The Incredible Hulk
Universal Pictures | Release Date: June 13, 2008
7.0
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1139 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
746
Mixed:
314
Negative:
79
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
6
RayzorMooseNov 13, 2013
The Incredible Hulk isn't very Incredible.
Edward Norton gives a good performance but the concept of Hulk itself just seems tired. There is no new outlook on the hero just simply a repeatedly mediocre take on a very one dimensionalThe Incredible Hulk isn't very Incredible.
Edward Norton gives a good performance but the concept of Hulk itself just seems tired. There is no new outlook on the hero just simply a repeatedly mediocre take on a very one dimensional character. The screenwriters should have tried to be more inventive.… Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
9
Bruce722May 26, 2013
Though I'm not a big fan of Edward Norton he does a great job in this movie. It's darker and more emotional and dramatic than most superhero movies and I think that fits in well with the Bruce Banner tragic story. Liv Tyler is as angelic asThough I'm not a big fan of Edward Norton he does a great job in this movie. It's darker and more emotional and dramatic than most superhero movies and I think that fits in well with the Bruce Banner tragic story. Liv Tyler is as angelic as usual and Tim Roth and William Hurt round out a great cast. The action sequences were done really well and I loved all of the little nods to the Hulk lore like the Lou Ferrigno cameo, the purple pants scene, the Stan Lee cameo, and the name of their old time friend "Stanley" being a nod to the creator. The plot also developed really well. The only negative was that the fight sequence at the end with abomination was a little anticlimactic. That fight is being hyped up the entire film and I just didn't think it was that great. Nonetheless, this was an outstanding movie and most people would enjoy it.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
Critic2012May 5, 2012
THE INCREDIBLE HULK helps us believe that the man who is the monster really does fear himself, that he fears not being able to control it. It's a Marvel film: it's fun, humorous, and packed with action. Sit back and watch the Hulk...SMASH!
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
OfficialNov 4, 2013
It can't beat "Iron Man", but "The Incredible Hulk" is still an intense and action-packed Marvel movie. It has an intelligent script but doesn't have the same intelligent style and craft like "Iron Man". Either way, I still recommend youIt can't beat "Iron Man", but "The Incredible Hulk" is still an intense and action-packed Marvel movie. It has an intelligent script but doesn't have the same intelligent style and craft like "Iron Man". Either way, I still recommend you check out this smashing movie.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
cameronmorewoodNov 13, 2012
This is the best Hulk we're going to get. Take it or leave it.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
9
cryhardhumorFeb 1, 2015
Colorful, exciting, well acted and visually impressive, The Incredible Hulk is one of my personal favorite Marvel Phase 1 movies. Edward Norton truly shines as does Tim Roth
9/10
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
9
SuperheroMoviesAug 5, 2013
The thrilling, adrenaline rushing reboot that the first Hulk film never was. The Incredible Hulk has the engaging story needed to make this film work, and all the visually appealing action to enthrall Marvel and superhero fans alike.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
Leo9127Feb 24, 2014
This is a mixed bag, the special effects are good, Edward Norton was good, and it was definatly better than Ang Lee's monstrosity (pun intended), but everything else is just kinda of underwhelming, and it just feels that it is missingThis is a mixed bag, the special effects are good, Edward Norton was good, and it was definatly better than Ang Lee's monstrosity (pun intended), but everything else is just kinda of underwhelming, and it just feels that it is missing something that Iron Man had.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
10
PeterParkerJan 23, 2015
L'incredibile Hulk non sarà un film ai livelli di The Avengers o Captain America: The Winter Soldier,ma è comunque un capolavoro fenomenale e soprattutto godibile.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
Kes4278Jul 30, 2017
Movie was great in my opinion. The hulk looked really good and the acting was just amazing to be honest. Too bad there won't be another one anytime soon.8/10
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
10
DavidC.Jun 14, 2008
I went into the theater still skeptical (primarily due to the 2003 version). They needed to do something magic to make up for that and on top of that I didn't expect near the same quality of movie as Iron Man. Walking out of the theater I went into the theater still skeptical (primarily due to the 2003 version). They needed to do something magic to make up for that and on top of that I didn't expect near the same quality of movie as Iron Man. Walking out of the theater I had an overwhelming sensation that The Incredible Hulk is better then Iron Man. After a nights reflection I stand by that, put simply Hulk > Iron Man [however in not all respects]. While RDJ near perfect role as Tony Stark is marginally better then Edward Norton's Bruce Banner, the Hulk is a far more impressive superhero then Iron Man. The fights in both their scale and frequency blow Iron Man out of the water. For fans of Marvel comics (like myself) the cross-overs just add to the experience. We get two Tony Stark references, subtle references to Captain America, a reference to The Avengers, and a possible set up for the Hulk and Wolverine's encounter at the end. Needless to say Marvel has hit two home runs this summer with movies, if you enjoyed Iron Man, you owe it to yourself to watch this movie, even if only for the 2 min ending featuring Tony Stark.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
9
MauricioL.Jun 28, 2008
The script is really short but the effects were a lot better, the hulk is a lot smaller which i really liked and the setting changed, Brazil was a nice touch, i really enjoyed it.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
9
MoviebuffreviewJan 22, 2011
The Incredible Hulk really surprised me. Sure, it doesn't have as much wit or substance as Iron Man, but the film is what the Hulk should be: fun with good acting, a solid script, awesome action, and an actor that can portray Bruce BannerThe Incredible Hulk really surprised me. Sure, it doesn't have as much wit or substance as Iron Man, but the film is what the Hulk should be: fun with good acting, a solid script, awesome action, and an actor that can portray Bruce Banner well. The Incredible Hulk is a great movie, and even better to comic book fans. Overall, forget Ang Lee, this is a great movie!… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
ImUnavailableMar 2, 2012
A solid effort that delivers what you would expect from a Hulk movie and then a little bit more. Ed Norton is good as Bruce Banner and the action scenes are impressive. It is not the cleverest or the most thrilling superhero movie but itA solid effort that delivers what you would expect from a Hulk movie and then a little bit more. Ed Norton is good as Bruce Banner and the action scenes are impressive. It is not the cleverest or the most thrilling superhero movie but it should appeal to fans and non-fans alike.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
SpunkyMonkeyOct 15, 2012
Really enjoyed this, bar a few daft bits & flimsy plot-lines/holes, it holds together well and does both a great job as a film, and a superhero flick. It finds a superb balance in portraying an angry-man-hating Hulk and also a caring,Really enjoyed this, bar a few daft bits & flimsy plot-lines/holes, it holds together well and does both a great job as a film, and a superhero flick. It finds a superb balance in portraying an angry-man-hating Hulk and also a caring, misunderstood one, although it does lacks a bit of needed dialogue in the early stages mind. However it definitely finishes strong with a top notch fight scene and the CGI graphics actually look great, with the end fight scene itself pretty damn cool and not the repetitive borefest which CGI usually spawns. All the scenes involving Hulk throughout are excellent in fact - no "it's obviously CGI" moments - and the film also cleverly intertwines into the plot the way that Hulk goes from being a raging monster, to more of a man-monster. If you can ignore the odd daft bit then you've a fine film to enjoy.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
ZilcellNov 13, 2011
The Incredible Hulk has much higher action and better development for story. The CGI is great. The acting is really great. This film really adds the incredible in The Incredible Hulk.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
PulseEnderNov 24, 2012
The Incredible Hulk is the Hulk reboot which fans have been waiting for. As a relevent part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Edward Norton plays the role of Bruce Banner very well as you can feel the connection between his depression and hisThe Incredible Hulk is the Hulk reboot which fans have been waiting for. As a relevent part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Edward Norton plays the role of Bruce Banner very well as you can feel the connection between his depression and his constant attempt to control his emotions. Plot: Bruce Banner is a scientist who along with the American army attempts to re-create the super soldier formula that had transformed Steve Rogers into Captain America. The attempt goes haywire when he becomes so confident in it that he injects himself and becomes the rage filled Incredible Hulk. While hiding out in the favelas of Brazil, he contacts a mysterious source known as Mr. Blue in an attempt to find an antidote toward his unwanted transformation. In the meantime he struggles to control his anger to avoid causing innocent casualties and waking up confused and naked. Meanwhile the General Ross (William Hurt) of the US army attempts to capture Banner in an attempt to use him as a weapon. To do this however he hires an elite soldier Emil Blonsky (Tim Roth) who is ecstatic to capture Banner and will go to extremes in order to do this. Comparison to Hulk: This movie includes much of the same plot but is much more linear and realistic. Instead of unrealistic scenerios, The Incredible Hulk immerses audiences with its top notch CGI the seriousness of its military forces and its incredible ending. Opinion: One of the best superhero movies that really show audiences what Hulk is all about. Anyone who is interested in a realistic live action Hulk should totally view this movie, also anyone interested in the Marvel Cinematic Universe should check this one out.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
Compi24Nov 28, 2012
It may not be as well-crafted as its other Marvel: Phase One counterparts, but "The Incredible Hulk" effectively rekindles the audience's interest in the plight of Bruce Banner, played by the always excellent Edward Norton.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
TheApplegnomeJul 29, 2014
The Incredible Hulk is an enormous improvement, if you compare this film with the previous one, because this one got so much more action, better actors, better CGI and more realistic scenes.

The story is way better than Hulk (2003), and IThe Incredible Hulk is an enormous improvement, if you compare this film with the previous one, because this one got so much more action, better actors, better CGI and more realistic scenes.

The story is way better than Hulk (2003), and I never felt boring at any time, compared to the previous movie. The Incredible Hulk is an enormous cool movie and it got a great opening scene, a good story, good music and a fascinating ending, and I really recommend it for anyone!

The Incredible Hulk gets a 8/10… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
MovieGuysApr 3, 2014
The Incredible Hulk is a hell of an improvement over Ang Lee's "Hulk" from 5 years earlier. Incredible Hulk as a better story, better action sequences, and it captures our attention and holds it. Edward Norton fits right into this movie, asThe Incredible Hulk is a hell of an improvement over Ang Lee's "Hulk" from 5 years earlier. Incredible Hulk as a better story, better action sequences, and it captures our attention and holds it. Edward Norton fits right into this movie, as this type of "quiet-but-deadly" role is right up his alley.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
marcmyworksNov 27, 2013
Edward Norton works as the new Bruce Banner. This reboot of the Hulk franchise is far superior to Ang Lee's "Hulk", as Ed makes us like the jolly green giant again.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
JaragonJan 8, 2014
Very enjoyable movie. I was actually quite surprised by how amusing the movie turned out to be, because I came in with the idea I wouldn't be watching for to long but it turned out I kept watching for the entire movie.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
ghost-nappa56Aug 16, 2014
After the terrible Hulk movie before I was happy that this movie was made as the origin story is correct, the acting was better and most importantly the CGI was much better. In my opinion the villain was much better and memorable.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
Meth-dudeApr 3, 2015
This is a good movie.It was more action packed than Ang Lee's one and the choice to cast Edward Norton as Bruce banner was a good idea.The special effects and acting are really good.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
ShiningLionMar 23, 2019
What could have easily been a mediocre and all-too-familiar origin story turned out a really fulfilling cinematic experience thanks to straight-up good filmmaking. This film is objectively better from a technical standpoint than itsWhat could have easily been a mediocre and all-too-familiar origin story turned out a really fulfilling cinematic experience thanks to straight-up good filmmaking. This film is objectively better from a technical standpoint than its predecessor, Iron Man. Cinematography is done artfully and carefully with lots of attention to pleasing compositions and meaningful movement and framing. The locations, environments, lighting, and weather are all used to great effect to give mood to the film's various situations and arcs. The score by Craig Armstrong, one of my favorite film composers, enriched each scene with appropriate energy and emotion. The performances of the main cast were convincing. I really felt the connections between the characters and the emotions of the characters. For a film that's relatively light on story, it really makes up with it with pleasing characters, visuals, and action. The action scenes were thrilling and handled particularly well, much more fun to watch than the action scenes in Iron Man, as these are more carefully planned and coreographed, with some truly surprise moments. I found there were moments of sheer awe and horror in the brutality of The Hulk and his fights with the menacing villains. I was even kind of surprised to see later parts of the film take on the feeling of a monster movie, evoking feelings of Godzilla, Cloverfield, and others of that genre. It worked very well and helped us feel the surrounding characters' fear of the "monster" they'd created in Bruce Banner. Great movie. I'd watch it again. It has a few weaknesses, namely every moment involving Mr. Blue, who gave a rather grating performance. There are a few moments that feel rushed, or forced, or cheesy, but all-in-all for such a simple story this film worked really well for me. I'm sad to see Ed Norton didn't keep the role, because I highly prefer him to Mark Ruffalo for this character.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
DudeFromIcelandOct 15, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A big improvement on the 2003 Ang Lee Hulk film (which wasn't hard tbh), not a amazing film but not a terrible one either. Feels a little bit irrelevant to the MCU but as a solo film it's decent. The action scenes are very fun and most performances are good.

Only thing I find a bit weird is the casting choice of Tim Roth as this amazing decorated soldier, it just doesn't fit. He never feels all that intimidating in the entire film until the end (for obvious reasons), that's really my only big gripe with the film… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
RojodeKantoFeb 14, 2016
Al principio creía como todos que era una secuela a la somnífera de Ang Lee, pero no, es un reinicio en un estanque más grande, me animé a verla por que en un anuncio de periódico que cierto personaje millonario que le habia visto hace casiAl principio creía como todos que era una secuela a la somnífera de Ang Lee, pero no, es un reinicio en un estanque más grande, me animé a verla por que en un anuncio de periódico que cierto personaje millonario que le habia visto hace casi mes y medio aparecería en la película, haciendo que estén conectados, algo que no se había hecho antes en películas de este género, sobre la película no me aburre en ningún momento y muchos de los díalogos son breves y hay mucha acción para dar y tomar, el diseño de Hulk, muy realista, fiel al material original, asi como varios cameos buenísimos, sobre todo cierto personaje que he mencionado al principio, Edward Norton hace genial de Bruce Banner, Liv Tyler preciosa y me convence como Betty Ross, William Hurt como el General Ross, clavadísimo, Tim Roth como el antagonista dío más caña tanto antes y después de volverse una abominación de monstruo, y dio mejor pelea que el disque Hombre Absorbente de Ang Lee, sin duda alguna Louis Leterrier ha hecho gran trabajo con este producto, lo bueno es que hubiera muchas referencias a la clásica serie televisiva de los 70's, tanto en el resumido origen del protagonista,que también mezcla el origen del universo Ultimate del mismo personaje, lo único malo de esta experiencia fue verla un sábado repleto de gente con niños, cuando hay cierta escena cachonda con Bruce y Betty… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
FuturedirectorMar 19, 2016
The Incredible Hulk has enjoyable story-telling but an unremarkable plot. The characters are back, with not much to say and Bruce Banner just wanna do what he always do: Kill his green side. This is not a classic for Marvel Universe, but, atThe Incredible Hulk has enjoyable story-telling but an unremarkable plot. The characters are back, with not much to say and Bruce Banner just wanna do what he always do: Kill his green side. This is not a classic for Marvel Universe, but, at least, Hulk's back, continuing with his predecessors, to be a hero and fight vs his real enemy. Fans won't be disappointed at the end.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
Cinemassacre94Mar 20, 2016
What seemed, in theory, the least-necessary revival of a bigscreen superhero emerges as perfectly solid summer action fare in “The Incredible Hulk.” Revisiting the character Ang Lee and James Schamus put under a psychological microscope inWhat seemed, in theory, the least-necessary revival of a bigscreen superhero emerges as perfectly solid summer action fare in “The Incredible Hulk.” Revisiting the character Ang Lee and James Schamus put under a psychological microscope in 2003 to mixed results, Marvel, Universal and several of the same producers have repackaged one of their better-known stable stars in a straightforward actioner that delivers the goods with no unnecessary frills or digressions. Happy to give the intended audience what it wants, this loud and quick-moving production will shake loose ample coin in all markets.

To anyone wondering why the Marvel team would so soon embark on a makeover of the growly green giant after all the angst endured on the previous one, the answer is provided by the final scene, in which the star of the most recent Marvel B.O. smash unexpectedly turns up to ask, “What if I told you we were getting a team together?”

New film thus marks the first step in the label’s plan to begin shuffling its major characters into films together, a la some of the comicbooks — a scheme that seemingly required the rehabilitation of the Hulk from something that came to be regarded as perhaps too rarefied, not of a piece with the studio’s other cinematic stalwarts.

Viewed in this utilitarian light, the new film gets its job done. It’s not especially exciting or surprising, lacking the cheek and sheen of “Iron Man” and the opulence and star power of the “Spider-Man” and “X-Men” series. But it’s better than the “Fantastic Four” pictures and “Daredevil” and manages to shift the title character from a hopelessly conflicted Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde to a wannabe good guy.

It seems that none of these Marvel-based films can begin with anything other than a medical experiment gone madly awry, leaving its subject with a drastically split personality. This one gets it over with pronto, after which scientist Bruce Banner (Edward Norton) hides out anonymously in a Brazilian favela while desperately trying to decontaminate his blood, eliminating the cells that can make him, if sufficiently incensed, turn into a raging, bemuscled, 9-foot screamer with disagreeably antisocial habits.

Keen to track Bruce down is Army Gen. Thaddeus “Thunderbolt” Ross (a cigar-chomping William Hurt), who oversaw the experiment. He wants to bend the results to military purposes and sends mad-dog soldier Emil Blonsky (Tim Roth) flying down to Rio to snatch the elusive fugitive. Resulting pursuit is a partially parkour-style chase through the pinched passageways and across the roofs of the hillside slums that entertainingly recalls but doesn’t nearly match the flair of the opening sequence of “Casino Royale.” The Hulk makes his first kick-butt appearance in Brazil 23 minutes in, but is only partly seen, and in shadows at that.

Despite the manpower expended to bring him to heel, Bruce is able to make his way back to Virginia, stopping en route in Mexico to buy a pair of stretchy pants, which he rightly predicts will prove useful down the line. In the intervening six months or so, g.f. Betty (Liv Tyler), old Thunderbolt’s daughter, has taken up with a new guy, but she immediately drops him when her old flame reappears with major issues to deal with.

First and foremost, her dad wants to extract whatever’s inside him to augment the Pentagon’s arsenal (there’s no discussion of whether or not this super-steroid constitutes a chemical weapon). Second, Blonsky, who admires his adversary as “a whole new level of weird,” can’t wait to attain that level himself. After he volunteers to receive a dose, he’s able to compete with the Hulk up to a point in an explosive battle on a university campus lawn, but he’ll need more juice to have any hope of besting the green one in a street brawl.

Which is exactly what the showdown consists of. Following an interlude in which the Hulk takes Betty to what looks just like King Kong’s cave, both he and Blonsky enlist the services of an enthusiastic research doctor (Tim Blake Nelson in an amusingly over-the-top turn) to become battle-ready. With Blonsky transformed into a creature fully justified in being called the Abomination, they proceed, ripped and roaring, to lay waste to Harlem; that the finale would seem to be almost entirely a CGI-animated sequence will be noticed but not much minded.

Norton gives indications of perhaps wanting to go places with the role that remain off-limits this time around (he no doubt would have been happy teaming with Lee), but he’s kept largely on the straight-and-narrow, to decent effect. Tyler is no more or less memorable in the femme lead than Jennifer Connelly was in “Hulk,” while both Roth and Hurt happily underplay by a bit what might have been expected of them in their villainous roles.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
ElectroNickApr 28, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This film is a massive improvement over Ang Lee's less-than successful attempt to bring this character to the silver screen. This film has gotten some flack for not being as good as one of the best films in the Marvel franchise but it is still a good movie in its own right. One ingenious thing about this film is that since it is a reboot of the previous Hulk film, they put the origin of the character in the opening credits which is something that I hope they do with the new Spider man movies since people are well aware of his origin. Edward Norton gives a compelling performance as both the Hulk and as Bruce Banner. The actor who plays General Ross fits his role perfectly as the no- nonsense military general. The story is what you would expect from the Hulk since it is about him running away from the military while fighting the Abomination played by Tim Roth. The final action scene was once again very entertaining with the protagonist fighting a darker reflection of him self. Unfortunately there are still some problems with this film that holds it back from making a great film instead of a good film. For instance although Tim Roth was an intimating villain his turn to evil wasnt really that convincing. At first it seems that he only wants to fight the Hulk because its his mission but than he turns evil in a snap because of the formula. There was also some buildup to a potential villain (either the Leader or Gargoyle) which never went anywhere and it will never be explored in any of the other Marvel movies. Betty Ross was also a bland love -interest. She is good at being the emotional support for Bruce Banner but I really didn't care for her safety that much. Despite those glaring problems though it is worth a watch especially for that POV shot when Banner tries to kill himself and later turns into the Hulk to spit out the bullet.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
SCarlisleSep 23, 2016
Louis Leterrier presents us with a very well-handled, respected version of the Bruce Banner we all know and love. The film is an overall fun experience, however, it suffers from very cringeworthy acting by Liv Tyler, which in turn makes theLouis Leterrier presents us with a very well-handled, respected version of the Bruce Banner we all know and love. The film is an overall fun experience, however, it suffers from very cringeworthy acting by Liv Tyler, which in turn makes the romance between Bruce Banner and Betty Ross very cringeworthy as well. The viewer cannot help but think the film had much more potential when it's over. The Incredible Hulk, to be quite honest, probably deserves an overall score of a 7, but I myself have always been a fan before being a critic, and The Incredible Hulk delivers just enough for me to not only give the film an overall score of 8, but also purchase the film of Blu-Ray. This underrated film is definitely worth watching in your spare time!… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
alejandro970Apr 22, 2018
Some better than Ang Lee version with several Easter eggs and winks to TV series of 70s. If it has a defect or two, it´s the hasty start sequence and the short sequence dedicated to villian. For kill 112 minutes with the less of pain.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
Creeper3455Sep 16, 2018
Let’s fast-forward things back in 2008,when Marvel was riding off the heels of Iron Man’s success and the fans’ mind-blowing reaction to the post-credit scene of Nick Fury introducing the Avengers Initiative.
After everyone saw IronLet’s fast-forward things back in 2008,when Marvel was riding off the heels of Iron Man’s success and the fans’ mind-blowing reaction to the post-credit scene of Nick Fury introducing the Avengers Initiative.
After everyone saw Iron Man,everyone didn’t know where the Marvel Universe would go,so hearing the news of another Hulk movie was both great news and terrible news,since we know what happened to the last Hulk movie (also because Hulk is owned by Universal and stuff)…. And that’s where we had “The Incredible Hulk”,a movie that promised us a new version of the Hulk (and a refresher from 2003… Ok,I’ll stop).
But if we’re going to see if it’s any good or not 10 years later (kind of astounding how it held up by itself,honestly),let’s see if it still holds up or not.
So,the story. To understand the story,technically you’ll have to see the 2003 Hulk movie by Ang Lee (I guess,which if you don’t want to,glad they retell that for the new viewers in the title sequence) to get some explanations of what’s going on in the beginning of the movie (when we’re introduced to Bruce Banner’s life),but,cutting that flaw out,the rest is interesting to look at. We understand why Bruce Banner (played by Edward Norton) is having a troubled life with the military,his love for Betty Ross (played by Liv Tyler) and his anger/excitement issues that lead him to becoming the Hulk,as the title says. Even if in the end,he realizes that no matter what he does,the city still needs him,even if he’ll SMASH his way through everything.
Speaking of that,at the same time,in the 3rd act,we’ll get introduced to the villain,Abomination (played by Tim Roth),where I’m kind of mixed. Look,his actions are not really understandable: He’s a Professional Soldier,he gets angry after he got beaten by a kick from Hulk,then he gets crazy and crazy as the movie progresses,him and his creepy CG’d out body (he gets the Super-Soldier serum,so that’ll better explain something…),then he becomes the Abomination just so he can kick Hulk’s butt. It’s not horrible,but it feels like the writers saw a Videogame Rage Compilation and thought “What if the angry player gets his revenge on him,and actually wins?” to just get away with it. Back to Bruce Banner, his relation with Betty is really sweet and Edward Norton plays a “scared,always on the lookout” Bruce Banner expertly.
Tim Roth is intimidating as Abomination and Liv Tyler was basically ‘Jennifer Connelly from Hulk 2003’ 2.0,since her lines are told in this weird,coff-y and muted tone,and a scene involving a Taxi Driver driving like if it’s a Car Chase (that was outta nowhere…). That,and the scene where Hulk throws a rock through the storm to defend Betty cracks a laugh for me. Sorry,but it’s just me.
Now,for the Special Effects...as of today,they look like the perfect Nintendo Switch videogame,ported by Panic Button. But,for 2008 standards,this felt serviceable. The action was fast and frenetic,and the Motion Capture was nice.
And yeah,the score is still another “Marvel Score where you’ll remember the theme and its action cues”,but it’s one of the better ones,being composed by Craig Armstrong (he also composed The Great Gatsby).
So in the end,I think The Incredible Hulk is an underrated MCU Movie that fans don’t necessarily have to go see now. Maybe for a fun time. And hey,it being a Universal movie from 2008 was kinda surprising since it has better qualities in it than Cash World Fallen Profit.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
MonkiReviewsMay 28, 2017
I enjoyed the action and fighting in this movie. I found some parts boring, and other parts awesome. The CGI wasn't great, which affected the story. Overall it was pretty good.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
spacebear1Dec 7, 2017
To me, this is an incredibly underrated superhero film. Edward Norton was great as the leading character, Bruce Banner. The action sequences were very entertaining. I guess my main complaint is the villain, Abomination was disappointing. ButTo me, this is an incredibly underrated superhero film. Edward Norton was great as the leading character, Bruce Banner. The action sequences were very entertaining. I guess my main complaint is the villain, Abomination was disappointing. But overall, this is a very entertaining superhero film.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
Naruto78909Mar 30, 2018
The incredible hulk was a good movie but it still had its problems that it gets boring at some parts of the movie and the hulk brings a fun experience but the movie is bit dated as it was made in 08 but the movie is decent
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
4zaApr 12, 2018
I don't get the hate for this movie. I find it a very entertaining movie that delivers on expectations. Compared to the other movies in the series it is weaker but on its own I find it to be a very solid movie. The score is pretty good in myI don't get the hate for this movie. I find it a very entertaining movie that delivers on expectations. Compared to the other movies in the series it is weaker but on its own I find it to be a very solid movie. The score is pretty good in my opinion and the action scenes can be great at points. Like Iron Man, the third act is a tad weaker than the first two but it doesn't completely ruin the movie for me.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
lori007101Oct 13, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Hulk goes into the second round! This time, the broken scientist is played by Edward Norton. The successor of Eric Bana and Lou Ferrigno gives Bruce Banner a certain vulnerability and acts more human than its predecessors. It's just not a parade for Norton. Norton is coming for me completely under-challenged. With this reorientation of the comics Hulk, all the main characters were exchanged. Betty Ross is now played by Liv Tyler. Tyler doesn't really fit into the role. Her charisma comes more naively over and the prehistory with Bruce Banner, one does not look at her. Also General Ross was now taken over by William Hurt. Like his predecessor Sam Elliott, Hurt also has a good screen presence and costs it completely. The main opponent is Emil Blonsky this time and is played by Tim Roth. Although Roth is motivated by his role, and he also sees that he is buckling, he also seems a bit stunted. One could have afforded more freedom for Roth.
The director's post took over this time Louis Letterier. Letterier relies more on action and effects than on figure drawings. His predecessor Ang Lee had rather told it as a romantic comic book fairy tale. Although Lee was rather lengthy in his history, Letterier is rather superficial. My favorite scene is when Hulk hits Blunsky for the second time. Blunsky says dry: Is that all? And you can see that in this version a bit: Is that all? Was that all? Conclusion: Better a few effects less to work out the screenplay better!… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
bertboy93Jun 28, 2020
Underrated movie. in my opinion it's a good movie, edward norton is very good as the hulk, the action sequences are also very good! and it has a solid story!
7/10
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
jonslowJan 11, 2019
Not as good of a starter movie as the first Iron Man but it gets the job done. The action is well made and the CG scenes are good looking. The casting roll seems a bit weak at first but you will get used to it. It is of course better than theNot as good of a starter movie as the first Iron Man but it gets the job done. The action is well made and the CG scenes are good looking. The casting roll seems a bit weak at first but you will get used to it. It is of course better than the first Hulk movie released few years prior to this one… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
metacecApr 25, 2019
The Hulk is one of my favorite characters and I thought this movie was very good. A bit slow in the middle but the finale was well above to great. Sadly, I think the Ang Lee version of Hulk , killed this movie's appeal somewhat at the boxThe Hulk is one of my favorite characters and I thought this movie was very good. A bit slow in the middle but the finale was well above to great. Sadly, I think the Ang Lee version of Hulk , killed this movie's appeal somewhat at the box office. Production values are high and it follows the source fairly well. Under rated in my opinion.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
Cap5677Sep 12, 2019
I honestly did not think this movie is as bad as people say it is. I mean sure some of the sriptting wasn't great and maybe the viallin could have been better. But still Edward Norton was not that bad he was pretty good.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
TudorPopescuJan 28, 2021
When I first watched this movie, I honestly didn't like it that much. Mark Ruffalo not being in it also put me off. I thought it was the worst movie from the MCU. But today I've watched it again and my impressions are more positive than lastWhen I first watched this movie, I honestly didn't like it that much. Mark Ruffalo not being in it also put me off. I thought it was the worst movie from the MCU. But today I've watched it again and my impressions are more positive than last time. I think it's an OK Hulk movie for 2008. It holds up decently in 2021. Edward Norton did a good job. Tom Roth also plays a fairly decent villain. I've seen worse.

And it's just really interesting to think how this and Iron Man kick-started the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
I9gzMar 28, 2021
An extremely uninteresting movie with boring characters, underwhelming action, and a surprising lack of a resonant story. It goes out of its own way for fan service and clichés that fall flat. At least it's atrocious to the point it's funnyAn extremely uninteresting movie with boring characters, underwhelming action, and a surprising lack of a resonant story. It goes out of its own way for fan service and clichés that fall flat. At least it's atrocious to the point it's funny at times, which is the only saving grace of this... abomination.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
4
BullyMaguireDec 2, 2021
This movie is honestly bad. The effects are terrible the action scenes are forgettable and the villain while looking cool is again pretty meh, and overall the movie is just kind of below average. The acting is okay overall Edward Norton wasThis movie is honestly bad. The effects are terrible the action scenes are forgettable and the villain while looking cool is again pretty meh, and overall the movie is just kind of below average. The acting is okay overall Edward Norton was okay but Mark Ruffalo is way better.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
grandpajoe6191Sep 23, 2011
"Incredible Hulk" is better than I expected thanks to a powerful performance by Edward Norton, amazing (green) CGI, and a great head start of Marvel studio's "Avengers".
7 of 8 users found this helpful71
All this user's reviews
10
ThegodfathersonNov 3, 2013
The Incredible Hulk is better, bolder and more explosive than Ang Lee's 2003 film. Edward Norton is Bruce Banner a scientist whose experiment fails and he becomes a violent green mutant. This film's special effects are amazing and NortonThe Incredible Hulk is better, bolder and more explosive than Ang Lee's 2003 film. Edward Norton is Bruce Banner a scientist whose experiment fails and he becomes a violent green mutant. This film's special effects are amazing and Norton delivers better acting than Eric Bana in the 2003 movie. The Incredible Hulk has strong emotion, awesome action and breathtaking visual effects. The cameos by Stan Lee and Robert Downey Jr are funny and effective. This film is also a step up for The Avengers. The story is excellent and Liv Tyler rocks. This is one of the best, smashingly great films of the year. Thanks to director- Louis Letterer, the Hulk has more comic based fun and less boring action as Ang Lee's Hulk. Awesome, Epic and Humongous fun- The Incredible Hulk is breathtaking.… Expand
7 of 9 users found this helpful72
All this user's reviews
10
MegWhiteleyMar 7, 2012
Wow, I forgett the last horrible hulk film, this is a great example of good superhero film, because Hulk have a great story, and this film is fantastic, the cast is awesome, a great title.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
9
Josephgamers65Mar 22, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Incredible Hulk is a great movie and an MCU Movie I feel like this is the most underrated MCU movie out there I don't have really any issues this movie is different from the regular MCU movie which I thought was better, to be honest, I like everything about this movie the characters are great Hulk looks amazing my fav he was looked even with the other hulk in the MCU that I really don't like Bruce Banner is amazing the other Bruce Banner I hate I like the couple in this movie with Bruce Banner and Betty I like the whole military thing they have going on the general wants to use it as a weapon and Bruce is not trying to let them have it the only one thing I dislike is Abomination I think he did that for no reason to become that for what to wreck the city nice idea? I did like the end fight I just don't like Abomination in the movie sadly all round an underrated MCU movie I wish we had this hulk and Bruce Banner in the MCU movies sadly we don't still have an underrated movie so I give The Incredible Hulk an A-… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
9
TheQuietGamerMar 10, 2011
Better than the previous garbage movie Hulk, it really stay true to the character and makes for one of Marvel's best super hero movies yet, a must see for fans of the comics.
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
10
gm101Dec 1, 2010
I love this movie! In fact, I actually like it more than Iron Man. Made me completely forget that awful movie Ang Lee did back in 2003. Can't wait for the Avengers!
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
asylumspadezNov 22, 2011
I didnt like it as much as the film before it but it was ok. The near 2 hour run time doesnt do it justice either and it can be a little bit boring in some parts. Edward Norton is a great cast for the lead and gives a good performance. II didnt like it as much as the film before it but it was ok. The near 2 hour run time doesnt do it justice either and it can be a little bit boring in some parts. Edward Norton is a great cast for the lead and gives a good performance. I think they relied far too much on effects instead of the story behind it.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
diogomendesNov 7, 2014
Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) Analysis: The Incredible Hulk (2008)

Hulk… SMAAAAAAAASHES! And he succeeds at it. “The Incredible Hulk” is a live-action movie focused around the iconic character Hulk. After the disappointing Ang Lee’sMarvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) Analysis: The Incredible Hulk (2008)

Hulk… SMAAAAAAAASHES! And he succeeds at it. “The Incredible Hulk” is a live-action movie focused around the iconic character Hulk. After the disappointing Ang Lee’s film, I thought it was right about time they start making a decent solo movie of the green monster and what we got, was a flick entertaining enough to please comic book fanatics and audience in general. The movie is not on its full potential, however, you may find the action pleasing and the actors performances (especially from Edward Norton) very likable.

A cure is in reach for the world's most primal force of fury: THE INCREDIBLE HULK. We find scientist Bruce Banner, living in shadows, scouring the planet for an antidote. But the warmongers who dream of abusing his powers won't leave him alone, nor will his need to be with the only woman he has ever loved, Betty Ross. Upon returning to civilization, our brilliant doctor is ruthlessly pursued by The Abomination -- a nightmarish beast of pure adrenaline and aggression whose powers match The Hulk's own. A fight of comic-book proportions ensues as Banner must call upon the hero within to rescue New York City from total destruction. One scientist must make an agonizing final choice -- accept a peaceful life as Bruce Banner or the creature he could permanently become: THE INCREDIBLE HULK.

Like I said earlier in this review, Edward Norton makes for a convincing and likable lead. He’s one of the reasons as to why this movie works and I’m not afraid to say that he is even better than Eric Bana. He was replaced by Mark Ruffalo – which is a talented actor – due to some problems with the studio itself. Mark Ruffalo is a great Bruce Banner, but he will never surpass the genuine performance that Norton delivered. As for the other cast, their performances are pretty good. Well, I think Liv Tyler’s performance was a little bit stupid but it never looked fake or anything.

Now let’s talk about the action and the special effects. The visuals in this movie are not as realistic as the 2003’s film, which is surely disappointing considering it has passed 5 years since then and the effects haven’t improved. I’m not saying it looks bad, but it’s not what I expected. Hulk looks like a PS2 video game graphic and The Abomination’s design leaves much to be desired. But the action is pretty f*cking great. It’s probably one of the highlights of this movie. Hulk fighting with The Abomination was so cool and exciting, and even the scene where he fights the military proves to be one of the best fight sequence in this movie. But then again, the action was also pretty good in the other movie but the story was mediocre. What do I have to say about this movie?

The story is entertaining enough to carry the movie. It adds a few tweaks here and there, while also putting some references to Marvel Cinematic Universe and comedic relief. Sure, it doesn’t reach Iron Man’s level, but it’s enjoyable.

Final Score to The Incredible Hulk (2008): 7/10. I have nothing much to say about this. It lacks originality and the special effects look a little bit cartoonish, but overall, “The Incredible Hulk” offers pleasant action and an excellent performance from Edward Norton.

Now guys, the next movie… the best one. The Earth’s Mightiest Heroes… finally, onscreen. My next MCU review: Marvel’s The Avengers.

:)… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
EpicLadySpongeJan 23, 2016
The better and improved version of the 2003 version of Hulk. It exactly works as a charm and it exactly works as a collector to a Marvel and Hulk fan's ultimate collection.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
tamcwlmmMay 1, 2018
After the powerfull movie that was Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk is certainly not a bad follow-up, but it's not perfect. Action is great, I like Ed Norton as Bruce Banner, but I like Mark Ruffalo more. Story is good, they give Banner a solidAfter the powerfull movie that was Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk is certainly not a bad follow-up, but it's not perfect. Action is great, I like Ed Norton as Bruce Banner, but I like Mark Ruffalo more. Story is good, they give Banner a solid origin story. CGI wasn't that great, sometimes it looked like it came out of a videogame.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
Aus_CriticXMar 27, 2018
Fantastic cast, kinda stake plot but amazing cgi and effects and most of all AMAZING action and sweet comedy! Not as mind blowing as Iron Man but an amazing movie otherwise!
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
BasilZeroMay 13, 2018
Not as good of a starter movie as the first Iron Man but it gets the job done. The action is well made and the CG scenes are good looking. The casting roll seems a bit weak at first but you will get used to it. It is of course better than theNot as good of a starter movie as the first Iron Man but it gets the job done. The action is well made and the CG scenes are good looking. The casting roll seems a bit weak at first but you will get used to it. It is of course better than the first Hulk movie released few years prior to this one.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
manningn15Jan 14, 2019
This movie was really good. I liked Edward Norton as Hulk but I like Mark Ruffalo as Hulk better. The acting was great especially Liv Tyler, Edward Norton, Tim Roth, and William Hurt. The visual effects were amazing especially for that time.This movie was really good. I liked Edward Norton as Hulk but I like Mark Ruffalo as Hulk better. The acting was great especially Liv Tyler, Edward Norton, Tim Roth, and William Hurt. The visual effects were amazing especially for that time. The action sequences were awesome. Over all this was a really good movie and I enjoyed it a lot. I hope they make a sequel sometime in the future and have Liv Tyler come back.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
0
Mick510Oct 22, 2016
I hate this movie. By the end of the movie I wanted to kill myself. The story is awful. The dialogue sucks. And don't even get me about the characters. Edward Norton sucked. No personality at all. How come this movie has such a good score II hate this movie. By the end of the movie I wanted to kill myself. The story is awful. The dialogue sucks. And don't even get me about the characters. Edward Norton sucked. No personality at all. How come this movie has such a good score I don't know. It's the worst movie I've ever seen. The choreography is awful. I don't care if this is a spoiler because you shouldn't ever watch this piling piece of crap. The only good part of the movie is the after credits scene because it introduces you to Hulk joining the Avengers. Don't watch this film. Please don't watch it. You'll want to kill yourself by the end of it.… Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
5
spadenxJan 16, 2012
I liked it about as much as I did the first Hulk film. Edward Norton was a great addition. However I ,for one, am tired of seeing Hulk movies because they are all the same and really offer no growth for the characters featured in the film.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
3
777FaronJun 21, 2012
This movie is very badly directed, and i just didn't care about any of the characters. Edward Norton was the only spot of light. I don't get it... Ang Lee's Hulk was miles better as a movie, and actually had an emotional story and charactersThis movie is very badly directed, and i just didn't care about any of the characters. Edward Norton was the only spot of light. I don't get it... Ang Lee's Hulk was miles better as a movie, and actually had an emotional story and characters i could at least somewhat relate to. Is it that people's tastes have really degenerated so much that the majority prefer this ridiculously mediocre movie to the Ang Lee's version? Or are the majority of reviewers just kids who prefer it just because... well, it's newer... and Hulk says: "Hulk smash!" Either way, it's embarrassing.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
1
CPD98Oct 13, 2014
Igual de sosa y aburrida que la de 2003. Hulk sin duda es el personaje de Marvel menos interesante de todos, la trama es super previsible y hay muy poca acción. Un desastre.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
0
Steven1981Mar 21, 2020
This Hulk film is laughably bad, Tim Roth's character ruins the film all the way through and when he mutates he's bigger, uglier and more powerful than the Hulk himself played by Edward Norton. The acting is ridiculous and poor and the filmThis Hulk film is laughably bad, Tim Roth's character ruins the film all the way through and when he mutates he's bigger, uglier and more powerful than the Hulk himself played by Edward Norton. The acting is ridiculous and poor and the film is boring even with so much action which is a joke and the action scenes seem to be done with computer or some rubbish and the Hulk himself even looks fake. Terrible film!… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
2
HenryW.Sep 20, 2008
I don't think I've ever seen such a boring movie.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
8
NigelN.Jun 16, 2008
This movie did not disappoint. No more abstract fights and a lot more direct action. Enough inter-play between characters for the audience to feel for Bruce Banner and Betty Ross. But ultimately - it's a "Hulking Smash"
0 of 1 users found this helpful
3
ValmeekyR.Jun 26, 2008
The low rating is based on comparing this movie to Hulk 2003 which was truly about the Hulk, a character born of an accident with gamma radiation which unleashes suppressed mental trauma (quite violently). Leterrier's Hulk is a tribute The low rating is based on comparing this movie to Hulk 2003 which was truly about the Hulk, a character born of an accident with gamma radiation which unleashes suppressed mental trauma (quite violently). Leterrier's Hulk is a tribute to the 1977 series (i.e. Banner purposely exposes himself to gamma radiation to improve his physiology). Ang Lee's Hulk was a gigantic, disproportionate and child-like monster. Leterrier's Hulk looked a muscular man and moved like a character in Streetfighter. I'm sure the video game moves (and the weak-ass thunderclap) fascinated some people but I wanted to see the more of the Hulk's psyche exposed including a better symbiosis with Banner and waaaay more destruction when fighting a powerhouse like the Abomination.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
1
LawrieS.Jun 28, 2008
I find it difficult to say how bad this film truly is. There is a really bad plot (hulk gets chased by American military, done), there is virtually no script as anyone hardly ever says anything, it's really dark, the hulk is a pussy, I find it difficult to say how bad this film truly is. There is a really bad plot (hulk gets chased by American military, done), there is virtually no script as anyone hardly ever says anything, it's really dark, the hulk is a pussy, please let me stop. OK Tim Roth is an uber soldier that turns into a bigger and more evil creature than the hulk, please get real! Save yourself the time and DO NOT WATCH IT!!… Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful
3
PhilB.Sep 18, 2008
Terrible, can't believe it received such positive reviews. The action was stilted, the script was appalling and the lead actress looked like she'd been to the plastic surgeon a few too many times, the nose and the upper lip. Worst Terrible, can't believe it received such positive reviews. The action was stilted, the script was appalling and the lead actress looked like she'd been to the plastic surgeon a few too many times, the nose and the upper lip. Worst movie I've seen in a long time, I love eddy norton, but this was atrocious.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
3
supersigyMay 22, 2012
There are no performances because no one really has lines or any character moments. The plot essentially comprises of going from A to B to C with a chase scene leading to a fight at each location. There is no continuity or suspense. How manyThere are no performances because no one really has lines or any character moments. The plot essentially comprises of going from A to B to C with a chase scene leading to a fight at each location. There is no continuity or suspense. How many times do you shoot Hulk with assault rifles until you realize the bullets bounce off? Oh maybe if I do a cartwheel over him and shot him with my 9mm that will do the trick. Worst of all this movie is filled with head scratching stupid decisions and plot devices that ruin what little moment it has. Even worse than Captain America. At least that had 20 okay minutes. When can we start making real movies again? Seriously.… Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
4
Tss5078Mar 3, 2013
The Incredible Hulk, not to be confused with the movie Hulk, is the first of the individual movies that introduces us to The Avengers, and that's the only reason why I decided to see it, as I never really cared much for the character. I meanThe Incredible Hulk, not to be confused with the movie Hulk, is the first of the individual movies that introduces us to The Avengers, and that's the only reason why I decided to see it, as I never really cared much for the character. I mean think about it, this scientist whose trying to create a super soldier tries the solution on himself, and now when he gets angry he turns into a WWE Superstar! As for the film, it's not much better. I love Edward Norton, he's a big name and a star in his own right, but he's just about the last person I would choose to be the Hulk. His whole personality wasn't right for the part. I like his co-star, Liv Tyler too, and it wasn't that she was bad in this film, it's that her role was a joke and she had absolutely no chemistry with Norton. Tim Roth was the bright spot in the movie, as he's one of those guys who can adapt to any role and I think I'd have preferred to see him as the Hulk. As for the story, parts of it were decent, but they skipped the whole part of the story that I wanted to see! The film starts five years later, in Brazil, I wanted to see how the story started and what prompted banner into doing this. I hate superheroes and I hate their movies, but the Avengers stories have been different. With the exception of Thor, they have for the most part been somewhat realistic and believable. The story here is lame and the movie is based on special effects which did nothing to help the film. The last half hour of the movie, I felt as though I was watching Peter Griffin fight the Big Chicken and I honestly hated every minute of it!… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
6
A_NorthernerApr 2, 2012
Following on from the 2003 film Hulk, Marvel decided the best course of action prior to the Avengers film was to reboot the series with a new director and cast, resulting in this 2008 update starring Edward Norton in the title role. Hulk is aFollowing on from the 2003 film Hulk, Marvel decided the best course of action prior to the Avengers film was to reboot the series with a new director and cast, resulting in this 2008 update starring Edward Norton in the title role. Hulk is a different type of superhero to most of the traditional good-looking all-American heroes such as Spiderman or Iron Man. Although tamed by Betty Ross, the Hulk is not capable of relating to humans and therefore the audience and I feel this has always made it difficult for storytellers and directors to produce engaging films with this character. On the occasions that the Hulk appears during the first half of the film, in a repetitive series of chase and escape scenes, he destroys almost everything in his path without remorse as Banner is unable to control his rage. At the end of the film, Banner intentionally turns into the Hulk in order to fight the Abomination, leading the audience to believe that the Hulk is now a fully fledged crime fighting superhero. This transformation between out of control animal and useful superhero may be the films idea of character development but apart from reuniting with Betty, no other significant events occur that explain this. Norton and Liv Tyler play their characters well and William Hurt is impressive as General Ross, despite the occasionally cheesy lines he is fed. Tim Roth gives an intense performance as Blonsky prior to his transformation into the Abomination. Ultimately though, despite being visually impressive, the final battle is between two CGI monsters and I found the film did not do enough to make me engage with Hulk. This is in part to do with the Hulk being unable to portray any real human emotion, this having to be shown through Betty at his side. Worth watching if you are a superhero film fan or as a warm-up for the Avengers.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
LinttaFlamingoDec 28, 2017
This movie is pretty bad. I liked Edward Norton as Bruce Banner, but it takes like 30 minutes for him to start doing any kind of hulking. And when he's not hulking, which he mostly isn't, the movie is either uninteresting exposition or aThis movie is pretty bad. I liked Edward Norton as Bruce Banner, but it takes like 30 minutes for him to start doing any kind of hulking. And when he's not hulking, which he mostly isn't, the movie is either uninteresting exposition or a romance between Bruce and Arwen from The Lord of the Rings, who by the way sounds like she's having breathing problems every time she talks. The special effects also aren't that great and I had a hard time caring about any of the characters in the end. There are some fun dialogue scenes, but they are seriously lacking and definitely aren't enough to make me care to watch this thing again.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
BarneyOnMTJan 5, 2016
WHAT I LIKE: A satisfying entry to the MCU 2 months after the fun 'Iron Man,' Edward Norton does well in a fairly conventional comic-book movie before Marvel realised they could get away with shaking up the rule book. In 'The IncredibleWHAT I LIKE: A satisfying entry to the MCU 2 months after the fun 'Iron Man,' Edward Norton does well in a fairly conventional comic-book movie before Marvel realised they could get away with shaking up the rule book. In 'The Incredible Hulk,' a good job is done over 2003's 'Hulk' film, and Marvel succeds in portraying Banner's despair well, and creating some action-filled CGI eye-candy for us too. 
WHAT I DON'T LIKE: It could have been really exciting or dark, but came out somewhere odd imbetween, the tone feeling pushed and pulled constantly and the overall film experience feeling dragged out. Also, the plot is failry formulaic, plus he dark visuals and emotional music get tiring at times.
VERDICT: Better than Hulk films of old, Marvel freshens the franchise, but it's still not their best work. The Incredible Hulk is a good film, but struggles to be the entertaining or dark film it could have been.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
3
SrPepeNov 13, 2017
The Incredible Hulk es por lejos la peor película perteneciente al Universo cinematográfico de Marvel. Es una porquería, la mejor parte es la escena de Iron Man.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
AproxxAug 19, 2018
This was BORING.
Casting was ATROCIOUS.
CGI action weak
Villain the worst
..........
The only thing this movie had was the action (which wasn't superb anyways) and the predictable but still entertaining story
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
HTGamerApr 24, 2018
The Incredible Hulk is easily and by far the worst MCU film so far. Nearly every aspect of this movie (story, plot, pacing, characters, CGI) is bad. Marvel chose Edward Norton to portray Bruce Banner but he failed to deliver. We now know thatThe Incredible Hulk is easily and by far the worst MCU film so far. Nearly every aspect of this movie (story, plot, pacing, characters, CGI) is bad. Marvel chose Edward Norton to portray Bruce Banner but he failed to deliver. We now know that Mark Ruffalo was a candidate for the role back then, and later on he successfully replaced Norton in the Avengers movies. Despite some legal issues with Universal, it's no wonder Marvel haven't made another Hulk solo movie since, and all the actors never reprised their roles (except for William Hurt who recently returned to the MCU and his Thunderbolt character is very different in Civil War).… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
JPKFeb 25, 2018
It's Okay
NOWHERE As Good As Iron Man, But Entertaining 68% Of The 112 Minute Run Time.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
wiiy71Dec 30, 2017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
WolfheartTomJan 25, 2018
A good cast, a mediocre plot, decent CGI, blend all of this together and you have what is for me the weakest instalment of the MCU. Bland storytelling that climaxes in a colourful hero clashing with a grey villain.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
3
LivingTribunalApr 22, 2018
It's the worst MCU movie. This movie failed as a super hero movie and as a Hollywood movie. However, it's still better than some super hero movies that I don't want to talk about.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
3
Kirollos-NoahNov 29, 2018
Until now, I didn't find good movie for Hulk. So for me there is no any solo movie for Hulk! Even the performance of each character was super-bad, except for Mark Ruffalo, the only Hulk who I really loved, but Edward Norton as Bruce Banner isUntil now, I didn't find good movie for Hulk. So for me there is no any solo movie for Hulk! Even the performance of each character was super-bad, except for Mark Ruffalo, the only Hulk who I really loved, but Edward Norton as Bruce Banner is totally unconvincing and bad! In any case, Edward Norton wasn't the only one who acted badly for me, more than 90% of the characters were bad too!
The story isn't about Hulk as I saw, it was about the love story between Bruce and Betty!
The CGI was totally bad, messy and didn't comfort my eyes at all!
Hulk wasn't INCREDIBLE at all!

The story is poor and boring, with some sh*tty CGI and some good fights.. with all of that, The Incredible Hulk was born and it's calling itself a movie!!!
The opening credits is totally 70'. It showed some stuff about Hulk, but not enough, Iron Man showed us the begging of Iron man, Captain America too showed some good stuff as a begging, but The Incredible Hulk showed nothing but some sh*tty scenes with a greed screen above the scenes!!!!

Bruce is trying the whole movie to prevent showing Hulk, so The Incredible Hulk most of the time is showing the life of Bruce not Hulk, and when Hulk shows up, I just see a very bad CGI green idiot in front of me!!!!

And of course the romance was terrible.. The only thing that I liked in this movie is the last 30 min of the movie, and thought, I barley could watch it, cause it went up and then to he bottom again and then the final fight, and then.. go home, you mothe*******!

One of the worst movies of all time!!… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
ARGzelderApr 7, 2019
El gigante verde vuelve a la pantalla grande pero esta vez bajo la supervisión de Marvel, y aunque esta versión es superior al intento de 2003 la película no llega a ser atractiva.
Esta película inicia con Bruce Banner recluido lejos de casaEl gigante verde vuelve a la pantalla grande pero esta vez bajo la supervisión de Marvel, y aunque esta versión es superior al intento de 2003 la película no llega a ser atractiva.
Esta película inicia con Bruce Banner recluido lejos de casa tratando de pasar desapercibido, hasta que su sangre delata su posición e inicia su persecución con las fuerzas norteamericanas.
"The Incredible Hulk" se vende cuenta con una Edward Norton dando lo mejor de si, aunque lamentablemente el guión es muy lento y el resto del elenco no logra dar el mismo nivel de actuación.
Uno de los problemas es el desenfoque en el villano, Emil Blonski nunca es una amenaza hasta el final de la cinta, y aún así uno no llega a reconocerlo como Abomination.
Esta segunda producción de Marvel es interesante, pero le falta mucho carisma, no es recomendable a menos que estén bien interesados en el MCU.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
DerekReideApr 23, 2019
I just like Mark Ruffalo better than Edward Norton. I'm not saying that the casting was bad or anything, but just let it be forgotten in the MCU.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
Onlyclassicvg1Dec 8, 2020
The Incredible Hulk isn't very Incredible.
Edward Norton gives a good performance but the concept of Hulk itself just seems tired. There is no new outlook on the hero just simply a repeatedly mediocre take on a very one dimensiona
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
0
Mrman69Jul 27, 2020
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
9
JacobB.Jun 10, 2008
I thought it was really good (I saw it at a pre-release screening). It's very clean and well-done, but some of the acting is a little flat (hence the 9 out of 10). If you liked Iron Man, you'll like The Incredible Hulk.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ClarkWAug 10, 2008
Every bit as good as Iron Man. Considering how bad the first movie was, I went in with zero expectations. I didn't have to worry though, it was fantastic. Edward Norton does for the Hulk what Robert Downey Jr. did for Iron Man, he is Every bit as good as Iron Man. Considering how bad the first movie was, I went in with zero expectations. I didn't have to worry though, it was fantastic. Edward Norton does for the Hulk what Robert Downey Jr. did for Iron Man, he is just spectacular. The supporting cast, led by Liv Tyler and Tim Roth, make the movie a classic. Don't be scared away by the first movie, this is one of the best superhero movies ever.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
[Anonymous]Jun 10, 2008
May not be incredible but still pretty darn good.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MattGJun 13, 2008
An incredibly well done movie- I'm excited for the whole slew of marvel movies to come!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RMJun 13, 2008
Hulk Smash!!!! What a rush, enjoyed it tremendously. Planning on seeing it a couple more times this weekend. Great job Marvel Studios, that's 2 for 2.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
P.J.BBossJun 16, 2008
Unbelievably good. The graphics were crazy, the action was crazy. everything about this movie was just HOTT. This is how the Hulk is suppose to be.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
AndreT.Jun 17, 2008
This is the real first movie of Hulk for me. I dislike the first one so much...You really got to feel for Banner and his struggle. And by any means, Banner is a fugitive and will always be to some extend. The effects were ok, but it's This is the real first movie of Hulk for me. I dislike the first one so much...You really got to feel for Banner and his struggle. And by any means, Banner is a fugitive and will always be to some extend. The effects were ok, but it's hard to somewhat beleive in that Hulk CGI. You have to take a leap of faith there...As for the actors, they were the right choices this time around. Good action movie and very decent story. If they can fix the HUlk and make him appear less spongy...… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
tonydannieJun 27, 2008
I enjoyed this film. but unlike so many I actually did enjoy Ang Lee's version a whole lot better. Norton Does a good Bruce Banner. He is a great actor. But I think Banna made that Character more complex. The action was great but a bit I enjoyed this film. but unlike so many I actually did enjoy Ang Lee's version a whole lot better. Norton Does a good Bruce Banner. He is a great actor. But I think Banna made that Character more complex. The action was great but a bit over the top in this film. while the HULK does look a lot more realistic then in the Lee version. I felt it still looked CG. Hey hwat do you expect right. we can't have Farrigno playing him at his age. I guess what i am trying to say is that there were more memorable action scenes in the Lee version in this one. Here we got a big final showdown at the finalle that recalls that of Iron Man. That is just my two cents. I did not hate it. just liked Lee's Version better.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
VladimirPJul 2, 2008
This movie has exceeded my expectations coming in as a person who loves marvel, but wasnt such a big fan of the hulk. This movie has incredible visuals; making the hulk really look realistic. Choosing Edward Norton to take on this roll was This movie has exceeded my expectations coming in as a person who loves marvel, but wasnt such a big fan of the hulk. This movie has incredible visuals; making the hulk really look realistic. Choosing Edward Norton to take on this roll was perfect, Liv Tyler as his love interest and their chemistry is unreal. The storyline cannot be truer than any other marvel comic and ending the story with the opening of a branch of hulk-related movies. Although Iron Man was a step above in wits and cleverness, this movie is a keeper itself. Watch this movie. Seriously.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DavidLOct 6, 2008
Loved Ang Lee's 2003 version of the Hulk .. dark, disturbing and intensely story driven.. something that most people just didn't get after Spider-Man set the bar for comic book hero movies. This movie is every bit as good as Ang Loved Ang Lee's 2003 version of the Hulk .. dark, disturbing and intensely story driven.. something that most people just didn't get after Spider-Man set the bar for comic book hero movies. This movie is every bit as good as Ang Lee's but more fun and less serious tones. I'm still trying to decide which musical score I like better. This one or Danny Elfman's from the first film.. both are brilliant.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
HelenB.Jun 12, 2008
A far better movie than its predecessor. This movie injects a more realistic feel to it, with Norton playing Banner/Hulk, with stronger emotion, than Eric Bana's character in 2003. All of the cast were impressive and CGI was amazing as A far better movie than its predecessor. This movie injects a more realistic feel to it, with Norton playing Banner/Hulk, with stronger emotion, than Eric Bana's character in 2003. All of the cast were impressive and CGI was amazing as usual. Overall, I believe that this movie has saved the Hulk franchise and in turn, brought about the continuous excitement of the Avenger Initiative! :) Can't wait for Stark and Banner to MEET!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
KevinRJun 12, 2008
Although Edward Norton does a good job, every other performance just falls flat on its face.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
equality7-2521Jun 13, 2008
Here's the GOOD: I liked the first 15 minutes (the opening credits and the Brazilian sequence). I liked Tim Roth's performance. I am a huge fan of Craig Armstrong, who did the score, and this one was not bad. I'm a huge fan of Here's the GOOD: I liked the first 15 minutes (the opening credits and the Brazilian sequence). I liked Tim Roth's performance. I am a huge fan of Craig Armstrong, who did the score, and this one was not bad. I'm a huge fan of Danny the Dog, one of Louis Leterrier's movies (starred Jet Li). And of course I loved Robert Downey Jr's appearance as Tony Stark. And if you paid attention, the reference to Nick Fury in the opening credits was exciting. Here's the BAD: The movie was an embarrassment. How could I be suckered into this. All of my instincts told me that they were going to DUMB it down (to the same level as the Fantastic Four movies). And that's what they did. This movie is strictly for 5 year old kids. The action was so BORING. God, really I didn't care about anyone in this flick. Okay, so I wasted my money and 2 hours of my life. THAT is not such a big deal. But here's what DISTURBS me: We know Marvel has plans for an AVENGERS movie. AND they have plans for the CAPTAIN AMERICA movie. These are really important, and dare I say sacred properties... Are their plans to continue making lame kiddie flicks? or treat them with the respect they deserve? I love Captain America and I will have nightmares if the eff it up. I hope Jon Favreau directs both Captain America and the Avengers. He's proven himself with Iron Man. It would be a dream if Bryan Singer came back to do these but he's busy with the Superman movies. Well, at least we have this to look forward to: The greatest movie of all time is being released next month. Yes, that's Christopher Nolan's THE DARK KNIGHT. See you there. BTW, I loved Ang Lee's Hulk released 5 years ago. It would have been brilliant had he been hired for the sequel. I will have to pretend I didn't watch Hulk 2008.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JohnD.Jun 13, 2008
Great Movie! Action was non-stop from start to finish and the movie never dragged. Norton was great and Roth was awesome. Solid performances from Hurt and Tyler and a nice part foreshadowing the future from Tim Blake Nelson. The CGI was very Great Movie! Action was non-stop from start to finish and the movie never dragged. Norton was great and Roth was awesome. Solid performances from Hurt and Tyler and a nice part foreshadowing the future from Tim Blake Nelson. The CGI was very realistic and the madder the Hulk gets....… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
TonySnyderJun 13, 2008
This exceeded my expectations, a fun movie, you should definitely check it out.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
prev
Page:
More From This Movie

61 Critic Reviews

7.0 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL