Men

A24 | Release Date: May 20, 2022
5.4
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 97 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
40
Mixed:
30
Negative:
27
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
7
HerickDienerAug 6, 2022
Tem algo realmente interessante aqui. Além da sempre extraordinária Jessie Buckley, claro. A simbologia representada nos personagens do ótimo Rory Kinnear é excelente. E não precisa ser um gênio para identificar a mensagem. Generalização é umTem algo realmente interessante aqui. Além da sempre extraordinária Jessie Buckley, claro. A simbologia representada nos personagens do ótimo Rory Kinnear é excelente. E não precisa ser um gênio para identificar a mensagem. Generalização é um problema. Mas não é o objetivo de ninguém que um homem saia confortável daqui. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
theredskyJun 10, 2022
This movie is definitely not for everyone however if you like Alex Garland’s other work (Ex Machina and Annihilation) then I think you’ll appreciate this more. As with Annihilation and Ex Machina, Garland’s directing style and the visuals areThis movie is definitely not for everyone however if you like Alex Garland’s other work (Ex Machina and Annihilation) then I think you’ll appreciate this more. As with Annihilation and Ex Machina, Garland’s directing style and the visuals are some of the strongest aspects of the movie. It was clear to me based on the story and characters that Alex Garland was directing this. The story is confusing and hard to decipher. I definitely need to rewatch it again to smoothen everything out but what I could grasp I liked. The themes that I could make out worked well for what this story was telling about who we are as people. I don’t wanna dive too deep into the story as most of it comes from the end and I don’t want to spoil that. The cinematography is absolutely stunning. There are shots in here that feel very surreal and unique compared to Garland’s other work along with the music adding a lot to the sense of horror and building tension. Jessie Buckley did a phenomenal job here. It’s not my favorite performance from her but it’s definitely up there but Rory Kinnear stole the show with his performances. Kinnear had to play multiple different characters throughout the film and he did an amazing job at making each character feel unique and different from the others. Definitely one of my shoe ins for Best Supporting Actor this year. The ending is definitely a lot in terms of story and visuals. If you can’t handle body horror then I don’t think it will be for you as body horror is a main aspect of portions of the film. If you like Alex Garland’s work then I would definitely recommend checking this out but if body horror isn’t your thing then definitely steer clear from this. Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
10
Coastal2009Jun 29, 2022
As a man who loves folk horror, I liked this one a lot. Well acted, realistic portrayal of trauma and abusive relationships. It was freaky too. What most people whining about neo-feminist propaganda aren’t smart enough to understand is thatAs a man who loves folk horror, I liked this one a lot. Well acted, realistic portrayal of trauma and abusive relationships. It was freaky too. What most people whining about neo-feminist propaganda aren’t smart enough to understand is that this is a folk horror based on gods/goddesses/archetypes that have existed pre-Christianity. The director does an excellent job of bringing these archetypes to life in modern times. Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
9
doctorseitanJun 4, 2022
Absolutely loved it. The acting, the atmosphere. The cinematography is gorgeous. Alex Garland at it with another hit.
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
9
HowManyRobotMay 27, 2022
A fantastic dive into the psychological journey the protagonist goes through in order to deal with the trauma and guilt she felt after getting out of an abusive relationship. Do ignore the deeply insecure #notallmen reviews, "Men" is about asA fantastic dive into the psychological journey the protagonist goes through in order to deal with the trauma and guilt she felt after getting out of an abusive relationship. Do ignore the deeply insecure #notallmen reviews, "Men" is about as 'misandrist' as "Aliens" is 'xenophobic'. Expand
3 of 10 users found this helpful37
All this user's reviews
9
duffles17May 20, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Beautifully-shot film with great performances and wild imagery. The ending and what the film "means" is up to the viewer, but it is definitely a deep excursion into how grief and guilt can be all-consuming and how survivors "should" feel in the eyes of others. This will be highly divisive but I will say it was a hell of a lot better than 'Mother'. Expand
3 of 12 users found this helpful39
All this user's reviews
7
etoppJun 19, 2022
Very well directed and acted but I think without an understanding of English folk tales about the Green Man this movie will be very confusing to mainstream audiences
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
teddywymanMay 29, 2022
I'll start by saying that I think Alex Garland is brilliant, and that this is his worst movie by far. His first two, Ex Machina and Annihilation, are each in my top 15 all time, and this movie probably doesn't crack my top 100. I do stillI'll start by saying that I think Alex Garland is brilliant, and that this is his worst movie by far. His first two, Ex Machina and Annihilation, are each in my top 15 all time, and this movie probably doesn't crack my top 100. I do still think, though, that this movie is consistent with Garland's brilliance. And I am writing this review under the context of people not liking it very much, both for being confusing but more saliently for being perceptually anti-male. I think the biggest problem, therefore, is that this movie does not do a good job of convincing people who don't already agree with its message. I already do agree with its message - which, while there is some ambiguity, is pretty clearly something along the lines of "while not all men literally are evil, men as a group oppress women such that they are justified in being wary of any given man." And don't worry, if you don't already agree with this message I won't try to convince you here. How much of a responsibility does a movie have to convey its message in a way that changes minds? A funny thing about the movie Fight Club is that Roger Ebert gave it a negative review, and basically said "this is a good movie that is presented in a way that people will not get its message, and it will be used to promote violence." To this day, many fans of Fight Club do not realize it is a scathing critique of toxic masculinity and capitalism, and instead view Tyler Durden as their hero and the Narrator as themselves. I agree with Ebert - a movie has a responsibility in that sense (and Ebert was right given the number of real-life Fight Clubs that arose). So for Men - is it a downside that it doesn't convince people? In my opinion, not really, because doing so doesn't really cause harm. Fight Club turns away people who agree with its message, while Men turns away people who disagree. So at worst, Men just reinforces a belief that probably wasn't going to change anyways. Maybe it'd be better if it was more clever, but would it work? Would those who believe that men and women have equal standing in modern western society see that they were wrong? I don't think so, and I don't think Garland does either. I'll end by saying that what might be funniest is how Garland's first two movies are objectively feminist. Ex Machina highlights both the crazed ego of the genius CEO, and the nervous insecurity of the mediocre programmer - which are both inherently male stereotypes (yes, there are women CEOs and programmers, but those stereotypes are male. The stereotypical basketball player is a male even though the WNBA exists). Annihilation shows the 12th expedition, which is also the first to involve women, and it also is the first to actually succeed at returning someone alive (the book is admittedly more explicit in why they chose women, but I think the movie does enough). The reaction to Men makes me question whether people understood just how feminist these movies are, given many of you say that you love his other two movies - why? Men is great because it highlights so many flavors of toxic masculinity that women must live with, and nothing that happens in the movie is random even if it doesn't immediately make sense (tons of biblical imagery for instance that I, as an atheist, had to research after). It shows how, as I said earlier, while not ALL men are literally bad, enough are that a woman is not required to believe that any given man is good. Men have been oppressive, dismissive, rude, creepy, violent, manipulative, and downright evil towards women for enough of human history that we have to earn back their trust, and no man is entitled to it. There is metaphor, horror, intrique, suspense, and beauty in this movie. To be blunt, if you are not a feminist, I do not think you will like it - and what a shame that your social views cut you off from what really is a brilliant movie. (And while I'm guessing it's obvious, yes I am a man. I'm guessing most of you are too). Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
10
lauracampbellJun 6, 2022
This movie was brilliant. Alex Garland has done something very few filmmakers have done before. He captured feelings that are impossible to describe. The performances are beyond excellent, the cinematography is gorgeous and the ending had meThis movie was brilliant. Alex Garland has done something very few filmmakers have done before. He captured feelings that are impossible to describe. The performances are beyond excellent, the cinematography is gorgeous and the ending had me believing in cinema again. Thank you ALEX! Watch it! Give it all the awards! Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
7
Rebel_PandaMay 29, 2022
I feel like a lot of people misunderstood this movie, or didn't attempt to understand it because of how badly marketed it was. Men 2022 is more of a drama/cosmic horror in the same vein as Eraserhead than a straight-up horror like the trailerI feel like a lot of people misunderstood this movie, or didn't attempt to understand it because of how badly marketed it was. Men 2022 is more of a drama/cosmic horror in the same vein as Eraserhead than a straight-up horror like the trailer made it out to be. A24 really needs to work on their advertisement game because they always overexaggerate all of their trailers. The cinematography is brilliant, especially because of the gorgeous countryside location it was filmed. I think the protagonist Jessie isn't quite three-dimensional but I found what she went through very relatable, so I could project to fill in the blanks. Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
8
VicFerrariJul 20, 2022
Not an anti-male film, rather one man's perception of the modern narrative surrounding women's perception of men, and what's wrong with that? Art isn't politics - it's personal. A single point of view, not a statement of how we all should orNot an anti-male film, rather one man's perception of the modern narrative surrounding women's perception of men, and what's wrong with that? Art isn't politics - it's personal. A single point of view, not a statement of how we all should or do view a subject. This is Art horror, it builds on the feels, it doesn't explain things. Effective, creepy, and engaging. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
MorbHeadJul 1, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I love Men. This movie is an adequate, perhaps greater, film than prequel Women. I don't like Women. Women should be burned on a stake. The End Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
adverbNov 2, 2022
I'll admit I didn't understand a lot of it (that's not a reason, fellas, to give the movie a bad rating). Like Garland's other movies, it is beautifully filmed.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
FelipePedro07Sep 13, 2022
Great !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Voodoo123Aug 5, 2022
Kinnear steals the movie with some compelling performances throughout. Overall I enjoyed the creepy imagery and surrealist elements including the chain of births towards the ending - utterly bizarre, compelling and very well paced.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Mauro_LanariJan 12, 2023
(Mauro Lanari)
I read that the atavistic problematic nature of the intersex relationship has been taken for toxic masculinity in the form of a folk-horror allegory. However, despite some allusions to "The Shining" (1980), the speech points to
(Mauro Lanari)
I read that the atavistic problematic nature of the intersex relationship has been taken for toxic masculinity in the form of a folk-horror allegory. However, despite some allusions to "The Shining" (1980), the speech points to something else. The symbolism is clear, Garland behaves like Nolan with explanations to ensure the audience's understanding. The conflict between the sexes arises in that biblical garden with the tree of forbidden fruit, where the widowed protagonist (Eva/isha) takes refuge in an endopsychic reality and faces the roles, masks, archetypes of her suicidal husband (Adam/ish). The optimistic ending is more confused than "Annihilation" (2018): what can it ever mean to reconcile with oneself in the name of the love required by the partner?
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
TomMondayAug 14, 2022
If you’re calling this film woke and blaming it of misandry, you’re a total loser and a lousy critic. Full stop. Film itself is a hypnotic tone poem about grief and death with a nightmarish visual language. Jessie Buckley is absolutelyIf you’re calling this film woke and blaming it of misandry, you’re a total loser and a lousy critic. Full stop. Film itself is a hypnotic tone poem about grief and death with a nightmarish visual language. Jessie Buckley is absolutely compelling in every frame, even when the writer/director’s impressionistic tendencies overwhelm his sense of storytelling in the end. (Like in every single one of his previous screenplays.) Only reason to hate this film is the conclusion’s lack of clarity after a banger first two acts. Or if you dislike gore – ending is the most disturbing series of images in any modern film. But it’s okay for a movie to explore themes of male violence refracted through female suffering – to reject a work of art just because it includes these ideas makes you as bad as the men in the picture. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MalwareLordApr 25, 2023
Good fun experience Good fun experience Good fun experience Good fun experience
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DunkaccinoSep 17, 2022
But this is quite a slowburn, although short in runtime. Garland kills the momentum once in a while, when Harper has seemingly unrelated encounters. The horror side of the story is some of the more stylish kind of thrills, which reminds meBut this is quite a slowburn, although short in runtime. Garland kills the momentum once in a while, when Harper has seemingly unrelated encounters. The horror side of the story is some of the more stylish kind of thrills, which reminds me the film is by A24. When speaking of the tone in the behind-the-scenes featurette, Garland noted, “It doesn’t have to be threatening. It can be undermining, or unsettling.” I think this is why the horror aspect works without deadly chases or massacre. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
CarlElmoreNov 25, 2022
One of the most screwed up films I've ever seen but also has some of the best cinematography in a film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
rmurray847Aug 10, 2023
For me, the main reason I wanted to see MEN was to experience another Jessie Buckley performance. One of the more intriguing actors around, whose work ranges from outstanding (BEAST, LOST DAUGHTER) to over-the-top (FARGO TV series). She'sFor me, the main reason I wanted to see MEN was to experience another Jessie Buckley performance. One of the more intriguing actors around, whose work ranges from outstanding (BEAST, LOST DAUGHTER) to over-the-top (FARGO TV series). She's just always interesting. She never makes easy choices and she never hesitates to present those choices in as strong a manner as she can.

She does not disappoint in MEN. Even viewers who dislike the movie (and there will be a number, I imagine) will be forced to reckon with Buckley's Harper, a performance that bravely shows a wide variety of emotions and reactions and yet clings to an air of mystery, as if we're STILL not seeing everything about this character. It's quite a performance, and thankfully, everyone else in the film matches her.

Harper has come to a small British village to rent a quiet, peaceful home "away from it all" following a deeply upsetting experience involving the breakup with and death of her husband. We see these scenes in flashbacks peppered throughout MEN, and they are indeed upsetting on many levels. Harper needs time to heel, if you will. The film dares to build slowly, following Harper on a long ramble through the woods, but eventually, she encounters a mysterious figure at the end of a long, moss-covered tunnel, and the events of the film progress from there.

With the exception of Paapa Essiedu playing Harper's husband, all the men in the film are portrayed by Rory Kinnear, from the somewhat scatter-witted and only slightly creepy homeowner who shows Harper the ropes of her rental home at the beginning of the film to the local vicar to the local pub owner to a spoiled-brat child (yes, that is what I said and it's supremely creepy). The device is alternately engaging and annoying, as it can have the effect of pulling one out of the film a bit. I'm still not certain it was the right way to go. "All men are the SAME men?" Is that the lesson here?

Anyway, Harper goes through a series of increasingly uncomfortable confrontations with various men, including a remarkably chilling scene with the vicar. As Harper bears her soul and anguish to this man of the cloth who seems to offer comfort and understanding, the dynamics begin to shift in ways that are truly nauseating. (Director Alex Garland knows how to milk little details for ultimate creepiness; witness the use of the vicar's one fingernail that is simply much-too-much longer than all his other nails.)

Elements of ancient mythology begin to weave into the story, and the film spends more and more time on body horror. It's all quite squirm inducing not for the faint of heart. Much of the film seems like it's going to be creepy but certainly not graphic. But the pendulum tips, and the viewer is in for some rough going! (Thank goodness Buckley's performance keeps us anchored in the world, even as the movie grows more and more laden with symbols.)

In the end, MEN is an interesting mix of the not-so-subtle metaphors with a heavy layer of "yes, but what does it all mean." You feel the point or points are pretty obvious ("men are awful", "relationships can grow toxic," "women have more power than they credit themselves for", "love can be great until its weaponized", etc. Etc.) and yet in the final scene, you're left feeling you've missed an awful lot.

I guess the great thing about this is that MEN leaves a lot of room for post-viewing discussions with friends and family. At the end of the viewing we attended, there were numerous clusters of viewers animatedly debating the meanings of the film. Including groups of teenagers. It's pretty rare to see a movie force people into discussing it. The experience of seeing it pretty much cannot leave you feeling ambivalent; you'll have a reaction and you'll want to get it off your chest.

Although there are flaws (heavy-handed symbolism, distractingly gruesome body horror, perhaps too much Kinnear), the movie is filled with so much...well...STUFF, that it is almost a force of nature. I admire it greatly, and look forward to seeing it again.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews