Read Positive User Reviews for The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug

10

ZineZDec 13, 2013

Enjoyed it thoroughly. Much better than the first one, it's not as action based as the LOTR series but that's not a bad thing. It sets its own pace and is more "adventurey". Makes me laugh where needed and was just a ton of fun to go for atEnjoyed it thoroughly. Much better than the first one, it's not as action based as the LOTR series but that's not a bad thing. It sets its own pace and is more "adventurey". Makes me laugh where needed and was just a ton of fun to go for at launch night.… Expand

43 of 76 users found this helpful4333

All this user's reviews

10

PradyuDec 13, 2013

I feel this movie receives unfair criticism from critics who compare it to the LOTR trilogy. The Hobbit was a children's book written by Tolkien for his kids and which was written before LOTR was even conceived. It was only after theI feel this movie receives unfair criticism from critics who compare it to the LOTR trilogy. The Hobbit was a children's book written by Tolkien for his kids and which was written before LOTR was even conceived. It was only after the popularity of this book and demand for a follow up that Tolkien set forth to write LOTR. It is supposed to be a fun and adventurous book and that is what the movie tries to present.
I watched the movie in IMAX 3D HFR 48fps and i loved the whole experience. I understand that this rendering of the cinema has many critics. It is important to note every cinematic experience relies on the suspension of disbelief. It is unfair to criticise the realistic quality of the backdrop of a fantasy flick. The HFR really adds to the quality of action sequences.
The performances in the movie were adequate and the movie was well set-up for the final instalment of the series.… Expand

15 of 28 users found this helpful1513

All this user's reviews

9

AlderHaloDec 13, 2013

Improvement in drama & action over the prior film. Cool new characters.
Great fight sequences, particularly the barrels set-piece.
My only complaint would be there's some odd pacing at times.
Overall much better than an unexpected journey.
9/10

15 of 31 users found this helpful1516

All this user's reviews

7

imthenoobJan 27, 2015

The extended edition really did this one justice. Added so much more content, Built on a lot more to the story. It made a lot more of a satisfying movie than the original version of it. It's such a major step up from the first one. StillThe extended edition really did this one justice. Added so much more content, Built on a lot more to the story. It made a lot more of a satisfying movie than the original version of it. It's such a major step up from the first one. Still relies a bit too heavy on CGI but I can deal with it thanks to the improvement in the dialogue.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

8

TerenceYiboFeb 3, 2014

惊险刺激的中土之旅，抛去前作的种种铺垫，哈比人2的节奏更加流畅，唯一的不足，长湖镇的戏略显沉闷，当然抵达孤山之后，和史矛革的对峙相当精彩。视觉效果出类拔萃，蜘蛛/龙的造型设计堪称完美，精灵族的造型超级美，同时场景设计美轮美奂，配乐不如首部曲但也高水准。不过彼得夹克逊对于原著的篡改实在是令人吃惊和不满。惊险刺激的中土之旅，抛去前作的种种铺垫，哈比人2的节奏更加流畅，唯一的不足，长湖镇的戏略显沉闷，当然抵达孤山之后，和史矛革的对峙相当精彩。视觉效果出类拔萃，蜘蛛/龙的造型设计堪称完美，精灵族的造型超级美，同时场景设计美轮美奂，配乐不如首部曲但也高水准。不过彼得夹克逊对于原著的篡改实在是令人吃惊和不满。

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

GrabacrJan 7, 2014

Still not at the level of LOTR, but an improvement over the first movie (which I did still like, just not as much). Just one thing, if you haven't read the book or seen the first movie, you absolutely have to do one or the other before youStill not at the level of LOTR, but an improvement over the first movie (which I did still like, just not as much). Just one thing, if you haven't read the book or seen the first movie, you absolutely have to do one or the other before you see this or you won't know what the hell is going on, because it jumps right in. Otherwise, this is one good movie.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

adpirtleAug 15, 2014

The second film in this trilogy dispenses with the relative reverence of the first, and that turns out to be a good thing. Its predecessor suffered a bit because it couldn't decide whether it wanted to be a scene-for-scene retelling of theThe second film in this trilogy dispenses with the relative reverence of the first, and that turns out to be a good thing. Its predecessor suffered a bit because it couldn't decide whether it wanted to be a scene-for-scene retelling of the novel or a looser, action-oriented adaptation. This film resides firmly in the second camp, and everything works better for it. For example, the escape from the Woodland Realm is every bit as over the top as the last film's escape from Goblin-town, but it doesn't feel so out of place, so it's easier just to kick back and enjoy the ride. The changes from the book once again mostly work, and in this case actually make more sense. Bard the Bargeman might not be as awesome as Bard the Bowman, at least not yet, but he is much more fleshed out, and the film finally gives the Company a decent reason for needing a burglar. I could have done without the dwarf-dragon battle at the end, I really liked the addition of Tauriel.

My biggest objection continues to be the over-reliance on CGI. Make no mistake, the Smaug of the title is every bit as incredible as I ever imagined he could be, but decision to animate Azog's son doesn't work out so well. I understand that it was a late decision to give what was originally a live performance a computer makeover, and it shows in how unrealistic he looks next to Daddy.

Overall, this is another fine addition to Jackson's Middle-earth saga, expanding on the previous film while avoiding its pacing pitfalls.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

CrazzaGamingDec 18, 2013

The Hobbit The Desolation Of Smaug was a great movie i enjoyed every second on it. It has the story of the book with some more added features. The addition of Evangeline Lilly made the movie a top for me. If you have not seen this movie IThe Hobbit The Desolation Of Smaug was a great movie i enjoyed every second on it. It has the story of the book with some more added features. The addition of Evangeline Lilly made the movie a top for me. If you have not seen this movie I strongly suggest you go rent it buy it see it in theatres. 10/10 great movie!!… Expand

7 of 9 users found this helpful72

All this user's reviews

10

Gamer4life1985Dec 21, 2013

Such a damn good movie; unbelievable I definitely recommend it. Nonstop in action, brilliant storytelling, etc... It's one of those movies that shouts in your mind afterward "It was definitely worth my price of admission." Will see itSuch a damn good movie; unbelievable I definitely recommend it. Nonstop in action, brilliant storytelling, etc... It's one of those movies that shouts in your mind afterward "It was definitely worth my price of admission." Will see it again before it leaves theaters xD… Expand

6 of 8 users found this helpful62

All this user's reviews

9

khoinJan 2, 2014

I'm a big LOTR fan and thought the first Hobbit was OK typical visual candy and decent story but TDOS really took the story to another extraordinary level. The last 30 minutes of this movie blew my friggin mind. I've never seen a movieI'm a big LOTR fan and thought the first Hobbit was OK typical visual candy and decent story but TDOS really took the story to another extraordinary level. The last 30 minutes of this movie blew my friggin mind. I've never seen a movie that so seamlessly integrated mind-bending effects so effectively. Talking dragons? Really? It works. Seriously… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

9

StaticSpineDec 22, 2013

Another breathtaking part of an Epic adventure. Three hours of pure epicness. I have no idea what else to say about the movie, just go see it yourself.

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

9

Wraithe1Dec 30, 2013

An honest opinion from an average Joe who is no LoTR fan-boy. I honestly thought this movie was one of the best I've seen this year. Aside from some ridiculous elven gymnastics it was very entertaining, didn't seem overly long, and set upAn honest opinion from an average Joe who is no LoTR fan-boy. I honestly thought this movie was one of the best I've seen this year. Aside from some ridiculous elven gymnastics it was very entertaining, didn't seem overly long, and set up everything well for the finale. I look forward to the holiday season next year to finish this thing off. My three young children enjoyed this movie greatly as well. They all actually sat quietly and watched it without whining for snacks or bathroom escorts. Solid 9.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

10

NolaneDec 17, 2013

Coming a year after the underrated and underappreciated “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey,” Peter Jackson strikes again with the year’s best movie- “The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug.” After a brief prologue featuring an excellentComing a year after the underrated and underappreciated “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey,” Peter Jackson strikes again with the year’s best movie- “The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug.” After a brief prologue featuring an excellent flashback conversation between Thorin Oakenshield and the wizard Gandalf, the movie hits the ground running and pretty much never looks back. This is a much more action packed movie than its predecessor, featuring an intense giant spider attack sequence in Mirkwood Forest, a thrilling river barrel chase sequence as the dwarves attempt to escape from Elvish captors, an intense battle between Gandalf and Sauron, and a non-stop battle with the Dragon Smaug at the end. As is to be expected, all technical credits are first rate, from the often brilliant special effects, to the stirring Howard Shore musical score, to the excellent use of High Frame Rate 3D. In addition, the film delivers some outstanding acting, with particularly good performances from Richard Armitage as Thorin Oakenshield, Martin Freeman as Bilbo Baggins and Luke Evans as a well-developed and sympathetic Bard the Bowman. It is also great to see Orlando Bloom’s Legolas back in action, and despite the initial controversy, the addition of Evangilne Lilly as the female elf warrior Tauriel is a welcome addition, even if she does not appear in the book. The crowning achievement of the movie, however, is the Dragon Smaug (the best dragon ever portrayed on the silver screen) and his initial reveal in the ancient kingdom of Erebor is absolutely perfect. This is followed by an Indiana Jones style climax that ends in a real cliffhanger that might irritate some. For me it just means that the final movie, “The Hobbit: There And Back Again” will launch with an absolutely incredible action sequence. Like “The Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers”, “Desolation” does not really have a beginning or an end, but like that brilliant movie, it is definitely one hell of a middle.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

10

Jamison12Dec 16, 2013

I loved the first Hobbit and saw nothing wrong with it. The Desolation of Smaug is a masterpiece and makes the previous installment look like crap. Peter Jackson's interpretation of Middle earth seems to be more and more breathtaking everyI loved the first Hobbit and saw nothing wrong with it. The Desolation of Smaug is a masterpiece and makes the previous installment look like crap. Peter Jackson's interpretation of Middle earth seems to be more and more breathtaking every film. This could very well be one of the best movies in the saga.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

10

DemonSoulDec 18, 2013

This is 10 for OMG this movie was so good. If you're looking for an adventure with wizards and dragons, it doesn't get better than this. Epic and well told in every way with an astute attention to detail. The script and casting are excellentThis is 10 for OMG this movie was so good. If you're looking for an adventure with wizards and dragons, it doesn't get better than this. Epic and well told in every way with an astute attention to detail. The script and casting are excellent with amusingly clever and thoughtful dialogue. There's romance abrewing as well. There were also scenes that had the whole audience rolling with laughter. I enjoyed this movie immensely.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

10

EdenChiDec 16, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is a great movie that offers a good moment in cinema. It does not follow the book, but only the outline. Otherwise, the film is likely to be less attractive. 3D is very well done, this is not a film made for the 3d but it is very well done, it gives good effect to some time.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

9

CosmonaustaDec 16, 2013

Although it does bother me how much they strayed from the source material (especially in regards to Legolas), I thoroughly enjoyed The Desolation of Smaug as a movie-going experience. As a film, it's action-packed, funny at times, andAlthough it does bother me how much they strayed from the source material (especially in regards to Legolas), I thoroughly enjoyed The Desolation of Smaug as a movie-going experience. As a film, it's action-packed, funny at times, and visually stunning.
The fight scenes were nothing short of incredible. Jackson was finally able to portray Legolas' agility in its full glory.
All around a very fun and gripping film.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

9

firstblood2Dec 19, 2013

Many people judge this movie for being to long and for adding in some extra scenes but to me that is a positive, cause now people who have read the book wont know everything that's coming up next. The action scenes are a lot better this timeMany people judge this movie for being to long and for adding in some extra scenes but to me that is a positive, cause now people who have read the book wont know everything that's coming up next. The action scenes are a lot better this time around especially the barrel scene.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

9

CiaranJDec 16, 2013

Again Peter Jackson has managed to impress me. Firstly, a few niggles that I want to get off my chest. I keep seeing reviewers comparing the Hobbit trilogy with the Lord of the Rings. While this is logically understandable, it should by noAgain Peter Jackson has managed to impress me. Firstly, a few niggles that I want to get off my chest. I keep seeing reviewers comparing the Hobbit trilogy with the Lord of the Rings. While this is logically understandable, it should by no means factor into the Hobbit trilogy reviews. Why? Because firstly the Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings have two distinctly different feels to them, both in terms of the movies and the books. The Hobbit is supposed to be more colorful, fantasy orientated and vivid than the later more darker Lord of the Rings. And so it is saddening to see that people use the Lord of the Rings, despite the stark contrast in the concepts, as a benchmark/basis to justify low ratings.

Which is why when I entered the cinema, and just as I sat down now to review this movie I try to dispel all the bias and judgments that may affect me beforehand. The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug was more exciting, action packed and energetic when compared to the first film, The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. While the first film served to introduce the characters, set the pace of the film and slowly familarise the audience; it was expected that TDoS (The Desolation of Smaug) would quicken the tempo and pace, and by God it did just that! Fans of the first film will enjoy and welcome the countless fight scenes that are magical, well choreographed and don't feel over the top. If I had to pick one aspect of the film that I would of liked more, I probably would have liked to have seen more comical moments. Again, it is understandable why there were fewer comical laughs than the first film; mainly because of the quicker pace of the film, and the darker subplot; which meant that an excess of comedy would have made the sense of urgency prevalent throughout the film seem unrealistic.

Benedict Cumberbatch as the voice of Smaug was brilliant. Sinister, yet somehow I found myself sympathising with the dragon when he retold his version of events that led to him occupying the Lonely Mountain.

While the first film lacks action and pace, it ultimately reinforces the need for character introduction. While the second film lacks the slower pace of the first film, it is squashed by the sheer speed of which this film moves at. Even the introduction to the movie, felt as though a sense of urgency was needed. Again, this is not a negative considering the fact the film is based through the middle/second half of the book.

Overall, brilliant film, didn't lose its way.... Slower in some scenes, but not necessary a bad aspect!

9/10.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

9

analogkid280Dec 15, 2013

This is like playing Skyrim but you are watching a movie. Mostly setup for the 3rd installment but has many clever twists and special effects. It reminded me of the newer Star Wars movies in a way. It was a very entertaining I have to admit.This is like playing Skyrim but you are watching a movie. Mostly setup for the 3rd installment but has many clever twists and special effects. It reminded me of the newer Star Wars movies in a way. It was a very entertaining I have to admit. That is rather surprising since I did not like the first Hobbit movie at all. This one brought me back and I will certainly be catching the last movie in the series.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

9

caldepenDec 16, 2013

Much better than the first and I didn't mind the first. I saw it in high-speed and 3d. Super well done but 2 things, the glasses are smaller than they used to be so you can see the rims which is distracting (but the crowd seems way coolerMuch better than the first and I didn't mind the first. I saw it in high-speed and 3d. Super well done but 2 things, the glasses are smaller than they used to be so you can see the rims which is distracting (but the crowd seems way cooler when the lights come up) and secondly the high-speed makes the production seem amateurish during the expositive scenes for some reason. So at the bar when they are talking it reminds me of a 80's British soap opera or a Canadian video production like Littlest Hobo. I think it exposes bad acting more. So a raised eyebrow by Gandalf looks kind of silly and deliberate or when Thorin notices bad guys it is super obvious like you can almost hear the director saying "look that way, then that way...". For the most part the action scenes are pretty spectacular, although at times somewhat video-gamey.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

10

crawlerDec 16, 2013

I think its a good movie, different than the lord of the ring but as good if you like middle-earth and a story that dont rush at all for action. I really like the action more than the first especially smaug and the barrel-ride. Legolas andI think its a good movie, different than the lord of the ring but as good if you like middle-earth and a story that dont rush at all for action. I really like the action more than the first especially smaug and the barrel-ride. Legolas and Tauriel are nice add-on from book in my opinion. Not perfect but definitively a good movie
Cant wait to see it again and again....the third movie cant come soon enough. 9/10… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

8

moviemitch96Dec 15, 2013

I'd say that this was equally as good as part 1 and that it definitely managed to keep me entertained. I really liked the cast and their performances. Martin Freeman once again fulfilled his role as Bilbo rather nicely. Ian Mckellen isI'd say that this was equally as good as part 1 and that it definitely managed to keep me entertained. I really liked the cast and their performances. Martin Freeman once again fulfilled his role as Bilbo rather nicely. Ian Mckellen is getting old, but he still makes a great Gandalf. Orlando Bloom returns as Legolas and he's fun to watch. Needless to say, the best part is when Smaug finally arrives. Benedict Cumberbatch sounds better than ever as the voice behind Smaug. The action was also great and will likely please adults and children alike. Despite the film's lengthy run time and a cliffhanger ending that left me wanting more, it still delivers and not only met my expectations overall, but got me even more excited for part 3 next year!… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

9

bmaster4616Dec 16, 2013

The first one was one of those movies that you hated or only though was alright. Certain things about the first one was crappy as hell (CGI orcs). This one was completely on another level. Loved it from start to finish and the ending wasThe first one was one of those movies that you hated or only though was alright. Certain things about the first one was crappy as hell (CGI orcs). This one was completely on another level. Loved it from start to finish and the ending was perfect. The music at the end should win an Oscar, because it was awesome. There were a few flaws in it like the fact that Legolas had a bigger role and the length of the movie was just way too long...other than that I loved it. The fight scenes were top notch, it was funny, the dragon scene was amazing, etc.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

10

hypersonic354Dec 18, 2013

i loved this movie in many ways 1 the design of smaug 2 in the theaters the fire looked really cool. its much better then the first one. smaug is a big heat for the Movie

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

10

MichaelBreaDec 16, 2013

This movie are so amazing. I think Peter Jackson do a very good job. Everything in this movie are great. I recommand this movie for every one I am not goin to tell you something of this movie. I just want to everybody watch this movie.

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

9

eagleeyevikingDec 13, 2013

Desolation of Smaug delivers on everything the first movie lacks with great special effects, swift pacing and much more character development even if a few of them are sidelined.

13 of 21 users found this helpful138

All this user's reviews

9

Khunter4382Dec 16, 2013

The stretching of the story is a bit more evident in this film as compared to the first, but it really isn't detrimental to the overall success of the film. This is pure cinema greatness.....engaging and beautifully filmed. Performances areThe stretching of the story is a bit more evident in this film as compared to the first, but it really isn't detrimental to the overall success of the film. This is pure cinema greatness.....engaging and beautifully filmed. Performances are all top-notch. I don't feel that the addition of Tauriel (the new elf) was necessary, but it worked. And yes, Smaug is easily the best looking (and sounding) dragon you'll ever see!… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

Bruce722Dec 15, 2013

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug was a really good movie with great visuals and it continued telling an amazing story. The increased action of this film over the previous one will surely get most people's attention and will probably makeThe Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug was a really good movie with great visuals and it continued telling an amazing story. The increased action of this film over the previous one will surely get most people's attention and will probably make most younger people actually like it more. The special effects were also a bit better, in my opinion, and the dragon sequence at the end was just amazing. My only real probably with the film is the ending. That just isn't a good place to leave the film hanging. Obviously you should look at all of these films as one large movie broken up into three parts but the reality is that the third part won't be available to see until next year which makes this movie stand alone, in a sense. When considering that the entire movie seemed to be building to a climax that never occurs, it feels a little anticlimactic.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

9

normypDec 16, 2013

This was a lot better than the first part of the Hobbit trilogy, mainly because we had a bit of romance, a bit of live action for once and some scenes which weren't constantly CGI which was a relief. The best scenes in my opinion were nearThis was a lot better than the first part of the Hobbit trilogy, mainly because we had a bit of romance, a bit of live action for once and some scenes which weren't constantly CGI which was a relief. The best scenes in my opinion were near the end and the scenes between Killi and the She-Elf. In my opinion, there was a bit too much CGI, I much prefer real sets but for the Orcs the CGI was perfect because it felt like they were actually fighting monsters not just men dressed up as monsters. The Orcs were perfect in my opinion, just a shame they have too much elven language, I much prefer the Orcs to act stupid and speak english than speak in this poetic manner, okay it's fine for the white orc because he's badass but his little grunts should speak english. The CGI, although a lot of it, was probably the best I've seen in a film, it really allowed the filmmakers to create more of a fantasy world instead of just showing us New Zealand, which isn't bad by the way. I found it thoroughly entertaining but The Hobbit works and flows best when it's just trying to be its own film. When you clearly hear lines and jokes copied from LOTR it's kind of cringey, they don't need to please LOTR fans they need to just clear their heads and focus on the story at hand. Either way, great film just hopefully for the next film we'll see more real sets and action sequences in places like Helm's Deep, like an out door set, they're so cool.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

10

sillyputtyDec 15, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. You can't compare the movie to the book at all, since half of the movie never happened in the book, but there are some scenes that you just can't describe with words!!! The movie in and of itself was awesome except for the cliffhanger ending. If you have no patience wait till next year to buy the 2nd hobbit and watch the third right after. But i still cant wait till next year to see where they're going to go with this different storyline. I wasnt too excited to see a love story mixed in though, but that's just me.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

9

LansdenrsDec 16, 2013

The visuals were stunning! The plot was better than the first. The directing and acting was very good! I think this one was better than the first. A lot of action and intensity

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

8

LensesDec 16, 2013

Take my advice and don't bother seeing The Hobbit until this time next year on DVD. You will thank me later.

The movie is fine, but the ending is so abrupt that the entire theater sighed and laughed when it ended in the middle of theTake my advice and don't bother seeing The Hobbit until this time next year on DVD. You will thank me later.

The movie is fine, but the ending is so abrupt that the entire theater sighed and laughed when it ended in the middle of the climax. I guess they need to drag it out into another movie. So. Do youself a favor and just wait. Or prepare to be dissappointed in the ending.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

10

PetroleumDec 15, 2013

Enjoyed the movie for it's darker and more Middle Earth feeling. The visual part of the movie was spectacular and eye-popping, with fantastic performances from Martin Freeman, Ian Mckellan and Benedict Cumberbatch, who's role as Smaug wasEnjoyed the movie for it's darker and more Middle Earth feeling. The visual part of the movie was spectacular and eye-popping, with fantastic performances from Martin Freeman, Ian Mckellan and Benedict Cumberbatch, who's role as Smaug was absolutely fantastic. The other thing that made the movie a lot more enjoyable was the break time it had, not trying to have too many things happening at once all the time, unlike the first of the trilogy.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

10

SkulbDec 16, 2013

For anybody who likes Tolkien`s books it is hard to imagine a more successful adaptation to the movies than Desolation of Smaug. Unlike with the LotR, where major character changes were made and major plot elements were twisted, almostFor anybody who likes Tolkien`s books it is hard to imagine a more successful adaptation to the movies than Desolation of Smaug. Unlike with the LotR, where major character changes were made and major plot elements were twisted, almost everything is spot on in the Hobbit movies. For this reason they are far better than the LotR movies, and the second one better than the first.
It is full of action, great characters, tremendous effects, sound and design, with crisp dialogue, most of which is directly from the book.. Smaug himself is a particular highlight, with perfect voice acting.
If there are any flaws they all stem from Franny Walsch`s peculiar obsession with inserting female characters into the story where none exist. The attempted love story between the entirely made up female elf and one of the dwarves was cringe-worthy and easily the low point of the movie.
I would ignore reviewers on this, as I would with all of Peter Jackson`s movies. From the first release of Bad Taste they have either failed to get his sense of humor, or failed to understand which story it is he is telling in his Middle Earth movies. It has never been just The Hobbit, since this would be an under narrated, simplistic children`s book with loads of silly songs and which would tell none of the story of what is going on in the background, which is all available in notes, appendixes and in Silmarillion.
Even Tolkien regarded the story of the rise of Sauron as the real story, and he tried to rewrite The Hobbit to include this but gave it up. Still "reviewers" to a man whine over the scenes where Gandalf uncovers this as "distracting" and "unnecessary" and even that they have been included "only to stretch the movies into three parts".
I can`t imagine being so ignorant. Go watch the movie and ignore the ignoramuses. You will not regret it.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

10

iffyguyDec 17, 2013

Peter Jackson did it again. Effortlessly blending action, drama, comedy, and nerd references, we are plunged into Middle-Earth yet again. With great CGI, memorable characters, and fun storytelling, he creates another surefire hit. He nailedPeter Jackson did it again. Effortlessly blending action, drama, comedy, and nerd references, we are plunged into Middle-Earth yet again. With great CGI, memorable characters, and fun storytelling, he creates another surefire hit. He nailed what the book did, which is makes you forget that there's a FREAKING DRAGON at the end, and instead focus on the danger at hand, whether it be spiders or orcs. Then, digging into the several hundred pages of appendices at the end of LOTR, he expands on the Necromancer, who is revealed to be Sauron. All in all, a great setup for the sure-to-please finale of the trilogy. And that cliffhanger!

P.S. Peter Jackson's cameo is hilarious.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

9

martyisrulingDec 14, 2013

It starts off a little weak, but gets really good. The story elements aren't great, but the movie suits it's purpose. It's a fun adventure. The effects are great, with the exception of a few isolated parts on a river scene and some bad horse CGI.

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

10

nikhil714Dec 13, 2013

Desolation of smaug proves to be majestic in its narrative and it is an improvement over the unexpected journey, it offers powerful action with crispy visuals and never feels bored, aslo leaving the audience very much excited for the nextDesolation of smaug proves to be majestic in its narrative and it is an improvement over the unexpected journey, it offers powerful action with crispy visuals and never feels bored, aslo leaving the audience very much excited for the next installment… Expand

14 of 26 users found this helpful1412

All this user's reviews

10

IsotopesamDec 14, 2013

That was exactly what I wanted to see in a Peter Jackson rendition of the Hobbit. Loved it from start to end. The action was intense and absolutely fun. Smaug was badass! Loved seeing the dwarves fighting to take back Erebor from the dragon.That was exactly what I wanted to see in a Peter Jackson rendition of the Hobbit. Loved it from start to end. The action was intense and absolutely fun. Smaug was badass! Loved seeing the dwarves fighting to take back Erebor from the dragon. The ring's slow effect on Bilbo and Gandalf'a quest made it all tie in to the LOTR movies. I can't wait for the extended edition.… Expand

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

10

Velvet_BruschDec 13, 2013

My expectations were met! Peter Jackson has done an amazing job again though the first one was a little bit sluggish this chapter will hook you up, The HFR 3d is the future.

8 of 15 users found this helpful87

All this user's reviews

10

ForeverFallingDec 18, 2013

What a fantastic film. An Unexpected Journey was brilliant but this one just takes it to new heights, with a lot more action to boot. Thrilling and fun action scenes, great acting, beautiful scenery. The film is just shot so wonderfully too.What a fantastic film. An Unexpected Journey was brilliant but this one just takes it to new heights, with a lot more action to boot. Thrilling and fun action scenes, great acting, beautiful scenery. The film is just shot so wonderfully too. Yes, it does change certain things from the book, but that isn't a negative and shouldn't hold the film back. Some of these additions and changes make for a very entertaining movie. The only negative for me was the Kili and Tauriel romance side plot. I just thought it was a bit cheesy at times and felt like it was thrown in there just for the sake of having a bit of romance. A minor niggle though. These user's that are bashing on this film and/or giving it a ridiculously low score, simply don't understand movies. The film may not be to certain peoples tastes or you may not think it is fantastic, but it is in no way, a "bad film". Isn't it funny that there are people out there giving this film a 0 simply because it isn't identical to the book? This is a marvellous piece of fantasy Peter Jackson has delivered us, yet again. Oh, and that Dragon! Smaug is awesome in this film. He looks amazing and the voice is perfect.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

9

Luan143Dec 13, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. O filme maravilhoso, o mestre Peter Jackson nunca mais repetirá os erros técnicos que ele tanto cometeu em Um Olhar do Paraíso. Como diretor ele conseguiu renovar seus tempos de glória que duraram dos filmes trash até King Kong. O filme foi repleto de truques de fotografia sensitiva (como naquelas cenas do diálogo ente Bilbo e Smaug onde ele simula a visão do espectador como se ele estivesse dentro do salão em Erebor) combinados com o 3d magnífico só visto em Avatar e efeitos visuais tão realistas e inéditos totalmente o oposto de Uma Jornada Inesperada. Houveram alguns erros de fotografia que me fizeram pensar que Jackson estava menos inspirado ao dirigir (um deles foi numa cena da invasão dos orcs em Esgaroth em que o Legolas mata um orc e na hora da facada ele simplesmente foi empurrado para fora da tela), mas esses aconteceram em um período tão curto de tempo que nem mesmo eu sei como reparei. O roteiro foi maravilhoso, aquela discussão do Bilbo e do Smaug foi uma obra prima do Peter Jackson, assim como vários diálogos vistos em As Duas Torres e o episódio Adivinhas no Escuro.
No aspecto técnico o filme sai quase perfeito (não quero deixar muitos spoilers sobre a emboscada armada pelos anões nas minas da montanha, mas aquelas partículas líquidas de ouro e água foram um avanço enorme para efeitos especiais), mas para um fã de Tolkien as muitas alterações foram o bastante pra te deixar cheio de pensamentos mistos sobre o filme.
Eu achei a ideia de cobrir as missões do Gandalf maravilhosa! Uma alteração que não feriu a história, pois seria muito importante anos após o arco que cobre o romance e ao mesmo tempo era algo que todos os fãs desejavam ver como aconteceu. SPOILER: Ver o Sauron dialogando chegou a ser assustador, na história do Anel ele não teve muita participação em primeiro plano, como eu digo: "ele estava lá, não aqui, mas ao mesmo tempo estava aqui e lá". Vamos ver que rumo essa "adição" terá ano que vem.
Sobre a inclusão da Tauriel, não fui um daqueles que ficaram de birra com a adição dela na história, mas o papel que ela teve foi o que marcou o filme todo, PJ infelizmente quis colocar uma pitada de romance adolescente e enfiou isso guela abaixo no plot, isso foi uma blasfêmia obra de Tolkien, que desejava sempre que a história fosse mais racional possível. O filme atingia um certo clímax e ele era cortado pra cara de sonsa dela (não que a atriz seja ruim, mas o papel)... sério, até as cenas de Dol Goldur e Erebor eram cortadas pra cara dela.
Parece que os episódios da casa de Beorn e da Floresta das Trevas foram cortados pela metade só pra mostrar o romance meia boca "Kiliel" ou "Taurikili" que mais parece uma fanfic de Harry Potter. (My Immortal diz: Oi)
Resolvi ignorar cada cena que aparecia a Tauriel pra pensar na forma de como ela morreria no próximo filme, o que óbvio ELA TEM QUE MORRER PRA DEIXAR UM AR DE DRAMA ADOLESCENTE.
Me senti neutro quanto a inclusão dos Orcs antes da batalha, pra mim Azog já estava morto há anos, mas rendeu muitos risos com as cenas do Bombur esmagando eles.
Para a maioria dos fãs a adição de personalidade aos anões só serviu para um complemento, a obra infantil como qualquer outra, em todas os personagens são meio unidimensionais pra não confundir a cabeça das crianças e isso num filme foi de grande ajuda.
Se eu pudesse me aprofundar numa crítica seria mais completo, mas isso aqui só um comentário extenso e amador sobre o que eu vi hoje.
O filme estava bom, nada mais. Poderia ser perfeito, mas PJ cometeu muitos erros com a história que eu não espero ver ano que vem.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

10

KalarienDec 14, 2013

Perfect
I love all the trilogy, the movie include some extend actions cenes who i like to much! Legolas in clearly the best! Grats Peter Jackson, u made a wonderfull movie again

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

8

Praetorian75Dec 15, 2013

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is the very enjoyable 2nd part of a fantasy movie trilogy. If you can look past the fact that its not an "entirely" faithful film adaptation of the book you will most likely enjoy it for what it is a bigThe Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is the very enjoyable 2nd part of a fantasy movie trilogy. If you can look past the fact that its not an "entirely" faithful film adaptation of the book you will most likely enjoy it for what it is a big budget fantasy movie trilogy.

I went to the Cinema (HFR 3D version) to Watch this with my son. Unlike "An Unexpected Journey" my son wasnt complaining about it being long and drawn out which is also how i feel about it. Thankfully there were no singing dwarves! The visuals were quite good with the HFR 3D just as you would be expecting. I wont mention anything of the plot as it deserves to be experienced.

I would definatly recommend seeing this in the Cinema. Rating: 8/10… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

waynDec 15, 2013

The hobbit desolation of smaug comes a huge step closer to make peter Jackson king of fantasy director. It is very much better than the first part the hobb8t trilogy does not even comes close to the Lord of the rings trilogy

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

felipeguaranaDec 16, 2013

Everything about The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug represents an improvement over the first installment of Peter Jackson's The Hobbit. Just remember, it's not a book! It's a movie and a great adaptation from the book, don't go watch if youEverything about The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug represents an improvement over the first installment of Peter Jackson's The Hobbit. Just remember, it's not a book! It's a movie and a great adaptation from the book, don't go watch if you have in mind that is 100% equal to the book. Honestly, you're a idiot if you do this.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

10

JJHoodDec 30, 2013

We love the story extension. It is a great combination of Lord of the rings and the Hobbit books!
OK, Orks looks a bit different (stronger) than in LOTR. but this is OK.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

Acher4Feb 5, 2014

It was great getting back into the world of the ring.
But, this time I wasn't so much thrilled as I expected.
Truthfully, I wanted a better Bilbo - Dragon confrontation, that meeting should have been as wonderful and arty as theIt was great getting back into the world of the ring.
But, this time I wasn't so much thrilled as I expected.
Truthfully, I wanted a better Bilbo - Dragon confrontation, that meeting should have been as wonderful and arty as the Gollum-Bilbo meeting. Oh well.
Didn't mind the additions, they had a nice touch, especially the female elf (although the romance angle should just be gone in the third part :P )… Expand