Noah
Paramount Pictures | Release Date: March 28, 2014
5.4
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 806 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
352
Mixed:
210
Negative:
244
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
1
belfastbikerApr 8, 2014
I was with a girl at the time, and I felt nothing but embarrassment watching this with her, as it was my choice for movie. Boy, I'll check out more than one crazy fundamentalist christian review next time. **** insane, that part I liked.I was with a girl at the time, and I felt nothing but embarrassment watching this with her, as it was my choice for movie. Boy, I'll check out more than one crazy fundamentalist christian review next time. **** insane, that part I liked. But to many parts were just cringeworthy and cheesy.… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
0
NagromNniuqApr 20, 2014
This movies is a waste of money, both in the production of and the going to see of. Not only does it not follow the actual story of Noah, it is fully of absurd situations and creatures that have no real bearing on the story being told. TheThis movies is a waste of money, both in the production of and the going to see of. Not only does it not follow the actual story of Noah, it is fully of absurd situations and creatures that have no real bearing on the story being told. The agnostic and environmentalist agenda is being pushed so hard that it detracts seriously from the movie as a whole regardless of what religion or view point you are coming from. It takes away from what could have been an entertaining movie, that was about something other than the story of Noah, and instead makes it a mixmash of explosions, special effects, poor acting and lines, that is painful to sit through. Sad.… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
9
talisencrwOct 2, 2014
A very controversial film, destined through Darren Aronofsky and Ari Handel script to alienate basically all factions who could possibly comprise the film's audience. Christians who take the Bible literally will be offended, athiests wouldn'tA very controversial film, destined through Darren Aronofsky and Ari Handel script to alienate basically all factions who could possibly comprise the film's audience. Christians who take the Bible literally will be offended, athiests wouldn't come within Noah with a ten-foot pole, that sort of thing. It's a lose-lose situation, which is a crying shame, because it's most probably Aronofsky's greatest work since Requiem for a Dream. Very inspired decision reuniting A Beautiful Mind's stars Russell Crowe and Jennifer Connelly, while Sir Anthony Hopkins really shines as Earth's oldest human being (Noah's grandfather Methuselah), it has the best acting I've seen from Emma Watson, and Ray Winstone is very good as the villain. Take it from the doves and grab this olive branch, and see this fine film for what it truly is--a very rewarding experience which examines the power of miracles and the equally fascinating mysteries of love and mercy.… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
2
AlanCheungApr 8, 2014
People were quick to judge the movie based on that fact it is biblical, but that should be put aside because it never mattered.
Story: Seemed like a story that was meant for environmentalists. A lot of it emphasized the importance ofPeople were quick to judge the movie based on that fact it is biblical, but that should be put aside because it never mattered.
Story: Seemed like a story that was meant for environmentalists. A lot of it emphasized the importance of maintaining the Earth the way it was when it was originally created.
Acting: Emma Watson and Jennifer Connolly stole the show with their sorrowful performances. Russell Crowe and Logan Lerman gave an average performance, which was limited by the script.
Direction: The Watchers were a bad idea, they never felt like they belonged in that world. Almost like a poor man's Lord of the Rings. Their clunky animations made it look like a stop motion animation. Very poor choice on Darren Aronfsky's part.
Enjoyability - Regardless of whether the story of The Great Flood means anything to you. It wouldn't be a movie you'd pay for if you wanted to watch something enjoyable.… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
0
MemetoApr 15, 2014
Saw it yesterday. Just made an account to write this. What a waste of time, money, humor.... You name it. Went out of the movie very disappointed, a little angry too. Story sucks, play sucks, effects sucks. I rate with 1 for those who tookSaw it yesterday. Just made an account to write this. What a waste of time, money, humor.... You name it. Went out of the movie very disappointed, a little angry too. Story sucks, play sucks, effects sucks. I rate with 1 for those who took the time to get together one of the worste movie ever.… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
3
XirrApr 15, 2014
Film felt confused; it just added content inconsistent with original Biblical teaching, but then tried to approach evolution, and even mix in the story of Abraham instead of just telling the story.

Cinematography was quite well--honestlyFilm felt confused; it just added content inconsistent with original Biblical teaching, but then tried to approach evolution, and even mix in the story of Abraham instead of just telling the story.

Cinematography was quite well--honestly one of the better approaches to use of imagery and special effects which is why I give it a 3. But the film is probably best watched on mute.… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
0
glgApr 16, 2014
"Noah" is the worst movie my two friends and I have ever seen in a theater -- and we're in our 60s and love movies, so that's saying a lot. (And no, we aren't religious fanatics.) It's so bad it's laughable, beginning with the Adam and Eve"Noah" is the worst movie my two friends and I have ever seen in a theater -- and we're in our 60s and love movies, so that's saying a lot. (And no, we aren't religious fanatics.) It's so bad it's laughable, beginning with the Adam and Eve sequence to the Hobbit-ripoff rock monsters. The plot is boring and so full of plot holes (including a huge tent that the characters just happen to put together out of backpacks) that it's beyond stupid.. The acting is bad, even though we all three usually love Crowe. It was like the actors were cringing at having to put up with anything so moronic. Don't waste your money!… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
2
LincolnbazApr 20, 2014
Not sure how people who query accuracy have a leg to stand unless they were there at the time of Adam, Eve, Noah and friends. However, that does not excuse the film makers coming up with probably the worst film I have ever seen. There isNot sure how people who query accuracy have a leg to stand unless they were there at the time of Adam, Eve, Noah and friends. However, that does not excuse the film makers coming up with probably the worst film I have ever seen. There is simply nothing positive I can say about it. Refund please, for my wasted time and money.… Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
5
GreatMartinMar 28, 2014
There is as much good as bad in “Noah” with good being the acting of Russell Crowe as the title character doing a strong role convincingly with Jennifer Connelly as his wife, repeating a role she played opposite Crowe in “A Beautiful Mind”.There is as much good as bad in “Noah” with good being the acting of Russell Crowe as the title character doing a strong role convincingly with Jennifer Connelly as his wife, repeating a role she played opposite Crowe in “A Beautiful Mind”. Their sons are played by Douglas Booth as the eldest boy Shem, Logan Lerman themiddle son Ham and with Leo Carroll as the youngest Japheth and Emma Watson as the adopted daughter Ila.

The central story of the bible of Noah building an Ark, taking his family and two of every earthly creature, spending 40 days and nights at sea and starting a new world. (I have very little knowledge about how the world would be repopulated but I suppose that is for bible studiers to answer.) The story has been expanded---one of the bads of the film is the length of the movie--to include a super villain Tubal-cain, a descendant of the Abel killer, his brother Cain, played by Ray Winstone,--by the director Darren Aronofsky and he with co-writer Art Handel. I am almost sure there were no such characters as The Watchers, live rock formations, in the bible though I was told they were the equivalent of Nephilim, supposedly fallen angels. The Watchers are voiced by unrecognizable sounds of Frank Langella and Nick Nolte.

The watchers are the biggest waste of time--and they are a big part of the second half--but save the director and writers explaining how the Ark was built and how the creatures were gathered. The use of special effects is becoming an excuse not to explain things in movies and bringing a certain unreality to the screen.

The production values are first rate and even the musical score never overtakes the story.

“Noah” is neither a good or bad movie though it is good to see Russell Crowe handling a deep role with ease as he did in his early days but even with that though Moses will always be Charlton Heston, Crowe may not always be Noah.… Expand
3 of 11 users found this helpful38
All this user's reviews
9
EdorkMay 7, 2014
Seriously, why is everyone freaking out about this? Do I have to be a religious fanatic in order to hate this movie? Because this film was amazing! "Worst movie ever"??? Get over yourselves!
3 of 11 users found this helpful38
All this user's reviews
10
karinrocksApr 21, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I have met people who "knew" they would hate this movie before they saw it so they either didn't see it and dis it anyway which makes no sense or they went to the theater and made a point of walking out loudly and rudely. One person said he was VERY angry that the word "God" was replaced with "Creator" and for him it "had to be" downhill from there. A lot of the negative reviews here and elsewhere seem to be coming from the same mindset. Obviously this review is not for these people. Either they won't read it or if they do they won't like it. But for the rest of you, those with open curious minds in search of a film worth spending money on, this is a very good movie. Russell Crowe leads an excellent cast through a script respectful of the Creator and his Creation, especially the innocent, the animals. And we humans must admit that we have not been very good caretakers of this planet and the flora and fauna who share it with us. It's an excellent movie for Earth Day! And it's also full of mindblowing special effects. You won't be bored!… Expand
3 of 11 users found this helpful38
All this user's reviews
7
TheHelpMar 29, 2014
If you go into this movie expecting a strong christian movie, you WILL be disappointing. I think that the creators of this movie did a really good job with appealing to Christians and non-Christians alike. For example, they hint at the bigIf you go into this movie expecting a strong christian movie, you WILL be disappointing. I think that the creators of this movie did a really good job with appealing to Christians and non-Christians alike. For example, they hint at the big bang and evolution, but not "apes to humans". Small things like these really help the movie stand out. The first half was fantastic. The last hour or so really made me lose some interest. To the people who are strong Christians, I do recommend you watch this movie on one account. You need to go in with an open mind, remembering that nobody really knows what happened from this long ago. The writers simply read the text, inferred their opinion of what happened, and tried to make it interesting to large crowds of people. I think they did well.… Expand
8 of 31 users found this helpful823
All this user's reviews
10
meagan214Jun 7, 2014
People who rated this amazing movie 1 or 0 is what is wrong with the world. Don't listen to the idiots downrating this movie. This is a masterpiece and with top notch performances. Kudos to everyone involved.
3 of 12 users found this helpful39
All this user's reviews
0
officerhansenApr 6, 2014
There is a first for everything. Yesterday, on my 31st birthday something happened around me that I have never before experienced. I am not talking about the dinner with the love of my life eating the love of my life, Pizza, leading up to theThere is a first for everything. Yesterday, on my 31st birthday something happened around me that I have never before experienced. I am not talking about the dinner with the love of my life eating the love of my life, Pizza, leading up to the movie. I am not talking about the romantic walk towards each other that ended up in hot steamy kiss up against the glass of shop on the street outside the theatre. I walked to the street corner after I purchased the tickets for the movie and as I turned my head to my left I saw her, it was like the first time I had seen this woman but I felt the energy from a block away, I knew she had me in her sites. I knew she was determined to run into me, I felt compelled to meet her half way and run into her just as determined. Our bodies collided like two galaxies in outer space. There is no collision more graceful than that of two galaxies. So large, so great, so passionate that when they collide the planets that make them up never hit. The two beautiful forces of our universe dance like they are in love until they settle into one new galaxy. That was us right there on the sidewalk under the streetlight at night just like in the movies. However this is not the first I am speaking of. The night was young and the movie had yet begun. After having a few laughs at the tavern next door, we walked through the crystal clear glass that lead to our horror. With a big bag of mouthwatering popcorn in one hand and a genetically engineered fructose corn syrup soup in the other. Sitting in the third row, we were traditionally set for our feature presentation starring, Rustle Crow. At first I am moved, pulled in by the selflessness of Noah and his sons. I thought I was proud to be in this crowd, so glad to see a movie that did not promote bad. However it was at this moment that I witnessed something I had never seen before! Something that totally made sense but yet none at all. I needed to take a picture so people would believe me when I share it on social media with the world to save them from making the same mistake we made that beautiful night. To save them from not only having to watch this movie but from possibly facing the same fate of those around me. To my right it was happening. Directly in front of me it was happening, I turned to look behind me and it was happening all around me. I thought at first, its ok, this is a dream, pinch yourself you fool this can’t happen in real life. It hurt, I was not sleeping, not yet, but if I subjected myself to this anymore I could end up doing just that. Doing what all the sinners around me were doing, engaging in what seemed to be either a mass suicide attempt or possibly a slumber party. People were sleeping not only around me but on each other. The young couple to my right fell asleep leaning against each other. The mother who sat in front of me separating her husband and son started snoring. People all around were speechless as we were subjected to the glorious acting out of a phycodic script obviously written or directed by a white male animal lover who probably has small ligaments. A white man that feels inferior to woman and children. Scared that one day people will wake up and realize that this is not a white man’s world. But a natural habitat for humanity. Scared that people will realize there is no one greater than our creator who is genderless and colorless. This movie features 100% people with a white ethnic background and a man who tells his sons that he does not believe there should be kings for there is no man greater than our creator. But after the king and his men are killed by the water from above Noah becomes a King, President, Dictator, Ruler, CEO whatever you want to call it, its all the same. He decided who lives and who dies. He decides who will go and who will stay regardless of the thoughts of the people who make up his pride. A man who believes that woman are to serve man and bear children. Only if he wants them to. He cares not what other humans say, he is only interested in carrying out the decisions that take place in his own mind and claims that they are orders from above, from the almighty who works threw no one other than himself. He believes that humans are not animals, that its only ok for lions to eat other animals, for if a human eats another animal he is eating the forbidden fruit. He supports the idea that killing mass quantities of humans is justified for the humans are all sinners. My take on this movie is that if you believe you are getting orders from god, you should act them out regardless of the thoughts of others around you even if it involves killing babies that are one day old or making mankind extinct. That murdering most the world population if not all is not only justified but glorious in the evolution of our Garden of Eden which we of the modern world refer to as planet earth, the third rock from the sun.… Expand
3 of 12 users found this helpful39
All this user's reviews
10
andreydelorenzoMay 28, 2014
Good and ambitious film. An incredible and cohesive movie under his own universe with great story, graphics and characters.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.....
.
3 of 12 users found this helpful39
All this user's reviews
10
jack977Jul 21, 2014
Dark, brooding and surreal; Aronofsky's epic is beautifully shot and ambitiously conceived. Most importantly it gives Biblical lore a healthy dose of human realism - not a bad thing at all.
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
10
cajieboyAug 27, 2014
Loved this movie! Nice surprise to see the inclusion of "The Watchers/Fallen Angels" taken from older ancient Flood stories co-mingled with the more recent version that most us have read in the Bible. I call it genius, while some other folksLoved this movie! Nice surprise to see the inclusion of "The Watchers/Fallen Angels" taken from older ancient Flood stories co-mingled with the more recent version that most us have read in the Bible. I call it genius, while some other folks can't seem to imagine it. My advice, leave that religous debating for the Sunday School of your choice, and just enjoy a very well-made movie. Excellent movie. Highly recommend.… Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
9
gusto43Aug 9, 2014
First of all to deal with inane comments regarding deviation from the biblical texts. Firstly, the story in Genesis is slight. Secondly, it didn't actually happen! It's a myth! One of several deluge myths in ancient middle and near eastFirst of all to deal with inane comments regarding deviation from the biblical texts. Firstly, the story in Genesis is slight. Secondly, it didn't actually happen! It's a myth! One of several deluge myths in ancient middle and near east religion. What Aronofsky does is mint a new version, and it works. Expectedly on some levels, as Aronosky uses typical visual inventiveness to tell the story. One highlight is the creation story-within-the-story interlude which is dazzling, another are his invention of the Watchers, and their nod to both Giacometti and Ray Harryhausen. But also unexpectedly, as we are, for the most part rooting for good Old Testament Yahweh and his plans to cleanse the world, such is Aronofsky's ability to depict it as relentlessly mired in vice, and in doing so hold an uncomfortable mirror up to our own rapaciousness. But this would be for nought if Crowe couldn't make the role work. He does, giving Noah pathos, intensity, a deep inner sadness. It's dark, it drags a bit if you're not lapping up the art direction, and arguably loses it's way a little in the final third, redeeming itself at the very end, but this is bold, intelligent film-making in a different league to the vacuous output of someone like Michael Bay. In time will be appreciated as a minor masterpiece.… Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
10
co2345Jul 5, 2014
i REALLY liked this movie...it was awesome! i really liked Emma Watsons acting in this movie...and the story line was very well put together, i like the other actor they chose...like Logan Lerman. i really liked this movie and i wouldi REALLY liked this movie...it was awesome! i really liked Emma Watsons acting in this movie...and the story line was very well put together, i like the other actor they chose...like Logan Lerman. i really liked this movie and i would recommend you watch it.… Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
8
adpirtleNov 2, 2014
Aronofsky has drawn from a number of canonical and apocryphal texts, as well as more modern post-apocalyptic and environmentalist themes, to craft an antediluvian world which feels part Biblical, part mystical, and part Mad Max. That mightAronofsky has drawn from a number of canonical and apocryphal texts, as well as more modern post-apocalyptic and environmentalist themes, to craft an antediluvian world which feels part Biblical, part mystical, and part Mad Max. That might sound like the makings of a hot mess, but it all somehow works, thanks to a strong script and even stronger casting. "Noah" is definitely not the story you learned in Sunday School, but it is a great movie, taken on it's own merits, as well as managing to inject some emotional impact back into a story we've become numbed to, having heard it so many times.… Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
10
DominicanSep 14, 2014
Very good movie, excellent, highly recommend, I was never bored...great graphics, excellent actors, the history is very interesting, the question is, the history of the movie there's some parts that are not mentioned on the bible right?
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
8
BigMike71May 10, 2015
To be honest, I was pleasantly surprised with this movie. Sure, it was not spot on with the Bible but it was still pretty good. It goes away from the child hood story showing the raw side of Noah. The side that any regular human would have.To be honest, I was pleasantly surprised with this movie. Sure, it was not spot on with the Bible but it was still pretty good. It goes away from the child hood story showing the raw side of Noah. The side that any regular human would have. It has just the right balance of drama and action to make it a fairly satisfying movie.… Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
3
David_HAug 11, 2014
For a Christian it would be hard not to lend a biblical critique to this. It was odd to the point of irritating that a story about Noah not once uses the word "God" in the script, yet it certainly seems typical for Hollywood. There wereFor a Christian it would be hard not to lend a biblical critique to this. It was odd to the point of irritating that a story about Noah not once uses the word "God" in the script, yet it certainly seems typical for Hollywood. There were semi-modern industrial references that seemed way out of place for the historically accepted time period. Even without the biblical errors, the show overall was excruciatingly long and it spends most of its time in a dark and sinister mood.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
0
IsotopesamJul 13, 2014
Forget that the movie completely ignores the actual Noah story and puts an environmentalist spin on it. The look of the movie wasn't good even. Everything looks bleak. The graphics did not impress me. it looked outdated, in fact. Couldn'tForget that the movie completely ignores the actual Noah story and puts an environmentalist spin on it. The look of the movie wasn't good even. Everything looks bleak. The graphics did not impress me. it looked outdated, in fact. Couldn't they have designed the Rock monsters a little better? I know Scifi channel could have done a better job. The story was dull, the characters cranky, and in the end, it all seem pointless. Aronofsky ruined the character of Noah and turned him into a maniac.
I'm concerned that future generations will turn to this movie and consider this trash as the actual Noah story when it is pure blasphemy and far from what's told in the Bible.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
1
csw12Aug 3, 2014
The first hour is unbearable, the last hour is boring and the entire movie had no life to it. The epic story of Noah has been turned into a disaster of epic proportions.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
5
Trev29Aug 5, 2014
Noah starts off surprisingly terrible and then manages to rise just above mediocrity in the end. A Strange way to present the story. It was no fun at all. The visuals were good at times.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
7
sammurphy66Jul 14, 2014
Grounded by a superb performance from Crowe and brilliant special effects emphasised with FANTASTIC camera work, Noah is an ambitious, wholly satisfying take on a biblical tale.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
2
GMaj777Apr 28, 2014
Very poor and nearly sent me to sleep. The highlights included a scene which followed the earth from its birth to now and Russell Crowes performance. Apart from that it was a dour film in which another Bible adventure was depicted in a boringVery poor and nearly sent me to sleep. The highlights included a scene which followed the earth from its birth to now and Russell Crowes performance. Apart from that it was a dour film in which another Bible adventure was depicted in a boring way. The issue I have with Bible stories is that you know the plot and the ending therefore no suspense or even a slight bit of interest towards the end of the film.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
0
guitarone47Aug 3, 2014
This film was created for the sole purpose of making fun of the Bible and spit in the face to Christians. Is horribly inaccurate on purpose and Noah looks like a psychopath. Do fallen angels wanted to help the man? Think before you shoot thisThis film was created for the sole purpose of making fun of the Bible and spit in the face to Christians. Is horribly inaccurate on purpose and Noah looks like a psychopath. Do fallen angels wanted to help the man? Think before you shoot this smoked marijuana, pure chlorine injected and even licked a poisonous frog.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
5
drewstroyerApr 5, 2014
It would be hard to predict who might like this show, and who might not.

If you had never heard the story of Noah, and had no religious interest in the film, you might think it was a decent, not great, epic movie. Some things were over theIt would be hard to predict who might like this show, and who might not.

If you had never heard the story of Noah, and had no religious interest in the film, you might think it was a decent, not great, epic movie. Some things were over the top, but some things were really pretty cool. I enjoyed it for what it was.

If you expect this to be a religious exposition of the Bible in detail, with a Christian message underneath, don't even think about seeing it. The creators of this movie took the simple basics of the Noah story and then turned it into a modern fantasy tale.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
5
LaffingravyApr 14, 2014
Personally I was divided by 'Noah'. I'm not well acquainted with the intricacies of the Bible story so I entered the cinema not really sure what to expect. I immediately, however, recognized that this rendition of the story would bePersonally I was divided by 'Noah'. I'm not well acquainted with the intricacies of the Bible story so I entered the cinema not really sure what to expect. I immediately, however, recognized that this rendition of the story would be embellished and changed, something I have absolutely no problem with.

I thought the first half of the movie was interesting and actually rather good. It was well shot and, as an origin story for humanity on this early version of earth, quite effective. I thought the depiction of the animals as less evolved versions of their modern counterparts was a nice touch. Taken out of context of the biblical scripture it had a good, mythical element to it's story which I appreciated. Sure there are a few inconsistencies here and there especially regarding the biology of repopulating the earth from one family (severe inbreeding... although it may explain a few things about the state of humanity now... Joke) but I was happy to overlook them as I just saw the story taking place in a parallel reality.

However, when Ray Winstone starts to get involved I thought it all went to **** In the second half of the movie Aronofsky throws his subtle camera work and interesting tale of legend out the window and replaces it with Hollywood drama and CGI bonanza. Granted, the effects look great but it was boring. Plus all the time on the Arc gave Emma Watson a chance to really show off her acting talent... of which she has none. Her constant crying or screaming in her remarkably quick childbirth were just awful.

So I'm giving it a 5. I wish Aronofsky had chosen to continue to deal with the story with the care and artistic integrity he used in the first half of the movie. It can not redeem what was simply just an awful, cliched final act.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
6
TBrianBryanMay 16, 2014
So-So... Well thought out details to fill the gaps in bible story. Special effecs good to OK. Expected a little more from a Russel Crow flick, but good enough to rent from Red-Box when available.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
5
SimonSays18May 17, 2014
Noah may be visually outstanding and very well-acted, but it is unable to satisfy due to a weak third act and unnecessary liberties Darren Aronofsky decides to take.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
7
rh2599May 26, 2014
Being a Russell Crowe Fan I personally thought he put on an Oscar Winning Performance. There was never any reference to God only to the Creator.. When you add alien looking creatures as the Watchers of The Wall you tend to think theBeing a Russell Crowe Fan I personally thought he put on an Oscar Winning Performance. There was never any reference to God only to the Creator.. When you add alien looking creatures as the Watchers of The Wall you tend to think the producers believe we were created by Alien Beings.I thought all the actors put in terrific performances and the movie had a strong theme of Good vs. Evil with of course Good winning out. As whacked out as Hollywood is at least up to this point they do not have Evil prevailing.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
0
BigZAug 29, 2014
I love movies very much and I respect the imagination and time and effort afforded to them. The story of Noah and the ark is a very old, well respected, and loved story, many people believe those events really occurred. When you get theI love movies very much and I respect the imagination and time and effort afforded to them. The story of Noah and the ark is a very old, well respected, and loved story, many people believe those events really occurred. When you get the chance to make a movie that stems directly from The Holy Bible, you would think it would stay knit at the waist with it as far as accuracy and tone. Aronofsky is obviously not a religious man, otherwise he would have had much more respect for the story of Noah and the nature of the characters involved. Portraying Noah, who has been said to have been directly guided by God to save the human race and its righteous moral ideals, as a crazed lunatic who spends most of the movie dazed and confused about his purpose who needs help from giant rock people and who eventually is convinced he needs to kill his family, is quite a slippery direction to take. it doesn't seem to paint a pretty picture of God or his followers. Though I will note that that the title "God" was not even used once in the entire film. From the artsy perspective, this was a well done unique piece of movie making. That explains why a simple bible story made it to such a large scale movie in this day and age. It was warped. Severely. The graphics were impressive and dazzling, the acting performances were polished and sharp, it was coordinated well. But the point of telling the story of Noah and his trials with the flood and the rest of a wicked world and a wicked people, and his dealings with God, got completely lost. Way to go. I cannot support this movie.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
0
TheLatinoCriticJan 20, 2015
Unbelievable! People call this movie a "Biblical Epic" This movie was not even 3% true! Noah was one of the worst movies of all time. Besides The Interview, there is a movie with poor direction and dialog and that specific movie is Noah. IfUnbelievable! People call this movie a "Biblical Epic" This movie was not even 3% true! Noah was one of the worst movies of all time. Besides The Interview, there is a movie with poor direction and dialog and that specific movie is Noah. If you are thinking about watching this movie, You better think more than twice.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
7
MyodynamicJun 29, 2015
Sweet clouts of humour, generosity from the righteous and no vanity. Overall, a movie worth watching, with breath catching nodes.
The lead of the movie is one that shows the marshalling of planet earth before humans begin to live on it andSweet clouts of humour, generosity from the righteous and no vanity. Overall, a movie worth watching, with breath catching nodes.
The lead of the movie is one that shows the marshalling of planet earth before humans begin to live on it and breathe its air. High and mighty is the evil that has sunk too deep and dark, the rising of the good and innocent is made to sink with the beastly, creepy and foul breath of every nefarious human, which corrupts the fresh air of the planet, with betrayal, murders, cruelty and unfathomable sins. Hence the imagination of god, for the future of these reprobate is the destructive impetus of water for cleansing. Good doesn’t space out and collate itself in the time of destruction, but during the time of saving the creation, on the boat in the form of children, where the real existential fight of good over evil is shown. Noah, the chosen one is to facilitate in the shining of new dawn and the shadows of a new era reflecting on this planet earth, by saving the innocence of the planet.
There is a wild discrepancy in the original biblical words and it’s spouting in the movie, no sacrilege and sacrifice from the forces of good make it a true biblical story.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
7
EpicLadySpongeFeb 22, 2016
Hey, at least you can end up being ashamed of yourselves after giving that review to this movie. Haven't you people ever heard of this one word called... "Try"? At least that's what the filmmakers did unlike most of you out there.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
8
OuendanerApr 6, 2014
Although it was inconsistent to have something stuck home, taking the viewer the first time sleepy
of film, then has some radical and unexpected changes to the public, featuring a very powerful climax in
which two quite distinct poles areAlthough it was inconsistent to have something stuck home, taking the viewer the first time sleepy
of film, then has some radical and unexpected changes to the public, featuring a very powerful climax in
which two quite distinct poles are discussed, highlighting the antagonist whose ideals were more sober than his action, is that the moment you realize that the title of this antagonist character is earned by being
against the actor and not as the villain in the movie. Finally the outcome fairly well developed
leaves the viewer as bad as it offsets the start of the movie. About the offended people by
film, the fictional fantasy in which the work is more notable for what it considered offensive is not possible. I traduce this from spanish to english on googletranslate

Español
A pesar de lo inconsistente que fue, al tener un inicio algo trabado, teniendo al espectador somnoliento la primera hora
de pelicula, luego tiene algunos cambios radicales e inesperados para el publico, presentando un climax muy potente en
el cual se debaten dos polos muy marcados, haciendo resaltar al antagonista cuyos ideales eran mas sobrios que su
accionar, es aquel el momento en que uno se da cuenta que este personaje se gana el titulo de antagonista por estar
en contra del protagonista y no por ser el villano en la pelicula. Finalmente el desenlace bastante bien elaborado
dejan al espectador conforme ya que compensa el mal arranque de la pelicula. Acerca de la gente ofendida por la
pelicula, la fantasia en la obra es mas que notable por lo que no es posible considerarla ofensiva.… Expand
3 of 13 users found this helpful310
All this user's reviews
10
tvchicano07Apr 20, 2015
The typical atheist and Bible hater will probably not like this film; however, for the rest of us it was an awesome work of art. It draws inspiration from the story of Genesis while not taking the story as too literal, and adding specialThe typical atheist and Bible hater will probably not like this film; however, for the rest of us it was an awesome work of art. It draws inspiration from the story of Genesis while not taking the story as too literal, and adding special effects and fantasy to the narrative. If you are willing to accept that the producers and director meant to do that then you will enjoy this film. Crowe and Connelly's acting is superb as well as Hopkins.… Expand
2 of 9 users found this helpful27
All this user's reviews
9
chrisjones914Aug 3, 2014
Now before I share my opinion on this movie I just want to get one thing out of the way. I am a Christian, My relationship with God and his son Jesus is the most important thing in my life! Now with that being said, I absolutely loved Noah!Now before I share my opinion on this movie I just want to get one thing out of the way. I am a Christian, My relationship with God and his son Jesus is the most important thing in my life! Now with that being said, I absolutely loved Noah! Do not listen to what all of the people are saying about this film. Yes, it does have one particular element where the director obviously took some creative liberties with the story but to me that was okay. The story of Noah is one of the shortest in the Bible, and a lot of the details are left to your imagination. That is where this film comes in, it shows the dark side of Noah. The stories we heard when we were little kids are the same stories per say, but they are much much darker than we could understand. Which is exactly what I loved about this film! Instead of exploring humans through the eyes of God like so many other movies do, this explores God through the eyes of his servants. It shows their struggles, their sacrifices, their doubts and ultimately how strong their relationship with their creator must be in order to make it in this harsh world! Noah is one of the best films I saw all year! If you are a Christian, or even if you're not, give it a try. I'm sure you will be glad you did!… Expand
2 of 9 users found this helpful27
All this user's reviews
10
CountvontrollioJan 5, 2015
I'm glad We the people have the outlet to set the record straight, as the collective insanity of the pro critics gets increasingly wackier. This was cool, shows the Old Testament with all its prescient wisdom about the world and for once notI'm glad We the people have the outlet to set the record straight, as the collective insanity of the pro critics gets increasingly wackier. This was cool, shows the Old Testament with all its prescient wisdom about the world and for once not concerned with exclusive Zionist projects. Some critics thought the plant rock spirits were too far fetched. And what, Guys thinking God is teling them directly to embark on crazy boat building projects isn't? Get a grip critics. Aronofsky executes it all with the right tone, and the performances are grounded in a seriousness that sells it. Ecological warnings and all that. Food for thought in the garden of eden.… Expand
2 of 9 users found this helpful27
All this user's reviews
10
johnforourkeJul 20, 2014
We shouldn't be disappointed that this movie doesn't repeat the biblical story of Noah. We know that the Noah story borrows many elements from the Epic of Gilgamesh. This movie creates an even deeper story that finds that man has destroyedWe shouldn't be disappointed that this movie doesn't repeat the biblical story of Noah. We know that the Noah story borrows many elements from the Epic of Gilgamesh. This movie creates an even deeper story that finds that man has destroyed his environment and his lust for violence and domination has brought him to the brink of ruin. It recreates the whole history of creation by fast forwarding the “days” of creation into the evolution of the universe and the life forms on earth. This is a new and revivifying story and one that needs to be told alongside our other stories to carry us forward with the mission of Noah to renew the earth all over again.… Expand
2 of 9 users found this helpful27
All this user's reviews
7
titanium-tigerMar 29, 2014
I heard a reviewer call this film both "faithful and fanciful" and that's exactly what it is. I don't believe in as literal, historical Noah and the Flood, but I do believe in human good and evil, and it's told masterfully in this film. It'sI heard a reviewer call this film both "faithful and fanciful" and that's exactly what it is. I don't believe in as literal, historical Noah and the Flood, but I do believe in human good and evil, and it's told masterfully in this film. It's an epic myth about humanity and divinity. Crowe and Connelly are superb. The visuals are good. Overall, very good.… Expand
5 of 24 users found this helpful519
All this user's reviews
7
Mr_zaneageMar 29, 2014
dont listen to all the bible bashers!. We all know the story of noah and this Hollywood adaptation isn't that bad, sure their is a few plot holes but other than that noah is an entertaining movie. the movie may not be historically accuratedont listen to all the bible bashers!. We all know the story of noah and this Hollywood adaptation isn't that bad, sure their is a few plot holes but other than that noah is an entertaining movie. the movie may not be historically accurate but its still an amazing looking film.

i would recommend this film its enjoyable, has awesome CGI and has pretty descent acting.… Expand
5 of 24 users found this helpful519
All this user's reviews
8
djniceyMay 27, 2014
I really enjoyed this film, much more than I was expecting. The rock monsters felt a bit out of place but they were a necessary plot device and I think they did work. I think the film interpretation of the story was very well done and theI really enjoyed this film, much more than I was expecting. The rock monsters felt a bit out of place but they were a necessary plot device and I think they did work. I think the film interpretation of the story was very well done and the values that the film was trying to convey came across well for me, it did make me think afterwards and very few films these days do that. The special effects were very well done, the scenery was beautiful and the water effects were powerful and very well done.… Expand
2 of 10 users found this helpful28
All this user's reviews
7
ClariseSamuelsApr 25, 2014
Darren Aronofsy is being billed as “visionary” director, and in general, I would have to agree with that assessment. He's still young, and his fame is based on a mere handful of movies, so there are still great expectations for this brilliantDarren Aronofsy is being billed as “visionary” director, and in general, I would have to agree with that assessment. He's still young, and his fame is based on a mere handful of movies, so there are still great expectations for this brilliant and politically engaged director. With Noah, Aronofsky reached for the sky, almost literally, and went slightly askew in an attempt to do a strange admixture that included disaster movie, blockbuster-for-teenagers movie, and a Biblical epic that would appeal to the faith-based audience. It was a tall order. Did Aronofsky succeed? To a certain extent, although there are some glaring weaknesses.

In general Noah is a sweeping and inspirational film. It explores the faith of one man who was chosen to lead the world forward after certain disaster, and also the frustration of dealing with G-d, who is often silent and remote, or who communicates with signs and wonders that are open to multiple interpretations. Let's not forget that in Exodus, Moses wants to know the Lord's name. The answer in Hebrew has been translated as “I am who I am,” which is inaccurate because it's more literally translated as “I will be what I will be.” What kind of name is that? G-d never gives a straight answer. His answers sound like a New Age philosopher. Yoko Ono would probably come up with lines like that.

Aronofsky mined the Midrash, the rabbinical interpretation of the Bible, for some of his own interpretation. The Midrash is a good source, but Aronofsky also took some strange liberties. Probably the greatest anomaly in the film, or Aronofsky's most fantastical element, is that Noah supposedly received help in building the ark from a horde of fallen angels. These angels appear in the form of giant rock monsters, and they vaguely resemble transformers; they don't just help with the ark—they pretty much do all of the heavy labor. The idea of angels helping Noah is entirely acceptable; rock monsters, however, are a little off-the-wall.

And the costumes sometimes look too modern—did they really wear scarves that are fashionably wrapped around their necks? (Aronofsky is often photographed wearing fashionable scarves.) In one scene, Noah (Russell Crowe) is wearing what vaguely looks like a polo shirt and jeans. There is an overemphasis on the purity and innocence of animals, and the sanctity of vegetarianism. Animals hunt and kill other animals, although they do it by instinct and not design. Aronofsky is reported to be a vegan. Some scholars say the Garden of Eden was meant to be vegetarian; others disagree. Nevertheless, if the Old Testament demanded it, every Orthodox Jew would be a vegetarian to this day. There are strict rules for koshering meat given in great detail in the Bible—killing an animal painlessly is paramount. Kosher slaughter is quick and painless; if pain is incurred even accidentally, then the meat is not kosher. Noah's vegetarianism may have been implied by a Biblical passage where permission to eat meat, with restrictions, seems to have been given after, but not before, the Flood.

Another exaggeration in the film was that some kind of Industrial Revolution was destroying the Earth at the time. No one is sure when Noah lived. However, in Biblical times the population of the planet was just a tiny fraction of what it is today. Even if every individual did something to poison the Earth, with so few people, the affect would be negligible. Nevertheless, the Biblical version states that humans were evil and had to be wiped off the face of the Earth, with the exception of Noah and his family. The story is open to interpretation, especially if the entire story is an allegory, which is another theory.

To complicate matters, shortly after the release of the film, Aronofsky announced that he was an atheist. Atheists are entitled to make Biblical films if they are so inclined, but for the faith-based audience, the director's atheism might be a serious sticking point, if not positively baffling.… Expand
2 of 10 users found this helpful28
All this user's reviews
5
bmaster4616Mar 29, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie was quite disappointing in the way it was hyped as this bold version of the telling of Noah. The story Darren tells is quite bold and it had a great dark tone to it. However, its message was thrown at you in a way that pissed me off. This idea that god would kill off the bad is a good thing, but to let the good suffer along with them is stupid. The loss of mental control of Noah wasn't something I was taught but maybe it was true. I'm right on the fence with this one; until I read the actually story (which is something I need to do). Maybe the story was true which would piss me off more than I'm already at. In the context of the bible of course. Stories of things that I believe were put there to tell the world what is wrong and right. Nothing to be interpreted as real life. So if this was the real story of Noah, then I've lost most my fate in the Bible all together. The story of how one man could get something wrong from god was good and the extent of his awakening was pretty satisfying. Though the decision of Noah to go to that extent where he thinks god is telling him he should kill kids is ridiculous and I wouldn't want a god like that. Though his revaluation at the end kind of made up for it. So at this point its more of a good movie than a bad, but I've got to read the story to see how much the movie is true to it. 7.6/10… Expand
2 of 10 users found this helpful28
All this user's reviews
7
Iamlush7Apr 6, 2014
Aronofsky puts an exciting sci-fi spin on a renowned biblical story that really does give it a new lease of life.

It may be inaccurate at times but I defy anyone to dislike this film simply for that. The performances were strong, theAronofsky puts an exciting sci-fi spin on a renowned biblical story that really does give it a new lease of life.

It may be inaccurate at times but I defy anyone to dislike this film simply for that. The performances were strong, the cinematography epic and the director's style shines through subtly.

My whole cinema enjoyed it and some may well of learnt a thing or two.… Expand
2 of 10 users found this helpful28
All this user's reviews
0
FnacyApr 15, 2014
What should have been an at least 'so bad its good' disaster movie, compounded to create one of the most drab and dull films i've seen in cinema for years. Each line feels as though it drags on longer than its previous, the script in itselfWhat should have been an at least 'so bad its good' disaster movie, compounded to create one of the most drab and dull films i've seen in cinema for years. Each line feels as though it drags on longer than its previous, the script in itself as wooden and repetitive as the acting. And one of the most irritating pauses after each and every line to try and emphasise the 'cleansing' or whatever drivel the actor/actress was spouting. I couldn't care less about it's religious inaccuracies, as long as you make it a decent story, but unfortunately the film fails on both accounts. Not worth anyones time.… Expand
2 of 10 users found this helpful28
All this user's reviews
0
NazguleroJul 19, 2014
As a filmmaker, I would simply be ashamed to present this garbage to an audience. Sub par CGI, horrible acting, dialogue that makes you cringe. The costume department must have had an off day as well. Just awful.
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
7
lasttimeisawJul 15, 2014
Aronofsky’s long-waited follow-up after BLACK SWAN (2010, 9/10) is a re-enactment of biblically inspired story of Noah’s ark, NOAH is a spectacular visual stunt spiked with Aronofsky’s atheist re-construction of a life-or-death conflictAronofsky’s long-waited follow-up after BLACK SWAN (2010, 9/10) is a re-enactment of biblically inspired story of Noah’s ark, NOAH is a spectacular visual stunt spiked with Aronofsky’s atheist re-construction of a life-or-death conflict between God’s will and humanity.

continue reading my review on my blog: google cinema omnivore, thanks… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
7
SpangleAug 21, 2014
Talk about divisive, haha. Though, I think much of the divisiveness surrounding this one is due to many religious folk walking in and expecting a re-enactment of the Bible word-for-word with no added elements and no alteration of anything.Talk about divisive, haha. Though, I think much of the divisiveness surrounding this one is due to many religious folk walking in and expecting a re-enactment of the Bible word-for-word with no added elements and no alteration of anything. Even as a Christian, I realize how stupid that demand is. As a whole, I largely enjoyed Noah. The performances from Russell Crowe, Ray Winstone, and Emma Watson, are all very good. Jennifer Connelly is also alright (though there is one scene where she struggled pretty badly). I also enjoyed many of the added elements, such as the Watchers (the rock creatures). They received the most criticism from hardcore Christians, but for me, I loved what they added to the film and their journey was just as riveting as that of Noah. Up until the flood, this film is brilliant. Post-flood, however, things begin to follow apart (while I liked Winstone's acting, I don't like his character being added and it all felt so cliche). However, it does pick back up again towards the end and convinces me there is brilliance in this somewhat broken film. The cinematography is very consistently beautiful. Some of the shots here are absolutely gorgeous (by some I mean the vast majority). The direction from Darren Aronofsky is also characteristically strong here and while this may not be my favorite film by him, it is still a great example of his talent. Overall, Noah is far from perfect, but is a solid film that does not try to be a Bible film, so do not come expecting that. Rather, it is more along the line of apocalyptic epic,… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
1
Patrick94Oct 13, 2014
I'm giving this a one to balance out the ridiculous amount of good scores this is getting. This movie doesn't deserve a 5/10. Really bad looking CGI, sacrilege story, unnecessary additions to the original story that ends up making this aI'm giving this a one to balance out the ridiculous amount of good scores this is getting. This movie doesn't deserve a 5/10. Really bad looking CGI, sacrilege story, unnecessary additions to the original story that ends up making this a terrible film. Seriously, if they had stuck to the original story it would have been a much better movie for Christians and atheists alike. Anyone that gives this anything above a 5/10 has no taste whatsoever.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
6
foxgroveApr 9, 2014
Noah is definitely not one for the purists. Opening in a bleak landscape and adopting a preachy tone, the film takes a good hour to really get going. Darren Aronofsky, usually one of the best visual directors around, takes a fair while toNoah is definitely not one for the purists. Opening in a bleak landscape and adopting a preachy tone, the film takes a good hour to really get going. Darren Aronofsky, usually one of the best visual directors around, takes a fair while to bring his undoubted talent to the fore concentrating instead on character development and uninteresting family dialogue. Even the visual effects, including some rock monsters that look as if they have just stepped out of a Transformers movie, seem dislocated from everything else going on at this time. In fact, it's not until the tremendous battle for the ark that things start to improve. From here, it's onwards and upwards and the cast finally have some dialogue and drama to sink their teeth into. A crazed Russell Crowe starts to lose it; Jennifer Connelly steals the acting honours in just two scenes; Emma Watson cries a lot, but shows real promise here, and even Ray Winstone is rather good in a baddie role that he can play in his sleep.

Once aboard the ark Aronofsky finally delivers what one has come to expect from him and the visual effects also become more integrated into the story. The animals arrival at the ark is wonderful as is a backwards tracking shot of the vessel from end to end. Also, one sequence is surprising in its unpredictability. Ultimately you leave the cinema fairly satisfied even as you begin to question things like; if they are the only ones left how did they re-populate? Oh well, it's only a film.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
6
googolendtimesApr 18, 2014
While it left me feeling drained as I left the cinema, "Noah" was technically superb, offering yet another outlet for Darren Aronofsky to showcase his skill as a director, and well-acted; Russell Crowe, in particular, fit the lead better thanWhile it left me feeling drained as I left the cinema, "Noah" was technically superb, offering yet another outlet for Darren Aronofsky to showcase his skill as a director, and well-acted; Russell Crowe, in particular, fit the lead better than I expected he would; his performance is haunted, sunken and finely nuanced. It drags, it feels an hour longer than it actually was, and only loosely adherent to the Bible, which may leave some offended. But it was an impressive piece of filmmaking, even if its entertainment value didn't quite measure up.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
2
Navin_AdApr 16, 2014
I would have given this movie a 0 if it wasn't for the spectacular special effects put into this movie. However, I'm not a Christian so I was bored half-way through the movie. It had a weird storyline of Noah killing all humans on earthI would have given this movie a 0 if it wasn't for the spectacular special effects put into this movie. However, I'm not a Christian so I was bored half-way through the movie. It had a weird storyline of Noah killing all humans on earth including himself. To be honest, the movie Evan Almighty was even way better than this. I know, Noah was way more darker but I found Evan Almighty more fun and entertaining to watch.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
4
GarfoodleMay 11, 2014
As an Atheist, i dont care about accuracy.

Its just dull. **** action sequence, 2 hours of pointless stuff, then action sequence, then done. More or less a waste of time, its not very good. Also, the acting is quite **** so thats done
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
1
surfnow3May 25, 2014
As a Christian, I can accept somethings about this movie that could be in the bible. For example there is no mention of people wanting to get onto Noahs ark in the bible. However I am sure during this time period, people probably thought NoahAs a Christian, I can accept somethings about this movie that could be in the bible. For example there is no mention of people wanting to get onto Noahs ark in the bible. However I am sure during this time period, people probably thought Noah was crazy, but I have little doubt that they tried to get on, with the impending doom. The rock monsters I am not so sure about.

What was ridiculous is when Noah flipped out and wanted to kill the unborn. Utter nonsense.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
7
root_Jan 7, 2015
The storytelling is good,score exciting at times

Darren Aronofsky's direction goes hand in hand with the graphics used in the movie.

About acting Emma Watson was spectacular along with Jennifer Connelly.
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
9
TheQuietGamerAug 7, 2014
It may not be a Biblically accurate telling of the tale, but it is a gripping one. It focuses on aspects that you won't hear in Sunday school. It takes a look at the emotional and mental tole the events had on Noah and his family. WatchingIt may not be a Biblically accurate telling of the tale, but it is a gripping one. It focuses on aspects that you won't hear in Sunday school. It takes a look at the emotional and mental tole the events had on Noah and his family. Watching them break and suffer over what is happening to those not on the ark is powerful. Russell Crowe delivers a fantastic performance as Noah, truly bringing the character's emotional complexity to life as he slowly begins to question why these events are happening, why he was chosen, and what he should do next. It really focuses on the morally grey aspects of the events, and shows that God, or "The Creator" as he is called in the movie, is capable of wrath as well as love.

I feel that this side the movie shows, as well as the fact that it does take some liberties with the Biblical telling of the story, will anger many people. Most likely the Christian audience who refuse to accept anything but the truth. I can appreciate, respect, and understand why those like that will feel that way. So I recommend they avoid it because of that. It was already said before it came out that the movie was not meant or going to be Biblically accurate, so it's best that the two don't mix.

For others though this is a gripping, emotional, and complex movie that I really recommend be checked out. I believe it also has the potential to do something few other movies based on religion do; It has the potential to make people actually interested in what the Bible says about what actually happened. I find that incredibly impressive. As someone who thought the movie would fail I must say I am incredibly impressed with has happened here. It's an all around excellent movie, and one that has the potential to get people interested in the Bible. As far as I'm concerned it's a top-notch movie that should be at the top of your must-watch list.… Expand
2 of 11 users found this helpful29
All this user's reviews
7
TVJerryApr 1, 2014
Russell Crowe plays the titular character in this arty version of the tale. Anyone looking for a flood epic will be disappointed. About 10 minutes is devoted to the actual deluge and it's pretty cool. Much of the rest of the time is all aboutRussell Crowe plays the titular character in this arty version of the tale. Anyone looking for a flood epic will be disappointed. About 10 minutes is devoted to the actual deluge and it's pretty cool. Much of the rest of the time is all about drama and family conflict. Darren Aronofsky ("Black Swan") is known for his singular, dark vision and it's manifest in this imaginative adaptation (the evolution of Earth and the montage of violence are standout moments). Like so many epics these days, this one could lose about 30 minutes and be a more compelling film. As it stands, it's a moderately involving drama that puts a pretty unique spin on the Bible story.… Expand
3 of 17 users found this helpful314
All this user's reviews
9
FadeBlackMar 28, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. There is one thing for certain about "Noah" that I think everyone will agree with - what Aronofsky does with the film is both very surprising and very creative.

It is another great movie to his collection, though it will require a second viewing to determine how much I really liked it. But 8/10 is the minimum for now.

As I mentioned, the movie is surprising, strange, and at some points maybe a bit too much so for its own good. The fallen angels/rock people were very imaginative, though they played such a notable part, especially when then battled masses of people, that hey felt like they would be more suited to a Lord of the Rings sequel.

Similarly, Noah going psycho on his family made for a very suspenseful and entertaining final act...but it went on for so long, it felt like we were stepping into the Shining.

The great things about the movie really shown, however. The creation story sequence that Noah shares with his family is incredible, ranks with some of the very best work Aronofsky has done.

The pro-environment themes of the movie were delivered beautifully and with great force, which explains why many people turn against this movie just for that. People get uncomfortable when their choices in life are questioned.

Noah clearly condemns what mankind is doing to nature and to animals, and describes it as one of the main reasons for God's punishment. As if back then man's treatment of others was bad, one can be said about today's? The unspeakable atrocities animals are subjected to, the continued destruction of the forests and the oceans - despite the work of a brave few, the relentless destruction of the planet for human greed continues. Tubal-cain's speech about how animals are meant to be used and abused by humans would likely get a rounding applause by most people.

The movie goes deep into biblical themes as well, such as Noah questioning why the flood is happening, wondering why he was allowed to live, and wondering what exactly is righteousness and being a good person. Does willing to kill for one's child make one good? What about killing a child for God? The 'answer' hinted by the movie seems to be love for the family. It definitely provided for some great drama and very strong character scenes. I am not quite sure that the Bible is as clear as that. And I am not sure what the answer is. But in any case, Aronofsky does a very good job of interweaving these questions into the movie, and making us care for the characters through them.

A word about the acting too, which was stellar. Crowe was brilliant, and absolutely nailed this dark-Noah version. Some of the best work of his career, and that's saying something. Connelly did an award-winning job as well.

Overall, "Noah" is terrific entertainment, a great achievement, and hits it as some very deep questions, even if it may come out as a bit Aronofosky-light. For now I would place it somewhere around the middle of his films, bellow both The Fountain and The Wrestler, but even so, it finds itself among some brilliant movies.

Oh, and I do hope Methuselah's berry tasted good.… Expand
4 of 24 users found this helpful420
All this user's reviews
7
LamontRaymondMar 30, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I'd say that the critical average of 70 is about right on for this one. I'm a Catholic, and of course this "drama" strays from the literal reading of Genesis 5 - 9, but of course it had to, right? It would have been tough to find a 600-year-old actor to play Noah disembarking the ark. (In MY scripture class, a 600-year-old was meant to represent a "very old" man... Father Gatto would be proud.) And yes, the Bible provided for wives for the three sons as they entered the ark, and there was no stowaway, but those deviations from the literal Genesis chapters are done for dramatic effect, and they don't take away from the essential meaning of the passages - that man had become corrupt, and God sought Noah's help to begin things again. I also didn't have a problem with the angels/rock-monsters - they were a convention to explain how such a small group could build such a massive structure in such a short time, while keeping the bad dudes at bay. The movie flagged a bit as Noah was convinced God would want him to take the life of his would-be granddaughter. The visual effects are amazing in this movie, and the leading actresses (Jennifer Connelly & Emma Watson) are outstanding. Great to see such strong women represented in a Biblical interpretation. As a friend of mine advised, it might be helpful to read Genesis 5 - 9 twice - just before and directly after you see the movie, simply to put things in context.… Expand
3 of 18 users found this helpful315
All this user's reviews
8
CanucksApr 7, 2014
I got dragged along to this film and went in thinking it would be too religious for me... But I was surprised, It was a nice twist on a great biblical story... Special effects were well done and this is one movie that I am sure is Far betterI got dragged along to this film and went in thinking it would be too religious for me... But I was surprised, It was a nice twist on a great biblical story... Special effects were well done and this is one movie that I am sure is Far better to watch at the cinema rather than at home... All is all I enjoyed it and the 2 and a half hours went by quickly.… Expand
2 of 12 users found this helpful210
All this user's reviews
7
arunkchowApr 27, 2014
This biblical inspired action adventure from Darren Aronofsky is not as great as any of his previous films but it does stand out because of it's darkly narrated plot with superior performances by it's cast. Clint Mansell's score is an assetThis biblical inspired action adventure from Darren Aronofsky is not as great as any of his previous films but it does stand out because of it's darkly narrated plot with superior performances by it's cast. Clint Mansell's score is an asset to the film though the film's CGI went haywire at few places.… Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
2
MrBBPrinterApr 8, 2014
Saw this movie on 4/2. While we were expecting somewhat of a fantasy movie we had no idea that it would be so preposterous. We're not fans of the Hobbit-type movies and this was really in that genera. None the less, I (male) found the actingSaw this movie on 4/2. While we were expecting somewhat of a fantasy movie we had no idea that it would be so preposterous. We're not fans of the Hobbit-type movies and this was really in that genera. None the less, I (male) found the acting to be atrocious. Compare this movie to Beautiful Mind in which both these actors starred. It is a masterful work. We expected a fictional movie, not a science fiction movie.

Save your money, rent it if you must see it. The CGI effects are worthy of a large screen but the remainder can be viewed on anything. As it droned on we found ourselves hoping that each scene was the last so we could go. When the credits ran, so did we.… Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
1
WakeForestNCApr 18, 2014
Transformer rocks and that's all you need to know about this nonsensical fantasy film. Bad, very bad. The liberal film critics liked Noah more due to it's left leaning Biblical story.
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
1
itsjustmeonlymeApr 12, 2014
not even close to the bible. what a let down. The sad thing is some will watch it and think that was what the bible said. Very sad. If only it would have been called by another name. It might have been an o.k. story.
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
7
jakesaysApr 12, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The fallen angels were really something to see and added a bit of depth to an otherwise same old story. The animals should have been more brightly colored and have more to do with the story than just falling asleep.… Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
6
BenubcApr 15, 2014
Over dramatized; that's what I told myself about 5 minutes into this drawn out epic, and that feeling only continued to overpower my thrill of this fantastical story which includes the Watchers within a decently explained creationismOver dramatized; that's what I told myself about 5 minutes into this drawn out epic, and that feeling only continued to overpower my thrill of this fantastical story which includes the Watchers within a decently explained creationism framework. Aronofsky is such a skilled director that I didn't think he would ever rely on such an unevenly paced story, disjointed and overly emotional characters, or plot devices that stretched the movie to an uncomfortable length, while failing to truly complete the yarn. That being said, much of the drama culminated in Watson's outtro, which was finally well executed... thereby making sense of the build up, yet not in a way that warranted the sloppy footwork of the preamble.… Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
8
RoganwarriorMar 30, 2014
Geez Relax, It was a movie, not a documentary. I thought it was a decent movie. Usually 2 hour plus long movies don't keep me motivated for that long, but I was entertained, hence this is a movie.
3 of 19 users found this helpful316
All this user's reviews
8
ParadiseIsLostMar 30, 2014
Beautiful film, and one of the most interesting worlds I've been to in a while. There was, admittedly, a lot that didn't work all that well (most of the action sequences seemed out of place), but as a character study of Noah, and by extensionBeautiful film, and one of the most interesting worlds I've been to in a while. There was, admittedly, a lot that didn't work all that well (most of the action sequences seemed out of place), but as a character study of Noah, and by extension the Creator he's trying to follow, it's just pretty brilliant.… Expand
3 of 19 users found this helpful316
All this user's reviews
7
PimpinpakmanMar 28, 2014
If we are grading this movie on accuracy then score would be very low. If we were to disregard the accuracy, because the director did take liberties with the source material molding it into something quite different, then this movie actuallyIf we are grading this movie on accuracy then score would be very low. If we were to disregard the accuracy, because the director did take liberties with the source material molding it into something quite different, then this movie actually deserves a lot more credit. Religious people will be offended and upset but as far as the movie is concerned, i liked it. It was directed well, amazing visuals, with great acting so judging it harshly because it did not interpret the story of Noah as others do seems narrow minded. This is someone else's interpretation of the story while stretching quite a few aspects of it but the movie itself was good and faulting it because of source material doesnt sit well with me. Decide for yourself but its definitely worth a watch.… Expand
4 of 26 users found this helpful422
All this user's reviews
7
HeadcrusherApr 1, 2014
This film was inspired by two different sources IMO - the Bible and the Lord of the Rings movies, put them together and you get something like this.

Still, one of the ways I estimate a films effectiveness is by the way the audienceThis film was inspired by two different sources IMO - the Bible and the Lord of the Rings movies, put them together and you get something like this.

Still, one of the ways I estimate a films effectiveness is by the way the audience responds - it was a talkative late night crowd but once the film got going, they were totally silent and riveted to the screen. When the film was over there was both uncomfortable laughter and applause. It definitely gave them something to think about and I bet a bunch of those people went home and cracked open their bibles to read the story, some maybe for the first time.

By the way Noah was not a Christian - or a Jew - at that point in the biblical narrative God hadn't even given the law yet so there is no reason to think Noah is a Christian film in the first place. The actual biblical story is about 3 pages in the bible which if depicted word for word might have made it to 20 or 30 minutes, unless you had 90 minutes of feeding and cleaning the animals.… Expand
2 of 13 users found this helpful211
All this user's reviews
8
itsjustmealbertApr 10, 2014
So, it may not follow the bible, but Noah has a powerful message worth telling. The visuals are so incredible. It is one of the most beautiful (in the darkest way) movies that I've ever seen. If you open your mind and don't expect a bibleSo, it may not follow the bible, but Noah has a powerful message worth telling. The visuals are so incredible. It is one of the most beautiful (in the darkest way) movies that I've ever seen. If you open your mind and don't expect a bible story, you are in for a really good and powerful movie.… Expand
2 of 14 users found this helpful212
All this user's reviews
8
RedOwlReviewsApr 3, 2014
As far as biblical epics go, they don’t get much better than Noah. And to a great extent, Noah isn’t even a biblical epic. It’s more of a vividly realized action period piece – only the period is an apocalyptic deluge centuries after theAs far as biblical epics go, they don’t get much better than Noah. And to a great extent, Noah isn’t even a biblical epic. It’s more of a vividly realized action period piece – only the period is an apocalyptic deluge centuries after the birth of mankind. The biblical elements pertain solely to the inner mechanisms of the characters; the audience is only supposed to come in knowing the basics of Abrahamic religion (Adam and Eve, original sin, God is ruler, Noah built an ark). Basically, Noah isn’t The Passion of the Christ, and Russell Crowe isn’t Mel Gibson. Director Darren Aronofsky uses the biblical story as an inspiration, a rough sketch to redraw with creative license and paint over with poetic dialogue, breathtaking imagery and near-flawless acting. With Noah, Aronofsky reaffirms he is an artist, and not simply a storyteller (as if Black Swan didn’t already do that).
The film starts off a little clumsily, taking time before finding its footing. The introduction is slow, unexciting and heavily narrative-driven. However, at the twenty-something minute mark, Aronofsky introduces his variation of a “fallen angel” – ramshackle Transformer-esque gargantuan rock beings that live in quarantined wastelands. This moment is where your head will perk up, because Aronofsky isn’t afraid to remodel the biblical story to accommodate to modern trends in visual culture. He isn’t creating a documentary, after all. He is directing his idea of a contemporary creative visualization of Noah’s journey. The movie then progresses with more force in each consecutive scene, employing Aronofsky’s fine eye for set pieces and choreographed movements. Each plot point is charged with incontrovertible energy and metaphorically significant poetry (as one would imagine the biblical story was to readers in 400 B.C.), induced by raw acting, transcendent writing and CGI used correctly. All this continues until the halfway point of the film, where all the animals and Noah’s family have boarded the ark (and defeated the invading makeshift peasantry army, but I don’t recall that being in the Bible).
The second half of the film experiences a dramatic shift in tone from action-based to character-centered. Aronofsky takes this chance to explore the darker, antihero aspects of the biblically impeccable Noah, questioning the intrinsic nature of sin and free will and what it truly means to be “free of sin.” Manipulating terrifying familial conflicts, Aronofsky constructs a surprisingly clever story. I can’t help but notice, though, that too often, he will follow up ambiguous dialogue and plot points with inspirational imagery, such as rapid-fire montages of time progression outside the ark and glistening horizons atop endless oceans. However, stronger scenes with powerful acting and head-on conflict adequately wipe away the more ambiguous scenes from memory.
The casting for Noah is perfect, with the entire cast delivering commanding roles. Although Russell Crowe cements a new image of the biblical Noah for our generation and sweetheart Emma Watson effectively jerks a few tears from the audience, the true majesty comes from Jennifer Connelly, who provides the most raw and grounded performance in the entire film. She smiles while suffering and uses subtle expressions and longing movements to establish a painfully real character. If you have just over two hours to spare this weekend, make a point to catch this year’s first true blockbuster. Aronofsky makes the most of his time, never letting his guard down and rarely slipping in momentum. Unless you are a staunchly conservative theist, you will surely enjoy Noah.

FINAL SCORE: 80 (great)… Expand
2 of 14 users found this helpful212
All this user's reviews
7
WhySoSerious54May 16, 2014
A nice fresh take on an old story. I enjoyed the originality and the acting was overall solid. The action sqeuences were amazing. Yes you understand there is a God, you understand, humans are to be punished, you understand love conquers all.A nice fresh take on an old story. I enjoyed the originality and the acting was overall solid. The action sqeuences were amazing. Yes you understand there is a God, you understand, humans are to be punished, you understand love conquers all. This was the basic principle behind the original story but updated in a new unique way. I am a person of faith and I apretiated the new take on it.… Expand
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
7
eupatorusApr 8, 2014
"Noah" is possibly Darren Aronofsky's worst movie. That being said it's still an entertaining well made film in it's own right. I was a little disappointed, but only because I hold him in such high regard with such an amazing track record of"Noah" is possibly Darren Aronofsky's worst movie. That being said it's still an entertaining well made film in it's own right. I was a little disappointed, but only because I hold him in such high regard with such an amazing track record of movies (The Fountain alone is enough to mark him as a modern master in my opinion, not to even mention Black Swan, The Wrestler, and Requiem). I think his first foray into CGI may have demanded enough of his attention that the film suffered a little. It's not as succinct as his previous outings.

With that "disclaimer" out of the way, this ain't your momma's Noah. There's no Gandalfian white beard, no shepherd's hook, no fluffy white lambs being led two-by-two into a wooden ship. Instead we follow the ass-kicking Noah and his family, the last "good people" in the world, as they prepare for and weather (no pun intended) the destruction of mankind, who in the years since their creation, have fallen corrupt and one step from downright evil.

The movie is solid on all fronts. The acting is great, especially from Ray Winstone, who I could barely recognize, playing the anti-Noah Tubal-Cain ferociously to my delight. The cinematography is excellent, as we've come to expect from Aronofsky, and shines especially in Noah's visions and few time-lapse sequences about the creation of the universe and evolution of earth, and the Creator's (as he is referred to in the film) miraculous conjuration of a forest from which Noah is to build his ark. The dialogue and story is interesting for the most part, and while straying from the little detail given in the bible and the torah, works within it's own world.

My only real problems with the movie are that it is a little too long at some where around 2hrs 20min and it feels this way because the last third of the movie feels a little slow compared to it's dramatic first parts and largely focuses on Noah's internal struggle and clashing with his family over whether mankind is ordained to live on through them or simply die out.

Don't listen to the bad reviews on here, however and ignore the 0,1, and 2 point attack-reduced User Score. Even if it wan't a good movie, which it is, it would warrant a 4 or 5 based solely on it's quality production. But by reading them you can tell that largely they are from a bunch a religious types that wanted to watch the same story they've been told a thousands time come to life on the big screen. While this is the Noah story at it's core, from start to finish, there is plenty of interpretation and creativity applied as well, which for my money worked very well.

I give it a 6 or 7, although I was tempted to give it a 10 to counteract all the knee-jerk negativity flowing around this movie. Maybe you don't need to see it in theaters, but if you're curious and open, definitely check it out.… Expand
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
9
BernanHandeiroSep 10, 2014
i'm not atheist, i'm not christian.
and i said i just like the movie. was a funny story, even when noah gets crazy and want to kill some babys. then shows that still exist some goodness in the humankind.
and yes, the inocents are thei'm not atheist, i'm not christian.
and i said i just like the movie. was a funny story, even when noah gets crazy and want to kill some babys. then shows that still exist some goodness in the humankind.
and yes, the inocents are the animals! when the humans doesn't exist, the planet doens't look like now: dead, polluted and soemthing liek that.
and please: "the movie doens't fall the true story of noah and his true character. please! lameque supposedly could reach 595 years and died five years before the flood! and since when is that possible, if now in a country where there is advanced treatments and medicine is difficult to reach age 90? oh! perhaps the goodness of God ??
and then kills everyone in a flood? even innocent children?
okay okay ...… Expand
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
9
danlm12Jul 31, 2014
Very moving version of the classic old testament story. Really keeps your attention from start to finish. A powerful tale of good versus evil. One man's struggle to decide the fate of humanity.
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
8
realnostokSep 16, 2014
A pesar de ser una película religiosa trata de los lazos familiares y como hacer frente a una tragedia o cataclismo... Noah le hace frente a la misión sin antes pensarlo dos veces.
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
8
LWTBPMar 29, 2014
Some may dislike how 'far fetched' the Darren Aronofsky adaptation of the Biblical story of destruction and new hope is, but you got to give it to him for having taken such a new and emotionally complex look at it.

The whole challenge ofSome may dislike how 'far fetched' the Darren Aronofsky adaptation of the Biblical story of destruction and new hope is, but you got to give it to him for having taken such a new and emotionally complex look at it.

The whole challenge of Noah, the man, lies in his human limitation that we all share. Most of us have wished for God to speak to us the way he spoke to the men and women of old, but perhaps he didn't. Perhaps he didn't come down in the shape of an angel and in clear linguistic signals tell them what they need to do and expect them to follow blindly.

Noah only 'feels' what he must do. And like any human, possibly errs in trying to understand what God may really want. Maybe he wants mankind dead, and the story of the Ark was a redemption of mankind ONLY IN RETROSPECT. Noah, like any of us, gropes in the dark and does his best to do what he thinks is God's work. And that's what takes up the length of this movie.

It does pack a good amount of classy effects and action to keep the adrenaline rushing once in a while. Of course, it's not going to be clean cut like a Nolan movie, where most would love it. It's bound to have haters and lovers balanced on a scale.

But one thing cannot be refuted - Aronofsky has delivered a deeper and more complex version of the Noah's Ark story than has ever been attempted before.

8/10 from me.… Expand
3 of 22 users found this helpful319
All this user's reviews
8
NicolasCageApr 3, 2014
A solid film that drags on a little bit in its final half but the special effects and its message is very powerful and Russel Crowe's performance is top notch.
2 of 15 users found this helpful213
All this user's reviews
8
therynoApr 1, 2014
I would like to point out that this is not supposed to be the biblical account of Noah's Ark. Honestly, I think that this is why I enjoyed Noah. The acting was good, the special effects were great, and I enjoyed the plot. This is a must watch.
2 of 16 users found this helpful214
All this user's reviews
8
david1997May 26, 2014
a breathtaking movie and its nowhere near being a horrible movie for what everybody else says ..This movie can be the most beautifully movie I've seen in awhile .. A True biblical movie that's put together nicely.
1 of 8 users found this helpful17
All this user's reviews
9
HaithamBJul 8, 2014
Even if the story is not close to the Holy Books, it is a unique imagination and interpretation of what could have happened with Noah, and it turned out pretty epic so watch out for it is a must see film!
1 of 8 users found this helpful17
All this user's reviews
8
StaticSpineMar 30, 2014
The movie is about the fanatic Noah trying to fulfill the will of God (as he sees it) at any cost, even if it hurts his own family. The visuals are breathtaking. Crowe, Jennifer Connelly and Anthony Hopkins were great, Emma Watson's characterThe movie is about the fanatic Noah trying to fulfill the will of God (as he sees it) at any cost, even if it hurts his own family. The visuals are breathtaking. Crowe, Jennifer Connelly and Anthony Hopkins were great, Emma Watson's character was pretty bland. I felt the length of the movie was too much. Overall I liked it.… Expand
2 of 17 users found this helpful215
All this user's reviews
7
judahjsnApr 5, 2014
I love Aronofsky. And the more out he is, the more I love him - The Fountain is my favorite of his films. Anything he makes is required viewing in my opinion and I'm glad I saw Noah, frustrating as it was. It's a thought-provoking movie but II love Aronofsky. And the more out he is, the more I love him - The Fountain is my favorite of his films. Anything he makes is required viewing in my opinion and I'm glad I saw Noah, frustrating as it was. It's a thought-provoking movie but I didn't enjoy any of it. The CGI is cartoonish, the score is wall to wall and suffocating, and the general emotional and visual palette is so relentlessly bleak that it feels like one long minor chord. There are numerous moments of genius and true beauty though as well as great performances. I thought Jennifer Connolly did a lot with the little material she was given and Ray Winstone always brings it. I have trouble connecting with Russell Crowe - he's always this monolithic block of human force, but I never see a person - but he gets the job done and carries all of his films.

I think the abuse of CGI was the biggest failing of the film for me. We're talking about water, wooden structures, people and animals. All naturally-occuring things that could have been filmed for real (the Watchers are another story, there's no getting around CGI'ing rock-Transformers). I think the film would have been more powerful with more low-tech effects done in-camera the way they were in The Fountain, and in this week's Captain America Winter Soldier.

I just think the balance was off. For a film to connect with me it has to approximate real life. Seriousness must be balanced with levity. Clouds must give way to sunshine. Noise gives way to silence. Even Saving Private Ryan had some laughs. I think Aronofsky has a tendency to become a hellfire and brimstone kind of preacher and forget to be a storyteller. It's why I never liked Requiem For a Dream. I like that with Noah and The Fountain he's trying to tell primal human stories that transcend any particular historical setting but I also think Noah bludgeons.… Expand
1 of 9 users found this helpful18
All this user's reviews
8
EzekiusJul 5, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It was fun to watch. Lots of cool things happen in this movie. The real story of Noah is boring as **** so I am glad they changed it to be entertaining. Most people talk about how they love the story of Noah, but most people don't even know a half of it.

People seem to forget that Noah got sodomized by Ham in his vineyard when he was passed out drunk and naked (oh yeah Noah was a boozer) who liked to pass out naked places.

They do make a reference to it in the movie, and I though that alone made the movie awesome.… Expand
1 of 9 users found this helpful18
All this user's reviews
8
saintivanJun 27, 2014
If you watch Noah with an open mind, you will be treated to an intense experience that has created a whole new world from one we thought we knew. From the very first scene I knew the movie was going to be well-made, and I was notIf you watch Noah with an open mind, you will be treated to an intense experience that has created a whole new world from one we thought we knew. From the very first scene I knew the movie was going to be well-made, and I was not disappointed. The movie does not hold your hand. As a good movie should, I had unanswered questions, and the movie stayed with me afterwards and the next day.… Expand
1 of 9 users found this helpful18
All this user's reviews
6
GardenChairApr 11, 2014
Any logical person will know that the Bible is a work of fiction, The director also thinks this as he has openly created Noah as a fantasy movie and it does not try to pretend to be anything else, people who have liked any other bigAny logical person will know that the Bible is a work of fiction, The director also thinks this as he has openly created Noah as a fantasy movie and it does not try to pretend to be anything else, people who have liked any other big blockbuster fantasy movie like the LOTR series will probably enjoy this movie. I can see why some people are creating a fuss about this movie because the director Darren Aronofsky makes it clear in every scene that this stuff obviously did not happen. Anyone who tries to argue that this movie was based on a true story would get laughed at, Aronofsky does not even attempt to hide the logical problems with the source material instead he puts a spotlight onto them and goes out of his way to remind people that the story he is telling is pure fantasy.… Expand
1 of 9 users found this helpful18
All this user's reviews
0
howardbeensMay 2, 2014
Saw this movie for free and was angry I spent so much to get in. HORRIFIC! Only thing it has to do with Noah is the title. The actual biblical account of Noah could have made a fantastic movie, this was a bad mix of generic Star Wars typeSaw this movie for free and was angry I spent so much to get in. HORRIFIC! Only thing it has to do with Noah is the title. The actual biblical account of Noah could have made a fantastic movie, this was a bad mix of generic Star Wars type characters that didn't belong, muddled dialog, bad cinematography, horrible special effects and extreme violence that seemed to be thrown in just to have extreme violence. Didn't add to the story one whit. Towards the end seemed to be nothing more than a flagrant attempt to paint important Christian figures as weak and evil.… Expand
1 of 9 users found this helpful18
All this user's reviews
8
CPD98Jan 11, 2015
No entiendo las malas críticas. Es entretenida de principio a fin, con buenas escenas de acción, interpretaciones dignas y alejada de momentos "tostón" de pelis de este género. Ojalá todas las películas bíblicas fueran como esta.
1 of 9 users found this helpful18
All this user's reviews
8
Pablo22Apr 15, 2014
Noah review

It´s weird that I´ve heard many people saying that it rained on the day they watched Noah and it got even weirder when the same happened to me. My theory is Arnofsky made a pact with god to make it rain while his movie isNoah review

It´s weird that I´ve heard many people saying that it rained on the day they watched Noah and it got even weirder when the same happened to me. My theory is Arnofsky made a pact with god to make it rain while his movie is screening to get us viewers in the mood. If that is true, it may have worked because I kinda liked this movie!

The movie is obviously based around the biblical story of Noah, who builds an arch to save the animals and the good from a great flood send by god as a catastrophe to cleanse the world. Arnofsky uses the source material to build his own mythology and world which is an aspect I respect. That is why many aspects created or "added" by Arnofsky don´t feel out of place. This adds tension to the movie as you cannot predict what the characters will do next as Noah is not the cheerful old dude that stuck a thousand animals in a boat that we pictured from what we had heard. This story is a lot darker. The characters are darker, especially Noah whose conviction to what he feels he is meant to do takes him into some VERY scary places. Logan Lerman´s character is a conflicted one too and has a nice arch written for him. The majority of these actors do a good job, even Jennifer Connelly who I thought was gonna be a generic character has his shining moments. I can´t tell you a lot about Emma Watson because holy hell she is beautiful and it got me a little distracted and the dude who bangs her is pretty forgettable as I can´t remember his name and I don´t even feel like looking it up. The one that really shone for me was Iron Man´s director, Jon Favreau. Nah I´m kidding it´s Ray Winstone, but jesus, does he look like Jon Favreau! Ray Winston made the villain as imposing and badass as the character got and I congratulate him on that. Hopkins got a few scenes in this movie and the two of them were charming. He even got his berry!

Aside from the darker parts of this movie, of which there are some that may surprise you and maybe stick in your brain for a few days, this movie is absolutely epic! EPIC, in capitals. From them moments the prophecy is shown you know something big is coming. But when the douchey villain is introduced and the movie starts going from the arch to the villain´s army camp back and forth it starts picking up on the epicness and it all climaxes when the rain drops start hitting that bald Russel Crowes head! That battle sequence was one well done action setpiece. All the rock giants are swinging legions of bad guys across the screen... it is awesome!

As seen in the battle sequences, this movie is very well filmed and directed. It even has an evolution montage which used an awesome technique that made it unique.

This movie goes a little bit further than an epic summer/spring movie and I give it props for it. It isn´t Arnofsky´s best and it won´t leave you burning your brain while you decode it afterwards and it is weirdly edited in some scenes, but it sure is a little bit better than a very good time at the movies.

I give Noah an 8 out of 10.

I do have a question that bothered me throughout the movie: If the rock angel commited suicide why did it go to heaven?? I´ll let Arnofsky go on this one for that Mila Kunis + Natalie Portman scene he gifted us with.
Check my other reviews in http://thechannelofawesome.blogspot.mx/ !… Expand
1 of 11 users found this helpful110
All this user's reviews
6
Compi24Mar 30, 2014
Though it's almost undone by some absolutely ridiculous conceptual elements throughout, Darren Aronofsky's "Noah" still retains its entertainment value with a bevy of powerful performances and some characteristically striking visuals for theThough it's almost undone by some absolutely ridiculous conceptual elements throughout, Darren Aronofsky's "Noah" still retains its entertainment value with a bevy of powerful performances and some characteristically striking visuals for the director.… Expand
1 of 12 users found this helpful111
All this user's reviews
7
BradySmithMar 30, 2014
Noah is solid entertainment, but nothing incredible. The action is done well, and the acting is first rate but it never really reaches the stunning heights that it should have. Aranofsky adds a lot of artistic expansion onto the story, likeNoah is solid entertainment, but nothing incredible. The action is done well, and the acting is first rate but it never really reaches the stunning heights that it should have. Aranofsky adds a lot of artistic expansion onto the story, like the rock creatures, and fictional animals, which I thought were ok additions. I didn't feel like he did this enough with his direction though. It's missing lyricism in many parts and never approaches the grandness seen in films like Life of Pi, or Avatar. The effects are solid but occasionally cheesey. Animals sometimes look too obviously fake. The flood itself however was very realistic looking. The script is pretty decent. It raises some tough questions and is filled with brutal occurrences. This movie is not for the easily frightened. Crowe's performance, some great scenes, and the fact that this is the first big budget bible epic in decades all make it worth seeing. I advise you however not to expect anything miraculous.… Expand
1 of 12 users found this helpful111
All this user's reviews
5
rory_sMar 31, 2014
This movie is interesting. The beginning is very hard to understand, with odd editing choices and a sluggish pace. The middle of the film is pretty good, with some standout fight sequences, but still no story that makes sense. Then the end ofThis movie is interesting. The beginning is very hard to understand, with odd editing choices and a sluggish pace. The middle of the film is pretty good, with some standout fight sequences, but still no story that makes sense. Then the end of the movie drags on in an overly dramatic sequence on the ark. The acting is alright, with Ray Winstone being the standout. But ultimately none of the characters are put to good use. However, some the CGI is very good, the "world-creation" scenes being the standouts. But, in the end, the movie fails.… Expand
1 of 13 users found this helpful112
All this user's reviews
7
GregTheGr8gamrMar 30, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Alright I saw this movie last night and I was VERY surprised. First off Noah has this army of rock creatures that are really stupid. Second this movie had some really scary parts like when people got chopped apart to eat and when the people outside the ark were on that rock and getting washed away. I would not recommend this movie for people under age 11… Expand
1 of 13 users found this helpful112
All this user's reviews
8
dharmaJul 6, 2014
One of the most controversial film of the year. Aronofsky's version of NOAH is a mix up between his usual eccentric approach, and a blockbuster film. Its interpretation of Biblical 'hero' Noah seems to either piss of religious people orOne of the most controversial film of the year. Aronofsky's version of NOAH is a mix up between his usual eccentric approach, and a blockbuster film. Its interpretation of Biblical 'hero' Noah seems to either piss of religious people or acclaimed by critics everywhere. Sure he took great liberties, but the end result is a riveting and unusual 'bible' film that pull no punches in humanizing its hero, a man considered a great prophets by many Religions. Well acted by Crowe in his best performance in years, highly recommended if you are a bit open minded about it.… Expand
1 of 14 users found this helpful113
All this user's reviews
Page:
More From This Movie

68 Critic Reviews

5.4 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL