Read User Reviews and Submit your own for The Godfather: Part III

6

TyranianApr 9, 2019

Big step down from previous films, has some of the sublime elements but just isn't as well written.

5 of 5 users found this helpful50

All this user's reviews

2

OverreachTHISAug 17, 2015

This film has SO MUCH to dislike in it, you can get lost before you realize what is the central flaw. Coppola got away pretty much with not recasting Brando or Richard Castellano ("Clemenza") in GF, but those avoidable failures did not meanThis film has SO MUCH to dislike in it, you can get lost before you realize what is the central flaw. Coppola got away pretty much with not recasting Brando or Richard Castellano ("Clemenza") in GF, but those avoidable failures did not mean he could just skip Robert Duvall in III to save a few more bucks. The first scenes didn't work for me, and Diane Keaton's Bronze-ish angered-wife costume looked bad.

Inadequate performances were by goofy Eli Wallach, wooden George Hamilton, the guy playing Tom Hagen's son, even Mantegna, and Cuban-American Andy Garcia didn't quite pull off the Italian thing. Much-criticized Sophia C. was okay to me, but many people couldn't deal with it.

The Church mumbo jumbo was for the birds. And this guy is worth a billion dollars or so and he lives in a sub-average suburban little house? The helicopter attack on a conference room was completely ridiculous - nothing in any way like that happened in the whole history of the mafia.. And murder-by-eyeglass frames was a groaner.

But hat was really wrong was the central premise: Don Corleone the mass murderer wants redemption and to live a church-goer's life? OMG, please! Coppola's on video asking if the Don's heart betrayed him, didn't protect him? Heart smart for Chrissake, this is supposed to be a gangster movie! The old Michael and this Michael don't even seem to be relatives.

I am reminded of a line from Barton Fink where the studio boss get's angry at the misguided director: "We don't put Wally Beery in some fruity movie about a guy wrestling with his soul!" Similarly, Paramount Pictures don't put some fruity movie about a guy wrestling with his soul in the Godfather franchise! Moralizing Coppola's so far off track wringing his choir-boy hands because he ignored the main lesson: It's not a story about you and It's not personal, Francis. It's only business, movie business gone terribly wrong.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

9

JamesEOct 15, 2007

Not as good as the originals, but defiantly gripping and intense.

3 of 3 users found this helpful

4

MovieManiac83Apr 24, 2015

As a nice little film about a bunch of hoods and their involvement in some complicated conspiracy involving the Vatican, The Godfather Part III works just fine, boasting first-rate performances from its two leading men and displaying enoughAs a nice little film about a bunch of hoods and their involvement in some complicated conspiracy involving the Vatican, The Godfather Part III works just fine, boasting first-rate performances from its two leading men and displaying enough clever directorial touches to suggest that this Francis Ford Coppola chap is a name to look out for. As the slavishly-awaited sequel to two of the finest films of the last 30 years, however, as the third episode in what may well be the Greatest Movie Story Ever Told, The Godfather Part III is, frankly, a dreadful disappointment.

It is, perhaps, unfair that this new production should be so smothered under the reputation of two films made nearly 20 years ago. By so closely adhering to the exact structure of his previous two instalments, however, and through his liberal employment of flashbacks, Coppola himself seems to beg for the comparisons, making it abundantly clear throughout that what is on offer here is no new departure, but simply part three of that old familiar tale of the familia Corleone. And as such, it simply doesn't work, lacking the strength of narrative, the menace, the sheer epic sweep of all that has gone before.

For about the first 30 minutes, however, everything seems to be very much in order. The familiar strains of Nino Rota's theme music never fail to send a shiver, the introduction of Andy Garcia as the suitably hotheaded bastard son of Sonny is a welcome addition to the ranks, while Pacino, all grey and shrunk, immediately conveys a telling portrait of immense power and obscene wealth, made all the more impressive by its confinement within such a wizened old frame.

The first hint that we may be going slightly off the rails comes with the gathering of the clans and the subsequent Die Hard-style interruption from the skies, a badly-handled set piece more reminiscent of Bond than the beautifully understated brutality of the tollbooth.

From here on, the violence becomes increasingly cartoon, notably Garcia riding a horse through the inevitable street festival, while things go from bad to worse as it gradually becomes all too apparent just how far out of her depth Sofia Coppola really is, floundering helplessly in her vain attempts to convince as both the Garcia love interest and daughter of the Don. By the time the much-vaunted operatic climax comes along, it is hardly surprising that proceedings finally slip into near-farce, as the supposed top assassin in all of Sicily takes a good half-hour and a fair portion of Cavalleria Rusticana to line up his sights. Miss Sofia manages to provoke the giggles amidst such supposed tragedy and all that is left is a basic re-run of your actual Don Corelone coil-shuffling routine to round things off.

Fans of the first two instalments are likely to find The Godfather Part III an unworthy heir to the tradition. First-time voters, meanwhile, will surely wonder what on earth all the fuss was all about.

Fans of the first two instalments are likely to find The Godfather Part III an unworthy heir to the tradition. First-time voters, meanwhile, will surely wonder what on earth all the fuss was all about.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

5

TrailesqueFeb 11, 2018

It is not as awful as I remember it being, but the final film in the Godfather trilogy is clearly the weakest. At the center of the story we have an older, more sympathetic Michael Corleone - now a respectable, rich businessman andIt is not as awful as I remember it being, but the final film in the Godfather trilogy is clearly the weakest. At the center of the story we have an older, more sympathetic Michael Corleone - now a respectable, rich businessman and philanthropist who is trying to reunite his family and make amends - but his mafia past keeps reaching out and dragging him back in. He begins grooming his illegitimate nephew (Andy Garcia) for a leadership role, and this hothead gets a romance going with Michael's daughter (his first cousin - yuk - in a part played by the director's daughter). A lot of the story involves the Catholic church and Michael's involvement in their finances - this was obviously based on a scandal that took place in the 1980s. Maybe I'm too much of a stickler for realism, but I never understood the financial picture or who was screwing who out of what. This should have been about the fall of the Corleones if it was to be a real "rise and fall of..." story, but they never really fall. Instead there is a wild series of murders at the end, intercut with an Italian opera taking place on a stage (referring to the similar sequences in the first two movies), but the logic of it was never clear to me.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

9

EddieM.Sep 8, 2007

Get a grip you lot - it's only a movie. And it's a really good movie too.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

9

DouglasMJul 20, 2007

I just saw Godfather Part 3 for the first time two days ago. While it still ranks as a great film, it lacks the emotional intensity of the first two films. The earlier two movies had incredibly well-acted and engrossing supporting characters I just saw Godfather Part 3 for the first time two days ago. While it still ranks as a great film, it lacks the emotional intensity of the first two films. The earlier two movies had incredibly well-acted and engrossing supporting characters like Fredo. Godfather Part 3 with Sofia Coppola, Joe Mantegna, and George Hamilton (while none of them were bad) just do not measure up to the quality of the first two movies.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

6

FilipeNetoFeb 19, 2018

This film follows the story of "The Godfather," which chronicles the journey of the Corleone family through the violent world of organized crime. In this film, an elderly Michael Corleone lives haunted by the crimes he committed and lookingThis film follows the story of "The Godfather," which chronicles the journey of the Corleone family through the violent world of organized crime. In this film, an elderly Michael Corleone lives haunted by the crimes he committed and looking desperately, but unsuccessfully, to clean his family of any taint through its legitimation and links to the Vatican.

Directed by Francis Ford Coppola, based on the novels of Mario Puzo, who collaborated in the writing of the script, it kept most of the cast of the previous films, made in the seventies, and bring new and important characters. The soundtrack goes from Nino Rota to Carmine Coppola, father of director and Talia Shire, actress who also enters this film. It didn't won any Academy Award but was nominated for seven statuettes.

More than fifteen years after "The Godfather II", this film is, almost, the black sheep of the "family". Criticized, misunderstood, even somewhat ridiculed, will always live in the shadow of the two films that preceded it, and which are undoubtedly two giants of cinema. And if we want to compare them, this is the loser because it can no longer surprise us, despite maintaining excellent action scenes and a Michael Corleone much more paternalistic, living threatened by his ghosts (in particular his brother, which is a very smart way to explore the cruelest act of the criminal life of this mobster). I didn't quite understand his position on the daughter's romance with Vincent, her cousin. The connection to the Catholic Church also seemed a bit forced, as if it had been snapped on in the script. Al Pacino has remained up to the challenge and managed to perfectly display the psychological contradictions of his character. Andy Garcia also had a great performance and Joe Mantegna can say that this, probably, it was the best performance he did. This is a film that is worth seeing, mostly if we didn't compare it to the previous two films.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

TiagoSantosSApr 9, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Infelizmente, não conseguiu superar seu antecessor. aqui, vemos mudanças absurdas nos personagens. não a nenhum problema aqui com isso. mas...nao me agradou muito. eu esperava uma conclusao epica. nao e ruim, e bom eu gostei. mas, faltou uma coisa, varias coisas. elementos importantes que precisavam estar aqui presente.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

3

lofu_agfyNov 12, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Many of the reviews of this seem too positive. The movie was deeply flawed and love for the early Godfather films should not blind us to the fiasco that was number 3.

Casting problems: Diane Keaton said all she needed to say in part 2. Her presence in the part 3 added nothing whatsoever. We learn from her dialog that she will always love Michael but that she will never accept his gangster ways. Yeah. We learned that in part 2. George Hamilton as the lawyer/confident. Lame. Sophia Coppola as Mary. She comes across like a dull-witted 16-year-old that doesn't know a thing about acting but thinks it is fun to be able to stand in front of a camera. (spoiler alert) the primary dramatic event of the movie involved her death. By that time I was hoping that she would be killed off (or at least get no more screen time), so my ability to feel any emotional impact at the death of this air-headed monstrosity.

Dialog problems: The dialog in Michael's study in the initial scene is painful to hear. The movie gets better, but very awkward dialog pops up every 20 minutes or so throughout the movie. Part of the problem is the screen play and part of the problem is that at times the actors don't know how to effectively deliver their lines.

Plot problems: Awkward casting & dialog aside, I think this is the biggest problem. when you get to be one of the wealthiest business men in the world, wacking people no longer makes any sense. When you have untold millions at your disposal, you find that you a wide range of tools to accomplish your aims, and most of these tools work better than bullets (anyone remember the last time a Fortune 500 CEO was taken out in a mob hit?). (spoiler alert) There is a scene in which one of the baddies flies a helicopter outside a penthouse ballroom in a high rise building and then occupants of the helicopter riddle the ballroom with machine gun fire killing dozens of wealthy business men. This would be par for the course in the Matrix, or True Lies, or Commando, but this type of violence is not part of the real world we live in. It's cartoonishness is at odds with the other Godfather films and makes it difficult to take this film seriously. As well paced and tense as the final opera house scene was, it was also in the category of cartooney violence. Did the best assassin in all of Italy really think the cleverest way to kill one of the richest men on the planet was to slip into a well guarded public place, kill off a bunch of hired body guards and then shoot a man in front of 1000 witnesses? Well, I guess the screenwriter thought so. The end result was a complete mess. The narrative flow of the final film was a train wreck. The plot elements went back from somewhat believable to overblown Hollywood insanity and back again.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

3

robertoiglesiasJan 15, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. So this is the Godfather film that I can say is bad and not get a bunch of fanboys attacking me. Yay.
Unlike the subtle and quieter tone of the first 2 films, this is loud noise. The story is more of an over the top satire about ties to the Vatican bank, the pope, and even a subplot about incest! EW, I DO NOT WANT TO SEE A YOUNG GIRL HIT ON HER COUSIN!
The acting and writing are also inferior, and not done well.
There's even a part where a helicopter tries to kill a group of men. It's loud, obnoxious, and goes against the quietness of the first 2 films. Then there was that piss poor written part where this one idiot is like "MY LUCKY COAT!" What idiot wrote that dumb sh*t?!
The film is also 2 hours and 42 minutes. UGH! At least the first 2 Godfather films had a better tone, and way better writing.
So yeah, this film is bad.… Expand

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

5

MoviebuffreviewMar 15, 2011

Overall, as a standalone movie, it is definitely very flawed, but it has its moments. As a Godfather film, it is somewhat of a clunker. I didn't hate the movie, but with unconvincing and very less powerful performances, a somewhat cliche plotOverall, as a standalone movie, it is definitely very flawed, but it has its moments. As a Godfather film, it is somewhat of a clunker. I didn't hate the movie, but with unconvincing and very less powerful performances, a somewhat cliche plot at some points, and overall a slow pacing, The Godfather Part III is definitely a step bellow its predecessors. It wasn't a bad conclusion, and I didn't hate it, but if you are worrying that this will ruin the great series for you, then you might want to think twice about seeing it.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

9

HudsonTNov 9, 2008

Not perfect, but certainly better than part two. Ultimately, after hearing about how everyone was so disappointed with three, I was surprised by how good it was.

2 of 3 users found this helpful

0

Schmit93Feb 20, 2012

I love the first two. I would even dare to say they are two of the greatest American movies ever made. Then number three comes along and just ruins it all. Sofia Coppola does no favors to the already unbearably slow movie. Not to mention theI love the first two. I would even dare to say they are two of the greatest American movies ever made. Then number three comes along and just ruins it all. Sofia Coppola does no favors to the already unbearably slow movie. Not to mention the whole opera scene. They also do not have the decency to give Michael a good death. I do realize that they are based off novels, but goddamn.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

4

aaronpaul121May 26, 2012

An enormous disappointment for Al Pacino and for the whole film. I'm expecting a lot about this movie thinking the fact that its predecessors are great (especially the first one which is one of the best films of all time). The acting isAn enormous disappointment for Al Pacino and for the whole film. I'm expecting a lot about this movie thinking the fact that its predecessors are great (especially the first one which is one of the best films of all time). The acting is horrible, the script is lousy and the whole plot was ridiculous and boring. An incredibly terrible film, but still, it does not belong to the worst.............… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

5

sinadoomApr 7, 2013

The Godfather 3, released 16 years after Godfather 2, has lost its cinematic touch. It's still a long film and follows Michael when he is older and in the process of retiring. The biggest let-down is how there is little connection betweenThe Godfather 3, released 16 years after Godfather 2, has lost its cinematic touch. It's still a long film and follows Michael when he is older and in the process of retiring. The biggest let-down is how there is little connection between some events, and the story is very thinly linked together and at points not well explained or explored deeply. It almost feels as if it was dragged out, and produced with few intentions other than for profit. There's no real story to tell. However, I can give it credit for somehow managing to make it feel engaging and entertaining for the whole length. It only really picks up in the last 20 minutes or so, but it's worth watching if you've got some spare time and have seen the other two films.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

TheWalrus2000Mar 9, 2013

It loses its feel entirely but the acting and still sorta good plot keep it together.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

joao1198pedroNov 28, 2013

this movie is not an masterpiece as it was the two first godfathers but it didn't mean it's an ok movie.Of course that is a lot of mistakes but it is still an nice movie.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

pabloaimarFeb 18, 2013

The amount of suspense towards the end is crazy and the ending really lets it all out, I haven't seen a scene more heartbreaking. There's less of the Godfather theme to it because its not as dark and it has no Marlon Brando, but its still theThe amount of suspense towards the end is crazy and the ending really lets it all out, I haven't seen a scene more heartbreaking. There's less of the Godfather theme to it because its not as dark and it has no Marlon Brando, but its still the same characters and actors and it doesnt fail to show the fate of the Corleone family. One of the greatest movies Ive ever seen.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

5

spadenxNov 29, 2011

Far too similar to the previous films, Lacks originality and its actually pretty boring and not all that interesting either. While it does end perfectly, The build up to that moment is shallow and shows just how far the one great franchiseFar too similar to the previous films, Lacks originality and its actually pretty boring and not all that interesting either. While it does end perfectly, The build up to that moment is shallow and shows just how far the one great franchise has fallen.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

0

joseap84Nov 25, 2011

I can't bring myself to give this movie in form of score, a pure "0". It's sad when a series goes from "good" to masterpiece", and finally to "garbage". There's nothing worth seeing in this movie.

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

4

asylumspadezNov 26, 2011

It lacks originality and is far too like the previous 2 films. The acting is fine but not as great as the previous films were. Overall it was a disapointing end to an epic series.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

LaMagiadeVirueAug 15, 2013

Nada que ver a las otras dos partes, "The Godfather: Part III" mantiene un buen enfoque a la vida mafiosa y una historia mejor que muchas otra películas a las que uno le puede poner mas nota. Pero es un tanto aburrida con respecto a las anteriores.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

10

PatrickM.Sep 26, 2007

Yeah - definitely flawed - but still really great. Not so much a godfather film, as an attempt by Coppola to understand himself in middle-age.

1 of 2 users found this helpful

6

DanteGodfather7Aug 18, 2015

Mikey returns in the the twilight of his life, to replenish himself and his 'family' of crime. After watching part I and II of Mario Puzo's: The Godfather, I have to say, this movie was a disappointment. It still is a great movie, but fromMikey returns in the the twilight of his life, to replenish himself and his 'family' of crime. After watching part I and II of Mario Puzo's: The Godfather, I have to say, this movie was a disappointment. It still is a great movie, but from my view, Al Pacino was greatly trying to re-enact what Marlon Brando perfected in part I. He failed. The whole point of Brado's performance was that he was always subtle. 'Michael' is a good character in his own right but a shadow in the greatness of 'Don Vito'. 'Vincent's' part in the movie was well executed by Andy Garcia, but yet again, Coppola tries to re-enact 'Michael' with 'Vincent'. This worked out better than the other one, but still had missing elements. The story was compelling with suspense and was a fitting end to 'The Godfather' trilogy. 6/10. Above average movie!… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

mellonheadDec 31, 2017

It's not so bad, not like everybody says. Sure, Sophia Coppola's acting sucks, but not throughout - a good portion of it I can stand. I would say if anything, it's Al Pacino's effort that's the most disappointing. It has a pretty weak plot -It's not so bad, not like everybody says. Sure, Sophia Coppola's acting sucks, but not throughout - a good portion of it I can stand. I would say if anything, it's Al Pacino's effort that's the most disappointing. It has a pretty weak plot - very weak compared to the first two and the dialogue is weak. It's too long - doesn't deserve or earn the length, like the first two. There aren't so many layers like the first two. If anything, repeat watches lessen my opinion of the film, because I just keep finding more and more flaws. The final couple scenes are nice, but maybe not worth a three-hour watch. Coming into the third, I expected very little, so it was a nice conclusion, but as a standalone, it's terrible. Don't watch it if you didn't like the first two, but then again, if you loved the first two, there's a good chance you'll hate this one. So maybe only watch out of morbid curiosity, or if you're one of those die-hard fans who will give it a 10/10 no matter what.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

merijnjFeb 23, 2018

(85/100)
It's the worst one out of The Godfather Trilogy but still a very good movie. The acting was a bit weak with Mary (Sofia Coppola) and Anthony (Franc D'Ambrosio), but that doesn't take away your focus too much. Vincent (Andy Garcia)(85/100)
It's the worst one out of The Godfather Trilogy but still a very good movie. The acting was a bit weak with Mary (Sofia Coppola) and Anthony (Franc D'Ambrosio), but that doesn't take away your focus too much. Vincent (Andy Garcia) was definitely the best new character. The Godfather, Part III is a strong movie with a relatively good plot.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

Compi24Nov 28, 2012

It's almost common knowledge that this film gets a boatload of flack, but I actually found "The Godfather Part III" to be quite an engaging and gratifying conclusion to the truly epic trilogy. While the film does have a few flagrant problemsIt's almost common knowledge that this film gets a boatload of flack, but I actually found "The Godfather Part III" to be quite an engaging and gratifying conclusion to the truly epic trilogy. While the film does have a few flagrant problems here and there, I find its merits to outweigh them deftly.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

4

EricR.Mar 17, 2006

Horrible, horrible, horrible. How is it possible that Al Pacino could give such an inept performance. I hated it, hated the whole damm thing. Bad acting, lame cliche script. Coppola took one of the most complex characters in cinema and made Horrible, horrible, horrible. How is it possible that Al Pacino could give such an inept performance. I hated it, hated the whole damm thing. Bad acting, lame cliche script. Coppola took one of the most complex characters in cinema and made him paper thin. Sophia's terrible performace is just icing on the shit cake. The only thing that was good was the ending. Everything else was dull beyond beliefe. At least the Matrix sequels were entertaining.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful

3

RexG.May 13, 2006

The film music alone made me dislike the movie from the beginning. It has been "hollywood-ized" - the atmosphere of the first two parts its missing entirely. I couldn't even watch it at once - I actually wouldn't have watched it to The film music alone made me dislike the movie from the beginning. It has been "hollywood-ized" - the atmosphere of the first two parts its missing entirely. I couldn't even watch it at once - I actually wouldn't have watched it to the end at all if it weren't for the money that I spent on the DVD. One thing they managed to get on screen though: The decline of the family by the decline of the movie itself.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

3

AADJul 17, 2007

Abysmal film. Unbelievable work from Scorcese. The film has lost all its glamour character and depth.

0 of 3 users found this helpful

10

JaredK.Nov 1, 2008

Sofia Coppla isn't nough to ruin this. The cast is stellar!

0 of 1 users found this helpful

1

JamesL.Jul 17, 2008

This one is the weakest film of 1990. The acting is poor. And Sofia Coppola is mistaken for being cast in the movie. Andy Garcia played his part well. Call that the most powerful film? NOT!

0 of 1 users found this helpful

0

RonD.Dec 13, 2005

Terrible acting, plot (what little unbelieveable amount there is) doesn't hold together. Took 4 viewings to watch the entire thing, that's how bad it is. Garcia acts as well as the average wrestler and shire/little coppola may as Terrible acting, plot (what little unbelieveable amount there is) doesn't hold together. Took 4 viewings to watch the entire thing, that's how bad it is. Garcia acts as well as the average wrestler and shire/little coppola may as well have entered a hog calling contest.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

0

JoyceC.Oct 21, 2007

The first part fascinated me, the book is amazing, the film isn't as good, but part 2 wasn't as good, it was all right, but it never worked with Al Pacino. And this, Al Pacino is more tuff, grumpy, and more compromising, I found The first part fascinated me, the book is amazing, the film isn't as good, but part 2 wasn't as good, it was all right, but it never worked with Al Pacino. And this, Al Pacino is more tuff, grumpy, and more compromising, I found cheesy and terrible. Either it is good, all right, or terrible. Classics can be either of the three since I know what a classic is. And this is terrible.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

RegOzJan 19, 2012

I know this movie has been subject of harsh criticism, especially when compared to the previous two. It is important to emphasize, however, that this film has merit by its own. At first, one may not feel very connected with this movie becauseI know this movie has been subject of harsh criticism, especially when compared to the previous two. It is important to emphasize, however, that this film has merit by its own. At first, one may not feel very connected with this movie because the absence of those characters that we learnt to love in those 2 previous 'The Godfather'...but I think we all know the reasons why they were not there. Thus, there was a need to think in a new storyline that was also engaging but could survive without those old characters. The plot is different and it may be perceived as forced and lame..Yet when located in the right context it does make sense. I believe the performances were good, and I enjoyed seeing the other side of Michael Corleone...here we see that he was after all human, although he never regretted what he did. In The Godfather I and II his character was all negative. Michael is presented as emotionless, controlling, obsessive, and ruthless. Governed by his ego and desires of revenge. Here...we can see a different side, the one of a lonely man...one that in spite of his power can never be in peace and doesn't seem to get anything he wants no matter what he does. As a result, he questions his means..especially considering the fact that his children have chosen different paths. Overall, I have to say that I enjoyed this movie more than The Godfather II . Finally, I would like to add that even though I have heard that some disliked Sofia Coppola's performance. I did not.. He performance was not outstanding but I do not believe it was bad. Her character was relevant to the plot but it was never meant to be central...thus; her characterization doesn't really affect the value of the movie. I give it a 9… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

imthenoobJul 11, 2021

Michael's daughter Mary, Vincent, and the inconsistent story that feels like we are viewing it out of the normal sequence of events ruin this movie for me. It feels like a forced sequel rather than one that they truly took time to develop.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

SpangleJun 28, 2014

This one is not as good as the first two for sure, but it has many positives. For starters, Al Pacino is great once again in his role as Michael Corleone. The changing landscape of the families is also well presented as we see many youngstersThis one is not as good as the first two for sure, but it has many positives. For starters, Al Pacino is great once again in his role as Michael Corleone. The changing landscape of the families is also well presented as we see many youngsters trying to come into the business, while many of the key players from before are now on their way out. In addition, the homages to the first two films and footage from the first two were brilliantly used and really added a nice touch here. For the most part, it was nice to see some things brought to a closure from the first two and how the family has progressed and regressed over all of these years. However, the negatives here really are what hold the film back. Firstly, the plot can be overly complicated at times, likely due to poor storytelling. At times, things would happen and you are trying to figure out what just happened and why. However, the major issue is the acting. Andy Garcia is fine for the most part, but at times, he fails to step up to the plate. I still feel like he had the charisma and energy for the role, I just wish his performance did not slump at times. Sofia Coppola was horrendous. I always thought people were overstating how bad she is, but you simply cannot overstate it. I think my dog could have been a better Mary than her.

Overall, this final entry into the Godfather trilogy is much like the raisin cookie to the first two's chocolate chip. No matter what, you are disappointed that it is not chocolate chip, but if you like raisins and can overcome that disappointment, you somewhat enjoy the cookie anyways. But, not everyone likes raisins and can overcome that disappointment.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

axelkochDec 15, 2013

The last instalment in the Godfather trilogy, The Godfather Part III, has some obvious flaws. Including real life events out of the time of the Vatican’s crisis in the late 70’s and early 80’s, for one, let the whole plot seem a bit weird andThe last instalment in the Godfather trilogy, The Godfather Part III, has some obvious flaws. Including real life events out of the time of the Vatican’s crisis in the late 70’s and early 80’s, for one, let the whole plot seem a bit weird and didn’t work all the time. Even more crucial, the casting of Sofia Coppola as Michael’s grown-up daughter Mary. Although we’ve come to experience her directing qualities a decade later, she just didn’t succeed in her role and was utterly unconvincing throughout the film. And, as in the two first films, it’s also more than a tad too long, which makes for some rather dreary moments.
Nevertheless, The Godfather Part III is a very good film and can very well compete with the rest of the series, despite being yet another step back from The Godfather’s initial quality. Not only can the audience still enjoy fabulous cinematography, set design, and score work (all of these securing the film’s respectable amount of Oscar nominations), but also some final 20 minutes that will keep The Godfather Part III in your memory. As we can relish in the insanely well-made shots of all the people that have just died under most unnatural circumstances, the crew concocts what are, in my opinion, the three best shots of all three films: Frederick Keinszig, hanging dead from a bridge, Calò stabbing Don Lucchesi with his own glasses, and Archbishop Gilday falling to his dead.
It may be just a bit too little of everything to establish Part III’s place on the same shelf as the first two films in the series, but it’s still the great Francis Ford Coppola that directed it and made the most out of a story significantly less interesting than I had expected.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

gzayas91Dec 21, 2014

The best film by Coppola. This is a King Lear film, a Shakespearean tragedy. Sophia Coppoplla's performs was not great, but suitable. It's better than part 2 because this was much an conclusion.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

JohnnyStephensAug 30, 2013

Only the ending was good I think. Francis For C., after many many years, thought to close the Godfather with a third film. Not a good decision at all!!! I didn't like so much. The worst movie of the trilogy.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

MovieGuysJan 6, 2015

Although it can never live up to the first two, Part III isn't totally horrible. However, many problems are abound, and I can't decide which one is the worst. Maybe it's Sofia Coppola's botox-looking face with her wooden, emotionless, "IAlthough it can never live up to the first two, Part III isn't totally horrible. However, many problems are abound, and I can't decide which one is the worst. Maybe it's Sofia Coppola's botox-looking face with her wooden, emotionless, "I don't give a damn I'm the director's daughter"-like acting. Maybe it's the occasional dragging scene that weighs the movie down. Maybe it's the fact that Andy Garcia looks way too Cuban to be of Italian descent. I don't know. The first 2 hours are just kind of there, but the movie does come to a stunning climax at the end, and is a nice resolution to the trilogy. Yes, it might be a cash-grabbing sequel effort, but you must watch it to close out the series.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

death12123Jun 1, 2019

I think the Godfather 3 is still a good movie but it falls flat especially with the pressure from the first two. Still captivating and capturing but some of the acting really just didn't catch me that well. (Again comparing to the firstI think the Godfather 3 is still a good movie but it falls flat especially with the pressure from the first two. Still captivating and capturing but some of the acting really just didn't catch me that well. (Again comparing to the first two.)
A great way to end it too with especially with that very powerful ending.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

MarickJan 1, 2015

The Godfather Part III is a 1990 American crime film written by Mario Puzo and Francis Ford Coppola, and directed by Coppola. It completes the story of Michael Corleone, a Mafia kingpin who tries to legitimize his criminal empire. The filmThe Godfather Part III is a 1990 American crime film written by Mario Puzo and Francis Ford Coppola, and directed by Coppola. It completes the story of Michael Corleone, a Mafia kingpin who tries to legitimize his criminal empire. The film also weaves into its plot a fictionalized account of two real-life events: the 1978 death of Pope John Paul I and the Papal banking scandal of 1981–1982; both are linked with the affairs of Michael Corleone. The film stars Al Pacino, Diane Keaton, Talia Shire, and Andy García, and features Eli Wallach, Joe Mantegna, George Hamilton, Bridget Fonda, and Sofia Coppola.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

kyle20ellisMar 17, 2022

First off, I adore the first two Godfather films. They were wonderfully made, scored, directed and acted with compelling elegiac stories. However, while I do not think it is as bad as it is made out to be, The Godfather Part III is aFirst off, I adore the first two Godfather films. They were wonderfully made, scored, directed and acted with compelling elegiac stories. However, while I do not think it is as bad as it is made out to be, The Godfather Part III is a disappointment. I did like it in general, but in comparison to the first two it is like a distant relative.

Starting with the good things, it does look splendid. The cinematography is beautiful and the settings are superb. The music is also outstanding, and the direction is good. The acting is uneven, but not all of it is bad. Al Pacino does have a lot of fine moments as a more gentler Michael, while Andy Garcia is electrifying too.

However, I didn't like the story as much here. It lacked the elegiac feel of the first two, it has a lot of loose ends and there was a number of times I didn't know what was going on. The script isn't as thoughtful, intelligent or as sophisticated here, instead some of it is quite stilted. As much as I do love Diane Keaton I personally don't think she was necessary here, she served her purpose perfectly in the first two. Finally I have to concur about Sophia Coppola. She never convinces as the "symbol of innocence", and just comes across sometimes as embarrassing. Much has been said about the climax in the opera house, some loved it, others didn't. I think it was a mixed bag. I had no problem with Pacino, the way it was shot and the music but it did come across as very protracted.

So all in all, not awful, not great. 6/10 Bethany Cox… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

peraveenJan 23, 2016

This movie is really good contrary to the comman belief that this is
not the good film. Just omit and see the movie... This is the best end
of the trilogy.... Don't go for negative review... Cheers

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

aadityamudharApr 17, 2016

Overall, as a standalone movie, it is definitely very flawed, but it has its moments. As a Godfather film, it is somewhat of a clunker. I didn't hate the movie, but with unconvincing and very less powerful performances, a somewhat cliche plotOverall, as a standalone movie, it is definitely very flawed, but it has its moments. As a Godfather film, it is somewhat of a clunker. I didn't hate the movie, but with unconvincing and very less powerful performances, a somewhat cliche plot at some points, and overall a slow pacing, The Godfather Part III is definitely a step bellow its predecessors. It wasn't a bad conclusion, and I didn't hate it, but if you are worrying that this will ruin the great series for you, then you might want to think twice about seeing it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

domnels234Mar 16, 2016

I think this is the most underrated movie of all time. Despite what people think i think this movie is great, a good way to finish the best trilogy in cinema history, and quite entertaining.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

GgslmJun 1, 2016

The first two movies are two of the highest cinematic achievements ever and it's really comprehensible how hard for this movie is to top that. It just doesn't, but the directing, writing and acting (excepting Sofia's awful performance) areThe first two movies are two of the highest cinematic achievements ever and it's really comprehensible how hard for this movie is to top that. It just doesn't, but the directing, writing and acting (excepting Sofia's awful performance) are still good since there's experienced people doing it. It's certainly the "less good" of the trilogy, but it's not a bad movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

BroyaxJan 5, 2017

Superbe conclusion de la saga mafieuse que l'on pourrait résumer par "le crime ne paie pas" ou bien par "le crime tue", car comme de coutume, la voie de la facilité, la voie de l'assassinat et du nettoyage par le vide n'arrange pas lesSuperbe conclusion de la saga mafieuse que l'on pourrait résumer par "le crime ne paie pas" ou bien par "le crime tue", car comme de coutume, la voie de la facilité, la voie de l'assassinat et du nettoyage par le vide n'arrange pas les choses... bien au contraire mais ainsi va la violence de ces gens-là...

Cette observation, cette évidence, presque une tautologie -non que dis-je, une lapalissade- m'est venue à l'esprit à la fin de ce Parrain troisième du nom, une fin assurément dramatique digne d'une histoire à la sicilienne dans laquelle de vendetta en vendetta, tout le monde finit par s'entretuer alors que les prétendus marionnettistes tombent dans la toile de ceux qu'ils croyaient manipuler.

Ainsi, Michael Corleone le mafioso en quête de rédemption qui tente une opération "mains propres" afin de tirer un trait sur son passé et comme -si souvent- afin d'assurer l'avenir de sa et de "la" famille se retrouve encore une fois pris dans l'engrenage infernal de Cosa Nostra.

Conclusion édifiante et touchante mais sans complaisance, ce dernier Parrain est un véritable accomplissement pour Al Pacino qui a gagné en maturité et en expérience et délivre ici une extraordinaire prestation. Le jeune poulain, Andy Garcia, s'avère à la hauteur, ce qui n'est pas rien même si on sait déjà qu'il s'agit d'un acteur très estimable en règle générale. Quant à Eli Wallach en vieux grigou retors, que dire sinon que ce monstre sacré tire encore davantage le film vers le haut !

Moins long (tout de même !) que les deux précédents -mais un peu long quand même- Le Parrain 3 est toujours d'une ambiance inimitable faite de réunions de pontes duplices et de rencontres discrètes où l'on fomente les prochains meurtres comme l'on avance ses pièces sur l'échiquier du double jeu et de la fourberie.

C'est aussi bien évidemment un lourd passif familial -et sentimental- dont même un Don -ou certain Don- peut éprouver quelque remords et regret. Contrairement au Parrain 2, le scénario reste assez clair et suffisamment développé pour qu'on en suive les tenants et aboutissants sans migraine, alors que chacun tire les ficelles en coulisses.

Quasiment un sans-faute donc pour le grand final et le meilleur opus de la saga.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

soumyadeepdasJan 26, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The movie would have obviously been worse than both the first and second movie since they had set such high standards for any moviegoer. The reasons why this movie has been panned is because of the various subplots, the unnecessary romance scenes, its inadequacy of being a standalone film (unlike Godfather II), and the atrocious acting of Sofia Coppola. However, the highs in this movie are very high. VERY high. I loved the second half of the movie, especially when Michael tours Kay around Sicily, as it is one of the more tender and beautiful scenes of this movie, if not the Godfather trilogy. The chemistry between Diane and Al is utter beauty. The opera scene is the greatest poetic justice I have seen in the trilogy. Heck, I even find that scene better than the baptism climax of the first movie. Andy Garcia was fully fit as Sonny's bastard son Vincent, and his character is one of the best of the Godfather trilogy as it depicted a fruitful change from a brash, rowdy man to a more responsible, sacrificial Don. The family struggles are a vital part of the movie, as you would see from the start where Michael quarrels with Kay about Anthony becoming an opera singer. The religious undertones too are commendable, especially the subplot on the murder of Pope John Paul I. The climax of this movie, where Michael Corleone contemplates shows what he has lost: his three loves of his depressing life. He lost Apollonia due to mistrust, he lost Kay due to his business, and he lost Mary due to gangster rivalry. On paper, it may seem he died of old age, but he actually died due to these three aspects. In short, it is a flawed masterpiece.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

JPKJul 2, 2019

Kinda Of A Letdown
Considering that the first two are masterpieces, Part III is pretty damn disappointing, But it’s still a great movie overall.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

cesky_hracMar 24, 2018

Truch slabší ale nevadí. Stále je to zábavný díl. Skvělé zakončení trilogie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

jonslowDec 11, 2018

It's the worst one out of The Godfather Trilogy but still a good movie. You watch the first part, must finish the ending part anyway.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

MichaelBeatchSep 9, 2019

The most vibrant and compact of The Godfather trilogy. It explores a time where we must familiarize ourselves with something new instead of observe a recognizable canvas. The film resonates on its own and Andy Garcia is overtly terrific. IThe most vibrant and compact of The Godfather trilogy. It explores a time where we must familiarize ourselves with something new instead of observe a recognizable canvas. The film resonates on its own and Andy Garcia is overtly terrific. I prefer the energy of Part 3 over the sombreness of its sequel counterpart. Francis paints an endearing end whether it was made for demand or not.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

MglovesfunJan 10, 2020

While by no means a bad film in its own right, it pales in comparison to Parts I and II.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

jastineDec 6, 2021

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

CharlesBOct 14, 2005

When looked at in comparason to the original two this movie is aweful...but as a stand alone movie it holds its own. There is nothing particularly new or different from the origional, but tries to use the same type of elements that make the When looked at in comparason to the original two this movie is aweful...but as a stand alone movie it holds its own. There is nothing particularly new or different from the origional, but tries to use the same type of elements that make the origionals great and that in a sense makes this movie good.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

MarkG.May 18, 2007

It is a pity that people insist on holding this film against the brilliance of its predecessor and frowning down upon it. While nothing on its prequels, the films nonetheless features some fine emotional scenes, such as Michael by the casket It is a pity that people insist on holding this film against the brilliance of its predecessor and frowning down upon it. While nothing on its prequels, the films nonetheless features some fine emotional scenes, such as Michael by the casket of his friend, the dead Don, and Michael's confession to the priest. Its a shame that the film receives such harsh reviews as the editing is simply masterful. The silent scream Pacino emits at the end is brilliant, its just not the end the masterpiece trilogy everyone expected.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

KeithM.Jul 19, 2006

Watching this failure was the saddest experience I have ever had in a theater. Loony casting, derivative and unbelievable scripting, choppy or too-baroque editing, Godfather III proved we all expected too much of Coppola, whose taste and Watching this failure was the saddest experience I have ever had in a theater. Loony casting, derivative and unbelievable scripting, choppy or too-baroque editing, Godfather III proved we all expected too much of Coppola, whose taste and performance without close collaboration are loose cannons aimed at his product. The filming of the broken Michael's senile demise tells it all - Arte Johnson falling off his tricycle on Laugh-In.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

JaradC.Oct 21, 2007

Completely boring, it has twists and turns, but it is so flat and hollow. Very disappointing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

JCA.Oct 21, 2007

Sucky, although well acted, I can see Oscars many times being nominated for this film, but I don't like how there has to be a part 3, when all this does is add on from part 2. What a draggy cinematic poor film, and why Al Pacino? his Sucky, although well acted, I can see Oscars many times being nominated for this film, but I don't like how there has to be a part 3, when all this does is add on from part 2. What a draggy cinematic poor film, and why Al Pacino? his age is done in part 2, I think Andy Garcia (also starring in this film) could play the godfather really well, just think about it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

GottlobF.Aug 14, 2007

First a message to AA D: this movie was not by Scorcese. Anyway, it's nowhere near as good as Parts I and II, but it was entertaining enough. Probably better than "Dances with Wolves", which beat it out for the Academy Award.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

gracjanskiMay 20, 2023

Very good end of the trilogy. As usual the characters are in the focus of the movie and many of them were grey, not clear and some of them developed, especially Michael Corleone and Vincent Mancini. Al Pacino was great. The story around theVery good end of the trilogy. As usual the characters are in the focus of the movie and many of them were grey, not clear and some of them developed, especially Michael Corleone and Vincent Mancini. Al Pacino was great. The story around the vatican and the foundation was good and took the mafia methods in the modern times.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

superbatAug 27, 2020

This final installment is a tier below its predecessors, which are two of the greatest movies ever made. The Godfather: Part III isn't a bad movie by any means, but it lacks the strengths of the movies that came before it. The story isn't asThis final installment is a tier below its predecessors, which are two of the greatest movies ever made. The Godfather: Part III isn't a bad movie by any means, but it lacks the strengths of the movies that came before it. The story isn't as captivating or as well executed. The performances are underwhelming. In addition, there are several scenes which are unrealistic and are borderline laughable, such as that helicopter hit. Overall, The Godfather: Part III is not a terrible movie but it could've been executed better.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

alejandro970Jun 7, 2020

In this latest episode, Micheal Corloene is seen searching for ways to keep his empire on its feet and reestablish ties with his estranged children, make peace with the past; all facing the possibility of not having an heir to the throne.In this latest episode, Micheal Corloene is seen searching for ways to keep his empire on its feet and reestablish ties with his estranged children, make peace with the past; all facing the possibility of not having an heir to the throne. It´s a pity it doesn't have the strengths of the older siblings but it makes up for it wel in the climax. Deserves a chance for watch the full trilogy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

arrivistJun 23, 2020

Pay Your Debts

Francis Ford Coppola's Zoetrope was in big debts after several flops. The obvious way out was to make another Godfather film, even though he'd said himself the saga ended with Part II. From the outset the film was cursed. ThePay Your Debts

Francis Ford Coppola's Zoetrope was in big debts after several flops. The obvious way out was to make another Godfather film, even though he'd said himself the saga ended with Part II. From the outset the film was cursed. The part of Mary Corleone was meant to go to Rebecca Shaeffer, but tragically, she was shot dead by her stalker on the way to the audition. The replacement Winona Ryder dropped out (literally) on the first days from 'exhaustion.' Cast members demanded more and more money, Robert Duvall dropped out after not getting his request of $5m to appear, and as a result the whole script has to be rewritten. Coppola asked the studio for this film to be a prologue rather than a sequel, and for it to be titled: The Death of Michael Corleone, which of course was denied. It would have made more sense as Part III doesn't hold a candle to its predecessors, even which the copycat cinematography. Although the character of Vincenzo Mancini is one of the more entertaining, the choice of Cuban-American Andy Garcia was a strange one. Garcia's pseudo-tough guy act becomes more toe-curling as his character's arc progresses. The rest of the cast also ham up proceedings, particularly Coppola's sister Talia Shire, whose line delivery of, 'Now they'll fear you,' drew audible groans in the screening room. Coppola's daughter, Sophia, stepped in at her father's request to fill the serially-doomed role of Mary Corleone, and received the most flack for her wooden performance and valley-girl accent; but she's not an actor, and even Pacino came across badly at times, so who can blame her. Ultimately this was a family effort to get Francis out of debt, and with a revenue of £137m from the box office; mission accomplished.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

KelvinSelimorMay 19, 2020

The Godfather: Part III. The end. What I want to say about the final film and the trilogy as a whole. The third film is not so boring as the second part was and not as terrific as the first film was. If the first part of The Godfather caughtThe Godfather: Part III. The end. What I want to say about the final film and the trilogy as a whole. The third film is not so boring as the second part was and not as terrific as the first film was. If the first part of The Godfather caught on to the characters with their plot, then unfortunately in the final film this is practically nonexistent. As a result, Godfather 3 is just a good movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DiptanshuApr 26, 2020

Amazing!Music was phenomenal.the acting was iconic nice to see such time jump and reunion type at start.the story was simple compare to prequels they were way too complex!screenplay was amazing engaging to watch the pace is perfect as perAmazing!Music was phenomenal.the acting was iconic nice to see such time jump and reunion type at start.the story was simple compare to prequels they were way too complex!screenplay was amazing engaging to watch the pace is perfect as per older movies it's not slow and right from start we were into the movie!cinematography was ok but in the prequels it was masterpiece cinematography!the business investment and whole felt flawed but the character arcs were interesting every one has unique dramas like mike's and her x wife's confessions and the cousins love and the singing as boy it was engaging to watch the core godfather thing felt missing and the godfather mantle to vincet at last was late but good then the whole ending was terrifying and heartbreaking the whole climax was intense the play's music the murders and attempts of assasination it was intense and entertaining although the murders were just same as prequels who ever was against they're the one's!overall entertaining movie!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

RobwinzJul 31, 2020

The Godfather Part III, It's not as bad as what people put this one out to be like, it's no where near as good as the first two. Also, it's still got some brilliant scenes throughout and yeah, it might have a few stupid ones also throughoutThe Godfather Part III, It's not as bad as what people put this one out to be like, it's no where near as good as the first two. Also, it's still got some brilliant scenes throughout and yeah, it might have a few stupid ones also throughout but it's not a bad movie. Finally, the cast aren't that bad but overall, it's not that bad of a movie but it's not a masterpiece like the other two were.

I think I noticed with this one was that there wasn't enough action in total whilst with the previous two there was a good amount.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

LucaTJun 7, 2020

Part III. It’s an outlier. It’s more action movie than the drama that the other two were. Also, get outta here with that incest! Please and thank you!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

JeffRsonApr 13, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Unpopular opinion but this is my favorite Godfather film. I just watched all three in one day without prior knowledge and without bias. The tension in this one is really well built, especially the opera scene. The acting and casting are great. I definitely prefered this film over the convulated plot of the second.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Isaiah_T_30Dec 4, 2020

It is nothing compared to the first two The Godfather films. It is disappointing, it really shouldn't have happened or shouldn't have existed. I recommend watching The Godfather CODA more than The Godfather Part III as Coppola re-edits someIt is nothing compared to the first two The Godfather films. It is disappointing, it really shouldn't have happened or shouldn't have existed. I recommend watching The Godfather CODA more than The Godfather Part III as Coppola re-edits some of the flaws of this film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MrPajamasNov 2, 2020

We've been waiting a long damn time for Godfather III. While the first part is from 1972 and the second from 1974, the third part is from 1990. I'm glad Al Pacino stayed. There's just no other person than Al Pacino to play Michael. TheWe've been waiting a long damn time for Godfather III. While the first part is from 1972 and the second from 1974, the third part is from 1990. I'm glad Al Pacino stayed. There's just no other person than Al Pacino to play Michael. The previous episodes are among the MASTERPIECE and the best movies ever made. Is that the case with the third installment? Not really for me. As great as the film is, it's not as masterful as the previous installments. While the story is again great and the soundtrack is masterful, as it always is with The Godfather, it just wasn't as interesting because not much happened except for the ending. The previous episodes appealed to me more. This was already a bit of an epilogue that just didn't have a chance for me to catch on to the previous episodes. The finale is worth it though, and the last 20 minutes of the film are an absolute delight to watch. A nice ending to the trilogy. It wasn't easy to conclude such a masterful trilogy, but it was quite successful. On the one hand, I'm not going to lie, I would have preferred it to end with a double feature. At least for me.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

geewahJan 27, 2021

It may not be as strong as it's predecessors but is still a fine end to one the greatest movie sagas made.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

511andahalfJan 9, 2022

Not on the same level as the first two, but it was never meant to be. Godfather 3 provides a satisfying conclusion to the saga overall. The performances are again top notch, Al Pacino and Andy Garcia in particular standing out. The stakes areNot on the same level as the first two, but it was never meant to be. Godfather 3 provides a satisfying conclusion to the saga overall. The performances are again top notch, Al Pacino and Andy Garcia in particular standing out. The stakes are high, and the themes of family and betrayal are portrayed so well. Great end to a legendary trilogy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

HikayeciMay 5, 2021

Haksızlık yapıldığını düşündüğüm bir film. İlk iki filmden daha kötü tabi de bana 60 puanlık bir film gibi gelmedi. Filmi izlediğim her andan zevk aldım.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

mg93108May 23, 2021

This movie sucked so bad!! How on earth could there be two fantastic movies followed by such a horrible movie. I got more and more upset with each passing moment. This could have been cut down to 45 minutes. No character development. The girlThis movie sucked so bad!! How on earth could there be two fantastic movies followed by such a horrible movie. I got more and more upset with each passing moment. This could have been cut down to 45 minutes. No character development. The girl who played Michael's daughter was good looking but a terrible actress. And the opera scene...perhaps I should say the opera movie, just dragged on and on and on. I hated this movie. The whole thing just sucked. I really have trouble finding any saving grace expecting the historical accuracy of the death of the two popes. 2 stars out of 10 is generous.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

HabibiehakimJun 2, 2021

The Corleone Family is getting old and getting less terrifying than the first two, replacing with their own son and godfather son, turn down to be an awkward cousins love relationship, but at least they still know what's wrong what's right inThe Corleone Family is getting old and getting less terrifying than the first two, replacing with their own son and godfather son, turn down to be an awkward cousins love relationship, but at least they still know what's wrong what's right in the end, The Godfather Part III is still have that moment, the movie still have that power, and ended with a very well done ending, The Godfather Part III is not a bad movie but still the last in the trilogy best list.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Pan_KrytykMar 12, 2022

to jest spójna część trylogii ... wiele razy słyszałem że po co, na co itd. bo pasuję jest dobrze wykonana i jest dobra ... nie jest miażdżąca jak pierwsza, natomiast jest dobra.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

LightsAndBulbsSep 18, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Despite being the shortest film in a series, The Godfather 3 feels far longer than its predecessors for numerous reasons. Firstly, the plot. To put it simply, the storyline involving the Catholic Church in this film is simply uninteresting. The scenes involving it move at a snail's pace, and the plot point as a whole feels as though it could have been far more interesting than it ended up being. Secondly, the acting. I know that people rag on Sofia Coppola a lot, and they're right to, but her scenes actually managed to entertain me because I was often able to laugh at them. Enzo Robutti on the other hand gives an annoyingly over-the-top performance as Don Lucchesi. Andy Garcia was decent, but there were points where I wanted him to emote a bit more than he did. Joe Mantegna was sort of laughable. I was unable to take Joey Zasa's character seriously, as he came across as mostly pathetic and slimy, as well as weak and quivering. To be fair however, that may have been the goal, and if it was, then I suppose I can't rag on Mantegna too much. Don Antobello was played rather well throughout the film, but his death scene was frankly embarrassing to watch. Finally, Al Pacino himself. I have no issue with Michael Corleone being portrayed differently in this film than he was in the previous films, as it has been years since the events of Part 2. But far too often I feel as though I'm watching Al Pacino's character in Heat rather than Michael Corleone. Moving on, the film generally has a sense of disengagement, as if there isn't a ton of care or passion being put into it. I say this because of how cheesy and ham-fisted certain scenes are, such as the helicopter massacre, Don Lucchesi being stabbed with his glasses, or that part where the assassin props up a guard's body to make it appear as though he is being strangled (seriously, did you even **** give a **** Francis?). Despite all the negativity I've been putting forth thus far, this movie isn't necessarily awful. Diane Keaton gives a really good performance, especially during the film's finale. There is some good cinematography in the film's latter half, and the set design, lighting, and costuming is all done very well and gives the film a generally gorgeous look and color palette. I also like the idea of a film revolving around Michael's attempt to atone for his sins, however I don't think that concept was executed especially well. Truthfully, while this is far from a dumpster fire, I'd be lying to you if I said that I had any desire to rewatch it.
-
Best Performance: Diane Keaton… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Chriscorc876Apr 9, 2023

The Godfather 3 definitely has its moments, but overall falls short of its predecessors. While the acting is still top-notch and the themes of power and corruption are still present, the pacing of the film can feel sluggish at times.The Godfather 3 definitely has its moments, but overall falls short of its predecessors. While the acting is still top-notch and the themes of power and corruption are still present, the pacing of the film can feel sluggish at times. Additionally, the plot is overly convoluted with too many subplots and characters to keep track of, which can be distracting. That being said, the final act of the film is well done and satisfying. Overall, The Godfather 3 is worth a watch for fans of the series, but it definitely isn't as impressive as the previous films in the trilogy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews