Star Trek

9

JBKMay 16, 2009

Amazing, I was nto a fan of star trek before this because it was before my time but after this movie i am a huge fan. Great charcter development and great chemistry between the new spock, zachary quinto and chris pine amazing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MaryoMay 16, 2009

I haven't been so happy after a movie in years. Pure delight and entertainment. If you were a fan of the original series, there are laugh-out-loud moments that will enchant you.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

LyleS.May 16, 2009

Very entertaining. Solid acting. Amazing action and FX. JJ Abrams is a masterful director at this genre. The plot was a stretch at times. And, overall, I'd say it falls short of matching the greatest action/sci-fi flicks of all-time Very entertaining. Solid acting. Amazing action and FX. JJ Abrams is a masterful director at this genre. The plot was a stretch at times. And, overall, I'd say it falls short of matching the greatest action/sci-fi flicks of all-time (Star Wars IV-VI, Aliens, Star Trek II, etc).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AnthonySMay 16, 2009

Unlike the crappy Dragonball thing this movie shows how an adaptation is done with style and lots of reference to the original.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AlessandroCMay 16, 2009

Finally, the epic return of star trek is here, and it exceeded my expectations are 500 miles, bottom line, the movie is a must watch.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AmelindaSMay 16, 2009

Loved it. This is what a summer should be.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BretMay 15, 2009

I was surprised at how good it was. I guess I had low expectations going in but it was simply fabulous. I want to see it again. I liked that Captain Pike (great casting there) survived. I was shocked that they destroyed Vulcan, but thought I was surprised at how good it was. I guess I had low expectations going in but it was simply fabulous. I want to see it again. I liked that Captain Pike (great casting there) survived. I was shocked that they destroyed Vulcan, but thought it interesting how in normal timeline Romulus is destroyed, in new timeline Vulcan is destroyed.. two sides of a mirror. I can't say enough how good the casting was.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful

10

DillSMay 15, 2009

What a movie in terms of rising-your-emotions! Great story, amazing action, incredible CGI, and overall the best movie I've seen this year.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

JudyTMay 15, 2009

Thank God I can give this movie a zero here. On IMDB I had to give it a one. This movie was comedic and pitiful, a disgrace to the whole Star Trek series. William Shatner should be grateful that they didn't ask him to appear and Leonard Thank God I can give this movie a zero here. On IMDB I had to give it a one. This movie was comedic and pitiful, a disgrace to the whole Star Trek series. William Shatner should be grateful that they didn't ask him to appear and Leonard Nimoy must need a paycheck really bad. I was done when they resorted to Alien Monsters and Tyler Perry.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful

10

LKMay 15, 2009

Outstanding adventure, great casting, and wonderful graphics. I am not a big sci-fi person, but Star Trek is a human story (or partially human in Spock's case) with some adventure, philosophy and humor. Learning about the early years of Outstanding adventure, great casting, and wonderful graphics. I am not a big sci-fi person, but Star Trek is a human story (or partially human in Spock's case) with some adventure, philosophy and humor. Learning about the early years of the main characters was briliant, and the acting was dead on. For those who talk about cliche, perhaps they are too young to know this is the original..cliche is what people emulate later. I fully enjoyed every second of this film and am thrilled that the spirit of StarTrek lives!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

BenLMay 15, 2009

GREAT SHOW! I had no desire to see it, but when I saw that everyone was being blown away I decided to give it a chance. J.J. Abrams has the George Lucas-like potential to revolutionize Hollywood, and he proved it with this film. It was also GREAT SHOW! I had no desire to see it, but when I saw that everyone was being blown away I decided to give it a chance. J.J. Abrams has the George Lucas-like potential to revolutionize Hollywood, and he proved it with this film. It was also brilliant how he crafted a way to leave the originals alone for the die-hard Trekkies, and at the same time, craft a brilliant, brand new history to take place right along side it!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

JesseRMay 15, 2009

I have never been anything close to a Star Trek fan and I really loved this movie. I thought the story was great, the cast really did an excellent job and the movie even managed to be a bit funny without it appearing like it was trying to I have never been anything close to a Star Trek fan and I really loved this movie. I thought the story was great, the cast really did an excellent job and the movie even managed to be a bit funny without it appearing like it was trying to be. I highly recommend it to fans and those not so much.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

KShulerMay 15, 2009

Trekkie from way back. Didn't mind the change of storyline, everything needs to be refreshed sooner or later. The actors were right on the money for the crew and the special effects were fantastic. However, plot was a little thin and Trekkie from way back. Didn't mind the change of storyline, everything needs to be refreshed sooner or later. The actors were right on the money for the crew and the special effects were fantastic. However, plot was a little thin and the bad guy wasn't so bad. My boss has performed a better bad guy routine that what was seen in the movie. Overall, I'd see it again in a minute.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

ColeDMay 15, 2009

J.J. Abrams had a monumental task ahead of him when he took on this project; please the newcomers to the Trek universe as well as appease the olde' school fans. In my opinion, he did it admirably. While there were a few mistakes made, J.J. Abrams had a monumental task ahead of him when he took on this project; please the newcomers to the Trek universe as well as appease the olde' school fans. In my opinion, he did it admirably. While there were a few mistakes made, overall there were more wins. The role of Cpt. Pike and others were perfectly cast, and the developement of the characters was interestingly done. While the "alternate reality" has been a bit over-done in the movie industry, it had to be done with this movie to provide the writers and the audience with a fresh, new storyline to work with. Especially in this case, since the current Trek universe has been oversaturated with dime store novels and shorts covering every possible asset of the universe. Brilliant work J.J. I'm looking forward to more.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

HarvensPMay 15, 2009

Trekker for the last two decades, it's with a certain amount of nostalgia that I witnessed the transition of Star Trek from 1.0 to 2.0. Though I understand the purpose of the many changes brought forth by M. Abrams (some brilliant, most Trekker for the last two decades, it's with a certain amount of nostalgia that I witnessed the transition of Star Trek from 1.0 to 2.0. Though I understand the purpose of the many changes brought forth by M. Abrams (some brilliant, most well meant & few ill advised), two of them got me cringing still: 1) Exploration seems to have been vacated from StarFleet's mission 2) Passing a water plant for the engine of a warp capable spaceship, I cannot buy into. Aside from this minor quibbling, it was a thrilling popcorner of a ride and a true delight for an old school trekkie. Star Trek is reborn and its soul unscathed. But make no mistake about it: this IS the Trek for the (ahem) next generation!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

StuartWoodMay 15, 2009

If you are of a certain age, then you probably grew up watching the Original Star Trek series on bbc2 each night. I was never as enthusiastic about the new Star Trek, although i went to see one of them at the cinema. I'm not a trekkie If you are of a certain age, then you probably grew up watching the Original Star Trek series on bbc2 each night. I was never as enthusiastic about the new Star Trek, although i went to see one of them at the cinema. I'm not a trekkie but i have to tell everyone how good the new film is. I was concerned that the new actors portraying he younger versions of Captain Kirk, Spock and the rest of the crew wouldn't match up. Bones in particular is spot on, the casting of this film have really done excelllently. The film itself is a blast from strart to finish. usually in most films there are slow points, this film doesn't let up. The visuals are stunning, at times reminiscent of Star Wars-A new hope. The film ends with the new crew fully established and ready for the next mission. I have to say, maybe for nostalgia value that this is one of the best films i've seen in 25 years going to see flicks. If you're not familiar with the old Tv series then i have no doubt that this will still be a great film to watch. Live long and prosper.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

HumprtPumMay 15, 2009

Poor Dr. Spock. They´ve made him so stupid. Like the whole movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

5

OoshMay 15, 2009

What should have been a genuine reboot (ala Batman) descended in to a poor pastiche of the original full of clumsy plot devices. Even if a little stilted It's not a bad action movie but wait for DVD/TV.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

joesMay 15, 2009

As an original trekkie baby, this movie met all expectation for a remake. the writting and script was well done and the newbies met all expectation of performance and delivery of their lines that I had hoped to see in the continuation of the As an original trekkie baby, this movie met all expectation for a remake. the writting and script was well done and the newbies met all expectation of performance and delivery of their lines that I had hoped to see in the continuation of the Star Trek phanominal myth. The only part that fell short for me was the music and too many close up scenes. A little more panoramic views of the battles and of the enterprize would have been a little more breath taking and memorable.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AnthonyWMay 15, 2009

I can't think that they could find a better cast to play these iconic characters. Everyone was perfect, their accents, looks, everything. I understand why JJ had to do a time travel / alternate reality plot to reimagine these I can't think that they could find a better cast to play these iconic characters. Everyone was perfect, their accents, looks, everything. I understand why JJ had to do a time travel / alternate reality plot to reimagine these characters. I have to say that came off better then what I thought the movie was going to be. With the Nero catalyst he was able to redevelop these characters into something a little differant, they are still the same people with similar lifes, but with Nero they can be something else as well, which allows JJ to make a sequel or two without just remaking old Star Trek episodes. Although this marks the 3rd Star Trek movie involving time travel it shows something different. I really enjoyed it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JackFMay 15, 2009

I'm not into sci-fi, space movies, or anything generally nerd/fan/cult-ish, but i'm ready to become a nerd/fan/cult member after this. A perfect movie for uncertain economic and environmental times, deftly scripted, spot-on I'm not into sci-fi, space movies, or anything generally nerd/fan/cult-ish, but i'm ready to become a nerd/fan/cult member after this. A perfect movie for uncertain economic and environmental times, deftly scripted, spot-on performances, perfectly paced. And really, really funny. Charming, exciting, and fills you with joy - I never expected to hear myself saying that about a Star Trek movie!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

JackBlackMay 15, 2009

JJ Abrams does it again

0 of 2 users found this helpful

5

MikeMMay 14, 2009

Leave brain at door. Bring Back The Kirk in the next one. Anything goes now!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

PatrickMMay 14, 2009

I have never seen an episode of startrek before(quite frankly I thought it was a bit nerdy!) but this movie was so amazing that now I might watch some!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

CallumHMay 14, 2009

This film was dangling a fine line, with a well known franchise and devout following you have to appease them. But also this film had to appeal to the masses so that Star Trek could actually have a shelf life past this reboot. Thankfully, This film was dangling a fine line, with a well known franchise and devout following you have to appease them. But also this film had to appeal to the masses so that Star Trek could actually have a shelf life past this reboot. Thankfully, this film does all of that with a sense of excitement and exhilaration. Every role is cast to near perfection and the alternate reality plot makes it capable for the franchise to go further without looking back for the sake of Trekkies.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

MichelleNMay 14, 2009

0 of 1 users found this helpful

6

JayDMay 14, 2009

I've never been a huge sci-fi fan, but the outstanding reviews caused me to go out and see this movie (excited to see it even). Sadly, I felt that it was one ultra convenient event after another. I dare someone to answer this for me: I've never been a huge sci-fi fan, but the outstanding reviews caused me to go out and see this movie (excited to see it even). Sadly, I felt that it was one ultra convenient event after another. I dare someone to answer this for me: How do people get all these high ranking jobs simply be hopping on a ship??? The effects were good, but effects alone do not make a movie good. The story new time-line story-line was acceptable, but certainly nothing worth writing home about. On the plus side, most of the acting was above par. The best praise I can give to this film is that at least it wasn't directed by Michael "Ruiner of Movies" Bay.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DanitaCMay 14, 2009

The movie develops the original characters beautifully. Every line and scene adds something to the movie. Watching the intro is like being shot out of a cannon. And it just keeps on delivering a great ride.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

ZacharyJMay 14, 2009

Really, 100s? Not only did they totally change the personalities of the characters, but they came up with a lame "excuse" to legitimize it! Alright, I understand that this is focused at a younger crowd, but why tarnish something so sacred? Really, 100s? Not only did they totally change the personalities of the characters, but they came up with a lame "excuse" to legitimize it! Alright, I understand that this is focused at a younger crowd, but why tarnish something so sacred? Why not just come up with a new, hip Sci-Fi movie instead of dumbing down a classic series that very few young-folk care about anyway? I'll put my trekkie tendencies aside and look at this differently: What a stupid movie! Why are the Romulans all bald? With all their "future" technology, can they still not handle lice? I'm tired of bald villains and hereby declare that I refuse to watch any film with a bald baddie from this day forward...unless I really want see it-- And the camera drove me nuts! Hold it still! I get that you want to beef-up the intensity and/or make it feel more reality-TVish in the moment-like, but it makes it hard to pay attention to silly, over-dramatic acting when the camera keeps bouncing up and down. And what about that "shoot-out?" Did they just film Kirk and Spock walking down a hallway then let second unit take care of death-shots? It was pathetic. So--that said, it's a pretty fun movie with some good laughs, but no sign of intelligence or nostalgic worth.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

PeteSMay 14, 2009

There was no grace or glamor to this film whatsoever. It sped from scene to scene with very little clarity. The jokes seemed forced and slapstick. The plot was vague. The cinematics were anything but. The soundtrack was nothing more than the There was no grace or glamor to this film whatsoever. It sped from scene to scene with very little clarity. The jokes seemed forced and slapstick. The plot was vague. The cinematics were anything but. The soundtrack was nothing more than the same 3 notes being played over and over again. All in all, it was a poor Star Trek. I am stunned that the critics bought in so completely into the hype.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful

10

JeanCMay 14, 2009

The movie was great. I read a couple of newspaper reviews which criticized the plot. They just don't get it. It's not about the plot... It's about the characters. Go see it!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

aderusuhMay 13, 2009

Great movie man, i'm not a Trekkie either, but always thought that Kirk and Spock duo make the best star trek movies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

PerryMay 13, 2009

A good movie that was better than anticipated. I highly recommend the experience; you won't be disappointed. Pay no heed to the finicky naysayers. There will always be "overzealous" fans who discredit anything new to their favored A good movie that was better than anticipated. I highly recommend the experience; you won't be disappointed. Pay no heed to the finicky naysayers. There will always be "overzealous" fans who discredit anything new to their favored universe that doesn't meet their exacting demands.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

GeorgeMMay 13, 2009

About as deep as "The A-Team in Space." Lots of explosions and fistfights signifying *nothing*. Heinous product placement and a disrespectful rip of Spock's death line from Wrath of Khan on top of herky-jerky abrasive cinematography.

3 of 8 users found this helpful

10

metroplexjimMay 13, 2009

As one who is not a "Trekkie", but has nevertheless seen all the Treks first run in the theaters, I must say that this film exceeded my expectations in being at least the equal of The Wrath of Khan. I look forward to as many sequels to this As one who is not a "Trekkie", but has nevertheless seen all the Treks first run in the theaters, I must say that this film exceeded my expectations in being at least the equal of The Wrath of Khan. I look forward to as many sequels to this as scripts as good as this one are written.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

osirisnMay 13, 2009

Fantastic movie. Went by incredibly fast, cannot wait to see it for a second time!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ChristinaMMay 13, 2009

I loved this movie! Spock is asweome! The kid actor is my age so that might age to that.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

FernandoVMay 13, 2009

the greatest rebooting of star trek franchise´s saga is one of de best compare to another saga, like batman begins.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JimSMay 13, 2009

Solid in every aspect. The acting is better than the original series, excluding Leonard Nimoy who is/was always very good. An excellent story that is weaved together so well it underscores what is best about Star Trek. Kudos to the writers Solid in every aspect. The acting is better than the original series, excluding Leonard Nimoy who is/was always very good. An excellent story that is weaved together so well it underscores what is best about Star Trek. Kudos to the writers and director.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

DaveCMay 13, 2009

Entertaining movie, not quite worthy of the hype. Sugar coats every movie cliche going and just about gets away with it. A modern Sci-fi soap opera.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

EJAMay 12, 2009

[***SPOILERS***] First off this movie is really fun and exciting to watch. The writing is plenty passable and the acting was fine. The only issues were someof the logic in the plot. Just a couple things: 1) Nero would probably attempt to warn[***SPOILERS***] First off this movie is really fun and exciting to watch. The writing is plenty passable and the acting was fine. The only issues were someof the logic in the plot. Just a couple things: 1) Nero would probably attempt to warn the romulans of the future then get all hell bent on revenge for something not even done yet. 2) Why does spock have to pod kirk to an unhospitable ice planet just for being disobedient? And I saw that planet, its HUGE. What a coincidence he runs into spock's cave of all places to further the plot. 3) Lastly, a gigantic drill that goes into a planet? why didn't the vulcans send one tiny spacecraft to shoot the lengthy thin drilling device down? thats all young spock did to stop the drilling. Hell any modernday jet could have torpedo'ed the drill apart to prevent the drilling. But hey, its summer, and its fun so enjoy the ride… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

KatieBMay 12, 2009

The personal reviews have got me laughing. Trekkies calling this story improbable and hard to follow!? Three words: Star Trek IV. Anyone remember Kirk and crew going back in time to get some WHALES? Not saying I didn't enjoy it, but the The personal reviews have got me laughing. Trekkies calling this story improbable and hard to follow!? Three words: Star Trek IV. Anyone remember Kirk and crew going back in time to get some WHALES? Not saying I didn't enjoy it, but the time travel was not explained well, and why the crap was the monolith looking for whales by destroying the atmosphere? Comparatively, this movie made time travel look possible and probable. I really enjoyed it. It was fun, and laid a firm ground for the next movie. This was a reboot; understand it on those terms, and I think you will appreciate it more. It does what it set out to do, and presented some great new actors.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AdamdMay 12, 2009

Coming from an old school Trekker, this movie is wonderful. Thank you JJ Abrams for not ruining my child hood heroes. Long live Star Trek!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SheldonHMay 12, 2009

best flick for a long time, and I'm not even a Trekkie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

NathanSMay 12, 2009

I am a star trek fan, I always have been. I found this film to be absolutely delightful, a parable of cinematic expression. Many other Trek fans have done nothing but whine and complain about this movie, but damn it, I'm going to go see I am a star trek fan, I always have been. I found this film to be absolutely delightful, a parable of cinematic expression. Many other Trek fans have done nothing but whine and complain about this movie, but damn it, I'm going to go see it again.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

EugeneOMay 12, 2009

A huge pile of dumb, similar to the latter-day Star Wars movies. I'd rather play a video game than pay and watch the equivalent in a theater. This 'alternate reality' Star Trek is insulting to anyone reasonably intelligent. I A huge pile of dumb, similar to the latter-day Star Wars movies. I'd rather play a video game than pay and watch the equivalent in a theater. This 'alternate reality' Star Trek is insulting to anyone reasonably intelligent. I paid $15 for an imax experience that achieved in imax-ing the ritalin camerawork, a crap storyline and script, thin character development and shameless product placement (they had 150 mil budget and the producers needed product placement?!). Stay away if you value the themes, humor, and the thoughtful sci-fi of the original and Next Gen series. There must have been an item in the budget to buy critical opinion. No integrity left for critics and these hack filmmakers.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

7

MattAMay 12, 2009

Ok... so more like a 6.5. But, I think it has potential to be great, come a sequel....so i'll bump it up. Star Trek proved to be an often fun, if not predictable and boring, Origin story to a take on Star Trek. The Effects were amazing, Ok... so more like a 6.5. But, I think it has potential to be great, come a sequel....so i'll bump it up. Star Trek proved to be an often fun, if not predictable and boring, Origin story to a take on Star Trek. The Effects were amazing, as well as the sound. The characters were all there, nostalgic as they are (for better or worse), and they are charming. The plot... was a tad "been there, done that." It didn't break away from the classic Hollywood 'Rise of the Hero' story that the orginial "Star Wars" attained decades ago. I found myself slightly bored during the last 30 minutes of the film because nothing held me on the edge of my seat. Very by the numbers. Should Star Trek be tarnished for giving the audience what they want?... Yes and a bit no. Abrams had the hard task of giving a fantastic original space opera, but cator to the nostalgia of previous fans. This made the film fall into the category of "safe." Not meant to step across boundaries to new comers and loyal fans... Horrible? No... Revolutionary? Not even close.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

tomsMay 12, 2009

A few clunky moments... especially when elder spock describes what happened... but that hardly matters since it was such a great ride... fx were awesome and startling at times, acting and casting was dead on, funny, sad, fast, exciting, A few clunky moments... especially when elder spock describes what happened... but that hardly matters since it was such a great ride... fx were awesome and startling at times, acting and casting was dead on, funny, sad, fast, exciting, great way of getting certain catch phrases in there... end credit music paying homage to the original show was a blast as well... absolutely loved it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

GregFordMay 12, 2009

[***SPOILERS***]Spock and Uhura---wrong Spock losing his cool---wrong. In your face fight scenes---wrong Future meeting the present---very wrong Giving it a 5 is generous.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

HyperSMay 12, 2009

Attempting to jump start what appeared to be a dead-in-the-water series is no easy task especially trying to match the iconic original actors of Nimoy, Shatner, etc, but the director in my opinion pulled it off with a surprisingly plausible Attempting to jump start what appeared to be a dead-in-the-water series is no easy task especially trying to match the iconic original actors of Nimoy, Shatner, etc, but the director in my opinion pulled it off with a surprisingly plausible alternate universe plot that allows for the main characters to have different childhoods/paths and thus different traits and relationships then the original series. Sure the Russian actor felt forced and the character development wasn't all there for the crew, but at 2 HRs running time there wasn't enough time to address it all for the Trekkers while still retaining the attention of the mainstream audience. Plenty of time to further delve into the relationships in the next film now that the hard part is out of the way [i.e. Setting the foundation and recapturing the audiences' interest in Star Trek]. P.S. Nimoy's cameo was great.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MiguelGMay 12, 2009

Incredible story, action, special effects, dialogue, and acting!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

ChuckFMay 12, 2009

There were some major holes in the plot(a supernova can destroy the galaxy?!), but all in all a really good start for what will hopefully be more films.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MarkNMay 12, 2009

Freakin' great movie. I never liked original series (thought I did love TNG) and this far exceeded my expectations. I hear a lot of hard core fans say they don't like it because it changes the whole story line, but they seem to be Freakin' great movie. I never liked original series (thought I did love TNG) and this far exceeded my expectations. I hear a lot of hard core fans say they don't like it because it changes the whole story line, but they seem to be missing the fact that the whole point was to change the story and time line. Great great great. Even my wife liked it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

BarneeBMay 12, 2009

It was a great movie. My only gripe about it is the plot. I've never seen any Star trek movies before, therefore I don't know the story of the original, but this time travel twist in the story was a bit overcomplicated. Some people It was a great movie. My only gripe about it is the plot. I've never seen any Star trek movies before, therefore I don't know the story of the original, but this time travel twist in the story was a bit overcomplicated. Some people might not even know that traveling at the speed of light means that time practically stops!! Scifi fans should definitely check it out, the cast, the action scenes, were really superb, all in all, it's a hell a lot of fun!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

JoeBLowMay 12, 2009

I don't get the positive reviews and ratings. The action scenes were a herky-jerky mess. The plot blazed along so quickly, with so little exposition, that the characters felt paper thin. The setting was the typical Trek blah, with no I don't get the positive reviews and ratings. The action scenes were a herky-jerky mess. The plot blazed along so quickly, with so little exposition, that the characters felt paper thin. The setting was the typical Trek blah, with no sense of culture, time or place. Most of all, it didn't look like a MOVIE, it looked like an overgrown TV episode -- and I saw it on an IMAX screen! For all their many (MANY) weaknesses, when you watch a Star Wars movie, at least you feel like you're seeing a real movie. The plot contrivances were so massive that you gave up any pretense of reality before the second half. Consider what a coincidence it was that Kirk happened to confront the man who killed his father, as a newly commissioned captain, just like his father. Wow, how significant. The reviews are all wrong, sorry.… Expand

3 of 10 users found this helpful

3

RobertP.May 12, 2009

I wanted to like this Star Trek outing but it just did not deliver for me. I have no qualms with the cast or acting. I especially liked Bruce Greenwood as Capt. Pike but this movie is not well written and it is hard to get past this. The I wanted to like this Star Trek outing but it just did not deliver for me. I have no qualms with the cast or acting. I especially liked Bruce Greenwood as Capt. Pike but this movie is not well written and it is hard to get past this. The revenge aspect of the plot is based on an event that makes no sense at all. They throw in a backstory for the villian that is short and could not have happened. Plus you don't even learn what it is until half way through the film. I was disappointed, hopefully the sequel will be better.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

4

EdwardKMay 12, 2009

This film is very poorly written. It has very good acting overall, but this cannot save the film. The idea that a cadet is promoted to Captain without even graduating and given command of the most powerful ship in the fleet is just absurd. This film is very poorly written. It has very good acting overall, but this cannot save the film. The idea that a cadet is promoted to Captain without even graduating and given command of the most powerful ship in the fleet is just absurd. It is also ridiculous that a black hole is generated near Earth and the solar system is not destroyed. Further, Nero commands a mining ship, which apparantly is the most powerful ship in the galaxy. How does this make any sense? The film has destroyed the entire Star Trek timeline. This means that nothing that happened in the previous six series and ten films actually occured. Don't feed me that alternate timeline nonsense either. This is fiction that has a 43 yeatr history and rich backstory which are now gone. They can never be referenced again, unless the alternate reality advocates actually believe that Paramount will do stories in both realities. Exactly! It isn't going to happen. So, in reality, 43 years of developed timeline are destroyed forever. This is unconscienable. To add to this cavalier destruction of franchise history poor writing and a ridiculous plot is just too much! I am amazed at critics who slammed Nemisis as a bad film but excuse similar poor writing in this film simply because they love the non stop action. This film just confirms my suspicions that J. J. Abrams cannot direct films. He has turned Star Trek into Mission: Impossible in space. The franchise is just another MTV video paced action franchise. R.I.P.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

ZackSMay 11, 2009

Im a trekkie. I loved this movie. Greatest Sci Fi movie no Greatest movie ever period end of story. Good day.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

CalvinL.May 11, 2009

Amazing movie. I love what J.J. Abrams has done with the series, revitalizing it. I am a fan of the old Star Trek series and I am now a fan of what Abrams has created. I hope to see the director and cast comeback in a sequel.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AlbeonJ.May 11, 2009

Was not a Star Trek fan and believed that Terminator Salvation would be the surprise hit of the summer. But this movie by far should be the summer's best I'm going to see it again.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

AndrewL.May 11, 2009

Wow... what a disappointment. To be fair, excellent special effects and casting (with 1 or 2 exceptions). But, very weak plot and too many corny moments to mention. This remake was eerily reminiscent of Starship Troopers, but it a bad way. Wow... what a disappointment. To be fair, excellent special effects and casting (with 1 or 2 exceptions). But, very weak plot and too many corny moments to mention. This remake was eerily reminiscent of Starship Troopers, but it a bad way. How X-Men Wolverine gets nailed and Star Trek gets incredibly great press reviews is a mystery.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

10

DiogoB.May 11, 2009

Great Movie, all that I expected in a sci-fi movie is there. Great choice of actors too.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

LarsMay 11, 2009

With the exception of the first half hour, the movie rocked. Fast paced, great action and all around fun.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

LeeW.May 11, 2009

This movie is utter trash. I must say, the beginning scene stood out as pretty damn epic, but after that, the film quickly deteriorated. There is little to no character development with the exception of Kirk, Spock, and Bones, only one of This movie is utter trash. I must say, the beginning scene stood out as pretty damn epic, but after that, the film quickly deteriorated. There is little to no character development with the exception of Kirk, Spock, and Bones, only one of whom (Bones) had an astounding actor (Karl Urban). Uhura was there for romance scenes, Scott was put in to spout one-liners, and Chekov was obviously just a waste of space filled in order to make the audience chuckle at the actor's (Anton Yelchin's) horribly fake Russian accent. The story behind the criminal's intentions aren't revealed until the fourth quarter of the film, and the backstory is truly abysmal with enough pseudoscientifc nonsense to make any Enterprise fanboy cringe and the worst criminal reasoning in Star Trek since Soran from "Generations." The time paradoxes are badly thought out and make little sense. During said first three quarters of the film, the cast of the film chase the bad guy around and try to stop him. This is utterly boring so the director and writers and such try to make up for this by "pace faking" by making characters argue and be violent and have romance scenes in-between the boring conflicts. The directing thoroughly lacks in logic, as bringing phasers along instead of fist-and-sword fighting Romulans on an orbital platform with gigantic fiery exhaust ports is obviously highly illogical. Another stupid thing that I didn't understand at all is why the film opened up with a fight. They have a little utilitarian ship in the middle of space and a portal opens and a big dark spiky ship comes out so they start firing at will without checking if the mysterious enemy has shields powered or weapons ready. They just go by "It's big and dark and it just appeared in front of us. We didn't try hailing it because every ugly thing in space is obviously evil." It of course does actually turn out to be evil, but that is not Star Trek. There are also the canon and plausibility concerns, which are wrecked entirely, so it doesn't deserve to be called Trek. Everything else mentioned here (excluding Karl Urban) just made it even worse.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful

8

BizmalBizmalMay 11, 2009

Not bad but it gelt like two movies split in half. The second part seemed to end out of the blue.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

NickiMay 11, 2009

Really enjoyed this one. Been watching off and on since the 60's and really liked the tie-ins to the original series. Could have left out a few of the fist fights and close-ups of Chris Pine's acne scars but all in all, a very good Really enjoyed this one. Been watching off and on since the 60's and really liked the tie-ins to the original series. Could have left out a few of the fist fights and close-ups of Chris Pine's acne scars but all in all, a very good movie that I will buy when it comes out on Blu-ray.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MarkM.May 11, 2009

JJ Abrahms and team were successful in breaking away from Star Trek canon thereby allowing this newly familiar crew to continue the Enterprise's mission....cool.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AnthonyN.May 11, 2009

Excellent movie! Haven't seen many mention this, but the enterprise can really do some damage!! Not like the older movies that were limited with FX? But this enterprise can lay down some serious fire! It was great to see! Fun movie for all!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

BJBrutherMay 11, 2009

Excellent reboot of the revered franchise--Spock Prime is crucial to the film, he is truly its heart and soul and the bridge between the old Trek and the new Trek. I look forward to the next journey.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

KeithS.May 11, 2009

The new Star Trek movie is not only a visit to our past as viewer and to the history of the Star Trek universe but it takes on a change of history and characters lives and events within the historical universe. Well written, well played. The new Star Trek movie is not only a visit to our past as viewer and to the history of the Star Trek universe but it takes on a change of history and characters lives and events within the historical universe. Well written, well played. Excellent casting. Look forward to seeing more of this cast and crew.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

VeronicaC.May 11, 2009

Even for a die-hard Trekkie, JJ Abrams did an awesome job! Tons of fun, good old-fashioned Trek humor, and non-stop action, how great it is to take another ride on the USS Enterprise!! It took awhile to finally get to the big screen, but wow Even for a die-hard Trekkie, JJ Abrams did an awesome job! Tons of fun, good old-fashioned Trek humor, and non-stop action, how great it is to take another ride on the USS Enterprise!! It took awhile to finally get to the big screen, but wow the cast is dead-on, characters young and fresh, but paid homage to our old Star Fleet friends!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

AramisgjrMay 11, 2009

Do any of these dolts (critics included) realize that this movie ended with a black hole being created right outside of Earth's atmosphere? That means the end of our solar system. This is one of maybe one hundred stupid things that Do any of these dolts (critics included) realize that this movie ended with a black hole being created right outside of Earth's atmosphere? That means the end of our solar system. This is one of maybe one hundred stupid things that happen in this movie that everyone seems to be overlooking. The new Star Trek is one of the sloppiest written sci-fi movies ever. I'm only giving it a 4 for casting and visuals.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

JohnP.May 11, 2009

This movie was like one fun ride from the start to the end. I want to see it again. Loved it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

GeorgeM.May 11, 2009

Having never been a big fan of Star Trek, save for my mild interest in Star Trek The Next Generation and Star Trek Deep Space Nine, I've always been partial to Star Wars for my "Sci-Fi" fix but this "Trek" is different. I get the Having never been a big fan of Star Trek, save for my mild interest in Star Trek The Next Generation and Star Trek Deep Space Nine, I've always been partial to Star Wars for my "Sci-Fi" fix but this "Trek" is different. I get the feeling this film will lure in a new generation of fans to the Star Trek franchise, mainly because its a fresh, exciting entry to the series that new and old fans can appreciate. The story centers around two characters primarily...Kirk (Chris Pine) and Spock (Zachary Quinto)...we see both characters as "up and comers" with a bit of their origins being shown as we know these two "legends" of the series are meant for great things. The story centers around Nero (Eric Bana), playing a great (though under-used) villain, as a Romulan h*ll-bent on getting revenge against Starfleet and Spock for whom he feels is responsible for the death of his people...throw in some "time travel" and you have a rather complex tale of revenge thats still easy to follow for the average film-goer. The cast is young and refreshing and most of them truly embrace their characters (Karl Urban IS "Bones" McCoy) with an energy that shows everyone is really having a great time portraying their characters. The action scenes are big, loud, and pleasing to the senses with some impressive FX and amazing sound (or lack there-of during the "in space" sequences...a nice touch). Overall...I am VERY pleased with this film...its entertaining through-out with an amazing cast, great action, and its done in a way that will surely make fans of even the most hardcore of Trek "haters". I very much look forward to the next film of what will hopefully be a new series of flicks. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RonH.May 11, 2009

Loved the movie. I loved how they kept to the whole Star Trek story line yet opened it to more possibilities by having the Old Spock & the Renegade Romulan for the future alter the present. Brilliant! I can now really accept the fact that Loved the movie. I loved how they kept to the whole Star Trek story line yet opened it to more possibilities by having the Old Spock & the Renegade Romulan for the future alter the present. Brilliant! I can now really accept the fact that the Enterprise & the crew does not act, look, or behave exactly like the original series. Let see if Abrams can wow us in future Star Trek Movies and Series.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

BrianD.May 11, 2009

Very solid movie in general but the story could have been reworked. I've been a fan of Star Trek ever since the original series as well as the spin offs, and this is probably the ideal direction to reboot the series. While, I may be Very solid movie in general but the story could have been reworked. I've been a fan of Star Trek ever since the original series as well as the spin offs, and this is probably the ideal direction to reboot the series. While, I may be disappointed on how this Universe has be rewritten so to speak, it's something I can overlook to inject more life in the series. The one really glaring problem I have( Pun intended) is the use of the good awful Lens Flare being used every 5 freaking seconds.. I though the hack director Michael Bay was a master. Abrams just takes it to and all new painful level that got really annoying rather quick. Other than that is was a solid flick with a strong cast, and effects.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

CathieMay 11, 2009

Check out the big issue website. Star Trek director JJ Abrahams and Simon 'Scotty' Pegg talk about relaunching the Enterprise: http://www.bigissuescotland.com/features/view/57

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

sasamMay 11, 2009

Worst star trek movie ever! Mindless trill ride and destroying 30 years of canon! JJ should never direct this, afterall he said by himself is STAR WARS fan.

0 of 2 users found this helpful

7

LynnA.May 11, 2009

Saw Star Trek & Wolverine on successive days this weekend and liked Wolverine better ... too many WTF bits in ST. Also to many action shots much to close to figure out what is actually happening (a MAJOR complaint w/ my partner & me in Saw Star Trek & Wolverine on successive days this weekend and liked Wolverine better ... too many WTF bits in ST. Also to many action shots much to close to figure out what is actually happening (a MAJOR complaint w/ my partner & me in action flicks over the past 10-15 years). See ST & then Wolverine & see if you don't really like the X-men flick better.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

GOE42May 11, 2009

I can't understand how this movie is being massively applauded for being utterly predictable and mainstream. The story is the most derivative I have seen so far. A Standard action comedy flick - getting undue attention duw to it's I can't understand how this movie is being massively applauded for being utterly predictable and mainstream. The story is the most derivative I have seen so far. A Standard action comedy flick - getting undue attention duw to it's name. There isn't a shadow of originality in the script.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

AlbertoA.May 11, 2009

It appeals to us Trek purists with proper references to already known story lines. It also appeals to a new audience because it just kicks butt as an action film. Finally, using the time paradox was briliant to open the door for completely It appeals to us Trek purists with proper references to already known story lines. It also appeals to a new audience because it just kicks butt as an action film. Finally, using the time paradox was briliant to open the door for completely new stories from the original crew. Looking forward to the next film!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

FransonMay 11, 2009

This movie was spot on. I was very concerned that they would somehow miss the true character traits that made the Star Trek TV series so enjoyable to watch. I was caught completely of guard in a good way. They matched up these characters to This movie was spot on. I was very concerned that they would somehow miss the true character traits that made the Star Trek TV series so enjoyable to watch. I was caught completely of guard in a good way. They matched up these characters to original personalities perfectly! And if that wasn… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

NelsB.May 11, 2009

Awesome. The old Trek universe was old, preachy, and geekafied. This resets the Trek universe is a way that that will only offend 5% of

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

VilhelmB.May 11, 2009

Well, this film has done something to dispel the long held belief about the Star Trek film franchise. It turns out that not every odd numbered Trek film sucks. We know that even numbered Treks were generally good (excepting the last film - Well, this film has done something to dispel the long held belief about the Star Trek film franchise. It turns out that not every odd numbered Trek film sucks. We know that even numbered Treks were generally good (excepting the last film - Nemesis) but the odd ones particularly "The Final Frontier" (directed by Shatner - coincidence?) were typically bad. With this new Star Trek, J.J. Abrahms has recreated the mold into something uniquely original, yet curiously satisfying for older fans like myself. I watched TOS in reruns whilst growing up in the '70's, and although I've never considered myself much of a "trekkie" I can pretty much give you the title of every single episode from memory, along with a great deal of the trivia. Essentially, I've seen every episode so many times that they've become impressed onto my brain like one of Dr. Daystrom's memory engrams. Much of the backstory has been procured from snippets of dialogue extracted from TOS, many of which may not even standout in the die-hard fans mind. Other bits have come from books, and the newer series'. Certain necessary liberties have been taken for the sake of efficiency. For example, the character of Nurse Christine Chapel was glaringly omitted by Abrahms, but he made sure to a least graft aspects of her character onto another crew member. Certain rules in TOS universe have been broken, or more accurately "side-stepped" via the alternate universe plot device. This has MANY original series fans up in arms, to which I say, "so what." This film is so enjoyable, and stands so well on its own, that I really did not care about the changes Abrahm's made. It did more than enough to satisfy the old Trek fan in me, while recreating the excitement and optimism I felt when I walked out of The Wrath of Khan nearly 27 years ago (god has it been THAT LONG!) Let's face it... the old film franchise had being beaten like dead horta - I mean horse - when they resorted to putting both Kirk and Picard on the screen at the same time to woo fans from both Treks. They even dropped the biggest emotional bomb imaginable in this film, and it still tanked. War weary fans were thrown a bone with First Contact, but it's hard to screw up a film with Borg in it (though they came close with the Data-Traitor plot device.) Insurrection finally nailed the lid on the coffin, and Nemesis buried it. We all breathed a sigh of relief. At last, no more Trek travesties for the sake of money. I was cautiously optimistic about this new Trek, and though critics gave it rave reviews, die-hard fans were panning it. Well, over the years I've learned to ignore critics AND fans, and just go to the movies with no expectations. This film fulfilled every expectation I had, and breathed in the NECESSARY life required to jump start a new Star Trek mythos. When TNG first debuted, it had armies of detractors. The initial character development was shaky, the scripts were weak, and many fans of TOS simply refused to watch it. Eventually, though, the series stood firmly on its own. The characters grew, the stories improved, and TNG created a new Trek universe while never disrespecting the TOS. Many of the detractors (myself included) were forced to admit we were wrong, and I eventually grew to enjoy TNG with nearly the same level of appreciation that I had for TOS. Today, I am proud... very proud to have been witness to the birth of the infant son of Star Trek, and I suspect anyone who "dares it to do better" than TOS will eventually be forced to appreciate the magnitude by which it WILL do better. I, like Captain Pike, haven't a doubt in my mind.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

KrisA.May 10, 2009

This film features very slick effects, and plenty of action. Its storyline, however, is so astonishingly weak that it occasionally offends. The leaps one is asked to take in order to follow along can hardly be believed. This picture is This film features very slick effects, and plenty of action. Its storyline, however, is so astonishingly weak that it occasionally offends. The leaps one is asked to take in order to follow along can hardly be believed. This picture is filled with ridiculous contrivances, and laughable caricatures of supporting characters from the Star Trek mythos. There is a dash of interesting development for Kirk and Spock in the mix, but it does not save the film. With the exception of these precious bits, this film is entirely disposable.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful

4

JosephB.May 10, 2009

This movie was by far the worst written movie in the franchise history. The timeline makes no sense, the plot lines are forced. The special effects are incredible, but flawed. The back story is silly and extremely flawed. Gene Rodenberry This movie was by far the worst written movie in the franchise history. The timeline makes no sense, the plot lines are forced. The special effects are incredible, but flawed. The back story is silly and extremely flawed. Gene Rodenberry would NEVER have accepted this script. But J.J. does every week on Lost. Pander to the advertisers (Nokia and Bud, only to mention two of many) - distract them with eye candy. This movie is simply lazy writing thrown to a hungry SciFi market. But the producers don't want to hear this. Many of the fans and critics don't want pay any attention to the obvious flaws. And too many of the Trekkies just want their beloved franchise back on the big screen, regardless of the cost to Gene Rodenberry's legacy. I want much, much better! So I'm here to say, at the top of my lungs: "The King has NO cloths."… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

RCMay 10, 2009

It's the best of the Trek movies so far and we're devoted fans who've seen all the series from the original to Enterprise and every movie that came out.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

AlexJ.May 10, 2009

Very great movie. When I saw all the CGI, I was like, WOW! Yeah, a lot of nerds saw this movie where I lived. I go with one who loved it. Because it actually is breath taking! The characters are great with roles. Like Kirk. The reason why I Very great movie. When I saw all the CGI, I was like, WOW! Yeah, a lot of nerds saw this movie where I lived. I go with one who loved it. Because it actually is breath taking! The characters are great with roles. Like Kirk. The reason why I gave it a 9 because of the end. I was NOT happy. They could have used Shatners' role! UGH, instead of him, they used some one different. But the movie was still great. I highly recommend this movie!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

NeilS.May 10, 2009

Not a perfect movie, but certainly better than half of the other 10 Star Trek movies and is light years, pardon the pun, beyond the abortion that was Star Trek Enterprise. In other words Star Trek is in the future once again, provided the Not a perfect movie, but certainly better than half of the other 10 Star Trek movies and is light years, pardon the pun, beyond the abortion that was Star Trek Enterprise. In other words Star Trek is in the future once again, provided the sequel doesn't suck.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MichaelT.May 10, 2009

Best movie I've seen in a long time.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

HollyC.May 10, 2009

Great, fun movie. Not flawless, or a masterpiece, but more well crafted the most crap out there. I'm a fan of the Next Generation and the films of the "Original" and did find the connections of this film to those well intentioned if not Great, fun movie. Not flawless, or a masterpiece, but more well crafted the most crap out there. I'm a fan of the Next Generation and the films of the "Original" and did find the connections of this film to those well intentioned if not downright intriguing so bravo to Abrams, Kurtzman and Orci for weaving that in. This was definitely more of spectacle--especially at the pace Abrams moves it, but strangely I think the character drama of Spock came off quite well. Kirk, not so much, but Spock (both Nimoy and Quinto) definitely. See this in the theaters if you can--it's worth it--matinee at least.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

TT.May 10, 2009

Pretty good start to a rebirth, excellent casting. Thought the pace was pretty good, the story was not bad either. Worth seeing for sure.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

CateT.May 10, 2009

I am a die hard Trekkie from the 1960s. In a world saturated with the mind-numbing sitcoms of that era (Beverly Hillbillies, Green Acres, etc), Star Trek was an (admittedly flawed) breath of reason, adventure, and really cool science. I I am a die hard Trekkie from the 1960s. In a world saturated with the mind-numbing sitcoms of that era (Beverly Hillbillies, Green Acres, etc), Star Trek was an (admittedly flawed) breath of reason, adventure, and really cool science. I lived it, breathed it, worshiped it. Each iteration of Gene Roddenberry's vision has added to the mythology of Star Trek and the genre of science fiction in general. That being said, this movie ROCKS!!! It is what I wanted the Star Trek of the 1960s to be, but limited by the FX of the era, formulaic scripts, and a network that didn't fully support it, wasn't. This J.J. Abrams version, however, gets it. It has great FX, humor, adventure, character development, and plenty of homage to the original series. I loved it and am really, really glad that I remained unspoiled. BTW, the whole red ball thing is a fun in-joke re: Mr. Abrams and Alias.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JohnH.May 10, 2009

Great action, but very weak story.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

ZaneW.May 10, 2009

An absolutely amazing film in general. If star trek had never existed before this (i know, Trekkies: GASP!), it would've been an even better movie! the Pros: Great effects, acting, scenery, and direction. The whole feel of the movie blewAn absolutely amazing film in general. If star trek had never existed before this (i know, Trekkies: GASP!), it would've been an even better movie! the Pros: Great effects, acting, scenery, and direction. The whole feel of the movie blew me away so much. Some parts of the writing were mediocre, but when they said their catchphrases, it was less an "eh, they went there? can you say, CLICHE?" moment and more a throwback " AHA! I remember when they said that in the show!" moment. The Cons: the plot was a little strange and hole-y (no pun intended... or not). The make-out scenes where occasionally unnecessary, and the camera was shaky at times. But don't let the Hardcore Trekkies that still probably live in basements say that this film should be avoided. WATCH THIS FILM! If you do so without bias, i believe it'll be a fun film, even if your like me and don't like Sci-Fi films too much.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DavidW.May 10, 2009

Was everything I was hoping for and then some.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

SteveV.May 10, 2009

I understand the need to create an alternative Star Trek universe to kickstart the franchise so new actors, characters and storyline were required. Some of the characters were spot on causing you to reminisce for the old series others were I understand the need to create an alternative Star Trek universe to kickstart the franchise so new actors, characters and storyline were required. Some of the characters were spot on causing you to reminisce for the old series others were simply distracting and took you immediately out of the story. Chekov seemed to be more for comic relief than any serious attempt at an honest portrayal. Uhura - enough already. And although J.J. Abrams has demonstrated some outstanding talent he has also demonstrated that he can be equally bad - Mission Impossible 3, Cloverfield, and now this. To paraphrase Tim Burton "I am not sure I could identify a good script if it bit me in the face" Listen to Tim J.J. - Great action, cinematography, and good actors cannot overcome this kind of uninspired and ridiculous writing. As the Executive Producer you should have fired whoever whoever pitched this script to you. Additionally track down and ceremonially fire anyone who has ever encouraged them or lied to them by even implying that that had a talent for screenwriting.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RichardM.May 10, 2009

Fantastically brilliant. Nostalgia, humor, insane action. This movie has it all. I have not liked a movie this much in a very long time.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

PiltdownManMay 10, 2009

At a time when most "action" movies amount to one endless, boring CGI sequence after another, here comes a movie with some actual heart. The casting is spot on, and while "Kirk" may seem a bit like a frat boy, my guess is that that's At a time when most "action" movies amount to one endless, boring CGI sequence after another, here comes a movie with some actual heart. The casting is spot on, and while "Kirk" may seem a bit like a frat boy, my guess is that that's exactly what he would have been as a young man! The movie has a great sense of humor, and for that alone I'm appreciative! Far too much sci-fi is overly serious and self-important. But the beauty of this is that the humor fits the narrative and, unlike almost all films today, doesn't cater to our baser instincts. Stark Trek is not an "important" film in the sense that it deals with deep themes, but it is "important" in the sense that it proves Hollywood can make an action film that isn't just a meaningless "effects fest." Michael Bay, are you listening?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JarvisR.May 10, 2009

It works at every level.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

Star Trek

User Reviews