Star Trek Beyond

5

gfnyJul 22, 2016

More Star Wars than Star Trek and this was a big disappointment. First rate production, good acting, convoluted storyline that is difficult to follow. Close up camera shots with shaky camera and scenes flashing by in a blur. A lot ofMore Star Wars than Star Trek and this was a big disappointment. First rate production, good acting, convoluted storyline that is difficult to follow. Close up camera shots with shaky camera and scenes flashing by in a blur. A lot of shootem up and explosions.… Expand

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

0

GamecubeLoverJul 26, 2016

The formula is amazing even though I don't tell a single reason why. The action parts of the movie are so amazing! Again, I don't tell a reason why. And the jokes are so funny! In reality they won't and can't appeal to anyone! (I gave it a 10The formula is amazing even though I don't tell a single reason why. The action parts of the movie are so amazing! Again, I don't tell a reason why. And the jokes are so funny! In reality they won't and can't appeal to anyone! (I gave it a 10 to be sarcastic literally this movie is a piece of crap)… Expand

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

2

Nobilis1984Jul 25, 2016

Better than the predecessor
but still I can not do anything.
The meanwhile third film offers something visually and convince the actor. Only this inconsequential and weak story makes much broken. It also comes at no voltage. I'm not aBetter than the predecessor
but still I can not do anything.

The meanwhile third film offers something visually and convince the actor.
Only this inconsequential and weak story makes much broken. It also comes at no voltage.
I'm not a fan of the reboot but Hollywood needs probably the Geldund there remains a red flag for me.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

5

Brent_MarchantJul 24, 2016

A disappointing effort from a storied franchise that has long placed its emphasis on, well, story -- something that's sorely lacking here. The film's overreliance on over-the-top action sequences to the detriment of meaningful substance andA disappointing effort from a storied franchise that has long placed its emphasis on, well, story -- something that's sorely lacking here. The film's overreliance on over-the-top action sequences to the detriment of meaningful substance and profound character development leaves one feeling terribly unsatisfied, longing for more from this mythic sci-fi series. Even though "Star Trek" has been going in a somewhat more adventure-oriented direction in its latest offerings, it's gone too far this time, scrapping what has traditionally made it work so effectively in favor of cheap pyrotechnic theatrics and fight scenes. Wait for the DVD.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

6

A7sus4Aug 4, 2016

Star Trek Beyond is another CGI action-fest that should've ended 25 minutes earlier if that's all it wanted to be. The callous way matters of the heart were weaved into it to make it seem like something of substance bordered pathetic.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

43in2014Aug 2, 2016

Background: I have seen all of the previous twelve films except for Nemesis, which was a dud, I read. I do not particularly try to watch the many TV series and I am not a Trekkie.

Pros: There are some nice visual effects of the attack onBackground: I have seen all of the previous twelve films except for Nemesis, which was a dud, I read. I do not particularly try to watch the many TV series and I am not a Trekkie.

Pros: There are some nice visual effects of the attack on the Enterprise.

Cons:
(1) The JJ Abrams-inspired new series of films have stunts that are getting less and less believable. Star Trek (2009) had some great stunts. Into Darkness had repeated some of the stunts and they felt a bit stale and less plausible. This film had gone in a slightly different direction, but its stunts had become too far-fetched.

(2) The plot, Jaylah, the villain and the doomsday device were poorly explained, the latter being a real MacGuffin.

(3) Two of the major locations in the film were, again, not believable, one being a planet that conveniently had breathable air and another being a space station that's so big that it would have cost an immeasurable amount of money to build. Think Death Star 2.

(4) Chris Pine actually looked bored in this film and pudgy, and I don't think it was acting. It was more likely due to an drinking problem, in real live.

Who would think the film is great? Young adults and kids.
Who would think the film is only so-so? Trekkies and older adults
Who would think the film is lousy? No one.

Rating: 3/5 (no half scores). Save your money and watch it on TV.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

0

Hawk321Dec 10, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie has nothing much in common with the real Star Trek Universe. So many erros and logical drops degrades this flic to pure trash.

CAREFULL SPOILER:
Spock has a foto of the TOS Cast? A spaceship can ram whole mountains without a shield ?
A spaceship corroding over 100 years somewhere does ignite like a charm.
...

There are so many moments where I said **** this movie is a C class trash movie without the accuracy from Roddenberries originals.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

migdalorguyJul 23, 2016

Eh. Had a few nice moments that were nods to how the original characters might have been, how they conversed, etc. However, I had major issues with plotlines (highly stretches the willing suspension of disbelief factor) and especially scale.Eh. Had a few nice moments that were nods to how the original characters might have been, how they conversed, etc. However, I had major issues with plotlines (highly stretches the willing suspension of disbelief factor) and especially scale. Someone did not do their homework when it came to scaling gigantic starships and even more giant dyson-sphere-like settings with each other, with human beings, etc. A starship that would be huge in outer space was reduced to a ridiculously smaller scale when planet bound, inside a space station, or crashed on a planet. Just plain sloppy.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

JonZsuJul 22, 2016

Stunning visuals and a tight plot, with a few good funny moments; Star Trek Beyond is a well executed effort for a summertime blockbuster. The cast is as amazing as the audiences remembered. Compared to the first two installments of theStunning visuals and a tight plot, with a few good funny moments; Star Trek Beyond is a well executed effort for a summertime blockbuster. The cast is as amazing as the audiences remembered. Compared to the first two installments of the reboot series, Star Trek Beyond is somewhat flawed in its pace. Some emotions could not be effectively conveyed by the timing and pacing, but the film wins with the cool action scenes.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

AshleyAshleyJul 25, 2016

It was so cheesy in the best way possible. The special effects were great, the costumes were great and the set design was great. It just felt a bit empty in some places. Like they had a lot of ideas and not enough time to execute them in the movie.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

ValloryJul 25, 2016

When looked at as simply a fun take on the original "Star Trek" series, "Star Trek Beyond" was somewhat fun, but when compared to TOS, it is nowhere near "beyond"; at best, it is merely so-so. That's why my posse and I have taken to referringWhen looked at as simply a fun take on the original "Star Trek" series, "Star Trek Beyond" was somewhat fun, but when compared to TOS, it is nowhere near "beyond"; at best, it is merely so-so. That's why my posse and I have taken to referring to it as "Star Trek So-So."

Standouts: Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

kuliddarAug 8, 2016

Despite what some fanboys staying in moms basement say, this is actually one of the better movies we have had of the franchise since First Contact. The story is an original story with lots of references to a particular Trek tv series (don'tDespite what some fanboys staying in moms basement say, this is actually one of the better movies we have had of the franchise since First Contact. The story is an original story with lots of references to a particular Trek tv series (don't want to spoil it) . The humour is there as it should in any trek film and we are treated to great visual effects as well. IMO this ranks in the top 5 trek films out of the 13 made so far.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

wholenessAug 3, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie was kind of meh, it has spectacular special effect and lots of action but is completely lacking in an interesting story-line or any character development whatsoever. I am a huge fan of all the Star Trek TV series (Enterprise excepted) and this movie really does not have the feel of a Star Trek movie at all. This movie feels a lot more like Star Wars somewhere from Episode I-III or Post Episode VII since the character. Really, it's like they took any old action space movie and just threw a few of the Star Trek characters in just so they could ride on the Star Trek franchise name, this could have been any sci-fi action movie and maybe I'd like it more if it wasn't pretending to be a Star Trek movie. Therefore I give it an average rating, I didn't feel like I wasted my time but I didn't feel like I saw a Star Trek movie either.

Spoilers:

The initial battle scene where the Enterprise is utterly destroyed against a force which is so overpowering that fighting back is futile (no borg pun intended) is so over-the-top that it is really not believable that anyone could survive that sort of attack.

The parts where Spock is crying out in pain and especially the one where he is crying is an insult to the pre-reboot TV series and movies.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

glutenfreeAug 4, 2016

YES and YES.. thank GOD that Hollywood are getting one reboot right i watched it last night very good action flick with enough depth to give substance to the story line which was simplistic but not without its suspense and thriller momentsYES and YES.. thank GOD that Hollywood are getting one reboot right i watched it last night very good action flick with enough depth to give substance to the story line which was simplistic but not without its suspense and thriller moments with great references to the original which were so subtle they added flavor and not over powered a few great brotherly moments between Spock and McCoy which was great to see, good soul searching moments and in the right places ... and some great one liners ... OK the story draged a touch here and there ... but for the most part .......spot on ...and dare i say it.. but very worthy replacements for the original cast (if not better at times) ... and hopefully will be doing many more star trek films to come… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

ke3bzAug 8, 2016

Never quite reaching the quality and heart of Into Darkness, Beyond hit new amazing heights with action sequences and that made this a fun watch at the very least. Many convenient plot points and a quickly dispersed main enemy made this feelNever quite reaching the quality and heart of Into Darkness, Beyond hit new amazing heights with action sequences and that made this a fun watch at the very least. Many convenient plot points and a quickly dispersed main enemy made this feel the most like an episode of Star Trek rather than its own entity like the other two successfully crafted. Very fun, funny and break-neck, but kiddie-pool shallow compared to the others in the trilogy.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

0

perrykgreeneFeb 19, 2017

I couldnt even finish this cheese. No depth, No realism, No immerision. Big fan of the first 2 cant believe how awful this was. Bad all around. I wish I could get my money back. So many mildly infuriating things. This and his star wars moviesI couldnt even finish this cheese. No depth, No realism, No immerision. Big fan of the first 2 cant believe how awful this was. Bad all around. I wish I could get my money back. So many mildly infuriating things. This and his star wars movies have destroyed the direction he was originall taking the Star trek series. All I can think of is in Community and Pierce directing the focus group about what the show to do and then taking every word he says as gold. You fail as a director and all who accompany you are fools… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

5

TodOrcimJul 22, 2016

This is truly the first time I have disliked Star Trek. At every turn it seemed that the movie contradicted itself. The plot followed basic movie tropes and most of the biggest scenes were completely phoned in.

4 of 13 users found this helpful49

All this user's reviews

8

PeterAlexanderJul 23, 2016

The third instalment of the re-booted Star Trek franchise is fun, humorous and action packed. The recent films have strayed from the historic Star Trek formula, bringing far more excitement to the picture. The films on the most part have doneThe third instalment of the re-booted Star Trek franchise is fun, humorous and action packed. The recent films have strayed from the historic Star Trek formula, bringing far more excitement to the picture. The films on the most part have done this very well, Star Trek beyond however, does it best. The film is grounded and has its emotional moments, but truly recognises itself as a large scale space adventure. Star Trek Beyond thrives on its understanding of being a blockbuster film with an array of epic scenes that will send chills down your spine.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

10

ArtheisJul 22, 2016

This movie is a must see for the summer for 2016. Star Trek beyond not only goes beyond but above too. The characters bring great depth to the already amazing plot. While the first two movies didn't particularly focus on the federationsThis movie is a must see for the summer for 2016. Star Trek beyond not only goes beyond but above too. The characters bring great depth to the already amazing plot. While the first two movies didn't particularly focus on the federations exploration and the key task of the USS Enterprise, this movie shows a lighter side of what the enterprise crew faces, and what the federation brings to the unknown frontier. There is no shortage of humor or action to boot. Spock's emotions are increasingly becoming more human throughout the movies, and that is something to truly fall in love with and feel with the conflicting character. If some may remember, and don't quote me exactly on this but Shatner as Kirk once said "Of all the souls I've encountered in my travels, his was the most....human." It's on thing to watch a movie, but to sit there and feel like you are right there with the characters in the movie is a new high, and Star Trek Beyond delivers that. So please go and enjoy the movie like so many others are, so that they will continue to improve and make greater Star Trek feature films that we can all love and enjoy for generations to come.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

10

SHORTFINGERJul 22, 2016

outstanding. i enjoyed it a lot. i have never seen so many people at a 430 showing almost 3/4 full. it was over before i knew it. lots a funny lines in the movie we all laugh. special effects where great too. cannot wait for the next one

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

10

NdamahJul 23, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. As others I was super skeptic before but this was equal or even better than the first reboot. Action, fun, some background story as I want it between Doc and Spock and others. I truly don't understand the critics here. Still also don't understand the hype on the for much shallower latest Starwars reboot. Well done Mr Lin. Please give us another one. Can't wait,… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

8

TheApplegnomeJul 24, 2016

Star Trek might go a bit too beyond from its original formula -- but it works with a more up-to-date balance between action, and the much improved character depth.

Star Trek was originally a show that explored the basics of morality.Star Trek might go a bit too beyond from its original formula -- but it works with a more up-to-date balance between action, and the much improved character depth.

Star Trek was originally a show that explored the basics of morality. Complex dilemmas between cultures, religions & conflicts – even to basic questions regarding social norms and life itself. We might not have gotten that much of it in this, nor the previous two flicks – but it paid a massive respect to its roots and its legacy (it’s the shows 50th anniversary). It’s finally (somewhat) a movie for “trekkies”. ‘Star Trek Beyond’ goes much deeper into the crew than its predecessors. It’s a very fast-paced flick, but it simultaneously catches the splendid character moments. It’s a masterful balance! The film establishes the story one piece at a time, and it’s not fully understandable until in the final act. It’s the antagonist and his motivations that’s not shared until in the final sight. The visualization of the main villain “Krall” is very good – when finally understanding his motivations – which takes a while to know (some out there might even because of that, stay annoyed throughout the whole film). But the well hidden twist that awaits, is worthy a wait!

The basic premise of this film lies much more on characters than the plot itself. Splendid chemistry is a gigantic plus, but the plot could have been much more passionate. There could have been a more want-to to the plot, especially to the climax. To succeed against the villain, and the motivations behind it could have been much greater. Give it more emotion! A more personal conflict! More drama! Not just action and the “several million people could die if the villain will succeed-cliché”. The story also got some convenient events that just felt off – just so the plot can develop. The change in direction could be one miss shoot – but the film really shines with its renewed energy! It’s definitely the most action-packed ST-film to date! It’s way more playful than its predecessors, and the focus lies massively on quantity rather than J.J’s quality. On a personal level did ‘Star Trek Beyond’ feel a bit too uneventful for my taste, even though that there are some really big character moments. Yes, the action did work – but in the end I wasn’t that satisfied. There are some really inventive and intense action-pieces, meanwhile others are “meh” – especially the hand-to-hand combat. But I still adore this film – with its energy & fascinating characters. Yes, even more chemistry & character depth to smaller as big characters could have made this film even greater – including less expositions and much more humor! This film surpassed my expectations, because the trailers did show something that simply wasn’t this film. It might not surpass when it comes to story, but it does with characters!

Personal rating: 82/100
Critical rating: 75/100… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

marcmyworksJul 24, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This film reads like an episode of the original series, except longer and with the bigger budget. Overall the acting is excellent though the story is quite weak and pandering to the lowest denominator. We have a series of scenes that build to an obvious and unoriginal ending. The tone of the film is also quite bland as Kirk opens the film saying he hates the episodic nature of the Enterprises missions, ironically this is what the movie becomes. The loss of Anton Yelchin also weighed on me while watching, such a bright young star. Overall the film is well made, but suffers from being nothing more than a predictable and obvious chapter in the franchise.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

Ron_PaulJul 22, 2016

I enjoyed the movie and I would definitely like to see it again as soon as it becomes available on other channels.
I thought the movie was very much character and action driven, it has a few really funny moments as well.
I did think it wasI enjoyed the movie and I would definitely like to see it again as soon as it becomes available on other channels.
I thought the movie was very much character and action driven, it has a few really funny moments as well.
I did think it was quite light on the story side, there is some form of philosophical tension (which I won't go into because I don't want to give out any spoilers) but the ideological conflict feels forced and a bit thin. It's a missed opportunity really.
The end-result is a movie that will still have enough for most of the trekkies out there, and is also very accessible to the general audience.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

EpicLadySpongeJul 22, 2016

Star Trek Beyond's line of striking me down with a big sci-fi treat manages me to come back to the Star Trek franchise with a big bang. This is another one of those movies that cannot be missed for the summer.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

0

AnnieTJul 23, 2016

This movie was beyond violence, including to women. Unfortunately, many of us have become so accustomed to it in movies that we take it for granted. Beware, America, and beware, parents, before you allow your children to see this move.

8 of 33 users found this helpful825

All this user's reviews

10

dammanJul 22, 2016

Looks great. People come on this site to troll so go see the movie and get your popcorn hot and ready. Peace. Always great sound effects and acting is spot on.

2 of 9 users found this helpful27

All this user's reviews

7

MoviebuffreviewJul 22, 2016

Star Trek Beyond mixes up the formula of the previous two films by being far slower in pace and smaller in scale. This is welcome not only because it is a nice departure from the previous two films, but also because it makes it feel the mostStar Trek Beyond mixes up the formula of the previous two films by being far slower in pace and smaller in scale. This is welcome not only because it is a nice departure from the previous two films, but also because it makes it feel the most like the original series of these three movies. Fortunately, the cast from the previous movies are able to make this change in pace work, being as consistently likable and entertaining as they were in the previous films. Unfortunately, while the scale of the story is welcome, it struggles in the way of character development and themes, setting up some interesting ideas without exploring them for the rest of the movie. And while the previous two films were able to distract with brisk pacing and some well filmed action sequences, Justin Lin does not handle the action sequences well, especially in comparison to Abrams. Many of them are often disorienting and difficult to follow, which makes the narrative shortcomings even more apparent. All of this amounts to a film that makes some improvements upon its predecessors, but also takes many steps backwards, making it less enjoyable in many ways. Star Trek Beyond is still worth watching, but while the crew of the Enterprise boldly goes where no one has gone before, this film doesn't quite have the legs to fully live up to that legacy.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

8

samichsupernovaJul 24, 2016

Ah! Director Justin Lin and writer Simon Pegg breathe new life into the reboot series that JJ Abrams and Bob Orci nearly killed in the water. What an improvement over the plot-hole ridden, willfully stupid "Into Darkness"!

This is theAh! Director Justin Lin and writer Simon Pegg breathe new life into the reboot series that JJ Abrams and Bob Orci nearly killed in the water. What an improvement over the plot-hole ridden, willfully stupid "Into Darkness"!

This is the first film of the "Star Trek" reboot that really seems like it gives two craps about the traditions of the franchise instead of rehashing them to pander to the audience, and it also happens to have a decent and not overly complex story, a ton of action, very good interplay between the iconic characters, and the old-fashioned pulpy adventure feel of the original series.

Unlike the ponderous rehash-riddled plot of "Into Darkness" or the over-the-top retconned AU fanfic origin story of the 2009 "Trek", this one drops the audience into a self-contained story right in the middle of the five-year mission and is all the better for it. Characters like Bones and Spock feel like they already have history, and the writing for them is especially on point, something that can't be said about "Into Darkness".

The action was silly and fun. The villain was interesting. The alien tech on display is also quite awesome. It truly seems like everyone was having a good time making this and I felt it was very entertaining. Even though at times the plot was predictable, no one thing took me out of the film and the performances alone were totally transporting. I can't say enough about how much more I enjoyed this than the ridiculous first two films in this reboot series. It really feels like this reboot has finally found its groove and I hope they keep it up for the recently-announced fourth film.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

8

nahtan1244Jul 23, 2016

I have not watched the star trek movies in a very long time so i am no Trekkie. However I do remember bits and pieces. For the third entry into the rebooted star trek cannon this was very good. It does not come close to the excellent filmI have not watched the star trek movies in a very long time so i am no Trekkie. However I do remember bits and pieces. For the third entry into the rebooted star trek cannon this was very good. It does not come close to the excellent film that was the first but then again isn't the first always the best one?. Anyway I enjoyed the mix of tons of action, humor and heart Justin lin brought to this movie. Chris pine proves once again he is a great James t Kirk. He is not as demanding as william shatner from what i can rember he still is great. Some of the standouts through is Karl urban as bones and Simon Pegg as Scotty. I also enjoyed the addition of jala. I thought she was super cool and i would like to see more of her character. A few small gripes i have are the villain is about as generic as can get. I mean whats up with Hollywood and generic villains. I felt that zachary quinto didn't brought a little more humor to his character than i would have liked he was still good as always though, Also The twist near the end where the villains revels his motivations are about as bland as they come. Still This movies is worth watching and is much better than into darkness which was not bad it still pares in comparison to this one and the first.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

8

sosbanfawrJul 23, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I liked this. The story and characters felt much more like actual Star Trek than he previous 2 in this re-boot series. There is still the problem of Quinto's Spock making out Vulcans to be the galaxy's most emotional creatures ever, but this is toned down to just the slightly off-beat decision to go save his girlfriend. A few strange dead-ends in the plot only came to me after the credits rolled (what happened to the Yorktown's rescue fleet, for example). The finale is still 'too Hollywood' but taken as a whole the story is engaging and the characters are interesting. Hopefully the success of Pegg's story heralds a trend that ACTUAL FANS of the source material are given prominent roles in bringing the making/remaking to the big-screen, instead of the merchandisers and bean-counters. As a standalone piece of entertainment 9/10, as a Star Trek piece, 7/10. Overall a solid 8/10.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

10

ForumDudeJul 24, 2016

Just like a TOS episode. Pays homage to what comes before it An intellectual Trek mixed with big action. Justin Lin fill the shoes nicely that Abrams Kelvin time-line created.

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

10

BitmouseJul 25, 2016

Finally, the reboot created a Star Trek film which truly hearkens to the original. This movie has more pacing, a random contained plot with little reference to prior films and shows an aging crew with more complicated dynamics and a moreFinally, the reboot created a Star Trek film which truly hearkens to the original. This movie has more pacing, a random contained plot with little reference to prior films and shows an aging crew with more complicated dynamics and a more mature perspective.

I would love to see more sci-fi film's hearkening to some of the earlier heydays of sci-fi where slow meandering plots were the name of the game.

Somehow this paints a more true to life image.

Still this film has plenty of pulse-pounding moments as you can't escape over 30 years of film making. They of course only add to the film making this an enjoyable blend of original and modern.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

8

tjman09Jul 23, 2016

Star Trek: Beyond is here, and it is truly unlike any other Star Trek movie you’ve ever seen. Directed by Justin Lin, who directed four entries in the Fast and Furious franchise, the film continues on the more fast paced and slightlyStar Trek: Beyond is here, and it is truly unlike any other Star Trek movie you’ve ever seen. Directed by Justin Lin, who directed four entries in the Fast and Furious franchise, the film continues on the more fast paced and slightly bombastic feel of the rebooted franchise. Star Trek: Beyond is often funny, fast paced and action packed, and features a cool new villain. The film is also co-written by Simon Pegg, and thus has a lot more moments of humor, sometimes resembling the Marvel mold more than Star Trek.
Star Trek films have historically been inconsistent when it comes to humor, some like Star Trek: The Voyage Home or Star Trek (2009) have been very funny, and some like Star Trek: Wrath of Khan, forwent humor for seriousness. This film may just be the funniest Star Trek film yet, because it’s not quite as silly as some of the other films, but manages to have a lot of good quips. The film’s sense of humor is most likely a product of Simon Pegg co-writing the film, and that has proven to be a great decision. It should be stated that the humor does make Star Trek: Beyond feel slightly more like a summer blockbuster than a Star Trek film, and they are different.
Star Trek Beyond is structured slightly more like an action film, as the pacing grows in tempo until the end of the film when it culminates in a big finale. This is more consistent with the pacing of the rebooted franchise, however the film never quite elevates like the previous two films did. The action sequences in this film are very good, which comes as no surprise given that Lin, who is experienced in shooting action sequences was in the helm. One surprise of this film was the villain character, Krall.
The rebooted franchise of Star Trek movies has done an amazing job forming well-rounded villains. The villain in this film feels weak at the beginning, but as the film progresses his motives become more clear. Both Nero and Khan were good villains, and while Krall isn’t as well rounded he is a serviceable villain. That being said the other characters in the film aren’t very well developed, besides Captain Kirk, who is given some development.
All-in-all this is probably the weakest of the rebooted franchise in my opinion, but that doesn’t mean it’s not a good movie, it is. Star Trek Beyond is very entertaining, fast paced, action-packed, funny, and has a very good villain. The film is a very good time at the theaters, and is fairly family friendly, for those who love summer blockbusters this is a perfect summer movie for you.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

10

uncompetativeJul 23, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I had low expectations going in based on what proved to be a misrepresentative trailer that foregrounded Kirk. Simon Pegg's scintillating script separates Kirk from his crew so that the warm interplay of their characters can be explored as an ensemble piece. When Kirk and an arguably stronger Jaylah (Sofia Boutella previous seen in Kingsman: The Secret Service) return in force in the third act to save the crew, his motivations to regain all those that he cares for and her deep trepidations as a former captive of the antagonist give palpable weight to a fast paced rescue scene.

I was struck at how good the special effects were in terms of their highly imaginative conception. There is no CGI for CGI's sake, but awesomeness for the sake of delivering impactful visual metaphor. I have witnessed a rare thing: epic science fiction conveyed in terms of pure cinema and ensemble relationships explored without a desperate rush to the next whizz-bang. I was mesmerized.

To put things in perspective my 10/10 isn't a 10 to offset the unfair average user score, but as I can't give it a 9.8 I will give it a 10 rather than a 9 even though it is by no means in the same league as an original first film in a franchise like ALIEN, Predator, or Blade Runner. I don't want to mark it down to a 9 just because it is another sequel to a rebooted franchise from a TV series. I don't want to be sneering. This is the best Star Trek movie ever made, and without wanting to enrage fanboys, is twice as good as Star Wars: The Force Awakens - which I thoroughly enjoyed but recognised was a safe retread of A New Hope with some gender swapped characters.

The antagonist does look like strips of Plasticine™ have been glued onto his face, but then the aliens of Star Trek were generally more humanoid than Star Wars (and, indeed Farscape) due to the restrictions of their 60's Desilu Production's TV episodic budget. So, in a way the entirely non humanoid aliens which appear at the outset of this movie are somewhat jarring and occasionally crew from the Enterprise or the Space Station draw you out of the narrative by looking inconsistently bizarre (i.e. a full blown alien cameo is glimpsed in a scene in which a standard ridged-nosed one would have drawn less attention and avoid distracting you from the plot). It is probably the movie's only fault that either be firmly in the camp of the 'aliens are really alien' like Star Wars, or how they were on Star Trek: Deep Space Nine with the focus on gradually investing in character relations. Put it this way, take Leia and Han out of Star Wars and you have got nothing, everyone else is a boring void of uninteresting or unexpressed motivation or pent up emo rage. The fact that people think Empire is the best in the series when Han gets "iced" for most of it, leaving Mr Can't Act to whine at Mr Muppet just demonstrates how overated the entire franchise must be when its best episode is so structurally flawed, underutilises all of its characters, and ends on a forlorn cliffhanger.

In contrast, Star Trek Beyond is a masterpiece combining all the best aspects of every Trek movie thus far in one harmonious package with a clear message of hope and unity prevailing over the savage frontier. It is all the better for a fourth act that acknowledges that the luxuries of the Federation may underpin its utopian dream and when confronted with survival without hope of rescue it is understandable that hope should turn to hate.

Doctor 'Bones' McCoy (Karl Urban), Jaylah (Sofia Boutella), Montgomery 'Scotty' Scott (Simon Pegg), and Lieutenant Nyota Uhura (Zoe Saldana) give standout performances and deliver well crafted dialogue. I don't mind that Kirk (Chris Pine) isn't in the movie that much as I always felt he was miscast and would have liked Matt Damon in the Captain's chair instead. Perhaps, in another alternate reality...… Expand

1 of 7 users found this helpful16

All this user's reviews

7

JacobJul 31, 2016

Star Trek: Beyond boldly goes where no Trek film has gone before seeking out new characters and stories. The film gives Star Trek fans the best 50th anniversary present they could’ve asked for. Ignoring Into Darkness and giving fans a filmStar Trek: Beyond boldly goes where no Trek film has gone before seeking out new characters and stories. The film gives Star Trek fans the best 50th anniversary present they could’ve asked for. Ignoring Into Darkness and giving fans a film that pays tribute to the show staying true to the characters, tone, and spirit of the show. The dynamics between the characters are fun, the action is entertaining but never too off the rails, and there are some nice moments of tribute to the original show that will make Trekies tear up. It may not have the flash and spectacle of the last two being a smaller and slower story, which may be a turn off to the casual moviegoer, but to those who love the original series there couldn’t be a better way to celebrate 50 years of Trek. Hopefully the trend continues… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Lambo442Jul 31, 2016

This was an all-round great Action film with minimal dialogue and a collection of mind-blowing set-pieces using innovative cinematography and state of the art effects. They hold back on the sentimental moments typical of the last instalmentThis was an all-round great Action film with minimal dialogue and a collection of mind-blowing set-pieces using innovative cinematography and state of the art effects. They hold back on the sentimental moments typical of the last instalment to deliver what the fans want, just an epic, edge of your seat thrill ride. Simon Pegg, being a true geek and sci-fi nut knows exactly how to please the fans and this film just keeps on giving and giving, never fizzling out and delivering a spectacular finale worthy of the franchise. Zulu's 'outing' is 'handled sensitively', without anything being 'rammed' down anyone's throats (ahem) and in it's context it just shows what a liberal, progressive place the federation is and reminds you what's at stake.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

MantisAug 24, 2016

Pure entertainment. It's clear this movie is directed by someone who did Fast & Furious. That's not a bad thing. It's pass is incredible and the graphics are just gorgeous. Good plot & story line although later on I was a bit lost and thePure entertainment. It's clear this movie is directed by someone who did Fast & Furious. That's not a bad thing. It's pass is incredible and the graphics are just gorgeous. Good plot & story line although later on I was a bit lost and the solution seemed a bit too odd... ending slowed down a lot and you do feel this. All in all it's a good new Star Trek which has the correct vibe and a perfect homage to the legacy.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

namelessAug 3, 2016

The plot flows, the actors can act but the action is a mass of retreads. How many fist fights do I have to see in space movies? Is it studios executives, directors... can they think of nothing else? Captain America, Star Trek, Superman... itThe plot flows, the actors can act but the action is a mass of retreads. How many fist fights do I have to see in space movies? Is it studios executives, directors... can they think of nothing else? Captain America, Star Trek, Superman... it is ridiculous. They make this pitch about it is great that we actually came out to the movie theater but I'm just about to stop going because I want to be able to fast forward past the monotonous fist fights that accomplish nothing. There are 3 fist fights in this movie. No point to any one of them.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

choppyAug 11, 2016

All of my meh. I can see why it's performing slowly in theaters. It's absolutely nothing you haven't seen before - crazy individualistic megalomaniac w/ superweapon attempts to destroy civilization; crew must show virtue of TEAMWORK! toAll of my meh. I can see why it's performing slowly in theaters. It's absolutely nothing you haven't seen before - crazy individualistic megalomaniac w/ superweapon attempts to destroy civilization; crew must show virtue of TEAMWORK! to defeat him (how can that possibly be a spoiler if it's the plot of almost every group action movie out there?)
Some nice graphics/special effects, but would be in bottom 50% of TNGS episodes, plot-wise. Plus mediocre pacing. Yawn.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

ZicAug 20, 2016

Star Trek Beyond is the first of the 3 newest Star Trek films I felt the old Star Trek magic coming back. Read some detractors that feels its not like Star Wars movies, which show how much they know about Star Trek (that is nothing at all).

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

EludiumQ36Feb 11, 2017

The perpetually flippant and cavalier attitudes exhibited in the face of overwhelming odds makes this more of a pre-teen comicfest than a serious film. Yes, it's got hundreds of millions in technical cinematics but it's all undone by theThe perpetually flippant and cavalier attitudes exhibited in the face of overwhelming odds makes this more of a pre-teen comicfest than a serious film. Yes, it's got hundreds of millions in technical cinematics but it's all undone by the juvenile nature of the imperative: Captain Kirk et al must always prevail in the end, no matter how implausible or just plain stupid. These can never be outstanding/classic films because of that - there's no element of genuine surprise. Star Trek follows the same plot formula every single time, the only thing that changes is the superficial layers of plot and nods to all facets of diversity. This type of entertainment can only appeal to the pre-teen/teen brain that hasn't developed sufficient capacity to critique. It's a shameless yet surefire money grab for that demographic's money - it never fails, but it never advances the art either. Yet, the writers ultimately know this. Near the end, Kirk even utters, "We change, we have to, or we spend the rest of our lives fighting the same battles." Amazing, hopefully that realization informs subsequent Trek films.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

Apotheosis34Aug 20, 2016

The third Star Trek in the rebooted franchise is consistently mediocre. Several characters, important environments, and other significant portions of the plot are largely insignificant, and the action plays the biggest role out of all. ThereThe third Star Trek in the rebooted franchise is consistently mediocre. Several characters, important environments, and other significant portions of the plot are largely insignificant, and the action plays the biggest role out of all. There is little sense of wonder, dread, or satisfaction throughout the journey and at the conclusion of the film.

Chris Pine is yet again fantastic as James T. Kirk; he brings so much to his role and to the film as a whole. The remaining characters are static placeholders of their character descriptions and the representations in earlier movies. The villain is par for the course, and even though there is a fantastic actor behind the mask he has only the one role to fill.

The CGI is top-notch, but the action can be quite eye-rolling at times. The score is copy-paste of the previous two films; this isn't a negative, but nothing has been added to increase emotional impact.

I found myself in the third act without noticing or caring, and the penultimate scenes did not make me feel that I needed to watch the first two acts to notice new aspects or care more about how the film finished.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

MetaSteveNov 2, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Yet another brain-dead Star Splosions movie with vacuous characters and a fatuous plot, topped of with a ridiculous Beastie Boys cannon in case you thought it wasn't vapid enough yet.

Total and utter garbage.

That's three bullets in the head for star trek.

Surely it must be dead now so please stop shooting it. Even I am beginning to feel sorry for it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

FranzHcriticAug 5, 2016

It isn't anything spectacular. The plot is thin at some points, and the action scenes are unnecessary in some points. For a summer blockbuster, it holds some merit, but not enough for me to give this movie anything above a simplistic 'meh.' IIt isn't anything spectacular. The plot is thin at some points, and the action scenes are unnecessary in some points. For a summer blockbuster, it holds some merit, but not enough for me to give this movie anything above a simplistic 'meh.' I give my condolences to Anton Yelchin. We'll miss him all. But that doesn't change my outlook on this formulaic film that should serve as a warning not to stretch this franchise too far.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

leaveitJul 29, 2016

It has a bald girl piloting a probe, a guy with a vendetta against the Federation, the Enterprise crashing and blowing up, a super weapon, and a warrior race as the enemies. In other words you've seen it all before.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

PandaFromHell05Jul 31, 2016

Wow! All I can say is wow! I'm in my mid 20's, and I grew up with Star Trek all of my life. My childhood memories consist of watching the Star Trek series and the movies. In 2009, I was happy when J.J. Abrams rebooted the franchise in movieWow! All I can say is wow! I'm in my mid 20's, and I grew up with Star Trek all of my life. My childhood memories consist of watching the Star Trek series and the movies. In 2009, I was happy when J.J. Abrams rebooted the franchise in movie format. The first reboot, I liked. I loved the new characters. While the story was alright, I enjoyed the movie. Into Darkness was an alright movie, but I did not like them ripping off from Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan.

I love the fact that this movie has an original storyline, as well as elements from the Star Trek universe. I feel like, when J.J. Abrams was directing, that it was all about action and whatnot. Star Trek Beyond grasps what Star Trek was supposed to be like. The character development was fantastic. The Bones and Spock interaction was on point from what the original series was. The movie felt like a glorified two-part episode, which was fantastic. My girlfriend, while new to Star Trek, did not enjoy the first two reboots but she loved this movie. Go see it!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Jim222001Jun 15, 2017

The crew must fight for their lives after an ambush by a new enemy named Krall (Idris Elba). While the story wasn't completely strong the chemistry of the cast was. The visuals were also as strong as the great action, since all of JJ'sThe crew must fight for their lives after an ambush by a new enemy named Krall (Idris Elba). While the story wasn't completely strong the chemistry of the cast was. The visuals were also as strong as the great action, since all of JJ's beloved lens flares weren't in the way.

Spock missing older Spock from an alternate time line, was also a great tribute to the late Leonard Nimoy. Spoiler: I can also say that Sulu gay does not hurt the birth of his daughter, so relax nerds lol. The late Anton Yelchin (Fright Night) gets the most he got to do in any Star Trek film as Chekov as well.

Idris Elba (Luther) gets a mostly forgettable villain to play but at least he was an original villain, unlike Khan. Sofia Boutella kicks ass though as an alien allie named Jaylah.

I wouldn't even mind if Justin Lin returns as director over JJ. Since JJ has shown with Super 8, Into Darkness and Force Awakens that he is better at making tributes than original movies.

JJ's part 4 would probably have Kirk looking for whales, while searching for Spock. Then part 5 would have Spock's brother who is on a mission to find God lol.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

SH1Sep 24, 2016

While this film had a good premise, it was hamstrung by the new style adopted by the Star Trek franchise. It is sad that an average episode of Deep Space Nine or Voyager is better than a massive blockbuster.

I have decided to not watch anyWhile this film had a good premise, it was hamstrung by the new style adopted by the Star Trek franchise. It is sad that an average episode of Deep Space Nine or Voyager is better than a massive blockbuster.

I have decided to not watch any “newer” Star Trek as part of my boycott of the Remake Industry. In my opinion this is a cash grabbing effort rather than a work of creativity.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

DavidV293Aug 29, 2016

Not much of a Star Trek fan but, I actually found enjoyment in this. It starts off well and it ends in a great way. The movie is not perfect, but it's something to put on the shelve of Star Trek collection. The action is great, the plot isNot much of a Star Trek fan but, I actually found enjoyment in this. It starts off well and it ends in a great way. The movie is not perfect, but it's something to put on the shelve of Star Trek collection. The action is great, the plot is good, and the CGI is fantastic. By the way, love the soundtrack.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

darkbloodshed13Aug 3, 2016

Star Trek Beyond is good movie, It has good action, good characters and plot. However it is not good Star Trek movie. Meaning it's missing the philosophy that Star trek was known for. Instead trying to make it more action packed than itStar Trek Beyond is good movie, It has good action, good characters and plot. However it is not good Star Trek movie. Meaning it's missing the philosophy that Star trek was known for. Instead trying to make it more action packed than it needed to be.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

YoloSwag4DogeOct 4, 2016

I wish I could explain why, but I found this installment really boring. I didn't finish watching it. Just felt like a really generic plot with no emotional investment or substance. The CGI was surprisingly bad at a lot of parts too. (Ex. KirkI wish I could explain why, but I found this installment really boring. I didn't finish watching it. Just felt like a really generic plot with no emotional investment or substance. The CGI was surprisingly bad at a lot of parts too. (Ex. Kirk on a motorcycle). Just didn't care about this movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

RvwFromUpHereAug 28, 2016

What: Star Trek: Beyond
Who: Chris Pine, Sean of the Dead, and Zachary Quinto as, not a serial murderer for a change
Where: Beyond When (Can I watch again): When you want to watch Star Trek but you also want to watch all of the thingsWhat: Star Trek: Beyond
Who: Chris Pine, Sean of the Dead, and Zachary Quinto as, not a serial murderer for a change
Where: Beyond
When (Can I watch again): When you want to watch Star Trek but you also want to watch all of the things that make a block buster terrible.
Why: If you want to watch Fast & Furious in space, and don't want to wait until Fast 9, when The Rock will naturally get there on his own, this movie is perfect for you.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

masamunerikuJul 28, 2016

Star Trek Beyond expands on its storytelling by making it less about space and more about planetary adventure. Rather than focusing the story around Kirk and Spock it makes an effort to bring other members of the crew into the spotlight. TheStar Trek Beyond expands on its storytelling by making it less about space and more about planetary adventure. Rather than focusing the story around Kirk and Spock it makes an effort to bring other members of the crew into the spotlight. The tone of the movie is also brighter compared to previous movies; even sometimes feeling similar to Guardians of the Galaxy.

The plot however is vague and a bit bland. The whole picture doesn't come into focus until late into the movie. The villain's motive and his development is ambiguous; I'd say the least interesting out of the three movies.

Also every found technology in the movie magically works to fit the protagonist's needs.
"Scotty can you make this work?"
"Of course! I'd just need to make some minor adjustments."
Interplanetary technology apparently is a simple matter.

Overall an enjoyable movie experience and a commendable change of direction compared to previous installments.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

gameguardian21Aug 21, 2016

Star trek beyond is a satisfying conclusion to now a complete trilogy, and to be honest, I thought this was the best one. The characters really shine in this movie as well as the new ones. The action sequences are also really exciting andStar trek beyond is a satisfying conclusion to now a complete trilogy, and to be honest, I thought this was the best one. The characters really shine in this movie as well as the new ones. The action sequences are also really exciting and entertaining. And the story is well written, with it having no dull moments. Overall, it's a great conclusion to one of the best sci fi movie trilogys I've ever seen.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

Betamax77Aug 29, 2016

This movie has it's basic action plot but it feels like it's made with more heart and knowledge of the Star Trek history than previous movies in this rebooted series.

After the initial action scene, the movie takes a little time to get youThis movie has it's basic action plot but it feels like it's made with more heart and knowledge of the Star Trek history than previous movies in this rebooted series.

After the initial action scene, the movie takes a little time to get you up to date with the crew's lives and it was a welcome change to previous movies that were hyperactive. Kirk isn't running everywhere like a headless chicken, he's more somber and calmly authoritative. I didn't get all the old school references since I'm not a trekkie, but they don't hit you on the head with them like in the awful Into Darkness. And the motorcycle from the trailers makes more sense in the movie.

This was a positive experience among all the bad summer movies.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

kaminJul 30, 2016

Granted that CGI is necessary for Star Trek today, but this CGI headache is overkill. More importantly, the movie is not Star Trek but rather Star Wars meets CGI for ADD. I am not getting the idea of the comments on movie threads that itGranted that CGI is necessary for Star Trek today, but this CGI headache is overkill. More importantly, the movie is not Star Trek but rather Star Wars meets CGI for ADD. I am not getting the idea of the comments on movie threads that it is like a TV episode. Except for a good scene between McCoy and Spock, it lacked all things like a Star Trek episode. Many Star Wars fans liked it better than some Star Wars movies. I think that proved the popular point of the similarities of Star Wars fan and producer JJ Abrams' approach. I support my friends in the past and current Star Trek production universes, but I cannot in good conscience promote a movie as Star Trek that is not truly Star Trek. But, I encourage people who enjoy Star Wars style movies to go see it, and I hope they have a great time.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

sandbornAug 30, 2016

Great visuals can't hide a weak story and a nonsensical villain! Yeah, it looks fantastic. The director did a great job with the visuals and special effects, but still couldn't save this movie from a poor script. Star Trek Beyond has all theGreat visuals can't hide a weak story and a nonsensical villain! Yeah, it looks fantastic. The director did a great job with the visuals and special effects, but still couldn't save this movie from a poor script. Star Trek Beyond has all the action but none of the heart or intelligence of the TV series.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

thoodeeAug 6, 2016

Loved the aspect of the crew actually in another world and space which is what made the film fun. However, the Beastie Boys scene completely took me out of the movie and allowed for a lame excuse to escape the conflict and force feed a "NOW!Loved the aspect of the crew actually in another world and space which is what made the film fun. However, the Beastie Boys scene completely took me out of the movie and allowed for a lame excuse to escape the conflict and force feed a "NOW! THAT'S WHAT I CALL MUSIC" track down our throats.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

feaurieJul 28, 2016

A good show. Enjoyable, funny and thrilling. Definitely one that most would enjoy. Except the people who lurk about here being salty, of course. I doubt those people enjoy anything.

Regardless, go watch it.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

dergigglerAug 3, 2016

Don't get me wrong, this is one of the coolest-looking movies of all time and the sound design is great, but the story is garbage and the characters have no motivation to do anything. The only reason anything happens is because the scriptDon't get me wrong, this is one of the coolest-looking movies of all time and the sound design is great, but the story is garbage and the characters have no motivation to do anything. The only reason anything happens is because the script says so. The writing is weird and the acting isn't very good. It reuses the same elements of drama-additions that the first two movies use, and even if the movie was great it would still feel like a drag. The action is okay but since that and the visuals are what Lin focused on it feels like the action should be much better than it is. A lot of the action is visual but not actual fighting. There is, however, a lack of lens-flares, but I would have doubled the Abrams amount of them if it meant I'd get a good movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

reallyadrielAug 3, 2016

Star Trek Beyond is on par with the second movie. The movie has a ton of action, the introduction of the new character was great, the villain was decent (could have been a better boss finale), the camera work and special effects were topStar Trek Beyond is on par with the second movie. The movie has a ton of action, the introduction of the new character was great, the villain was decent (could have been a better boss finale), the camera work and special effects were top notch. I personally can't wait for the next movie now.

The Star Trek Beyond movie is truly the blockbuster that you need to see in Theaters.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

EuripidesAug 11, 2016

This was not a Star Trek movie to be honest. Just a fast paced action movie with a sci-fi skin. The tempo doesn't stop for 5mins to take in any of the Star Trek universe in the slightest. So disappointing. I'd say a lot had to do with cuttingThis was not a Star Trek movie to be honest. Just a fast paced action movie with a sci-fi skin. The tempo doesn't stop for 5mins to take in any of the Star Trek universe in the slightest. So disappointing. I'd say a lot had to do with cutting and editing, but it's nonsense. I feel bad for Simon Pegg who's a fan :(… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

gioasjSep 11, 2016

From the generic taste of the movie to the generic motivations of the villain everything in this movie feels completely casual and never serious, it just does not flow.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

shiftworkerAug 22, 2016

If you like Star Trek, here we go again. Hokum, but wholesome. Harmless visual entertainment with goodies, baddies, spaceships and special effects. If only life was like this, but you cannae change the laws of physics ... unless we reverseIf you like Star Trek, here we go again. Hokum, but wholesome. Harmless visual entertainment with goodies, baddies, spaceships and special effects. If only life was like this, but you cannae change the laws of physics ... unless we reverse the polarity of the dillithium crystals, Jim.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

BiasOct 8, 2016

Like eating cotton candy in the middle of the week when it would probably be better to have a decent meal. Not a big Star Trek fan, and that didn't change because of this movie. Kirk cowboys it up and Spock all rationalizes stuff andLike eating cotton candy in the middle of the week when it would probably be better to have a decent meal. Not a big Star Trek fan, and that didn't change because of this movie. Kirk cowboys it up and Spock all rationalizes stuff and whatever. Still, aliens mostly have humanoid bodies, but with different colors and oddly shaped heads. Humans too this time.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

alejandro970Sep 14, 2016

Conserva el espíritu y ritmo de la saga. Los efectos especiales están la servicio de la trama y no al reves. Tomen noten del homenaje a Leonard Nimoy, el Capitán Spock original.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

RHGSep 18, 2016

As a long time star trek fan, I expected much more - at least as good as the previous movies. I was disappointed. There was so much effort in doing cool graphics - that it pulled the movie down. The movie seemed like it would never end.As a long time star trek fan, I expected much more - at least as good as the previous movies. I was disappointed. There was so much effort in doing cool graphics - that it pulled the movie down. The movie seemed like it would never end. The actors did not come close to the performance of the actors in the previous movies. Save your money folks, Most of the Star Trek movies warranted going back to "see it again", This one doesn't.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

nrm604Oct 29, 2016

I've been a Star Trek fan my whole life and have seen every film. This one is an absolute train wreck. It's boring and stupid and you stop caring within about 15 minutes

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

mondainaiOct 12, 2016

Everything feel so fake. I was so disappointed. I saw the positive reviews, and I don’t know what I was thinking having any hope from the director or F&F whose target audience is high school drop outs. This isn’t even 2nd grade science textEverything feel so fake. I was so disappointed. I saw the positive reviews, and I don’t know what I was thinking having any hope from the director or F&F whose target audience is high school drop outs. This isn’t even 2nd grade science text book level sci-fi. There is nothing new. Nothing seems remotely plausible, alien ships destroyed by music?? Motorcycles in space?? Seriously??!! The alien ship looked totally CG, Krull is a total cliché. The level of suspension of disbelief required is so astounding, I think you probably need to be on drugs to enjoy this – which Justin Lin is counting on. I am disappointed because I really liked JJ’s 2009 version, which was extremely entertaining. This however was just lame, feel made by like it was made by committee. I couldn’t figure out why the Army of Liberal Arts Majoring Critics loved this movie so much, but now it is obvious. It promotes Hollywood’s values so they overlook its faults. I really question Hollywood’s need to rub their politics in my face in one of the opening sequences. Yes, I agree with you!! But I don’t need to be lectured about homosexual equality in my Star Trek movie, because I know that is what you are doing and it is extremely distracting. Might I suggest you make a separate movie about Asian Homosexuals raising a girl and all the discrimination they endure and let me for a second escape CNN for a moment and let me enjoy a star trek movie, something Hollywood seems incapable of creating anymore.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

DjtOct 28, 2016

I didn't have very high hopes for the third installment of the Star Trek reboot as i didn't enjoy the second film (the first was pretty good) but i was pleasantly surprised by the engaging story, new and interesting characters and of courseI didn't have very high hopes for the third installment of the Star Trek reboot as i didn't enjoy the second film (the first was pretty good) but i was pleasantly surprised by the engaging story, new and interesting characters and of course the great visual and special effects.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

MatthewAkalusiJan 23, 2017

Star Trek Beyond opens with an introspective Captain Kirk on the USS Enterprise as it journeys through the vast reaches of space, three years into a 5-year journey, which has engendered in him feelings of boredom with the staid routine andStar Trek Beyond opens with an introspective Captain Kirk on the USS Enterprise as it journeys through the vast reaches of space, three years into a 5-year journey, which has engendered in him feelings of boredom with the staid routine and uneventfulness. A scheduled stop for maintenance at the Galactic Station, Yorktown changes all that, when a distress call received from space leads Captain Kirk, Lt. Spock, Engr. Scotty, Dr. McCoy and the crew of the Enterprise on a mission that pits them against a formidable villain played by Idris Elba. Another solid entry in the Star Trek Franchise.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

wiiy71Dec 30, 2017

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

utmamJul 28, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A movie bordering on greatness, but falling short. The CGI is PHENOMENAL, maybe he best I've ever seen. The acting is very good, and the script is quite good. The drawbacks are small but noticable; the villain is blah, the dialog for Scottie was not what one would expect from a Starfleet graduate (too much lassie and wee), and the motorcycle scene was too easy a way out. I guess it's about what you'd expect from a "Fast and Furious" director. Idris Alba could have been hsed so much more and so much better. Despite these short comings, the movie is thoroughly entertaining. The destruction of the Enterprise was well worth the price of admission alone!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

TyranianApr 13, 2019

Definitely entertaining but a step backwards in terms of writing and inventiveness.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

imthenoobJul 27, 2016

The best movie of the new Star Trek film series by far. Every character is given a chance to shine and is given more than enough character growth through out the film. Krall was an Ok villain but I don't think that his side of the story wasThe best movie of the new Star Trek film series by far. Every character is given a chance to shine and is given more than enough character growth through out the film. Krall was an Ok villain but I don't think that his side of the story was told as well as it could have been. We were given some very quickly told sentences to explain things and that was that. Visually, It's a stunning film and even with a 2 hour run time, I didn't get bored watching it.

Hats off to Simon Pegg. He wrote a good film and I think that's the main reason everything clicked so well. It's a shame that they had to cut it to shreds in order to fit a more watch-able run time because I am sure it would have been even better if it were slightly longer.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

Ivan665Mar 14, 2017

Very stupid movie, nerer make the mistake of watching it. The plot is moronic and predictible, the characters are bland, the action is lackluster, the effects are just decent. Its barely a sci fi movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Iky009Jan 4, 2019

Se seus antecessores impressionam pela trama muito bem escrito, Sem Fronteiras se distância do impacto causado pelo dois primeiros filmes, talvez seu maior problema foi ser simples demais em sua trama, e ter um vilão fraco e esquecível, porémSe seus antecessores impressionam pela trama muito bem escrito, Sem Fronteiras se distância do impacto causado pelo dois primeiros filmes, talvez seu maior problema foi ser simples demais em sua trama, e ter um vilão fraco e esquecível, porém ainda sim é um filme divertido e de ótimo visual.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Compi24Jul 30, 2016

"Fast And Furious" franchise pioneer Justin Lin commandeers the captain's chair with "Star Trek Beyond," proof positive that J.J. Abrams' Enterprise crew can still produce worthwhile stories for movie fans the world over to enjoy. Thanks to"Fast And Furious" franchise pioneer Justin Lin commandeers the captain's chair with "Star Trek Beyond," proof positive that J.J. Abrams' Enterprise crew can still produce worthwhile stories for movie fans the world over to enjoy. Thanks to that legendary character chemistry we saw back in 2009 and 2013, a rockin' good script from screenwriters Simon Pegg and Doug Jung, two fantastic new additions to the cast in the form of both Sofia Boutella and Idris Elba, and some incredible vfx work throughout, the film not only leaves the viewer with a big smile on their face - it leaves them excited for what's to come.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

MeritCobaMar 10, 2018

For a moment I felt myself dropped into the Mass Effect Andromeda game when confronted by what must be one of the most boring, generic adversary I have seen for a decade. Whereas in Andromeda they at least try to flesh out to enemy leaderFor a moment I felt myself dropped into the Mass Effect Andromeda game when confronted by what must be one of the most boring, generic adversary I have seen for a decade. Whereas in Andromeda they at least try to flesh out to enemy leader more, here we get you run-of-the mill generic reptilian looking baddy with a slavish following wanting to destroy the federation for reasons. He also seems to have the control a large fleet of ships and seems totally unaccountable to anyone. Excruciating boring are the few exchanges he has with Kirk and Uhura. Yes, yes, being the top dog is all that counts in our amoral universe.

I dare say that star trek heads the opposite of star wars as it denudes itself from anything that makes sense or makes you feel connected to the people. There are some attempts at this, but as someone said elsewhere. They nod at it and then continues with the relentless frantic action scenes that seem to topple over each-other. No pause is given as the movie goes from chase scene, to fight scene, to blow up scene. It is written large: there will be no moment to ponder. Of course there are a few moments in which pondering happens, but they are at the beginning, just to get them over with. Star Trek beyond baffles mostly by the outrageous: the sheer outrageous stupidity of the cast making one idiotic decision after the other, the sheer outrageous luck that gets them out of their predicament that those idiotic decisions put them into, the sheer idiocy of the writing that offers the outrageous funniest and outrageous ridiculous moments, such as the one where they blow up the enemies swarms of ship with an old rock song.

The biggest problem is that the cast of well established characters are in fact outrageous boring, with the exception of Uhura and some newcomers.

It would be better if Star Trek rebooted again and then introduced us with some new characters so that they can be fleshed out and explored. Give the whole movie some more depth and people motivation that make sense.

Just having a uninteresting star trek crew take on a generic baddy is.. (here it comes) beyond boring.

That all been said, if you like a relentless series of action scenes that does not pause for anything substantial, you will probably find that here. But to be honest: you get the same with Guardians of the Galaxy, but that has better characters, slightly more depth and more humor definitely. So if you have to face that choice, you know what you are getting into.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

GreeniceyJul 28, 2016

As someone who is a pretty big fan of the second Star Trek movie, and thought the first was tolerable, this movie was a satisfying end to the reboot trilogy now. First off, while it may not be as strong as it's predecessor Into Darkness, itAs someone who is a pretty big fan of the second Star Trek movie, and thought the first was tolerable, this movie was a satisfying end to the reboot trilogy now. First off, while it may not be as strong as it's predecessor Into Darkness, it manages to keep itself serious enough to tell a decent story while not being overbearingly grim. In a sense, tone-wise it's somewhere in the middle of it's two predecessors.
Pros: Once again the special effects of the movie are top-notch, no one will walk away saying the action sequences didn't look awesome. The gravity-bending near the end of the movie especially are very well done, and are almost as disorienting as it is to the characters. Acting-wise all the supporting characters are given a bit more screen-time and definitely make the most of it. McCoy and Spock's interactions are definitely a highlight as comedic relief, and I have to give a special nod to Chekov's development with Kirk. (Anton will be sorely missed).
Cons: Not every supporting character was quite as well done though, the character of Jaylah checks off every archetype of alien/kinda primal ally that has a grudge on said villain.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

AlexanderLuthorDec 20, 2016

Anton Yelchin will be missed. This was a very enjoyable Star Trek film. It reminded me of the better episodes from the original series. I hope they will continue to produce films focused on characters development and great story telling inAnton Yelchin will be missed. This was a very enjoyable Star Trek film. It reminded me of the better episodes from the original series. I hope they will continue to produce films focused on characters development and great story telling in the backdrop of space.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

gracjanskiSep 17, 2019

50 kg women fighting against 90 kg men... yes sure.
Plot very basic and superficial without time to explain it, because there were so many action scenes.
Visually this movie was great.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Hallow_99Aug 14, 2016

Well, there's so much negative reviews... I'm not a Star Trek fan, I watched only previous rebooted films. I didn't expect much and I got what I wanted. Yes, it lacks some important things... but everything important was told in previousWell, there's so much negative reviews... I'm not a Star Trek fan, I watched only previous rebooted films. I didn't expect much and I got what I wanted. Yes, it lacks some important things... but everything important was told in previous films. It's not a bad movie, it's just not like first two films, more action and less sci-fi. It's absolutely not perfect, but it's not a disaster. Watch it or not, you decide.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

kivayugimotoAug 2, 2016

Another exciting Star Trek movie! I like it how it starts off with the credits (inlcuding Abrams Bad Robot), and the music in the background till the first scene. the movie doesn't disappoint. Lots of acton and humor.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

whipnetAug 13, 2016

As a long time ST fan who enjoyed the first two reboots well enough, all I can say about this one is I think we've tolerated these reboots long enough. It's time for a real Star Trek movie and not the cash grab reboot universe.

*

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

SpiRoOct 21, 2016

I really wanted to write long review explaining everything wrong in this movie. But then i realized that would consume too much time and i already wasted my life watching this movie. So without any further adieu..

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

NotoriousFraudSep 6, 2016

Well shucks, we finally get a new Trek movie that's actually really good and it's a bomb at the Box Office. Director Justin Lin (Fast & Furious) takes the helm from JJ Abrams after the bungled 'Into Darkness' and improves on the previousWell shucks, we finally get a new Trek movie that's actually really good and it's a bomb at the Box Office. Director Justin Lin (Fast & Furious) takes the helm from JJ Abrams after the bungled 'Into Darkness' and improves on the previous entries in every way. After two movies in the rebooted franchise, 'Beyond' actually feels like a progression in the story of the USS Enterprise as in it does not waste time reintroducing the characters we all know and gets straight to the story and the action. 'Beyond' may just become the 'First Contact' of this new series.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Smash_RedRyuAug 15, 2016

So this is one of my first experiences to a Star Trek movie, only other movie I've seen are bits of the first two and Wraith of Khan. I loved Wraith of Khan and while this might not be up to level as that movie I did thoroughly enjoy thisSo this is one of my first experiences to a Star Trek movie, only other movie I've seen are bits of the first two and Wraith of Khan. I loved Wraith of Khan and while this might not be up to level as that movie I did thoroughly enjoy this movie. It held a very easy to follow plot with a lot of elements of what happens when you end up losing hope from abandonment and when you lose your place in the world. Where do you belong and what do you do when you lost your way.

This was a movie where I loved the themes it presented here and offered a lot of good action to go along with it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

EinRandNov 12, 2016

Any true fan or 'Trekkie' who has a 'Sense of Life' that is oriented toward reason would approve of what one reviewer comically quipped as 'Space Porn'. Indeed, for them, this is a 'Universe' we would like to live in. [Sense of Life:]> "ItsAny true fan or 'Trekkie' who has a 'Sense of Life' that is oriented toward reason would approve of what one reviewer comically quipped as 'Space Porn'. Indeed, for them, this is a 'Universe' we would like to live in. [Sense of Life:]> "Its consequence is the inability to believe in the power or the triumph of evil. No matter what corruption one observes in one’s immediate background, one is unable to accept it as normal, permanent or metaphysically right. One feels: “This injustice (or terror or falsehood or frustration or pain or agony) is the exception in life, not the rule.” One feels certain that somewhere on earth—even if not anywhere in one’s surroundings or within one’s reach—a proper, human way of life is possible to human beings, and justice matters." -AR… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

dr_heartlessAug 3, 2016

The most fun of the reboot films by far. The cast has the best chemistry yet with a refreshingly originally story and I hope we get a few more by this team.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

revelcDec 7, 2016

I love the first Star Trek reboot. Star Trek Beyond is just beyond stupid. It's basically Fast and Furious in space. I give 6/10 just because of the cast.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

homer4presidentMay 16, 2017

great continuation of the reboot series. You can tell there was a change in who helmed this film in the tone and general action sequences. However that may not be a bad thing depending on who you are. I personally enjoyed this and feel it agreat continuation of the reboot series. You can tell there was a change in who helmed this film in the tone and general action sequences. However that may not be a bad thing depending on who you are. I personally enjoyed this and feel it a worthy successor to 'Into Darkness."… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

sefrabuJul 28, 2016

This is actually the first time the rebooted Star Trek goes truly where no man has gone before, and I welcomed this with relief, as I was afraid the franchise is going too much off course. There's a truly star trek-like message beyond theThis is actually the first time the rebooted Star Trek goes truly where no man has gone before, and I welcomed this with relief, as I was afraid the franchise is going too much off course. There's a truly star trek-like message beyond the impressive visuals, some surprisingly up-to-date social commentary, some guilty-pleasure cheese, and breaking with some conventions and at the same time paying homage to others. Oh, and there's Uhura. Uhura always scores additional points to the new Star Trek, yes.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

badgerryan19May 19, 2017

Star Trek Beyond is the third installment in the Star Trek "reboot" movies. The first two directed JJ Abrams and I absolutely loved them. Now when I heard that Justin Lin would be taking over the project over JJ I was skeptical. Those worriesStar Trek Beyond is the third installment in the Star Trek "reboot" movies. The first two directed JJ Abrams and I absolutely loved them. Now when I heard that Justin Lin would be taking over the project over JJ I was skeptical. Those worries are put to rest because Justin has directed an awesome film. The action he brings over from Fast and Furious translates very well into Star Trek. The costume, makeup and CGI is once again flawless. The writing by Simon Pegg was smart, interesting, and funny. The cast once again does a tremendous job on being these characters especially Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto. Idris Elba's character "Krall" is very interesting. He brings his very good acting and toughness to the character to bring him to life. Even though the characters motivations are unclear until the end.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

PipeCSep 10, 2016

We Underestimated The J.J. Alliance (Justin Lin & Jacob Abrams)

"Beyond" was not the kind of sequel we expected. Despite excessive unease by fanatics since the announcement of Justin Lin as captain of the USS Enterprise - which resided inWe Underestimated The J.J. Alliance (Justin Lin & Jacob Abrams)

"Beyond" was not the kind of sequel we expected. Despite excessive unease by fanatics since the announcement of Justin Lin as captain of the USS Enterprise - which resided in that he could exceed his own limits with a franchise as long-lived as perpetual, - Lin delivers a breath of uplifting and new air to the vigorous reboot that J.J. Abrams began in 2009, but the film feels like an extensive TV episode focused on the memorable action sequences, neglecting the primordial which is an unforgettable argument, as well as the wasted talent of Elba; it seems that they leave unfinished threads of the story, substituting such defect with an action scene. Although it promises renovations and inventions profitable for the saga, the film ends up as a summer film more with big-budget.

The Enterprise is dispatched on a rescue mission after an escape pod emerged in the space, in the middle of a nebula. Giddily, the crew goes to the scene, in where, unfortunately, turns into an ambush by small ships similar to a swarm, that perforate and destroy the ship Enterprise, aggressively. Without weapons nor defenses, the crew is forced to leave the beloved ship, falling into a desolate planet called Altamid. Now, the team will have to survive, restore the spacecraft, solve their personal problems and combat the villain, Krall - who searches for a relic called an Abronath that Kirk had obtained for a failed diplomatic mission - to keep the Star Trek universe stable.

What role does the third installment in the Star Trek universe? Tabulating similarities and differences present in the film, "Beyond" approximates to installments #5 ("The Final Frontier") and #9 ("Insurrection") due to its particular autonomy and beyond gigantic effects and budgets, they were installments that narrated certain experiences of the crew, nevertheless, this time, the purpose is to weave one new central story interconnected with the sub-plots of others.

The mandate of Lin takes a detour from the prominent influence that Abrams had by "Star Wars"; Lin opts for a world more comical and fabulous, Pegg and Jun were crucial to support not only the new atmosphere with a different script and not very practical as seen before in "Into Darkness", also, it is noticeable an improvement in the massive and apocalyptic destruction of the NCC-1701 that, although , does not generate the same impact that would obtain the annihilation of the Millennium Falcon , but the comparisons between these juxtaposed universes are unnecessary.

To some extent, the longevity of the movie series is due to their well-argued villains, spreading panic among audience since their first appearances, crossing from Khan played by Ricardo Montalban in "Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan" to Benedict Cumberbatch in "Into Darkness". Now, the time is for a convincing male actor, nothing less than Idris Elba. With a career worthy of being applauded, he has joined to Trek universe buried under all the prosthetics - fatal decision, I realize until the ending, when I saw his face -. Krall is the antagonist, a villain with weak and unconvincing motivations, who does give nothing strong to the simple plot, an unacceptable waste of talent and potential, the same happened with Oscar Issac in "X-Men: Apocalypse"

Besides the addition of Elba, an attractive and fascinating character is joined to the team. The newcomer, Sofia Boutella, who will return to use layers of makeup on the reboot of "The Mummy" (2017) to the universe of monsters from Universal and who participated in "Kingsman: The Secret Service" , her biggest success so far, she is Jaylah, a survivor who took refuge on the USS Franklin after the attack of Krall. Suggestive and promising future for Jaylah, a new member is equal to new adventures.

Our former members of the crew, who have been the authors of the renovation of the saga - involved for seven years - continue to growing. The Kirk/Spock/McCoy trio are more attractive and spontaneous than previous movies, Pegg continues moving forward with Scotty, Uhura is a beacon of light and all others persist in the search for their self-realization, the new crew no longer has any reason to "envy" original crew. Sadly, we have missed two big guys, not only in the Star Trek family, but two great human beings. Our Mr. Spock (Leonard Nimoy) died by a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the last year and, fatally, Anton Yelchin (Pavel Chekov) died by forceful traumatic choking due to an accident car in this same year, however, they have only disappeared of way physical, since continue alive and latent in the heart of the universe Star Trek, masters, rest in peace.

"Beyond", faithful to the original saga, delivers a succulent film for the Trekkies, however, does it neglecting the consistency in its story and some of its characters. Supported by a mythology that expands more and more, "Star Trek Beyond" is the best in the franchise, even though, the word "best" is hypothetical.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

RobBob99Aug 3, 2016

While it may be my least favorite of the current rebooted series, that isn't exactly a bad thing. Justin Lin surprised me with his sharp direction giving us great humor, well handled action and nailing the most important part of Stat Trek,While it may be my least favorite of the current rebooted series, that isn't exactly a bad thing. Justin Lin surprised me with his sharp direction giving us great humor, well handled action and nailing the most important part of Stat Trek, the characters. This is a film that totally gets it's characters and they make the movie what it is. While some of the closeup fight scenes were a little too quickly edited for me and some of the visuals felt a little too CG for me. I think that as an overall film, it lacks the charm of the first two and I doesn't feel quite as special as the first two either.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

TBallAug 1, 2016

Why is the Federation so militarily inept? I realize they are primarily on a science mission or so they say but in this case it's a rescue mission. A young captain takes a gazillion dollar star ship into unknown location. No scouts,no combatWhy is the Federation so militarily inept? I realize they are primarily on a science mission or so they say but in this case it's a rescue mission. A young captain takes a gazillion dollar star ship into unknown location. No scouts,no combat air patrol? The space city Yorktown apparently has neither, as well, and is unaware of an attack until it's upon them. Other than that, pretty entertaining, I suppose. Neither great nor terrible.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

milehighcrewAug 6, 2016

As a fan of this new Star Trek series but not all things Star Trek I really have enjoyed all 3 films that have been released. I loved the first one and although this movie doesn't live up to that one it is the 2nd best of the series.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SrPepeJan 5, 2018

Tiene buen diseño y eso pero no le llega ni a los talones a las dos anteriores.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

Star Trek Beyond

User Reviews