Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures | Release Date (Streaming): December 25, 2020
8.2
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 731 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
627
Mixed:
59
Negative:
45
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
6
ZephlarDec 25, 2020
This movie captivated me quickly, but then left me a bit confused at parts. Not because anything was too ambitious or deep, it was more how disjointed the story seemed to be between the living world and spirit world. I don't want to ruinThis movie captivated me quickly, but then left me a bit confused at parts. Not because anything was too ambitious or deep, it was more how disjointed the story seemed to be between the living world and spirit world. I don't want to ruin anything but there are things that happen that flat out made zero sense and had my head scratching, especially in the last quarter of the movie. Also when the cat thing happened I was kinda like....I guess that has to be for the children because that route made way less sense to me than a fusion situation, where they were BOTH operating. It's one of those you have to just accept it's a fictional movie kind of deals.

I really enjoyed most of the characters a lot. Terry was my biggest gripe character-wise. I get you aren't supposed to like him and he's arguably the only antagonist if there is one, but he was just a means to an end obviously. I just felt like there was a struggle to connect the two realms to further the story in the writers room. There was a lot of hurrying things along near the end.

Overall a good movie that conveys a message about how our desire to seek purpose (and how those purposes can become obsessions) can take away from really "living" life. Just missed the mark a bit in the writers room.
Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
5
ZodwraithDec 27, 2020
This is difficult to rate. As an overall movie it's pretty good with deep meaning of life searching subject matter. Problem is it's pixar so if you sit the kids down expecting Frozen or the like they're going to be bored out of their minds.This is difficult to rate. As an overall movie it's pretty good with deep meaning of life searching subject matter. Problem is it's pixar so if you sit the kids down expecting Frozen or the like they're going to be bored out of their minds. This is drama with a capital D so maybe watch it before you think younger kids will enjoy it. Mine didn't. Not from a lack of quality but simply because it's just not a kids movie.

Given that I have to wonder why they would even put it in pixar's hands instead of just making it live action. The subject matter is majorly adult but the visuals are very kids movie. I didn't hate it but was very dissatisfied when I was looking for a family movie that made everyone happy.
Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
4
namelessDec 27, 2020
It is the movie "Heaven Can Wait" (1943 and 1978). Not sure why the people scenes are animated. The "uncanny valley" problem is huge, it pulls you out of the movie, over and over again. It really is a live-action & animated movie. It isn'tIt is the movie "Heaven Can Wait" (1943 and 1978). Not sure why the people scenes are animated. The "uncanny valley" problem is huge, it pulls you out of the movie, over and over again. It really is a live-action & animated movie. It isn't "The Incredibles" where the character's powers and stylization make sense. They tried to make it for all audiences and in the end, it isn't made for anyone. It is not for little kids because the theme is adult philosophical ideas and it is not for adults because the pacing and visuals are for kids. If you like "Inside Out" this will work for you, if you were just OK with "Inside Out" then make sure you have your fast forward button handy. Expand
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
4
MovieTurtleDec 25, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Amazing visuals, snappy dialogue, interesting characters, lacking story, deplorable protagonist, and an ending that doesn't provide closure. I'd say I barely enjoyed watching it and will probably not see it another time. This movie honestly feels like it's trying to imitate Pixar's Inside Out, but does so with disingenuous material and does it poorly.

We follow our main guy Joe along his life being obsessed with music and finally getting the gig he wants only to fall into a sewer and die. From there we get to see the Great Beyond and the Great Before; terms that become problematic when talking about any actual afterlife that the movie makes neatly side step by saying that's all in the beyond.
Joe is able to avoid the Beyond (only to put a time limit on his actions and to trick him into thinking he's special) and escapes to the Before, where he proceeds to get back to his body even at the cost of stealing other's lives. Joe constantly shows he's selfish and doesn't care about others and only changes after he destroys a life and only through Deus Machina fixes it.

Combined with a lot of psych nonsense rhetoric, anti-christian hints, and naive view of life makes this movie feel like a way of tricking the next generation the way Disney did the previous: feelings are all that matter.
Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
4
pardogatoDec 27, 2020
Emotional blackmail to make you feel bad if you happen to say you didn’t liked it. Seen in Korean Soap Operas and in Bollywood classics, now Pixar relies on this “ye olde” formula to explicitly state a positive feel-good “message” to guardEmotional blackmail to make you feel bad if you happen to say you didn’t liked it. Seen in Korean Soap Operas and in Bollywood classics, now Pixar relies on this “ye olde” formula to explicitly state a positive feel-good “message” to guard itself from its cinematic faults. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
4
LoZe12Jan 5, 2021
esto es de opinion mia asi que diré que no me gusto y ya pero eso si la animación es hermosa
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
screenplayhouseFeb 8, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. When I used to be a screenwriter type -- I'd sometimes write a story that was full of great ideas and such -- but at the end of the story it didn't nail the landing.

For days I'd scratch my head and try to make parts of the story more spectacular. Which this film does to... no effect. Except that it makes matters worse.

What I would then do is step back from MY story and act like it was written by someone else. What I would then do is go thru the 'rule book' (best practices of all great movies) and -- VOILA -- I'd discover broken rules. Everywhere.

Listen. I'm not talking about formula. I hate formula too. I'm talking about best practices. Do tables work best with four legs? Yup. So did Soul include tables with four legs? Or did they get caught up in/very distracted by their 'wonderful' story and forget these best practices? That's a big YUP.

The most appalling practice they violated was, "Who's story is this?" Like it or not, Pixar, every great story has one lead that the story belongs to. Did the Good Witch take over the story from Dorothy? Nope. Did Leia take over Luke's story? Nope. Did Buffalo Bob take over Starling's story? NOPE.

So why does SOUL think 22's story is more interesting than Joe's? To the (painful) degree that 22 inserts herself inside of Joe? This is not a transgender story. It was a story about a black man and jazz and then SOUL throws that in the dumpster.

So when this movie takes a victory lap for featuring a first black protagonist, think again. The morons are blissfully unaware that they got bored of that story and thought whitey ping pong ball Tina Fey was a better idea. Like I said, PAINFUL.

Tina Fey's role was supposed to be 'the best friend'. That's the 'best practice'. The entity that helps Joe on his journey. SHE should have become the cat, not Joe. The other major misstep in this piece is what I call WRITERS WRITING ABOUT WRITING. Instead of telling a story for all of us -- they're telling their story. The obvious violation of this is when a story is about a writer writing a screenplay that gets produced and his girl decides to marry him because "you're such a great writer!"

In SOUL Writers Writing About Writing is much better hidden. But it's there. You see the audience was pitched this story about a jazz musician. So what we wanted to see was a musician who goes 'into the zone' and makes us feel all warm and jazzy.

Jazz, in this story, is really about being a Disney animator. Spending morning noon and night rendering crap on computers. This was hinted at in the scene where the stock broker is given a soul. Remember what he did the moment that happened? He pushed his PC and monitor off his desk and ran out of the room gleeful to be alive. In other words: "Don't be a tool like me and sit in front of a computer all day. Go outside, in the sunshine, watch a leaf fall, and enjoy a slice of pizza!!!!"

This 'universal truth' is more an accidental recommendation of the story instead of an inspired goal. And really -- this viewer would have rather watched a musician find JAZZ and by doing so somehow unlock the secret of the universe. And I don't love jazz that much, mind you. It's just that --

-- yet another best practice is called 'If you put a gun on the stage -- use it." The gun, in SOUL, is jazz. Which they trashed for a slice of pizza.

This movie is being rated better than it should because black lives matter. But the cynical way this film blackspoited Joe to tell Tina's story is APPALLING.

5 stars is being generous.

I'm giving this film a 5 but frankly it's not worth recommending or seeing again.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
debieApr 26, 2021
Disappointing! I liked the message but the delivery wasn't as entertaining or clever as we are used to from Pixar. This was definitely geared toward adults, and almost at the expense of kids. Unlike 'Inside Out', which had an adult theme butDisappointing! I liked the message but the delivery wasn't as entertaining or clever as we are used to from Pixar. This was definitely geared toward adults, and almost at the expense of kids. Unlike 'Inside Out', which had an adult theme but was fun and enjoyable for children, I can't see this movie holding the attention of the younger audience. There was very little humor or fun to this movie. It was slow and matter of fact, and I doubt kids will decipher the moral of the story. This movie probably won't be one your kids will ask to watch over and over. I also think the ending came up short... it would have been nice to see how the lessons affected change in the 2 character's futures...a "12-years later" scene would have been nice, IMHO!! 4/2021 Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
BulgarianCriticJan 18, 2021
This movie was pretty fine by all means but unfortunately it wasn't anything special or unique. The idea was fine, the animation was the same as the studio's previous animations and it wasn't really breath taking. The humor was fine for theThis movie was pretty fine by all means but unfortunately it wasn't anything special or unique. The idea was fine, the animation was the same as the studio's previous animations and it wasn't really breath taking. The humor was fine for the most part and I enjoyed the moral of the story but sadly the entire movie felt really average and not that interesting. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
clem666Jan 6, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A huge step forward for Disney who continues to extend the cultural variety and diversity of its characters. This time we follow an old black man whose passion is jazz. Everything is far from being perfect in his daily life, especially the day he comes to die by accident. The story really begins at this point. I think this is truly ingenious and even thought it was going to be a far more interesting movie than I expected. Following a man in his fifties is awesome. Following a man struggling with life but who realizes that it could be worse is great. Following a man who dies by being not enough focus in the streets is promising. Following a man trying to make a living from music is profound.

Soundtrack is as great as the animation. Pace in general is a bit weird with two serious slow and sleepy parts. Scenario was awesome at some point but ends up getting all messed up...

The rest of the story we follow Joe Gardner's soul in heaven who obviously wants to come back to Earth as soon as possible. He comes up to encounter some disruptive elements allowing the movie to take a huge funny yet unnecessary journey to make the kids laugh because in overall this movie is really hard to understand for them. For example, creatures living in heaven are just human concept ideas and are wierdly represented. Without speaking about a particular religion this movie however question their existence and especially asks the question of life after death (and life before life).

The ending is what made me lower the score so much. You don't die from nothing. Dying by accident doesn't make your death funnier, easier for your friends and family, less unexpected or even reversible. The major flaw of this movie is that it sweetens the reality of life too much. What would you have thought if Bambi's mother or Simba's father had woken up as if nothing had happened after being mortally wounded? Or the queen in 'White Snow'? Or Synndrome in 'The Incredibles'? 'Soul', in its core-story, is way too close to reality to allow itself to take death lightly. The fact it came out during COVID should have make the directors think more about it. If you want to sell dreams, sell real dreams, if you want to get closer to daily life, do it. But don't get piteously stuck in between. There were some truly attractive points in 'Soul' but when you consider it as a whole you easily realize it is falling into pieces.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
MarvaSoJan 6, 2021
Intentaron que la película fuera divertida pero se me quedaron en el intento sin pena y sin gloria.
fue muy compleja y demos gracias que muchos si entendimos, pero no generalicemos a que todos vamos a entender. Pixar es que estás rodeado de
Intentaron que la película fuera divertida pero se me quedaron en el intento sin pena y sin gloria.
fue muy compleja y demos gracias que muchos si entendimos, pero no generalicemos a que todos vamos a entender. Pixar es que estás rodeado de gente brillante, artistas talentosos que te ayudan a ir más allá pero, no se si se están esforzando para dar algo de calidad o solo están lanzando películas por que solo quieren monetizar.
-Mar
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Ivan_NevesenkoDec 30, 2020
Truly complicated questions can't be simply answered

Pixar has always been my favorite animation studio (along with Ghibli) and today I was lucky to watch "Soul" in a movie theatre: I can't say that I did not like "Soul", but it has a number
Truly complicated questions can't be simply answered

Pixar has always been my favorite animation studio (along with Ghibli) and today I was lucky to watch "Soul" in a movie theatre: I can't say that I did not like "Soul", but it has a number of problems, which makes the overenthusiastic reviews from critics seem unjustified to me.

"Soul" touches upon complicated philosophical issues (the issues of life and death, as well as the search for purpose and meaning of one's own existence), which, I felt like, are too difficult not only for children who will probably fall asleep in the cinema, but also for the authors themselves, who seemed to be confused, trying to understand what they want to tell the audience in the end.

The answers and solutions to the (insoluble) existential questions offered by "Soul" seem to me somewhat unsatisfactory. Digging deeper than commercial animation filmmakers usually do, Pixar's scriptwriters have reached a level where any attempt to answer a question clearly and unequivocally, will look naive.

In "Soul" there is A LOT of things that can get more and more confusing the more you think about logic of the world created by Pixar, but it gets even more embarassing when you realise what it lacks: for example, themes of love and loneliness, past which the storyline deftly maneuvers. It's difficult for me to agree with the formula "love of life" = "the ability to enjoy little things and what we call "routine"" (A slice of pizza? Riding a bike?) = "happy life." I think this formula obviously lacks at least love, friendship and a sense of belonging to something greater than one's self.

It's possible (and sometimes even useful) to speak simply about such complex things with adults and children, but to claim to be true in this case means to impose a point of view and even show a share of ignorance, leveling thousands of years of the history of the development of existential philosophy.

However, it's still a unique and enjoyable animated film that was fun for me to watch. I think it is better to stay at this level of perception and not try to unravel the tangle, which neither Nietzsche, nor Sartre, nor Kierkegaard, nor the authors of "Soul" managed to do successfully.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
lelel5384Dec 31, 2020
É um filme muito bom, com um ótimo desenvolvimento porém o final é meio decepcionante e daria para finalizar de uma maneira mais tocante.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
saeeDexterJan 3, 2021
First of all nice idea but just that, there is nothing more, even not deep emotional moments. just a nice idea and they just wanned to put it in your mind ok enjoy of every single minutes of your pathetic life even walking what next. thereFirst of all nice idea but just that, there is nothing more, even not deep emotional moments. just a nice idea and they just wanned to put it in your mind ok enjoy of every single minutes of your pathetic life even walking what next. there was no creativity in performance.in comparison to up or inside out it's disappoiting. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
megomikeJan 29, 2021
Soul is Pixar’s attempt to add humor to death under ironic circumstance. While playing fast and loose with the concept of birth, death and the afterlife, it often succeeds, but misses its opportunity to give life to itself with a trulySoul is Pixar’s attempt to add humor to death under ironic circumstance. While playing fast and loose with the concept of birth, death and the afterlife, it often succeeds, but misses its opportunity to give life to itself with a truly worthy theme. Instead, Soul suggests that humans with a true purpose in life abandon their excellence in favor of acceptance and the world’s view of carpe diem. In short, it’s an attack on introverts and artists. While a somewhat entertaining film there are a dozen messages that are not especially positive for young viewers. As a piece of pure fiction, however, it delivers the typical feast of Pixar humor and humanity. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews