Kong: Skull Island

6

FlexedacornApr 20, 2017

The second movie in the Monster movie cinematic universe (Godzilla being the first). Where as Godzilla kept teasing you with brief appearances, Kong was not camera shy in the least. From the very beginning of the movie you get put rightThe second movie in the Monster movie cinematic universe (Godzilla being the first). Where as Godzilla kept teasing you with brief appearances, Kong was not camera shy in the least. From the very beginning of the movie you get put right into the action. The movie takes place right after the Vietnam War and uses a lot of the music from the time period. A little too much music at times, but defiantly helps to set the overall tone.

Kong: Skull Island benefits from the star cast of Tom Hiddleston, Bri Larson, Sam Jackson, and John Goodman to name a few. The best in my opinion is John C. Reilly who really steals every scene he is in with his sense humor. In the end it’s a Giant Monster (Kaiju) movie, so if you like the genre you will not be disappointed.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

5

red_ninja_9Apr 19, 2017

This movie is average at best, not as good as the one by Peter Jackson. There arent enough creatures, the scenery is bland and repetitive, characters are forgettable (except John C Riley, he's good). The movie has a lot of potential but fellThis movie is average at best, not as good as the one by Peter Jackson. There arent enough creatures, the scenery is bland and repetitive, characters are forgettable (except John C Riley, he's good). The movie has a lot of potential but fell short, like it was rushed. Some actors in there has no purpose and completely forgetable that throws a one-liner here and there. There's no chemistry among the actors. So the movie was okay, don't expect to be blown away, you wont.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

CyranoApr 19, 2017

"...Hellicopters flying through a giant hurricane an then only 20 mts off the ground to allow a giant beast to destroy them all.." Brillant. There are clever movies, dumb movies, stupid movies and then comes "Kong"... A continuous "nonsense""...Hellicopters flying through a giant hurricane an then only 20 mts off the ground to allow a giant beast to destroy them all.." Brillant. There are clever movies, dumb movies, stupid movies and then comes "Kong"... A continuous "nonsense" from beginning to the end.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

7

Iky009Apr 18, 2017

With great visual effects and catchy action scenes, Kong manages to entertain, but his disappointingly weak premise discourages those looking for a story to the height of the film's most famous giant gorilla, but it's still a fun movie.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

1

ZoethApr 14, 2017

This movie is a complete mess. The characters that "live" are easily identifiable at the beginning. They have no survival skills but get through on luck alone. This is what happens when a huge studio and franchise hires an "indie" director.This movie is a complete mess. The characters that "live" are easily identifiable at the beginning. They have no survival skills but get through on luck alone. This is what happens when a huge studio and franchise hires an "indie" director. They completely used and abused this director and forced him to do what they wanted. It is easy to influence someone with no experience because they never say no to corporate. I feel like I wasted my bandwidth even pirating this movie, poor bastards who actually spent money watching this trash.… Expand

8 of 10 users found this helpful82

All this user's reviews

4

kamgeforceApr 14, 2017

Not exactly sure how did this movie get away with being ok or even good. Its bland pile of mediocrity. People were hating on Jackson´s King Kong but that movie blows this **** out of the water in every aspect. Whether its acting, action,Not exactly sure how did this movie get away with being ok or even good. Its bland pile of mediocrity. People were hating on Jackson´s King Kong but that movie blows this **** out of the water in every aspect. Whether its acting, action, characters, soundtrack, hell even the so called bad cgi in King Kong was more enjoyable to watch than this. The only reason this movie exists is to set up the duel with godzilla, but both movies were horrid so what can we expect from it... Some good actors wasted their time and good name on this ****e and some ****e actors got opportunity to show of their suckage like the lead female, quite possibly the most useless and generic "character" in a while.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

6

PeterAlexanderApr 12, 2017

Kong: Skull Island is monstrously entertaining, follows a simple plot that works, but fails to deliver in terms of characterisation. The film has some of the best action sequences you'll see all year, but also some of the worst. It also hasKong: Skull Island is monstrously entertaining, follows a simple plot that works, but fails to deliver in terms of characterisation. The film has some of the best action sequences you'll see all year, but also some of the worst. It also has some great acting performances, including John Goodman and Samuel L. Jackson, and some less than stellar performances. Overall I have very mixed feelings about this film.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

1

dunnyoneApr 11, 2017

I simply HAVE to believe that positive user reviews on Metacritic are now mostly paid for. To give this utter tripe a glowing review is doing disservice to your own intellect. This film had no:

- Characters - plot Kong DID have: -GoodI simply HAVE to believe that positive user reviews on Metacritic are now mostly paid for. To give this utter tripe a glowing review is doing disservice to your own intellect. This film had no:

- Characters
- plot

Kong DID have:

-Good looking CG (Kong had sick abs, he clearly does crunches while waiting for people to arrive)
-John C Reilly (he had rare moments of humour)
-forced universal building that is actually WORSE than the crap seen in Batman v Superman: dawn of something something

I hated this film. It was utterly boring, predictable, tame nonsense. Please do not waste your money on it.… Expand

7 of 9 users found this helpful72

All this user's reviews

8

holovaaanApr 8, 2017

King Kong was better to watch at cinema in IMAX. I didn't see any other parts so I can't compare but I think that it is good enough. Good special effects and acting, there are some moving and funny moments. Characters are interesting despiteKing Kong was better to watch at cinema in IMAX. I didn't see any other parts so I can't compare but I think that it is good enough. Good special effects and acting, there are some moving and funny moments. Characters are interesting despite of that the film is too short for knowing them. There were a few not logical moments as in other modern action films. Overall I liked this film and my mark is 8/10.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

3

TreceApr 8, 2017

Luego de la joya de Godzilla pensé que una buena saga de monstruos vendria, pero finalmente escucharon al publico palomitero que no supo apreciar esa pelicula y aqui esta el resultado: Kong. Y muy bien que sea Kong a secas, porque este monoLuego de la joya de Godzilla pensé que una buena saga de monstruos vendria, pero finalmente escucharon al publico palomitero que no supo apreciar esa pelicula y aqui esta el resultado: Kong. Y muy bien que sea Kong a secas, porque este mono sin personalidad perdido en una pelicula que no entiende sus momentos ni sabe quien es el protagonista, no seria rey de nada.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

4

deckApr 8, 2017

Its like a Marvel Movie. Lot of cgi and more cgi with a soft story everyone can understand. Well acting Jackson and Goodmann. King Kong of 2005 is way more worked out.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

moviecritic68Apr 8, 2017

Wasn't all that impressed with the imaginary screenplay. A bit too far-fetched overall. I gave credit to the creations used which boosted my rating. Not a big fan of Samuel L. Jackson's acting nor some of the other cast rmembers. Overall aWasn't all that impressed with the imaginary screenplay. A bit too far-fetched overall. I gave credit to the creations used which boosted my rating. Not a big fan of Samuel L. Jackson's acting nor some of the other cast rmembers. Overall a passable grade but barely.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

tibzoidApr 8, 2017

Conventional, uninteresting, basic genre picture. People have forgotten how good movies used to be. Ignore this film and rent Peter Jackson's version or even the 1978 De Laurentiis film.

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

7

SpangleApr 5, 2017

Dear Billy,

Kong: Skull Island, directed by Jordan Vogt-Roberts, is his chance at a Vietnam War. In his sophomore feature, Vogt-Roberts seems to have some self-recognition that he will never get to direct a Vietnam War film. This is not aDear Billy,

Kong: Skull Island, directed by Jordan Vogt-Roberts, is his chance at a Vietnam War. In his sophomore feature, Vogt-Roberts seems to have some self-recognition that he will never get to direct a Vietnam War film. This is not a shot at him, as he is certainly a promising young director with both this and his debut Kings of Summer standing as solid starts that show he is capable of handling both small intimate films and huge films of epic proportions. While neither are particularly great, they are both capable films nonetheless. In this film, he takes his chance to add as much Vietnam imagery as possible by setting the film in 1973 and also tossing in some Cold War paranoia for good measure in this story of a group of people wandering the jungles on a mission, encountering a remote tribe, and facing a being that the tribe sees as a god. Did Francis Ford Coppola not make this film, sans the big monkey, in 1979?

Wearing this Apocalypse Now influence on its sleeve, Vogt-Roberts shows a love of both gratuitous shots of helicopters flying into the island or of the smell of napalm in the morning when Preston Packard (Samuel L. Jackson) tries to dump napalm on Kong. Yet, as with all Kong films, it must run through the beats of the story. Fortunately, Vogt-Roberts improves upon Peter Jackson's recent rendition. By chopping off an hour, the film is not so dreadfully long, which is really a major benefit. Give me the dinosaurs, but not for too long. Give me some backstory, but not extended scenes in a boat and trying to get funding for the trip. This latest edition streamlines it, yet still has the time to get into very compelling mythology regarding Skull Island and the nature of Kong as well as the other beasts that call Skull Island home. Additionally, some of the more unsavory elements of Jackson's films included its depiction of the natives of Skull Island. Depicting them as horrible savages out to kill white people, Jackson's film indulges in nasty stereotypes that create a truly captivating opening scene in that film, but that hardly justifies the racism. With Skull Island, Vogt-Roberts dispatches of this nastiness and instead has a smart and respected tribe in the center of Skull Island. Playing host to WWII veteran Hank Marlow (John C. Reilly) for 28 years, these are no savages and Vogt-Roberts never pretends they are. Instead, the tribe is given its due respect throughout the film. This latest film also ditches the racist undertones of past Kong films. From the original to various remakes, critics have shown the parallel between King Kong being an ape (as black people have often been derogatorily been referred to as "monkeys") and the white/blonde damsel in distress that he clutches in his hand. To critics, it has been a parallel between the perceived assault on the white race by black America. Now, whether or not you buy that or not, I did once have a film professor who claimed that it was why no studio could have an American direct King Kong again, as that parallel had been made. She was not entirely wrong, even if Vogt-Roberts is American as Brie Larson is never a damsel in distress or screeching in his paw, which Naomi Watts did often in 2005. Instead, he holds her once and it is to save her. By then, she had already established that he was not an enemy and was passed out anyways, so no concerns there from her. Of all of its updates, ditching the possible racist undertones is certainly a major plus, regardless of whether you buy into that angle or not.

However, Vogt-Roberts' influences also come via the heavily 70s soundtrack, references, and the political situation at the time. Fortunately, it does actually have a lot to do with the plot. As the Cold War is burning brightly and the Americans are coming off a loss in Vietnam, the whole country needs a win. This mission to Skull Island is that win. Finding new species' or a new island would re-establish America as the top dog in the world and, as such, is a major effort even if it takes some convincing. Yet, what the film does very well with its 1970s post-Vietnam setting is to show the men trying to regroup and go back to war, even if it is a different kind of war. The men are resistant and constantly thinking home. From writing letters, discussing home, or making references to what they will do once they get there, the men form a common bond of trying to make the best of the situation. Yet, on the flip side men such as Packard or James Conrad (Tom Hiddleston) need this war. Even photographer Mason Weaver (Brie Larson) needs the war, though she is anti-war. The three of them have nothing left to do after the end of the Vietnam War and the Skull Island job represents another opportunity to feel useful in the world at a time when opportunities were scarce.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

misterpMar 29, 2017

Solid action movie. Good acting. Good pace. Excellent special effects. The movie has a political message which is not overstated. Aside from a couple of action scenes that should make better sense and one failed comic moment, the movie hitsSolid action movie. Good acting. Good pace. Excellent special effects. The movie has a political message which is not overstated. Aside from a couple of action scenes that should make better sense and one failed comic moment, the movie hits its target and the few flawed moments in the movie do not take away much from the whole. Almost as good as Peter Jackson's King Kong.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

4

LoveeLandMar 29, 2017

Don't go into this movie expecting a great story, great acting, or really anything great other than the effects. It is fun to go and see in 3D, but to me it is another below average film pumped out by Hollywood. If you are looking for a greatDon't go into this movie expecting a great story, great acting, or really anything great other than the effects. It is fun to go and see in 3D, but to me it is another below average film pumped out by Hollywood. If you are looking for a great Kong film, I would definitely recommend the Peter Jackson version, as the creatures, acting, and story are all superior to this new version. I'd only recommend you see it if you do so in 3D or IMAX.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

ethansreviewsMar 29, 2017

This film is very mediocre its entertaining enough but not interesting enough to rewatch. the action was great but the characters were so boring that i cant give it beyond a five.

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

5

DjacobUnchainedMar 27, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Watching King Kong beat stuff up was awesome, Samuel L Jackson, as usual, is very likable and entertaining. The rest of the cast gave good performances, however the script gave no effort in showing who any of the characters were the movie was really boring in a lot of place were Kong was not present as the characters were poorly developed and we had no reason to care for theme. Also a lot of stupid concepts, like a man who lived on skull island whose character was badly introduced.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

7

Truth_of_PiscesMar 26, 2017

When I found it this was a prequel to 2014's Godzilla, I was super excited. This movie does an excellent job of expanding the universe they're trying to set up. Visually it's pretty damn impressive. Kong himself looks just as should for whatWhen I found it this was a prequel to 2014's Godzilla, I was super excited. This movie does an excellent job of expanding the universe they're trying to set up. Visually it's pretty damn impressive. Kong himself looks just as should for what they're trying to make him out to be. He's not just a giant silver back gorilla like Perter Jackson envisioned, he's a giant up-right walking ape that knows how to do some serous damage, and it's just an awesome display. A lot of the other monsters are beautifully presented, with the exception of the movie's "Skull Crawlers" which just fell a little flat for me in terms of design. The actors do a really great job, but they feel sort of wasted, as if they cast simply because their names would draw in viewers and not based on their acting talent, but this is just a personal gripe; Tom Hiddleston is charming as ever on screen, John Goodman performs as good as expected, and Samuel J. Jackson...well you don't need me to comment on a performance from SLJ. Overall, Kong: Skull Island is a much more "fun" film than Godzilla. You get to see a lot more of the title character than in the latter film which is a plus. However, the film's main problem is tone; it's a bit all over the place being tense one minute minute followed by camp and comedic the next. Still, it's a great build-up and if you stick around for the end credits, you'll see why.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

10

cupofcassacinoMar 26, 2017

If you enjoy mega monsters and nostalgia, you'll enjoy Kong. I mean, he is King. I was entertained by this movie and went in just beyond excited to see this adaptation. Well done!

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

66jdMar 26, 2017

A great movie. The special effects have been brought right up to date.
However, I still find myself preferring Peter Jackson's 2005 version.
I did prefer the ending of this one though.

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

tbeit2Mar 25, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Kong was overall a really good movie. The movie was best in its world building that occurred. Seeing the cool creatures, the geography and just the environment in general were a joy to watch and discover. The action scenes themselves were also impressive. They were well directed, exciting, looked fantastic and at times surprising. There is a specific scene where Jackson's group is walking through a forest and they are around bamboo trees. There was a giant spider who's legs look like the trees and it was unbelievably amazing.

The only flaw in the movies are the characters. The actors are good and they are decent blank slates, but they could have used more personality.

Overall, i would say it was a great film. I would definitely recommend it to anybody who is thinking about seeing it. At worst, it should be a decent film with some great moments that everybody should enjoy.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

NerdConsultantMar 24, 2017

Kong Skull Island is a dumb film, but it’s the sort of dumb film I like. It never tries to over stretch it boundaries and gives you exactly what you expect but it is entertaining in that sense, so my predictions of it being a mediocre filmKong Skull Island is a dumb film, but it’s the sort of dumb film I like. It never tries to over stretch it boundaries and gives you exactly what you expect but it is entertaining in that sense, so my predictions of it being a mediocre film feel unjustified. I think this is a good film. It could have used a bit more Kong and the plot doesn’t flow quite as well as it could have, but what it does well it does well. The dialogue is pretty good some of the characters are relatively entertaining, though some of them are not as well written. The acting is fairly decent and the effects hold up alright. Anyone who saw 2014’s Godzilla should check this one out. It’s a very similar film and it almost follows the plot beat for beat. This unfortunately means that you probably won’t enjoy it as much if your problem with the Godzilla film was that they focused too much on the humans at the expense of the monsters. You can probably tell from my brief descriptions whether you are going to like this film or not. I would recommend seeing it at the cinema as I think you won’t get the same effect on the TV screen and it comes with my recommendation. This is a pretty good film. If you are going to see the film, stay until the end of the credits, there’s a post credit scene which sets up future movies and it’s really awesome.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

6

russiangamerMar 23, 2017

Ну сценарий мягко говоря средний получился, режиссура хорошая вместе с операторской работой, эффекты тоже неплохи.
Простой блокбастер на разок, который не нагружает мозг.Ну сценарий мягко говоря средний получился, режиссура хорошая вместе с операторской работой, эффекты тоже неплохи.
Простой блокбастер на разок, который не нагружает мозг.

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

7

Jess_HillMar 23, 2017

Hold onto your butts! This is a joyful creature feature with some of the best monster fights I've seen on film, and cinematography to die for. The storyline is beyond ridiculous, and the script is woeful, but the world building and creatureHold onto your butts! This is a joyful creature feature with some of the best monster fights I've seen on film, and cinematography to die for. The storyline is beyond ridiculous, and the script is woeful, but the world building and creature design are phenomenal. The visual effects are stunning, some sequences had the audience applauding, and the fact that it doesn't take itself too seriously makes for a delightfully entertaining, if not cerebral, experience. Cinematic fun writ large, this is a silly monster movie that delivers what it promises on the tin. 7.87/10*
*Stay until the very end.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

6

SavageYetiMar 22, 2017

kong skull island is a entertaining movie but has many downfalls that turn what could have been a good or even great movie into an average forgettable one. this movie has amazingly talented actors but somehow has some of the worst actedkong skull island is a entertaining movie but has many downfalls that turn what could have been a good or even great movie into an average forgettable one. this movie has amazingly talented actors but somehow has some of the worst acted scenes i have scene in a film of this caliber sadly do to the writing, and the character i thought would be the worst (hank marlow/john c. reilly) was actually in my opinion the only good character in the entire movie. sadly for me this movie will be forgotten quickly and doesnt make me excited for godzilla vs kong because this is an 0/2 for me.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

imthenoobMar 22, 2017

The plot is kind of typical and predictable but the beauty of the film lies in the CG and the entertaining fights with Kong and his fellow monsters. That's the whole point of big monster films - To see big monsters fight. Don't water it downThe plot is kind of typical and predictable but the beauty of the film lies in the CG and the entertaining fights with Kong and his fellow monsters. That's the whole point of big monster films - To see big monsters fight. Don't water it down with a shallow plot and rarely feature the key character (much like they did with the new Godzilla). From the start, Kong is a front and center character and is given plenty of screen time through out.

It's a solid film and I can't wait for Godzilla vs Kong.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

3

OscarTurnerMar 22, 2017

Being a big fan of the 2005 King Kong movie, I was scared to be disappointed, but after seeing the second trailer, my hopes got a bit higher, making the movie appear to be artistic, and not just a simple big blockbuster movie. My firstBeing a big fan of the 2005 King Kong movie, I was scared to be disappointed, but after seeing the second trailer, my hopes got a bit higher, making the movie appear to be artistic, and not just a simple big blockbuster movie. My first impressions were right: it is a traditional blockbuster movie, with a thin plot and uncharismatic characters, and yes, I am including Kong in this. The actions scenes were alright but not great, the scenery was okay at best and there's just no attachment for any of the characters here.

This world is filled with monsters and ugly creatures, compared to the more dinosaur world in the 2005 movie. This is fine, although, Kong seems to be more a creature than a giant ape. He walks and acts way too human like, not at all ape-like, and there is no real connection between the humans and this beast. This lack of emotional context, depth and even artistic scenery makes up for a disappointing movie.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

10

KillerCroweMar 21, 2017

Great movie! Will definitely watch again. I loved that you got to see Kong in action, Unlike "Godzilla." Great CGI. Story writing was Good. End Credits made the audience emotional. Well thought out.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

sandbornMar 21, 2017

What a monster blockbuster should be! Finally Hollywood makes a monster movie just right! I was captivated from start to finish; this movie is all thriller and no filler! I wasn't bored for a minute. Definitely better than Godzilla 2014!

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

HerrKapitan9Mar 21, 2017

Kong is the newest entry into this cinematic monster universe that is upon us and for the most part... its pretty entertaining! Sure the movie has its flaws but if you want to go to the theater and have a good time with you well deservedKong is the newest entry into this cinematic monster universe that is upon us and for the most part... its pretty entertaining! Sure the movie has its flaws but if you want to go to the theater and have a good time with you well deserved hotdog popcorn combo its a good choice.

Having that in mind i can tell you Kong Skull Island has a pretty cool visual style and having the setting the actual island is a very good choice that increase its adventure characteristic. They are lots of monsters, and monster fighting monsters or humans, pretty good special effects and a promise for what is to come. The down part is the writing, not much character development (hope that changes in the potential other movies) and in a way i think is overcasted! too many big names and not much time for them to shine, except for John C. Reily, he slays it!!!!

In short, its a fun movie to watch, lots of things to see and enjoy, just don't expect a master piece of cinematography and you'll have a good time :) They will be very interesting things to come in the future of this monster universe… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

barthebardMar 21, 2017

CGI is really good. The fight scenes were realistic. However, the story left me disappointed. But I guess you really don't watch this sort of movies for the story...

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

6

KaptenVideoMar 20, 2017

Yet another "useful" reboot, also promoted as origin story... because movie buffs haven't surely seen enough of those, yeah? It doesn't even make much sense to create an origin story for Kong because his movies have always explained theYet another "useful" reboot, also promoted as origin story... because movie buffs haven't surely seen enough of those, yeah? It doesn't even make much sense to create an origin story for Kong because his movies have always explained the origins... but they did it anyway. For the bigger purpose to add the king ape into the newest Godzilla reboot. You do remember 2014's mediocre "Godzilla", starring Bryan Cranston, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Ken Watanabe et al? You don’t? Hopefully you will still like to see the sequel „Godzilla: King of Monsters“ coming in 2019 March, where G and Kong will meet finally (again). Anyway, about the experience at hand. „Skull Island“ reaches wide cinema release this weekend. It’s probably partially an experiment, to see how early in the year the masses are ready to shell out their hard-earned for run-of-the-mill epics usually more suitable for summer season.

The movie cost 190 million dollars and I am glad to report that the producers have put this for good use. Everything looks amazing and for a big dumb adventure like this, there’s unusually big and varied line of actresses/ actors. Casting team has done a fine job indeed. We have: * some always super-solid supporting star players (John Goodman, Samuel L. Jackson), * an acclaimed indie actress offering some feminine beauty (Brie Larson), * also always-reliable surprise player who can do both drama and comedy (John C. Reilly), * and a bunch of good likable actors that you are sure you know from somewhere, even if you can’t recall the names (such as Tom Hiddleston – Loki from „Thor“, Corey Hawkins, John Ortiz, Toby Kebbell – doubling as a motion capture actor for Kong, Shea Whigham et al).

The only odd choice is to criminally underuse China’s rising star actress Tian Jing. She’s here but can’t do much. She’s not used to add beauty, she’s not gonna offer some kick-ass action scenes as in „The Great Wall“ alongside Matt Damon. Why cast her at all if you have no need for her?

What’s surprising is that actors are not here just to hold our attention between grand action setpieces. Their performances have heart and persuasiveness which is something of an achievement, considering that much of their acting time was probably spent in front of the empty green canvas. John C. Reilly is the main man here actually, he has the meatiest character and also the side-mission to act as a comic relief without turning into a joke. As usual, I love him and what he does with the material. Just the perfect balance between obscure, funny and crazy.

The monsters look awesome as well and meeting them is worth your time and ticket money. I watched „Kong: Skull Island“ in IMAX and 3D, and both have actually been put to good use here. But I am sure everything looks good in „standard“ 2D as well. "Skull Island" sure is a looker, not only monsters and fighting but the locations as well which make everything look truly epic. Filmed in Hawaii, Vietnam and Australia by the way.

The only reason I am not willing to give the result a higher score is the screenplay. It’s just a bunch of old tired cliches and, to add insult to the injury, the story has been left to sit uncomfortably between two different chairs in at least two important aspects. Firstly, the story’s is too cliched and unoriginal to really grab any adult viewer BUT there’s too much violence to gladly recommend it as a family thing. Secondly, the plot moves constantly between being very serious and just light-hearted which makes it uneven and sometimes hard to take.

In my mind, they should have modernized soldier characters, right now it feels like anachronism – something from old Kong movies. The army marches in and just tries to destroy everything which feels pretty disgusting in the „enlightened“ times of 21st century. If it wasn't all so serious, at least it could be taken as social commentary or black comedy or something. Even Jurassic's and Godzilla's latest outings have fresh-er approach to monster movies which involves more than senseless killing.

So you will get an odd combo where mindless destruction alternates with light-hearted adventure. Is it really proper approach for PG-13 family movie? Am I too sensitive here?… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

GreatGatsbyMar 20, 2017

Kong: Skull Island is one of the best blockbuster films you will ever see, with brilliant production, characters, and especially the great visual effects. It's great to see a film that does not fear killing off major characters, while leavingKong: Skull Island is one of the best blockbuster films you will ever see, with brilliant production, characters, and especially the great visual effects. It's great to see a film that does not fear killing off major characters, while leaving more than just a couple survivors as well. The greatest handicap on Kong is elements of the writing and a fairly simplistic story overall that really takes no risks to shock the viewer past the great effects. The film, however, is a gripping tale with each character portrayed brilliantly, with a ever looming sense of thrill. Kong provides the viewer with a meaningful creature that is sure to lead the way for Universal's forthcoming universe of monsters.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

5

VeldkampPhilipMar 20, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie is just a random mashup of scenes and different tones. The editing is incredibly poor and creates a movie that feels like on big trailer. Furthermore the characters are just so bland. Nobody cares about them and they are just there to act as things for monsters to kill. Even the main characters with the exception of Samuel L Jackson's just say the stupidest things. The photographer girl is just there to be pretty and does not contribute to the story in any way. Some instances, characters just speak and it has no impact on anything around them. I remember the photographer just saying some stuff about mass graves at one point which just doesn't make sense and is just inconsequential. Furthermore the guys wearing the blue jackets are just so incredibly stupid and say such stupid stuff until they die in a brutal way. Additionally, nobody reacts in a human-like way when people die. They just look at it with a confused expression and continue. Ultimately, sometimes the movie is sad, then the next scene is a like a rock montage of stuff and the tone just feels like its all over the place. the only reason this is a 5/10 is because the monster scenes look really cool and the final fight between Kong and the Lizard-thing is awesome.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

3

ZerpnosMar 20, 2017

Berbat abi bu film berbat ötesi bir şey. Daha az puan verebilme şansım olsa onu verirdim. "King Kong" denen filmi de hiç sevmemiştim ve 3 saatimi boşa harcadığımı düşünmüştüm. Şimdi de 2 saatimi boşa harcadığımı söylüyorum. İnsana kattığı birBerbat abi bu film berbat ötesi bir şey. Daha az puan verebilme şansım olsa onu verirdim. "King Kong" denen filmi de hiç sevmemiştim ve 3 saatimi boşa harcadığımı düşünmüştüm. Şimdi de 2 saatimi boşa harcadığımı söylüyorum. İnsana kattığı bir şey varsa o da can sıkıntısından nasıl patlama noktasına geldiğinizdir. Bu kadar kısmı spoilersız anlattım çünkü filme gidecek varsa, gerçekten kandırmıyorum. Berbat bir film kesinlikle gitmemenizi öneririm. Şimdi spoiler vererek, sahneleri örnekleyerek anlatıcam. Zaten filmde senaryo adına hiçbir şey yok. Spoiler: İsteyen spoiler verdiğim kısmı okuyabilir, devamı da şöyle gerçekleşiyor. Her zaman ki gibi klişeler ardı arkası kesilmeden devam ediyor ve Bir tane adamım kaldı, adadan çıkamam. O adamı bulup kurtarmalıyız gibisinden erkeklik gösterileri ve sonucunda ölen daha fazla adam tabi film size bunların sonucunda Kong ve adanın Kongdan sonra en güçlüsünün savaşını gösteriyor.(Aman tanrım mükemmel bir senaryo) Bu kadar birbirini takip etmeyen, çok kötü şeyler izledikten sonra hemen adadan kurtuluyorlar ve bitiyor. Bu kadar film işte bu, boş beleş aksiyon seven ve 2-3 tane CGI canavarı görüp "Ben buna bayılıyorum" tarzında olan bir insan gitsin ve izlesin. Böyle seyredenlerin keyif alacağından eminim. Ha bir de atladığım bir kısım var. Filmde ki kızımız ve Kong 2 dakikalık bir aşk yaşıyorlar. Kesinlikle izlemek istediğim şeylerdi bunlar. Son zamanlarda ortaya bomboş senaryosu olan ve boş beleş aksiyonlarıyla dolu filmler çıkıyor. Gerçekten bıktım ve berbatlar. İzlemenizi asla tavsiye etmiyorum arkadaşlar. Sırf paranıza ziyan olmasın ve sinirimi atabileyim diye buraya bu incelemeyi yazıyorum. UZAK DURUN BU FİLMDEN.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

AdamCrostonMar 19, 2017

I enjoyed this a lot more than Peter Jackson's 2005 retelling, but while this movie sells itself based on its improved focus on action, its characters, script and story are a far cry from its predecessor. People have seemingly selected JohnI enjoyed this a lot more than Peter Jackson's 2005 retelling, but while this movie sells itself based on its improved focus on action, its characters, script and story are a far cry from its predecessor. People have seemingly selected John C. Reilly's character at the standout weak point, due to has offbeat comedic presence. However I would say that he along with Brie Larson are the only two decent characters in the entire film. Between Samuel L. Jackson's frustrating war veteran character to Tom Hiddleston's cringe enduing special forces hero there's a lot of tiresome lines of dialogue and cliches. However none of that matters in the big picture. This is a monster movie epic, with beautiful cinematic moments, which fully captured my interest and attention. This movie is visually stunning. Overall it's a very fun action-packed popcorn movie worth the 2 hour viewing time.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

BrianMcCriticMar 19, 2017

It's true the characters are not well developed, but Kong is awesome and the film is still a lot of fun. Kong and the islands other monsters kept me intrigued throughout and the human characters were just good enough. B+

6 of 9 users found this helpful63

All this user's reviews

5

AcaciaMar 18, 2017

I was very disappointed in this remake of the King Kong saga. While some aspects of the movie were enjoyable, its emphasis on war and war-like behavior by Samuel L. Jackson's character were too much of a departure from the adventure of beingI was very disappointed in this remake of the King Kong saga. While some aspects of the movie were enjoyable, its emphasis on war and war-like behavior by Samuel L. Jackson's character were too much of a departure from the adventure of being on Kong Island. I did not enjoy seeing areas of jungle being blown up constantly and, for me, this detracted greatly from the whole movie. Visiting Kong Island should have been about the adventure and the idea of seeing things you haven't seen before. Even if they are scary. It seemed a bit mean-spirited and although some of the other parts of the story were fun to watch, it basically took over the movie for me.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Pablo97121Mar 18, 2017

Amazing special effects and scenery. The acting was superb from every emotional angel. Must be on the biggest screen possible with the raddest sound system for full enjoyment.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

2

NamuriMar 17, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. An uninspired and uninteresting film that could have been much better if the writing have been compelling enough to make me care what was happening. The majority of the deaths might as well have been spray painted on the actors faces as they were introduced, because that's how unsurprising they were. The only character who really managed to catch my interest for his off beat oddness, Cole, ended up souring my investment in his survival due to the idiotic pointlessness of his death. For the others, they are mostly anticlimactic, without any sort of narrative payoff or comeuppance or ANYTHING besides a number to add to the body count. Kong's portrayal was at least interesting, but the racist portrayal of the Natives of the island was not. Tom Hiddleston was quite handsome and British and in short sleeves during the movie, but if you want to see him act that badly I would suggest rewatching him in Thor, because at least that film is good.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

7

caledo1801Mar 17, 2017

A good movie, pretty decent. A great improvement since Godzilla (2014), specially for the fact they focused a lot more on the monster. Hoping that they do even better on Godzilla: King of the Monsters (2019)

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

0

donelsonMar 17, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This abortion of a movie should never have seen the light of day. With a credits list of OVER 1,300 people, you think someone would have put their hand up and said "Umm... Wait a minute"

This is supposed to be 1974, but apparently no one bothered to check any actual history. Even the props are more modern, with an office full of DEC-VT100 display terminals from 1978 and later. Many other items in this movie are clearly more modern than they should be. Totally lazy for such an expensive project.

I guess if you cast Samuel L. Jackson into anything these days, it must pass his "cartoon silliness test" to be produced. Tarantino can get away with this with great dialog and action. The clowns producing this hairball should hide their faces in public.

You can tell from the very beginning that this is going to be bad. Even if you, as did I, go into it expecting very little. The setup of the movie is long and face-slapping cliché. The actors, whom we know to be quite skilled, are entirely wasted by bad bad bad dialogue and bad direction. The editing is not so good either.

And when we get out onto the ocean (1974 remember), we are insulted by Hollywood physics and meteorology. A huge storm doesn’t even churn up the waves near the ship *facepalm*

Of course, the dorks then fly their non-vintage helicopters into the hellstorm, with super-fake lightning all around, and get through to see the beautiful islands.

Within a few minutes, ALL of them have been knocked down by insisting on flying close enough to Kong to get bashed *facepalm* holy crap.

Things only get more clichéd from there, with the grizzly 28 year survivor (with the 20 year old son at the end), the demented Samuel Jackson staring and almost drooling as he chews the scenery.

Vietnam veterans are insulted by their blind obedience to a ranting idiot. Civilians and military alike enter "the valley of death" in spite of the writers allowing some of the characters to suggest it's a bad idea.

And then it gets really bad. "OMG bad".

And in all of this, you feel incredibly bored. It's dull, and bad, and stupid.

Oh, and the "teaser for the idiots' sequel" comes after the 1,300+ lines of credits, if you are not asleep or barfing in the toilet.

The only thing that could save this movie would be cartoon music and a laugh track. Then it would rate a 4/10.

Astoundingly bad.… Expand

10 of 14 users found this helpful104

All this user's reviews

8

Movieman27Mar 17, 2017

I have to be honest with you and say that I did not enjoy the movie as much as I did Logan but that being said I did like the movie it was a good time at the movies super fun and adventure and action packed with suspence and even a littleI have to be honest with you and say that I did not enjoy the movie as much as I did Logan but that being said I did like the movie it was a good time at the movies super fun and adventure and action packed with suspence and even a little humor but due to what I was seeing in the theater I was in the movie is not for kids an entire family had to walk away from the movie during a disturbing scene I don't think that it is a good idea to take the kids kong himself may traumatize children much less the level of action and adventure but I am going to have to say that you should see the movie just don't take the kids… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

3

DecTheWallsMar 17, 2017

Fails in every aspect. The only thing I didn't laugh at were the jokes. Horribly cliche, horrible writing, horrible direction, some poor acting and fake accents here and there, mostly poor CGI (although Kong's CGI was fine).

I'm baffled asFails in every aspect. The only thing I didn't laugh at were the jokes. Horribly cliche, horrible writing, horrible direction, some poor acting and fake accents here and there, mostly poor CGI (although Kong's CGI was fine).

I'm baffled as to how this movie is being received so well. The only saving grace is that about 10 seconds of the movie had some interesting lighting. That's it.

I don't recommend anyone even think about this movie, let alone pay money to see it.… Expand

7 of 9 users found this helpful72

All this user's reviews

10

cdunny21Mar 16, 2017

I THOUGHT THIS WAS A GREAT MOVIE! IT WAS SHOT WELL AND HAD A WELL DONE PACE. EVEN AT THE SLOWER MOMENTS OF THE MOVIE, OF WHICH THERE WERE FEW; IT NEVER FELT THAT THE MOVIE WAS DRAGGING. THE ACTION WAS WELL DONE AND THE CGI WAS FLAWLESS.I THOUGHT THIS WAS A GREAT MOVIE! IT WAS SHOT WELL AND HAD A WELL DONE PACE. EVEN AT THE SLOWER MOMENTS OF THE MOVIE, OF WHICH THERE WERE FEW; IT NEVER FELT THAT THE MOVIE WAS DRAGGING. THE ACTION WAS WELL DONE AND THE CGI WAS FLAWLESS. EVERYTHING WAS ASTHETICALLY PLEASING AS WELL. NO ACTOR DID A POOR JOB IN THEIR ROLE. THE MOVIE IS SO STAR PACKED THEIR IS A QUESTION ON IF EVERYONE GOT THEIR FAIR SHARE OF SCREEN TIME. AND DO NOT FORGET TO STAY FOR THE AFTER CREDIT SCENE!… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

6

Jack97Mar 16, 2017

You go to a King Kong movie for the spectacle of Kong himself, and when the ape shows up in Kong: Skull Island it's a sight to behold. The CGI is well realized and when he throws down with these skull crawlers it is VERY fun! The climaxYou go to a King Kong movie for the spectacle of Kong himself, and when the ape shows up in Kong: Skull Island it's a sight to behold. The CGI is well realized and when he throws down with these skull crawlers it is VERY fun! The climax especially was amazing big screen eye candy. The human characters are bland and uninterestiing, which is more of a bummer considering the cast assembled, but if you just want to see Kong in all of his glory then you'll be satisfied with Kong: Skull Island. Good escapist blockbuster entertainment.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

7

hicholesterolMar 15, 2017

If you like monster movies, you will be pleased with this movie. It was not anything special when you consider actually acting or writing, but it was definitely entertaining. John C. Reilly really stole this movie. He was the most lovable,If you like monster movies, you will be pleased with this movie. It was not anything special when you consider actually acting or writing, but it was definitely entertaining. John C. Reilly really stole this movie. He was the most lovable, and quoteable character. This movie also gets the size of Kong right, which is great. (Probably to give Godzilla an actual challenge in the upcoming crossover movie). It's a great movie about a giant ape, but if you're looking for this movie to blow you away, you'll be dissapointed.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

5

yosemiteMar 15, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Movie started off great. Nice pacing, good background music and casting seemed good. The movie weakened after the helicopters went down. Turned "we've seen this before" about 1/2 way into the film. Stolen themes from other movies. Samuel Jackson as Captain Ahab. Brie Larson as the love interest in Mighty Joe Young. Killer animals from Jurassic Park. A moderately entertaining film on a winter's afternoon… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

9

BoskowitzMar 15, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I have to say, I do not like the titular character that much, I went to see the movie for the Vietnam Era. It is there. From helicopters to songs and scenery. Fire and darkness, Apocaliptic (now!) red rising sun, door gunner who bombs the pristine jungle with a grin. One might not expect a monster movie to be about character, but Kong makes it shockingly true. Hiddleston as Conrad and white woman as white woman with a camera are not exactly spectatucal. The soldiers are. Mills, Chapman and Cole are great characters. And Jackson as Packard. They are men who are about to go to their families and beds after enduring horrors of jungles of Vietnam, but are given one last mission before they can go home. One last mission that sends them to hell itself. The story. The movie is a re-told Mobi-Dick, with Jackson/Packard as Ahab and Kong as Mobi-dick. I mean, there are other characters, but the story of decorated officer who accepts a seemingly innocent mission, only to lose his men one by one to the nightmarish island and his quest of maddening, insane need to extract revenge upon a creature that killed his men in self defence is not something one sees every day. The image of Kong and Packard staring at each other thru fire and smoke of wrecked helicopters, eyes swirling with unmendable hate is very powerfull and sugestive.

What I did not like was the unecesery "romantic involment" or what is that supose to be between Wear and Kong, but I guess it was necesery not to older films. There is the last fight scene where giant monsters duke it out and from time to time there is cut focused on a woman faling into water. That is not good. But other then that, if you want to be entertained, go and watch it. It is an unique film with unique scenery, story and characters.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

coltonjamesMar 15, 2017

Being over 80-years-old and with seven films under his belt, King Kong needed to change up the formula with his eighth outing. Rather than the usual route of ape meets woman, ape falls for woman, ape dies; Kong: Skull Island attempts to beBeing over 80-years-old and with seven films under his belt, King Kong needed to change up the formula with his eighth outing. Rather than the usual route of ape meets woman, ape falls for woman, ape dies; Kong: Skull Island attempts to be fresh by venturing into new territory with an Apocalypse Now inspired theme and bold foray into the studio coveted “shared universe” approach with a planned Godzilla vs. King Kong in 2020. Does the film succeed in this regard? Short answer: kinda. The film nails presentation, action and Kong himself, but is a disappointment in every other aspect. The giant gorilla based adventure is set in the Vietnam War era, with a group of scientists and their military escorts attempting escape from an ancient island, inhabited with terrifying monsters and godlike behemoths. An all-star cast consisting of Tom Hiddleston, Brie Larson, John Goodman, Samuel L. Jackson and John C. Reilly try their best to save the film from its formulaic approach, but ultimately fail. The actors are given clunky dialogue and poor motivations. The human characters are clichéd and given nothing to do in the entire film other than stare in awe at Kong, and Kong is to be marveled at. The best compliment I can give this film is that Kong’s depiction makes him feel like a true God compared to other King Kong films. The mythology of the island and monsters, although delivered through tedious exposition dumps, is thought out and tantalizing leaving you wanting to know more about this world. Kong is not the only inhabitant of the island and many other fascinating creatures are given cool set pieces. Kong’s effects are beautifully done and the action is easy to follow. Helicopters are thrashed, giant “skull-crawlers” are punched and humans flee in terror in glorious spectacle throughout the film. Unfortunately, the moments in-between the action don’t deliver. Many scenes feel very familiar and were done better in other movies. The tone of the film is wildly inconsistent. It appears director Jordan Vogt-Roberts didn’t know if he wanted it to be a hard-edged Vietnam war flick or a light-hearted action comedy. There are far too many attempts at humor with only lines by standout John C. Reilly landing. Kong: Skull Island is a passable action film, but it also is a great monster flick. If character progression and in-depth storytelling are what you’re looking for, don’t look to this film. More likely however, you’re looking for a movie about a giant gorilla smashing things and you can’t do much better than Kong: Skull Island.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

MaverickneoMar 15, 2017

Lets face it, you are going to see this movie to see King Kong kick some serious butt. This movie wastes ZERO time putting King Kong on the screen and having him do just that. Sure most of the characters are Kong fodder but hey, thats whatLets face it, you are going to see this movie to see King Kong kick some serious butt. This movie wastes ZERO time putting King Kong on the screen and having him do just that. Sure most of the characters are Kong fodder but hey, thats what they are there for. The movie is very entertaining if you love monster movies. This movie was lots of fun and best of all...Wait until the credits are over. :)… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

8

bfoore90Mar 14, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Pretty dope movie if you ask me. Its definitely a much different Kong than the stories that have been told in the past like the 2005 Peter Jackson remake of King Kong which is also a good movie. Overall, the film does well in setting up Kong's origin story with alot of cool scenes, impressive direction and screenplay as well as some more lighthearted moments here and there which is a big difference from 2014's "Godzilla" which had a darker and more tense tone to it. The film is well acted but it does have some flaws to it, other than Brie Larson, Sam Jackson and John C Reilly's characters none of the supporting character's offer much to drive home with. Tom Hiddleson plays the part well of the rugged British Special Forces Merc, John Goodman and John Ortiz are kinda just there and Toby Kebbell's Chatman is more a plot device than to justify Samuel Jackson's lust for revenge than anything else. There are a few gems however, I found Shea Whigman, Jason Mitchell and Corey Hawkin's characters to be the more likable of the bunch. Overall, the film does well setting up for what its trying to do which is good that Legendary seems to be taking the steps of creating a "Monsterverse" the right way as opposed to what DC is doing with their superhero universe.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

FuturedirectorMar 14, 2017

Predictable and clumsy but impressive and fast-paced. Kong: Skull Island is another cool and satisfying all-new story that reboots the classic King Kong character in a very vigorous and ambicious form.

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

9

TVJerryMar 14, 2017

This is a complete revision of the King Kong tale. A group of scientists (and their military escorts) goes on an expedition to a mysterious island, where they discover quite a few large, dangerous creatures. It's less about a raging monsterThis is a complete revision of the King Kong tale. A group of scientists (and their military escorts) goes on an expedition to a mysterious island, where they discover quite a few large, dangerous creatures. It's less about a raging monster and more about an action-packed adventure. The creatures create a formidable presence and the encounters are full of creative ways to kill. Toss is John C. Reilly for some sweet humor, stunning locations and beautiful cinematography. Combine them with assured filmmaking from 2nd time director Jordan Vogt-Roberts ("The Kings of Summer") and the result is pure popcorn fun! NOTE: Stay thru the credits for a promising preview.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

GinaKMar 13, 2017

An enjoyable film but the feeling of fragmentation is very noticeable. I also didn’t think we needed to bring up Vietnam and World War II, although I can see why the (what can I call them?) newbies on the island had to be separated toAn enjoyable film but the feeling of fragmentation is very noticeable. I also didn’t think we needed to bring up Vietnam and World War II, although I can see why the (what can I call them?) newbies on the island had to be separated to contrast the militaristic and the humanistic to drive the plot along and provide some “drama.” Sadly Samuel L. Jackson was much too over-the-top and not believable. On the other hand, Tom Hiddleston gave an excellent performance as did Brie Larson. Although the previous two versions of Kong have their virtues, I liked this new version for its many excellent cast members and its attempt to do something different, faults and all. The monsters get a 9 but the cast average for me is a 7.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

10

marlavrMar 13, 2017

The action begins from the start. It is very suspenseful more than scary. Great use of technology. I liked that Kong was given a soul and compassion for others. Loved the soundtrack.

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

dijavantewowMar 13, 2017

It is a visually beautiful movie, and there are some great moments of comic relief, but the best part is the Kong himself is ever-present. This may seem obvious, but Godzilla proved, to our detriment, that the monster doesn't apparently needIt is a visually beautiful movie, and there are some great moments of comic relief, but the best part is the Kong himself is ever-present. This may seem obvious, but Godzilla proved, to our detriment, that the monster doesn't apparently need to be in the movie much to make the movie (although not good). Not a perfect movie by any stretch, but overall solid, fun to watch, and a great way to bring King Kong back.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

7

Lone_Wolf_SonesMar 13, 2017

Kong Skull Island is a fun Monster flick. It's budget clearly didn't go to waste with its visual effects which are very well done. There are some genuinely spectacular sequences of action with Kong. The film is a bit slow to start but onceKong Skull Island is a fun Monster flick. It's budget clearly didn't go to waste with its visual effects which are very well done. There are some genuinely spectacular sequences of action with Kong. The film is a bit slow to start but once things get rolling its generous in the number of thrills it delivers. The cast is pretty solid with notables like John Goodman and Samuel L. Jackson as well as John C. Reiley who offers some great comedic relief. A lot of monster films like to offer only glimpses or keep the monster hidden to build suspense. I was glad that Kong makes his presence known fairly early. While Kong is the main attraction of the film, there are some other amazing creatures as well and its a thrill to watch Kong slug it out against them.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

3

bennyslenMar 13, 2017

It's funny how the "2005 version" of Kong is better in every single aspect, even in special effects. The only thing that caught a little bit my attention was the weirdness or the direction and production, but it didn't even fit well in theIt's funny how the "2005 version" of Kong is better in every single aspect, even in special effects. The only thing that caught a little bit my attention was the weirdness or the direction and production, but it didn't even fit well in the movie. If you are looking for a movie with action scenes only, it might fit for you.… Expand

6 of 9 users found this helpful63

All this user's reviews

7

Creeper3455Mar 13, 2017

Kong Skull Island felt like watching a low budget version of Mad Max Fury Road. I mean,the movie is good,but some things were boring. If we have to watch Kong kicking everyone's butt,it will be less entertaining in charachter development,Kong Skull Island felt like watching a low budget version of Mad Max Fury Road. I mean,the movie is good,but some things were boring. If we have to watch Kong kicking everyone's butt,it will be less entertaining in charachter development, since Samuel L. Jackson and John C. Reilly were the only ones that made this movie a bit fun (aside from the action),and the rest was quite decent. The visual effects were great/weird at the same time. In some parts, it felt like rewatching The Jungle Book (The 2016 one,not the cartoon). In the end,no,it's not better than 2005's King Kong,but Kong Skull island really knows how to entertain the audienc with a promising story,some weirdly impressive effects,but with a (kinda)lame acting that makes this movie fine to watch.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

1

suadeshMar 13, 2017

There is no surprise all along the movie. the characters are a cliché. nice special effect, but not enough to make it a good movie. Plot is sometimes inconsistant.

9 of 13 users found this helpful94

All this user's reviews

8

imshiva21Mar 13, 2017

Movie was spontaneous. visually could have been better nevertheless enjoyed till the end, great casting sam jackson was a bit naive... KONG stole the act even Mr Loki(Tom Hiddleston) couldn't match up with his skill. (7.5/10)

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

Compi24Mar 12, 2017

It may only occupy a runner-up position when stacked against some of the other, more formidable installments in the "Kong" cinematic mythos, but "Skull Island's" look alone makes it a monstrous force to be reckoned with, as director JordanIt may only occupy a runner-up position when stacked against some of the other, more formidable installments in the "Kong" cinematic mythos, but "Skull Island's" look alone makes it a monstrous force to be reckoned with, as director Jordan Vogt-Roberts and cinematographer Larry Fong have really crafted something with immense visual appeal. And even with an underdeveloped character here and a plot contrivance there, the jaw-dropping set pieces and majestic vistas are more than enough to compensate for any negligible script-based flaws. The ape is great, Sam Jack is as pissed as ever, and John C. Reilly offers up enough smirk-worthy light-heartedness to make this film a well-rounded and serviceable action experience from point A to point Z.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

Muskrat147Mar 12, 2017

Kong's abundance of action and gorgeous eye-candy shots help drown out all accusations regarding interesting characters and a unique story, and serve as a somewhat proper interpretation of the iconic creature.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

jdiazMar 12, 2017

**** please!"

Kong: Skull Island is a movie that develops characters well enough to make the plot compelling while having awe-inspiring and impressive action sequences. Hats off to Industrial Light & Magic for the special effects, they are**** please!"

Kong: Skull Island is a movie that develops characters well enough to make the plot compelling while having awe-inspiring and impressive action sequences. Hats off to Industrial Light & Magic for the special effects, they are flawless. The cinematography is also very impressive, there are multiple shots that are landscape porn and beautiful sunsets all around. I want to see more blockbusters like this.

Also, Tom Hiddleston, Brie Larson, Samuel L. Jackson, and especially John C. Reilly gave very good performances. Every scene looks believable and I flinched several times on some of the more visceral ones.

Go see it.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

4

AxeTMar 12, 2017

As advertised this is pure 100% B movie, whereas the previous two remakes were A class pictures. It is a huge production of course like the other two, but much smaller in scope. However this is not a pure remake but a fusion reboot not onlyAs advertised this is pure 100% B movie, whereas the previous two remakes were A class pictures. It is a huge production of course like the other two, but much smaller in scope. However this is not a pure remake but a fusion reboot not only of the original classic but more so of the schlocky spinoff sequel Kongs. And as expected it is scenario by committee no doubt. What is a surprise is how much it apes (just can't help the pun) both the enormously under-valued 1976 and over-rated bloated 2005 film cherry picking aspects from each, not to mention a strong influence from "Apocalypse Now", which it throws all together into a big convoluted mess of a story with too many characters and one of the weakest most underused lead protagonists ever in a formula Hollywood blockbuster. As if the thinly scripted character wasn't problem enough, the actor Tom Hiddleston is awful. He's a non-personality no presence disaster of a leading man. All he has going for him is a stalwart stance and prissy Brit accent, actually a big minus in his case! (If the rumors are true he's on the short list to play Bond then that franchise is in alarming trouble.) The rest of the cast is fine with the exception of the couple token minority scientist characters.

The director (or whoever) here infuses the picture with a bold audacious comic book style with some stunning visuals (especially in IMAX 3D and the best use of I've seen in quite a while) and a forward propelled story that holds your attention initially, but only for a short time before the usual Act II bottoming out. The science fiction conceit concocted is only glossed over which is too bad. More exposition on that would have been good. They seem more interested in cramming overplayed to death retro pop rock songs into the soundtrack than in creating a mood and telling a good story all the way through.

What this fusion entry is most noticeably missing is the Kong (now about 100 feet tall instead of around 25 or 48 which is purely for one reason...) we not only fear (and maybe Sam Jackson is the more frightening one in this), but root and cry for which the original 1933 classic gave us in a beautiful original enduring tale for the screen. Zero tragedy here. No the tragedy here is how reduced the storytelling and genuine emotion has become in today's blockbusters in favor of pure calculated beat by beat formulaic non-stop action. It's boring. Once upon a time Hollywood had balance and could deliver it like no other.

The best part of the presentation by far was the special custom 3D IMAX snipe designed just for Kong playing before the feature. By far, oh but that wasn't part of the actual feature.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

6

ATXHippieMar 12, 2017

Lots of excellent special effects, although there were a few non-sequiturs that made you go, What??? At times I felt like I was watching a Star Trek movie wherein there seemed to be an inexplicably endless supply of the doomed guys in the redLots of excellent special effects, although there were a few non-sequiturs that made you go, What??? At times I felt like I was watching a Star Trek movie wherein there seemed to be an inexplicably endless supply of the doomed guys in the red shirts. John C. Reilly was hilarious. I liked Hiddleston's performance. About 50% of the time Tom Hiddleston & Brie Larson seemed to be in two different movies. To be fair, Brie's part did not have a lot of meat to it. Smiling, crying, looking tough & determined, taking photographs. There was an English 101 superficial smattering of references to Joseph Conrad's great novel, "Heart of Darkness." The military leader played by Samuel L. Jackson had a lot of Kurtz, or even Captain Ahab, in him. The character was way over to top. Multiple movie genres were mashed together: Vietnam pullout movie, Kong movie, Jurassic Park, Apocalypse Now, & so on. You must watch all the way through the credits and beyond to see the sequel hints: Mothra & the Hydra may be on the horizon. So the Japanese and the Greek mythology are pulled in at the end. The actors playing the military guys were fun to watch. So this movie was fun, but had too many random elements and dumb, illogical plot drivers.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

EdwardGerryMar 12, 2017

This is one of the most immersive and captivating movies ever made! Its literally insane and theres something you would never expect every five minutes I was totally loving it. It's a two hour movie but I was ready for another hour of theseThis is one of the most immersive and captivating movies ever made! Its literally insane and theres something you would never expect every five minutes I was totally loving it. It's a two hour movie but I was ready for another hour of these gigantic monsters! not a fan of samuel jackson though… Expand

6 of 25 users found this helpful619

All this user's reviews

7

moviemitch96Mar 11, 2017

This definitely met my expectations as nothing more than a good and simple popcorn action spectacle. Lots of great cgi and effects to behold throughout, as well as a talented all-star cast with the likes of Tom Hiddleston, Samuel L. Jackson,This definitely met my expectations as nothing more than a good and simple popcorn action spectacle. Lots of great cgi and effects to behold throughout, as well as a talented all-star cast with the likes of Tom Hiddleston, Samuel L. Jackson, Brie Larson, John Goodman, and John C. Reilly to name as few. Storywise, there's little to none to be found here, but that simply doesn't matter, as the film's already plenty of fun without. Overall, simply put, it's loud and entertaining, so don't do yourself a disservice by going in expecting more. Also, stick around after the credits for a brief little teaser of a familiar monster who got a film of his own a few years ago (but this film's much better in my opinion.)… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

ivan_terribleMar 11, 2017

It's different from the previous king kong. More action and more victims. Less character developments compared to the previous ones. Don't forget to stay back until the end of the credits for potential sequel.

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

10

TxMANZMar 11, 2017

When I had first heard that they were making another Kong film I was skeptic; after all, its only been a few years since Jackson's iconic King Kong reboot rolled into theaters. Still, it seemed like it would be a lot of fun, and would alsoWhen I had first heard that they were making another Kong film I was skeptic; after all, its only been a few years since Jackson's iconic King Kong reboot rolled into theaters. Still, it seemed like it would be a lot of fun, and would also tie into Legendary's Godzilla reboot; seemed promising.
We just got back from the theater, and to sum it up simply: it is truly amazing! Without spoilers, it is enough to state that it has so many unexpected great things going for it: the ensemble cast is great (particular props to John C. Riley's character), the story is completely fresh and unique, and the movie keeps going and never grows dull from start to finish, whether the action is fierce or if the characters are merely conversing. Skull Island isn't a retread of the original story, and reboots the series right. Also of note is how the WWII and 70's eras are well-established and integrated into the overall experience. As one last note, a surprising amount of humor and fun is sprinkled throughout the film; it never feels like too much, and yet adds an extra spark to an already fantastic film.
Overall, Kong:Skull Island is a fun and enjoyable blockbuster smash that delivers in all the right ways, and is not to be missed.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

9

saintdeckyMar 11, 2017

Kong: Skull Island is an enjoyable, fun, thrilling movie that by no means has good characters or screenplay.

Acting: The acting is just fine. There are so many actors and characters that most people barely even get to say anything. Some ofKong: Skull Island is an enjoyable, fun, thrilling movie that by no means has good characters or screenplay.

Acting: The acting is just fine. There are so many actors and characters that most people barely even get to say anything. Some of the lines are kind of phoned-in, but that's also a problem with the script.

Characters: There are way too many characters. The movie attempted to develop each one multiple times by giving them two lines describing their backstory or something significant that happened once. They did little to nothing to develop anyone and just ate up time that could have been spent for action sequences. Halfway through, I just hoped that they didn't focus on the characters and just on the action, and it seems they almost gave up as well. Towards the last 40 minutes, they just kind of give up and don't give anymore background. John C. Reiley's character is really the only one who has any development, and the only one that really feels like a character. Brie Larson's character does little to nothing besides annoyingly take pictures throughout and say exclamations when something happens. I would give an example, but I don't even remember some things she said. And I saw the movie 5 hours ago. That's how forgettable she was I completely forgot some characters existed halfway through the movie. John Goodman just kind of disappears after being in the first 20 minutes. Tom Hiddleston just acts cool and kills stuff when he gets the chance. I think the few minutes they spent trying to develop him should've been spent on him killing stuff, because it was great seeing him in action. Sammy Jackson's character just kind of stares murderously at stuff through fire during the whole movie. There are some characters that literally have a few lines and then just kind of die.

Plot: There are some problems with the movie throughout (example: why didn't they see any of Kong's destruction when they first flew over the island, then they walk around for a few minutes and see footprints and stuff everywhere), and I don't think anyone should've survived the initial helicopter crashes. I admire the fact that they didn't spend 30 minutes building up going to the island; it still took 20 something minutes, but it wasn't boring or anything. The Magnificent Seven is a good example of this. In that movie, they spent nearly half the film just gathering the seven, even though it was next to useless because you know they're going to join. In this movie, you know they're going to go to the island, so they didn't take their time building up to the expedition, they just gave some background information and went. Some things happen very conveniently, that can be expected in a movie like this. I also walked into this movie expecting to be able to predict twists and turns, but I wasn't necessarily able to. This may have been because the movie didn't attempt to throw any curveballs; they just made the movie with no ambition in mind.

Screenplay: Most of the lines are cheesy and not necessarily necessary. Most attempts to develop the characters further fall flat and just end up as a waste of time.

Action: The action was great, fun, and well-shot. It was well-done, and I wanted more by the end. As I said, many of the minutes spent attempting to develop should've been spent on action, as it was the best part. It was smart and engaging, with scenes that were pretty intense. They were nowhere near the most intense scenes I've seen in a movie, but it definitely comes close.

Effects: The effects were absolutely gorgeous. Kong looked great, the skullcrawlers looked scary and awesome, and every other animal looked realistic and convincing. The fights between Kong and the skullcrawlers looked amazing, and didn't feel like I was watching two CGI animals fighting. Another thing I want to bring up are the creatures. The creatures were creative and cool, and I wish there were more of them. Some of the best parts and best scenes were when they discovered a new species and had to fight it off. Even just seeing a new creature was cool and enjoyable. Unfortunately they spent time with the characters, as I've said.

Overall, Kong: Skull Island has bland, bleak characters, but is compensated for with truly amazing effects and great action. Still think 10-15 minutes could have been shaved off, though.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

6

JorgeLestreMar 11, 2017

'Kong: Skull Island' stays behind Peter Jackson's bold approach back in 2005. It is entertaining sometimes but it feels that Hiddleston and Larson are only there to make name for the cast. Sam Jackson is the only one working here.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

TriggatomicMar 11, 2017

It is an okay and entertaining movie, nothing special, however. If you have seen a lot of movies it is not much of a thriller, because everything is obvious and its easy to tell what will happen next. Another problem it faces is that kingIt is an okay and entertaining movie, nothing special, however. If you have seen a lot of movies it is not much of a thriller, because everything is obvious and its easy to tell what will happen next. Another problem it faces is that king Kong is more of a background character, still worth seeimg.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

4

MetzaeMar 11, 2017

This was as far from good as you can be without being bad. Great cast, great acting, big budget special effects...all gone to waste. The pure schlock of it wasn't obvious until halfway in, then a monster puked up the skull of the deus exThis was as far from good as you can be without being bad. Great cast, great acting, big budget special effects...all gone to waste. The pure schlock of it wasn't obvious until halfway in, then a monster puked up the skull of the deus ex machina (still wearing dog tags) at the feet of our deus ex machina, which led to a deus ex...position, fire, death, hero shot, end credits.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

Davrosdaleks1Mar 11, 2017

I loved this move, absolutely loved it! I feel that some of the naysayers are too jaded. This was a popcorn, adventure film and its quality was far above expectations.

It looks great. The computer animation is really good and didn't take youI loved this move, absolutely loved it! I feel that some of the naysayers are too jaded. This was a popcorn, adventure film and its quality was far above expectations.

It looks great. The computer animation is really good and didn't take you out of the film. Also, really liked the giant creature design in this. They feel very natural. The cinematography is superb, the best part of the film. Kong of course is the king of the film and he does not disappoint. He has never looked better. A lot of color in this too, which is refreshing considering how grey and muted so many films are these days.

This film fixes a lot of problems from the Peter Jackson remake. Gone is the need for Kong to be attracted to a human woman (which never made a whole lot of sense). It has a lot of monster like Jackson's, but it doesn't feel like the violence is trying too hard to be edgy. It also scraps the worn out plot from the original. No third attempt at the skyscraper bit. This is a new story and it works all the better for it.

Many people complained that the people aren't as interesting as Kong. I disagree. Yeah, there were a lot of them, some had more time to shine than others, and the two leads weren't as developed as some supporting characters, but I still liked them all. I felt they were all likable and excellently performed by the cast.

I highly recommend this film. (Oh, and if you're catching the scene after the credits, don't read the credits near the end. It'll spoil something.)… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

Meth-dudeMar 11, 2017

The acting was good, the special effects were really well made and the movie is entertaining. Sure, it's definitely not as good as the previous King Kong remake and the trailer shows basically all the movie, but it's still a pretty good movie.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

Thatonenerd2187Mar 11, 2017

King Kong Is one of those monster movies where it focuses more on the action than the actual story, but I'm pretty sure that's what most people expect. The story itself I'd not only rushed, but it's actually trying to get itself to KongKing Kong Is one of those monster movies where it focuses more on the action than the actual story, but I'm pretty sure that's what most people expect. The story itself I'd not only rushed, but it's actually trying to get itself to Kong island as fast as possible, which surprised me because I was expecting it to take at least fourty five minutes to get there. The characters have no development, but they are entertaining to watch at times. The film I'd shot well, it looks nice, and the action scenes are entertaining to watch. Overall, if you just want action with giant monsters, you'll get it here. But if your expecting an Oscar worthy story, you better watch something else.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

HeaviermetalMar 11, 2017

Good movie overall. Feels a bit too flat at times, and could have used more of what made the trailer so exciting throughout the movie. The cinematography and VFX were incredible.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

johnem95Mar 11, 2017

Despite getting off to a somewhat shaky start and featuring an overabundance of characters, 'Kong: Skull Island' delivers as a fun, fast-paced popcorn-muncher with colorful visuals and exciting action.

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

6

royledesma90Mar 11, 2017

Fong did an amazing job, everything else has a regular level, on the other hand, sometimes the rhythm of the film becomes too slow and the action scenes are not at all epic.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

PimpinpakmanMar 11, 2017

The action was actually very well done. I haven't seen monster movies where they were able to show great detail into the destruction a giant king kong would be able to do or fight another big monster like creature. This is what i expectedThe action was actually very well done. I haven't seen monster movies where they were able to show great detail into the destruction a giant king kong would be able to do or fight another big monster like creature. This is what i expected Godzilla to be like. So i actually highly recommend a watch, preferably not in 3D.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

5

EdeltraudMar 11, 2017

CGI (or whatever techniques used to make beasts) & locations are great. Enjoyed the movie as I watched it, but later it left me flat. So much more could have been done with the characters' stories, the photographer & scientists got shortCGI (or whatever techniques used to make beasts) & locations are great. Enjoyed the movie as I watched it, but later it left me flat. So much more could have been done with the characters' stories, the photographer & scientists got short shrift. The natives were especially meh, no cool rituals or any action vis a vis Kong there. Overall, way too glossy, never felt the fear. Would like to see a grittier treatment, I mean, Kong had his best parts airbrushed -- come on!… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

3

GetDaRekM8Mar 11, 2017

To sum this movie up, if you've seen the trailers you've basically seen the movie, the trailers are basically a shorter version of the movie. This movie has no character development at all to the point where they are so bland and boring youTo sum this movie up, if you've seen the trailers you've basically seen the movie, the trailers are basically a shorter version of the movie. This movie has no character development at all to the point where they are so bland and boring you really don't give a crap about them. Nearly four main characters die and you don't give a damn about them. Due to the trailers spoiling pretty much every interesting scene in the movie, you sit there bored out of your mind waiting for anything to happen. The only good thing about this movie are a couple of good action scenes with Kong destroying stuff (These scenes were also spoiled by the trailers).… Expand

11 of 14 users found this helpful113

All this user's reviews

2

bkristmanMar 10, 2017

One of the worst bigger budget films i've ever seen and i'm usually a fan of creature feature/monster movies. It's a hodgepodge of cliched dialogue and badly acted scenes with long periods of nothing happening.
Kong goes missing for half anOne of the worst bigger budget films i've ever seen and i'm usually a fan of creature feature/monster movies. It's a hodgepodge of cliched dialogue and badly acted scenes with long periods of nothing happening.
Kong goes missing for half an hour at a time .
They rip off ideas from apocalypse now and moby dick and likely a dozen other films but in a cheesy way.
It was like watching a bunch of bad low budget b-movies all strung together. Tom Hiddleston is so out of place in this film it's not even funny.
He and the other actors just phone in their lines . The 3-d was practically non existent so i wish i hadn't paid extra.
Sorry i even went to this junker.… Expand

12 of 20 users found this helpful128

All this user's reviews

4

Rebecca31Mar 10, 2017

My gut instinct told me this would not be a good movie, however upon hearing the positive reviews I thought I should set aside my prejudgements and give it a try. And you know what? I should have listened to my gut. I’ve been told by multipleMy gut instinct told me this would not be a good movie, however upon hearing the positive reviews I thought I should set aside my prejudgements and give it a try. And you know what? I should have listened to my gut. I’ve been told by multiple people that this is better than Peter Jackson’s version, and yes his version isn’t amazing and no it hasn’t aged well but it’s a hell of a lot better than this mess. Simply put, ‘Kong: Skull Island’ does not hold up against the motion capture by Andy Serkis in ‘King Kong’ 2005. There isn’t enough effort put into this remake so I was left disappointed.
One dimensional characters embark on an adventure to an uncharted island blah, blah, blah. Enter Kong, John C. Reilly and skull crushers. Yeah I know stupid name to call them but don’t worry John C. Reilly takes a moment to acknowledge their ridiculous name and we all laugh… Don’t get me wrong, I did in fact laugh at times yet I don’t think I was supposed to laugh quite as much. Sometimes a script is so bad all you can do is laugh and cringe. Also featuring Tom Hiddleston, Brie Larson and Samuel L. Jackson. Now if I had known this was going to turn into Samuel Vs Kong then I honestly wouldn’t have bothered. The countless amount of other great movies referenced in this one was crazy, jumping on the shoulders of other monster movies in the desperate hope of creating something decent out of it was simply a giant fail. Considering King Kong is an iconic movie monster this does not do him any justice whatsoever. That just leaves one question. Was I entertained? Well yes and no. It had its moments were it reeled me in but moments later it lost me again. No I wouldn’t recommend it but all you monster movie fans will probably see it anyway so don’t say I didn’t warn you.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

4

TrevorsViewMar 10, 2017

Were you disappointed by the amount of screen time by the giant lizard in Godzilla? I have good news for you: the big ape of Kong: Skull Island hits the screen immediately before the opening credits in all his grandness, and appearsWere you disappointed by the amount of screen time by the giant lizard in Godzilla? I have good news for you: the big ape of Kong: Skull Island hits the screen immediately before the opening credits in all his grandness, and appears constantly throughout the film with constant action and explosions in the mix. Yet even without the ape on screen all the time, the amount of swords, flames, helicopters, bombs, and Skullcrushers satisfactorily draw out everything moment by moment in an approach comparative to various scenes in Apocalypse Now.

So whether if you’re a millennial or a baby boomer, the action should satisfy. Standard to the tradition of Skull Island, other behemoths are accompanied to confront both Kong and the humans in search for him. These camouflaged beasts include a swamp ox, a log insect, a giant spider amongst a bamboo forest, reptilian birds, and a kraken who becomes Kong’s dinner. Other colorful sights on this god forsaken island range from the mesmerizing northern lights to the horrific pale-tinted mass grave of great ape skeletons, creating a believable look to a testing world against man’s successes.

Would such an experience keep you talking in the long run? Will you get pumped for Kong’s eventual confrontation against Godzilla?

Well, let’s rewind the clock to answer that question, shall we?

As the movie starts, a World War II soldier crash lands on a deserted island in 1944, only to come face to sword against a Japanese warrior. Compared to past King Kong movies, this slightly different period setting receives a rather poor treatment; I mean, when the first five minutes persuades us to cheer on a US soldier fighting against one of the Pearl Harbor bombers, has racism really changed at all by 2017 standards?

Then the opening credits shows historical footage of man’s scientific progress up until 1973. Then we see a researcher intent on proposing a government-funded trip to an unexplored destination named “Skull Island,” the one island God did not finish creating. They compare it to the Bermuda Triangle, as nobody has ever come back alive. So right at the Vietnam War’s end, a team of US soldiers, investigators, and a photographer set out to explore. Eventually they find the same soldier who crash landed in 1944, and introduce the old soldier to the worlds’ robust change since he left humanity, and team up with him to head back home. Although could man really be king here? Especially when the castaway tribe worships a 200 foot tall ape?

Kong may be an epic time for all you men out there, but you ladies may be napping once or twice, as your only mode of connection is Oscar winner Brie Larson (Room, Short Term 12), who exists here purely to play THAT kind of female lead. You know, the one who exists just so women have a celebrity name to gush over. The one who gets wet while wearing a skimpy gray tank top. If you’re still not underwhelmed, what if I told you about her romantic subplot, one that meets absolutely no resolution?

You may not even notice any predictable romantic subplot anyway, as there are so many millimeter thick cardboard cutout characters, none of which have a proper introduction to tell you who they are as human beings. Some of them are even there purely for comic relief’s sake. The large cast’s screen time balance of screen time has so little attention, you don’t feel any hint of tension or sorrow whenever one of them gets killed or mauled.

Now one question still remains: how will it be when Kong has to fight Godzilla in 2020? I can absolutely presume the fight will be epic. I mean, if Kong can deliver the nonstop action and cinematic grandness we asked for, while also learning its lessons from 2014’s Godzilla, then it should turn out entertaining enough.

On the other hand, if you prefer a much deeper story featuring characters who are worth cheering on, then you’d probably be better off watching Peter Jackson’s version as opposed to investing in future films similar to Kong: Skull Island. It may not be a particularly good movie, nor was it trying to be, but it’s still a pretty sweet thrill ride!… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

9

Dirk2112Mar 10, 2017

This film is just short of a pitch perfect pulp kaiju adventure. Has a few comparatively minor issues but see it. See it immediately if you know what the words "pulp kaiju adventure" mean.

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

Agent314Mar 10, 2017

At times muddled and a bit awkward, K:SI truly shines when it matters. Some, but not all, the characters are a bit thin; however, this isn't a character driven drama. It's a MONSTER MOVIE! And let me tell, boy does it have monsters. AndAt times muddled and a bit awkward, K:SI truly shines when it matters. Some, but not all, the characters are a bit thin; however, this isn't a character driven drama. It's a MONSTER MOVIE! And let me tell, boy does it have monsters. And when they fight you'd better hold on to your popcorn. This is why the film succeeds. Of course, the brilliant visuals and surprisingly good cinematography don't hurt. The true stand-out is certainly Kong himself. Both pensive and angry, he is oft times bewildered by the human cast and royally pissed off by them. But he is Lord Protector of Skull Island, and there's a lot more for him to be concerned with than human mosquitoes.

Expect to laugh. Expect to cheer, and be prepared to be amazed. But most of all, expect to have fun.… Expand

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

9

Joshua123Mar 10, 2017

If you've come to expect King Kong fighting dinosaurs like in the original, or Peter Jackson's reboot, you'll probably walk out a bit disappointed. However, if you can enjoy the movie for what it is; a goofy yet fun and action packed monsterIf you've come to expect King Kong fighting dinosaurs like in the original, or Peter Jackson's reboot, you'll probably walk out a bit disappointed. However, if you can enjoy the movie for what it is; a goofy yet fun and action packed monster movie, then you'll DEFINITELY enjoy KONG: Skull Island.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

7

eagleeyevikingMar 10, 2017

With extravagant visuals and plenty of action & adventure, Jordan Vogt-Roberts’ popcorn flick, Kong: Skull Island, is a feverishly entertaining addition to Legendary’s new monster-verse, even if there are far too many underdeveloped andWith extravagant visuals and plenty of action & adventure, Jordan Vogt-Roberts’ popcorn flick, Kong: Skull Island, is a feverishly entertaining addition to Legendary’s new monster-verse, even if there are far too many underdeveloped and uninteresting human characters.… Expand

8 of 12 users found this helpful84

All this user's reviews

6

EpicLadySpongeMar 10, 2017

Kong: Skull Island builds up many improvements and marks it as the next generation of King Kong. If the next generation was ever on a track where it keeps losing itself after great moments, I'd believe that the driver on that road wouldKong: Skull Island builds up many improvements and marks it as the next generation of King Kong. If the next generation was ever on a track where it keeps losing itself after great moments, I'd believe that the driver on that road would specifically be Kong: Skull Island.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

Kong: Skull Island

User Reviews