Wellspring Media | Release Date: August 27, 2004
6.7
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 49 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
30
Mixed:
4
Negative:
15
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
6
CraigBOct 24, 2005
Truly a disappointing film. I really enjoyed Gallo's last one, Buffalo '66, so I would like to be able to say that the 10 minutes of exposition that we got at the end of the film justified making us sit through the first 80 minutes Truly a disappointing film. I really enjoyed Gallo's last one, Buffalo '66, so I would like to be able to say that the 10 minutes of exposition that we got at the end of the film justified making us sit through the first 80 minutes which consists mostly of Vincent Gallo driving around looking glum. For me, the "revelation" that we get at the end of this tiresome affair does nothing to make his characters interesting and it comes off felling like a cheap trick to get us to care about a character that he never bothered to develop. Still, he gets points for style: I do like his camera work. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
PeteAAug 23, 2005
I neither hated nor loved this film, it was actually much better than I thought it would be, and while some stretches were a bit tedious, I found Gallo's final scene on the bed and his (and our) final realization about Daisy to be quite I neither hated nor loved this film, it was actually much better than I thought it would be, and while some stretches were a bit tedious, I found Gallo's final scene on the bed and his (and our) final realization about Daisy to be quite moving. I didn't find the movie to be particularly pretentious, much of it was hypnotic, but much of it was just plain boring. I think the movie was a series of experiments that sometimes hit and sometimes missed, but no one can say that Gallo didn't try something daring and unique! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful