Wellspring Media | Release Date: August 27, 2004
6.7
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 49 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
30
Mixed:
4
Negative:
15
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
1
LindseyMOct 7, 2005
This movie is about as bad as high school student's film project. Actually, check that, I've seen more interesting film made by teens in their basement with a 8mm and clay. Let's face it, without the BJ scene the film would This movie is about as bad as high school student's film project. Actually, check that, I've seen more interesting film made by teens in their basement with a 8mm and clay. Let's face it, without the BJ scene the film would have been never found a distributor. Watching somebody film themselves driving across country is about as appealing as watch Uncle Bob and Aunt Sally's trip to Disneyland slide show. What a complete and utter bore. I found myself fast forwarding through many of the road scenes. Having enjoyed Buffalo '66 I was immensely disappointed in this Galo project. His ego has blown itself if you ask me. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
2
JasonW.May 24, 2007
This is one of the worst porno films I have ever seen. Period.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
0
MichaelL.Oct 2, 2005
This film--and its fairly positive reviews--only prove how worthless critics are. It's a mind-numbingly boring piece of self-love created by a megalomaniac passing as art. As someone who took a 3 month, solitary road trip--he captured This film--and its fairly positive reviews--only prove how worthless critics are. It's a mind-numbingly boring piece of self-love created by a megalomaniac passing as art. As someone who took a 3 month, solitary road trip--he captured NONE of the power/lonliness/self examination that comes with such a journey. Just masturbatory close ups of his own face. Endlessly. Mumbled dialog, trite and obvious plotting and a ridculous hard-core sex scene that says nothing more than "I really like my penis and want to show it to the world". Chloe Sevegny is a fine actress who literally sucks in this film. I can't imagine what possessed her to take this role. The one moment of interest is seeing how truly lovely Cheryl Tiegs, the original supermodel, still is. That's it. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
0
SebastianL.Sep 12, 2005
For all of the controversy surrounding this movie, it sure was boring! The low budget cinematography has a few good moments that reminded me of a 1970's Redford movie; but mostly it just looks like an amature with a handi cam. The story For all of the controversy surrounding this movie, it sure was boring! The low budget cinematography has a few good moments that reminded me of a 1970's Redford movie; but mostly it just looks like an amature with a handi cam. The story is of a guy who is deeply damaged and his cross country ride in a van. His delusion is sort of played on the audience like a bad joke and the punch line is a gritty imagined oral sex scene that would even make Bill Clinton uncomfortable. My question for Paul Gallo who wrote, directed stared and produced this waste of time is this... Why not just make a real porno with rude sex from start to finish? It would be more interesting! Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
0
JuanitaG.Jul 2, 2006
Incredibly boring act of self-absorbed narcissism without a whit of self-reflection. I'm flumoxed: why was it distributed, why did Chloe Sayer get involved, why were normally responsible critics taken in, and why did my partner and I Incredibly boring act of self-absorbed narcissism without a whit of self-reflection. I'm flumoxed: why was it distributed, why did Chloe Sayer get involved, why were normally responsible critics taken in, and why did my partner and I fastforward through to the ridiculous end instead of yanking it out of the DVD player after 5 minutes. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
2
RobinT.Apr 16, 2006
Very slow and pretentious.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
2
DarkCriticAug 31, 2010
The Brown Bunny is one of the worst independent films that Vincent Gallo directed this strange movie. The scenes are too boring to watch,because we see that the character keeps driving around all the way to the road and nothing with the plotThe Brown Bunny is one of the worst independent films that Vincent Gallo directed this strange movie. The scenes are too boring to watch,because we see that the character keeps driving around all the way to the road and nothing with the plot that he's going at the same plot without no explanation of the story. The characters had no speaking louder in the audience and we try to figure it out what they're saying. Chloe Sevigny just arrived and she started to have a sex scene,but very graphic and too controversial with the actress (that it looks like a porn or a sex scandal in this movie that the audience see.) I give this movie a horrible,but amazing horrible film that Gallo did this horrible film that he shows in Cannes and I agree with Roger Ebert that he only gave three stars and thumbs up for saying "amazing horrible film. But it's just a horrible independent adult film and it's seen to believe! Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
0
CablesMar 21, 2007
This is officially the worst excuse for filmmaking I've ever experienced. It's almost unbearable to watch. On several different occasions I actually had to turn my head.. not because of the content, but because of how banal and This is officially the worst excuse for filmmaking I've ever experienced. It's almost unbearable to watch. On several different occasions I actually had to turn my head.. not because of the content, but because of how banal and pretentious the few lines of dialogue are. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
SakataOct 6, 2018
A boring, tiring movie that only works in the final moments - and yet, in a controversial scene that that didn't need to be so explicit.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews