The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug

9

Beowulf4862Dec 14, 2013

Terrific fun. Almost too fast paced, though. I wanted more of Beorn--maybe we'll get some further scenes with him in the extended version. The acting was uniformly good, though Lee Pace had fun chewing the scenery (the cgi?). A little moreTerrific fun. Almost too fast paced, though. I wanted more of Beorn--maybe we'll get some further scenes with him in the extended version. The acting was uniformly good, though Lee Pace had fun chewing the scenery (the cgi?). A little more setup for the barrel escape would be nice, though I'd love to take that ride at TOLKIENLAND when it opens. I predict that this will be yet another of Peter Jackson's films which be criticized for being too long only to turn out to have been too short when the extended version proves to be just right.… Expand

1 of 7 users found this helpful16

All this user's reviews

9

LansdenrsDec 16, 2013

The visuals were stunning! The plot was better than the first. The directing and acting was very good! I think this one was better than the first. A lot of action and intensity

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

9

kykinsonDec 23, 2013

The movie is just amazing! it has the mix of action,adventure and fun! It makes me wanna watch the Lord of the Rings again! Really amazing everyone should see this!

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

braedenDec 19, 2013

Comparing to disappointing first part, The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is much better movie. It has better pacing, more meaningful action scenes, more character development and it was entertaining from start to finish. Only time I wasComparing to disappointing first part, The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is much better movie. It has better pacing, more meaningful action scenes, more character development and it was entertaining from start to finish. Only time I was starting to feel bored was the final action scene which is a bit over the top. The extra elements (compared to book) didn't really bother me, since getting three 3 hour movies using only 300 page children's book is impossible to start with.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

AnEpicPotatoeDec 13, 2013

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is Peter Jackson's middle earth, no doubt about it. If you you go into the movie expecting a faithful recreation of the book, I daresay you'll be disappointed. However, having read both the Lord of theThe Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is Peter Jackson's middle earth, no doubt about it. If you you go into the movie expecting a faithful recreation of the book, I daresay you'll be disappointed. However, having read both the Lord of the Rings trilogy and The Hobbit book, I can assure you that Peter Jackson's middle earth is nothing short of breathtaking, and I find that the his numerous changes are more than justified. Desolation of Smaug offers much improved CGI (when compared to An Unexpected Journey), a soundtrack wrapped in nostalgia, and non-stop action from start to finish. Unlike the first installment in this new trilogy, the Desolation of Smaug feels much more free from the confines of staying true to the book. It really feels like Jackson just had fun making this movie, dotting it with welcome humor and incredible action. Legolas and Tauriel discover the most creative ways to slay orcs, and trust me, everything about their addition is epic and memorable. Without them, a lot of the intensity and uniqueness of the action scenes may have been lost. And then of course you have Smaug, who is undoubtedly the most impressive dragon I have ever witnessed. Ever. And Benedict Cumberbatch's voice only perfects an already astoundingly memorable creation. Smaug is most certainly up there with the best of the best.

All in all, this film stepped things up so much from the previous installment of the Hobbit trilogy, that I am actually tempted to say it just might compete with the Fellowship of the Ring. In other words, it's really good, and I highly recommend it.… Expand

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

9

bmaster4616Dec 16, 2013

The first one was one of those movies that you hated or only though was alright. Certain things about the first one was crappy as hell (CGI orcs). This one was completely on another level. Loved it from start to finish and the ending wasThe first one was one of those movies that you hated or only though was alright. Certain things about the first one was crappy as hell (CGI orcs). This one was completely on another level. Loved it from start to finish and the ending was perfect. The music at the end should win an Oscar, because it was awesome. There were a few flaws in it like the fact that Legolas had a bigger role and the length of the movie was just way too long...other than that I loved it. The fight scenes were top notch, it was funny, the dragon scene was amazing, etc.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

9

MattyJMApr 13, 2014

WOW!
Just as good as the first one, maybe even surpasses it by the plain fact of there being a dragon in it! I recommend this movie to ANYONE and EVERYONE! If your the kind of moviegoer that enjoys action, fantasy, battles and things beingWOW!
Just as good as the first one, maybe even surpasses it by the plain fact of there being a dragon in it! I recommend this movie to ANYONE and EVERYONE! If your the kind of moviegoer that enjoys action, fantasy, battles and things being killed then this is the movie for you!… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

pescetarianDec 29, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The first encounter of Master Bilbo and Smaug was suspenseful... no sooner had Smaug cornered the ever elusive hobbit, even while sporting his precious ring which these days the so-called burglar has grown quite accustomed to wearing, the dragon got respect... not just the bling bling.

Smaug wasn't another stereotypical Hollywood lizard with wings (sorry Sean Connery)... it spoke with eloquence, with a hint of aristocratic English accent... like an intelligent psychopathic killer that craves death without a hint of remorse... ancient evil certainly lurks in the darker world of Tolkien.

The dwarf/dragon hide n' seek in the cave quickly became redundant after knowing Bard awaits at the nearby lake town with his family heirloom, the black arrow... Peter Jackson and his editors should have left that tidbit out until after Smaug stretched out its wings in the twilight to unleash its conscious act of "fire" and "death" upon the lakers.

Aside from this rant... overall, this film is deserving of a spot at the top, near the very first LOTR film... critics' reviews are harsh... those who enjoy epic journeys that capture the imagination would thoroughly enjoy this adventure and will anticipate the sixth and final installment.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

milogoldDec 15, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I don't understand some of the bad reviews, they're ever trolls or stupid. This film is exactly how the book intended it to be (which is a children's book by the way)! There is some perfectly timed comedy moments, some tense moments which is really helped by the brilliant character development and those cute little Dwarves. Most of the animation was superb, I think Smaug was done brilliantly, however there were some moments which really stood out as very bad animation such as moments in the barrel ride scene and some moments in the halls of Erebor. The side stories with Gandalf discovering Sauron's return and the love triangle with Tauraylon, Legolas and Kili really complement the main action, and I actually am starting to like the fact they added more orcs to the story, unlike An Unexpected Journey where they're existence was annoying and pointless. Synopsis: Better than the first, amazing script adaption and story but some moments were let down by animation!… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

9

muntingprinsipeDec 21, 2013

This is way, way better than the first installment. People should really stop comparing it to LOTR because there is nothing we can do to the story of THE HOBBIT. LOTR will always be better in every aspect. I have very high respects for PeterThis is way, way better than the first installment. People should really stop comparing it to LOTR because there is nothing we can do to the story of THE HOBBIT. LOTR will always be better in every aspect. I have very high respects for Peter Jackson and I can really say that without him, all these Middle Earth movies will never ever be the same.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

AlderHaloDec 13, 2013

Improvement in drama & action over the prior film. Cool new characters.
Great fight sequences, particularly the barrels set-piece.
My only complaint would be there's some odd pacing at times.
Overall much better than an unexpected journey.
9/10

15 of 31 users found this helpful1516

All this user's reviews

9

victorhjklDec 19, 2013

This movie is amazing the special effects are incredible, the movie has a great story, there is good actions scenes and also drama scenes, I think that is better than the first movie, and it will make you anxious for the next one.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

9

eagleeyevikingDec 13, 2013

Desolation of Smaug delivers on everything the first movie lacks with great special effects, swift pacing and much more character development even if a few of them are sidelined.

13 of 21 users found this helpful138

All this user's reviews

9

Luan143Dec 13, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. O filme maravilhoso, o mestre Peter Jackson nunca mais repetirá os erros técnicos que ele tanto cometeu em Um Olhar do Paraíso. Como diretor ele conseguiu renovar seus tempos de glória que duraram dos filmes trash até King Kong. O filme foi repleto de truques de fotografia sensitiva (como naquelas cenas do diálogo ente Bilbo e Smaug onde ele simula a visão do espectador como se ele estivesse dentro do salão em Erebor) combinados com o 3d magnífico só visto em Avatar e efeitos visuais tão realistas e inéditos totalmente o oposto de Uma Jornada Inesperada. Houveram alguns erros de fotografia que me fizeram pensar que Jackson estava menos inspirado ao dirigir (um deles foi numa cena da invasão dos orcs em Esgaroth em que o Legolas mata um orc e na hora da facada ele simplesmente foi empurrado para fora da tela), mas esses aconteceram em um período tão curto de tempo que nem mesmo eu sei como reparei. O roteiro foi maravilhoso, aquela discussão do Bilbo e do Smaug foi uma obra prima do Peter Jackson, assim como vários diálogos vistos em As Duas Torres e o episódio Adivinhas no Escuro.
No aspecto técnico o filme sai quase perfeito (não quero deixar muitos spoilers sobre a emboscada armada pelos anões nas minas da montanha, mas aquelas partículas líquidas de ouro e água foram um avanço enorme para efeitos especiais), mas para um fã de Tolkien as muitas alterações foram o bastante pra te deixar cheio de pensamentos mistos sobre o filme.
Eu achei a ideia de cobrir as missões do Gandalf maravilhosa! Uma alteração que não feriu a história, pois seria muito importante anos após o arco que cobre o romance e ao mesmo tempo era algo que todos os fãs desejavam ver como aconteceu. SPOILER: Ver o Sauron dialogando chegou a ser assustador, na história do Anel ele não teve muita participação em primeiro plano, como eu digo: "ele estava lá, não aqui, mas ao mesmo tempo estava aqui e lá". Vamos ver que rumo essa "adição" terá ano que vem.
Sobre a inclusão da Tauriel, não fui um daqueles que ficaram de birra com a adição dela na história, mas o papel que ela teve foi o que marcou o filme todo, PJ infelizmente quis colocar uma pitada de romance adolescente e enfiou isso guela abaixo no plot, isso foi uma blasfêmia obra de Tolkien, que desejava sempre que a história fosse mais racional possível. O filme atingia um certo clímax e ele era cortado pra cara de sonsa dela (não que a atriz seja ruim, mas o papel)... sério, até as cenas de Dol Goldur e Erebor eram cortadas pra cara dela.
Parece que os episódios da casa de Beorn e da Floresta das Trevas foram cortados pela metade só pra mostrar o romance meia boca "Kiliel" ou "Taurikili" que mais parece uma fanfic de Harry Potter. (My Immortal diz: Oi)
Resolvi ignorar cada cena que aparecia a Tauriel pra pensar na forma de como ela morreria no próximo filme, o que óbvio ELA TEM QUE MORRER PRA DEIXAR UM AR DE DRAMA ADOLESCENTE.
Me senti neutro quanto a inclusão dos Orcs antes da batalha, pra mim Azog já estava morto há anos, mas rendeu muitos risos com as cenas do Bombur esmagando eles.
Para a maioria dos fãs a adição de personalidade aos anões só serviu para um complemento, a obra infantil como qualquer outra, em todas os personagens são meio unidimensionais pra não confundir a cabeça das crianças e isso num filme foi de grande ajuda.
Se eu pudesse me aprofundar numa crítica seria mais completo, mas isso aqui só um comentário extenso e amador sobre o que eu vi hoje.
O filme estava bom, nada mais. Poderia ser perfeito, mas PJ cometeu muitos erros com a história que eu não espero ver ano que vem.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

9

martyisrulingDec 14, 2013

It starts off a little weak, but gets really good. The story elements aren't great, but the movie suits it's purpose. It's a fun adventure. The effects are great, with the exception of a few isolated parts on a river scene and some bad horse CGI.

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

9

CosmonaustaDec 16, 2013

Although it does bother me how much they strayed from the source material (especially in regards to Legolas), I thoroughly enjoyed The Desolation of Smaug as a movie-going experience. As a film, it's action-packed, funny at times, andAlthough it does bother me how much they strayed from the source material (especially in regards to Legolas), I thoroughly enjoyed The Desolation of Smaug as a movie-going experience. As a film, it's action-packed, funny at times, and visually stunning.
The fight scenes were nothing short of incredible. Jackson was finally able to portray Legolas' agility in its full glory.
All around a very fun and gripping film.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

9

firstblood2Dec 19, 2013

Many people judge this movie for being to long and for adding in some extra scenes but to me that is a positive, cause now people who have read the book wont know everything that's coming up next. The action scenes are a lot better this timeMany people judge this movie for being to long and for adding in some extra scenes but to me that is a positive, cause now people who have read the book wont know everything that's coming up next. The action scenes are a lot better this time around especially the barrel scene.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

9

CageFreeGDec 23, 2013

Much has been made by professional and amateur critics alike regarding all the scenes and dialogue in the movie that didn't exist in the book. Jackson has, in fact, invented a great deal on the fly, and not all of it to the betterment of theMuch has been made by professional and amateur critics alike regarding all the scenes and dialogue in the movie that didn't exist in the book. Jackson has, in fact, invented a great deal on the fly, and not all of it to the betterment of the story. But if purists are concerned about these additions and revisions it must then be asked if having dogs and goats serving dinner to the Dwarves in Beorn's house would have met with their approval. Though this is exactly what happened in the book, I think this would have resulted with an even greater amount of eye-rolling, if not more, than has been expressed in any number of reviews.

In addition, a great many critics know nothing about the story and are disadvantaged by their ignorance. Lou Lumenick of he New York Post writes, "...character of Legolas has been interpolated into this story, which also manufactures a wan romantic triangle that pits him against hunky fellow elf Killi (Aidan Turner) for the hand of a Katniss-ish warrior named Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly)."

I agree completely with the addition of Evangeline Lilly's character Tauriel as being a WTH moment. I don't understand Jackson's compunction to create her (other than giving the orcs someone to chase all the way to Laketown). But I have two thoughts on the remainder of this controversy; 1) Legolas is actually the son of King Thranduil (see the appendices of LoTR), and since we are in Thranduil's domain, though Legolas is not so much as mentioned in The Hobbit, it's not coloring entirely outside the lines that we might encounter him here, and 2) Since "Kili" (one "l", not two...) is a dwarf, and not an elf, one must not only wonder at Lou's ability to critically follow a simple plot line, one must also wonder at what Jackson and company might have been thinking here. It's beyond me to sus this out...

Another oft cited critical failing of the movie(s) is that a trilogy seems to have been manufactured out a rather short story. This critique for me is less understandable than a great many others. The brevity in which Tolkien tells his story should in no way reflect how that story gets told in a cinematic form. Tolkien's economy of words belies a rather grand and epic story which, contrary to the assumptions of many, does not end with the defeat of Smaug; The Battle of the Five Armies being a huge set piece that occurs after the Dwarve's mission has all but been accomplished. In my opinion, three films is about right to cover all the fertile ground that Tolkien so lovingly plowed and seeded for us in this book.

Having said all that... there are certainly problems that a fan of the book must contend with. For me, the specifics of the plot line Lou Lumenick references is an issue. The insinuation of even the possibility of a romantic plot line between a dwarf and an elf makes me shake my head; but the dialogue reference to what "may or may not be hidden in Kili's pants" (as he asks why he wasn't searched) for me was a bridge too far. I was equally non-plussed by Bofur's confusing "crochet" for "croquet" in An Unexpected Journey, and saying, "It's a great game... if you have the balls for it." This kind of quasi-sexual innuendo I find to be completely out of place in these films. Not that I'm a prude... I'm not. It just seems to set the bar lower than it need be. The "Azog" plot line I also find problematic... given that Azog is, according to Tolkien, dead at the time the Dwarves attempt to retake Erebor. Another weakness in the film for me was the Beorn story line... to me this section is the perfect justification for excluding Tom Bombadi and Goldberry in the first LoTR film. Some characters, though beloved by the fans, just don't translate well to film. Was this just a bad translation or is there something inherent to the character that defies translation... you be the judge.

Overall I rather enjoyed the film. The barrel escape from the Wood Elves was a barrel of fun and the spiders of Mirkwood cast a completely compelling web. I especially like how Jackson included the fact that Bilbo could understand the spider's speach when he was wearing the One Ring. The visualization of Gandalf and the Necromancer in Dol Guldur was, for me, an added pleasure. I don't believe there is any fan of The Hobbit or the LoTR that hasn't wished in our heart of hearts that Tolkien had given us more of this story, or wanted to see that confrontation played out on film. I, for one, am hoping that Jackson will dazzle us with Sauron's eviction from Dol Guldur by the White Council in the third installment. But the pièce de résistance has to be Bilbo's verbal thrust and parry with Smaug. The anticipation built in An Unexpected Journey is paid off in spades in Desolation. Benedict Cumberbatch plays a spellbinding and villainous Smaug. I hung on every word, and when it was over felt an almost physical pain of withdrawal.

Is it a perfect film? Hardly... but it certainly satisfies this life-long Tolkien fan… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

SeniorMintsDec 27, 2013

I loved the movie. The only negative thing I can say is I didn't like where Jackson ended the second movie. I'm a fan of the book, and I realize that Jackson is going to have to add some stuff that wasn't in the book, but this doesn't takeI loved the movie. The only negative thing I can say is I didn't like where Jackson ended the second movie. I'm a fan of the book, and I realize that Jackson is going to have to add some stuff that wasn't in the book, but this doesn't take anything away from the story.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

extremeswagdudeDec 28, 2013

I went into DOS expecting to see more plot and establishing characters and story lines, much like the first one. I was okay with that. And I was surprised on how well done this was. It has those aspects of the first film. But there was muchI went into DOS expecting to see more plot and establishing characters and story lines, much like the first one. I was okay with that. And I was surprised on how well done this was. It has those aspects of the first film. But there was much more. It establishes a love story, that is similar to a forbidden love, and adventure. This adventure takes you to places of Middle Earth you have never seen before. This has much more action, and adventure. It is amazing in 3D/… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

Wraithe1Dec 30, 2013

An honest opinion from an average Joe who is no LoTR fan-boy. I honestly thought this movie was one of the best I've seen this year. Aside from some ridiculous elven gymnastics it was very entertaining, didn't seem overly long, and set upAn honest opinion from an average Joe who is no LoTR fan-boy. I honestly thought this movie was one of the best I've seen this year. Aside from some ridiculous elven gymnastics it was very entertaining, didn't seem overly long, and set up everything well for the finale. I look forward to the holiday season next year to finish this thing off. My three young children enjoyed this movie greatly as well. They all actually sat quietly and watched it without whining for snacks or bathroom escorts. Solid 9.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

9

leterlastDec 30, 2013

full of fighting scene and good story indeed.The story,the backgrounds,the scenes,the pictures are all almost perfect.Pull us into the soul of the film and bring us deeply to feel every moments in it.Every second drives usd to morefull of fighting scene and good story indeed.The story,the backgrounds,the scenes,the pictures are all almost perfect.Pull us into the soul of the film and bring us deeply to feel every moments in it.Every second drives usd to more excitement.Unexpected that will be as good as it.Simply,the exposition in this film is perfect.The desolator of other films in 2013!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

TurbodowgJan 11, 2014

I've read a few negative reviews of The Hobbit TDOS and can’t see why so many Tolkien fans dislike it? I have read the book and I feel although the film has some changes, it is still a brilliant adaptation. Peter Jackson is still the rightI've read a few negative reviews of The Hobbit TDOS and can’t see why so many Tolkien fans dislike it? I have read the book and I feel although the film has some changes, it is still a brilliant adaptation. Peter Jackson is still the right man for the job, and he has yet again made Middle Earth look fantastic. The film flows well and there are some great action sequences such as the escape from the Elves and the fight with Smaug and the Spiders in Mirkwood.

The Sets look authentic and magical. The score is enchanting and the acting is all spot on. Some CGI is a bit ropey and I'm not a great fan of Orlando Bloom leaping around grinding like he's on a skateboard, but that doesn’t spoil the whole film.

The scenes with Smaug are particularly exciting and work very well. They are intense and Smaug really is terrifying I found the film to be better paced than the first movie and I enjoyed TDOS more. The ending has a real cliffhanger that has made me really excited for the next film. So Ignore the haters and Tolkien geeks who think the books were written just for them. And go see this movie, blockbuster movie making at it's finest and a cracking fantasy adventure movie.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

9

GustavoKFeb 11, 2014

Hobbit 2 is about a mission where dwarves want to take the mountain and the gold back, because in the past the dragon took it from them.

The battles are very cool and there is lots of action in te entire movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

MagicManRAWJun 30, 2014

I don't know if I am just getting used to the storyline of Middle Earth, because this one seemed a bit tired with that been there done that theme. I take away one point. Largely a very entertaining film and large quality. Love all the newI don't know if I am just getting used to the storyline of Middle Earth, because this one seemed a bit tired with that been there done that theme. I take away one point. Largely a very entertaining film and large quality. Love all the new elements not in the book. I cant wait for the third one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

DrewtheDude85Mar 29, 2014

I did actually like the first Hobbit movie, despite what some may say, but Desolation of Smaug was amazing! The first few minutes were a little bit bland, but it picked up really fast. The action in this film was really good; it would getI did actually like the first Hobbit movie, despite what some may say, but Desolation of Smaug was amazing! The first few minutes were a little bit bland, but it picked up really fast. The action in this film was really good; it would get very fast paced and epic and it was just a lot of fun, I especially love the barrel scene. The scenes with Smaug were also great however I did kind-of got my groove threw off at the ending due to it having a huge cliffhanger, but overall this was a very good film and I look forward to There and Back Again when that comes out later this year.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

Viper8787Apr 18, 2014

A really good action movie. I thought this one was way better than the first one. Smaug was casted and played awesomely. It did have a really long run time but I don't fell that any of the scenes were un needed. Great job with this movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

JekSpaceyMay 3, 2014

This second chapter devoted to the adventures of Bilbo is clearly our most upbeat and dynamic than the first, which was preparing , instead , only to usher in a land of fairy-tale and a half more joyous than we had seen in "The Lord of theThis second chapter devoted to the adventures of Bilbo is clearly our most upbeat and dynamic than the first, which was preparing , instead , only to usher in a land of fairy-tale and a half more joyous than we had seen in "The Lord of the Rings ."
In "The Desolation of Smaug ," the fairy-tale atmosphere of the first was slowly dissolved, As the figure of the magician is to emerge in the future Sauron , the symbol of pure evil .
Despite having a script slightly weaker than the first episode , which was almost poetic , is much more convincing in terms of narrative and this time the scenes and additional characters are not at all out of place.
Doubled the action scenes , the fights ( some a little ' forced I admit) , but above all the characters, the story has not in fact a single thread as in the first chapter , but it follows the fortunes of different groups of characters .
Although this film has taken a little 'space Bilbo , who was the protagonist in the first , this new feature has helped make " The Desolation of Smaug " more like the old timeless Jackson trilogy , which also had a multitude of characters and situations.
A praise is due to the realization of Smaug do it , which is really something fantastic, impressive , magnificent, superior.
In my opinion this movie had all the papers in order to reach the level of the first three masterpieces by Jackson, but unfortunately was hit from the soundtrack (which despite being epic is not remotely comparable to the work done by the old trilogy ) , and the script, which convinces , but not jaw-dropping .
I want to clarify that I have not read the book , so I can not comment on the film at 360 degrees, but the emotions that made me feel while watching were really intense , and at times I felt like I really go back to the first trilogy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

A1K4PWN3DJan 29, 2015

More action than the first, but not as much as the third, The Desolation of Smaug is the best kind of movie for a trilogy like this. It is a nice bridge between movies, that also has it's important moments in the timeline of the book. PlusMore action than the first, but not as much as the third, The Desolation of Smaug is the best kind of movie for a trilogy like this. It is a nice bridge between movies, that also has it's important moments in the timeline of the book. Plus seeing Orlando Bloom as Legolas again, was just a cherry on top the sundae.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

vikesh2206Nov 9, 2014

Desolation of Smaug corrects the pacing issue that plagued the first installment and despite its lengthy runtime, still provides fascinating visuals, delivers the sense of adventure and sets things up nicely for the final movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

SythusRATINGSOct 19, 2014

Thorin and company have reached Lake-town and it is time for the hobbit Bilbo Baggins to fulfill his contract with the dwarves. The party must complete the journey to Lonely Mountain and burglar Baggins must seek out the Secret Door that willThorin and company have reached Lake-town and it is time for the hobbit Bilbo Baggins to fulfill his contract with the dwarves. The party must complete the journey to Lonely Mountain and burglar Baggins must seek out the Secret Door that will give them access to the hoard of the dragon Smaug. If Bilbo and the others are able to gain the treasure, will they be able to keep it? And will they discover what has become of the wizard Gandalf?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Le__XenomorphDec 28, 2014

The Desolation of Smaug is the second entry in the Hobbit trilogy. This movie managed to be way more impressive than the first one and had awesome visuals and action scenes. Especially the final act. This movie is a fine example of a hugeThe Desolation of Smaug is the second entry in the Hobbit trilogy. This movie managed to be way more impressive than the first one and had awesome visuals and action scenes. Especially the final act. This movie is a fine example of a huge improvement. 9/10 (Awesome)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

BoogeeFilmGuyAug 9, 2015

Smaug. Bloody Smaug. Smaug looked AMAZING in this. The movie looked amazing. Everything was amazing! Peter Jackson 100% still has it, baby. Definitely a must-see.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

JosephFret14Jan 11, 2016

A visually stunning sequel that includes some very intense scenes, mind blowing visuals and a story that has so much wonder and mystery you can't get it out of your head. Another fantastic movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

spacebear1Jan 4, 2018

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is another fantastic film in this amazing franchise. Once again the cinematography is marvelous and all of the characters are fantastic, especially Bilbo, Gandalf the Grey, and the one and only Legolas. IThe Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is another fantastic film in this amazing franchise. Once again the cinematography is marvelous and all of the characters are fantastic, especially Bilbo, Gandalf the Grey, and the one and only Legolas. I also loved Benedict Cumberbatch as both, the Necromancer and Smaug the dragon. In the end, I love this film even more than the past and I have very little problems with this film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

BeatrixKiddoSep 14, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Less fascinating than the previous movie but still enjoyable. It was very adventurous and entertaining. Also, "I See Fire" was a great soundtrack. I liked this film a lot.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

merijnjFeb 21, 2018

(87/100)
Stunning CGI and very exciting action sequences. Thrilling end too.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

Manuel189qqSep 27, 2022

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Manuel89qqNov 5, 2022

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

intruder313Dec 18, 2013

It's an entertaining and at times stunning movie but some of the sections which are actually from The Hobbit (as opposed to The Lost Tales) deviate quite dramatically and annoyingly.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

TokyochuchuJul 13, 2014

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is a really awesome LotR movie. It feels significantly fresher than 'An Unexpected Journey' but also retains that films delightful fairy-tale edge. And Smaug himself was a fantastic creation. More please!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Acher4Feb 5, 2014

It was great getting back into the world of the ring.
But, this time I wasn't so much thrilled as I expected.
Truthfully, I wanted a better Bilbo - Dragon confrontation, that meeting should have been as wonderful and arty as theIt was great getting back into the world of the ring.
But, this time I wasn't so much thrilled as I expected.
Truthfully, I wanted a better Bilbo - Dragon confrontation, that meeting should have been as wonderful and arty as the Gollum-Bilbo meeting. Oh well.
Didn't mind the additions, they had a nice touch, especially the female elf (although the romance angle should just be gone in the third part :P )… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

kevtheobaldDec 23, 2013

For fans of the series, this a great movie if you not obsessed with the book. I have never read the book, but a common theme among those who are avid readers of the book is mixed reviews at best. If you like fantasy movies, this should be aFor fans of the series, this a great movie if you not obsessed with the book. I have never read the book, but a common theme among those who are avid readers of the book is mixed reviews at best. If you like fantasy movies, this should be a great one for you to see. If you love action movies, you will likely still enjoy this. Some of the action looks very cartoon like, but should not be a total surprise considering the type of movie it is.

Covering the basics, the acting on average is fine, the pace of the film is much improved over the previous one, the script is fine, special effects were in general very good, and since I saw it in 2D, I have no idea if the 3D is worth the extra money.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

rafa14Dec 21, 2013

So I read this book and the movie had some differences that is necessary to have, because the book was wrote for kids so there isn´t anything very excited in the book so Peter Jackson had to do some alterations, but I can't denied that thereSo I read this book and the movie had some differences that is necessary to have, because the book was wrote for kids so there isn´t anything very excited in the book so Peter Jackson had to do some alterations, but I can't denied that there are somethings that I didn't like it, for example the part that a Elf start to feel something more for Killi, but almost everything worked out perfectly, the actors were great and I couldn't make this review without saying how Peter Jackson was audacious to make the movie again in 48 frames per second so this is very good. The story is very rich and ambitious, in the end of the film let everybody anxious to watch the last part of the movie and the song choice "I see fire" was perfectly right. This movie was way better than the first one and also one of the best movie of 2013… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

grandpajoe6191Aug 27, 2015

"The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug" follows on through the first Hobbit film with its creativity, intelligence, and visuals as the movie continues on Peter Jackson and the audience's journey towards reclaiming the home of the Dwarfs from"The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug" follows on through the first Hobbit film with its creativity, intelligence, and visuals as the movie continues on Peter Jackson and the audience's journey towards reclaiming the home of the Dwarfs from the evil Smaug.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Bruce722Dec 15, 2013

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug was a really good movie with great visuals and it continued telling an amazing story. The increased action of this film over the previous one will surely get most people's attention and will probably makeThe Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug was a really good movie with great visuals and it continued telling an amazing story. The increased action of this film over the previous one will surely get most people's attention and will probably make most younger people actually like it more. The special effects were also a bit better, in my opinion, and the dragon sequence at the end was just amazing. My only real probably with the film is the ending. That just isn't a good place to leave the film hanging. Obviously you should look at all of these films as one large movie broken up into three parts but the reality is that the third part won't be available to see until next year which makes this movie stand alone, in a sense. When considering that the entire movie seemed to be building to a climax that never occurs, it feels a little anticlimactic.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

theofficeDec 29, 2013

Not as good as the first one I think but still a very solid movie all around. The story, action sequences, comedy, etc was all really good. The one knock against it is that it didn't give me the same "epic" feeling the lord of the ringsNot as good as the first one I think but still a very solid movie all around. The story, action sequences, comedy, etc was all really good. The one knock against it is that it didn't give me the same "epic" feeling the lord of the rings movies and the first hobbit movie gave me. It didn't seem as grand an adventure as the first one. And I also feel there is too much computer animation which takes away from the realism. In any case I still very much liked it and highly recommend you go see it!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

MrAppleKinsDec 14, 2013

It's not necessarily an amazing movie, but it is an amazing viewing experience. It has depth, story and characters, all which play out well in the movie--but the real draw here is the fantastic action and visuals, even though they sometimesIt's not necessarily an amazing movie, but it is an amazing viewing experience. It has depth, story and characters, all which play out well in the movie--but the real draw here is the fantastic action and visuals, even though they sometimes bog down the quality of the film itself. A big improvement over the first, mainly due to how well the epic action manages to propel the story as well as the visuals, as opposed to the first one. 3.5/4… Expand

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

8

MouthofSauronDec 23, 2013

The second installment in The Hobbit franchise is a fast-paced adventure flick, sure to please the average moviegoer. The visuals are fantastic, if a little over the top- some scenes seem excessive and drawn-out. It's a darker film than itsThe second installment in The Hobbit franchise is a fast-paced adventure flick, sure to please the average moviegoer. The visuals are fantastic, if a little over the top- some scenes seem excessive and drawn-out. It's a darker film than its predecessor, and certainly a stronger one.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

BshopAug 16, 2014

Better than the first one by a long shot. I enjoyed every scene, except the ones with the Bard (who seems mild-mannered and not too leader-esque) and the barrel-river scene (which also was a bit long and somewhat ridiculous), but I digress.Better than the first one by a long shot. I enjoyed every scene, except the ones with the Bard (who seems mild-mannered and not too leader-esque) and the barrel-river scene (which also was a bit long and somewhat ridiculous), but I digress.
From Lonely Mountain on it was a great show indeed. Can't wait for the Battle of Five Armies.
In summary, rent if you can. Buy if you like the LOTR and Peter Jackson/Tolkien series thus far. 3D not really worth the price honestly.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

JamesCannonDec 16, 2013

Return of the Jackson. Finally Jackson gets it right. His post Lord of the Rings commercial films have been mediocre at best (King Kong, Lovely Bones, Hobbit 1). They seemed like they would have been sure easy slam dunks for him, but theReturn of the Jackson. Finally Jackson gets it right. His post Lord of the Rings commercial films have been mediocre at best (King Kong, Lovely Bones, Hobbit 1). They seemed like they would have been sure easy slam dunks for him, but the lack of editing in all of them, made them bloated hot messes. I like a few of his pre Lord of the Rings work as well and I knew it was matter of time till he finally directed a good film. The second Hobbit movie gives him more to work with. One you have a great creature creation that Weta can show off, but you also have great action sequences that looked amazing in the high frame rate. The problems of straining my eyes were no longer there and I was able to just absorb everything on the screen. The film still has pacing problems and the characters just aren't as lively or interesting as the LOTR. The biggest problem is the story only really offers dwarves getting in and out of shenanigans and nothing else really propels the story forward until smaug shows up. All that being said its much better than the first and it has me anticipating the final act, which hopefully will shave off another ten minutes from its running time and be ever sharper.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

MaxsonDec 13, 2013

Pretty much the middle of the book. If you read the book, you know it's really short compare to The Lord of the ring. Peter Jackson did a great job expanding the story. The pacing in this one is a lot faster than the first one, its morePretty much the middle of the book. If you read the book, you know it's really short compare to The Lord of the ring. Peter Jackson did a great job expanding the story. The pacing in this one is a lot faster than the first one, its more action packed, and the special effects was beautiful. Lots of exciting moments in this one, smaug the dragon was...badass. The scale and visual of smaug was beyond amazing. Can't wait for the final installment.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

8

foxgroveJan 17, 2014

Peter Jackson seems to have sparked into life with this second installment of The Hobbit series as this is a vast improvement on the first film. Gone are the laboured, talky scenes of Hobbit domesticity and much of the lame humour has alsoPeter Jackson seems to have sparked into life with this second installment of The Hobbit series as this is a vast improvement on the first film. Gone are the laboured, talky scenes of Hobbit domesticity and much of the lame humour has also been excised. We now have a movie with plenty of action and adventure and one that stands tall and bears comparison to 'The Lord of the Rings' trilogy. All the series' constants are present including impressive make-up and special visual effects, as well as beautiful Art-Direction and great sound. The film sports boundless energy and some amazing set pieces involving spiders, dragons and Hobbits in barrels. Editing is also much sharper this time out and the wonderful swooping camera shots are very much part of the film's overall style. Aside from an awful supporting performance from Stephen Fry as 'The Master of Lake Town', 'The Desolation of Smaug' really does deliver. The cliff hanger ending sets up the third picture nicely, although I would Quite happily have continued watching this one for another couple of hours, that's how good it is!… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

sanyrubJan 7, 2014

Can´t believe I´m saying this but I really liked and enjoyed this second part of the trilogy. I love The lord of The Rings (especially the last part and especially Frodo+Sam, the heart of the film) and yes the first Hobbit was a letdownCan´t believe I´m saying this but I really liked and enjoyed this second part of the trilogy. I love The lord of The Rings (especially the last part and especially Frodo+Sam, the heart of the film) and yes the first Hobbit was a letdown because it felt long and was boring at parts, like there was no reason whatsoever for this new adventure despite the stunning visuals. TLOTR was vibrant and exciting and had a heart, the first Hobbit didn´t have that and it made us wonder if this was a bad decision. Well, so surprised they convinced me with this second part that the effort to do this new trilogy was worthy. They explain some more things about this adventure that make it more grounded. I enjoyed it from start to finish, visuals can´t get any better, good acting (actor playing Bilbo was an amazing choice, he is fantastic for this), the pacing was great this time because the start of the film was strong, this younger Legolas we didn´t know is great to see, the new Elfo woman is a good character too, the King of the Elves from the forest seems like a great and intimidating character too (I´m sure we´ll see him a lot in the last part of the trilogy) and of course the moment we finally get to see Smaug is impressive, very entertaining and spectacular. Best part of the film was Smaug+Bilbo scenes. It went a little downhill after that when all the dwarfs join Smaug and Bilbo because it felt like nobody was at risk despite the giant dragon trying to kill them.

Overall, I think it´s time to accept The Hobbit has always been a lighter story and that it is here to be enjoyed without getting emotionally involved like it happened to everybody with Frodo, Sam and the whole TLOTR trilogy. This time the director got it right and was entertaining and stunning offering so I give this a strong 7.5 (I gave the first Hobbit a 6 out of 10).… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

TrilobiteGJul 20, 2015

Ah yes, the best movie out of the Hobbit Trilogy. What an adventure! From start to finish it was just action, action and more incredible action. This movie is better than it's previous because the dialogue (although some of it unnecessary) isAh yes, the best movie out of the Hobbit Trilogy. What an adventure! From start to finish it was just action, action and more incredible action. This movie is better than it's previous because the dialogue (although some of it unnecessary) is cut down magnitudes less than the predecessor. And of course Smaug, what a villain, actually intriguing dialogue with a sinister presence whilst watching it, props to Cumber batch because that was amazing. Best one!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

vlahoponMay 16, 2014

Good movie but still far away from LOTR . Benedict Cumberbatch is amazing as Smaug's voice . The only problem with this movie is the elf-dwarf love story

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

silver497Dec 23, 2013

I've heard a lot of people complaining that this movie sucks because it's not faithful to the novel. This doesn't bother me since film is a completely different artistic medium, and some things will be lost or added. That being said, I reallyI've heard a lot of people complaining that this movie sucks because it's not faithful to the novel. This doesn't bother me since film is a completely different artistic medium, and some things will be lost or added. That being said, I really liked this movie, and thought this was a huge improvement over the first. One of the most impressive things about the movie was they added Legolas and a new Elven character, and it didn't feel shoehorned or forced, it actually made sense. A problem I had with the first film in this trilogy was that the pacing was uneven and all over the place. This one, however, the pacing is consistent for the most part(except for the lake village). While many of the dwarf characters in the first one felt underdeveloped and were more like throwaways than actual characters, many of the dwarves get to shine in this. Benedict Cumberbatch as Smaug is sensational. And it looks like Bilbo is beginning to reach his full potential. In conclusion, 2/3s in, I don't think The Hobbit trilogy will ever reach the heights of the masterful Lord of the Rings, I can still enjoy the ride, especially The Desolation of Smaug. 8/10… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

PStakhivDec 18, 2013

Outstanding acting mixed with high quality CGI makes it's action scenes to become new benchmark! The movie isn't perfect, but still Second installment of Hobbit series is the best action movie if 2013, period.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

JCouch777Dec 14, 2013

Part 2 of the Hobbit Trilogy delivers even more than the first. A great action movie for fans who read the book, and for fans who did not. While there were some major differences and changes in the movie from Tolkien's novel, I thought it wasPart 2 of the Hobbit Trilogy delivers even more than the first. A great action movie for fans who read the book, and for fans who did not. While there were some major differences and changes in the movie from Tolkien's novel, I thought it was still made well. The only thing that felt off to me was the horrible sub-plot involving Kili and his wound. The ending, although completely made up, still leaves you longing for the final installment.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

8

callumjsouthDec 13, 2014

An Unexpected Journey eased us into the story of Bilbo Baggins which did have merits. The Desolation of Smaug takes a different path and throws us in amongst it all, which makes it a more significant and more entertaining chapter. The questAn Unexpected Journey eased us into the story of Bilbo Baggins which did have merits. The Desolation of Smaug takes a different path and throws us in amongst it all, which makes it a more significant and more entertaining chapter. The quest to the Lonely Mountain continues and concludes in epic fashion. The story is breathlessly told just as any great fantasy story should be. The lack of quantitative source material begins to become a positive in the second instalment, as the film feels well paced and appropriately long. The pacing of the film allows it to flow well which enhances the story's presentation. As a result, the plot never feels stop-go or overly congested like the LOTR trilogy did. Nor does it feel too bare like An Unexpected Journey. The Desolation of Smaug is home to well paced plot development, many strong characters and ever present danger which is complimented by some very convincing antagonists. All of which allow for a thoroughly entertaining and impressively compelling film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TerenceYiboFeb 3, 2014

惊险刺激的中土之旅，抛去前作的种种铺垫，哈比人2的节奏更加流畅，唯一的不足，长湖镇的戏略显沉闷，当然抵达孤山之后，和史矛革的对峙相当精彩。视觉效果出类拔萃，蜘蛛/龙的造型设计堪称完美，精灵族的造型超级美，同时场景设计美轮美奂，配乐不如首部曲但也高水准。不过彼得夹克逊对于原著的篡改实在是令人吃惊和不满。惊险刺激的中土之旅，抛去前作的种种铺垫，哈比人2的节奏更加流畅，唯一的不足，长湖镇的戏略显沉闷，当然抵达孤山之后，和史矛革的对峙相当精彩。视觉效果出类拔萃，蜘蛛/龙的造型设计堪称完美，精灵族的造型超级美，同时场景设计美轮美奂，配乐不如首部曲但也高水准。不过彼得夹克逊对于原著的篡改实在是令人吃惊和不满。

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

WorstReviewsJan 18, 2014

Maybe Peter Jacksons money, and quest for the oversized adventure has got to his head. Nonetheless, I loved this film. It's such a major improvement over An Unexpected Journey, I don't even want to talk about that peice of crap. I feel moreMaybe Peter Jacksons money, and quest for the oversized adventure has got to his head. Nonetheless, I loved this film. It's such a major improvement over An Unexpected Journey, I don't even want to talk about that peice of crap. I feel more like this should be similar to that of the trilogy and thats what makes it amazing. If Peter would've done this with An Unexpected Journey they would've made alot more money on this film. overall major improvement, 8/10 Great.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

TheApplegnomeDec 9, 2014

This second installment of The Hobbit is greater in almost every aspect. Unfortunately that does not include CGI.

This is the second installment of the new trilogy in our beloved Middle-earth. It quite spectacular when you see the extendedThis second installment of The Hobbit is greater in almost every aspect. Unfortunately that does not include CGI.

This is the second installment of the new trilogy in our beloved Middle-earth. It quite spectacular when you see the extended version, and you realize how big the franchise really is. It got so much extra material and things that really connect all the Middle-earth films together. The biggest thing with this movie is that it got much more action than in An Unexpected Journey, especially when it comes to Smaug and “The Necromancer”. Some of the action sequences though, are boring. There’s just nothing unique with them. But there are much more unique and epic scenes, that I can tell you! Therefor it feels much more like Lord of the Rings. The plot is very entertaining and last act of the film is superb. You really want to see the continuation. The characters in The Desolation of Smaug are very good, and combined with an awesome cast like in An unexpected Journey: do I really have high expectations of The Battle of The five Armies. But the thing with this trilogy is that the CGI is very odd. In this film are the CGI very good when it comes to Orcs and Smaug. But at the same time is there much terrible and awful CGI when it comes to natural objects. It didn’t feel real at all. There’s also a big mix of CGI and real recorded scenes. They aren’t working well together. There are much dark scenes; witch didn't work well while using 3D-glasses. The computer-generated light that’s included in some parts in the movie is also terrible.

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is much better than the previous film in this new trilogy. The action is greater, better music and a lot more LotR-feeling. But the movie is a bit slow at some places, and the CGI are just terrible sometimes.

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug gets an 8/10.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Jack_SunshineDec 24, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. There was a time, during the early years of the twenty first century, when each December would herald a new Lord of the Rings (alongside a new Harry Potter film and maybe a Star Wars, if we were lucky). The height of this lasted only as long as the three years over which Peter Jackson’s original trilogy were released, but was already becoming something of a tradition.

With ITV serialising Harry Potter over the Christmas period, and a brand new epic trilogy in the Hunger Games series coinciding with the release of The Hobbit, it really does feel like it did all those years ago. Certainly, Peter Jackson wants to do it all over again, and why not? It’s a treat to indulge in almost three hours of fantasy on the big screen, and there can be no denying that The Hobbit is indulgent.

Much has been made of the seemingly unnecessary decision to stretch a meagre prequel out to the length of the epic three-book Lord of the Rings trilogy. Strictly speaking, this series rounds out Peter Jackson’s version of Middle Earth as both an adaptation of The Hobbit and the numerous appendices and preambles that were cut from The Lord of the Rings.

It’s been a long time since I read The Hobbit so long, in fact, that it may have been read to me by my parents. I can’t quite remember what‘s original, and what’s just filler, but these films are ticking all the boxes for me. Last year had the encounter with trolls and Bilbo’s riddles with Gollum, and this time around we visit the foreboding gloom of Mirkwood, the distant settlement of Laketown (where Stephen Fry appears as the greedy master) and the lair of the dragon Smaug.

The star of these films as always been the visual effects and epic scope, and this instalment is no exception. CGI spectacle integrates seamlessly into the breathtaking New Zealand landscape. While largely flawless, some of the green screen shots are regrettably obvious, and the final sequence, involving much molten gold, is decidedly lacklustre.

Martin Freeman shines as the unassuming Bilbo Baggins, who has much greater confidence, a result of both his experiences in the first film and the slow but steady corruption of the ring. Similarly, the deposed king Thorin (Richard Armitage) appears to come under the influence of his lost wealth as the party nears the ocean of gold below the mountain.

New material includes the presence of Legolas (Orlando Bloom) and Jackson’s original character Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly, providing the film’s only female lead) who flesh out the scenes in the Elven kingdom and provide some intrigue into the relationships between Elves and Dwarves. They also help drive the film’s most high paced action sequence, the famous barrel escape.

With a hindsight that Tolkien himself was not afforded, the film is tied neatly to Lord of the Rings continuity by Legolas, along with references to his future companion Gimli and the Eye of Sauron. The latter is the focus of an expanded sequence with Gandalf (Ian McKellen, delivering a typically winning performance) in the spooky ruins of the fortress which casts a pall over the surrounding region. The final sequence, a battle with Smaug through ruins of mighty Dwarven industry, provides another thrill ride, and prevents the film from ending with an otherwise unsatisfying cliff hanger.

Inevitably, with thirteen dwarves and one hobbit in the main party (and countless other wizards, elves and humans filling up the story) the cast is too large, and many of the characters slip into the background. Thankfully, Bilbo receives a lengthy scene one-on-one with the film’s most stunning special effect, the dragon Smaug, voiced by Benedict Cumberbatch. The performance drips with ham and cheese and the beast occupies every inch of the cinema screen.

So while this film strays occasionally into overblown fantasy dialogue, and it can be a challenge to keep up with all the characters and everything that’s going on, this is an enjoyable, if lengthy movie, at least the equal of its predecessor.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

moviemitch96Dec 15, 2013

I'd say that this was equally as good as part 1 and that it definitely managed to keep me entertained. I really liked the cast and their performances. Martin Freeman once again fulfilled his role as Bilbo rather nicely. Ian Mckellen isI'd say that this was equally as good as part 1 and that it definitely managed to keep me entertained. I really liked the cast and their performances. Martin Freeman once again fulfilled his role as Bilbo rather nicely. Ian Mckellen is getting old, but he still makes a great Gandalf. Orlando Bloom returns as Legolas and he's fun to watch. Needless to say, the best part is when Smaug finally arrives. Benedict Cumberbatch sounds better than ever as the voice behind Smaug. The action was also great and will likely please adults and children alike. Despite the film's lengthy run time and a cliffhanger ending that left me wanting more, it still delivers and not only met my expectations overall, but got me even more excited for part 3 next year!… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

8

HeartanalogDec 25, 2013

Awesome! Not the travel channel version, like the first Hobbit where it could have been just Golum, instead we got hours of sweeping vistas. I got to admit the 3D was very clean, and it payed off when you finally see Smaug! Go see it! Fun forAwesome! Not the travel channel version, like the first Hobbit where it could have been just Golum, instead we got hours of sweeping vistas. I got to admit the 3D was very clean, and it payed off when you finally see Smaug! Go see it! Fun for the whole family!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

LensesDec 16, 2013

Take my advice and don't bother seeing The Hobbit until this time next year on DVD. You will thank me later.

The movie is fine, but the ending is so abrupt that the entire theater sighed and laughed when it ended in the middle of theTake my advice and don't bother seeing The Hobbit until this time next year on DVD. You will thank me later.

The movie is fine, but the ending is so abrupt that the entire theater sighed and laughed when it ended in the middle of the climax. I guess they need to drag it out into another movie. So. Do youself a favor and just wait. Or prepare to be dissappointed in the ending.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

8

Praetorian75Dec 15, 2013

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is the very enjoyable 2nd part of a fantasy movie trilogy. If you can look past the fact that its not an "entirely" faithful film adaptation of the book you will most likely enjoy it for what it is a bigThe Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is the very enjoyable 2nd part of a fantasy movie trilogy. If you can look past the fact that its not an "entirely" faithful film adaptation of the book you will most likely enjoy it for what it is a big budget fantasy movie trilogy.

I went to the Cinema (HFR 3D version) to Watch this with my son. Unlike "An Unexpected Journey" my son wasnt complaining about it being long and drawn out which is also how i feel about it. Thankfully there were no singing dwarves! The visuals were quite good with the HFR 3D just as you would be expecting. I wont mention anything of the plot as it deserves to be experienced.

I would definatly recommend seeing this in the Cinema. Rating: 8/10… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

epocDec 24, 2013

I love the Hobbit, it is my favourite book ever! So I have to say I was a little exasperated at some of the additions to the story that weren't in the book. For example Legolas! WTF? Another one the Kili and elf love scene! WTF? HoweverI love the Hobbit, it is my favourite book ever! So I have to say I was a little exasperated at some of the additions to the story that weren't in the book. For example Legolas! WTF? Another one the Kili and elf love scene! WTF? However that's not to say I hate this movie. In fact I love this movie! All of its elements are strong, with so much attention to detail. The set pieces are marvellous, making me want to live in Middle Earth and roam freely. In all aspects it is an improvement over the last film, which struggled to find its feet. But here it gets straight on course, and the atmosphere is always exciting. Also the film is very well acted, but star of the show is Smaug. Credit to Benidict Cumberbatch, he's dark and installs fear into audiences. The CGI is also fantastic, leading to some amazing visual spectical. The action is great, but takes a different tone to LOTR. Instead of giant battles, the action here involves clever tricks and wit. If these changes weren't here I could of gave this a 10, but I can't.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

waynDec 15, 2013

The hobbit desolation of smaug comes a huge step closer to make peter Jackson king of fantasy director. It is very much better than the first part the hobb8t trilogy does not even comes close to the Lord of the rings trilogy

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

FordPrefectDec 17, 2013

Just saw this movie last night and I was blown away! Jackson again keeps the tone lighter than Lord of The Rings and although it makes this a more fun filled adventure it can at times seem out of place. Overall however, this movie is aJust saw this movie last night and I was blown away! Jackson again keeps the tone lighter than Lord of The Rings and although it makes this a more fun filled adventure it can at times seem out of place. Overall however, this movie is a fantastic adventure.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

PHJDec 16, 2013

I don't know what to say, this movie is great obviously, by the way there is some problems witch make it worst than the 1fst one, Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug continue and follow correctly the history, and starts badly.

When the movieI don't know what to say, this movie is great obviously, by the way there is some problems witch make it worst than the 1fst one, Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug continue and follow correctly the history, and starts badly.

When the movie self develops it starts to be great, the scene of the river (witch is in the trailer, no spoiler) it's just perfect, the background music, the animation, the especial effects and the theme is great, and you will have more great scenes like this as the movie continues, so about sound track, especial effects, actuation, voiceover, background and history, the movie is great.

I think the point witch everyvbody hates in this movie is the final, but think if you was the director of Hobbit, you have a great triology to make movies, what you can do to obligate the people to continue watching the triology? No finals, you watch a 2:30 hours movie and don't see any final, it's a bad point? Is, but it's good for create an expective for the next Hobbit.

The scenes with Smaug is a little bit confusig, obviouly Bilbo will not kill the dragon alone, so the dwarfs came to help him, and they start to make a trap for Smaug, the movie shows that, but you will know that they are making the trap just when Samug is trapped, so it's confusing.

The strong points of the movie is the beatiful soundtrack and the sounds by it self, the especial effects, the background (witch is in New Zeland, and it's impressive), the great history and how the movie shows the changes of Bilbo, this is nice and a strong point of the movie. Hobbit The Desolation of Smaug is a worthy 8 8.5 movie, I recomend!… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

felipeguaranaDec 16, 2013

Everything about The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug represents an improvement over the first installment of Peter Jackson's The Hobbit. Just remember, it's not a book! It's a movie and a great adaptation from the book, don't go watch if youEverything about The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug represents an improvement over the first installment of Peter Jackson's The Hobbit. Just remember, it's not a book! It's a movie and a great adaptation from the book, don't go watch if you have in mind that is 100% equal to the book. Honestly, you're a idiot if you do this.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

Mole2807Dec 17, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A positive response to harsh criticism.
This film in all its glory does feel like a middle chapter of a trilogy. Though Jackson opens the movie, reappearing as his carrot-eating-cameo that bags a few laughs from LOTR movie fans in the theaters; its opening is weak. The movies ending is frustrating for anyone in the audience, but that's just because the films content is so good! The film fails to sustain any real structure so to any viewers who haven't seen the first installment or the LOTR movies, will struggle to follow the plot.
Although this film has its weak points it is a vast improvement on the first, firstly; there is tons more action, gore and evil. Then there's the CGI (best seen in the 3D format) which in this movie has some of the best achievements; Smaug is a masterpiece and is definitely worth the wait, and the orcs are truly brought to life when seen in 3D. Though there are some parts of the movie that have clearly been weakly written, this fresh take on evil and hatred festering in MiddleEarth outweighs these few flaws and gives Tolkien fans and Christmas cinema-goers what they need to restore their love for MiddleEarth on the big screen.
Look out for the spider scene in Mirkwood; for anyone who has read the book, they will realize how hard it must have been to write that scene with the spiders talking. For people who hadn't read the book this scene could have turned out to appear a little cheesy but Jackson and his team have succeeded and made the scene work better than any other in the movie!
Stronger writing and this movie could have been up there with 11 Academy Award winning, Return of the King...the film is satisfying; full of action, plenty of fantastic CGI eye-candy and a good performance from the entire cast.
8 out of 10, now wait for There and Back Again.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

Garbouw_DearkDec 26, 2013

So, I never read the book, and I never saw the first movie. Still, The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug, while a bit rushed at times (despite the length of the movie) was still enjoyable to watch.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

GrabacrJan 7, 2014

Still not at the level of LOTR, but an improvement over the first movie (which I did still like, just not as much). Just one thing, if you haven't read the book or seen the first movie, you absolutely have to do one or the other before youStill not at the level of LOTR, but an improvement over the first movie (which I did still like, just not as much). Just one thing, if you haven't read the book or seen the first movie, you absolutely have to do one or the other before you see this or you won't know what the hell is going on, because it jumps right in. Otherwise, this is one good movie.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

NedensoruyorsunDec 28, 2013

Sağlam görsel efektler kullanılmış bence, Yönetmen Peter Jackson yine bütün yeteneklerini bu filmde göstermiş. Özellikle kullanılan Efektler çok iyi kurgulanmış...

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

CiniMan623Jan 2, 2014

The thing that grabs and holds you is the rich visuals. My eyes were in ecstasy! Such detail goes into these worlds. Its quite a trip. This should be enjoyed in IMAX 3D if you can. Its worth the extra cost. Do not see if you are afraid ofThe thing that grabs and holds you is the rich visuals. My eyes were in ecstasy! Such detail goes into these worlds. Its quite a trip. This should be enjoyed in IMAX 3D if you can. Its worth the extra cost. Do not see if you are afraid of heights. There are so many precarious walkways and stairs without railings that span bottomless pits and gorges you just may find yourself clutching your armrests a little too tightly. The sense if enormous scale is wonderful. I wondered how it would compare to the LOTR series and its different but still good. Plenty of new action like the entertaining barrel escape sequence, great acting, cool special FX. Awesome set pieces. Some things are familiar Orcs are effortlessly dispatched in a thousand bloodless ways by sweatless elves. Some things are worth the price of admission like the deliciously evil and infinitely powerful Smaug. The ending will leave you wanting more even disappointingly so.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

MovieAndGameExpJan 2, 2014

Well, I have to say that this movie was better than the last one, but stills very bad if you compare it with The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy; I think Peter Jackson is doing an excellent work with the Tolkien's novel, but no good enough.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

oDjentoJan 3, 2015

I'll just do a short review for this. Definitely the best out of the 3, with the best pacing, and more characters getting to do things for themselves and not just being there (like dwarves just standing doing nothing in other films). FramingI'll just do a short review for this. Definitely the best out of the 3, with the best pacing, and more characters getting to do things for themselves and not just being there (like dwarves just standing doing nothing in other films). Framing is a bit off as well (dragon stutters in one shot). The film was great as it had 3 main focus points in the film to distinguish itself nicely: 1st half make the dwarfs the main focus, making a bit more character development, the 2nd half being focused on bilbo and the excellent encounter he has with smaug (favourite scene easily!). Then the sub plot is gandalf going to find out what is happening at Don Guldor. This one was as close as it came to the LOTR trilogy, but still just missed it's quality. A slightly darker tone than the previous film and just overall made far better. In retrospect, they could've done this trilogy in two films to miss out all the bull **** they have!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Leo9127Jan 16, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Holy Sh*t was this movie awesome, I mean Smaug was so cool, and it was less boring than the first, and It leaves wanting for more thanks to the Cliffhanger ending, but it does have it's flaws, like straying too far from the book, the pacing it's still a little off, but ironically, I actually enjoyed the part I thought I would hate, the character of Tauriel, who was actually Bad ass, but her romance with one of the dwarfs still felt forced, and awkward, but overall though this movie was great, but not as good as The Lord of the Rings, but still pretty good on it's on right.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

DanielGrozaJan 16, 2014

A really enjoyable movie that has it all: action, adventure, humor,drama and even a small romance. The fact that Peter Jackson did not stay completely true to Tolkien's book, is a very brave and admirable thing. Obviously, it's worse than TheA really enjoyable movie that has it all: action, adventure, humor,drama and even a small romance. The fact that Peter Jackson did not stay completely true to Tolkien's book, is a very brave and admirable thing. Obviously, it's worse than The Lord of the Rings, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's bad. The visual effects are top notch, especially the dragon Smaug which was incredibly detailed.

Although the movie takes us to many new and beautiful designed locations, you really cannot feel like you really care about them. The hobbit 'gang' are thrown from one place to another, each with one different character to another, and only when they get to the mountain you feel excited.

Still, 'The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug' is a very good movie. Sure it's not better that 'The Lord of the Rings' trilogy, but that doesn't mean it's bad.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Laekerson95Jan 23, 2014

Just imagine, one whole 3-hour Hobbit movie with the trolls, Rivendel, Gollum, the Spiders, the Woodland Elves, the Barrels, Laketown, Smaug, and the final battle. Could you imagine. JAckson has it. He captures Middle Earth and the belovedJust imagine, one whole 3-hour Hobbit movie with the trolls, Rivendel, Gollum, the Spiders, the Woodland Elves, the Barrels, Laketown, Smaug, and the final battle. Could you imagine. JAckson has it. He captures Middle Earth and the beloved tale of THe Hobbit as I pictured it to be 8 years ago. But sequences are time-dragged where they don't need to be. Constant reminders of character backgrounds is unnecessary. Where's Bilbo's backstory 'cause I could do a 15-page paper on Thorin. Remember all the backstory they gave LEgolas and Aragorn and Gimli in The Lord of the RIngs? Of course not, 'cause there didn't need to be. The mystery is the page-turner for viewers. Nevertheless, in this the pace crescendos, a wondrous love story draws in better character and a tearing score, and the intensity spine-tingles of SMAUG!! Holy mother of Middle Earth. Reminded me of the identical-looking horror dragon of my childhood dreams. There's annoyed-yawn moments, but it's a park blast worth another go and a perfect Christmas blockbuster to sit back and drink steamed milk to with the snow lightly covering the land. Now we gotta wait a whole year for part III after it's Breaking Bad-like finish.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Deadpoolfan117Jan 29, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Major praise to the performances of the cast, especially scenes involving Martin Freeman and/or Benedict Cumberbatch, the CGI, and the overall improvement from the previous film. However, the love triangle between Evangeline Lilly's character, one of the dwarfs, and Legolas, and the films use of previous locations and characters from the 'Lord of the Rings' trilogy does decrease its likability.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

adpirtleAug 15, 2014

The second film in this trilogy dispenses with the relative reverence of the first, and that turns out to be a good thing. Its predecessor suffered a bit because it couldn't decide whether it wanted to be a scene-for-scene retelling of theThe second film in this trilogy dispenses with the relative reverence of the first, and that turns out to be a good thing. Its predecessor suffered a bit because it couldn't decide whether it wanted to be a scene-for-scene retelling of the novel or a looser, action-oriented adaptation. This film resides firmly in the second camp, and everything works better for it. For example, the escape from the Woodland Realm is every bit as over the top as the last film's escape from Goblin-town, but it doesn't feel so out of place, so it's easier just to kick back and enjoy the ride. The changes from the book once again mostly work, and in this case actually make more sense. Bard the Bargeman might not be as awesome as Bard the Bowman, at least not yet, but he is much more fleshed out, and the film finally gives the Company a decent reason for needing a burglar. I could have done without the dwarf-dragon battle at the end, I really liked the addition of Tauriel.

My biggest objection continues to be the over-reliance on CGI. Make no mistake, the Smaug of the title is every bit as incredible as I ever imagined he could be, but decision to animate Azog's son doesn't work out so well. I understand that it was a late decision to give what was originally a live performance a computer makeover, and it shows in how unrealistic he looks next to Daddy.

Overall, this is another fine addition to Jackson's Middle-earth saga, expanding on the previous film while avoiding its pacing pitfalls.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

horcrux2007Sep 26, 2014

Not surprisingly, "Desolation of Smaug" is exponentially better than its shaky predecessor, "An Unexpected Journey". Every scene is exciting and entertaining, and the visual effects are absolutely amazing; Smaug looked especially visuallyNot surprisingly, "Desolation of Smaug" is exponentially better than its shaky predecessor, "An Unexpected Journey". Every scene is exciting and entertaining, and the visual effects are absolutely amazing; Smaug looked especially visually beautiful. The one problem this film had was that it condensed the best chapters in the book to just a few minutes such as the spider attack scene.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

WheelzFourReelzDec 29, 2014

It definitely goes a little too over the top, but The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is a very fun, fast paced, fantasy movie with one of the coolest movie dragons ever.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

emlugo123Feb 22, 2015

No doubt the best out of the 3 Hobbit movies that were released. Smaug's voice was intimidating and was done perfectly by Benedict Cumberbatch. The pace of the movie was vastly improved from the last movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

homer4presidentMar 11, 2015

The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug is a great movie I recommend to fans of the LOTR and avid readers of Tolkien in general. Unlike the first addition in this trilogy, Desolation of Smaug is fast paced and brimming with action almost to the pointThe Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug is a great movie I recommend to fans of the LOTR and avid readers of Tolkien in general. Unlike the first addition in this trilogy, Desolation of Smaug is fast paced and brimming with action almost to the point of being busy. There are some parts where CGI is not as good as it could be, but upon seeing the dragon Smaug, you soon realize that it was worth it all along.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DanilSirotkinJul 31, 2015

В августе 2013 я увидел первый трейлер к Хоббиту: Пустоши Смауга (The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug), (название этого фильма я предугадал ещё до того, как узнал официальное). Как и ожидалось, этот трейлер мне очень понравился, и я сталВ августе 2013 я увидел первый трейлер к Хоббиту: Пустоши Смауга (The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug), (название этого фильма я предугадал ещё до того, как узнал официальное). Как и ожидалось, этот трейлер мне очень понравился, и я стал ждать выхода очередного фильма "Дядюшки Джексона" по Толкину. Естественно я ожидал, как и в прошлых картинах, полного перенесения духа Толкина из книг на экран. Осенью вышел второй трейлер, который, конечно, ТОЖЕ мне понравился (а как вы думали?). И я уже полностью удостоверился в идеальности этого фильма. Кстати, книгу я на то время ещё не читал (прочитал я её только в 2014), и не знал, что он довольно сильно будет отличаться от книги. (Поэтому появившиеся в трейлерах Леголас и Тауриэль меня не смутили ("Лего" я даже обрадовался, так как этот персонаж нравился мне в ВК.)) Вышел ещё один ролик (не трейлер, а как бы дополнение, превью, не знаю как сказать), и ДА, да-да-да, он тоже был классным, атмосферным, хорошо поставленным, с отличной музыкой. Да и вообще, все три ролика были дико атмосферными и "Толкиновскими". Итак, в декабре вышел фильм, однако, посмотрел я его только спустя несколько месяцев, и то пиратку, а на экране телевизора примерно через пол года после выхода. Мне всё равно, где смотреть фильм, если он отличный. Но, оказалась ли отличной "Пустошь"? - Не совсем, как бы тяжело мне не было это признавать. Если прошлые фильмы были ШЕДЕВРАЛЬНЫМИ, этот оказался просто ХОРОШИМ. Итак, СЮЖЕТ. - Команда, видимо, уже спустившаяся с Каррока (Джексон не решил показывать спуск с горы) продолжает свой путь. Она ночует в доме оборотня Беорна, добирается до Лихолесья. Гэндальф покидает гномов с хоббитом, и они, уже без него, с трудом преодолевают Великий Лес. Попадают, в качестве пленников, во дворец Трандуила, короля лесных эльфов, сбегают от него на бочках, приплывают в Эсгарот, Озёрный город, потом наконец достигают своей цели - Одинокой горы. Затем следует беседа со Смаугом и его вылет в Озёрный город. КОНЕЦ. Вроде бы, всё по книге, скажете вы. Нет, скажу я вам, - я ведь рассказал только самый основной сюжет, самое главное. На самом деле, фильм просто ИСПЕЩРЁН различными ДОПОЛНЕНИЯМИ, ПЕРСОНАЖАМИ, КОТОРЫХ НЕ БЫЛО В КНИГЕ, НЕНУЖНЫМИ СЮЖЕТНЫМИ ЛИНИЯМИ. Понятно, что без всего этого не получилась бы ТРИЛОГИЯ, а только, максимум, 2 двухчасовых фильма, но так перебарщивать... Я уже не говорю про ненужную любовную линию... (Хотя, сама Тауриэль получилась симпатичная :)) НО, я даже вытерпел бы всё это, если бы в фильме была такая музыка, КАК В ТРЕЙЛЕРЕ и подобная ей. НО, Шор написал довольно красивую, но АБСОЛЮТНО НЕ ПОДХОДЯЩУЮ (в большинстве случаев), по моему мнению, музыку для фильма. К тому же, её здесь СЛИШКОМ много. На эпизоде с Озёрным городом от неё начинают болеть уши -(Правда). Фильм потерял из-за этого всего почти всю свою сказочность. Но нет, он не бездушный, абсолютно! Просто, фильм стал пропитан не духом Толкина, а духом Джексона.-(Он тоже хорош). И лишь в некоторых моментах проскальзывает тот самый дух Толкина. Вообще, Хоббит с дополнениями смотрелся бы неплохо, но это уже перебор... Джексон с женой видимо замечтался и стал слишком много экспериментировать с уже готовым отличным материалом (я имею в виду книгу). Сценарий, видимо, много раз переписывался, и далекооо не только Джексон приложил к нему руку. Тут замешана и его жена, и Дель Торо (который остался в качестве сценариста) и Филиппа Бойенс, и ДАЖЕ АКТЁРЫ и частично съёмочная группа. В итоге - фильм перегружен. Прибавилось экшна. Погоня на бочках хороша. _ Кстати, ещё одна проблема: если в книге гномы просто спокойно плыли по реке в закупоренных бочках, - то в фильме это СУПЕРМЕГАПОГОНЯМЕСИЛОВОСОРКАМИИСЭЛЬФАМИКРУТЫЕСПЕЦЭФФЕКТЫ и тд. Если в книге Бильбо беседует с драконом, а потом он улетает, то в фильме после разговора идёт длиинный эпизод, где ПОГОНЯГНОМОВОТДРАКОНАГНОМОВЗАДРАКОНОМБИТВАСНИМТЕЛЕЖКИПОКАЗЫВАНИЕНАМВНУТРЕННЕГОУСТРОЙСТВАГОРЫИОБЛИВАНИЕДРАКОНАЗОЛОТОМАТАКЖЕДРАЗНИЛКИТОРИНАПООТНОШЕНИЮКДРАКОНУ и тд... Гномов в Эсгароте зачем то разлучают, явно не для того, чтобы показать, что Торин не прочь ради достижения цели пожертвовать близкими (ещё в первом фильме он говорил, что готов принять любого из этих гномов вместо целой армии), а ради намешивания в дальнейшем ряда других персонажей, ВТОМЧИСЛЕДРАКИСОРКАМИЛЕГОЛАСА и дальнейшего развития ЛЮБОВНОЙЛИНИИКИЛИ+ТАУРИЭЛЬ=ДЕГРОДАЦИЯПИТЕРАДЖЕКСОНА. Ну а зачем пролог? Ну что это я, только ругаю и ругаю фильм... Поговорим о его плюсах. Актёры как обычно хороши, кроме медведя-оборотня. Спецэффекты на высоте, правда теперь их слишком много. И, самое большое достоинство этого фильма - это сцена С БАБОЧКАМИ. Боже, КАК ОНА ПРЕКРАСНА. Только ради этого стоит смотреть этот фильм, разумеется, в расширенной версии, ибо она добавляет духа Толкина, и моменты из книги, которые были вырезаны ради вставки боевых сцен в фильм. К сожалению, Хоббит перестал быть шедевральным фильмом, а стал просто хорошим. Но всё равно лучше, чем большинство современных фильмов. 85/100 или 8/10, 4/5, 3/4.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

EpicLadySpongeJan 26, 2016

Aw, did 2013 had to end so early? Why, 2013? You'll never see 2013 ever again; however, you can see this movie a whole load of times if you want to. The Desolation of Smaug feels like an improvement critics say and it feels like a decreaseAw, did 2013 had to end so early? Why, 2013? You'll never see 2013 ever again; however, you can see this movie a whole load of times if you want to. The Desolation of Smaug feels like an improvement critics say and it feels like a decrease from users. I say it still look the same.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

gameguardian21Mar 20, 2016

This sequel remains better than the first. While it stile isn't close to being good as the lord of the rings, this still offers some entertaining moments, and action that kept me interested.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

nahtan1244Mar 12, 2016

A improvement over a very good first movie. Here the pacing issues have been mostly fixed martin freeman shines once again as the titular hobbit. This movie is much faster paced and darker than the first. We finally get to see smaug who isA improvement over a very good first movie. Here the pacing issues have been mostly fixed martin freeman shines once again as the titular hobbit. This movie is much faster paced and darker than the first. We finally get to see smaug who is terrifically voiced by Benedict cumberbatch. He and our hero exchange some clever word play. We get introduced to legleos more nods to the previous lord of the rings movies. We also get introduced to a new cast member and her name is tourial and she is a bad ass. With it's pacing issues mostly fixed i found The love story stupid and unnecessary also the laketown politics should have been cut down significantly. The fact that some of the characters in laketown were annoying ahem Alfred did not help either. Other than that The second movie returns with what you love elves, wizards men legeos giant spider battles the necromancer and a brilliant finale battle with smaug the terrible. This movie is a bit of a improvement over the first but with an unnecessary love story and laketown politics that seem to drag on forever keeps this movie from being great.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

JPKJun 24, 2019

Better Than An Unexpected Journey
Desolation Of Smaug has brilliant visuals and amazing performances (Especially Cumberbatch), and a decently written script.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

robertoiglesiasMay 21, 2020

I think it's a big improvement over The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, or as I like to call An Unexpected Filler. This film is a little overlong, but I still enjoyed it. 7.5/10

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

CoreGamer1408Dec 16, 2018

Read the Hobbit it is unlike the more sophisticated Lord of the Rings trilogy. Well the hobbit is one simplistically written children's book. They did a good job of fleshing out these films and characters from one children's book. Not as epicRead the Hobbit it is unlike the more sophisticated Lord of the Rings trilogy. Well the hobbit is one simplistically written children's book. They did a good job of fleshing out these films and characters from one children's book. Not as epic as LOTR movies, but a darn good try considering the limited and simplistic source material they had to work with.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Mihael_Prislin0Dec 27, 2017

I enjoyed this one even more that the first one! The best moments were The fight scene with Smaug and the river scene where the Orcs are attacking the fellowship and Tauriel is helping them with Legolas! reat casting choises, excpecialy withI enjoyed this one even more that the first one! The best moments were The fight scene with Smaug and the river scene where the Orcs are attacking the fellowship and Tauriel is helping them with Legolas! reat casting choises, excpecialy with Cumberbatch performing Smaug! The last scene is so tense that I couldn't wait the final chapter to come into theatres!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SirKrustyMar 8, 2018

This is a great movie, Imagine playing a really intense action game, and putting it all in a movie. GO SEE THIS!!!!!!!!!!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ErikTheCriticSep 25, 2018

This sequel improves on the first film's pacing and is a more well-balanced movie as a whole. It is more stirring, exciting and intense, and has perhaps one of the coolest CGI dragons ever put to film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SaythatDec 11, 2018

The movie is very spectacular. Many scenes do not look plausible (such as why barrels did not sink), but I am charmed with the dragon. This is a paradox because at the same time I am deeply dissatisfied that Bilbo's communications with theThe movie is very spectacular. Many scenes do not look plausible (such as why barrels did not sink), but I am charmed with the dragon. This is a paradox because at the same time I am deeply dissatisfied that Bilbo's communications with the dragon differ from the classic version, and I like the classic variant more.

The movie is slightly long. But it is well done.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug

User Reviews