Pathology

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) | Release Date: April 18, 2008

6.5	USER SCORE Generally favorable reviews based on 35 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Watch Now

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

SMDec 30, 2008

This movie is only to be watched by guys. Excessively VIOLENT. Not much of twist or interesting ideas.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

rellimdetOct 31, 2010

Extremely awkward. Plot development is empty and the acting is nothing special, which is the overall feeling of this movie...nothing special. Just another gruesome, gory, and violent movie trying to mask itself with a mildly interesting plot.Extremely awkward. Plot development is empty and the acting is nothing special, which is the overall feeling of this movie...nothing special. Just another gruesome, gory, and violent movie trying to mask itself with a mildly interesting plot. By the end of the movie you find yourself saying "Why am I watching this?"… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

PathoslogosApr 1, 2018

The name is a misnomer first of all. It should have been "forensics" or "forensic pathology". The main reason is that "Pathology" is the laboratory work at the hospital site whose main function is diagnostic procedures on tissues and bodyThe name is a misnomer first of all. It should have been "forensics" or "forensic pathology". The main reason is that "Pathology" is the laboratory work at the hospital site whose main function is diagnostic procedures on tissues and body fluids of mainly from living patients i.e. "surgical pathology" or as in UK "histopathology"for organs and tissues and "cytopathology" for body fluids........The movie has only fouced on "forensci pathology" whish is an autopsy work......Besides this there is a great gap inthe movie omitting microscopic analysis of the organs and tissues. The movie gives the wrong impression of gross examination of autopsy findings is adequate for final diagnosis. This has been rejected by the 19th century pathologists saying that final pathologic diagnosis can not exist without a microscopic analysis (pionered by Professor Rudolph Virchow and colleagues of 19th century) as opposed to the medieval approach of the old centuries. The movie gives a false impression of medical pathology practice in this regard......… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews