Lionsgate | Release Date: November 21, 2018
3.8
USER SCORE
Generally unfavorable reviews based on 172 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
36
Mixed:
49
Negative:
87
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
2
The3AcademySinsJul 8, 2019
A borderline offensive, unwatchable mess, 2018's Robin Hood is a horrible adaptation that I regret watching. The opening sequence with the hand-holding narration can be construed as insulting. The second sequence portraying the Crusades asA borderline offensive, unwatchable mess, 2018's Robin Hood is a horrible adaptation that I regret watching. The opening sequence with the hand-holding narration can be construed as insulting. The second sequence portraying the Crusades as the American War in the Middle East IS insulting. Getting back to England after Robin's attempted and unpunished mutiny isn't much better. The talent of the cast is completely wasted on this hackjob, lazy, cashgrab of a script. The effects are goofy at best and laughably fake at worst. The story is full of cliches and forced storytelling. The pace of this movie is so stilted I almost fell asleep during a 90 minute movie. Apart from some nice moments from the cast, there is almost nothing redeemable here. Expand
4 of 4 users found this helpful40
All this user's reviews
2
Firewing2Feb 15, 2019
A tragically misguided mishmash of a poor mans' Guy Ritchie and the Mask of Zorro... I give this a 2 only as a nod to the talented cast, painfully squandered on a worthless script and direction struggling to reach mediocrity.
4 of 4 users found this helpful40
All this user's reviews
2
dc127Mar 6, 2019
When I saw all of the bad reviews I thought "the movie can't really be that bad." I was wrong. So wrong. There was clearly a lot of money dumped into this film. Some of the visuals were downright amazing. I also appreciated how it tried toWhen I saw all of the bad reviews I thought "the movie can't really be that bad." I was wrong. So wrong. There was clearly a lot of money dumped into this film. Some of the visuals were downright amazing. I also appreciated how it tried to portray soldiers akin to what occurs in the middle east now. I mean I appreciated how they were swinging big and that it was an interesting choice.

Everything else in the film is a disaster. The pacing and plot are just terrible. None of the set pieces pay off. I was also very annoyed at how they were very heavy handed about a parallel to the US being in the middle east being evil and how the church is just a bunch of evil white men. For the record the Crusades were a response to invasions by muslims, not aggression by Christians into Muslim lands. It was clear that the script was written by a bunch of hacks with liberal views thinking they were clever. Instead you got a poor film and a wasted cast.
Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
2
stsilverFeb 15, 2019
There's nothing from Robin Hood in this grotesque trash apart from character names.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
0
Ben_RuckusMar 8, 2019
I did not think there could have been a worse remake than the Russell Crowe version. As abysmal as the King Arthur remake. Modern language and modern concept references used just shows extremely lazy writing.
Not even worth watching for free.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
3
Happy-KMay 29, 2019
A new Robin Hood Movie. I wanted to give the Film a fair chance but there isn't much you can like about the Movie. The Story is nothing new and everybody basically knows it already. The cast has some Talented actors but they cannot use thereA new Robin Hood Movie. I wanted to give the Film a fair chance but there isn't much you can like about the Movie. The Story is nothing new and everybody basically knows it already. The cast has some Talented actors but they cannot use there potential. There is of course a Love Triangle. Romantic in the most cringiest boring and dumbest way possible. And there is no real chemistry between the Characters. The scenes between the Action set pieces are pretty boring ,but if seen worse. The only thing i liked are some of the Action Scenes and the bow Skill Of Taron Egerton. But its better to watch the Training clipes than the Movie. The Editing is also awkward. It uses fast camera movement and Slow-mo but just does not fell right. The overall Setting would be interesting if it wouldnt be a Robin hood movie, it just does not fit for the Character. The Film kind of fells it wants to be a Guy Ritchie Film without understanding how to use his Style Correct, and what make his Movies entertaining and re-watchable. I was bored for 80% of the whole Run-time. Its nothing more than an uncreative Blockbuster that has no own ideas and Takes every ideas from better Movies. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
2
DodgerAug 18, 2019
This movie is shockingly bad. For evidently having a large budget this movie could of been made by first year film students. Literaly no redeeming qualities beyond perhaps the direciton they went with the first 5 minutes sort of a "modernThis movie is shockingly bad. For evidently having a large budget this movie could of been made by first year film students. Literaly no redeeming qualities beyond perhaps the direciton they went with the first 5 minutes sort of a "modern filter" on medievil warfare.

Very poor, avoid if possible.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
1
PedrusMar 1, 2020
What the hell is this? On the very first 15 min I have seen an American war movie with things like "the crusades .on Afghanistan." or "the sheriff of Nottingham" sending recruitment letters to the people.
25 min have been enough to see that
What the hell is this? On the very first 15 min I have seen an American war movie with things like "the crusades .on Afghanistan." or "the sheriff of Nottingham" sending recruitment letters to the people.
25 min have been enough to see that this is not robin hood movie. Another ruined movie because a terrible script. North American people, really, learn more about other cultures and stop adapting other cultures history or legends into your single vision of the world.
In summary, do not put a minute into this movie.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
0
LunalalaJul 22, 2019
Nope... Just nope... This movie should’ve never been made, It is the most generic, Boring, Stupid, terrible, disgusting, ugly, dull, and pointless movie I’ve ever watched, No one asked for this, not a single person... I fell asleep for theNope... Just nope... This movie should’ve never been made, It is the most generic, Boring, Stupid, terrible, disgusting, ugly, dull, and pointless movie I’ve ever watched, No one asked for this, not a single person... I fell asleep for the second half, and we were at a 6:30 showing. No one should have to endure this movie, it’s more torture than movie. Trust me... Every other action movie is better than this... Even the actors, who are usually good... Give such dull performances... Robin Hood should stick too fluffy animals I guess... Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
0
Dostoyevsky3May 15, 2020
Containing pathetic performances, Robin Hood smothers its classic material with a modernized action-packed atrocity that provides dishonorable and unethical messages.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
0
Azhar123May 23, 2021
Garbage movie.
Wasted 1h56m of my time. A class action lawsuit should be filed against the director for the time that they owe every poor soul who had to suffer through this so called movie. Robin hood : men in tights was a better film. Not
Garbage movie.
Wasted 1h56m of my time. A class action lawsuit should be filed against the director for the time that they owe every poor soul who had to suffer through this so called movie. Robin hood : men in tights was a better film. Not even close to the drama or epicness of the 1991 and 2010 from that took different approaches to the character but atleast did it well.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
Pan_KrytykSep 29, 2021
no no no... huge misteake.. do not waste your time... please do not do it this ;)
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
1
kamgeforceNov 22, 2018
I dont give it 0 only because I wasn´t disappointed. I knew its gonna be an incredible piece of **** garbage.
9 of 10 users found this helpful91
All this user's reviews
1
RudygerDec 4, 2018
Dear Hollywood: litterally NO ONE asked for another reboot of this well-known story. Haven't you learned any lesson from king Arthur box office bomb? People want something new, original! At least, if you're disgusing a historical movie into aDear Hollywood: litterally NO ONE asked for another reboot of this well-known story. Haven't you learned any lesson from king Arthur box office bomb? People want something new, original! At least, if you're disgusing a historical movie into a modernized antifa propaganda, with modernized outfits, make it happen in modern days. Expand
7 of 8 users found this helpful71
All this user's reviews
0
NavyBeanNov 25, 2018
It's obvious the guy giving all the same POSITIVE reviews is the same person from the WAY he WRITES. This movie is awful and no matter how many burner accounts the brother of the director uses to try and convince you otherwise save your timeIt's obvious the guy giving all the same POSITIVE reviews is the same person from the WAY he WRITES. This movie is awful and no matter how many burner accounts the brother of the director uses to try and convince you otherwise save your time and money. Expand
6 of 7 users found this helpful61
All this user's reviews
0
imthenoobJan 23, 2019
Yes, It's surprisingly as awful as critics made it out to be. And it's not just bad, It's dreadfully boring and doesn't even remotely entertain.
6 of 7 users found this helpful61
All this user's reviews
0
DragonloupNov 25, 2018
Let me summarize the movie
Dumb acting ,so many plot holes all over that you need a 4x4 to go through the movie, completly incoherent story , bow that becomes faster and more powerfull than ak47 with infinite arrows....I mean the director
Let me summarize the movie
Dumb acting ,so many plot holes all over that you need a 4x4 to go through the movie, completly incoherent story , bow that becomes faster and more powerfull than ak47 with infinite arrows....I mean the director was tripping . What does the actors are doing in this pile of $h!+
Expand
6 of 7 users found this helpful61
All this user's reviews
0
calledman123Nov 24, 2018
What a **** movie, boring, acting from the actors was bad, cgi was bad, don’t recommend at all.
6 of 7 users found this helpful61
All this user's reviews
3
AceZachRocks2Nov 21, 2018
If you want a really cheesy Robin hood movie that changes the story you like and the performances and character design and pretty much everything in terms of landscape then here you go. Besides Taron Egerton everyone sucks, the performancesIf you want a really cheesy Robin hood movie that changes the story you like and the performances and character design and pretty much everything in terms of landscape then here you go. Besides Taron Egerton everyone sucks, the performances come off as awkward and cheesy. The action looks bad basically every action scene has bad cgi and slow motion and it is annoying. If you wanted a good Robin hood movie, Men in Tights is more realistic. If this gets a sequel which with the movies its going up against this weekend I doubt it will, They better get an experience director and writer to helm it because these people have made the simplest form of entertainment for the I don't care movie fans, who believe as long as I can here the action and see stuff happening then its coolllllllllll. But no for me and most movie fans we will not enjoy this. Go see anything else out, except nutcracker. 2.5/10 Expand
11 of 14 users found this helpful113
All this user's reviews
2
DotTheEyesNov 22, 2018
Dismal. At its core, it commits a similar sin as Ridley Scott's 2010 film, which is still far more accomplished and satisfying overall. It does not realize Robin Hood's charm is best encapsulated by Errol Flynn, committing acts of daringDismal. At its core, it commits a similar sin as Ridley Scott's 2010 film, which is still far more accomplished and satisfying overall. It does not realize Robin Hood's charm is best encapsulated by Errol Flynn, committing acts of daring (yes, in tights) with a heavy dose of mischief, romance, and whimsy.

Scott used Robin as a bizarre Trojan horse to dramatize the origin of the Magna Carta and revisit beats in Gladiator and Kingdom of Heaven. This film posits the Sheriff of Nottingham is a war profiteer responsible in large part for the Crusades in the Holy Land, and he forces the Nottingham peasantry to live in and around mines (an industrial wasteland out of Mad Max); it is as overblown as it is preposterous. (The cringe-worthy opening voice-over edgily assures us, "This is no bedtime story.") One longs for a charismatic bandit in the forest instead of a po-faced revolutionary in leather.

Director Otto Bathurst's approach feels schizophrenic, as if he followed a different studio mandate every other day on set. At times the picture plays as a fairly standard Hollywood-style medieval adventure, albeit not a very impressively staged one, but then there are abrupt, bizarre lapses into Moulin Rouge!-style anachronism and badly outdated aesthetics in the vein of 300, including egregious overuse of computer-enhanced slow motion. It never finds a consistent stylistic rhythm; the comics-panel end credits, following a sad tease of a sequel we will never see, suggest perhaps the intention was to pretend Robin Hood is a superhero, the -first- first Avenger. Who knows?

And though it presumably enjoyed a healthy budget, the production feels cut-rate at points, from obvious use of green-screen to official edicts and wanted posters that appear as if they were created in Microsoft Word by an intern using the most "antique" font he or she could find on the drop-down menu

Everyone in the strong-on-paper cast responds to the void by either appearing adrift (Jamie Foxx has no clue how to play his role, an Arab man trying to avenge his son's death at the hands of English soldiers, and spends his time on screen squinting and changing his accent) or doubling down on what they assume is expected of them (Ben Mendelsohn uses every snide sneer and bellicose growl in his toolbox to play the oddly stationary role of the Sheriff). I was particularly disappointed by how unimpressive Bono's daughter Eve Hewson is as Maid Marian, here conceived as an improbably stylish quasi-social activist. She delivered a sublime performance (at times eerie, at times sensual, at time vulnerable) on Steven Soderbergh's The Knick, one of my favorite television series, but none of the magnetism is on display in her first high-profile on-the-poster film role.
Expand
14 of 18 users found this helpful144
All this user's reviews
0
TylerNFDec 2, 2018
Poorly acted trash with a plot that doesn't even vaguely try to capture the feel of Robinhood. Special effects are OK, but the whole setting is a cringey, muddy, mess like someone tried to rip off Game of Thrones or the gritty reboot trendPoorly acted trash with a plot that doesn't even vaguely try to capture the feel of Robinhood. Special effects are OK, but the whole setting is a cringey, muddy, mess like someone tried to rip off Game of Thrones or the gritty reboot trend but without any idea how to do it well. And top of that this movie is also communist propaganda. At one point they literally say "redistribute the wealth," lol, what trash. Expand
6 of 8 users found this helpful62
All this user's reviews
2
qqiwkqaqwDec 2, 2018
How to mess up Robin Hood, but it's never possibile for all live action are always awful, the original was a masterpiece, but this is a really garbage.
5 of 7 users found this helpful52
All this user's reviews
2
eagleeyevikingApr 12, 2019
While some action set pieces are entertaining, "Robin Hood" is an absolute mess when it comes to everything else. The underdeveloped characters look disinterested in the poorly constructed plot, and the costume design makes it seem like aWhile some action set pieces are entertaining, "Robin Hood" is an absolute mess when it comes to everything else. The underdeveloped characters look disinterested in the poorly constructed plot, and the costume design makes it seem like a commercial for modern day Zara outfits even though the film is set in the distant past. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
cynic69Dec 10, 2021
Yeah wauw jet another robin sigh hood movie, this is just what i wanted to see. This will get me out of my chair to get to the overpriced cinema.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
suavapaFeb 23, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Modern fashion suits. Molotov cocktail in green beer bottles. SWAT with shields. Casino hall with roulette and many more crap like these ... I can not believe how low is cinema these days. Every second director is oligophrenic and proudly shows it to the world under tumultuous applause ... Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
evokingsJul 22, 2019
This movie has so many issues that need to be addressed, so much so that I might miss a few key problems in my review, I apologize in advance if I fail to mention something that viewers are bound to hate lol, but lets get into the review, IThis movie has so many issues that need to be addressed, so much so that I might miss a few key problems in my review, I apologize in advance if I fail to mention something that viewers are bound to hate lol, but lets get into the review, I will start with: the background props and sets/clothing, pretty much the whole movie design, to be brief and to the point, it's not fooling anyone, we're supposed to be back in robin hoods time, which is the past, and this is a problem for a lot of modern films that delve into the past, and I have mentioned this in a few of my other reviews, but everything is way too clean just not done well enough to convince viewers that we are in a time of less conveniences, as for clothing well this is one of my biggest gripes with the film whoever did the costume/wardrobe listen you can't put robin hood in a "JC penny style" button up dress shirt answering the door in one scene, and then a leather hoodie with exotic diamond patches the next, then the white long sleeve shirts for the training montage, come on a man that was supposed to be born in 1160 it's all wrong, and I know the stupid monologue in the opening of the movie, which I will be going into detail about soon, said "forget what you know about robin hood" but hey lets get real if a movie gives no effort to produce something close to it's own source material or show that they give a dang it makes the viewer open his mind up to what other movies they watched and what source material or movie it's ripping off, which is yet another thing that needs to be addressed lol, but as for the monologue it seems like it was thrown in to help explain the awkwardness of the movie as it progresses, but here is the thing fryer tuck is the voice they chose to do the monologue, think about that for a second, this is robin hoods tale yet he does not perform the voice for the monologue that plays throughout the movie, which would have added more depth to the character had robin voiced the monologue, and made it feel more focused as opposed to told from someone whom has a limited perspective on the matter, I almost forgot the commoners/peasants if that's what you want to call these well dressed people rotfl, call him "hood" or "The hood" in the movie no doubt hoping to cash in on the success of the hit CW TV series Arrow [for those that don't know the main characters alter ego in the show is known as the Hood], now that reminds me this movie pretty much flat out rips off or takes elements from these movies: Zero dark thirty, The count of Monte Cristo, Star wars episode 1, James bond, the matrix, the fast and the furious, just to name a few, and here is how the movie does it... Zero Dark thirty because middle eastern conflict and machine gun arrows yes they want you to know they existed not semi automatic full on automatic with a mount for a gopro and a samsung galaxy lol, you know this movie is soo bad at times it seems as though the script must have been rewritten or something, for example when robin hood returns from his crusade he does not let his maiden know he is alive, at first and it genuinely seems like he wants to keep it that way for some reason, then he's like you know what I'm Edmond Dantès from the count of monte cristo I don;t care if she sees me, now here take my money people and sheriff lol, episode 1 of star wars because politics are discussed more then some might care in the movie I know I'm grasping at straws a little here lol, James bond because, Maid Marion shows up at a casino and they gamble for some reason and then talk politics afterwards, I suppose it sort of goes into star wars episode 1 again here lol. the Matrix well slow-mo action after hiding behind large pillars as cover, that get destroyed by oncoming enemy arrows in slow-mo, it's totally and shamelessly a matrix rip here, fast and the furious because were steeling money heist style over the top cheese with fire and the hoods merry, well dressed for the era, men walking gangsta style with cocktails sort of a stupid scene in the movie [I'd be lying if I said i did not laugh while watching this]. in closing the acting and dialog is all over the place ranging from passable to down right terrible save for maybe: little john, fryer tuck, and maybe the sheriff, so if you read this long rant I'm sure you can understand why I gave it a 2 lol. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
PiranteApr 5, 2019
There are a lot of faults that could be picked at here: bad sets, uninspiring action set pieces, cheap-looking CGI, awful costumes, mediocre acting. Yet I could at least partially forgive these things if the plot was a) interesting and b)There are a lot of faults that could be picked at here: bad sets, uninspiring action set pieces, cheap-looking CGI, awful costumes, mediocre acting. Yet I could at least partially forgive these things if the plot was a) interesting and b) executed well. Sadly it is neither of these. I would not recommend this movie to anyone. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
Space84rmNov 1, 2019
Orrendo, frettoloso non segui nemmeno un filo logico sulle ambientazione e attori più finti che mai
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
armcoZMay 26, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The only thing this horrible movie shares with the tale of Robin Hood is the name. Everything else is completely different and modernised. If you want a movie about the famous thief who stole from the rich and gave to the poor, this movie is not for you.

This movie feels like a commentary on modern day politics, not a tale of the hero of the common folk. Starting right at the depiction of a crusade. The crusade very clearly represents the invasion of Iraq by the USA, not to mention that never has it been mentioned in a tale that Robin Hood has ever participated in a crusade.

This movie contains a lot of historical inaccuracies - the Sheriff of Nottingham wearing a modern suit, the muslim warriors using some strange version of a crossbow which is able to shoot bolt after bolt as if it was a firearm using magazines, Sheriff's guards using riot shields, the protestors using fire bombs, and a lot more - this is just the tip of the iceberg.

The same goes to the rest of the movie - the performance feels mediocre at best, the setting, that is, Robin's mansion (yes, in this movie Robin Hood does not live in Sherwood Forest) and Nottingham do not look medieval, and so on, so on and so on.

All in all this movie excels only in one thing - disrespecting the legendary tale of Robin Hood, wrongly accused hero of the common folk. Quite ironic how the image of a great and honourable man has once again been destroyed by the rich.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
makurashiniNov 29, 2020
It's not that bad, but it's kinda stupid. It can be watched, but the screenwriting really sucks. All stereotipilicall stuff, not so good hollywood screenplay. Its funnny and you can watch it, but younhave to shut down your brain a little bit.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
snaesDec 27, 2021
Jew propaganda machine, degrading everyone's history and trying to erase truth with fabrication and dogmas.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
DarkwingSchmuckMar 8, 2022
Full of unintentional laughs, this bonkers take on Robin Hood is played entirely straight. There is nary a whiff of self awareness for its own bizarre tone or mix of modern aesthetics and 18th-century setting. Not only does this not deserveFull of unintentional laughs, this bonkers take on Robin Hood is played entirely straight. There is nary a whiff of self awareness for its own bizarre tone or mix of modern aesthetics and 18th-century setting. Not only does this not deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence as Errol Flynn, it'll make you long for the days of Ridley Scott's dreary adaptation or Kevin Costner's attempt at a British accent. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews