at the end like God, looked back and said in amazement, look at what we made....

I was in tears by the brilliance of this movie… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
michael1208Jan 9, 2015
It's not a film full with science, massive actions and stunning visual effects, it's just a simple story narrating the life of a noble scientist. Not knowing of how true is the screenwriters adapting Stephen Hawking's life to the big screen,It's not a film full with science, massive actions and stunning visual effects, it's just a simple story narrating the life of a noble scientist. Not knowing of how true is the screenwriters adapting Stephen Hawking's life to the big screen, but the moderate pacing does not upset the audiences as it fills with a lot of interesting theoretic dialogues which some might be funny and the special yet specific cinematography has successfully crafted a beautiful life full of love. A big applause for Eddie Redmayne who has worked hard to portray a character with motor neuron disease that looks extremely real, nature yet pitiful; while Felicity Jones is doing great to support by building up a charming and emotional chemistry. With amazing and calm scores from Jóhann Jóhannsson to enhance the overall tone of the film, the biopic inspires us that when there is life, there will be hope and so, to be courageous, to be strong in overcoming challenges, it will still be successful in achieving dreams. It also ends impressively and audiences would have stunt for a moment thinking on what we have made so far in our life.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
TheRocksBarneyJan 5, 2015
If you want a film that is going to inspire you, not with fictional stories, but instead with the use of a true one grounded in reality than “The Theory of Everything” is what you should go out and see right now. It is, simply put, aIf you want a film that is going to inspire you, not with fictional stories, but instead with the use of a true one grounded in reality than “The Theory of Everything” is what you should go out and see right now. It is, simply put, a fantastic, life-affirming film that is propelled forward by its story and its leading roles. In that order. And the rest of the film is pretty good too. But “The Theory of Everything” isn’t all about Stephen Hawking (played by Eddie Redmayne) and how incredible his story is. Instead the film is “part biopic, part love story” with the latter telling us about the imperfect marriage between Stephen Hawking and Jane Wilde (played by Felicity Jones).
Eddie Redmayne is fantastic as Stephen Hawking and what is best at how he portrays Hawking getting worse in regards to his Motor Neurone Disease (/ALS). Redmayne starts the film as a young Hawking and we can tell this guy is clever. But it is as the film goes on that Redmayne’s performance gets better. Halfway through the film we are looking at a slouched Redmayne, slurring his words and occasionally smiling and by the end of the film we are looking at Redmayne playing Hawking as he is now. In testament to this the real-life Stephen Hawking commented, on seeing the film, that he felt he was sometimes looking back in time at himself. I’m with him. His performance is again, incredible, as incredible as the story he has the privilege to tell. If I don’t see him in the running for the Best Actor Oscar come February then I will be surprised.
Felicity Jones performance as Jane Wilde is magnificent too. Although on the surface she doesn’t seemingly require the various skills that Redmayne has to delve into, she again does the story and her real-life counterpart justice. Although she starts the film as a student, we come to see her having to raise 3 children as well as look after her husband and you feel that she really is going through all this. Again, the real-life Jane Wilde was impressed with Jones’ performance. When I think about Best Actress potential this year, she should also be in the running for the appropriate Oscar.
Harry Lloyd is brilliant as Stephen’s university friend Brian too. Although Brian is a mere composite character, he is a brilliant one at that. His attitude is drawn from Jane’s descriptions of “Stephen’s fellow lodgers and research students” at Cambridge: “They talked to him in his own intellectual terms, sometimes caustically sarcastic, sometimes crushingly critical, always humorous. In personal terms, however, they treated him with a gentle consideration which was almost loving.” He could also be in for an Oscar nomination for Best Supporting Actor.
But it is the story that really propels “The Theory of Everything” forward and it provides for half the reason as to why the films leads are fantastic. The film itself is based on Jane Wilde’s 2008 autobiography “Travelling to Infinity: My Life with Stephen”, a flattering account of their initial marriage and a significantly different, revised edition of the 1999 autobiography “Music to Move the Stars: My Life with Stephen”, a less flattering account of their marriage, sparked when Hawking left Wilde for his nurse Elaine Mason in 1990. (It’s worth noting they quietly divorced in 2006 following a 5 year period of rumours over whether Mason abused Hawking, apparently hitting him, throwing him around and even leaving him in the sun to burn for several hours.) The revised edition was sparked by her and Hawking managing to develop a good working relationship with Wilde.
The story of “The Theory of Everything”, as I said earlier, is “part biopic, part love story”. We learn in the film of how clever Hawking was and how he refused to let his disability stop him from being great, initially managing to overcome the 2 years he was given to live and ultimately managing to become a household name. But this isn’t what “The Theory of Everything” is really about. Although the film does give Hawking his due, it’s not as if Eddie Redmayne has a bigger role than Felicity Jones. Their roles are coequal and the film thus focuses on Stephen and Jane’s relationship, in particular how Wilde had to cope with raising 3 children whilst looking after her husband.
“The Theory of Everything” is a fantastic film with a fantastic story and two fantastic leads. The only problem I had with the film, and it’s always there for me when I watch this kind of film, is although it is never boring, you do find yourself occasionally wondering how long is left. But this is not the final thought I want to leave you with. Instead, let me remind you that “The Theory of Everything” is again, a fantastic film and worth seeing if you get the chance. It tells you something that apparently a nurse wiped a tear from Hawking’s eye when he first saw the film.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
LorddillpickleFeb 18, 2015
A gripping and fascinating light on the back story to Stephen Hawking. This film shows that Eddie Redmayne deserves the oscar which he is nominated for. See this movie.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
jacobshoffDec 17, 2014
I absolutely loved this movie. I Laughed, I Cried. A well done biopic/Love story about Stephen Hawking's early life and how this one woman Jane Hawking stuck through all the struggles and hardships of Stephen Hawking's Terrible Motor NeuronI absolutely loved this movie. I Laughed, I Cried. A well done biopic/Love story about Stephen Hawking's early life and how this one woman Jane Hawking stuck through all the struggles and hardships of Stephen Hawking's Terrible Motor Neuron disease. I would absolutely recommend this movie to anyone looking for a great love story and also a true story. 5 Stars… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
heathermJan 28, 2015
I was really pleasantly surprised by how much I liked this movie. I was expecting a cringe-inducing, inspiration-porn style depiction of disability, which the film did slip into at times (such as the pen scene toward the end), but overall II was really pleasantly surprised by how much I liked this movie. I was expecting a cringe-inducing, inspiration-porn style depiction of disability, which the film did slip into at times (such as the pen scene toward the end), but overall I was impressed by how realistic and matter-of-fact the depiction of life with a physical disability is. The overwhelming impression I had of Stephen and Jane's life together is that it was fairly normal--in particular, I loved the scenes of the children naturally and curiously climbing all over Hawking's wheelchair and riding it around the house. Such a normalized depiction of disability is hard to find.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
Beardfull1Jan 12, 2015
Extraordinary acting... Inspiring story.... Very good craftmanship, good direction... What moré can you así for in a movie.
I had higo expectations and was not dissapointed at all.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
6
aaronbartuskaJan 12, 2015
Redmayne and Jones, two of the best young actors working today, give admirable performances. However, that is about the only compliment I can give this film. It doesn't do the story of Hawking justice and feels sort of lazy as a result.
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
9
wornoutspinesFeb 21, 2015
I expected this movie to be an overly romanticized sugar coated version of Jane and Stephen Hawking That's probably the reason why I didn't rush to the theater to see the film. Although, it's tastefully done, the story is does not shy awayI expected this movie to be an overly romanticized sugar coated version of Jane and Stephen Hawking That's probably the reason why I didn't rush to the theater to see the film. Although, it's tastefully done, the story is does not shy away from the difficulty they faced.

The Theory of Everything seamlessly shows their life, the personal side of thing, and it's no romantic comedy. The film tells a great deal of what this brilliant man and his wife had to endure. Jane married this genius man, on borrowed time, planning to cherish the little time they had but in time found herself with a husband, whose slowly crumbling body, demands a lot of her. Stephen, this brilliant young man, who had a bright future in front of him, found himself faced with a hurdle he can't possibly overcome and only live with. Their story is beautifully told, fascinating but also cruel.

The Theory of Everything is subtle and clever. Like I said, it's not an overly sugar-coated and romanticized story of Stephen and Jane Hawking. They are portrayed as strong and determined people but they're also flawed, which makes them human and very likable. I was touched all the way through, immersed into the story and into their lives, but I did not pity them I admired them. The immersion into the story is wonderfully accompanied by the score. It gives an extra layer to such a beautiful story.

The cast is just superb, Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones really deserve the nominations and awards they got because they carried the movie. Redmayne was incredible and once you fathom the amount of work and details that went into this performance, you realize how impressive Eddie Redmayne's performance is. Felicity Jones, though, is the cherry on top the movie wouldn't have been as good without her in it. She's sweet and incredibly good as Jane Hawking her eyes speak for themselves in the movie. She's brilliant.

As Biopics go, The Theory of Everything is a great one among the many we had this year with Unbroken, and The Imitation Game, or Selma. When the story's great and you have a very talented cast, the director is often overlooked James March did a stellar job.

I now understand what all the fuss is about. The Theory of everything as a great script, talented cast, is believable and touching.

@wornoutspines… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
DimitrakisFeb 2, 2015
The theory of everything is one of the most interesting movies of 2015 along with the imitation game. I find the story of Hawking really fascinating and the movie really captures the difficult situasion of Hawkin's problem. The director did aThe theory of everything is one of the most interesting movies of 2015 along with the imitation game. I find the story of Hawking really fascinating and the movie really captures the difficult situasion of Hawkin's problem. The director did a really good job emphasise in Hawkings life instead of his work . The music and cast was absolutely fantastic the combination of those two in some scenes made the atmoshere very emotional. I really hope to see again movies like that because they make all the difference in the movie industry.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
ChristianHannahFeb 8, 2015
Ever since I saw the first trailer, I was wanting to see this film. I am a very big Stephen Hawking fan, & I saw this film on New Year's Eve. Eddie Redmayne was not in the movie. That was Stephen Hawking himself! That is how great RedmayneEver since I saw the first trailer, I was wanting to see this film. I am a very big Stephen Hawking fan, & I saw this film on New Year's Eve. Eddie Redmayne was not in the movie. That was Stephen Hawking himself! That is how great Redmayne was. This was really interesting to watch, & the science in this film really got my brain going. This is my favorite movie of 2014 & The Theory of Everything absolutely gets 5/5 stars! If Eddie Redmayne doesn't win the Best Actor oscar, it will be a sad day for us all.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
ProfesorRadamesFeb 14, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. incredible performance, stunning makeup, unlike beautiful mind attaches a little closer to reality, it is more real, however I feel that ignores many important details as prominent conferences (Play God dice?) and jumps in the time are very long. I recommend seeing it followed Mr. Nobody.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
RatedRexJan 7, 2016
Actors who play challenged, handicapped or crazed people always seems to get acclaim. Because it is not the acting that is great but the role. Whoever would have played the Joker in "The Dark Knight" would have been nominated. Linda Blair gotActors who play challenged, handicapped or crazed people always seems to get acclaim. Because it is not the acting that is great but the role. Whoever would have played the Joker in "The Dark Knight" would have been nominated. Linda Blair got nominated for her role in "The Exorcist", but she sucked in everything else. I think Eddie Redmayne is a fine actor, but really, what did he do that was so special? The role is what won him the award, not his acting. I thought Bradley Cooper in "American Sniper" and Michael Keaton in "Birdman" were better. However, you couldn't always "see" them acting. You can definitely see Redmayne acting because the character he plays is so much more different than Redmayne is in real life. I think it is much harder to play Al Pacino's Michael Corleone than it is to play Jack Nicholson's two dimensional role in "One flew over the Cuckoo's Nest" (Nicholson didn't even have to act), but tell that to award voters. They always seem to preferred the extreme. "The Theory of Everything is a decent movie, nothing spectacular. Its worth a look. Yet, in three years most of us will forget that this movie was ever made.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
MantisAug 23, 2015
This movie is so beautifully capturing the essence of love and care. The struggles of taking care of a person with a serious illness and not giving up. Extremely well portrayed and captivating. I agree with comments about the negative sidesThis movie is so beautifully capturing the essence of love and care. The struggles of taking care of a person with a serious illness and not giving up. Extremely well portrayed and captivating. I agree with comments about the negative sides not being that well depicted, but still you feel the pain of the persons involved, I think there was no need to go further into it. Bravo to this movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
DukeJonFeb 28, 2016
This film could have been so much more. Instead we get a surprisingly uninvolving story with little chemistry between the actors. Hawking's work isn't stressed strongly enough so I found that he came across to be quite unlikeable. MaxineThis film could have been so much more. Instead we get a surprisingly uninvolving story with little chemistry between the actors. Hawking's work isn't stressed strongly enough so I found that he came across to be quite unlikeable. Maxine Peake the nurse is too attractive for the viewer to believe she would be interested in Hawking, they should have cast someone else. We never really get any background on Hawking's children either. A big pile of "meh"… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ClariseSamuelsMar 31, 2015
The Theory of Everything refers to the elusive resolution to the paradox that faces all physicists. This is the fact that there are two major theories in physics—the theory of general relativity, which is used to make very accurateThe Theory of Everything refers to the elusive resolution to the paradox that faces all physicists. This is the fact that there are two major theories in physics—the theory of general relativity, which is used to make very accurate predictions about the behavior of massive objects in space, such as planets, stars and galaxies, and the theory of quantum mechanics, which predicts, also with great accuracy, the behavior of invisible particles such as protons, neurons, and quarks. The problem is that the two theories contradict each other, but since they are employed in completely different realms, there is usually no conflict; however, there are a few situations where the two theories are both applicable and stand in opposition to each other. Therefore, another more integrating and all-encompassing mathematical equation is needed to unify the two theories and reconcile all the forces of the universe, and this is called the Theory of Everything, sought in vain by Albert Einstein himself for the last thirty years of his life.

As critic Mike Scott pointed out about the film, Hawking’s preoccupation with the Theory of Everything appears as a background process, superficially discussed in conversations and occasionally depicted on blackboards filled with mathematical formulas. A layman’s version of the theoretical quest is given by Hawking’s wife, Jane (Felicity Jones) when she tells a dinner guest that there are two major theories of physics to be reconciled, one dealing with the large objects (“potatoes”) and one dealing with the small objects (“peas”).

Since the film is based on Jane Hawking’s autobiography (Travelling to Infinity: My Life with Stephen), the emphasis is on the romance between Jane and Stephen Hawking (played by Eddie Redmayne), their subsequent marriage and raising of children, their heartbreaking but in many ways triumphant struggle with his ALS, and their ultimate break-up. It is actually a fascinating aspect of his life, perhaps almost as fascinating as the Theory of Everything. Through sheer determination, a young man who was given two years to live not only survived for fifty years (and counting), but he resolutely sought to have all the experiences he would have had as an able-bodied adult—career, romance, marriage, children, and even divorce and remarriage, and then another divorce. As a friend who picks up the young Hawking to carry him up a flight of stairs asks rather pointedly, “Stephen, is everything affected?” And Hawking replies, “No, it’s a different system—it’s automatic.” Eddie Redmayne comes as close to becoming his subject as is possible for any actor to get.

Despite the intrigue and complications in his personal life, Hawking was always obsessively at work on brilliant ideas that included the discovery of Hawking radiation, his theories about the origin and boundaries of the universe, and his best-selling popular science books, among other projects and theories, making him one of the most famous physicists in the world. The details of this ongoing intellectual process would have made for an interesting portrayal in the film, since his work is the most fascinating and most important part of the miracle of Stephen Hawking’s life.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
jgzegerMar 1, 2015
First and foremost, this film has great acting. Both the performances of Eddie Redmanye as Stephen Hawking and Felicity Jones as Jane are worthy of commendation. However, although mostly interesting and entertaining, the movie doesn't quiteFirst and foremost, this film has great acting. Both the performances of Eddie Redmanye as Stephen Hawking and Felicity Jones as Jane are worthy of commendation. However, although mostly interesting and entertaining, the movie doesn't quite soar to the great heights that it aspires to.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SpangleDec 11, 2015
I do not really care for Stephen Hawking, but this film is undeniably very good. Featuring brilliant imagery and a great score to couple good direction from James Marsh and a terrific performance from Eddie Redmayne, the film has quite theI do not really care for Stephen Hawking, but this film is undeniably very good. Featuring brilliant imagery and a great score to couple good direction from James Marsh and a terrific performance from Eddie Redmayne, the film has quite the good report card. A good biopic on Hawking, the film also manages to be a phenomenal romance film with some elements of period pieces involved in it as well. Additionally, the costume and production design are very good, as is the sequence of Hawking's decline. Each stage is appropriately handled and given its due weight. Though I do not care for the man, he is undeniably brilliant and this shines through in the film and you feel a sort of sense of awe watching his mind work. Overall, The Theory of Everything is not a great film, but it is very close and was very much deserving of its recognition as such.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
BrianMcCriticMar 3, 2015
Eddie Redmayne gives a terrific performance and while the film has a few short comings it's an overall success. Felicity Jones is also great and the film is almost equally about her and their relationship as well. Overall the film has aEddie Redmayne gives a terrific performance and while the film has a few short comings it's an overall success. Felicity Jones is also great and the film is almost equally about her and their relationship as well. Overall the film has a certain award shine on it making it seem a bit forced, but the film is solid nonetheless. A-… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
chepod8Jun 12, 2015
Simplemente interpretar la vida de Stephen Hawking lo hace valedor de ganarse el Oscar a Mejor Actor, es tanto el merecimiento que estoy por empezar a leer Una breve historia del tiempo.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
TheApplegnomeJun 16, 2015
The Theory of Everything got great actors (not Felicity Jones), wonderful plot, great characters and the movie is better than my expectations. But lack of powerful and emotional scenes and a bit boring for the classic action-nerd made me onlyThe Theory of Everything got great actors (not Felicity Jones), wonderful plot, great characters and the movie is better than my expectations. But lack of powerful and emotional scenes and a bit boring for the classic action-nerd made me only put a 7/10.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
googolendtimesMar 14, 2015
What "The Theory of Everything" lacks in substance it makes up for in the transformative and tremendously expressive performance by Eddie Redmayne. He elevates what is otherwise quite a conventional and glossy entry to the biopic genre thatWhat "The Theory of Everything" lacks in substance it makes up for in the transformative and tremendously expressive performance by Eddie Redmayne. He elevates what is otherwise quite a conventional and glossy entry to the biopic genre that is handsomely made, affecting and entertaining in its own right, but not nearly as thought-provoking as it ought to be.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
zouz123Mar 16, 2015
Excellent performance by Redmayne, Didn't know much about Hawking before watching the movie, but all I can say is, what a character! Really enjoyed the movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
inaneswineNov 14, 2017
As expected, the film focuses far less on Hawking's work than on his relationships and the deterioration of his health. But what makes the film a triumph is the moving screenplay, and Redmayne's startlingly accurate portrayal of Hawking.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
WJSAug 22, 2015
This film is much better than I ever thought it would be, thanks to the wonderful performances of the two main leads (well, everyone actually). It beautifully directed and executed and looks amazing, with great attention to detail. The scriptThis film is much better than I ever thought it would be, thanks to the wonderful performances of the two main leads (well, everyone actually). It beautifully directed and executed and looks amazing, with great attention to detail. The script is also quite strong, avoiding any melodrama and the movie clicks along at a good pace.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
danippMar 13, 2015
Touching love story, with amazing performance by Redmayne and Jones. Although who deserved an Oscar was Keaton, the British actor gives us an incredible portrait of Stephen Hawking. Soundtrack is beautiful too. The only problem here was theTouching love story, with amazing performance by Redmayne and Jones. Although who deserved an Oscar was Keaton, the British actor gives us an incredible portrait of Stephen Hawking. Soundtrack is beautiful too. The only problem here was the lack of exploration on Jones' family and some changes on the real marriage of Hawking and Wilde. It was too perfect on screen, while in reality it wasn't. And Hawking was basically turned into perfection and he isn't such an amazing person as he is on this adaptation, he also has flaws and we don't get to see them here.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MattBrady99Mar 10, 2015
Stephen Hawking: "There should be no boundaries to human endeavor. However bad life may seem, while there is".

The movie tells the origins of the great genius today Stephen Hawking. He falls deeply in love with fellow Cambridge studentStephen Hawking: "There should be no boundaries to human endeavor. However bad life may seem, while there is".

The movie tells the origins of the great genius today Stephen Hawking. He falls deeply in love with fellow Cambridge student Jane Wilde. Once a healthy, active young man, Hawking received an earth-shattering diagnosis at 21 years of age. With Jane fighting tirelessly by his side, Stephen embarks on his most ambitious scientific work, studying the very thing he now has precious little of - time. Together, they defy impossible odds, breaking new ground in medicine and science, and achieving more than they could ever have dreamed.

I have seen many actors in the past taking on roles where their play people based on real life with have a serious disease or a disability which involves a lot of training to get the body movement and the speaking spot on, many actors nailed that and so dose Eddie Redmayne.

Theory of Everything is a movie that get's straight to the point and doesn't waste your time with scenes that could have felt unneeded or filler like the TV show The Walking Dead dose all the time.

Eddie Redmayne did the most spectacular, flawlessly brilliant performance I've seen in him in... well in small roles really, this is his actually big role and I hear some Oscar buzz about his performance and I wouldn't be surprise if he get's nominated because he was fantastic in this movie. He got the look, the movement and the speaking like Hawking.

If I had to compare the score to this movie it would be The King's Speech, you know the piano music that so relaxing and peaceful to listen to. Music like that for some strange reason makes my feel more life inside of me, and the people who did the music I give them two thumbs up for that.

But what the movie dose lack on is that they didn't really sell the fact that Hawking is a genius, and we know that he is but in this movie everybody didn't really seem all that filled with his mind blowing work, everybody was all like "Yeah great job man, that's some good stuff". but really they should be losing their sh't over how smart Hawking was.

Theory of Everything is a well made Biography movie with fantastic performers from Eddie and Felicity, excellent directing and a pretty nice score.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
EdgarReviewsJun 27, 2015
As far as biopics go, The Theory of Everything is much more entertaining than most. Yet it cannot escape biopic conformities; aside from incongruous cinematography, there is very little to set this flick apart from its competition. ItAs far as biopics go, The Theory of Everything is much more entertaining than most. Yet it cannot escape biopic conformities; aside from incongruous cinematography, there is very little to set this flick apart from its competition. It contains outstanding performances, but so do Mr. Turner and The Imitation Game, 2014’s other critically-acclaimed non-fictional character studies. The Theory of Everthing is worth watching for the performances alone – but the film is only a decent one, with its rather confined plot rendering it unable to excel.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Acceleracer13Aug 7, 2017
I am a science enthusiast. I went into the movie knowing that this film did not focus on the science that Dr. Hawking studied, but rather the relationship between him and his wife. Nonetheless I genuinely enjoyed the movie. The movie wastesI am a science enthusiast. I went into the movie knowing that this film did not focus on the science that Dr. Hawking studied, but rather the relationship between him and his wife. Nonetheless I genuinely enjoyed the movie. The movie wastes no time setting things up between Stephen and Jane. They are introduced to each other a couple of minutes into the movie, and from there, their story continues to develop. It also showcases the severity of Stephen's illness, and the emotional toll it takes on himself and Jane. Stephen and Jane's relationship isn't sunshine throughout. There are plenty of rocky moments they go through, many of which stem from Stephen's behavior and his suffering. Throughout the movie, their relationship is like a rollercoaster; rising and falling suddenly and often. The movie doesn't shy away from being a bit funny as well. There are moments in the movie that may make someone laugh, and those sections are well placed. The best part of the movie is by far the acting. Eddie Redmayne does amazing as Dr. Stephen Hawking. I feel that there isn't a better fit for the role than him. He portrays Hawking in a manner that isn't offensive, and really stays true to Hawking in real life. Felicity Jones as Jane Hawking is the show stealer. I have always been a huge fan of Felicity Jones, and this movie showcases her brilliant acting skills. Overall, I loved this movie. Although it isn't a science movie like I hoped, I really do like the portrayal of Stephen and Jane's relationship as they struggle with Stephen's condition.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
RafaelalexanderAug 4, 2015
The theory of everything is actually a hypothetical theory in physics. Scientists are trying to find the ultimate theory for everything in which all the forces of attraction as well as theories of physics will be connected together. StephenThe theory of everything is actually a hypothetical theory in physics. Scientists are trying to find the ultimate theory for everything in which all the forces of attraction as well as theories of physics will be connected together. Stephen Hawking is one them who is seeking for such a theory in his whole life.
The movie is a romantic biographical presentation of Hawking's life. It shows us the romantic and emotional part of Hawking's life, not the part with scientific experiments and thinking. In a word, it's an awesome movie to enjoy. We all know that theories and movies are different… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
paulblartmallcoAug 18, 2015
This is a really thrilling documentary about robots taking over the world. It really scared me when the man fell over and became a cyborg. And then he said that god is wrong and we should all worship robot. and then non-robot wife left himThis is a really thrilling documentary about robots taking over the world. It really scared me when the man fell over and became a cyborg. And then he said that god is wrong and we should all worship robot. and then non-robot wife left him which made me sad because i think thats why stevie hawk wanted to kill all humans yeah. Safety never takes a holiday. Always bet on blart xxx… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
james417Oct 15, 2015
The Theory Of Everything provides both insight and comfort. There are many ways to make a relationship work.

Check this movie here http://www.watchfree.to/watch-2a0729-The-Theory-of-Everything-movie-online-free-putlocker.html
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
softwaredougJan 3, 2016
This film stinks of bad nostalgia. Conflict between Jane and Stephen should be deep in this film. Yet it's dealt with so glibly to be laughably unbelievable. Seriously, I think my wife taking care of two kids at home by herself without aThis film stinks of bad nostalgia. Conflict between Jane and Stephen should be deep in this film. Yet it's dealt with so glibly to be laughably unbelievable. Seriously, I think my wife taking care of two kids at home by herself without a disabled husband demonstrates and communicates more stress than the Jane character does.

Seriously a woman gives up her hopes and dreams to care for a disabled person and his kids Instead, her resentment is rather sugar coated. She rarely speaks up for herself. And she doesn't experience any other kind of mental breakdown. The one time she tries to bring it up to her husband he laughs about it. She doesn't pull over the car and give him a piece of her mind? Or let in bottle up until she snaps?

The most hilarious part of this is when something is "too much" cause it involves 3 kids potentially going camping with their mom in France while dad is at an opera. Seriously? That's what crosses the line? Not, you know EVERYDAY fact of taking care of an extremely disabled man and three kids. WTF.

A more realistic version of this film makes Jane's life appear far more horrifying and isolating. It should have made Stephen's celebrity a source of deep, deep resentment. His inability to agree to simple ways to help her deeply insulting. It should show the despair of the female caregiver, stuck. The unquenchable anger at a man that has all the fun. It should be far more critical of Stephen Hawking and somewhat critical of Jane if she seriously can't seem to communicate her feelings.

On the plus side this film has a tremendous performance by Redmayne. He thoroughly inhabits the image of Stephen Hawking we all are familiar with. I enjoyed the early romance and the chemistry between the leads was great. Having visited Cambridge, the setting was filmed beautifully.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
BarneyOnMTJan 6, 2016
WHAT I LIKED: Eddie Redmayne, Eddie Redmayne, Eddie Redmayne. This amazing actor and the excellent cast all excell in this incredibly moving and tragic tale of one extraordinary man. The emotion feels so real and the story is beautiful, andWHAT I LIKED: Eddie Redmayne, Eddie Redmayne, Eddie Redmayne. This amazing actor and the excellent cast all excell in this incredibly moving and tragic tale of one extraordinary man. The emotion feels so real and the story is beautiful, and condensing one man's life story into 2 hours is an incredible achievement. Plus the beautiful cinematography and the way in which themes were protrayed were excellent.
WHAT I DIND'T LIKE: Perhaps this film's weight falls onto the main two cast members a little to much, and the soundtrack was a little cheesy.
VERDICT: One of the best emotional tales of 2014, 'The Theory of Everything,' pays tribute in an amazing way to an amazing man.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
FuturedirectorMar 20, 2016
Theory of Everything is a very romantic film, with a clever direction and gorgeously perfect interpretations, showing a terrific premise and unofrgettable characters with a cool story-telling, totally honest feelings and true stories on aTheory of Everything is a very romantic film, with a clever direction and gorgeously perfect interpretations, showing a terrific premise and unofrgettable characters with a cool story-telling, totally honest feelings and true stories on a gorgeous film that evryone will love.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SrPepeNov 18, 2017
Esta película tendría que ser de conocimiento popular ya que nos brinda la historia de una de las personas más importantes para nuestra historia científica.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Pamuditha007Nov 5, 2016
Brilliant ! This movie just moves you ... if you don't cry during this movie, then that's something else ! WOW !
amazing movie!
Perfect acting by Eddie Redmayne !
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
jameswildJul 25, 2016
An outstanding performance from Eddie, utilising the deepest of acting talent to bring out the life of one of the most influential people to the eyes of the public, it is such a refreshing film to watch, a representation of what true artisticAn outstanding performance from Eddie, utilising the deepest of acting talent to bring out the life of one of the most influential people to the eyes of the public, it is such a refreshing film to watch, a representation of what true artistic filming is.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
alejandro970Mar 26, 2017
Inspiring real life tale of a beautiful but determinated and strong mind: Stephen Hawking; following his early years in University, his theories, the inner cataclysm and the fight against all odds. Brilliant Redmayne.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
VirgonoShakaJun 25, 2017
In the interest of fairness, it's always easy to pick on a history or biography film because of inaccuracies that it may have, and in the case of the Theory of Everything, that certainly feels a little bit in some parts, but on the otherIn the interest of fairness, it's always easy to pick on a history or biography film because of inaccuracies that it may have, and in the case of the Theory of Everything, that certainly feels a little bit in some parts, but on the other hand, as an emotional journey into the life of such a brilliant and celebrated person, it is a fascinating study and great inspirational tale for everyone. With a couple of excellent performances, a superb screenplay and cinematography, and a soundtrack that works very effective with the topic and mood of the film, I can definitely say that this movie really in a brief moment in time pulls your heartstrings quite enough to win you over. Generally recommended, although be warned that there is not much science explanation nor expect too much detail in the story if you are a big fan of the professor. Final Verdict: 8.2… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
BroyaxJan 15, 2017
Ce Stephen Hawking est un paradoxe vivant, j'en avais entendu parler de loin, une sorte de génie maudit ! Son histoire personnelle à faire pleurer les ménagères de moins de 50 ans (et le reste) aurait sans doute été maintes fois refusée siCe Stephen Hawking est un paradoxe vivant, j'en avais entendu parler de loin, une sorte de génie maudit ! Son histoire personnelle à faire pleurer les ménagères de moins de 50 ans (et le reste) aurait sans doute été maintes fois refusée si elle avait germé de l'esprit alcoolisé d'un quelconque quidam plus ou moins écrivaillon à ses délires perdus mais la réalité comme de coutume dépasse toujours la fiction.

Les acteurs incarnant à l'écran ce couple hors norme sont tout simplement brillants et d'une justesse étonnante, la mise en scène appliquée, soignée est indéniablement efficace. Puis la musique tout de même nous met la puce à l'oreille (tous ces violons...) et l'ensemble du film, du reste : cette commisération géante, cette communion universelle avec le malheur d'un homme atteint d'une maladie dégénérative incurable... n'est-ce pas un peu trop finalement ?

Des larmes, du courage, et du misérabilisme surtout. Et quelques omissions à propos du prêtre : quel est le point de vue d'Hawking à ce sujet ? le scénariste a préféré l'escamoter, on ne saura pas ce qu'il en pense ni ce qu'il ressent. Ah l'infirme n'était pas au courant ? ou pas encore ? Je note que le scénariste prend toujours soin de ne pas écorner sa femme, la pieuse et glorieuse "Mère Teresa". Une sainte vous dis-je.

La théorie, l'oeuvre du cosmologiste, est trop mise en retrait, faute d'avoir pu "vulgariser" suffisamment des concepts sans doute un peu trop techniques pour la ménagère de moins de 50 ans : on préfère lui faire sortir encore quelques mouchoirs et Dieu sait qu'ils ont fort à faire les mouchoirs pour éponger les hectolitres déversés devant le chemin de croix du génie grabataire.

Cela étant, le film dispose de cette autre qualité : faire connaître cet homme singulier mais surtout donner envie de lire ses bouquins qui ont l'air tout aussi singulier. Au moins par curiosité.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SomePersonaFeb 6, 2017
Outstanding score by Jóhann Jóhannson (different from Arrival and Sicario) and cinematography by Benoît Delhomme and an excellent model of Stephen Hawking by Eddie Redmayne. Most of everything else is good besides the fact that the plot canOutstanding score by Jóhann Jóhannson (different from Arrival and Sicario) and cinematography by Benoît Delhomme and an excellent model of Stephen Hawking by Eddie Redmayne. Most of everything else is good besides the fact that the plot can get a bit repetitive sometimes.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
reaper66689May 26, 2017
one man i respect is stephen hawking i loved this movie and i allways respected stephen hawking and to see his strugglemade me respect even more the actor who played him did justice to one of the best minds in the world today
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
alvaroarellanoMar 2, 2018
Me sentí siempre ajeno en uno de los personajes que admiro mucho. Me interesó su historia, no me atrapó la forma en que fue contada. Aun así es una película bien hecha. Pero quizá no fue hecha para mí.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
JLuis_001Sep 6, 2017
The Theory of Everything meets expectations for a movie of its kind, delivering excellent performances by its protagonists, special mention to Eddie Redmayne.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
SenyTheWolfApr 13, 2018
At the start I thought I will only see an annoying film with cosmology formulas ecc... But after watching it I can say that the film was fantastic, it wasn't annoying, it had good jokes, this film shows in 2 hours big part of Stephen's life.At the start I thought I will only see an annoying film with cosmology formulas ecc... But after watching it I can say that the film was fantastic, it wasn't annoying, it had good jokes, this film shows in 2 hours big part of Stephen's life. In the past I watched a lot of films, but this is one of them that I liked.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Wavy_YeezyMay 25, 2019
Not the greatest movie, but wow. Eddie Redmayne's acting is amazing. One of the best acting performances I have seen.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
prev
Page:
More From This Movie

71 Critic Reviews

7.8 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 71 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL