New Line Cinema | Release Date: June 10, 2016
7.7
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 693 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
559
Mixed:
91
Negative:
43
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
10
David05Jun 10, 2016
This sequel is really well-done, the director (James Wan) created a work of art, this movie has many different genres, it has everything, it's a horror thriller movie but it has comedy, action, romance, drama, which is awesome! This movieThis sequel is really well-done, the director (James Wan) created a work of art, this movie has many different genres, it has everything, it's a horror thriller movie but it has comedy, action, romance, drama, which is awesome! This movie tell us a great story since the beginning you can feel it! The plot is really awesome and entertaining. The scares were really creepy. This sequel is excellent ! Expand
21 of 25 users found this helpful214
All this user's reviews
7
moviemitch96Jun 21, 2016
Despite not quite reaching the same level as its predecessor, this still managed to hold up surprisingly well for a horror sequel. James Wan does what he knows how to do best, which is make an imaginative and chilling film with several tenseDespite not quite reaching the same level as its predecessor, this still managed to hold up surprisingly well for a horror sequel. James Wan does what he knows how to do best, which is make an imaginative and chilling film with several tense moments throughout. Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga also deliver strong lead performances once again. Overall, while it does explore familiar territory for the most part as well as draw from some horror and possession cliches, most of that is made up for through its fair share of clever and tense scares as well. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
6
stellarnomadJul 28, 2016
I usually like to take a mediator approach in all things: a recognition that there is always two, or more, sides to everything and you only possess a part of the puzzle. In this case I change my mind.

The Conjuring 2 isn't genius, scary,
I usually like to take a mediator approach in all things: a recognition that there is always two, or more, sides to everything and you only possess a part of the puzzle. In this case I change my mind.

The Conjuring 2 isn't genius, scary, interesting, fresh, horrific or any other overblown descriptor people care to toss around so haphazardly. It is, however, a cliched look into a complete non-event that took place in 70's England regarding a poor, single-mother family and some imaginative children desperate for attention.

Why the powers that be chose to revolve this series of films around a dubious duo, known as the Warrens and well known to sceptics, giving them a credibility they don't deserve, is obvious. Plenty of tall tales to fictionalise further based off of their "case studies". Terms such as "based on" and "inspired by" should be taken as Hollywood shorthand for: we take a few of the interesting parts, jazz them up and make up the rest. In this context I would have preferred they simply created a fresh, fictional set of investigators and have them attempt to resolve each of these otherworldly experiences - an updated X-Files, if you will.

That aside, you get a pretty straight forward yarn that gives you several ghosts of the week packed into the one film. The warrens are presented as prettier versions: altruistic, god-fearing, loving people who can't understand why people criticise their work. The family are serviceable as public housing tenants suddenly thrust into creepy events.

Beyond this, I don't have much else to say about the film. I was never scared by the overdone premise, the ghosts were all typical types you've seen before, and the resolution is as absurd as ever--we know its name therefore we win. Aren't we tired of ghosts, zombies, vampires and demons yet? I guess not.

I appreciate this genre for its ability to get under my skin, and provide different perspectives. If done properly it can achieve anything from simmering unease to heart-racing terror, whilst forcing us to focus on issues we would rather not. Horror has long been a vehicle for social commentary, but films like The Conjuring 2 have nothing to say beyond Box Office.
Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
7
eagleeyevikingJun 14, 2016
The Conjuring 2 may lack a "Clap-clap" level scare like the first film but offers everything else; romance, drama, action, tension and plenty of scares.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
JonZsuJun 17, 2016
What this movie lacks in originality is well compensated by the good performances and the fine pacing of scare. it is the one of most enjoyable horror films of the year. By the way, does the designer of the demons have a thing with Marilyn Manson?
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
SpangleSep 6, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The rare actually good horror sequel, The Conjuring 2 serves as yet another example of how James Wan is able to balance good, quality, and well-earned scares with a solid story that keeps you engrossed even when the scary bits take a bit of a break. As with the original, The Conjuring 2 has a lot going for it. Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga have terrific chemistry and make for a truly believable married couple who happen to fight demonic presences in homes. Plus, this new story - particularly the nun - made me produce more than a few bricks out of fear. The slow introduction of the presence and then the rising actions of its presence is great. The film is willing to build tension in a horror movie sense while then balancing it with the tension of whether or not everyone will believe the family. Most horror movies just want to skip into everything and just assumes everyone believes in ghosts. However, Wan knows he has skeptics in the crowd and must prove his case in order to scare them as well. This said, there is one major problem with The Conjuring 2 that holds it back; the ending. In order to defeat the demon, Lorraine must use its name against it. How does she know its name? Oh, it told her earlier in the movie. If the name gives humans power over the demon, why would the demon ever give up its name? I like to imagine that this demon was fired as Chief Possession Officer in England after such a rookie mistake. That said, The Conjuring 2 keeps you on edge for the entire film and effectively earns its scares, instead of relying on cheap tricks. Heck, even the jump scares are well earned, merely through the tension and atmosphere Wan creates. Though a minor stepback, The Conjuring 2 takes what made the original terrific horror and repackages it for another story. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
marcmyworksSep 14, 2016
The Conjuring 2 offers up some great scares and a very haunting demon, however it feels too familiar to the first and doesn't really break any new ground to the horror franchise.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
4
papadrew7Jun 11, 2016
All of the intelligence and freshness that the first conjuring brought to the horror genre is completely gone. The movie wasn't terrible but its a big disappointment for being a sequel to one of the best horror movies ever made.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
andrelucasJun 11, 2016
The Conjuring 2 introduces a new way of doing horror movies. The film is a true mix of scares, afflictions, romances and drama. Everything is very well architected so that the film has a more sensitive and familiar touch. The film isThe Conjuring 2 introduces a new way of doing horror movies. The film is a true mix of scares, afflictions, romances and drama. Everything is very well architected so that the film has a more sensitive and familiar touch. The film is certainly efficient in terror (perhaps even more than its predecessor), but the big bonus is the empathy that the viewer gets the family during the movie.

Featuring new tracks for future movies and using their own resources to create effective antagonists, The Conjuring 2 is certainly the best horror movie I've ever seen.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
Rebecca31Jun 16, 2016
So here we have Ed and Lorraine Warren on another epic journey of ghostbusting, the sequel to the ever popular The Conjuring. If you thought it couldn’t get any scarier than the first one then you are most definitely wrong. You’ll jump andSo here we have Ed and Lorraine Warren on another epic journey of ghostbusting, the sequel to the ever popular The Conjuring. If you thought it couldn’t get any scarier than the first one then you are most definitely wrong. You’ll jump and you’ll scream, again and again. No it’s not perfect, yes it has its fair share of clichés but it’s damn entertaining. Do not miss this movie. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
The3AcademySinsOct 29, 2019
The second entry into the Conjuring Cinematic Universe is fun, scary, but not particularly innovative. It follows mostly identical beats to the original film. However, this is not necessarily a bad thing! Ed and Lorraine Warren receive a lotThe second entry into the Conjuring Cinematic Universe is fun, scary, but not particularly innovative. It follows mostly identical beats to the original film. However, this is not necessarily a bad thing! Ed and Lorraine Warren receive a lot more character development in this sequel. The introduction of the Nun as a villain also works incredibly well. However, there is also not one conjuring in this movie. There is another banishing, where the spirit is expelled from the home. No spirits are summoned at all. Just a little nomenclature fun fact!

The direction is remarkably well done. The scares in the first act are especially scary. The finale is satisfying. This is a very enjoyable horror sequel. Can't wait to see the rest of the franchise!
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
MarioGreeceJul 3, 2016
Very good horror movie. Left me pretty satisfied although it was slow in certain parts.
It could had maybe been even better movie but I don't really complain.
Its very worthy movie to watch on the cinema. 10/10 for the great acting of the
Very good horror movie. Left me pretty satisfied although it was slow in certain parts.
It could had maybe been even better movie but I don't really complain.
Its very worthy movie to watch on the cinema.
10/10 for the great acting of the actors in it.
We don't see many great or that good horror scary movies on this genre often, that's for sure.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
MothmannMay 29, 2019
I really enjoyed this film. Very creepy atmosphere with plent of scares throughout. I also really liked the 1970s vibe which was done really well in this film.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
tellmikeyyJan 30, 2022
Felt longer than it needed to be but it still told a great story and had that unease factors the first one gave me. Any scene with Valak was pure horror-esk. Overall a good watch but did feel like a small step down from the first one.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
JACOBJBNov 24, 2021
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
BrianMcCriticJun 10, 2016
Maybe the most touching heartfelt scare the crap out of me horror film I've ever seen. The script in this film is great you really care about these characters and you really feel the love of The Warren's. The extremely rare sequel that'sMaybe the most touching heartfelt scare the crap out of me horror film I've ever seen. The script in this film is great you really care about these characters and you really feel the love of The Warren's. The extremely rare sequel that's better than the original. A Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
3
MatteoJul 9, 2016
I went to see this because I liked the first one, and I saw there were some good reviews. This movie is bad, at times it feels like Scooby Doo. Just answers to unimaginable problems come out of thin air, not to mention the pointless -andI went to see this because I liked the first one, and I saw there were some good reviews. This movie is bad, at times it feels like Scooby Doo. Just answers to unimaginable problems come out of thin air, not to mention the pointless -and sometimes downright silly- statements about the paranormal. The dialogue is horrendous, there are a few scares in the first forty fives minutes, but then it just becomes absurd and repetitive. It's waaaaaay too long with the same scares used over and over.. If you are over the age of 12, do not go see this. Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
8
SeanVincentJun 11, 2016
Horror sequels can be another horrible film following from it's predecessor's success that most filmmakers just want some money without any effort and interesting stuff to show,they are just blatantly lazy.Conjuring 2 didn't follow that butHorror sequels can be another horrible film following from it's predecessor's success that most filmmakers just want some money without any effort and interesting stuff to show,they are just blatantly lazy.Conjuring 2 didn't follow that but instead brought us new interesting things to this franchise with a captivating story and a hunting and creepy atmosphere,it is a well directed horror sequel.The performances were amazing,the chemistry of the Warrens was just marvelous and so thus the children in the film they were also excellent.As the film progress the tension gets higher and also thus the apprehension.This Horror film is far from the worst and near from the best it's on par with it's predecessor,Conjuring 2 is an example of a good horror sequel Expand
6 of 8 users found this helpful62
All this user's reviews
10
PipeCJun 10, 2016
"The Conjuring 2" Is Equivalent To Its Predecessor, Diabolically Creepy

James Wan is the genuine Sir Alfred Hitchcock of the 21st century Three years ago, the world went crazy with the 5th invention of the Malay director, James Wan - my
"The Conjuring 2" Is Equivalent To Its Predecessor, Diabolically Creepy

James Wan is the genuine Sir Alfred Hitchcock of the 21st century

Three years ago, the world went crazy with the 5th invention of the Malay director, James Wan - my king, master and role model -. "The Conjuring" triumphs in critics and box office bringing a breakthrough and resurgence to horror movies in the last decade,it's considered as the master jewel of malayan and the cinematographic of horror. Wan has continuously been providing us great achievements in commercial films, since his major debut as a director with "Saw" in 2004 to his first action film "7 Furious" last year; his shiny and original style to portray suspense and horror through each frame, has made to the director reaches to the top of podium of the films, not only in the horror genre, also the action genre, and we hope more he'll try to experiment.

"The Conjuring 2" opens the same iconic way that its predecessor, now is the famous case of Amityville (112 Ocean Avenue) which reveals to Ed and Lorraine Warren, the renowned paranormal investigators duo. Amityville was the event that gave them renown and recognition to investigators, but not by their horrible experiences, but by unbelief and ignorance of the people, which didn't believe it possible that those things happen. Later, within the film, we continue to validating in a 90s TV Show lack of confidence and credibility of the people towards the Warrens. Ironically, that skepticism would be powered once more with the Enfield Poltergeist, the case more documented to paranormal level. The famous massacre (DeFeo family) has been adapted millions and millions of times a big screen, however, Wan manages to save that gloomy essence of the night of the murder and projects it of a delirious and disturbing way in Lorraine's head, from the first minutes, "HORROR" genre shines.

The Enfield Case is adapted with purity and splendour of a script credited to Carey Hayes and Chad Hayes & James Wan and David Leslie Johnson. Wan dodges references of the two small programs have focused on the event to develop to Ed and Lorraine in the story (in real life, Warrens had not the least significance in the case, they only evidenced it one night). The film takes its time - somebody says that enough, I for one, the more see James's delights more I go crazy - to introduces the destabilized life of Peggy Hodgson (Frances O'Connor). The events happened in a interval between 1977 and 1979, to capture each sublime moment of the epoch, it was vital the intervention of the Department of costume led by Kristin Burke, the Department of light and art led by Fiona Gavin, A. Todd Holland and Andrew Rothschild, which not exaggerated in capturing the atmosphere of the 70s and 80s. Wan is amazing to recreate complex and refined milieus and sets, every shadow, square, furniture, door, toy and even each color play a fundamental role in the creation of the style of the director, a director who is delicately precise with his details, even though was a humble house, without many luxuries or support tools, the visual tension is concurrent.

On a night as any, Hodgson family is sleeping peacefully after a tiring day. Two of the four children, Janet (Madison Wolfe) and Margaret (Lauren Esposito) are awakened abruptly from their nap by an unknown entity, immediately, they go to tell what happened them to her mother, who refuses to believe and finds an Ouija board manually made by her daughters. Next day, harassment persist more sharply up to the point that the mother experiences with her own eyes paranormal events - James's interesting proposal to not to fall into the cliche that nobody believes them. Meanwhile, a suggestive sub-plot takes place in Warren family. Lorraine tends to keep fragments of each case and in their latest investigations, she sees to the Demon Nun (Bonnie Aarons), a superb and shocking demonic nun who torments them with a sinister intent, that purpose will intertwine of a sumptuous way with Hodgson's ending (which never happened).

Wan knows how to distort every trick in his favor, rung by rung construction makes that final climax has really earned. Wan is distinguished by the ability to frighten or intimidate the audience with shots both day as at night, he knows play and combine the tools that possesses, knows to keep constant tone of his film, he doesn't allow his audience to sleep, and even though this time he uses to more jump-scares than its predecessor, are equally enjoyable and are not shamelessly used. All of the above is essential in the foundations, however, the actors take all the credit Ed, Lorraine, Peggy and her four children (especially Janet) are fabulous, measured and charismatic.

"The Conjuring 2" is credited with the title "Horror film of the year" and is used for viewing the constant advancement of its director within the genre, it's hard to watch and hear, the film is not suitable for hearts or minds weak, "The Conjuring 2" an instant classic.
Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
3
moothemagiccowSep 5, 2016
This would be a great comedy, but it turns out it's supposed to be a horror movie.
The scares are so cheesy and the special effects are so poor that I just couldn't stop myself from laughing.
The Conjuring 1 was actually creepy as hell.
This would be a great comedy, but it turns out it's supposed to be a horror movie.
The scares are so cheesy and the special effects are so poor that I just couldn't stop myself from laughing.
The Conjuring 1 was actually creepy as hell. This one is just bad. I'm really glad I didn't see it in theaters because I'm sure my guffaws would have ruined it for everyone else.

The story, moreso than the last movie, is focused on insisting that haunted houses are real, which really killed it for me. It's obvious what really happened - the movie even spells it out for you.
Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
10
Red-Opposom-098Jun 10, 2016
The Conjuring 2 is directed by James Wan and stars Patrick Wilson,Vera Farmiga, Madison Wolfe, Frances O' Connor, Simon McBurney and Lauren Esposito. Ok to start things off I really liked the first movie and I really wanted to like this, andThe Conjuring 2 is directed by James Wan and stars Patrick Wilson,Vera Farmiga, Madison Wolfe, Frances O' Connor, Simon McBurney and Lauren Esposito. Ok to start things off I really liked the first movie and I really wanted to like this, and I did. Since this was a horror movie sequel I had a feeling this wasn't going to be any good.
Everyone in the movie was great including the kids. There was one scene which I won't spoil had Patrick Wilson, Madison Wolfe and a glass of water. The nun you saw in the trailer was really scary. Even when the scary parts are not happening, the saw character moments are great. James Wan is a master of horror. You can tell he knows what he's doing. The soundtrack is great, the scares are great, and the characters are great. One huge surprise was Simon McBurney, I haven't seen him in anything but he was great. Another great thing about the movie is that it's very entertaining. My only problem is that it uses some horror cliches but its just done so well that it feels different. That's my opinion though. This is the best horror sequel to come out. Is the film perfect, no, is it great, yes. You really should check the film out when you get the chance.
Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
9
JWayneworldJun 10, 2016
The movie is truly awesome. It has many well made scenes. I have made a video about this movie. Just visit youtube and then search "The Conjuring 2 honest movie review (no spoilers) !!! Best Videos".
You must watch this video for know the
The movie is truly awesome. It has many well made scenes. I have made a video about this movie. Just visit youtube and then search "The Conjuring 2 honest movie review (no spoilers) !!! Best Videos".
You must watch this video for know the honest review.
Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
10
FarhanFirozJul 22, 2016
Conjuring 2 is definitely one of the greatest horror movies ever made. Nearly every aspect of the movie is perfect . The use of claustrophobic environment and elimination of all the horror cliches makes the movie great , intense and Scary. AConjuring 2 is definitely one of the greatest horror movies ever made. Nearly every aspect of the movie is perfect . The use of claustrophobic environment and elimination of all the horror cliches makes the movie great , intense and Scary. A must see movie in theatre . Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
5
NigmeJul 2, 2016
User score: 7.9 ????!!!!!!!

You must be joking, People!!! The screenplay is so predictable and so boring that even Patrick Wilson & Vera Farmiga are not able to save the movie.
I am extremely disappointed mr. Wan.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
5
DXDJun 27, 2016
RUBBISH........................... its not scary and no one dies so over hyped the story is good and acting to great just not as scary as the trailers make it out to be
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
10
Lambo442Jun 20, 2016
James Wan strikes again with another bone-chilling horror containing imagery that will haunt you for weeks. Enfield in the 70's acts as a brilliantly sombre setting for this take on the famous real-life haunting described as 'England'sJames Wan strikes again with another bone-chilling horror containing imagery that will haunt you for weeks. Enfield in the 70's acts as a brilliantly sombre setting for this take on the famous real-life haunting described as 'England's Amityville.' I've watched some of the footage taken from around the time and although I'm a non-believer, some of the goings-on did phase me a little. For example, how did such a young girl manage to change the pitch of her voice so drastically without seriously damaging her throat? If is was all a hoax (which I'm almost certain it was) then it was all very convincing one and not bad for a bunch of nutty inbreds. It certainly makes for a great horror, especially in this hands of Wan, who takes it to a new level of course, throwing in the Warrens and a bad-ass demon to boot. What a film Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
9
JoeWilliamsJun 11, 2016
A well-written horror sequel master piece with great performances of the cast and a great hunting or creepy atmosphere that builds tension throughout the film.With scares that works best here this horror film is a must see if you are a horror fanatic
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
9
busbfranJun 10, 2016
James Wan must be praised for this amazingly directed sequel to one of the best horror franchise of recent years. The conjuring 2 comes together brilliantly with the great performances, effects and scares. This is a must watch horror!
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
9
roman_emperorJun 11, 2016
Critics... I think they are just trolls sometimes.

I loved this movie. The movie only has 1 moment that turn me off. The use of special effect doesn't really work for me. If the Crooked Man would have been an actual person in costume, it
Critics... I think they are just trolls sometimes.

I loved this movie. The movie only has 1 moment that turn me off. The use of special effect doesn't really work for me. If the Crooked Man would have been an actual person in costume, it would have been better.
Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
2
mmmpepsiSep 26, 2016
Not even slightly scary. The weird fast forward thing they did when the "ghosts" appeared was pretty awful. The ghosts in general just looked like normal people in costumes. The fact they act like this is a true story is pretty hilarious withNot even slightly scary. The weird fast forward thing they did when the "ghosts" appeared was pretty awful. The ghosts in general just looked like normal people in costumes. The fact they act like this is a true story is pretty hilarious with how fake everything looked. The soundtrack is great though. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
TryASummersaultJun 13, 2016
4.8/5. James Wan has crafted the greatest horror film I've ever seen and solidified himself as the new age master of horror. I've never screamed out loud in sheer surprise/fear before but I did watching today. Imagine the best elements of The4.8/5. James Wan has crafted the greatest horror film I've ever seen and solidified himself as the new age master of horror. I've never screamed out loud in sheer surprise/fear before but I did watching today. Imagine the best elements of The Exorcist, Poltergeist, The Amityville Horror, Insidious, and The conjuring, and you have this new age classic. The camera work in this is absolutely astonishing and evokes pure tension throughout. The atmosphere and lighting is executed perfectly. The plot has several different aspects intertwining into a fantastic story overall. The soundtrack is stunningly terrifying. The demonic entities are the most frightening I've ever seen. Seriously if you are a fan of horror or just film in general you must see this. I truly hope this franchise has several more movies because both films are amazing.
"Sometimes it takes a leap of faith, to believe when no one else will."- Ed Warren
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
moviecritic68Jul 14, 2016
Hard to truly rate horror films in accordance to other genres but that being said this film was easily the best horror picture I've seen in years. A little cheeky in parts but overall delivers the goods on scaring the crap out of you atHard to truly rate horror films in accordance to other genres but that being said this film was easily the best horror picture I've seen in years. A little cheeky in parts but overall delivers the goods on scaring the crap out of you at times ..... and that is it's purpose is it not ? I give it a 8.5 overall. Don't cross your legs if the row in front of you reclines are you might get a sprain knee and a lap full of popcorn :) Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
IGaJul 26, 2016
Remains scary, but with a little more sentimentalism... and that's good. Familiarity with the characters may be the reason, but this only adds to the strange and dark story. This time, we have not the simple work of the first that makes it soRemains scary, but with a little more sentimentalism... and that's good. Familiarity with the characters may be the reason, but this only adds to the strange and dark story. This time, we have not the simple work of the first that makes it so scary, and I admit: it disturbs a little. But the strong performances of the actors outweigh any unnecessary exaggeration. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
HectorInTheMornJun 14, 2016
This is really one of the best and most scary horror movies I had seen in a very long time in my life. I recommend seeing it now! It is definitely worth all of the money!
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
barometerJun 17, 2016
The Conjuring 2 is fine tuned to perfection. Its depiction of supposedly true events is extremely dubious and it offers absolutely nothing new, but the winning central performances and Wans masterful direction make this one of the best of theThe Conjuring 2 is fine tuned to perfection. Its depiction of supposedly true events is extremely dubious and it offers absolutely nothing new, but the winning central performances and Wans masterful direction make this one of the best of the genre, and a steady improvement over the first film. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
3
weiiskruezJun 20, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I heard about the movie Conjuring 2, about how great it was and how well it was rated, I immediately arrange a visit to the best cinema in town for the best experience. I must say, the movie is a total let down. It was supposed to be a horror movie, but it doesn't seems to be portraying as one. The concept of ghosts, demons, haunting, poltergeist, are not supposed to be jump scares or some imaginary crooked man that can actually twist limbs of an animal or puncture hole through a solid door! I am not sure if the screen writer and the director has lost touch, the supernatural entities are supposed to be eerie, mysterious, send chills down the spine, and make your imagination runs wild. A good and quality horror movie I was hoping for, is to have the feeling of having to wonder that might it be possible to happen the moment I step out of the cinema and won't even dare to walk alone in the dark, going to the washroom alone, go downstairs for a cup of water in the middle of the night, or switch off the lights when I sleep at night... A ghost or demon doesn't necessary be mutant looking to be scary... One look at her, the viewers can immediately conclude that she is the bad one, one look at him, he is the good one... What is wrong with the screen writer? It is so misleading... Before the movie even ends, my personal feelings are, phew, the movie's soon gonna be over, time to go back, what an overly exaggerated movie, piece of joke, definitely won't leave an impression... I am not saying that the movie must be realistic, I know, it is a movie, it is for entertainment purpose, it is supposed to be unrealistic and exaggerated, I totally get that... But, not to the point where it feels like watching Alien vs Predator movie... Horror genre, baby alien crawlers jumping out from air ducts / chests that scares the sh*t out of you, predator trying to kill you with its concealed weapon instead of an umbrella from thin air that can do bigger damage than a shotgun... With those abilities, I'm surprised that no one died in Conjuring 2... The whole story is so badly plotted, the ending is totally bollocks, so predictable, and it is very obvious that the screen writer has very little knowledge about supernatural and under pressure from the first Conjuring movie... I am not against anyone watching this movie, I did enjoy the humorous part with the police and Ed's jokes. There are a massive amount of positive feedbacks, but I'm sorry, it's just not up to my standards... Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
PollockJun 24, 2016
The Conjuring 2 is a wonderful movie and excellent sequel, but is less scary that the first movie . Whatever, I think that is one of the few that are good of this genre in this times
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
daviddelnorte23Jan 18, 2018
Muy buena película de terror/entretenimiento que cuenta dos historias a la vez. Soñé muchos dias con "la monja" pero que al final se le va la mano con lo fantástico y los efectos.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
luu123Apr 9, 2017
This is the best horror film I have seen. I'm very scared when I watch it because of its effect. I think this is a must-see. The acting of the main characters is good. I am very impressed by the role of Vera Farmiga.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
GinaKJun 12, 2016
Overall an enjoyable film, but for me the film was much too long and the London actors were not very interesting, just workmanlike. I was nodding off until Lorraine and Ed arrived in London – but then I thought the film really took off andOverall an enjoyable film, but for me the film was much too long and the London actors were not very interesting, just workmanlike. I was nodding off until Lorraine and Ed arrived in London – but then I thought the film really took off and was fantastic. The "second half" was beautifully acted with plenty of tension and great plot twists. Perhaps the problem was that the introduction to the haunting was not very interesting or original nor were the scenes of Lorraine and Ed at home,even though we are fond of them by now. Yes, I know this was necessary explanation but much of it was really dull and went on much too long. But once the plot strands came together – Wow! Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
3
GuywiththeGamesJun 10, 2016
The best part of the movie was the beginning. Everything else was boring. This movies definition of "horror" are jump scares that wear off quick. There is no tension, not a single person in this movie dies (Except some random family in theThe best part of the movie was the beginning. Everything else was boring. This movies definition of "horror" are jump scares that wear off quick. There is no tension, not a single person in this movie dies (Except some random family in the beginning), and it is full of cliches. Random things move around the house? Check. Demon possessing a little girl? Check. The horror only happens in dark rooms cause it's more scary? Check. Also, none of the characters are interesting. I don't remember anyone. Some of the logic that this little girl was faking being possessed was some of the stupidest crap I have seen. I know that this movie was based off a true story, but that doesn't make it a good story. Like I said, NOBODY DIES. I was actually begging for someone to be killed. This movie does not even deserve an "R" rating. The only rating it deserves is a "3" Expand
4 of 11 users found this helpful47
All this user's reviews
10
kokolostaJun 10, 2016
The spookiest movie i have seen in my life.AMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG.
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
10
JurassicParkFanJun 13, 2016
This is the best horror movie I have seen all year! It has everything in your checkbook on how to make an incredible horror film. I don't know how directors these days just don't know how to make a great horror film. It is scary, It has a lotThis is the best horror movie I have seen all year! It has everything in your checkbook on how to make an incredible horror film. I don't know how directors these days just don't know how to make a great horror film. It is scary, It has a lot of tension and suspense, actual characters you care about, a great fleshed out screenplay, great horror visuals, jump-scares that actually do frighten you unlike those false jump-scares, That's It Directors! THAT'S ALL YOU NEED TO DO! - Nicholas Cage. 10/10 go see it!! Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
5
NerdConsultantJun 26, 2016
I actually thought this was a fairly decent horror film, though it’s not a classic, like The Witch or It Follows. The major reason being that whereas the first film felt like it was using a lot of the horror tropes to it’s advantage, thisI actually thought this was a fairly decent horror film, though it’s not a classic, like The Witch or It Follows. The major reason being that whereas the first film felt like it was using a lot of the horror tropes to it’s advantage, this film feels like it’s using them as a crutch to cover up the cracks in the script, which I was really beginning to notice. The overall performances are pretty good and it’s a decent made horror film, but I really wish the Conjuring films would not market themselves as based on a true story and I hated the treatment of skeptics in the film and I don’t like the fact that these films are perpetuating the idea of exorcisms being true, a lot of people are not seeking medical help because they believe in exorcisms Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
8
michael1208Jun 11, 2016
Sequels of horror genre have always been cursed to turn out poor yet director James Wan manages to set his bar as compelling as the first one; though not critically-acclaimed but overall a satisfying scare without blood and gore. SlightlySequels of horror genre have always been cursed to turn out poor yet director James Wan manages to set his bar as compelling as the first one; though not critically-acclaimed but overall a satisfying scare without blood and gore. Slightly longer than its predecessor, the 134 minutes running time enhances smooth pacing of the plot, allows further debate over the controversy of supernatural phenomenons and scientific psychology, human tricks and role play of the religion organisations; even if parts of its horror elements may feel routine, it is still able to trigger chills and unsettling moods. Characters development and emotional engagement especially the love life of Warren have made this follow up more to like a family crisis drama interrupted by a demonic figure, thanks to the strong performance of the young casts, eerie but not over loud thematic scores as well as the confident cinematography and visual effects. Overall, the efforts of remaining the styles from the first one, the decision to twist the final act and the addition of dramatic aspects are mixing so well which eventually it just feels so real that leaves the desire to follow up with the next documented case. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
8
RainbowDenixJun 20, 2016
Very spooky movie.Good actor's game,atmosphere of terror everywher.Very nice film.this movie really scare you to crap his pants.I don't know what else to write just see this movie.Part 2
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
8
sandbornJun 16, 2016
A very well made movie with minor flaws. The first scene is one of the best openings to a horror movie ever. This alone proves that director, James Wan is a genius! There's a lot of tension and a lot of scares. It gets to be over-the-top atA very well made movie with minor flaws. The first scene is one of the best openings to a horror movie ever. This alone proves that director, James Wan is a genius! There's a lot of tension and a lot of scares. It gets to be over-the-top at times, which slightly detracts from the story's realism. My only beef with the movie is how the haunting is resolved. It could have been more clever. Other than that, this movie is a must see! Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
0
BamrockJun 16, 2016
Not Scary

There is only so much ghostly door slamming that can happen before a person starts to think he wasted his money. The sound design is so awful it can only be compared to a 2 year old with the lungs of an Olympic swimmer screeching
Not Scary

There is only so much ghostly door slamming that can happen before a person starts to think he wasted his money. The sound design is so awful it can only be compared to a 2 year old with the lungs of an Olympic swimmer screeching into your ear. I wish I could give a lower rating. The acting was good, but everything else was rediculous and annoying. In a word, this movie is forgettable. Don't waste your money on "The Conjuring 2" and go see "Warcraft" instead.
Expand
7 of 25 users found this helpful718
All this user's reviews
10
NumberOneFourJun 10, 2016
Simply the best 2016 horror film, a film epic and as good as the first , the story is diabolically chilling.
The BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEST EVER
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
0
imthenoobNov 6, 2017
What disappoints me is that the story behind the Conjuring 2 is painfully boring and not scary in the slightest. The sub plot with the Nun was interesting and that should have been the focus instead of the junk main plot in England. ReallyWhat disappoints me is that the story behind the Conjuring 2 is painfully boring and not scary in the slightest. The sub plot with the Nun was interesting and that should have been the focus instead of the junk main plot in England. Really disappointed as I was a fan of the first film. Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
10
vgmkyleJun 13, 2016
Conjuring 2 redeems the franchise after the utterly terrible Annabelle. This movie satisfied me not only because of the well placed scares, but it was just brilliantly acted out and well shot. The special effects bugged me and disturbed me.Conjuring 2 redeems the franchise after the utterly terrible Annabelle. This movie satisfied me not only because of the well placed scares, but it was just brilliantly acted out and well shot. The special effects bugged me and disturbed me. James Wan is awesome. Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
2
EpicLadySpongeJun 10, 2016
There's no way I ain't falling for this obvious horror sequel bait again. Remember Insidious: Chapter 3? Well, this one manages to get positive reviews, but I fail to see what's the difference in me.
4 of 25 users found this helpful421
All this user's reviews
9
TheQuietGamerOct 13, 2016
What works in James Wan's follow up to his horror hit, aside from the man's mastership over the genre, is that there is a very human element to it. It treats it's character like humans and takes time to allow us to connect and care aboutWhat works in James Wan's follow up to his horror hit, aside from the man's mastership over the genre, is that there is a very human element to it. It treats it's character like humans and takes time to allow us to connect and care about them. It even fleshes out the Warrens a little bit more.

All of that is something the vast majority of horror film's struggle with nowadays. We aren't able to care about their characters, because all they really are is blank faces meant to scream at stuff. The Conjuring 2's ability to give us characters that feel like real people (all fantastically portrayed by a very talented cast) gives the movie an incredible edge over the competition. It also allows elements of humor, heart, and romance to be apart of the experience in ways that feel natural and believable. The writing is just good.

The horror elements is also very well handled. While it ends up being not that scary, Wan's experience with the genre allows for a very well-crafted haunted house thrill-ride. The excellent camera angles, spooky ideas, and an actual emphasis on tension building show what mainstream horror movies can be in the right hands.

James Wan gives us something better than all those crappy teenage date night, jump scare fests that clog up theaters all the dang time. It's a respectable effort. One made out of genuine love for the genre and talent. As a result it's so much more than your cheaply-made cash-crab horror sequel that we so often get. James Wan breaths new potential back into the mainstream horror genre. It's just up to other directors to pick up on it and start making horror movies with their heads and hearts, instead of just focusing on their wallets.

9.1/10
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
MisterKSJun 17, 2016
A masterful horror film that has a little everything for anyone. It's as terrifying as the first one yet it deepens its' characters that separates itself from a lot of horror movies. And the plot is thicker than the first one which makes theA masterful horror film that has a little everything for anyone. It's as terrifying as the first one yet it deepens its' characters that separates itself from a lot of horror movies. And the plot is thicker than the first one which makes the movie even more engaging. If you wanna get scared and riveted, then this is your ticket! Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
joyalJun 15, 2016
Scary redefined,great scares -stunning camera works-out of focus shots was brilliant ,unexpected scary horrifying shots by James wan is awesome- theater was scatted -everybody go n watch this blockbuster horror film and get scared .
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
9
Baby1206BabyJun 11, 2016
Director James Wan did an amazing job once again. Yes, it looks like something we have seen it before in other horror films, but it is the cinematography that brings up the tension. The jump scares are not cheesy at all, they are great. WeDirector James Wan did an amazing job once again. Yes, it looks like something we have seen it before in other horror films, but it is the cinematography that brings up the tension. The jump scares are not cheesy at all, they are great. We also get to know more about the Warrens in this movie and what they had been through, and how they feel, which is why when the girl told Lorraine about her paranormal experience, and Lorraine being still-ed, you actually felt how Lorraine feels. This also makes the drama so rich. Definitely watch it if you like the first conjuring! And I hope they make conjuring 3 with James Wan directing it. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
tjman09Jun 19, 2016
The Conjuring 2 is one of those extremely rare horror sequels that doesn’t fall victim to copying it’s predecessor. While The Conjuring 2 isn’t free of cliches and isn’t better than it’s predecessor, it’s a really solid horror film separateThe Conjuring 2 is one of those extremely rare horror sequels that doesn’t fall victim to copying it’s predecessor. While The Conjuring 2 isn’t free of cliches and isn’t better than it’s predecessor, it’s a really solid horror film separate from the original. The Conjuring 2 is chilling without relying on jump scares, features really good character development, despite being a tad familiar. This film may prove that James Wan is the modern king of horror, because every horror film he does is solid.
One thing to learn from this film is that while jump scares are a cheap way to get scares, they can be very effective when used sparingly. Many modern horror films rely solely on jump scares to scare the audience, but this film has a truly chilling tone, and many scenes are terrifying without jumping the audience. That being said there are jump scares littered throughout this film, but Wan is clever when he uses them, and is often effective when he uses them. I’m proud that most horror films don’t jump me, that being said multiple times watching this film I found myself jumped.
One major reason this film succeeds is because of the character development, which really helps the audience care about the characters. Every single character in the film is well fleshed out, and given a moment of relatability. Even the ghosts in the film are generally scary and have a really good design. However, the film’s characters represent one of the film’s major problems, the fact that it’s based on true events. After seeing this film it would seem to say that the phrase “based on true events” was only included for dramatic effect.
The story of the film is based on the actual events of the Enfield Poltergeist in England in the late 70’s but the problem is that half the film uses moments from that investigation and the other half feels like an exorcist rip off. It’s unfortunate because there’s a terrifying story, despite the evidence that it was a hoax, in the Enfield Poltergeist that gets lost in the shuffle. Simply put if the filmmakers hadn’t felt the need to match The Exorcist, the film’s ending may not have felt so different from the rest of the film.
In the end for horror buffs, this may be the best horror film of the year, if nothing better comes along. For those who want to see a great horror film regardless of its faithfulness to the actual events this is a great film, but for those who want a faithful adaptation of the Enfield Poltergeist this film definitely takes some liberties. That being said this film is genuinely scary which is rare today, and above that is just a good film in general, so it’s most definitely worth seeing.
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
4
Dal_ReviewedDatAug 31, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Really disappointing.

One thing I think ALL horrors should be, is punchy. A good pace and flow between scares and suspense. The Conjuring 2 managers to have very little fear factor, regardless of some excellent cast members, it just dragged. Being over 2 hours long really made this movie suffer, its 2 1/4 hrs long, and to me that's 45 minutes of drag, and drag it did. By the final seen, i was only shocked that I'd made it to the end, after 30 minutes of considering switching it off.

The story ties up the real-life-haunting's in the UK and US, with the same team from the 1st movie. It has a few jump scares early on, but by the time the "Crooked Man" reveals himself, I was laughing at it. It tries to re-create the unnatural movements of Sadako in the Ring series, which still haunts me, but instead it's like a pantomime villain walking through the house, and is really un-scary. Even my missus was laughing. It felt like the movie had a few concepts which failed to add up. Whilst the acting was fine, the script was often poor.

I maybe sounding harsh on this film, but the last 45 minutes was a true struggle to watch, just through sheer boredom. By the credits I could only conclude that the film was totally up-itself.

Believe me, they'll be a Conjuring 3... and this my friends is why Hollywood horrors are poor. Endless sequals to films that originally performed well, I'm sure most horror fans will watch this, but in comparison to other mainstream horrors of the past few years, such as "It Follows" this failed to scare, get under my skin or entertain
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
GentM2015Sep 5, 2016
The Conjuring 2 is a direct sequel to the first Conjuring and is once again directed by James Wan. Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga are back on the leading roles as Ed and Lorraine Warren, the paranormal investigators. Also stars FrancesThe Conjuring 2 is a direct sequel to the first Conjuring and is once again directed by James Wan. Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga are back on the leading roles as Ed and Lorraine Warren, the paranormal investigators. Also stars Frances O'Connor, Madison Wolfe, Simon McBurney, Franka Potente and Lauren Esposito among others.
The film is based on the true story, that follows Ed and Lorraine Warren trying to help a family with their problems with paranormal forces in Brimsdown, Enfield council house in 1977, what is their most documented paranormal case ever.
This is one of the best horror movies ever made in my opinion, and it is much better than the first film which I also really liked. What this movie does is benefit from a great horror director who clearly knows how to inject good scares with amazing use of camerawork and tension building that result to thrilling scenes and make for a great movie overall.
All of the actors do a fantastic job, with Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga on the lead who have great chemistry with each other and make us really feel for their characters when stuff with the demons is going down. Also, Madison Wolfe gives one of the best kid performances on screen ever. She is just brilliant and carries entire scenes on her own, with her amazing gifted ability to act and it might just be me but she is totally Oscar worthy here. Much better than all the kids in Stranger Things combined, even though I know that's a TV Shows by comparison, but just on the acting scale of things she deserves much more recognition for this role .
Since the movie is over two hours, by the end it does feel like it is going on for a bit too long, and the ending in itself is a bit too much in the sense that the way they defeat the demon and resolve the case felt like cheating to me. But either way those are the only small issues that I have with this wonderful film which I loved and I can't wait to see what's in store for this universe.
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
UrbanlistenerJun 18, 2016
Great sequel to the great first one, really enjoyed that one. James Wan does not disappoints and brings us a truly well crafted horror film, mostly based on atmosphere, suspense, music and camera tricks, while relying on jump scares and scaryGreat sequel to the great first one, really enjoyed that one. James Wan does not disappoints and brings us a truly well crafted horror film, mostly based on atmosphere, suspense, music and camera tricks, while relying on jump scares and scary imagery only when necessary and after the tension has been build up to its culmination point, which allows this sequel to be as good as the first and also scarier, bigger and better than it had any right to be. This is how a horror film is done, definitely worth your time and money! Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
TheDude-Jun 19, 2016
A truly terrifying film.................................................................................................................................................................................................
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
Giantmonkey101Jun 16, 2016
James Wan is easily the best horror movie director in a very very long time, usually sequels suck ass compared to the original (The conjuring was amazing) but this was just has good if not better, excellent movie, great casting, acting, storyJames Wan is easily the best horror movie director in a very very long time, usually sequels suck ass compared to the original (The conjuring was amazing) but this was just has good if not better, excellent movie, great casting, acting, story with a very good ending. **** i love this guy! Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
horrorliefhebJun 11, 2016
-The Conjuring 2 (alternatively known as The Conjuring 2: The Enfield Poltergeist) is a 2016 American supernatural horror film directed by James Wan. The film was written by Carey Hayes, Chad Hayes, Wan and David Leslie Johnson. It is the-The Conjuring 2 (alternatively known as The Conjuring 2: The Enfield Poltergeist) is a 2016 American supernatural horror film directed by James Wan. The film was written by Carey Hayes, Chad Hayes, Wan and David Leslie Johnson. It is the sequel to the film The Conjuring, which was released on July 19, 2013. Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga reprise their roles as paranormal investigators and authors Ed and Lorraine Warren. The Warrens travel to the United Kingdom to assist the Hodgson family, who are experiencing poltergeist activity at their Enfield council house in 1977.

-The film was released in the United States on June 10, 2016, by Warner Bros. Pictures.

--Filming:

-Principal photography for The Conjuring 2 began on September 21, 2015, in Los Angeles, California. Due to inexplicable eerie events during production of the first film, a priest from the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Santa Fe was brought in to bless the set of the sequel by the film's producers. Production moved to London on November 18, 2015, with filming taking place in and around The Warrington, a pub in the residential district of Maida Vale. On November 22, filming took place at Marylebone station. Filming concluded on December 1, 2015. Production lasted for 50 days, with 40 days filming on sets and locations in Los Angeles, and 10 days on location in London.

-In early July 2015, lead actors Farmiga and Wilson visited Lorraine Warren at the New England Paranormal Research Center in Connecticut in preparation for their roles.

--Critical response:

-The review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes reports an approval rating of 73%, based on 92 reviews, with an average rating of 6.6/10. The site's critical consensus reads, "The Conjuring 2 can't help but lose a bit of its predecessor's chilly sting through familiarity, but what remains is still a superior ghost story told with spine-tingling skill." Metacritic assigned the film a weighted average of 64 out of 100, based on 34 critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews".

-In her review for The Hollywood Reporter, Sheri Linden praised the film, saying: "Three years after The Conjuring rattled the multiplex with old-school horror, director James Wan ups the ante with an excellent sequel." Owen Gleiberman of Variety gave the film a mixed review, writing: "On one level, The Conjuring 2 is just a not-bad megaplex funhouse movie, no more and no less, but on another level it offers its potential fans a helping of reassurance to go along with the fear. If there are ghost demons out there, then God must be out there as well. Audiences, it was long ago proven, will pay to see both." TheWrap's Alonso Duralde gave the film a positive review, stating: "Frightening rarely strikes twice in the same place, despite the efforts of so many horror sequels, but even if The Conjuring 2 doesn't deliver the delightful jolts of its predecessor, it maintains a consistent chill throughout, with a slow and steady dread that creeps up on you over time."

-In a mixed review, Chris Nashawaty of Entertainment Weekly gave the film a B-, writing: "There are some solid scares (Wan is too gifted in the dark art of gotcha manipulation to not make you leap a few times), but there's nothing on par with the first film's brilliant hide-and-clap scene with Lili Taylor." Pete Hammond of Deadline.com wrote that he was "pleasantly surprised" by the sequel and what Wan has accomplished with the film, stating: "Wan knows the tricks of this trade (heightened sound effects, moving furniture, dark corners) but somehow miraculously he really puts a fresh spin on it all here. It's riveting stuff, even if in a familiar cinematic environment." He added: "It is one hell of a movie."

--Possible sequel:

-Director James Wan has said that a third Conjuring film is possible if response to The Conjuring 2 warranted it. He said: "There could be many more (Conjuring) movies because the Warrens have so many stories." Screenwriters Chad and Carey Hayes have also expressed interest in working on a story for another sequel. However, Wan stated that he may not have time to direct a third film because of his commitment to other projects.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
JPKJul 2, 2019
A Satisfyingly Scary Sequel
Conjuring 2 isn’t as good as the first film, But it’s just as scary.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
JAKEJACOBJORDSep 22, 2021
GOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOOD
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
dharmaMay 31, 2021
The Conjuring 2 is a big hit that cements this franchise as one of the most profitable in the history of cinema. Why? For such a low budget, the producers got huge box office numbers. To tell you the truth, I watched the 1st installment andThe Conjuring 2 is a big hit that cements this franchise as one of the most profitable in the history of cinema. Why? For such a low budget, the producers got huge box office numbers. To tell you the truth, I watched the 1st installment and was quite impressed but passed on the rest. Just catching up to them as its 3rd installment will be released as of writing. My take? It is a good supernatural thriller that suffers the same problem as 'Annabelle': as it is based on a true story, the film makers can only tell you so much without 'over dramatization' and face it, a ghost film is bounded by one own's imagination, but a 'reality' based film such as this is bounded by the facts of the case itself. Of course, you can add a 'Freddy Krueger' like figure here and there, but to no avail. It is designed as thrill ride hence its popularity but for horror fans such as myself, it felt too 'mild' for my liking. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Compi24Jun 27, 2016
James Wan proves once again that he is the only worth-a-damn mainstream horror filmmaker in the biz with this evocative sequel to the 2013 marvel "The Conjuring." With "The Conjuring 2," Wan reimplements the many sensations that made thatJames Wan proves once again that he is the only worth-a-damn mainstream horror filmmaker in the biz with this evocative sequel to the 2013 marvel "The Conjuring." With "The Conjuring 2," Wan reimplements the many sensations that made that predecessor great (the visuals, the sound design, the character development), slightly improves upon the things that hurt the 2013 film (the cheese, the unintentional humor), and even leaves room for some new elements for the audience to chew on as well (new locale, new demons, new visual tricks). It's enough that Wan has made an actually watchable horror film, but a great horror sequel? Bravo, sir. Bravo. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
LeZeeOct 4, 2016
This time a London family struggle in their haunted house.

First of all, I am not a big fan of the first film, but I liked that. Now this sequel was not bad either. This time it takes us to the London. But the film reminded me the 80s film
This time a London family struggle in their haunted house.

First of all, I am not a big fan of the first film, but I liked that. Now this sequel was not bad either. This time it takes us to the London. But the film reminded me the 80s film 'Poltergeist', particularly the second part. So don't assume it is exactly the same, only the scenes involving house seems similar, but the story was different. It is another true story based film, that's what they said in the opening statement. You're not forced to believe that, if you're here for an entertainment, you will get that if you put your logics away for the two hours.

A family of four young children and their mother living in a house in the London witness some serious paranormal activities lately. Particularly the eleven year old girl affected the most with the spirit the house possessed. So the American couple from the first film are brought in to do their best to help the family. When they try to contact the spirit, they won't get what they were looking for. Instead, an unexpected blame goes for the girl and soon the family loses confidence in them. The overcoming those misunderstanding, particularly realising the truth brings a twist before concluding the tale.

The one twenty minute never looked too long. Because there's always something keeps happening, so the audience to keep engaged with. Probably this is won't be your best horror film of the years, but being a horror themed film, it had good form of those contents. Not too scary, at a time those clichés were used in a good way to bring freshness in the scenes. I will credit the writers for that. Besides, the actors were undoubtedly good, including those little ones. For me this is a better horror film and I definitely look for another sequel. I hope this one would stand up to your expectations.

7.5/10
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
sanyrubDec 29, 2016
One of the best horror films of the last few years. Despite the many new releases we get every year, the script manages to stay fresh and innovative enough. The performances are on par with the whole story. As good or better than the firstOne of the best horror films of the last few years. Despite the many new releases we get every year, the script manages to stay fresh and innovative enough. The performances are on par with the whole story. As good or better than the first Conjuring film. Especially welcome is the fact that every character recognizes from very early on that something happens and the film does not spend half of its run-time letting a particular character being ignored by the others (so annoying when it comes to this genre). Despite the over 2 hour-long run time, the film manages to keep it classy and fun. In some parts it has the quality of a good drama. See it! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
chidimeAug 30, 2016
The beginning was really scary, but certain plot device choicesd kind of killed the fear/scare as the movie went along. Could have been muchh better than it was if stronger plots were chosen. Still an interesting watch.

7/10
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
fredinatorAug 11, 2016
Actually scary and what I like the most is that most of the time all the people in this movie act somewhat logical ... Hey there is something strange going on in that room. Let's walk in the other direction ... perfect!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Meth-dudeJun 23, 2016
James Wan knows how to do scary horror movies and he proves it with this second instalment in The Conjuring franchise. The acting is really good, the effects are well made and the atmosphere is tense.The Conjuring 2 is not only better thanJames Wan knows how to do scary horror movies and he proves it with this second instalment in The Conjuring franchise. The acting is really good, the effects are well made and the atmosphere is tense.The Conjuring 2 is not only better than the first, it's also one of the best horror movies of the decade. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
papeadojhonJun 25, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Conjuring 2 is a well-crafted, well-acted, certainly creepy treat for fans of the first movie or horror enthusiasts. But as a fan of art, I have many issues with this movie, 3 in particular:
Mainly, It lacks the realism the first movie worked so hard to get in the camerawork, the excellent acting, the cold-creepy atmosphere, all of it (except for some of the acting) mostly you won't find it here.
The music, in this sequel they added some real music to it and at the beginning it worked (if you watched the movie, you'll know that the music has something to do with the history of the family), but as the movie goes on it felt unnecessary, in the first movie, music wasn't necessary because they added sounds, creepy sounds that helped to create the atmosphere, those sounds are mostly not here.
The villain, in the first movie the villain was the witch, in this sequel the villain is a nun, that was scary, but its presence felt forced, i didn't really get why that nun was there in the house, why it wanted the little girl, why it involved so much with Lorraine coincidentally, who it was (Valak), but it did felt forced.

In my opinion, this sequel is inferior to its predecessor, for many reasons, but, once again, it's nothing close to be a bad movie compared with all of the horror sequels, it added more romance, drama, some comedy, but as the story goes on it can sacrifice some of the main product of the movie, genuine horror.
I recommend it, however, because if you want to see a creepy, well-crafted, and well-acted sequel, you'll get it.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MattBrady99Jun 30, 2016
There was a crooked man, and he walked a crooked mile.
He found a crooked sixpence upon a crooked stile.
He bought a crooked cat, which caught a crooked mouse, And they all lived together in a little crooked house. The Conjuring 2 is
There was a crooked man, and he walked a crooked mile.
He found a crooked sixpence upon a crooked stile.
He bought a crooked cat, which caught a crooked mouse,
And they all lived together in a little crooked house.

The Conjuring 2 is one of those rare squeals that wasn't terrible, but rather good. The squeal did a lot of things better than first film in terms of character's, the twist and the unpleasant atmosphere. But it's kinda rare that we get a squeal that's just as solid as it's predecessor with plenty of surprises under it's sleeve.

I have no idea how James Wan dose it. I seriously don't know how he manages to take the things that I usually can't stand in today's horror and somehow turn it into gold. That's why The Conjuring movies always stand out from the rest of the paranormal demonic movies, because movies like 'The Conjuring' actually have an atmosphere and characters with depth. Even the jump scars are effective and used at appropriate times. James Wan is the only director I can think of that I trust when it comes to directing horror movies, as he understands the genre well. Wan does it again here with tension that builds and the good old sense of death.

The acting from everyone was pretty damn solid. Patrick Wilson, Vera Farmiga and Frances O'Connor were all great in the movie. Even the littler girl (Madison Wolfe) was really good, as she actually looked terrified and it was a very convincing performance, even for a child actor in a horror movie.

What really surprised me about "The Conjuring 2" is that I actually did care for the character's. I mean, compared to some horror flicks that are somewhat similar to this, but with the character's that are forgettable and so boring to watch on screen. Luckily this movie had character's with emotional weight to them.

The camera work, the score and the cinematography are the highlights of this film. It also takes it's time and uses different ways to scare or spook you. It may not impress a lot of people, but I do admire the film markers for taking a risk like that.

Enfield haunting case has been a hot topic for years now with people debating if it's a hoax or not. And while the "based on a true story" may be bullsh*t (or just any movie that uses that headline for attention), I'm just so use to it now that it's getting numb. A lot people complained that this was too Hollywood or it was not accurate to the original story. I have seen plenty of documentary's and stories about the Enfield haunting case, and it's so BORING. I literally found nothing interesting about it and all the evidence for the paranormal haunting seemed a bit fake. I'm so glad this movie wasn't accurate to the original case that may or may not be real. The film markers took something with it and told a different story with events that's very loosely based on an actual case.

The problems that I had with this movie (which is not a lot) is the use of CG for scenes involving the Crooked Man. It took me out of the movie and it kinda took away the terror from the Crooked Man character that Wan beautifully created. And yes, Javier Botet (who is about 6' 6¾) plays the Crooked Man, but the CG is so noticeable when he starts jumping around or growing tall to scare the little girl that he's haunting. I think practical effect's would have been so much better and scarier.

Overall rating: The Conjuring 2 is a solid squeal that's way better then the avenge horror squeal. It takes your expectations and turns it completely around.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
nibbloSep 5, 2016
James Wan is running out of ideas. The only creepy scene was the nun scene and the painting everything else was laughable in it's comic book tones or been there done that. A big step down from his previous movies.
He seriously needs to
James Wan is running out of ideas. The only creepy scene was the nun scene and the painting everything else was laughable in it's comic book tones or been there done that. A big step down from his previous movies.
He seriously needs to either stop making these ghost movies or sit down with a notepad and come up with something really scary instead of relying on jump scares and darkened corners.
Come on James I know you can do it!
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
johnem95Aug 28, 2016
The Conjuring 2 is a damn good horror movie. It succeeds in scaring the crap out of you, while also telling a touching love story about Ed and Lorraine Warren, who you'll be hard-pressed not to fall in love with in this movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
PhilosophyRexOct 16, 2016
La mejor película de terror desde hace mucho tiempo. Te mantiene pegado desde el principio hasta el final. No paran de suceder cosas desde el principio, cosas que tienen ALGÚN SENTIDO cosa que no siempre ocurre en estas películas, todo tieneLa mejor película de terror desde hace mucho tiempo. Te mantiene pegado desde el principio hasta el final. No paran de suceder cosas desde el principio, cosas que tienen ALGÚN SENTIDO cosa que no siempre ocurre en estas películas, todo tiene una explicación y todo queda explicado al final, no terminas la película con ninguna incógnita. Recomendadísima. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
badgerryan19May 19, 2017
The entire movie was very entertaining, smart, never a dull moment, and it gets you into the action right of the bat. Everything the original Conjuring did well Conjuring 2 capitalizes on it and makes it even better. I can't say how pleased IThe entire movie was very entertaining, smart, never a dull moment, and it gets you into the action right of the bat. Everything the original Conjuring did well Conjuring 2 capitalizes on it and makes it even better. I can't say how pleased I am with this movie. James Wan is no doubt the best horror director in the business right now. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
KamarrJun 20, 2016
Would see again enjoyed very much. Go see it I'm not gonna list reasons to see it except that its better than the first one so if you liked that one you will love this one.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MuxagataJun 19, 2016
This movie was a great upgrade from the first Conjuring. It keeps the viewer on the edge of the seat for the entire movie. Building suspense and paying it of whit great scares. Solid acting, a sense of dread through the entire movie, a greatThis movie was a great upgrade from the first Conjuring. It keeps the viewer on the edge of the seat for the entire movie. Building suspense and paying it of whit great scares. Solid acting, a sense of dread through the entire movie, a great soundtrack, smart placed scares and the fact that the viewer cares about the characters are what keeps this horror movie has one of the best ever made. Go watch this movie on theaters as soon as possible
It´s worth every penny and it is a horror masterpiece.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CineAutoctonoAug 30, 2016
"The Conjuring 2" was a promising movie , it did not become as good as the first, but turned out to be more chilling than the first, terrifying case history Enfield authored by Ed and Lorraine Warren , was very entertaining , and especially"The Conjuring 2" was a promising movie , it did not become as good as the first, but turned out to be more chilling than the first, terrifying case history Enfield authored by Ed and Lorraine Warren , was very entertaining , and especially chilling , and so the nun was terribly frightening, and proved to be the demon that hit the Hodgson family. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
RvwFromUpHereJun 28, 2016
Who: Vera Farmiga, Nite Owl, and the Daughter that Woody Harrelson beats in True Detective
What: A fun ride for horror enthusiasts everywhere
Where: British Amityville When (Can I watch again): At least a year before this is an enjoyable
Who: Vera Farmiga, Nite Owl, and the Daughter that Woody Harrelson beats in True Detective
What: A fun ride for horror enthusiasts everywhere
Where: British Amityville
When (Can I watch again): At least a year before this is an enjoyable re-watch
Why: As far as horror movies go, The Conjuring franchise is a solid entry in the market. I'd call this film a tie with the first one, inferior to Insidious, but better than Insidious 2
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
smiyamotOct 13, 2016
I'm old so I remember the "Amityville Horror" when it came out in the theaters. Wow, it was these two, surprise! This movie continues where the other one left off, our two Ghostbusters taking on another case, this time in England. SpiritsI'm old so I remember the "Amityville Horror" when it came out in the theaters. Wow, it was these two, surprise! This movie continues where the other one left off, our two Ghostbusters taking on another case, this time in England. Spirits are all over, not just America. Sometimes it seems like really bad acting but since these people and stories are real, I have to believe they are trying to act it like the real people experienced it, I hope. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
donaldistJun 24, 2016
For a needlessly precise numerical rating: 59/100
"Have you ever been bullied? Well, this demon is like that bully."
Goofy as heck, often in an endearing way, like the above, often in an irritating way. See, a film interpretation of the
For a needlessly precise numerical rating: 59/100
"Have you ever been bullied? Well, this demon is like that bully."
Goofy as heck, often in an endearing way, like the above, often in an irritating way. See, a film interpretation of the Ensfield Poltergeist hoax would work best as a satire, and the film knows that, so it spends much of its runtime trying to subvert the most obviously hoary elements. In fact, the entire film feels like it doesn't want to have anything to do with the Ensfield Haunting, going so far as to spend a significant amount of time to revise the "culprit" of the happenings so that they are scarier. Make up a case, goshdarn it, we already know the Warrens are crackpots!
Anyway, forget all that. This film may not be well-written or structurally sound, but as a string of horror set-pieces, it is darned scary- best of the bunch goes to a slow-burn sequence involving a little boy and a toy fire engine. James Wan was made for these types of films, if anybody is.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
SrPepeJul 8, 2018
El Conjuro 2 es una película que no pasa de la media y sinceramente deja mucho que desear.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
than_QJun 19, 2016
Yes, the possessed girl story has been tried and tested many times before but this movie actually delivers quite excellently in telling it. Being someone who has seen both of The Conjuring films now, you can really just jump into this oneYes, the possessed girl story has been tried and tested many times before but this movie actually delivers quite excellently in telling it. Being someone who has seen both of The Conjuring films now, you can really just jump into this one without any prior knowledge to the franchise, and the little reference that it does make to the first film is almost insignificant, there really isn't any need for prior knowledge of the films. The film is a jumpscare-fest, yes, and it does so generously, however, it creates a hell of a lot of tension and atmosphere throughout the film and then doesn't even lead to a scare at times, which I can definitely appreciate.

However, the movie is extremely cliche in the common horror movie elements category, stupid character moments, levitating character moments, ghosts don't exist when it's daytime moments, yeah there are a few cliches here and there, and James Wan certainly knows how to deliver his cliches. I think that we all know that the 'based' part of 'based on a true story' is highly stressed upon because it's probably **** for the most part, so don't walk into the movie thinking "Oh my god! Based on a true story? Does that mean that ghosts and possessive spirits are real?! Oh god! I better become an intensive Catholic right now!", because it isn't real, and people should know that, but regardless of real or not, still a good movie.

The Conjuring 2 will scare you, and it's definitely a good horror movie, I would recommend it to first time horror movie viewers and people who saw the first movie, however, horror movie junkies might not see it as original or special in any way, but regardless as appeal to the horror movie junkies, I think that it's a good horror movie for anyone to take a look at, so yeah, consider watching it.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Mahmoud9Jul 14, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. very good movie , Good job guys and keep , really i'm waiting the conjuring 3 and trust me you must watch it and you'll enjoy and it's **** awesome and the music is excellent Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
mateuschneiderJun 11, 2016
The Conjuring is so good that it could be a TV series. I loved, I think is the best horror movie like The Conjuring, the first. I hope that this film has continuity. The Conjuring 3, please.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
neonvoiceJun 12, 2016
A creepy, tense and well crafted film, overall. The first film is more fast paced and shorter and scarier.but, that doesn't mean conjuring 2 doesn't have it's moments, because it freaking! Does! The conjuring 2 is a more story driven plotA creepy, tense and well crafted film, overall. The first film is more fast paced and shorter and scarier.but, that doesn't mean conjuring 2 doesn't have it's moments, because it freaking! Does! The conjuring 2 is a more story driven plot then it's predecessor and with the 2 hour length, it help fleshes out it's characters more so than the first film. The sequel format allow for more setup action scenes for you adrenaline junkies out there. The film utilizes CGI but, with enjoyable affect. Where as the first film used no CGI or at least, non so blatant as the sequel. Cinematography is natural and fits the time period and theme of the movie. The sound effects is chilling and ambient almost, atmospheric. The acting is top-notched from all cast members, because the writing in this film coveys it's characters empathy for one another very well that, it should seem familiar to the audience. The pacing of the film know it's direction and knows it's final destination. No scenes ever felt out of place. It all flowed fluidity, never clashing with itself. All in all, worth my time and money. I want more. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
UNARMED_JORDJul 19, 2016
whilst it doesn't quite live up to the originals glory and scares Conjuring II brings in its own scares and new plot to the table the result is a horror movie that both terrifying and has meaning
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
KrissTolliday14Oct 23, 2016
Following the cases of Ed and Lorraine Warren, two psychic investigators, this sequel pits the duo against a demonic entity haunting a small Enfield home in London. Despite Lorraine's worry that their jobs put them in harms way, Ed is stillFollowing the cases of Ed and Lorraine Warren, two psychic investigators, this sequel pits the duo against a demonic entity haunting a small Enfield home in London. Despite Lorraine's worry that their jobs put them in harms way, Ed is still eager to save desperate families from their spiritual issues and they are convinced by the church to head to England to assess the Hodgson's case. Is it fact or fiction? This is the question that the film threatens to delve down and if anything is the theme that could be of most interest. It is a different angle to other horror movies and could tip it to being more advanced then your typical scare-fest. However that theme is never developed and the story slowly evolves back into the less original frights. The story is slow moving, with the Warren's failing to really get involved until half way through, and actually isn't really very scary. When we start to unravel what the demon is it becomes a little laughable, making it less terrifying than it should have been. The performance of Madison Wolfe is a saving grace for this problem however. As the possessed child she brings a frightening presence more so than what the demons do. There are many good moments but it never delves as deep as what it should have done. If the Warrens were brought in earlier we could learn more about the family and the demons and understand more of what is disturbing Lorraine Warren, however we have two stories that collide when it is convenient for the plot. Characters are also too slow to react to situations, for instance a screaming toy fire truck fails to wake a house of three sleeping children, and solutions come by too easily, mainly through asking questions. James Wan is well known for his horror entries and to be fair his direction and choice of shots are chilling, however he struggles with the emotional moments. The soft score during these scenes is out of place and off tone. These moments are required but are not helped by being forced home. The Conjuring franchise is a step up from many horror films but this second entry could have gone further and never really does so. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
itsrenanyallJun 23, 2016
One of my favorite horror movies of all time, nice jumpscares, good plot. Loved it! Scarier than Anabelle, really got me into it from the beginning till the very end.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SzakonyiPalikaJul 26, 2016
The film has some great moments. I scared 3 times. The evil guy is very awesome. He could have more minutes. I think the children wasn't on the focus enough. We don't know anything about the dad.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MarioGRSep 30, 2016
Very good horror movie! I pretty enjoyed it watching it!
It had me on the edge of my seat. The acting was just antastic.
I highly recomment this movie to anyone!
Thumbs UP!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
nestoryavithJun 26, 2017
This is an excellent sequel and very well paced and just as teriffying as the first one with amazing acting now mostly by the kids. I was a little bit not satisfied with the ending a little bit but overall, it was fantastic 9/10
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
detrahokieOct 27, 2016
This isn't like a horror movie, I was disappointed with the sequel conjuring, in the middle of the movie until I fell asleep. the way the story was bad, easy to guess and there was a strange scene. Bill Wilkins role very useless and inferiorThis isn't like a horror movie, I was disappointed with the sequel conjuring, in the middle of the movie until I fell asleep. the way the story was bad, easy to guess and there was a strange scene. Bill Wilkins role very useless and inferior to valak role, because she's creepy. some scenes I laugh because the director has not managed to make it super horror scenes. But, I love the cinematography, color gradding and sound effects. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
sthill87Nov 6, 2016
I thoroughly enjoyed this sequel as opposed to some of the other's I've seen in the horror genre. The story was fresh, the acting was great, and there were a few moments that potentially made you jump depending on expectations. As a horrorI thoroughly enjoyed this sequel as opposed to some of the other's I've seen in the horror genre. The story was fresh, the acting was great, and there were a few moments that potentially made you jump depending on expectations. As a horror movie advocate, especially given the time of year, it was definitely a treat! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DenathornDec 22, 2016
Definitely scarier than the first, however, it couldn't help but lose some of the chilling originality. This one was a bit more wacky, but still scared the **** outta me! Once again, a good sign!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
TheRussianatorMar 28, 2018
This sequel to the 2013's "The Conjuring" is better at every aspect of it - acting, directing, and plot.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
sunoblakDec 27, 2017
Un claro ejemplo de como intentar crear algo nuevo, hacerlo, y tener como resultado una obra incoherente y nada inmersiva. Literalmente solo hay dos sustos buenos. Veamos que logran cambiar en la película de la monja 2018, si es que quierenUn claro ejemplo de como intentar crear algo nuevo, hacerlo, y tener como resultado una obra incoherente y nada inmersiva. Literalmente solo hay dos sustos buenos. Veamos que logran cambiar en la película de la monja 2018, si es que quieren cambiar algo.
Una película para pasar el rato y avanzar en la saga, no para no soñar, esperemos que sepan avanzar a la hora de desarrollar la historia y carácter de los dos protagonistas y no hacer lo que han hecho en el caso Endfield.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews