Read User Reviews and Submit your own for SPECTRE

6

AlanoSilvaPBFeb 24, 2023

Mais do mesmo, na minha opinião o melhor é o primeiro filme, o do Cassino. O roteiro não tem muita criatividade e parece que sempre é o mesmo filme, sem falar que é cheio de conveniências!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

liamexeDec 21, 2022

The real irony is that Bond has thrived for 53 years on a tried-and-true formula, only making adjustments when needed. He is at a worrying crossroads where, if confident stability is not established, his fictional descendants (Mission:The real irony is that Bond has thrived for 53 years on a tried-and-true formula, only making adjustments when needed. He is at a worrying crossroads where, if confident stability is not established, his fictional descendants (Mission: Impossible, espionage parodies like Kingsmen and The Man from U.N.C.L.E., and even superhero movies themselves) threaten to nudge him into irrelevance and antiquity. The abundance of incredible entertainment in Spectre's first half further supports Daniel Craig's argument that, yes, the world does unquestionably still need James Bond to return, which he has spent the last four films reiterating. It's time he began to think so for himself. And if another facelift is necessary to see that come to pass,… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

stevekmNov 18, 2022

With Daniel Craig as Bond, the movies tend to jump around the world from here to there as Bond chases one lead to another. It's almost like a bunch of half hour TV shows stitched together. But there is an underlying story and it allows forWith Daniel Craig as Bond, the movies tend to jump around the world from here to there as Bond chases one lead to another. It's almost like a bunch of half hour TV shows stitched together. But there is an underlying story and it allows for a lot of action to take place in every locale. One theme through the Daniel Craig movies is the "fire Bond from MI6," which is getting old after 4 movies.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Onlyclassicvg1Sep 10, 2022

A cryptic message from Bond's past sends him on a trail to uncover a sinister organization. While M battles political forces to keep the secret service alive, Bond peels back the layers of deceit to reveal the terrible truth behind SPECTRE.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

elviejoyorsJun 23, 2022

Watch this one before No Time to Die since it's the "prequel" to it.

Looks and feels like 007. Great Bond girls and 007 is witty, smart, and cool as ever.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

GDsReviewsJun 7, 2022

This movie doesn't stand well on its own as it requires seeing Casino Royale, Quantum of Solace, and Skyfall beforehand to fully grasp its story. If you have seen all three of those beforehand, it actually becomes quite powerful and good to watch.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

geo333May 11, 2022

I actually think this film is the second-best film of the Daniel Craig 007 films, as it has a great supporting cast and great movie quotes overall great film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ChanekeCholoDec 13, 2021

I watched it this morning and I remember a little the history and is well, but for two hours and twenty eight minutes is very ambiguous, at the end gets boring and forgettable. The action scenes are great but not like in the past film. TheI watched it this morning and I remember a little the history and is well, but for two hours and twenty eight minutes is very ambiguous, at the end gets boring and forgettable. The action scenes are great but not like in the past film. The performances are well but the development of the characters are missing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JP32Dec 7, 2021

As an uber-sleek and spit-polished take on the 007 formula, it reminded me a lot of the newest Mission Impossible movies, which sacrificed unique auteuristic spins for premium-grade stunt shows.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

arostislavnaOct 2, 2021

Truthfully, I enjoyed the nods back to previous films, it is by no means amazing... but it is inspired by the NWO (SPECTRE) & domestic spying that is rampant with the Five Eyes (called Nine Eyes in Bondverse), NSA, Pegasus, Shadowdragon,Truthfully, I enjoyed the nods back to previous films, it is by no means amazing... but it is inspired by the NWO (SPECTRE) & domestic spying that is rampant with the Five Eyes (called Nine Eyes in Bondverse), NSA, Pegasus, Shadowdragon, etc.

Far better than Judi Dench's M in Skyfall acting out a script that makes her obsolete and incompetent at her job.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

AJ_13Nov 5, 2021

A good Bond movie. Craig is as great as always, and you can't ask more to Seydoux and Waltz performance-wise. Score and cinematography also stand out.

Nonetheless the script has more flaws. Some pacing issues, some annoying "deusA good Bond movie. Craig is as great as always, and you can't ask more to Seydoux and Waltz performance-wise. Score and cinematography also stand out.

Nonetheless the script has more flaws. Some pacing issues, some annoying "deus ex-machina", and some clumsily ended plots. It also has strong moments though (beginning, action scenes) .… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

HeroicAge616Oct 26, 2021

SPECTRE feels lifeless and stale, trying to hard to seem like a smart film, but leaves audiences checking their watch more than Bond.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

VidyaBumOct 21, 2021

Out of 25 Bond movies, I'd place Spectre at 18/25.

I watched it not 4 days ago. I can't remember a thing about it. The photography was very yellow for some reason. The story almost started being ok at some point, and then it turned to crapOut of 25 Bond movies, I'd place Spectre at 18/25.

I watched it not 4 days ago. I can't remember a thing about it.
The photography was very yellow for some reason.

The story almost started being ok at some point, and then it turned to crap the very instant I thought the movie started showing competence.

I do remember that I thought at some point "somehow it's started being just as silly as Roger Moore era Bond now".
The action took too long and a lot of characterisation wasn't properly done.

Honestly, even after rewatching bits of it, I can't even appreciate, or remember appreciating, anything about Spectre.

The only positive and reason it's so high in my list is that Sam Mendes is a good director, Craig and Seydoux play well, actually every actor does his job well. But it's so uninteresting. No lines, no scenes, no plot points, nothing reall marks. It's competent work spent on a completely forgettable and uninteresting movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ItsmayaOct 7, 2021

I enjoyed this film, I will repeat what I said in my Skyfall review because I think it's necessary, just ignore the first two films in the Daniel Craig saga!
Léa Seydoux and Daniel Craig are wonderful in this film, the story was great, andI enjoyed this film, I will repeat what I said in my Skyfall review because I think it's necessary, just ignore the first two films in the Daniel Craig saga!
Léa Seydoux and Daniel Craig are wonderful in this film, the story was great, and the villain was also good (not remotely as the villain in Skyfall tho).
To sum up, if you like bond films, you will probably enjoy this one as well.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

gracjanskiOct 2, 2021

I enjoyed this movie a lot. Indeed this is the best Bond I saw in my marathon with all 007 movies. Visually the pictures are perfect, especially in the first half of the movie. Almost every character here is interesting, especially Q improvedI enjoyed this movie a lot. Indeed this is the best Bond I saw in my marathon with all 007 movies. Visually the pictures are perfect, especially in the first half of the movie. Almost every character here is interesting, especially Q improved a lot since the last movie. Ralph Fiennes as M has more scenes and he is much better than the ice cold and ugly Judi Dench. Christoph Waltz as Blofeld is a perfect cast, I still remember him as Col. Hans Lada in Inglourious Basterds. Daniel Craig is perfect as usual. Only the character Madeleine Swann is annoying in the beginning, but gets better. The story is a good one, I like the political statement here much better than in Skyfall.
The action scenes are perfect, because they are much more realistic than in many other Bond movies. Also the hand fights are great, compare them with the Bond movies from the 60s and 70s...
The biggest surprise is the humour. I never laughed in the all the Bond movies, sometimes the humour was even bad. But here, every joke is on point.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SoapNuggetJul 25, 2021

Eh, Spectre is fine. It's not the worst Craig Bond film, that is 100% Quantum of Solace, but Spectre is disappointing after Skyfall, still worth a watch

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SQRLYJul 25, 2021

The Bond franchise has seemed to settle into a good/mediocre movie pattern. After following the almost perfect Skyfall, this outing is rather bland and dull. The characters are hollow and leave us wondering what could have been.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

MrPajamasFeb 24, 2021

After the amazing Skyfall, there was another fall called Specter. The locations were great, but they didn't have a Skyfall, and especially the overall story faltered quite a bit. Although the action scenes were great, there weren't many ofAfter the amazing Skyfall, there was another fall called Specter. The locations were great, but they didn't have a Skyfall, and especially the overall story faltered quite a bit. Although the action scenes were great, there weren't many of them, but the music was great. Overall, I would say it's a good movie that I can recommend.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

mikesgold2KMar 4, 2021

Mocny zjazd po świetnym Skyfall. Kolejna zła organizacja stojącą za wszystkim, przerysowany ten zły i jego dziwne połączenie z Bondem. Szkoda, bo był potencjał

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

511andahalfFeb 7, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Just a decent movie that has a lot of flaws. The film connects the last 3 Craig movies together when it had absolutely no reason to do so; CR, QOS, and SF all worked perfectly fine on their own. The whole topic of Blofeld being Bond's long lost brother is also very unnecessary and feels shoehorned in. Madeline, the Bond girl, is also one of the weaker Bond girls, she has 0 chemistry with Bond.

The film is partially saved thanks to some pretty good cinematography and a few good action scenes, like the helicopter fight and train fight. But overall, Spectre had a lot of potential to be really good and just fails to live up to its hype.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

noname2Jan 9, 2021

Spectre (2015) is a modern, stylish, entertaining 007 film.
Craig's 3rd best entry. Should be considered as a borderline entry to franchise top 10 list.
Co-starring Christoph Waltz as a new take on the old reliable villain Blofeld, grossed aSpectre (2015) is a modern, stylish, entertaining 007 film.
Craig's 3rd best entry. Should be considered as a borderline entry to franchise top 10 list.
Co-starring Christoph Waltz as a new take on the old reliable villain Blofeld, grossed a whopping $879.6M worldwide - the second-biggest take for the franchise.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

Linuski92Nov 19, 2020

Spectre has got to be one of most underwritten movies ever, it has great actors in it, but none of them are given anything to do. It's boring, long (2 hrs 27 min.) and has the worst set of villains in bond history. People really outta stopSpectre has got to be one of most underwritten movies ever, it has great actors in it, but none of them are given anything to do. It's boring, long (2 hrs 27 min.) and has the worst set of villains in bond history. People really outta stop defending this movie.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

3

lofu_agfyNov 11, 2020

This is the worst Bond movie ever, filled with emotionless characters that I couldn't care less about. The pace of this film after a predictably exciting start is slow and boring. Unlike his fellow actors, Ben Whishaw as Q manages to portrayThis is the worst Bond movie ever, filled with emotionless characters that I couldn't care less about. The pace of this film after a predictably exciting start is slow and boring. Unlike his fellow actors, Ben Whishaw as Q manages to portray the only believable human in this whole fake production. Why couldn't JB have been given a touch of Q's wit, humour or vulnerability? No wonder Daniel Craig wants out of this franchise - it's beneath his talent. Such a cacophony of totally forgettable dialogue, people and silly stunts is hard to imagine in a single movie and yet here it is. During one of the 'action' fights when James was being hammered by the evil assassin I noticed the person next to me had fallen asleep and was snoring. That person was an exceedingly eloquent critic.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

Jake869Sep 15, 2020

Unpopular opinion but I prefer this over skyfall.
While skyfall was amazing from a directorial standpoint it just felt bland and had no energy whereas here I felt like Craig was bond once again and was having fun in the role and eprovedUnpopular opinion but I prefer this over skyfall.
While skyfall was amazing from a directorial standpoint it just felt bland and had no energy whereas here I felt like Craig was bond once again and was having fun in the role and eproved himself again to be the awesome spy we grown to love this decade.
The cinematography is beautiful and the soundtrack was stellar ,not to mention some of the best action set pieces & sequences I've seen in a while especially the opening however it could have benefited from being at least twenty minutes shorter ,two hours and thirty minutes is a lot to ask for today's generation to sit through Definitely the second best bond in the Craig trilogy in my opinion.
P.S writings on the wall was a masterpiece and smith deserved all the recognition.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

4

ValBalSep 1, 2020

Action was ok, I definitely like the darker tone and the music but I just couldn't bare seeing moronic things that J. Bond does. That's not reckless, that's just dumb. Antagonist is cringe worthy. He's just basically a villain who doesAction was ok, I definitely like the darker tone and the music but I just couldn't bare seeing moronic things that J. Bond does. That's not reckless, that's just dumb. Antagonist is cringe worthy. He's just basically a villain who does whatever a villain does, no reason. Lastly, Bond's change of heart at the end of the movie felt forced. Skyfall remains the best film of Craig's era.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

Gamepro3093Aug 19, 2020

This is a huge step backward for the Craig era. It’s still gritty and hard edged like his other efforts but is marred by tossing in the cheeseball stuff from the old series like pointless monologues, unrealistic stunts and your typical trainThis is a huge step backward for the Craig era. It’s still gritty and hard edged like his other efforts but is marred by tossing in the cheeseball stuff from the old series like pointless monologues, unrealistic stunts and your typical train scene a la The Spy Who Loved Me and From Russia With Love only somehow more dull and pointless. This stuff doesn’t mesh well with what was once a gritty and more hard edged reboot with less focus on fantasy and more on realism. They even toss in Blofeld with a plot twist visible from a mile away with an even dumber one straight out of Austin Powers. Don’t know how they’re going to fix this mess with No Time To Die but based on it’s trailers it already looks much better than this slog. I’d suggest only watching this to be on board with No Time To Die. Otherwise you’re better off watching the other Daniel Craig Bond movies or the ones from the old Bond series.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

DanielNS87May 11, 2020

This movie contain the structure classic of James Bond Films, action, intrigue and sexy womans, Sya Is beatiful! All actors has a decent performance, and a good direction of Sam, Is a decent film.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

beezballNov 7, 2015

I have way too much to say, so just ignore the critics, I don't often say they are wrong, but in this case they certainly are. Enjoy yourself, and don't be a Debbie Downer!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

MaxMyDogJun 11, 2019

My problems with this film relate to where the series has gone. connecting the previous films together. the story behind blofeld. love interests. that being said it is one of the best looking bond films made. right up there with skyfall.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

amheretojudgeJan 16, 2018

Mendes is a fanatic for arthouse system, a love letter he writes to Fleming, I wonder who will do the same to him.

Spectre Mendes is a local seller. This time, breathing pure England-ness and all the patriotism towards it, the director, SamMendes is a fanatic for arthouse system, a love letter he writes to Fleming, I wonder who will do the same to him.

Spectre

Mendes is a local seller. This time, breathing pure England-ness and all the patriotism towards it, the director, Sam Mendes is going global with household methods. And to me, it is an ode to this franchise. Never has been a film so formal and personal altogether, like this. Many have come and gone, including his own version in the previous round, but no one was this professional. They have been claiming James Bond's excellence and superiority in his work shamelessly, and never had even cared to prove it. But with a clean polished job comes Mendes, with a neatly poised futuristic world i.e. the present one in which we are living. His huge set pieces gives away the clues. Armed with a huge production budget, Mendes colors the film with ravishing locations and Ridley Scott's Blade Runner-isc captivating tone.

Calculative steps and a simple pragmatic way out, from those steps, Daniel Craig is carrying a much heavy weight on his shoulder. Reinventing the character after a complete arc, he is given everything gift wrapped and untouched. And his version of sober Bond leaves a safe air in the room that is soothingly quiet and cathartic. Christoph Waltz, a mere pawn of the game, no matter how much he brags himself to be the puppeteer, he always stays a puppet.

Despite of a brief appearance, Monica Bellucci casts an unbreakable spell on us from which even the lead, Lea Seydoux couldn't free us. Personally, I feel for Ralph Fiennes, hiding someone else's mistakes and correcting his own, to bring down an evil empire Spectre, his job is to justify all the chapters of the franchise keeping in contrast to the materialistic world, this current generation is drawn to, "A license to kill is also not a license to kill." he concludes.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

TyranianApr 11, 2019

Another decent entry in the never ending franchise, Spectre has good action though its story has issues.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

OnaskDec 27, 2018

La última película hasta la fecha del Bond de Craig me deja un sabor agridulce.

Spectre coge partes de Skyfall y desgraciadamente también otras de Quantum of Solace. Su primera mitad es muy buena, pero conforme se acerca el final empieza aLa última película hasta la fecha del Bond de Craig me deja un sabor agridulce.

Spectre coge partes de Skyfall y desgraciadamente también otras de Quantum of Solace. Su primera mitad es muy buena, pero conforme se acerca el final empieza a desmoronarse y pierde bastante esencia de todo lo que ha construido durante la primera hora de metraje: he sentido que veía algun film de acción genérico y no a James Bond. De nuevo, interpretaciones brutales de Craig, Seydoux y Fiennes, así como del nuevo villano, Cristoph Waltz. El personaje femenino característico de la cinta me ha sabido a muy poco, mal construido y mal llevado durante toda la película, aunque la actriz cumple con su papel. La acción de nuevo muy bien dirigida: desde una elegante persecución por las calles de Roma en coches de alta gama hasta feroces tiroteos en alta montaña. En cuanto a la trama, me parece que han tirado de manera un poco descarada de las películas previas. En este aspecto no me ha agradado mucho: no he sentido al villano como un verdadero peligro en ningún momento y parece ser que tiene los mismos delirios de grandeza que Silva (Skyfall). Es una película sólida y entretenida, pero dado el gigantesco presupuesto, la posible extensa toma de referencias de Mendes en la saga (cuarta película y parece que siempre toca una buena y una "mala", alternando) y lo bien que se adapta Craig al papel del agente 007, creo que podrían haber exprimido esta última entrega mucho más. En cualquier caso, recomendada. Espero con ansias Bond 25.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DominArsenDec 9, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. James Bond Spectre

Surement l'épisode ou Daniel Craig rendra son costume...
Un film à la belle allure sortit à un moment mouvementé pour la France. À été acclamé pas forcement en bien.
!SPOILER!
On commence par une scène d'introduction qui se passe quasiment sans changement de caméra, ça rend le film fluide, j'ai trouvé cela sublime d'autant que la fête (Squellete) fait office de compteur ... On a une autre scène avec des jeux d'ombre géniale et pour un film avec un beau casting; dans cette scène se trouvent très peu de paroles. De plus j'adore Christophe Waltz (le dentiste dans Django) qui endosse le costume du méchant...

La scène du train a été ressentie comme une cassure pour moi, il se casse mutuellement... c'est assez étrange dans un James Bond.

Une fin qui m'attriste un peut, car le méchant qui dit que "c'est à cause de lui toutes les difficultés de BOND" .... Personnellement le méchant on en parle que dans spectre. Pour dire rapidement tout s'effondre à partir de cette citation ce qui est vraiment dommage.

Après il été difficile de faire mieux que l'excellence qu'a été SKYFALL !!! ADÈLE MUSIQUE… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ErikTheCriticSep 26, 2018

It's not a bad movie, it's just not as good as I wanted it to be. The action and cinematography are masterful, however the film can be tiresome from time to time.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

FilipeNetoSep 6, 2018

Since always the 007 franchise has a special place in my personal cinematheque. I have all the movies and I really enjoy watching them. And although the majority are very good, of course, not all have been good. Some were realSince always the 007 franchise has a special place in my personal cinematheque. I have all the movies and I really enjoy watching them. And although the majority are very good, of course, not all have been good. Some were real disappointments, however much the unconditional fans find it difficult to admit. For me, there is a difference between being a fan and being a blind. I loved to watch "Skyfall", I really enjoyed the honors that are made there to several others past movies (it was released during the celebration of the franchise's fifty years, and it made sense to pay these homage). Another point I loved about "Skyfall" was the way it made connections to previous films, creating a thread through these films since "Casino Royale", and I was excited to see how this was going to continue. And, unlike a lot of people, I've never put any objections to the way Daniel Craig plays Bond nor do I get homesick thinking the previous actors were better than him. Every actor who wore the 007 suit had his time and his personal way of being Bond, and that diversity helps franchise to become richer and appealing. It's my opinion on that. So, as you might imagine, I was really excited about "Specter". Of course, the title showed me one thing: Bloofeld was going to come back one way or another. And so it was.

As always, Craig was well on the main character. Charismatic and seductive without losing the rough and dangerous look, he never lets us forget that he is a man on a mission. Christoph Waltz was compelling and Machiavellian and rose to the challenge of embodying one of the most iconic Bond villains. Ralph Fiennes, Ben Whishaw, Andrew Scott and Naomie Harris were impeccable in supporting roles. On the other hand, Lea Seydoux is far from being a memorable bond-girl with an uninspired performance, while veteran Monica Bellucci, despite her age, is much more sexy and could have been more interesting if she had a more active and important character. Sam Mendes is an excellent director, with good ideas, good casting skills and what appears to be a long-term plan for future films. However, the excessive length of the film, with a very slow pace sometimes and an ending that is, at least, disillusioning, showed me that this director has some difficulty in post-production work. For example, the pre-opening sequence in Mexico was more worthy of being a movie ending than what I saw in the end. Attempts to make humor or even some romance were also a resounding failure and suspense, that should be growing throughout the film, seem more to come in waves, growing and collapsing to re-grow in the next action sequence. Speaking of action, there's plenty to suit everyone, from car or train chases to truly unbelievable fights. All very well done but sometimes overdone and unbelievable. Soundtrack is unremarkable and Sam Smith's theme-song is boring, effeminate and far from the quality of its immediate predecessor (Adele's "Skyfall"), to give just one example.

Thus, "Specter" proved to be a good addition to the franchise and a very positive continuation although, of course, not as good as the film that preceded it. Let's see what will come next.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

LoletinAlexisJun 27, 2018

Spectre is a blurred version of Skyfall, which although entertains and the action scenes are cool, the story is not interesting, the villain is horrible and the film has plenty of footage.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

JamesIrish68Nov 17, 2015

Daniel Craig is for me one of the best Bonds we've had. Its a shame this is is last. He has tremendous screen presence and makes somehow believable what is fantastical in the Bond world

It's the usual Bond formula. Aston Martins and styleDaniel Craig is for me one of the best Bonds we've had. Its a shame this is is last. He has tremendous screen presence and makes somehow believable what is fantastical in the Bond world

It's the usual Bond formula. Aston Martins and style every man wishes he could have. Multiple locations, one desert and hot, one cold and Alpine, Rome ( where else..perfect) ,of course London and a great single shot opening sequence from Mexico city during the day of the dead festival. 2 1/2 hours flew by.

I've heard some complaints about the new French Bond girl not being beautiful enough. I disagree and Monica Bellucci is stunning. Hard to believe she is 51.

Slight grumble about Andrew Scott who plays Moriarty so well in Sherlock. They could have done a better job with him.

All in All ..loved it..… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

7

merijnjFeb 21, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. (74/100)
The plot was rather simple and almost all of the CGI looked bad. But it still is another good instalment in the bond franchise and isn't terrible. Spectre deals with James's past in a good way and doesn't take away the focus of the plot like Quantum of Solace did. The look into his past was also suitable seen as Blofeld is his step-brother.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Voodoo123Nov 9, 2015

A fun if tired entry that in the Daniel Craig films. I enjoyed watching this movie. I just wish they hadn't tried so hard with the fan service that crops up later on though. Didnt like the effort made to tie everything together from the craigA fun if tired entry that in the Daniel Craig films. I enjoyed watching this movie. I just wish they hadn't tried so hard with the fan service that crops up later on though. Didnt like the effort made to tie everything together from the craig plotlines here... felt like that decision was detrimental to the quality of its own self contained story.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

WalterKovacsDec 26, 2017

If you are a fan of the old films then this is an exciting film, but most will find the film corny with over-the-top action sequences. Enjoyable for fans of the genre.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

JyroJyroJul 24, 2017

Unfortunately, we've seen this sort of film a thousand times before. Forgettable characters, unbelievable stunts and a poor attempt of 'connecting the dots'. It's a shame because Daniel Craig shines as effortlessly in this as he did in theUnfortunately, we've seen this sort of film a thousand times before. Forgettable characters, unbelievable stunts and a poor attempt of 'connecting the dots'. It's a shame because Daniel Craig shines as effortlessly in this as he did in the previous three films (he really has set a new mantle for Bond actors). Just as well the storyline isn't quite as hopeless as Quantum of Solace...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

DomgwyDec 20, 2017

I have been trying to collect my thoughts on the latest entry to the Bond franchise for the best part of a day now….here goes nothing.

After three films of origin stories and departures from the Bond formula, the end of Skyfall finally sawI have been trying to collect my thoughts on the latest entry to the Bond franchise for the best part of a day now….here goes nothing.

After three films of origin stories and departures from the Bond formula, the end of Skyfall finally saw all the pieces in place for a return to the classic Connery-era Bond.

In many respects Spectre delivers on this promise. Ben Whishaw’s Q, Naomie Harris’ Moneypenny and a scene steeling Ralph Fiennes as the new M provide great energetic back up to Daniel Craig’s Bond as he embarks on his latest globe trotting mission.

I have always been a fan of Craig’s portrayal of the character, but in Spectre the actor has reached a new level. Here Bond is cocky, deadly and cold while simultaneously remaining witty, charming and at times even playful. However the film’s plot also allows Craig to display those rare moments of vulnerability as his past comes back to haunt him in the form of the shady organisation of the title.

Unfortunately it is also the plot that lets the film down. As is often the case with franchise films the end result is only as strong as the lead villain and their scheme. Although two time oscar winner Christoph Waltz delivers a subtly sadistic performance the writers have let him down in a major way.

The role of SPECTRE and Waltz’s Oberhauser in the film is often reduced to a MacGuffin, only there to give Bond motivation to move from one scene to the next. We spend the majority of the film waiting for Oberhauser to step out from the shadows and explain his organisations’ goals and motivations. When he is finally revealed however no such explanation is given. From the context of the secondary plot and a standout scene where the members of SPECTRE meet in Rome, the audience is left to piece together their scheme without being spoon fed via exposition.

For this reason above all Spectre is a film that demands repeat viewing. I feel like during my first watch, any time the plot was unclear or I missed a key line, it was ok because Waltz would inevitably spell it all out for me. The fact that this never happened is really to be comended. I feel that modern audiences (myself very much included) have now come to expect this overt kind of expository dialogue, so much so that when it is missing films feel incomplete and disjointed. However commendable though, this is still a major flaw that leads the last third of the film feeling decidedly anti-climatic.

Despite these plot concerns (and a somewhat misjudged and underdeveloped attempt to tie in Craig’s previous Bond films) Spectre certainly doesn’t disappoint when it comes to action set pieces and sharp dialogue.

With standout performances and some great action, if this is indeed to be Craig’s final outing it certainly gives the audience the Bond film they have been asking for ever since Casino Royale. Whether this is the Bond film we deserve however, is another matter entirely.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

EverfieldsDec 20, 2017

Much like Daniel Craig's previous appearances as Bond, Spectre tries with little effort to invoke the feelings and atmosphere so often present in Bond films of decades past. The occasional reference is made to Bond's origins but the filmMuch like Daniel Craig's previous appearances as Bond, Spectre tries with little effort to invoke the feelings and atmosphere so often present in Bond films of decades past. The occasional reference is made to Bond's origins but the film falls short in delivering a truly exceptional experience as it seems unable to define it's own objective. The film is conflicted in it's pursuit of relevance whilst trying to tell the story of a character that was designed for the cold war era. As a result we are met with an archaic spy film existing in a contemporary culture no longer dependent upon physical espionage. A return to the classic era is badly needed to refresh this franchise and wow new audiences with the thrill of a great Bond adventure.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

spacebear1Dec 7, 2017

Sam Mendes' Spectre was a film that got way more hate than it deserved. Daniel Craig is once again, an amazing James Bond. The action sequences were perfect. My main complaints are that the film has some pacing issues but also the film reallySam Mendes' Spectre was a film that got way more hate than it deserved. Daniel Craig is once again, an amazing James Bond. The action sequences were perfect. My main complaints are that the film has some pacing issues but also the film really underused it's villain, Ernst Blofeld/Franz Oberhauser… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

mouseypoo13Jun 14, 2017

OK, it looks good, it has decent enough action, but the rest isn't great. Unrealistic scenes and bad writing make this a generic bond movie, or worse. Watch Casino Royale.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

007FilmReviewerJun 4, 2017

the suspense is real the suspense is real the suspense is real the suspense is real the suspense is real the suspense is real the suspense is real the suspense is real

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

2

ourtimehascomeApr 5, 2017

Spectre is the perfect example of a lack of new ideas in the Bond franchise. Its story is so ridiculous it seems it was written by at least five people all with their own different ideas. The cinematography is excellent, and the action scenesSpectre is the perfect example of a lack of new ideas in the Bond franchise. Its story is so ridiculous it seems it was written by at least five people all with their own different ideas. The cinematography is excellent, and the action scenes are worthwhile. Unfortunately, there aren't enough of them to justify this two hour bore.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

2

emeraldstormFeb 4, 2017

Corny, tedious, lengthy, cliche, and only worth watching if you're a die-hard James Bond fan or are into the history of the franchies. I really did not enjoy it.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

4

BroyaxJan 7, 2017

Après les deux précédents qui étaient des purges, ce Bond nouveau est presque un soulagement : l'action y est à peu près lisible, moins parkinsonienne, moins surdécoupée et permet d'apprécier les quelques scènes spectaculaires, parfois trèsAprès les deux précédents qui étaient des purges, ce Bond nouveau est presque un soulagement : l'action y est à peu près lisible, moins parkinsonienne, moins surdécoupée et permet d'apprécier les quelques scènes spectaculaires, parfois très inventives. Bref, c'est enfin regardable...

Daniel Craig campe un 007 de belle facture, sans doute un peu plus narquois que d'habitude mais encore bien loin des facéties et des bons mots d'un Roger Moore -mais il s'agit d'une autre époque à dire vrai.

Comme d'habitude, les stars s'invitent au carnaval bondesque avec la Belluci -un peu passée- en amuse-gueule, puis le grand méchant Christopher Waltz qui semble se régaler mais dans un rôle trop petit pour lui, un méchant sans envergure, et notre Léa Seydoux nationale, ravissante mais hélas réduite au rôle de potiche plus ou moins parlante. Ralph Fiennes, pour sa part, incarne un M assez convaincant, qui remplace avantageusement le vieux hibou.

On reste interloqué par contre devant le traitement infligé à Moneypenny et Q : une jeune godiche et un jeune con, complètement geek ! James Bond, ce n'est pourtant pas Mission Impossible...

Là où le bât blesse sans cesse, c'est à propos du scénario complètement mongolo et déjà vu, encore une histoire de contrôle de l'information à la petite semaine (c'est Appeule qui a écrit cette merde ?) ; en outre, le film lambine beaucoup trop souvent et n'en finit pas, essayant maladroitement de trouver une quelconque psychologie à l'agent double zéro mais sans jamais y parvenir.

On sent globalement une envie de moderniser le vieux fossile qui devrait être à la retraite depuis des lustres et peut-être bien que le super-agent devrait prendre à tout le moins quelques vacances au lieu de se faire essorer jusqu'au trognon par le rouleau compresseur hollywoodien.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

david-rJan 2, 2017

It is unbelievable that the "Skyfall" director, the creative Sam Mendes made this cliche Bond movie. However, "Spectre" is not too bad till its middle. But from the scene that Bond faces Blofeld -the main villain character- in SpectreIt is unbelievable that the "Skyfall" director, the creative Sam Mendes made this cliche Bond movie. However, "Spectre" is not too bad till its middle. But from the scene that Bond faces Blofeld -the main villain character- in Spectre organization, the movie is falling down and become untolerable.
Despite of a positive atmosphere before the screening (eg; Monica Bellucci as the oldest Bond girl ever, the last Mendes James Bond, etc.) it is not an special Bond movie. But if you enjoy watching the Bond life, pure action scenes and spy games, watching "Spectre" is not without pleasure.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

hassallNov 27, 2016

This movie was ok, Its wasn't bad but it wasn't good.the start of the movie was good and quite exciting and after that it was boring nothing much really Happened.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

TheWaffleNov 26, 2016

Spectre is by far the laziest of the Craig films. They've unlearned the subtle personal touch of Skyfall and replaced it with empty spectacle. The writers tried to raise the stakes of the plot by introducing a villain claiming to haveSpectre is by far the laziest of the Craig films. They've unlearned the subtle personal touch of Skyfall and replaced it with empty spectacle. The writers tried to raise the stakes of the plot by introducing a villain claiming to have masterminded everything in the past four films, and it falls utterly flat. There was no work to build that payoff, and the attempt to reach into Bond's childhood past fails even more. Beyond the big plot failures, there are a half-dozen small things that break the film's flow: despite having been temporarily (if not permanently) debilitated Bond fights off a dozen men with incredible precision, after saying "I love you" another character decides to walk away from the relationship in the very next sequence, and finally "now we know what M stands for, 'moron'" must be the worst line in Bond history.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

RalfbergsNov 19, 2016

I liked it generally, but the plot lacked a bit , especially how James Bond got near to bad guys - either just casually going to them, or they kidnap him and just bring to their place etc. I mean it felt a bit dumb and maybe overused in someI liked it generally, but the plot lacked a bit , especially how James Bond got near to bad guys - either just casually going to them, or they kidnap him and just bring to their place etc. I mean it felt a bit dumb and maybe overused in some earlier Bond films - I bet they could have thought of something more interesting by now. There were some other parts where the movie lacked and it was mostly quite predictable, so that makes it a bit more boring.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

AngusBarbudezAug 26, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. La defino con una sola palabra...ESTÚPIDA, bueno mejor dos.....MUY ESTÚPIDA.

Voy a contar esta parte Sin Spoilers, y luego aviso de los Spoilers

El problema general, es que Sam Mendes no tiene ni repajolera idea de llevar a James Bond, de una manera que no sea, la versión de Roger Moore o la de Sean Connery en sus momentos mas bajos, es decir, volvemos a los clichés mas rancios de 007 aderezado con villanos y situaciones dignas, como repito de un Roger Moore, en sus ultimos films, donde ya era un chiste y una caricatura grotesca de lo que era Bond.

Que problema tenía seguir con el estilo de Casino Royale?, se alejaba del Bond clásico, el de los gadgets, los villanos y planes rancios?, es lógico, es necesario reinventar el personaje, no podía volver otra vez a lo mismo, porque ya es anacrónico. Pero Mendes, es un señor que debe tener admiración por esa epoca ¿dorada? de Bond y cuando toma el control de Bond, volvemos a la epoca dorada, que desgraciadamente ya huele a rancio, y tenemos Skyfall ese truño de peli de Bond con villano de opereta con un tercer actor digno de Solo en Casa y plagado de guiños chorras para los fans, un desastre que tira por al borda toda las virtudes de Casino Royale.

Y nos encontramos con SPECTRE, que reconozco que la primera mitad va bien, perdonas las chorradas...pero llegan a la base del malo, y el guión entra en modo RANDOM, rozando niveles de Austin Powers, y por supuesto enlazando a las 3 anteriores como el puto culo.

Si te encantan las peliculas como Moonraker, Panorama para Matar o Muere otro Día, esta te parecerá una obra Maestra.

SPOILERS TOCHOS.

- Los titulos de inicio, es asombroso, ese homenaje al Hentai que se casca Mendes.

-La Base de SPECTRA, que explota de una manera tan absurdamente gratuita y tan RANDOM.

- El villano, Waltz que es el Hermanastro de Bond y que es Blofeld, una mezcla rancia entre el Nazi de Malditos Bastardos, un Voyeur y el Doctor maligno, .

-Enlazan espantosamente mal las 3 peliculas anteriores, TODOS LOS MALOS DE ESTE BOND, ERAN DE SPECTRA...PORQUE LLEVABAN EL MISMO ANILLO!!!....COMO? PERO....a ver si Bardem, iba muy a su puta bola....

-Batista tan desaprovechado.

-El CGI DIOS COMO CANTA POR TODOS LADOS.

-James Bond, con sus problemas de Cleptomanía.

-Folleteo gratuito tras la muerte de BATISTA (Desaprovechado de cojones)

- El plan, chorra no, lo siguiente...Dominar el mundo a traves del espionaje pero que una gran parte del presupuesto de SPECTRA, se dedique a joderle la vida a Bond.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Lone_Wolf_SonesAug 7, 2016

Spectre didn't reach the same heights that Skyfall did in my eyes; but it is still a solid Bond film in its own right. Skyfall afterall was the film that finally sold me on Craig as Bond. It was a pleasant surprise seeing a classic BondSpectre didn't reach the same heights that Skyfall did in my eyes; but it is still a solid Bond film in its own right. Skyfall afterall was the film that finally sold me on Craig as Bond. It was a pleasant surprise seeing a classic Bond nemesis return as well. Spectre cleverly ties together all of the Craig Bond films in a way other Bond films have never done. Craig's films have a continuity all their own and should Craig reprise the role for another film I look forward to seeing where they go next.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

2

reallyadrielAug 3, 2016

To be completely honest and straight forward. I'm not a Daniel Craig type of guy, I'm more of a Pierce Brosnan. Either way here is my honest review of Spectre.

The movie was kinda a let down. They should have upped the film rating fromTo be completely honest and straight forward. I'm not a Daniel Craig type of guy, I'm more of a Pierce Brosnan. Either way here is my honest review of Spectre.

The movie was kinda a let down. They should have upped the film rating from PG-13 to R to get more action/gory scenes in the movie that is usually limited by the PG-13 rating. I thought it had cliche moments, situations, and endings in the movie that you can probably guess what is going to happen next, even if you haven't watched the movie. In general, the movie did not feel like a James Bond film it felt more like a movie that separated itself from the series.

In sum, the movie needed more action. It did not have enough of gadgetry like how a James Bond film should have and more focused on adding 'fluff' to the storyline.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MasterRileyJul 22, 2016

Spectre isn't as good as Casino Royale or Skyfall, but it is definitely better than Quantum of Solace. Its a good movie all around; with great action, good characters, good writing, and good music.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

ComandanteCobraJun 16, 2016

An uninspired action movie that has little to offer I'm afraid. It seems to me as if i was watching a toned down Jason Bourne movie rather than a serious spy movie....too much clichéd action and too little of the "class" that made James BondAn uninspired action movie that has little to offer I'm afraid. It seems to me as if i was watching a toned down Jason Bourne movie rather than a serious spy movie....too much clichéd action and too little of the "class" that made James Bond famous.
If you are looking for a good action film watch something else like "Mission Impossible Rogue Nation" that is highly entertaining ... and if you are loking for a good Spy story retrieve another James Bond movie but one with Sean Connery in It. Monica Bellucci is still gorgeous ..she is the only good thing in this picture… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

YoloSwag4DogeJun 16, 2016

I can't say the dialogue or plot was particularly engaging, but the action sequences are great. My greatest issue with the film was the musical score. I felt like I was watching some high end opera theater instead of an epic, high action bondI can't say the dialogue or plot was particularly engaging, but the action sequences are great. My greatest issue with the film was the musical score. I felt like I was watching some high end opera theater instead of an epic, high action bond film. It was quite off putting and really killed a lot of the excitement for me. Overall, I'd say it's a good movie, but not really memorable.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

2

CalibMcBoltsMay 30, 2016

What a big fat disappointment ''Spectre'' is, the things they would have done, the opportunities they had, the actors they had, they had double Oscar winner Christoph Waltz for christ sakes and they didnt use him AT ALL, he was just anotherWhat a big fat disappointment ''Spectre'' is, the things they would have done, the opportunities they had, the actors they had, they had double Oscar winner Christoph Waltz for christ sakes and they didnt use him AT ALL, he was just another paint by numbers stereotype Bond villain, who does bad things, because it's bad, and he likes bad.
''Spectre'' has just another cliche storyline (in combination with, that the end of this movie is practically the same as the end of MI:5, a much better spy thriller who came out earlier in 2015), a cliche bond girl, a cliche villain.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

TheQuietGamerMay 10, 2016

Watching Bond at the very beginning of the movie in Mexico City during the Day of the Dead with a beautiful woman on his arm and wearing a striking skeleton mask makes one thing very clear from the get go; that this is going to be a gorgeousWatching Bond at the very beginning of the movie in Mexico City during the Day of the Dead with a beautiful woman on his arm and wearing a striking skeleton mask makes one thing very clear from the get go; that this is going to be a gorgeous film. It even capitalizes on that with some surprising destruction that makes you think that the rest of the movie is going to be just as exciting as those opening minutes. However as soon as that surprisingly, yet appreciated, comedic ending to the scene happens it's straight to formula.

This is very much a case of been there, done that, and seen it all before. Formulaic to a T, there's almost no sense of excitement as I found myself predicting everything that would happen next. The plot tries hard to be something bigger than the average Bond affair by having a sense of connectivity to the previous Daniel Craig movies, but it follows the exact same formula the series has been using for years. Christoph Waltz plays a potentially cool villain who has some real ties to our hero. However a painful lack of screen time renders that moot.

Outside of a surprise fight between Craig and Bautista that literally comes out of nowhere the action suffers from the same problem; predictability. That's really the issue with everything in the movie. It's the same stuff we've seen over and over again in this very series making it's return once again. There are moments where it looks they wanted to add more depth to everything, but ultimately just ended up delivering the same old, same old. The perfect example of this is with the new "Bond girl."

There's a point in the movie where it becomes clear that they are setting up Léa Seydoux's character to be more meaningful to Bond than the typical one night stand. Someone he can actually end up settling down with. This however does not occur to the audience until the movie outright says it. Why? Because there's literally nothing to distinguish her from any of the more generic Bond girls that have come before her. Any chemistry between Seydoux and Craig is unnoticeable as Seydoux is playing the most generic of Bond girl stereotypes. She feels exactly as important to the plot as Monica Bellucci was earlier in the film. Basically just nothing more than a pretty face for Bond to have sex with. I was literally baffled when the movie tried to convince me there was any sort of actual connection between the two, much less love.

To be honest "SPECTRE" is a lot like the majority of Bond girls. Gorgeous to look at, but lacking any sort of originality or substance to back up those good looks. It actually ends up being worth less to the audience than a Bond girl is to Bond. At least Bond can get an afternoon of pleasure from a Bond girl before he casts her aside. The audience won't be able to even get that from this movie. It's an exercise in familiarity. A few bits of humor scattered throughout and dazzling views keep things from getting too dull, but they can't save the entire thing from being boring. I think it's time to revoke 007's license to kill.

4.5/10… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

Jack97May 6, 2016

Spectre has many classic Bond elements ranging from the girls to the cars to the extravagant locations as well as an old school flavor of big evil villains and henchmen. The action is great and the film is well made for sure. However it fallsSpectre has many classic Bond elements ranging from the girls to the cars to the extravagant locations as well as an old school flavor of big evil villains and henchmen. The action is great and the film is well made for sure. However it falls frustratingly short of greatness due to pacing issues and an enormous lack of screen time for our villain Christoph Waltz. On top of that the deeper relationship between him and Bond is mentioned but never explored as much as it should've been. Overall Spectre is a solid Bond movie just unfortunately not entirely a great one.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

AcidwormApr 29, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Very disappointing overall. I love Craig's Bond which gives a lot of depth to the role with some backstory that the series never gave Bond, and his icy seriousness works well. However, he is a little light on the humor, which the character is most known for.

The movie is overlong, and makes poor use of the villain and his main henchman. I enjoy how the movie connects all the Craig installments, but the plot becomes very convoluted in the second half with a lot of confusing sub-plots and backstory that are not always properly explored. The first half of the movie is excellent, but the second half really drags it down.

The love scenes come across very jarring and forced. First Bond sleeps with Monica Belluci after killing her husband and it makes no sense that she would jump into his arms so easy. Then she is quickly forgotten. The lead-lady role is a poorly designed character. One minute she pushes Bond away having no sexual interest in him whatsoever giving off an image that she is a strong woman that can take care of herself and very unavailable to men, and then after a fight scene they are in each other's arms a couple scenes later, and she tells him a little later how much she loves him. This sudden change of behavior for her does not work.

Such a shame as the movie began so well and Skyfall left the series on a high note including a refreshing change in direction.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

aadityamudharApr 18, 2016

Spectre was a marginally decent movie, it followed the outline of the past Bond movies structurally, but the story was a bore. Some scenes seemed too goofy to be in the film - almost a parody of itself, other scenes were mediocre and a coupleSpectre was a marginally decent movie, it followed the outline of the past Bond movies structurally, but the story was a bore. Some scenes seemed too goofy to be in the film - almost a parody of itself, other scenes were mediocre and a couple were fun. If you have money to blow, and have nothing else to see, then go for it. For the rest of you... It's a Netflix movie for sure.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

LoafyApr 11, 2016

Spectre may not be the best, but rather enjoyable. The action scenes are great, Daniel Craig is the best James Bond ever. Though the new bond girl was rather annoying with unnecessary scenes with them.There is humor in the movie from time toSpectre may not be the best, but rather enjoyable. The action scenes are great, Daniel Craig is the best James Bond ever. Though the new bond girl was rather annoying with unnecessary scenes with them.There is humor in the movie from time to time that you can get a laugh at, which does get you back right to the pace of the film. What I hated the most of spectre was the villian Oberhauser. It was a very weak performance and wasn't as sinister as silva in skyfall. Overall...yes Skyfall is the better choice but Spectre is a fun and enjoyable movie to watch.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

TheFilmBuffApr 2, 2016

'Spectre' Grinds Through Plot, but It and Craig Look Great!

Because women are particularly beguiling when viewed from behind, the camera loves to follow them: Anyone who's watched James Stewart's lovesick detective trailing Kim Novak, a'Spectre' Grinds Through Plot, but It and Craig Look Great!

Because women are particularly beguiling when viewed from behind, the camera loves to follow them: Anyone who's watched James Stewart's lovesick detective trailing Kim Novak, a platinum dream poured into a pale gray flannel hourglass, understands the voyeurism at the heart of Vertigo. With Spectre — the twenty-fourth James Bond picture and the fourth and probably final one to feature Daniel Craig as 007 — director Sam Mendes takes a tip, perhaps unwittingly, from Hitchcock, as well as from Orson Welles's Touch of Evil: The picture opens in Mexico City with a regal, ambitious, Wellesian tracking shot that begins in the midst of a Day of the Dead parade and eventually finds its way to Craig's Bond, standing in the crowd.

He's wearing a holiday-appropriate costume, a sexy-threatening skull mask and a black topcoat with a silkscreened skeleton's spine winding up the back. There's a masked beauty on his arm, but who's looking at her? The camera trails the couple as they trek through the reveling masses, and it's impossible to take your eyes off that spine, a sensuous, rippling, imaginary x-ray of the man beneath. Why, oh why, don't real 3-D glasses — the ones advertised in the backs of comic books and sold to young boys hoping to see through women's clothes — actually exist?

We don't really need to see through Daniel Craig's clothes, because eventually he does take at least some of them off. But dressed or un-, he's the chief pleasure to be had in Spectre, along with the joys of gazing at the feral-flower beauty of Léa Seydoux (as Madeleine Swann, the headstrong psychologist Bond falls for), Monica Bellucci (who appears only briefly, as an Italian widow in a merry widow), and the radiant charmer Naomie Harris (who again plays MI6 administrative assistant Miss Moneypenny, although like most administrative assistants, she's sorely underappreciated and given only unimportant things to do).

Spectre on the whole is gorgeous, shot — by cinematographer Hoyte van Hoytema — in a bevy of locales including sandy-gold Morocco, glowing, gray-marble Rome, the winter-white Austrian Alps, and, of course, dazzling, polychrome Mexico City. Every action sequence is beautifully staged and edited clearly: There's a rough-and-tumble dustup set in a train's dining car and a breathtaking midair scuffle in which the two principals dangle precariously from a flying helicopter. Mendes and his screenwriters (John Logan, Neal Purvis, Robert Wade, and Jez Butterworth) give us multiple villains to thrill to and hate, one played by appealing muscleman Dave Bautista, another by Christoph Waltz, who's perfectly fine if you're not yet tired of his trademark death's-head grin. This isn't your average James Bond movie; it's more of a SuperBond, packed with all sorts of things you didn't know you wanted — but also with things you don't really need.

Because in the end, Spectre is just too much of a good thing. Though each scene is carefully wrought, there's little grace, majesty, or romance in the way the pieces are connected. The whole is bumpy and inelegant — entertaining for sure, but hard to love. It's easy to see how all this aggressive splendor could fall flat: Both Mendes and Craig have said in interviews that they were nervous about being able to top the over-the-topness of 2012's rich, resonant Skyfall, Mendes's first film in the franchise; Craig has also said that he's "done" with James Bond, and though that could be exhaustion speaking, it's easy to see how the excesses of Spectre might cause anyone to say, Enough.

The shaky plot mechanics don't help: Acting on a tip from his late, and beloved, boss M (Judi Dench, who appears here only in a small, moving snippet of video), Bond goes rogue to root out the mysterious head of bad-guy syndicate SPECTRE. In the process, he flagrantly disobeys his new boss (played with bespoke tastefulness by Ralph Fiennes) and messes up the beautiful Aston Martin DB10 he's stolen from fidgety gadget mastermind Q (an adorable Ben Whishaw, dressed in a series of amazing jackets, in plum tweeds and dark-blue windowpane-checks). Meanwhile, an evil new boss (Andrew Scott, of Sherlock) has taken over MI6 with plans to dissolve it. There's enough plot here for six movies, and Spectre groans under the weight. Mendes has dropped in some lovely details that nearly get lost: Not surprisingly, Bond's underfurnished bachelor-spy apartment is lacking in tchotchkes, but we do get a glimpse of a miniature bulldog figurine, its back adorned with a Union Jack, that in the old days used to sit on M's desk.

This scrappy bulldog Bond is tired, but he's also capable of tenderness. And no matter how frustrating or exhausting Spectre may be, there's nothing but sadness to be felt in watching him walk away.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

CarewolfApr 2, 2016

Not a very good James Bond movie. It can best be compared to Moonraker in that has a non-sensical plot and is mostly just recycled ideas from other Bond movies, but compared to Moonraker, Spectre lacks the charm and humor. This sets a new lowNot a very good James Bond movie. It can best be compared to Moonraker in that has a non-sensical plot and is mostly just recycled ideas from other Bond movies, but compared to Moonraker, Spectre lacks the charm and humor. This sets a new low for the Bond franchise.

It does have occationally nice visuals, I didn't fall asleep while watching it (though two of my friends did), so I give it a few bonus points to a final score of 4.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

MovieGeeksApr 1, 2016

Does it mean something that James Bond drinks a dirty martini in “Spectre,” the latest in the seemingly unkillable franchise? It’s too soon to know, though true Bondologists will be parsing this new drink’s significance shortly. As more of anDoes it mean something that James Bond drinks a dirty martini in “Spectre,” the latest in the seemingly unkillable franchise? It’s too soon to know, though true Bondologists will be parsing this new drink’s significance shortly. As more of an amateur in all-things Bond, I had hoped a dirty bomb would go boom or that the actress Léa Seydoux would do something unspeakable to Daniel Craig, given that the pre-credit sequence features female nudes writhing alongside an octopus with busy arms. Part of the bankable pleasure of the series, after all, is that every so often, among the usual guns and girls, the unexpected happens — a bikini stops the film, a villain revs it up, Bond surprises.

There’s nothing surprising in “Spectre,” the 24th “official” title in the series, which is presumably as planned. Much as the perfect is the enemy of good, originality is often the enemy of the global box office. And so, for the fourth time, Mr. Craig has suited up to play the British spy who’s saving the world one kill at a time, with Sam Mendes occupying the director’s chair for a second turn. They’re a reasonable fit, although their joint seriousness has started to feel more reflexive than honest, especially because every Bond movie inevitably shakes off ambition to get down to the blockbuster business of hurling everything — bodies, bullets, fireballs, debris, money — at the screen.

Before that happens here, there’s the usual narrative busywork that plays as if it were written by committee, which it was (John Logan, Neal Purvis, Robert Wade and Jez Butterworth). If you have watched one Bond movie, you know the score. The band — M (Ralph Fiennes), Moneypenny (Naomie Harris) and Q (Ben Whishaw) — gets back together, with Bond singing lead. There’s an opening lollapalooza blowout that Mr. Mendes largely delivers in one long silky take, having clearly studied trends in contemporary art cinema. Mr. Craig and the camera move together beautifully in this sequence, whether Bond’s sauntering across a roof (and in what has become a signature, adjusting a shirt cuff) or riding down a collapsing building as easily as you would a slide at a water park.

There’s more, of course, including car chases, nominally exotic locales and a pulpy, visceral slugfest on a passenger train with a Bluto-size hurting machine (Dave Bautista) who’s evocative of that old Bond enemy Jaws. The train, as well as the purr of an Aston Martin, suggests that the filmmakers are working the nostalgia angle, though, the series has always been driven by longing for other men and worlds, for the British Empire, for a hyper-masculine savior, for sex kittens (friends or foes) and for a reassuring vision of the world in which the greatest threat is an orderly criminal organization run by a single supervillain. The superbaddie in “Spectre” is, alas, a bore, enlivened only by our series sentimentality and Christoph Waltz working his accented villainy with a smile.

Back in 2006, Mr. Craig slipped into “Casino Royale” and the role of James Bond like a middleweight’s fist in a boxing glove, bringing to the gig a battered beauty one punch away from ugly, a powerful chest that looks good in a tux and a visceral predatory quality that works equally well for annihilating villains and ladies.

Mr. Craig delivers the blows — the crushing uppercuts and sucker punches — more persuasively than the chaste kisses, although given the anemic seductresses Bond is often now paired with, the actor can scarcely take the blame. A few sashay through “Spectre,” most agreeably Monica Bellucci, cinema’s current go-to Italian bombshell. She shows up in widow’s weeds, which Bond promptly removes while she babbles intel about her dead husband. The husband is a nail that leads to the shoe, the horse, the rider and finally the kingdom, little of which has anything to do with the world as it exists, with its environmental disasters and political uncertainties, religious wars and ordinary terrors. But then it’s hard to imagine Bond taking on, say, the Islamic State.

The Bond movies have always managed to tap into reality by switching on a camera, a connection to the material world that lingered no matter how far out the villains, their wild lairs and intrigues.The current Bond team is trying to keep the audience entertained with new tricks and gizmos while keeping it kind of real, which perhaps explains why this Bond sweats buckets, tears up and even bares his feelings. Mr. Craig is very good at selling Bond’s humanity, though in truth, what has always really turned us on isn’t 007’s humanity but the reverse.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

jlittle1404Mar 30, 2016

I thought a long time on this one and I don't think this Bond film was great but it wasn't the worst. Middle of the road action movie. Boring at times and will leave half the audience scratching their heads. I hope Daniel Craig comes back forI thought a long time on this one and I don't think this Bond film was great but it wasn't the worst. Middle of the road action movie. Boring at times and will leave half the audience scratching their heads. I hope Daniel Craig comes back for one more because this would be a low note to go out on.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

OzyMar 30, 2016

Much better than the last two installments of the franchise. Definitely not original though. I feel that this is Craig's last bond film and the direction although safe gave me a good impression in the end. One that finally related Bond to theMuch better than the last two installments of the franchise. Definitely not original though. I feel that this is Craig's last bond film and the direction although safe gave me a good impression in the end. One that finally related Bond to the rest of us. He wants to be normal after all, marry a beautiful woman and have tonnes of kids. At least this is what i gathered. And if this is the direction it took, its funny as i would usually be sad to see the end, but instead I'm excited at what the franchise will come up with next.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SwiftReviewsMar 29, 2016

It was a good movie, i would probably rank it last out of the other Daniel Craig bond films, i enjoyed it because it was a bond film but it didn't seem very original and it didn't really take any risks.

so the good points are, the openingIt was a good movie, i would probably rank it last out of the other Daniel Craig bond films, i enjoyed it because it was a bond film but it didn't seem very original and it didn't really take any risks.

so the good points are, the opening scene was fantastic, with an awesome helicopter scene that was unique and visually exciting. The music overall was good and the theme song matched the movie well.

Overall it was put together well with some really good action scenes but a lot of it wasn't very memorable. I didn't like the storyline, the plot points were poor. I am thinking they must be running out of ideas or something.

When compared to Skyfall this movie fails pretty badly.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Jimi360Mar 26, 2016

Spectre had the unfortunate pleasure of attempting to follow up on the huge acclaim and success of Skyfall. High hopes were put upon Spectre, including by myself, as one of the best actors in the world at the moment, Christoph Waltz, wasSpectre had the unfortunate pleasure of attempting to follow up on the huge acclaim and success of Skyfall. High hopes were put upon Spectre, including by myself, as one of the best actors in the world at the moment, Christoph Waltz, was snapped up as the villain. Despite this, Spectre never gets anywhere near the bar that Skyfall or previous Daniel Craig instalments have set.

What Spectre does well is progress the stories of some of the side characters, such as the new M (Ralph Fiennes) as he struggles with a few sub-plots within the film. Q is also an excellent character once again, adding some witty little remarks to Bond and his accomplices. Despite not speaking, aside one word, Dave Bautista is a terrifying bodyguard as Mr Hinx, and does everything he is asked.

The problem is here, there is absolutely nothing new. Spectre is just recycled plot points from Bonds of old and, though Craig and Waltz provide equally solid performances, but there is nothing to excel on the brilliance of Skyfall or Casino Royale from earlier in the franchise. There is a basic plot, with a standard villain, with standard motives, which is so disappointing considering the recent resurgence of Bond, as well as the potential of the cast.

Die-hard Bond fans may still enjoy this movie, but as someone who just wanted a good follow-up to Skyfall I was left disappointed, personally.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

csw12Mar 22, 2016

Another James Bond film chooses to be ordinary. Just more typical car chases, slutty women, and a boring bad guy. Spectre is overlong and at times a corny, silly film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Jollyjoe1000Mar 12, 2016

it was not that bad but just kinda off. Missing the charm of the other films(at least most of them) but I hope that daniel craig will be able to fix the bond series with a good new installment that will come in a few years.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Tomiati1912Mar 12, 2016

Delicia de filme cara,mas poderia ser melhor,deixou a a desejar em alguns pontos,e deveria ter sido diferente em outros ,mas ainda sim e o melhor filme dês de goldeneye

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

IntelliCriticMar 10, 2016

Spectre is my favorite movie of all time to date. If James Bond can get spiritual, Spectre is the quintessence of Mr. Bond's redemption. I write this as a Catholic Christian seeing past the endless array of Bond's sleazy women.

In fact,Spectre is my favorite movie of all time to date. If James Bond can get spiritual, Spectre is the quintessence of Mr. Bond's redemption. I write this as a Catholic Christian seeing past the endless array of Bond's sleazy women.

In fact, Daniel Craig's Bond has two women of interest in each of his movies, one a lover and one a whore. In all the four movies, the whore gets killed because of Bond and the lover reveals to us something about him. The deaths may seem a bit repetitive, but they actually prepare an important setting. In Spectre, those four deaths and others lead straight to Bond's archnemesis and rival. Bond's lovers, however, culminate in a final lasting love through which he may return to a life of ease. Still, the women of these four movies are not the primary focus of Bond's development.

What is the primary focus of the Daniel Craig Bond movies? Upon careful analysis, one will come to the same conclusion as mine: James' self-control. Bond may save the world (more or less) four times, or he may magnetize (more or less) four different babes. But, at the end of the day, only Bond's ability to pacify his internal scars matters. And that is exactly what takes place in this movie. And it's glorious! After his gory killing-spree in Quantum of Solace, Bond holds the trigger at a key moment of revenge.

On the most superficial of levels, Spectre is a fairly scary feature of murder and death. At the heart of its premise is a spiritual balance wherein James Bond wraps up his out-of-control ego. Spectre includes a helicopter fight, a crazy mountain chase, and a lot of insane action. But it's definitely got a lot more to it than that. Watch it after Casino Royale, Quantum of Solace, and Skyfall; otherwise, it won't add up. Also, enjoy the unexpected octopus squirming around in the opening credits!… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

smiyamotMar 9, 2016

Since I've been watching James Bond since Dr. No, it's always been fighting, sex, and guns. This movie seemed to try for a little more; make Bond more human, maybe? We get a glimpse of his past, we see what makes him tick, we see that he'sSince I've been watching James Bond since Dr. No, it's always been fighting, sex, and guns. This movie seemed to try for a little more; make Bond more human, maybe? We get a glimpse of his past, we see what makes him tick, we see that he's not indestructible. That might not be everyone's cup of tea. Some of the fight scenes seemed to go on too long, but this is an action movie so maybe I'm off base. The "Bond girl" by the description of her, should have been older, which would have been a better match for Daniel Craig, who is an "older" Bond. Guess they wanted a young actress to bring in the younger audience.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

NicoteenMar 9, 2016

" A moderate movie, a weak Bond. Skyfall was one of the best Bond movies of all time, so the sequel is never as good Skyfall (weak action, boring characters).. I like Christoph Waltz, but he couldn't save it. In the end it's entertaining for" A moderate movie, a weak Bond. Skyfall was one of the best Bond movies of all time, so the sequel is never as good Skyfall (weak action, boring characters).. I like Christoph Waltz, but he couldn't save it. In the end it's entertaining for a BD/DVD night, but not more.."

GENRE RATING (AGENT/THRILLER): 6.4
OVERALL RATING: 5.8… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

XharlieMar 7, 2016

Spectre is a shallow action movie but, by claiming to be a Bond film, it bids too high and loses all credibility because of how badly it fails to make that bid. It is a melange of tired old tropes, nostalgia and reminiscence, without anySpectre is a shallow action movie but, by claiming to be a Bond film, it bids too high and loses all credibility because of how badly it fails to make that bid. It is a melange of tired old tropes, nostalgia and reminiscence, without any particular flavour or highlight.

James Bond, in Spectre, does not do justice to the character we have read about in books and watched for decades in previous films. In Spectre, he's impatient and lacking of all subtlety. He isn't witty or intelligent or ingenious or elegant or classy or sophisticated and, although he drives a fancy car and drinks fancy Champagne, he doesn't do it with aplomb or finess. Even his English is appaling. James Bond would *never* spout dialogue with imperfect grammar just like he'd never drink white wine with red meat.

The villain is a walking cliché. The plot required a villain so one was found and that's about as much effort as was made. He's a bad guy because the plot frames him so. He's phychologically creepy because he takes the role of tourtourer in a physchologically creepy scene that is entirely predictable and painfully drawn out. He is evil but so shallow you simply can't be invested in Bond's quest to defeat him.

Along with Bond and The Villain, Spectre also serves all the other dishes that one expects. There's a Bond Girl and a mediocre romance which is out of place and tastelessly timed when you consider the plot and reinforces the holes in Bond's character - he isn't the suave romantic you expect. There are gadgets but they either don't work or work in an entirely uninspired fashion. There's a car chase but it is slow, linear and underwhelming - the cars are nice but neither the driving nor the journey are thrilling and the way it ends is simply pathetic.

There are also a very large number of moments that challenge your suspension of disbelief. Things happen that are just a little too far fetched or just a little too convenient. James Bond is permitted to push the limits but I think Spectre pushes them too far. I had to consciously set aside incredulity on a number of occasions to survive to the end of the rather long show.

Most damningly, the plot is nought but rubbish and unintelligable unless you happen to remember the two movies previous to Spectre. I was lost entirely when Bond was instructed to, "Kill him... and don't miss the funeral." Nothing, to my knowledge, gave us any way to know who's funeral the phrase was talking about. Thankfully, my friends at the cinema enlightened me. They also helped by reminding me of the events of the previous two movies so I could follow the plot a little more or else I would have been completely lost but, even with their help, I felt that the very shallow and unoriginal plot was stuck together with nails and glue and contained an unhealthy number of holes.

My final conclusion was that this movie was merely an excuse to set up an arch-enemy for Bond to fight in future installments. It was an origin story. Sadly, for me, it misses even this mark - the arch-enemy it has set up made a poor villain in Spectre and I wasn't at all invested in his demise throughout the movie, I have no interest in seeing future films that feature his villainy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

crnppsclsFeb 28, 2016

The beginning of Spectre is sublime and good Bond. By which i mean the location, a little character development and damn good destruction, it is taken too far on the latter point however.

Same old rhetoric in mi5, Fiennes is good as M, BenThe beginning of Spectre is sublime and good Bond. By which i mean the location, a little character development and damn good destruction, it is taken too far on the latter point however.

Same old rhetoric in mi5, Fiennes is good as M, Ben Whishaw as Q is cool but not nearly nerdy and as intolerant, as you might expect of Bond's making light of his tech advances.

Naomie Was ok as moneypenny, whether this was because she was the only cast member bond didn't sleep with is another argument.

The plot was just abysmal however. Batista as a hench could've worked but didn't. Bond just jumped on every female that got screen time. Waltz at the antagonist just didn't work, mostly due to poor writing, he just came over like a mature emo that had issues with his childhood. Blofelt, by defenition should be idk more omnipotent.

For me the 'Bond' checklist was complete; doing anything female that moves 'Check'; expensive car chase 'check'; Mi5 in disarray 'Check"; Gaudy hench with no char development 'Check'; Saving the world 'check'. Not a bad checklist but it's just been done so much better in other movies.

This film could've been worked into the next fast and furious film and no-one would've batted an eyelid.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

UrbanlistenerFeb 23, 2016

A fairly decent Bond movie, spectacular action scenes, great special effects, great cinematography and score and of course performances, but the problem is the plot. It is very by the numbers, unoriginal, there is not much to it, it is reallyA fairly decent Bond movie, spectacular action scenes, great special effects, great cinematography and score and of course performances, but the problem is the plot. It is very by the numbers, unoriginal, there is not much to it, it is really your typical action movie plot and also the villain is really not exploited the right way. You have a great actor (Christoph Waltz) playing the villain and a lot of premise, but his talents are kind of wasted. They build the character for more than an hour and when he finally appears it is for maybe 2-3 short scenes where he does pretty much nothing and when he does do something it fails and he look moronic. But in the end, it is a very enjoyable as an action film, but definitely not as much as Skyfall or Casino Royale.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

DanielGFeb 20, 2016

Get ready to fall asleep. This is easily the worst bond title to come out in a long while. Even surpassing Quantum Solace for mediocrity. Its endless scenes of boring dialogue and stiff acting. The main antagonist played by Christoph WaltzGet ready to fall asleep. This is easily the worst bond title to come out in a long while. Even surpassing Quantum Solace for mediocrity. Its endless scenes of boring dialogue and stiff acting. The main antagonist played by Christoph Waltz barely gets any screen time. Keep in mind I never found Sky Fall to be that great either. I find these Daniel Craig bond movies to be more dialogue then actual entertainment. You can tell this movie was rushed into production and it shows. Everyone in the entire film just feels so out of place and you can tell it through their acting. Anyone who gives it anything beyond a 6/10 must have been watching another film. Its bad.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

beingryanjudeFeb 18, 2016

One of the best opening sequences—and surely the most expensive—of any 007 film. Unfortunately, somewhere after the first 15 minutes, the film loses its footing and never recovers. Perhaps it’s the missing Judi Dench. Or, possibly, the lackOne of the best opening sequences—and surely the most expensive—of any 007 film. Unfortunately, somewhere after the first 15 minutes, the film loses its footing and never recovers. Perhaps it’s the missing Judi Dench. Or, possibly, the lack of screen time for a wonderful Christoph Waltz. Nevertheless, something isn’t quite right in wake of the brilliance that was SKYFALL in 2012.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ToFewViewsFeb 15, 2016

Going into Spectre I didn't have the highest expectations but was slightly surprised with some of the filming in this Movie. Parts like the opening and most of the fights are filmed great with no shaky cam or the fast blurry camera work youGoing into Spectre I didn't have the highest expectations but was slightly surprised with some of the filming in this Movie. Parts like the opening and most of the fights are filmed great with no shaky cam or the fast blurry camera work you see in most action films. The parts of action that are CGI blend well with the practical effects to come together seemingly...For the most part.The story is nothing new with it pretty much being the same to the new Mission Impossible movie, The build up in the mystery is alright but still makes you feel like it could have been more. On the other hand the acting is great and Daniel Craig, Christoph Waltz and Lea Seydoux all do a great job but I feel like more could have been done with Waltz's character. Action scenes where enjoyable and it all had that James Boned Feel that they should, Some scenes started to feel a little generic action movie. Overall if you enjoyed the other recent James Bond I'm sure you'll like this.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

LeZeeFeb 14, 2016

Not your usual Bond movie, but still a good entertainer.

What I liked from a couple of last Bond movies was they were off the regular 007 style, like not overly rely on spy's special gadgets. This change has been since the day one ofNot your usual Bond movie, but still a good entertainer.

What I liked from a couple of last Bond movies was they were off the regular 007 style, like not overly rely on spy's special gadgets. This change has been since the day one of Daniel Craig as a famous British spy, James Bond. Anyway, he's the most fittest (muscular) Bond I've ever seen and he's celebrating 10 year anniversary with this film release. But the question is whether he to do another film or done with the franchise. The doubt after the confusing end of this film.

The end was quite clear on the story perspective, so I kind of felt it was a farewell for Craig. But, later I came to know that the official source says Bond25 will be his fifth and so on till he opts out himself. 'Spectre' was a very simple Bond movie I have ever seen, but I can say the production quality was so good that you can't resist the enjoyment. The actors, they were also good, but not as I anticipated. Maybe many scenes were very ordinary for a Bond movie, that's comparable with the nowadays action movies, otherwise it was not as bad as critics expressing their disappointment.

You can't believe what I was disappointed, you know when they say what the C stands for - is that the best word they come up with against the M for Moron? Anyway, James Bond movies have always had ups and downs, the last film 'Skyfall' was a mega hit and now this has not stood up to that standard. But very entertaining with all the actions and unexpected turns in the narration. As a spy movie, it was okay, but as a Bond movie is what might upset you, so its upto you how you look at it. But to be honest, I enjoyed it.

7/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

alexnodeFeb 13, 2016

The last two Films seemed that they were leading the franchise to an interesting place. Spectre went two steps back to "sex, run, crash with style and repeat". Really silly plot , nice style.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

SpankyFeb 13, 2016

I knew this was going to be a bad Bond movie as soon as I saw the pale sepia toned filter used to film all outdoor and indoor scenes. It's always used, along with the blue filter to create "mood", by bad directors in an attempt to create aI knew this was going to be a bad Bond movie as soon as I saw the pale sepia toned filter used to film all outdoor and indoor scenes. It's always used, along with the blue filter to create "mood", by bad directors in an attempt to create a certain "feeling". It's not real and it doesn't work. How about giving us a decent movie with intelligent dialog and a real and normal colored scene? When are amateur filmmakers going to get it through their head?

The script, and dialog was shockingly horrible. My jaw dropped, I was shaking my head and almost laughing at the verbal exchanges between James and an assassin's widow. It was incredibly ludicrous. Who signed off on this piece of trash?

Speaking of the script, Bond keeps showing up to confront characters without explaining why and how he got there. Boom! All of a sudden he's in Europe jumping around finding and talking to all the right people at the right time. Even the attempt at humor is forced and banal.

The action isn't as good as past films. A car chase at night in Rome with absolutely no pedestrians or cars on the street is too hokey to be believed. This is not only the worst Bond movie with Daniel Craig, it is the worst Bond movie since the ludicrous Roger Moore films.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

koconnorFeb 12, 2016

It was predictable, slow and incredibly long. It would not end, it just going on and on and on and on...for 2.5 hours. I love James Bond movies and this was by FAR the worst one yet. Anybody who rated this a 10 probably isn't independent.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BrianMcCriticFeb 12, 2016

While Spectre delivers on style, compared to Skyfall it lacks some substance. Don't get me wrong this is still a pretty good time, but compared to Skyfall and Casino Royale I wanted more. B+

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

6

jamessFeb 11, 2016

There are things to like about Spectre, and things that have grown stale. The opening Day Of The Dead scene was beautifully shot and well executed. The "one take" scene from the hotel room to the Mexican rooftops was very well done, but theThere are things to like about Spectre, and things that have grown stale. The opening Day Of The Dead scene was beautifully shot and well executed. The "one take" scene from the hotel room to the Mexican rooftops was very well done, but the helicopter fight went on a little long for my taste. The building collapse tried to recreate the Skyfall crane/train feeling, but felt a bit forced (nice landing on a convenient couch). So what happens? Bond gets suspended because of Mexico. What happens next? Bond goes rogue. AGAIN. How many Bond movies, hell, how many spy movies have the plot involving the agent going rogue? Almost every MI? 17 Bond movies? The train fight scene is a great throwback to the physical fistfights of the Connery days, and the car chase is slick, but somehow not as exciting as recent vehicle chases from the MI's or Bourne's. There's no sense of real danger. And that's about all there is to recommend. Much has been said about Craig sleepwalking through the role, and his slightly pursed-lip serious look gets a serious workout. Without Taratino's dialogue (just see The Green Hornet, The Three Musketeers, etc. or best..don't), Waltz is rather flat as the villain. Bellucci is wasted in her very small role for a two and half hour film. And that's the thing. Do we a two and half hour James Bond? About as much as we need a two and half hour Judd Apatow comedy. MI Rogue Nation told a better story, with better action and did it twenty minutes shorter.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

chidimeFeb 6, 2016

Not bad but not necessarily good too. It picked up towards the end from the train fight scene but it just doesn't live up to other James Bond movies. Could be much better.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

in_obsessionJan 31, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Coming off the high that was Skyfall, a lot of people were expecting a lot out of this movie. And did it deliver?

....not really, no. In fact, I'd venture to say that it's probably only a bit better than Solace and definitely not up to calibre with Skyfall's success. The most serious flaw (a flaw that many movies have tbh) is in it's villain. I admit the introduction leading up to him was interesting but then it just...stagnates. He spends so much time talking about what he's done but never actually does anything. Not to mention the fail that was Andrew Scott. Not as an actor because the way he looks Bond up and down...ahhh that was a beautiful Moriarty look there, but his entire part could have been erased and it probably would have been a better movie. Let's not even talk about the uselessness that was Bautista's character. There was no need for the dramatics of his introduction. In fact, there was so much that could have been cut out and that time used instead to introduce more by way of character depth to the main villain.

It's so sad when so many great actors get together to make what could have been a great movie but had a shoddy script to work with.

The gold in this film lies not with anything Bond does with his Bond girls or M getting down into the trenches or even Andrew Scott's subtle interest in all the men in this movie, but in the Bond/Q relationship. Shipping aside, their chemistry is absolutely wonderful and I wish desperately that they had focused more on that than with their sad excuse for a romance. Each scene with them together was filled with snark and just...so much perfection.

Watch this movie if you just want to watch a Bond movie, no matter how bad it is. It's at least better than Solace?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JackalJan 29, 2016

This is absolutely going back into the formula that made James Bond great in the first place...he just needs a bit more humour and its spot on! but the movie in itself was superb just as it was supposed to be.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

YorkManJan 25, 2016

Spectre is merely an average Bond movie. There's been much better and, unfortunately, there has been far worse.

The main crux of the problem stems from the need to tie together the overarching storyline set up in the previous three DanielSpectre is merely an average Bond movie. There's been much better and, unfortunately, there has been far worse.

The main crux of the problem stems from the need to tie together the overarching storyline set up in the previous three Daniel Craig outings, and the introduction of the organisation of Spectre, with Blofeld at its head, being the super secret 'umbrella' cartel that has been yanking Bond's chain.

Why is this a problem? Because it, in numerous ways, undermines the whole notion of what had come before. Especially the plot devices used in Quantum of Solace and then expanded on in Skyfall. This was the idea that Quantum was THE criminal cartel. Why bring back Spectre and Blofeld (and the need to create a backstory that links Bond and Blofeld together, having a shared childhood)? Because the producers of the film were able to secure usage of the name, nothing more, nothing less.

As a film, it's directed fairly well, the cinematography is fine, the musical score isn't that memorable, and the acting performances (on the whole) are ok(?). But as a whole, it doesn't really add up to much.
Craig as Bond is on autopilot and if he's brought back again for a fifth outing (to close off the Blofeld story arc) he needs a director who'll kick his arse and make him look at least like he cares.
Same with Christophe Waltz as Blofeld. It's clear this film is designed to introduce the character (the ending is left ambiguous), and it's not a spoiler in any sense to know Blofeld doesn't die!
But Waltz is also just acting by numbers in this movie.
For me though, the biggest acting issue is the casting of Lea Seydoux as the 'main' Bond girl. She's as wooden as a toothpick and not much better to look at. When the 'minor' Bond girl (played by Monica Belucci in a fairly small role) is so much more memorable, then the casting director got something very wrong indeed!!

But, if I'm being critical, it's the script that fails the most. Craig has established a Bond who is both rugged and emotive, both tough and free to show his fear. In Spectre he's very flat, with none of the suaveness and one liners that he's poured onto the screen in earlier films. Add to that a plot which revolves around the internal machinations of MI5, a power struggle in the 'boardroom' between M and and an up and coming 'techie' who believes field agents are an outmoded concept in the digital/cctv/smartphone/laptop world, and the actual actions scenes feel like a completely different movie.
The dialogue is cliched, and there's so much exposition (because of the dual storylines, and the need to keep the audience 'up to date') that I came away feeling like someone had pushed that secondary storyline so hard, as merely a means to have a substantial run-time for the movie. Believe me, they could knock it down to 90 minutes and have the 'other' storyline merely pop up as a rationale, a few throwaway lines here and there, and it wouldn't have changed the way the main story developed.

Overall, it's just average. It's never going to be hailed as a Bond classic, and that's fair enough. I am just hoping they pull out all the stops and go for a massive action finale for Craig's final outing!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Jiano74Jan 25, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. An average Bond film should have been a lot better, Batista's (can't remember film name) car chase with Bond was bad should have been better. For this it is easier to refer to the characters by their real names as I can't remember character names. At first I didn't know why Christoph Waltz's character was spared at the end but then I fully understand when I realised who is character was, the white cat earlier in the film helped.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

TheGreatBakerJan 24, 2016

While this film isn't the best Bond Film for Daniel Craig, it still has a collection of great actors/actresses and scenes that define the Bond film's. This film also brings the realization of James Bond being a badass agent but still notWhile this film isn't the best Bond Film for Daniel Craig, it still has a collection of great actors/actresses and scenes that define the Bond film's. This film also brings the realization of James Bond being a badass agent but still not unbeatable. Great film overall and wonderful performance by Daniel Craig, and other actors.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

nahtan1244Jan 23, 2016

Spectre is Directed by the same guy who directed the fantastic Skyfall. The opening shot in mexico Is worth the price of admission alone. The opening credits are also beautifully made. Christoph waltz was a great casing choice as the mainSpectre is Directed by the same guy who directed the fantastic Skyfall. The opening shot in mexico Is worth the price of admission alone. The opening credits are also beautifully made. Christoph waltz was a great casing choice as the main villain. This movie leans toward the earlier entry's of the bond films and constantly makes subtle references to the earlier entry's. Back to the villain he delivered in every scene he appeared even though he only in like 3 scenes and didn't show up until half way into the movie. Also you could tell both Sam and Danial Craig were running out of steam as the movie went on. this will likely be Danial Craig's last bond movie but none of the less Spectre is way better than Quantum of solace and is very entertaining throughout even though it is not quite as good as casino royale or skyfall.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

CineAutoctonoJan 19, 2016

"SPECTRE" is a movie with lots of action and romance, but it was a little boring but very revealing , but I still doubt whether Daniel Craig as James Bond continues , if it continues as I'll get to see Daniel all the movies many times as"SPECTRE" is a movie with lots of action and romance, but it was a little boring but very revealing , but I still doubt whether Daniel Craig as James Bond continues , if it continues as I'll get to see Daniel all the movies many times as desired , and if not this may be the last of Daniel as James Bond , without hesitation Daniel Craig he has left a mark on this incredible saga.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

emirbudJan 18, 2016

I just cannot believe this site counts 460 positive reviews for this movie. It is possibly the dumbest and least imaginative movie ever made. It is also terribly boring and a terrible waste of talent. There are some respectable actors here,I just cannot believe this site counts 460 positive reviews for this movie. It is possibly the dumbest and least imaginative movie ever made. It is also terribly boring and a terrible waste of talent. There are some respectable actors here, without a single interesting line what so ever. I hope this is a warning enough for anyone contemplating watching this abomination. Let me get back to those positive reviews. The people who wrote them should be put on trial. They are criminals, because they lead innocent people to watch this mind damaging atrocity, and they should be prosecuted. Hold them accountable I say. Unbelievable.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

6

TheApplegnomeJan 17, 2016

007 is back, way back to the old & classic days of action & thrills -- but I don’t recall forced romance, rushed plot-lines nor vague writing being a part of this ”shoot first, ask later-franchise”. It’s James Bond; intense & cliché-ish007 is back, way back to the old & classic days of action & thrills -- but I don’t recall forced romance, rushed plot-lines nor vague writing being a part of this ”shoot first, ask later-franchise”. It’s James Bond; intense & cliché-ish action isn’t something new to the genre, and it does bring some great & odd moments to the screen. It’s a great action-flick, but not more than that. The major lack of a better visualization of characters, protagonist as antagonist, are shockingly vague. There’re some understanding & depth to the plot & characters -- but there could have been so much more. Character development? Relatable romance? More originality? Character & plot motivation? A not-odd and non-fitting title-sequence? Nope, not much of that. Still an entertaining & eye-popping flick, yes -- but at the expense of the future of the franchise, that’s for sure.

Personal rating: 67/100
Critical rating: 70/100… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews