Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation | Release Date: December 25, 2015
7.9
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1813 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,511
Mixed:
195
Negative:
107
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
10
Mulholland2603Jan 10, 2016
Wonderful. I found Leonardo Di Caprio simply outstanding. I don't know how is possible that he doesn't win the osar this year too. Maybe this year the academy'll reward a tree or the bear. Ahah. It's ridiculous. I think thjat this is a greatWonderful. I found Leonardo Di Caprio simply outstanding. I don't know how is possible that he doesn't win the osar this year too. Maybe this year the academy'll reward a tree or the bear. Ahah. It's ridiculous. I think thjat this is a great Di Caprio's performance and the Inarritu's film is better than Birdman, full of pathos, moving and with a perfect photography. Simply the better film from a while. Expand
4 of 11 users found this helpful47
All this user's reviews
10
ChampionaaronJan 10, 2016
**** Just go see this movie. Seriously. Dont miss this one on the big screen. It's almost all shot on a wide 18mm lens, you want to see this on the big screen.
4 of 12 users found this helpful48
All this user's reviews
10
samichsupernovaJan 10, 2016
Beautiful. Gritty. Brutal. Gripping. I couldn't take my eyes off this movie. All the hellish conditions undergone by the cast and crew while shooting in sequential order and using only natural lighting really paid off with one of the mostBeautiful. Gritty. Brutal. Gripping. I couldn't take my eyes off this movie. All the hellish conditions undergone by the cast and crew while shooting in sequential order and using only natural lighting really paid off with one of the most harrowing cinematic experiences ever (as far as I'm concerned). Though some of the wide-angle shots remind you that you're watching a film, the emphasis on realism is absolutely transporting. Some of the best action scenes are shot entirely with one take as well which adds to their immediacy. The performances by DiCaprio and Hardy are top-notch and both truly disappear into their roles. Can't recommend this enough. Lubezki's cinematography... it must have been such hell getting some of those shots. This is Inarritu's best work by far, beating out the gimmicky "Birdman" and the visionary but depressing "Babel". A true gem of cinema and easily among the top 3 films of 2015. Go see it in the best theater possible!! Expand
6 of 14 users found this helpful68
All this user's reviews
10
Movie-Freak-KKJan 9, 2016
Thank You director Alejandro G Inaritu. You made my two and a half hour, i mean entire life, utterly fulfilling,
This is probably the most good looking film i have ever seen. Everything about this movie is Oscar-worthy. The cinematography (
Thank You director Alejandro G Inaritu. You made my two and a half hour, i mean entire life, utterly fulfilling,
This is probably the most good looking film i have ever seen. Everything about this movie is Oscar-worthy. The cinematography ( lingering long shots ), the performances delivered by Dicaprio, Hardy and even Poulter, the score, the action sequences, the emotion , the message.....This movie is flawless. Go and witness the birth of a new-born masterpiece
Expand
5 of 13 users found this helpful58
All this user's reviews
10
MUIZZKJan 9, 2016
This movie is what is called a true 'Masterpiece' A great Movie for all Ages. Action,Drama,Thrill,Adventure This movie has it all.Tom Hardy's Performance,Great! Leo's Performance Even Better!. This is Like
Well this movie should be named Man
This movie is what is called a true 'Masterpiece' A great Movie for all Ages. Action,Drama,Thrill,Adventure This movie has it all.Tom Hardy's Performance,Great! Leo's Performance Even Better!. This is Like
Well this movie should be named Man v/s Wild. Give Leo him Oscar Already! This is clearly the best film of 2016 maybe even the Decade.
Expand
5 of 13 users found this helpful58
All this user's reviews
1
TheKavehJJan 9, 2016
It's really hard to enjoy a movie that is slow to pick up, but it's even harder to enjoy a movie when there's almost no dialogue. The Revenant is both loved by critics and fans alike, but to me, The Revenant was a 3 hour waste of time thatIt's really hard to enjoy a movie that is slow to pick up, but it's even harder to enjoy a movie when there's almost no dialogue. The Revenant is both loved by critics and fans alike, but to me, The Revenant was a 3 hour waste of time that I'll never get back. Expand
13 of 27 users found this helpful1314
All this user's reviews
7
francisrgoJan 9, 2016
Another must see film of 2015. This is the film that Leonardo Dicaprio is finally going to win the Oscar! He was great and very different from all the douche characters he has played from Wolf of Wall Street, Great Gatsby and DjangoAnother must see film of 2015. This is the film that Leonardo Dicaprio is finally going to win the Oscar! He was great and very different from all the douche characters he has played from Wolf of Wall Street, Great Gatsby and Django Unchained. It is his to lose. The film is very gritty and some scenes are hard to watch. Alejandro Inarritu is an amazing director and really knows his sense of focus and are prominent throughout his films from Babel, Birdman and The Revenant. They all somehow revolve in one setting like a center stage. Audience are glued and fixated to the main character who is dealing with self conflict or inner demons. In Babel one of the stories is how a young girl deals with suicide. In Birdman Riggan played by Michael Keaton is dealing with his fading career and trying to get back to the limelight. Expand
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
10
bghofflerJan 9, 2016
This was one of the best movies I have seen in years. Decaprio and Hardy put on superb performances in their respective roles. The story was captivating. The cinematography was sublime. My pick for best picture.
5 of 12 users found this helpful57
All this user's reviews
9
moviemitch96Jan 9, 2016
I had the chance to read Michael Punke's novel that this was based on before seeing this. So when watching the film, I noticed that it was straying awfully far away from what was happening in the book and at first I was disappointed. However,I had the chance to read Michael Punke's novel that this was based on before seeing this. So when watching the film, I noticed that it was straying awfully far away from what was happening in the book and at first I was disappointed. However, by the time the film ended, I understood more why this was the case. First off, the credits read "based in part on the novel by Michael Punke", so that was a dead giveaway right there. Also, Punke couldn't promote, do any publicity, or even be on set or aid in the making of the film due to the fact that he's currently an ambassador to the World Trade Organization, which prevented him from helping the filmmakers include many of the events from the novel. I also realized that since so little is known about what happened with the real-life Hugh Glass that multiple stories and plot points can be made up about him. Even Punke admitted to having to make up several events that were in the novel. So basically Punke was telling his own version of what Glass might've been through or experienced, while the filmmakers were telling their own as well. For these reasons, I'm able to forgive the fact that the film drastically strayed from the novel. In fact, the more I thought about it after the film ended, the more I realized that I actually liked the film better, because the third act in the novel kind of strayed from the revenge plot that it so specifically advertised and went more towards the justice route, whereas the film stuck firmly with the revenge plot, which made for a much more exciting and satisfying third act that truly made the film a great story of revenge! In addition to this, everything about this film was absolutely perfect and phenomenal! The gorgeous cinematography and landscape shots throughout, the hauntingly effective and powerful score, the brutal and unflinching violence and action, etc. And of course, the acting from everyone involved was outstanding! Leonardo DiCaprio will win his long overdue Oscar for this film, mark my words!!! Tom Hardy also delivers a very aggressive performance. Even Domhnall Gleeson and Will Poulter make the most of their characters and screentime. So overall, director Alejandro G. Inarritu does it again with a film that's just as intriguing and engaging as his last film Birdman was! It's undoubtedly one of the most impressive, powerful and memorable films of 2015! Expand
1 of 8 users found this helpful17
All this user's reviews
8
PeabarterJan 9, 2016
There aren't many movies that have made me squirm in my seat and this one did several times. This movie is not for everyone. There are some very graphic and intense scenes of violence it it. This is basically a story of survival in theThere aren't many movies that have made me squirm in my seat and this one did several times. This movie is not for everyone. There are some very graphic and intense scenes of violence it it. This is basically a story of survival in the 1820s. Leonardo plays as a scout (Glass) with his son helping trappers harvest pelts. They are attacked by Indians and forced to retreat into the wilderness in search of a fort many miles away. On route, Glass is attacked within an inch of his life by a bear, but manages to survive. Ultimately, the company is forced to leave him with his son and 2 other men while they forge ahead in search of the fort. This is not a special effects movie, but a plodding story of one man's will to survive and seek vengeance. Much of this movie has no dialog as Glass is on his own and doing what he can to live in the wild. The cinematography is stunning at times. I deducted 2 stars since I did look at my watch twice (2 hr 36 min). The theater was packed and I was glad I went to this movie. You could tell at the end of the movie that it had an impact on the audience since everyone seemed quietly stunned as they filtered out of the theater. Expand
1 of 8 users found this helpful17
All this user's reviews
10
TheDavoJan 9, 2016
Riveting from start to finish. Cinematography to die for. Leo completely wrong for the lead role but still nails it. The acting, the story, the adventure. Going to probably win all the rewards.
5 of 14 users found this helpful59
All this user's reviews
8
herndonrulesJan 9, 2016
One of the best films of the year. While DiCaprio is spectacular, Hardy has a juicier role and almost steals the show. Scenery and cinematography on par with Jeremiah Johnson, the previous gold standard in the "mountain man" genre. An epicOne of the best films of the year. While DiCaprio is spectacular, Hardy has a juicier role and almost steals the show. Scenery and cinematography on par with Jeremiah Johnson, the previous gold standard in the "mountain man" genre. An epic survival/revenge story made even stronger by its basis in fact. The bear scene absolutely lives up to the hype. Expand
1 of 8 users found this helpful17
All this user's reviews
8
jbrown8989Jan 9, 2016
This movie had some of the best cinematography I've seen. You could see that each scene was visually crafted. At the beginning, Tom Hardy's accent was a bit tough to understand but I got use to it halfway through. Some of the scenes are veryThis movie had some of the best cinematography I've seen. You could see that each scene was visually crafted. At the beginning, Tom Hardy's accent was a bit tough to understand but I got use to it halfway through. Some of the scenes are very intense and you can feel the emotion in them. Overall a very good movie. Only thing I didn't like was that it was almost 3hrs long but I guess...so are most major movies these days. I would recommend seeing this one in theatres. Expand
1 of 8 users found this helpful17
All this user's reviews
10
GreenGoblin215Jan 9, 2016
Holy Smokes. I just finished watching this captivating movie a little
while ago and it was Absolutely Phenomenal. I will start with the story
which is about the explorer named Hugh Glass who is left for dead by a friend after a brutal bear
Holy Smokes. I just finished watching this captivating movie a little
while ago and it was Absolutely Phenomenal. I will start with the story
which is about the explorer named Hugh Glass who is left for dead by a
friend after a brutal bear attack in the American Frontier of 1823. The
story is extremely solid especially since it's based on a true story. I
did find the story dragging a few times but it doesn't take off of the
score. I will now move onto the acting which was Breathtaking with both
Tom Hardy and Leonardo DiCaprio playing their roles to Perfection like
in every movie they have ever done prior. I must say that the two of
them together make for one Hell of a powerful movie experience. The
other actors played their roles just as well even though they were
minor in comparison. I will now move onto the action which was if I
dare say the most Savage and Barbarous Adaptation of combat during that
time period which took place on the American Frontier of the 1800's. I
mean it was Masterfully shot and truly one of a kind even to present
day Military movies. The military movies of today pale in comparison to
just how Ruthless it was back then for the men who fought. I will now
move onto the Cinematography which was done by Emmanuel Lubezki which
is a Master of his Arts. I mean they shot the film in both Canada and
Argentina and a small part in America but the dedication it takes to
travel all the way to South America for snow just to double as the
American Frontier says volumes on how dedicated the cast and crew were
on this film. I can't stress enough how visually stunning the shots
were and how realistic it all felt and the music was on point even
though it was sparse it was still Amazing. I will close with this
statement and that is that you must go and watch this film. I mean it's
one of the Best Films and the most refreshingly original films in terms
of the cinematography and the depth of the characters will power to
evoke just how Indomitable the human body and the human spirit can be
when it wants something bad enough.
Expand
3 of 10 users found this helpful37
All this user's reviews
8
jrodfilmsJan 9, 2016
i liked the film from start to finish, and dont let the long runtime fool you, i wasnt bored or checked my watch once. its not a perfect film though, but its better than hateful eight. so if you want a good action film with a simple storyi liked the film from start to finish, and dont let the long runtime fool you, i wasnt bored or checked my watch once. its not a perfect film though, but its better than hateful eight. so if you want a good action film with a simple story check this one out. awesome music and cinematography. Expand
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
6
BHBarryJan 9, 2016
"The Revenant" stars Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hardy in this "based in part on a true story" of mountaineer Hugh Glass and his fight for survival in the South Dakota wilderness after an almost fatal encounter with a bear. The film was"The Revenant" stars Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hardy in this "based in part on a true story" of mountaineer Hugh Glass and his fight for survival in the South Dakota wilderness after an almost fatal encounter with a bear. The film was directed by Alejandro Gonzalez Innarritu ("Birdman") who, with Mark L. Smith, co-wrote the screenplay based on the novel by Michael Punke. Although shot in Canada and Argentina, the film attempts to depict the challenges of a South Dakota winter n 1823. The word "revenant" is derived from the French word "revenir" (i.e. to return) and literally means the return of the spirit from the dead. This is the plight of Mr. DiCaprio’s character as he struggles across the barren icy wasteland for over 2 and ½ hours of viewing time. The audience also feels his pain and anguish since it too has to suffer through this ordeal as it is forced to endure a tedious and overlong excursion through the cold and unforgiving wilderness. The difference of course is that Mr. DiCaprio was paid for his suffering while the audience was not. Mr. DiCaprio’s character is enmeshed in a thin story line and basically has a non-verbal role as the script requires him to do a great amount of crawling and some groaning but, unfortunately, these do not necessarily rise to the level of great entertainment.
One must acknowledge the haunting and vitally important original musical score created by Ryuichi Sakamoto and Alva Noto and the spectacular photography of Emmanuel Lubizki. That being said, I found myself looking at my watch at least 3 times during the film in hopes that it was nearing its conclusion and wondering why I saw what the editor didn’t. I give the film a 6.0 rating for it proves once again that advertising and hype will not always make a film great but a quality screenplay and strong acting performances will. In my opinion, this film is lacking in both.
Expand
6 of 11 users found this helpful65
All this user's reviews
7
AxgrinderJan 9, 2016
It can be difficult to show off your acting chops in a movie with minimal dialogue, but Leonardo DiCaprio reminds us that physical acting is an art onto itself, and gives a solid performance. The lack of dialogue is also a nuanced plotIt can be difficult to show off your acting chops in a movie with minimal dialogue, but Leonardo DiCaprio reminds us that physical acting is an art onto itself, and gives a solid performance. The lack of dialogue is also a nuanced plot device used to establish an unspoken maxim: The bad guys talk more than the good guys. Tom Hardy makes an excellent bad guy, but the dialogue he has been given (God as a squirrel) sometimes just doesn’t work very well, and maybe it’s for the best that there isn’t more of it.

The season of the film is winter, and the sun rarely shines on any of the majestic background shots. The weather is not the only thing that is bleak. Set in the American frontier, the movie is a vivid reminder not only of the devastation that early hunters/trappers wreaked on wildlife and the Native American way of life, but the brutality that frontiersmen and Native American Indians visited on each other.

Except for the scene in which DiCaprio is attacked by a bear, the story - written by director Alejandro Inarritu (Birdman) - fails to captivate. DiCaprio’s relentless desire for vengeance and his never-ending struggle to survive weigh heavily on the film’s mood. Overlay a portrayal of frontier life as totally joyless for all who live and things get downright depressing. Top it all off with a “mixed-result” ending, and a lengthy run-time of 2hrs 45 mins and you have a movie that’s a bit of a grind.
Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
4
TomHugJan 9, 2016
Tedious, well-acted, interminable, beautifully filmed, failure as a story. I came in with high expectations. Problem is, there's no real story here and no character development. No character changes from their initial depiction in the story.Tedious, well-acted, interminable, beautifully filmed, failure as a story. I came in with high expectations. Problem is, there's no real story here and no character development. No character changes from their initial depiction in the story. It is beautifully filmed, and both DiCaprio and Hardy are excellent. But I was bored by this story. I can see why this movie is getting the art-house Oscar buzz, but I think you can have artistic elements and still have a well-paced story with actual development in the story line. Expand
6 of 11 users found this helpful65
All this user's reviews
9
sbechtJan 9, 2016
I'd like to give this movie a 10, but that would seem trite. The "hook" for me was set within the first 1-2 minutes and my interest never waned. Set during the fur-trading era of the early 19th century, it's an inspiring tale of survival setI'd like to give this movie a 10, but that would seem trite. The "hook" for me was set within the first 1-2 minutes and my interest never waned. Set during the fur-trading era of the early 19th century, it's an inspiring tale of survival set in the cold Dakota region. The imagery is breathtaking at times, and the details the filmmakers portray are amazing. I highly recommend this movie. It's a masterpiece. Expand
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
1
penfifteenJan 8, 2016
Truly one of the most boring movies I've ever seen. About ten minutes of plot surrounded by two and a half hours of needless flashbacks and useless shots of scenery. Beautiful scenery, sure, but so little happens that even the non-boringTruly one of the most boring movies I've ever seen. About ten minutes of plot surrounded by two and a half hours of needless flashbacks and useless shots of scenery. Beautiful scenery, sure, but so little happens that even the non-boring parts become boring. The film doesn't get to what we are trying to accomplish until an hour and a half in. Thoroughly unwatchable, you just can't make movies this way. Expand
12 of 27 users found this helpful1215
All this user's reviews
9
BrianMcCriticJan 8, 2016
The Revenant is a visually stunning revenge film that is one of the year's best. Alejandro G. Inarritu is proving to be one of the best directors working today and if Leo doesn't win best actor this year he may never. This is a must seeThe Revenant is a visually stunning revenge film that is one of the year's best. Alejandro G. Inarritu is proving to be one of the best directors working today and if Leo doesn't win best actor this year he may never. This is a must see film on the big screen. A Expand
1 of 8 users found this helpful17
All this user's reviews
3
TSTINKERSJan 8, 2016
When I saw the previews a month ago I really wanted to see this movie. I saw it pretty much opening day (Friday jan 8). The first 30minutes were good... the next 2hours was boring as hell. So many scenes were so fake. The movie endingWhen I saw the previews a month ago I really wanted to see this movie. I saw it pretty much opening day (Friday jan 8). The first 30minutes were good... the next 2hours was boring as hell. So many scenes were so fake. The movie ending was predictable. I went with some family members and they said that its the last time I get to pick the movie. I heard Leo suffered a lot during the making of the movie. I suffered more sitting through it. Expand
10 of 20 users found this helpful1010
All this user's reviews
7
DarkSideOTForceJan 8, 2016
I thought Leo did a great job acting, howerver, the movies resembles Castaway, Jeremiah Johnson, Death Hunt 3, and Gladiator wrapped up into one movie. Good but not great;
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
3
hotfromcauldronJan 8, 2016
Thirty minutes and two shock and awe moments into the Revenant I am out of it. Maybe because having the “leads” in “do or die” situations is meaningless or the abundance of cuts to icy rapids and tall timbers is surprising from the man whoThirty minutes and two shock and awe moments into the Revenant I am out of it. Maybe because having the “leads” in “do or die” situations is meaningless or the abundance of cuts to icy rapids and tall timbers is surprising from the man who shot “Birdman”. Ironically, it left me cold. Granted, production values are good - performances good - and for a re-enactment trimming sixty minutes might have been better. Expand
10 of 20 users found this helpful1010
All this user's reviews
9
horcrux2007Jan 8, 2016
Loosely based on the life of 19th century frontiersman Hugh Glass, The Revenant is a brutal yet visually stunning western with one of Leonardo DiCaprio's best performances yet. The film follows Glass after he is mauled by a bear and left forLoosely based on the life of 19th century frontiersman Hugh Glass, The Revenant is a brutal yet visually stunning western with one of Leonardo DiCaprio's best performances yet. The film follows Glass after he is mauled by a bear and left for dead by his fellow fur traders. One of the frontiersmen, John Fitzgerald, kills his son, and Glass voyages over 200 miles to exact revenge on him. The Revenant is one of the most violent movies I've seen from 2015, although the incredible scenery and cinematography also make it one of the most astonishing movies to look at. It combines some intense, difficult-to-watch scenes with amazing scenery which makes it one of the most beautiful violent films I've seen. Leo's committed and demanding performance is certainly one of the best of his career especially because of the lack of the dialog in the film. The 156-minute running time, relentless brutality and limited dialog does take a bit of a commitment to finish, but The Revenant is a masterfully directed film that makes the most of its subject matter's intriguing story. Expand
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
9
tjman09Jan 8, 2016
The Revenant isn’t like most westerns that have very straightforward moral dilemmas and are fun tones, it is dark, and it is complicated. The Revenant is a movie with a lot of backstories that makes, it even more impressive than it alreadyThe Revenant isn’t like most westerns that have very straightforward moral dilemmas and are fun tones, it is dark, and it is complicated. The Revenant is a movie with a lot of backstories that makes, it even more impressive than it already is, and it is impressive. The Revenant is brilliantly acted, features beautiful cinematography all the while showing deep narrative heft. The film is poised to receive major awards attention, and rightfully so.
The first piece of backstory surrounding this film is fairly well known, and that is that Leonardo DiCaprio is still fighting for his first Oscar. After seeing this film, it seems safe to say that his performance is oscar worthy. DiCaprio carries the movie as long stretches of the film feature DiCaprio alone, acting in an isolated surrounding, which is even harder to do. DiCaprio often balances soft-hearted empathy and stone-cold revenge within small stretches, and every emotion is well accentuated. While the focus is on DiCaprio, because he’s the cornerstone of the film, Tom Hardy and Domhall Gleeson are also brilliant in this film as well.
Another piece of backstory that may not be as well known is that Director Alejandro Gonzalez Innaritu and Cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki decided to shoot the entire film with nothing but natural light. To go a little deeper, considering exposure and reciprocity this gave the filmmakers only a few hours to shoot per day in order to get a good exposure. Even more impressive is that the film is stunningly gorgeous, and by that I mean that the film looks professionally lit, despite the use of no lighting. This is Lubezki’s third consecutive cinematography masterpiece, and he’ll probably end up winning his third consecutive Oscar for cinematography.
The other impressive aspect of the film is the story. Most westerns tell straightforward stories, with simple characters (good guy vs. bad guy), that’s not bad it’s just easier to follow. The Revenant mixes traditional western conventions such as the use sweeping panoramic vistas, and the typical setting, but has far more complicated and deeper characters. All of the characters in this film are relatable because their motivations are easy to follow, just not always pleasant. The end result of the realistic character development is that the story is far more realistic and thus thought provoking.
In conclusion, The Revenant is brilliantly acted, and may be the film to finally get Leonardo DiCaprio his much awaited Oscar win. The film is beautifully shot and will, more than likely, win the Best Cinematography oscar. The story is uncompromising, and graphic when it needs to be. For those who love artistic films, this is right up your alley, and for those who love westerns, you’ll probably enjoy it too.
Expand
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
7
Brent_MarchantJan 8, 2016
A beautifully filmed, technically proficient but decidedly bloated frontier tale that's thin on plot and character development and long on graphic violence. The fine performances by Leonardo DiCaprio, Dohmnall Gleeson and (especially) TomA beautifully filmed, technically proficient but decidedly bloated frontier tale that's thin on plot and character development and long on graphic violence. The fine performances by Leonardo DiCaprio, Dohmnall Gleeson and (especially) Tom Hardy help to paper over some of these shortcomings, but the film definitely would have benefited from some judicious editing, a tighter script and a little less directorial ego. As many critics have said, this is an easy film to admire but not one that's easy to like; I concur wholeheartedly. Expand
5 of 12 users found this helpful57
All this user's reviews
8
CarribeanDeanJan 7, 2016
Overall, a decent movie. some pretty good photography, competent direction. nothing spectacular but quite a few engrossing scenes. Tom hardy did not totally destroy it with his mushmouth mumbling muzzled **** about the best we can hope forOverall, a decent movie. some pretty good photography, competent direction. nothing spectacular but quite a few engrossing scenes. Tom hardy did not totally destroy it with his mushmouth mumbling muzzled **** about the best we can hope for these days. Expand
1 of 8 users found this helpful17
All this user's reviews
10
enochingJan 7, 2016
9.5/10

The fact that this was shot without any CGI lighting in the most brutal of conditions should already put this movie on the radar for any movie-goer. Add to the movie that this is by Innarritu who directed Academy award winning
9.5/10

The fact that this was shot without any CGI lighting in the most brutal of conditions should already put this movie on the radar for any movie-goer. Add to the movie that this is by Innarritu who directed Academy award winning Birdman, and you know that this movie sets expectations high. There isn't a scene anywhere that is wasted, those who complain about length and dullness (critics and average movie goers alike) seem to forget the adrenaline-pumping moments that demand your attention. In an era where comic movies with excessive CGI and low effort writing are winning views and reviews, this movie should be a stunning reminder to everyone that this is the real deal when it comes to film-making, entertainment at its highest form.

Addedum: How does a movie with a 76 metacritic rating end up with a 78% on rottentomatoes, when The Avengers that scored a 67 here ended up with a 92%?
Expand
4 of 13 users found this helpful49
All this user's reviews
7
silvercultureJan 6, 2016
The story has a lot holes and predictable, but the film is saved by the incredible cinematography. I really enjoyed the long shots that showed the entire scene in one single shot, very unique and astonishing. DiCaprio was committed to hisThe story has a lot holes and predictable, but the film is saved by the incredible cinematography. I really enjoyed the long shots that showed the entire scene in one single shot, very unique and astonishing. DiCaprio was committed to his role but the faulty story is not strong enough to make him win an Oscar. Expand
5 of 12 users found this helpful57
All this user's reviews
5
ProsmoothJan 5, 2016
While I certainly admired it (greatly, oh so greatly) on a technical level--I just can't quite recommend it unless you're a film geek who wants to admire a director and cinematographer shooting a film using only natural light sources. ThatWhile I certainly admired it (greatly, oh so greatly) on a technical level--I just can't quite recommend it unless you're a film geek who wants to admire a director and cinematographer shooting a film using only natural light sources. That must have been a nightmare to pull off. On a screenplay level, this film just doesn't work. Sitting through this slog made me long for the fun filled times of Schindler's List. Oy vey. Leo will probably get an Oscar nod for being miserable for 2 hours. He should share it with everyone who sits through the entire exhausting thing. 5/10 Expand
7 of 14 users found this helpful77
All this user's reviews
9
GurolgeJan 4, 2016
This film is good at whatever it is going for. Very strong depiction of man vs man and man vs nature. Revenge aspect of the movie is underdeveloped and could have been avoided to make the beginning more attention grabbing and ending more related.
6 of 17 users found this helpful611
All this user's reviews
10
PlutarcoJan 4, 2016
Leonardo is one of the best actors nowadays and this is another movie that proves it. The bear scene, for example, is a jewel of modern film making. Great movie, intense, dramatic, with superb photography and unique story.
Thanks to all the
Leonardo is one of the best actors nowadays and this is another movie that proves it. The bear scene, for example, is a jewel of modern film making. Great movie, intense, dramatic, with superb photography and unique story.
Thanks to all the people that created this mastierpice
Expand
5 of 14 users found this helpful59
All this user's reviews
9
killer_101796Jan 3, 2016
This movie should win a award. It was fantastic, one of the best movie's i've seen in awhile. It leaves you spell bound through out the movie, everyone i've to loves this movie.
7 of 18 users found this helpful711
All this user's reviews
9
PeterAlexanderJan 2, 2016
The Revenant is dark, gritty and powerful. Shot in all natural light, Alejandro Innaritu provides audiences with one of the most beautiful looking films of the year. The camera work helps to convey the harshly realistic conditions theThe Revenant is dark, gritty and powerful. Shot in all natural light, Alejandro Innaritu provides audiences with one of the most beautiful looking films of the year. The camera work helps to convey the harshly realistic conditions the characters must face, harsh to one scenes spectacularly terrifying extent. Leonardo DiCaprio inevitably provides an amazing performance, although matched equally by brilliant character portrayals from both Tom Hardy and Domhnall Gleeson. The theme of revenge drives what is a superb story, a story that matches the amazing camera work and character development to create a great film. Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
5
OsamamahJan 2, 2016
The movie filmed well! The cinematography was breathtaking, And the story message is good ( that revenge makes you stronger and whatsoever) but the plot was so bad, it was really boring and some sense there was nothing to watch! the movieThe movie filmed well! The cinematography was breathtaking, And the story message is good ( that revenge makes you stronger and whatsoever) but the plot was so bad, it was really boring and some sense there was nothing to watch! the movie it's just too long with no reason.. Feel like it was only to show off Leonardo di caprio for trying to win the Oscar! Loved Tom hardy though he was dope! Overall they just needed a good screenplay! Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
0
speedoriginalJan 2, 2016
Revenant may have been filmed well, but the overall movie is just an OK experience.......

The plot of the movie is appear to a little more than cliche........its more like Lieutenant Dunbar meet Robinson Crusoe, but this time Crusoe is
Revenant may have been filmed well, but the overall movie is just an OK experience.......

The plot of the movie is appear to a little more than cliche........its more like Lieutenant Dunbar meet Robinson Crusoe, but this time Crusoe is stuck on snow crested forest and cliffs rather than an island.........and a familiar and cliche desire of vengeance drives our main character to progress very slowly through a rather simple and shallow plot.

Another thing that really bothered me about this movie is that at one point the main character was almost dead, his flesh brutally torn by a feral animal and he was on death bed but then he heals on his own and with in few days he is back on horse back and even survived a fall from a cliff and a fall through a waterfall during the period he was supposed to be recuperating........the pace at which Leonardo's character recovers from his wounds is very unrealistic even in a fantasy, this is one of the factors that blew this movie for me.

Its a very slow moving movie and there isn't much that happens in this movie, for the most part Leonardo's acting is comprised of moans and groans rather than actual dialogue delivery........he did a well enough job but I wouldn't give him an Oscar for this.....
Expand
8 of 37 users found this helpful829
All this user's reviews
9
ydnar4Jan 1, 2016
The Revenant is one of the most epic yet simple films that I have ever seen. This film is long but there is never a part of the film that feels like it doesn't need to be there. Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu already showed us with Birdman lastThe Revenant is one of the most epic yet simple films that I have ever seen. This film is long but there is never a part of the film that feels like it doesn't need to be there. Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu already showed us with Birdman last year that he is one of the best directors out there. Its only been a year and Inarritu WILL be in the winners circle again this year. I feel that The Revenant is even better than Birdman. The film is so raw and powerful and its visually stunning regardless of the scene. Leonardo DiCaprio has become an actor that we expect nothing but excellence. Not only is this one of DiCaprio's best performances but I think that there is almost no way that he does not take home the Oscar for Best Actor. The Revenant may sweep many of the major categories at the Oscars. I think it will win Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor and perhaps even Best Supporting as Tom Hardy is excellent in this film as well and its one of his best performances so far. The Revenant is outstanding filmmaking and it may only improve with more watches. Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
8
Primevortex1234Jan 1, 2016
The Revenant is a very visual film. Innaritu's camera goes into the beauty of the wilderness where few have gone. At it's core, it's a classic revenge film. I laud it highly but it's not great but certainly shows glimpses of greatness. TomThe Revenant is a very visual film. Innaritu's camera goes into the beauty of the wilderness where few have gone. At it's core, it's a classic revenge film. I laud it highly but it's not great but certainly shows glimpses of greatness. Tom Hardy is so good, that my respect for his acting has gone up tenfold. Leo is at his usual best as always. This is oscar material alright , specially the cinematography. A very good and satisfying film. Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
6
misadventurerJan 1, 2016
The Revenant reviewed

by jd ep In short, The Revenant could just be called "Leo goes roughing it." Widely to be considered a front runner for many awards in early 2016, Alejandro Iñárritu's film about a mountain man savaged by a bear,
The Revenant reviewed

by jd ep

In short, The Revenant could just be called "Leo goes roughing it." Widely to be considered a front runner for many awards in early 2016, Alejandro Iñárritu's film about a mountain man savaged by a bear, who then hunts down the man who killed his son, starring Leonardo DiCaprio & Tom Hardy, also has a lot going against it when the accolades come, more a story of Production vs Nature, the Canadian wilderness where the film was shot, in order (most films are shot out of order to make the most of the locations as needed) didn't have the amount of snow needed, so the filming had to move to Patagonia in South America to finish, a rough shoot for everyone involved, going over budget and taking more time than anyone anticipated. Though it can be said Iñárritu did not compromise for his vision, and what we get as an audience is a feast for the eyes, and heartthrob DiCaprio gets dragged through the mud for most of the film and so much worse happens to him. As for story, it's fairly barebones, DiCaprio's character of Hugh Glass (which i'm almost certain Bart Simpson called Moe's and used that name for a crank call) is hired by a fur trapping company to get them through an Indian hunting ground, the company gets attacked and they must make their way back to port, Glass goes off on his own and ends up on the wrong side of a Mama Bear who beats the crap out of him, Glass who is supposed to be a little more attuned to nature than the average Anglo, who has a half Native son, and can speak Algonquin, doesn't know how to play dead and shoots at the bear after it started walking away, for a second round of savagery where he gets brutalized even more than the initial attack, and all this happens within the first twenty minutes of the film. A couple survivors of the Fur Trapping team find him and stitch him up, the leader of the company played by Domhnall Gleeson, does the honorable thing of attempting to bring him home for a proper burial for his services rendered, though they get lost, Gleeson asks for a team of men to watch over the dying Glass and to give him a proper burial when he finally passes, while the rest go home, and offers a handsome bonus for anyone who does this service. Tom Hardy & Will Poulter (the boy from "We're the Millers") 's characters stay back with Glass's son Hawk. Hardy gets impatient that Glass won't die, so he decided to just bury him and tells Poulter to put a bullet in Glass, Hawk protests, Hardy kills DiCaprio's son, Poulter doesn't have what it takes to kill Glass and the two make their way back only to be denied their bonuses, due to the accounting of their provisions and everyone came home empty handed. Hugh Glass manages to drag himself back to the camp after finding his son dead and then pursues Hardy. Nothing else really goes on. It's a thin tale of avarice and revenge, where two handsome actors made themselves look ugly and beat each other up. The Revenant gives up the ghost. I thought maybe Hugh had died and he really was just a spirit of revenge, but how the movie ends is so anticlimactic it takes away what satisfaction could be had in a revenge tale. Though it was a very pretty film, for being so ugly.

Film Grade: C.
Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
10
TinoTrivinoJan 1, 2016
I never understood some critics, they give a positive rating to Star War Force awakens, although it was so bad, it could be a simple tv movie, only the users gave it what it deserves a negative rating, but for the Masterpiece The Revenant theI never understood some critics, they give a positive rating to Star War Force awakens, although it was so bad, it could be a simple tv movie, only the users gave it what it deserves a negative rating, but for the Masterpiece The Revenant the users are the only people who rated it positive while the critics not... really something is wrong here. This is a Masterpiece of Cinema, so such Movie i didnt see since Interstellar...

Thank You Iñaritu, you are the best example how spanish filmmakers know their arts and Disney/Hollywood sucks!
Expand
8 of 17 users found this helpful89
All this user's reviews
8
NathonasDec 31, 2015
This may be one of the most beautifully shot films I've ever seen. The way the camera follows different characters and reveals things was done very well, and made all of the action sequences that much more exciting. The shots of nature areThis may be one of the most beautifully shot films I've ever seen. The way the camera follows different characters and reveals things was done very well, and made all of the action sequences that much more exciting. The shots of nature are gorgeous and the indigenous imagery works very well. Highly entertaining film, although the plot is rather simplistic and the ending was weaker than I had hoped. Expand
5 of 14 users found this helpful59
All this user's reviews
3
shoulderoforionDec 31, 2015
Dreary & dull, best part is the bear, i'll say no more in way of spoilers but found myself looking at the clock after the first 30 minutes, would not recommend
10 of 20 users found this helpful1010
All this user's reviews
8
JimmyJackDec 31, 2015
Best actor for Leo and best cinematography for sure -- incredible mind-blowing cinematography. Probably one of the most beautifully-shot movies ever made. In the first half of this movie, it seems like Leo only says about eight words. ButBest actor for Leo and best cinematography for sure -- incredible mind-blowing cinematography. Probably one of the most beautifully-shot movies ever made. In the first half of this movie, it seems like Leo only says about eight words. But somehow it works. In the second half, he talks a little more, but not much. It's a quiet film, as far as dialog goes. But the filming is almost a virtual reality or GoPro-type experience -- very immersive.

For me, when the experience was over, I felt like I'd just seen a masterpiece. It feels like a work of art more than movie. Leo was put through the ringer in the making of it, and I think he actually aged a few years in the process. If he doesn't win an Oscar this year, it's a conspiracy :)

The movie made sense to me. But some people don't seem to get it. I read a review on Vox and it felt like we hadn't even seen the same film. That reviewer compared it to the Good Dinosaur - WTF? It sounded like it was written by a twenty-year-old who couldn't comprehend or appreciate it. But my wife also gave it a 'so-so.' Apparently, the movie only speaks to certain people, and others don't really get it.

If you get it, you'll know you're seeing something special. If not, oh well.
Expand
3 of 11 users found this helpful38
All this user's reviews
8
TheApplegnomeDec 30, 2015
*Spoiler free review* Leonardo DiCaprio's endless hunt for the future Oscar comes to an end with a stunning performance in this realistic, dark and overall stunning cinematography-masterpiece.

We follow Hugh Glass in the late 1820s of
*Spoiler free review* Leonardo DiCaprio's endless hunt for the future Oscar comes to an end with a stunning performance in this realistic, dark and overall stunning cinematography-masterpiece.

We follow Hugh Glass in the late 1820s of America and his endless fight for survival. It's a suffering journey towards redemption, revenge and of course the continuous passion for living. The realistic direction by Iñárritu, who also directed Birdman, is a present aspect. Just the long, smooth & realistic close-ups and overall sequences are stunningly shot! We see our characters react and express their inner self in a true way that, thanks too the once again great camera work, makes the film something extraordinary and very rare in todays-filmmaking. Even when characters are in real danger and much intensity are a present thing, we still get close and detailed scenes, we even experience the condensation of water from the breath on the camera lens! Wow! The tone of this always-intense, non-stop movie is extraordinary, they went for a real, shoot on location-only flick and we got exactly that. Fingers, body parts and blood are flying wildly and all over the camera and it feels real. It feels like it really did happen. That's how good 'The Revenant is'; never boring.

DiCaprio continues to impress, and he really does have a spectacular performance as Glass. His great passion for acting gives his character much power, and combined with a wonderful and deep writing, we have a very understandable antagonist! Alongside with DiCaprio does Gleeson have a major role, and he steals it! Both ant-and-protagonist are very understandable and it's not a very complex chemistry, which could have been more explored yes I agree, but it didn't have to be that way. The father-son relationship though, could have been much more developed and emotionally-bonded. There wasn't anything unique nor anything 'that very' special about it. It's good yes, but it's just a small aspect that could have been more explored for a better emotional impact. The dialogs are another minor aspect, there's nothing wrong with them but some out there will probably find them a bit boring, and if that's the case I think this movie isn't perfect for you.

This really is a real and slick survival film that made oneself aware of how dark and dangerous the world can be, while at the same time being barely watchable due to the intense and horrifying moments of this Oscar nominee.

Personal rating: 83/100
Critical rating: 92/100
Expand
21 of 37 users found this helpful2116
All this user's reviews
10
CogentlemanDec 29, 2015
One of the most engrossing, riveting cinematic experiences I've ever witnessed, this film is an absolute wonder to bask in for 2 and a half hours. The cinematography, acting, sets, characters, and atmosphere feel so immersive that I thinkOne of the most engrossing, riveting cinematic experiences I've ever witnessed, this film is an absolute wonder to bask in for 2 and a half hours. The cinematography, acting, sets, characters, and atmosphere feel so immersive that I think this movie should really leave its mark in movie history, it really feels like there is so much it does that pushes the art of cinema forward. The story is simple and straightforward, but its all about the incredible journey you take, not the destination. Expand
8 of 18 users found this helpful810
All this user's reviews
9
LamontRaymondDec 29, 2015
What a visually spectacular film - it's worth seeing simply for the visuals. The story is a little blunt, but it has such an authentic feel to it - from the Native Americans, to the French traders, to the hunters - it all felt very real. IWhat a visually spectacular film - it's worth seeing simply for the visuals. The story is a little blunt, but it has such an authentic feel to it - from the Native Americans, to the French traders, to the hunters - it all felt very real. I have no idea how certain scenes were filmed (animal attacks, falling over a cliff on a horse, etc.), but the direction is incredible. It's a long movie, but you'll never be bored. Expand
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
6
royphishoohDec 28, 2015
Just watched The Revenant; good performance by Leonardo di Caprio but who the hell cast Amersmiff boy Tom Hardy as a Texan Fur Trapper? Absolutely terrible ham acting with a ludicrous incomprehensible accent, a real disappointment afterJust watched The Revenant; good performance by Leonardo di Caprio but who the hell cast Amersmiff boy Tom Hardy as a Texan Fur Trapper? Absolutely terrible ham acting with a ludicrous incomprehensible accent, a real disappointment after "Legend". It's directed by the Mexican fellow who did "Birdman" last year, obviously the latest flavour in Hollywood but like Birdman it's not very good. Expand
8 of 17 users found this helpful89
All this user's reviews
5
Robbor1Dec 28, 2015
The first hour IS good,they still haven't mastered slower movement with animals with cgi though(Bear Attack),Caprio shouldn't be nominated for acting here because there is very little oppurtunities,he moan's & groan's,pull's faces and get'sThe first hour IS good,they still haven't mastered slower movement with animals with cgi though(Bear Attack),Caprio shouldn't be nominated for acting here because there is very little oppurtunities,he moan's & groan's,pull's faces and get's turned over every now and then and crawl's, but should get an award for putting his body through it,great cinema-photography though but wy too long....zzz Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
7
marco34laDec 27, 2015
This movie decent, not epic or excellent. DiCaprio is great, but the film is more about surving nature than any real story or plot. It's about 2hrs and 30 mins long -- probably could have been better at 2hrs. Nontheless, it was beautifullyThis movie decent, not epic or excellent. DiCaprio is great, but the film is more about surving nature than any real story or plot. It's about 2hrs and 30 mins long -- probably could have been better at 2hrs. Nontheless, it was beautifully shot and had some great moments. Not enough for me to give it higher than a 7. Expand
1 of 10 users found this helpful19
All this user's reviews
10
BloomMNDec 26, 2015
First and foremost, the cinematography in this movie is masterful, and it's one of the most beautiful pieces of Cinema I have ever seen. Thats honestly not even debatable, this movie is world class in the beauty department. Its hard to notFirst and foremost, the cinematography in this movie is masterful, and it's one of the most beautiful pieces of Cinema I have ever seen. Thats honestly not even debatable, this movie is world class in the beauty department. Its hard to not enjoy a movie presented with such overwhelming views, the directing is wonderful as well and the unique ways of capturing tense scenes and using only natural lighting was a win. DiCaprio is solid, and his commitment to the role made the journey worthwhile. The story is simple enough, its not meant to be mindblowing or even clever, its just meant to be a journey. Its unrelenting and vicious. The bear scene in particular and the wounds close up after the fact is hard to watch, but its the realness of the actions/consequences that make it such a great piece of cinema, all the ingredients put together seamlessly throw you into the wild along with all the characters. Expand
5 of 13 users found this helpful58
All this user's reviews
0
sun20890Dec 26, 2015
overlong...overacting.....over direction....only cinematography is breathtaking....plot lines(that arent in novel) seems heavily oscar bait. Lead actor seems to supernatural as recovery duration is unnatural
15 of 34 users found this helpful1519
All this user's reviews
6
ZlatanDec 26, 2015
Like watching a rehash of bear grylls survival guides on discovery. Sad and boring movie for me, and this is dragging on through the whole movie. Nature shots are amazing.
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
9
ih8shartsDec 25, 2015
It is very seldom that a movie impresses me and has me asking "How did they shoot this scene?" Sr. Iñárritu uses an outstanding scenic background to tell a compelling story of a man's perseverance, when all he has left is his thirst forIt is very seldom that a movie impresses me and has me asking "How did they shoot this scene?" Sr. Iñárritu uses an outstanding scenic background to tell a compelling story of a man's perseverance, when all he has left is his thirst for revenge.
A big thumbs up to Mr. DiCaprio as well for a job well done.
I take one point for time-line issues.
Expand
3 of 11 users found this helpful38
All this user's reviews
10
JohnMasterLDec 25, 2015
We have one of the best films of this year. The Revenant is a visual spectacle in every sense of the word, the cinematography of Lubezki is simply sensational, using the formula as seen in Birdman (long and uncut footage) combining scenesWe have one of the best films of this year. The Revenant is a visual spectacle in every sense of the word, the cinematography of Lubezki is simply sensational, using the formula as seen in Birdman (long and uncut footage) combining scenes accompanied by incredible images of the landscapes or the environment courts and a completely natural lighting. Is without a doubt the best film by Alejandro G. Iñarritu, are also against the most violent film that he has directed, Dicaprio is brilliant, amazing and shocking, the Oscar is for you! Movies are no longer made as well, combine perfectly the real thing with little CGI (bear attack scene is spectacular and an of the most stunning never seen), epic, violent and absolutely amazing, a true masterpiece.

Review en Español:
Estamos ante una de las mejores películas de este año. The Revenant es un espectáculo visual en todo el sentido de la palabra, la fotografía de Lubezki es simplemente sensacional, usando la formula ya vista en Birdman (Tomas largas y sin cortes) combinando escenas con cortes acompañados de increíbles imágenes de los paisajes o del ambiente y con una iluminación totalmente natural. Es sin duda alguna la mejor película de Alejandro G. Iñarritu, también estamos ante la película más violenta que él ha dirigido, Dicaprio es magistral, increíble e impactante, !el Oscar es para ti!. Ya no se hacen películas así, combinan perfectamente lo real con poco CGI (la escena del ataque del oso es espectacular y una de las mas impactantes que jamas he visto) impactante, épica, violenta y absolutamente impresionante, una verdadera obra maestra.
Expand
4 of 15 users found this helpful411
All this user's reviews
0
BrimsurferDec 25, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. (May contain minor spoiler)

Revenant may have been filmed well, but the overall movie is just an OK experience.......

The plot of the movie is appear to a little more than cliche........its more like Lieutenant Dunbar meet Robinson Crusoe, but this time Crusoe is stuck on snow crested forest and cliffs rather than an island.........and a familiar and cliche desire of vengeance drives our main character to progress very slowly through a rather simple and shallow plot.

Another thing that really bothered me about this movie is that at one point the main character was almost dead, his flesh brutally torn by a feral animal and he was on death bed but then he heals on his own and with in few days he is back on horse back and even survived a fall from a cliff and a fall through a waterfall during the period he was supposed to be recuperating........the pace at which Leonardo's character recovers from his wounds is very unrealistic even in a fantasy, this is one of the factors that blew this movie for me.

Its a very slow moving movie and there isn't much that happens in this movie, for the most part Leonardo's acting is comprised of moans and groans rather than actual dialogue delivery........he did a well enough job but I wouldn't give him an Oscar for this........
Expand
11 of 27 users found this helpful1116
All this user's reviews
10
johnem95Dec 25, 2015
Visually breathtaking and emotionally rich, 'The Revenant' is a mesmerizing film with more Oscar-worthy work from director Alejandro González Iñárritu as well as a truly amazing performance from Leonardo DiCaprio.
4 of 13 users found this helpful49
All this user's reviews
8
CanisrahDec 25, 2015
A strong film. Gripping, relentless, beautiful. Themes explored provide substance and food for thought, and standout performances are both refreshing and uplifting. That said - it's heavy going.

A great followup from the magnificent
A strong film. Gripping, relentless, beautiful. Themes explored provide substance and food for thought, and standout performances are both refreshing and uplifting. That said - it's heavy going.

A great followup from the magnificent Birdman.

In a year of lackluster offerings - this one had me engaged from start to finish.
Expand
9 of 25 users found this helpful916
All this user's reviews
8
SmoothrunnerDec 25, 2015
This movie is beautiful with that kind of creepy beauty you'll find in Coppola's "Apocalypse Now" or Greenaway's "The Pillow Book". Though it's spoiled with preachy sentiments it will still envelop you and carry away into the straight-outThis movie is beautiful with that kind of creepy beauty you'll find in Coppola's "Apocalypse Now" or Greenaway's "The Pillow Book". Though it's spoiled with preachy sentiments it will still envelop you and carry away into the straight-out wilderness that long gone now. This movie is not about "action", but about one man's journey, about revenge and justice. In "The Revenant" you'll see magnificent vistas and blatant brutality, cowardliness and courage, vileness and generosity. Rare artwork in now day's cinematography which is actually art and not your typical blockbuster junk movie. It's European film in the essence with Hollywood's scale and budget. Expand
4 of 12 users found this helpful48
All this user's reviews
10
Compi24Dec 25, 2015
In what might very well be Inarritu's best film, "The Revenant" delivers in every way imaginable. You get immaculate cinematography that bridges the gap between the majestic and the phantasmagorical. You're delivered brilliantly designed setIn what might very well be Inarritu's best film, "The Revenant" delivers in every way imaginable. You get immaculate cinematography that bridges the gap between the majestic and the phantasmagorical. You're delivered brilliantly designed set pieces, featuring ornate choreography and stunning practical effects. You get household-name actors, virtually disappearing into their vivid characters. A simple, yet powerful score. And an endlessly fascinating narrative dwelling in the film's heart. "The Revenant" is easily one of the year's best films. In fact, simply calling "The Revenant" a "film" is a severe understatement. It truly is a breathtaking event to behold. Expand
39 of 74 users found this helpful3935
All this user's reviews
6
YorkManDec 25, 2015
Beautifully shot film, showing the harshness of the freezing environment and the struggle for man to survive and attempt to make a living.
Leonardo DiCaprio should be at least Oscar nominated for his performance as the man left for dead
Beautifully shot film, showing the harshness of the freezing environment and the struggle for man to survive and attempt to make a living.
Leonardo DiCaprio should be at least Oscar nominated for his performance as the man left for dead seeking revenge against Tom Hardy's character, but I don't think he should win.
Best Director Oscar, most definitely, but the actors in the film are secondary to the gorgeous cinematography and breathtaking scenery.
As for the film, as a piece of 'work'... It's far too long, and ultimately unsatisfying as a movie. It's all visual, with no character depth at all.
Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
9
RichardGonciDec 25, 2015
As an award-winning director of CG animation myself, the bear-mauling scene is worth the price of admission alone. Stunning work. And, while I have not always been a fan of Leonardo DiCaprio, he does put in a fine performance here. Tom HardyAs an award-winning director of CG animation myself, the bear-mauling scene is worth the price of admission alone. Stunning work. And, while I have not always been a fan of Leonardo DiCaprio, he does put in a fine performance here. Tom Hardy captures the ambivalence of malice. His is a Shakespearian character writ in grit. To say that the film is gorgeous to look at does a disservice to the creators. Every frame is a painting. The unalloyed brutality that runs through the film reinforces the sense of the folly of man... very relevant to the time in which we now live. Expand
4 of 11 users found this helpful47
All this user's reviews
10
Agent314Dec 25, 2015
Savagely beautiful. The savage beast of man and the indifferent beast of nature are put to film in this stunning story of revenge and retribution. It's not for the squeamish or faint of heart. But like nature and humankind, its cold, hardSavagely beautiful. The savage beast of man and the indifferent beast of nature are put to film in this stunning story of revenge and retribution. It's not for the squeamish or faint of heart. But like nature and humankind, its cold, hard and bloody canvas will reward with images of beauty, kindness, and the unbreakable love between a parent and their children. Expand
4 of 14 users found this helpful410
All this user's reviews
10
PaulCharlesDec 25, 2015
Best movie of the year. Incredible performance by Dicaprio and Hardy. At 3 hours I was worried I'd get bored, but it never happened. The negative reviewers are paid trolls. This movie isn't for the typical american peasant.
5 of 18 users found this helpful513
All this user's reviews
9
Penny_DCDec 25, 2015
Одличен филм, одличен режисер, одлична фотографија, одлична актерска екипа, дефинитивно "мириса" оскарот за Лео. Можеби режисерот малку претерал со прикажувањето што се преживеал Glass, но добро, овде се работи за филм и мора малку да сеОдличен филм, одличен режисер, одлична фотографија, одлична актерска екипа, дефинитивно "мириса" оскарот за Лео. Можеби режисерот малку претерал со прикажувањето што се преживеал Glass, но добро, овде се работи за филм и мора малку да се уфрли таа холивудска атракција. Ликот малку е преставен како супер херој, како лик кој тешко може да го совлада природата, но како што реков ова е филм и мора да ги има тие "состојки". Expand
3 of 12 users found this helpful39
All this user's reviews
9
Movie1997Dec 25, 2015
Coming off the success of "Birdman", Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu delivers with easily the most gritty film you will see this year. First off, this movie is incredibly gorgeous. From its beyond beautiful cinematography to its gorgeousComing off the success of "Birdman", Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu delivers with easily the most gritty film you will see this year. First off, this movie is incredibly gorgeous. From its beyond beautiful cinematography to its gorgeous locations, it's a real cinematic movie that traps you in this environment. The cast (particularly the two leads) is fantastic. Tom Hardy gives arguably the best performance of his career in my opinion. He's an antagonist with layers and even brought unpredictability to his character. But Leonardo DiCaprio, is what you go to see. Saying that he gives a great performance is an understatement. He is Hugh Glass. Not once did I think to myself that I'm watching Leo give a performance. He felt like a real person! Maybe it's not my favorite performance of his but it's beyond damn good to say the least. I loved that it was a revenge story and one that makes you clinch your fists during the big combat sequences. You feel the brutality! And you feel Hugh Glass wanting to seek his revenge. It even has really good pace for a two and a half hour long movie. I never got bored because there was always something at stake. I will say that the very end felt a little too ambiguous for its own good. Other than that, I believe you have a strong contender for best picture at the oscars. Overall, it's a brutally beautiful movie with grit and heart pounding intensity. I'm going to give "The Revenant" an A! Expand
7 of 17 users found this helpful710
All this user's reviews
0
NikolaDec 25, 2015
Malopre sam odgledao film "The Revenant",
i zaista mogu da kažem da sam se veoma razočarao.
Film je groteska. Navodno je rađen po istinitom događaju, i po istoimenom romanu Michael Punkea. Ne znam za roman, ali film je njesra. Posebno
Malopre sam odgledao film "The Revenant",
i zaista mogu da kažem da sam se veoma razočarao.
Film je groteska.
Navodno je rađen po istinitom događaju, i po istoimenom romanu Michael Punkea.

Ne znam za roman, ali film je njesra.
Posebno sam razočaran jer je Iñárritu jedan od mojih omiljenih režisera.

Ko nije gledao film, a želi da ga pogleda neka ne čita dalje, jer nemam nameru da spojlujem stvar, ali naprosto moram da iznesem nekoliko zdravorazumskih zapažanja,
zbog kojih mislim da je film uvreda intelektu.

Elem, priča bi bila odlična da nije preterivanja, koja su za moje pare upropastile film.
Hugh Glass je traper kojeg grupa njegovih ortaka ostave da umre nakon navodno "smrtonosnih" povreda koje mu je zadala ženka grizlija (u nameri da zaštiti potomstvo).
E, tu je zapravo potpuna groteska.
Taj Hugh Glass (koga u ovom filmu odlično glumi Di Caprio) je zaista preživeo napad grizlija, ali nipošto na način kako je to prikazano u ovom filmu.
Ovde ga je medved izujedao 30-ak puta, igrao se njime kao mačka s mišom, pa se ovaj nekako dokopao puščerine i ranio zver, koja je opet nasrnula na njega,
ovaj put je on izbode nožem 2-3 puta, te se zajedno otkotrljaju niz neku padinu 30-ak metara u dolinu, ali na načina da se na zlosrećnog Glassa, stropošta medvedica teška tonu.
On je i to preživeo, njegovi drugari traperi čuvši njegovo zaponmaganje i pucanj pre toga, dolaze mu ubrzo u pomoć, te ga na licu mesta oslobađaju medveđeg zagrljaja i "krpe" ga priručnim sredstvima.
Napominjem, u filmu se sve ovo dešava usred zime, gde Sibir izgleda kao Sen Trope u špicu turističke sezonu, u odnosu na krajolik u ovom filmu.
U stvarnost, zlosrećnog Hugh Glassa medved je napao usred leta, ali OK, dobro je zbog priče, ne zameram.
Znači preživeo je izujedan od strane razjarenog medveda, koji se pritom mrtav stropoštao na njega sa visine, ostavljen je od protuva(koje su u prethodno ubile sina) da umre od posledica napada grizlija.
Sve on to preživljava na -300, u snegu do kolena. Upadao je pride i u ledenu reku, još jednom se stropoštao sve tako kljakav ovaj put sa drugom mrtvom životinjom (ubijenim konjem) u neku provaliju
duboku brat - bratu 50 metara, i naravno i to preživeo.Kako je sve to preživeo a da pritom nije 7 puta dobio upalu pluća, ili sepsu. Ne znam.
Džon Rambo, visoko trenirani pripadnik "Zelenih beretki", obučavan da preživi u najekstremnijim uslovima, je za ovog trapera mala beba.

Razumem da je po onoj Hičkokovoj "film veći od života", ali brate, kad se uželim superjunaka, ja gledam onda ekranizacije DC Comics ili Marvela.
Ne razumem, zašto je Iñárritu pribegao ovakvim budalaštinama.
Mogao je naprosto da smanji doživljaj, i da ovaj Hugh Glass zaista preživi manje "letalan" napad grizlija, pa makar i po najgoroj zimi (zbog bolje priče),
ali ovako je baš napravio potpunu grotesku.
Expand
9 of 42 users found this helpful933
All this user's reviews
2
Tone01Dec 25, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. - Miserable; Not Only The Character's Life But The Film Too -

At 156 minutes, "The Revenant" is unwatchable, so it wasn't. After an hour, instead skipped to watch a minute every three or four through to the last twenty minutes which encapsulates the final conflict between John Fitzgerald (Tom Hardy) and Leonardo DiCaprio (Hugh Glass). Nothing was missed for in between is Glass grimacing left then right.

There is a harrowing, savage bear attack leading to Glass hanging to life by a slender thread. Oddly, all that came to mind is how the effects were accomplished. That goes to a lack of empathy for protagonist Glass.

This is a film of unquestioned artistic merit. Though some gush about the cinematography, it is merely serviceable. It's not the cinematography that's beautiful, it's the wilderness. All that's required of the cinematographer in this situation is to set the frame and F-stop. The actors most likely kissed pavement back in civilization after shooting this demanding film. They did well under the circumstances, particularly DiCaprio. The villain is the director and the unreachable allegory he wrote on the script pages.

In "Jodorowsky's Dune," the titular director made a few memorable Seventies' films. When pitching "Dune," the studios requested a standard length film - 120 minutes (not viable for a film from a story this complex). But Jodorowsky wondered why it couldn't be ten hours or twenty hours. He was clueless why the studios weren't funding him. The doc is in part the story of a delusional, out-of-control ego. The viewer may wish to slap his face. Enter Alejandro González Iñárritu who also appears to have an ego of the same dimensions.

God bless the artists, but not those who trade their expression for self aggrandizement. Not only is "The Revenant" a vanity project, it is Oscar bait.

Awards should be given to those brave enough to sit through this slog. It is a simple story raised to the power of crashing bore. "The Revenant" is nearly incomprehensible, and filled with spiritual mumbo-jumbo even Iñárritu most likely can't explain.

See this if you relish masochism. It's a bet this film will bomb. Maybe that will awaken Iñárritu. He's a genius. He just doesn't know how to connect with an audience. He certainly doesn't here.
Expand
10 of 25 users found this helpful1015
All this user's reviews
10
pipesanDec 25, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. es una de las mejores peliculas del 2015, espero que leonardo se gane el oscar a mejor actor, ya que en esta pelicula la revento de sobremanera, aparte su director es muy bueno a la hora de dirigir. Expand
3 of 13 users found this helpful310
All this user's reviews
10
GentM2015Dec 25, 2015
The Revenant is one of the best movies as far as cinematography goes.The natural shots they were able to take are amazing and mesmerizing.The visuals are beyond perfect and that "Bear scene" is so great that it's hard to believe how they wereThe Revenant is one of the best movies as far as cinematography goes.The natural shots they were able to take are amazing and mesmerizing.The visuals are beyond perfect and that "Bear scene" is so great that it's hard to believe how they were able to do it.The movie is gritty and also intense while still being very interesting and gorgeously shot with top notch performances and directing.
Leonardo DiCaprio gives one of the best,if not the best performance of the year by a male in a leading role and I truly hope that this time he actually gets to win an Oscar for this.He's so committed to the role and it shows especially in some of the more brutal scenes.
Tom Hardy also nails the role perfectly and gives almost an equally great performance as Leo.His voice is weird though but by now we're used to him having different voices on different roles,even though sometimes is hard to understand what he's saying.
It does get brutal though and some of the things that the characters have to do to survive are beyond disgusting but reasonable and understandable for the situations they're in.
The soundtrack is also very good but it's not what you take away from the movie the most,because the amazing cinematography and the style of the movie,the direction that Alejandro G.Iñárritu goes including here the two amazing performances of the leads are what you take away the most about this amazing cinematic achievement.
At 153 minutes it is a bit too long but that doesn't take away from the movie that much because this still remains as one of the best movies of the year with some of the best performances,cinematography,visuals a really good score and memorable scenes that are bound to stick in your mind for a long time after.
Expand
5 of 16 users found this helpful511
All this user's reviews
10
robert21Dec 25, 2015
Very good film all made great director and camera work especially well oktery Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hardy played their characters very well and I hope Leonardo DiCaprio get your Oscar
8 of 22 users found this helpful814
All this user's reviews