Read Mixed User Reviews for Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation

6

TVJerryAug 4, 2015

Tom Cruise finds his central organization disbanded and goes off the grid to expose and defeat "The Syndicate." His character is slowly evolving into more of a super hero; defying absurd physical odds, dominating every chase or fight andTom Cruise finds his central organization disbanded and goes off the grid to expose and defeat "The Syndicate." His character is slowly evolving into more of a super hero; defying absurd physical odds, dominating every chase or fight and outsmarting everyone with ridiculously convoluted ruses. The action regularly pops up, but none of it is impressive (even the publicized plane gag is only remarkable if you know it's real). The expected new tech toys are not particularly cool. While it's basically entertaining, the big Hollywood formula has overtaken, demanding ever-growing stakes and lacking any cinematic originality to get it there.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

4

AxeTAug 1, 2015

Big production, overly formulaic bore. Where it stands in the series: first one was okay, second was awful, third was quite good, fourth was okay, this one is lame. Some idiot critic is claiming this better than Bond and Bourne. On theBig production, overly formulaic bore. Where it stands in the series: first one was okay, second was awful, third was quite good, fourth was okay, this one is lame. Some idiot critic is claiming this better than Bond and Bourne. On the whole these movies are not nearly as good as the best Bonds but better made overall than the Bournes which in my book were very sloppy after the first one.
It has much of the signature style, clock ticking set pieces, trick identities, etc., but this time it's all so very, very tired! I've seen this movie before a hundred times! The plot is typically convoluted and silly. Jeremy Renner is useless and annoying. Alec Baldwin doesn't seem to know if he's in a serious movie or an SNL sketch. The audience seemed to be laughing at the movie not with it over some of the silly dialogue exchanges (Then again the audience partially applauded at the end, it was made up of at least half morons I'd say judging for some of the wasteoids sitting near me, probably professional critics looking to have a bright day and cut this dud a break. That's how they roll, it's all in the release timing, they were ready for a more serious non-superhero movie so they unjustifiably praise this no matter how lackluster it actually is. What stupid idiots! They should be all sued in class action for incompetent financial advisement.)
This whole Cruise did it for real stunt thing with the plane (makes no difference whatsoever in a pretend story, this isn't sports where the outcome is unknown, we know he was fine in real life), the underwater bit (that he actually held his breath for 6 minutes making that scene is such an absurdly preposterous account being told to the press and it's not even questioned as an outright lie is it? Michael Phelps couldn't do that on his best day.) Another is that he did all his own stunt driving, fine but then the scene goes so obviously CGI by the end that it calls the integrity of everything they are saying into question! The whole gimmick of his doing his own stunts to sell this movie is so passé nowadays. It meant something when Ford did it on "Raiders", but it just doesn't matter now. The problem was way back when you could see the stuntman actually in the frame, or you didn't show faces for that reason. Now with actors' faces digitally painted onto stuntmen or with outright digital doubles being used it's irrelevant.
I still think Tom Cruise is a great movie star and a very good actor. He should do more serious movies at this point and not this kind of big expensive junk just to stay popular and land box office. A trend amongst all older super stars and the other older ones are even more guilty of it.… Expand

7 of 17 users found this helpful710

All this user's reviews

5

franissavioAug 7, 2015

How many times in your life you want to watch same thing all over again and again and again and again....Hollyowood STOP THIS SEQUEL business.. STOP MI, FF.......

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

5

hotfromcauldronAug 1, 2015

Mission Impossible - Rogue Nation - runs on Cruise control.
He had us at risky business - and three decades later - still tackles his roles with wild abandon.
And although he might not show his age the script does. The plot is tired - theMission Impossible - Rogue Nation - runs on Cruise control.
He had us at risky business - and three decades later - still tackles his roles with wild abandon.
And although he might not show his age the script does. The plot is tired - the surprise twists old - the dialogue laughable and the third act long. Rebecca Furgurson holds her own - she is hot and tough - but the sexual tension is non-existent. A step back from Edge of Tomorrow. Still i look forward to his next move.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

5

TheKavehJAug 9, 2015

After hearing all the rave reviews for MISSION IMPOSSIBLE ROUGE NATION, I was so excited to see it. I was truly disappointed. I found myself wondering when exactly the film would end. Although, some of the scenes were fantastic, I felt as ifAfter hearing all the rave reviews for MISSION IMPOSSIBLE ROUGE NATION, I was so excited to see it. I was truly disappointed. I found myself wondering when exactly the film would end. Although, some of the scenes were fantastic, I felt as if it was the same thing going on over and over again for 130 minutes. Truly a disappointing film compare to it's predecessors.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

5

David_HAug 3, 2015

We’ve all probably seen the preview where Tom Cruise is hanging off the side of a large airplane taking off. Well, the next morning after I saw this movie… that scene was about the only thing I could remember if someone asked me about it. InWe’ve all probably seen the preview where Tom Cruise is hanging off the side of a large airplane taking off. Well, the next morning after I saw this movie… that scene was about the only thing I could remember if someone asked me about it. In other words; it was just okay. I talked to my friends about this and we came to the conclusion we’re experiencing “Cruise-fatigue”. I can’t fault the guy for trying to keep the paychecks coming in, but Hollywood’s enthusiasm for Tom Cruise has resulted in choosing his name over movie quality/integrity.
Note to Hollywood: if you're writing any more Mission Impossible scripts, please leave Cruise out of it and let him start auditioning for grandpa roles.
Tom’s sidekick Jeremy Renner (of recent Bourne fame) is a bit of a fresher face in the cast, but his role in this sequel is much blander than the last one. As for positive points; there is a decent motorcycle chase scene, and the newest female face in this genre (Rebecca Ferguson) I thought was excellent. She is pretty but not in a way that makes it hard to believe she can also beat someone down. Hopefully this will open up opportunities for her because it would be fun to see her in more films.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

6

papadrew7Aug 1, 2015

I didn't really enjoy this movie as much as I thought I would. This movie seemed to be just going through the motions of what a cookie cutter mission impossible movie is: pretty girls check, impossible mission check, ethan hunt invincible toI didn't really enjoy this movie as much as I thought I would. This movie seemed to be just going through the motions of what a cookie cutter mission impossible movie is: pretty girls check, impossible mission check, ethan hunt invincible to bullets check, impossible stunts check, and semi interesting villian check. The movie just didn't seem to have any soul to it. Of all the movies I have seen this year this is probably the worst one for me. There are plenty of far better movies still out like jurassic world, ant man, and inside out.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

6

DRauchDoes2015Jul 31, 2015

It was solid, fleetingly intelligent entertainment fodder. Cruise is still kicking, old as he is the guy's stamina is undeniable. I view this franchise as decent on the whole. There's a weird, escalating liveliness to each sequel that isIt was solid, fleetingly intelligent entertainment fodder. Cruise is still kicking, old as he is the guy's stamina is undeniable. I view this franchise as decent on the whole. There's a weird, escalating liveliness to each sequel that is surprising. Still, the mission is always revealed to be quite possible and, though the stakes are more and more considerable with each entry, there is no risk or tension simply because killing Ethan Hunt and his team is the real Impossible Mission. The stunt choreography in this one, though, sheesh, it's pretty crazy. Mad Max: Fury Road still takes the cake for me as the best display of action stuntwork I've seen this year (and maybe my whole life), but there are some memorable, delirious set pieces to bask upon here. The whole cast functions fine, though I think Renner and Baldwin have been given the most mundane material, disappointingly. New addition Ferguson is really cool. She's way too sexualized and is giving only fleeting backstory, but aside from that, she is easily the most nuanced and human thing about this movie. It's ludicrous, it's all staged, but dammit, I enjoyed myself. It's a winking (and often quite funny), adrenaline fueled action movie, filmed with taste and grace, performed as well as one of these blockbuster behemoths can be, and all-in-all is worth, at the very least, your attendance.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

5

techaiJul 31, 2015

Just saw MI - Rogue Nation. This installment has no soul at all and is really on the boring side. It is formulatic as if some assembled all the pieces from past movies but they did not know how to make them come alive. I am an MI fan; MI -Just saw MI - Rogue Nation. This installment has no soul at all and is really on the boring side. It is formulatic as if some assembled all the pieces from past movies but they did not know how to make them come alive. I am an MI fan; MI - Ghost Protocol was great but someone has gutted the series of its verve and thus its life. Save your money; wait for Red Box or some streaming option.… Expand

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

4

Rebecca31Nov 8, 2015

Tom Cruise is back with yet another impossible mission...should he choose to accept it...which he does...that's not a spoiler...otherwise there wouldn't be a movie...wouldn't that be terrible? It's got the action, the stunts and shows thatTom Cruise is back with yet another impossible mission...should he choose to accept it...which he does...that's not a spoiler...otherwise there wouldn't be a movie...wouldn't that be terrible? It's got the action, the stunts and shows that once you surround yourself with a good supporting cast it doesn't matter if you're Tom Cruise. About ten minutes too long but is still entertaining and at movie number five it appears to be drifting into endless sequel territory so stay tuned everyone for more impossible missions. Recommended if you've nothing else to watch.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

SirNilesIVAug 3, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Not a bad movie, per se; but is very much in the summer blockbuster trope. Go in expecting cogent script writing and you'll find this movie is a 3, at best. However, go in expecting a silly fun time and you'll give it what I did, a 6+. There are many (too many) moments where everything just works out for Mr. Cruise and team, but it's not for lack of trying; one has to give Cruise an A for *trying* to still be an 80's action hero, despite his early onset age and height. Simon Pegg is really funny though and Alec, is well, Alec; which is to say always fun to watch.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

5

aikman2irvinAug 2, 2015

The best scene was the first; the one you saw on the YouTube trailer. If you like fantasies of a petite woman manhandling tough guys (Hollywood is still trying to convince us that women are physically superior to men because they are pretty)The best scene was the first; the one you saw on the YouTube trailer. If you like fantasies of a petite woman manhandling tough guys (Hollywood is still trying to convince us that women are physically superior to men because they are pretty) then you'll feel right at home. Otherwise commence eye rolling for the entire drawn out affair. A bit of a disappointment after Ghost Protocol.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

5

benjitekOct 31, 2015

Pretty standard spy stuff but fun entertainment nonetheless. The world is in danger, lot's of people fight, lots of people get killed, but everything works out in the end... or... did it? We'll find out in the next sequel :-)

Really wishPretty standard spy stuff but fun entertainment nonetheless. The world is in danger, lot's of people fight, lots of people get killed, but everything works out in the end... or... did it? We'll find out in the next sequel :-)

Really wish they'd get a new Ethan, give someone else a shot -- Scientology Cruise annoys in the role.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

Trev29Dec 19, 2015

A few well designed and shot action scenes is the only thing that saves this tedious film. There is no real tension and I have no investment in these uninspiring characters.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

MariaGalJan 23, 2016

What a lie. I mean it is disturbing in your eyes. If you want to laugh and have fun before you go to sleep, it is OK. But the movie is bad. The only thing that is worthy is Simon Pegg!

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

oDjentoSep 29, 2015

With possibly the best entry to date coming out for the MI series in 2011 (Ghost Protocol), we had plenty of reasons to be excited for a new Mission Impossible film. With all leading actors and actresses coming back to reprise their roles weWith possibly the best entry to date coming out for the MI series in 2011 (Ghost Protocol), we had plenty of reasons to be excited for a new Mission Impossible film. With all leading actors and actresses coming back to reprise their roles we had an idea of what we could expect. However, the film ultimately under delivers and creates something that is for the most part unmemorable.
The film begins with an epic and exciting piece of Tom Cruise trying to enter a moving plane which is both tense and funny to watch – especially knowing that Tom Cruise actually did the stunt. Albeit this, I couldn’t help but realise that this scene all of a sudden kind of made me feel a little more sceptical about the rest of the film, as if you had seen the adverts you would’ve known that this scene was one of the main selling points for the film and then, 2 minutes into the film they just throw it away. Great.
The film also continues with a one note bad guy who is completely unforgettable. To act his part of the bad guy he ranges from speaking almost inaudibly and with so little emotion that it was frustrating to watch him and then to make him show he is a scary guy if mad, he has a wonderful little eye twitch to make you really nervous. Obviously he has made a better villain than Hoffman’s portrayal in MI:3 (please detect sarcasm).
The story also has a sort of incoherence to it and disorderly fashion to it that makes it a bit bland but once all characters meet up it becomes quite fun, even though the ending to the film is pretty stupid and doesn’t really make any sense as to how it would’ve been possible to set up. There are also other scenes in the film that are outright **** as well, and I’m all up for a bit of non-realism every now and then but as for one scene in particular I just found it a bit too much. Having Tom Cruise fall of a motorcycle at breakneck speeds not wearing any leather s but instead a Hawaiian t shirt and come off completely unscathed (at the speed he was going out he should’ve been dead anyway) is just too much for me to handle. That **** is impossible (hohoho).
Now I have the negatives off my chest I can move onto the positives. The series has added more comedy into the films as they’ve gone along and they are a great addition, with the 5th entry adding some hilarious scenes into the mix. There are also a few pretty awesome set action pieces, 2 noticeably cool ones being a fight at an opera house and Tom Cruise’s underwater infiltration scene. That scene though, albeit tense, was slightly stupid as you can see that they are struggling for ideas for their typical heist/infiltration scenes and the method they were using to detect intruders there seemed a bit questionable.
Overall, if you want to see an action film Rogue Nation is a fair enough candidate to pick up and watch, but if you’re expecting it to live up to Ghost Protocol, don’t hold your breath: otherwise a woman will have to dive in after you a resuscitate you.
6/10… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

SpiRoOct 29, 2015

I actually thought this movie could be good, boy was i disappointed. Making this movie any dumber than it is, is the real Mission Impossible. Then again there is always sequel..

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

AliceofXAug 19, 2015

With reviews in the 90% I expected something better. Not even great but at least fun and thrilling. Mission Impossible 5 gave me none of that and as the movie went towards the last half I felt bored. Maybe my view would have been different ifWith reviews in the 90% I expected something better. Not even great but at least fun and thrilling. Mission Impossible 5 gave me none of that and as the movie went towards the last half I felt bored. Maybe my view would have been different if I had seen any of the other Mission Impossible films and thus already formed an attachment to these characters but as it stands I felt nothing for them.

My problem with Ethan Hunt's character is that he is too uber. Of course you know walking into the cinema that the good guys are going to win. A good action film should challenge that by adding vulnerabilities to the hero, make it seem like he's really fighting for his life. Mission Impossible 5 is the kind of film where the main character walks in, is awesome and you never really feel a sense of danger for him.

Benji is probably my favourite character of this film as he is the only one that now sticks in my head. He felt the most human which I can't say about anyone else.

Which is not to say the movie is bad, but I found nothing likable in it so gave it five stars as it falls squarely in the middle in that place between good and bad.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

RollingSquareAug 13, 2015

I'll start out by saying I'm not a fanboy of any single MI movie. I had heard many good things about this movie, but it really disappointed me. It's not as good as MI3, and it doesn't even come close to MI1. It's like a mishmash of the secondI'll start out by saying I'm not a fanboy of any single MI movie. I had heard many good things about this movie, but it really disappointed me. It's not as good as MI3, and it doesn't even come close to MI1. It's like a mishmash of the second and third MI movies, meaning it has a lot of action and almost no suspense.

First off, the plot is predictable. Right from the get-go, you realize Ilsa Faust is going to be a good guy, and most likely will end the movie fighting back-to-back with Ethan. Now, the movie does start out interestingly with Ethan hanging from a side door of an airplane, but that is probably the best scene of the movie. The movie goes downhill after that as fast as the airplane takes off. The plot is predictable and rehashes all spy movie clichés: a director who doesn't believe the IMF? Check. A strangely insipid car chase (this time down some sets of shallow stairs)? Check. A motorcycle chase with the protagonist crashing and miraculously surviving, even without burns? Check. Bad guys who can't hit a target five feet in front of them? Check. It's just too predictable, and sometimes even nonsensical. Of course a device is stored inside a water-cooler cyclone... thing. Why not?

The story also suffers from some bad pacing, and the soundtrack seems largely absent when it could probably do some good.

Not only that, but the action is also very bland. That probably mainly has to do with the uninteresting choreography and the fact that it never gains momentum, but also with the awkward camera angles: the close-up camera work reminds me too much of MI3; the scenes never get heart-poundingly tense, they just look overly stylized and don't actually give your eyes any room to put things into perspective. There is no sense of 'oomph', no impact at any point. The motorcycle chase feels like it was lifted straight from the second installment.

Even the 'heist' that is being called the Mission Impossible, is not impossible at all: there is never any sense that Hunt was ever in real trouble, and the heist seemed incredibly easy. There was never any scene as suspenseful as the one with the pressure and temperature change-sensitive vault from MI1. And that's the main problem: the movie has an overly long introduction, and when it finally tells us the Mission is about to begin, the mission ends up being very simple and reaches a conclusion far too long before the psychological pressure reaches a head.

The character of Ilsa Faust is not well fleshed out, and it soon becomes clear what exactly the idea behind Ilsa's character is, and it's yet another action movie cliché. This time around, the main characters don't even become romantically involved, nor are they even very friendly; there is just no substance there. There is just something missing; the dialog is uninteresting and full of exposition, and there is little fervor, no humanity. The main antagonist, Solomon Lane, is only barely intimidating, and only in one scene. The visual presence and connection to the main character is absent, so this role is very much inferior to MI3's Owen Davian, especially when he mainly intimidates Ilsa rather than a more important character. The movie's ending doesn't actually end anything, it just feels hollow.

In conclusion, Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation feels like a mishmash of MI2 and MI3, but instead of being a mixture of intrigue and infiltration with a smidgeon of action, it's full-blown action. The action is clear as day, sure, but it lacks a sense of awe and impact. There is really only one infiltration scene, and it lacks suspense and uncertainty. I think Brian De Palma needs to return and inject M:I with that classic stealth infiltration suspense and likable characters that the first movie was known for.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

BarbudezAug 25, 2015

" Refrito Imposible"

Tom Cruise nos presenta su quinta entrega de su franquicia Misión Imposible, basada en la mítica serie de Martín Landau, Peter Graves y Leonard Nimoy entre otros, que narraban las aventuras de un grupo agentes secretos" Refrito Imposible"

Tom Cruise nos presenta su quinta entrega de su franquicia Misión Imposible, basada en la mítica serie de Martín Landau, Peter Graves y Leonard Nimoy entre otros, que narraban las aventuras de un grupo agentes secretos que hacian misiones de espionaje o sabotaje a países enemigos o grupos terroristas. Y que en 1996 Tom Cruise se apoderaría de ella, para su uso y autosatisfacción personal.

Esta franquicia, desde sus inicios, ha sido una especie de oda y lucimiento de palmito de Tom Cruise y su sueño húmedo de ser James Bond se hace realidad, aunque, la primera película, pese a ser muy vapuleada por la critica, es la mas fidedigna a la serie,es una película de espías clásica con sus pequeños desfases y flipadas de acción, pero en general, digna. Luego vino la segunda, donde la película se convierte en un grotesco y esperpentico film que parece digno de agarralo como puedas o de Luc Besson en horas bajísimas, provocando casí que la franquicia de Mision Imposible se quedase muerta. Ya en 2006 J.J Abrams, el mister lucecitas de Hollywood, el director de Marketing por antonomasia, consigue resucitar la franquicia, con su sobresaliente MI 3, porque se da cuenta, que esta franquicia tras el fiasco de la 2, solo puede ser, una comedía de acción donde vemos a un Tom Cruise decadente, haciendo sobradas y flipadas, planes enrevesadamente absurdos, secuencias de acción rocambolescamente exageradas con su James Bond de marca Hacendado, y es como la franquicia ha continuado hasta nuestros días. En otras palabras, esta franquicia no se toma en serio a si misma.

El FMI ha sido desmantelado, Ethan Hunt es un proscrito para los Estados Unidos y además lucha contra una organización criminal, El Sindicato, que desde la sombra conspira para desestabilizar el mundo.

El resultado de esta quinta película es un producto entretenidamente anodino, nada destacable, un refrito de las cuatro películas anteriores que ni sorprende ni genera tensión, simplemente es la nada absoluta, pero no implica a que roce a la infamía, simplemente es un blockbuster veraniego inofensivo del montón. Destaco simplemente como Simon Pegg, le da vidilla y humor a esta película con su actuación, que en ciertos momentos de la película, parece mas dos policías rebeldes o vaya par de polis, pero con Cruise y Pegg.

Ya dejo la tercera el listón muy alto en comedía de acción y la primera es una interesante película seria de espías, esta es una que pasa sin pena ni gloria, pese a sus delirios de Tom Cruise en hacer las escenas acción sin especialistas, los absurdos y enrevesados planes y las instalaciones mas ultravanzadas situadas en países del tercer mundo.

En conclusión, Blockbusters mas del montón que ni destaca, ni sorprende.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

4

jonutahAug 26, 2015

There are so many spy movie cliches (like the bad guys who can't hit the side of a barn) in this movie that my spouse and I mostly giggled through the over 2 hour show. What really got us going is how many times any mortal being would haveThere are so many spy movie cliches (like the bad guys who can't hit the side of a barn) in this movie that my spouse and I mostly giggled through the over 2 hour show. What really got us going is how many times any mortal being would have died in this movie (or at least gotten pretty wrecked up), but somehow Ethan Hunt escapes without so much as a nick. And that's where Rogue Nation went rogue; the creators ignored all realism thus making the hero more of a cartoon character.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

gdiego135Dec 4, 2015

No where near as exciting as the last Mission Impossible. It's pretty boring through out the whole thing, and when i was watching at my local theater i just wanted to leave the whole time, just watch ghost protocol that one's good.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

Lalaland_gerJan 18, 2016

Well done movie by its production with some really cool scenes. But trivial as hell. I had to ask myself during the whole movie, why should I watch this? It can't tell or show me anything new. If you are a big fan of MI, it will be your pieceWell done movie by its production with some really cool scenes. But trivial as hell. I had to ask myself during the whole movie, why should I watch this? It can't tell or show me anything new. If you are a big fan of MI, it will be your piece of cake.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

AngusBarbudezAug 26, 2016

" Refrito Imposible"

Tom Cruise nos presenta su quinta entrega de su franquicia Misión Imposible, basada en la mítica serie de Martín Landau, Peter Graves y Leonard Nimoy entre otros, que narraban las aventuras de un grupo agentes secretos" Refrito Imposible"

Tom Cruise nos presenta su quinta entrega de su franquicia Misión Imposible, basada en la mítica serie de Martín Landau, Peter Graves y Leonard Nimoy entre otros, que narraban las aventuras de un grupo agentes secretos que hacian misiones de espionaje o sabotaje a países enemigos o grupos terroristas. Y que en 1996 Tom Cruise se apoderaría de ella, para su uso y autosatisfacción personal.

Esta franquicia, desde sus inicios, ha sido una especie de oda y lucimiento de palmito de Tom Cruise y su sueño húmedo de ser James Bond se hace realidad, aunque, la primera película, pese a ser muy vapuleada por la critica, es la mas fidedigna a la serie,es una película de espías clásica con sus pequeños desfases y flipadas de acción, pero en general, digna. Luego vino la segunda, donde la película se convierte en un grotesco y esperpentico film que parece digno de agarralo como puedas o de Luc Besson en horas bajísimas, provocando casí que la franquicia de Mision Imposible se quedase muerta. Ya en 2006 J.J Abrams, el mister lucecitas de Hollywood, el director de Marketing por antonomasia, consigue resucitar la franquicia, con su sobresaliente MI 3, porque se da cuenta, que esta franquicia tras el fiasco de la 2, solo puede ser, una comedía de acción donde vemos a un Tom Cruise decadente, haciendo sobradas y flipadas, planes enrevesadamente absurdos, secuencias de acción rocambolescamente exageradas con su James Bond de marca Hacendado, y es como la franquicia ha continuado hasta nuestros días. En otras palabras, esta franquicia no se toma en serio a si misma.

El FMI ha sido desmantelado, Ethan Hunt es un proscrito para los Estados Unidos y además lucha contra una organización criminal, El Sindicato, que desde la sombra conspira para desestabilizar el mundo.

El resultado de esta quinta película es un producto entretenidamente anodino, nada destacable, un refrito de las cuatro películas anteriores que ni sorprende ni genera tensión, simplemente es la nada absoluta, pero no implica a que roce a la infamía, simplemente es un blockbuster veraniego inofensivo del montón. Destaco simplemente como Simon Pegg, le da vidilla y humor a esta película con su actuación, que en ciertos momentos de la película, parece mas dos policías rebeldes o vaya par de polis, pero con Cruise y Pegg.

¿Es la mejor de la saga, como se comenta por ahi?

Ya dejo la tercera el listón muy alto en comedía de acción y la primera es una interesante película seria de espías, esta es una que pasa sin pena ni gloria, pese a sus delirios de Tom Cruise en hacer las escenas acción sin especialistas, los absurdos y enrevesados planes y las instalaciones mas ultravanzadas situadas en países del tercer mundo.

En conclusión, Blockbusters mas del montón que ni destaca, ni sorprende.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

arostislavnaAug 4, 2023

Bad plot based on propaganda inspired by adjacent events. Nobody intelligent would give a pass. CIA are the bad guys, and being aligned with such a group makes IMF bad guys by association.

One major technical flaw within the first 20Bad plot based on propaganda inspired by adjacent events. Nobody intelligent would give a pass. CIA are the bad guys, and being aligned with such a group makes IMF bad guys by association.

One major technical flaw within the first 20 minutes. Shooting Kalashnikovs down a hallway would not shoot every wall around Hunt (Tom Cruise) and thus, Christopher McQuarrie is an unintelligent director.

The third act is pretty good though, but the CIA are the bad guys, so I don't think it deserves anything higher than a 6, but with all the other negatives I'll give it a 4.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

BroyaxJan 19, 2017

Il est grand temps de s'arrêter, ce 5ème Mission Impossible ressemble désormais à un mauvais James Bond d'autant que Môssieur Hunt fait équipe avec un agent anglais (l'athlétique et charmante Rebecca Ferguson, belle comme un tracteur) pourIl est grand temps de s'arrêter, ce 5ème Mission Impossible ressemble désormais à un mauvais James Bond d'autant que Môssieur Hunt fait équipe avec un agent anglais (l'athlétique et charmante Rebecca Ferguson, belle comme un tracteur) pour contrer la très méchante organisation Spectre... euuh le Syndicat ! (on sait la CGT très vindicative mais tout de même). A court d'idées et au bout du rouleau, la série se perd ici dans des pirouettes scénaristiques de mauvais aloi et les raccourcis faciles... et impossibles.

Hormis un montage trop nerveux dans les combats, le film reste néanmoins assez bien réalisé et s'avère tout-à-fait spectaculaire avec moult poursuites et cascades. Le rythme sans être phénoménal parvient à se maintenir vaille que vaille malgré l'intrigue en roue libre. Le placement publicitaire est un poil exagéré (BMW et... Halo 5 ?) tandis que Crise nous ressert son numéro de petit prétentieux une fois de plus, entouré de son équipe de faire-valoir.

Bref, une sensation d'imposture et de réchauffé tiédasse nous étreint fort désagréablement et nous accueillons -nous ne le cachons pas- le générique de fin avec un certain soulagement.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews