Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation | Release Date: March 3, 2017
8.5
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 2749 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
2,454
Mixed:
133
Negative:
162
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
8
CineAutoctonoMar 11, 2017
"Logan" was a good movie, which has respected the essence of the comic, but the story as such was flawed, but with such success, Hugh Jackman has closed his cycle with Wolverime with a golden snap, and X-23 opens the Doors to a new era in the"Logan" was a good movie, which has respected the essence of the comic, but the story as such was flawed, but with such success, Hugh Jackman has closed his cycle with Wolverime with a golden snap, and X-23 opens the Doors to a new era in the universe of X-Men, the actress Dafne Keen, was the protagonist of the film and awaits a good future ahead. Expand
5 of 5 users found this helpful50
All this user's reviews
8
kyle20ellisSep 20, 2018
This review contains spoilers. Last year’s Deadpool movie proved there is a market for more adult orientated and violent comic book movies and Logan backs that up with a movie that ranks amongst the best Marvel Studios have created. Set inThis review contains spoilers. Last year’s Deadpool movie proved there is a market for more adult orientated and violent comic book movies and Logan backs that up with a movie that ranks amongst the best Marvel Studios have created. Set in the near future, in which mutants are no longer born, Logan (aka Wolverine) is driving a limousine for a living whilst caring for an ailing Charles Xavier. When he is contacted by a woman caring for a young girl, that she claims is her daughter, Logan and Xavier are forced out of hiding to in order to help.

Logan has is as much a western or a road as it is a superhero film and this really helps set it apart from what has started to become a slightly over-familiar structure for Marvel films. This approach also carries over into the action/fight scenes that, as well as being more bloody and brutal than you’ll see in other Marvel movies, rely less on CGI and are all the more effective for it. Hugh Jackman is as good as ever as Wolverine and the on screen chemistry between him, Xavier (Patrick Stewart) and Laura (the superb Dafne Keen) really helps give the movie a further edge by making it easy to actually care about what happens to these characters. If this is to be Jackman’s last appearance as Wolverine he’s certainly gone out on a high note.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
RobBob99Mar 9, 2017
Perhaps the best installment of this 17 year running franchise. This film is flat out great and a game changer in the comic book movie genre. Having the feel of a small budget indie film and class western, Logan earns it's R rating with itsPerhaps the best installment of this 17 year running franchise. This film is flat out great and a game changer in the comic book movie genre. Having the feel of a small budget indie film and class western, Logan earns it's R rating with its brutal violence that never feels forced. And if this is truly Hugh Jackman's final time as Logan, what a day to go out. Jackman delivers his best performance as Logan to date and straight up his best performance to date, worthy of Oscar consideration. Layered, emotionally powerful, Logan had me in tears by the end and it's something everyone should check out. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
EpicLadySpongeMar 3, 2017
X-Men fans, this film awaits you and we're not just talking X-Men, we're talking Wolverine over here. Logan, if not, will excite you off the seat until the movie's over. It's that ride you never want to get off and miss.
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
8
BlancheApr 24, 2017
I've never really been a fan of the X-Men franchise nor its characters but when I heard that this will be Hugh Jackman's last main film portrayal of Wolverine, I had to give it a shot. I've only ever had a brief understanding of who he is andI've never really been a fan of the X-Men franchise nor its characters but when I heard that this will be Hugh Jackman's last main film portrayal of Wolverine, I had to give it a shot. I've only ever had a brief understanding of who he is and what he's all about. Thanks to its R-Rated approval rating, it allowed me to really understand how Wolverine truly interacts with everything and I bet the team behind the film were just as thankful too. It seemed like it allowed them to explore and push boundaries, fiddling with levels of creativity to really force the audience to properly immerse themselves in this jam-packed thriller.

All I'm going to say is that I got goosebumps several times. That's what makes a fantastic film - the fact that it was the final nail in the coffin only cements its place as surely one of the best Wolverine films ever. I think the fact my inherent, slight distaste of the Wolverine character myself prevents me from realising that it was a masterclass of a film. It's a darn shame I can't absolutely love the film when I don't love the character itself.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
FuturedirectorMar 23, 2017
Even if Logan may feel enormously different from X-Men's original films, a surprisingly dramatic, entertaining and the same marvelous Hugh Jackman's interpretation mean a great "goodbye" to its characters.
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
8
AuthorityMay 18, 2017
Logan is a good superhero movie and a good drama movie that ironically is less than the sum of its parts. There are some awesome superhero fight scenes that benefit greatly from the R rating, and the drama is able to evoke real emotions inLogan is a good superhero movie and a good drama movie that ironically is less than the sum of its parts. There are some awesome superhero fight scenes that benefit greatly from the R rating, and the drama is able to evoke real emotions in the viewer. The problem is that there aren't enough superhero parts to make a good superhero movie, and the weak plot and villain motivations undercut the movie as a drama. Logan could easily be a 9+ movie with the benefit of some addition by subtraction by improving the pacing with tighter editing. Even without that Logan is well worth the watch at a solid 8. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
KayVen17Jun 10, 2017
Deutsche Review - Kritik Der folgende Test ist in 5 Kategorien zusammengefasst. Diese 5 Kartegorien ergeben die Gesamtpunktzahl von 0 - 100 Punkten. Um einen passenden Userscore zu geben wird auf oder abgerundet. Bei 84 Punkten ergibt dasDeutsche Review - Kritik Der folgende Test ist in 5 Kategorien zusammengefasst. Diese 5 Kartegorien ergeben die Gesamtpunktzahl von 0 - 100 Punkten. Um einen passenden Userscore zu geben wird auf oder abgerundet. Bei 84 Punkten ergibt das einen User Score von 8. Bei 86 einen von Userscore von 9. Falls eine 85 kommt entscheide ich ob ich es eher positiv oder negativ nehme. Regeln verstanden? Dann sind hier meine Punkte. Mein persönlicher Score = 82/100 Mein User Score = 8/10 Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
vans-3410Mar 14, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The R-rated Xmen movie 'Logan' is really badass, but the ending is sad because Logan died at the end of the movie. R-rated movie is better than Pg-13 movie. I like Deadpool better than Logan. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
8
The3AcademySinsJan 5, 2018
Logan is a one-of-a-kind film that honestly shouldn't be missed. Who would have thought that Shane meets Wolverine meets Unforgiven would be such an incredible piece of art? This is an incredibly bloody, mature, R-Rated farewell to the oldLogan is a one-of-a-kind film that honestly shouldn't be missed. Who would have thought that Shane meets Wolverine meets Unforgiven would be such an incredible piece of art? This is an incredibly bloody, mature, R-Rated farewell to the old X-Men canon, and it could not have been done better. The script and performances are all Oscar-worthy. My one complaint is that the stylized camera work threw me off a little for such a realistic movie, but by the time the Logan was halfway over, I didn't mind so much. I will end this review by saying that a lot of people have called this one of the best super-hero films ever made, and it's hard to argue that. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
abm0Mar 3, 2017
Very good X-Men movie, well worth the ticket price, but falls just short of greatness. I may have gone in with overinflated expectations because I forgot to take all the rave reviews in the context of the X-Men movies and I let myself beVery good X-Men movie, well worth the ticket price, but falls just short of greatness. I may have gone in with overinflated expectations because I forgot to take all the rave reviews in the context of the X-Men movies and I let myself be fooled that this was a "masterpiece" in the general sense. It's not. It's up there with the best X-Men movies, possibly the best Wolverine movie, but it's not up there with the best movies in general. I liked the realism and the drama they used in place of the usual superhero fare of endless fights (though they didn't disappoint in terms of stabby Wolverine-y scenes either) and shoddy plots, but it still wasn't as good as "Unbreakable" (2000) or the first season of "Jessica Jones". Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
Lone_Wolf_SonesMar 13, 2017
Logan marks what may be the final outing for Hugh Jackman as the character Wolverine as well as Patrick Stewart as Professor Charles Xavier. Jackman and Stewart give stellar performances that make you believe that these are men on the ropes.Logan marks what may be the final outing for Hugh Jackman as the character Wolverine as well as Patrick Stewart as Professor Charles Xavier. Jackman and Stewart give stellar performances that make you believe that these are men on the ropes. You can feel the emotion and baggage each of them bear. The media has questioned whether superhero fatigue is setting in. What Logan does so well is that while it does depict characters that have super powers/abilities; it focuses on the human elements. What it's like to become older. Having responsibility for someone else thrust upon you. Wolverine's relationship with Laura (X-23) in particular is interesting to see develop over the course of the film. The film does kind of get bogged down in the 2nd act when they essentially find themselves on a road trip. But I was so invested in these characters by that point, that I was eager to see what happened next. The film is rated R and for good reason. If Deadpool is one end of the spectrum, Logan is on the other. The violence isn't comedic as it was in Deadpool. It accentuates and amplifies just how brutal Wolverine and his young ward can be. Logan is a great film that adds one more feather to Fox's cap after the success of Deadpool. It is my hope that Fox takes the right lessons from these two films in that with the right talent, direction, writing and respect of the source material, comic book films can be incredibly poignant. Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
8
ourtimehascomeMar 11, 2017
A film like Logan could not have been directed by X-Men longtime director Bryan Singer. It took James Mangold to create a rich, tonally different, yet consistent movie like this. Mangold's writing/directing always seems to be one step aheadA film like Logan could not have been directed by X-Men longtime director Bryan Singer. It took James Mangold to create a rich, tonally different, yet consistent movie like this. Mangold's writing/directing always seems to be one step ahead of the audience, and Jackman's performance as the titular hero is grotesque, in the best way. In fact, this is one of his best performances, as well as every other actor. Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
8
Cameronius_113Mar 3, 2017
Logan was released in 2017 and was directed by James Mangold. The film is a new instalment in the X-Men universe and is the final film starring the centre characters of Logan (Wolverine) and Charles Xavier, showing them tasked with protectingLogan was released in 2017 and was directed by James Mangold. The film is a new instalment in the X-Men universe and is the final film starring the centre characters of Logan (Wolverine) and Charles Xavier, showing them tasked with protecting a young girl.
What I love about this film is that it doesn't feel like your average superhero movie (evident from the trailers) and is instead a very human story, hence the title going for Wolverine's human name of 'Logan'. Over time we've seen people's expectations for comic book change quite drastically and we're in a period of time now where expectations are changing rapidly. However, this film bravely ignores the trends and goes for what it wants to be and I highly appreciate it for that.
To start off with, this movie does indeed have an R rating and is very brutal. I knew this was going to be something before I even saw it and I was kind of afraid whether or not this would be too big of a change from the previous X-Men films. Thankfully, the R rating felt necessary and required and if the film was PG-13 it would have nowhere near as much of an impact. The fact that more strong language is included too was another concern I had for it being too big of a change but it makes sense for the characters to use this language considering what stage they are at in their lives and didn't feel like it was there just for the sake of it.
The main three characters of the film are brilliant; Hugh Jackman gives a great performance as Logan and also Patrick Stewart gave a unique, emotionally deep performance as Charles Xavier, showcasing a side to the character I never thought I'd see. Newcomer Dafne Keen was also very promising as the new character Laura Kinney. Showing these characters at the dark point in their lives made for an overall more emotionally involving story and makes them discover each other in a much deeper way than they ever had before and for once the main characters feel like a family instead of just a team. The way they all interact was amazing to see and adds up to the overall 'human' theme of the story.
What I probably loved the most about the film (like I mentioned just then) is how it was a human story, ignoring the trends other comic book movies are going for and being what it wants to be. It's also clear that this is a film not made solely for the money but one for the fans; you can tell they aren't adding things in simply for extra money (for example the film wasn't shot in 3D), there's no big beam in the sky for the characters to fight at the end and it also takes into consideration what films do for people in real-life too, as in the end credits it says that the film help supply thousands of jobs and it's amazing to see when a film goes the extra level with thought like that, especially nowadays when most movies are made for the money.
Overall, I loved how much thought was put into this film and the fact that it was what it wanted to be, especially for the time period of superhero movies that we're in at the moment. The main cast give brilliant performances and was a great send-off for the characters we know and love. I did have one or two problems with the film (which will be in my spoiler section), however they weren't enough to hold down the film in quality. Even if they don't continue to make superhero films like this in the future, we'll always have Logan.
8.2/10
I've just got to mention that this was my most anticipated film of 2017 and the fact that I saw it the day it came out and also thought it was great made my day
Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
8
thedaywalkerMar 5, 2017
And Hugh Jackman gets the sending off he deserves, they finally did justice to the wolverine character in this final solo act, it's bloody as it should, action is great and it's emotional when it needs to be... Can't help to think it couldAnd Hugh Jackman gets the sending off he deserves, they finally did justice to the wolverine character in this final solo act, it's bloody as it should, action is great and it's emotional when it needs to be... Can't help to think it could have been better with some more clever dialogue and some plot points that weren't really thought of, but overall, it was really great Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
The_Man_XXMar 19, 2017
Logan was a brutal,somber and entertaining film which was different from another other X-Men movie and followed in the steps of The Dark Knight pretty well.

Lets talk about how the R-rating worked in this film,i would say for the character
Logan was a brutal,somber and entertaining film which was different from another other X-Men movie and followed in the steps of The Dark Knight pretty well.

Lets talk about how the R-rating worked in this film,i would say for the character Wolverine it was awesome,the slashing(action),gore and language was better because of it but in the beginning it felt a bit forced as the first line of the movie is an "F" bomb,but after a few minutes everything felt natural.

The plot is very simple and very small which was good as the movie dives into deep character emotions & developments as Wolverine is old and bitter and i found it interesting how he was reluctant throughout the film and was only helping the girl in this movie to like get rid of her,but he isn't all bad as Logan cares for professor X & the their relationship is different from other films and for this dark and gritty movie it was well needed.

Although the tone of this movie was dark,gritty & somber there is some humor and fun to be had in this movie even if it's keep at a minimum,were humor was needed the movie did it nicely.The action was on point and i loved every bit of it,from chase scenes to the slashing the action was well done & glorious.Now the characters in this movie all had some purpose and meaning to their roles especially X-23(the little girl who is helped by Logan),she was awesome in her action sequences & her acting was good,Charles Xavier was also good in this movie as it shows him as an old,tired and beaten down Professor X who isn't as wise as he was and it was very interesting to see the growth or struggle of the character.

Hugh Jackman was amazing as always as Logan and his character is pitiful,bitter and you almost wonder if he is still a hero as he refuses to help people and doesn't are about anyone expect Charles and doesn't almost care about X-23 and the film portrays & explains why he is like that and it is very satisfying.

Another reason why this movie works and why it's so different in the superhero genre is that this film is sad and so emotional especially in the 1st and 3rd act of the movie,and since its a grounded movie the tone works nicely.What annoys me in this movie is the 2nd act whereby the film becomes a bit boring & since it was a more grounded movie it focus on some real world themes which sometimes worked and sometimes didn't & you start to notice that the movie is too long and some scenes that could have been cut out,but other than that the movie is fine.

Logan was a fascinating movie full of great action,emotion and depth,this was the Wolverine movie that makes a fitting end to Hugh Jackman's 17 year run as Logan.
Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
8
amai2739Mar 3, 2017
James Mangold's Logan, the third installment to the Wolverine franchise goes out with a bang for Hugh Jackman's last outing as the titled character. I thought this movie was great, very well written, and loving the cinematography, the feel ofJames Mangold's Logan, the third installment to the Wolverine franchise goes out with a bang for Hugh Jackman's last outing as the titled character. I thought this movie was great, very well written, and loving the cinematography, the feel of it. Lets talk about characters, Hugh Jackman as an older Logan to me was done greatly, so was Patrick Stewart as Charles Xavier/Professor X, their dynamic was fun to watch, like father and son. Also, absolutely love Dafne Keen as Laura Kinney/X-23, she didn't speak for most of the movie, but did a darn great job every time on screen. Also enjoyed the dynamic between her character and Logan, would have liked a little more to the father/daughter relationship, but it was good nonetheless. There were somethings I wish could've been different, but a very solid film. Some other actors I thought that deserve praise Boyd Holbrook as Donald Pierce and Stephen Merchant as Caliban, both did great jobs. Overall, great R rated superhero film, western vibe, drama driven, brutal action. Also to me, the best of the Wolverine movies. Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
8
IvanPupyshevMar 5, 2017
If you think, that MCU’s started quiet a long time ago, think again and look at Hugh Jackman, who’s been playing Wolverine for more than 17 years – symbolic that his character’s more than hundred years old. But this long run’s come to an end,If you think, that MCU’s started quiet a long time ago, think again and look at Hugh Jackman, who’s been playing Wolverine for more than 17 years – symbolic that his character’s more than hundred years old. But this long run’s come to an end, but what kind of it? The end we all dreamed of – brutal and enjoyable franchise’s epilogue with both dramatically and action satisfaction. Hugh Jackman’s brilliant smile has passed away, Logan’s grown some hairs and accepted hobo-style look – in the world of familiar comic book adaptations, such approach is really welcomed, especially in Wolverine’s case, who’s iconic and original image of severe killer was long-awaited by the fans and average viewers. Costumes and shining setting are gone, substituted by dystopic and urban landscapes, which’re perfectly matches title character’s inner world – broken and hopeless. Frankly, dark tone makes old and new heroes or villains look more mature and conversations between Stewart’s and Jackman’s aged Professor Xavier and Logan come to a new level from just professional to more family-style. Of course, it’s more because of wow-effect from new conception either from real franchise drama-development, but still it’s really cool. Especially, considering the fact that actors give fine performances of their characters, especially Boyd Holbrook, whose vicious Donald Pierce is the best villain in years. Even Dafni Keen’s character isn’t annoying at all, as it may concern previously. She’ isn’t much talking anyway, what’s a really smart move from creators. Director James Mangold’ new entry in comic genre includes high-stakes filming and the viewers are also now more demanding here and although he’s made a great job in style and concept, scenario has some significant flows. Yes, we have a minimum world description for comfort viewing, which includes automatic wagons and some new technologies descriptions, but the story background lacks of information – Mangolg gives only glimpses of what happened, why and how characters ended like this. This may upset some hardcore fans as well as universe development’s pretty weak with the feeling that film in every way tries to stay from X-Men franchise. However, the real concern about director’s work is movie’s rough final act – after emotional and thoughtful main part ending feels like directorproducer came out on the stage and said “we run out of time/budget and have to end this drama with typical superhero sequence”. Make no mistake, it’s not as bad as you may think, the problem isn’t so big, as it was in previous Wolvie movie, where after well-done narration has come a silly finale, but still it’s a bit upsetting. But nevetheless, even considering this issues “Logan” is a great story with complex characters and may be ranked as step forward for comic book movies with the chance, that in future we will get more adult-style adaptations with both satisfying dramatic and action features. “Logan” is barely can be named as a revolution in genre, but it’s a great example of a thoughtful storytelling combined with terrifying action-sequences - script issues can be easily forgiven, given the fact, that the major part is really great and now we can peacefully let go the classical character. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
FromKangaJul 1, 2017
Logan is great, it's the most mature and competent movie from the X-men universe, as someone who doesn't like the other x-men films, this was a huge improvement.

The story was great, great drama, interesting ideas and concepts...even if I
Logan is great, it's the most mature and competent movie from the X-men universe, as someone who doesn't like the other x-men films, this was a huge improvement.

The story was great, great drama, interesting ideas and concepts...even if I didn't like the last 30 minutes, the ending was great, it was emotional and I got a teary-eye but the last third of this movie took a lot of the charm of the story for me.
But apart from that, the story was solid enough to keep me invested.

The characters were great, I never liked Wolverine but he's fantastic in this film, I really felt bad for him and he has great developpement. Xavier was my favorite character, he had his comedic moments but you feel so sorry for him and once you understand what happend to him and what he did, it honestly made me care for his character and the other characters were really good too... exept for the villain, it seems to be that it's very hard to make a good and memorable villain in super-hero films because I've never seen a good one (exept for dark knight), he was the weakest character and the weakest element in the film, it reminded me why I disliked the other X-men films so much, he's just another boring scientist...

The action scenes are really well made, this is the most violent x-men film I've seen and the brutal scenes are really satisfying to watch (sometimes hard to watch).

So even if it's not perfect, I do believe that Logan was a success, it has a great story, a great narrative and a fantastic emotional payoff, if you don't like super-hero films or X-men films, I would still recommend it.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
simonjanosMay 19, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Very few to get ten (9-10/10)!
Spoiler: clear the children thread (if they -the scientist, etc. - do not deal with them so much they will be mental disorderd, eg. can't drive, etc.) and a few more things... Very good movie.
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
neothinkerNov 27, 2017
Hugh Jackman's last hurrah as Wolverine is good enough, but it's nothing special. I wanted greatness, but what I got was a solid x-men film. I'm happy enough with that. You don't get many of those anymore.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
avenger141Mar 3, 2017
For me it has been the most enjoyable X-men/Wolverine film so far. I appreciate that the creators did not hesitate to depict brutality and kill characters. So the story is well-written, entertaining and sometimes even dramatic.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
8
Amari_SaliMar 3, 2017
While the villains were as dull and expendable as any Marvel film, this one had more emotional depth and development than probably any you could name. Well, outside of Spiderman. Hopefully signaling that there might be a change to the MarvelWhile the villains were as dull and expendable as any Marvel film, this one had more emotional depth and development than probably any you could name. Well, outside of Spiderman. Hopefully signaling that there might be a change to the Marvel formula. If not, at the very least, how FOX will handle the X-Men franchise going forward. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
Ashwin36905Jun 4, 2017
Call it what you want (a western or a comic book movie), this first and foremost is a brilliant character study. For die hard fans and casual movie-goers alike, this is the Wolverine movie every one has been waiting for. Hugh Jackman andCall it what you want (a western or a comic book movie), this first and foremost is a brilliant character study. For die hard fans and casual movie-goers alike, this is the Wolverine movie every one has been waiting for. Hugh Jackman and Patrick Stewart are outstanding and Dafne Keen is a star in the making. It's one of the best in it's genre and it's up there with 'The Dark Knight' and 'Spider-Man 2' for me. 8/10 Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
iioniicMar 3, 2017
its am impact film that hits you hard from the beginning its a thrilling character driven study that gives an analysis on the fall of greatness its a fantastic film that will leave a legacy for the character
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
xina08Mar 5, 2017
Loved this movie more than I anticipated. Great performances by all the cast, especially that little girl - she almost steals the movie. I say almost because Hugh Jackman is amazing here, Oscar worthy, imo. Very violent, but that's to beLoved this movie more than I anticipated. Great performances by all the cast, especially that little girl - she almost steals the movie. I say almost because Hugh Jackman is amazing here, Oscar worthy, imo. Very violent, but that's to be expected.GO SEE THIS MOVIE and see for yourself. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
reviewbuddyMar 12, 2017
As one of the first big R-rated movies I've gone out and seen with a friend, I've gotta say that it was awesome. The action scenes themselves could be the whole movie and I would be just as happy. The story was an incredibly interesting takeAs one of the first big R-rated movies I've gone out and seen with a friend, I've gotta say that it was awesome. The action scenes themselves could be the whole movie and I would be just as happy. The story was an incredibly interesting take on the X-Men universe, though I will say that one might be a tad disappointed that it doesn't live up to the Old Man Logan comics that the movie is based off of. As a fan of Old Man Logan, I feel this, but not to an extent that I'm truly taken aback by it. It's a very respectful Wolverine movie that I can connect with, and a wonderful sendoff for Hugh Jackman's performance as the character. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
8
SamuraiBarryMar 14, 2017
The movie was very enjoyable and had some very good scenes, the movie did fail for me in some aspects, some scenes feeling cliche or stupid during important points in the story. The characters all felt interesting and some scenes drew someThe movie was very enjoyable and had some very good scenes, the movie did fail for me in some aspects, some scenes feeling cliche or stupid during important points in the story. The characters all felt interesting and some scenes drew some strong emotions, overall a great movie and would recommend seeing it. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
8
Pablo97121Mar 15, 2017
Finally after good/bad xmen movies or spinoffs we got the Wolverine we begged for aswell as a proper farewell to Hugh. Dafne Keen's acting is superbern for a character with barely any dialogue.
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
8
cohenmax93Mar 16, 2017
Finally! A good Wolverine movie! With great intense action and a few heart-wrenching scenes it's a must see for both fan boys and regular movie goers.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
Stringer360Mar 17, 2017
Well here is a film I loved, for so many reasons. The acting was spot on from Jackman, Stewart, Merchant, Holbrook and Keen. Each portraying there characters with true emotions and grit. It's no secret that the film had a huge legacy to keepWell here is a film I loved, for so many reasons. The acting was spot on from Jackman, Stewart, Merchant, Holbrook and Keen. Each portraying there characters with true emotions and grit. It's no secret that the film had a huge legacy to keep on it's shoulders, mainly due to the other brilliant Xmen and origin stories that have been produced in the series by Marvel. Personally I feel the film did well to carry the legacy of its franchise, while still showing us the complex relationships between the characters, as well as the more real life relationships between us and people who are different. I hope that it highlight that story to other people who see the film. Moving back to the acting, I have to give a special mention to keen, as for me she stole the show, with her passionate yet fierce portrayal, it's clear in the film that she has been damaged, and she shows this incredibly well for such a young actress. I personally think she has places to go yet.
Moving to the set and scenery it was produced well, the use of CGI wasn't so blatantly obvious in the background scenery as in other films. Generally its holds up as a great action/science-fiction film, I personally recommend going to see it as quickly as you can.
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
ferjo826Apr 18, 2017
excelente pelicula , me gustaron muchos los guiños y la lejanía que de algún modo se ve de las otras películas de x-men . Hugh hace un papel espectacular y despide su personaje a lo grande
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
mrdr4gonJan 1, 2018
An atmospheric Superhero Western with a strong set of central performances (including a very surprising performance from child actor Dafne Keene). The film is gory and gritty, but never laboriously so and the script keep things moving at aAn atmospheric Superhero Western with a strong set of central performances (including a very surprising performance from child actor Dafne Keene). The film is gory and gritty, but never laboriously so and the script keep things moving at a very healthy pace. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
vinethewalkerJul 4, 2017
A new face for superhero movies stereotype can been seen by the brilliant work done here. In some moments the proposite loses herself just for more action scenes and fulfilled explosions however the intriguing drama catches your personaA new face for superhero movies stereotype can been seen by the brilliant work done here. In some moments the proposite loses herself just for more action scenes and fulfilled explosions however the intriguing drama catches your persona paternal feelings. Sometimes. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DomgwyDec 20, 2017
After 17 years and 10 appearances Hugh Jackman and director James Mangold bring us the Wolverine movie we always wanted.

Set in a run-down post-mutant future, Logan pitches itself as a character study of two former superheroes at the end of
After 17 years and 10 appearances Hugh Jackman and director James Mangold bring us the Wolverine movie we always wanted.

Set in a run-down post-mutant future, Logan pitches itself as a character study of two former superheroes at the end of their rope.

The legendary Wolverine is now a Las Vegas limo driver (a suitably sleazy profession for the film’s tone) scratching a living and doing his best to protect an ailing friend.

Although the film takes some inspiration from the Frank Millar graphic novel Old Man Logan, it’s key point of difference is also it’s greatest strength i.e. the inclusion of Patrick Stewart’s Charles Xavier.

Suffering from a degenerative brain disorder and struggling to retain his former self, this is a Professor X we have never seen before. At first this felt like a jarring shift for the character, especially given Charles’ new found foul mouth. As the story progresses though, the intricacies of Stewart's performance become clear and the true heartbreak of Xavier’s fate is felt. He has come a long way from the eloquent, sophisticated head-master of his School for the gifted, this is man who has lost himself.

What makes this character arc great though, is that here, in this comic book movie, Xavier hasn’t been turned to the dark side by some demi-god or manipulated by some contrived plot (see Magneto in Apocalypse) instead he is an older man who is battling his own age and mortality. It’s a great example of the X-Men films doing what they do best — humanising these larger than life comic book characters and making them relatable.

Despite this films title, for me the heart of Logan is Xavier and his relationship with those around him. He serves as father figure and continence to Logan throughout and anchors Hugh Jackman’s ageing hero.

Re-watching the previous X-Men/ Wolverine films also brings a greater sense of depth to this central relationship. In Jackman and Mangold’s previous effort 2013’s The Wolverine, Logan is described as a Ronin — a samurai without a master. When viewing Logan’s journey as a whole (and this movie serves as a definitive end for this interpretation of the character) it becomes clear that Xavier is and always has been Logan’s ‘master’. Before he met Charles, Logan was lost (‘when I found you, you we’re making a living as a cage fighter') when Charles was no longer around (if we have to treat The Last Stand as something that happened) Logan became a reclusive outsider we saw at the beginning of The Wolverine.

It is only when Charles is by his side that Logan has any sense of purpose and drive.

As the plot of Logan kicks in to gear and the second act gets going the protagonists are introduced to a new young mutant — Laura (Dafne Keen).

From there the film becomes a road movie of sorts as Laura is perused by a sinister organisation, hunted by Narcos alumni Boyd Holbrook as Pierce.

Although Laura is the driving force of the film’s story, from a character point of view she serves a much greater purpose, although this doesn’t become clear until the third act which, of course I won’t spoil.

As Logan and Charles are forced out of retirement we are treated to some spectacularly brutal action beats, the film fully embracing its ‘adult only' rating.

What impressed me most about the film, but can also be seen as a flaw, is the remarkable restraint it showed in terms of being a blockbuster comic book movie.

In press junkets and promotional material for tent-pole releases, actors and directors often wax lyrical about how ‘it’s all about character’ when more often then not, the ‘talky bits’ are just there to get us to the next action set piece.

In Logan however, James Mangold has really committed to the idea of a character driven comic book movie. Previous attempts often fall at the last hurdle, Batman Begins is a fantastic character piece until someone turns up with a mustache, a ‘microwave emitter’ and a plan to poison the city’s water supply in the third act.

Logan is not afraid to pump the brakes and really dig in to why everyone is doing what they’re doing, why they’re thinking what they’re thinking etc.

While this is a welcome change it also means the pacing of the movie is a little all over the place. When the action scenes kick in they are relentless, but they are few and far between which may disappoint fans hoping for a straight up action film.

When all’s said and done Logan is a rare beast — a comic book movie that transcends the genre and is just a great movie full stop. Brilliantly directed, perfectly acted and subtly written, Hugh Jackman’s X-Men swan song is no doubt an early entry into 2017’s top ten lists.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
benskylerhillApr 9, 2018
With the X-Men franchise struggling to stay afloat in the waters of cinema, it has been in dire need of an influx of strength, so as to catch a breath of fresh air. I am happy to report that Logan provides that strength.

The plot may not be
With the X-Men franchise struggling to stay afloat in the waters of cinema, it has been in dire need of an influx of strength, so as to catch a breath of fresh air. I am happy to report that Logan provides that strength.

The plot may not be terribly original, but it moves quickly enough--with the exception of the second act--to remain engaging and provides sufficient tragic twists to make it emotionally investing. Hugh Jackman arguably gives his best performance as Logan as he allows the darkest sides of the character to roll forth in his facial expressions and spot-on line delivery. Logan is not for the faint of heart. Its brutal violence and dark themes are sure to make stomachs church and hearts ache. But this is the side of Wolverine that we have always wanted to see and it serves as a more than satisfying farewell to Marvel's beloved--if flawed--hero.

Story: 6.5
Acting: 8
Script: 10
Visuals/Sound: 8.5
Entertainment Value: 9

MY RATING: 8.4/10
Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
MoviezNPApr 4, 2019
Wolverine is perhaps the most beloved character from X-Men film series, but his solo outings have been the most forgettable and/or full of s**t. Thankfully, we have Logan to break that trend. Still have issues with it, but I would acknowledgeWolverine is perhaps the most beloved character from X-Men film series, but his solo outings have been the most forgettable and/or full of s**t. Thankfully, we have Logan to break that trend. Still have issues with it, but I would acknowledge that it was one of the best films in X-Men series. .
.
Good : Hugh Jackman gives the most intense and gritty performance as Wolverine in his final film role as the adamantium clawed mutant. I have always loved him as Wolverine, but he has never been so good. Patrick Stewart does the same in his final role as Charles Xavier, and in his part, there's nothing to complain either. Dafne Keen as Laura - owns the film. Loved the kid as baby/lady Wolverine (X-23). The setting feels really different in this movie, compared to those of other X-Men films. It is obvious that they gave a Revisionist Western tone to the movie, which hasn't been done in the genre so far. It acknowledged the fact that it was inspired by Unforgiven, The Wrestler and Shane, which if had not been done, would've made it look like a ripoff. Not a total waste of a film, it has good parts, but still a copied idea without acknowledgement seems bad. Then, there is action. The actions are the best ones in the entire X-Men film series. The choreography is great to say the least. It looks badass, savage and intense. But there's one thing that this film does with action which most action films don't with these days. And that is, have the actions mean something. Every action scene has a purpose. It either sets up a characterization, or aggressively portrays what a character is feeling. Acting, action and the overall story won't disappoint. Also, all the characters are interesting. .
.
Mixed : There are some story issues. It feels as if there is a huge story that needs to be told between the altered timeline of DoFP and Logan. We get tiny little expositions for that matter and sound like much more interesting ideas for a better X-Men Apocalypse movie. This made the largely different characterizations feel totally out of place, for both Xavier and Logan. It works for the movie, I like it, but I don't buy it. It felt a lot out of the place and quite confusing with why they were so different. With all the movies in the series, I don't think they have given all the character development necessary for those changes. .
.
Bad : Mostly, it's the villain and some logic issues. There's a video narration/exposition which looked professionally edited with great voiceover, but was by a nurse who didn't even have 12 hours to do it, keeping aside the resources. Xander Rice doesn't feel so good of a villain. Nothing to blame Richard Grant, but just not a compelling villain. X-24 does have a frightening presence, I acknowledge that. But all his likeability depends upon the character arc of Wolverine over the years. Just take out the "humane" part of the character of Wolverine, and replace it with Terminator's menace. You'll get X-24. .
.
Conclusion : It's a good goodbye to Hugh Jackman as Wolverine. You can get the unpleasant satisfaction of seeing him die, and it does hit emotional notes a number of times and feel really saddening. But there are story and characterization issues which cannot be overlooked and to be honest, do not make a good sense. .
.
Rating. .
.
Score : 8.2/10
Grade : A-
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
HurQlezJul 25, 2019
The best farewell movie for Jackman's Wolverine as well as Stewart's Professor X. This is the kind of superhero movie that rises above even the other X-men movies.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
Onlyclassicvg1Feb 19, 2021
Jackman's swan song as the Wolverine is an uncommonly atmospheric superhero film with nuanced performances by its two leads, gleefully gritty & well earned R-rated action and a story by director James Mangold that is moving and de
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
MrPajamasJul 22, 2021
So here we have one last chance to see Wolverine in all his glory. In terms of setting, action and overall plot. A complete satisfaction and a great conclusion. Marvel has scored again and I don't have much to add. For me, a great film that ISo here we have one last chance to see Wolverine in all his glory. In terms of setting, action and overall plot. A complete satisfaction and a great conclusion. Marvel has scored again and I don't have much to add. For me, a great film that I recommend, especially to fans of the X-Men franchise. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
Yi_SpottNov 2, 2020
Logan came to break the norms of superhero movies. The movie shows us that this genre doesn´t need to be all the same and more than this, Logan helps us realize that we´re tired of the same old plain superhero movies.
As a part of a franchise
Logan came to break the norms of superhero movies. The movie shows us that this genre doesn´t need to be all the same and more than this, Logan helps us realize that we´re tired of the same old plain superhero movies.
As a part of a franchise Logan is the perfect closure to its predecessors, but what makes it a fantastic movie is that it can stand on its own.
Logan accomplishes the feeling of nostalgia through all the movie, even at the beginning, you feel that time has passed and you know this is the end. Both fans and casual viewers exit the theater with tears in their eyes.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Sarian263Mar 15, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A brilliant ending to Hugh Jackman's LEGENDARY run as Logan/Wolverine. This movie is brutal and I love it. It does not hold back on showing how vicious this character is meant to be. Sir Patrick Stewart also does a fantastic job and it is a very bitter sweet/sad ending but makes you appreciate what has come before it even more. You are so invested in this character that just as Hugh Jackman says goodbye to Wolverine, We as the audience also say goodbye to him. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
AgentLviJul 21, 2023
Great movie. The story is decent. The scoring is great, visual is really amazing, the voice & sound is also amazing
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
AmadouIraklidisNov 10, 2022
One of few, is any, superhero movies that have as deep, and as touching, of a tone as Logan did. In a movie about superheros, men with claws, girls with telekenesis, this might be the closest a superhero has seemed to being human in film history.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Fixer84Mar 16, 2023
As with Marvel's Spider-Man 2 and DC's The Dark Knight, Logan is the spearhead of Fox productions, a gem, a small masterpiece that offers a worthy conclusion to a now historic character like Wolverine, who has now reached that legacy thatAs with Marvel's Spider-Man 2 and DC's The Dark Knight, Logan is the spearhead of Fox productions, a gem, a small masterpiece that offers a worthy conclusion to a now historic character like Wolverine, who has now reached that legacy that made it iconic in the eyes of the small and large public. All set in a future of an alternate universe and perhaps this is the strength of him. This is where men cry. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
BikerjamesMar 20, 2017
Critics are stating this is not the usual superhero movie which is why I went to see it. I know now they are referring to the human interest part of the film, as the rest of the movie is the usual villain vs. good guy predictability. It wasCritics are stating this is not the usual superhero movie which is why I went to see it. I know now they are referring to the human interest part of the film, as the rest of the movie is the usual villain vs. good guy predictability. It was way more gory than it needed to be with a lot of cursing, so I would not recommend this film for a young audience. Hugh Jackman is terrific in the film, as is the young girl (Dafne Keen). Not a film I would ever want to see again, as it was too gory and predictable for my taste. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ThundermaxMay 23, 2017
Best wolverine movie. Predictable from the beginning to the end but great acting and direction. Actress for X-23 was a bad casting choice. Little miss sunshine meets Mad Max.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
TyranianApr 14, 2019
Best Wolverine film, Jackman is great and there are some great scenes, death is a bit forced though.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Tss5078Mar 7, 2017
Many people have asked why the name Wolverine isn't in the title of the latest X-Men movie. The reason is that this film is not for children. Logan is violent, vulgar, and disturbing, this film will give your kids nightmares. Logan isMany people have asked why the name Wolverine isn't in the title of the latest X-Men movie. The reason is that this film is not for children. Logan is violent, vulgar, and disturbing, this film will give your kids nightmares. Logan is supposedly the last time Hugh Jackman will play Wolverine, it might also very well end the current X-Men film franchise, that has produced nine feature films and brought in billions of dollars. That being said, I expected an epic conclusion, the likes of which Marvel had never done before, and what I got was somewhat of a disappointment. It takes place in the future and yes, Logan is older, but he's still the Wolverine, so I was expecting a fair bit of fighting and chases, but it seems that was pretty much all this film has to offer. A deteriorating Charles Xavier (Patrick Stewart) claims that even though a new mutant hasn't been born in decades, he is speaking to one that needs help, and as it turns out he was right. Logan and Prof. X go to rescue the child and bring her to safety, while the government tries to stop that from happening. I get that this is the future and there isn't time to fill us in on everything, but there are some major plot holes with the story that are never explained. This may be a Wolverine movie, but it is also the conclusion of the X-Men, so what happened to everyone and everything else? The stories narrow focus is on these three and getting to their destination, with chase after chase and fight after fight. The film certainly has it's moments and more than it's fair share of F bombs, but where was the whole conclusion element to it? The epic end to one of the biggest franchises in the history of film just isn't there. The big draw seems to be that they finally went for the R rating and showed Logan's true personality and yes, they made the film much more realistic than any other X-Men film, but I didn't have that satisfied feeling when it was all said and done. As for Hugh Jackman, this was easily his best performance as Wolverine. You see his real personality and all that comes with it, and if this wasn't the type of film that it was, released when it was, I truly believe people would be talking about an Academy Award, he was really that good. The harsh reality is that X-Men as we know it, with the cast that we know is probably over, but the way they ended it leaves us with too many unanswered questions and a feeling of unfulfilled promise. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
7
LeZeeJul 13, 2017
A farewell and a welcome!

A perfect farewell to the only mutant who had solo films in 'X-Men' franchise. I never understood 'X-Men', I thought it was the worst superhero film series I've ever seen. But 'Wolverine' was the only reason I
A farewell and a welcome!

A perfect farewell to the only mutant who had solo films in 'X-Men' franchise. I never understood 'X-Men', I thought it was the worst superhero film series I've ever seen. But 'Wolverine' was the only reason I watched them all and particular, Hugh Jackman. There won't be Logan now onwards, though a set of new generation welcomed in this film, while saying goodbye to the old guys. So now what happens in the future of this franchise is a very suspense. Yet Logan had been the precious gem in the crown of 'X-Men', that mean it won't be the same anymore.

After many years passed in the future, the last survivours of mutants hiding their identity and living among the humans. Logan and two others were attacked by the armed men when he decided to help a child mutant. Running away from them and looking for a place where they can be safe prioritised in the narration. More dramatised film in the franchise, but there are enough actions those who desire for that.

It's an emotional time for the hardcore fans of Logan/Hugh Jachman. One final great performance by him and the little kid was also good. A well shot film, with minimum graphics and more realistic stunt sequences. Well, not all were real, too strong fights, too bloody, despite having a child actor in it. Yeah, it is a good film, I liked it, but not a masterpiece as you might have heard of. But anyway, it is a must see for the 'Wolverine' fans.

7/10
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
Qgal5kapApr 16, 2017
I am a little disappointed, but all in all it was a decent viewing experience. It's a good thing the kid was "mute" during most of the movie, since a poor child actor can be a kiss of death for your movie. I liked the dialogue at times, theI am a little disappointed, but all in all it was a decent viewing experience. It's a good thing the kid was "mute" during most of the movie, since a poor child actor can be a kiss of death for your movie. I liked the dialogue at times, the cursing was refreshing, and the gore was great. I can't wait to re-watch it at home, to explore all the small details I might have missed at the cinema. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
ViolettJul 10, 2017
Very good movie, but, seriously, I cannot rate this high. I just cant - I cant see Wolverine being brought to THIS - weak and depressed. I remember those X-man movies of young and powerful Hugh Jackman - how I liked it. And now what we canVery good movie, but, seriously, I cannot rate this high. I just cant - I cant see Wolverine being brought to THIS - weak and depressed. I remember those X-man movies of young and powerful Hugh Jackman - how I liked it. And now what we can see here - old and weak ex-superhero. Man, despite the movie itself is great I really dislike when you force us to see our lovely heroes to die. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Brent_MarchantMar 4, 2017
A moderately entertaining action-adventure offering that's a stand-alone story from the "X-men" franchise. While a bit more gratuitous than I typically care for, and with an overlong middle section that could have benefited from someA moderately entertaining action-adventure offering that's a stand-alone story from the "X-men" franchise. While a bit more gratuitous than I typically care for, and with an overlong middle section that could have benefited from some considerable chopping, the film nevertheless delivers a compelling story with good action sequences, ample humor and familiar characters seen in an unfamiliar light. Fans of the series will undoubtedly enjoy this the most, but even casual movie goers are likely to find a fair amount of entertainment value here. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
7
marc5477Apr 12, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Good movie if a little over the top. They pull the heart string card a few too many times though I have to admit that I will be sad if Patrick Stewart never returns as Professor X... He was the absolute most perfect actor for the role and it will be near impossible to get a replacement. Certainly the new guy playing the younger professor was lame by comparison. The other deaths were not as big of deal though I am a fan of Jackmans Wolverine. The problem is, I just dont find Wolverine interesting. Actually I think he is downright boring and idiotic. The only thing going for him is his drive to do right but in all other aspects he was always a doorknob, even in the comics. So him dying does not matter too much. The only other complaint I had is why they couldnt get a real Spanish speaker for the girl? She had the worst Spanish accent I have seen in many years. So bad, that even I was able to spot it and Spanish is my 3rd language. Cant be that hard to find a Mexican actress in California...

Other than minor complaints, the movie was very enjoyable. Seeing these characters as old men was entertaining and watching Wolverine go up against his younger self was funny as well. I do enjoy watching bad guys get eviscerated and I like happy endings and this one had plenty of both. The villains were ok, certainly not as good as Magneto in the earlier films but adequate enough to glue the story together and keep me interested. Definitely see it if you have not.
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
eeykMar 4, 2017
This episode was just no as good as the other movies. The whole movie logan was drunk or wounded it was really annoying to watch something. The ending was not what i expected.
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
7
NigmeMar 16, 2017
Acting: 7,5
Screenplay: 6,5
Ending: 7

I do not like comics and movies about them. But the Wolverine, thanks to the strong acting of Hugh Jackman & Patrick Stewart, sinks into the soul.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
sjwilkinMay 26, 2017
Admittedly I have only ever seen X-Men 1 and Wolverine out of the countless entries - but this caught my eye as something different. A lot darker, swearier and quite violent but it actually works. It felt like an X-Men movie for adults, and IAdmittedly I have only ever seen X-Men 1 and Wolverine out of the countless entries - but this caught my eye as something different. A lot darker, swearier and quite violent but it actually works. It felt like an X-Men movie for adults, and I think this is pretty much how you sum it up. Logan's story has been a long one I think he finally deserves his rest. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Seymour_MoviesMar 5, 2017
Exactly what I have been looking for in a comic book movie for years! I love how gritty they took this film and hope that they continue this direction with other comic book movies. That being said, it is a comic book movie, so don't expectExactly what I have been looking for in a comic book movie for years! I love how gritty they took this film and hope that they continue this direction with other comic book movies. That being said, it is a comic book movie, so don't expect the most original piece of film you have seen this year. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
KaptenVideoMar 21, 2017
In the near future, a weary Logan (Hugh Jackman) cares for an ailing Professor X (Patrick Stewart) in a hide-out on the Mexican border. But his attempts to hide from the world and legacy are up-ended when a young mutant (Dafne Keen) arrives,In the near future, a weary Logan (Hugh Jackman) cares for an ailing Professor X (Patrick Stewart) in a hide-out on the Mexican border. But his attempts to hide from the world and legacy are up-ended when a young mutant (Dafne Keen) arrives, being pursued by dark forces.

Hell yeah! Finally a mainstream superhero movie for those who don't really care about superheroes, or have grown tired of all the cliches of the genre.

It's got R-rated action, it's got characters with some depth and also memorable acting, it's got heart. It still is not deep enough to be compared to the quality superhero TV series, of which there are many. And it loses some of its dramatic heft near the end due to lack of variety (not enough different stuff happening, the same type of events are always recurring). But all in all, the movie's good, and worth the hype it's gained.

This is the last time we got to see Hugh Jackman as Wolverine... unless he changes his mind, of course.

Also stars Boyd Holbrook, Richard E. Grant, Stephen Merchant, Eriq La Salle and Elizabeth Rodriguez.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ZerpnosMar 16, 2017
Hugh Jackman Wolverine karakterine mükemmel bir şekilde veda etmiş. Aynı şekilde Profesörde öyleydi ikisinin oyunculuğu karakterlere yakışan, çok iyi performanslardı. Dafne Keen muhteşemdi gerçekten büyüledi, bu yaşta böyle bir performansHugh Jackman Wolverine karakterine mükemmel bir şekilde veda etmiş. Aynı şekilde Profesörde öyleydi ikisinin oyunculuğu karakterlere yakışan, çok iyi performanslardı. Dafne Keen muhteşemdi gerçekten büyüledi, bu yaşta böyle bir performans inanılmaz. Oyunculuklar olarak çok iyi bir filmdi, duygusallığı çok iyi veren bir film olmuş. Fakat filmde eksik yerler var gibiydi, izlerken işte başlıyoruz dedim ve yine olmadı. O konuda biraz bana kendini sevdiremedi, tamamen duygusallığa ve karakter vedalarına odaklanmışlar. İzlerken sıkılmadım fakat büyük bir beklentiyle gittiğim için istediğimi de pek alamadım. Yine de öyle kötü veya ortalama bir film değil. İyi bir filmdi. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
hristo-hrMar 13, 2017
It is a good try to make a comic book movie relevant to non-comic book fans. I enjoyed the performance by Hugh Jackman; he looks particular bad ass as an old, muscular man.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
omg10of10Mar 18, 2017
Intense, anguish, brutal neowestern-type story with devastating atmosphere. Fully engaging flawlessly performed.

BUT There are too much cliches and all this kind of hollywood stupidities to call it a masterpiece. Take a stormstrooper's
Intense, anguish, brutal neowestern-type story with devastating atmosphere. Fully engaging flawlessly performed.

BUT
There are too much cliches and all this kind of hollywood stupidities to call it a masterpiece. Take a stormstrooper's syndrome of gunmen, take a "train saving from chase" cliche, take this theatrical death speech cliche, take the weird video of supersecret laboratory where you can easily shoot everything with your smartphone. Too much of such displeasing features. That's why not perfect but still good.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
pocky9091Mar 23, 2017
The biggest take away I got from this movie is that I could have waited for it to come out on DVD. It wasn't a movie I needed to see in a theater. There weren't any big special effects that warranted the huge screen. I enjoyed the film inThe biggest take away I got from this movie is that I could have waited for it to come out on DVD. It wasn't a movie I needed to see in a theater. There weren't any big special effects that warranted the huge screen. I enjoyed the film in the sense that I always love watching Hugh Jackman as Wolverine and I felt this was a must see even though I knew how it would ultimately end. It's a "smaller" film with a more dramatic bent than other X-men films. Action scenes were violent but rather unoriginal. And ultimately, it would not be a movie that I would re-watch again and again. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SquaredRenApr 3, 2017
The movie antagonist is not good enough, either secondary characters. Logan and Prof. X had the nostalgia factor which is good ,& X23 is a big surprise, awesome acting by her. Dramatic scenes are not that deep, I did not feel moved by some ofThe movie antagonist is not good enough, either secondary characters. Logan and Prof. X had the nostalgia factor which is good ,& X23 is a big surprise, awesome acting by her. Dramatic scenes are not that deep, I did not feel moved by some of them (except the finale). Overall this movie is a good way to end Logan's long journey. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Go2Apr 1, 2017
I believe that movies are important. Entertainment, sure. Inspirations? Of course. Lessons learned? Absolutely. Logan moves along well enough. Superhero movies ARE. I spent fifteen buck on popcorn alone watching this in a theatre, andI believe that movies are important. Entertainment, sure. Inspirations? Of course. Lessons learned? Absolutely. Logan moves along well enough. Superhero movies ARE. I spent fifteen buck on popcorn alone watching this in a theatre, and didn't want my money back. However, I recommend only that the viewer rent this movie at redbox for $1.60. Then I can be jealous of you, for the value. The director and the film editor here deserves credit for the pacing and sustained level of tension and thrills. The new face of the young female lead adds a freshness long overdue in this genre. Feel safe and gather your family and friends for a movie night where fun on the couch is the point. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
WalterKovacsDec 26, 2017
A mixture of a comic-book film and a western. The action is raw and the characters are grounded. I gave this film extra points for going above my expectations. A must see for those who are a fan of the genre.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Jaredc324May 17, 2019
Logan is a masterpiece from the mid-way point on. The moments and sequences between him and Laura entice some of the most powerful of all the X-Men films. But is hardened by an overly grueling and painfully unnecessary first few acts. It'sLogan is a masterpiece from the mid-way point on. The moments and sequences between him and Laura entice some of the most powerful of all the X-Men films. But is hardened by an overly grueling and painfully unnecessary first few acts. It's gritty and intense, but overshoots in trying to be a half-apocalyptic type story, when the good stuff is in the survival journey with Logan and Laura. And where it ends up results in a beautifully engrossing and personal conclusion to a character and series that touched our hearts so dearly. Farewell old friend. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Jose_VitorFeb 13, 2018
a movie that runs away in a good way from the superhero movies style. Can emotion and reflect, combining action and explanation scenes, not requiring prologues or sequences
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
wayrezMay 15, 2020
For drama it was possible to weave into the plot of Daken, son of Logan, to go through comics, add more anger, aggression and make a really high quality film. Perhaps even with a claim to an Oscar and other awards. Or at least, elementary,For drama it was possible to weave into the plot of Daken, son of Logan, to go through comics, add more anger, aggression and make a really high quality film. Perhaps even with a claim to an Oscar and other awards. Or at least, elementary, to screen the comic book "Old Man Logan". But Hugh Jackman is too simple-minded by himself. Probably wouldn't have done him any good. It turned out that it turned out - the film is not bad, but not a masterpiece and no "epic". The Wolverine fans, performed by Hugh Jackman, will be satisfied. Because, in fact, the movie was made for people like that... Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
WiscoJoeMar 7, 2017
'Logan' is a well-calibrated folktale. The story is familiar and monotonous, but it's told with gravitas and specificity. Hardcore X-fans will surely be thrilled, as will anyone seeking a leaner and meaner approach to the genre, but be warned'Logan' is a well-calibrated folktale. The story is familiar and monotonous, but it's told with gravitas and specificity. Hardcore X-fans will surely be thrilled, as will anyone seeking a leaner and meaner approach to the genre, but be warned that the movie is incredibly predictable and has some weird pacing issues, which likely result from budget shortcuts and the myopia of a director more concerned with paying homage to his favorite Westerns and Noirs than in creating a new experience. I respected the hell out of how this movie was crafted (the acting! the cinematography! the wonderful little details!), but often felt like I was just going through the motions waiting for the next inevitable, repetitive plot point. Every time the movie takes a pit stop to ponder some interesting tangent, the trip is immediately jerked back on course, barreling towards it's final, thoroughly mapped-out destination. Watching this movie is like taking a road trip through Nebraska. The scenery is initially breathtaking and it seems like anything could be just beyond the horizon, but eventually as you make your way from Point A to Point B it all just kind of goes by in a dusty, hazy blur. Expand
7 of 14 users found this helpful77
All this user's reviews
6
VonSeuxMay 26, 2017
Well, its still an xmen movie, not genre bending as I was promised and I don't think will please people who don't like superhero movies. Its ok, although a bit low value when it comes to scenarios and earpieces... anyway, worth to watch butWell, its still an xmen movie, not genre bending as I was promised and I don't think will please people who don't like superhero movies. Its ok, although a bit low value when it comes to scenarios and earpieces... anyway, worth to watch but not mind blowing Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
6
3ebfan511Mar 19, 2018
This is what happens when you mix a comic-book film, with an art-house film. You get comic-book movie goers proclaiming it the "greatest superhero movie ever"..but yet it is just an OK film, nothing special in any way, it just varies fromThis is what happens when you mix a comic-book film, with an art-house film. You get comic-book movie goers proclaiming it the "greatest superhero movie ever"..but yet it is just an OK film, nothing special in any way, it just varies from the silly level of most superhero films. As a film itself, it was just OK. A little slow, still a silly superhero movie with the action parts, and nothing fantastic, but nothing terrible either. It was just..OK. I did like how it was a grittier version of Logan, which reminded me of some of the comics I read as kid, but..the story was still cheesy at times and too-predictable. Just because a film has art-house qualities..and superhero fans do not watch such films..does not make this film some kind of "masterpiece". It was just OK. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
raporgiMar 5, 2017
Its a really good looking movie on Imax. I have no problems with the violence but in some scenes its just overly long and uncreative. This film is just too self-serious to the point of ridiculousness. "Logan" seems too self-conscious inIts a really good looking movie on Imax. I have no problems with the violence but in some scenes its just overly long and uncreative. This film is just too self-serious to the point of ridiculousness. "Logan" seems too self-conscious in trying to distance itself from the MCU. I found myself driftng off to Never-Never Land during the movie's sadsack pls-cry-moments. I wont be watching this movie again becoz once is enough. Expand
9 of 21 users found this helpful912
All this user's reviews
6
SkleogApr 13, 2017
I like the character of Wolverine in the comics, and what is the frustrations to see it oppressing realization in cinematography. From the picture to the picture, the potential of the Wolverine character remains unrealized, the storiesI like the character of Wolverine in the comics, and what is the frustrations to see it oppressing realization in cinematography. From the picture to the picture, the potential of the Wolverine character remains unrealized, the stories always trivial and the new film has become no exception. The whole picture will have a maximum of 10 minutes of action scenes, all the rest is Logan's self-reflection. The picture is not saved by the excellent performance of Patrick Stewart and Dafne Keen, Hugh Jackman, on other side, is also good, but to watch at his sad face in every Wolverine movie is painful. Sadly, but film is boring and protracted to infinity, all the fun is shown in the trailer. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
SoakerCityMar 12, 2017
An overrated movie, which eschews story in favour of hitting the correct political points. Every single bad guy is a white man who is terminated violently. There's a farming family in plaid, who are black instead of white. The main baddy is aAn overrated movie, which eschews story in favour of hitting the correct political points. Every single bad guy is a white man who is terminated violently. There's a farming family in plaid, who are black instead of white. The main baddy is a blue eyed man with a British accent. There's a rainbow coalition of children to save. And because they can't quite yet portray preteen LGBTQTx2 characters, they are named the "Transigen" kids who wear t-shirts with rainbows on them... the overall lesson is for Wolverine to teach a feral young woman (who of course is the world's most powerful fighter, weighing in at 85lbs) to be compassionate, but not a single white male is spared their life. Hamfisted political dreck at its worst, a boring story at best. I love Wolverine but this is just as overrated and stupid as The Dark Knight Rises, with slightly less plot holes and dumber politics. Far more interested in virtue signaling than telling a good story. Predictable through and through. Missed opportunities in both fight choreography and tone. The setting in nonsense. Doesn't fit in with the world set up in the other X films. No better than the first movie, and worse than the second. Jackman saves it from being a fail. More humorous than expected. Meh. Hollywood in continued decline. Lowest common denominator moralizing abounds. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
6
Meth-dudeMar 7, 2017
For a recent superhero movie, Logan is actually a pretty decent movie. It was kind of violent, the acting was good and the movie was, for the most part, entertaining.
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
6
43in2014Mar 3, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The short story: Went in with high expectations, ended up disappointed, as the film was a slow burn and has too many clichés.
>
What's it like?: It’s 2029 and Wolverine/Logan is aging, which shouldn’t be because he’s supposed to be immortal. Prof X is dying and losing control of his mind power. A young girl, Laura, who has the same abilities as Logan, comes into their lives. They try to escape to Canada because Laura is wanted by hired men of Transigen, a genetics research company. It is a very violent road movie.
>
Pros: The path the film takes, where two major X-Men characters could be killed off, is brave and noteworthy. The acting, in general, is also good.
>
Cons: >
1. While the film tries to portray Logan’s and Laura’s fights as realistically as possible, it comes off very violent and in some areas, unnecessarily so.
>
2. Cliché #1: When trying to capture a person who has blades in their hands and has an accelerated healing ability, do send in a bunch of regular soldiers without any special weapons. >
3. Cliché #2: While on the run from murderous chasers, do accept the kindness of a family to stay overnight at their home and do risk them getting killed.
>
4. Laura’s initial muteness, mid-film speeches in Spanish and speeches in another language in the final third of the film are inconsistent and they were not explained.
>
5. The supposed motivation behind Transigen use of excessive numbers of soldiers just to capture Laura is not well explained, particularly if you consider what is revealed in the final third of the film. Too much focus on just one person.
>
6. Richard E. Grant’s character, the supposed arch-villain, was insufficiently developed and was killed off too easily. He should have some kind of an ace-in-the-hole to avoid dying so easily.
>
7. The film is slow in many parts, thereby making it less of an action film. This could disappoint a lot of people. Estimated US Box office takings: $150m.
>
8. Cliché #3: When the situation turns grim, a couple of people would pluck up their courage and chip in with their special abilities to defeat their common enemy, whereas they were not keen to use their abilities before this. >
How would the different age groups rate it?
Children: (The film is not rated for them)
Teenagers: For those who can see this R-rated, it’s an Average. Young adults: Average
Medium age adults: Average
Old adults: Poor
My rating: 3/5 (no half scores). Save your money and watch it on TV.
Expand
7 of 22 users found this helpful715
All this user's reviews
6
yashdanApr 2, 2017
A drama-action movie very different from the other Xmen movies but kinda depressing throughout. Great performance by the actors.
Drama - 10
Action - 8
Child Violence - 10
Thriller - 6
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
bwin12May 28, 2017
The film has some good moments of action of action and Mortal Kombat fatality style violence. That being said this is the worst X-men film made. Imagine x-men being just about wolverine and professor xavier with a flat one tone storyline andThe film has some good moments of action of action and Mortal Kombat fatality style violence. That being said this is the worst X-men film made. Imagine x-men being just about wolverine and professor xavier with a flat one tone storyline and you have Logan. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
6
DaigoustMar 7, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Expectation: Word that defines itself in expecting much for something, great desire, a strong belief that something will happen or be the case in the future.
When I left the theater I did not take a thought from my head: " Missed Salt." Do not get me wrong, I'm a fan of Wolverine (HQs) and the movie has great moments, which I even imagined, with wit in some lines, funny ones and the courage to show the legendary characters in decadence. But on the other hand I can not stop thinking that some elements of the story could be much better. If I could talk to the creative or script team to be able to suggest everything I think and that could have improved the film (in humility). I'll segment:
1. The villains are weak and shallow and the clone did not interest me. First of all, to replace the doctor "I do not know who" by Dr. Sinister, the whole story could have revolved around a very evil scheme of Dr. Sinister, the virus or whatever it was that had decimated the mutants, etc. .
2. Instead of the clone, it could have been a robot equal to Wolverine, an equal cyborg in the comics. Or an alternative was also to have used Wolverine's son: Daken.
Daken is bloodthirsty, “blood in the eyes”, he could have killed all that family in the same way without remorse, but I do not think he would be easily controlled like the Clone.
3. The end was rough, the mutant powers of the children, so ... "childish" ... if they were what was left of the mutants, experiment with the blood of Jean Gray or Magneto, what I mean, more powers Cool and "Ice breath", etc ...
4. The son of Wolverine could be an experiment too and could have escaped before or have an appearance that warranted a future film with the X-23 and the latest mutants, or a fight between "family." I just know that, it would generate another huge Hype.
Otherwise the movie holds the tips ! Oh and it's kind of dead in the end, it did not move me and I just thought I'd end it.

Em Português:
Expectativa: Palavra que se define em esperar muito por algo, grande desejo, vontade de algo!
Ao sair do cinema não tirei um pensamento da cabeça: "Faltou Sal". Não me entenda mal, sou fã do Wolverine (Quadrinhos) e o filme tem ótimos momentos, momentos estes que eu não previ imaginar, com sagacidade em algumas falas, outras engraçadas e a coragem para mostrar os personagens lendários em decadência. Mas por outro lado não consigo parar de pensar de que alguns elementos da história poderiam ser bem melhores. Se eu conseguisse falar com a equipe criativa ou de roteiro para poder sugerir tudo que eu penso e que poderia ter melhorado o filme (na humildade). Vou segmentar:
1. Os vilões são fracos e rasos e o clone não me despertou interesse. Primeiro de tudo, substituir o doutor "sei lá quem" pelo Dr. Sinistro, toda a história podia ter girado em torno de um esquema bem maligno do Dr. Sinistro, o vírus ou seja lá oque foi ter dizimado os mutantes, etc...
2. Ao invés do clone, poderia ter sido um robô igual ao Wolverine, um ciborgue igual nas HQs. Ou uma alternativa também era ter usado o filho do Wolverine: Daken.
Daken é sanguinário, sangue nos "zóio", ele podia ter matado toda aquela família da mesma forma sem remorso, mas não acho que ele seria facilmente controlado como o Clone.
3. O fim ficou tosco, os poderes mutantes das crianças, tão... "infantis"... se eles foram oque sobrou dos mutantes, façam experiência com o sangue do Magneto, da Jean Gray, oque eu quero dizer, poderes mais legais e não bafo de gelo, etc...
4. O filho do Wolverine poderia ser mais uma experiência e poderia ter escapado antes ou ter uma aparição que justifica-se uma futuro filme com a X-23 e os últimos mutantes, ou uma luta entre "família". Só sei disso, geraria um outro Hype enorme.
De resto o filme segura a onda! Ah e é meio morto no final, não me comoveu e só pensei em acabar logo.
Expand
4 of 10 users found this helpful46
All this user's reviews
6
DefinitelyMaybMar 4, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Logan is a good movie in some parts (mainly in the beginning). Although this review will probably trigger some of the diehard fans here, much of the film actually has a lot of issues which people seem to be overlooking. If you enjoy the original Xmen films and won't get mad over valid criticisms presented here, feel free to read on. The film does well in many parts: action - amazing and visceral, leaves you speechless. I thought the villain played by Boyd Hollbrook was played very well. Acting in this movie is very good -especially Dafney Keen, the girl who plays X-23. The film is also very funny which is always a good thing.

However, I believe these are the major flaws of the film that prevents it being anywhere as good as X2 or Days of Future Past:
1) Structurally it's very simple (which is fine) but it's so predictable in narrative events. What you essentially have in this film is a an action set piece, then followed by dialogue/character building. Its arguably one of the laziest scripts I've ever seen due to the fact they repeat the same thing after they first retreat from the farm. For example in the midpoint of the film, after they are chased out of a hotel they were residing in, they literally for no reason (despite being on the run) stay at some farm guys house after helping their horses. It makes absolutely no sense given the Transigen troops were after them (with seemingly unlimited resources). And then this is repeated again, when they again stop at the Eden get away.

2) Emotionally this film wasn't that strong. I like the beginning when Logan is taking care of Charles showing the care he has towards his father figure, despite the fact Professor X has lost all of his agency as a character. It is sad, yet emotionally satisfying because it is not artificial. However, this is never developed any further due to the fact the film wanted use to then relate Logan with X-23. So when Charles kinda just dies, it was one of the less impactful deaths of X-Men (I hold X3 death of Charles far superior here). The relationship between X23 and Wolverine also falls flat because they never spend enough time alone to get that relationship. You never really feel Logan is making a choice about his daughter because they never really speak. This was evident in the final act when Logan was seemingly prepared to just let X23 go off and only decided to help once he saw the troops advancing on their position. 3) Score was barely existent, cinematography was average at best (but I did like the beginning 2049 look of America with driveless trucks etc). 4) Lazy tropes. Xander Rice magically appears in the mid point of the film to become another villain and he brings the most generic villain ever which was a clone of Logan. 5) **** kids actor with CGI powers come up at the end. I thought this was suppose to be a grounded film. They also decide to sit there half the time, and only conveniently use their powers where the plot requires them to do so. 6) Chekhov's gun is abused in this film. Adamantium bullet magically shows up to counter clone Logan, magically green power boost potion needed one more time for hero - but then magically evaproates once the noobs are taken out, photo of children conveniently has their secret revendouz point spelt out on the back and surives a grenade explosion. 7) Stupid scene where Caliban blows himself up to also kill Donald Pierce, but is miraculously fine straight after. We also later see the body of Caliban is also not torn to shreds despite 1m from approximity of grenade- WTF? - but even more stupid is the redundant random line said by the villain saying his tissues are good for marking, despite the fact we wont be ever seeing this timeline again and nothing happens with that tissue. 8) Wolverine back get pierced by wood despite having a skeleton made of that stuff. Also stops healing for no reason - we saw earlier in the film that bullets and wounds were still healing albeit slowly.

9) Action was great at start but got tedious. Also too many close ups, wasn't very clean shots by the end. Hopefully, these points highlight the objective flaws of the film. Logan is still a good film, but to say it's best Xmen film would be doing a disservice to X2 and Days of Future Past (and maybe First Class).
Expand
11 of 23 users found this helpful1112
All this user's reviews
6
night4May 28, 2017
I'm bumping up the score from a 5 because it didn't feel like a superhero movie, and that's a good thing.

But, it's incredibly dark, like Rogue One. I don't think I'd watch it again, even if it were free and I was on a plane. I think the
I'm bumping up the score from a 5 because it didn't feel like a superhero movie, and that's a good thing.

But, it's incredibly dark, like Rogue One. I don't think I'd watch it again, even if it were free and I was on a plane.

I think the creators had a bet to see how many claw-through-the-head shots they could cram into a single film. One or two would be cool, but thirty makes it seem desperate for attention.
Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
6
BroyaxAug 21, 2017
J'ai pensé à faire une blague avec Dacia en guise d'introduction, puis je me suis ravisé. Je me suis dit qu'un hommage à ce pauvre vieux Hugh qui n'en finit plus de végéter dans ces conneries de "X-men" et compagnie était davantage deJ'ai pensé à faire une blague avec Dacia en guise d'introduction, puis je me suis ravisé. Je me suis dit qu'un hommage à ce pauvre vieux Hugh qui n'en finit plus de végéter dans ces conneries de "X-men" et compagnie était davantage de circonstance.

Oh rien d'alarmant, car je crois que notre cher Hugh se porte comme un charme et mérite bien mieux que ce débris de Logan, "Wolverine" fatigué et mutant dépassé bon pour la casse... Il se retrouve à son grand dam et de façon fort impromptue propulsé au range de papa-poule protecteur d'engeance(s) mutante(s). Une relation qui fait penser à celle de Terminator 2 bien que moins développée ici, plus maladroite, plus bourrue (Logan est un bourrin) et moins intéressante -sauf à la fin.

Evidemment, je n'ai pas vu la litanie des précédents "X-Men" trucmuches, alors les nombreuses allusions m'ont totalement échappé, ce qui n'est pas non plus rédhibitoire dans la compréhension d'une histoire fort simple au demeurant, composée de vilains à la poursuite de gentils.

On peut regretter quelques baisses notables de rythme dûes à un scénario qui ne peut tenir les 2h17 qu'on lui impose ! de même, on regrette un montage et un cadrage aussi nerveux l'un que l'autre, lors des bastons récurrentes certes enragées mais assez peu lisibles.

Il reste tout de même une ambiance "fin de règne" assez plaisante avec ce Logan surmené qui se coltine un vieux grabataire et une gamine mal élevée aux crises d'ultra-violence très colériques... c'en est presque drôle. Et très inattendu finalement.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
saintdeckyMar 19, 2017
Logan, I feel, is a tad overrated and not as good as everyone is making it to be. Sure, it's not bad, but I feel it doesn't deserve all the praise. I couldn't help but be disappointed when the credits rolled.

Characters: I honestly didn't
Logan, I feel, is a tad overrated and not as good as everyone is making it to be. Sure, it's not bad, but I feel it doesn't deserve all the praise. I couldn't help but be disappointed when the credits rolled.

Characters: I honestly didn't get the whole "he's so pained and tortured, and it's easy to forget this is a superhero movie because of the character development." Superhero movies still have character development. Maybe some don't have the best, but it's still there. And while I do admire this movie for focusing more on the characters and their problems, I didn't feel for Logan a whole lot all the time. Sure, I know he was sad and could tell the pain he was in that he'd accumulated throughout his life. But he was just kind of grumpy and sad and acted the same. One thing I did like about the movie was that Wolverine and most characters didn't need some long monologue or anything describing how sad they are. You know the pain they're going through. What I'm trying to say is that I don't think this movie deserved AS much praise for its character substance. Sure, the movie pulled it off pretty well, and for a superhero movie it's good I guess, but it didn't blow me away.

Acting: The acting is very good. Hugh Jackman and Patrick Stewart both do an excellent job portraying the older, more pained versions of themselves. You could really tell the difference between them in older movies and them in this movie. They really showed that they are pain and are suffering. Dafne Keen was also good, though she didn't get to do much in terms of acting range until the end.

Action: I was never a huge fan of Wolverine's action, as it gets kind of repetitive. Pretty much all of his killing sprees are "stab stab stab stab stab stab, get shot, stab stab, get shot again, stab stab stab, cut off arm, stab stab stab, slit throat, stab stab stab." I'm not saying it wasn't well done, as the action scenes were sort of cool and darker than the past. However, it got kind of boring as it does with most of his action scenes. The best parts of the action scenes were the parts with choreography, like Laura running and jumping off his back and landing on a guy, or Laura using her foot blade and becomes more acrobatic when fighting, like Black Widow. Stuff like that added more diversity to the otherwise repetitive action.

Plot: It's basically just a 2 hour and 20 minute chase scene. This doesn't mean it's a bad movie, but I was hoping for a bit more, and it wasn't even a super exciting chase plotline. At least a movie like Mad Max: Fury Road, which was basically a long chase scene, just had non-stop, well-done and perfectly executed action sequences, where this movie has inconsistent parts throughout, slowing down the movie. When he meets the family halfway through, the entire momentum of the story just stops for 20 minutes. There also wasn't really a definitive bad guy. I'm guessing this was because they wanted to focus on Logan and the characters more, which I don't have a problem with, but then I didn't really have anyone to go against. I wanted more motivation for Logan to escort Laura. Sure, he wants to do something good and she's his daughter of course, but if there was a more defined bad guy, even just a few more minutes distinguishing a villain, I would feel more like "yeah Logan! Go get Laura to wherever they're going! I want you to beat that guy!" or something. Instead I just feel like "ah, just kill this guy that looks like Ryan Gosling who's supposed to be a villain and get to wherever you're going" instead.

Overall, Logan is a bit slow at times with not much to compensate for. I must say I had high expectations from the pretty high ratings from critics and very positive reviews from fans and friends. Unfortunately, Logan did not live up to those expectations. I guess I would recommend it because a basic fan of superhero movies would probably like it since so many did. It wasn't a complete waste of time, and I may have given it a 7 if I didn't have such high expectations.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
kevinbrownMar 24, 2017
I've always been a huge fan of the X-Men, especially Wolverine. For many of us who were watching the 90's X-Men animated series - although he wasn't the strongest of Professor X's team - Wolverine was by far the top favorite X-Men hero amongI've always been a huge fan of the X-Men, especially Wolverine. For many of us who were watching the 90's X-Men animated series - although he wasn't the strongest of Professor X's team - Wolverine was by far the top favorite X-Men hero among kids at kindergarten, because he simply looked badass in his yellow suit, but also stubborn as Batman.
In 2000, Hugh Jackman has been announced to play Wolverine in the first X-Men movie. 17 years and nine movies later, Jackman signed his "last movie as Wolverine" entitled 'Logan'.

Logan's first trailer instantly caught my eye: its serious tone and darker take, the likes of The Dark Knight, Daredevil and Watchmen to name a few, is about to become a new standard, in a world where comic book movies are labelled by default as Hollywood blockbusters or family entertainment. Here in 'Logan', the first and second don't qualify. The movie is extremely violent compared to the other X-Men movies, if not more than any comic book adaptation released so far, and it was shot to look like an independent low budget type of movie.

First thing I noticed after watching 'Logan': it's a movie based on the X-Men franchise... without really wanting to be based on it (?). Simply said: I feel like it was only a X-Men by the name. Basically, you could remove any X-Men reference to 'Logan' and you're practically going to get the same movie. This is a dangerous zone because the only thing that such X-Men association will do onto an independent type of movie, is to build expectations towards the X-Men part of the movie, which was clearly lacking in 'Logan'.

The originality and the will to make a different movie has to be considered. This is what holds th house of cards together, along with a state of the art direction. The project initiated from that idea.

Then, passed its unique independent movie aspects and serious tone, the movie lacks in continuity and story. You will find the movie long, very very long to watch. Not that because the movie is actually long (2:20), but because the script is rather weak. Story-wise, which is influencing the script, it also fails to justify several scenes, leading to a few incoherencies; towards the end of the movie, we still have questions regarding Laura (Logan's daughter) and Charles Xavier. There were important questions asked throughout the movie and we don't really get the answers.

My feeling after watching the movie is that, overall, the director does seem to have a lot of experience in everything X-Men and big budget movies, but no experience at all when the time comes to shoot more serious independent movies type. I believe you should watch it with no expectation. It's not a good X-Men, but a good movie nonetheless. The psychology and profoundness of this movie is by far superior than any other Marvel.

To this, we can't be more thankful to Hugh Jackman for having greatly played a comic book character the longest - 17 years as Wolverine, quite an achievement. His last interpretation is certainly one for the books.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
jackmorganMar 30, 2017
Let me get this straight, this movie is good and I recommend it but I dont think it is as good as people say it is. This is the Wolverine movie I have ever wanted just not as good as it could have been. I loved the fact that this movie isLet me get this straight, this movie is good and I recommend it but I dont think it is as good as people say it is. This is the Wolverine movie I have ever wanted just not as good as it could have been. I loved the fact that this movie is really violent and has a lot of curse words and it is a grittier, more realistic, darker portrayal of the Wolverine. This movie defies genre conventions to the extreme but maybe that serves as a bad point too. Maybe I am just not used to see a Wolverine movie with an R rating and such brutal violence but a lot of people think this is an vantage point. Hugh Jackman is great in this movie and you get to see him portray the Wolverine in a whole new way. The movies plot is kind of dumb and when I really thought about it , a lot of the things that happened didnt really seem to make sense and for the tone this movie is going that has got to be the worst thing they could have posibly done. So youre telling me that when Logan is watching that video of the kids on the phone, she edited that just for Logan to watch it and bee like "now the audience gets what was happening in that Hospital", seriously, and how did the people at the Hospital didnt notice a person filming their clearly illegal activities. For example the little girl only says a word almost at the end of the movie and there is no reason for her not to be talking during the rest of the movie. So all and all this movie is good and I am sure a lot of people will love it but it is just not for me. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
ElliottGreen200Jul 27, 2017
Logan was a great movie. It would've been so much more enjoyable if it hadn't been so hyped up, I was looking forward to watching this as I thought it'd be a different superhero film but the only thing that is different is the fact that it's R-Rated.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
xsinxJun 24, 2017
Always been a fan of the X-MEN movies and I like Wolverine as a character for the most part, but all his solo movies are pretty bad IMHO and this one is no exception. There wasn't much if anything interesting in this movie, Wolverine is moreAlways been a fan of the X-MEN movies and I like Wolverine as a character for the most part, but all his solo movies are pretty bad IMHO and this one is no exception. There wasn't much if anything interesting in this movie, Wolverine is more emo than ever, there wasn't much mutant showmanship and it was overall pretty cliché. Really not a great movie. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
MoviesR_OKOct 22, 2017
This was fun to watch, it was entertaining, it had gore and violence. BUT it had the weirdest fight scene between two people EVER. It was a person fighting a newer version of himself. That scene let the movie down, as I like everything toThis was fun to watch, it was entertaining, it had gore and violence. BUT it had the weirdest fight scene between two people EVER. It was a person fighting a newer version of himself. That scene let the movie down, as I like everything to make sense, but that didn't make sense. Entertaining, ever so slightly sentimental at the end, it would be better with a different villain though. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
WintersMay 24, 2017
Decent but forgettable. Enjoyed but would not watch again. Nothing memorable about the movie. Far too much Marvel fanboyism behind the upvotes. Far too many nods to comic lore instead of real content.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
5
XishnikMar 5, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I really don't see why everyone is so ready to praise this film. It's mediocre at best. Not great as a superhero movie, not great as a western. A campy slow building film with shallow villains with nonsensical motivations. A plot that has enough short sightings to make one cringe *spoilers* 1.Let's go to canada where we will be safe when the villians are already crossing borders from mexico and could care less about borders. 2. Let's Kill all of the children from the experiments but wait lets take the GIRL ALIVE. *end spoiler* **** exposition leaving the viewer confused as to where the **** all of the x-men are and why all of them are dead. Lot's of gore to the point of being goofy (lot's of face stabbing). LOTS OF FACE STABBING. FACE EXPLOSIONS. shallow character deaths and depths, with little to no emotions. Everyone saying it's the perfect 'goodbye' is officially an emotionaless zombie. They died in vain to what their characters stood for. The movie truges slowly for the middle hour and half to point of incredible boredom with logane doing nothing but cursing or staring at the road or his companions. Notable mentions are Patrick stewarts attempt at somwhat redeeming the movie (somewhat). All in all the praise for this movie is undeserved. It's a shortsighted overproduced campy gorey goofy and shallow movie. A shallow ending for a hero that's been in the X-men series for over a decade. Expand
13 of 27 users found this helpful1314
All this user's reviews
5
imthenoobMay 30, 2017
I think they focused too much on the violence and not enough on fixing the paper thin plot. The amount of growls and yells by Jackman outnumbers the amount of spoken sentences through out and I think that is a big issue. Old Man Logan is suchI think they focused too much on the violence and not enough on fixing the paper thin plot. The amount of growls and yells by Jackman outnumbers the amount of spoken sentences through out and I think that is a big issue. Old Man Logan is such an original comic and they did a poor job translating it to film. This should have been a more dialogue heavy film and it wasn't. They switched the dialogue for action and while that may sell a bit more tickets, It robs us of what could have been the crown jewel of the X-Men series.

Case in point - Patrick Stewart was fantastic as a old and fading Professor Xavier and I felt he was the best part of the film. I would have liked to see more of him on screen because he stole every second of the short time he was in the film. Jackman was solid but I do think he was a tad bit overrated because this is his final time portraying the character as nearly 20 years doing so.

The action scenes were ok but they did a poor job with the CGI and things were very noticeably fake during said scenes. Like when Logan is impaled on the tree branch. I just found it funny that they put so much emphasis on the action and do such a poor job at it.
Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
5
GerNFeb 3, 2018
Not a bad film, but weighted down but repetition and a very long running time. Predictable, illogical, stretcher of credulity to the breaking point. Worth watching if you have the time to spend, but don't expect a superior movie.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
sandbornMar 8, 2017
Ho-Hum, same old same old with a few bright spots. The formula for this movie is fairly simple: Fight, go, stop, fight, go, stop, etc.,. Jackman is always awesome as Wolverine but the villains are just so predictable and unoriginal. There'sHo-Hum, same old same old with a few bright spots. The formula for this movie is fairly simple: Fight, go, stop, fight, go, stop, etc.,. Jackman is always awesome as Wolverine but the villains are just so predictable and unoriginal. There's enough action to satisfy, and the story premise had potential but the execution was so convential and contrieved. The movie just doesn't have that much going for it to deserve a higher rating. Expand
3 of 10 users found this helpful37
All this user's reviews
5
bananapants34Mar 18, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Oh, how desperately I wanted to enjoy this movie, but alas, I was disappointed. I want to start off by saying I am not criticizing this film because of some petty fanboy war going on in the comic book world right now, and I hope fans of this movie won't simply dislike this review because of the yellow score, and will listen to the critiques I give it.

Let's start with the positive aspects. The acting in this was fantastic. Hugh Jackman gives a powerhouse performance. The girl who plays X-23 is great for the little amount of lines she is given. I will watch just about anything with Patrick Stewart in it, and his performance didn't disappoint. Second, Emotionally, this film rocks. The connections between characters are strong, and there are some genuinely touching moments (especially towards the end of the second act, and the entire third).

Now the cons. First, the violence in the film. Violence in movies should ALWAYS have a decent justification to be there. Whether to entertain, or provide drama and tension. "logan" could have very well have been toned down (Even to the point of being PG-13) and it would have been just as (or more) entertaining. In the tension/Drama department is where this film kind of screws itself. Because the entire film is soaked in blood, the climax is somewhat deflated and lacking in tension. Nothing about the "final battle" seems more dire or desperate than other tussles in the film. We see the wolverine get viciously torn up in a scene taking place on a farm, and nothing seems more dangerous or threatening in the last fight. In fact, you barely feel concerned for the characters at all, because the nemesis in the fight during the resolution was one they already encountered, and survived earlier. On top of that, the villains in this film are severely lacking, mainly because they're all cliches. One is an evil scientist, One is a clone of Wolverine (Cough* Terminator 2 *Cough), and one is a leader of a big bad government agency, the kind that we've seen in countless films like the Bourne trilogy, transformers 4, and other spy themed adventures. Lastly, the action scenes in "Logan" become boring and tedious after two hours. In most action movies there are things to help the audience differentiate one action scene from another. Take The "Mission: Impossible" series for instance. In "Rogue nation" one scene takes place at the opera, on a catwalk. Another on a plane taking off. Another underwater, in which the hero has to hold his breath while completing a task. Unfortunately Logan is not like this. Each action scene is the same. Guns and Claws. Guns and Claws. The location of the fights may change, but the circumstances don't. There are no obstacles that force the characters and action to adapt to their surroundings. It's just a slash-fest.

Overall, I'll probably see it again, because I enjoyed the parts between the characters. It's just a shame that in the mean time I have to endure 2 hours of tedious and grueling face stabbing.
Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
5
TrevorsViewMar 3, 2017
It is 2029, and mutations are still looked at as potential weapons for border patrol purposes. No longer are the mutants considered human, but tools. Although one is not yet a part of this fascist organization to redeem hope to America. He isIt is 2029, and mutations are still looked at as potential weapons for border patrol purposes. No longer are the mutants considered human, but tools. Although one is not yet a part of this fascist organization to redeem hope to America. He is the long-lasting hero who we have looked up to for over fifteen years, the one who we have experienced many highs and lows with, the one who Hugh Jackman is now making his adieu to, yes, he is Logan, or as some would know him, Wolverine.

But it’s not all fun and games anymore, with a crisp, well-earned R rating to match the red on dust violence this franchise needed. Director James Mangold (Kate & Leopold, Walk the Line) makes the most of Logan’s legacy with the bloodiest action you’ll see this spring. Especially with the backdrop upon the Mexican border, this gritty view of classic comic books feels more like a modern day western than a popcorn flick.

Logan’s first mode of action is taking down several immigrants attempting to steal one of his hubcaps. Then he receives a request from an unknown Mexican woman, demanding he escorts a little silent girl named Laura to North Dakota. His motivation for this is low, until three motivations erupt. One, he watches an upsetting video of mutant children in hospitals forcefully trained to become soldiers as if in a concentration camp. Two, she is one of these mutant children. Three, she is his daughter. So now with her on the road with him as well as Professor X, Logan learns his responsibility to punish those who neglect the gifts of these mutants.

While the overall look of this journey looks nice, cinematographer John Mathieson (Gladiator) constantly sets up horrible lighting arrangements that make the backgrounds lighter than the subject’s face. It becomes especially problematic, I might add, when he films the action scenes super up close, with nothing but a forgettable musical score to back it up. This is not the only thing that hurts the tension of the action scenes, but the aftereffects of the turmoil are weak, with no thanks to the unconvincing makeup effects. If you don’t believe me, look at the albino man who serves as Logan and Professor X’s personal assistant: The pale texture of his skin looks plastered on from at most ten minutes in the makeup chair.

At least that’s a minor complaint. Compare that to the stellar performances by Dafne Keen and Patrick Stewart, and this may just as well be the greatest achievement based off a Marvel comic. Stewart in particular steals the show with his aged, frail curtain call of a presence that just disorients your expectations further whenever he gets a seizure.

With such a humble grandfather figure here to ground us into the foundation of this world, it’s too bad that there’s nothing else in the backdrop to give us a sense of Mexico’s and Texas’ true culture. The latest Academy Award nominee Hell or High Water delved quite a bit into this culture, but the closest that Logan gets to in creating the social pressures is a brief moment in a casino, and a villain with a really bad accent. Nothing else about the look of this world looks authentic enough to buy into.

The other moral implications are also quite problematic. We all can understand that bloody adult-rated violence can lead to viewers imitating it in real life, but judging by the character of Logan as a father, he takes several actions that make me question whether he’s worth looking up to as a role model. Shortly after he brings in his daughter to escort her, she robs from a convenience store (since she grew up in a hospital and thus doesn’t know any better). While he does discipline her for attacking the clerk who tries to stop her, he robs from the store himself—and in a moment that is mostly played for laughs. Is this really the role model people should be looking up to?

But then again, this type of gritty realism proves just how far superhero movies, and superheroes in general, have come since their rising popularity. All three of the protagonists: Logan, Laura, and Professor X, learn what it means to live in this wild frontier known as the United States, as represented by the professor’s favorite motion picture, the classic western Shane.

While he may not have always been the perfect sort of hero for us to look up to over the years, it has been a great pleasure having Logan around to entertain and teach us about what’s really worth fighting for. So long, Wolverine. Thank you for your endeavors over the years, and thank you for leaving a strong legacy for the upcoming generation of mutants at heart.
Expand
6 of 19 users found this helpful613
All this user's reviews
5
AMARASMay 25, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I have really wanted to like this movie, but plot don't make much sense a lot. Why lady who was looking after girl couldn't. take girl to location herself? All other kids made it... And why they stayed with the innocent family when they knew that they being tracked by baddies? Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
YesterJan 28, 2020
The main draw of this movie is that it's not PG-13. It's a breath of fresh air for the superhero genre, otherwise the rest of the movie is just okay. (there is one bit of absolutely fantastic CGI)
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
sugarniteApr 5, 2022
Days of Future Past exists, we never needed this. It’s contrived, boring, and internally inconsistent.

Nobody would be talking about this movie if not for the R rating. Seriously, try to find one review for this movie that doesn’t mention
Days of Future Past exists, we never needed this. It’s contrived, boring, and internally inconsistent.

Nobody would be talking about this movie if not for the R rating. Seriously, try to find one review for this movie that doesn’t mention the R rating.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
MandalaMar 9, 2017
I don't know what people are loving about Logan. The movie was slow, barely covered any ground, had no big plot, and not really a good ending, IMO. The premise basically suggests that all the X-Men efforts from previous movies amounted toI don't know what people are loving about Logan. The movie was slow, barely covered any ground, had no big plot, and not really a good ending, IMO. The premise basically suggests that all the X-Men efforts from previous movies amounted to little, if anything. That pretty much makes the earlier X-Men films moot, and seem a bit pointless - Logan is a very nihilistic statement on the X-Men characters and past X-Men movies.

The writing of Logan was pretty bland, and the characters were very limited in their personalities. The visual spectrum was very limited, and so was the amount of action. There was also a lack of mutant stuff.
Expand
5 of 13 users found this helpful58
All this user's reviews