Read User Reviews and Submit your own for The Godfather: Part II

8

drlowdonAug 20, 2023

Acting as both a sequel and prequel to the first movie, The Godfather Part II tells two parallel storylines. The first involves Mafia chief Michael Corleone in 1958 and 1959 whilst the other is a series of flashbacks following his father,Acting as both a sequel and prequel to the first movie, The Godfather Part II tells two parallel storylines. The first involves Mafia chief Michael Corleone in 1958 and 1959 whilst the other is a series of flashbacks following his father, Vito Corleone from 1917 to 1925.

An incredibly ambitious sequel that reunites most of the cast that helped made the original movie so good, The Godfather Part 2 is one of those rare sequels that actually improves on what came before.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

AgentLviJul 5, 2023

Excellent movie. The story is so enjoyable, scoring is really great, visual is decent, and the voice is stunning

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

coolmattsinegarMay 3, 2023

Matthew Alexander "Matt" Sinegar [SIN-NA-GAR] (An EXTREMELY Mature & EXTREMELY Heterosexual (Straight) African-American/Black Man):
The Corleone Family Are Literally Always My All-Time Favorite Characters.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

DinoHippieApr 17, 2023

perfect movie, almost same level with the first. I didn't like the past part with De Niro but acting was excellent from all of the actors

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

SjossjskApr 15, 2023

Good Movie The Godfather Part II Is good
Fantastic Movieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee hrjdjs

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

gracjanskiApr 12, 2020

Usually you expect the first part is great, the second just good, but not here. Again the story has many details about the mafia life and does not show much action. Great actors, especially Al Pacino

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

oopkpApr 1, 2023

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I didn't want to do it, fellas... I really didn't. But this movie SUCKS!! They turned Michael into a monster! A monster, I tell ya! This movie is boring and doesn't contain the thrilling plot twists of the original. Roth is the lamest antagonist ever. Worst of all, it doesn't have so many of the lovable characters that the original did. The large cast of interesting characters was one of the best parts of the original film, and none of that is present here. The movie still gets 3 points because of the part where Michael and Kay stare at each other for a few seconds and you're expecting something really bad to happen but then he just closes the door. That was really funny.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MDXVMar 7, 2023

MasterpiaceMasterpiace
MasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiaceMasterpiace… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Jozef_232Jan 27, 2023

Probably the best sequel in history of cinema! An amazing performance by Al Pacino and outstanding role of Robert De Niro. I recommend anyone to watch this.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

SFPMDec 27, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie takes over from Godfather 1 and the back story is brilliant you have Michael Corleone in one half then Vito Corleone as a young man in his late 20s /30s played by Robert De Niro. One half of the movie is about how Vito Corleone came to America and became a mob boss and the other half is Michael Corleone trying to still cope with the loss of his father by becoming the new godfather. There are a lot of very good scenes in this movie my favourite was the ending when the whole family were at the table for the birthday and Michael is with his brothers they exchange words about Michaels future then Tom Hagen played by Robert Duvall tells him his father (Vito) has high hopes for his future Michael responds that he has his own plans for his future his brother Sonny Corleone replied by calling him stupid then they leave the table and Michael is left alone at the table smoking a cigarette which is a strong scene that’s showing it is inevitable that Michael will become the next Godfather… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Voodoo123Jul 22, 2022

Excellent sequel serves to expand the storyline across two time periods with top tier production quality for both. The cast and soundtrack are superb. Well directed.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

SuperbaDMIkeJun 15, 2022

The Godfather 2 is like a sequel to an action movie but it's not a action movie though it's a drama crime movie lasting 200 minutes.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

dxrgamer2234Jun 15, 2022

gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

GDsReviewsJun 5, 2022

Few sequels in history are as legendary and excellent as The Godfather Part 2, though you really need to see the original Godfather to fully grasp its story. Al Pacino gives easily one of his best performances here as Michael Corleone, whereFew sequels in history are as legendary and excellent as The Godfather Part 2, though you really need to see the original Godfather to fully grasp its story. Al Pacino gives easily one of his best performances here as Michael Corleone, where you really feel his cold and complete loss of morality even more so than his father in the original Godfather. This is easily one of the greatest films ever made, and is honestly better than the original Godfather.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

BoiWeiMar 22, 2022

Greatest gangster/mafia movie ever made and one of those rare superior sequels.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Pan_KrytykMar 12, 2022

kontynuacja pierwszej części jest również zajebista jak pierwsza... al pacino diane keaton czy robert de niro grają rewelacyjnie

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

kyle20ellisMar 9, 2022

I do have to agree that calling Godfather Part II a sequel is rather insulting. It is one of those rare sequels that almost outdoes the first, and considering how amazing the first Godfather was that says a lot. The Godfather Part II isI do have to agree that calling Godfather Part II a sequel is rather insulting. It is one of those rare sequels that almost outdoes the first, and considering how amazing the first Godfather was that says a lot. The Godfather Part II is longer, but in some ways it is also richer. People may say like with the first it is slow and takes a while to unfold. Of course, but I think that was deliberate. Both this and the first Godfather have an elegiac quality to them that makes them even more compelling.

For one thing, the film is very well made. The cinematography is simply gorgeous, whether it is dark or autumnal or picturesque, and the settings are wondrous. The music once again is outstanding, it is haunting and sticks in your head for a very long time. Then there is a brilliantly written screenplay that is intelligent and thoughtful, masterly direction from Francis Ford Coppola and a fabulously constructed story. The film does have some wonderful scenes-: the scenes where Vito flees Sicily has the grandeur of a silent movie, while the scenes in Cuba actually avoid being clumsy and confusing and the climax is extremely chilling. Not to mention the Pop Goes the Weasel scene, which was very funny.

The acting is superb once again. Vito is brilliantly portrayed by Robert DeNiro in one of his better performances. I was also taken with Robert Duvall as loyal Tom, John Cazale and Diane Keaton. But the picture belongs to Al Pacino. He was great carrying the first Godfather movie, but he is even better here. He is simply phenomenal, and to be honest I think he should have won that Oscar. Overall, an amazing film and one of the best sequels ever to be conceived. 10/10 Bethany Cox… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

mailpollFeb 17, 2022

This movie is SPECTACULAR! I can't decide if it's better than the first one. Everyone gives exceptional performances and the dialogue is so well written it almost seems real

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

10

noob328Feb 15, 2022

It is even better than the first film, and has the greatest single final scene in Hollywood history, a real coup de cinéma

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

Jaredc324Jan 25, 2022

The movie sometimes loses you and itself in its daze of transitions, but there's no question it allures you from start to finish. Diving into subtleties and memories that only add to the Godfather lore in a mesmerizing way.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

511andahalfJan 15, 2022

Great sequel to a legendary film, and one of the best sequels ever made. The way Coppola tells two narratives at once is done so well. Al Pacino's performance as Michael Corleone is expanded upon in this movie, giving one of his finestGreat sequel to a legendary film, and one of the best sequels ever made. The way Coppola tells two narratives at once is done so well. Al Pacino's performance as Michael Corleone is expanded upon in this movie, giving one of his finest performances. Though a little overly long, Part 2 is just a stellar film overall.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Onlyclassicvg1Nov 12, 2021

th es para el béisbol, como John Steinbeck es para escribir, no hay duda al respecto, El padrino es la mejor película de todos los tiempos. ¡Nunca antes habíamos visto actuaciones tan estelares de Marlon Brando, Al P

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

jastineOct 13, 2021

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MrPajamasNov 2, 2020

The Godfather was so masterful that it was impossible to overcome him with another work. Of course, The Godfather: Part II is also a masterpiece. The story beautifully follows up on the previous part and explains the backstory of theThe Godfather was so masterful that it was impossible to overcome him with another work. Of course, The Godfather: Part II is also a masterpiece. The story beautifully follows up on the previous part and explains the backstory of the godfather himself, more precisely Vito using flashbacks. It's unbelievable how much Godfather: Part II did and it's damn hard to choose which part was better, it's more a personal preference. Personally, I'm leaning a little towards number one, but it really doesn't mean that the second part is worse. It is as masterful as the previous one and overall it is a MASTERPIECE and MUST-SEE film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

imthenoobJan 29, 2012

Part 2 is everything that you want in a sequel and then some. It truly matches it in nearly every way possible. The backstory of Vito is a true treat and seeing Michael firmly in place as the head of the family while dealing with a myriad ofPart 2 is everything that you want in a sequel and then some. It truly matches it in nearly every way possible. The backstory of Vito is a true treat and seeing Michael firmly in place as the head of the family while dealing with a myriad of problems highlighted how Michael was very much Vito's son and the only son fitting to lead the family.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

HabibiehakimMay 29, 2021

7.5/10
For 3 hours and 22 minutes movie, The Godfather Part II doesn't have the power to make me stand and wake for quite some time, but it still have that moment, again with incredible perfomance by all the cast, The Godfather Part II feels7.5/10
For 3 hours and 22 minutes movie, The Godfather Part II doesn't have the power to make me stand and wake for quite some time, but it still have that moment, again with incredible perfomance by all the cast, The Godfather Part II feels empty without Marlon Brando, even though that was actually the right idea, The Godfather Part II isn't as powerful as the first one but it still pretty good and watchable.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

HikayeciMay 5, 2021

İlk film kadar sevmesem de çok sevdiğim bir film. Şahsen filmde Marlon Brando olmaması beni çok üzdü. Kısaca özetleyecek olursam; 3. filmden güzel, 1. filmden kötü.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

geewahJan 27, 2021

An exceptional sequel.
All the qualitites that made the original a classic are present in this brilliant movie.
A must see.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

AJ_13Jan 11, 2021

Amazing movie with an amazing music and with an amazing cast. Al Pacino's performance is one of my all-time favorites, and that's why I prefer this part over the first one.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Isaiah_T_30Dec 4, 2020

I absolutely love this movie, but not as much as the original. The Godfather Part II does shows how much better the original was, and there are a lot of replications from the original that Coppola reused in this film; but overall, an absoluteI absolutely love this movie, but not as much as the original. The Godfather Part II does shows how much better the original was, and there are a lot of replications from the original that Coppola reused in this film; but overall, an absolute classic, highly recommended.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

superbatAug 11, 2020

Definitely one of the greatest sequels of all-time, The Godfather Part II is a sequel that nearly lived up to its predecessor. It expands on the Godfather saga by depicting Michael Corleone's venture into the "family business", and hisDefinitely one of the greatest sequels of all-time, The Godfather Part II is a sequel that nearly lived up to its predecessor. It expands on the Godfather saga by depicting Michael Corleone's venture into the "family business", and his gradual descent into madness, while also showing flashbacks of his father's rise to power. The constant switching between time periods makes this film less engaging to watch. However, this film has pretty much all of the strengths of the first Godfather film: performances, score, cinematography, etc. If you appreciated The Godfather, it's more than likely that you'll appreciate its sequel.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

RobwinzJul 31, 2020

Ahhh The Godfather Part 2, an amazing sequel to the first. The plot is great, the actors/actresses are just as brilliant as they were before and so are the new characters throughout this movie. Also, the movie's got some lovely cinematographyAhhh The Godfather Part 2, an amazing sequel to the first. The plot is great, the actors/actresses are just as brilliant as they were before and so are the new characters throughout this movie. Also, the movie's got some lovely cinematography throughout from Gordon Willis and the score for the movie is just outstandingly beautiful. Finally, the movie builds up quite well to the bloody action scenes throughout this movie, which I really liked. Overall, it's a great sequel to the first with an amazing cast, great plot, brilliant action, beautiful score and some lovely cinematography. When you've got done watching the first, watch this after it's worth the watch.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

kman1014Jun 26, 2020

A great film that captures much of the phenomena of the first film. A masterpiece in it's own right.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

LucaTJun 7, 2020

Thoroughly enjoyed it! My only gripe is that it starts to loose momentum after the two hour mark. I feel like had the credits rolled at the intermission it would’ve been a 10/10, but that’s probably just me.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

alejandro970May 31, 2020

The king is dead. Hail to the new king. While looking in introspective the origin of the patriarch and his relation with the underworld, and how made an empire of his own, it is observed how Michael Corleone wears an increasingly heavy crown.The king is dead. Hail to the new king. While looking in introspective the origin of the patriarch and his relation with the underworld, and how made an empire of his own, it is observed how Michael Corleone wears an increasingly heavy crown. Remarkable Al Pacino, as ever.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

DiptanshuApr 26, 2020

Great sequel but original was Classic!this one has perfect theme and cinematography specially in vito's origin timeline.the back and forth between timelines were engaging to watch this movie too was also slow!the Music was great specially inGreat sequel but original was Classic!this one has perfect theme and cinematography specially in vito's origin timeline.the back and forth between timelines were engaging to watch this movie too was also slow!the Music was great specially in the 1900s timeline it was phenomenal.Acting was iconic robert deniro was perfectly casted but considering the runtime the origin has not showcased fully whereas it showcased only after certain incidents he become's don but it was entertaining origin story of Godfather.the house rented scene was hilarious and the characters in past and linking the family was amazing to watch.now for present timeline it was just business talks and finding the one who attacked whereas in 1st movie it was similar but way more interesting to watch.the change in mike's character was amazing as hell the way he became at last miserable!The vito's way of handling things were amazing compared to mike's as he chose family whereas mike was opposite it was amazing how he wants to change but couldn't and the climax was great similar to 1st one's pattern of killing all who are against!Overall considering runtime it was stretched but Iconic Amazing movie!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

robertoiglesiasJan 15, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Godfather Part II is another film that I consider to be a bit overrated, but people like it, so um, cool.
I like this more than the first film because the plot is more than just: the Mafia does things. It's about Michael becoming mentally unstable during a period of time, and the Mafia doing things. However, that doesn't stop this film from having some filler padding like the original.
This film is 3 and a half hours long! Why?! The whole Cuba segment could be taken out, some scenes here and there can be removed, I'm just baffled by these decisions. I understand wanting to show your entire vision, but it doesn't work as well when it's so long!
The prequel part is great, but even that could be trimmed a bit. The sequel part drags on in my opinion.

So I will say it's better than the original based on plot and characters (less characters to deal with and the characters have more development in this film). However, the first film was at least under 3 hours and had more of a unique vision (it felt more artistic).… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

KelvinSelimorMar 28, 2020

The Godfather: Part II. Family is the main thing. A good continuation of one of the best films of the century. The sequel, which did not get worse but also did not get better. The plot itself is not inferior to the first part, but there isThe Godfather: Part II. Family is the main thing. A good continuation of one of the best films of the century. The sequel, which did not get worse but also did not get better. The plot itself is not inferior to the first part, but there is some protractedness which I did not like a bit. If the first film was about how Michael becomes a more rude cruel and strong head of the family, then in the second film the plot is already built around another less interesting topic.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

MglovesfunJan 10, 2020

I'd give the prequel part of the story 10/10 and the sequel part 6/10. Better even than Part I. While it is a masterpiece, there are undoubtedly more entertaining movies out there. Furthermore, it's never explained why Roth wants to killI'd give the prequel part of the story 10/10 and the sequel part 6/10. Better even than Part I. While it is a masterpiece, there are undoubtedly more entertaining movies out there. Furthermore, it's never explained why Roth wants to kill Michael, which is the main plot of the entire movie. It's a baffling oversight.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

DMLYxCriticJan 31, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Just when I thought that the first film is impossible to surpass, then comes this. The Godfather Part II is perfect in many ways the first film is not. Darker, heavier, longer and epic in every way, the film is a massive improvement from the first, providing a rich backstory of Don Vito Corleone, and a darker contemporary story of the present-day trials of his son, Michael. This is the greatest sequel of all time, and shows how sequels should be made.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

jomatchueOct 24, 2019

The first "Godfather" is one of my favorite movies. So is "The Godfather Part II," which is not only superior to the original but has a serious claim to being my favorite movie of all time. While Marlon Brando's presence is sorely missed,The first "Godfather" is one of my favorite movies. So is "The Godfather Part II," which is not only superior to the original but has a serious claim to being my favorite movie of all time. While Marlon Brando's presence is sorely missed, "Part II" does everything the original did and does it better. Its story is deeper, richer, and ultimately more thought provoking. While "Part I" was a tale of good and evil, "Part II" explores the Mafia as the ultimate perversion of the American Dream - something that took the innocence of the immigrant ideal and warped it into a criminal monstrosity. "Part I" showed how a good man can become evil. "Part II" continues that story and demonstrates how an amoral but complicated man can lose his own soul in doing what he thinks is right. Like "Part I," "Part II" is endlessly entertaining but it's also more emotionally involving and satisfying. I love how the filmmakers show the parallel stories of Vito and Michael Corleone, who're both played brilliantly by Robert De Niro and Al Pacino. The fact that Al Pacino didn't win the Oscar for "Part II" is unbelievable; it's easily the best performance of his career. In fact everyone in "Part II" is great, from Robert Duvall to Diane Keaton to John Cazale. Like "Part I" the writing, directing, and music of "Part II" are flawless and make for some of the greatest scenes in movie history. "The Godfather Part II" is an unqualified masterpiece and essential viewing for anyone who loves movies. 10/10.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JPKJul 2, 2019

Another Sequel Masterpiece
Godfather Part II is literally as great as it’s predecessor.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

Narek009Jun 7, 2019

Another great Godfather movie. In my opinion this movie was almost as great as the second but still amazing.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

death12123Jun 1, 2019

Imagine having the pressure of the first film but delivering a masterpiece that's a great follow up to it. A great sequel and moments that blew me away like the first.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

gzayas91May 3, 2019

I have mixed thoughts of Part 2. It plays both prequel and the sequel and I don't think it works. I like part 3 better because it much more of a sequel. Part 2 is good but not great.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

TiagoSantosSApr 9, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. "Considerado a melhor sequencia de todos os tempos"
Para mim, isso e muito mais do que verdade, e logico. este filme honrou muito o primeiro superando-o. dificilmente isso acontece no cinema. principalmente, hoje em dia. Michael neste filme esta bailhante. os diálogos continuam surpreendentes.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

TyranianApr 9, 2019

Almost as good as first film, absolutely stellar filmmaking. Brilliant stuff.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

movieguy24601Feb 10, 2019

Every movie I've watched, every movie I've reviewed, none of them have compared to the brilliance of Francis Ford Coppola's masterpiece, "The Godfather Part II". This movie is my all time favorite movie, with it being both a prequel, and aEvery movie I've watched, every movie I've reviewed, none of them have compared to the brilliance of Francis Ford Coppola's masterpiece, "The Godfather Part II". This movie is my all time favorite movie, with it being both a prequel, and a sequel, and the narratives both flowing beautifully between Michael's downfall, and Vito's rise (both played tremendously by Al Pacino, and Robert De Niro). This movie is one of the strongest, if not the strongest film I have ever watched, and I highly recommend this incredible film to anyone.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

MartyMcFlyOct 2, 2018

My score 100
Metascore / User score 90 / 90
Tomatometer / Audience score 97 / 97
IMDB 91
(94)

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

AndremaxJul 10, 2018

A certain sequel to a amazing movie. It's amazing and perfect as the first movie. The best sequel of a movie of all time. The action, the characters, the story... just incredible as ****

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

cesky_hracMar 24, 2018

Stále výborný!!! Nemám co bych k tomu dodal. Tento film hrdě následuje svého staršího bratra. A to dobře.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

merijnjFeb 21, 2018

(98/100)
A great follow up that doesn't go down in quality. Loved the flashbacks to Vito's youth.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

FilipeNetoFeb 19, 2018

This film follows the movie "The Godfather" and continues the story of the Corleone family, now headed by Michael after the death of Vito. In this film, the audience is confronted with two realities: the rise of the family during Vito'sThis film follows the movie "The Godfather" and continues the story of the Corleone family, now headed by Michael after the death of Vito. In this film, the audience is confronted with two realities: the rise of the family during Vito's adolescence, and the psychological contradictions of Michael, who want to get out of illegality, but needs it to prevent rival families to put at risk the safety of his family. From Nevada to Cuba, the illegal investment of the Corleone's will bring them a new golden age?

Like the previous film, it was directed by Francis Ford Coppola, based on the novels of Mario Puzo, who collaborated on the script. The cast kept most of the actors from the previous film but introduces new characters as well. The soundtrack continued in the experienced hands of Nino Rota. It won six Oscars in 1974 (best film, best supporting actor, best director, best adapted screenplay, best art direction and best soundtrack).

After the resounding success of "The Godfather", any sequel was condemned to fail but, on the contrary, this film has managed to maintain it's level high and the same popularity, which is a rarity when we talk about sequels. I cannot make big negative reviews except, perhaps, the very long duration of the film. Al Pacino had probably one of the greatest performances of his life as actor. Irreproachable, he incorporated Michael with an almost petrifying naturalness. The same can be said of Robert De Niro that, with his performance, opened the way for other important works of his career like "Goodfellas." Robert Duvall also had here one his most outstanding works. Those who like action scenes may not like this movie. Its a quieter film, where the deaths are violent but made with almost surgical precision. The Mafia does not kill at random. Tense from start to finish, it has a powerful suspense that holds the audience, but the complexity of the script, full of twists, can confuse the most inattentive, so pay attention.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

daviddelnorte23Jan 19, 2018

Decepción me llevé con esta película. No es lo que me esperaba. Aún así, es una de las mejores películas de la época y cine con mayúsculas. No me convence la trama de 'Young Vito'. Mejor la primera.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

TrailesqueJan 13, 2018

One of the genius moves in the Godfather series is the mixing of recent history into a fictional gangster flick. It is this flawless blending that gives it weight to match its presence. If there is a better story about how power corrupts IOne of the genius moves in the Godfather series is the mixing of recent history into a fictional gangster flick. It is this flawless blending that gives it weight to match its presence. If there is a better story about how power corrupts I can't think of it. We see the young don dealing with a plot on his life, and then setting out to destroy his enemies while becoming a monster in the process. At the end he is left alone, pondering the good man that he almost became. Parallel to this are superbly realized segments focusing on the young Vito Corleone coming to America as a kid and beginning to make his mark among the tenement buildings of New York's Little Italy. DeNiro is fantastic and lays down a prequel to Brando's classic performance. One flaw: young Vito murders the local mafia boss without much provocation - the Godfather was supposed to be deadly, but just. There was a scene that got cut where Vito stumbles across him sexually abusing a boy. Like the first Godfather it juxtaposes thuggish brutality with the Italian reverence for family and Catholic tradition. A great film.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

VirgonoShakaNov 21, 2017

Godfather part two is a very good movie, and continues a story from a masterpiece that is the first one, and in general, is a complete success in that it is a worthy sequel that has great value and stay true to what you expect, but I can'tGodfather part two is a very good movie, and continues a story from a masterpiece that is the first one, and in general, is a complete success in that it is a worthy sequel that has great value and stay true to what you expect, but I can't say that it surpases the original because that was going to be very, very difficult. Nevertheless, a great movie with great characters that is totoally recommended and necessary for any movie fan that is worth his salt. Final verdict: 8.5… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

alizshoeOct 9, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Similar to the original, this movie is beautifully filmed and adds more depth to the Corleone family. I loved seeing Michael Corleone further adapt into his role as "The Godfather" and seeing how it was paralleled with Vito Corleone become the original "Godfather". There are similarities and differences between the two. Both feel obligated to take on this role for the protection and well-being of their family; however, Michael Corleone proves to be the more ruthless of the two. The reason why this movie does not get a perfect score is because it's slow in some parts and its scenes are not as memorable as the first one. The kill scenes are performed out of necessity and do not have the same shock factor. Additionally, the reason why this movie is good is because it builds upon the original so well; however, this would not have been a good standalone movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

BroyaxJan 6, 2017

Une grande partie du charme du premier film a disparu dans ce second volet, sans doute parce que Vito Corleone n'est plus et partant, l'incroyable prestation de Marlon Brando... Revenir sur les origines et le début de parcours du Don auxUne grande partie du charme du premier film a disparu dans ce second volet, sans doute parce que Vito Corleone n'est plus et partant, l'incroyable prestation de Marlon Brando... Revenir sur les origines et le début de parcours du Don aux Etats-Unis est une idée assez dispensable en définitive, bien que ce soit l'occasion pour un jeunot plein de talent de s'illustrer, à savoir Robert De Niro dont les rôles à venir de mauvais garçon et/ou de gangster feront la gloire... parce qu'il le vaut bien !

Bien sûr, Al Pacino reprend les rênes de la Famille avec aplomb et talent, se fait des ennemis, puis éventuellement finit par liquider tout le monde, ainsi va Cosa Nostra. La vie familiale et sentimentale de notre mafieux va de pair ou parfois à contre-courant des aléas des "affaires" mais tourne un peu trop souvent au psychodrame, tandis que le rythme faiblit considérablement au fil des trois plombes qui sont allègrement dépassées...

Cela reste loin d'être inintéressant ou même ennuyeux et cette saga sait encore captiver l'attention malgré une intrigue principale plus fouillis que jamais, pour ne pas dire confuse sur bien des aspects... malgré (encore !) son pourtant très long métrage qui aurait dû et pu fournir davantage de lumière aux évènements.

L'ambiance demeure inimitable, toujours accompagnée de la belle musique de Nino Rota mais décidément, il y a quelque chose de pourri au royaume de Mafialand qui ne parvient plus à nous électriser et nous émouvoir comme jadis.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

YorkManMay 5, 2016

The Godfather part II is hailed as the greatest sequel of all time..... But it isn't. It is a remarkable movie, but has some big problems... Problems which you can't simply overlook, and which manifest themselves more and more with repeatedThe Godfather part II is hailed as the greatest sequel of all time..... But it isn't. It is a remarkable movie, but has some big problems... Problems which you can't simply overlook, and which manifest themselves more and more with repeated viewings.

The film struggles to maintain the narrative and characters as defined in the first film. It's understandable that Michael has become embittered and has difficulty balancing the life as the 'Don', and that of a loving husband and father. But that element only exists because the movie insists on keeping Kay away from the actual truth about who Michael really is. When, towards the end of the movie, she discovers his duplicity and hard-edge, she is actually shocked..... Even though throughout the movie she clearly doesn't believe Michael's assurances about what he does for a 'living'. It's not enough to wonder where their family's wealth comes from, and it just makes no sense.

The other major problem is from a Direction point of view. De Palma won an Oscar for this movie (he didn't win for The Godfather, which is a far, far better film!) but the narrative structure is pretty awful. Jumping between Vito (in 1920's New York) to Michael (in the late 50's/early 60's) isn't handled well. The popping back and forth, and the parallels in the two storylines is well crafted, but there are massive pockets in the movie where the pace just falls off. There is a need in the 'Vito' era to introduce the characters who appeared in The Godfather, just as there is a need in the 'Michael' era to tie it into contemporary 'big' events..... (in this case the build up to, and subsequent take-over, of Cuba by the Communist rebels).

The bottom line is that the film falls well short of the brilliance of the original. Even so it's still a masterpiece compared to the truly awful Part III!!!
You don't need to see part II, if you've seen part I.... In fact I'd recommend reading the book, it's far more compelling!… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

aadityamudharApr 17, 2016

Its easily the greatest sequel of all time, The Godfather Part 2 does a good job at living up to the previous film. Despite its greatness, It doesn't have as much originality that the first film had but its still great.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

MovieMasterEdMar 22, 2016

A companion piece in the truest sense of the term, The Godfather Part II garnered as much adulation as its predecessor, if not more. Receiving twelve Academy Award nominations, and again winning Best Picture (and this time Best Director forA companion piece in the truest sense of the term, The Godfather Part II garnered as much adulation as its predecessor, if not more. Receiving twelve Academy Award nominations, and again winning Best Picture (and this time Best Director for Coppola as well), the second installment has been rightfully hailed as the best sequel of all time.

The Godfather Part II is a more ambitious production than the original since it attempts not only to tell a pair of completely disconnected stories, but to do so in parallel. The less time consuming of the two presents the early life of Vito Corleone (played by Robert DeNiro) in Sicily and New York, and shows how he came into power. The other tale picks up approximately a decade after the conclusion of The Godfather, and shows the means by which Michael Corleone (Al Pacino), now secure in his position, attempts to expand the family empire into Las Vegas and Cuba.

Michael lives his life and runs his business by two of his father's creeds: "A man who doesn't spend time with his family can never be a real man" and "Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer." There are times, however, when those precepts fail as guiding principles, such as when a betrayal occurs from within the family. Broken trust arising from so intimate a source can be devastating.

In The Godfather, family was more important than anything to Don Vito Corleone. Michael has inherited his father's values and as Part II opens, he is surrounded by the Corleone clan as they gather for his son's first communion. A symmetry between the first and second films is established here - both open with a family assemblage, and each quickly establishes where the power lies as the don "holds court."

The traditional elements of the Tragedy introduced in The Godfather reach their maturity in Part II. Much of the humanity remaining to Michael at the outset is leeched from him with each deception and setback. Late scenes with a resentful Fredo (John Cazale) and a bitter Kay (Diane Keaton) emphasize the price for Michael of continuing his father's dominion. His flaw is his imperceptiveness and, as is the case for any hero in a story of this nature, its effects are crippling.

Primarily due to the scope of events, Part II is not as tightly-scripted as Part I. While most of the first film takes place in New York (with a few excursions elsewhere), here the settings vary: Sicily, Ellis Island, New York, Nevada, Cuba, Miami, Washington DC. In letting their characters escape the confines of the "old neighborhood", Coppola and Puzo lessen the intimacy of certain interpersonal conflicts.

Visually, many of Michael's scenes have a more gloomy appearance this time around. Especially during the latter portions of the film, the don is shown in severely underexposed settings, appearing as a silhouette. His is a voice from the darkness - a photographic mirror of what's happening beneath the surface.

As the beginning of Part II echoes the opening of The Godfather, so too does the end. Because of the manner in which circumstances are handled and considering the people involved, the impact here is more forceful. The tragic flaw has accomplished its poisonous, inevitable designs. Coppola punctuates both movies with a gut-twisting exclamation point.

Combined, The Godfather and The Godfather Part II represent the apex of American movie-making and the ultimate gangster story. Few sequels have expanded upon the original with the faithfulness and detail of this one. Beneath the surface veneer of an ethnic period piece, The Godfather is not so much about crime lords as it is about prices paid in the currency of the soul for decisions made and avoided. It is that quality which establishes this saga as timeless.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

CinemassacreMar 13, 2016

A companion piece in the truest sense of the term, The Godfather Part II garnered as much adulation as its predecessor, if not more. Receiving twelve Academy Award nominations, and again winning Best Picture (and this time Best Director forA companion piece in the truest sense of the term, The Godfather Part II garnered as much adulation as its predecessor, if not more. Receiving twelve Academy Award nominations, and again winning Best Picture (and this time Best Director for Coppola as well), the second installment has been rightfully hailed as the best sequel of all time.

The Godfather Part II is a more ambitious production than the original since it attempts not only to tell a pair of completely disconnected stories, but to do so in parallel. The less time consuming of the two presents the early life of Vito Corleone (played by Robert DeNiro) in Sicily and New York, and shows how he came into power. The other tale picks up approximately a decade after the conclusion of The Godfather, and shows the means by which Michael Corleone (Al Pacino), now secure in his position, attempts to expand the family empire into Las Vegas and Cuba.

Plot and counterplot develop, and Michael becomes the focal point of a web of betrayal and deceit, turned against by those he had sought to protect. Assassination attempts and government probes target Michael, but he fights back using every scintilla of ingenuity he possesses and sacrificing much of his humanity in the process.

For a man constantly battling to keep his family together, a mournful irony of The Godfather Part II is that Michael's efforts succeed only in fragmenting it. If the end of the first film was numbing, this one is shattering. The flashback preceding the final scene presents a stark differentiation of how things once were from what they have become.

The traditional elements of the Tragedy introduced in The Godfather reach their maturity in Part II. Much of the humanity remaining to Michael at the outset is leeched from him with each deception and setback. Late scenes with a resentful Fredo (John Cazale) and a bitter Kay (Diane Keaton) emphasize the price for Michael of continuing his father's dominion. His flaw is his imperceptiveness and, as is the case for any hero in a story of this nature, its effects are crippling.

Primarily due to the scope of events, Part II is not as tightly-scripted as Part I. While most of the first film takes place in New York (with a few excursions elsewhere), here the settings vary: Sicily, Ellis Island, New York, Nevada, Cuba, Miami, Washington DC. In letting their characters escape the confines of the "old neighborhood", Coppola and Puzo lessen the intimacy of certain interpersonal conflicts.

Visually, many of Michael's scenes have a more gloomy appearance this time around. Especially during the latter portions of the film, the don is shown in severely underexposed settings, appearing as a silhouette. His is a voice from the darkness - a photographic mirror of what's happening beneath the surface.

As the beginning of Part II echoes the opening of The Godfather, so too does the end. Because of the manner in which circumstances are handled and considering the people involved, the impact here is more forceful. The tragic flaw has accomplished its poisonous, inevitable designs. Coppola punctuates both movies with a gut-twisting exclamation point.

Combined, The Godfather and The Godfather Part II represent the apex of American movie-making and the ultimate gangster story. Few sequels have expanded upon the original with the faithfulness and detail of this one. Beneath the surface veneer of an ethnic period piece, The Godfather is not so much about crime lords as it is about prices paid in the currency of the soul for decisions made and avoided. It is that quality which establishes this saga as timeless.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

EpicLadySpongeJan 23, 2016

A great sequel, but not with absolute correctness the first movie had. As this movie delivers its way to theaters in 1974, people thought it was a big deal until now.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

jedwardsAug 30, 2015

The Godfather Part II is a truly incredible piece of cinema. While I am not one of the many who sees this as superior to the original, this film is still easily one of the best in American cinema, and the best sequel of all time. It isThe Godfather Part II is a truly incredible piece of cinema. While I am not one of the many who sees this as superior to the original, this film is still easily one of the best in American cinema, and the best sequel of all time. It is superbly acted, written and directed and is a very worthwhile successor to the original.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

ahn77Aug 23, 2015

A masterpiece. One of the best trails I've seen and I guess I'm gonna see in the rest of my life. The great process of directing and acting will lead to such a great movie.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

DanteGodfather7Aug 18, 2015

The family rises... Wow! I never thought this would happen. The sequel of the BEST movie of all time would become one of the best acclaimed movies of all time. What Al Pacino did in the role of 'Michael' was unbelievable, but what Robert DeThe family rises... Wow! I never thought this would happen. The sequel of the BEST movie of all time would become one of the best acclaimed movies of all time. What Al Pacino did in the role of 'Michael' was unbelievable, but what Robert De Niro did with the role of 'Vito Corleone' stands up to Marlon Brando alone. That performance was... no further comment. The way Francis Ford Coppola put the two Don's stories together was pure genius alone. The only reason this movie will not get a perfect score is because it's predecessor: 'The Godfather: Part I' was better and still today is the best movie of all time. Hats of and applause... 9/10. Excellent Movie!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

CinemaSinsMay 9, 2015

A companion piece in the truest sense of the term, The Godfather Part II garnered as much adulation as its predecessor, if not more. Receiving twelve Academy Award nominations, and again winning Best Picture (and this time Best Director forA companion piece in the truest sense of the term, The Godfather Part II garnered as much adulation as its predecessor, if not more. Receiving twelve Academy Award nominations, and again winning Best Picture (and this time Best Director for Coppola as well), the second installment has been rightfully hailed as the best sequel of all time.

The Godfather Part II is a more ambitious production than the original since it attempts not only to tell a pair of completely disconnected stories, but to do so in parallel. The less time consuming of the two presents the early life of Vito Corleone (played by Robert DeNiro) in Sicily and New York, and shows how he came into power. The other tale picks up approximately a decade after the conclusion of The Godfather, and shows the means by which Michael Corleone (Al Pacino), now secure in his position, attempts to expand the family empire into Las Vegas and Cuba.

Michael lives his life and runs his business by two of his father's creeds: "A man who doesn't spend time with his family can never be a real man" and "Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer." There are times, however, when those precepts fail as guiding principles, such as when a betrayal occurs from within the family. Broken trust arising from so intimate a source can be devastating.

Plot and counterplot develop, and Michael becomes the focal point of a web of betrayal and deceit, turned against by those he had sought to protect. Assassination attempts and government probes target Michael, but he fights back using every scintilla of ingenuity he possesses and sacrificing much of his humanity in the process.

For a man constantly battling to keep his family together, a mournful irony of The Godfather Part II is that Michael's efforts succeed only in fragmenting it. If the end of the first film was numbing, this one is shattering. The flashback preceding the final scene presents a stark differentiation of how things once were from what they have become.

The traditional elements of the Tragedy introduced in The Godfather reach their maturity in Part II. Much of the humanity remaining to Michael at the outset is leeched from him with each deception and setback. Late scenes with a resentful Fredo (John Cazale) and a bitter Kay (Diane Keaton) emphasize the price for Michael of continuing his father's dominion. His flaw is his imperceptiveness and, as is the case for any hero in a story of this nature, its effects are crippling.

Primarily due to the scope of events, Part II is not as tightly-scripted as Part I. While most of the first film takes place in New York (with a few excursions elsewhere), here the settings vary: Sicily, Ellis Island, New York, Nevada, Cuba, Miami, Washington DC. In letting their characters escape the confines of the "old neighborhood", Coppola and Puzo lessen the intimacy of certain interpersonal conflicts.

Visually, many of Michael's scenes have a more gloomy appearance this time around. Especially during the latter portions of the film, the don is shown in severely underexposed settings, appearing as a silhouette. His is a voice from the darkness - a photographic mirror of what's happening beneath the surface.

As the beginning of Part II echoes the opening of The Godfather, so too does the end. Because of the manner in which circumstances are handled and considering the people involved, the impact here is more forceful. The tragic flaw has accomplished its poisonous, inevitable designs. Coppola punctuates both movies with a gut-twisting exclamation point.

Combined, The Godfather and The Godfather Part II represent the apex of American movie-making and the ultimate gangster story. Few sequels have expanded upon the original with the faithfulness and detail of this one. Beneath the surface veneer of an ethnic period piece, The Godfather is not so much about crime lords as it is about prices paid in the currency of the soul for decisions made and avoided. It is that quality which establishes this saga as timeless.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

MovieManiac83Apr 24, 2015

A companion piece in the truest sense of the term, The Godfather Part II garnered as much adulation as its predecessor, if not more. Receiving twelve Academy Award nominations, and again winning Best Picture (and this time Best Director forA companion piece in the truest sense of the term, The Godfather Part II garnered as much adulation as its predecessor, if not more. Receiving twelve Academy Award nominations, and again winning Best Picture (and this time Best Director for Coppola as well), the second installment has been rightfully hailed as the best sequel of all time.

The Godfather Part II is a more ambitious production than the original since it attempts not only to tell a pair of completely disconnected stories, but to do so in parallel. The less time consuming of the two presents the early life of Vito Corleone (played by Robert DeNiro) in Sicily and New York, and shows how he came into power. The other tale picks up approximately a decade after the conclusion of The Godfather, and shows the means by which Michael Corleone (Al Pacino), now secure in his position, attempts to expand the family empire into Las Vegas and Cuba.

Plot and counterplot develop, and Michael becomes the focal point of a web of betrayal and deceit, turned against by those he had sought to protect. Assassination attempts and government probes target Michael, but he fights back using every scintilla of ingenuity he possesses and sacrificing much of his humanity in the process.

The traditional elements of the Tragedy introduced in The Godfather reach their maturity in Part II. Much of the humanity remaining to Michael at the outset is leeched from him with each deception and setback. Late scenes with a resentful Fredo (John Cazale) and a bitter Kay (Diane Keaton) emphasize the price for Michael of continuing his father's dominion. His flaw is his imperceptiveness and, as is the case for any hero in a story of this nature, its effects are crippling.

Primarily due to the scope of events, Part II is not as tightly-scripted as Part I. While most of the first film takes place in New York (with a few excursions elsewhere), here the settings vary: Sicily, Ellis Island, New York, Nevada, Cuba, Miami, Washington DC. In letting their characters escape the confines of the "old neighborhood", Coppola and Puzo lessen the intimacy of certain interpersonal conflicts.

Visually, many of Michael's scenes have a more gloomy appearance this time around. Especially during the latter portions of the film, the don is shown in severely underexposed settings, appearing as a silhouette. His is a voice from the darkness - a photographic mirror of what's happening beneath the surface.

As the beginning of Part II echoes the opening of The Godfather, so too does the end. Because of the manner in which circumstances are handled and considering the people involved, the impact here is more forceful. The tragic flaw has accomplished its poisonous, inevitable designs. Coppola punctuates both movies with a gut-twisting exclamation point.

Combined, The Godfather and The Godfather Part II represent the apex of American movie-making and the ultimate gangster story. Few sequels have expanded upon the original with the faithfulness and detail of this one. Beneath the surface veneer of an ethnic period piece, The Godfather is not so much about crime lords as it is about prices paid in the currency of the soul for decisions made and avoided. It is that quality which establishes this saga as timeless.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

0

SelvaganapathyFeb 3, 2015

What is the point of killing everyone.Mike hates his own family too. He killed his own Brother.I do miss Vito Carleone. If he is still there, their family would live together in harmony.Mike sucks as a Don. He don't know how to deal withWhat is the point of killing everyone.Mike hates his own family too. He killed his own Brother.I do miss Vito Carleone. If he is still there, their family would live together in harmony.Mike sucks as a Don. He don't know how to deal with things.Living alone wont make you a Don. It will always be Vito Carleone.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

9

AkashVijayJan 22, 2015

It's not a perfect film. It lacks the innovative ideas of the Godfather and it has a hard time juggling multiple storylines. The Michael-Kay subplot is very rushed and the film doesn't quite have the thrill and the mystery of the first film.It's not a perfect film. It lacks the innovative ideas of the Godfather and it has a hard time juggling multiple storylines. The Michael-Kay subplot is very rushed and the film doesn't quite have the thrill and the mystery of the first film. But it succeeds in being an immensely powerful character study. Al Pacino, even better in this one, is remarkable as a malicious figure of quiet authority waiting and longing for the right time to strike his prey. Works very well for the most part but it's not quiet the achievement the first film was. But there's no shame in that.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

MovieGuysJan 6, 2015

Yes, it may be the second movie in the Godfather trilogy, but to call The Godfather Part II a sequel is an insult to the movie, to Francis Ford Coppola, Mario Puzo, and Marlon Brando. Think of it as a "continuation" of the first. Although itYes, it may be the second movie in the Godfather trilogy, but to call The Godfather Part II a sequel is an insult to the movie, to Francis Ford Coppola, Mario Puzo, and Marlon Brando. Think of it as a "continuation" of the first. Although it has a 200 minute runtime, the well-made story, multi-layered characters, and Oscar-winning performances make the film breeze by. Modern directors can learn from films like this; instead of changing the shot every 5 seconds to a new angle, sometimes it is much better to just leave the camera in one spot and let the actors act. While there are more prologues and footnotes and flashbacks and flash-forwards, the movie still maintains a consistent pace and tone, the mark of a truly great picture.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

MarickJan 1, 2015

The Godfather Part II is a 1974 American crime epic produced and directed by Francis Ford Coppola from a screenplay co-written with Mario Puzo, starring Al Pacino and Robert De Niro. Partially based on Puzo's 1969 novel The Godfather, theThe Godfather Part II is a 1974 American crime epic produced and directed by Francis Ford Coppola from a screenplay co-written with Mario Puzo, starring Al Pacino and Robert De Niro. Partially based on Puzo's 1969 novel The Godfather, the film is both sequel and prequel to The Godfather, presenting parallel dramas: one picks up the 1958 story of Michael Corleone (Pacino), the new Don of the Corleone crime family, protecting the family business in the aftermath of an attempt on his life; the prequel covers the journey of his father, Vito Corleone (De Niro), from his Sicilian childhood to the founding of his family enterprise in New York City.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

googolendtimesNov 2, 2014

Part II is perhaps the greatest American film of all time, at least in my opinion, upstaging Citizen Kane and even its predecessor. If Part I was to Coppola what The Grapes of Wrath was to Steinbeck, then Part II is his East of Eden. ItPart II is perhaps the greatest American film of all time, at least in my opinion, upstaging Citizen Kane and even its predecessor. If Part I was to Coppola what The Grapes of Wrath was to Steinbeck, then Part II is his East of Eden. It recreates all that was so brilliant about the first but fine-tunes it in a manner so that it happens on a scale much larger and much more ambitious, with a wide scope traversing decades and continents that intersects the past with the present in its ferocious exploration on how organised crime shapes those who operate at its highest levels. Returning cast members up their game, especially John Cazale, Diane Keaton and Talia Shire, and Coppola replenishes the ranks with a stellar supporting cast that includes memorable turns from Robert De Niro and Michael V. Gazzo. But no-one can detract from Al Pacino, who tops the brilliance of his first outing as Michael Corleone with a mesmerising, electric tour de force of Macbethian portents that gives this film its heart and its gut: both are as crucial to the film's impact as the other. Where Part I was more cerebral and restrained in its meditation on matters of morality, Part II opens the floodgates to unleash a blistering and merciless cascade of betrayal, savagery, bitterness, passion, vengeance and irreconcilable guilt and greed as corrosive as the other, eventually leaving us with something that is tragic, elegiac and searingly true. The morally-corrosive properties of power may be a tried and tired theme of cinema by now, but the unflinching manner that Part II slides it under the microscope and squints as far as the eye can reach has never been replicated - and quite probably never could.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Kylenine1Aug 5, 2014

This film isn't terrible, but it doesn't compare to the first film. We go back and forth in this film between Michael being the Godfather and his father being younger and when he was alive. I wanted to see more of Michael and less of hisThis film isn't terrible, but it doesn't compare to the first film. We go back and forth in this film between Michael being the Godfather and his father being younger and when he was alive. I wanted to see more of Michael and less of his father. I hope the Godfather Part: III is all about Michael. I'm just glade I didn't pay for this movie. I can't believe people liked the Godfather Part: II, the first one is terrific is easily in my top 5 best movies ever made. But for me the acting was okay in this one, the special effects were good and the storyline is decent, but there's really no special moments or anything that would make me say that this is the best movie ever made. This film disappointed me and I just hope that when I watch the rest of The Godfather films that they'll bounce back and surprise me.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

chwJul 18, 2014

Part II was not as good as the first Godfather, but the The Godfather: Part II is just as excellent with the story, the acting (portrayed by Al Pacino, Robert De Niro, Robert Duvall, Talia Shire, and Diane Keaton), and directed by legendaryPart II was not as good as the first Godfather, but the The Godfather: Part II is just as excellent with the story, the acting (portrayed by Al Pacino, Robert De Niro, Robert Duvall, Talia Shire, and Diane Keaton), and directed by legendary director Francis Ford Coppola.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

warrenworldMay 4, 2014

By continuing Michael Corleone's story AND traveling back to Vito's timeline, this film is one of the only sequels that can match its predecessor. This and The Dark Knight alone.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

Bob_LoblawMay 1, 2014

If the Godfather has a 100 metascore then the Godfather II should have a metascore of 99. Hands down the greatest sequel ever made as well as the best acted film ever made, surpassing even the first one. Pacino gives his greatest performance

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

carloswalnutsApr 16, 2014

Muy injusta la nota que le han puesto a esta maravillosa segunda parte. Es mi favorita de la trilogía de The Godfather, interesante y a la vez grandilocuente de como la historia que se divide en dos, una es la vida de cuando Vito aun no eraMuy injusta la nota que le han puesto a esta maravillosa segunda parte. Es mi favorita de la trilogía de The Godfather, interesante y a la vez grandilocuente de como la historia que se divide en dos, una es la vida de cuando Vito aun no era el patriarca de los Corleone y por otra la trama donde ocurre los hechos del presente es decir en los 50, un Michael mas frió y calculador que en la primera parte, traiciones y conspiraciones en contra su vida, la presión del senado y del fbi es lo que debe enfrentar en esta segunda parte, incluso si la traición es... mejor vean la película. Agrego algo mas aparte de su impecable guion, es su banda sonora con el tema The Immigrant que se convierte en el broche que lo caracteriza.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

SanctifiedMar 2, 2014

The Godfather: Part II is one of those rare sequels that match the original; Anchored by impeccable casting and a riveting story, Coppola's second instalment into the cult phenomenon trilogy succeeds in garnering critical praise and becomingThe Godfather: Part II is one of those rare sequels that match the original; Anchored by impeccable casting and a riveting story, Coppola's second instalment into the cult phenomenon trilogy succeeds in garnering critical praise and becoming the first and only sequel to win the coveted Best Picture award. Al Pacino is at his apex here.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

jack977Feb 1, 2014

Arguably better than its predecessor, Part II brilliantly juxtaposes the rise of the father with the fall of the son and is one of the finest showcases of cinema's great character studies, not to mention Carmine Coppola's haunting score.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

python2000Jan 25, 2014

The second chapter in the life of Vito Corleone best known as The Godfather.
At just over 200 minutes I think it's safe to say that The Godfather Part Two isn't a movie for a rainy Friday afternoon, it's definitely less gripping than theThe second chapter in the life of Vito Corleone best known as The Godfather.
At just over 200 minutes I think it's safe to say that The Godfather Part Two isn't a movie for a rainy Friday afternoon, it's definitely less gripping than the first but that doesn't mean to say that it isn't interesting. Actually it's the opposite. Francis Ford Coppola keeps everything slick and cool but still intelligent, some scenes are more compelling than others. Particularly the tense confrontation between two brothers. With no Marlon Brando to give the film at least one guaranteed brilliant performance, you might worry that the actors are not strong enough to portray the legendary characters well. Luckily Pacino and De Niro are both excellent and provide the movie two Oscar worthy performances, which don't even rival Brando from the first film but are still very good.
Overall I don't think that The Godfather Part Two was as enjoyable or as gut wrenching as the first, but due to many excellent performances and another chilling yet satisfying ending I still find it to be a timeless piece of cinema.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

FranzHcriticJan 20, 2014

It has less character development than its predecessor, other than Vito Corleone, beautifully acted by Robert De Niro, whose learning of a new language truly deserves an Oscar. Al Pacino has a more sufficient role, and more dynamic, as theIt has less character development than its predecessor, other than Vito Corleone, beautifully acted by Robert De Niro, whose learning of a new language truly deserves an Oscar. Al Pacino has a more sufficient role, and more dynamic, as the crime boss struggling with his crime life and family life, whose every choice is both hard and difficult to make. The rest of the ensemble makes all the violence sophisticated and interesting, mostly due to the complexity of it. And lets not forget John Cazale, although his career was short, he was an amazing actor, who actually gave me sympathy rather than scorn and a desire to see him killed. A formidable sequel, though it doesn't surpass the original.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

moviebuff_420Dec 23, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie is three hours and twenty two minutes long but an hour passes like 15 minutes.It is incredibly entertaining and one of the best gangster movie ever made.
The plot is tricky featuring two parallel storylines,one of young Vito Corleone fighting with life's dark events,providing for his family,building a Don status and seeking revenge for the killing of his family while other depicts the Michael Corleone and his falling empire,family and life.
Al Pacino is stand out in the movie cast.You just see the expressions and his eyes it can tell you the whole story.
He has completely transformed to a ruthless,heartless and cold gangster but never stopped loving his family.
The scene where Kay(Diane Keaton) tells him about that she aborted their child,Al is flawless and most realistic how his eyes pops out and how he knocks her down.He deserved the oscar for best actor.
Robert De Niro is impeccable.What do you expect when two of the greatest actors play two of the greatest characters.
De Niro portrays the character with similar talent as Marlon Brando did.
The way he speaks with same husky voice also his sicilian.
His principles,taking care of things,returning the favor and rise to mafia is just marvellous.
The best scenes are where he follows Fannuci at Festa to his house and kills him other one ,obviously where he stabs Don Ciccio and says "My father's name was Antonio Andolini... and this is for you" is just brilliant.
Diane Keaton portays her character with utter excellence.
Robert Duvall is as great as he was in the previous movie,the sophisticated lawyer ,caring brother and a good man.
John Cazale character is bigger in this one and he is first class in the scene where he yells his heart out and in the whole movie.
Michael Vincente Gazzo's performance is most realistic.
The screenplay,style and violence is top notch.
Again.Coppola's direction is mesmerizing.
Overall,this is one of the best movie and not to be missed.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

waynDec 18, 2013

Godfather part 2 just takes us on a tour of want the greatest movie of all time's sequel brings which is phenomenon do not miss it man I wish I was a gangster after watching this movie

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

axelkochDec 1, 2013

While I do consider it an outstanding movie, I don't love the original
The Godfather and its prequel/sequel is actually a bit of a step back,
in my opinion. The 200 minutes are a lot too long and get boring, even as I anticipatorilyWhile I do consider it an outstanding movie, I don't love the original
The Godfather and its prequel/sequel is actually a bit of a step back,
in my opinion. The 200 minutes are a lot too long and get boring, even
as I anticipatorily watched the movie on two consecutive evenings, and
neither of the cross-cut story parts was as interesting and thrilling
as the one the original movie had to offer. That isn't to say that The
Godfather Part II skimps on entertaining and rememberable scenes; in
fact, the movie's best moments may even be more rememberable than The
Godfather's. However, a lot of the scenes in between are just too long
and not really necessary what would have been needed a lot more were
additional explanation scenes as the panoply of characters grows even
bigger through the story being set in two different times and the
dialogues give more focus to being pointed and quotable instead of
making what happens fully clear. This is indubitably important, don't
let me be misunderstood, but the huge plot that Mario Puzo has devised
for The Godfather is simply too complex and convoluted to be easily
grasped without having read the source material. Nevertheless, The
Godfather Part II is a cinematic masterpiece that is sovereign and
seminal on so many different layers, such as the beautifully
picturesque cinematography, the smooth editing, the meticulously
conceived set design, the innovative and unforgettable score by Nino
Rota, and the tremendous acting cast that is reflected in the five
Oscar nominations for acting (a tied record). Thus, The Godfather Part
II is an undeniably excellent motion picture that merely suffers from
the director's attempt to put too much in just one movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

joao1198pedroNov 28, 2013

the godfather part 2 is not as good as the first godfather,but it didin't mean that isn't an universal acclaim,simply it is the best continuation ever made.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

JohnnyStephensAug 30, 2013

The best film of the trilogy. It's boring in some parts, but it's without doubt one of the best films ever made. A HUGE well done to Francis Ford Coppola!!!!

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

LaMagiadeVirueAug 15, 2013

Como su predecesor, una genialidad de Coppola. Creo que supera a la primera. Impresionantes actuaciones de dos grandes estrellas del cine como Al Pacino y Robert de Niro. Intensa historia y buenos giros. Perfecta.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

SpangleJul 7, 2013

Just absolutely masterful. I have no idea how the metascore here is so low, especially considering the film is critically acclaimed. The acting, once again, is superb and Coppola is fantastic as the director. There isn't much to say beyondJust absolutely masterful. I have no idea how the metascore here is so low, especially considering the film is critically acclaimed. The acting, once again, is superb and Coppola is fantastic as the director. There isn't much to say beyond the fact that this film is one of the best ever.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Azid_AlexDeSmalApr 8, 2013

Francis Ford Coppola's Godfather Part II, a golden cinema from the era of 1970s. Exaggerating? Over-Praised? Nope. If one looks back at that wonderful decade of cinema, he or she would see 'Colossal' films like Taxi Driver, Apocalypse Now,Francis Ford Coppola's Godfather Part II, a golden cinema from the era of 1970s. Exaggerating? Over-Praised? Nope. If one looks back at that wonderful decade of cinema, he or she would see 'Colossal' films like Taxi Driver, Apocalypse Now, Annie Hall, Means Streets, Jaws, Chinatown, The Godfather (Its Predecessor) and many more. But, I think, the film which captures 6 Academy Awards (Best Picture, Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Original Score, Best Art-Direction and Best Actor in a Supporting Role) surpasses them all, and that film is The Godfather Part II.

To begin with it's acting would be a pleasure to me. "Sun rising to shine the world" That would be the expression to depict it's masterful acting. Well supported by it's supporting players and that include Robert Duvall (extremely impressive), John Cazale, Lee Strasberg and Michael V. Gazzo. Al Pacino plays the cold Michael Corleone, who's delivery entertained me with some kind of realism. Just rightfully perfect, I could conclude that he's transformed or easily put, Al gives a perfect performance which deserved an Oscar for best performance of the year. Just somewhere in that corner of brilliance, one could see a composed acting of Robert Deniro as young Vito Corleone. It is like pure cloud gathering all around him, truly an unforgettable contribution. In summary, it could be commented that this piece is a well acted motion picture.

The element which grasped my attention is Coppola's method of slow or methodical filmmaking which captures the beauty of this cinema. Beautifully shot from start to finish, it is a breathtaking sight of grandeur.

This film is a cleverly written piece too. Completed with inspiring dialogue, attractive epic storytelling and it could be easily 'snatched'that it is masterful.

Many would disagree with me because I'm going to, or will always name this picture as 'The Greatest Film Ever Made'. The Godfather is an offer you can't refuse but The Godfather Part II is an offer you MUST NOT refuse.

Facebook (http://facebook.com/alex.desmall) Twitter (@Alex_DeSmall) (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/member/AlexDesmall)… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

sinadoomApr 5, 2013

Suspensful, engaging, gripping story, beautifully directed and superb performance by Al Pacino. He really suited Michael's role and did a great job in this film. However, this has the same problem as the original film, only made worse. TheSuspensful, engaging, gripping story, beautifully directed and superb performance by Al Pacino. He really suited Michael's role and did a great job in this film. However, this has the same problem as the original film, only made worse. The first film was long, but this one is half an hour longer, yet a lot less happens in it. Of course, one has to account for the fact that there are two stories going on here; one of Vito as a young man and one of Michael, but even still, I think there could have been more events and more of a link between the two stories. Overall though, this is a great movie; not as good as the first but definitely worth watching and certainly not a disapointment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

TheWalrus2000Mar 9, 2013

Its still strong on all levels, but part II doesn't have the same effect that The Godfather did.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

andsoitgoesJan 27, 2013

Looking at the negative reviews saying they should have stopped at 1 clearly haven't read the bloody BOOK. Do your research, the book includes the entirety of 1 and 2. That said, 3 is such a complete failure that it's sad. It's the equivalentLooking at the negative reviews saying they should have stopped at 1 clearly haven't read the bloody BOOK. Do your research, the book includes the entirety of 1 and 2. That said, 3 is such a complete failure that it's sad. It's the equivalent of the worst of the Star Wars prequels and Indiana Jones 4. But to say Godfather 2 is a terrible movie compared to the first is absolutely crazy. 1 does not exist without 2, even though 2 isn't AS good, it certainly deserves no less than a low positive or a very high mixed. It's not "Master of Disguise" or "Deuce Bigalo 2". When I see reviewers mark a film so poorly and then rank other films that are throwaway crap, it easily shows how stupid they are. Hate the story, find it a little confusing all you want, even at its worse, this film is better than almost everything made today. It's certainly an infinite amount better than 3.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Speed4RunsDec 15, 2012

Just as its predecessor, this is a masterpiece movie. Simply perfect. Amazing plot and almost perfect technical realization. 100% recommended, especially if you like its genre.

Plot: 8.5
Technical realization: 7.9

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

Compi24Nov 28, 2012

A distinctively well-paced and sumptuously plotted drama with unforgettable performances from Pacino and De Niro, "The Godfather Part II" is an objectively perfect sequel to the 1972 classic.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

aaronpaul121May 25, 2012

The first movie is way better than this one. It is still a great movie. Al Pacino's performance was still amazing. The plot is still great. Everything is still great, but maybe the first movie is an incredibly difficult act for it to follow.....

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

TrantorMar 2, 2012

This film its as good as Godfather :Part 1. I dont understant how a man who is working in the New York Times gives Godfather 40/100. If i was NTW director i would lay off him.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

RegOzJan 19, 2012

Did I enjoy it? Yes I did...but for some reason it didn't fulfill my expectations. It doesn't have anything to do with Marlon Brando's absence (for that was logical...) but with the way the plot develops. I would have love to seen more ofDid I enjoy it? Yes I did...but for some reason it didn't fulfill my expectations. It doesn't have anything to do with Marlon Brando's absence (for that was logical...) but with the way the plot develops. I would have love to seen more of Robert Duval's character. T here are parts that are unclear, and towards the end it becomes evident that Michael doesn't trust the famous consigliere but that is not totally justified, so there is a need for clarification. I am not sure if the length of the movie justifies its quality...it was at times slow...so I believe with that length it could have been better. I did still enjoy it...but no more than what I enjoy The Godfather I and definitely less than The Godfather III (which greatly surprised me!)… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

SamMJan 7, 2012

After hearing all the hype surrounding this film, many labelling it as a classic, I was disappointed when I finally watched it. The acting was very good and the rise of Vito Corleone was very interesting to watch. However, the plot regardingAfter hearing all the hype surrounding this film, many labelling it as a classic, I was disappointed when I finally watched it. The acting was very good and the rise of Vito Corleone was very interesting to watch. However, the plot regarding Michael is fairly dull and overall far too little happens to spread the film over three hours. I am a fan of longer films in general, however I think the same story could have been told in 2 hours. The important parts of the plot are given far too little attention, while the film dedicates far longer periods of time to dull scenes. Worst of all was the ending, which was a non-event. Although it is far from the worst film I have seen, it is definitely overrated.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

10

vishal8492Jan 6, 2012

Well I gotta say I always liked Godfather II better than part I.It's amazing how characters are portrayed in this part really perfect.I loved I'st part too it was 3'rd that was dissapointing.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews