Netflix | Release Date: October 7, 2016
7.6
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 30 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
23
Mixed:
6
Negative:
1
Watch Now
Stream On
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
9
dogiiOct 9, 2016
Amazing movie that really questions the effectiveness of UN missions and their effects. The movie was wonderfully done with an amazing cast. Movies that make me look up the origins and its real stories are awesome movies in my book.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
dmerckOct 10, 2016
First of all, I wasn't too keen to watch this thinking it would be a typical war drama, as one critic put it. Instead, I was pleasantly surprised because it's much more multi-faceted. For example, it not only includes, the battle scenes andFirst of all, I wasn't too keen to watch this thinking it would be a typical war drama, as one critic put it. Instead, I was pleasantly surprised because it's much more multi-faceted. For example, it not only includes, the battle scenes and how global politics (the Cold War, the UN) can effect a local population but it also speaks of the role and aspirations of small countries like Ireland that are hoping to be able to do good in global politics through the UN when in the past they lacked the military muscle to have a voice. This last is probably an angle that people, who live in a country that has power in global politics, would miss. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
SpangleOct 12, 2016
Despite being largely quite cliche, The Siege of Jadotville is a thoroughly riveting war thriller that should provide action junkies and thrill seekers more than enough to chew on. However, beyond this, The Siege of Jadotville suffers fromDespite being largely quite cliche, The Siege of Jadotville is a thoroughly riveting war thriller that should provide action junkies and thrill seekers more than enough to chew on. However, beyond this, The Siege of Jadotville suffers from poor character development, iffy writing, and moments of sub-par acting. That said, there are many positives to the film, namely in the technical department with good cinematography, good costume design, production design, and just thoroughly thrilling battle sequences. It is what happens when the guns are placed down where the film suffers.

In The Siege of Jadotville, Jamie Dornan stars as Commandant Pat Quinlan. The leader of a company of Irish soldiers sent as UN Peacekeepers to the Congo in 1961, film depicts his company's brave stance in Jadotville, despite being under constant siege from Congolese soldiers and mercenaries. The film most certainly does its real life heroes justice, showcasing both their bravery and courage in the face of insurmountable odds. Throughout the film, the battle sequences are covered with brilliantly executed explosions that, somehow, manage to look incredibly beautiful. Against the drab brown and green uniforms and buildings, the repeated bursts of orange and yellow flames bring a certain perverse beauty to the film. Having seen many a war film, there are not many better looking explosions during a battle out there than can be found in The Siege of Jadotville.

The beauty of these explosions are most certainly encapsulated in the cinematography from Nikolaus Summerer. Though at times pretty typical for war film fare, there are a few moments of brilliance that really just soak in the odd beauty of war, as well as the sheer beauty of Jadotville and the Congolese landscape. In particular, there is a shot of Dornan walking to speak to the mercenary leader and there is a window briefly behind him that has the window pouring through it. This shot in particular shows a keen eye on the part of Summerer for what is truly beautiful, in spite of the carnage and destruction surrounding this beauty. In many ways, it is a nice touch of juxtaposition to put so much brutality against such natural beauty.

The film's battle sequences are not its only strengths, as Jamie Dornan does turn in a very good performance as Pat Quinlan. Though, this is also where the weaknesses of the film come in, namely in the story and characterization. The real life story is riveting. The film does encapsulate some of this, but fails in regards to actually do anything unique with the story. A tale of men being left to die at insurmountable odds has been told again and again. While obviously a real story, it does feel as if the film was limited by its real life basis as it left it nowhere to go to find any originality in the narrative. Instead, it doubles down on this with cliche interactions between Quinlan and his commanding officers.

Additionally, the film fails to develop anybody, even Quinlan. Before writing this review, I only knew that Jamie Dornan played the lead. Still had no idea as to his name. This is a problem. I caught other names along the way, but their characters were either slotted fully into supporting roles or cliched antagonist roles where their motives are unclear and no efforts are made to explain their decisions. This latter element comes into play with Conor Cruise O'Brien (Mark Strong), the head of UN operations in the Congo and an Irishman himself. His character's motivations are unclear throughout and the film cannot be bothered to explain them. That said, it is almost a reprieve as Strong did not bring his A-game to this film. There is one scene in particular that he completely bombs and it comes off as hysterical, rather than powerful.

Overall, The Siege of Jadotville is a solid thriller that tells a riveting real life story, but feels consumed by it and fails to develop any of its characters to a satisfactory level. That said, it is well shot and thoroughly entertaining, thus it is most certainly worth a watch. Even if the rest of the film may not be to your tastes, there is one kill accompanied by a hilariously out-of-place Wilhelm scream, which should really justify watching this for any skeptics out there.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
TyranianApr 24, 2020
A pretty good war film with solid acting and a fairly remarkable story. Action is quite well-done.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
LeZeeDec 24, 2016
The Irish entry to the modern warfare.

The Irish war film based on the book of the same name, which was originally inspired by the real battle of the Irish army during the UN's peacekeeping mission in the central Africa. Directed by a first
The Irish entry to the modern warfare.

The Irish war film based on the book of the same name, which was originally inspired by the real battle of the Irish army during the UN's peacekeeping mission in the central Africa. Directed by a first timer and a well done job. I have seen lots of Irish film, but this was like I have never seen one before. Obviously, for being a war themed film about their first battle ever in the modern world. Between the start and the end, everything happened so quickly. You will love it if you like fast paced narration. Particularly if you are a war film fan, this is not to be missed.

First of all it was not a World War II film. It was about the cold war, and its consequences, that's too far from the land those who are involved. It sets in the Congo basin in the early 60s, when the Irish army arrived representing the UN, the Katangese forces charged them from all the corner. With the limited resources, how these inexperienced men fought against the outnumbered opponents is what this film revealed. Truly a thrilling film is it.

The Non-Aligned Nations' forces like from India and Sweden for UN peacekeeping mission who were present around at the time, could not assist the Irish troop either from crossing an important bridge or through the air. These nearly 160 soldiers fought bravely, especially being away from home for the first time, which makes them in an unfavourable condition. This film covered everything from the Irish perspective, but the other way around like how the UN officials failed in their part was also focused on the side.

"No plan survives contact with the enemy."

It was all about the natural resources found in this African region. So basically no one wants to back off, that means those from the cold war nations sent their mercenaries to fight out any obstacles. The five day battle that the Ireland never forgets, but initially it was not recognised by its own nation, until the recent time. Especially the UN who thought they had lost their reputation with this warfare which is really a shameful behavious for such organisation.

It was an English language film, despite an Irish film. That's not new to me, because most of the Irish film I have seen were direct English films. The actors were good, but no one was particularly focused, except the commandant. It opened with him preparing to leave country and ends with him returning. It was a non-stop war film. A series of attacks for the five days with a little gap between the assault to prepare for another. In reality, the Ireland's entry to the warfare was in an unfortunate circumstance, but their opponents underestimated them to use full force.

Its a less story, more action film. The war sequences were awesomely made. Though it reminded me the recent Hollywood film '13 Hours'. Mark Strong was in a small part, though he looked different with a wig. I think it was one of the best war films in the recent time. It's not about the heroism, but inspires how they responded to the situation. They did everything they could and they would have achieved even bigger, only if they had everything they wanted. That makes it one of the rare film about the rare warfare where the world failed to acknowledge their effort. So a big thanks to the filmmakers for bringing it to the big screen. Now you should try it if you haven't seen it yet.

8/10
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DenetApr 16, 2017
I was interested in this film because: 1. It is about hystory of Kongo - very large country and I only knew that it was a Dutch colony and where it is on the map.
2. It is a real story and I was interested in, what did Irish solgiers do there
I was interested in this film because: 1. It is about hystory of Kongo - very large country and I only knew that it was a Dutch colony and where it is on the map.
2. It is a real story and I was interested in, what did Irish solgiers do there :)

So I put 7 of 10 points because:
1. It is good if you don't have anything to watch +6 points
2. After watching of it I went to Wiki and now I know Kongolese hystory much better!!! +1 point!
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
CDRRiderOct 14, 2016
SOLID war movie -- best I've seen in some time. It helps that it's pretty true to events, and excellent war action scenes.

Yeah, some cliche's. So? It works, and works well. It's a WAR movie -- not some analyst couch self-absorbed
SOLID war movie -- best I've seen in some time. It helps that it's pretty true to events, and excellent war action scenes.

Yeah, some cliche's. So? It works, and works well. It's a WAR movie -- not some analyst couch self-absorbed whiner.

It's well worth watching if you are not seeking long soulful emotional silences as characters suffer from their overwhelming angst.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
BroyaxDec 30, 2016
C'est une histoire d'ONUafrique avec un peu de Françafrique dedans et comme c'est toujours assez compliqué ces affaires-là, on y comprend effectivement pas grand'chose. Cependant, le film atteint certainement son objectif, celui de nous faireC'est une histoire d'ONUafrique avec un peu de Françafrique dedans et comme c'est toujours assez compliqué ces affaires-là, on y comprend effectivement pas grand'chose. Cependant, le film atteint certainement son objectif, celui de nous faire comprendre que l'ONU est comme la SDN qu'elle a remplacée : un gros machin qui sert à rien, qui met les pieds dans le plat et se prend les pieds dans le tapis tandis qu'elle fait la danse de la reculade : un pas en avant, deux pas en arrière...

Cela étant dit, il est intéressant de retracer le destin de ce régiment irlandais dindon de la farce, ces bérets bleus qui n'ont miraculeusement perdu aucun homme !

Pour autant et malgré ses bonnes intentions, Jadotville est un film globalement assez plat qui peine à démarrer et dont la réalisation se repose un peu trop sur ces saletés de caméras à l'épaule. Rien de rédhibitoire cela dit, car le montage et les plans restent des plus corrects et permettent d'apprécier des combats d'assez bonne facture.

Le jeu des acteurs est également assez raplaplat sans s'avérer insupportable à suivre mais témoigne comme le reste d'un manque de personnalité et d'ambition pour un film de guerre certes très regardable mais qui rappelle quelques vieux nanars des années 60 dans le genre.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
daisyramosbNov 6, 2017
Didn't have high expectations, but it was a really good movie. Showing those men were real life heroes. Love the whole cast performances, really getting into the characters.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
glommanNov 30, 2019
It's a solid war movie, not on the levels of the already established masterpieces, but definately solid. Although it isn't universally watchable, I would only recommend you to watch it, if you have an interest in Cold War politics.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Kludd4EverMar 27, 2021
Great war movie, the only one that has likable characters on bot the good side and the bad side, altough the poster does look a bit missleading. Also the movie is pretty rewatcheble.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews