Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures | Release Date: November 2, 2018
4.8
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 97 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
28
Mixed:
39
Negative:
30
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
4
amehannaNov 20, 2018
The Walt Disney Company’s latest film’s marketing has been almost non-existent, with Disney seemingly pushing the film into a toy chest and sliding it under the bed, for fear of an unimpressive box office run.

The problem with the film does
The Walt Disney Company’s latest film’s marketing has been almost non-existent, with Disney seemingly pushing the film into a toy chest and sliding it under the bed, for fear of an unimpressive box office run.

The problem with the film does not lie with the visuals, but with the execution of the narrative goes from magical realm to old forgotten toy.

The film follows a young Clara who is whisked away into adventure via the help of her godfather, Uncle Drosselmeyer, much like the original classic tale, yet everything that comes after gets a predictable formulaic rewrite, though that may not have been what screenwriter Ashleigh Powell intended.

When the audience first meets Clara, she is rambling physics to her younger brother as they set up a trap for a tricky mouse, and then the audience is told and retold how smart, special, and how Clara is unlike anyone her age.

Yet, aside from the scientific ramblings, Clara is pretty much no different – and the audience does not get any other character to compare Clara to.

Not to mention, the two minor challenges that come her way at the beginning of the film, and then throughout the second act, that Clara seems to overcome without even breaking a sweat.

For you see, Clara is another in a long line of female protagonists that seem to be good at everything from the moment they appear on screen, and though at the surface that might not seem like a negative, at its core, any character, regardless of gender, that is not challenged throughout a film and continuously succeeds is a rather dull character to cheer for.

This is not only harmful to stories with female protagonists, but it is also painful for the audience because of lack of engagement.

Witnessing a character trying their hardest to achieve their goal, and along the way winning some, and losing some, is why audiences go to the movies – they want to feel some form of emotional catharsis.

Unfortunately, the audience never fears for Clara’s safety, nor ever doubts that Clara will survive in the end. Yet when considering all past Disney films, specifically the much-debated and mocked Disney princess films, even though the audience knew that the end would be happy, it would worry about whether Ariel would get her voice back, whether Pocahontas would be able to save her tribe, whether Mulan would be able to save China because the challenge was evident and it was not easy.

On that front, the film fails to engage with the audience on a narrative level, and thus becomes a magical missed opportunity.

To add onto the already problematic narrative, screenwriter Ashleigh Powell follows the new Disney agenda of turning what they view as stereotypical villains into the misunderstood heroes while characters who were once beloved heroes into diabolical, heartless villains.

This was the intent behind Disney’s Maleficent, and the mechanics are used again here, making the plot twist blatantly predictable and disappointing.

The power of classic Disney animations was the never-ending battle between good and evil, yet with this new wave of Disney films, the characters we grew up believing are villains are being restructured and repurposed into poor victims of circumstance that became villains, and that just makes the hero indirectly evil for going after the villain to begin with…

On a positive note, the film’s production value, and color palette are quite mesmerizing to look at.

From the astoundingly flamboyant costumes, to the grandiose sets and environments THE NUTCRACKER AND THE FOUR REALMS is a visual treat.

The film opens with a fantastic long take that helps pull the audience into the world and ambience of the narrative.

One of the most memorable sequences in the film would have to be the interlude ballet sequence due to the creative way that it was shot as well as the stage like set pieces that were placed with the ballerinas.

That one sequence had more complex and layered characters than the entire film.

The performances from the cast were decent when one looks at the screenplay that they were given, yet the stand out performance here goes to Matthew Macfadyen who plays Clara’s father.

His nuanced performance and evident struggle in coping with the loss of his wife and having to remain a proper father to his children almost brings tears to the eye, all this considering he appears in the film a total of twenty-minutes.

THE NUTCRACKER AND THE FOUR REALMS had a lot going for it in terms of visuals and cast but faltered in terms of lazy storytelling that doesn’t require any emotional engagement from audiences, specifically younger audiences who are the main target of such a film.

Gone are the days when Disney used to tell stories that challenged the mind of child and taught them something, even if it was a hard truth. What we are left with now are cotton candy stories that disappear instantaneously leaving not a trace behind.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
TVJerryNov 10, 2018
This film has numerous references to the classic ballet, including the title, many of the characters and bits of Tchaikovsky's music. The plot revolves around Clara, who enters a fantasy world in search of a special key. Since the script isThis film has numerous references to the classic ballet, including the title, many of the characters and bits of Tchaikovsky's music. The plot revolves around Clara, who enters a fantasy world in search of a special key. Since the script is pretty insipid and the "action" is never exciting, the lovely art direction is the only real reason to see the film. Young girls may appreciate the sweetness and the preponderance of strong female characters, but the overall effect is rather bland. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
Compi24Nov 6, 2018
When it comes to live action entertainment, Disney's track record has been inarguably dominant as of late. Whether its the MCU films, the recent Star Wars installments, or the live-action adaptations of their animated classics, it wouldWhen it comes to live action entertainment, Disney's track record has been inarguably dominant as of late. Whether its the MCU films, the recent Star Wars installments, or the live-action adaptations of their animated classics, it would appear that they have their stuff together. But every once in a while you get your "John Carter's," your "Lone Ranger's," and your "A Wrinkle In Time's." They're certainly rare. But they exist. This is one of those. This is a complete, hot mess of a movie, with a couple of unironically enjoyable elements. For one, it looks good. Now, don't confuse "good" with "real." The backdrops and scenery may be cool-looking, but don't think you'll be watching anything out of an "Avatar" sequel or anything. Also the music -- of course -- is quite a delight. But when you have a movie called "The Nutcracker" that has the titular character reduced to a role of mere spectatorship and chauffeur work, I can't give you anything higher than the above score. This is about as far away from a "Nutcracker" adaptation as you can get. And when the swings come, boy, do they miss hard. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
Jim222001Jan 30, 2019
Visually stunning but it would have been better. If it was actually based on the Nutcracker. Just like with A Wrinkle in Time, Disney was more focused on being diverse. Then actually doing the story justice. Yet they don’t even do anythingVisually stunning but it would have been better. If it was actually based on the Nutcracker. Just like with A Wrinkle in Time, Disney was more focused on being diverse. Then actually doing the story justice. Yet they don’t even do anything with the Nutcracker or much with Morgan Freeman. The Nutcracker gets to do very little and the actor doesn’t stand out much.
Hell the Nutcracker starring Elle Fanning that got 0% good reviews. Was more Nutcracker like since Mouse King was actually the villain. Oh and actually in it.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
JLuis_001Nov 15, 2018
Visually dazzling but also incredibly empty.

This film makes the same mistake that A Wrinkle In Time, where they believed the production and its extravagance was good enough and despite being quite colorful, it suffers from a very diluted
Visually dazzling but also incredibly empty.

This film makes the same mistake that A Wrinkle In Time, where they believed the production and its extravagance was good enough and despite being quite colorful, it suffers from a very diluted script that hardly offers anything new.

It's a pity because this is a first level production but to tell the truth it didn't make me feel anything.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
stjude_bruhJan 3, 2019
Let us begin with the great aspects of The Nutcracker & The Four Realms. With a budget of $120 million, the producers and visual artists had quite a bit to work with, but certainly not enough to match the effects of the most visually splendidLet us begin with the great aspects of The Nutcracker & The Four Realms. With a budget of $120 million, the producers and visual artists had quite a bit to work with, but certainly not enough to match the effects of the most visually splendid films, such as Avengers: Infinity War ($316-400 million), Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End ($300 million), and The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey ($200 million). Usually, films that have the same budget as this film have very noticeably CGI effects that don’t come off great at least in my eyes, such as Rampage and Ghost Rider, which also aren’t good film company to serve as comparison. To compare to a fellow Disney remake, Beauty & The Beast has a budget of $175 million, which was used very well. However (in a good way), The Nutcracker’s visuals were absolutely on par with those visually splendid films. The world’s created with the CGI were beautifully rendered, and the set design in the real-world scenes was extravagant and fitting for the Christmas-based period in time. The costumes were also well-designed and fitting for the settings. Due to the bad reception, it is unlikely, but I truly believe that this film should be nominated for an Oscar for its costume design. Visual splendor cannot carry a film towards overall excellence, but the visuals for this film certainly keep it from sinking rock bottom.

Another positive element of the film was the beautiful film score that incorporated Tchaikovsky’s classic pieces and some new content very well. Of course, being a film based on classic ballet, it must have Tchaikovsky and classical music or else it would be as dumb as Gotti using Pitbull music even though it was based in the 1980s. Along with the proper incorporation of classical music, the first half of the film was a great set-up that felt homely and harkened back to some childhood memories. The sets were great, we got more of Morgan Freeman, and the ballet performance by Misty Copeland was among the best scenes in all of the film industry for 2018. That is where the praise for this film ends.

With the runtime clocking in at only one hour and 35 minutes, there is so much film to pack out in such a short timeframe. With these limitations, the movie moves too fast as we enter the world of The Four Realms. There is a lot of missing information that would allow the circumstances of conflict presented to make sense if they were properly explained. Instead, there is little explanation as to why there is any form of conflict. I’ve begun to care less about plot holes by understanding that filmmakers seek to reap box office results first, but when a film does not give explanation as to what events occurred for conflict to exist, it just doesn’t make sense.

I’d say that another atrocity committed in the film was its use of clichés from other Disney films while utilizing them in the worst way possible. I was shocked by how much content and elements that The Nutcracker borrowed from other Disney films, especially considering that this is a Disney film itself. It was made worse by the fact that these elements were ultimately executed in the worst way possible. This movie borrowed heavily from the first Chronicles of Narnia, which seems like a bad sin made worse considering both films are made by Disney.

Since the film aims to appeal to young viewers aged 10 and under, there was a lot of childlike humor and tone that made the film feel corny. It isn’t impossible to include quality humor in a kid’s film, but The Nutcrackerfell into the bad side of appealing to children. I should’ve expected that, but considering the maturity found in many Disney films such as The Incredibles 2and Big Hero Six, I was very disappointed and felt like I was an adult with a child’s mind for sitting through the movie.

The last disappointing aspect of The Nutcracker & The Four Realmswas the performances of the main leads. Mackenzie Foy, whose claim to fame was in Twilight along with a great performance in Interstellar, was largely lifeless in this movie. The delivery of the lines came out flat, which contributed to the film’s corny feel. Keira Knightley exacerbated this feel with her awful, nasal voice and too many moments of overacting. I’d say that Jayden Fowora-Knight, who played Captain Philip who was supposed to be the Nutcracker but there never was any Nutcracker, also had the same problems as Mackenzie Foy. A few other actors weren’t bad but just overtly childish. Helen Mirren did well with what she had, but she was barely in the movie. The Nutcracker & The Four Realms has unfortunately earned its place among the very worst films of 2018, and worst films that Disney has ever made.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
clarkaddisonNov 9, 2018
If your family is going to see any holiday film this season, make it the Grinch. This film has crazy plot, creepy clowns, weird innuendos, just not a whole lot going for it. The cast is not used to their full potential. There are some coolIf your family is going to see any holiday film this season, make it the Grinch. This film has crazy plot, creepy clowns, weird innuendos, just not a whole lot going for it. The cast is not used to their full potential. There are some cool shots but kids are not going to enjoy the entire film and just see some cool shots. I`d much rather take my kids to see the Grinch Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
qqiwkqaqwNov 23, 2018
A really dissapointing movie, sin, from the trailer promised better. A really bad luck...
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
CineAutoctonoJan 14, 2020
This movie has a good production design and story, but failed in performances, developing in the story, and photgraphy. With all the pros and cons we could say that The Nutcracker and The Four Realms wasn´t a good adaptation that Disney did,This movie has a good production design and story, but failed in performances, developing in the story, and photgraphy. With all the pros and cons we could say that The Nutcracker and The Four Realms wasn´t a good adaptation that Disney did, but it wasn´t worse that the 3D version of 2010. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
ahmedaiman1999Apr 19, 2020
Soulless, dull and utterly lacking in magic. This is every inch A Wrinkle in Time, only even more uninspiring, yet shorter and less cringe-worthy, and hence way more watchable.

(5/10)
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
fmathezDec 28, 2020
Un film avec un principal point fort (peut-être le seul...) sa mise en scène et les décors.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews