Read Positive User Reviews for The Shape of Water

10

PAYAMFURYDec 3, 2017

گیلرمو دل تورو کارگردان توتنمند و عالی این روز های سینما است.او از وقتی که پسر جهنمی رو ساخت مشهور شد و این فیلم رومنس و هیجان انگیز عالی که با بازی عالی مایکل شنون است فیلم شهکاری رو ارائه میدهد.گیلرمو دل تورو کارگردان توتنمند و عالی این روز های سینما است.او از وقتی که پسر جهنمی رو ساخت مشهور شد و این فیلم رومنس و هیجان انگیز عالی که با بازی عالی مایکل شنون است فیلم شهکاری رو ارائه میدهد.

21 of 64 users found this helpful2143

All this user's reviews

10

DiogoOliveiraFeb 5, 2018

Atemporal, não encontro palavras para descrever essa obra prima, estou emocionando, lindo, poético, verdadeiro, único, 13 indicações ao Oscar é o bastante para descrever? não é, vejo filmes como Lady Bird, ou ate mesmo Call Me by your NameAtemporal, não encontro palavras para descrever essa obra prima, estou emocionando, lindo, poético, verdadeiro, único, 13 indicações ao Oscar é o bastante para descrever? não é, vejo filmes como Lady Bird, ou ate mesmo Call Me by your Name com notas acima de 90 que não da a metade da qualidade de shape of water. apenas por ser dirigido por um Mexicano.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

ffejeryDec 17, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It was a smart fairy tale. It's a collage of things we've already seen but put together in a unique way. Sally Hawkins' conveys so much emotion without saying a word. The supporting cast is great too. The 60's sets are cool and the cinematography is beautiful. The water motif is consistent through out. That being said allow me to switch into a Jungian analysis of the story in the context of the 1960's sexual revolution:

I thought the sea creature symbolized feeling shame for sexual desire. Under water represents the subconscious. She masturbates under water in the bathtub and the creature comes from under water. Then she boils eggs while masturbating and uses the eggs in the lab to lure the creature up from under water at the lab. Later they have sex in the bath tub. I think the movie is set in the 1960's to coincide with the sexual revolution. Thanks to the pill, more women were able to have sex for pleasure. Society had to reconcile that with more established conservative beliefs. This is the symbolism of the creature being smuggled out of the lab and into society. That was an interesting digression. At any rate, it's worth checking out. It's not a gangster movie even though the main character does end up sleeping with the fishes.… Expand

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

8

zarrah28Dec 12, 2017

A beautiful & romantic story led by the wonderful Sally Hawkins who plays a hearing-impaired government worker. Octavia Spencer & Michael Shannon are fantastic as back-up. Beautiful art direction. One of del Toro's finest.

7 of 14 users found this helpful77

All this user's reviews

8

ozymandias79Jan 8, 2018

A quality film. Simple plot. Good acting. Great production design. Definitely has a "Rapture" feel. It's very unfortunate that project wasn't green lit for Del Toro. Although, maybe The Shape of Water will have some executives re-thinking.A quality film. Simple plot. Good acting. Great production design. Definitely has a "Rapture" feel. It's very unfortunate that project wasn't green lit for Del Toro. Although, maybe The Shape of Water will have some executives re-thinking.

Best film at the oscars! Come on, greenlight Bioshock!!!… Expand

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

7

DubeauMar 4, 2018

This a love movie, but also an allegory about isolation and loneliness. The story has one fantastic element, but apart that everything feels almost grounded. Really love the actors in this movie. They were amazing. The creature effects areThis a love movie, but also an allegory about isolation and loneliness. The story has one fantastic element, but apart that everything feels almost grounded. Really love the actors in this movie. They were amazing. The creature effects are spot on. Now for the parts I didn't like...the creature felt like recycling the idea of Abe in Hellboy. At least it's in another context and time frame. The pace of the movie is slow, so I got really bored in the middle of the movie and I skipped a lot after that. I think the editing and the length could have been a bit more dynamic. The music is also an era style of music that were found in old musical movies. I wasn't very found of it, but that depends of your taste in the genre. Still, it was an interesting movie and a very nice tale. I give it a 75%. Go see it for the actors and their skills in that movie.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

10

Shlomo3006Feb 28, 2018

Just beautiful and intense. One of the best films of the year, and the best movie of Guillermo del Toro, besides Pan's Laberynth.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

ianglaucoFeb 22, 2018

las escenas que no combinan, el sexo y los desnudos con un monstruo fantasioso no combina, la critica al capitalismo en el calidac, con un musiucal, y los ideales de igualdad con un final que separa a la gente normal de la anormal. quizas sealas escenas que no combinan, el sexo y los desnudos con un monstruo fantasioso no combina, la critica al capitalismo en el calidac, con un musiucal, y los ideales de igualdad con un final que separa a la gente normal de la anormal. quizas sea una linda y cursi historia de amor libre, pero no totalmente poser y kitch… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

fiabegJan 9, 2018

There are many people who suffers from sexism, racism, homophobia or a disability. On the other hand there are people who behave as white male supremacists. Del Toro shows us some of these two different groups of people, how they live theirThere are many people who suffers from sexism, racism, homophobia or a disability. On the other hand there are people who behave as white male supremacists. Del Toro shows us some of these two different groups of people, how they live their different situations and how they deal with them.

But Del Toro goes beyond. He ads a third category, a non human creature. And show us the different way the two groups relate with this creature. The result is the confrontation of values like compassion, solidarity and love vs oppression, brutality and sense of superiority.

This is a wonderful movie. Sally Hawkins acting is extraordinary. Don’t miss it, you will enjoy it very much.… Expand

11 of 23 users found this helpful1112

All this user's reviews

9

StevieGJDDec 9, 2017

What a beautiful and romantic movie. The visual aesthetic of this film is so captivating. The varied green tones embedded in every scene are lovely. The art direction is astonishing. This looks like the early 60s. The acting isWhat a beautiful and romantic movie. The visual aesthetic of this film is so captivating. The varied green tones embedded in every scene are lovely. The art direction is astonishing. This looks like the early 60s. The acting is universally great. Sally Hawkins, Richard Jenkins and Octavia Spencer are simply perfect in their roles. Michael Shannon is the bad guy (perhaps too bad) and he is up to the task as well. The movie is about how we tend to view those of different races, genders, cultures, nations, and species as "the other" and this "other" needs to be blamed for our lot and hated for its existence. The greater meaning of this allegory is too sad to contemplate. Only those whose hearts are open, will understand "The Shape of Water".… Expand

8 of 17 users found this helpful89

All this user's reviews

9

NightReviewsDec 18, 2017

If I told you about The Shape of Water, what would I tell you? I wonder?

Well, for starters, I don’t think that anyone would have predicted that we would have gotten two adaptations of the classic “Beauty and the Beast” story arc in 2017.If I told you about The Shape of Water, what would I tell you? I wonder?

Well, for starters, I don’t think that anyone would have predicted that we would have gotten two adaptations of the classic “Beauty and the Beast” story arc in 2017. While one was a literal Disney re-imagining, following the animated classic almost frame-for-frame, Disney’s March hit Beauty and the Beast was a huge success at the box office and with critics alike. While our second interpretation, The Shape of Water, the film is more of a…lets say, unconventional take on the classic narrative archetype; complete with full frontal nudity, scenes of masterbation, feline decapitation and of course (as with any del Toro film) good ol’ bloody violence, our second interpretation is defiantly a more imaginative and adult directed adaptation.

Yet, the sex, blood, violence, gore and nudity aren’t the things we remember most from The Shape of Water. Instead, we focus on the lucid use of luminous night colours, the amazing characters and all of their flaws, feats and challenges, and most of all, the beauty of such a taboo love story, between two very misunderstood individuals from different worlds.

While del Toro may very well NOT be remembered as a director and writer who flourished making intoxicating love stories, The Shape of Water will surely be a film that challenges that notion greatly.

Set in 1962, del Toro’s newest is an interesting yet ironically reflective film that romanticizes the past with great style. While the past that del Toro is passionate about, his narratives always seem to use the past as a tool that presents an idealized and passionate and very forward way of thinking. In doing so, del Toro uses the past as a reference point of so many of society’s mistakes about women, visible minorities and of course, a repressed society without a voice, hence, why our story centres around a princess without a voice.

Our princess here, Elisa (Sally Hawkins), is an uninteresting mute who, in the first five minutes, establishes her daily routine of her home life, work life and social life in very quick and easy to understand order of routine. Elisa, who works for a highly classified government research facility in Baltimore, has seen many things. Among one of the newest secrets to be housed in the facility, is their most sensitive assets to-date; an aquatic creature that was captured in South America by the highly violent and blue-collard, religious American patriot Strickland (Michael Shannon). Along with her best Zelda (Octavio Spencer), Elisa and Zelda are tasked with cleaning the facility that houses the highly sensitive and elaborate creature from the South American lagoon, with out course keeping in mind that Elisa’s muteness adds to the sense of secrecy. With each passing day and intrigue to blame, Elisa becomes more and more transfixed with the two-legged, finned man-fish who is never given a name but played by the del Toro staple Doug Jones. Clearly, Elisa begins to fall in love with the creature that eats the hard boiled eggs. As each passing night brings the beast and beauty together, Elisa begins smuggling in record players, vinyls and experiences for the creature that begins to humanize him. Sharing her nightly work experiences with her best friend and neighbour Giles (Richard Jenkins), Elisa finds comfort in the unordinary romance with the “thing” that has captivates her heart, as well as ours.

It would be hard to argue the vision of the passionate and such artful director Guillermo del Toro, especially since his masterwork Pan’s Labyrinth. While Water may not be that films successor, it surely will be remembered along side it for many years to come. A man whose fascination with the gothic and horror elements of storytelling are visibly seen in almost all his works, del Toro has been known for focus on action and the very violent side of story-telling. With The Shape of Water, del Toro places violence and gore aside, alongside with his co-writer Vanessa Taylor, who decide to focus on their shared voice of telling the story, the very contemporary and relevant social commentary, as well as the love story between a woman and a creature who feels and is made to feel, that they do not belong.

The theme of oppression is soaked within each and every frame of The Shape of Water. By choosing on having the main couple in love both mute, the two main voices of the film are Zelda (a black working class woman) and Giles (an artistic, flamboyant artist), two very specific caricatures of people who may have suffered the most amount of oppression and suppression in the United States in the 1960’s. Yet, in a world where Russians and Americans are in a race to superiorly outwit one another, del Toro’s world in the film, doesn’t seem too far from the America we know and despise today.… Expand

7 of 16 users found this helpful79

All this user's reviews

10

GinaKDec 18, 2017

I have seen most of the films Del Toro has directed, especially his very early films like Cronos and The Devil’s Backbone. I consider him a great and very interesting director, and I think this film is a wonderful achievement, one that isI have seen most of the films Del Toro has directed, especially his very early films like Cronos and The Devil’s Backbone. I consider him a great and very interesting director, and I think this film is a wonderful achievement, one that is both lyrical and romantic. Somehow, even though the villain is completely evil and the heroine thoroughly good, the film works and is both riveting and very, very sad. To make a film like this believable, every performance has to be strong and all are, but especially Sally Hawkins, who is sympathetic as a mute without ever being pathetic, and Doug Jones, who does an incredible job making you believe that the Amphibian Man has feelings regardless of how weird he looks. Although hateful in the film, Michael Shannon does a great job as the villain and Octavia Spencer is wonderful too. Overall, a very strong cast in a beautifully directed film. One of the best films I have seen this year.… Expand

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

9

Brent_MarchantDec 9, 2017

Though at times a little predictable, this inventive fantasy/fairy tale delivers the goods with superb special effects, gentle humor, heartwarming sincerity, and a host of excellent performances, especially by Sally Hawkins, Octavia SpencerThough at times a little predictable, this inventive fantasy/fairy tale delivers the goods with superb special effects, gentle humor, heartwarming sincerity, and a host of excellent performances, especially by Sally Hawkins, Octavia Spencer and Richard Jenkins. Think "Beauty and the Beast" meets "E.T.," and you've got a good idea what's going on here. It's so satisfying to see a film that truly lives up to its pre-release hype.… Expand

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

9

FlexedacornDec 21, 2017

Guillermo Del Toro is back in form. This was a very welcome surprise for me after being let down by his last film “Crimson Peak”. I would say this is his best film right after Pans Labyrinth. The tone, atmosphere and practical effects allGuillermo Del Toro is back in form. This was a very welcome surprise for me after being let down by his last film “Crimson Peak”. I would say this is his best film right after Pans Labyrinth. The tone, atmosphere and practical effects all played nicely into making this bizarre film believable. It was more of a contained story complimented by some of the best acting I have seen in a while. I have to give nods to almost all the main characters. Sally Hawkins, Michael Shannon, Richard Jenkins, Octavia Spencer and Michael Stuhlbarg all gave wonderful performances. There is one scene between Sally Harkins and Richard Jenkins that should give her an Oscar Nomination. If you like bizarre films or just want a nice original screen play, I highly recommend the shape of water. Just be forewarned there are scenes that are very unorthodox, so you have to keep an open mind throughout.… Expand

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

8

TVJerryDec 22, 2017

Sally Hawkins brings her natural inner beauty and sensitive charms to this role as a mute cleaning lady. She and Octavia Spencer (who adds her brand of spunk) work at a high security government facility. When she discovers an amphibiousSally Hawkins brings her natural inner beauty and sensitive charms to this role as a mute cleaning lady. She and Octavia Spencer (who adds her brand of spunk) work at a high security government facility. When she discovers an amphibious man-like creature, her curiosity and longing for love disrupt the lab and set the narrative in motion. Obviously, this is science fiction, but more importantly, it's a romantic fantasy. Even though it's based in '60s Baltimore, the slightly surreal style and bigger-than-life imagery lend it a wondrously eccentric edge. This makes sense, considering it comes from the highly creative mind of writer/director Guillermo del Toro. His masterful style and the elevated emotions make the film a slightly bizarre, sometimes melodramatic, yet still sweetly human encounter.… Expand

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

9

misterpDec 17, 2017

The Shape Of Water is well done. It has especially good acting by Sally Hawkins. Although we have seen the frame work of this story before this movie has fresh dilogue, well developed lead characters and a uniqueness of it's own. PerhapsThe Shape Of Water is well done. It has especially good acting by Sally Hawkins. Although we have seen the frame work of this story before this movie has fresh dilogue, well developed lead characters and a uniqueness of it's own. Perhaps more could have been done to develop the monster character.… Expand

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

10

Willyam_CarrJan 8, 2018

This is possibly the most beautiful love story put to the screen, and it is about a woman falling for a fish-man.

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

9

zorraDec 12, 2017

Superb art direction & effects. This beautiful fantasy-fairy tale lives up to the hype. It's led its humor & sincerity. Fantastic performances by Sally Hawkins & cast. del Toro has made a masterpiece.

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

9

GreatMartinDec 19, 2017

There is so much to love—and hate—about “The Shape of Water” but there is one thing everyone has to agree upon and that is the illuminating performance by Sally Hawkins. I have seen her in some movies but never remembered her, or was thatThere is so much to love—and hate—about “The Shape of Water” but there is one thing everyone has to agree upon and that is the illuminating performance by Sally Hawkins. I have seen her in some movies but never remembered her, or was that impressed by her, until earlier this year when I saw “Maudie” and flipped over her performance which she outdoes in this movie.

A lot goes on in this movie, which starts off slowly, but never feels rushed or ‘off’ including the love story. People who are looking for fantasy will find it and believe the make-believe is real while those looking for a villain will not find anyone more ‘hissable’ than Michael Shannon nor some violent scenes while not lasting long will be remembered long after. There are Russian spies like Michael Stuhlbarg playing a scientist with secrets of his own, a gay friend/neighbor Richard Jenkins who has a refrigerator filled with slices of pies that he buys from the counter server, Morgan Kelly, who he has a crush on. There is the 5-star general who take no for an answer and there is Octavia Spencer who everyone should have as a friend.

There is frontal and rear nudity by both men and women along with, literally, finger crunching scenes, cattle prod hits and then there is the “Asset”, the sea creature which the story revolves around affecting everyone in the movie. He is played by Doug Jones and, considering that he and Sally Hawkins have a believable love story with neither being able to speak, is one of the best love stories in movies in a long time. You know he is a ‘creature from the Black Lagoon’ but you forget that and root for him and Elisa (Hawkins) to have a happy ending.

I am not a fan of director Guillermo del Toro’s previous movies but he does a beautiful job of directing here along with writing the screenplay, with Vanessa Taylor and producing, with J. Miles Dale, a first-rate production in every aspect of the movie.

For old car lovers there is the first teal colored Cadillac, for old movie fans there is Alice Faye, Carmen Miranda and a salute to Fred and Ginger and for the music lovers some big band and jazz music along with “You’ll Never Know How Much I Love”.

Along with touching upon many movie genres, the casting couldn’t have been better and I would be hard pressed as to whether Sally Hawkins should get an Oscar nomination for this or “Maudie” since according to the rules actresses aren’t allowed to be nominated for 2 different pictures.

“The Shape of Water” is not an easy film to get into and at times to watch but it is definitely a film to see.… Expand

6 of 15 users found this helpful69

All this user's reviews

9

PrettyGoodDec 13, 2017

Beautiful, heartwarming and pleasing. A touching love story. The visuals and the art direction are perfect. Del Toro made a perfectly packaged fairy tale. A little predictable, but still one of the best movies of the year.

6 of 15 users found this helpful69

All this user's reviews

7

RtheomJan 14, 2018

This is basically "Beauty and the Beast" with del Toro visuals. Overall a very enjoyable movie although at bit too long. There are a number of scenes that are absolutely unnecessary, but absolutely del Toro. If you're the kind of person thatThis is basically "Beauty and the Beast" with del Toro visuals. Overall a very enjoyable movie although at bit too long. There are a number of scenes that are absolutely unnecessary, but absolutely del Toro. If you're the kind of person that likes his more artistic movies and watches them specifically for the visuals, you'll love this. If you find his movies enjoyable, but not magical, you'll still enjoy this, but wish it was shorter, like me. I'd place Pan's Labyrinth higher than this, but it's a close second to that and feels nearly the same. A solid 8 as far as acting, visuals and direction goes, but -1 point down to a 7 for the length.… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

8

KeithDowDec 22, 2017

The Shape of Water stands out for the way Guillermo del Toro is able to give this fantasy-laden film such a distinct time and place, in this case a military research facility set in the 1960’s, which highlights del Toro’s masterfulThe Shape of Water stands out for the way Guillermo del Toro is able to give this fantasy-laden film such a distinct time and place, in this case a military research facility set in the 1960’s, which highlights del Toro’s masterful screenwriting ability. The writing is further gilded by its intellectual depth, with characters remarking about the origin of certain words and names, or drawing on biblical references to better frame the predicaments they’re in. And if del Toro only wrote the screenplay, he’d still be receiving acclaim, yet this entire production is his. All told, he’s credited as the writer, director, and producer.

The film exhibits an alluring, Amelie-like color profile, with water motifs throughout, featuring a career-making performance by Sally Hawkins. The selective use of nudity and sexuality adds a real sense of depth and fullness to her role, making the character seem that much more lifelike, and Hawkins certainly makes the most of it.

Her performance is quite simply magnanimous. She’s outwardly tender and sweet, with an inner strength and resolve that manifests itself whenever the occasion calls. It’s a combination of perfect casting and the actress rising to the occasion that, in my estimation, places her as the odds on favorite to win the Golden Globe for Best Performance by an actress in a drama, for which she’s currently nominated, and the Academy Award in the same category, for which she most certainly will be nominated.… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

8

dharmaJan 27, 2018

Del Toro is back on track and as of writing, has received 13 Oscars nominations for his work on this flick. Give him a too much 'money', and he will focus too much on the production design. When he has a limited budget, that's when he madeDel Toro is back on track and as of writing, has received 13 Oscars nominations for his work on this flick. Give him a too much 'money', and he will focus too much on the production design. When he has a limited budget, that's when he made some of his best work. The Shape of Water is essentially an 'odd' romantic film, between a 'fish man' and a mute woman. On paper, it's as weird as it sounds, but on screen, it is again another classic from the director.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

9

temptershellJan 27, 2018

I waited for this film for a very long time. Not necessarily for this title but in this form because Tim Burton's latest productions did not delight as much as any del Toro project and that's why The Shape of Water is a production for me.I waited for this film for a very long time. Not necessarily for this title but in this form because Tim Burton's latest productions did not delight as much as any del Toro project and that's why The Shape of Water is a production for me. Honestly, I was hoping for something darker but the convention of delicate urban fantasy also appealed to me.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

9

Jess_HillJan 21, 2018

A sublime experience, this otherworldly fairytale is beautiful to watch, with exquisite performances and superb creature design allowing you to become entranced by this romantic story. As the compelling narrative unfolds, the delightfulA sublime experience, this otherworldly fairytale is beautiful to watch, with exquisite performances and superb creature design allowing you to become entranced by this romantic story. As the compelling narrative unfolds, the delightful soundtrack and detailed set design ground the storyline in the era, and combined with careful pacing and stunning cinematography, this becomes an enchanting experience that keeps you enthralled by this moving and melancholy tale. A film for the mature and discerning viewer, this is an exploration of intimacy and connection that is well worth your time. 9.12/10… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

TrevorsViewDec 22, 2017

Here it is! My absolute favorite movie of 2017! While Star Wars: The Last Jedi comes in close at second, I still had issues about it that grew over time. Yet for The Shape of Water, it’s the opposite: the more I think about it, the more IHere it is! My absolute favorite movie of 2017! While Star Wars: The Last Jedi comes in close at second, I still had issues about it that grew over time. Yet for The Shape of Water, it’s the opposite: the more I think about it, the more I love it!

Found in the river as a baby—abandoned by her parents, Elisa, a mute, keeps a specific daily routine in her home over Baltimore’s grand Orpheum theater. In the morning, she masturbates in the bath and hard-boils eggs; then she commutes to work, her cap used to cushion her cheek on the bus window, often mesmerized by water droplets dancing across the glass; then over the next eight hours she puts on her janitor apron to swab up a government-funded facility. So sure enough, Elisa finds a ripple to disrupt her calm life once she meets the Amazonian man-shaped fish, essentially The Creature from the Black Lagoon in design, imprisoned in the facility. The two instantly discover the great sense they have in common, since neither one of them can speak.

Even if they lack the decisive intelligence of humans, God’s animals somehow can see your true self better than people, as the anthropomorphic denizen from below does upon meeting Elisa. She shares one of her hardboiled eggs, teaching him to say “egg” in American Sign Language, like the “Project Nim” study at Columbia University. Over time, their nonverbal connection grows into something unimaginably intimate for Elisa’s inner Mary Magdalene.

Director Guillermo del Toro (Pan’s Labyrinth) sustains aquatic turquoise hues to delight his gothic, fantasized 1960s recreation, practically a giant rustic French painting. From the key lime tinted diner to a shiny new teal Cadillac, waves of despair swirl about inside what almost resembles the nearest abandoned cathedral after a flood destroyed its inner form; an immersive feel of swimming through the sets miraculously keeps itself going.

Del Toro commands your thirst without crossing into arthouse cinema mode, he just tells a straightforward story under the necessary creative choices in sound design. The beautiful sounds include the musical score’s orchestrated beauty creeping from beneath, thanks to eight-time Oscar nominee Alexandre Desplat (Argo, The Grand Budapest Hotel). The harsher sounds include the thump-squeak-thump of sex transitioned into the pulse of the facility’s prison chamber run to the same beat, as if lust is the true fuel for the drowned organization.

Everyone in the plotline whirlpool, such as some communists after the new discovery, lives a personal objectional truth about who to worship, with bits of your own identity projected upon every individual on the seafoam tinted screen. Richard Jenkins (The Visitor) portrays Elisa’s besieged artist neighbor like a spirit progressively decaying by the scenery no matter how high he tries to keep it up. Octavia Spencer (The Help, Hidden Figures) likewise highlights her subtle racial empowerment to convey a fear of racist attacks on her work ethic in an all-White facility. Although no one in the talented cast brought out the film’s aura as well as Sally Hawkins (Blue Jasmine) in the main role, commanding a quiet nature, secretly strong inside despite her weak façade.

While a few smaller actors did fail to leave a durable impression, it barely affected much beyond missed chances. Speaking of missed chances, the government’s involvement in the fishy situation could’ve been tightened up a bit to create deeper political arguments, rather than the shallow Democratic stand the script ends up taking.

Now look back at the big picture, particularly the way it channels old social issues into the US today. A rather impactful detail includes a point when Blacks in the city are refused a seat at public eateries, alongside presumed homosexuals. It reminds about the dark side of the plastered 1950’s American dream all men at the time craved to perfect. The villain in particular follows the universal dream by joyfully shocking the man-shaped thing he claimed as his trophy. According to science, no animals can ever smile or cry, so such a prize ought to be head monkey of the circus put on by US Government. This beast’s resemblance to Jesus Christ, alongside his child’s curiosity, represents Blacks, homosexuals—anyone outside the societal bubble. The real monster isn’t the hideous blue freak, but the bleach-washed success-crazed humans destined for the fate of Jonah.

Therefore, please go hear Fox Searchlight’s tale of the unbelievable romance, one which uses the supposed lies to warn you about the truth.… Expand

5 of 13 users found this helpful58

All this user's reviews

10

The3AcademySinsDec 13, 2017

The Shape of Water might be Guillermo Del Toro's best movie yet, and THAT is saying something. This film is an incredibly timely (and timeless!) ensemble-driven romance that takes place in such a fantastical world, but then you realize it isThe Shape of Water might be Guillermo Del Toro's best movie yet, and THAT is saying something. This film is an incredibly timely (and timeless!) ensemble-driven romance that takes place in such a fantastical world, but then you realize it is our world. The performances are strong across the board with Sally Hawkins, Michael Shannon, Doug Jones, Octavia Spencer, Michael Sthulbarg, and Richard Jenkins really shining. The score is incredible. The motiffs and themes and shots are so incredibly layered that you will find new things with this movie every time you watch it. The Shape of Water is a must-see for film goers, a must-own for Del Toro fans, and a very strong Oscar Contender for 2017.… Expand

6 of 16 users found this helpful610

All this user's reviews

8

CineAutoctonoJan 20, 2018

"The Shape of Water" was a surprising and spectacular film, both the characters and the story were spectacular. Guillermo del Toro did a great work again from "Pan's Labyrinth" fascinating and spectacular. A surprising fable.

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

9

Compi24Dec 26, 2017

"The Shape Of Water" is a film that's about as difficult of an undertaking for a director as possible. It's a Cold War era fantasy/sci-fi thriller with fairy tale elements, a very frank sense of sexuality, and a whole heap-load of gore. Oh,"The Shape Of Water" is a film that's about as difficult of an undertaking for a director as possible. It's a Cold War era fantasy/sci-fi thriller with fairy tale elements, a very frank sense of sexuality, and a whole heap-load of gore. Oh, also it's a movie that has to successfully sell a woman/fish-man romance in just about 2 hours. Good luck, am I right? Well, Del Toro has proven time and time again that luck doesn't necessarily factor into auteuristic filmmaking. The man's ability to craft and sell a world in no time flat is simply astounding. And if there was ever a movie that could perfectly embody the phrase "poetry in motion," Guillermo Del Toro just made it. From the first shot of the film, you're sucked in to the lyrical nature of the cinematography, and held tightly in your seat by the simply masterful performance work from - quite literally - every actor onscreen. Sally Hawkins, Doug Jones, Michael Shannon, Richard Jenkins, Octavia Spencer, Michael Stuhlbarg, etc. They all deliver some their best work. Unquestionably one of the most meaningful, original, powerful, and well-made films of the year.… Expand

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

9

NBFCJan 17, 2018

“Water is like love, it has no shape. It takes the shape of whatever it inhabits. It’s the most powerful element in the universe. It’s gentle, flexible, but breaks through every barrier.”-Guillermo del Toro

Despite del Toro’s love for“Water is like love, it has no shape. It takes the shape of whatever it inhabits. It’s the most powerful element in the universe. It’s gentle, flexible, but breaks through every barrier.”-Guillermo del Toro

Despite del Toro’s love for comics, gothic visuals, giant mechs, and practical monster effects; the famous Spanish director has always been a bit of a romantic at heart as demonstrated by the above quote.

From his more artsy Spanish films (Devil’s Backbone, Pan’s Labyrinth) to the more mainstream efforts (Hellboy and Pacific Rim), there is a touching reoccurring theme concerning the idea of societal outsiders and marginalized individuals finding solace within each other’s company.

With his fascination with fairy tales, it seemed only a matter of time before del Toro took a stab at creating a straight-out romance tale, which comes in the form of his latest feature that gives a great twist to the “Beauty and the Beast” concept.

What makes TSOW probably one of del Toro’s best films since The Devil’s Backbone is that taken on a pure conceptual level, the inter-species romance angle could have easily been awkward and almost kitschy if done by lesser hands. But del Toro’s mathematical but delicate storytelling, impressive set designs, and the incredibly layered performances from the silent Sally Hawkins and Doug Jones, despite wearing a thick rubber monster costume, turns TSOW into one of the most touching and honest romance tales in quite a while.

The performances in general are incredible across the board, arguably the best when it comes to del Toro’s English-language movie canon. Hawkins is obviously magnetic in the lead but Michael Shannon as the openly racist research team leader Richard Strickland easily joins the canon of Jacinto (The Devil’s Backbone) and Captain Vidal (Pan’s Labyrinth) in del Toro’s brand of genuinely terrifying but tragic human villains.

But the person that I feel really stole the show was Richard Jenkins, playing Elisa’s down-on-his-luck friend/neighbor and closeted commercial artist Giles. Giles by far feels like the most down-to-earth character in this fantastical tale and you really do feel sorry for his plight in life. For most of the movie Giles and Elisa’s coworker Zelda (Octavia Spencer) have to verbalize the mute Elisa’s sign language; giving way to some unique interactions. Giles also provides some great subtle moments of comic relief.

Praise should also be level at the spell-binding score by Alexandre Desplat (The Grand Budapest Hotel, The Imitation Game, Argo), giving a film with admittedly strange subject manner a timeless classy atmosphere that further contributes to the fairy tale quality. The accordion and whistle-heavy music that plays over the film’s mesmerizing opening underwater dream sequence was the first sign that I was watching something truly special.

The movie on the whole has a magical Old Hollywood feel to the whole thing, which is something different compared to del Toro’s previous efforts. It’s not the type of Old Hollywood tribute that feels pandering either (Ex. La La Land), it all feels born out of genuine affection and is completely at the service of painting the film’s intoxicating atmosphere.

TSOW on the whole is a pretty unconventional movie that is hard to pigeonhole into a single genre.

It’s part “Beauty Meets Beast” romance, part creature-feature, part period piece, part fairy tale, part science fiction and part spy thriller. There is also the fact that this is an R-rated del Toro flick and while it’s not nearly as violent as Pan’s Labyrinth, there are a few scenes that will make you wince or shiver in uncomfortableness.

Even with the trailers it’s obvious the distributor’s Fox Searchlight Pictures could not crack the egg on how to market the movie. Hopefully it will continue to get more attention due to it’s appearance on many critic’s “best of” lists and with award season underway; but regardless del Toro’s latest masterwork is one of the 2017’s best.… Expand

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

9

UltimatmovieguyDec 23, 2017

Guillermo Del Toro is back in this under water romance drama. After years of not writing any origional material and staying strictly to directing, he has immerged from the depths of the ocean and arose with a near masterpiece. The plot beingGuillermo Del Toro is back in this under water romance drama. After years of not writing any origional material and staying strictly to directing, he has immerged from the depths of the ocean and arose with a near masterpiece. The plot being set to a 1960's era with its dark and bleak surroundings is filled with a glimmer of hope everytime Sally Hawkins, Elisa, appears on screen. With the main character being a mute it adds to the whole film with its unique characters and twisty plot. Shot with reportily less than $20 million dollars as well. This movie is beautiful. Octavia Spencer, gives a great minor performance as a more moral guide for Hawkins and a comic relief in some of its most tense scenes. Michael Shannon is amazing as the films antagonist and it's moral split on what he wants. And Richard Jenkins is amazing as Hawkins friend who supports her in her decisions in unique ways. And not to forget about the amazing performance by Doug Jones as the amphibian man is amazing. With such a low budget it doesn't show with its beautifully design sets and props along side with minor special effects and CGI used to accent this movies beauty. Between being in the underground of the lab to the bus rides to looking out Elisa's window to watch the rain and dark city light up. It's underwater scenes are equally as beautiful as we watch the slow romance build. The only complaint I have on the movie is I wish we got a little more in-depth explanation of a few character's backgrounds and some of their understandings as why they do what they did in the film. But besides that it's a near flawless movie that's entertaining as hell. Leaving you happy and wanting more from Del Toro.… Expand

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

10

Rebecca31Jan 19, 2018

The hype surrounding The Shape of Water is immense and it’s certainly not going away any time soon. So you always have to wonder going into a film like this, will it meet these expectations or fall beneath them leaving you disappointed.The hype surrounding The Shape of Water is immense and it’s certainly not going away any time soon. So you always have to wonder going into a film like this, will it meet these expectations or fall beneath them leaving you disappointed. Absolutely not, it really does exceed all expectations. A truly magical twist on the traditional fairy tale. Sally Hawkins and Doug Jones are exceptional, along with a great supporting cast from Michael Shannon, Richard Jenkins and Octavia Spencer. Guillermo del Toro has somehow managed to outdo himself yet again. Everything about The Shape of Water is there to fully immerse you in the story. From the wonderful movie soundtrack by Alexandre Desplat to the cinematography and set designs. The attention to detail is perfect. A while ago I claimed Crimson Peak was del Toro’s best English language film, well move over because The Shape of Water has just taken that spot.

Set in a secret research facility in the 1960s, a cleaner (Sally Hawkins) forms a unique relationship with an amphibious creature (Doug Jones) being held captive. The most beautiful and enchanting film I’ve seen in years. You can’t help but fall in love with this story and I loved every minute of The Shape of Water. Every supporting character has their moment, Octavia Spencer and Richard Jenkins are sure to make you giggle at least once. But as for Michael Shannon, he plays a bad guy in such a way that you despise him so much, he’s simply rotten to the core. This part was written for him and it clearly shows. Sally Hawkins gives such an emotional performance without saying a word, so if you’re the type I guarantee you’ll be reduced to tears at some point. Not that I care so much for the awards but she should have an Oscar for that performance no problem. Doug Jones is perhaps the most versatile actor of this generation, he is unrecognisable in a role, so unrecognisable you may think you don’t even know who he is but believe me you do, and now he has become a completely different creature yet again. An unforgettable and completely enthralling experience. It may not be for everyone but if you like things a little quirky then under no circumstance should you miss The Shape of Water.

The perfect way to lose yourself in a movie that will dazzle you with its sheer beauty. It’s hard to compare it to anything else, like a dream inside Guillermo del Toro’s imagination. A love story with a twist. Unique, magical, brilliant. Don’t let the fact that I’m a huge del Toro fan influence you in any way I wouldn’t call a movie amazing if I didn’t mean it. If I give a film 10/10 you can bet it deserves it and The Shape of Water deserves everything it has coming to it, I cannot wait to see it again.… Expand

4 of 12 users found this helpful48

All this user's reviews

8

Meth-dudeJan 9, 2018

With beautiful visuals, great acting performances, above average directing and an interesting story, The Shape of Water is one of the most visually interesting and original movies of 2017. While the movie dragged a little at parts and oneWith beautiful visuals, great acting performances, above average directing and an interesting story, The Shape of Water is one of the most visually interesting and original movies of 2017. While the movie dragged a little at parts and one scene in particular annoyed me, it's still a visually impressive and rather entertaining movie.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

10

alejandro970Jan 21, 2018

An outstanding stir of genres with the unique style of Del Toro. It´s an uncommon story of love and a deep reflexion about the real meaning of "monsters". Sally Hawkings, in the role of a mute janitor express a lot without saying a word. AAn outstanding stir of genres with the unique style of Del Toro. It´s an uncommon story of love and a deep reflexion about the real meaning of "monsters". Sally Hawkings, in the role of a mute janitor express a lot without saying a word. A must to see.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

9

Aloxb3Jan 12, 2018

Um filme muito bonito e muito bem produzido com ótimos itens de época. Bons atores e boas atuações (Que nem sempre estão juntas *Tom Cruise*) o enredo é interessante e envolvente apesar da nudez que, neste caso, eu achei desnecessário porémUm filme muito bonito e muito bem produzido com ótimos itens de época. Bons atores e boas atuações (Que nem sempre estão juntas *Tom Cruise*) o enredo é interessante e envolvente apesar da nudez que, neste caso, eu achei desnecessário porém não tira a qualidade que este filme tem. É o meu romance favorito depois de "Her" :*… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

10

ConorMacleodJan 18, 2018

A beautifully dark and magical americanised fairy-tale that really brings out the best in its cast, direction from Guillermo del Toro and amazing production work.

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

8

marymaebennettJan 4, 2018

Last year for NYE, I watched Arrival and this NYE I watched The Shape of Water. Both movies are about trying to communicate with monsters. Weird coincidence. The first movie I watched in theatres this year was Hidden Figures, the last movie ILast year for NYE, I watched Arrival and this NYE I watched The Shape of Water. Both movies are about trying to communicate with monsters. Weird coincidence. The first movie I watched in theatres this year was Hidden Figures, the last movie I watched was, of course, The Shape of Water. Both movies are about trying to make further scientific discoveries than Russia. Weird coincidence. So, why did it take me this long to write a review? I don't know. I don't know how I feel about this movie. It was very unique in premise but it felt very paint by numbers in structure. It was like they read a book on the rules of screenwriting and decided they needed to incorporate every rule. The color wheel was a bit on the nose. The Hitchcock rule was definitely implemented. The allusions were there. I'm sure there were more but it's been a while since I've seen it. I did like the movie and the rules were effective but I just wonder for a movie all about not playing it safe, why did they play it so safe?… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

9

mrharrybeckJan 13, 2018

This great tale of unexpected and true love between these two utterly different & unique entities makes you feel lucky for just witnessing it.

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

8

JLuis_001Jan 11, 2018

Guillermo del Toro takes the reins of the story of Beauty and The Beast and exposes it in film with every part of his style.

In general terms, I certainly think that the film could have been better in terms of story because I think it wasn'tGuillermo del Toro takes the reins of the story of Beauty and The Beast and exposes it in film with every part of his style.

In general terms, I certainly think that the film could have been better in terms of story because I think it wasn't really strong enough. The development of the characters is kinda poor because soon you realize that the only character that matters is Sally Hawkins character: Elisa Esposito but I've gotta say, she does a magnificent job as a mute janitor, who without words manages to be enormously expressive.

When I say the story wasn't strong enough I say it because the way in which it unfolds is very fortuitous, there is no background for the characters and the relationship that Elisa and the creature develop is too fast for my taste, especially considering the deep love that Elisa develops for him.

Michael Shannon is a one-dimensional villain and I'm surprised that Del Toro wasted him in that way.

Putting that aside, The Shape of Water is a very well done film, with an impeccable production that bears all the signature of Del Toro. The music is exceptional, one of the best scores of Alexandre Desplat and in general the film is very enjoyable, it is two hours of good entertainment, quality entertainment and yes it's honestly the best film of del Toro since Pan's Labyrinth. No doubt the magic is still there, but I think a little shake in terms of narrative would not hurt him, I feel that Guillermo can evolve and create much more complex stories and I think it's necessary for him to do so because he may fall into a creative hole and the worst thing that could happen to him is to be repetitive.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

9

kiankJan 4, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie is a little weird, there is no denying that but it is also romantic and visually captivating. The main character, played by Sally Hawkins, is mute and she able to find love with this sea creature because of their shared mutism. While the premise may seem weird, the story is conveyed in a romantic and cute way that captivated me throughout. The main villain wasn't very complex but the actor did a good job making a new hated villain. Moreover, Hawkins' character's neighbor is a homosexual struggling artist who truly was "born in the wrong time." I loved seeing him and Sally's character interact, and their relationship overall was sweet. Octavia Spencer and Sally Hawkins also have great on screen chemistry and I love seeing Spencer, one of my favorite actresses, in a science fiction movie. The ending was quite intense but it left me satisfied. Overall, I would give it an 8.9.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

10

Basma7Jan 16, 2018

such a wonderfully written and crafted movie.. just BEAUTIFUL. Love is Greater than Fear♥

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

10

PlastiktorJan 21, 2018

This movie is a work of art. Everything is perfect. Every take, frame, lighting , coloring, photography and art direction, make up, casting I mean everything, the music is flawless. I enjoyed it immensely since the first second. One of theThis movie is a work of art. Everything is perfect. Every take, frame, lighting , coloring, photography and art direction, make up, casting I mean everything, the music is flawless. I enjoyed it immensely since the first second. One of the best movies I have ever seen in my life.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

9

WaelJan 18, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. "The Shape of Water" is what happens when you apply an excellent artistic take to a compelling peculiar premise (like, let's say... a mute woman falling for a weird amphibian creature). It tells the story of what happens when two creatures find common comfort in their undermined and misunderstood nature. The direction is excellent, the score fits the atmosphere of the film so well, and the characters are very poignant, evoking so many feelings and thoughts (even though the main two don't even say a single word the whole movie). The water is used for a lot of symbolism, like love (when they swim together in her flooded bathroom), erotica (the masturbation scenes and how well they fit with the boiling eggs), and salvation (when he brings her back from the dead and turns the scars on her neck to gills). In conclusion, this film was a true artful visual treat. Would totally recommend.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

9

davd123Jan 26, 2018

What a great movie! At some points it was kinda basic because on the middle of this movie you can already guess what it will be like in the ending. And this is the main reason why it is not 10 from me. But everything else was magnificent theWhat a great movie! At some points it was kinda basic because on the middle of this movie you can already guess what it will be like in the ending. And this is the main reason why it is not 10 from me. But everything else was magnificent the acting, the atmosphere of this movie, it was something special for me.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

7

RroyJan 7, 2018

Good story that celebrates diversity (and could have done it more subtly) but which is not as strong (by far) as Pan’s Labyrinth.

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

10

AlbertoHerbbFeb 4, 2018

One of the best movies I've seen in a while. I've been an avid fan of Guillermo Del Toro since Pan's Labyrinth, I'm not a big fan of Hell Boy or Pacific Rim, but The Shape Of Water nailed it. The Shape Of water is a love Story set during theOne of the best movies I've seen in a while. I've been an avid fan of Guillermo Del Toro since Pan's Labyrinth, I'm not a big fan of Hell Boy or Pacific Rim, but The Shape Of Water nailed it. The Shape Of water is a love Story set during the cold War. The Movie has a historical context which entwines with a mystical and supernatural love story. I'm surprised that the Academy gave this movie 11 Nominations. The movie on paper seems quiet odd, but the actors and the director helped establish it into a beautiful film.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

9

errinstevensJan 23, 2018

I might be biased because of my own novels, but this is a stunning, fresh portrayal of what could have been a tired trope. Guillermo del Torro's sensibilities are gorgeously present; and every single character in this thing is perfectly portrayed.

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

8

rafa14Feb 1, 2018

it is a Beauty and the Beast, but for adults, because the story is about a girl who never felt part of the society, because she is mute and when she meet the creature and start to build a relationship with him, she feels complete even thoughit is a Beauty and the Beast, but for adults, because the story is about a girl who never felt part of the society, because she is mute and when she meet the creature and start to build a relationship with him, she feels complete even though his is not the prettiest thing in the world. But besides this, the movie is a masterpiece, the way that Del Toro directs it's unbelieve good and he deserves a oscar for it especially because of the under water scenes. Octavia Spencer and Sally Hawking are the main reason this movie is been so well receveid, Sally doesn't say a word in the whole film, but still, you get her, you know when she is happy, sad or in love, and Octavia is the best as always, she is so funny and confident.… Expand