The Godfather: Part II
Paramount Pictures | Release Date: December 12, 1974
9.0
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 1272 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,185
Mixed:
33
Negative:
54
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
10
ReviewCriticDec 28, 2011
O.K., my first response to this is that it is immensely underrated. As The Godfather's Metascore was a perfect 100, The Godfather Part II deserved at least an 85. It's the Godfather Part III that's the bad one, not II! The acting was aboutO.K., my first response to this is that it is immensely underrated. As The Godfather's Metascore was a perfect 100, The Godfather Part II deserved at least an 85. It's the Godfather Part III that's the bad one, not II! The acting was about 2/3 as good as the original. Al Pacino took the leading role and made it shine, though not nearly like Marlon Brando did. The supporting cast was very good, although it was Robert DeNiro who swept the movie, winning him his first Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor.… Expand
16 of 23 users found this helpful167
All this user's reviews
10
TClunaticdavidNov 16, 2010
This movie is SPECTACULAR! I can't decide if it's better than the first one. Everyone gives exceptional performances and the dialogue is so well written it almost seems real. The plot is so interesting and totally sucks you in, you can'tThis movie is SPECTACULAR! I can't decide if it's better than the first one. Everyone gives exceptional performances and the dialogue is so well written it almost seems real. The plot is so interesting and totally sucks you in, you can't even tell it's over 3 hours. Robert De Niro's, Vito Corleone, I almost (not quite though) is as good as Marlon Brando's. Which I think was an amazing achievement. It is possibly the greatest movie ever made.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
9
RexG.May 13, 2006
Without Marlon Brando in the original I would have probably given it a 10 but he's just lacking in this movie. Al Pacino acts good but isn't as convincing as "his father". Robert De Niro however was a great choice for the young Don Without Marlon Brando in the original I would have probably given it a 10 but he's just lacking in this movie. Al Pacino acts good but isn't as convincing as "his father". Robert De Niro however was a great choice for the young Don Vito. Not quite as good as the original for the reasons mentioned above but still an outstanding movie.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
MikeP.Oct 17, 2009
To put it simply: The Godfather Part II is one of the finest pieces of cinema to ever be crafted. How anyone can rate this film below an 8 is just totally beyond me. The cinematography is brilliant. The characters are highly textured. The To put it simply: The Godfather Part II is one of the finest pieces of cinema to ever be crafted. How anyone can rate this film below an 8 is just totally beyond me. The cinematography is brilliant. The characters are highly textured. The dual story lines being parallel throughout the film is an excellent device in which to tell the stories of Vito and Michael Corleone. Mario Puzo and Francis Ford Coppola have created a masterpiece.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
kman1014Jun 26, 2020
A great film that captures much of the phenomena of the first film. A masterpiece in it's own right.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
noob328Feb 15, 2022
It is even better than the first film, and has the greatest single final scene in Hollywood history, a real coup de cinéma
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
asylumspadezNov 26, 2011
Its easily the greatest sequel of all time, The Godfather 2 does a good job at living up to the previous film. Despite its greatness, It doesnt have as much originality that the first film had but its still great.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
10
roddersj04May 11, 2011
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Godfather is one of my favourite ever films, and i'm glad to say that The Godfather Part II manages to match the first chapter in the story of Corleone family. The best thing about this movie, for me, was the flashback sequences to Vito's early years, how he ended up living in America, how he got started in the mafia, how he made his first (I presume it was his first) kill, how he set up his most important element: Family. The absence of Marlon Brando is evident here, but its made up for as we have Robert De Niro playing the young Don Corleone. There is a vast difference between Michael and his deceased father, Vito. Vito immensly loved his family and it was evident that family was the most important thing to him. To Michael, that is not true. Note how he smacks Kay across the face, how he refuses to let her see his children, how he orders the execution of his brother Fredo. The final scene, where we got a flashback to the family at the table for Vitos surprise party, is quite a well executed scene, and it was interesting to see the familys reaction to Michael joining the Marines and that it was Sonny who introduced the despicable wife beater Carlo to Connie. Honestly, this film was pretty brilliant, but I, myself prefer the first film. This is definately one of the best sequels though… Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
9
joseap84Nov 25, 2011
A true masterpiece. Unlike the original, there are no dull moments. The present story is wonderful, but it's the flashbacks that I found to be brilliant. Excellent movie.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
9
tonyGreenJun 25, 2011
One of those movies you are supposed to see but never get around to. I got around to it. Do beleive the hype - It's great. Great story, great cast, great film
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
10
jack977Feb 1, 2014
Arguably better than its predecessor, Part II brilliantly juxtaposes the rise of the father with the fall of the son and is one of the finest showcases of cinema's great character studies, not to mention Carmine Coppola's haunting score.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
6
gzayas91May 3, 2019
I have mixed thoughts of Part 2. It plays both prequel and the sequel and I don't think it works. I like part 3 better because it much more of a sequel. Part 2 is good but not great.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
10
warrenworldMay 4, 2014
By continuing Michael Corleone's story AND traveling back to Vito's timeline, this film is one of the only sequels that can match its predecessor. This and The Dark Knight alone.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
10
MovieManiac83Apr 24, 2015
A companion piece in the truest sense of the term, The Godfather Part II garnered as much adulation as its predecessor, if not more. Receiving twelve Academy Award nominations, and again winning Best Picture (and this time Best Director forA companion piece in the truest sense of the term, The Godfather Part II garnered as much adulation as its predecessor, if not more. Receiving twelve Academy Award nominations, and again winning Best Picture (and this time Best Director for Coppola as well), the second installment has been rightfully hailed as the best sequel of all time.

The Godfather Part II is a more ambitious production than the original since it attempts not only to tell a pair of completely disconnected stories, but to do so in parallel. The less time consuming of the two presents the early life of Vito Corleone (played by Robert DeNiro) in Sicily and New York, and shows how he came into power. The other tale picks up approximately a decade after the conclusion of The Godfather, and shows the means by which Michael Corleone (Al Pacino), now secure in his position, attempts to expand the family empire into Las Vegas and Cuba.

Plot and counterplot develop, and Michael becomes the focal point of a web of betrayal and deceit, turned against by those he had sought to protect. Assassination attempts and government probes target Michael, but he fights back using every scintilla of ingenuity he possesses and sacrificing much of his humanity in the process.

The traditional elements of the Tragedy introduced in The Godfather reach their maturity in Part II. Much of the humanity remaining to Michael at the outset is leeched from him with each deception and setback. Late scenes with a resentful Fredo (John Cazale) and a bitter Kay (Diane Keaton) emphasize the price for Michael of continuing his father's dominion. His flaw is his imperceptiveness and, as is the case for any hero in a story of this nature, its effects are crippling.

Primarily due to the scope of events, Part II is not as tightly-scripted as Part I. While most of the first film takes place in New York (with a few excursions elsewhere), here the settings vary: Sicily, Ellis Island, New York, Nevada, Cuba, Miami, Washington DC. In letting their characters escape the confines of the "old neighborhood", Coppola and Puzo lessen the intimacy of certain interpersonal conflicts.

Visually, many of Michael's scenes have a more gloomy appearance this time around. Especially during the latter portions of the film, the don is shown in severely underexposed settings, appearing as a silhouette. His is a voice from the darkness - a photographic mirror of what's happening beneath the surface.

As the beginning of Part II echoes the opening of The Godfather, so too does the end. Because of the manner in which circumstances are handled and considering the people involved, the impact here is more forceful. The tragic flaw has accomplished its poisonous, inevitable designs. Coppola punctuates both movies with a gut-twisting exclamation point.

Combined, The Godfather and The Godfather Part II represent the apex of American movie-making and the ultimate gangster story. Few sequels have expanded upon the original with the faithfulness and detail of this one. Beneath the surface veneer of an ethnic period piece, The Godfather is not so much about crime lords as it is about prices paid in the currency of the soul for decisions made and avoided. It is that quality which establishes this saga as timeless.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
6
YorkManMay 5, 2016
The Godfather part II is hailed as the greatest sequel of all time..... But it isn't. It is a remarkable movie, but has some big problems... Problems which you can't simply overlook, and which manifest themselves more and more with repeatedThe Godfather part II is hailed as the greatest sequel of all time..... But it isn't. It is a remarkable movie, but has some big problems... Problems which you can't simply overlook, and which manifest themselves more and more with repeated viewings.

The film struggles to maintain the narrative and characters as defined in the first film. It's understandable that Michael has become embittered and has difficulty balancing the life as the 'Don', and that of a loving husband and father. But that element only exists because the movie insists on keeping Kay away from the actual truth about who Michael really is. When, towards the end of the movie, she discovers his duplicity and hard-edge, she is actually shocked..... Even though throughout the movie she clearly doesn't believe Michael's assurances about what he does for a 'living'. It's not enough to wonder where their family's wealth comes from, and it just makes no sense.

The other major problem is from a Direction point of view. De Palma won an Oscar for this movie (he didn't win for The Godfather, which is a far, far better film!) but the narrative structure is pretty awful. Jumping between Vito (in 1920's New York) to Michael (in the late 50's/early 60's) isn't handled well. The popping back and forth, and the parallels in the two storylines is well crafted, but there are massive pockets in the movie where the pace just falls off. There is a need in the 'Vito' era to introduce the characters who appeared in The Godfather, just as there is a need in the 'Michael' era to tie it into contemporary 'big' events..... (in this case the build up to, and subsequent take-over, of Cuba by the Communist rebels).

The bottom line is that the film falls well short of the brilliance of the original. Even so it's still a masterpiece compared to the truly awful Part III!!!
You don't need to see part II, if you've seen part I.... In fact I'd recommend reading the book, it's far more compelling!… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
10
MovieMasterEdMar 22, 2016
A companion piece in the truest sense of the term, The Godfather Part II garnered as much adulation as its predecessor, if not more. Receiving twelve Academy Award nominations, and again winning Best Picture (and this time Best Director forA companion piece in the truest sense of the term, The Godfather Part II garnered as much adulation as its predecessor, if not more. Receiving twelve Academy Award nominations, and again winning Best Picture (and this time Best Director for Coppola as well), the second installment has been rightfully hailed as the best sequel of all time.

The Godfather Part II is a more ambitious production than the original since it attempts not only to tell a pair of completely disconnected stories, but to do so in parallel. The less time consuming of the two presents the early life of Vito Corleone (played by Robert DeNiro) in Sicily and New York, and shows how he came into power. The other tale picks up approximately a decade after the conclusion of The Godfather, and shows the means by which Michael Corleone (Al Pacino), now secure in his position, attempts to expand the family empire into Las Vegas and Cuba.

Michael lives his life and runs his business by two of his father's creeds: "A man who doesn't spend time with his family can never be a real man" and "Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer." There are times, however, when those precepts fail as guiding principles, such as when a betrayal occurs from within the family. Broken trust arising from so intimate a source can be devastating.

In The Godfather, family was more important than anything to Don Vito Corleone. Michael has inherited his father's values and as Part II opens, he is surrounded by the Corleone clan as they gather for his son's first communion. A symmetry between the first and second films is established here - both open with a family assemblage, and each quickly establishes where the power lies as the don "holds court."

The traditional elements of the Tragedy introduced in The Godfather reach their maturity in Part II. Much of the humanity remaining to Michael at the outset is leeched from him with each deception and setback. Late scenes with a resentful Fredo (John Cazale) and a bitter Kay (Diane Keaton) emphasize the price for Michael of continuing his father's dominion. His flaw is his imperceptiveness and, as is the case for any hero in a story of this nature, its effects are crippling.

Primarily due to the scope of events, Part II is not as tightly-scripted as Part I. While most of the first film takes place in New York (with a few excursions elsewhere), here the settings vary: Sicily, Ellis Island, New York, Nevada, Cuba, Miami, Washington DC. In letting their characters escape the confines of the "old neighborhood", Coppola and Puzo lessen the intimacy of certain interpersonal conflicts.

Visually, many of Michael's scenes have a more gloomy appearance this time around. Especially during the latter portions of the film, the don is shown in severely underexposed settings, appearing as a silhouette. His is a voice from the darkness - a photographic mirror of what's happening beneath the surface.

As the beginning of Part II echoes the opening of The Godfather, so too does the end. Because of the manner in which circumstances are handled and considering the people involved, the impact here is more forceful. The tragic flaw has accomplished its poisonous, inevitable designs. Coppola punctuates both movies with a gut-twisting exclamation point.

Combined, The Godfather and The Godfather Part II represent the apex of American movie-making and the ultimate gangster story. Few sequels have expanded upon the original with the faithfulness and detail of this one. Beneath the surface veneer of an ethnic period piece, The Godfather is not so much about crime lords as it is about prices paid in the currency of the soul for decisions made and avoided. It is that quality which establishes this saga as timeless.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
10
MoviebuffreviewApr 24, 2011
Seriously? Only a "Generally favorable reviews" from critics? Really? The Godfather Part II is an absolute masterpiece. It keeps all of the great elements from the first movie (the drama, fantastic cast, great script, and unforgettableSeriously? Only a "Generally favorable reviews" from critics? Really? The Godfather Part II is an absolute masterpiece. It keeps all of the great elements from the first movie (the drama, fantastic cast, great script, and unforgettable quotes), and also adds new elements that are great (a new story with Michael that is fantastic, tragic moments, and plenty of twists). I really am not doing this movie justice, just go see it!… Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
10
deltapatrickSep 8, 2010
I loved this movie i liked the orginal better but this was just amazing its the only movie i have seen that serves as a sequil and a prequil the only thing i did not like about this movie is micheal corleano being the godfather he is great asI loved this movie i liked the orginal better but this was just amazing its the only movie i have seen that serves as a sequil and a prequil the only thing i did not like about this movie is micheal corleano being the godfather he is great as a godfather dont get me wrong but i just liked him when he was entering the family… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
5
SamMJan 7, 2012
After hearing all the hype surrounding this film, many labelling it as a classic, I was disappointed when I finally watched it. The acting was very good and the rise of Vito Corleone was very interesting to watch. However, the plot regardingAfter hearing all the hype surrounding this film, many labelling it as a classic, I was disappointed when I finally watched it. The acting was very good and the rise of Vito Corleone was very interesting to watch. However, the plot regarding Michael is fairly dull and overall far too little happens to spread the film over three hours. I am a fan of longer films in general, however I think the same story could have been told in 2 hours. The important parts of the plot are given far too little attention, while the film dedicates far longer periods of time to dull scenes. Worst of all was the ending, which was a non-event. Although it is far from the worst film I have seen, it is definitely overrated.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
6
robertoiglesiasJan 15, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Godfather Part II is another film that I consider to be a bit overrated, but people like it, so um, cool.
I like this more than the first film because the plot is more than just: the Mafia does things. It's about Michael becoming mentally unstable during a period of time, and the Mafia doing things. However, that doesn't stop this film from having some filler padding like the original.
This film is 3 and a half hours long! Why?! The whole Cuba segment could be taken out, some scenes here and there can be removed, I'm just baffled by these decisions. I understand wanting to show your entire vision, but it doesn't work as well when it's so long!
The prequel part is great, but even that could be trimmed a bit. The sequel part drags on in my opinion.

So I will say it's better than the original based on plot and characters (less characters to deal with and the characters have more development in this film). However, the first film was at least under 3 hours and had more of a unique vision (it felt more artistic).… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
9
TheWalrus2000Mar 9, 2013
Its still strong on all levels, but part II doesn't have the same effect that The Godfather did.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
Kylenine1Aug 5, 2014
This film isn't terrible, but it doesn't compare to the first film. We go back and forth in this film between Michael being the Godfather and his father being younger and when he was alive. I wanted to see more of Michael and less of hisThis film isn't terrible, but it doesn't compare to the first film. We go back and forth in this film between Michael being the Godfather and his father being younger and when he was alive. I wanted to see more of Michael and less of his father. I hope the Godfather Part: III is all about Michael. I'm just glade I didn't pay for this movie. I can't believe people liked the Godfather Part: II, the first one is terrific is easily in my top 5 best movies ever made. But for me the acting was okay in this one, the special effects were good and the storyline is decent, but there's really no special moments or anything that would make me say that this is the best movie ever made. This film disappointed me and I just hope that when I watch the rest of The Godfather films that they'll bounce back and surprise me.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
CinemassacreMar 13, 2016
A companion piece in the truest sense of the term, The Godfather Part II garnered as much adulation as its predecessor, if not more. Receiving twelve Academy Award nominations, and again winning Best Picture (and this time Best Director forA companion piece in the truest sense of the term, The Godfather Part II garnered as much adulation as its predecessor, if not more. Receiving twelve Academy Award nominations, and again winning Best Picture (and this time Best Director for Coppola as well), the second installment has been rightfully hailed as the best sequel of all time.

The Godfather Part II is a more ambitious production than the original since it attempts not only to tell a pair of completely disconnected stories, but to do so in parallel. The less time consuming of the two presents the early life of Vito Corleone (played by Robert DeNiro) in Sicily and New York, and shows how he came into power. The other tale picks up approximately a decade after the conclusion of The Godfather, and shows the means by which Michael Corleone (Al Pacino), now secure in his position, attempts to expand the family empire into Las Vegas and Cuba.

Plot and counterplot develop, and Michael becomes the focal point of a web of betrayal and deceit, turned against by those he had sought to protect. Assassination attempts and government probes target Michael, but he fights back using every scintilla of ingenuity he possesses and sacrificing much of his humanity in the process.

For a man constantly battling to keep his family together, a mournful irony of The Godfather Part II is that Michael's efforts succeed only in fragmenting it. If the end of the first film was numbing, this one is shattering. The flashback preceding the final scene presents a stark differentiation of how things once were from what they have become.

The traditional elements of the Tragedy introduced in The Godfather reach their maturity in Part II. Much of the humanity remaining to Michael at the outset is leeched from him with each deception and setback. Late scenes with a resentful Fredo (John Cazale) and a bitter Kay (Diane Keaton) emphasize the price for Michael of continuing his father's dominion. His flaw is his imperceptiveness and, as is the case for any hero in a story of this nature, its effects are crippling.

Primarily due to the scope of events, Part II is not as tightly-scripted as Part I. While most of the first film takes place in New York (with a few excursions elsewhere), here the settings vary: Sicily, Ellis Island, New York, Nevada, Cuba, Miami, Washington DC. In letting their characters escape the confines of the "old neighborhood", Coppola and Puzo lessen the intimacy of certain interpersonal conflicts.

Visually, many of Michael's scenes have a more gloomy appearance this time around. Especially during the latter portions of the film, the don is shown in severely underexposed settings, appearing as a silhouette. His is a voice from the darkness - a photographic mirror of what's happening beneath the surface.

As the beginning of Part II echoes the opening of The Godfather, so too does the end. Because of the manner in which circumstances are handled and considering the people involved, the impact here is more forceful. The tragic flaw has accomplished its poisonous, inevitable designs. Coppola punctuates both movies with a gut-twisting exclamation point.

Combined, The Godfather and The Godfather Part II represent the apex of American movie-making and the ultimate gangster story. Few sequels have expanded upon the original with the faithfulness and detail of this one. Beneath the surface veneer of an ethnic period piece, The Godfather is not so much about crime lords as it is about prices paid in the currency of the soul for decisions made and avoided. It is that quality which establishes this saga as timeless.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
BroyaxJan 6, 2017
Une grande partie du charme du premier film a disparu dans ce second volet, sans doute parce que Vito Corleone n'est plus et partant, l'incroyable prestation de Marlon Brando... Revenir sur les origines et le début de parcours du Don auxUne grande partie du charme du premier film a disparu dans ce second volet, sans doute parce que Vito Corleone n'est plus et partant, l'incroyable prestation de Marlon Brando... Revenir sur les origines et le début de parcours du Don aux Etats-Unis est une idée assez dispensable en définitive, bien que ce soit l'occasion pour un jeunot plein de talent de s'illustrer, à savoir Robert De Niro dont les rôles à venir de mauvais garçon et/ou de gangster feront la gloire... parce qu'il le vaut bien !

Bien sûr, Al Pacino reprend les rênes de la Famille avec aplomb et talent, se fait des ennemis, puis éventuellement finit par liquider tout le monde, ainsi va Cosa Nostra. La vie familiale et sentimentale de notre mafieux va de pair ou parfois à contre-courant des aléas des "affaires" mais tourne un peu trop souvent au psychodrame, tandis que le rythme faiblit considérablement au fil des trois plombes qui sont allègrement dépassées...

Cela reste loin d'être inintéressant ou même ennuyeux et cette saga sait encore captiver l'attention malgré une intrigue principale plus fouillis que jamais, pour ne pas dire confuse sur bien des aspects... malgré (encore !) son pourtant très long métrage qui aurait dû et pu fournir davantage de lumière aux évènements.

L'ambiance demeure inimitable, toujours accompagnée de la belle musique de Nino Rota mais décidément, il y a quelque chose de pourri au royaume de Mafialand qui ne parvient plus à nous électriser et nous émouvoir comme jadis.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
JPKJul 2, 2019
Another Sequel Masterpiece
Godfather Part II is literally as great as it’s predecessor.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
0
SelvaganapathyFeb 3, 2015
What is the point of killing everyone.Mike hates his own family too. He killed his own Brother.I do miss Vito Carleone. If he is still there, their family would live together in harmony.Mike sucks as a Don. He don't know how to deal withWhat is the point of killing everyone.Mike hates his own family too. He killed his own Brother.I do miss Vito Carleone. If he is still there, their family would live together in harmony.Mike sucks as a Don. He don't know how to deal with things.Living alone wont make you a Don. It will always be Vito Carleone.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
0
JCAOct 8, 2007
Holy crap this movie sucked. I made a totally different impression of the reviews here, I had watched it in the theatres all those years ago and I did not like it, the most very very disappointing movie ever. It is boring and really hard to Holy crap this movie sucked. I made a totally different impression of the reviews here, I had watched it in the theatres all those years ago and I did not like it, the most very very disappointing movie ever. It is boring and really hard to follow. I never new what the reviews would say till now. i am astonished: 0 is its match.… Expand
3 of 16 users found this helpful
4
CritiqueGirlMar 4, 2011
I saw it on TV so it was not as violent. They should have never made II and III but they didn't know when to leave well enough alone and I am sure Al Pacino thought he was that good that the story didn't matter. And he wasn't very good inI saw it on TV so it was not as violent. They should have never made II and III but they didn't know when to leave well enough alone and I am sure Al Pacino thought he was that good that the story didn't matter. And he wasn't very good in this one. I never bothered to watch III.… Expand
3 of 17 users found this helpful314
All this user's reviews
10
AmKOct 18, 2006
It
0 of 1 users found this helpful
0
JoyceCOct 8, 2007
Confudling, a dull masterpiece with nothing.
0 of 4 users found this helpful
0
JaradCOct 8, 2007
Rated R!!!!!! This movie isn't even bad, it is hard to follow crap!
0 of 2 users found this helpful
7
RirenMar 5, 2007
More brazenly violent, even in its opening, and more sensational in the nature of the mafia's corruption, but hardly a superior film to the original. Where the original had horrible and bloody events, they were earned - here, they just More brazenly violent, even in its opening, and more sensational in the nature of the mafia's corruption, but hardly a superior film to the original. Where the original had horrible and bloody events, they were earned - here, they just happen. This one really is slow, and many times things just happen, rather than build on each other. Like any good sequel, it takes advantage of the existing plot, and most of the references and allusions are good. The cast isn't quite up to the par set by the original, for while it has all of the menace, it possesses little of the charm, and no one provides a "Brando quality" performance. Even Hagen isn't quite what he used to be. There's also no experience comparable to Pacino's character development in the first picture. It packs several very memorable moments, but it's not up to the task, and is too long to justify what it accomplishes.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful
6
RonD.Dec 13, 2005
Good movie, a bit too choppy to be considered great. not even close to the original but very good.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
4
AndrewRMar 22, 2008
Vastly overrated. The plot is identical to both other movies in the series (there's a party, someone tries to kill the Don, the Don tricks the real culprit into revealing himself, a short interlude for some random marital melodrama, and Vastly overrated. The plot is identical to both other movies in the series (there's a party, someone tries to kill the Don, the Don tricks the real culprit into revealing himself, a short interlude for some random marital melodrama, and then the Don has all the bad guys simultaneously murdered. Fin.), the themes are shallow and largely inapplicable to anybody not involved in organized crime (violence begets violence, huh? YOU DON'T SAY.), the characters are flat (Michael is the grim Zen hardass, Fredo is the blubbering idiot, Kay is the shrill square, etc.), the two "halves" of the movie don't inform each other at all, so that the entire production is ultimately just remaindered bits of the book that they couldn't fit into the first film, and ultimately none of the characters do anything worthy of praise or emulation, and none of the conflicts are worth caring about. The plot meanders wildly over the punishing 200-minute running time, and when it comes time to wrap up they just have Michael give a little speech where he says "oh, by the way, we can just kill all those people who've been bothering us," and then they go do that. I will never understand why they had to make 10 hours worth of movies just to point out that organized crime is not a suitable environment in which to raise and preserve a well-adjusted family, let alone why that's considered a rare and notable achievement.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
vishal8492Jan 6, 2012
Well I gotta say I always liked Godfather II better than part I.It's amazing how characters are portrayed in this part really perfect.I loved I'st part too it was 3'rd that was dissapointing.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
RegOzJan 19, 2012
Did I enjoy it? Yes I did...but for some reason it didn't fulfill my expectations. It doesn't have anything to do with Marlon Brando's absence (for that was logical...) but with the way the plot develops. I would have love to seen more ofDid I enjoy it? Yes I did...but for some reason it didn't fulfill my expectations. It doesn't have anything to do with Marlon Brando's absence (for that was logical...) but with the way the plot develops. I would have love to seen more of Robert Duval's character. T here are parts that are unclear, and towards the end it becomes evident that Michael doesn't trust the famous consigliere but that is not totally justified, so there is a need for clarification. I am not sure if the length of the movie justifies its quality...it was at times slow...so I believe with that length it could have been better. I did still enjoy it...but no more than what I enjoy The Godfather I and definitely less than The Godfather III (which greatly surprised me!)… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
moviebuff_420Dec 23, 2013
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie is three hours and twenty two minutes long but an hour passes like 15 minutes.It is incredibly entertaining and one of the best gangster movie ever made.
The plot is tricky featuring two parallel storylines,one of young Vito Corleone fighting with life's dark events,providing for his family,building a Don status and seeking revenge for the killing of his family while other depicts the Michael Corleone and his falling empire,family and life.
Al Pacino is stand out in the movie cast.You just see the expressions and his eyes it can tell you the whole story.
He has completely transformed to a ruthless,heartless and cold gangster but never stopped loving his family.
The scene where Kay(Diane Keaton) tells him about that she aborted their child,Al is flawless and most realistic how his eyes pops out and how he knocks her down.He deserved the oscar for best actor.
Robert De Niro is impeccable.What do you expect when two of the greatest actors play two of the greatest characters.
De Niro portrays the character with similar talent as Marlon Brando did.
The way he speaks with same husky voice also his sicilian.
His principles,taking care of things,returning the favor and rise to mafia is just marvellous.
The best scenes are where he follows Fannuci at Festa to his house and kills him other one ,obviously where he stabs Don Ciccio and says "My father's name was Antonio Andolini... and this is for you" is just brilliant.
Diane Keaton portays her character with utter excellence.
Robert Duvall is as great as he was in the previous movie,the sophisticated lawyer ,caring brother and a good man.
John Cazale character is bigger in this one and he is first class in the scene where he yells his heart out and in the whole movie.
Michael Vincente Gazzo's performance is most realistic.
The screenplay,style and violence is top notch.
Again.Coppola's direction is mesmerizing.
Overall,this is one of the best movie and not to be missed.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
SpangleJul 7, 2013
Just absolutely masterful. I have no idea how the metascore here is so low, especially considering the film is critically acclaimed. The acting, once again, is superb and Coppola is fantastic as the director. There isn't much to say beyondJust absolutely masterful. I have no idea how the metascore here is so low, especially considering the film is critically acclaimed. The acting, once again, is superb and Coppola is fantastic as the director. There isn't much to say beyond the fact that this film is one of the best ever.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
axelkochDec 1, 2013
While I do consider it an outstanding movie, I don't love the original
The Godfather and its prequel/sequel is actually a bit of a step back,
in my opinion. The 200 minutes are a lot too long and get boring, even as I anticipatorilyWhile I do consider it an outstanding movie, I don't love the original
The Godfather and its prequel/sequel is actually a bit of a step back,
in my opinion. The 200 minutes are a lot too long and get boring, even
as I anticipatorily watched the movie on two consecutive evenings, and
neither of the cross-cut story parts was as interesting and thrilling
as the one the original movie had to offer. That isn't to say that The
Godfather Part II skimps on entertaining and rememberable scenes; in
fact, the movie's best moments may even be more rememberable than The
Godfather's. However, a lot of the scenes in between are just too long
and not really necessary what would have been needed a lot more were
additional explanation scenes as the panoply of characters grows even
bigger through the story being set in two different times and the
dialogues give more focus to being pointed and quotable instead of
making what happens fully clear. This is indubitably important, don't
let me be misunderstood, but the huge plot that Mario Puzo has devised
for The Godfather is simply too complex and convoluted to be easily
grasped without having read the source material. Nevertheless, The
Godfather Part II is a cinematic masterpiece that is sovereign and
seminal on so many different layers, such as the beautifully
picturesque cinematography, the smooth editing, the meticulously
conceived set design, the innovative and unforgettable score by Nino
Rota, and the tremendous acting cast that is reflected in the five
Oscar nominations for acting (a tied record). Thus, The Godfather Part
II is an undeniably excellent motion picture that merely suffers from
the director's attempt to put too much in just one movie.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
Speed4RunsDec 15, 2012
Just as its predecessor, this is a masterpiece movie. Simply perfect. Amazing plot and almost perfect technical realization. 100% recommended, especially if you like its genre.

Plot: 8.5
Technical realization: 7.9
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
Compi24Nov 28, 2012
A distinctively well-paced and sumptuously plotted drama with unforgettable performances from Pacino and De Niro, "The Godfather Part II" is an objectively perfect sequel to the 1972 classic.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
python2000Jan 25, 2014
The second chapter in the life of Vito Corleone best known as The Godfather.
At just over 200 minutes I think it's safe to say that The Godfather Part Two isn't a movie for a rainy Friday afternoon, it's definitely less gripping than theThe second chapter in the life of Vito Corleone best known as The Godfather.
At just over 200 minutes I think it's safe to say that The Godfather Part Two isn't a movie for a rainy Friday afternoon, it's definitely less gripping than the first but that doesn't mean to say that it isn't interesting. Actually it's the opposite. Francis Ford Coppola keeps everything slick and cool but still intelligent, some scenes are more compelling than others. Particularly the tense confrontation between two brothers. With no Marlon Brando to give the film at least one guaranteed brilliant performance, you might worry that the actors are not strong enough to portray the legendary characters well. Luckily Pacino and De Niro are both excellent and provide the movie two Oscar worthy performances, which don't even rival Brando from the first film but are still very good.
Overall I don't think that The Godfather Part Two was as enjoyable or as gut wrenching as the first, but due to many excellent performances and another chilling yet satisfying ending I still find it to be a timeless piece of cinema.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
Azid_AlexDeSmalApr 8, 2013
Francis Ford Coppola's Godfather Part II, a golden cinema from the era of 1970s. Exaggerating? Over-Praised? Nope. If one looks back at that wonderful decade of cinema, he or she would see 'Colossal' films like Taxi Driver, Apocalypse Now,Francis Ford Coppola's Godfather Part II, a golden cinema from the era of 1970s. Exaggerating? Over-Praised? Nope. If one looks back at that wonderful decade of cinema, he or she would see 'Colossal' films like Taxi Driver, Apocalypse Now, Annie Hall, Means Streets, Jaws, Chinatown, The Godfather (Its Predecessor) and many more. But, I think, the film which captures 6 Academy Awards (Best Picture, Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Original Score, Best Art-Direction and Best Actor in a Supporting Role) surpasses them all, and that film is The Godfather Part II.

To begin with it's acting would be a pleasure to me. "Sun rising to shine the world" That would be the expression to depict it's masterful acting. Well supported by it's supporting players and that include Robert Duvall (extremely impressive), John Cazale, Lee Strasberg and Michael V. Gazzo. Al Pacino plays the cold Michael Corleone, who's delivery entertained me with some kind of realism. Just rightfully perfect, I could conclude that he's transformed or easily put, Al gives a perfect performance which deserved an Oscar for best performance of the year. Just somewhere in that corner of brilliance, one could see a composed acting of Robert Deniro as young Vito Corleone. It is like pure cloud gathering all around him, truly an unforgettable contribution. In summary, it could be commented that this piece is a well acted motion picture.

The element which grasped my attention is Coppola's method of slow or methodical filmmaking which captures the beauty of this cinema. Beautifully shot from start to finish, it is a breathtaking sight of grandeur.

This film is a cleverly written piece too. Completed with inspiring dialogue, attractive epic storytelling and it could be easily 'snatched'that it is masterful.

Many would disagree with me because I'm going to, or will always name this picture as 'The Greatest Film Ever Made'. The Godfather is an offer you can't refuse but The Godfather Part II is an offer you MUST NOT refuse.

Facebook (http://facebook.com/alex.desmall) Twitter (@Alex_DeSmall) (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/member/AlexDesmall)… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
JohnnyStephensAug 30, 2013
The best film of the trilogy. It's boring in some parts, but it's without doubt one of the best films ever made. A HUGE well done to Francis Ford Coppola!!!!
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
LaMagiadeVirueAug 15, 2013
Como su predecesor, una genialidad de Coppola. Creo que supera a la primera. Impresionantes actuaciones de dos grandes estrellas del cine como Al Pacino y Robert de Niro. Intensa historia y buenos giros. Perfecta.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
carloswalnutsApr 16, 2014
Muy injusta la nota que le han puesto a esta maravillosa segunda parte. Es mi favorita de la trilogía de The Godfather, interesante y a la vez grandilocuente de como la historia que se divide en dos, una es la vida de cuando Vito aun no eraMuy injusta la nota que le han puesto a esta maravillosa segunda parte. Es mi favorita de la trilogía de The Godfather, interesante y a la vez grandilocuente de como la historia que se divide en dos, una es la vida de cuando Vito aun no era el patriarca de los Corleone y por otra la trama donde ocurre los hechos del presente es decir en los 50, un Michael mas frió y calculador que en la primera parte, traiciones y conspiraciones en contra su vida, la presión del senado y del fbi es lo que debe enfrentar en esta segunda parte, incluso si la traición es... mejor vean la película. Agrego algo mas aparte de su impecable guion, es su banda sonora con el tema The Immigrant que se convierte en el broche que lo caracteriza.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
FranzHcriticJan 20, 2014
It has less character development than its predecessor, other than Vito Corleone, beautifully acted by Robert De Niro, whose learning of a new language truly deserves an Oscar. Al Pacino has a more sufficient role, and more dynamic, as theIt has less character development than its predecessor, other than Vito Corleone, beautifully acted by Robert De Niro, whose learning of a new language truly deserves an Oscar. Al Pacino has a more sufficient role, and more dynamic, as the crime boss struggling with his crime life and family life, whose every choice is both hard and difficult to make. The rest of the ensemble makes all the violence sophisticated and interesting, mostly due to the complexity of it. And lets not forget John Cazale, although his career was short, he was an amazing actor, who actually gave me sympathy rather than scorn and a desire to see him killed. A formidable sequel, though it doesn't surpass the original.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
AndremaxJul 10, 2018
A certain sequel to a amazing movie. It's amazing and perfect as the first movie. The best sequel of a movie of all time. The action, the characters, the story... just incredible as ****
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
MovieGuysJan 6, 2015
Yes, it may be the second movie in the Godfather trilogy, but to call The Godfather Part II a sequel is an insult to the movie, to Francis Ford Coppola, Mario Puzo, and Marlon Brando. Think of it as a "continuation" of the first. Although itYes, it may be the second movie in the Godfather trilogy, but to call The Godfather Part II a sequel is an insult to the movie, to Francis Ford Coppola, Mario Puzo, and Marlon Brando. Think of it as a "continuation" of the first. Although it has a 200 minute runtime, the well-made story, multi-layered characters, and Oscar-winning performances make the film breeze by. Modern directors can learn from films like this; instead of changing the shot every 5 seconds to a new angle, sometimes it is much better to just leave the camera in one spot and let the actors act. While there are more prologues and footnotes and flashbacks and flash-forwards, the movie still maintains a consistent pace and tone, the mark of a truly great picture.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
joao1198pedroNov 28, 2013
the godfather part 2 is not as good as the first godfather,but it didin't mean that isn't an universal acclaim,simply it is the best continuation ever made.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
waynDec 18, 2013
Godfather part 2 just takes us on a tour of want the greatest movie of all time's sequel brings which is phenomenon do not miss it man I wish I was a gangster after watching this movie
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
death12123Jun 1, 2019
Imagine having the pressure of the first film but delivering a masterpiece that's a great follow up to it. A great sequel and moments that blew me away like the first.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
chwJul 18, 2014
Part II was not as good as the first Godfather, but the The Godfather: Part II is just as excellent with the story, the acting (portrayed by Al Pacino, Robert De Niro, Robert Duvall, Talia Shire, and Diane Keaton), and directed by legendaryPart II was not as good as the first Godfather, but the The Godfather: Part II is just as excellent with the story, the acting (portrayed by Al Pacino, Robert De Niro, Robert Duvall, Talia Shire, and Diane Keaton), and directed by legendary director Francis Ford Coppola.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
Bob_LoblawMay 1, 2014
If the Godfather has a 100 metascore then the Godfather II should have a metascore of 99. Hands down the greatest sequel ever made as well as the best acted film ever made, surpassing even the first one. Pacino gives his greatest performance
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
AkashVijayJan 22, 2015
It's not a perfect film. It lacks the innovative ideas of the Godfather and it has a hard time juggling multiple storylines. The Michael-Kay subplot is very rushed and the film doesn't quite have the thrill and the mystery of the first film.It's not a perfect film. It lacks the innovative ideas of the Godfather and it has a hard time juggling multiple storylines. The Michael-Kay subplot is very rushed and the film doesn't quite have the thrill and the mystery of the first film. But it succeeds in being an immensely powerful character study. Al Pacino, even better in this one, is remarkable as a malicious figure of quiet authority waiting and longing for the right time to strike his prey. Works very well for the most part but it's not quiet the achievement the first film was. But there's no shame in that.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
MarickJan 1, 2015
The Godfather Part II is a 1974 American crime epic produced and directed by Francis Ford Coppola from a screenplay co-written with Mario Puzo, starring Al Pacino and Robert De Niro. Partially based on Puzo's 1969 novel The Godfather, theThe Godfather Part II is a 1974 American crime epic produced and directed by Francis Ford Coppola from a screenplay co-written with Mario Puzo, starring Al Pacino and Robert De Niro. Partially based on Puzo's 1969 novel The Godfather, the film is both sequel and prequel to The Godfather, presenting parallel dramas: one picks up the 1958 story of Michael Corleone (Pacino), the new Don of the Corleone crime family, protecting the family business in the aftermath of an attempt on his life; the prequel covers the journey of his father, Vito Corleone (De Niro), from his Sicilian childhood to the founding of his family enterprise in New York City.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
CinemaSinsMay 9, 2015
A companion piece in the truest sense of the term, The Godfather Part II garnered as much adulation as its predecessor, if not more. Receiving twelve Academy Award nominations, and again winning Best Picture (and this time Best Director forA companion piece in the truest sense of the term, The Godfather Part II garnered as much adulation as its predecessor, if not more. Receiving twelve Academy Award nominations, and again winning Best Picture (and this time Best Director for Coppola as well), the second installment has been rightfully hailed as the best sequel of all time.

The Godfather Part II is a more ambitious production than the original since it attempts not only to tell a pair of completely disconnected stories, but to do so in parallel. The less time consuming of the two presents the early life of Vito Corleone (played by Robert DeNiro) in Sicily and New York, and shows how he came into power. The other tale picks up approximately a decade after the conclusion of The Godfather, and shows the means by which Michael Corleone (Al Pacino), now secure in his position, attempts to expand the family empire into Las Vegas and Cuba.

Michael lives his life and runs his business by two of his father's creeds: "A man who doesn't spend time with his family can never be a real man" and "Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer." There are times, however, when those precepts fail as guiding principles, such as when a betrayal occurs from within the family. Broken trust arising from so intimate a source can be devastating.

Plot and counterplot develop, and Michael becomes the focal point of a web of betrayal and deceit, turned against by those he had sought to protect. Assassination attempts and government probes target Michael, but he fights back using every scintilla of ingenuity he possesses and sacrificing much of his humanity in the process.

For a man constantly battling to keep his family together, a mournful irony of The Godfather Part II is that Michael's efforts succeed only in fragmenting it. If the end of the first film was numbing, this one is shattering. The flashback preceding the final scene presents a stark differentiation of how things once were from what they have become.

The traditional elements of the Tragedy introduced in The Godfather reach their maturity in Part II. Much of the humanity remaining to Michael at the outset is leeched from him with each deception and setback. Late scenes with a resentful Fredo (John Cazale) and a bitter Kay (Diane Keaton) emphasize the price for Michael of continuing his father's dominion. His flaw is his imperceptiveness and, as is the case for any hero in a story of this nature, its effects are crippling.

Primarily due to the scope of events, Part II is not as tightly-scripted as Part I. While most of the first film takes place in New York (with a few excursions elsewhere), here the settings vary: Sicily, Ellis Island, New York, Nevada, Cuba, Miami, Washington DC. In letting their characters escape the confines of the "old neighborhood", Coppola and Puzo lessen the intimacy of certain interpersonal conflicts.

Visually, many of Michael's scenes have a more gloomy appearance this time around. Especially during the latter portions of the film, the don is shown in severely underexposed settings, appearing as a silhouette. His is a voice from the darkness - a photographic mirror of what's happening beneath the surface.

As the beginning of Part II echoes the opening of The Godfather, so too does the end. Because of the manner in which circumstances are handled and considering the people involved, the impact here is more forceful. The tragic flaw has accomplished its poisonous, inevitable designs. Coppola punctuates both movies with a gut-twisting exclamation point.

Combined, The Godfather and The Godfather Part II represent the apex of American movie-making and the ultimate gangster story. Few sequels have expanded upon the original with the faithfulness and detail of this one. Beneath the surface veneer of an ethnic period piece, The Godfather is not so much about crime lords as it is about prices paid in the currency of the soul for decisions made and avoided. It is that quality which establishes this saga as timeless.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
ahn77Aug 23, 2015
A masterpiece. One of the best trails I've seen and I guess I'm gonna see in the rest of my life. The great process of directing and acting will lead to such a great movie.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
DanteGodfather7Aug 18, 2015
The family rises... Wow! I never thought this would happen. The sequel of the BEST movie of all time would become one of the best acclaimed movies of all time. What Al Pacino did in the role of 'Michael' was unbelievable, but what Robert DeThe family rises... Wow! I never thought this would happen. The sequel of the BEST movie of all time would become one of the best acclaimed movies of all time. What Al Pacino did in the role of 'Michael' was unbelievable, but what Robert De Niro did with the role of 'Vito Corleone' stands up to Marlon Brando alone. That performance was... no further comment. The way Francis Ford Coppola put the two Don's stories together was pure genius alone. The only reason this movie will not get a perfect score is because it's predecessor: 'The Godfather: Part I' was better and still today is the best movie of all time. Hats of and applause... 9/10. Excellent Movie!… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
jedwardsAug 30, 2015
The Godfather Part II is a truly incredible piece of cinema. While I am not one of the many who sees this as superior to the original, this film is still easily one of the best in American cinema, and the best sequel of all time. It isThe Godfather Part II is a truly incredible piece of cinema. While I am not one of the many who sees this as superior to the original, this film is still easily one of the best in American cinema, and the best sequel of all time. It is superbly acted, written and directed and is a very worthwhile successor to the original.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
aadityamudharApr 17, 2016
Its easily the greatest sequel of all time, The Godfather Part 2 does a good job at living up to the previous film. Despite its greatness, It doesn't have as much originality that the first film had but its still great.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
EpicLadySpongeJan 23, 2016
A great sequel, but not with absolute correctness the first movie had. As this movie delivers its way to theaters in 1974, people thought it was a big deal until now.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
superbatAug 11, 2020
Definitely one of the greatest sequels of all-time, The Godfather Part II is a sequel that nearly lived up to its predecessor. It expands on the Godfather saga by depicting Michael Corleone's venture into the "family business", and hisDefinitely one of the greatest sequels of all-time, The Godfather Part II is a sequel that nearly lived up to its predecessor. It expands on the Godfather saga by depicting Michael Corleone's venture into the "family business", and his gradual descent into madness, while also showing flashbacks of his father's rise to power. The constant switching between time periods makes this film less engaging to watch. However, this film has pretty much all of the strengths of the first Godfather film: performances, score, cinematography, etc. If you appreciated The Godfather, it's more than likely that you'll appreciate its sequel.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
alejandro970May 31, 2020
The king is dead. Hail to the new king. While looking in introspective the origin of the patriarch and his relation with the underworld, and how made an empire of his own, it is observed how Michael Corleone wears an increasingly heavy crown.The king is dead. Hail to the new king. While looking in introspective the origin of the patriarch and his relation with the underworld, and how made an empire of his own, it is observed how Michael Corleone wears an increasingly heavy crown. Remarkable Al Pacino, as ever.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
daviddelnorte23Jan 19, 2018
Decepción me llevé con esta película. No es lo que me esperaba. Aún así, es una de las mejores películas de la época y cine con mayúsculas. No me convence la trama de 'Young Vito'. Mejor la primera.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
TrailesqueJan 13, 2018
One of the genius moves in the Godfather series is the mixing of recent history into a fictional gangster flick. It is this flawless blending that gives it weight to match its presence. If there is a better story about how power corrupts IOne of the genius moves in the Godfather series is the mixing of recent history into a fictional gangster flick. It is this flawless blending that gives it weight to match its presence. If there is a better story about how power corrupts I can't think of it. We see the young don dealing with a plot on his life, and then setting out to destroy his enemies while becoming a monster in the process. At the end he is left alone, pondering the good man that he almost became. Parallel to this are superbly realized segments focusing on the young Vito Corleone coming to America as a kid and beginning to make his mark among the tenement buildings of New York's Little Italy. DeNiro is fantastic and lays down a prequel to Brando's classic performance. One flaw: young Vito murders the local mafia boss without much provocation - the Godfather was supposed to be deadly, but just. There was a scene that got cut where Vito stumbles across him sexually abusing a boy. Like the first Godfather it juxtaposes thuggish brutality with the Italian reverence for family and Catholic tradition. A great film.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
VirgonoShakaNov 21, 2017
Godfather part two is a very good movie, and continues a story from a masterpiece that is the first one, and in general, is a complete success in that it is a worthy sequel that has great value and stay true to what you expect, but I can'tGodfather part two is a very good movie, and continues a story from a masterpiece that is the first one, and in general, is a complete success in that it is a worthy sequel that has great value and stay true to what you expect, but I can't say that it surpases the original because that was going to be very, very difficult. Nevertheless, a great movie with great characters that is totoally recommended and necessary for any movie fan that is worth his salt. Final verdict: 8.5… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
KelvinSelimorMar 28, 2020
The Godfather: Part II. Family is the main thing. A good continuation of one of the best films of the century. The sequel, which did not get worse but also did not get better. The plot itself is not inferior to the first part, but there isThe Godfather: Part II. Family is the main thing. A good continuation of one of the best films of the century. The sequel, which did not get worse but also did not get better. The plot itself is not inferior to the first part, but there is some protractedness which I did not like a bit. If the first film was about how Michael becomes a more rude cruel and strong head of the family, then in the second film the plot is already built around another less interesting topic.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
alizshoeOct 9, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Similar to the original, this movie is beautifully filmed and adds more depth to the Corleone family. I loved seeing Michael Corleone further adapt into his role as "The Godfather" and seeing how it was paralleled with Vito Corleone become the original "Godfather". There are similarities and differences between the two. Both feel obligated to take on this role for the protection and well-being of their family; however, Michael Corleone proves to be the more ruthless of the two. The reason why this movie does not get a perfect score is because it's slow in some parts and its scenes are not as memorable as the first one. The kill scenes are performed out of necessity and do not have the same shock factor. Additionally, the reason why this movie is good is because it builds upon the original so well; however, this would not have been a good standalone movie.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
FilipeNetoFeb 19, 2018
This film follows the movie "The Godfather" and continues the story of the Corleone family, now headed by Michael after the death of Vito. In this film, the audience is confronted with two realities: the rise of the family during Vito'sThis film follows the movie "The Godfather" and continues the story of the Corleone family, now headed by Michael after the death of Vito. In this film, the audience is confronted with two realities: the rise of the family during Vito's adolescence, and the psychological contradictions of Michael, who want to get out of illegality, but needs it to prevent rival families to put at risk the safety of his family. From Nevada to Cuba, the illegal investment of the Corleone's will bring them a new golden age?

Like the previous film, it was directed by Francis Ford Coppola, based on the novels of Mario Puzo, who collaborated on the script. The cast kept most of the actors from the previous film but introduces new characters as well. The soundtrack continued in the experienced hands of Nino Rota. It won six Oscars in 1974 (best film, best supporting actor, best director, best adapted screenplay, best art direction and best soundtrack).

After the resounding success of "The Godfather", any sequel was condemned to fail but, on the contrary, this film has managed to maintain it's level high and the same popularity, which is a rarity when we talk about sequels. I cannot make big negative reviews except, perhaps, the very long duration of the film. Al Pacino had probably one of the greatest performances of his life as actor. Irreproachable, he incorporated Michael with an almost petrifying naturalness. The same can be said of Robert De Niro that, with his performance, opened the way for other important works of his career like "Goodfellas." Robert Duvall also had here one his most outstanding works. Those who like action scenes may not like this movie. Its a quieter film, where the deaths are violent but made with almost surgical precision. The Mafia does not kill at random. Tense from start to finish, it has a powerful suspense that holds the audience, but the complexity of the script, full of twists, can confuse the most inattentive, so pay attention.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
merijnjFeb 21, 2018
(98/100)
A great follow up that doesn't go down in quality. Loved the flashbacks to Vito's youth.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
cesky_hracMar 24, 2018
Stále výborný!!! Nemám co bych k tomu dodal. Tento film hrdě následuje svého staršího bratra. A to dobře.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
MartyMcFlyOct 2, 2018
My score 100
Metascore / User score 90 / 90
Tomatometer / Audience score 97 / 97
IMDB 91
(94)
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
movieguy24601Feb 10, 2019
Every movie I've watched, every movie I've reviewed, none of them have compared to the brilliance of Francis Ford Coppola's masterpiece, "The Godfather Part II". This movie is my all time favorite movie, with it being both a prequel, and aEvery movie I've watched, every movie I've reviewed, none of them have compared to the brilliance of Francis Ford Coppola's masterpiece, "The Godfather Part II". This movie is my all time favorite movie, with it being both a prequel, and a sequel, and the narratives both flowing beautifully between Michael's downfall, and Vito's rise (both played tremendously by Al Pacino, and Robert De Niro). This movie is one of the strongest, if not the strongest film I have ever watched, and I highly recommend this incredible film to anyone.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
Narek009Jun 7, 2019
Another great Godfather movie. In my opinion this movie was almost as great as the second but still amazing.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
mailpollFeb 17, 2022
This movie is SPECTACULAR! I can't decide if it's better than the first one. Everyone gives exceptional performances and the dialogue is so well written it almost seems real
0 of 6 users found this helpful06
All this user's reviews
10
RobertM.Mar 2, 2006
The best sequel to any movie. Pure Genius.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
EricF.May 6, 2006
Fantastic, every bit as great as the original. The plot and characters are interesting and complex, portrayed by an amazing cast. The dialogue sports so many quotable lines, and the whole thing is visually stunning with the set decoration, Fantastic, every bit as great as the original. The plot and characters are interesting and complex, portrayed by an amazing cast. The dialogue sports so many quotable lines, and the whole thing is visually stunning with the set decoration, costume design and cinametography. Fantastic!.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
EddieM.Sep 26, 2007
Brilliant companion piece to the original. Quite stupendous stuff - proves that other worlds really do exist through the magic of cinema. Pacino & De Niro give to of the greatest performances ever committed to celluloid.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
PedroJul 6, 2007
The REAL rating for this is 83, in case anyone really wants to know. So it DOES have universal acclaim. I don't know who's doing the math over there! Anyway, that critic who gave the movie a 40 obviously doesn't know what the The REAL rating for this is 83, in case anyone really wants to know. So it DOES have universal acclaim. I don't know who's doing the math over there! Anyway, that critic who gave the movie a 40 obviously doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MarvinTAug 7, 2008
A masterpiece with a few flaws.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DanD.Jan 4, 2006
To me it is more interesting and esier to follow than the original godfather.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
StewartB.Feb 21, 2007
For that reviewer to rate a movie highly considered as one of the greatest of all time a 40, is just an absolute travesty. I did however, like the film, love it. The best sequel to date in my opinion, and a fantastic ending. If only the For that reviewer to rate a movie highly considered as one of the greatest of all time a 40, is just an absolute travesty. I did however, like the film, love it. The best sequel to date in my opinion, and a fantastic ending. If only the third movie were left on the cutting room floor, or was just a bonus epilogue movie than the real thing....but otherwise I loved the Godfather series, and every bit of this movie as well as the first one.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AnaK.Mar 17, 2007
The fact that any reviewer could give this movie a 40 is lost on me. This movie was put together with a superb plot and superb acting. Al Pacino continues to excel at his role as Michael Corleone. Marlon Brando's absence is made up for The fact that any reviewer could give this movie a 40 is lost on me. This movie was put together with a superb plot and superb acting. Al Pacino continues to excel at his role as Michael Corleone. Marlon Brando's absence is made up for marvelously by Robert De Niro, who recreates the voice of the godfather perfectly. It is the best sequel i have ever seen. It doesn't match the incredible perfection of the original, but it comes as close as any movie could. The two parallel storylines make the story of the godfather complete. This is an amazing movie… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ErikH.May 3, 2007
How does a movie not garner "Universal Acclaim" when half the reviews are perfect? This isn't as outstanding as the film that precedes it (but what could be?), but it is still an outstanding film and near-essential viewing for anyone How does a movie not garner "Universal Acclaim" when half the reviews are perfect? This isn't as outstanding as the film that precedes it (but what could be?), but it is still an outstanding film and near-essential viewing for anyone interested in great direction and acting.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LexingtonD.Jul 28, 2007
This movie is, in fact, better than the Godfather I, but there's a caveat: it does not function without its predecessor. On its own, the movie is without flaw, but the story is simply not enough without the presumption of its being a This movie is, in fact, better than the Godfather I, but there's a caveat: it does not function without its predecessor. On its own, the movie is without flaw, but the story is simply not enough without the presumption of its being a sequel; having said that, being as Part I is a perfect film that must be seen this should not be an issue for any viewers. Perhaps my critical opinion of it being better simply reflects a flawless continuation of a flawless film, but I do generally feel Part II is equal to, if not superior to, Part I. It's hard to outdo perfection.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
NickTJan 21, 2009
a very good film buy it still is a little too long and a little confusing but overall its a great film. Not as good as the first but its still a great classic SECOND BEST FILM EVER!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DonaldEJan 16, 2008
I have viewed this amazing picture no less than three dozen times and have yet to grown tired of it. It is a captivating, moving, and gripping piece, brilliantly directed and exquisitely written. The cast is nothing less than awesome. An I have viewed this amazing picture no less than three dozen times and have yet to grown tired of it. It is a captivating, moving, and gripping piece, brilliantly directed and exquisitely written. The cast is nothing less than awesome. An epic story that pulls you in and you can't let go! Intrigue, drama, and sparkling action. Not one dull moment. I am no movie critic but this film, and it's predecessor, Godfather I, rank in my book as the greatest films ever made.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
wallacefJun 21, 2008
Brilliant sequel, a matchto the original.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
andrewdJun 21, 2008
Nearly equal to original, but more lengthy and detailed. violence attributes to the effect the mafia has on society, even today.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ShaneBJun 17, 2009
Personally, this gets my vote for 'The Greatest Film Ever Made'. I felt that the only flaw with the original Godfather was that it dragged out a bit towards the end. However, dispite The Godfather: Part II being 25 minutes longer Personally, this gets my vote for 'The Greatest Film Ever Made'. I felt that the only flaw with the original Godfather was that it dragged out a bit towards the end. However, dispite The Godfather: Part II being 25 minutes longer then the original Godfather, this doesn't happen in The Godfather: Part II. In fact, if anything, I wanted this film to go on for longer. The main reason it doesn't drag out dispite it's lenght is because of the transitional two storylines. The main story dealing with Micheal Corleones reign as the Don of the powerful Corleone family. Micheal is clearly a changed man since he took over the family after the death of his father, Vito Corleone, three years earlier. Becoming more and more ruthless, his wife Kay has realised that Micheal has become a vicous, cold and calcuative criminal. Towards the end, she also realises that there is no way back for Micheal and that even though he has gained the world, he has ultimately lost his soul. The other storyline deals with Vito Corleones rise to power(who is protrayed in an Academy-Award winning performance by Robert De Niro). After his family are slaughtered by a local mob boss in Sicily, he flees to America to start a new life. There, he befriends a young man named Genco, who gets Vito a job as a baker with his father. He later becomes friends with two other thugs, Peter Clemenza and Salvatore Tessio, who introduce him to a life of crime. However, they are being squeezed by a local mob boss, Don Fanuci, who orders them to pay protection. Instead of paying however, Vito kills Fanuci, and Vito himself starts his own family. The Godfather: Part II is a stunning film with fantastic performances from Al Pacino, Robert De Niro, Robert Duvell, Diane Keaton, John Cazale, Lee Strasberg and Micheal V. Gazzo, beautiful Cinematography and very well directed by Francis Ford Copella.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
drlowdonAug 20, 2023
Acting as both a sequel and prequel to the first movie, The Godfather Part II tells two parallel storylines. The first involves Mafia chief Michael Corleone in 1958 and 1959 whilst the other is a series of flashbacks following his father,Acting as both a sequel and prequel to the first movie, The Godfather Part II tells two parallel storylines. The first involves Mafia chief Michael Corleone in 1958 and 1959 whilst the other is a series of flashbacks following his father, Vito Corleone from 1917 to 1925.

An incredibly ambitious sequel that reunites most of the cast that helped made the original movie so good, The Godfather Part 2 is one of those rare sequels that actually improves on what came before.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
aaronpaul121May 25, 2012
The first movie is way better than this one. It is still a great movie. Al Pacino's performance was still amazing. The plot is still great. Everything is still great, but maybe the first movie is an incredibly difficult act for it to follow.....
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
CRO-BROJul 31, 2011
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I am sorry but how can you give to this movie a scone seventy one? :O I'm think that is the most shameful thing I have ever saw when it comes about movies reviews. Godfather Part II is a piece of art... maybe it's not excellent as Godfather Part I but it's not far away from it. The score for Part II should be around Ninety, and it would be if you have any common sen-ce. I really respected this page when it comes about movie critics, I respected it TILL NOW. Now I see that you have your mistakes, and you made A BIG ONE. I just cannot accept the "fact" that some childish harry potter have scored more than godfather part II, I mean that's just ridiculous... and when I saw this, I decided to never come on this page again. CIAO… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
sinadoomApr 5, 2013
Suspensful, engaging, gripping story, beautifully directed and superb performance by Al Pacino. He really suited Michael's role and did a great job in this film. However, this has the same problem as the original film, only made worse. TheSuspensful, engaging, gripping story, beautifully directed and superb performance by Al Pacino. He really suited Michael's role and did a great job in this film. However, this has the same problem as the original film, only made worse. The first film was long, but this one is half an hour longer, yet a lot less happens in it. Of course, one has to account for the fact that there are two stories going on here; one of Vito as a young man and one of Michael, but even still, I think there could have been more events and more of a link between the two stories. Overall though, this is a great movie; not as good as the first but definitely worth watching and certainly not a disapointment.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
TrantorMar 2, 2012
This film its as good as Godfather :Part 1. I dont understant how a man who is working in the New York Times gives Godfather 40/100. If i was NTW director i would lay off him.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
andsoitgoesJan 27, 2013
Looking at the negative reviews saying they should have stopped at 1 clearly haven't read the bloody BOOK. Do your research, the book includes the entirety of 1 and 2. That said, 3 is such a complete failure that it's sad. It's the equivalentLooking at the negative reviews saying they should have stopped at 1 clearly haven't read the bloody BOOK. Do your research, the book includes the entirety of 1 and 2. That said, 3 is such a complete failure that it's sad. It's the equivalent of the worst of the Star Wars prequels and Indiana Jones 4. But to say Godfather 2 is a terrible movie compared to the first is absolutely crazy. 1 does not exist without 2, even though 2 isn't AS good, it certainly deserves no less than a low positive or a very high mixed. It's not "Master of Disguise" or "Deuce Bigalo 2". When I see reviewers mark a film so poorly and then rank other films that are throwaway crap, it easily shows how stupid they are. Hate the story, find it a little confusing all you want, even at its worse, this film is better than almost everything made today. It's certainly an infinite amount better than 3.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
TyranianApr 9, 2019
Almost as good as first film, absolutely stellar filmmaking. Brilliant stuff.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
spadenxNov 29, 2011
Easily the greatest sequel of all time. While it is a little too similar to the first film, The built in prequel and the overall growth of Michael in the film shows just how great it really is.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
imthenoobJan 29, 2012
Part 2 is everything that you want in a sequel and then some. It truly matches it in nearly every way possible. The backstory of Vito is a true treat and seeing Michael firmly in place as the head of the family while dealing with a myriad ofPart 2 is everything that you want in a sequel and then some. It truly matches it in nearly every way possible. The backstory of Vito is a true treat and seeing Michael firmly in place as the head of the family while dealing with a myriad of problems highlighted how Michael was very much Vito's son and the only son fitting to lead the family.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
prev
Page:
More From This Movie

90 Critic Reviews

9.0 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 71 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL