Spider-Man

10

ChrisNelsonFeb 20, 2022

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

MoviebuffreviewJan 28, 2011

Many people do not know the true impact of Spider-Man. However, it is revolutionary to the comic book industry. It keeps enough of the comic book feel with the characters and story, which are both excellent. Spider-Man also entertains, makesMany people do not know the true impact of Spider-Man. However, it is revolutionary to the comic book industry. It keeps enough of the comic book feel with the characters and story, which are both excellent. Spider-Man also entertains, makes us laugh, has a powerful script with emotional scenes, excellent stars, and awesome action. This is a comic book movie at it's finest. This is the gift, the revolution. What is it? It's Spider-Man!… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

8

FranzHcriticJul 27, 2014

With an even pace, above average action scenes, and genuine emotional depth, it'll be enjoyable throughout the whole two hours. A thoughtful story about a man who becomes a superhero, and tries to win the heart of his longtime crush. ThereWith an even pace, above average action scenes, and genuine emotional depth, it'll be enjoyable throughout the whole two hours. A thoughtful story about a man who becomes a superhero, and tries to win the heart of his longtime crush. There were so many ways to f**k this up, and Sam Raimi didn't do that here. Here, he succeeded admirably. I still think Kirsten Dunst is annoying.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

8

diogomendesJul 5, 2014

Tobey Maguire is a great Spidey and Kirsten Dunst is not hard to look at. This is a classic and a good one, I highly recommend it for the fans of the webslinger.

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

BronsonApr 27, 2014

Sam Raimi's 2002 movie "Spider-Man" is a testament on how a good superhero movie is done. This also paved the way for future superhero movies with it's groundbreaking effects (for it's time) and likeable cast with Tobey Maguire as PeterSam Raimi's 2002 movie "Spider-Man" is a testament on how a good superhero movie is done. This also paved the way for future superhero movies with it's groundbreaking effects (for it's time) and likeable cast with Tobey Maguire as Peter Parker, William Dafoe as Norman Osborn, Kristen Dunst as Mary Jane and James Franco as Harry Osborn. Everything just works in this movie. Great villain. Great action. Great storytelling. Just a good movie across the board.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

7

JacobApr 18, 2014

CC: This film is a mixed bag especially given how big a part of my childhood it was. On one end most of the acting is good, the first half of the movie is really good, and the film is fun with a nice feel good atmosphere. At the same time theCC: This film is a mixed bag especially given how big a part of my childhood it was. On one end most of the acting is good, the first half of the movie is really good, and the film is fun with a nice feel good atmosphere. At the same time the film is bogged down by a not as good second half with little supposed, some cheesy dialogue, and some not so great acting. At the end of day though I still have fun watching this movie and prefer it over the reboot. It’s a fun summer blockbuster, which is what it should be and is worth a watch.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

TokyochuchuDec 2, 2012

Spider-Man is a fun superhero movie. It's colorful and has some good fights between hero and villain. Beyond that, there is not much else to say. It's not a masterpiece or anything but Spider-Man does more than enough to entertain throughSpider-Man is a fun superhero movie. It's colorful and has some good fights between hero and villain. Beyond that, there is not much else to say. It's not a masterpiece or anything but Spider-Man does more than enough to entertain through it's running time.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

sil3nt_nickMar 27, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Tobey McGuire leads this talented cast on an adaptation of the classic Marvel series of the same name. Heart wrenching in some scenes, such as the death of Uncle Ben and very good action scenes made this movie a true success, along with its screenwriting.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

SythusRATINGSOct 22, 2014

Peter Parker (Maguire), after being bitten by a genetically altered spider, becomes Spider-Man, a hero of superhuman strength with the ability to cling to any surface. He dedicates himself to a life of fighting crime, while living a doublePeter Parker (Maguire), after being bitten by a genetically altered spider, becomes Spider-Man, a hero of superhuman strength with the ability to cling to any surface. He dedicates himself to a life of fighting crime, while living a double life as a superhero and working student.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

Cinemassacre94Mar 20, 2016

A SPIDER-MAN movie had been in the making for years. In the eighties, the schlockmeisters at Cannon Films threatened to make a low-budget feature film (which at one time was rumoured to star Bob Hoskins as Doc Ock) before the company wentA SPIDER-MAN movie had been in the making for years. In the eighties, the schlockmeisters at Cannon Films threatened to make a low-budget feature film (which at one time was rumoured to star Bob Hoskins as Doc Ock) before the company went under. Considering what they did with SUPERMAN IV: THE QUEST FOR PEACE, and what Menahem Golan did with CAPTAIN AMERICA & THE FANTASTIC FOUR, we should be grateful this project never came to fruition.
Throughout the nineties, James Cameron was attached to direct a big-budget version, with Leonardo Di Caprio rumoured to star. For one reason or another, this never happened. In 2000, Bryan Singer's X-MEN demonstrated that a credible, non-cartoony superhero film could be made, and would have crossover appeal beyond comic-book fans, opening the floodgates, from which the SPIDER-MAN series emerged.

Thus, in 2002, a SPIDER-MAN film finally hit the big-screen. Sam Raimi, director of THE EVIL DEAD series (not to mention DARKMAN- a nifty superhero film in it's own right) was on-board to direct, and Tobey Maguire, a low-key actor known for his work in films like THE CIDER HOUSE RULES and WONDER BOYS was signed to play the title role. At the time, he casting was ridiculed in the same way Michael Keaton being signed for BATMAN was over a decade earlier. Like BATMAN, a trailer was enough to change peoples' minds, and SPIDER-MAN opened amid a white-hot fury of hype, broke box-office records, and was well-received by fans and critics.

Ten years later, the first SPIDER-MAN holds up relatively well, although I'd wager that it loses some of it's luster in hindsight only due to the fact that later superhero entries (X2, BATMAN BEGINS, THE DARK KNIGHT, IRON MAN, THE AVENGERS and SPIDER-MAN 2) proved just how good a superhero film really could be.

In a way, the first SPIDER-MAN is like a rough draft for all the superhero films to follow. A good deal of time is spent establishing the character of Peter Parker, and Tobey Maguire absolutely anchors the film with a role he seems to have been born to play. In fact, Maguire is so good both in and out of the Spidey suit that he's still struggling to emerge from the typecasting that's linked him so closely to the part. The first section of the film is really good, establishing his sweet relationship with Aunt May, and Uncle Ben (beautifully played by Cliff Robertson in one of his final roles). Once he gets bitten, Maguire's (real) physical transformation is startling, as the usually gangly and weak-seeming Maguire was able to pack on pounds of muscle and instantly transform himself into a big-screen hero.
For me, the weaker parts of SPIDER-MAN mostly have to do with his relationship with Mary-Jane. I always liked Kirsten Dunst in the part, but other than the steamy rain-soaked upside-down kiss, I always felt the relationship came across as shallow. Sure, Parker is in love with her, but why? Because she's hot- that's why. And of course, Mary-Jane won't give him the time of day until he's absolutely ripped after the mid-way point, and her final confession of love to Parker seems unearned and phony, although Raimi takes the unusual step of ending the film without them together. Of course, that would all change later in the franchise, and the second film does indeed make the relationship a little more credible.

As Parker's best pal, we get James Franco, who was just coming off the amazing FREAKS & GEEKS. Franco's always been the kind of actor who can either knock your socks off or be as boring as watching paint dry. I always thought he was phoning it in as Harry Osborn, and this would actually get worse in each film.

But back to what works. The CGI, for the time, was truly-groundbreaking, and the FX still hold up pretty well, making the web-slinging look convincing, a considerable feat ten years ago (just look at how bad THE HULK looks in a film that was made a year later). Most importantly, SPIDER-MAN feels like a real “A-picture” meaning that all involved took it seriously, and didn't turn it into a campy ride, like what happened with the nineties post-Burton Batman movies. There's a reason SPIDER-MAN was a smash and crossed-over to a mainstream audience, and it's that- warts and all, it's quite a good film.

In his first outing as Spider-Man, Tobey Maguire is just great. Obviously he knew this role had the potential to make him a star, and he clearly threw himself into the role, giving a performance that compares favourably to the parts that helped him break-out in the nineties.

Willem Dafoe as Norman Osborn/ The Green Goblin. With the Goblin's suit is a bit dumb, Dafoe is excellent, striking exactly the right balance between the relatively sympathetic, weak Norman, and the evil incarnate of Green Goblin. The final moment, before he dies, when he says “Peter” in Norman's voice is one of the more affecting moments of the series.

Overall it's quite a good film.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

Kes4278Jul 31, 2017

Great movie.Just Wow.Tobey Maguire was awesome as spider-man.And the green goblin was awesome.It was a really good origin movie.Spider-Man is my favorite. Thanks for making his movie great.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

9

Josephgamers65Mar 22, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Spider-Man 2002 Is one of my fav Movies from the superhero genre also as a film on its own Spiderman is about peter parker getting his powers from the spider also while he needs money he uses his power against a fighter when the ending to the fight happens the person giving him the money did not give him the money he needs for a car and his home life peter let's the robber run off he see's a lot of people and cops gathering up and he wonders what is going on his uncle got shot and he wants to get him which he does when peter uses his suit the very first suit chasing down the robber while goblin becomes evil starts getting controlled by goblin and his project went wrong so he wants revenge so he does the ending to this movie is perfect the battle between goblin and spiderman wow what a scene now all the good in this movie is peter parker a solid peter parker in this movie, not my fav, not the worst spiderman is good also goblin is so good my fav betral of goblin out of the spiderman movies mary jane is not a good character to me in these movies she is annoying in the second one and in spiderman 3 the last fight of this movie is perfect cimena everything spiderman gets tossed into an abandoned building which is very bad to fight in and goblin wrecks spiderman until spiderman comebacks and beats him up un to the glider kills him the only thing what is not great in this movie is the first act not my fav but goblin is dated in this movie he does not look great he looks good as what there were doing in 2002 So all Around very good spiderman movie and origin story of spiderman I give Spiderman 2002 an A-… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

Tall_But_ShortJul 4, 2012

Sam Raimi's orginal Spider-Man was a great film, but not without flaws. Tobey Maguire is a great choice for the science nerd, Peter Parker. As Spider-man though, sometimes he does fall flat though because Spidey is supposed to be eccentricSam Raimi's orginal Spider-Man was a great film, but not without flaws. Tobey Maguire is a great choice for the science nerd, Peter Parker. As Spider-man though, sometimes he does fall flat though because Spidey is supposed to be eccentric delivering witty one-liners as he whacks bad guys. I would have loved to seen more of this in the movie, but it still doesn't take away from the overall value of the film. The origin story of Spider-man is amazingly well done in this movie but in some parts the movie falls apart. There are some cheesy moments in the film which didn't impress me at all such as the entire scene when the Green Goblin appears and the NYC parade float. These scenes do take away from the movie, which is a true shame. Kirsten Dunst was an excellent choice for Mary Jane Watson as was James Franco for Harry Osborn and Williem Dafoe as Norman Osborn. The build up to Peter discovering his powers is brilliant executed especially the bully scene during the beginning. Overall, Spider-man is a much more solid film than the newer reboot, The Amazing Spider-man, with Andrew Garfield.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

7

cameronmorewoodNov 12, 2012

Spider-Man jumps into what seems to be a third-act way too quickly. I want to know more about Peter Parker's past. Who were his parents? How did they die? Though the action is very good, the film seems far to anxious to get to it.

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

5

BarneyOnMTJan 6, 2016

WHAT I LIKED: The character of Peter Parker is relatively well established and the ending is excellent, the cast are generally great too. But truly this film's best feature is how well it stays true to the comics, it feels like a comic bookWHAT I LIKED: The character of Peter Parker is relatively well established and the ending is excellent, the cast are generally great too. But truly this film's best feature is how well it stays true to the comics, it feels like a comic book film more than any other.
WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: This is one of the cheesiest films in the history of comic book films, and the green goblin feels odd and is hard to take seriously. It also lacks focus on character, or even humour, which it feels like it needs in places to lift the cheesy tone and make fun out of itself a little.
VERDICT: Not a bad attampt at establishing Spider Man on the big screen, but this film does little else in terms of plot or excitement. It's very cliched and thus takes itself too seriously.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

0

mailpollFeb 17, 2022

How did spider-man get such good reviews let's face it this movie is terrible.The acting is just awful some of the worst acting I have ever seen.Toby Maguire is definitely the worst choice for the role of spider-man his acting sucks

2 of 9 users found this helpful27

All this user's reviews

6

OfficialNov 11, 2013

"Spider-Man" is a fun comic-book movie, but quite a lot of the acting is pretty cheesy and unreal too. It has good fight scenes between the hero and villain, that's probably all I can say about the film. The movie just doesn't feel satisfying"Spider-Man" is a fun comic-book movie, but quite a lot of the acting is pretty cheesy and unreal too. It has good fight scenes between the hero and villain, that's probably all I can say about the film. The movie just doesn't feel satisfying when it's over.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

3

seiferJan 5, 2011

ok... but could be a lot better and some of you state this is one of the greatest movies of all time! Well... how old are you 6?! it's a 3 from me and there shouldn't be a rating higher!

1 of 17 users found this helpful116

All this user's reviews

0

MessiahL.Dec 4, 2007

Like Spiderman 3, Spidey 1 is atrocious. The 2nd is a masterpiece of the art form. Don't listen to individuals who didn't get at least a Bachelor's. Americans without such a degree are, by and large, retarded and, Like Spiderman 3, Spidey 1 is atrocious. The 2nd is a masterpiece of the art form. Don't listen to individuals who didn't get at least a Bachelor's. Americans without such a degree are, by and large, retarded and, unfortunately... easily entertained. Nostalgia and first-impressions over content depth.… Expand

0 of 7 users found this helpful

0

Gamer44Dec 5, 2012

How did spider-man get such good reviews let's face it this movie is terrible.The acting is just awful some of the worst acting I have ever seen.Toby Maguire is definitely the worst choice for the role of spider-man his acting sucks and andHow did spider-man get such good reviews let's face it this movie is terrible.The acting is just awful some of the worst acting I have ever seen.Toby Maguire is definitely the worst choice for the role of spider-man his acting sucks and and he goes on and on like a baboon.The storyline there is no word to describe how terrible and awful it is.If I had to review this movie in 2002 I would have given it a perfect 10.As I did not know the difference between a good film and a terrible film.Having seen it again on TV yesterday I can with pride know the difference between a good film and and a terrible one and spider-man is one of the worst films in history.It is by far not worth a 10. spider-man is only worth a 0 and it deserve's the 0 hands down.,… Expand

0 of 12 users found this helpful012

All this user's reviews

7

JawsPapi87Aug 25, 2011

It's not a huge stand out now with all the superhero movies but in 2002 it was pretty significant. It doesn't have a great script but it's entertaining enough

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

jos95Sep 17, 2011

This was the first Marvel film I ever watched, and for this fact I have a large respect for this movie (clearly Sony doesn't respect this series at all, which is how the reboot came to pass) It has a decent story and solid acting, but theThis was the first Marvel film I ever watched, and for this fact I have a large respect for this movie (clearly Sony doesn't respect this series at all, which is how the reboot came to pass) It has a decent story and solid acting, but the Green Goblin's dialogue was just AWFUL and many of the visual effects did not age well. Despite this, it provides plenty of superhero excitement and fun for all tastes.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

EssenceOfSugarJul 18, 2012

I found Maguire portrayed Spider-Man in an accurate way - I don't think Parker is supposed to be cool and Maguire had that specific look about him. The story itself was entertaining, although it was slightly imbalanced in the way that we sawI found Maguire portrayed Spider-Man in an accurate way - I don't think Parker is supposed to be cool and Maguire had that specific look about him. The story itself was entertaining, although it was slightly imbalanced in the way that we saw too much of Spider-Man rather than the villain, but that's not a particular problem, in way of the style of development of the story. Many of my concerns were with Mary Jane, who I felt kind of interfered in some scenes where she tried too hard to look independent but it was obviously see through as she behaved much more desperate and helpless. The villain was O.K, but I think his costume looked a bit childish and plasticky. This film is entertaining but it is flawed. Maguire is an extremely good Spider-Man - much better suited to the role than Garfield - but it was mostly the other characters who needed more space and time to improve in light of the flaws that I have pointed out.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

TyranianApr 13, 2019

An awesome Spiderman film, Raimi nails it and the whole cast is perfect. Great humour, music and screenplay.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

imthenoobJul 8, 2020

Spider-Man is such an important movie because it really changed how people viewed superhero movies. It proved that you could make one that really connects to a mass audience rather than a select few. Then again, with Sam Rami at the helm, ISpider-Man is such an important movie because it really changed how people viewed superhero movies. It proved that you could make one that really connects to a mass audience rather than a select few. Then again, with Sam Rami at the helm, I doubt much could go wrong. He's a criminally underrated director that really solidified his status as a great director with this movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Chris_DKJul 7, 2012

This movie is absolutely amazing, the cast is perfect. Tobey Maguire as the friendly neighborhood Spider-Man, Kirsten Dunst as the beautiful Mary Jane and Willem Dafoe as the deranged criminal psychopath the Green Goblin.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

MonsieurEamesJul 12, 2012

Silly and over-the-top at times, with sometimes cheesy special effects, but Spider-Man works because of the cast's chemistry with each other and their likableness, as well as the genuine fun that occurs whenever Spidey is involved. EmotionalSilly and over-the-top at times, with sometimes cheesy special effects, but Spider-Man works because of the cast's chemistry with each other and their likableness, as well as the genuine fun that occurs whenever Spidey is involved. Emotional scenes were done well, also.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

TheDaneKeilJul 18, 2012

Sam Raimi

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

btzneb92Aug 12, 2012

Intentionally campy, but a great deal of fun and heart in all of it.Intentionally campy, but a great deal of fun and heart in all of it. Intentionally campy, but a great deal of fun and heart in all of it.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

ballpark_frankNov 25, 2012

I never was a "Marvel" comics fan, so my background knowledge of the web-crawler isn't too great. Still, based on 60's cartoons (and the more recent excellent animated series), I know most of the basics. This movie actually lived up to theI never was a "Marvel" comics fan, so my background knowledge of the web-crawler isn't too great. Still, based on 60's cartoons (and the more recent excellent animated series), I know most of the basics. This movie actually lived up to the hype which I'd been hearing. The effects actually did make it seem like Maguire/Parker had spider-powers (unlike the original "Superman", which I, for one, did NOT believe a man could fly). The inner turmoil which Peter goes though is presented in excellent fashion by Maguire. I dare say, from now on, his 'interpretation' of the character is the one which I'll carry with me, unless a better one comes along (and I can't see that happening any time soon). Overall, this was an enjoyable experience.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Compi24Nov 28, 2012

For what it is, "Spider-Man" is still an outstanding adaptation of the comic hero I truly adore.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

SwatiFeb 12, 2013

It had all the superhuman crap you expect from a superhero movie. This is the only time I liked Kirsten Dunst. The villain, however, was pathetic. There were a few good scenes. On the whole I enjoyed it, but it was nowhere near the perfectIt had all the superhuman crap you expect from a superhero movie. This is the only time I liked Kirsten Dunst. The villain, however, was pathetic. There were a few good scenes. On the whole I enjoyed it, but it was nowhere near the perfect start to a franchise.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

MDiGIaCMar 14, 2013

Spider-Man is an over the top, goofy, misdirected movie. The way that this movie pans out is along a very kid friendly approach with an immature vibe throughout. The relationship between Peter and Mary Jane is not fleshed out at all, thereSpider-Man is an over the top, goofy, misdirected movie. The way that this movie pans out is along a very kid friendly approach with an immature vibe throughout. The relationship between Peter and Mary Jane is not fleshed out at all, there are too many useless, undeveloped characters that do not push the plot forward and only falter specific scenes. The movie's use of CGI is beyond terrible, making movies like Star Wars Episode I look better, even if it had come out years before. The Action scenes aren't believable due to the poor CGI quality and the way these movies tear the comic books to pieces by not following the original plot at all is really disappointing to me. You might get a kick of old nostalgia by watching these movies, but be ready to sit through goofball acting, painful CGI, annoying extras, haltered plot points, and a very poor interpretation of Spider-Man. If you want to really see a good Spider-Man movie, watch "The Amazing Spider Man" directed by Marc Webb.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

SuperheroMoviesAug 3, 2013

Being my favorite superhero, Spider-Man is delivered with heart and a likable lead in Tobey Maguire as Peter Parker who shows a candid spirit towards his role. Despite some special effects being only average, overall Spider-Man is loads of fun.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

ThatCooperGuyOct 10, 2015

Oh the nostalgia. If I wasn't watching Star Wars, I was watching Spider-Man. I still think this movie is entertaining, yes it's pretty campy and the visual effects look like garbage by today's standards, but every time I re-watch it I'mOh the nostalgia. If I wasn't watching Star Wars, I was watching Spider-Man. I still think this movie is entertaining, yes it's pretty campy and the visual effects look like garbage by today's standards, but every time I re-watch it I'm always in a good mood. The film score by Danny Elfman is terrific and I liked Tobey Maguire's portrayal of Peter Parker. He does look too old to be a teenager in the first film, but I still believed his sense of being an underdog who later gains these ultimate powers to save his hometown. Besides, he graduates high school pretty early in the film. It's aged, but I still enjoy watching it, it's a decent enough superhero movie.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

FreedomFightersOct 31, 2016

One of the movies credited with helping revitalize the superhero genre, "Spider-Man" is not perfect, but it's plenty of fun to watch, it's well-acted and well-directed. Sure, it's been outdone by other superhero films and it may no longer beOne of the movies credited with helping revitalize the superhero genre, "Spider-Man" is not perfect, but it's plenty of fun to watch, it's well-acted and well-directed. Sure, it's been outdone by other superhero films and it may no longer be the pinnacle of comic book films, but "Spider-Man" is still a very worthwhile watch for anyone that enjoys the web-slinger.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

RayzorMooseNov 12, 2013

Comic fans will rejoice.
The highly anticipated Sam Rami hero flick Spider-man depicts practical faults of a special ,but still average young hero. With very dry acting and a very predictable plot; Spider-man simply learns to crawl.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

Meth-dudeApr 19, 2014

The movie spider-man do not have enough action and the movie is too long.James Franco and Tobey Maguire are pretty good in their roles but the movie do not have what it takes to be a good movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

AaronWasserman2May 4, 2014

For its time Spider-Man revolitionized comic book movies. the movie was so enjoyable and still is. Raimi's film is very campy but does feel very much like a spidey world. While Dunst isnt so compelling. Franco, Maquire, Simmons, and DafoeFor its time Spider-Man revolitionized comic book movies. the movie was so enjoyable and still is. Raimi's film is very campy but does feel very much like a spidey world. While Dunst isnt so compelling. Franco, Maquire, Simmons, and Dafoe defintally are a plus… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

SpiderPlayerMay 17, 2015

The film is great, has good special effects for its time, good story, I think I would have had a better relationship between Mary Jane and Peter Parker, but the film clearly shows this thing Spider Man responsibility, and the villain is greatThe film is great, has good special effects for its time, good story, I think I would have had a better relationship between Mary Jane and Peter Parker, but the film clearly shows this thing Spider Man responsibility, and the villain is great and interesting.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

JohnMasterLAug 6, 2015

La primera parte de esta trilogía por Sam Raimi es excelente, pero no estupenda. El inicio de la trilogía de Spider-Man es emocionante, dramático e increíble. Tobey Maguire´s es estupendo (al igual que todo el elenco, sobre todo Willem Dafoe)La primera parte de esta trilogía por Sam Raimi es excelente, pero no estupenda. El inicio de la trilogía de Spider-Man es emocionante, dramático e increíble. Tobey Maguire´s es estupendo (al igual que todo el elenco, sobre todo Willem Dafoe) Una de mis películas favoritas de mi infancia, pero sin duda alguna, no es la mejor de las 3 (Cof...Cof... Spider-Man 2...Cof... Cof)… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

WamblyHadesNov 12, 2014

Muy buena película. Buena historia, buena acción, buenos efectos especiales y una buena música. Una adaptación perfecta del superhéroe arácnido de Marvel a la gran pantalla.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

banda89Jul 16, 2017

Went to see it opening day, huge fan as a kid of the web head. Came out and didnt really know what to think about it. Did I like it? I cant tell rally?
Never fully accepted Tobey as Spider Man, he just didnt seem the right guy to portrayWent to see it opening day, huge fan as a kid of the web head. Came out and didnt really know what to think about it. Did I like it? I cant tell rally?
Never fully accepted Tobey as Spider Man, he just didnt seem the right guy to portray spidey on the big screen. Defoe as the green rang... I mean as the Goblin its good, But that suit, my god that suit.
Kirsten Dunst is a horrific choice for Mary Jane, just cant grasp how anyone thinks she is a good actress. Spidey's origin story is well told. The suit is great but thats just about it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

BernolsvenJan 26, 2015

Eu amo Homem-Aranha e eu realmente amei esse filme, já vi repetidas vezes, trouxe algo bom e diferente dos quadrinhos, o que é difícil de acontecer.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

UltimateBubFeb 1, 2015

This is simply one of the best superhero films ever. The cast may not be the ultimate best, but they do such a terrific job. The action sequences are amazing, the humor is funny, the plot is top-notch, etc. And it never gets boring or dull.This is simply one of the best superhero films ever. The cast may not be the ultimate best, but they do such a terrific job. The action sequences are amazing, the humor is funny, the plot is top-notch, etc. And it never gets boring or dull. Also, the score is very enjoyable. And most important of all, the emotional scenes are so gripping... if you're a Spider-Man fan, you'll know what I'm talking about.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

MovieManiac83Apr 22, 2015

Recent times have been good to Marvel comics, and the long-anticipated arrival of Spider-Man represents the latest step up the ladder. Long the underdog in the motion picture arena, Marvel has at last been able to catch up to rival DC comicsRecent times have been good to Marvel comics, and the long-anticipated arrival of Spider-Man represents the latest step up the ladder. Long the underdog in the motion picture arena, Marvel has at last been able to catch up to rival DC comics by placing a trio of its superheroes into multiplexes - Blade, the X-Men, and Spider-Man. DC may have struck first with Superman and Batman, but, these days, the comics-to-cinema summit belongs to Stan Lee's corporation. The second X-Men movie is on its way, as are Daredevil, The Hulk, and, a little farther into the future, The Fantastic Four.

The first hour of Spider-Man is unquestionably better than the second. This is the segment of the film where Peter discovers his newfound powers and tentatively explores them. Covertly, then with more confidence, he stands up to the school bully. He also has to deal with his unrequited love for Mary Jane and cope with the responsibilities and consequences of using (or not using) his abilities. An exhilarating sequence in which Spider-Man first employs his webs to swing from building-to-building is filmed in such a manner that we can sense how close he is to losing control and plunging to the streets below. The latter half of the film is more action-oriented and features an excessive reliance upon special effects. The CGI work is not clumsily done, but it is evident when the movie switches from live actors to computer-generated ones. Peter Parker has a lot of appeal and emotional depth. Those qualities do not always remain in force once the mask is donned.

Spider-Man's greatest strength is Tobey Maguire. The Cider House Rules actor, who has never given a bad performance, is an inspired choice for the role. Not only is he capable of handling the role of nerdy Peter, but he has bulked up enough that he looks good under the spider-suit (that is, when it's him under it). Maguire never overacts the part, nor does he view this as camp. It's a quiet, serious performance, and it doesn't take us long to believe in Peter. And, when tragedy strikes, it's genuinely moving. Added to that, Maguire can make some extremely dopey lines of dialogue sound convincing. With this everyman interpretation, Maguire shows us what could have been with Michael Keaton as the Caped Crusader, but never was.

aimi's direction is solid, although not as involving as it was in the Evil Dead movies or his other superhero yarn, Darkman. He avoids an overabundance of trickery, but chooses his shots in a way that often gives us the sense of being on a journey with Spider-Man, rather than standing to the side as detached observers. The special effects may not be entirely convincing, but they do not eclipse the characters. Danny Elman's score is workmanlike and somewhat reminiscent of the music he composed for Batman.

Spider-Man gets the 2002 summer movie season off to a satisfying start. This is a pure popcorn movie - the kind of film one can unabashedly enjoy for what it is. There's plenty of visual flash and dizzying action, but not at the expense of the other qualities that make for a complete motion picture experience. As a character in a comic book, Spider-Man is four decades old. His leap into this new medium has rejuvenated the legend, and offers movie-goers an opportunity to sit back and enjoy the birth of a new cinematic superhero.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

UrbanlistenerApr 17, 2016

One of my favorite movie as a kid and one of my favorite movie today as well. This movie is just pure fun, it is light, funny and does not take itself too seriously. The casting is incredible, Tobey Maguire is the best spiderman to date, heOne of my favorite movie as a kid and one of my favorite movie today as well. This movie is just pure fun, it is light, funny and does not take itself too seriously. The casting is incredible, Tobey Maguire is the best spiderman to date, he gives an amazing performance and Kristen Dunst is also great as Mary Jane as well as Cliff Robertson as uncle Ben. Oh and what about J.K Simmons as J Jonah Jameson! He his so funny, a fantastic comic relief to an already fun film. Willem Dafoe as Green Goblin is just perfect, the guy was born to play that role, he has the looks and the personality. The story is simple, coherent and emotionally rich, the CG is very impressive for 2002. There is not one thing I do not like about this film, everything is just pure comic book spiderman fun.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

waronassermanMay 2, 2015

lost a bit of magic over time but still one of the greatest comic book movies of all time! and an excellent start to Spider-Man's adventures on the big screen

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

luketeddyJul 16, 2015

very good movie from marvel even if spider-man 2 is better but this one is still pretty good. marry was not as bad as people say and this is a good watch.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

CineAutoctonoJul 21, 2015

Too bad that Spider -Man is not the first Marvel film but that movie is really lovely, as he began the history of this wonderful superhero , and always leaves her web at the scene of the good deed.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

kyle20ellisMar 31, 2022

I am not into action films particularly,(I'm 17) but this was a really pleasant surprise. This is a well-designed, well-acted and well-directed film, that is close to the comics, which my younger brother used to collect. I loved the musicI am not into action films particularly,(I'm 17) but this was a really pleasant surprise. This is a well-designed, well-acted and well-directed film, that is close to the comics, which my younger brother used to collect. I loved the music score by Danny Elfman, very like Batman. The special effects were excellent, especially with the scene on the bridge, and the direction from Sam Raimi was fast-paced and secure. But for me, the acting was the best aspect of the movie. Tobey Maguire was the biggest surprise. Usually actors playing comic book heroes are bland, but Maguire was not that at all. If anything he was very charming. Kirsten Dunst portrays the thankless role of the damsel in distress, and I must say, she is very impressive. J.K Simmons gets the most laughs as Jameson, but the best actor was Willem Dafoe as Norman Osborn aka the Green Goblin. He not only looked the part of the Green Goblin, but brought some welcome gravitas to the role. The story is sweet and sometimes poignant towards the beginning, though the only real complaints I have of this movie is that the script at times is a little uneven, and the film is a bit long. All in all, a satisfying take on the comic book hero. 8/10 Bethany Cox.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

Morbid_TzAug 7, 2015

Solid adaptation of one of the greatest comic book superheroes. To see one of my favourite childhood hero being brought to life on the big screen was something very satisfying. Solid performances from lead actors, effects are maybe outdatedSolid adaptation of one of the greatest comic book superheroes. To see one of my favourite childhood hero being brought to life on the big screen was something very satisfying. Solid performances from lead actors, effects are maybe outdated today, but back then it was something big. Villain is probably the weakest point in the movie, as Spider-Man's main nemesis Green Goblin looks like a standard Power Rangers baddie.
In my personal opinion, not that great but still very entertaining blockbuster that, along with X-Men started the new wave of superhero movies.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

CDizznessApr 2, 2020

Forever and always my favorite Spider-Man film. Tobey Maguire is and always will be the Spider-Man.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

aadityamudharApr 18, 2016

The original Spider-Man in my eyes and while its probably been overshadowed now by the remake I still really enjoyed this one. A little corny perhaps but in a way that simply works thanks to the actors and characters in the film they play.The original Spider-Man in my eyes and while its probably been overshadowed now by the remake I still really enjoyed this one. A little corny perhaps but in a way that simply works thanks to the actors and characters in the film they play. Maguire plays a respectable Peter Parker and gives the character a likability that other actors would not have given. It's a great storyline also that moves well with a villain that was actually pretty creepy. Overall a solid comic book film with good sequels!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

EpicLadySpongeJan 22, 2016

Spider-Man is an enjoyable installment that seems to be getting the plots between Peter Parker just right. The first is truly the best out of the other Spider-Man installments.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

SonEdoMar 20, 2016

My first superhero movie that I ever saw in cinemas, so yes there will be some bias. Green Goblin is my favourite villain because of this, Dafoe was great in the role.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

FuturedirectorMar 18, 2016

Spiderman is one of the greatest action superhero-films ever, full of suspense, thriller, love and heart enough for makes this film one of the bests in history. Thanks to his director and main actor, Spider is one of the most importantSpiderman is one of the greatest action superhero-films ever, full of suspense, thriller, love and heart enough for makes this film one of the bests in history. Thanks to his director and main actor, Spider is one of the most important characters on the super-hero films history.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Shadow1Apr 10, 2016

This is best film of the 2002 . This movie has good story , but story in Spider-man 3 better than story in Spider-man . Im love this film because I like Spider-man and films with amazing storyline .

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

SrPepeNov 29, 2017

A pesar de la historia de orígenes de Spiderman (horrible por cierto) la película está buena y los actores son geniales. Marca una nueva era en el cine.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

FilmClubMar 27, 2016

The pic’s first, and better, half is devoted to Peter’s makeover from campus dweeb to physically unique righter-of-wrongs. While visiting a Columbia U. science lab, Peter is bitten by a mutant blue-and-red spider. Next day, his vision isThe pic’s first, and better, half is devoted to Peter’s makeover from campus dweeb to physically unique righter-of-wrongs. While visiting a Columbia U. science lab, Peter is bitten by a mutant blue-and-red spider. Next day, his vision is perfect and he’s newly buff, and it isn’t long before he discovers he’s capable of spinning industrial-strength webs and walking up buildings.

He first uses his new strength and acrobatic skills to dispatch Mary Jane’s a-hole b.f. in a school fight, then thinks to impress her by earning money in a wrestling challenge matched against a monster named Bone Saw. This entire apprenticeship section was always going to live or die on the charm and appeal of the actor playing Peter, and the initial sweet sensitivity Maguire conveys, followed by the growing thrill of self-discovery of his new superhuman abilities, proves captivating.

Peter’s strictly larky use of his powers comes to an unwelcome end when his uncle Ben (Cliff Robertson), who with wife May (Rosemary Harris) has raised the boy, is killed in a Manhattan carjacking. Donning Spider-Man gear and swinging via self-generated threads from building to building like an urban Tarzan, he dispatches the culprit while deftly eluding police seizure. Already in this early major action sequence, though, something feels a bit off; the movement seems herky-jerky, the pursuit unnecessarily hurried, so that while the sight of the young crime-buster gallivanting through the nocturnal canyons of New York City is impressive, it lacks the desired visceral thrill.

Naturally, Spider-Man requires an adversary, and he gets one in the form of the Green Goblin (Willem Dafoe), an armor-plated fiend who zips around like a rabid snowboarder on a heavily armed glider dropping pumpkin bombs on uncomprehending foes. Like Spider-Man, the Goblin has a human identity, that of Norman Osborn, an ousted corporate arms manufacturer who becomes a Jekyll-and-Hyde upon consuming an experimental formula of his own devising. Unlike Peter, Norman can’t control when he slips into his alternate self, and Dafoe’s best moments come when the two sides of his personality argue with one another and flip back and forth as quickly as a light switch.

Unfortunately, when “Spider-Man” settles into full superhero mode an hour in, the conventional contours of David Koepp’s script come fully to the fore. With the Green Goblin committing such heinous acts as blitzing a World Unity Festival in Times Square toplining Macy Gray and threatening to drop Mary Jane and a Roosevelt Island tram loaded with kids into the East River, he and Spider-Man face off in increasingly standard-issue good guy/bad guy fashion, with no bigger issues to give their rivalry special import. Further deflating the balloon is an abundance of over-cranked digital physical action that’s singularly lacking in grace or the feel of real movement, human or animal.

Welcome compensation comes in the form of Peter’s continued pursuit of Mary Jane, who remains oblivious to his dual personality for some time but eventually warms to his newfound confidence. For many teenage boys, pic’s highlight will not be found among the action interludes but rather in the scene of Mary Jane, her flimsy shirt drenched by rain, peeling back the lower part of Spider-Man’s facemask in order to kiss him while he’s hanging upside down in a dark street.

Ironically, it’s when “Spider-Man” sticks to simple human interaction that the film breathes and ingratiates itself. Chemistry between Maguire and the winning Dunst is excellent, and there are good moments, too, between Maguire and James Franco, who plays Norman’s unhappy son and Peter’s only friend at school, as well as with Robertson and Harris as Peter’s doting substitute parents. Cackling behind his armored Goblin costume, Dafoe is stuck with routine villainy when not writhing through his transformations, while standout supporting turn is served up by J.K. Simmons, who brilliantly catches his piece’s comicbook origins while snapping out funny one-liners as a cynical newspaper editor.

Physically imposing production is notable for Neil Spisak’s production design, which involves considerable invention but also allows New York City to play itself without Gotham City-like stylization. James Acheson’s costumes, beginning with the terrific ribbed Spider-Man outfit, are splendid, Danny Elfman’s score punches things up in customary form, and Don Burgess’ lensing, while accommodating the countless effects, makes the actors look great.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Aaron_WassermanMay 31, 2016

Great for the start of Spidey on the big screen, and for the true start of the superhero craze, but as time goes on its flaws become more apparent, but still after all this time Raimi's first movie is still enjoyable.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

superbatApr 24, 2020

Though I found it to be bit too silly at times (mainly the dialogue), Spider-Man is a decent movie nonetheless. Tobey Maguire does a good job as a relatable Peter Parker. Kirsten Dunst and Willem Dafoe are good in their roles as Mary Jane andThough I found it to be bit too silly at times (mainly the dialogue), Spider-Man is a decent movie nonetheless. Tobey Maguire does a good job as a relatable Peter Parker. Kirsten Dunst and Willem Dafoe are good in their roles as Mary Jane and Norman Osborn/Green Goblin.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

SilcaMay 12, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. "Com grandes poderes, vêm grandes responsabilidades."

Homem-Aranha é uma história clássica da origem de um dos maiores e mais populares heróis da atualidade. O filme conta com um elenco competente, ótimas cenas de ação e uma trilha sonora absolutamente espetacular. Seu enredo, embora simples e fácil de acompanhar, tem profundidade e desenvolve de ótima forma os conflitos do desenrolar da história. Peter Parker, um jovem inteligente de pouca popularidade, vê sua vida mudar ao receber poderes sobre-humanos e, com eles, torna-se um vigilante de Nova York. Inicialmente inspirado por ambições pessoais, o chamado Homem-Aranha vê sua perspectiva mudar diante da trágica e repentina morte de seu querido tio, morto em um assalto. Assim, o vigilante busca, agora, proteger à cidade até onde pode. Para se contrapor ao herói, surge o Duende Verde, que luta pelos interesses pessoais de seu alter-ego e cria uma rixa com o protagonista ao ser por ele contrariado, questionando se vale mesmo a pena ser um herói e até que ponto chega a admiração da população pelo cabeça de teia. Colocando à prova as virtudes e as crenças de Parker, o Duende ataca aquilo que o protagonista mais ama e funciona como excelente vilão, principalmente por sua filosofia antagônica e também pela ligação pessoal ao personagem principal, sendo pai de seu melhor amigo. No embate entre os dois, o Homem-Aranha desconstrói os argumentos de seu adversário e, num conflito final, o vê morrer num último ataque malsucedido. Apesar de tudo, Parker percebe que não pode revelar aos seus amados sua identidade para mantê-los seguros, rejeitando o amor de sua vida para tal. Ele se entrega às responsabilidades de um super-herói, com todos os seus percalços e perigos. Conclui-se, assim, um excelente filme, vítima apenas de diálogos ocasionalmente artificiais. Tanto em seu lançamento quanto hoje, Homem-Aranha é visto como um grande exemplo de seu gênero e mais tarde permitiu que sua sequência, lançada dois anos depois, se provasse um dos melhores filmes de super-herói de todos os tempos.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

MasterRileyJul 20, 2016

My first real super hero movie! As well as my favourite super hero, period. Sam Raimi did an incredible job, from the casting (Toby Maguire is perfect) to the script, music, cinematography, CGI, and action this movie rocks.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Cameronius_113Mar 21, 2017

Spider-Man was released in 2002 and was directed by Sam Raimi. The film is about a high school kid named Peter Parker whose life changes completely when he is bitten by a radioactive spider and gains superpowers, going on to develop theSpider-Man was released in 2002 and was directed by Sam Raimi. The film is about a high school kid named Peter Parker whose life changes completely when he is bitten by a radioactive spider and gains superpowers, going on to develop the alter-ego of Spider-Man.
What makes this movie stand out from other superhero movies is how much attention to human detail it is given; we're presented with relatable every-day characters which we begin to care for because of how much we identify with them and it becomes a story you can understand and doesn't seem out-of-this-world like many other superhero films. The director also understands how to balance the amount of time given to both the human side and the superhero sides of the characters.
Tobey Maguire is perfect as Spider-Man and even though I think Tom Holland will do a greatn job in the new Spider-Man: Homecoming, Tobey is the true Spider-Man in my eyes. He captures the character of Peter Parker perfectly; awkward and quirky but a character you can identify with and relate to and therefore care for. His traits combined with Maguire's performance make him a very likeable character and a great lead.
The relationship between Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten Dunst) and Peter Parker was handled in a realistic, albeit very entertaining manner and there are multiple situations that many can relate to as they can put themselves in the positions of both of those characters and feel what they are feeling which makes their relationship one that audiences can connect with.
Willem Dafoe portrays the main antagonist of Norman Osborn/the Green Goblin. I loved his performance as Oborn and he was a fascinating, complex character, however I couldn't really buy the Green Goblin too well. I understand that the film is supposed to be comical and goofy at times and for the most part that aspect is handled well but I think they might have gone just a bit too far with this villain; his motivations for acting this crazy don't really make much sense and he literally says and does every supervillain cliche in the book. His costume also looks absolutely ridiculous and it's impossible to take him seriously, however this isn't something that holds the movie down too much.
I've also got to mention how amazing J.K Simmons is as J. Jonah Jameson; all I can say is perfect casting choice.
This film is a film that certainly has dated, however it isn't necessarily a negative point. When you watch it, you can instantly tell that it's from the early 2000s, whereas watching the other two you'll have a harder time working out what time period it's from. It's mainly the style of the film which has made it dated, the biggest reason being the character of the Green Goblin for me. Like I said, this isn't necessarily a negative point but something I felt should be said.
Conversely, the style is also something which makes the movie unique as what it is and gives it the comic-book feel, but not going too over-the-top (most of the time anyway). The style adds for plenty of humour which was refreshing to see and makes the movie even more charming.
Overall, I don't really have anything else to say about this movie and I thought it was really good, with a great lead character and a director who clearly understands the material. It's a film that has certainly dated, however it isn't necessarily a bad thing.
7.8/10… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Titanic21Mar 18, 2018

The original Spider-Man movie has in my eyes what all the new Marvel and especially DC movies are lacking of nowadys: Lovable characters, reasonable depth and emotion. Sure, this one is by far not as much stuffed with action and effects asThe original Spider-Man movie has in my eyes what all the new Marvel and especially DC movies are lacking of nowadys: Lovable characters, reasonable depth and emotion. Sure, this one is by far not as much stuffed with action and effects as others, but exactly that's it what makes Spider-Man so sympathic to me. The atmosphere is pretty sad most the runtime and for the first time I could relate to the actors or at least to their roles, which are from my point of view well casted and more importantly feel with them. This movie didn't make me cry and neither laugh, but it's quite remarkable to have some calm moments in times of evil needing to be defeated. Unlike many other superficial action and especially super hero movies, this one was to stay in my memory long time after and for sure this one has one of the most important voicelines to start with. I am very pleased this movie is there and I wish for many of the upcoming Super Hero series to take Spider-Man as an example for how they should be made.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

SonicHD7May 31, 2017

"Spider-Man" centers on student Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) who, after being bitten by a genetically-altered spider, gains superhuman strength and the spider-like ability to cling to any surface. He vows to use his abilities to fight crime,"Spider-Man" centers on student Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) who, after being bitten by a genetically-altered spider, gains superhuman strength and the spider-like ability to cling to any surface. He vows to use his abilities to fight crime, coming to understand the words of his beloved Uncle Ben: "With great power comes great responsibility."… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

DK_AbleJul 9, 2017

For the first time ever Spider-Man is truly brought to life, providing movie-goers with first-person view of what it's like to websling through New York. The film played an instrumental role in building the Super Hero genre into a credibleFor the first time ever Spider-Man is truly brought to life, providing movie-goers with first-person view of what it's like to websling through New York. The film played an instrumental role in building the Super Hero genre into a credible sect of the cinematic world. With a wide range of intense, fun, and truly emotional conflicts, this film is a masterpiece, made even better by the completely flawless cast.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Dragonfly44May 5, 2018

This is without a doubt a great movie. A tad cheesy and the special effects do not hold up well in this day an age, but the plot and the love story between Mary Jane and Peter Parker make this a fantastic movie.

Rating - 78%

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

PsalmbodySep 10, 2018

Doesn't hold up but if you look at this film as a comedy it's a perfect 10/10, a quote from green goblin in the near the end was awesome. Toby Maguire as spider-man is stupid, he's not very good. This film is really cheesy. The pacing for theDoesn't hold up but if you look at this film as a comedy it's a perfect 10/10, a quote from green goblin in the near the end was awesome. Toby Maguire as spider-man is stupid, he's not very good. This film is really cheesy. The pacing for the most part is fine, there are some parts that are too fast.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

Miles_SDec 3, 2017

Most of Spider-Man is a great movie, but i take issue with the subpar performance at the core. Maguire isn't a bad actor, but he definitely wasn't the right choice for this role. Besides Maguire the cast is great, great action, great writing,Most of Spider-Man is a great movie, but i take issue with the subpar performance at the core. Maguire isn't a bad actor, but he definitely wasn't the right choice for this role. Besides Maguire the cast is great, great action, great writing, but Maguire's weak performance dominates the many positive aspects of the movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

spacebear1Jan 9, 2018

Sam Raimi's Spider-Man is one of the best superhero films ever made. I have a lot of nostalgia with the film but I'll try to put it aside for this review. I thought all of the casting decisions were perfect and Tobey Maguire owns the role ofSam Raimi's Spider-Man is one of the best superhero films ever made. I have a lot of nostalgia with the film but I'll try to put it aside for this review. I thought all of the casting decisions were perfect and Tobey Maguire owns the role of Spider-Man. The film was definitely cheesy but it was awesome because it was made to be cheesy instead of dark and brooding like superhero films later became. I also really loved Willem Dafoe as the Green Goblin. In the end, this is a fantastic first installment to an amazing film trilogy.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

LoletinAlexisJun 24, 2019

Sam Raimi's Spiderman continues to demonstrate even today that he is an example to follow.
This first installment is great and maintains a correct balance on elements such as humor and drama. What I have missed a little is more action.
AndSam Raimi's Spiderman continues to demonstrate even today that he is an example to follow.
This first installment is great and maintains a correct balance on elements such as humor and drama. What I have missed a little is more action.
And Tobey... Oh, Tobey. He was just perfect for the character.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

CTHReviewsFeb 3, 2018

This movie is in my opinion, just okay. It's good, but nowhere near as amazing as people say it is. One of my main issues is how hard it tries to be like the tone of the original comics. Sorry, this isn't a comic book. The line "We'll meetThis movie is in my opinion, just okay. It's good, but nowhere near as amazing as people say it is. One of my main issues is how hard it tries to be like the tone of the original comics. Sorry, this isn't a comic book. The line "We'll meet again, Spider-Man!!!" doesn't work in live action. Speaking of that line, what kind of script and direction was Willem Dafoe given??? I KNOW he can be amazing as the Goblin! His face is perfect for a great makeup effect to turn him into the Goblin! Even his performance as plain old Norman Osborn comes across as sophisticated and intimidating! But once he's the Green Goblin, he becomes a complete cartoon character in all of the worst ways.

It also doesn't help that Mary Jane Watson is one of my most hated characters of all time. She is so complainy, always needs rescuing (I think four or five times in this movie), and is such a complete tool.

Like I said, there are many good things in this movie. J.K. Simmons as J. Jonah Jameson is the single perfect thing in this entire trilogy. He is hilarious in every sense of the word. And Uncle Ben reminds me of an old man I knew, and was very likeable. There's enough good in this movie to recommend it, but still very overrated.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

FilipeNetoOct 7, 2019

Good, but not extraordinary.

This movie basically shows the emergence of Spiderman: the way Peter Parker, a teenager, changes his life after being bitten by a genetically modified spider. He becomes a hero, able to do justice and protect theGood, but not extraordinary.

This movie basically shows the emergence of Spiderman: the way Peter Parker, a teenager, changes his life after being bitten by a genetically modified spider. He becomes a hero, able to do justice and protect the weak. But on the other side of the barricade comes the Green Goblin, a villain that only he can stop.

I'm not a fan of comics-based movies, but I must admit that this movie has its quality. It shows a hero who, after all, is still a teenager with doubts and learning. The script seems to me well done, presenting a story reasonably capable of capturing the interest of those who do not even like this genre of movies very much.

The actors seem to me to have made a positive effort. I liked Tobey Maguire, he was quite human in a character who risked being just a red suit that jumps from building to building. Willem Dafoe was a pretty good villain, and even before turning, he knew how to give his character an amoral touch. Kirsten Dunst, an actress I don't even appreciate widely, did a job well done. James Franco didn't surprise me, but there's no room for much more than he did either. J.K. Simmons was a surprise to bring us a profoundly annoying character, but it brings great touches of humor to the movie.

Technically, the movie is not surprising, nor is it even brilliant. You bet heavily on CGI, as you'd expect, but it doesn't bring us anything that truly impresses us. Photography is regular, with many action scenes designed to capture the public but become tiring over time. The soundtrack is good, but not particularly good either.

In short, it is a summer movie, designed to attract large masses of crowds and crowded box offices, with a foreseeable sequel soon ahead. It's good, it's certainly better than other cartoon movies, but it's not extraordinary.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

DeepKamateApr 6, 2018

The first successful attempt to transfer the "Spider-Man" to the big screens. Why did the studio bosses turn to the director of "Evil Dead", I probably will never understand, but the most important thing is that everything turned out reallyThe first successful attempt to transfer the "Spider-Man" to the big screens. Why did the studio bosses turn to the director of "Evil Dead", I probably will never understand, but the most important thing is that everything turned out really good. Despite the fact that the costume of the Green Goblin looks as stupid as possible, and in the movie about "Spider-Man" there are not that many "Spider-Man", I believe that this film clearly demonstrates how to shoot superhero movies ... Why you couldnt do the same, Marvel?!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

4zaAug 2, 2018

The beginning of Sam Raimi's amazing trilogy and a pioneer in the modern superhero movie. While some of the movie may come off as dated now, the movie still holds up and is a near masterpiece.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Max_SpideyApr 25, 2018

[PT-BR] Homem Aranha de 2002 é o segundo melhor filme do Aranha,perdendo apenas para a sua sequência de 2004,o filme é ótimo,nele Tobey Maguire interpreta o Homem Aranha,e caiu muito bem.
Homem Aranha é um filme de origem,e construiu a origem[PT-BR] Homem Aranha de 2002 é o segundo melhor filme do Aranha,perdendo apenas para a sua sequência de 2004,o filme é ótimo,nele Tobey Maguire interpreta o Homem Aranha,e caiu muito bem.
Homem Aranha é um filme de origem,e construiu a origem do personagem com o cuidado que ela merece,muito fiel às HQs.
O antagonista é o Duende Verde,que só pecaram no visual,que ficou meio futurista,mas a insanidade do vilão ficou perfeita.
O par romântico de Peter Parker é a Mary Jane,que não convenceu tanto.
Filme excelente.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

LivingTribunalApr 27, 2018

This film and X-Men in 2000 started the new wave of film age. I cannot say that you'll be satisfied after watching this, but this is a memorable film in comic book film history. If you focus on the story and the main character's emotions,This film and X-Men in 2000 started the new wave of film age. I cannot say that you'll be satisfied after watching this, but this is a memorable film in comic book film history. If you focus on the story and the main character's emotions, you'll have a good time watching it, but if you focus on action and villain, it will be boring to you.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

NolanLundgaardJun 26, 2018

While I liked Spider-Man, I cannot day that I was completely impressed with the film. It had an okay plot, with a good villain (which is always appreciated in these types of movies), and enough great scenes in the film (both action andWhile I liked Spider-Man, I cannot day that I was completely impressed with the film. It had an okay plot, with a good villain (which is always appreciated in these types of movies), and enough great scenes in the film (both action and emotional scenes) for me to give it a seven out of ten. By no means is this the best movie I have seen from Marvel, since it’s sometimes predictable and the special effects look unrealistic, with bad CGI. Spider-Man was enjoyable, but not my favorite.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

GrantD243Apr 25, 2018

I wasn't a huge fan of Spider-Man when it first came out. And while I do feel like I appreciate what it did for the genre more now, I still can't say that I love it. There's just a little too much cheese, and I don't like how he's supposed toI wasn't a huge fan of Spider-Man when it first came out. And while I do feel like I appreciate what it did for the genre more now, I still can't say that I love it. There's just a little too much cheese, and I don't like how he's supposed to be of high school age but he nor any of his friends really look high school age. I will say that William Dafoe is perfect as the Green Goblin in this film. I also think a lot of the CGI in this movie was pretty dang good for early the 2000s. But overall, this movie ranks towards the bottom of the superhero movies I have in my collection.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

EgeBerkJul 18, 2019

The most beautiful film in the Spiderman series maybe because it's the first time I love it so much or because I watched it as a kid but I think this is the most successful film.
Although it was shot in 2002, it was both emotional and funnyThe most beautiful film in the Spiderman series maybe because it's the first time I love it so much or because I watched it as a kid but I think this is the most successful film.
Although it was shot in 2002, it was both emotional and funny and immersive
of course the effects were bad because it was shot in 2002, but it doesn't matter if there is a good scenario,also acting very good quality and Toby is best Spiderman… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

TheTalkSep 23, 2018

A timely classic that has definitely made my teen years, but furthermore, the childhood of plenty more people. Comic books have always been popular, in most cases, but not just everywhere and when you didn't have that culture (even if comicA timely classic that has definitely made my teen years, but furthermore, the childhood of plenty more people. Comic books have always been popular, in most cases, but not just everywhere and when you didn't have that culture (even if comic books were around), you'd get into characters like these by television shows and movies. I definitely love the adaptation and the corniness definitely makes a 2000's film, but unfortunately, it has not aged that well. Truly, if you are a Spider-Man, you MUST watch this film but overall, it's a film whose acting can be somewhat flawed and almost hilarious to watch when it comes to seeing Tobey's weird face expressions. Not to talk about the special effects and CGI; it's so blatantly poor that it ruins plenty of scenes. When it comes to the story; nothing to say. Definitely a classic that is capable of conveying emotions that can hardly be felt in modern films nowadays.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

GarethBNov 10, 2018

A good intro into spiderman with decent action and characters. These movies really work better with fewer characters in them.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

DerekReideApr 7, 2019

So a lot of people are going to disagree with me here, but this is what I have to say. Ugh.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

Timothy25Oct 22, 2019

Although the plethora of superhero films in recent years have diluted the appeal of the genre, Spider- Man was released during the infancy of the process and as such is a good film that considers plot and characters as much as the specialAlthough the plethora of superhero films in recent years have diluted the appeal of the genre, Spider- Man was released during the infancy of the process and as such is a good film that considers plot and characters as much as the special effects. The first hour of Spider-Man is unquestionably better than the second. This is the segment of the film where Peter discovers his newfound powers and tentatively explores them. Covertly, then with more confidence, he stands up to the school bully. He also has to deal with his unrequited love for Mary Jane and cope with the responsibilities and consequences of using (or not using) his abilities. An exhilarating sequence in which Spider-Man first employs his webs to swing from building-to-building is filmed in such a manner that we can sense how close he is to losing control and plunging to the streets below. All in all, this is a good superhero origin movie. (The origins of Spiderman).… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

BrunoVn00Mar 31, 2019

This is one of the best super hero movies ever made. Granted, it's not high art and not as good as its sequel, but for a superhero movie and one of the first to truly define the genre, it's fun and really entertaining. It has good andThis is one of the best super hero movies ever made. Granted, it's not high art and not as good as its sequel, but for a superhero movie and one of the first to truly define the genre, it's fun and really entertaining. It has good and memorable action scenes and yes it's a cheesy and silly movie, with over-the-top acting, cartoon characters and cheesy dialogue but that's what makes this movie so special, that it doesn't take itself too seriously and is still so much fun. It's a good summer movie overall.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

zNeverSleepingApr 5, 2020

Nostalgia define essa obra. Sinto saudade das OST's de identidade, as aberturas com os créditos e até mesmo do Tobey como Spider-Man.

Uma das características que mais gosto nesse filme é a dualidade de camadas, que geralmente está maisNostalgia define essa obra. Sinto saudade das OST's de identidade, as aberturas com os créditos e até mesmo do Tobey como Spider-Man.

Uma das características que mais gosto nesse filme é a dualidade de camadas, que geralmente está mais presente em animações. Aqui temos aspectos mais óbvios e aqueles que só uma pessoa mais atenta e madura perceberá. Isso fica ainda mais perceptível no segundo filme, que é livre para todas as idades e ainda sim é pesadíssimo. Fico imaginando quão mais relevante esse filme seria se fosse abordado hoje em dia, de maneira mais seria, como a trilogia do Nolan. A perda do seu Tio por conta de uma atitude vingativa, a relação do Harry com seu pai, o bullying estereotipado que assim foi enxergado por muito tempo, até mesmo a relação com Mary Jane e o poder de escolha da mesma, fora a mídia massacrando o Herói apenas para lucrar mais.

A OST do filme é lendária, só de escutar já emociona. Isso é talvez o melhor exemplo de uma musica de Herói. A fotografia funciona muito bem nas cenas onde o mesmo voa, e as cenas de luta são bem estruturadas. Os momentos de alivio cômico são memoráveis e te fazem gargalhar.

Quanto aos personagens, devemos lembrar que o foco aqui é o publico jovem, dai seria errado pedir demais profundidade, mas mesmo assim há uma presença aqui. Peter é um personagem muito fácil de simpatizar, visto que ele é humanizado a todo momento, tomando decisões que provavelmente tomaríamos, decisões essas que corroboram para problemas que o mesmo terá de enfrentar no futuro. Harry tem um relacionamento conturbado com o pai. Ele tem uma certa admiração, porém sente-se a sombra dele e tem a responsabilidade de seguir os mesmos passos. Já não bastasse isso, sente ciumes da relação dele com seu melhor amigo, que o mesmo deixa claro que admira. Já sobre o pai, temos uma arrogância natural por parte de um estudo cientifico, como também temos um desespero por haver um risco de perder a verba do seu projeto e ver a sua empresa a beira da falência. Atitudes devem ser tomadas, mas é sabido que a ciência não é amante do tempo - Willem Dafoe estava excelente no papel. Rosemary Harris consegue ser suave, mostrar sua fragilidade devido a sua idade, e atua muito bem nos momentos onde o drama é exigido. E por ultimo, e não menos importante, J. K. Simmons é lendário e seu papel já faz parte da historia do cinema como um dos mais cômicos e marcantes.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Ahmedrizwan11Aug 16, 2019

It was an entertaining movie , however not a very well made movie. The movie was rushed. it was a good spider man movie but not a great movie

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

MaxShibeSep 14, 2019

By far one of the best superhero movies ever made. Spider-Man 1 does have some dated effects..But what movie from that Time period doesn't? Spider-Man 1 is definitely a masterpiece and a Classic.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Dungeon00XNov 23, 2019

So this movie is still pretty good, all things considered. I still think it has some great cinematography, and great performances from all the actors. It probably hasn't aged well, but we still got some amazing Macho Man Randy Savage moments.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

ShawnSmithNov 6, 2019

So many Spiderman movies out there but this will always be the original. Though the other ones have better CGI and maybe action sequences, none can match the plot this one has.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

RobertJohnsonDec 23, 2019

Truly one of the most successful superheroes ever made! Will always love it as one of the classics.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

MichaelWillDec 23, 2019

Was, still is, and will forever be one of my favorite childhood superhero movies!

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

AGuyFromGothamOct 19, 2019

Great Origin For Spider-Man.
This movie is great comic book movie.
Storyline is good.Acting is good.I liked this movie.This Trilogy are only Marvel movies I loved.This is my childhood

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

ThomasMooreDec 30, 2019

I MISS THIS SPIDER-MAN. This film is one of the reasons why 2002 was a great time to be alive!

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

ChristopherAndeJan 3, 2020

Tobey Maguire was made for this role. Gonna be hard for me to shake the image of Spider-Man when I see him on other films from now on.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

MatthewJacksonJan 5, 2020

Sam Raimi is the true mvp on this one. He paid so much attention to even the little details on this move and because of that, we are all richly rewarded.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

JeffreyYoungJan 2, 2020

It's not a surprise that this is considered one of the most successful superhero movies ever made.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

JacobKing1Jan 2, 2020

It's amazing how they were able to balance action and human element in this movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

Spider-Man

User Reviews