Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation | Release Date: November 8, 2013
7.1
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 178 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
111
Mixed:
53
Negative:
14
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
6
TVJerryDec 2, 2013
This is one of those trying-to-be-touching stories about a child growing up during war. This time it's a 9 year-old girl, who is adopted by new parents (Geoffrey Rush & Emily Watson) in Nazi Germany. She develops a love of books and shares itThis is one of those trying-to-be-touching stories about a child growing up during war. This time it's a 9 year-old girl, who is adopted by new parents (Geoffrey Rush & Emily Watson) in Nazi Germany. She develops a love of books and shares it with the Jew hidden in the basement (isn't there always one?). The deliberate pacing means that it often takes too long for scenes to develop. There's a constant sense of dread, but never much real drama. So many plot points are predictable and the whole things feels manipulative in a Hallmark Movie of the Week style. While it's competently made, it's slight on emotional impact. On a side note: It also observes one of those silly Hollywood traditions. The people are all supposed to be German, but they speak English with a German accent (and a few actual German words are sprinkled about). Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
5
Patrick94May 6, 2014
I honestly am siding with the critics this time. It had a lot to say, and all of it's messages are kind of lost within each other that at the end you go "Okay, I get it. But, is that it?". A lot of people are talking about how faithfully theI honestly am siding with the critics this time. It had a lot to say, and all of it's messages are kind of lost within each other that at the end you go "Okay, I get it. But, is that it?". A lot of people are talking about how faithfully the film sticks to the book. Maybe that's the problem. It's definitely not a must-watch IMO. I'm actually a bit disappointed to be honest. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
NightReviewsDec 8, 2013
There are movies that can be put in a category appropriately labelled ‘Oscar bait’; and if there is one film that exemplifies that best this year, it is The Book Thief. Just like any cold or flu, ‘Oscar bait’ films have very clear symptoms.There are movies that can be put in a category appropriately labelled ‘Oscar bait’; and if there is one film that exemplifies that best this year, it is The Book Thief. Just like any cold or flu, ‘Oscar bait’ films have very clear symptoms. For starters, setting the film during The Academy Awards’ favourite time in history, World War II is a must; having a young lead performance is another; previous academy award winners and nominees within the cast (in this case the illustrious Geoffrey Rush and the always impressive Emily Watson) always helps; and finally, the icing on the cake is the heavy-handed and manipulating (to the point of distracting) forced drama (in this case, a completely unnecessary voice-over). Put all those factors together and you have one of the most formulaic and familiar films during Oscar season this year. Read more!

I have not had the pleasure to read Markus Zusak‘s supposed enthralling source material in which the film is based off of. The novel has received an overwhelming amount of accolades for presenting a story through the perspective of an unlikely narrator, but within Brian Percival‘s cinematic adaptation, unfortunately, this narration is far from effective.

The Book Thief is by no means a terrible film. Mediocre at best, the film is a slow, long-winded feature that check-marks most of the essential plot-points of its far superior World War II predecessors. With just over a two hour run time, The Book Thief uses morbid images of death, sometimes involving children, to get its dramatized point across and elicit notions of pure sentiment.

The film follows Liesel Meminger (French-Canadian Sophie Nélisse from Monsieur Lazhar), a newly orphaned child who is in the midst of pre-war Germany in 1938. Liesel is sent to live with a new family, Mr. & Mrs. Hans Hubermann (Rush & Watson) and like any child her age, she is very much reserved towards the strangers she must now call her parents. Hans does everything in his power to comfort his new daughter, finding a common passion in literature. Liesel, who is unable to read before she arrives to her new home on Heaven St., seeks the guidance of her new father, and together they find a small solace amongst the raging political ideology and war propaganda within Germany at the time. As you would expect, Liesel befriends a young, lemon-haired boy Rudy (Nico Liesch), and together the film recounts the innocent relationship these two share during one of the most atrocious times in our world’s history.

The scenes between Rudy and Liesel are some of the best within the film, surely capturing the simplicity of children trying to make sense of a very complex time. The very fabric of the relationships and loyalties between the people she holds dear to her are tested with the sudden arrival of Max (Ben Schnetzer), the son of an old friend of Hans. With cultural tension and war on the rise, Liesel and her family must turn a blind eye to patriotism in favour of humanity, finding a new way to survive without ever compromising their own integrity.

Some of the finer points of The Book Thief comes from its impeccable acting talent. Nélisse embodies the young heart of Liesel and makes the character her own. While Rush and Watson make the best of the material they are given, Rush is always shining, capturing our hearts and the heart of Liesel any which way he can. His affections are as sweet as the lumps of sugar he magically surprises her with.

Light on any real emotional responses, The Book Thief will less than likely make a dent during the award season. It’ll probably be left mostly forgotten by the time nominations come early next year.

Rush is a fine actor joined by an equally talented cast. Despite the great acting unfortunately, The Book Thief will surely be crippled for its cliched war narrative that we have seen time and time again. Applause is surely warranted for choosing to focus on elaborate set pieces, excellent production design, authentic filming locations in Berlin and talented actors, however the film neglects its chance to actually drop any emotional bombs on its audience.
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
5
mvoelckerJan 28, 2014
It`s not a bad movie, but also does`t have anything that would make it a great movie. It includes good actors like Geoffrey Rush and Emily Watson but they are not even close to their bests.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
5
TyranianApr 7, 2019
Bit of a non-event story-wise. Decent acting and visuals but not really worth making a film about.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
vitortfvDec 29, 2020
If I hadn't read the book before, maybe my experience would be completely different. Totally disappointed, the whole story in my view is treated superficially. Two lenght hours and failed to develop the relationships between the characters -If I hadn't read the book before, maybe my experience would be completely different. Totally disappointed, the whole story in my view is treated superficially. Two lenght hours and failed to develop the relationships between the characters - an example of the friendship of Lisel and Max, Liesel and Rudy -, not to mention the changes they made, which although they seem simple, do not work, as it is a failed attempt to create a drama that has become superficial. Yes, it could be a thousand times better. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
GoodukladyMar 16, 2014
I viewed The Book Thief with great anticipation at the beginning, but unfortunately my attention flagged halfway through. There was little new in the story line and I wasn't convinced by Emily Watson's performance as a harsh, Germanic fosterI viewed The Book Thief with great anticipation at the beginning, but unfortunately my attention flagged halfway through. There was little new in the story line and I wasn't convinced by Emily Watson's performance as a harsh, Germanic foster mother with a heart of gold. The acting was fair, in my opinion, and the film plodded along without any great surprises. There were no heart-stopping moments - nothing to make me laugh or cry - so I am sad to say that I felt this movie was just average and a waste of Geoffrey Rush's talents. I hated the insertion of German phrases with American accents. Either English or German - or sub-titles please. Everything seemed forced and formulaic. Nice try, but I wouldn't recommend it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
charlieburyMar 20, 2014
The problem with The Book Thief is that it feels as though Brian Percival (known for his work on Downton Abbey) has narrowed the whole story to the confinements of a stage play. Okay, one can still make staging methods effective (take Dial MThe problem with The Book Thief is that it feels as though Brian Percival (known for his work on Downton Abbey) has narrowed the whole story to the confinements of a stage play. Okay, one can still make staging methods effective (take Dial M for Murder), but the way the camera moves, the actors enter right to left, the design shuffles as time goes by, all feels robotic and even oppressive. There is a great war going on outside, agreed this film isn’t directly intended to expose the war effort, but to signify the unconceivable act of the Nazis in true force one might need to dampen the glamorization of this storytelling.

The structure of the film is designed in such a way that the final act is alive, theoretically, with all the acts. At least, you can be sure to be awoken by the final 30 minutes of tailored clichés interweaving disaster and relief. I can admire the day-to-day life of our book thief Liesel Meminger (played by Sophie Nélisse), the core of the story, and her fascination with what lies beyond and above (she finds in the written word). This is, in fact, the most enjoyable aspect of the film, not to mention how well Sophie Nélisse holds everything together with her perceptive performance. The Book Thief feels alive and then the final years of the war are crammed into one act, an act spreading an entire story arc, an arc that would be better suited to capturing a separate film. It was never going to be an easy book to adapt.

The film begins with the voice of death (narrated by Roger Allam), a voice instantly recognizable and a voice that will no doubt shadow the entire film. However, this voice seems irrefutably naïve to the story it is telling. It takes a nap for a few years before coming back and interrupting the film three quarters of the way through. The film has made every effort to immerse its audience only to be pulled out of the picture by the voice of death shrewdly reappearing, perhaps to remind us that there is indeed a war going on outside of the street where Liesel lives.

The cast is occupied with pleasantly accomplished performers (Geoffrey Rush, Emily Watson), however the Germanic approach of the film is inconceivable to any admirable performance. “Nein” is apparently a plausible word in the English language? My take would be that if you are going to speak any German, then I want to see the whole film in German. And, in fact, I would have very much loved to see this film in German. Part of the disposition from the horrors of the depicted reality is bred from the fact that our characters are reciting English (could you imagine watching Downfall in English?). Consequently, and for other reasons mentioned, this film doesn’t sink its claws deep enough. It balances on the rope of knotting together a less frightening past.

I must note that the ending is fatefully superfluous. The tracking of the camera, in a present day, past mature pictures of a prosperous Liesel is grossly implemented by an ostentatious white iMac pulling apart the skin of the entire screening before us. This concentrated product placement, led by the palpable apple logo, was scornful to the foundations of the story and was the only symbol reminiscent on my mind as I left the cinema. Couldn’t the final assemblies of the budget have come from elsewhere?

I wish to admire this film, but it doesn’t attempt the depth required of a child’s eyes on the horrors of a war; don’t look for such a powerful picture as The Boy in the Striped Pajamas. There were moments in which I obtained a deep affection for the family, their love of the lost and found. Yet, I feel that all along I was perhaps searching for a different movie altogether.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
clayscottbrownJul 21, 2014
The Book Thief, is a whimsical sort of film that I thought was going to have magic in it, I kept waiting for something to happen, besides the usual Western vibe of THIS IS BAD/THIS IS GOOD!

The Hitler movies without Hitler are not as
The Book Thief, is a whimsical sort of film that I thought was going to have magic in it, I kept waiting for something to happen, besides the usual Western vibe of THIS IS BAD/THIS IS GOOD!

The Hitler movies without Hitler are not as interesting.

This time it's a German Girl living with a family who decide to take in a Jewish man about 20 something... they hide him in the basement.

It's a fair film but I found it quite dull.

VERDICT: CHICK FLICK!
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
MrMovieBuffMay 13, 2016
'The Book Thief' means well, it's an innocent film depicting a little girl's point of view of the war, so that means we will not be seeing a graphic view of the combat and violence of these horrific events that take place.

Directed by
'The Book Thief' means well, it's an innocent film depicting a little girl's point of view of the war, so that means we will not be seeing a graphic view of the combat and violence of these horrific events that take place.

Directed by Brian Percival (of 'Downton Abbey'), he adapts the widely acclaimed novel by Markus Zusak, Percival sets the ideal tone of the movie. The movie focuses on a young girl named Liesel Meminger (Sophie Nelisse) who meets her new foster parents (played by Geoffrey Rush and Emily Watson) and tries to get comfortable in her new home. She begins to grow closer towards her foster father as he notices that she collects a lot of books. However, it seems that she is not quite as literate and nor is he, so they develop a sort-of school in the basement of their home and learn how to read.

Later on, we meet a young, Jewish man named Max (Ben Schnetzer) who is a refugee and stays with the family. Liesel develops a friendship with the innocent man, discovering that they share a love for reading. Liesel even runs away to a hidden library somewhere to take some books and read them to Max for comfort. During her journey, she meets a young boy named Rudy (Nico Liersch) who doesn't mind getting into trouble for her, he seems infatuated, and so does she.

This is a warm film, filled with some touching moments and is well acted...it has hints of being the next 'Hugo' (2011), but what does hold it back is its ability to emphasize on the horrors of the war, even though this isn't that kind of film, a lot of things seemed to be glossed over. There is an emotional impact throughout this movie, and it does its job to hold your attention for longer than possible. I guess, at times, it feels empty, almost like opening a shiny wrapped present, but what's inside is a box full of accessories, but not the product itself.

It's a film I wanted to love...but I just admired it.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
MoviesR_OKOct 22, 2017
Well, the movie was nice to watch. It had some nice sentimental moments and it does make you have emotions inside and feel for the movie. However, the opening scene was pretty horrible. Coupled with Liesel's screaming and her brother dying,Well, the movie was nice to watch. It had some nice sentimental moments and it does make you have emotions inside and feel for the movie. However, the opening scene was pretty horrible. Coupled with Liesel's screaming and her brother dying, made me feel like I was watching a horror movie. Everything was decent except the opening scene. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews