Read Positive User Reviews for The Godfather: Part III

9

JamesEOct 15, 2007

Not as good as the originals, but defiantly gripping and intense.

3 of 3 users found this helpful

9

EddieM.Sep 8, 2007

Get a grip you lot - it's only a movie. And it's a really good movie too.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

9

DouglasMJul 20, 2007

I just saw Godfather Part 3 for the first time two days ago. While it still ranks as a great film, it lacks the emotional intensity of the first two films. The earlier two movies had incredibly well-acted and engrossing supporting characters I just saw Godfather Part 3 for the first time two days ago. While it still ranks as a great film, it lacks the emotional intensity of the first two films. The earlier two movies had incredibly well-acted and engrossing supporting characters like Fredo. Godfather Part 3 with Sofia Coppola, Joe Mantegna, and George Hamilton (while none of them were bad) just do not measure up to the quality of the first two movies.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

9

HudsonTNov 9, 2008

Not perfect, but certainly better than part two. Ultimately, after hearing about how everyone was so disappointed with three, I was surprised by how good it was.

2 of 3 users found this helpful

10

pabloaimarFeb 18, 2013

The amount of suspense towards the end is crazy and the ending really lets it all out, I haven't seen a scene more heartbreaking. There's less of the Godfather theme to it because its not as dark and it has no Marlon Brando, but its still theThe amount of suspense towards the end is crazy and the ending really lets it all out, I haven't seen a scene more heartbreaking. There's less of the Godfather theme to it because its not as dark and it has no Marlon Brando, but its still the same characters and actors and it doesnt fail to show the fate of the Corleone family. One of the greatest movies Ive ever seen.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

10

PatrickM.Sep 26, 2007

Yeah - definitely flawed - but still really great. Not so much a godfather film, as an attempt by Coppola to understand himself in middle-age.

1 of 2 users found this helpful

9

merijnjFeb 23, 2018

(85/100)
It's the worst one out of The Godfather Trilogy but still a very good movie. The acting was a bit weak with Mary (Sofia Coppola) and Anthony (Franc D'Ambrosio), but that doesn't take away your focus too much. Vincent (Andy Garcia)(85/100)
It's the worst one out of The Godfather Trilogy but still a very good movie. The acting was a bit weak with Mary (Sofia Coppola) and Anthony (Franc D'Ambrosio), but that doesn't take away your focus too much. Vincent (Andy Garcia) was definitely the best new character. The Godfather, Part III is a strong movie with a relatively good plot.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

Compi24Nov 28, 2012

It's almost common knowledge that this film gets a boatload of flack, but I actually found "The Godfather Part III" to be quite an engaging and gratifying conclusion to the truly epic trilogy. While the film does have a few flagrant problemsIt's almost common knowledge that this film gets a boatload of flack, but I actually found "The Godfather Part III" to be quite an engaging and gratifying conclusion to the truly epic trilogy. While the film does have a few flagrant problems here and there, I find its merits to outweigh them deftly.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

JaredK.Nov 1, 2008

Sofia Coppla isn't nough to ruin this. The cast is stellar!

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

RegOzJan 19, 2012

I know this movie has been subject of harsh criticism, especially when compared to the previous two. It is important to emphasize, however, that this film has merit by its own. At first, one may not feel very connected with this movie becauseI know this movie has been subject of harsh criticism, especially when compared to the previous two. It is important to emphasize, however, that this film has merit by its own. At first, one may not feel very connected with this movie because the absence of those characters that we learnt to love in those 2 previous 'The Godfather'...but I think we all know the reasons why they were not there. Thus, there was a need to think in a new storyline that was also engaging but could survive without those old characters. The plot is different and it may be perceived as forced and lame..Yet when located in the right context it does make sense. I believe the performances were good, and I enjoyed seeing the other side of Michael Corleone...here we see that he was after all human, although he never regretted what he did. In The Godfather I and II his character was all negative. Michael is presented as emotionless, controlling, obsessive, and ruthless. Governed by his ego and desires of revenge. Here...we can see a different side, the one of a lonely man...one that in spite of his power can never be in peace and doesn't seem to get anything he wants no matter what he does. As a result, he questions his means..especially considering the fact that his children have chosen different paths. Overall, I have to say that I enjoyed this movie more than The Godfather II . Finally, I would like to add that even though I have heard that some disliked Sofia Coppola's performance. I did not.. He performance was not outstanding but I do not believe it was bad. Her character was relevant to the plot but it was never meant to be central...thus; her characterization doesn't really affect the value of the movie. I give it a 9… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

SpangleJun 28, 2014

This one is not as good as the first two for sure, but it has many positives. For starters, Al Pacino is great once again in his role as Michael Corleone. The changing landscape of the families is also well presented as we see many youngstersThis one is not as good as the first two for sure, but it has many positives. For starters, Al Pacino is great once again in his role as Michael Corleone. The changing landscape of the families is also well presented as we see many youngsters trying to come into the business, while many of the key players from before are now on their way out. In addition, the homages to the first two films and footage from the first two were brilliantly used and really added a nice touch here. For the most part, it was nice to see some things brought to a closure from the first two and how the family has progressed and regressed over all of these years. However, the negatives here really are what hold the film back. Firstly, the plot can be overly complicated at times, likely due to poor storytelling. At times, things would happen and you are trying to figure out what just happened and why. However, the major issue is the acting. Andy Garcia is fine for the most part, but at times, he fails to step up to the plate. I still feel like he had the charisma and energy for the role, I just wish his performance did not slump at times. Sofia Coppola was horrendous. I always thought people were overstating how bad she is, but you simply cannot overstate it. I think my dog could have been a better Mary than her.

Overall, this final entry into the Godfather trilogy is much like the raisin cookie to the first two's chocolate chip. No matter what, you are disappointed that it is not chocolate chip, but if you like raisins and can overcome that disappointment, you somewhat enjoy the cookie anyways. But, not everyone likes raisins and can overcome that disappointment.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

axelkochDec 15, 2013

The last instalment in the Godfather trilogy, The Godfather Part III, has some obvious flaws. Including real life events out of the time of the Vatican’s crisis in the late 70’s and early 80’s, for one, let the whole plot seem a bit weird andThe last instalment in the Godfather trilogy, The Godfather Part III, has some obvious flaws. Including real life events out of the time of the Vatican’s crisis in the late 70’s and early 80’s, for one, let the whole plot seem a bit weird and didn’t work all the time. Even more crucial, the casting of Sofia Coppola as Michael’s grown-up daughter Mary. Although we’ve come to experience her directing qualities a decade later, she just didn’t succeed in her role and was utterly unconvincing throughout the film. And, as in the two first films, it’s also more than a tad too long, which makes for some rather dreary moments.
Nevertheless, The Godfather Part III is a very good film and can very well compete with the rest of the series, despite being yet another step back from The Godfather’s initial quality. Not only can the audience still enjoy fabulous cinematography, set design, and score work (all of these securing the film’s respectable amount of Oscar nominations), but also some final 20 minutes that will keep The Godfather Part III in your memory. As we can relish in the insanely well-made shots of all the people that have just died under most unnatural circumstances, the crew concocts what are, in my opinion, the three best shots of all three films: Frederick Keinszig, hanging dead from a bridge, Calò stabbing Don Lucchesi with his own glasses, and Archbishop Gilday falling to his dead.
It may be just a bit too little of everything to establish Part III’s place on the same shelf as the first two films in the series, but it’s still the great Francis Ford Coppola that directed it and made the most out of a story significantly less interesting than I had expected.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

gzayas91Dec 21, 2014

The best film by Coppola. This is a King Lear film, a Shakespearean tragedy. Sophia Coppoplla's performs was not great, but suitable. It's better than part 2 because this was much an conclusion.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

JohnnyStephensAug 30, 2013

Only the ending was good I think. Francis For C., after many many years, thought to close the Godfather with a third film. Not a good decision at all!!! I didn't like so much. The worst movie of the trilogy.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

MovieGuysJan 6, 2015

Although it can never live up to the first two, Part III isn't totally horrible. However, many problems are abound, and I can't decide which one is the worst. Maybe it's Sofia Coppola's botox-looking face with her wooden, emotionless, "IAlthough it can never live up to the first two, Part III isn't totally horrible. However, many problems are abound, and I can't decide which one is the worst. Maybe it's Sofia Coppola's botox-looking face with her wooden, emotionless, "I don't give a damn I'm the director's daughter"-like acting. Maybe it's the occasional dragging scene that weighs the movie down. Maybe it's the fact that Andy Garcia looks way too Cuban to be of Italian descent. I don't know. The first 2 hours are just kind of there, but the movie does come to a stunning climax at the end, and is a nice resolution to the trilogy. Yes, it might be a cash-grabbing sequel effort, but you must watch it to close out the series.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

death12123Jun 1, 2019

I think the Godfather 3 is still a good movie but it falls flat especially with the pressure from the first two. Still captivating and capturing but some of the acting really just didn't catch me that well. (Again comparing to the firstI think the Godfather 3 is still a good movie but it falls flat especially with the pressure from the first two. Still captivating and capturing but some of the acting really just didn't catch me that well. (Again comparing to the first two.)
A great way to end it too with especially with that very powerful ending.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

MarickJan 1, 2015

The Godfather Part III is a 1990 American crime film written by Mario Puzo and Francis Ford Coppola, and directed by Coppola. It completes the story of Michael Corleone, a Mafia kingpin who tries to legitimize his criminal empire. The filmThe Godfather Part III is a 1990 American crime film written by Mario Puzo and Francis Ford Coppola, and directed by Coppola. It completes the story of Michael Corleone, a Mafia kingpin who tries to legitimize his criminal empire. The film also weaves into its plot a fictionalized account of two real-life events: the 1978 death of Pope John Paul I and the Papal banking scandal of 1981–1982; both are linked with the affairs of Michael Corleone. The film stars Al Pacino, Diane Keaton, Talia Shire, and Andy García, and features Eli Wallach, Joe Mantegna, George Hamilton, Bridget Fonda, and Sofia Coppola.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

peraveenJan 23, 2016

This movie is really good contrary to the comman belief that this is
not the good film. Just omit and see the movie... This is the best end
of the trilogy.... Don't go for negative review... Cheers

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

aadityamudharApr 17, 2016

Overall, as a standalone movie, it is definitely very flawed, but it has its moments. As a Godfather film, it is somewhat of a clunker. I didn't hate the movie, but with unconvincing and very less powerful performances, a somewhat cliche plotOverall, as a standalone movie, it is definitely very flawed, but it has its moments. As a Godfather film, it is somewhat of a clunker. I didn't hate the movie, but with unconvincing and very less powerful performances, a somewhat cliche plot at some points, and overall a slow pacing, The Godfather Part III is definitely a step bellow its predecessors. It wasn't a bad conclusion, and I didn't hate it, but if you are worrying that this will ruin the great series for you, then you might want to think twice about seeing it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

domnels234Mar 16, 2016

I think this is the most underrated movie of all time. Despite what people think i think this movie is great, a good way to finish the best trilogy in cinema history, and quite entertaining.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

GgslmJun 1, 2016

The first two movies are two of the highest cinematic achievements ever and it's really comprehensible how hard for this movie is to top that. It just doesn't, but the directing, writing and acting (excepting Sofia's awful performance) areThe first two movies are two of the highest cinematic achievements ever and it's really comprehensible how hard for this movie is to top that. It just doesn't, but the directing, writing and acting (excepting Sofia's awful performance) are still good since there's experienced people doing it. It's certainly the "less good" of the trilogy, but it's not a bad movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

BroyaxJan 5, 2017

Superbe conclusion de la saga mafieuse que l'on pourrait résumer par "le crime ne paie pas" ou bien par "le crime tue", car comme de coutume, la voie de la facilité, la voie de l'assassinat et du nettoyage par le vide n'arrange pas lesSuperbe conclusion de la saga mafieuse que l'on pourrait résumer par "le crime ne paie pas" ou bien par "le crime tue", car comme de coutume, la voie de la facilité, la voie de l'assassinat et du nettoyage par le vide n'arrange pas les choses... bien au contraire mais ainsi va la violence de ces gens-là...

Cette observation, cette évidence, presque une tautologie -non que dis-je, une lapalissade- m'est venue à l'esprit à la fin de ce Parrain troisième du nom, une fin assurément dramatique digne d'une histoire à la sicilienne dans laquelle de vendetta en vendetta, tout le monde finit par s'entretuer alors que les prétendus marionnettistes tombent dans la toile de ceux qu'ils croyaient manipuler.

Ainsi, Michael Corleone le mafioso en quête de rédemption qui tente une opération "mains propres" afin de tirer un trait sur son passé et comme -si souvent- afin d'assurer l'avenir de sa et de "la" famille se retrouve encore une fois pris dans l'engrenage infernal de Cosa Nostra.

Conclusion édifiante et touchante mais sans complaisance, ce dernier Parrain est un véritable accomplissement pour Al Pacino qui a gagné en maturité et en expérience et délivre ici une extraordinaire prestation. Le jeune poulain, Andy Garcia, s'avère à la hauteur, ce qui n'est pas rien même si on sait déjà qu'il s'agit d'un acteur très estimable en règle générale. Quant à Eli Wallach en vieux grigou retors, que dire sinon que ce monstre sacré tire encore davantage le film vers le haut !

Moins long (tout de même !) que les deux précédents -mais un peu long quand même- Le Parrain 3 est toujours d'une ambiance inimitable faite de réunions de pontes duplices et de rencontres discrètes où l'on fomente les prochains meurtres comme l'on avance ses pièces sur l'échiquier du double jeu et de la fourberie.

C'est aussi bien évidemment un lourd passif familial -et sentimental- dont même un Don -ou certain Don- peut éprouver quelque remords et regret. Contrairement au Parrain 2, le scénario reste assez clair et suffisamment développé pour qu'on en suive les tenants et aboutissants sans migraine, alors que chacun tire les ficelles en coulisses.

Quasiment un sans-faute donc pour le grand final et le meilleur opus de la saga.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

soumyadeepdasJan 26, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The movie would have obviously been worse than both the first and second movie since they had set such high standards for any moviegoer. The reasons why this movie has been panned is because of the various subplots, the unnecessary romance scenes, its inadequacy of being a standalone film (unlike Godfather II), and the atrocious acting of Sofia Coppola. However, the highs in this movie are very high. VERY high. I loved the second half of the movie, especially when Michael tours Kay around Sicily, as it is one of the more tender and beautiful scenes of this movie, if not the Godfather trilogy. The chemistry between Diane and Al is utter beauty. The opera scene is the greatest poetic justice I have seen in the trilogy. Heck, I even find that scene better than the baptism climax of the first movie. Andy Garcia was fully fit as Sonny's bastard son Vincent, and his character is one of the best of the Godfather trilogy as it depicted a fruitful change from a brash, rowdy man to a more responsible, sacrificial Don. The family struggles are a vital part of the movie, as you would see from the start where Michael quarrels with Kay about Anthony becoming an opera singer. The religious undertones too are commendable, especially the subplot on the murder of Pope John Paul I. The climax of this movie, where Michael Corleone contemplates shows what he has lost: his three loves of his depressing life. He lost Apollonia due to mistrust, he lost Kay due to his business, and he lost Mary due to gangster rivalry. On paper, it may seem he died of old age, but he actually died due to these three aspects. In short, it is a flawed masterpiece.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

JPKJul 2, 2019

Kinda Of A Letdown
Considering that the first two are masterpieces, Part III is pretty damn disappointing, But it’s still a great movie overall.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

cesky_hracMar 24, 2018

Truch slabší ale nevadí. Stále je to zábavný díl. Skvělé zakončení trilogie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

jonslowDec 11, 2018

It's the worst one out of The Godfather Trilogy but still a good movie. You watch the first part, must finish the ending part anyway.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

MichaelBeatchSep 9, 2019

The most vibrant and compact of The Godfather trilogy. It explores a time where we must familiarize ourselves with something new instead of observe a recognizable canvas. The film resonates on its own and Andy Garcia is overtly terrific. IThe most vibrant and compact of The Godfather trilogy. It explores a time where we must familiarize ourselves with something new instead of observe a recognizable canvas. The film resonates on its own and Andy Garcia is overtly terrific. I prefer the energy of Part 3 over the sombreness of its sequel counterpart. Francis paints an endearing end whether it was made for demand or not.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

MglovesfunJan 10, 2020

While by no means a bad film in its own right, it pales in comparison to Parts I and II.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

jastineDec 6, 2021

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

CharlesBOct 14, 2005

When looked at in comparason to the original two this movie is aweful...but as a stand alone movie it holds its own. There is nothing particularly new or different from the origional, but tries to use the same type of elements that make the When looked at in comparason to the original two this movie is aweful...but as a stand alone movie it holds its own. There is nothing particularly new or different from the origional, but tries to use the same type of elements that make the origionals great and that in a sense makes this movie good.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

gracjanskiMay 20, 2023

Very good end of the trilogy. As usual the characters are in the focus of the movie and many of them were grey, not clear and some of them developed, especially Michael Corleone and Vincent Mancini. Al Pacino was great. The story around theVery good end of the trilogy. As usual the characters are in the focus of the movie and many of them were grey, not clear and some of them developed, especially Michael Corleone and Vincent Mancini. Al Pacino was great. The story around the vatican and the foundation was good and took the mafia methods in the modern times.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

alejandro970Jun 7, 2020

In this latest episode, Micheal Corloene is seen searching for ways to keep his empire on its feet and reestablish ties with his estranged children, make peace with the past; all facing the possibility of not having an heir to the throne.In this latest episode, Micheal Corloene is seen searching for ways to keep his empire on its feet and reestablish ties with his estranged children, make peace with the past; all facing the possibility of not having an heir to the throne. It´s a pity it doesn't have the strengths of the older siblings but it makes up for it wel in the climax. Deserves a chance for watch the full trilogy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

KelvinSelimorMay 19, 2020

The Godfather: Part III. The end. What I want to say about the final film and the trilogy as a whole. The third film is not so boring as the second part was and not as terrific as the first film was. If the first part of The Godfather caughtThe Godfather: Part III. The end. What I want to say about the final film and the trilogy as a whole. The third film is not so boring as the second part was and not as terrific as the first film was. If the first part of The Godfather caught on to the characters with their plot, then unfortunately in the final film this is practically nonexistent. As a result, Godfather 3 is just a good movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DiptanshuApr 26, 2020

Amazing!Music was phenomenal.the acting was iconic nice to see such time jump and reunion type at start.the story was simple compare to prequels they were way too complex!screenplay was amazing engaging to watch the pace is perfect as perAmazing!Music was phenomenal.the acting was iconic nice to see such time jump and reunion type at start.the story was simple compare to prequels they were way too complex!screenplay was amazing engaging to watch the pace is perfect as per older movies it's not slow and right from start we were into the movie!cinematography was ok but in the prequels it was masterpiece cinematography!the business investment and whole felt flawed but the character arcs were interesting every one has unique dramas like mike's and her x wife's confessions and the cousins love and the singing as boy it was engaging to watch the core godfather thing felt missing and the godfather mantle to vincet at last was late but good then the whole ending was terrifying and heartbreaking the whole climax was intense the play's music the murders and attempts of assasination it was intense and entertaining although the murders were just same as prequels who ever was against they're the one's!overall entertaining movie!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

RobwinzJul 31, 2020

The Godfather Part III, It's not as bad as what people put this one out to be like, it's no where near as good as the first two. Also, it's still got some brilliant scenes throughout and yeah, it might have a few stupid ones also throughoutThe Godfather Part III, It's not as bad as what people put this one out to be like, it's no where near as good as the first two. Also, it's still got some brilliant scenes throughout and yeah, it might have a few stupid ones also throughout but it's not a bad movie. Finally, the cast aren't that bad but overall, it's not that bad of a movie but it's not a masterpiece like the other two were.

I think I noticed with this one was that there wasn't enough action in total whilst with the previous two there was a good amount.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

JeffRsonApr 13, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Unpopular opinion but this is my favorite Godfather film. I just watched all three in one day without prior knowledge and without bias. The tension in this one is really well built, especially the opera scene. The acting and casting are great. I definitely prefered this film over the convulated plot of the second.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Isaiah_T_30Dec 4, 2020

It is nothing compared to the first two The Godfather films. It is disappointing, it really shouldn't have happened or shouldn't have existed. I recommend watching The Godfather CODA more than The Godfather Part III as Coppola re-edits someIt is nothing compared to the first two The Godfather films. It is disappointing, it really shouldn't have happened or shouldn't have existed. I recommend watching The Godfather CODA more than The Godfather Part III as Coppola re-edits some of the flaws of this film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MrPajamasNov 2, 2020

We've been waiting a long damn time for Godfather III. While the first part is from 1972 and the second from 1974, the third part is from 1990. I'm glad Al Pacino stayed. There's just no other person than Al Pacino to play Michael. TheWe've been waiting a long damn time for Godfather III. While the first part is from 1972 and the second from 1974, the third part is from 1990. I'm glad Al Pacino stayed. There's just no other person than Al Pacino to play Michael. The previous episodes are among the MASTERPIECE and the best movies ever made. Is that the case with the third installment? Not really for me. As great as the film is, it's not as masterful as the previous installments. While the story is again great and the soundtrack is masterful, as it always is with The Godfather, it just wasn't as interesting because not much happened except for the ending. The previous episodes appealed to me more. This was already a bit of an epilogue that just didn't have a chance for me to catch on to the previous episodes. The finale is worth it though, and the last 20 minutes of the film are an absolute delight to watch. A nice ending to the trilogy. It wasn't easy to conclude such a masterful trilogy, but it was quite successful. On the one hand, I'm not going to lie, I would have preferred it to end with a double feature. At least for me.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

geewahJan 27, 2021

It may not be as strong as it's predecessors but is still a fine end to one the greatest movie sagas made.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

511andahalfJan 9, 2022

Not on the same level as the first two, but it was never meant to be. Godfather 3 provides a satisfying conclusion to the saga overall. The performances are again top notch, Al Pacino and Andy Garcia in particular standing out. The stakes areNot on the same level as the first two, but it was never meant to be. Godfather 3 provides a satisfying conclusion to the saga overall. The performances are again top notch, Al Pacino and Andy Garcia in particular standing out. The stakes are high, and the themes of family and betrayal are portrayed so well. Great end to a legendary trilogy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

HikayeciMay 5, 2021

Haksızlık yapıldığını düşündüğüm bir film. İlk iki filmden daha kötü tabi de bana 60 puanlık bir film gibi gelmedi. Filmi izlediğim her andan zevk aldım.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

HabibiehakimJun 2, 2021

The Corleone Family is getting old and getting less terrifying than the first two, replacing with their own son and godfather son, turn down to be an awkward cousins love relationship, but at least they still know what's wrong what's right inThe Corleone Family is getting old and getting less terrifying than the first two, replacing with their own son and godfather son, turn down to be an awkward cousins love relationship, but at least they still know what's wrong what's right in the end, The Godfather Part III is still have that moment, the movie still have that power, and ended with a very well done ending, The Godfather Part III is not a bad movie but still the last in the trilogy best list.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Pan_KrytykMar 12, 2022

to jest spójna część trylogii ... wiele razy słyszałem że po co, na co itd. bo pasuję jest dobrze wykonana i jest dobra ... nie jest miażdżąca jak pierwsza, natomiast jest dobra.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews