Quantum of Solace
Columbia Pictures | Release Date: November 14, 2008
6.3
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 755 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
359
Mixed:
300
Negative:
96
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
5
AlanoSilvaPBFeb 24, 2023
Filme bem inferior ao anterior (Cassino Royale)...mas pra quem gosta da franquia dá pra se divertir.....
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
liamexeDec 17, 2022
Although there are a few amazing action scenes, the plot lacks pace in my opinion. You can't keep up with what's happening or understand the plot because the scenes move by so quickly. To me, it simply lacks overall depth.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Onlyclassicvg1Sep 8, 2022
Betrayed by Vesper, the woman he loved, 007 fights the urge to make his latest mission personal. Pursuing his determination to uncover the truth, Bond and M interrogate Mr White who reveals the organization which blackmailed Vesper is farBetrayed by Vesper, the woman he loved, 007 fights the urge to make his latest mission personal. Pursuing his determination to uncover the truth, Bond and M interrogate Mr White who reveals the organization which blackmailed Vesper is far more complex… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
GDsReviewsJun 7, 2022
Easily the weakest of the Daniel Craig Bond movies, with none of the flair and grit of Casino Royale, and a heroine that is a total brown face.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
ChanekeCholoDec 13, 2021
It is a continuation of Casino Royale, but It forgets all of the first film. I accept that the 200 millions of budget can be reflected in the film, but the editing kills all the action scenes and the script maybe it has sense but is veryIt is a continuation of Casino Royale, but It forgets all of the first film. I accept that the 200 millions of budget can be reflected in the film, but the editing kills all the action scenes and the script maybe it has sense but is very boring and without any structure.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DawdlingPoetNov 22, 2021
The movie starts very suddenly with lots of action and there certainly is enough action to keep you entertained throughout, between dialogue and scenes with M at MI5s London HQ.

The movie is pretty fast paced and there are the usual carThe movie starts very suddenly with lots of action and there certainly is enough action to keep you entertained throughout, between dialogue and scenes with M at MI5s London HQ.

The movie is pretty fast paced and there are the usual car chase scenes, as well as gun fights and hand to hand action scenes plus some of it is set in the skies and some is out at sea as well. I thought some of the cinematography was quite good, there's some nice imagery.

Daniel Craig may not be everyones ideal choice as Bond but he does have bring quite an 'edge' to the character and he certainly seems very self assured, with the same apathetic and rather unrepentant facial expression as was seen in Casino Royale. Of course in Casino Royale, James was getting to grips, so to speak (and somewhat literally!), with having a 'license to kill' and he somewhat reluctantly started out becoming the James Bond we all know today, with that movie being the first James Bond story but in Quantum of Solace, James is back and he seems alot more sure of himself, being spurred on to find out who may have been behind the blackmailing of his late lover, Vesper Lynd.

I would like to point out that there is quite alot of shaky camerawork, so those who suffer from motion sickness be warned! especially if you go to see this on the big screen, I almost felt queasy after a few minutes of the most shaky camerawork, on such a large screen it is really quite shaky, not in a 'Blair Witch' way but in that the camera jumps and moves around alot, pretty much (I hope that makes sense), I guess thats done to make it seem more fast paced and to add to the frantic feel of the action scenes.

I was surprised by the length of the movie, having quickly watched some of Casino Royale last night to remind myself of what happened in that movie (I heard that your supposed to re-watch that before seeing this movie since it starts where that movie left off), I noticed Casino Royale was about 2 hours and 20 minutes, yet this movie finished what I thought was quite soon and it turned out it was only about 1 hour and 40 minutes long, which doesn't seem that long for a James Bond movie. However, I enjoyed it while it was on and I guess its better for a movie to be too short than to go on too long and become predictable or, heaven forbid for a James Bond movie, boring, so thats the way I see that. When the last line is uttered, you think 'ah thats a good line' and feel like that could a place to end it but it still did feel a bit too soon to end, so I was still a bit surprised when it did go to the usual 007 ending sequence and onto the credits from there but it was still a good movie while it was on, as I say.

For fans of James Bond movies, you should enjoy the rather psychadelic sequences shown at the start of the movie, when the credits appear, this movie provides a pretty slick and interesting credit sequence, graphics-wise.

Yes, I would recommend it. This is another decent James Bond movie with the 'blonde Bond' (ie Daniel Craig) proving that he really can be quite a killing machine and he certainly seems to be very much on a mission in this movie. It is quite fast paced, while also maintaining a pretty strong storyline, so you do quite need your 'thinking cap' on for this movie, as I found I had to work fairly hard to keep up with who's who and what was going on, much in the same way as other James Bond films, so this shouldn't surprise anyone.

This film has a bit of everything, a good car chase scene, boat chases, gun fights and hand on hand conflict, plus action in the skies, so pretty much all bases are covered. If your a James Bond fan or are otherwise intrigued or like the sound of this movie, I'd say you should definitely check it out, its quite entertaining and is worth watching.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
HeroicAge616Oct 26, 2021
Although it's disappointing as a follow up to Casino Royale, Quantum of Solace is still a well done Bond fight.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
VidyaBumOct 22, 2021
Out of 25 Bonds I saw, I place this one at 17/25.

Quantum of Solace, apart from having a title that makes everyone ask "what the hell?" has pretty much nothing of note. It follows up on Casino Royale's storyline of Craig's Bond being aOut of 25 Bonds I saw, I place this one at 17/25.

Quantum of Solace, apart from having a title that makes everyone ask "what the hell?" has pretty much nothing of note.

It follows up on Casino Royale's storyline of Craig's Bond being a lonely child that needs love. He still seeks revenge for his girlfriend's loss. He still gets M to be his surrogate mommy.

I never personally liked that side of Craig's movies too much, and it really lingers over Quantum, since it drives the plot.

But plot aside, the bigger issue is that Quantum's "villain" is not even worth remembering. Mathieu Amalric doesn't exactly suck entirely, but if a good villain is supposed to be impressive, or frightening, in his case, the only feeling is "uneasy" at best, or rather "creepy". Also, he's almost not the villain here, since the real villain of Quantum is an incompetent american administration. So a weak villain that only feels creepy at best is supported by a CIA agent being a complete tool.

Rebellious teenager Craig/Bond in need of love faces that terrible opposition, and with a villain and girl that overall do not really strike as characters (or as actors), the movie just sort of wallows from action scene to murder scene, because it's also one of the most violent and murderous Bond movies.

At some point, there is a genuinely well-acted and well-written scene that I almost felt something for does come, and a tragic death full of pathos does happen. And I genuinely wanted to feel for it, because it had everything to be good. Sadly, since it was in this movie, it just fell flat, or rather, the plot, actions, events, and everything surrounding that scene, made it fall flat.

Quantum is a flat movie which, even when it shines, fails to bring attachment. See it only if you care about continuity between Casino Royale and Skyfall.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
AJ_13Oct 15, 2021
A lot of action (impressive sometimes) and almost nothing else. Every character transmited a sense of emptiness and there isn't really any standout performance. Olga Kurylenko's character, though good, isn't nowhere near Vesper. There's moreA lot of action (impressive sometimes) and almost nothing else. Every character transmited a sense of emptiness and there isn't really any standout performance. Olga Kurylenko's character, though good, isn't nowhere near Vesper. There's more than one plot hole.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
ItsmayaOct 4, 2021
This film was less boring from the last one, but I think it's because it was shorter and not better...
Can't recommend this one either.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
gracjanskiSep 29, 2021
Craig is good as usual and the action scenes are not bad, because there are only few ridiculous scenes. But the editing was too fast and the camera was too shaky, so the movie is hard to follow. Also the story was a bit weird, but I like theCraig is good as usual and the action scenes are not bad, because there are only few ridiculous scenes. But the editing was too fast and the camera was too shaky, so the movie is hard to follow. Also the story was a bit weird, but I like the critical mention of states, who just want to get ressources.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
SQRLYJul 25, 2021
An utter disappointment after the high of Bond's return in Casino Royale. The plot is ludicrous, which is saying a lot for a Bond film, and places this movie at Die Another Day levels of absurdity. The tedious pacing and wasted storylineAn utter disappointment after the high of Bond's return in Casino Royale. The plot is ludicrous, which is saying a lot for a Bond film, and places this movie at Die Another Day levels of absurdity. The tedious pacing and wasted storyline make this one a skippable turkey.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
SoapNuggetMay 14, 2021
What happened here? Quantum of Solace is absolutely terrible from acting to plot to villain, everything is wrong in this film it's an absolute slog to get through and the action is boring and tiresome, I was falling asleep halfway through,What happened here? Quantum of Solace is absolutely terrible from acting to plot to villain, everything is wrong in this film it's an absolute slog to get through and the action is boring and tiresome, I was falling asleep halfway through, not a good sequel or film at all… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MrPajamasFeb 21, 2021
After the great Casino Royale came a total fall bearing the name Quantum of Solace. The film is good, but just not as much as the previous one. The story is great and there are good action scenes with good music, but at the end of the film IAfter the great Casino Royale came a total fall bearing the name Quantum of Solace. The film is good, but just not as much as the previous one. The story is great and there are good action scenes with good music, but at the end of the film I just thought this is all? I was missing something there, although it was a good film that I can recommend.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
511andahalfFeb 7, 2021
Disappointing follow up to Casino Royale. The whole plot of the Bolivian water supply is not compelling, like is that really what a Bond film should be about? Dominic Greene is not a very intimidating villain either. The film should have beenDisappointing follow up to Casino Royale. The whole plot of the Bolivian water supply is not compelling, like is that really what a Bond film should be about? Dominic Greene is not a very intimidating villain either. The film should have been focused a lot more on Vesper's death and Bond's vengeance, Vesper's death is just forgotten in this movie. On top of that, the film feels a lot more like Jason Bourne with the excessive and poorly edited action scenes . It's an okay movie I guess, but honestly had a lot of potential to be really good.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Kai82Jan 8, 2021
The twenty-second James Bond movie and its starting directly after the events of the previous movie Casino Royale. I recommend watching Casino Royale first as it works better together, sets up this movie, character motivations and is one ofThe twenty-second James Bond movie and its starting directly after the events of the previous movie Casino Royale. I recommend watching Casino Royale first as it works better together, sets up this movie, character motivations and is one of the best movies in the franchise. James Bond is seeking vengeance for the events of the previous movie and is on an investigation to find more information's about the secret organization he stumbled on there. The organization did a good job in hiding as even the MI 6 has no information about them. This soon escalates in more than one way as there was more to it than he imagined. I wont spoil more but fans of the franchise had a theory back then. It continues what the last movie began. Daniel Craig plays a younger, rougher and more unpolished James Bond that even sometimes shows true emotions behind his facade. From the timeline it is at the beginning of his career as he just shortly before received 00 status and his license to kill. He continued to become a contender for best James Bond actor. The movies are grittier, darker and more matured. This works well and won fans and critics over. This works because of the great performance of the actors. I already praised Daniel Craig as James Bond so I will continue with the others. Lets begin with Olga Kurylenko as Camille. Just a near perfect performance. She is as much interesting, has relatable motives, scars of the past and works really well. This era has so much great female characters. They are more than damsels in distress or just love interest. While I am at it as always I will praise Judi Dench as M. Still a great leader and terrifying for her enemies. Matthieu Almaric fully delivers and is in the love to hate category. The rest of the cast is also really good. Then there are the well done fight scenes and intense action. These are breathtaking and you feel the impact. It is a no nonsense or gadgets approach. Overall this is an excellent James Bond movie. A bit weaker than Casino Royale but still refreshing and a recommendation. Will repeat that I would watch both movies in order to get more out of this.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
lofu_agfyNov 11, 2020
When Casino Royale arrived two years ago I was a very happy person. I was one of what feels like the few people that actually wanted Craig to do well as Bond. I wasn't moaning about him being blonde, I wasn't moaning about the lack ofWhen Casino Royale arrived two years ago I was a very happy person. I was one of what feels like the few people that actually wanted Craig to do well as Bond. I wasn't moaning about him being blonde, I wasn't moaning about the lack of gadgets, I was just happy to see one of my favourite fictional characters back on screen. As many people know I am a huge Bond fan, I have all the movies, I love them all in their unique way, and even if Casino Royale had been a disaster I would have found some enjoyment out of it. Thankfully it wasn't a disaster, it was actually one of the best Bond movies made. Quantum of Solace is a direct sequel of Royale, and so I once again had high expectations of it. Perhaps even more so than with Royale, as now I knew Craig is a superb Bond, and I wanted the story to evolve more. Let me start off by saying Solace is not as good as Royale, and for many people that will be a problem, as so many people were expecting an even better movie. While it is an extremely good movie, and a brilliant Bond movie, its just not one of the best and does have a few problems. Still as a Bond fan I still absolutely loved nearly every minute of the movie. It isn't overlong and outstays its welcome like Royale, but neither is it rushed as I feared. The performances are incredibly strong once again and there are some thrilling action sequences thrown in as well.

Daniel Craig once again is very strong as Bond, and unlike what a lot of critics have said, is actually good fun. He can deliver a pun quite well, and he also does the dramatic and seriousness of Bond to perfection. In short he is definitely up there in terms of quality with Sean Connery. He feels a bit more comfortable as Bond this time around, he doesn't have to say the famous line which sadly felt a tad forced at the end of Royale. Instead he does get his fair share of brooding, although his verbal sparring with Gemma Arterton is pretty brilliant. The lead Bond girl this time is played by Olga Kurylenko, who I last saw in the dismal Hit-man movie. Thankfully here she plays a very interesting, although different Bond girl. She doesn't appear much for the first half, and her first sequence seemed more random than interesting. However she does develop quite nicely and by the end she is definitely one of the better Bond girls. Lead villain duties go to Mathieu Amalric. I have to say he was a bit of a disappointment after the brilliant Lechiffre in Royale. Amalric is a slimy villain, and he does put in a good performance, but his villain just isn't all that menacing, and I can see him being one of the easily forgettable Bond baddies. Judi Dench gets an awful lot more screen time this time round, and its all the better for it. M has been rewritten as a superb character, and gets some nice bit of swearing to do. Finally Gemma Arterton is fairly decent as a wasted Bond girl. She has way too little screen time, and far too little to do, however she does shine through, and features in one of the more memorable moments of the movie.

Quantum of Solace story wise is perhaps where the problems begin to slip in. Royale's story was simple and very easy to follow, while Quantum is nowhere near as confusing as people are making it out to be, the movie is a bit overcomplicated for its own good. The villains plan is nowhere near as diabolical as it really could be, and I feel I need to watch the movie again just to get the intricate details of the movie. However as most Bond fans know story is not always a Bond movies strong point, just look at Live and Let Die, Die Another Day. So long as it manages to entertain I am quite happy. Solace thankfully is a brilliantly entertaining movie for the majority. I will admit, the pre-credit sequence is a very big disappointment. I know the stunts were good, and it should have been thrilling, but I felt so oddly bored by it. However once the credits sequence began, to a song I am steadily coming to like, the movie kicked off. The rest of the action sequences were particularly well done, my personal favourite being a bit in an opera house, extremely well edited. Drama wise the movie is very solid, there are some lighter moments to keep people happy, and some amusing one liners, but the movie for the most part is pretty down to earth.

Quantum of Solace as I've said is a great movie, and no doubt many people will love it, although some will be a bit disappointed by it. Either way Craig is still a great Bond, and I cannot wait to see more adventures with him as the lead. Although we could do with a more interesting villain next time round please.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
DudesofThoughtOct 21, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Slightly better than Casino Royale, but similarly, transitions happen in the blink of an eye, leaving more to be desired as far as tying the general storyline together is concerned.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
BitashSep 7, 2020
Saw this again today 2020, loved it. The films actions scenes are insane from minute one till end, Daniel did such a great job in all action scenes. I love hi. As Bond!! No holes in the plot. The politics of the plot kept you interested.Saw this again today 2020, loved it. The films actions scenes are insane from minute one till end, Daniel did such a great job in all action scenes. I love hi. As Bond!! No holes in the plot. The politics of the plot kept you interested. Daniel .C does not disappoint. Super entertaining and wonderful shots of Italy. Must watch.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
6
Gamepro3093Aug 19, 2020
A step down from the ground breaking Casino Royale but still a good watch nonetheless. It further expands the reintroduction to Daniel Craig’s much more on point portrayal of James Bond and is a decent continuation of Casino Royale. There areA step down from the ground breaking Casino Royale but still a good watch nonetheless. It further expands the reintroduction to Daniel Craig’s much more on point portrayal of James Bond and is a decent continuation of Casino Royale. There are some visually interesting scenes like the opera scene where Bond spies on a Quantum meeting and the Sienna rooftop chase scene.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
WizardofOswaldJun 18, 2020
I would have given this a 6/10, but the action is so bad that I gave it a 5/10. I want to kill whoever edited those action scenes.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
eva3si0nApr 28, 2020
Quantum of Solace is the weakest and most boring film in a series of films since its restart in 2006. There is no well-prescribed antagonist here, and the hero Mathieu Amalric does not pull on it in any way. And the plot does not shineQuantum of Solace is the weakest and most boring film in a series of films since its restart in 2006. There is no well-prescribed antagonist here, and the hero Mathieu Amalric does not pull on it in any way. And the plot does not shine originality, the single thing that is remembered in the film, it is the companion of agent Olga Kurylenko.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
JordanLaytonApr 27, 2020
The second of the Daniel Craig Bond films is an unfortunate step backward for the franchise that borrows quite a few too many filmmaking techniques from the Bourne franchise.

Whenever a film fails to succeed such a wonderful precursor on soThe second of the Daniel Craig Bond films is an unfortunate step backward for the franchise that borrows quite a few too many filmmaking techniques from the Bourne franchise.

Whenever a film fails to succeed such a wonderful precursor on so many levels, the answer to why almost always lies in the direction. A good director will guide the creation of nearly every aspect of a film in order to achieve their ultimate vision. If the director of QoS's vision was a return to the pulpy, lighthearted Bond films of the past, I think he absolutely achieved that.

The problem with doing that is that it directly contradicts the precedent that was set by Casino Royale, a film where characters grow and change over the course of their arcs and a film where action scenes actually convey the weight of the stakes surrounding them.


The closest thing Bond has to an arc in QoS is that he learns to kill a little bit less often. The only pieces of his character I enjoyed in this film are remnants and threads relating to Vesper that are peppered in seemingly only by some obligation to achieving continuity with Casino Royale.

Along with the featherweight plot and character of this film also comes mind-numbing presentation of fight and action scenes. Frantic editing and persistent shaky-cam result in every chase, fight, and shootout being difficult to follow. This poses a real problem since the writing fails to set up the goals of the characters in most of these scenes. What these failures amount to is a lack of suspense thereby interest in the majority of the action in this film.

Lackluster dialogue is delivered by most of the actors with little to no emotion as well throughout the movie. There's a few moments I enjoyed but on the whole, there very few good things to hold on to with this one. Also, David Harbour's character, in both writing and performance, was straight out of an SNL sketch. Didn't believe it for a second.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
JP32Mar 24, 2020
Quantum of Solace is embarrassed by the classic Bond films, ditching anything fun and anything over-the-top in favor of "gritty realism". The result is a completely joyless endeavor, and one of the worst Bond movies of them all.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
nozamanAug 8, 2015
My kid's first Bond film, and a bit disappointed it had to be so. Has all the elements of a modern-day action thriller, and few of the elements of, you know, James Bond. There has to be a happy medium between Roger Moore-era camp and joylessMy kid's first Bond film, and a bit disappointed it had to be so. Has all the elements of a modern-day action thriller, and few of the elements of, you know, James Bond. There has to be a happy medium between Roger Moore-era camp and joyless grit, but this film errs toward the later. Craig at least has plenty of screen presence.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
0
killcounterOct 1, 2019
I think the script needed more work, A LOT OF WORK. perhaps it should then it would be good but no it sucks, the action scenes are dizzy like the opening car chase, the gunbarrel is **** terrible, the only good thing about this is the ****I think the script needed more work, A LOT OF WORK. perhaps it should then it would be good but no it sucks, the action scenes are dizzy like the opening car chase, the gunbarrel is **** terrible, the only good thing about this is the **** game, more enjoyable than this piece of ****… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
amheretojudgeMay 13, 2019
The second round takes a heavy toll on Craig, not accounting in the previous chapter scenarios, but individually, it is too effortful and tirsome.

Quantum Of Solace Foster doesn't serve my cup of tea. I never fully got his rhythm. Even inThe second round takes a heavy toll on Craig, not accounting in the previous chapter scenarios, but individually, it is too effortful and tirsome.

Quantum Of Solace

Foster doesn't serve my cup of tea. I never fully got his rhythm. Even in Finding Neverland, his mundane events never woke me up. And now invading the Bond franchise with similar speech and agenda, Mark Foster, the director, is keeping things mellow which doesn't suggest that it is smart or mature. Let's dive in on the conversations, that actually made its previous installment so light in feet, but this time reminiscing about the past and approaching the mission with the safest way possible, it gets very hard then to make it commercially successful. In fact, Judi Dench's track has the objective to make sure Bond plays safe; practical(!), but who'd want that.

The action too, in this one seems like a bait, almost a reason to make it there on time, or more accurately to reach the two hour clock, ergo the flight chase, the water chase, the car chase and the running chase, too much of ingredients did spoil the appetite. Let me go back once again, to the rhythm of the film, with no whatsoever thread linked in the narration, jumping from one debate to another, there is zero romance between these characters to make us care for them- overcooked empathy for one character will not make up for everyone.

Daniel Craig with recent wounds is back on the hunt and with a more clenched jaw, he keeps his poker face on, that basically works as a guard who won't let us in on his emotional journey, creating a physical distance with the audience. The Bond girl gets quite a chunk of bite but unfortunately antagonist, almost an empty space in this chapter. Quantum Of Solace is the afterparty after what went down in Casino Royale, the memory is a bit hazy and it also fumbles a lot.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
TyranianApr 11, 2019
Reasonable follow up to Casino Royale, still pretty smart but the not quite as good.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
JohnzinMar 24, 2019
Quantum of Solace is a disappointing sequel in the classic bond style.The film is cliche and does not deliver anything special, this movie was a mistake.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
OnaskNov 24, 2018
La película funciona, pero ni de cerca está a la altura de "Casino Royale". Aquí Bond es simplemente un héroe de acción más, afligido por su pasado que apenas muestra su lado más 007 en todo el metraje. Espectaculares escenas de acciónLa película funciona, pero ni de cerca está a la altura de "Casino Royale". Aquí Bond es simplemente un héroe de acción más, afligido por su pasado que apenas muestra su lado más 007 en todo el metraje. Espectaculares escenas de acción vacías. El desarrollo de los personajes muy pobres: quitando a Craig (mucho más flojo que en el anterior film) y a Dench, el resto es una masa de personajes secundarios completamente olvidables e intrascendentes. Poco recomendada, especialmente si se ha visto la anterior, te dejará un amargo sabor de boca.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
merijnjFeb 21, 2018
(73/100)
It had less quality than Casino Royale but still an OK movie in it's own right. Quantum of Solace also seems to be finishing old and setting up new story plots instead of focusing on the story that's going on in the movie itself.(73/100)
It had less quality than Casino Royale but still an OK movie in it's own right. Quantum of Solace also seems to be finishing old and setting up new story plots instead of focusing on the story that's going on in the movie itself. Action scenes were also incomprehensible, too many cuts and too much shaky cam.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
4
FilipeNetoFeb 19, 2018
Directed by Marc Forster and produced by Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson, it has script by Robert Wade, Neal Purvis and Paul Haggis. This is the twenty-second movie of the franchise and is the second film in the new era of James Bond,Directed by Marc Forster and produced by Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson, it has script by Robert Wade, Neal Purvis and Paul Haggis. This is the twenty-second movie of the franchise and is the second film in the new era of James Bond, embodied by the participation of Daniel Craig as 007. It inherits the central cast from the previous film, to which joins Olga Kurylenko, in the role of bond-girl Camille, Gemma Arterton, in the role of Strawberry Fields, Mathieu Amalric in the role of villain, Dominic Greene, and Joaquín Cosio in the role of General Medrano.

In this film, James Bond seeks revenge for the death of Vesper, killed by Quantum, a mysterious criminal organization that seeks to manipulate governments and control natural resources. In the process, however, he will have to act on his own, even going against MI6's orders to destroy this criminal syndicate.

This is one of the Bond movies I understand worse due to its complexity. It's so complicated and intricate that it becomes incomprehensible. But it's also true that, after the success of "Casino Royale" (which this film follows up), it would be difficult to obtain similar results. Despite the incomprehensibility, i enjoy the way that it approaches the value of water and ecological issues and concerns. Daniel Craig continues to play his role brilliantly, giving realism and credibility to the British agent. The interpretations of Mathieu Amalric and Joaquín Cosio also deserve congratulations, especially the latter one, which could become truly repellent with his sexist behavior and total disregard for women. However, Olga Kurylenko didn't satisfy me: her interpretation is very positive but her character is too ambiguous: she was a great help to Bond, she touched the audience with her story, but she isn't attractive enough to be a bond-girl. The opening sequence didn't surprised, despite Alicia Keys collaboration on the song "Another Way to Die"… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
wiiy71Dec 30, 2017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
mrdr4gonDec 6, 2017
Victim of the writer's strike, this film ends up being a disjointed mess, hindered by unsure direction and over edited action sequences. There's some neat moments here and there, but this is definitely one of the weaker Bond films.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
BradySmithAug 21, 2016
I might be being a little generous giving this a 6. It's not a horrible movie but it's definitely the weakest of Craig's movies. The first half or maybe more has almost no depth, no character, and no intrigue. The action scenes aren'tI might be being a little generous giving this a 6. It's not a horrible movie but it's definitely the weakest of Craig's movies. The first half or maybe more has almost no depth, no character, and no intrigue. The action scenes aren't horrible but they're mostly too over the top and poorly edited. The story, after meandering through a bunch of chases and not really building to anything, does start to pick up at a point. Apparently someone remembered a movie has to have some sort of depth to maintain interest. From there it goes onto a decent yet mostly uninspired path to the finish. The movie has its moments of character and atmosphere peppered throughout the second half but this is basically the definition of a placeholder movie. A watchable but frustratingly by the numbers and only occasionally engaging movie that's nowhere near Casino Royale or Skyfall.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
MasterRileyJul 20, 2016
While it still boosts fun action and set pieces, Quantum of Solace doesn't reach the critical acclaim of Casino Royale. It is still enjoyable to watch which is why I would still recommend it to Bond fans.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
EpicLadySpongeMay 10, 2016
Sounds lovely as it is and also sounds as much for James Bond, but Quantum of Solace can prove that the series is falling down for its 'doom' for its time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
aadityamudharApr 18, 2016
With absolutely no explanation of what is going on from scene to scene, what could potentially be a very interesting storyline becomes a mess of over-dramatic action scenes. James Bond just happens to find himself in exotic places on boats,With absolutely no explanation of what is going on from scene to scene, what could potentially be a very interesting storyline becomes a mess of over-dramatic action scenes. James Bond just happens to find himself in exotic places on boats, planes and fast cars but with no explanation... Also, for the first time, I get the feeling that this James Bond is as bad as the other villains! James Bond is supposed to be the hero, not the revenge-seeking murderous d*ck. Action scenes are fun to watch and they happen in a good variety of locations around the world - this is all that saves this film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
sicranoApr 8, 2016
.....................................................................................................................................A Very very very very BAD 007 MOVIE,
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
TheFilmBuffApr 2, 2016
Marc Forster Has a License to Confuse and Bore in Quantum of Solace.

Those of us who adored Casino Royale, the 2006 reboot of the haggard, self-parodic James Bond franchise, had some trouble trying to decide where to place it among theMarc Forster Has a License to Confuse and Bore in Quantum of Solace.

Those of us who adored Casino Royale, the 2006 reboot of the haggard, self-parodic James Bond franchise, had some trouble trying to decide where to place it among the series' finest. Was it better than Goldfinger? Probably not, but close. The Spy Who Loved Me? Maybe so. From Russia With Love? Nope—missed it by this much, to quote another secret agent. Granted, it's all shades of bullet-gray when it comes to Bond, historically riddled with silly, soporific misfires that looked the same regardless of who wore the tux and gulped the gin and gave the girl one last gasp before she drew her last breath.

But Casino Royale was a welcome break with a wearying tradition: It was the first James Bond movie since On Her Majesty's Secret Service to portray 007 as something more than a suave, Kennedy-era caricature—a handsome head perched upon a tailored suit and a martini glass. Daniel Craig, an art-house bombshell if there is such a thing, brought to Bond warmth, humanity, and, above all, gives-a-damn decency heretofore lacking since George Lazenby's sole stint as Connery's stand-in. More than just a good time spent riding shotgun in a tricked-out ride with a bad boy, Casino Royale was a love story masquerading as a spy thriller, with Bond falling for his collaborator and eventual betrayer, Vesper Lynd (Eva Green), who was working for . . . ?

That, alas, is the question allegedly answered by Quantum of Solace, which takes its title from an inconsequential Ian Fleming short story and is the first Bond movie to serve as a direct sequel. Allegedly, because Craig's second outing as Bond is as frustrating, sloppy, and brusque as its predecessor was engaging, sleek, and unhurried. At 106 minutes, it's the shortest of the Bond films, but it feels like one of the longest as it bounces hither and yon only to wind up stranded in a Bolivian desert, where baddie Dominic Greene (The Diving Bell and the Butterfly's Mathieu Amalric) is sucking the sand dry of its underwater river. Yawn. Used to be, Bond villains were larger-than-life Evil Geniuses who at least had Grand Aspirations to take over the world, bwah-haw-haw. Now, the bad guy's just a phony environmentalist with a thing for deposed dictators and dry wells.

At least, that's what Quantum of Solace seems to be about, though most of the time it's simply too hard to tell—or too pointless to care about—courtesy of the haphazard direction of Marc Forster, who demonstrates by negative example why Bond movies are best served by journeymen with something to prove rather than would-be A-listers slumming it. From its very first moments—we enter the film mid–car chase—Quantum is a spastic, indecipherable, unholy, and altogether unwatchable mess. Between swerves and smashes, we simply have no idea who's doing what to whom, where they're doing it, or why. What's meant to be kinetic and cathartic serves only to disorient, to keep the audience at a head-scratching distance.

It's as though Forster (Monster's Ball, Finding Neverland) and his two editors (longtime collaborator Matt Cheese and, get this, Get Smart and Bourne Supremacy vet Richard Pearson) filmed Quantum on a roller coaster and cut the movie with a food processor set on "indecipherable." Consider the scene, only moments after the car chase, where Bond and M (Judi Dench, even more disagreeable than she was in Casino Royale) question the mysterious Mr. White (Jesper Christensen, reprising his role from the previous film) about his role in Vesper's double-cross and death. The interrogation, but of course, turns into a shoot-out, with Bond chasing the assassin across rooftops and through broken glass ceilings—a reprise of Casino Royale's thrilling parkour sequence, perhaps the franchise's singular Great Moment. But Forster, whose biggest action sequence to date involved Halle Berry and Billy Bob Thornton getting it on, interrupts the action with needless, irritating cutaways to inconsequential doings (dunno what, can't say, wouldn't matter anyway) elsewhere that render the entire scene a confounding, alienating muddle. Which is to say nothing of the klutzy opera-house shoot-out stolen from The Godfather: Part III only moments later.

Written by Neil Purvis and Robert Wade (whose association with Bond dates back to 1999's The World Is Not Enough—yes, the one with Denise Richards) and Casino Royale pinch hitter Paul Haggis, Quantum of Solace may ultimately prove Bond's worst enemy to date. It's both frantic and boring, a surprising and wholly unnecessary attempt to gin up the revived franchise by turning Bond into Bourne.

If nothing else, there's no need to worry about where Quantum of Solace fits in the Bond pantheon—it's easily one of the worst.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
MovieGeeksApr 1, 2016
A reviewer may come to a new James Bond movie — “Quantum of Solace,” directed by Marc Forster and opening Friday, is the 22nd official installment of the series in 46 years — with a nifty theory or an elaborate sociocultural hermeneuticA reviewer may come to a new James Bond movie — “Quantum of Solace,” directed by Marc Forster and opening Friday, is the 22nd official installment of the series in 46 years — with a nifty theory or an elaborate sociocultural hermeneutic agenda, but the most important thing to have on hand is a checklist. It’s all well and good to reflect upon the ways 007, the Harry Potter of British intelligence, has evolved over time through changes in casting, geopolitics, sexual mores and styles of dress.

But the first order of business must always be to run through the basic specs of this classic entertainment machine’s latest model and see how it measures up.

So before we proceed to any consideration of the deeper meanings of “Quantum of Solace” (or for that matter the plain meaning of its enigmatic title), we need to assess the action, the villain, the gadgets, the babes and the other standard features.

The opening song, performed by Jack White and Alicia Keys (an intriguing duo on paper if nowhere else), is an abysmal cacophony of incompatible musical idioms, and the title sequence over which those idioms do squalling battle is similarly disharmonious: conceptually clever and visually grating. The first chase, picking up exactly where the 2006 “Casino Royale” left off, is speedy and thrilling, but the other action set-pieces are a decidedly mixed bag, with a few crisp footraces, some semi-coherent punch-outs and a dreadful boat pileup that brings back painful memories of the invisible car Pierce Brosnan tooled around in a few movies ago.

Picturesque locales? Bolivia, Haiti, Austria and Italy are featured or impersonated, to perfectly nice touristic effect. Gizmos? A bit disappointing, to tell the truth. Technological advances in the real world may not quite have outpaced those in the Bond universe, but so many movies these days show off their global video surveillance set-ups and advanced smart-phone applications that it’s hard for this one to distinguish itself.

What about the villain? One of the best in a while, I’d say, thanks to a lizardy turn from the great French actor Mathieu Amalric, who plays Dominic Greene, a ruthless economic predator disguised as an ecological do-gooder. The supporting cast is studded with equally excellent performers, including Jeffrey Wright and Giancarlo Giannini, both reprising their roles in “Casino Royale.”

And the women? There are two, as usual — not counting Judi Dench, returning as the brisk and impatient M — one (Gemma Arterton) a doomed casual plaything, the other a more serious dramatic foil and potential romantic interest. That one, called Camille, is played by Olga Kurylenko, whose specialty seems to be appearing in action pictures as the pouty, sexy sidekick of a brooding, vengeful hero. Not only Daniel Craig’s Bond, but also Mark Wahlberg’s Max Payne and Timothy Olyphant’s Hitman.

James Bond is a much livelier character than either of those mopey video-game ciphers, but he shares with them the astonishing ability to resist, indeed to ignore, Ms. Kurylenko’s physical charms.

This is not out of any professional scruple. The plot of “Quantum of Solace” is largely propelled by Bond’s angry flouting of the discipline imposed by his job, and anyway when did James Bond ever let work get in the way of sex? No, what gets in the way is emotion. 007’s grief and rage, the source of his connection to Camille, are forces more powerful than either duty or libido.

Mr. Brosnan was the first actor to allow a glimmer of complicated emotion to peek through Bond’s cool, rakish facade, and since Mr. Craig took over the franchise two years ago the character has shown a temperament at once rougher and more soulful than in previous incarnations. The violence in his first outing, “Casino Royale,” was notably intense, and while “Quantum of Solace” is not quite as brutal, the mood is if anything even more grim and downcast.

The death in “Casino” of Bond’s lover Vesper Lynd (Eva Green), along with the possibility that she had betrayed him before dying, provides an obvious psychological explanation for his somber demeanor in “Quantum.” But while the exploration of Bond’s psychology makes him, arguably at least, a deeper, subtler character — and there is certainly impressive depth and subtlety in Mr. Craig’s wounded, whispery menace — it also makes him harder to distinguish from every other grieving, seething avenger at the multiplex.

“Quantum of Solace,” a phrase never uttered in the course of this film (though it has something to do with Greene’s diabolical scheme, itself never fully explained), means something like a measure of comfort. Perhaps that describes what Bond is looking for, or maybe it is what this kind of entertainment tries to provide a fretful audience. If so, I prefer mine with a dash of mischief.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
SpangleMar 12, 2016
Quantum of Solace is a bit of a mess. Its action is over the top and makes it look as though Michael Bay took over direction at some point given its affinity for hard to follow action and explosions. The story is a bit much and I did not loveQuantum of Solace is a bit of a mess. Its action is over the top and makes it look as though Michael Bay took over direction at some point given its affinity for hard to follow action and explosions. The story is a bit much and I did not love the revenge angle too much. If the story was more fleshed out, I think the film would have benefited. As it stood, the film was too short. Olga Kurylenko's character has very little to do here other than look good, aside from the minor sub-plot that feels shoehorned in. That being said, that is where the negatives just about end. The non-action direction from Marc Forster is quite stylish, and the acting from Daniel Craig and Judi Dench is fantastic. Quantum of Solace has style for days and is not afraid to use it, but it truly is style over substance here with a pretty worthless plot. Quantum of Solace is an entirely mediocre effort from director Marc Forster.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
FilmMasterEdJan 5, 2016
So shoot me. I left the action rush of this follow-up to the terrific 2006 Casino Royale feeling bummed out by James Bond. Well, not by the Bond of Daniel Craig — he's still one nasty-ass dude, with the kind of rough-edged style that the 007So shoot me. I left the action rush of this follow-up to the terrific 2006 Casino Royale feeling bummed out by James Bond. Well, not by the Bond of Daniel Craig — he's still one nasty-ass dude, with the kind of rough-edged style that the 007 franchise hasn't seen since the glory days of Sean Connery. But the character fun seems to have gone out the window in Quantum of Solace, a fancy-shmancy title (the only thing borrowed from Ian Fleming's short story) for a movie that pours crude oil all over the subtle pleasures and sexy beats that came before.

The new movie picks up a few minutes after the last one. Big car chase (all together now: eww!) as Bond, barely recovered from the death of his lady love Vesper Lynd (Eva Green), burns rubber all over Italy with the wiggling body of Mr. White (Jesper Christensen) in the trunk of his Aston Martin. Cut to Mr. White's interrogation by M (Judi Dench), who finds herself surrounded by traitorous MI6 agents now working for Quantum, an agency bent on (what else?) world domination. So it's Bond on the march, killing everything that moves.

I know, it sounds juicy, but it isn't. Things go on the fritz early — even the new theme song, "Another Way to Die," sung by Jack White and Alicia Keys, sucks. Bond seems to have come down with a serious case of Jason Bourne penis envy, leaping across rooftops from Bolivia to Haiti like a jug-eared Matt Damon.

Put the blame on Marc Forster, a sensitive filmmaker (Monster's Ball, Finding Neverland) who has no experience as an action director and appears to be seriously overcompensating. In Casino Royale, Martin Campbell — a real action man — stopped to savor the distractions in the script co-written by Crash Oscar winner Paul Haggis. Remember the poker game and the sexual teasing in that train scene with Craig's Bond and Green's Vesper trying to guess each other's past histories? Haggis is back, but the mischief is gone. There's a flicker of interest when redhead Gemma Arterton shows up as Fields, an MI6 agent not averse to bonding with Bond, but she's soon gone like the ghost of good times past.

Instead, we get pouty Ukrainian model Olga Kurylenko as Camille, perhaps the dullest Bond girl ever. Camille treats 007 like he has an STD, but she screws the villainous Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric, bugging the eyes he only blinked in The Diving Bell and the Butterfly) to get to Bolivian general Medrano, who did evil perversities to her and her family.

It could have been a hell of a revenge tale about two people, Bond and Camille, who know you kill most effectively when you don't take it personally but who can't help taking it personally. That story is written all over Craig's haunted face. But Quantum of Solace won't trust its own darker instincts. It delivers the popcorn goods, but it ignores the poison eating at Bond's insides. Killer mistake.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
ivancic24Dec 22, 2015
Well sorry for the poor rating, but it seems to me that Sony made this picture in a hurry. Many jump-cuts, a story that is pale in comparison to the previous James Bond titles (mainly with Pierce Brosnan), and an actor who looks plainly dullWell sorry for the poor rating, but it seems to me that Sony made this picture in a hurry. Many jump-cuts, a story that is pale in comparison to the previous James Bond titles (mainly with Pierce Brosnan), and an actor who looks plainly dull compared to the other charismatic actors. Heck if I wanted to see a Casino Royale movie on meth, I would have, but this is simply wrong. Ian Fleming would be ashamed of it...… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
oDjentoDec 18, 2015
This film absolutely butchered the Bond franchise. So many cuts the action sequences are nauseous to watch and don't capture you at all. The villains here are also completely unmemorable and cast horribly. The plot is something that almostThis film absolutely butchered the Bond franchise. So many cuts the action sequences are nauseous to watch and don't capture you at all. The villains here are also completely unmemorable and cast horribly. The plot is something that almost becomes strung onto the movie last minute and everything about it is plain and boring. I actually seriously struggle watching this film. Awful.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
SchroederRockNov 7, 2015
I don't understand critics not being on board with this film. I greatly enjoyed it, not quite the level of awesome that Casino Royale achieved, but still a strong action film with a plot that builds upon its predecessor. Worth seeing if you ask me.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
4
Deadly_TravelerNov 7, 2015
Well, in 2015 this web-site told me that this movie is 'new or notable' so I decided to write a review. It's bad. There're so many movies about 007 (LOTS) that I'd rather call it cliche than something new. Movie is absolutely not satisfying.Well, in 2015 this web-site told me that this movie is 'new or notable' so I decided to write a review. It's bad. There're so many movies about 007 (LOTS) that I'd rather call it cliche than something new. Movie is absolutely not satisfying. Plot is trash, all the sh*t happening is trash. Rather no than yes.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
MrMovieBuffOct 30, 2015
Yes, it's true what they say. 'Quantum of Solace' is a silly, choppy action movie that felt less like a Bond movie and more like a Bourne movie.

Daniel Craig still maintains the role magnificently well, doing what he can in a silly actionYes, it's true what they say. 'Quantum of Solace' is a silly, choppy action movie that felt less like a Bond movie and more like a Bourne movie.

Daniel Craig still maintains the role magnificently well, doing what he can in a silly action film. Olga Kurylenko makes a good Bond girl and Mathieu Amalric is an okay Bond villain. I don't remember him as much as previous villains, especially Mads Mikkelsen ('Casino Royale'), and then Javier Bardem ('Skyfall') four years later.

I am not sure whether 'Quantum of Solace' would have been a much better movie if it wasn't a follow up to the great 'Casino Royale' (2006). It felt more like one of those dumb, gimmicky Pierce Brosnan movies after 'Goldeneye' (1995), this movie reminded me of 'Die Another Day' (2002), I was afraid that this current series of Bond movies would fall into that routine of dumb action and gimmicky moments. After starting off so well in 'Casino Royale' (2006), I feared this movie would end Daniel Craig, luckily he survived this one.

I just hope we never see another dumb action Bond flick ever again.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
5
raciocinioOct 21, 2015
The worst Bond of Daniel Craig,any one of Pierce Brosnan s better than this..... So weak,boring and long isn't too long but is so bad that seems which was 10 hours of weakest action and development
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
Duke_NukemOct 13, 2015
Connery is the ultimate Bond, Moore is the funny Bond, Dalton is the cool Bond, Brosnan is the suave Bond and Craig is... the ugly Bond?

I have no idea why they came up with the ludicrous idea to pick Craig as the new Bond and why theyConnery is the ultimate Bond, Moore is the funny Bond, Dalton is the cool Bond, Brosnan is the suave Bond and Craig is... the ugly Bond?

I have no idea why they came up with the ludicrous idea to pick Craig as the new Bond and why they decided to make Bond movies so dark and boring.

The conversations between Craig (no, I wont call him Bond) and grandma 'M' are ridiculous: "All you do is hurt people, you have no feelings you big bully!"... "Yes mom!"

Although this movie is not that good it's still better than the 2 other Bond movies Daniel Craig did, because at least there is a lot of action in this movie and the Bond girl is hot while in the other 2 movies the story is boring and the Bond girls unattractive.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
ThatCooperGuySep 18, 2015
Nearly 40 minutes in, and nothing interesting was happening. The non-stop action is upped, but that diminishes the story, plus the action scenes are poorly shot & horribly edited. There's too much action and not enough dialogue, not evenNearly 40 minutes in, and nothing interesting was happening. The non-stop action is upped, but that diminishes the story, plus the action scenes are poorly shot & horribly edited. There's too much action and not enough dialogue, not even Daniel Craig could save this movie.
Such a disappointing sequel to Casino Royal...… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
cryhardhumorJul 26, 2015
What is so sad about Quantum of Solace is the tremendous step down it was from Casino Royale. The only thing that makes this a Bond movie is Bond himself. All the style, action, and fun is sucked out and replaced by painful mediocrity.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
5
Zanessa250QIJul 5, 2015
Eu pensei que ia dar uma goleada no Cassino Royale (2006) no quesito de ação e principalmente como filme,mas foi um filme completamente fraquíssimo,em tudo o a conclusão foi uma bosta,o suspense uma merda,e o roteiro legal mas cansativo,masEu pensei que ia dar uma goleada no Cassino Royale (2006) no quesito de ação e principalmente como filme,mas foi um filme completamente fraquíssimo,em tudo o a conclusão foi uma bosta,o suspense uma merda,e o roteiro legal mas cansativo,mas pela algumas boas cenas de ação,boas atuações e por incrível que pareça nos deixar grudado até o final, Eu vou dar 6 mais?? Nem fudendo Fraco!!!… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
dyshpoMar 23, 2015
Overwrought with complete disregard for any Bond purist to overuse of Bourne flair. This is no Bond film it takes a steamy **** on your memory I've watched several times and then it flies out of conscience into the abyss.

From the worstOverwrought with complete disregard for any Bond purist to overuse of Bourne flair. This is no Bond film it takes a steamy **** on your memory I've watched several times and then it flies out of conscience into the abyss.

From the worst Bond intro song to the most unnatural and unyielding story and having no Bond in story is disgusting.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
0
FunposterUUUUFeb 17, 2015
I loved Casino Royale, but this, this is pure **** its the literal blandest film in the bond franchise and its something a bond film shouldnt be, i **** hate bland films, and this one was so mediocre i cant remember anything about its plot,I loved Casino Royale, but this, this is pure **** its the literal blandest film in the bond franchise and its something a bond film shouldnt be, i **** hate bland films, and this one was so mediocre i cant remember anything about its plot, just so unmemorable… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
manofthemoonJan 17, 2015
Rushed into production and it shows in every way, "Quantum of Solace" is a major disappointment after the excellent "Casino Royale". Directed, shot and cut as though it's a commercial, "QoS" also makes the mistake of trying to compete withRushed into production and it shows in every way, "Quantum of Solace" is a major disappointment after the excellent "Casino Royale". Directed, shot and cut as though it's a commercial, "QoS" also makes the mistake of trying to compete with the Jason Bourne series by dragging story and plot over from "Casino Royale", defeating the strong, stand alone stories that have worked for 50 films so far (as of 2014). Love interests should stay inside each story. The cast are strong against a weak script and terrible direction, to sadly make "QoS" one of the weakest outings in the entire franchise.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
vikesh2206Nov 9, 2014
Although it is action-packed and very entertaining, Quantum of Solace can't help feel like a corny popcorn action flick which derivates from all other action movies.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
SatiricalewokNov 8, 2014
This film is a mess. There are good features, the theme song is one of the best yet, Daniel Craig is yet again very good. But really the film is needlessly hard to follow, it feels awfully disjointed and the villain is not a charismatic one.This film is a mess. There are good features, the theme song is one of the best yet, Daniel Craig is yet again very good. But really the film is needlessly hard to follow, it feels awfully disjointed and the villain is not a charismatic one. This would all be fine if it was enjoyable during the film, but it's not really, it's a bit boring.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
beingryanjudeSep 4, 2014
Coming off the heels of the wonderful Casino Royale, Quantum is a surprising disappointment. Clearly, our director and Daniel Craig felt a tad bit too confident and lost their way.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
MovieGuysMar 12, 2014
"Quantum of Solace" might be the least best in the Daniel Craig series, but that doesn't mean it's bad. It's just a bit short of these awesome movies.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
Iky009Jan 3, 2014
Se destaca como o mais fraco da era Craig, simplesmente foi o mais mal produzido que seu anterior e seu antecessor uma pena que nem a carisma de Craig tenha salva esse filme mediano.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
eagleeyevikingDec 13, 2013
Although it is action-packed and very entertaining, Quantum of Solace can't help feel like a typical popcorn action flick which derivates from all other action movies.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
RayzorMooseNov 13, 2013
Quantum of Solace is an action packed hot mess.
The entire movie is plagued with absolute horrible direction, compact with terrible cut scenes. It relies heavily on jumpy cameras and snappy one liners that it simply doesn't work.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
mymediaSep 30, 2013
I watched this movie with skepticism but was truly surprised and happy with the end result. The action sequences are sublime and the story is more than entertaining. Bond is well represented and well played. I may be a minority for lovingI watched this movie with skepticism but was truly surprised and happy with the end result. The action sequences are sublime and the story is more than entertaining. Bond is well represented and well played. I may be a minority for loving this film but I feel it has everything that makes the Bond character amazing. Love the movie from start to finish!… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
5
alexthegreatSep 10, 2013
On the positive side, I still enjoyed Daniel Craig's performance as James Bond, the score was excellent, and the action scenes was somewhat creditable, but on the negative side, I had a huge problem about the story, the editing, the pacing,On the positive side, I still enjoyed Daniel Craig's performance as James Bond, the score was excellent, and the action scenes was somewhat creditable, but on the negative side, I had a huge problem about the story, the editing, the pacing, and the main villain became so much bland.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
DibbHansenJul 16, 2013
Another modern Bond film, that is a sequel to 'Casino Royale' mostly disappoints. I find it is the worst of the Bond films, but it has some cool action and good acting in it. The story is terrible, the music is good (except for the awfulAnother modern Bond film, that is a sequel to 'Casino Royale' mostly disappoints. I find it is the worst of the Bond films, but it has some cool action and good acting in it. The story is terrible, the music is good (except for the awful theme song) and the fact that this Bond film relies mostly on Bourne type things, this does not feel like much of a Bond film. So in conclusion, this is the worst Bond film, but it had its good moments- but they were mostly rare.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
WalkingDead5640Jul 10, 2013
It's not a perfect follow up the phenomenon and just on the average mark. The story is wasted just as the dull villain who may look creepy, does nothing memorable. Other supporting cast are either wasted or good. What this film does deliverIt's not a perfect follow up the phenomenon and just on the average mark. The story is wasted just as the dull villain who may look creepy, does nothing memorable. Other supporting cast are either wasted or good. What this film does deliver is very exciting and outstanding action scenes, with some of the best of the series and touching moments. I still disagree with the fast cut editing like a Bourne movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Compi24May 10, 2013
It may not be edited perfectly or nearly three-quarters as well-crafted as its predecessor, but "Quantum Of Solace" still stands tall as a thrillingly engrossing Bond film.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
6
CaestusMar 11, 2013
Quantum of Solace dont live up to its expatiation, having a poor pace and bad editing. An average action film.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
StevenFFeb 19, 2013
It was always going to be difficult following the raging success of 'Casino Royale', but to throw out this messy and flash bang action film with a downright boring and far too realistic plot, it just felt top heavy.
I love films that take aIt was always going to be difficult following the raging success of 'Casino Royale', but to throw out this messy and flash bang action film with a downright boring and far too realistic plot, it just felt top heavy.
I love films that take a realistic turn, Batman Begins being the best example, but with this mediocre plot of water and large deserts with hotels and perverted soldiers inside, this was not meant for James Bond, gone is the smooth and fluid dialogue and controlled action of Daniel Craig's debut, and in its a place an explosive and a cut too many action flick that was a step back, but that doesn't mean its a bad film.
Starting basically where the last film left off, we open with a pulsating chase in Bonds Aston Martin, being pursued through various close call cliffs by Alfa Romeo's, and this sets up the film for what it is, an action rampage. After a betrayal brings Bond and M back to London in an attempt to investigate the organisation known as Quantum, Bond rescues Camille (Olga Kurylenko) who was the victim of a failed assassination from her boyfriend, and main antagonist Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric).
M continues to be weary of Bond after the events of the first film, obersving his continuing reckless and raging behaviour, Daniel Craig expertly carries this film, and for all its failures, he is the one shining light. His ability to convey Bond's emotion through excessive violence is certainly a step away from what is expected of this British spy, but for this realistic nature of conveying human emotion, Craig must be lauded.
There are plenty of set pieces and explosions to rival the Die Hards and Bournes of this world, but this is the faltering moment of the film, because Bond simply isn't an adrenaline junkie or a flat out superhero, he is an MI6 operative doing his job, and Solace seems to forget this.
The writing is spot on, but the plot and story is messy to the point of there being very little point to many of the characters in the film, the appearance of the beautiful Gemma Arterton as MI6 agent Strawberry Fields just seems pointless.
It certainly isn't a bad film, its still miles apart from the later Brosnan days, but it is still unfortunately further a field than Casino Royale, its weak, slow, and sometimes just too much of a good thing.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
3
thenthomwaslikeJan 24, 2013
first things first. this movie has some of the worst film editing i've ever seen. it cuts between cameras in literally less than 1 second intervals. and it blatantly ignores decades of bond lore, as well as the scientific laws of time. ifirst things first. this movie has some of the worst film editing i've ever seen. it cuts between cameras in literally less than 1 second intervals. and it blatantly ignores decades of bond lore, as well as the scientific laws of time. i heard great things about skyfall so i figured i would catch up with daniel craig's bond beforehand, but i would recommend just skipping this one altogether.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
WiesyJan 18, 2013
This is a very good action movie. The story is good, The cast is good, just everything is good. I give this movie an 8 because I expected more as casino royal.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
imthenoobJan 2, 2013
No where near as good as the previous Bond film. Pretty much lacks in every area - Acting, Plot, Villain sucks, and the action isn't as good either. A bit disapointing imo.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
DanteTheCynicDec 18, 2012
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A love letter to Timothy Dalton's 'License to Kill', Quantum is a great action film, but not so much a great Bond film. To be fair, the film's quality isn't it's fault, because of a writer's strike that was going on at the time. Still, there aren't that many girls or gadgets. Simply a boat load of action. If you've seen the trailer, try to imagine an entire movie of just that: Simple, gritty violence. The main villain is forgettable, but where the film shines is it's modern day answer to SPECTRE, Quantum. The name makes little sense, as it literally means 'Amount', but other than that, the film is pretty decent. A good watch for bond junkies, but it may not be worth more than one or two viewings.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
3
jos95Dec 11, 2012
This was a bitter disappointment compared to Casino Royale, ditching a substantial story for a string of action scenes. The plot is ruined by its eco subtext, which gets tedious and annoying. The villain wasn't sinister at all, he was theThis was a bitter disappointment compared to Casino Royale, ditching a substantial story for a string of action scenes. The plot is ruined by its eco subtext, which gets tedious and annoying. The villain wasn't sinister at all, he was the sort of guy you'd take out for a beer. The lack of originality is incredibly obvious, the action scenes gave me serious deja vu of the M:I series, and Bond's subplot of his eagerness to avenge Vesper Lynd shamelessly borrows from The Bourne Supremacy. The ending is atrocious, since when would Bond leave the Bond girl stranded in a Bolivian desert town? The gaps in logic are bigger than Jupiter, he puts Vesper's father's corpse in a dumpster instead of having a proper burial, and some random guy comes and fights Bond in a hotel with no connection to the plot whatsoever. Worst of all is the shaky cam and rapid fire editing, which dominated the action making it difficult to watch. The only things giving me points to this movie are Daniel Craig's gritty portrayal of Bond, and the holographic table scene, that's all. Topping Casino Royale was always going to be difficult, but Quantum of Solace doesn't even come close.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
shineonsunfishNov 29, 2012
I'm going to go against the grain here and say that I really, really like this movie. I am not a fan of old Bond - I loved Casino Royale, and think that this film really stands up as a sequel to it. I liked that it had one, clear plot, andI'm going to go against the grain here and say that I really, really like this movie. I am not a fan of old Bond - I loved Casino Royale, and think that this film really stands up as a sequel to it. I liked that it had one, clear plot, and tied in well with Casino. At the end of that film, Bond realizes he has been betrayed by the only woman that he ever let himself love - he responds by shutting his feelings off entirely, and beginning a mad quest for revenge. The action scenes are smart and quick, and Olga Kurylenko as Camila is extremely beautiful, but also very interesting with a subplot of her own. There are so many small character building moments in this film, and the villain leads us to believe that there is a sinister Bilderberg type group pulling the strings for all of these coups in major countries. Nice to see Felix back again, and the political intrigue parts of the film were sharp. M's maternal relationship with Bond is subtly expanded upon. The Opera scene is flipping brilliant. Overall, I think that this is one of my favorite action movies of all time, and honestly it's super underrated.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
NerungNov 22, 2012
A decent film but it does not manage to compensate for its bland concept. The story is uninspired and all about the film seems like a standard formula. All in all, the film is okay but still one of the weaker Bonds.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
jwt7000Nov 20, 2012
This movie is a toss-up since License to Kill. A corny and weak plot so unimaginable winds up being concentrated on something else. Also the movie is short despite five good action scenes and there's nothing else special in this one.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
6
bosnianNov 12, 2012
Loses a lot of the emotion of Casino Royale as well as character development and story. Villain is forgettable and finale underwhelming. Still, far from a bad movie especially in the sea of below average action movies out today.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
cameronmorewoodNov 12, 2012
Not even the writers themselves could keep up with the plot. There's no problem with the action sequences and Daniel Craig is spot on, but at one point, Bond is poisoned. The poison doesn't seem to affect him in the next scene. Big oops.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
SeriosityNov 4, 2012
Like a solid second act. Ends up being only a follow up to the original instead of its own movie. A step down from Casino Royale, but I'm still looking forward to future installments.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
4
axelkochNov 3, 2012
A big step back after Casino Royale. The action isn't really rememberable (like the parkour fight in its predecessor) and the actors are bad. You have to put feelings into it to make Daniel Craig endurable - like in Casino Royale. It's just aA big step back after Casino Royale. The action isn't really rememberable (like the parkour fight in its predecessor) and the actors are bad. You have to put feelings into it to make Daniel Craig endurable - like in Casino Royale. It's just a sequel to it, which is a short movie but is longsome. 'Quantum Of Solace' is not that bad because you can enjoy it as a moderate action movie but they could've done way better.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
jordiNov 2, 2012
Muy aceptable. Acción a raudales desde el primer minuto. Continuidad con la anterior entrega de Daniel Craig. Globalización a tope, enseñándonos como la economía y el poder pasan por encima de losMuy aceptable. Acción a raudales desde el primer minuto. Continuidad con la anterior entrega de Daniel Craig. Globalización a tope, enseñándonos como la economía y el poder pasan por encima de los mandatarios. Lealtad. En contra algunas escenas con demasiado movimiento que necesitan un esfuerzo de concentración, así como el deseo de venganza y demasiadas muertes. Es cierto que después de la venganza se nos muestra que esta deja igualmente un vacío.
Fabulosa la interpretación tanto de Daniel Craig como de Judi Dench.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
TokyochuchuOct 28, 2012
Quantum of Solace turns back the clock on Casino Royale's unconventional structure to bring about a more traditional Bond adventure. Craig still makes for an excellent 007, investing the role with emotional gravitas. The action scenes areQuantum of Solace turns back the clock on Casino Royale's unconventional structure to bring about a more traditional Bond adventure. Craig still makes for an excellent 007, investing the role with emotional gravitas. The action scenes are more fantastical than it's predecessor and as such have that tangible James Bond feel to them. Quantum of Solace is a good movie, even though it makes me cry to see a DB7 banged up so roughly.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
Andys_ReviewsOct 14, 2012
Production wise, I couldn
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
pauljohnsonOct 7, 2012
It's not great, but its not terrible either. The plot feels confused at many points as to what it wants to be in terms of its themes and story goals, and as a result it feels like a string of under-developed plot points. Some characters, suchIt's not great, but its not terrible either. The plot feels confused at many points as to what it wants to be in terms of its themes and story goals, and as a result it feels like a string of under-developed plot points. Some characters, such as Fields are largely pointless, and Greene as the villain is not threatening at best, and just uninteresting at worst. Not that the actor does not do a good job with the material he had. Craig and Dench save the film with their stellar performances in their roles, and Craig especially in his role as the brooding, vengeful Bond. On the whole, it just feels confused as to what it wants to be, but its entertaining enough to hold your attention. Oh, and the song for this film is awful. Roll on Skyfall.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
SamblixAug 14, 2012
Bond is angry. Quantum of Solace shows Bond like never before, setting out on a mission of vengeance and a lot of explosions. Daniel Craig again portrays Bond in a new light, darker, grittier, angrier yet this movie falls short in comparisonBond is angry. Quantum of Solace shows Bond like never before, setting out on a mission of vengeance and a lot of explosions. Daniel Craig again portrays Bond in a new light, darker, grittier, angrier yet this movie falls short in comparison to it's predecessors. Where Casino Royale showed us a new Bond isn't necessary a bad thing, Quantum of Solace shows us that, too much of the same thing, is.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
Sub-zero52Aug 4, 2012
I'll tell you straight! The film Quantum of Solace is not for everyone. Those who watched movies as a child because of the steep Bond shootouts, chases, fights will be very upset because of their absence. And those who watched them becauseI'll tell you straight! The film Quantum of Solace is not for everyone. Those who watched movies as a child because of the steep Bond shootouts, chases, fights will be very upset because of their absence. And those who watched them because the story will be completely satisfied. You can also recommend this film to those who did not sign with the Bond. They will appear in this film a masterpiece. I belong to the latter. So I put it the highest rating.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
movie2187Jan 3, 2012
Stuck on this film, the story editing is great and fast moving for all the right reasons, but some action scenes (such as the opening) makes no logical sense, Yes it's thrilling (In large thanx to the sound effects) but It is dizzyingStuck on this film, the story editing is great and fast moving for all the right reasons, but some action scenes (such as the opening) makes no logical sense, Yes it's thrilling (In large thanx to the sound effects) but It is dizzying instead of entertaining. The film is well made but the half a second editing still enhances the film at certain times (planes chase sequence, hotel room fight) and hurts at others. The film is well written for the genre and actually improves certain aspects of Casino Royale, but the overproduced editing hurts it from being better than Casino Royale.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
5
spadenxDec 31, 2011
It really sorted of abandoned all plot in exchange for good action sequences. I did like however that Craig was able to show a more serious side then he did in the previous film, Even though it made his character come off a bit of an emo (butIt really sorted of abandoned all plot in exchange for good action sequences. I did like however that Craig was able to show a more serious side then he did in the previous film, Even though it made his character come off a bit of an emo (but thats because of the poor script, not Craig himself). Also the film was pretty much a knock off of The Bourne Ultimatum. The action sequences reminded me a lot about that film and it made Quantum Of Solace look cheesey.

Overall the film is a huge step down from the first film, I expected better.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
Commander_JimDec 14, 2011
An underrated gem of a Bond film. No, its not your usual epic, lavish Bond adventure. It is instead a very taut action thriller in the vein of films like Taken and euro-thrillers. I have no doubt that in years to come it will become moreAn underrated gem of a Bond film. No, its not your usual epic, lavish Bond adventure. It is instead a very taut action thriller in the vein of films like Taken and euro-thrillers. I have no doubt that in years to come it will become more highly regarded as other "different" Bond films like On Her Majestys Secret Service and Licence To Kill have.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
asylumspadezNov 26, 2011
Daniel Craig is good in this film once again. The action sequences are good and film in general is good as well but not as great as the previous fim. I still enjoyed it though.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
10
steveos69Nov 10, 2011
I am a huge Bond fan. I have read the Flemming novels and I have seen all movies. Quantum of Solace is my favourite Bond movie by a mile.
It has everything that you could want from a bond film. Awesome action, excellent acting, hot BondI am a huge Bond fan. I have read the Flemming novels and I have seen all movies. Quantum of Solace is my favourite Bond movie by a mile.
It has everything that you could want from a bond film. Awesome action, excellent acting, hot Bond girls, a realistic plot and a realistic villain with a genius plan. The car chase and fight scene are better shot and easier to follow than anything in the Bourne films. They're hard hitting and thrilling to watch.
It pays homage to most of the great early movies like Goldfinger and The Spy Who Loved Me.
Sean Connery played Bond just like the character in the Flemming novels but Daniel Craig is by far the best actor to ever portray Bond. He looks classy and he kicks ass when he needs to. Highly recommended.… Expand
8 of 11 users found this helpful83
All this user's reviews
7
Smartine7Oct 24, 2011
The plot is just slightly too complex to follow, the Bond-girls aren't quite as stunning, and the writing is not quite as polished as its predecessor. "Quantum"'s primary problem is that it had to follow "Casino Royale". A moderately-funThe plot is just slightly too complex to follow, the Bond-girls aren't quite as stunning, and the writing is not quite as polished as its predecessor. "Quantum"'s primary problem is that it had to follow "Casino Royale". A moderately-fun action movie, an adequate addition to the Bond franchise, but a below-average sequel. Regardless, it's still worth a look. Maybe even two or three.… Expand
4 of 4 users found this helpful40
All this user's reviews
7
kingshahidOct 8, 2011
This movie had a lot of action. Aside that I had no clue what the story was. I never liked this actor as James Bond either. It was not worth sitting through but the action was packed.
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
4
J-ShapAug 27, 2011
Daniel Craig still shows himself as one of the best Bonds ever, and I applaud the filmmakers for wanting to veer away from the campy days of yore, but this Bond film is so morose, in a bad way, that it comes across as a bland actionerDaniel Craig still shows himself as one of the best Bonds ever, and I applaud the filmmakers for wanting to veer away from the campy days of yore, but this Bond film is so morose, in a bad way, that it comes across as a bland actioner disguised as something more. Quantum of Solace is an average film, and that's arguably the worst thing one can be.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
CRLAug 4, 2011
Quantum of Solace was not a 'bad' film, but pales in the light of Casino Royale. It had huge potential with one of the best Bonds ever and what could have been an excellent plot, but in the end falls a bit short with too much action and notQuantum of Solace was not a 'bad' film, but pales in the light of Casino Royale. It had huge potential with one of the best Bonds ever and what could have been an excellent plot, but in the end falls a bit short with too much action and not enough clever story; enjoyable in itself but nowhere near the stellar mark of its predecessor.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
FolstarJul 19, 2011
I find the negative reviews of this film laughable: 1. I DOES NOT UNDRSTAND DER PLOT... why? because the film does not pause to explain everything like so many modern films do? Everyone I watched this film with understood the plot withoutI find the negative reviews of this film laughable: 1. I DOES NOT UNDRSTAND DER PLOT... why? because the film does not pause to explain everything like so many modern films do? Everyone I watched this film with understood the plot without many questions. 2. WATER? WATER?... being completely unaware of how valuable water is makes a poor excuse for disliking a film. Having no understanding of current events and problems is just sad. 3. SO MUCH AKTON IS NOT BOND... yes, it is. This film does action sequences better than the slow and clumsy Bond films of yesteryear and that is a good thing. 4. I LIKE BROSNAN BETTERER... yes, those were great movies. No one should question that.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
moviegrabbagJun 13, 2011
Not up there with Casino Royale but a great follow up to it. The acting was still great but the movie rushed through its self a little bit. Daniel Craig still does a good job and makes me forget about that Pierce guy. Overall a very good movie.
4 of 4 users found this helpful40
All this user's reviews
7
Andy92May 21, 2011
i found this an enjoyable movie however what has let it down is too much action. The acting was good as you would expect from a james bond movie and so was the storyline. it was just too fast paced there was not much talk involved it neededi found this an enjoyable movie however what has let it down is too much action. The acting was good as you would expect from a james bond movie and so was the storyline. it was just too fast paced there was not much talk involved it needed to take sometime to slow down every so often… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
prev
Page:
More From This Movie

58 Critic Reviews

6.3 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL