Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Robin Hood (2018)

2

The3AcademySinsJul 8, 2019

A borderline offensive, unwatchable mess, 2018's Robin Hood is a horrible adaptation that I regret watching. The opening sequence with the hand-holding narration can be construed as insulting. The second sequence portraying the Crusades asA borderline offensive, unwatchable mess, 2018's Robin Hood is a horrible adaptation that I regret watching. The opening sequence with the hand-holding narration can be construed as insulting. The second sequence portraying the Crusades as the American War in the Middle East IS insulting. Getting back to England after Robin's attempted and unpunished mutiny isn't much better. The talent of the cast is completely wasted on this hackjob, lazy, cashgrab of a script. The effects are goofy at best and laughably fake at worst. The story is full of cliches and forced storytelling. The pace of this movie is so stilted I almost fell asleep during a 90 minute movie. Apart from some nice moments from the cast, there is almost nothing redeemable here.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

2

Firewing2Feb 15, 2019

A tragically misguided mishmash of a poor mans' Guy Ritchie and the Mask of Zorro... I give this a 2 only as a nod to the talented cast, painfully squandered on a worthless script and direction struggling to reach mediocrity.

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

4

TVJerryNov 28, 2018

Director Otto Bathurst is best known for the TV series "Peaky Blinders" and his rough, raw style is apparent in this revision of the classic tale. Taron Egerton plays the titular lord, who teams up with a Moor (Jamie Foxx) to take on theDirector Otto Bathurst is best known for the TV series "Peaky Blinders" and his rough, raw style is apparent in this revision of the classic tale. Taron Egerton plays the titular lord, who teams up with a Moor (Jamie Foxx) to take on the immoral Sherriff and the Catholic church in an attempt to help his village's struggling workers. Besides the fact that the period is funked up with modern, punk elements, the plot is so absurdly jiggered that it strains credibility and turns Hood into a superhero, instead of a scrappy everyman. Playing to Bathurst's skills, there's plenty of well-staged action and angry violence, but the overall effect of this reboot feels empty and not especially inventive.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

2

dc127Mar 6, 2019

When I saw all of the bad reviews I thought "the movie can't really be that bad." I was wrong. So wrong. There was clearly a lot of money dumped into this film. Some of the visuals were downright amazing. I also appreciated how it tried toWhen I saw all of the bad reviews I thought "the movie can't really be that bad." I was wrong. So wrong. There was clearly a lot of money dumped into this film. Some of the visuals were downright amazing. I also appreciated how it tried to portray soldiers akin to what occurs in the middle east now. I mean I appreciated how they were swinging big and that it was an interesting choice.

Everything else in the film is a disaster. The pacing and plot are just terrible. None of the set pieces pay off. I was also very annoyed at how they were very heavy handed about a parallel to the US being in the middle east being evil and how the church is just a bunch of evil white men. For the record the Crusades were a response to invasions by muslims, not aggression by Christians into Muslim lands. It was clear that the script was written by a bunch of hacks with liberal views thinking they were clever. Instead you got a poor film and a wasted cast.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

4

moviemitch96Nov 30, 2018

I was a little hesitant to check this one out, cause it looked like just another unnecessary Robin Hood movie, and it turns out... that's exactly what it was! Nothing all that memorable in terms of story or character development, or whatI was a little hesitant to check this one out, cause it looked like just another unnecessary Robin Hood movie, and it turns out... that's exactly what it was! Nothing all that memorable in terms of story or character development, or what little of it there was. Taron Edgerton does a fine enough job in the titular role, but him and the rest of the talented cast can only do so much with a formulaic and predictable story such as this one. Overall, it's pretty forgettable and doesn't really bring anything new to this tale at all.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

2

stsilverFeb 15, 2019

There's nothing from Robin Hood in this grotesque trash apart from character names.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

0

Ben_RuckusMar 8, 2019

I did not think there could have been a worse remake than the Russell Crowe version. As abysmal as the King Arthur remake. Modern language and modern concept references used just shows extremely lazy writing.
Not even worth watching for free.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

3

Happy-KMay 29, 2019

A new Robin Hood Movie. I wanted to give the Film a fair chance but there isn't much you can like about the Movie. The Story is nothing new and everybody basically knows it already. The cast has some Talented actors but they cannot use thereA new Robin Hood Movie. I wanted to give the Film a fair chance but there isn't much you can like about the Movie. The Story is nothing new and everybody basically knows it already. The cast has some Talented actors but they cannot use there potential. There is of course a Love Triangle. Romantic in the most cringiest boring and dumbest way possible. And there is no real chemistry between the Characters. The scenes between the Action set pieces are pretty boring ,but if seen worse. The only thing i liked are some of the Action Scenes and the bow Skill Of Taron Egerton. But its better to watch the Training clipes than the Movie. The Editing is also awkward. It uses fast camera movement and Slow-mo but just does not fell right. The overall Setting would be interesting if it wouldnt be a Robin hood movie, it just does not fit for the Character. The Film kind of fells it wants to be a Guy Ritchie Film without understanding how to use his Style Correct, and what make his Movies entertaining and re-watchable. I was bored for 80% of the whole Run-time. Its nothing more than an uncreative Blockbuster that has no own ideas and Takes every ideas from better Movies.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

2

DodgerAug 18, 2019

This movie is shockingly bad. For evidently having a large budget this movie could of been made by first year film students. Literaly no redeeming qualities beyond perhaps the direciton they went with the first 5 minutes sort of a "modernThis movie is shockingly bad. For evidently having a large budget this movie could of been made by first year film students. Literaly no redeeming qualities beyond perhaps the direciton they went with the first 5 minutes sort of a "modern filter" on medievil warfare.

Very poor, avoid if possible.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

1

PedrusMar 1, 2020

What the hell is this? On the very first 15 min I have seen an American war movie with things like "the crusades .on Afghanistan." or "the sheriff of Nottingham" sending recruitment letters to the people.
25 min have been enough to see thatWhat the hell is this? On the very first 15 min I have seen an American war movie with things like "the crusades .on Afghanistan." or "the sheriff of Nottingham" sending recruitment letters to the people.
25 min have been enough to see that this is not robin hood movie. Another ruined movie because a terrible script. North American people, really, learn more about other cultures and stop adapting other cultures history or legends into your single vision of the world.
In summary, do not put a minute into this movie.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

4

JLuis_001Dec 26, 2018

Frankly, it's a film that feels very similar to Guy Ritchie's recent King Arthur. A similar approach despite being completely different stories but in the eagerness to update them the essence is lost and therefore despite the budget qualityFrankly, it's a film that feels very similar to Guy Ritchie's recent King Arthur. A similar approach despite being completely different stories but in the eagerness to update them the essence is lost and therefore despite the budget quality they are still incredibly forgettable.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

LunalalaJul 22, 2019

Nope... Just nope... This movie should’ve never been made, It is the most generic, Boring, Stupid, terrible, disgusting, ugly, dull, and pointless movie I’ve ever watched, No one asked for this, not a single person... I fell asleep for theNope... Just nope... This movie should’ve never been made, It is the most generic, Boring, Stupid, terrible, disgusting, ugly, dull, and pointless movie I’ve ever watched, No one asked for this, not a single person... I fell asleep for the second half, and we were at a 6:30 showing. No one should have to endure this movie, it’s more torture than movie. Trust me... Every other action movie is better than this... Even the actors, who are usually good... Give such dull performances... Robin Hood should stick too fluffy animals I guess...… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

Dostoyevsky3May 15, 2020

Containing pathetic performances, Robin Hood smothers its classic material with a modernized action-packed atrocity that provides dishonorable and unethical messages.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

Azhar123May 23, 2021

Garbage movie.
Wasted 1h56m of my time. A class action lawsuit should be filed against the director for the time that they owe every poor soul who had to suffer through this so called movie. Robin hood : men in tights was a better film. NotGarbage movie.
Wasted 1h56m of my time. A class action lawsuit should be filed against the director for the time that they owe every poor soul who had to suffer through this so called movie. Robin hood : men in tights was a better film. Not even close to the drama or epicness of the 1991 and 2010 from that took different approaches to the character but atleast did it well.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

3

Pan_KrytykSep 29, 2021

no no no... huge misteake.. do not waste your time... please do not do it this ;)

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

1

kamgeforceNov 22, 2018

I dont give it 0 only because I wasn´t disappointed. I knew its gonna be an incredible piece of **** garbage.

9 of 10 users found this helpful91

All this user's reviews

1

RudygerDec 4, 2018

Dear Hollywood: litterally NO ONE asked for another reboot of this well-known story. Haven't you learned any lesson from king Arthur box office bomb? People want something new, original! At least, if you're disgusing a historical movie into aDear Hollywood: litterally NO ONE asked for another reboot of this well-known story. Haven't you learned any lesson from king Arthur box office bomb? People want something new, original! At least, if you're disgusing a historical movie into a modernized antifa propaganda, with modernized outfits, make it happen in modern days.… Expand

7 of 8 users found this helpful71

All this user's reviews

0

NavyBeanNov 25, 2018

It's obvious the guy giving all the same POSITIVE reviews is the same person from the WAY he WRITES. This movie is awful and no matter how many burner accounts the brother of the director uses to try and convince you otherwise save your timeIt's obvious the guy giving all the same POSITIVE reviews is the same person from the WAY he WRITES. This movie is awful and no matter how many burner accounts the brother of the director uses to try and convince you otherwise save your time and money.… Expand

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

0

imthenoobJan 23, 2019

Yes, It's surprisingly as awful as critics made it out to be. And it's not just bad, It's dreadfully boring and doesn't even remotely entertain.

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

0

DragonloupNov 25, 2018

Let me summarize the movie
Dumb acting ,so many plot holes all over that you need a 4x4 to go through the movie, completly incoherent story , bow that becomes faster and more powerfull than ak47 with infinite arrows....I mean the directorLet me summarize the movie
Dumb acting ,so many plot holes all over that you need a 4x4 to go through the movie, completly incoherent story , bow that becomes faster and more powerfull than ak47 with infinite arrows....I mean the director was tripping . What does the actors are doing in this pile of $h!+… Expand

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

0

calledman123Nov 24, 2018

What a **** movie, boring, acting from the actors was bad, cgi was bad, don’t recommend at all.

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

3

AceZachRocks2Nov 21, 2018

If you want a really cheesy Robin hood movie that changes the story you like and the performances and character design and pretty much everything in terms of landscape then here you go. Besides Taron Egerton everyone sucks, the performancesIf you want a really cheesy Robin hood movie that changes the story you like and the performances and character design and pretty much everything in terms of landscape then here you go. Besides Taron Egerton everyone sucks, the performances come off as awkward and cheesy. The action looks bad basically every action scene has bad cgi and slow motion and it is annoying. If you wanted a good Robin hood movie, Men in Tights is more realistic. If this gets a sequel which with the movies its going up against this weekend I doubt it will, They better get an experience director and writer to helm it because these people have made the simplest form of entertainment for the I don't care movie fans, who believe as long as I can here the action and see stuff happening then its coolllllllllll. But no for me and most movie fans we will not enjoy this. Go see anything else out, except nutcracker. 2.5/10… Expand

11 of 14 users found this helpful113

All this user's reviews

2

DotTheEyesNov 22, 2018

Dismal. At its core, it commits a similar sin as Ridley Scott's 2010 film, which is still far more accomplished and satisfying overall. It does not realize Robin Hood's charm is best encapsulated by Errol Flynn, committing acts of daringDismal. At its core, it commits a similar sin as Ridley Scott's 2010 film, which is still far more accomplished and satisfying overall. It does not realize Robin Hood's charm is best encapsulated by Errol Flynn, committing acts of daring (yes, in tights) with a heavy dose of mischief, romance, and whimsy.

Scott used Robin as a bizarre Trojan horse to dramatize the origin of the Magna Carta and revisit beats in Gladiator and Kingdom of Heaven. This film posits the Sheriff of Nottingham is a war profiteer responsible in large part for the Crusades in the Holy Land, and he forces the Nottingham peasantry to live in and around mines (an industrial wasteland out of Mad Max); it is as overblown as it is preposterous. (The cringe-worthy opening voice-over edgily assures us, "This is no bedtime story.") One longs for a charismatic bandit in the forest instead of a po-faced revolutionary in leather.

Director Otto Bathurst's approach feels schizophrenic, as if he followed a different studio mandate every other day on set. At times the picture plays as a fairly standard Hollywood-style medieval adventure, albeit not a very impressively staged one, but then there are abrupt, bizarre lapses into Moulin Rouge!-style anachronism and badly outdated aesthetics in the vein of 300, including egregious overuse of computer-enhanced slow motion. It never finds a consistent stylistic rhythm; the comics-panel end credits, following a sad tease of a sequel we will never see, suggest perhaps the intention was to pretend Robin Hood is a superhero, the -first- first Avenger. Who knows?

And though it presumably enjoyed a healthy budget, the production feels cut-rate at points, from obvious use of green-screen to official edicts and wanted posters that appear as if they were created in Microsoft Word by an intern using the most "antique" font he or she could find on the drop-down menu

Everyone in the strong-on-paper cast responds to the void by either appearing adrift (Jamie Foxx has no clue how to play his role, an Arab man trying to avenge his son's death at the hands of English soldiers, and spends his time on screen squinting and changing his accent) or doubling down on what they assume is expected of them (Ben Mendelsohn uses every snide sneer and bellicose growl in his toolbox to play the oddly stationary role of the Sheriff). I was particularly disappointed by how unimpressive Bono's daughter Eve Hewson is as Maid Marian, here conceived as an improbably stylish quasi-social activist. She delivered a sublime performance (at times eerie, at times sensual, at time vulnerable) on Steven Soderbergh's The Knick, one of my favorite television series, but none of the magnetism is on display in her first high-profile on-the-poster film role.… Expand

14 of 18 users found this helpful144

All this user's reviews

0

TylerNFDec 2, 2018

Poorly acted trash with a plot that doesn't even vaguely try to capture the feel of Robinhood. Special effects are OK, but the whole setting is a cringey, muddy, mess like someone tried to rip off Game of Thrones or the gritty reboot trendPoorly acted trash with a plot that doesn't even vaguely try to capture the feel of Robinhood. Special effects are OK, but the whole setting is a cringey, muddy, mess like someone tried to rip off Game of Thrones or the gritty reboot trend but without any idea how to do it well. And top of that this movie is also communist propaganda. At one point they literally say "redistribute the wealth," lol, what trash.… Expand

6 of 8 users found this helpful62

All this user's reviews

2

qqiwkqaqwDec 2, 2018

How to mess up Robin Hood, but it's never possibile for all live action are always awful, the original was a masterpiece, but this is a really garbage.

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

4

AaronRadcliffNov 21, 2018

I'm sorry anybody who is a fan of the character, but Robin Hood is just plain boring and his titular movie is even more boring. That is the greatest sin of all. What was, by all accounts from the trailer, a fun action adventure instead feltI'm sorry anybody who is a fan of the character, but Robin Hood is just plain boring and his titular movie is even more boring. That is the greatest sin of all. What was, by all accounts from the trailer, a fun action adventure instead felt like a slog that makes you feel every agonizing second of its two hour runtime. Maybe if a good 20 or 30 minutes were chopped off then it could have been a dumb film going at such breakneck speed that it would be easy to overlook its issues. It is painful and it reminds me once again why the only Robin Hood movie worth watching is Men in Tights.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

FefehernNov 28, 2018

Honestly, it wasn't that bad. I had low expectations but the movie did its job of introducing the story and characters really well. The story was fine and helps flesh out the idea of Robin Hood. The main protagonist Robin is nice to follow,Honestly, it wasn't that bad. I had low expectations but the movie did its job of introducing the story and characters really well. The story was fine and helps flesh out the idea of Robin Hood. The main protagonist Robin is nice to follow, and the main antagonist the Sheriff of Nottingham is fleshed out better than any typical antagonist.

The best thing the movie does is show the relation between the two characters above. Robin has a reason why he's a rich guy in-day and a man who steals from the rich to give to the poor at night. The Sheriff has a reason why he's in his position of power and looks to keep the order of things current.
To me, Jamie Foxx's role has worked well, but I will leave that up to YMMV.

The worst thing is the other faceless adversaries the movie has. That, alongside a little too much romantic undertones and slightly confusing action scenes mark down the score by two points. Certain weak plot holes take off another point. I won't mark points off though for the infinite arrows because rich boy Hollywood movie.
I also want to criticize the movie for feeling like Netflix's Arrow (Green Arrow) but in the middle ages.

Overall, a good movie… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

AlexbobboDec 8, 2018

An old tale with a new view and more modern take ,i love the story and cant wait to see if we are lucky enough to get a sequel ,it has everthing it's,romatic,funny, ,thrilling and filled with action and great acting from all of the cast ,andAn old tale with a new view and more modern take ,i love the story and cant wait to see if we are lucky enough to get a sequel ,it has everthing it's,romatic,funny, ,thrilling and filled with action and great acting from all of the cast ,and it leave's you wanting to know and see more ,a solid hit in my book .… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

aisharickettsNov 22, 2018

I can't for the life of me understand why anyone would say this is a bad movie. THE MOVIE IS FREAKING AWESOME! It's like if a critic says a movie is bad everyone wants to follow suit instead of taking this movie for what it really is, whichI can't for the life of me understand why anyone would say this is a bad movie. THE MOVIE IS FREAKING AWESOME! It's like if a critic says a movie is bad everyone wants to follow suit instead of taking this movie for what it really is, which is really REALLY good. I absolutely LOVED this movie. The movie flowed, it catches you're attention from start to finish, you are on the edge of your seat. It starts with romance which continues into a story line that grabs your attention with war and tragedy to hope. HOPE! Go......See.....This.....Movie! You will not regret it. Action packed, moving and very entertaining.… Expand

6 of 32 users found this helpful626

All this user's reviews

9

DamionNov 23, 2018

It is beyond me how anyone has anything terrible to say of this film. It's action-packed from start to finish with a strong script, great performances, does not hit too many cliches, has a most excellent horse chase AND you get to stare atIt is beyond me how anyone has anything terrible to say of this film. It's action-packed from start to finish with a strong script, great performances, does not hit too many cliches, has a most excellent horse chase AND you get to stare at Taron Egerton for two hours.

I was pretty sure I would like this film and be entertained, but I was NOT expecting it to me even remotely as good as it is. An absolutely solid film. Don't listen to any of the ridiculous reviews saying otherwise.… Expand

0 of 17 users found this helpful017

All this user's reviews

9

pwnedkittenJul 7, 2019

I'm amazed by how low the ratings are for this, because when I watched it, it kept me entertained and riveted. The acting was great, the script was entertaining, the action scenes were fire, and it was very well paced. To me, it wasn't soI'm amazed by how low the ratings are for this, because when I watched it, it kept me entertained and riveted. The acting was great, the script was entertaining, the action scenes were fire, and it was very well paced. To me, it wasn't so much a story about a survivor of the Crusades as it was a story about "what would Batman be like, if he was sent back in time," and I was totally there for the ride.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

HealingToolboxDec 25, 2018

A lot of talent and high production design are well-managed here. One of few films to have three good villains, able to keep them well-employed and not confuse the audience. "Boy sent to do a man's job" describes Taron Egerton but he'sA lot of talent and high production design are well-managed here. One of few films to have three good villains, able to keep them well-employed and not confuse the audience. "Boy sent to do a man's job" describes Taron Egerton but he's not awful. He, Jamie Fox, F. Murry Abramson and the rest all muster admirable AAA conviction in their portrayal of timeworn characters. I think the main issue is cultural timing. Robin Hood resonates with the Yellow Vests in France. Inequality of the rich is a growing issue in teh US. Does a nascent people's revolt appear imminent in the US? The US revolt seems likely to be slower and more ballot-box-oriented than fighting in the streets as revolution in Robin Hood is portrayed. The two seemingly unknown screenwriters inject some welcome novelty into the old Robin Hood tropes (please ignore all the anachronisms, including Ben Mendelsohn, who also is doing his best). Without more resonance with the present Progressive political moment, the movie comes across as a very excellent television effort.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

BradfordroDec 18, 2018

This is definitely better than the last Robin Hood movie done by Ridley Scott. The storyline is well done incorporating the crusades into the movie. The downfall for me was the fact that they shouldn't have introduced Maid Marian into theThis is definitely better than the last Robin Hood movie done by Ridley Scott. The storyline is well done incorporating the crusades into the movie. The downfall for me was the fact that they shouldn't have introduced Maid Marian into the movie or have Robin have another love interest. It does have incredible special effects.… Expand

0 of 7 users found this helpful07

All this user's reviews

8

PepsiJamieDec 10, 2018

Really enjoyed this retelling of a classic. The different storyline was really refreshing. Great action, fantastic stunts, good acting, great costuming. Not sure why people didn't like this, we had a great time

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

9

hcristicDec 3, 2018

Honestly, I enjoyed the movie. It had a medieval base but the style gave a modern twist for a specific purpose. The people revolting against a corrupt government, pushing them to fight/pay for wars that only they benefit from, who doesn'tHonestly, I enjoyed the movie. It had a medieval base but the style gave a modern twist for a specific purpose. The people revolting against a corrupt government, pushing them to fight/pay for wars that only they benefit from, who doesn't want to see the underdogs kick their a**? If anything, watch the movie to support that message!

My teenage girls loved it ... but I think for different reasons.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

8

DerekReideMar 10, 2019

I am aware that this movie has gotten the review it had gotten, and I respect that. I personally believe Robin Hood was a good movie in all, but it did have a flaw in my eyes. Hear me out here, I liked the movie and yes, I was among theI am aware that this movie has gotten the review it had gotten, and I respect that. I personally believe Robin Hood was a good movie in all, but it did have a flaw in my eyes. Hear me out here, I liked the movie and yes, I was among the forty-five percent of the audience who ended up enjoying this film. I probably would've enjoyed it a tad more if they had implemented some more humor. So to start, Taron Egerton, Eve Hewson, Jamie Foxx, and the rest of the cast played really solid roles. But especially Ben Mendelsohn, he is just a perfect villain. Whether it be in Ready Player One or Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, he just does a great villain role. So I really appreciated the fact that we got Ben as Sherrif Nottingham. We got great character performances and we also got great action sequences. Classic modern bow and arrow action. That's what I call it. And rightfully so, it majorly succeeds in putting you at the edge of your seat. The onscreen chemistry is also pretty good between the actors and one thing I thought they could've toned down on was the romance scenes. Now I didn't mind it as much, but it was used fairly excessively. I did understand as to why the romance scenes were kind of needed because of Rob's draft, which added to emotion somehow. The story I thought was pretty straight forward along with the central conflict. What else is there to say here? I thought it was a pretty good action movie. Not the best, but in my opinion, it passed the remake "test". This movie, in my opinion, is an 8 out of 10.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

TyranianApr 13, 2019

Has some decent action and visuals but this is mostly a very poor take on the Robin Hood story.