Read User Reviews and Submit your own for The Magnificent Seven (2016)

8

RalfbergsDec 9, 2016

I really enjoyed this movie. Again, have not seen the original, but I wanted to see this one as it is without any comparisons. Ok some might say it did not bring anything new compared to previous one or whatever, but to me this is a movieI really enjoyed this movie. Again, have not seen the original, but I wanted to see this one as it is without any comparisons. Ok some might say it did not bring anything new compared to previous one or whatever, but to me this is a movie with a really great cast of modern day actors and I really enjoyed Washington's and Pratt's performances and as a whole it was really entertaining movie either way.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

The3AcademySinsJul 31, 2018

The Magnificent Seven is a serviceable and at times very enjoyable remake of a classic Western. While it does not hold up to the original in my opinion, they are some good performances and some fun action scenes to entertain you for a while.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

Kaywill1Oct 31, 2016

Magnificent Seven
More Than Magnificent
Introduction     With the small town of Rose Creek under the siege of the tycoon Bartholomew Bogue, the small community of poor, hard-working farmer are faced with a life-changing choice, pack upMagnificent Seven
More Than Magnificent

Introduction
    With the small town of Rose Creek under the siege of the tycoon Bartholomew Bogue, the small community of poor, hard-working farmer are faced with a life-changing choice, pack up their few belongings and sell their land to the enemy or gather their arms and fight for what they have spent their entire lives pursuing. One major factor being these inhabitants are farmers not fighters, few if any have been in combat making inexperience a deadly weapon. Emma Cullens’ husband was murdered by one of Bogues’ gangs, along with many others in the close knit community; her and friend Teddy Q ride to a nearby town searching for anyone that can help, here they find Sam Chrisholm the bounty hunter and immediately try enlist his help in gaining control of the beloved Rose Creek again. Initially Chrisholm denies the pair until he learns that Bogue is the man responsible. The trio begins enlisting a quite diverse group of gunslingers, gamblers, a knife artist, sharpshooters, a tracker, and indian and a mexican outlaw to take down Bogues’ tyranny. There is never a dull moment from inlaid jokes, smart comments, and humour to intense battles, realistic situations, and the constant terror; whether you enjoy comedies, action-packed, or straight western The Magnificent Seven is sure to please.
Evaluation
    From the start I knew The Magnificent Seven was going to be well thought out, prepared and executed movie. While some movies begin slow and gradually lead up to the plot or piece by piece put together a long drawn out story line, this one hits you straight on in the first few scenes. I personally prefer this kind of movie because I feel it grabs your attention quickly and will continue to hold your attention for longer rather than dragging out the intro. I thoroughly enjoyed The Magnificent Seven from start to finish.

Relation to Similar Cultural Artifacts
    The Magnificent Seven 2016 version is actually a remake of the 1960 version directed by John Sturges and starring Yul Brynner, Eli Wallach, Steve McQueen, Horst Buchholz, Charles Bronson, Robert Vaughn, Brad Dexter, etc. While the 1960 versions is also a remake; It was reproduced based on the 1954 Samurai Seven directed by Akira Kurosawa starring Toshirô Mifune, Takashi Shimura, and Keiko Tsushima.

Getting Down To Business
Entertaining 4/4
    I rated a perfect because I was wide-eyed the whole movie, was anticipating what would happen next with every new twist and turn of the plot, and I without a doubt would watch this movie again in a heartbeat. Although deemed a western, I believe The Magnificent Seven brought a new level of excitement to the table. Even when considering this movie a remake I believe the action was intriguing.
Scene Quality 3/4
    While analyzing the animation and scenes, I thought the scenes were very well thought out and decorated. The one low point in the scenes was when the church was shown after being torched; this was while Sam Chisholm rode into town. I thought the church was lacking when it came to the burnt look but other than that all else seemed well-executed.
Actors’ Performance 4/4
     One huge aspect to look into is the quality of the actors and how well they play the role. Not once did I find a actor breaking character, they were believable being so heartfelt and dedicated to making the movie seem real. The level of experience in this cast was extreme looking at Denzel Washington, Chris Pratt, Ethan Hawke, Haley Bennett being just a few of the main characters you can imagine that this crew can and will excel.
Plot 4/4
    Not once did I find myself wonder what the plot was actually supposed to be. I followed the timeline easily and not once was I confused about what the final goal was; that being the reason why I rate the plot as perfect.
Intensity 4/4
     The Magnificent Seven was nothing short of intense, with the man to man combat, western gunfights, and hidden surprises. The addition of the background soundtrack adds even more effect making the experience all the more life-like.
The Little Things 4/4
    While easily overlooked the small things in all movies make them all the more solid and interesting. The Magnificent Seven is not lacking here; while a major detail is the color of the horses. For each of the seven men their horses are all a different color or shade of brown. Furthermore each horse matches the riders’ clothing color. Looking at Sam Chisholm dressed in all black atop a black horse, Josh Faraday clothed in a dark brown leather riding a dark brown horse, Billy Rocks rides a chestnut colored horse that matches his gun holster, Jack Hornes’ vest and hat matches the brown horse he is atop, Red Harvest is masked with the same war paint his horse is, the others follow in the same pattern. I easily rate the details a 4/4 in The Magnificent Seven.

Final Tally 23/24
PS. THIS WAS FOR A CLASS GRADE!… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

gzappia4Dec 30, 2016

Not a great movie but it is fun to watch. Much better than the original. If you watch this with high expectations you must have never seen the first film. Obviously, it is unrealistic and asks a great deal from the audience. It does notNot a great movie but it is fun to watch. Much better than the original. If you watch this with high expectations you must have never seen the first film. Obviously, it is unrealistic and asks a great deal from the audience. It does not take itself too seriously so just enjoy have have a few good laughs.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

toadvinesFeb 1, 2017

I have not seen the original Magnificent Seven so I can only judge this version on its own merits. And with that in mind, I thought this was excellent.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

tropicAcesSep 23, 2016

The cast is impressive, but every person besides Denzel Washington is a (distracting) cartoon character. The entire first half of the film is a narrative that does not build to anything, it's just a recruiting and then suddenly they'reThe cast is impressive, but every person besides Denzel Washington is a (distracting) cartoon character. The entire first half of the film is a narrative that does not build to anything, it's just a recruiting and then suddenly they're preparing for the final fight which turns out to be a 45 minute long shoot-em-up of rapidfire edited killings of nameless bad guys. It had potential to be great, but it seemed to settle for "meh, fine."… Expand

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

4

analogkid280Sep 23, 2016

M.A.7. Is barely adequate but ultimately brings nothing new to the table over previous versions of this movie. We have seen this Denzel character before in other movies maybe just not this setting but close. The other 6 are problematic withM.A.7. Is barely adequate but ultimately brings nothing new to the table over previous versions of this movie. We have seen this Denzel character before in other movies maybe just not this setting but close. The other 6 are problematic with characters loosing accents at inapropriate times.… Expand

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

7

Muskrat147Oct 3, 2016

Though not the most impressive adaptation of its original source material, The Magnificent Seven's expansive cast and action sequences make up for its overall bland and cheap narrative.

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

6

IndiefilmloverSep 25, 2016

If you're looking for a film to just pass the time, you could a lot worse. It's competently made with well orchestrated action sequences, decent performances, and a few memorable lines of dialog. Other than that there is nothing to write homeIf you're looking for a film to just pass the time, you could a lot worse. It's competently made with well orchestrated action sequences, decent performances, and a few memorable lines of dialog. Other than that there is nothing to write home about. As long as you're not expecting the film to be on the level of "The Seven Samurai" and the first "Magnificent 7," you won't be disappointed.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

moviemitch96Sep 25, 2016

As much as it pains me to admit it, to this day I still haven't seen the original in it's entirety (I've caught little glimpses and snippets of it here and there on TV.) Therefore, I went into this remake pretty cold for the most part. AndAs much as it pains me to admit it, to this day I still haven't seen the original in it's entirety (I've caught little glimpses and snippets of it here and there on TV.) Therefore, I went into this remake pretty cold for the most part. And while I can say that it was certainly entertaining in some aspects, story-wise, it was simply lacking in this department. All of the action and shootouts are stuffed into the first and third acts of the film while the entire middle act is spent setting up the final battle and events of the third act, which I didn't appreciate very much. And like I said, while the film managed to remain pretty entertaining for the most part with the shootouts, it eventually all began to feel rather scattershot and choppy in the final battle. Acting was meh. Honestly it felt as though the actors portraying the seven titular protagonists were somewhat wasted and weren't really given their full potential (Denzel Washington, Chris Pratt, Ethan Hawke, etc have all certainly been and can do better.) Overall, it's not without it's fair share of fun moments and action. However, the fact that it's all crammed into the first and third acts of the film that leaves an overly long setup for the rather hollow-feeling middle act as well as the subpar performances from a solid cast with far more potential makes this one questionable. However, if anything, it also makes me feel somewhat compelled to go home and watch the original, which from what I hear unsurprisingly is supposed to be a lot better than this.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

eagleeyevikingApr 16, 2017

Sleek outside but slight inside, Antoine Fuqua's entertaining second remake of 'Seven Samurai' settles for a by-the-numbers Western shoot-em-up storyline instead of expanding upon the two films it remakes, although the cast is impressive andSleek outside but slight inside, Antoine Fuqua's entertaining second remake of 'Seven Samurai' settles for a by-the-numbers Western shoot-em-up storyline instead of expanding upon the two films it remakes, although the cast is impressive and they perform well. 5.5/10… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

4

marc5477Dec 26, 2016

Unnecessary remake. It brings nothing interesting to the table and it a pure money grab. I don't mind remakes if they try to bring something new to the table like good humor or new twists but this one is pretty straight forward and honestly,Unnecessary remake. It brings nothing interesting to the table and it a pure money grab. I don't mind remakes if they try to bring something new to the table like good humor or new twists but this one is pretty straight forward and honestly, there is no reason for it since the original movie was already good. The Seven Samurai remains the best of the pack and if your brain is too weak to enjoy subtitles then even the old 1960 western remake was ok (I forget what its called). Anyway, if you are young and have never seen the originals then this might be an ok film but honestly the bad guys were a weak point in this one. They were not intimidating nor intelligent which really brought down the story. In the original film, the village was facing an indomitable foe since it took place in a time of turmoil. The original foe did not select the village specifically rather the bad guys were more like a wave sweeping the country and that made them much more intimidating that some band of morons who follow a megalomaniac. I would skip it, especially if you have seen the original.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

tbeit2Jan 5, 2017

The Magnificent Seven was a really good movie. Almost everything, from the acting to the action to the story was all entertaining and a joy to watch. The only thing that keeps this movie down at all is that it is very predictable, with noThe Magnificent Seven was a really good movie. Almost everything, from the acting to the action to the story was all entertaining and a joy to watch. The only thing that keeps this movie down at all is that it is very predictable, with no surprises even for someone who hasn't seen the original. They also could have maybe done a bit more world building, but overall it was a fine movie that I would recommend renting.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

1

ABCXYZ108Sep 27, 2016

The original is a thousand times better. Don't waste your money or time on this remake. The characters are shallow, and the action scenes are "more of the same". It brings the saying "chewing the chewed" to a whole new level.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

RatedRexSep 24, 2016

.
"The Seven Samurai", which came out in 1954, is one of the most influential films in cinema history. Its theme has been copied one way or another in many subsequent films. However, the movie itself is vastly overrated. I defy anyone, who.
"The Seven Samurai", which came out in 1954, is one of the most influential films in cinema history. Its theme has been copied one way or another in many subsequent films. However, the movie itself is vastly overrated. I defy anyone, who has never seen it, to view that movie without thinking how grossly outdated the acting, writing and directing is. Moreover, "Seven Samurai" lacks realism and common sense. Plus, the action scenes are some of the worse battles scenes in cinema history. The battle scenes are basically bad guys charging through the streets for a minute or two and then retreating. We barely get to see the seven samurai show their stuff. The 1960 version of "The Magnificent Seven", which I have seen 4 or 5 times, has an outstanding cast (Yul Brenner, Steve McQueen) and a great musical score, but this version of the story also makes no sense. It too suffers from being extremely dated. While watching the 1960 version, I kept thinking over and over, why would they all risk their lives for total strangers. The answers were never given. Without plausible motivations, I couldn't believe what I saw on screen. Thus the 1960 version is also overrated. I think both movies are considered classics simply because they have a reputation for being classics. The 2016 version has upgraded special effects and enough action to keep the audience awake, but, just like the previous two versions, this movie lakes common sense and realism. The bad guys are some of the worse hired gunslingers in the history of American Westerns. They drop like flies. And though we eventually understand Denzel's motivation for defending the villagers, we don't quite see what motivates the other 6. The characters just weren't developed enough for us to understand who they were and why they fought. When the smoke clears and the body count is tallied, we are left with wondering "was it all worth it?"… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

4

BertoflyingfoxSep 25, 2016

It should've been called "Denzel Washington And the Other 6". There are so many long scenes of him trying to look stoic and thoughtful while nothing is happening. Fuqua has made this movie before, it was called King Arthur. It too has aIt should've been called "Denzel Washington And the Other 6". There are so many long scenes of him trying to look stoic and thoughtful while nothing is happening. Fuqua has made this movie before, it was called King Arthur. It too has a "knife guy" and cheap one-dimensional character deaths.

This movie needed wide camera lens shots, instead it's talking heads and quick cuts. A sprinkle of scenes lifted directly from Django (minus the better dialogue) and then ruining the whole point of the story by connecting it to a revenge plot that didnt need to exist.

Overall, a lazy effort with a boring shoot out that overstays its welcome.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

2

AxeTSep 25, 2016

Another remake. Another mindless utterly formulaic excruciating bore. Even for a younger generation unfamiliar with westerns this has got to come off as a stale, uninspired, painfully paint-by-the-numbers worthless waste of time. How manyAnother remake. Another mindless utterly formulaic excruciating bore. Even for a younger generation unfamiliar with westerns this has got to come off as a stale, uninspired, painfully paint-by-the-numbers worthless waste of time. How many endless gunfights where you can't even tell who is shooting who can anyone with a brain find entertaining? So what if the casting is more diverse. That doesn't make a movie.
The villain is woefully miscast. He's not a bad actor, but for this role? Come on! And if any star could give this thing life, it's the never less than exceptional always reliable Denzel (one of my favorite actors), but this thing is so thin even he can't remotely save it. And he is not exactly thin himself as he appears in this to be in his worst shape ever on screen.

At least it's not poorly shot and crafted by hacks who delusionally think they are game changers. No it's just a soulless empty bore.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

0

CutlosoJul 31, 2020

Kurosawa must be rolling on his grave.
If you think the value of a movie is only to be entertaining, and not to comunnicate and idea, then this movie is for you. Big blockbuster, go see it.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

tinas2centsSep 30, 2016

I've waited 5 months for this movie to finally open and it did not disappoint. Making a remake movie from a book it's not going to be the same, it shouldn't be. The actors and action was good. The characters are credible. It is a 'spaghettiI've waited 5 months for this movie to finally open and it did not disappoint. Making a remake movie from a book it's not going to be the same, it shouldn't be. The actors and action was good. The characters are credible. It is a 'spaghetti western', not a drama, the cliches are intentional. While I love (grew up watching) the original and the good the bad and the ugly, this is more authentic. The "Wild" West got its name for a reason. It was extremely violent. Historically it is also more accurate, from the demographics to the mindset, it was about claiming/keeping your land and greed. If u had to work/fight 4 what u have u get the plot. If you like the whole good versus evil, little guy fighting back kind of movie. You'll like this. If you like the clean death scenes of the classics where people get shot without bleeding, Then not so much.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

antenaNov 13, 2016

All of the typical Western genre tropes are efficiently ticked off one by one, but the whole is much lesser than the sum of its parts. Fuqua helms the whole thing with a reduced sense of humor and an amped body count. Not so much aAll of the typical Western genre tropes are efficiently ticked off one by one, but the whole is much lesser than the sum of its parts. Fuqua helms the whole thing with a reduced sense of humor and an amped body count. Not so much a "Magnificent" Seven rather more like a slightly acceptable one.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

SpangleOct 14, 2016

The Magnificently Boring Seven is, well, boring. Predictable to its core, director Antoine Fuqua tries to valiantly cram every action cliche into a single film and the end result is a cliche film. Job well done, good sir. I never really everThe Magnificently Boring Seven is, well, boring. Predictable to its core, director Antoine Fuqua tries to valiantly cram every action cliche into a single film and the end result is a cliche film. Job well done, good sir. I never really ever rated Fuqua as a director. Training Day is a one off hit. Otherwise, he just directs safe, Hollywood, and bland action movies. This film is no exception with its problems only exacerbated by an iffy cast. Before I speak further on the film, I should first confess a major sin. As God is a major part of this film, I feel as though it is still pertinent. I...I...I have never seen Seven Samurai or the original The Magnificent Seven. I know. I would not like me either. Anyways, pressing on...

The film's predictability comes from the very first shot. Throughout, the film is not just predictable because it is a remake (recall how I have never seen the originals), but also because you can sit there and just guess where each scene is going. What is worse is that the lazy writing carries onto the characters with skin deep character development at best. This development does not help to actually differentiate characters in the least. I honestly kept forgetting their names and mixing up who they are throughout the film. I knew that Red Harvest was the Native American, but I mean, that is because his name is Red Harvest. Hard to think that Denzel would be Red Harvest (I guess I should not say that, since Johnny Depp was Tonto...). Even worse from a character development standpoint is Emma Cullen (Haley Bennett). Okay, low-rent Jennifer Lawrence cannot act. She is not horrible, but I have yet to see any reason to cast her other than her resemblance to Lawrence. Yet, here, she plays a character that could have been a strong female character. Instead, her role disintegrates into being nothing more than a sexual object for us to ogle at thanks to frequent low-cut costumes and constant jokes about having sex with her and how she is pretty. The film can barely go 10 minutes without reminding us Emma's real role in the film: to be sexualized and objectified. How could I ever dream of forgetting such a key element of the film? Emma's role, in spite of the conclusion, continues to marginalized as she can never do anything for herself. Instead, she finds herself in the midst of gunfights and failing to defend herself. Rather, a man must come to her aid at every turn. What a missed opportunity here.

Yet, as mentioned, Bennett is nothing to write home about in the acting department. The rest of the cast is equally mediocre. Denzel and Ethan Hawke are fine. Not career-best work by either, but they are okay. Chris Pratt has nothing charisma and abs going in his favor. As an actor, he is the definition of safe and bleh. That said, Byung-hun Lee and Martin Sensmeier were the real standouts. If the film was just Billy Rocks (Lee) stabbing people and throwing knives at them with Red Harvest (Sensmeier) sniping them with arrows, I would be a satisfied customer. Instead, they are bit players at best. Manuel Garcia-Rulfo is fine, though the butt of numerous offensive Mexican jokes, which further highlights the lazy writing. Finally, Vincent D'Onofrio was abysmal. It is like he had a frog caught in his throat and had to fight against said frog with all his might to utter a single line. Please spare me.

As for the action, it is well done. The most entertaining part for sure. Yet, the in-between moments are so non-descript, slow, and shallow, it is hard to be entertained by the action. Instead, you are more-or-less relieved that film decided to try and do something again. I am a big fan of westerns (though I need to see more) and would love for a revival to happen. This film is not that revival. Instead, it just tediously moves along until Fuqua decides to let us get back to the good bits again with Denzel capping dudes left and right with his team by his side. In saying this, however, the action sequences are far too long and equally predictable, pulling out every cliche in the book (especially Pratt at the end, as well as the ending with Bennett).

The sole positive that elevates this film to being just mediocre is the cinematography and scenery. I love gawdy shots of the country side with the sun setting. The Magnificent Seven has them in spades. Yet, the film does not stop there with beautiful long shots of cowboys riding in the distance and silhouetted cowboys against the sun in the background. The end result is truly gorgeous imagery. The peak of this imagery comes at the end of the film, however, particularly a shot of Denzel silhouetted against the bright sun to his left (in the image) as he walks out of a building. Another highlight coming shortly after that with Denzel and Bennett in the church with the light pouring in through the windows. Big pluses, really.

As a whole, The Magnificent Seven is just really, really boring. Like, I am not a huge action guy, but damn. Nobody seems to have fun.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

LeZeeDec 24, 2016

The new seven, all unique and diversified!

Basically, people watch it for either those actors and the director or for an entertertainment. But we all know the story, how it begins and how it ends, since it was the remake of the 1960 film.The new seven, all unique and diversified!

Basically, people watch it for either those actors and the director or for an entertertainment. But we all know the story, how it begins and how it ends, since it was the remake of the 1960 film. Actually, it was a successful remake, but not as magnificent as the original. Maybe the youngsters might like this one better.

The director's favourite, Denzel Washington in one of the main characters. Not much change in the theme, except the screenplay was little altered, especially diversity in the film characters and their developments. Because nowadays that's a big issue in Hollywood cinema. So it was led by Denzel and possibly there will be a sequel like the 'Ocean's' trilogy.

The people from a small mining town decides to hire men with guns to fight the villainous businessman who slaughtered their loved ones. The unusual seven men come together and form a team with a plan to defend the town. So what comes next is the battle between the good and the bad that lasts for the whole final act.

The setting was completely refreshing, but slightly disappointing action sequences. All the seven characters were unique and awesome, but the film lacked the great battle scene that defines each one of them. Surely I favour it just for once watch that told from the todays imagination of the 1870s era. Feels like it should have been better, but in the end it is a satisfying film.

6.5/10… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

roosevelt323Oct 10, 2016

The ensemble made this movie. Albeit, a rather predictable western with all of its typical stereotypical
jabs and token characters. But, all in all, and entertaining time at the movies
Denzel and Pratt really make the movie shine...

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

WheelzFourReelzSep 29, 2016

There is nothing new about The Magnificent Seven, however, it knows exactly what it is and it has a lot of fun with itself. It's well acted, well written, and has some of the best action and sound design of the entire year.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

horizonbtsSep 28, 2016

First of all I can tell you that I was excited when last year I learned of the remake and the cast to be involved. Yes I have watched the original and own it on DVD as yes I am a fan of the genre. For me the original and this version thereFirst of all I can tell you that I was excited when last year I learned of the remake and the cast to be involved. Yes I have watched the original and own it on DVD as yes I am a fan of the genre. For me the original and this version there are a ton of differences, still I will put a positive spin on it as I didn't dislike the movie, but just thought there was a chance given the cast and the budget that this movie could have been great!! I understand that there is a time limit, but felt like the characters weren't given their just dues in development. I felt like the first part of the movie was boring and somewhat lackluster when it was introducing us to each member of the Magnificent Seven. The story was set-up in the beginning as to why the seven were needed, but again didn't really give us much to go on. Peter Sarsgaard as the villain Bartholomew Bogue was well cast and one we hated, but again he could have been developed even more into one of the best vilians of all time-another lost opportunity for me. So many times in the movie it lost out to the original. Still with all that said, when the fight and the action does come, it is Magnificent and entertaining in the sense that the original couldn't match due to the technology of today! I thought the tricks and surprises to cut down the enemies was brilliant, the teaching of the townspeople how to fight was humorous too. In the end the story gave a little more light to the characters, but still think it could have given us so much more! All in all for those of you that haven't seen the original you will enjoy the action of this one, and Denzel Washington lives up to the billing, and does seem to enjoy his character. Bottom line for a few bucks its worth the ride.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

MadMaxFuryRoadOct 8, 2016

The Magnificent Seven was in my opinion the biggest surprise of the year. I expected nothing going into this film because I don't really like western movies; but when I came out of the theater, I was extremely blown away. Denzel WashingtonThe Magnificent Seven was in my opinion the biggest surprise of the year. I expected nothing going into this film because I don't really like western movies; but when I came out of the theater, I was extremely blown away. Denzel Washington and his crew were amazing in this film and everyone gave a terrific performance. Antoine Fuqua directed this film with such passion and I loved this film. From beginning to end, The Magnificent Seven blew me away. The last 30 minutes of the film alone was totally worth my $10. Great story and plot with amazing action! The film also gave a lot of humor, which I loved. (99/100)… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

Jess_HillSep 30, 2016

Cliche upon cliche upon tired cliche, this really should have been better. I understand that when remaking a film, you should stay true to the source material, but thinly veiled racism, misogyny and every single western trope shoehorned inCliche upon cliche upon tired cliche, this really should have been better. I understand that when remaking a film, you should stay true to the source material, but thinly veiled racism, misogyny and every single western trope shoehorned in isn't necessary. There are some fantastic action sequences, and individual performances aren't bad, though no one stands out. The pacing is utterly wrong for a western, there's no drawn out tension, no time for the audience to pause, it doesn't feel right, it's much too fast and as a result you're not invested in the outcome. A mediocre film. 5.47/10… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

CLUELESS35861Oct 12, 2016

Seen the Kurosawa original, the 1960 hollywood version, and none of the others. I liked this take on "Shichinin", made politically correct with little racial tension. I like most of Antoine Fuqua's efforts, this included. Great action,Seen the Kurosawa original, the 1960 hollywood version, and none of the others. I liked this take on "Shichinin", made politically correct with little racial tension. I like most of Antoine Fuqua's efforts, this included. Great action, fast pace, no in depth character study, just a good ol' action flick. Tired of so-called cinema critics trying to one up each other with silly observations and pompous justification of their paychecks. Just too many of them now to single out. Good flick, go see it; and, check out the original and the first cover version!… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

spacebear1Jan 13, 2018

Antoine Fuqua's The Magnificent 7 is a fantastic western film. Easily the best part of the film are the action sequences and shootouts. I liked Ethan Hawke's character and Byung-Hun Lee's character the most. Some characters are a bitAntoine Fuqua's The Magnificent 7 is a fantastic western film. Easily the best part of the film are the action sequences and shootouts. I liked Ethan Hawke's character and Byung-Hun Lee's character the most. Some characters are a bit underdeveloped but this is still a very entertaining western.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

0

namelessSep 25, 2016

Insulting, insulting, insulting... If you saw the 1960s version this movie is beyond bad it is insulting. If you see this movie you will lose 2 hours of you life you will want to get back unless you are a 15 year old boy.They gutted it ofInsulting, insulting, insulting... If you saw the 1960s version this movie is beyond bad it is insulting. If you see this movie you will lose 2 hours of you life you will want to get back unless you are a 15 year old boy.They gutted it of what made the original work. They even gutted the music. There was nothing at stake, some of the townspeople left. There was no existential crisis for the characters. It wasn't like they were poor farmers and if they left they would starve, or that the banditos had to come back because they were starving. If you have to see it please miss the first 5 minutes with it's big speech that made no sense because the point was ignored. The politically correct 7 ignored everything about the time period you could have used to increase the conflict. Which then proceeded to kill more people that violates everything about the progressive point of view it tries to hammer home in the beginning. The director knew what he was doing, the actors knew what they were doing it is the fault of the producers that couldn't protect this movie from the studio that must be employing 25 year olds that didn't go to film school. I can't even recommend seeing this on cable. I love the manificent Seven premise, I will see all versions (animation, Japanese, superhero etc.) but this is not that movie. It kept only the "7" and threw out everything else. I will tolerate bad movies but not this can't even rise to the level of bad.… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

5

EpicLadySpongeSep 23, 2016

The Magnificent Seven tries the best it can do to be magnificent as it can get. Unfortunately, it's not as magnificent as it wish it would be like what it feels like. You'd be better watching the classic that inspired millions of dollars forThe Magnificent Seven tries the best it can do to be magnificent as it can get. Unfortunately, it's not as magnificent as it wish it would be like what it feels like. You'd be better watching the classic that inspired millions of dollars for this film.… Expand

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

8

herman73trioSep 26, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. "You seek for revenge?"
"I seek righteousness, but I'll take revenge"

A slick,sick,greed,ruthless dan heartless businessman Bartholomeuw Bogue (Peter Saarsgard) came to this small village Rose Creek, and just when he find out that at some site near that village worth maybe tons of gold, he intend to occupied it in very cheap price, $20 for each land from which every single house build. And no negotiation, and as time goes by the offering is only get bitter.So, 3 weeks or else. Then, Bogue shot to death a young man, after questioning about Bogues morality when Bouge's men beat a reverend ruthlessly.The death of that young man leaves anger deep in the heart of Emma Cullen (Halley Bennet).

Then Emma accompanied by his associate Teddy (Luke Grimes) search for a bounty hunter that she will pay with everything she got. Then she cross path with Chisolm (Denzel Washington) just after Chisolm executed a state wanted man for murder and rape, and so Emma ask for Chisolm's help. Chisolm accept the job for one reason - that he always takes high price, but never before someone ask for his service with everything they got. Then Chisolm recruits another six persons, first he recruited Faraday (Chris Pratt), a gambler drinker handsome big mouth but with excellent skills of card magic, then a sharp shooter with stress post traumatic disorder Goodnight Robicheaux a.k.a Angel of Death (Ethan Hawke),also a former Confederation along with his sidekick Billy Rocks (Byung Hun Lee), a very fast Chinese gunman, but faster and deadlier with blades (Byung Hun Lee actually a Korean actor).While Chisolm recruited a Mexican outlaw Vasques (Manuel Garcia Rulfo). After then they together recruited an ex Indian hunter, the legendary John Horne (Vincent D' Onofrio), and an Indian Comanche warrior with his noble principals, Red Harvest (Martin Sensmeir).
Chisolm didn't waste much time, he and his 6 compatriots killed 22 Bouge's best gunmen and sent the town sheriff to infom Bouge, gather the town's citizens to choose, stay and fight to death or leave. These 7 men only have 3 days to prepare the city before Bogue and his hundreds of army to rush them all.

This is the 2nd remake of Akiro Kurosawa's "Seven Samurai" after John Sturges "The Seven Magnificent" (1960). If 1960's version is more focus to the 7 gunmen with the citizens, Fuqua's version is upgraded into a whole new level, all thanks to Pazollato and Wenk's screenplay that create the citizen's despair, but Chisolm anfd his men manage to turn the citizen's fear of Bouge into the fear of lost everything they ever dream for, lost for they pride. Pazolatto and Wenk also manage to put some humor in some parts.

The screenplay smartly deliver us the story of a group of men that some of them with background that give them enough emotional reason to kill each other, e.g John Horne (ex Indian Hunter), Red Harvest (Indian Comanche), Faraday (his grandfather killed by Mexican gang), Vasquez (his grandfather was a member of Mexican gang that ambush Faraday's grandfather's town), but they bound together with one purpose, a noble purpose.Why?Cauze for another 5 men (beside Chisolm and Red Harvest) each of them have they own past to reconcile with, wanna make piece to their own soul before the next battle that could be their last one by take the impossible job. But off course the the last tiny element of surprise from Chisolm about his personal agenda, he has his very own personal reason why he finally take this job, that left me a question : Maybe this one flaw on this Mag7? Why? Because, why Chisolm rejected the offering from Emma, and declared that he himself is not for sale.but then he take the job when he found Emma will pay him - even all at once- with everything she got. Or maybe is just Chisolm eager to know how far would this widow go to seek righteousness or even revenge?If she would go a long the way, then Chisolm had a good reason to recruit the men he need.

This Mag7 only give as much as a glance of each person's historical background, through their dialogues. Except for Robicheaux, this character get a little more exposed and curiousity what the hell happen to him after North and South war that make him hate himself so much after all act that he has committed during North and South war, that make him a very flimsy man.
Denzel is really perform great his character cool bad ass, while Pratt represent enthusiasm and the spirit of this movie. Ethan Hawke (this is the 2nd time he team up with both Denzel and Fuqua) gave audiences skepticism about what will happen to this team. The rest of the cast, even didn't get portion as much as Denzel (off course, he is the man) or Ethan Hawke and Pratt - especially Martin Sensmier get the smallest portion - but they're all represent an assembled excellent marksmen (some og them have hororable dirty little secrets) to march as one into a battle for one descent good noble cause. Haley Bennet performances represent as young widow search for the last hope and an attitude to face all odds at all cost for he igdinity since her husband gunned down in coldblood by Bouge (Saargards appearance really gives the impression as the sick man). I also give credit to the cinematography that shots all gunfight scenes so perfectly, how Mauro Fiore took the angle to describe the savarage of Bouge's gold minning from distance.

Fuqua's Mag7 is not one of classical western movie, but It's superbly done...and magnificently delivered to us, magically entertaining from beginning till end. Even though this movie might don't have what all critics wants to be as classical but still will be remembered as one of the most entertaining,enjoyable western.. Really as the quotes of the dialogues between Chisolm and Robicheaux "What we lost in the fire, we found in the ashes"… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

0

TrunkisSep 27, 2016

Had this been a new western, rather than a remake of an awesome remake of a classic, I'd give it a 3.

I loved the original remake & thought the new trailer was great, so admittedly went in with high expectations, especially with DenzelHad this been a new western, rather than a remake of an awesome remake of a classic, I'd give it a 3.

I loved the original remake & thought the new trailer was great, so admittedly went in with high expectations, especially with Denzel Washington playing the legendary Yul Brenner.

The beginning is horrible and the first hour is plain bad. The first action scene as seen in the trailer, is such a letdown, with no rhyme, reason or continuity. They throw in some corny bones of the original remake, including a few verbatim lines.

Denzel was okay, but far from his best work. Vincent D'Onofrio is mildly amusing, very entertaining & quite likable as Jack Horne. Byung-hun Lee rocks as Billy Rocks and I would liked to have seen & heard more of/from him. Martin Sensmeier as Red Harvest was awesome but an important fight scene with him near the end, fell short & flat. The best actor/character in the film is Haley Bennett as the heroine, Emma Cullen! Funny thing is, the very best part of the film is her narration at the very end. I think it was the only time I smiled during the boringly long film which could have been done just as poorly in 90 minutes.

Someone in the discussion boards talks about the painful PC diversity, and I would normally agree, but in this case, it actually worked and made a terrible film, a little more interesting. The commenter quips that only a little person was missing, but there actually is one and chose him to mock on several occasions. I guess little people aren't high on the SJW's list of victim class.

I had to see it but would much rather have seen The Hateful Eight again instead and even went back and gave that movie an extra star. The Magnificent Seven needed the Tarantino touch and some blood. For all the killing, I don't remember seeing a drop, though maybe I just blinked through them. Then again, They can get a pass because there wasn't much blood used in old time westerns and they probably saved millions on spectacular special effects, or the lack thereof.

This movie is SO bad, that I did something I never do at the movies, got up & went to the bathroom to be comfortable in my boredom, without even asking my friend what I missed, because I didn't care. I didn't really bond with the characters, except my concern for the horses, imagining as I always do in movies, the suffering these poor creatures went through during times of war & battle.

This expensive movie will make money on the back of the original remake, and I'm sure they paid a fortune for the right to butcher it. I'd really like to know exactly what they did pay for the rights.

I recommend you wait until it's on cable and have 2+ hours to waste.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

8

Compi24Sep 27, 2016

Antoine Fuqua continues to demonstrate his utter dominance over the genre filmmaking craft with "The Magnificent Seven," an invigorating western with enough respect for the original to get even the most fervent remake-haters on board for theAntoine Fuqua continues to demonstrate his utter dominance over the genre filmmaking craft with "The Magnificent Seven," an invigorating western with enough respect for the original to get even the most fervent remake-haters on board for the ride. Denzel Washington and Co. throw smoke across the screen in some of the most thrilling gunfights I've witnessed this side of "Django Unchained," thanks in no small part to Fuqua's undeniably brilliant grasp of set piece direction. Throw in the final score we'll ever hear from the late, great James Horner and a hilarious performance from Vincent D'Onofrio and you're left with a truly impactful cinematic thrill ride. More please!… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

1

Qgal5kapDec 6, 2016

The original is a lot better. This feels like more of a play, rather than a movie. Like Trunkis said: Had this been a new western, rather than a remake of an awesome remake of a classic, I'd give it a 3.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

BrianMcCriticSep 23, 2016

This is a real fun remake with a lot of fantastic charismatic performances. There isn't much new territory discovered here but for this genre this is a winner. B+

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

NerdConsultantSep 28, 2016

The Magnificent Seven is a remake that almost worked completely, but it is held back by a few elements. The actors are pretty decent, the plot moves at a decent place and the action scenes are very good, plus it does a decent job jugglingThe Magnificent Seven is a remake that almost worked completely, but it is held back by a few elements. The actors are pretty decent, the plot moves at a decent place and the action scenes are very good, plus it does a decent job juggling the characters even though a few don’t get the necessary screen time they need. The film is held back by a really weak villain and a second half that really doesn’t match the tone of the first. I prefer it to the 1960 version because it has a bit more fun and it has fixed a lot of the pacing issues and dropped a lot of the un-necessary sub plots from the original but I would be lying if I said I thought this was a great movie. The first half is genuinely fun and I did enjoy myself watching the film but I am not sure I can entirely recommend it, I don’t think there is enough for fans of the old film to latch on to and I think they will be disappointed by the newer elements bought into the film and I don’t think a younger audience will connect with it as the producers want them to. I suspect this film will find an audience and it is a decent attempt at a remake but I think it needed a little bit more. As it stands, it’s a pretty fun movie if you don’t think about it too much.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

0

MaleficentoSep 27, 2016

You have got to be kidding me. A new low is upon us in not only movie making but for the western genre. I strongly recommend that Mr. Fuqua, the director take this film off his resume. It takes away from all his good work. Denzel? What in theYou have got to be kidding me. A new low is upon us in not only movie making but for the western genre. I strongly recommend that Mr. Fuqua, the director take this film off his resume. It takes away from all his good work. Denzel? What in the world were you thinking as well as Ethan Hawke and all the rest of the cast. First of all, just go see the original and anyone who does will immediately come to their senses with little of no effort and understand without explanation how good a Western can be. You will probably watch it twice as I have seen it maybe 30 times. That is where the word "magnificent" belongs and not in this remake in any way. Mass random shootings & killings with might makes right is not suspense or good story-telling. This movie came across as hollow and plastic for script, acting and plot. This is movie is like a video game of some sort where you get to pick a character and then kill as many people as you can. Mindless in presentation, severe lack of character development, egotistical parading of look at me I am in a Western and riding a horse and shooting guns is more of a display of embarrassment that I had for all the people in this movie. Here's an interesting thought. Why didn't all these folks just get together and make a movie any movie? Calling this a remake? I am surprised that critics are not all over this and telling the truth about how bad it is. Methinks the fix is in. All I can say is that if anyone likes this type of Western portrayed here, in this way and style, The Western as we know it is doomed at least for this generation. Shame on everyone in this movie for charging money to go see this. A refund is in order for all plus an apology. Enough said....… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

0

KugelKopfFeb 3, 2017

Has more or less nothing to do with the Original. It's just a multicultural money milking actionmovie. Sad taht this had to happen going on screen with this name. Probably as another movie and not as the iconic Original remake.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

pastor43Sep 24, 2016

After reading the mixed and negative reviews I am wondering if people even go to the movies any longer for shear entertainment value or to audition for the next vacant movie critique position. The movie in my opinion was simply entertaining,After reading the mixed and negative reviews I am wondering if people even go to the movies any longer for shear entertainment value or to audition for the next vacant movie critique position. The movie in my opinion was simply entertaining, the cast seemed to enjoy their respective roles and the simply story was obvious but not overbearing. My wife who I can count on for at least two or three sleep nods during our date night movies was full on engaged clutching my arm intently during the entire movie. She never realized the movie was just over 2 hours, it was a obvious emotional end. People seem to forget movies are meant to be entertaining, action- save the day, drama- cry at the end for the moral victory, sci-fi- the unusual, thrill/mystery- thought provoking, my point simple entertainment. Magnificent!… Expand

8 of 28 users found this helpful820

All this user's reviews

9

ThegodfathersonSep 23, 2016

A firecracker western with a cast that one could have only dreamed of. The Magnificent Seven is high on body count, heart and one-liners. Antoine Fuqua (Training Day) spreads his love of westerns on a film that works both on screen and onA firecracker western with a cast that one could have only dreamed of. The Magnificent Seven is high on body count, heart and one-liners. Antoine Fuqua (Training Day) spreads his love of westerns on a film that works both on screen and on paper. Being a remake of Seven Samurai, it never reaches its excellence but will give a blast to western audiences and a dose of the story that was so beloved before.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

9

Slobr18Oct 3, 2016

The Magnificent Seven is a very well directed film, with great performances by Chris Pratt, Denzel Washington, and the other five main characters. It was refreshing to see just a good western. If your a fan of westerns and a character drivenThe Magnificent Seven is a very well directed film, with great performances by Chris Pratt, Denzel Washington, and the other five main characters. It was refreshing to see just a good western. If your a fan of westerns and a character driven plot, i'd recommend The Magnificent Seven.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

0

thedaarkbattySep 24, 2016

Absolute trash movie. It's way too long. Not funny. Action sucks. Acting is terrible. Plot is boring and goes nowhere. Non of the characters are remotely interesting. Do not watch.

3 of 13 users found this helpful310

All this user's reviews

10

hawkeye766Sep 24, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This remake of a remake tells the time honored tale of a few brave men rising up to defend the weak and oppressed, and again shows us the conflict we've seen many times before, in which, the skilled few stand u to the oppressive many.

The Magnificent 7 establishes its setting in perfect fashion, thrusting us into a heated town meeting. Then suddenly, the villain enters, his menacing footsteps thump and creak on the wood floor, disagreement ensues, and suddenly, a shot splits the air. Such a startling sound, that you never really get used to, despite the amount of lead that flies here. The Western atmosphere is perfectly recreated and though it is that much more real, due to improved technology, it feels familiar in a way. Strains, variations, and melodic teases of Elmer Bernstein's famous score riddle the film and keep the mood adventurous.

The obvious dominant component of the film, its action scenes are epic, and gripping. There are of course plenty of scenes that any western worth its salt is simply required to feature. Several Mexican standoffs, so delightfully stereotypical, as well as quite a few things that are new, or have not been seen for a while. A duel between two Comanches, a fighting force seeking shelter from the mighty Gatling gun, and a cowboy lighting dynamite with a cigarette as he lays dying all come to mind. I could go on for much longer about how ridiculously cool this movie's action sequences are, but I'll let you see for yourself.

Finally, the plot, though anything but unfamiliar is a moving and epic tale about unity, loyalty, and grit. One of my favorite scenes in the movie features Jack Horne, the tracker, played by Vincent D'onofrio, (who like the rest of this all star cast is just downright amazing in a role that fits like a glove) shot by an enemy arrow. He falters, but stares at the enemy and rises. He takes a step forward, and is stopped again, a second shaft protruding from his chest. He continues his advance toward the enemy until he can no longer, dying with his dignity intact.

The Magnificent Seven is a film that is so clichéd that it begins to feel original. And That is definitely a compliment. Not that there is anything wrong with modern westerns that try something new, like Django, or No Country For Old Men, but It is certainly a joy to watch a movie that owns these tropes for what they are, tosses some satisfying character development into the mix, and makes something out of it that is, for lack of a better adjective, positively "Magnificent".… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

5

TVJerrySep 29, 2016

The opening massacre is the most violently shocking moment in this film. It's also the catalyst for the small town to hire the titular gang to defend them from the perpetrator (Peter Sarsgaard). They start with Denzel Washington, who sets outThe opening massacre is the most violently shocking moment in this film. It's also the catalyst for the small town to hire the titular gang to defend them from the perpetrator (Peter Sarsgaard). They start with Denzel Washington, who sets out to assemble his team, which includes a wise-cracking Chris Pratt and a rainbow of ethnicities. Most don't have much personality, but neither does the movie. With a re-imagining, you'd expect a stepped-up approach. Instead, it's a mostly somber drama with lots of serious posturing (and not much emotion). While copious bullets fly in the final showdown, not much of the action is original or even interesting. Without advancing the genre in any way, it's still an adequate Western.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

TheQuietGamerApr 9, 2017

It's an exciting western with modern day flourishes. It's shootouts are big, flashy, and all very exciting. The strength of the movie though comes from it's characters. They are wonderfully acted and likable in their own ways.

Most of theIt's an exciting western with modern day flourishes. It's shootouts are big, flashy, and all very exciting. The strength of the movie though comes from it's characters. They are wonderfully acted and likable in their own ways.

Most of the attention does go to Denzel and Pratt, but Fuqua makes sure the rest of the talented people onscreen don't go by unnoticed. Each member of the seven has their presence felt throughout. The biggest surprise onscreen has to be Vincent D'Onofrio who proves to be a fantastic character actor. The camaraderie between the cast adds a little heart to the experience and gives the battles more weight.

The one area where The Magnificent Seven stumbles is with it's plot and main villain. The writing is fine, it's just the setup isn't very original. I'm aware this is a remake so it's likely just following the source material, but that doesn't change the fact that this sort of thing has been done to death at this point. Then there's Peter Sarsgaard. Or rather there isn't Peter Sarsgaard. He barely has any screen time or presence in a movie where he's the big bad guy. Kind of disappointing.

When all is said and done though, The Magnificent Seven is no less exciting or well-cast. It's a heck of a lot of fun and a reminder that it's about time that westerns made a comeback on the big screen.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

imthenoobOct 12, 2016

Bits of dialogue for everyone through out. The only one to really shine though would be Sarsgaard, who portrays the main villain of the film. The cast does a good job though at carrying a rather lackluster film. The action doesn't reallyBits of dialogue for everyone through out. The only one to really shine though would be Sarsgaard, who portrays the main villain of the film. The cast does a good job though at carrying a rather lackluster film. The action doesn't really happen until the last 30 minutes but it's non-stop the whole way and is quite enjoyable to watch. The story is kind of bland though and doesn't really capture the magic of the original film or Seven Samurai, which the original film was based off.

Overall, I liked it enough to not hate it. I thought the cast and the action were good enough to justify viewing it. I just wished there was a bit more dialogue and a bit more originality with it. I know it's a remake but it doesn't need to be a recycle.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

mrmonsterOct 4, 2016

I kind of regret paying the full theater price to see it, but still, it was a good movie. It had lots of great action and some very interesting characters; I just wish it focused more on the plot and the script.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

foxgroveOct 1, 2016

Despite its classic status the Original 1960 ‘Magnificent 7’ must be one of the most over rated films ever made. This new version does nothing to re-ignite any interest in a story that is basically simple to the point of non- existence. AsDespite its classic status the Original 1960 ‘Magnificent 7’ must be one of the most over rated films ever made. This new version does nothing to re-ignite any interest in a story that is basically simple to the point of non- existence. As with most film’s one starts watching optimistically, but after a promising but tried and trusted set up one begins to lose interest as Denzel Washington goes off in search of the other titular six. From here on in there really is not much here to pique the imagination. The film drags on for a good hour before finally letting rip with a half hour battle to save the town that is truly exciting and very well staged. The cinematography is the true star and the locations are breathtakingly gorgeous, but the music, half of which is credited to the late James Horner, is inappropriate and lacking strength for such a testosterone fuelled movie. It’s a pretty score, signature Horner in fact, and unobtrusive but it just seems out of place here. The film also would seem to have no right to its title being far from magnificent in its scripted characters. It is actually a misnomer. These characters don’t display anything resembling magnificence, a few of them even ending up as corpses. Most of the actors lack any kind of screen presence or charisma (Washington not withstanding) and the whole enterprise resolves to be a so-so affair. Magnificent? No. Just average.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

FadeBlackFeb 11, 2017

A delightfully entertaining movie from beginning to end, a must for any Western and/or adventure fan. Yes, the story is very straightforward, but the chemistry of the cast made it work, big time.

Its downfall, to an extent, is that it wasA delightfully entertaining movie from beginning to end, a must for any Western and/or adventure fan. Yes, the story is very straightforward, but the chemistry of the cast made it work, big time.

Its downfall, to an extent, is that it was extremely, extremely, and I mean extremely predictable. Most often than not, that is not an issue for me, but there was barely a scene here which you could not predict how it would play out 2 minutes in advance. It took me out of it.

Still, overall another good movie to add to Washington's fantastic filmography.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

WintxOct 25, 2016

Big long time Western fan here. So needless to say, not very overwhelmed by this new addition. Feel like meddlesome middle of the road execs/focus groups got in the way of this one and bullied Fuqua into a remake that wandered in no man'sBig long time Western fan here. So needless to say, not very overwhelmed by this new addition. Feel like meddlesome middle of the road execs/focus groups got in the way of this one and bullied Fuqua into a remake that wandered in no man's land. It's not Silverado fun, not Wild Bunch drama, not Leone tension -- but throws in attempts at all of those, I suppose as an homage but feels more derivative (been there done that) than a respectful wink/nod. (sigh) Hopefully not a final nail in the genre's coffin.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

bfoore90Apr 9, 2017

I never thought I'd like this movie as much as I did, it was a surprising and unique take on a rather generic western plot line. Denzel, Pratt and Ethan Hawke are the standouts here with Washington and Hawke still got the chemistry that madeI never thought I'd like this movie as much as I did, it was a surprising and unique take on a rather generic western plot line. Denzel, Pratt and Ethan Hawke are the standouts here with Washington and Hawke still got the chemistry that made "Training Day" great and Pratt is as good as ever at playing a western version of Chris Pratt. Fight scenes are cool and entertaining with good shots and spot on directing by Fuqua. Overall Magnificent Seven is a refreshing take on western movies and a fun movie to watch.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Jim222001Jun 15, 2017

As historically accurate as Wild Wild West. I almost expected a giant robot spider. However, the cast makes it fun, especially Chris Pratt (Guardians of the Galaxy). While Peter Sarsgard (Flight Plan) could play a great villain in his sleep.As historically accurate as Wild Wild West. I almost expected a giant robot spider. However, the cast makes it fun, especially Chris Pratt (Guardians of the Galaxy). While Peter Sarsgard (Flight Plan) could play a great villain in his sleep. Well, just not in Green Lantern. Denzel Washington (Training Day) and Ethan Hawke (Training Day) aren't bad either but Pratt steals the show. It was also nice to get one final musical score by the late great James Horner (Aliens, Willow).… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

legoman786Nov 6, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Very little build up. I had to ask my friend half the time for the names of the characters every time they made an important remark. The only names I know by heart are Goodnight, Sam, and Billy... The others are practically bystanders who could have been replaced with civilians in all honesty. The plot is so simple... It's TOO simple... so simple that it leaves much to be desired. The only character that was given some sort of background and or buildup was goodnight who I was only able to understand after some far-fetched interpretation that really stretched the bounds into something I have to do in AP reading (such as him having horrible memories of the Civil War and leaving the main battle scenes because of it). Other than that, I know nothing of him or the other characters for that matter. I feel as though I have more questions then were answered-

The Civil War is over, so why is Sam given a racial connotation? I thought this was a Western movie. Pioneers traveled west to leave the past behind them and pursue opportunity. They didn't pursue Western Expansion to continue their racial stereotypes.

What motive does the Native have in joining the 7? Other then the fact he says his Destiny is different then the rest of the tribal citizens, it is not emphasized enough.

What's up with that ending? Where do the survivors of the 7 head off to in the distance? Is that for further audience interpretation?

What is Sam's background with Bouge? Why does he resent him so much other then some mentioning of rape within the church scene before Bouge is shot?

Where do the endless supply of Cavalcade come from within the final battle scene? It's obvious that a good portion was blown up by the dynamite. Furthermore, if you payed attention to the surroundings, you should have noticed the Cavalcade pushing towards the town in a Horizontal line formation where they broke up as they reached the center of town... So how is that there is more of them approaching the town from the background when the entire Cavalry pushed at one time? That was complete nonsense.

In continuation, the battle scene had no flow of strategy. It was a free for all where all hell broke lose. The residents over Rose Creek had the advantage, then Bouge pulled out the Gatling gun, then the Residents sent whatchyama call it out to go and blow the gun up with dynamite, and the rest were cleared out... Very confusing and the only parts I actually understood were the death scenes

My thoughts were all over the place with this movie. The only redeeming factor was the action. That's it. Great planning with poor execution.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

1

papadrew7Oct 2, 2016

This movie was just awful from the writing, to the sets/props that obviously look like were made in the 21st century, to how ridiculously clean everyone is for the time period. I mean this movie wants us to believe that a bunch of criminalsThis movie was just awful from the writing, to the sets/props that obviously look like were made in the 21st century, to how ridiculously clean everyone is for the time period. I mean this movie wants us to believe that a bunch of criminals lead by a black man in the 1800's would band together to defend a meaningless town filled with strangers just for the goodness of their hearts? The movie was way too long by the way and I seriously contemplated leaving after I was bored to death and realized I had another hour of this pathetic excuse of a movie. The score reflects that at least the finale was mildly entertaining but for the most part the shootouts just were not done well at all. If you are going to make a movie about cowboys killing each other at least do the time piece solid and make the shootouts realistic with rated R blood/gore you would expect after a man is shot multiple times with a gatling gun.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

Douglas56Sep 30, 2016

Surprisingly stupid film, and I'm someone who likes westerns. With all his acting smarts, Washington cannot save this movie from its relentless cliches and lack of excitement. The soundtrack is welcome compensation and the camera work andSurprisingly stupid film, and I'm someone who likes westerns. With all his acting smarts, Washington cannot save this movie from its relentless cliches and lack of excitement. The soundtrack is welcome compensation and the camera work and stunts are of a high standard, but that's the best one can say for this escapist fluff.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

YoloSwag4DogeOct 9, 2016

The special effects and stunt work in this movie are great. And the acting, for the most part, is quite good. What fell flat for me was what felt like a lack of substance. We learn a bit about the several men and the plight of the townsfolkThe special effects and stunt work in this movie are great. And the acting, for the most part, is quite good. What fell flat for me was what felt like a lack of substance. We learn a bit about the several men and the plight of the townsfolk is done well. The villain is made out to be quite despicable, which certainly adds some weight to things. But when it comes to the actual shootouts (there's two big ones), it feels like a montage of badass kill maneuvers rather than actual shootouts. What I mean is that for all the style and flare, there is very little of the fighting that actually feels real. Especially the final showdown, there are literally dozens upon dozens upon dozens of guys just randomly popping up around the town sitting atop of their horses just waiting for someone to do a badass take down of them. The initial charge there appears to be maybe a couple dozen of the baddies, but somehow despite blowing up half of them with dynamite and surprising them with a hidden trench filled with armed villagers, they continue to pop up around the town in bunches of 3 just spinning around in circles on their horses getting shot. There's a gatling gun that's used later in the fight by the bad guys even though there killing some of their own men. Why this gun wasn't used to open up the fight, (kind of like bombarding with artillery fire), is beyond me. There's no flanking maneuvers. The bad guys run at the town head on, while the good guys later charge at the gatling gun head on. But I know, I'm just beating on a dead horse. Bottom line is the action is all flare without care. So, I found it somewhat amusing to watch, but I didn't really feel attached to the characters or the townsfolk, who were basically just fodder for the bad guys to kill while the good guys hip fired their 6 shooters like a cliche straigh outta the 60's. (Oh and don't worry. No good guy ever just holsters his pistol. There is always the double spin that somehow makes really loud windmill noises while they're doing it).… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

CineAutoctonoOct 12, 2016

"The Magnificent Seven" turned out to be an unnecessary remake, but entertained a lot, the cast, history and western atmosphere that drove was very good but felt that as a new movie and not remake, because it does not meet those requirements,"The Magnificent Seven" turned out to be an unnecessary remake, but entertained a lot, the cast, history and western atmosphere that drove was very good but felt that as a new movie and not remake, because it does not meet those requirements, but because you can do, it's an enjoyable movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

tallhollySep 28, 2016

Why is everyone sweating all the time except Denzel who manages to maintain his perfect black costuming admist swirling dust storms, raging rivers, and constant flesh wounds and gushing blood.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

3

infinityofbroSep 30, 2016

I'm fine with violence when done intelligently, or in a fun way. The violence is never ending in this film, it's uninspired, it's graphic (without breaking the pg13 rules), and in most cases does not add to the film other than another sceneI'm fine with violence when done intelligently, or in a fun way. The violence is never ending in this film, it's uninspired, it's graphic (without breaking the pg13 rules), and in most cases does not add to the film other than another scene where a bunch of people get murdered by who we're supposed to be rooting for. The motivations of the "heroes" was ambiguous, and all the people they were killing, in some cases maliciously, were just hired hands. I'd never let a kid see this film, not because of the violence, but because the movie is totally irresponsible about the idea of punishing evil, who deserves punishment, and how that evil is punished. Just garbage movie. And its painful to watch a movie that was clearly edited to hell after Chris Pratt became a big movie star. His one liners are terrible and half the movie follows him around for basically no reason. Don't see this movie.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

4

ourtimehascomeMar 2, 2017

This film is a perfect example how not to produce a remake. Instead of sticking to the original script, it tries to be different. Except, in its struggle, it fails so magnificently it can hardly be called original. Instead, it isThis film is a perfect example how not to produce a remake. Instead of sticking to the original script, it tries to be different. Except, in its struggle, it fails so magnificently it can hardly be called original. Instead, it is cliche-ridden and predictable. Almost as if there was a checklist of Western tropes the team was making sure were included.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

AT9Mar 17, 2019

I liked it. It was a movie with a message that race doesn't matter that came off more like that race doesn't matter in the face of evil. Well, they messed that up, but since it's in the film and leads to some hilarious scenes, I am okay withI liked it. It was a movie with a message that race doesn't matter that came off more like that race doesn't matter in the face of evil. Well, they messed that up, but since it's in the film and leads to some hilarious scenes, I am okay with it. In my eyes, they fixed their own own mistake on presenting their political message with humour. Now onto the actual film: some actors had more time to shine which was a shame because the cast all did great. Because it's an action movie, maybe that doesn't even matter. Why develop characters when they are fodder? That's a very Wild West view. Imagery pulled me in and the tactics were pretty authentic to my knowledge to the expense of maybe getting draggy because of the attention to detail. I LOVED THAT! This movie wasn't a politically neutral film, but it was a blast of an adventure with a great battle scene. I'd recommend this film.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

NIntendoFan94Feb 25, 2017

Magnificent Seven was a solidly good movie! The cast has done very well with this movie. This could be the best western movie of 2016 unlike any other.