Dimension Films | Release Date: December 12, 1997
8.4
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 668 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
568
Mixed:
70
Negative:
30
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
3
BerCJul 3, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The artistic medium of film is very subjective. Every audience member has a different set of criteria they use to measure their viewing experience. Not everyone shares the same set of criteria. If we did, what a bland and uninspired world this would be.

What I Personally Liked About "Scream 2":
Right off the bat, let me say that the two best things about this sequel are Neve Campbell and Jamie Kennedy. They bring the same energy and same characterizations to this second installment that they brought to the first. It seems like they slipped effortlessly back into their roles whereas Courteney Cox and David Arquette struggled here and there. The death of Kennedy's character Randy was one of the best sequences of the movie and was a necessary evil as the ante always needs to be upped in sequels. Personally, I just think it's a shame Dewey didn't die while they were at it. Liev Schreiber was also a wonderful supporting actor who fits the film well. If they could have only found a few more people like him who didn't automatically turn into overacting hyenas, we would have been all set. While we're at it, Peter Deming's magnificent cinematography should be noted as one of the highlights of this production. Visual framing this good really deserves a better movie to accompany its presence.

What I Personally Disliked About "Scream 2":
For the most part, this sequel takes itself more seriously than its predecessor did and this hampers the enjoyment tremendously. Where the first film lampooned the horror genre, this second chapter feels like it's striving to fit in with the very flicks the initial production thumbed its nose at. In addition, it succumbs to the pitfall that plagues most scary movie sequels: it feels like we've seen it all before. It has nothing new to bring to the table. A good example of this is the boyfriend issue. For those of you (like myself) who thought Skeet Ulrich was the height of conventionality, I give you Jerry O'Connell. Yikes. He just had to sing, too, didn't he? Oh, the horror! I'm also not a big fan of Courteney's hair. Seriously. Who in their right mind thought THAT looked good? Double yikes. The inclusion of the painfully unfunny sorority girl stereotypes was also an abysmal decision which, of course, would make triple yikes. I thought watching Arquette in the first film was like being slammed against a brick wall but these girls take the cake. At least David had the good sense to ever so slightly tone down his buffoonish antics. Let's be completely honest with each other as well, shall we? The twist ending in this picture is a little lame and quite a bit forced when compared next to the innovation of the original.

My Overall Impression of "Scream 2":
At two hours in length, this film is about forty minutes too long. A lot of sequences (particularly the atrocious last third of the movie) seem to drag out endlessly and the viewer is left to wonder what happened to Wes Craven's normally tight directing skills. There are some briefly enjoyable moments scattered about, but this sequel feels more tired than inspired.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
2
motionpaintingsNov 21, 2020
i think that sequels are never particularly good. especially not in horror. This film confirms my attitude again.
0 of 16 users found this helpful016
All this user's reviews
3
imthenoobFeb 15, 2020
Scream 2 recycles a bit too much from the original while lacking what the original so good. The story is atrocious and the multiple re-writes that when on during production did nothing but hurt the movie overall. The plot made zero sense, theScream 2 recycles a bit too much from the original while lacking what the original so good. The story is atrocious and the multiple re-writes that when on during production did nothing but hurt the movie overall. The plot made zero sense, the twist involving the killers felt totally out of left-field. It was bad and it goes to show that sometimes you just can't capture lightning in a bottle a second time around. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews