Star Trek

10

SteveK.May 10, 2009

If you're not stuck in the past and you're not a Star Trek die-hard, you will love this movie. It is the first movie in a long long time where I left the theater being fully satisfied, no complaints at all. The perfect Hollywood If you're not stuck in the past and you're not a Star Trek die-hard, you will love this movie. It is the first movie in a long long time where I left the theater being fully satisfied, no complaints at all. The perfect Hollywood action blockbuster. Don't understand why it's getting so much ire from the Star Trek faithful. If they woulda made this movie exactly how Trekkies want it to be, they would be the only ones who would watch it or like it. Star Trek needed a makeover and a fresh take on a tired franchise. They got it, and I'm thrilled. Terrific cast, interesting story, great action, just enough of a homage to the past = the perfect summer movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

AramisG.May 10, 2009

Looks great, nice casting... totally retarded and insulting plot holes and illogical science. In other words, more like the original Star Trek, less like anything since Next Generation.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

BryanK.May 10, 2009

This film is AMAZING!!! At first I did not expect such a good film. It occurs between the events of the first of the two pilots, "The Cage" (1964) which introduced the most of the main cast including Spock and the first series (1966-1968). This film is AMAZING!!! At first I did not expect such a good film. It occurs between the events of the first of the two pilots, "The Cage" (1964) which introduced the most of the main cast including Spock and the first series (1966-1968). The cast gave fantastic performances including Simon Pegg's funny performance as Scotty and John Cho (Harold and Kumar) as Sulu. In short, BEST FILM OF 2009!!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

StephenD.May 10, 2009

Phenomenal. This movie is Oscar material, on top of it, it reinvents a franchise. The storytelling is top-notch. I was planning on being underwhelmed but found myself overwhelmed by the sheer top quality value of the total experience. I will Phenomenal. This movie is Oscar material, on top of it, it reinvents a franchise. The storytelling is top-notch. I was planning on being underwhelmed but found myself overwhelmed by the sheer top quality value of the total experience. I will be watching this film for years to come, and eagerly anticipate new additions in the series. Bravo and a standing ovation to all involved!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ScottMay 10, 2009

This movie was crazy awesome. The whole thing is fast paced. The casting and acting were perfect.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JacobL.May 10, 2009

A great movie that fans of the series will definitely enjoy. Not only was their good acting and action scenes; but, the story was the best in the series. Despite the fact that the movie doesn't tie perfectly into the series I still A great movie that fans of the series will definitely enjoy. Not only was their good acting and action scenes; but, the story was the best in the series. Despite the fact that the movie doesn't tie perfectly into the series I still enjoyed it a lot.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

DavidD.May 10, 2009

[***SPOILERS***] First off, I will say that I am a huge fan! Not the kind that dresses up and makes a fool of himself, but the kind that loves the in depth stories and Characters that only Star Trek can bring in. I agree with several people [***SPOILERS***] First off, I will say that I am a huge fan! Not the kind that dresses up and makes a fool of himself, but the kind that loves the in depth stories and Characters that only Star Trek can bring in. I agree with several people that they made this into a movie that Young A.D.D people would love. Or that non Star trek fans would like. What Hollywood doesn't realize is that there are plenty of real Star Trek fans that would make them plenty of money if they just knew how to write a good story!! My God, what the hell was this?!! Yes, the acting and the special effects were good but the story was inexcusable!! They just took Star Treks 40 year history and pissed it away in one movie! And what in the hell is up with the camera movement?! Can Hollywood please stop this already!!! And as for all the plot holes? Blowing up Romulus and Vulcan was just idiotic! Killing Spocks mom was just stupid also! There were a 1000 different ways they could have written this without involving time travel. And one drop of red matter can create a planet destroying black hole but a whole crap load of it at the end couldn't suck in a ship?! lol! I think I will leave the rest of the plot holes to Andrew C who said it best. I am just going to pretend this movie is just a stand alone and has nothing to do with the rich history of Star Trek. sigh!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

ChrisD.May 10, 2009

Great! The best Star Trek film by far, and better than all Star Wars films except Empire and about the same as A New Hope. Wonderfully cast, and wonderfully handled. Wonderful storyline. Definitely worth seeing, and amazingly creative. Great Great! The best Star Trek film by far, and better than all Star Wars films except Empire and about the same as A New Hope. Wonderfully cast, and wonderfully handled. Wonderful storyline. Definitely worth seeing, and amazingly creative. Great as a Star Trek film, action film, and sci-fi film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JasonL.May 10, 2009

Amazing feeling. want to watch it again.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

NeoSquonkMay 10, 2009

Great franchise reboot! Paid homage to the classic series while forging ahead in a new direction. Actors did a great job channeling their predecessors, and there were plenty of obligatory 'shout-outs'. Some plot points were a tad Great franchise reboot! Paid homage to the classic series while forging ahead in a new direction. Actors did a great job channeling their predecessors, and there were plenty of obligatory 'shout-outs'. Some plot points were a tad contrived & rushed, but overall I come away feeling Star Trek has been reborn.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DaveJ.May 10, 2009

Great movie! very exciting with some laughs I wasn't expecting. Overall like the story line very much and mixing the old star trek with the new.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

WillG.May 10, 2009

A bold, daring and fresh reboot that grabs hold of you from the first minutes into the film -- and I saw it dubbed in Italian. Like many, I'm a lifelong Trek fan and I was dubious at the outset of this project. Many of the carping A bold, daring and fresh reboot that grabs hold of you from the first minutes into the film -- and I saw it dubbed in Italian. Like many, I'm a lifelong Trek fan and I was dubious at the outset of this project. Many of the carping comments here remind me of the criticism of the prior major reboot, The Next Generation. All isn't how I would've done it but it's not my vision. It's J.J. Abrams' vision and he's done a terrific job, particularly in casting. The cast is just about pitch-perfect and I had no trouble accepting them in their roles. Hard-core fans, like me, will have some pangs over some of the developments, especially surrounding Spock. Zachary Quinto merits special mention for an uncanny performance that never once veers into imitation. I particularly love how Abrams took hints from ST:TOS about the characters and explored them. Like others before me, I would remind some of the fan critics of a few cogent points: This is an *alternate* reality and some events from ST:TOS have changed. Vulcans -- and Romulans -- have 250 year life expectancies. We are not told at what point Spock Prime (and Nero) exited the main ST timeline but it clearly was much later than the ST:TNG period and tech undoutedly had advanced. Wesley Crusher was a prodigy and it was implied in TOS that Chekhov was also. TOS episode "Mirror, Mirror" was one of the best. So relax, don't let the best be the enemy of the good, and enjoy a great new Trek adventure. The Trek universe is more than big enough to hold an alternate storyline or two.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MichaelB.May 10, 2009

Fantastic, i went to see Star Trek having the gut feeling it was going to be a childish space journey but was thrilled to find it was an action packed movie filled with great story, wit and characters.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

BillyM.May 10, 2009

Very good. The pace of the film is excellent, as are the characters and acting. However, the overall plot is rather flimsy. I understand that some it was a device to get out of endless geeks arguing about inaccuracies, but some of it was Very good. The pace of the film is excellent, as are the characters and acting. However, the overall plot is rather flimsy. I understand that some it was a device to get out of endless geeks arguing about inaccuracies, but some of it was just plain lazy, e.g. the space slut being used on Pike which was never mentioned ever again. Saying that, I enjoyed the film. And I just hope that any subsequent sequels will be just as good.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

AndrewC.May 10, 2009

[***SPOILERS***] Disappointed - that's how I feel. The new Star Trek film promised so much, and in some ways delivered, but in others fell oh so short. Firstly the most positive thing - thae actors. They all faced a difficult task in [***SPOILERS***] Disappointed - that's how I feel. The new Star Trek film promised so much, and in some ways delivered, but in others fell oh so short. Firstly the most positive thing - thae actors. They all faced a difficult task in picking up established characters. They all did a good job, being instantly recognizable as who they were supposed to be. Secondly the pacing was good for an action movie, and to bring in non-trekkies. Having said that there were some bits that were pointless - the car going off the cliff, the monster chase (one of the monsters looked quite badly evolved for an ice planet BTW) served no purpose than to get Kirk to bump into old Spock. From there on in though the problems really start. The set design is way off the mark. The new bridge is sterile and engineering looks more like an oil refinery than the bowels of a starship. The biggest problem though is the script. OK, I completely understand that there was a difficult task here in trying to reinvent the franchise, but too many liberties have been taken. The moving of the Enterprise's construction to Iowa I can just about cope with. Romantic involvement for Spock? Destroying Vulcan? These are just steps too far. Then we get into the scientific holes. Like they wouldn't have spotted that a star was about to go supernova, like that wouldn't have affected Vulcan (which is just around the corner from Romulus) too. Why do none of the black holes formed have any time dilation effects? Why would the black hole have to be at the centre of a planet, when it would be just as effective anywhere near? Then there's the plot holes. What was Nero doing for 25 years, and why didn't he age? Once he realises when his is, wouldn't he just warn the Romulans what would happen in the future? Taking revenge for something that hasn't happened yet makes no sense. Why throw kirk off the ship in an escape pod? What's wrong with the brig? Isn't it a bit too much of a coincidence that he lands on the planet where Spock is hiding (and wanders into his cave) and where Scotty has been working? Then there's the interplanetary beaming - something that wasn't even possible in the ST:TNG era. Ooh, the transporters, Why can a 17 year old cadet get a transporter lock when experienced techies and the computer can't? Why is Vulcan, one of the founder members of the federation, defenceless when Earth has a defence system that Nero needs information on? So, all in all? It's a long long way from the best Trek ever. Treks 2,3,4,6 and 8 are all light years ahead of this. Before the next film they need to employ some script writers who actually know something about Star Trek and who can write a plot that makes sense.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

E.igorMay 10, 2009

I have never even liked star trek... but this movie was incredible.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

PeterK.May 10, 2009

Star Trek is back and better than ever! Loved this! Great casting and more than plausible plot kept the audience riveted!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

ClifC.May 9, 2009

I am surprised to read all the good reviews for this movie. I mean... it's entertaining, the actors are quite good (but far from being excellent), the special effects are grandiose... but the plot, PLEASE, the plot! Seems like Hollywood I am surprised to read all the good reviews for this movie. I mean... it's entertaining, the actors are quite good (but far from being excellent), the special effects are grandiose... but the plot, PLEASE, the plot! Seems like Hollywood productions have problems on creating a good plot. I was disappointed to see that "Star trek" was far from being original and far from the excellence a lot are saying of it. "Candy-eyed and visually generous" that's all I'd say for this movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

JoeBloMay 9, 2009

All the critics liked this picture lots, but it left me cold. Maybe I'm getting old, but it seemed rather gen-y for my taste. I didn't find Kirk charismatic; in fact, I found his simpering frat-boy superiority off-putting. Also, All the critics liked this picture lots, but it left me cold. Maybe I'm getting old, but it seemed rather gen-y for my taste. I didn't find Kirk charismatic; in fact, I found his simpering frat-boy superiority off-putting. Also, the character doing 'Bones' seemed constantly on the verge of blowing his accent. And I thought the plot was thin. I felt the story gratuitously celebrated its more aggressive impulses in the form of constant (often unnecessary) fist-fights etc. The thing that made the first Star Trek so legendary was its message of hope, which it addressed while asking more serious questions about human nature. Although well executed, this picture seemed to be more spectacle than substance.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful

10

AlbertoR.May 9, 2009

A perfect reimagination of the original series that will captivate a whole new generation of young trekkers!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

CliveH.May 9, 2009

Star Trek by JJ Abrams takes us where no characters have gone before; they actually seem like real people, not caricatures from some perfectionist future. Star Trek got "real" and deviates from Roddenberry's vision, it does so in a way Star Trek by JJ Abrams takes us where no characters have gone before; they actually seem like real people, not caricatures from some perfectionist future. Star Trek got "real" and deviates from Roddenberry's vision, it does so in a way that also makes it much more satisfying, emotional, and believable. The end credit music was great and should have been used throughout. The new score in the rest of the movie totally sucked...hope they fix that next time around.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

StanH.May 9, 2009

Awesome ! Can't wait for the next one.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ZacO.May 9, 2009

Most incredible movie I've ever seen, Visually and with story, best star trek ever! 11/10

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BettyD.May 9, 2009

2nd day out and i've seen it twice. Nonstop action, incredible graphics, just the right touch of humor, and a great story line. Loved the new characters - looking forward to many more movies! The best movie in years!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

mIKEM.May 9, 2009

I think that the director and writers faced a real challenge threading the needle between honoring the past series while making something new and interesting. I think they nailed it. Casting is right on, there are lots of interesting nods to I think that the director and writers faced a real challenge threading the needle between honoring the past series while making something new and interesting. I think they nailed it. Casting is right on, there are lots of interesting nods to the original series yet the whole production feels new and fresh. Massively better than the last few movies. Really highly recommended, all members of our family sat rapt through the whole thing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

FantasyH.May 9, 2009

Has it really been 45 years? I have seen every episode and every movie. Watching these new actors in a prequel made me feel my age. But basically this is the rebirth of a dying franchise. As much as we fell in love with those lovable Has it really been 45 years? I have seen every episode and every movie. Watching these new actors in a prequel made me feel my age. But basically this is the rebirth of a dying franchise. As much as we fell in love with those lovable characters this movie was needed to re-engerize the franchise. We already accept the premise that we can go backward and forward in time so the storyline made sense to us Trekkies. However, as a stand alone movie it was very formulaic. No shocking revelations, no mind altering thinking, just a few chuckles when trademark punch lines were made by the characters. Now this reborn franchise must take us boldly where no man has gone before in the next movie. Number One Make It So!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MurrayC.May 9, 2009

A bright light at the end of the dark tunnel that was the last few trek movies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JohnMay 9, 2009

The first movie I literally sprinted back to the theater to see again the same weekend in years. Loved it. Nitpickers are sad people.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MattY.May 9, 2009

A great start on what will hopefully be a long and excellent reboot of the series. Characters were a little undeveloped, but all really well cast. Can't expect every thing to be perfect on the first movie. There really isn't too A great start on what will hopefully be a long and excellent reboot of the series. Characters were a little undeveloped, but all really well cast. Can't expect every thing to be perfect on the first movie. There really isn't too much to complain about here.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

EvanS.May 9, 2009

I hated the old star trek movies and tv shows. This one actually kept my attention the whole time and didn't make me want to walk out. Star Trek is now something that everyone can enjoy.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

BrandonS.May 9, 2009

I'll keep this short. A long-time fan, I went in skeptical and left a believer. Great movie. The flaws are vastly overshadowed by the virtues.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

MaitlandMay 9, 2009

This movie was incredibly entertaining, and the special effects were gorgeous. The actors were chosen perfectly, and the story maintained my interest for the entire film. Michael Giacchino's score was excellent, and the film ties into This movie was incredibly entertaining, and the special effects were gorgeous. The actors were chosen perfectly, and the story maintained my interest for the entire film. Michael Giacchino's score was excellent, and the film ties into the star trek canon almost perfectly. See this movie. When it is on DVD, buy it and watch it twelve times a day. In short- Thank you, Makers of this film, for making my otherwise dull and meaningless life interesting.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

GuillermoM.May 9, 2009

This film is great. It manages to update a 40 year old franchise that is central to American culture and the international sci-fi genre while remaining thoroughly contemporary in its sensitivities. Zachary Quinto's younger (and This film is great. It manages to update a 40 year old franchise that is central to American culture and the international sci-fi genre while remaining thoroughly contemporary in its sensitivities. Zachary Quinto's younger (and therefore more human) Spock is a lot less alien yet still brings an otherworldly flavor to the plot. The exploration of the relationship between Kirk and McCoy is an aspect that is almost completely new to Star Trek productions (it was a given before). Leonard Nimoy provides much needed gravitas and the new Scotty brings a fresh take to a character not easy to re imagine. I'm a big fan of sci-fi in general and Star Trek in particular. I have seen all the movies and the episodes of all the series at least twice. However, none of the films ever came close to being considered among my favorite movies. (And no, I don't speak Klingon or go to conventions.) This movie is something else entirely. I went to a pre-screening with government and industry execs and the press where I did not expect to find the best reception for the film and was surprised to hear everyone say they liked it (even people who normally wouldn't be caught dead watching sci-fi). To answer those that state that you need to have ADHD to enjoy it well you need to get with the times, that is the modern film aesthetic and must be appreciated just as abstract art is appreciated even though it doesn't have the detail of the great masters. Anyway this is much more than a popcorn flick, it is a piece of Americana resurrected. In short, go see it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

PhilH.May 9, 2009

Tom K. is right, all style no substance. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed myself in the theater, and it was worth my money for that enjoyment. But this is not a serious Star Trek film, like some of the earlier movies were. It's like Tom K. is right, all style no substance. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed myself in the theater, and it was worth my money for that enjoyment. But this is not a serious Star Trek film, like some of the earlier movies were. It's like watching a typical episode from the original series on the big screen. Fun, action-packed, but little depth and no intelligence. P.S., like most movies made in the past ten years, the action sequences were too frenetic. If I'm watching a fight scene, I want to see whats actually happening, not flashing colors and close ups of fists.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

GregS.May 9, 2009

Dazzling effects and some excellent casting for McCoy and Uhuru especially. The Kirk and Spock characters were suitably underdeveloped as they should be in a prequel.. Chekhov and Scott were just fun. But the overall presentation struck me Dazzling effects and some excellent casting for McCoy and Uhuru especially. The Kirk and Spock characters were suitably underdeveloped as they should be in a prequel.. Chekhov and Scott were just fun. But the overall presentation struck me as "Star Trek for Dummies," which is to say, much more like the Star Wars franchise. As a stand-alone movie, it was very enjoyable. As part of the Star Trek canon, it was not there.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AnonymousMCMay 9, 2009

Amazing, way better than I thought.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

AdamB.May 9, 2009

Formulaic, mindless, and poorly written. The only good acting comes from how half the characters perform nearly identically to the original cast. Special effects are laughably over the top but entertaining nonetheless. Fans of the series and Formulaic, mindless, and poorly written. The only good acting comes from how half the characters perform nearly identically to the original cast. Special effects are laughably over the top but entertaining nonetheless. Fans of the series and people who like big explosions and green girls in bikinis will probably overlook it's numerous flaws.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

1

JonZ.May 9, 2009

Awful movie if you're a trekkie. There is very little in this movie that makes Star Trek special-- no morality, no intelligent problem solving, etc. JJ Abrams has turned Star Trek into a bad Star Wars replica.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

0

MarcusMay 9, 2009

As this is NOT star trek i have to rate it as 0, it's a generic scifi space move with star trek references. Everything that makes Star Trek Star Trek is missing.

0 of 2 users found this helpful

4

TomK.May 9, 2009

All Style and No Substance This movie is short-attention-span theater- if you think about what you're watching for even a minute, you'll notice plot holes and bad story logic, in addition to 1-dimensional characters. I enjoyed it All Style and No Substance This movie is short-attention-span theater- if you think about what you're watching for even a minute, you'll notice plot holes and bad story logic, in addition to 1-dimensional characters. I enjoyed it while I watched it, for the most part. Afterward it left a terrible taste in my mouth because of its don't-change-the-channel! style of storytelling. If you have ADD/ADHD you'll love it. It's a bunch of 'awesome' scenes pasted together from JJ Abrams and the dullards who wrote Transformers. There's definitely nothing re-watchable about it. The Metascore of 84 has to be a case-in-point against the quality of modern movie criticism. Sweet CGI and a franchise reboot should not give you 40 bonus points. The score should be somewhere in the yellow, maybe 44.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

AndrewO.May 9, 2009

All that an action sci fi movie should be.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

Jasonh.May 9, 2009

This movie was amazing. It was funny, it was action packed, and I didn't even have to be a trekkie to enjoy it. Honestly don't understand people that have given this a grade below 7.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MikeR.May 9, 2009

Celebrates the elements that made Star Trek work while freshening the whole thing up--Chris Pine is utterly fantastic. I thought this movie was just superb.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AndrewS.May 9, 2009

For people giving 0's and 1's. This movie was set in an alternate universe. I guess you didn't pay very much attention to the first ten minutes, or the rest of the movie. Not paying attention also probably leads to the fact For people giving 0's and 1's. This movie was set in an alternate universe. I guess you didn't pay very much attention to the first ten minutes, or the rest of the movie. Not paying attention also probably leads to the fact that you didn't get the character motivations. These actors did a great job, and most of them were nobodies before. You naysayers want a movie based of super Trekkyness and sci-fi? You want one that's full of the original Star Trek exactly how it was in the tv show? Go pull out your DVD's and watch Star Trek: The Motion Picture. And remember, while this movie is getting rave reviews, The Motion Picture was getting 50's out of 100.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MaxB.May 9, 2009

There probably won't be a better "summer blockbuster" action flick this year. It moves fast and feels more like a 90-minute film rather than a 2-hour one; this is a good thing. Awe-inspiring visuals, very good sound effects (and There probably won't be a better "summer blockbuster" action flick this year. It moves fast and feels more like a 90-minute film rather than a 2-hour one; this is a good thing. Awe-inspiring visuals, very good sound effects (and soundtrack), completely solid actors and characters coupled with the entertaining story make Star Trek a hit. A near perfect approach to the action-drama/popcorn genre.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

PaulS.May 9, 2009

Well done. Holds true to the original series and adds a nice edge to the characters. Cast is exceptional. Kirks birth is a little over the top and they went a little too far with "old Spock" at the end of the movie but this still rates as a Well done. Holds true to the original series and adds a nice edge to the characters. Cast is exceptional. Kirks birth is a little over the top and they went a little too far with "old Spock" at the end of the movie but this still rates as a top notch film. Old fans will love the way this film ties in with the series and the action will surely bring in some new fans. I, for one, am ready for the sequel!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RyanMay 9, 2009

Brilliant! Exciting and fresh for non-fans, true to the original for fans. It's exactly what the franchise needed. They brilliantly set this new cast up for a boat load of sequels if they desire. The best film to come out from this Brilliant! Exciting and fresh for non-fans, true to the original for fans. It's exactly what the franchise needed. They brilliantly set this new cast up for a boat load of sequels if they desire. The best film to come out from this franchise since "First Contact."… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

RichardJ.May 9, 2009

As a summer blockbuster action movie, Star Trek is excellent. The action scenes are intense and exciting, and the story of Kirk and Spock's origins was very compelling. Newcomers to the Star Trek universe will be very entertained, As a summer blockbuster action movie, Star Trek is excellent. The action scenes are intense and exciting, and the story of Kirk and Spock's origins was very compelling. Newcomers to the Star Trek universe will be very entertained, however many fans will be very disappointed. In the interests of opening up Star Trek to a wider audience, J.J. Abrams has taken many liberties with the story which many fans might find too much to swallow.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

ErinE.May 9, 2009

Extremely enjoyable movie. It's rare that I want to pay to see a movie again and again in the theater, but this one is exceptional. I am a proud Trekkie and this movie is one to be happy about! The Red Shirts are back!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RolandN.May 9, 2009

Masterpiece, it is a must see movie, if you are a star trek fan you will love it, unless you are a fanatical old school star trek fan then you might have something bad about it. But for me, i loved it totally and completely they successfully Masterpiece, it is a must see movie, if you are a star trek fan you will love it, unless you are a fanatical old school star trek fan then you might have something bad about it. But for me, i loved it totally and completely they successfully revived star trek into glorious blockbuster, i can't wait for future star trek movies of this caliber. you will instantly recognize each character and person from the old ones, each one is played to hold their special personalities perfectly. If you love sci fi and haven't seen this yet, shame on you, it is one hell of a great movie! :D… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

EvanSMay 9, 2009

I really enjoyed this one. It may be in large part due to my disappointment regarding the X-men movie but I thought the cast nailed their parts. Quinto hit all the little Spock-ish looks with just the right timing and the right application I really enjoyed this one. It may be in large part due to my disappointment regarding the X-men movie but I thought the cast nailed their parts. Quinto hit all the little Spock-ish looks with just the right timing and the right application of his eyebrows. Pine was a bit obvious in his constantly checking out every woman who passed him by but that is exactly what Kirk would do seemingly. The plot was the only aspect of the film I thought needed real help. It lacked a certain oomph provided by a sci-fi-esque conceptual nightmare like a giant single celled creature about to eat the ship. In any case the film was fun, in the spirit of the original at the very least and filled with what I thought were some fine performances.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

NathanR.May 9, 2009

Awful. Just awful. Let's start from the beginning. . . what's with the Beastie Boy's "Sabotage" doing in a Star Trek film? I knew this movie was bogus from about that point on. The character development was poor. The villain Awful. Just awful. Let's start from the beginning. . . what's with the Beastie Boy's "Sabotage" doing in a Star Trek film? I knew this movie was bogus from about that point on. The character development was poor. The villain was not menacing. Poor acting all around. Each fight scene is predictable. Horrible score. At certain points I felt like I was watching a college drama in space. . .complete with sex scenes and plenty of make outs. Wtf was Winona Ryder doing in this?!? Were we supposed to care about ANY of these characters? I sure didn't! The only thing I cared about was checking my watch in hopes that this flop was almost done with. And how about the final battle that was practically lifted from Star Wars?? I kept waiting for Han Solo to yell "You're all clear kid, now let's blow this thing and go home!" However, the film does deserve a couple points for great visual effects. Unfortunately even the effects were sometimes cheesy. I wasn't sure if I was watching a movie or playing a game of Halo. This one is a stinker!… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful

9

JoshuaH.May 9, 2009

It is so refreshing to have a good sci-fi movie released. It was well cast and just a joy to watch.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

DarrylS.May 9, 2009

Excellent movie. I am unfamiliar with the original Star Trek, but I can tell you that this movie makes me want to look into the series because it was so good. Definitely a 'movie theater popcorn movie'... Great Excellent movie. I am unfamiliar with the original Star Trek, but I can tell you that this movie makes me want to look into the series because it was so good. Definitely a 'movie theater popcorn movie'... Great action/comedy/drama/etc. The only thing I didn't like was the 'green girl' as that looked kind of cheesy, and the part where Kirk's hands swell up: a little too over the top for me.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DavidM.May 9, 2009

See it twice best star trek fil ive seen ( got the others on dvd ) took the wife the second time she enjoyed it very much and she is not a fan

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

IgorA.May 9, 2009

Perfect. Simple storyline returning some of the original cast, fast moving, interesting. The cast is hot, acting is realistic and the camera is unusual but cool.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JoeW.May 9, 2009

Great imaginative job. Glad the sequel was already approved because I'm already waiting for it lolol! Enjoy it!!!!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BillB.May 9, 2009

Saw it yesterday in IMAX. My first reaction, WOW. After it was over, I said to my wife "we are going to have to see it again and buy it on DVD when it comes out. This is the best of the Star Trek movies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BenC.May 9, 2009

Definitely one of the top 10 science fiction movies and it will make a ton of money. It's best to see this movie in an IMAX theatre if possible.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JoeyK.May 9, 2009

Fantastic. It did everything right that it needed to. The characters were done perfectly, and the modern-redoing of the look worked, because it blended modern and nostalgic styles successfully. It was far more action-packed than Star Trek Fantastic. It did everything right that it needed to. The characters were done perfectly, and the modern-redoing of the look worked, because it blended modern and nostalgic styles successfully. It was far more action-packed than Star Trek ever is, and it did not venture into any true sci-fi territory. But to those who fault the film for that, I'd like to remind you that only the best Star Trek episodes were real Sci-Fi. If you didn't like the movie because it wasn't sci-fi enough, then there's a whole lot of Star Trek that you must have hated. Either that, or you have a very strong aversion to fun.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DarylP.May 9, 2009

Words cannot describe how amazing this movie movie is. Seldom times does a movie come out that not only lives up to the hype, but also lives up to the heavy $12 one time view asking price. I'm not a Trekkie, and there once was a time Words cannot describe how amazing this movie movie is. Seldom times does a movie come out that not only lives up to the hype, but also lives up to the heavy $12 one time view asking price. I'm not a Trekkie, and there once was a time when i said i would never become one, but this movie was so good, im on the verge of eating my own words. Suffice to say, this wasn't your traditional Star Trek movie. It was good. They kept the sci-fi lingo, over the top dialog, and boring conversations, to a minimum. What they lacked in a traditional boring trek movie, they made up for with drama, comedy, even romance. You don't need to watch a Star Trek film to understand whats going on, as its a prequel, but it makes wonderful reference work of the greater films in the series (of which Ive only seen one). I'm not going to tell you to see this, but if you decide to see it, i can more then guarantee you wont be disappointed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AlexB.May 9, 2009

Excellent space romp. Truly luscious visuals complemented by some excellent acting and good humour. All the catchphrases making a return. Yet through all this they bring a new life back to the franchise, all of the actors add something to Excellent space romp. Truly luscious visuals complemented by some excellent acting and good humour. All the catchphrases making a return. Yet through all this they bring a new life back to the franchise, all of the actors add something to the original role. The story is not overpoweringly excellent but its very very solid. Anyway blows most of the recent action filler out of the window.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

KilonMay 9, 2009

I am like most of people around here a huge Start Trek fan. I watch the trailers and even though the graphics look very good it looked more like an action film than a real Star Trek. It looked good but it did not look Star Trek. Cause behind I am like most of people around here a huge Start Trek fan. I watch the trailers and even though the graphics look very good it looked more like an action film than a real Star Trek. It looked good but it did not look Star Trek. Cause behind Star Trek is whole philosophy , it is not a Star Wars fairy tale , because it tries to predict the Future , even though some exaggeration is added for the sake of drama. It is however one of the very few if not the Only , serious SCI FI. So as many Trekkie out there feared that this film will disappoint me greatly. Another reason is that unlike many people out there I am not a JJ ABRAMS fan. LOST does not excite me , even though I must admit is well made. And his last film COVERFIELD even though I am a big fan of moster movies , I found it TERRIBLE. But when I went to see this movie I was blown away. Ok Let say I understand the fact that his movie has the most AMAZING Effects I have ever seen in any MOVIE in my LIFE TIME. IT blows away any other movie in its path. OK let us say that I felt comfortable that the movie respects the Star Trek Philosophy , and vaporates all my fears. But HOW, HOW ON EARTH did he take a cast of inexperienced actors and turn them to EXACT replicates of the original crew??? I was blow away , not because JJ Abrams clones the unclonable but also expands the characters in ways unthinkable. For example is the FIRST time that all the crew plays an important role. In most other movies only Bones, Kirk and Spok take the biggest part of the movie , in this one , every character is polished and ready to perform its best. Second , how on earth did manage to tell us so much about SPOK? Why the previous movies did not do it and this one does? Ok now let say What I did not like. First , the central theme of the movie is Boring. I am tried of the time machine stories that have been polluting Star Trek for so long. It is old , tried many many times and for all trek fan nothing original. Of course the Scenario is very well done, it is probably one of the best Start Trek scenarios out there, and makes you forget the boring theme and concentrate on what really happens which is so carefully crafted as a story and character interaction that you cannot escape its enchantment. My second objection is the BAD GUY, Nero. Dont get me wrong he is a fine actor, but surprisingly he never gets enough time to develop his character. There is mostly the original star trek crew. The movie makes us understand his motives , but we never have time to understand who he really is. The previous start trek movie was not like this one but he had a bad guy the alter ego of picard that really sends us deep into the dark side of picard and made probably the best Villain (or almost the best if you count the Khan, In Warth OF Kahn or the evil Klingon general in Undiscovered country ). But in this one , the bad guys play only a tiny role in the movie. However the movie is awesome, it rates as high as the last Batman, with wonderful performance, excellent art, amazing directing and a very solid yet complex Story line that fully respects and dare expand the Star Trek ethos. Even women did like it !!! and this hard to do in my country. (Greece). It pains me that the Theater was only half full, but here we are no big Sci fi or Star Trek fans. Well, they missed something amazing. So After the movie the only question remains --->I am sure there is going to be a sequel to this , but When are we going to see the new series on TV with this new cast mr Abrams ?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AdamO.May 9, 2009

A perfect two hour "f u" to the obsessive nerds of Star Trek. Keeping a common theme of self parody as it fills itself with just as many plot holes, lame explosions and shaky camera shots as the classic series. I can't wait for the A perfect two hour "f u" to the obsessive nerds of Star Trek. Keeping a common theme of self parody as it fills itself with just as many plot holes, lame explosions and shaky camera shots as the classic series. I can't wait for the sequel of the new and improved Star Trek.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

ChadS.May 9, 2009

[***SELF-POLICING SPOILER ALERT***] "Star Trek" was never cool, until now. The prologue is rousing stuff, but it's not until we hear the Beastie Boys blaring over the soundtrack that this shrewd reboot irreparably distances itself from [***SELF-POLICING SPOILER ALERT***] "Star Trek" was never cool, until now. The prologue is rousing stuff, but it's not until we hear the Beastie Boys blaring over the soundtrack that this shrewd reboot irreparably distances itself from the campy original, as Kirk(Chris Pine), a rebel without a cause, sends his vehicle careening over a cliff(perhaps, a subtle nod to the 1955 film directed by Nicholas Ray). Painting Kirk as a lost child with suicidal tendencies repositions William Shatner's lecherous take on the captain as being symptomatic of overcompensation. Finally, Kirk becomes relatable to the masses, and breaks the filmic text wide open. Enlistment with the Star Fleet makes all the sense in the world; he has nowhere else to go. In the original series, the viewer never gets a sense that the Enterprise crew members had lives outside of the ship. Never has an origin story been this crucial, or game for self-invention. The film's masterstroke, no doubt, is its reimagining of Kirk and Spock(Zachary Quinto) as rivals. You always took their friendship for granted. The way Leonard Nimoy played the half-breed alien, Spock was always so cool and collected, like he was on a perpetual Quaalude high. The fiery temper that the Vulcan displays here is a revelation. So many unknown scenarios, death-causing scenarios, could have arisen once Spock jettisons Kirk off the ship. His dislike for the future captain nearly makes a murderer out of him. This Spock is no celibate. This Spock kicks ass. As does the film. For a refreshing change, it presents military service in a positive light, completely free of the nihilism found in Paul Verhoeven's "Starship Troopers". Nero(Eric Bana) is given a choice; the violence that comes down on the Romulans isn't senseless.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

EricO.May 9, 2009

Just absolutely fantastic! Rarely has a movie that I have anticipated SO much lived up to the anticipation and expectation. What a way to reboot Star Trek. Thank you Mr. Abrams.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

GaryN.May 9, 2009

Very well conceived and executed. A Star Trek movie that will re-ignite the franchise and bring a lot of new fans

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

StigO.May 8, 2009

Too much "Cloverfield." Not enough "Lost." A constantly moving whirligig camera is not a substitute for either acting or story-telling. Just hold the thing still, for Pete's sake, so we can see what's happening.* And the film Too much "Cloverfield." Not enough "Lost." A constantly moving whirligig camera is not a substitute for either acting or story-telling. Just hold the thing still, for Pete's sake, so we can see what's happening.* And the film literally strips the classic characters of their dignity.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

BobH.May 8, 2009

I am mourning the passing of original story line..... it's kind of like waking up from a dream and knowing that everything that happened in the dream never happened.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

MeganJ.May 8, 2009

Very poor film due to incoherent script. At the end, Captain Kirk orders his crew to open fire on a crippled ship full of civilians, making him a war criminal. This is after he tries to use "compassion" as a cynical ruse against his Very poor film due to incoherent script. At the end, Captain Kirk orders his crew to open fire on a crippled ship full of civilians, making him a war criminal. This is after he tries to use "compassion" as a cynical ruse against his opponent. The script is flimsy and illogical; Nero's motivations make no sense. There is virtually no science fiction element; this is an action film set in space. Very, very poor.… Expand

0 of 8 users found this helpful

9

JA.May 8, 2009

Loved it. It is finally a Star Trek movie worthy of the cinema. It's not a TV series, it's a movie. Amazing effects and scenes. Very emotional start, great humour, and a fun adventure. Overall very entertaining, which is what going Loved it. It is finally a Star Trek movie worthy of the cinema. It's not a TV series, it's a movie. Amazing effects and scenes. Very emotional start, great humour, and a fun adventure. Overall very entertaining, which is what going to the cinema is all about. Only qualm I have with it is it was a little too fast paced, particularly with the character development. I would have prefered to see more depth in that regard, but then again that's something that suits the tv audience better. Hopefully, a revived series will come of this to add to the depth, and something new to look forward to on tv.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

SpiderbabyMay 8, 2009

For all you zero givers: this is an alternate universe. remember that as it's laid out in the FIRST TEN MINUTES. james is a rebel in this movie (and the following sequels for sure) because of those first few minutes. it changedFor all you zero givers: this is an alternate universe. remember that as it's laid out in the FIRST TEN MINUTES. james is a rebel in this movie (and the following sequels for sure) because of those first few minutes. it changed everything...and we are given something brand new to explore and enjoy. good stuff.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

StevA.May 8, 2009

Great movie, but am I the only person who found Anton Yelchin absolutely HORRID in this movie? That accent and acting was so bad that it killed any scene he was in. Other than that, I have no other complaints.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

PatrickT.May 8, 2009

Absolutely thrilling! Star Trek left me in awe as I left the theater; I was completely blown away by the epic scale of this incredible masterpiece.

0 of 2 users found this helpful

10

BrianA.May 8, 2009

I had high expectations for the film after seeing all the reviews, and I have to say, they were met and beyond. Like one reviewer said, it's the greatest prequel ever made. Visually stunning, great story, and above all, pitch perfect I had high expectations for the film after seeing all the reviews, and I have to say, they were met and beyond. Like one reviewer said, it's the greatest prequel ever made. Visually stunning, great story, and above all, pitch perfect acting. See this film (and see it in IMAX if you can - it's worth a longer drive and/or paying more).… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

KimL.May 8, 2009

No disappointments here.Took me back to when I was first captured by the TV series. Excellent!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

SeannF.May 8, 2009

Characters were good (except for Uhara), dialogue was witty in places, cinematography and special effects were beautiful but the story was incredibly (poor).

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JamesM.May 8, 2009

I think a lot of people complaining about the plot just haven't thought it through. I was very entertained by this film and would certainly recommend it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JamieT.May 8, 2009

I have never actually liked Star Trek before, but after seeing this movie i can safely call myself a "Trekkie" (though not a true one as they would have me believe!) The film was awesome, great effects, complex but satisfying storyline and I have never actually liked Star Trek before, but after seeing this movie i can safely call myself a "Trekkie" (though not a true one as they would have me believe!) The film was awesome, great effects, complex but satisfying storyline and overall the acting was perfect.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

WillieL.May 8, 2009

Without exaggeration, this movie is STUNNING! It is action packed, fast moving, and leaves you craving for SO MUCH MORE! It is thoroughly loyal to the original genre (despite the liberal changes it takes), as well as being a flick that a Without exaggeration, this movie is STUNNING! It is action packed, fast moving, and leaves you craving for SO MUCH MORE! It is thoroughly loyal to the original genre (despite the liberal changes it takes), as well as being a flick that a non-"trekkie" can pick up on. And tell me, please, be honest... that opening sequence with the emotional climax... didn't you wanna shed a tear? Didn't it grab ya? Well GRAB ME AGAIN, ENSIGN! I'm going in for another trip through the black hole, WARP 10!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AlexH.May 8, 2009

The greatest experience i've had in a movie in a long time. The new and improved "Star Trek" proves it has the potential to suppress the old films and become one of it's kind in the Sc-Fi business. Christopher Pine also proves that The greatest experience i've had in a movie in a long time. The new and improved "Star Trek" proves it has the potential to suppress the old films and become one of it's kind in the Sc-Fi business. Christopher Pine also proves that he is one of the better actors in the business that will stay with his career for a long and memorable one as Captain James Kirk.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

PaulK.May 8, 2009

The prequel killed it. see this at all costs. worth the price of getting a sitter, if you have to.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

JamesT.May 8, 2009

This is a travesty and an insult to the memory of Star Trek. Especially egregious: as any Trekker (fan of the original series) knows, far from being a rebel, Jim Kirk was a straight-laced, uptight, over-achiever type in his pre-Enterprise This is a travesty and an insult to the memory of Star Trek. Especially egregious: as any Trekker (fan of the original series) knows, far from being a rebel, Jim Kirk was a straight-laced, uptight, over-achiever type in his pre-Enterprise days. This is referenced in several episodes and is a continuing facet of his character throughout some of the most important plotlines. The SNL skit with Belushi and Chase was far better Star Trek.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful

10

JosephO.May 8, 2009

I just saw 'Star Trek' about 10 minutes ago! This was an exquisite 'Star Trek' origins movie! Very clever, very well written, very true to the unique 'atmosphere' of Star Trek! Excellent character casting!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DaleR.May 8, 2009

Being a trekkie myself this long awaited prequel delivers on every level. It was updated, yet kept the humor and focus of the series. Even those who came in later on as fans of the series or movies were mesmerized by every detail given to Being a trekkie myself this long awaited prequel delivers on every level. It was updated, yet kept the humor and focus of the series. Even those who came in later on as fans of the series or movies were mesmerized by every detail given to this prequel. The cheers given after the credits began to roll proved that. After being fully disappointed by The Day the Earth Stood Still retelling, I was happy to see that They delivered a true RIDE of your Life, from start to finish. I anticipate several sequels from this movie itself.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

CM.May 8, 2009

Being a Hard Core Star Trek fan - The only thing going for this Movie was the Special Effects and its laughable, story line.... I felt this movie, was too made up and not true to the Original series or story line that made Genes baby come to Being a Hard Core Star Trek fan - The only thing going for this Movie was the Special Effects and its laughable, story line.... I felt this movie, was too made up and not true to the Original series or story line that made Genes baby come to life in the 1960's. Spock was on the Enterprise with Captian Pike - when Kirk was in the Academy.... the list of errors goes from there - MC coy was not the Physian in the first show with Kirk as Captain, etc. It would have been nice, If they would have made it towards - how The Captain & crew of the Enterprise, all met either on the Star Ship or before since many were of Different Ages and on Different ships.... I must face the facts, the original Star Trek, is now somethng to be misused and Non actors - but pretty boys play parts, that take on Han Solo's charectistics.......… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful

10

RobE.May 8, 2009

Outstanding!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JosephT.May 8, 2009

When I went in there, I was worried I might see something offensive to the original ideas for Trek...but I wasn't offended. I was delighted to be along for the ride! The first 15 minutes would sell anyone.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

KenenthF.May 8, 2009

I have watched Star Trek from day one (Sept 1966). This attempt to bring new and fresh ideas to the already iconoclastic series was so successful. Granted it did not follow the original storyline, but it gave the story new ideas but at the I have watched Star Trek from day one (Sept 1966). This attempt to bring new and fresh ideas to the already iconoclastic series was so successful. Granted it did not follow the original storyline, but it gave the story new ideas but at the same time you could tell who was who and you could easy fell a connection with the basic Star Trek universe. I hope this is the first of many stories to come.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ZachridW.May 8, 2009

In fact: I'm stunned. I saw this movie two hours ago, so the fresh impressions may warp my judgment a little bit... but I already can say that - of all Star Trek movies out there - this one is the best... or at least the one that had In fact: I'm stunned. I saw this movie two hours ago, so the fresh impressions may warp my judgment a little bit... but I already can say that - of all Star Trek movies out there - this one is the best... or at least the one that had left the biggest impact on me. Despite all concerns I had, I can say that any fan can enjoy this flick.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BillyS.May 8, 2009

A tent-pole is reborn!! My only experience with Star Trek was watching the original series on NBC when I was a teenager, it was ok but not exactly must see tv and not being a trekkie i've never seen a Star Trek movie, until I learned A tent-pole is reborn!! My only experience with Star Trek was watching the original series on NBC when I was a teenager, it was ok but not exactly must see tv and not being a trekkie i've never seen a Star Trek movie, until I learned J.J. Abrams was directing a pre-quel to them all. I caved and saw the new Star Trek in IMAX today and it is a brand new perfect summer blockbuster that will restart a franchise for many years to come. The casting of all the characters is absolutely brilliant. Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Karl Urban, Anton Yelchin and Zoe Saldana are all assured lucrative careers if they only work in the next 6 or 7 sequels this movie will generate, and I'll be waiting for them, now that I'm a trekkie!! Bravo Mr. Abrams!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DanW.May 8, 2009

I thought the movie was the right mix of tradition and new. Without getting into spoilers, the surprises were right on target. I would like to see more...

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

[anonymous]May 8, 2009

Did not disappoint in the least. Thoroughly enjoyable. Was it really over two hours long? Sure didn't seem like it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

RickB.May 8, 2009

A total reset of the Star Trek mythos but with familiar characters... loved it and look forward to this new timeline!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

KevinM.May 8, 2009

I Loved the tv series ,but lost interest in the movies ,due to the fact they tried to hard to bring the excitement for the show to the movie's but somewhere along the way they gave way to corn plots .but after watching this movie i am a I Loved the tv series ,but lost interest in the movies ,due to the fact they tried to hard to bring the excitement for the show to the movie's but somewhere along the way they gave way to corn plots .but after watching this movie i am a born again star trek fan .… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DaveF.May 8, 2009

And so the torch passes on. Well done, excellent all around.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ChristopherG.May 8, 2009

Great movie! There was a wonderful interplay between the new cast and Leonard Nimoy! Lots of action and SFX! I also like the way they used Captain Pike as the first captain of Enterprise

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DerekH.-DayMay 8, 2009

I dunno what to say.. I went in fearing the worst, after all I'm a Trekker, and a re-imagining of the film to me, meant a complete re-ordering of the timeline all over again.. BUT.. forget all that, because it does not matter one bit. I dunno what to say.. I went in fearing the worst, after all I'm a Trekker, and a re-imagining of the film to me, meant a complete re-ordering of the timeline all over again.. BUT.. forget all that, because it does not matter one bit. The ships, the internals and externals, the worlds, and heck, even the warp sequences are just so damn cool. I seriously think this is the best Star Trek ever!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SusanMay 8, 2009

Even my 13 year-old daughter loved it! (And she really wasn't expecting to...)

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

WayneA.May 8, 2009

A great start or re-start of the series. I already want to see the sequel.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

Star Trek

User Reviews