Julie & Julia
Columbia Pictures | Release Date: August 7, 2009
7.3
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 202 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
149
Mixed:
36
Negative:
17
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
5
EliasCAug 21, 2009
I wish I could split this vote; 8 for Julia, 3 for Julie. The problem with this film is Nora Ephron. She took 2 interesting books and reduced the plot to a Cliff Notes version and managed to make both stories uninteresting. But even Nora I wish I could split this vote; 8 for Julia, 3 for Julie. The problem with this film is Nora Ephron. She took 2 interesting books and reduced the plot to a Cliff Notes version and managed to make both stories uninteresting. But even Nora Ephron could not hide the potential of a truly great film based on the life of Julia Child. I found myself wanting more. More story, more character, more drama. A bio flick about Julia Child would have been fascinating. Tell us about her days in Ceylon. Tell us about her TV days. Tell us more about her relationship with Paul Child. All we get is snipes and tidbits here and there delivering in an incomplete story. The performances by the great Meryl Streep and Stanley Tucci stand out as a testimonial of what could have been. However such a film is apparently not within the capability of the writer/director. Instead we get a side story with Amy Adams as Julie playing a typical Ephron character - obsessive, depressing, and tiresome.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful
0
killdarrenAug 26, 2009
Rip your hair out by it's roots, scream at the top of your lungs, pound head against the wall infuriating! The premise is ridiculous. Omg, look at me I have a boring life and I'm going to write a blog about it. Aren't I so Rip your hair out by it's roots, scream at the top of your lungs, pound head against the wall infuriating! The premise is ridiculous. Omg, look at me I have a boring life and I'm going to write a blog about it. Aren't I so interesting and clever? NOOOO!!! Stop it. Meryl Streep's accent is nails on chalk board and Amy Adams is one determined but you'd never- know-it fame whore leaching off her fame. It will soon fade away and be forgotten, thank you Julia Child's ghost.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
JohnP.Dec 15, 2009
Great parity , Both lead characters attained thier lifelong goals . Terrific creativity and good stories.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
4
annbdJul 2, 2018
Some funny moments, pretty amazing Maryl Streep as always and that's it. Meryl Streep and Stanley Tucci are an awesome team, that we also can see in The Devil Wears Prada and hopefully will be in more movies together. But Streep's charmSome funny moments, pretty amazing Maryl Streep as always and that's it. Meryl Streep and Stanley Tucci are an awesome team, that we also can see in The Devil Wears Prada and hopefully will be in more movies together. But Streep's charm could't save this movie. It's okay, but nothing special.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
HollyR.Nov 14, 2009
Meryl Streep did a great job but this movie sucked. Unless you love Julia Child and her life story and watching it interspersed with a lame, pathetic woman who claims as an adult to have never eaten an EGG, don't waste your time.
1 of 2 users found this helpful
2
DavidDec 13, 2009
This movie sucked. It was very boring. Nothing "happens" in this movie. I feel like I should've been watching grass grow. The sorry excuse for a plot was so paper thin it was hard for me to enjoy.
1 of 2 users found this helpful
10
RONGIUSep 11, 2010
Sorry for the translation, is mechanical. Thank you.

What's for dinner? Qu'est-ce qu'on mange? Paris 1949 Queens, New York 2002 Two women, two "ways of being" different, two lives, two ways of addressing it.Sorry for the translation, is mechanical. Thank you.

What's for dinner?
Qu'est-ce qu'on mange?

Paris 1949
Queens, New York 2002

Two women, two "ways of being" different, two lives, two ways of addressing it. Motivational-ironic-energetic-enthusiastic Mrs. Child, analytical and emotional-volitional Mrs. Powell. Julia Child, the wife of an official U.S. government moved to Paris to work, seems to have found his "real" city. It immediately take "possession" a real French feeling. Gourmet with a passion for cooking, envy the French because the French eat a daily basis. This observation, will begin the project of his life. Teach Americans to eat French. She has two large "gifts". First, she learns quickly and develops what is taught and that is how the age of 37, began attending classes at the Cordon Bleu School in Paris. She is' full of life, want to discover the secrets, the new experiences it is based, short for Julia's life is a huge package filled with gifts. The second, she is an excellent teacher and this will be universally acknowledged by those who got to attend his tuition, then wins with his manner, whole masses television. Julie Powell, who moved with her husband, reluctantly, from Brooklyn to Queens for work of Erik, are home on a pizzeria. Work at LMDC - Lower Manhattan Development Corp., a receptionist job that does not satisfy, it defines a "bureaucrat who tries to manage the side effects of 11 September." When he returns, it is always destroyed, why can not internalize the point 2 of the guidelines to be observed in relations with customers and that is "not get involved emotionally when they denounce the incident." Motivational-ironic-energetic-enthusiastic Mrs. Child, analytical and emotional-volitional Mrs. Powell. Julia Child, the wife of an official U.S. government moved to Paris to work, seems to have found his "real" city. It immediately take "possession" a real French feeling. Gourmet with a passion for cooking, envy the French because the French eat a daily basis. This observation, will begin the project of his life. Teach Americans to eat French. She has two large "gifts". First, she learns quickly and develops what is taught and that is how the age of 37, began attending classes at the Cordon Bleu School in Paris. She is' full of life, want to discover the secrets, the new experiences it is based, short for Julia's life is a huge package filled with gifts. The second, she is an excellent teacher and this will be universally acknowledged by those who got to attend his tuition, then wins with his manner, whole masses television. Julie Powell, who moved with her husband, reluctantly, from Brooklyn to Queens for work of Erik, are home on a pizzeria. Work at LMDC - Lower Manhattan Development Corp., a receptionist job that does not satisfy, it defines a "bureaucrat who tries to manage the side effects of 11 September." When he returns, it is always destroyed, why can not internalize the point 2 of the guidelines to be observed in relations with customers and that is "not get involved emotionally when they denounce the incident."
Meryl Streep gives us another fresco film showing what it means to be an actress and as much sensitivity must be in support, to carry out that work. Result, even if he were in front of cutouts of any script, the remains of a camera, if working with a director maybe drunk or disoriented can, with his immense ability, capacity and skill training again even more beautiful mosaic. A script becomes a "Creature" not sparing in professional generosity. The spectator has the accurate perception of the character played managed to capture all the personality traits.
The film in question is a film adaptation "passion" of two stories. The books that inspired director and screenwriter Nora Ephoron, are: "Julie & Julia" by Julie Pewell (Amy Adams) and "My Life in France" by Julia Child (Meryl Streep) and Alex Prud'hommme.

Good Ciak!… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
2GUI2Jan 5, 2011
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
kyle20ellisMar 31, 2022
With talented actors such as Meryl Streep, Amy Adams, Stanley Tucci and Jane Lynch on board, plus Nora Ephron has been responsible for some lovely work, 'Julie & Julia' seemed a recipe made in heaven. Seeing it, it is truly delicious stuff.With talented actors such as Meryl Streep, Amy Adams, Stanley Tucci and Jane Lynch on board, plus Nora Ephron has been responsible for some lovely work, 'Julie & Julia' seemed a recipe made in heaven. Seeing it, it is truly delicious stuff.

Do agree with those saying that the Julia Child portions are much more interesting than the Julie Powell ones. Not that the Julie Powell scenes are unwatchable, certainly not. There are amusing and sweet moments and succeeds just as much as the Julia Child story in making one want to grab a cook-book and start cooking or starting a blog. The film in general with both story lines compels one to want to cook, regardless of how good they are at it or not.

Amy Adams also brings charm to Julie and an amusing angst and Chris Messina is likable support, though the character is underwritten somewhat. Their chemistry is nicely done.

What lets it down however are silly scenes like with the dinner and 65 answer phone messages, pacing that lacked lustre in places and the shallow self-absorbed way Julie particularly is written.

Luckily, the Julia Child portions have much more charm and are easier to relate to, with Julia's obstacles and determinations being easier to root for and Julia being a more endearing character. The scenes have so much warmth and makes one laugh in an uplifting fashion and cry in how delicately and sensitively the subject is portrayed.

Meryl Streep gives yet another masterly performance, that's both hilarious and touching and much more than an impersonation even with the mannerisms, voice and such being spot on. She is not as tall as Child was, who was 6 foot 2 to Streep's 5 foot 6, but 'Julie & Julia' cleverly disguised that by basically casting shorter actors and actresses. Stanley Tucci is equally brilliant as her husband, one really believes that they are in love and Tucci charms the socks out of everybody. Jane Lynch is a welcome presence in a small role as Dorothy.

The only problems with her story are that it occasionally sags in the middle and that the Republican/McCarthyism jibes did come over as mean-spirited and unnecessary.

'Julie & Julia' is beautifully filmed, especially in the Julia story, which also has very evocative and handsomely rendered period detail that feels like late 40s-50s France. The music gives a good taste of the uplifting and the tragic, with brilliant use of "Time After Time". Am not a fan of the very overplayed "Prince of Denmark" march but tolerated it here.

Nora Ephron's directing in the film's best parts is some of the best she ever did in my opinion and in the best parts the script is witty, inspiring, poignant and sharply observant with lots of warmth. Much of the story works really well, with the two stories and time lines intertwined with great skills and never is hard to follow or choppy.

Overall, culinary deliciousness if at times uneven. 8/10 Bethany Cox… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
JohnFAug 10, 2009
It made me laugh and it made me cry. Streep is amazing. Amy Adams is delightful. Best of all the film introduces a whole new generation to Julia Child.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AndresB.Aug 7, 2009
Great film and a wonderful performance by Meryl Streep. Her chemistry with Stanley Tucci is unmissable. A total winner!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MichaelD.Aug 7, 2009
What a satisfying film. Watching Meryl Streep is a lesson in film acting...and All the cameo parts are a treat to see. Delightful from start to finish.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
SandraTAug 8, 2009
Nothing exciting about this movie. First movie ever where I wanted to leave early!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
BerylV.Sep 2, 2009
Other than the spectacular performance of Meryl Streep, I found the movie completely uninteresting. Maybe I wasn't hungry.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
DavidB.Sep 7, 2009
Tremendous fun. Lots of warm, affectionate laughs. Very human. Meryl Steep channels Julia Childs.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
chuckhAug 10, 2009
Streep was terrific, she WAS Julia Child. Still cannot figure out how they could drive a 1950 Buick on arrival in France when they actually went there in November ,1948. The film said 1949. Hey, that car had not been built yet.The industry Streep was terrific, she WAS Julia Child. Still cannot figure out how they could drive a 1950 Buick on arrival in France when they actually went there in November ,1948. The film said 1949. Hey, that car had not been built yet.The industry makes a lot of mistakes with old cars, look at Public Enemies. 1935 and 1936 models when Dillinger died in 1934.It isn't that hard to get it right.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LindsayFAug 10, 2009
I think this movie was a masterpiece. Stanley Tucci and Meryl Streep were extraordinarily touching and believable. I grew up watching my grandparents watch (and adore) Julia Child. This movie brought her indomitable optimism and generosity I think this movie was a masterpiece. Stanley Tucci and Meryl Streep were extraordinarily touching and believable. I grew up watching my grandparents watch (and adore) Julia Child. This movie brought her indomitable optimism and generosity to the fore, and showed how the urge to create great food becomes a spiritual calling.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LaurenAug 11, 2009
Perfect movie. Makes you feel so good coming out of it. Meryl Streep deserves an Oscar hands down.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
PorterhouseWAug 10, 2009
The Julie part of the movie is a snooze. Meryl Streep now more than ever impresses me as an actress who can never let the audience forget she's being a great actress to the detriment of the character and her co-stars. Someone please The Julie part of the movie is a snooze. Meryl Streep now more than ever impresses me as an actress who can never let the audience forget she's being a great actress to the detriment of the character and her co-stars. Someone please convince Nora Ephron to retire before we get another trifle like this one. Almost as bad as "Bewitched" was.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
barbarahAug 12, 2009
Loved it. Made me go home and reread all of my Julia's cookbooks ,also cook, cook , cook.After all life is a banquet and you know the rest.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JamesFAug 10, 2009
It's smart and funny and moving in unexpected ways. Streep and Tucci are amazing together. Linda Emonds also delights with what should be a unnoticed role. The sense of period and the food itself is done perfectly. It is the It's smart and funny and moving in unexpected ways. Streep and Tucci are amazing together. Linda Emonds also delights with what should be a unnoticed role. The sense of period and the food itself is done perfectly. It is the contemporary story that slightly disappoints, not in the initial watching but afterwards. I have gone for several days with scenes and lines popping into my head, but they were all of Julia and never Julie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JohnHAug 15, 2009
Meryl Streep is unbelievable. Her acting talent is always a thing to behold. Also, I personally regard Amy Adams as one of the most adorable actresses in the world. Combine with an entertaining screenplay and I was very happy with the movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
lizhAug 10, 2009
A perfectly delightful film, and the men seem to love it too. The chemistry between both couples is wonderful to watch. The Paris scenes are stylistically beautiful as is Julia's car. A feel good film that is not all sticky, gooey A perfectly delightful film, and the men seem to love it too. The chemistry between both couples is wonderful to watch. The Paris scenes are stylistically beautiful as is Julia's car. A feel good film that is not all sticky, gooey (except for the food).… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
JeanSAug 15, 2009
It didn't have the depth that I wanted in the character of Julia Child.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
TDKinDallasAug 19, 2009
I liked it. Worth the $$$.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
StevenOAug 22, 2009
Worst movies ever seen! Love both main actresses and was ruined by a bunch of keckling women who laughed at every word said. Would possibly liked the movies at home without the audience laughing at every word that wasn't funny. Worst movies ever seen! Love both main actresses and was ruined by a bunch of keckling women who laughed at every word said. Would possibly liked the movies at home without the audience laughing at every word that wasn't funny. Meryl's husband was to unreal and too gay to be realistic. Love him but didn't cut it! This was definitely a woman and gay man's movie. I'm gay and hated it!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
NickWAug 30, 2009
Of course Meryl is a marvel; she could probably play Hitler or Genghis Khan and pull it off....But the movie ultimately seemed rather flat, missing something crucial. And it could have been 10-15 minutes shorter. One friend said -- after Of course Meryl is a marvel; she could probably play Hitler or Genghis Khan and pull it off....But the movie ultimately seemed rather flat, missing something crucial. And it could have been 10-15 minutes shorter. One friend said -- after we'd just made a huge, fabulous French dinner before the film -- that with all the cooking, you never saw a single dish being cleaned up! And one thing I noticed -- and would love to know if anyone else saw it too -- was at the end when Julia's book arrived in that padded envelope, I swear that it was padded with bubble wrap, which wasn't invented until decades later....I know it's nit-picky, but a movie of that scale should never have that kind of mistake.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ColleenHAug 30, 2009
We saw this movie while visiting Montreal and loved it! Meryl Streep was superb as Julia Child and I note the sales of Julia's cookbook have soared. I have made two of the recipes already! Can't wait for its release here in We saw this movie while visiting Montreal and loved it! Meryl Streep was superb as Julia Child and I note the sales of Julia's cookbook have soared. I have made two of the recipes already! Can't wait for its release here in Australia as I will be off to see it again!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ChristopherK.Aug 7, 2009
Excellent! Streep should win another Oscar for fleshing out what could have been a farce of a character! Don't listen to all the complaining about Adams-she's good too! Excellent!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
ChadSAug 8, 2009
At its very foundation, "Julie and Julia" is about old and new media, so for the traditionalists, the title itself might rankle their antiquated sensibilities, since the title gives equal weight to the writer and the blogger. According to At its very foundation, "Julie and Julia" is about old and new media, so for the traditionalists, the title itself might rankle their antiquated sensibilities, since the title gives equal weight to the writer and the blogger. According to the film, Julia Child did not give Julie Powell's blog a fair shake. The chef said it wasn't "respectful". On one hand, the moviegoer sympathizes with Julie Powell(Amy Adams) because as is so often the case, an artist's voice, or persona, may not necessarily be the artist him-/herself. Child(Meryl Streep) might have not been the perfect woman who lived in Julie's head, or for that matter, the filmmaker's head, as well. Crushed by her hero's negative on-the-record statements to the press about "The Julie/Julia Project", the post-9/11 cubicle worker and her husband stay up late in their one-room apartment, guessing at what angered the then-living icon of French cuisine. Was it Powell's use of the f-word? It's a probability, since Child added that the blog wasn't "serious" either. Another probability, the one that "Julie and Julia" seems unaware of, suggests itself in the juxtaposition of both women's lives within the dual narrative framework. While Child's first manuscript went through countless drafts and multiple publishers over a pretty good chunk of time, Powell had a literary agent and book deal before a full calendar year was up. Although "Julie and Julia" works hard to paint an imperfect picture of Powell's personal and professional life(due to the time-intensiveness of her project), there's something almost obscene about how fame is ascertained these days. Are enough dues paid; especially if you're essentially amalgamating somebody else's work? Powell was like the Danger Mouse of culinary blogging. Adapted from her own bestselling book, naturally, neither the author's diegetic counterpart nor her husband, broach the possibility that copyright issues might be the reason behind Child's ungenerous spirit. Undeniably entertaining, there's a dishonesty about "Julie and Julia". It needs a dissenting voice(a dramatization of Child's voice at 90), a dialectic; a voice to counter the filmmaker's notion that bloggers are indeed the professional writer's equal. By retaining the title of Powell's book, "Julie and Julia" endorses the new media, which merely collates and/or comments on first generation sources, rather than starting off from scratch. For the sake of humility, the film should be entitled "Julia & Me".… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
MarkMAug 8, 2009
The Julia Child half (delightful, fun, smart) gets an 8/10 and the Julie Powell half (cutesy, sickly-sweet) gets a 0/10, which averages out to 4/10. And the best thing about Julie Powell
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
RonaldoCAug 8, 2009
This film is not perfect, and the story of Julia Childs is much more fascinating than the story of Julia. But these tales DO intersect. They mirror each other as tales of women (people?) who do not know what to do with themselves finding This film is not perfect, and the story of Julia Childs is much more fascinating than the story of Julia. But these tales DO intersect. They mirror each other as tales of women (people?) who do not know what to do with themselves finding themselves by writing about food: Julia writes the first french cookbook for Americans, as we all know, and Julie writes a blog detailing her adventures cooking all the recipes from that book. Modern day Julie just cannot compete with the wild character of Julia, and Meryl's performance often times pushes into camp. But that's okay. It's great fun. Julie, with her work-a-day worries, and Internet hobby is us. Childs is the big boned myth. How could they compete? Consequently the film drags on a bit with the Julia side of things. Maybe it has to do with not being a woman and not being endlessly fascinated by relationships skidding this way and that. But then it was all so predictable, too. Anyway I forgave it all because Streep was just so funny and alive. Millions will be reminded of this female icon. Before the feature hit the screen, we were treated to previews of four films about women made by women, and it is as a film about a strange female hero that I appreciated Julie & Julia. If Julie is along for the right, 'sallright.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
BartJAug 9, 2009
While it's true that Jule & Julia can sometimes sag when it's "Julie", one wishes for less whining from her, this film is a great crowd pleaser. When I saw it, in an almost-full matinee screening, the audience laughed throughout While it's true that Jule & Julia can sometimes sag when it's "Julie", one wishes for less whining from her, this film is a great crowd pleaser. When I saw it, in an almost-full matinee screening, the audience laughed throughout and at the end gave it generous applause. Meryl, if you won't marry me, couldn't you at least adopt me? What a delight, every second that Meryl/Julia is on screen.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
sheilafAug 9, 2009
Wonderful film..As tasty as the fancy food prepared with lusty abandon. Streep and Tucci are the sexiest odd couple ever and Amy Adams' plucky energy is the secret sauce. She holds her own in the unenviable position of Streep's Wonderful film..As tasty as the fancy food prepared with lusty abandon. Streep and Tucci are the sexiest odd couple ever and Amy Adams' plucky energy is the secret sauce. She holds her own in the unenviable position of Streep's other half. .and together they serve up a delicious meal!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
DaleMAug 9, 2009
This film was very enjoyable largely because of Meryl Streep's portrayal of Julia Child. I think the film also captures a genuine love of food preparation and cooking. It also has some wonderful scenes of post-war Paris street vendors. This film was very enjoyable largely because of Meryl Streep's portrayal of Julia Child. I think the film also captures a genuine love of food preparation and cooking. It also has some wonderful scenes of post-war Paris street vendors. However, there are a number of things which prevent this film from really taking advantage of Streep and its material. The stories (both Julie's and Julia's) are straight forward rags to riches stories which show hard work and persistence paying off in the end. This is not a bad formula to build on, but the film doesn't build much on it. The characters lack depth, especially the husbands, who are portrayed as saints with little lives of their own. Even the main characters lack much complexity in their lives or in their inner selves. There are no major story twists. The Julie story especially becomes a get-rich-quick-with-remarkably-little-work story. Julie isn't very eccentric or interesting as a character. She seems to have just had a good idea, a love of cooking, and some talent at writing. At least the Julia story showed someone working for years (not just a year). Julia just loved cooking and kind of oafishly bungled her way to success. Her story was much more interesting than the Julie story. The scenes in the Paris streets with the vendors were a pleasure to watch. I also think more could have really been made about the genuine love of food preparation. Some great contrasts could have been made between our fast food, buy-it-prepared, convenience philosophy of food and the genuine love of preparing food. At first it looked as though the film was going in this direction, but then it became about get rich quick by blogging for a year… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
TomWAug 9, 2009
Meryl Streep does an excellent job acting, impersonating Julia Child. But the movie I saw in San Diego Aug. 7, the Boom Operator should get an Academy Award for the mics apperance 3-4 times, from the top of the screen. Turns this picture Meryl Streep does an excellent job acting, impersonating Julia Child. But the movie I saw in San Diego Aug. 7, the Boom Operator should get an Academy Award for the mics apperance 3-4 times, from the top of the screen. Turns this picture into a B movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JulieSAug 9, 2009
I loved everything about this movie! Pure enjoyment from beginning to end! Meryl becomes Julia and we get a glimpse of the person behind the celebrity! It's just wonderful!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RichardWAug 9, 2009
Meryl Streep brilliantly becomes (not "acts as," "becomes") Julia Child and is surrounded with a great ensemble (Amy Adams is getting a bad wrap from some) in Nora Ephron's triumph.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JoyceTAug 9, 2009
The critics are being unduly cranky. This movie is a delight. it may reduce Julia Child a bit, but it's saucy nonetheless and celebrates good marriages as well as good food. My eight comes with at least another half point for good cheer The critics are being unduly cranky. This movie is a delight. it may reduce Julia Child a bit, but it's saucy nonetheless and celebrates good marriages as well as good food. My eight comes with at least another half point for good cheer and a few well placed political digs.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
EnzoP.Aug 9, 2009
Julie and Julia based on the true story and the book shows you how to drool for food. The food in that film looked delicious I wanted to grab it of the screen and munch it down. The food looked like it was just delivered from heaven. Ok, now Julie and Julia based on the true story and the book shows you how to drool for food. The food in that film looked delicious I wanted to grab it of the screen and munch it down. The food looked like it was just delivered from heaven. Ok, now back to the movie Meryl Streep was superb. Meryl Streep in this movie reminded me why she is my favorite actress in hollywood. Now don't forget Amy Adams in her second movie with my favorite actor. Amy played great not oscar worthy but nice job she can really act. In this romantic comedy they showed how julie and julia's life got changed by food and how similar their life were. I never expected this film to be so funny. It was some laugh out loud stuff. I felt like they went overboard with romance just to much. It would of been better off with less romance. Overall a funny and delightful movie but not a masterpiece.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
KristenT.Sep 4, 2009
If you're a foodie, a woman, middle-aged, tall, and independent of mind you will love this movie. Can't think of the last time I saw a movie with women in the leads that was as well made. It's funny, poignant and well crafted. If you're a foodie, a woman, middle-aged, tall, and independent of mind you will love this movie. Can't think of the last time I saw a movie with women in the leads that was as well made. It's funny, poignant and well crafted. Nothing blows up, no one is shot. Not every movie has too appeal to adolescent male movie goers. Support a fine woman director and a great movie about the lives of two women -- a rare thing these days.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
LeeR.Sep 6, 2009
Streep and Tucci are fantastic actors. Both are so versitile and seemingly effortlessly recreate the characters they portray. It is unfortunate that Mr. Tucci is not given the billing recognition that he merits as a "co-star". Without these Streep and Tucci are fantastic actors. Both are so versitile and seemingly effortlessly recreate the characters they portray. It is unfortunate that Mr. Tucci is not given the billing recognition that he merits as a "co-star". Without these two, the movie itself could not rate higher than 3 stars.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ElliotP.Jan 3, 2010
Well done. Acting and directing inspired and inspiring.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JamesH.Dec 11, 2009
Impressive. Meryl Streep
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
JoeN.Dec 25, 2009
Nora Ephron had done what I thought impossible; made me dread watching the real Julia Child and the actor who played her in this film again...anytime soon. The real Julia is delightfully funny in her various cooking programs, but Nora Ephron had done what I thought impossible; made me dread watching the real Julia Child and the actor who played her in this film again...anytime soon. The real Julia is delightfully funny in her various cooking programs, but Streep's goose-like portrayal in this film made me nauseous, as if I'd eaten way too much fois gras. The Julie portion is to horrible to comment on.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
JimboHDec 30, 2009
Puke. O.k. Give it a "1", just because....? 'Chick flick'. too polite. How about self-indulgent Nor E. direction dictates dickless Julie husband, and obnoxious Julie and Julia. Do women really see the genders and the word around Puke. O.k. Give it a "1", just because....? 'Chick flick'. too polite. How about self-indulgent Nor E. direction dictates dickless Julie husband, and obnoxious Julie and Julia. Do women really see the genders and the word around tem this way? God, no wonder!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
VibhavP.Dec 6, 2009
Meryl deserves her 3rd Oscar for this! Adams and Tucci certainly add their share of charm in this movies.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AEOct 28, 2009
Meryl Streep continues to amaze. Sure, there are moments when her technique breaks the surface of the narrative, but they only serve to dazzle us with her brilliance like a silvery fish leaping in full moon. She then, again, plunges so fully Meryl Streep continues to amaze. Sure, there are moments when her technique breaks the surface of the narrative, but they only serve to dazzle us with her brilliance like a silvery fish leaping in full moon. She then, again, plunges so fully into character, pulling us back down with her, that she becomes more Julia than Julia. It is a startling and singular talent not unlike shamanic possession. Such a presence could threaten to overcome a film (and some have argued it does), rather it appropriately heightens Child… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
CaroleL.Oct 7, 2009
Great Entertainment, excellent story line, good acting. Human. Feel-good. Anyone who is a Foodie - a cook, a chef, a wannabe chef or a wannabe writer identifies with the characters in this movie. I have spoken to so many who just loved it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
BillySAug 11, 2009
Julie & Julia would have been two great movies had they been made independently of each other, melding them together was pure genius by Nora Ephron! Both stories are immensely entertaining and perfectly cast and designed in two different Julie & Julia would have been two great movies had they been made independently of each other, melding them together was pure genius by Nora Ephron! Both stories are immensely entertaining and perfectly cast and designed in two different eras, the thing is though, when you have a performance so channeled as Meryl Streep's, you tend to overlook the whole movie and remember Julia Child. Even the clip of Dan Ackroyd's famous take on SNL, you are thinking of Streep's Julia and not the real Child! Much like Philip Seymour Hoffman's Capote, Meryl Streep becomes Julia Child and wins you over from frame one right up to that walk up to the podium on Oscar night 2010!!! An Iconic Performance from an American Icon. Bon Appetite!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
dmcAug 11, 2009
Flawed in the up and down of performances as well as a technical embarrassment of microphones in the screen and glitches.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
IdaJAug 14, 2009
Loved it! Now I would like a movie just about Julia Child.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
DomoRAug 15, 2009
The movie is good and perfectly enjoyable but I think it doesn't really show the true Julia Child. It is a feverish, commercially narcissistic endeavor from start to finish given a great deal more merit due to Meryl Streep's The movie is good and perfectly enjoyable but I think it doesn't really show the true Julia Child. It is a feverish, commercially narcissistic endeavor from start to finish given a great deal more merit due to Meryl Streep's performance. All the shallow wanna-be chefs in the audience made it all the more ironic: they're devouring this film as if it were scripture. Sad really, since those vain little pretentious bores lapping it up will never have the talent or passion that Child had. Instead they'll watch the film, act like they've been touched by god and go out and buy some overpriced olive oil at Whole Foods and think they too are gourmands.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
TomMAug 18, 2009
Streep and Adams are terrific, as well as Tucci. I thought it dragged a little in the middle.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
JamesRAug 18, 2009
Julia, good. Julie, not so good. If I could, I would've skipped the whole Julie side of the movie. The acting on the Julie side just doesn't compare to that of the Julia side.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
TDKinDallasAug 20, 2009
Took my Mom hoping that it would be passable and it turned out to be a very good movie. There was only one other guy in the theater and he liked it a lot more than he was expecting too! If you are considering it, then go see it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
victorianAug 24, 2009
Wonderful story of two women with time to make a small difference in many lives of other bored women. What a portrayal by Streep of a memorable chef!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
UptonKAug 25, 2009
Dear Nora Ephron: Please stop making movies. You are not good at it. You take wonderful ideas and run them through some kind of vanilla pudding-nator until they are rendered so bland and meaningless that whatever kernel of originality that Dear Nora Ephron: Please stop making movies. You are not good at it. You take wonderful ideas and run them through some kind of vanilla pudding-nator until they are rendered so bland and meaningless that whatever kernel of originality that once existed and prompted the filming of said material in the first place ends up airing its tepid undies on the silver screen with all the grace of a lobotomized Sunday school teacher on valium. Julie & Julia is no exception to this rule. My suggestion? Retire. Take up badminton or the shoeing of horses. Invite people over to your mansion and play let… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
danielw.Aug 8, 2009
Was I watching the same movie as the critics? Has Meryl Streep become the teflon actress, a critic's pet regardless of what she throws up on the screen? This was one of the most extreme and selfish pieces of overacting I have seen in Was I watching the same movie as the critics? Has Meryl Streep become the teflon actress, a critic's pet regardless of what she throws up on the screen? This was one of the most extreme and selfish pieces of overacting I have seen in ages. Streep sucks the oxygen out of every scene she's in. Even as talented an actor as Stanley Tucci has trouble registering, given how much scene chewing she engages in. I actually found the modern-day Queens' scenes a relief from all the grandstanding. Not to say that they amount to very much either. Ephron homogenizes and pasteurizes all the situations and characters, to the point where one has a lot of trouble seeing what the demons are that could have driven the main character to take on her year-long encounter with Childs, or what could have driven Childs herself. Adams' character doesn't seem to have any inner demons. When she has a fight with her husband, it comes as a total surprise. The characters until then do not seem to have the depth required to actually generate some conflict. Too bad. There are clearly two good stories here that could have been told. Childs was a more multi-faceted character than what the screenwriter and director Ephron has let on, and as for the Julie Wallace character, a quick perusal of her blog reveals that she was much more interesting and complicated than the character that was provided to Adams. This is what happens when you underestimate your public's intelligence and ability to deal with real, multi-dimensional characters in movies.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
kellypAug 8, 2009
Thoroughly entertaining. But don't take my word for it...a packed theatre laughed out loud at the many funny and endearing scenes. A little gem!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
NathanLAug 9, 2009
Meryl Streep delivers another Oscar worthy performance in this charming film! Streep and Tucci are so perfect together that you'd never think this was acting. However, I want to concentrate on Adams because she does not get the credit Meryl Streep delivers another Oscar worthy performance in this charming film! Streep and Tucci are so perfect together that you'd never think this was acting. However, I want to concentrate on Adams because she does not get the credit she deserves. It is very difficult to serve as the other half to the unforgettable Streep and add the fact that Julie is nowhere near perfect. You could very easily make the arguement that her role is more challenging (which it is not but still wonderful). She makes this simple every woman just as interesting as Julia Child's larger than life character. And like Child herself that is no small feat.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
NormGAug 9, 2009
A warm, old fashion, entertaining, throughly enjoyable movie is the only way to describe Julie & Julia. You probably heard about the parallel stories, separated by 40 years, that make up the plot. Most critics seem to favor the Meryl Streep A warm, old fashion, entertaining, throughly enjoyable movie is the only way to describe Julie & Julia. You probably heard about the parallel stories, separated by 40 years, that make up the plot. Most critics seem to favor the Meryl Streep side (even predicting another Oscar win). I have no argument with that. Streep's performance is just that . . . a great, broad, performance. But I kinda like the small warm performance of Amy Adams (who is headed to a Streep like reputation) as struggles with food, career, marriage and the blogosphere. I loved Julie & Julia.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
HansEAug 9, 2009
I have to side with those who find the "Julie" part of this movie weak. Streep is amazing as Julia Child; her way of being is life-affirming and the chemistry with Stanley Tucci as her adoring husband is fantastic. By contrast, Amy I have to side with those who find the "Julie" part of this movie weak. Streep is amazing as Julia Child; her way of being is life-affirming and the chemistry with Stanley Tucci as her adoring husband is fantastic. By contrast, Amy Adam's Julie is just plain petty and she doesn't seem to learn a thing about food or life from her experiences. Still, this is a good movie. I just kept wanting more exuberant Julia and less whining Julie!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
jamesmSep 5, 2009
A very enjoyable movie. Meryl Streep plays another life-affirming role with audacity and style. The younger couple were a tad annoying, but otherwise a real treat...not just the food!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
CarolynM.Sep 7, 2009
The premise seemed ridiculous to us, but both my husband and I saw this last night and were completely charmed. And of course Meryl Streep can do anything and everything, and does it here.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
MarkDSep 8, 2009
I got in to see this movie free and STILL feel cheated! Two hours of Meryl Streep rolling around the screen like a barroom drunk on helium, and this a blessed relief from the whiney Amy Adams and her insipid man accessory's I got in to see this movie free and STILL feel cheated! Two hours of Meryl Streep rolling around the screen like a barroom drunk on helium, and this a blessed relief from the whiney Amy Adams and her insipid man accessory's dope-with-a-heart act. Nora Ephron directs with all the subtlety of a road side burger van vendor, add a bucket of syrup, a few lades of cheese and serve; guaranteed nausea!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LawrenceCAug 11, 2009
Meryl Streep was sheer perfection! Stanley Tucci was outstanding. Amy Adams was very good. I found this to be a sweet, tender romance of a film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
helenpAug 14, 2009
I am just a layman,not a movie connoisseur, but I and my famly enjoyed this movie more than any other movie we have seen in a long time. I thought the two female actresses balanced each other perfectly and the story was wonderful!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
AngoraBAug 14, 2009
A summer popcorn movie is not one thing I usually like. Of course, this is not an exception. Meryl is good, as always, but the only point I give this movie is her. Nothing more should be rewarded.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
SteveAug 16, 2009
Definitely a feel-good movie. There's really not any conflict in the plot other than Julie inexplicably detesting her Long Island apartment and her job. So, from that end there's really not much to it other than showing two stories Definitely a feel-good movie. There's really not any conflict in the plot other than Julie inexplicably detesting her Long Island apartment and her job. So, from that end there's really not much to it other than showing two stories side by side (really, the only thing the two women have in common is that they are married). Meryl Streep was unreal, and it was great to just watch her as Julia Child, one of the most charming and good-natured people to ever grace our pop-culture. Fun and funny...worth the price of admission.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JoanAug 18, 2009
One of the most delightful films that I have seen in quite a while. Meryl gives yet another Oscar-worthy performance. The whole look and feel of the film, as well as the soundtrack, radiates a genuiness that seems to be missing from many of One of the most delightful films that I have seen in quite a while. Meryl gives yet another Oscar-worthy performance. The whole look and feel of the film, as well as the soundtrack, radiates a genuiness that seems to be missing from many of the other movies we have seen this summer...a totally enjoyable movie experience, especially for those of us who remember Julia Child (and the original cast of "Saturday Night Live"!)… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BillAug 21, 2009
If Meryl Streep doesn't win her 3rd (and well deserved) Oscar win from this, there is no justice. Just magnificent.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
richardhAug 22, 2009
Bon cinema! thoroughly enjoyed this charming, heartwarming work of art. the carping critics got it all wrong. i was totally charmed by its humor (not an easy thing) and humanity (all too rare in movies today). more than a few times i teared Bon cinema! thoroughly enjoyed this charming, heartwarming work of art. the carping critics got it all wrong. i was totally charmed by its humor (not an easy thing) and humanity (all too rare in movies today). more than a few times i teared up at moving or happy moments that were very skillfully created. Brava/bravo to the writers, the original sources, all the performers and the director who created this gem.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
LarryAug 24, 2009
The Julia side of this story was really excellent! The Julie side, while weaker, was nowhere near as bad as I expected from the professional reviewers. Her story served as a quite decent vehicle for delivering Julia. In some sense, I think The Julia side of this story was really excellent! The Julie side, while weaker, was nowhere near as bad as I expected from the professional reviewers. Her story served as a quite decent vehicle for delivering Julia. In some sense, I think the professional reviewers got bogged down in details that had fairly little impact on the whole movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
DanaMSep 13, 2009
Entertaining movie. Worth seeing on the big screen. It definitely has a feel goodness about it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
NancySep 26, 2009
I quite enjoyed this film. The two halves may not make quite a whole, but close enough. And as delightful as it was to watch Meryl Streep, an entire film of her as Julia Child might be a bit exhausting. Amusing and genial, the Julia 1/2 had I quite enjoyed this film. The two halves may not make quite a whole, but close enough. And as delightful as it was to watch Meryl Streep, an entire film of her as Julia Child might be a bit exhausting. Amusing and genial, the Julia 1/2 had the greater interest, in characters (well, come on, Stanley Tucci and a soupcon of Jane Lynch? Delish!) but also in setting and style. The Julie 1/2, I consider to be the frame within which the Julia 1/2 shone. It did provide contrast, it didn't shine in the same way, but as a matter of necessity it was truncated (or perhaps painted with broad strokes) as there wasn't alot of room/time to explore the in-depth issues of the lives of Julie and her husband. Lots of chuckles and a few laughs and a not a bad movie value.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
MichaelPJ.Dec 14, 2009
Though Julie's story pales by comparison to Julia's, the movie is charming thanks to Meryl Streep. Her portrayal of Julia Child -- or rather our idea of Child as the Salon critic put it -- is so entertaining, making it easy to Though Julie's story pales by comparison to Julia's, the movie is charming thanks to Meryl Streep. Her portrayal of Julia Child -- or rather our idea of Child as the Salon critic put it -- is so entertaining, making it easy to overlook the not particularly interesting script. Stanley Tucci, Linda Emond and Jany Lynch also are pleasures to watch.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
SteveMartin97Aug 13, 2010
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. In this movie Meryl Streep drives us to the concept of cooking with the same charisma than Remy in Ratatouille, but this time with a lady who is not afraid of what people will think. Marvelous.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
olympiansNov 6, 2010
I loved this film. Meryl Streep is utterly brilliant in it, and completely believable as a cook and cookery writer. I do have 3 slight reservations about cast and script tough.
Firstly, Stanley Tucci did not entirely work for me as JuliaI loved this film. Meryl Streep is utterly brilliant in it, and completely believable as a cook and cookery writer. I do have 3 slight reservations about cast and script tough.
Firstly, Stanley Tucci did not entirely work for me as Julia Child's husband (nothing to do with his acting) but, to my eyes, he looked far too young to be 10 years older than she was . We can see that he is a dapper dresser and particular about his appearance but in those days someone his age did not look that youthful (all shiny complexion and wrinkle free face). Secondly although Julia Child is a household name in the US, in Europe we had no idea who she was and I felt that there could have been a couple more scenes before Amy Adams' character embarked on her cooking odyssey to somehow explain to the audience the size of the leap that was about to take place between being able to cook simple but tasty food like bruschettas (as we see her do at the beginning of the film I think) and the demanding technical skills she would have to acquire to be able to cook Julia Child's food. It took me a while to realize we were entering serious food territory.
Thirdly, the lady who plays one of the characters involved in trying to put together the first draft of the cookery book (the one who never puts in any work) is not a native speaker and it it does feel rather strange to hear a supposedly French person , in Paris, speaking accented French. It is a small detail but could a native French speaker not be found? None of the above ruined my enjoyment of the film though I have to say and I am very pleased to see that my long held belief that Amy Adams is the best character actress to come out of the US in the last 5 years remains as strong as ever. Long may it continue!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
moviemongerAug 28, 2011
Meryl Streep has been the unopposed Queen of the Screen for 3 decades - the interest in her movies is as much to see her sculpt a character as it is to see the movie itself. Julie and Julia did not disappoint, with regard to Meryl - she wasMeryl Streep has been the unopposed Queen of the Screen for 3 decades - the interest in her movies is as much to see her sculpt a character as it is to see the movie itself. Julie and Julia did not disappoint, with regard to Meryl - she was fantastic, as always. Instead of a movie intertwining two separate plots, I viewed two completely different movies. Ironically, I rooted for Julia Child, already knowing her life's outcome and really could not have cared less about the Julie Powell, the Amy Adams character, I knew nothing about - the whiny, somewhat unlikeable character. The movie boils down to, simply, a tribute to a beloved "character" for generations....Julia Child.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
eTurkeyFeb 13, 2012
It's not just some of the food featured that's light and fluffy, but rather the context of this film. That's not to say Julie & Julia is a bad movie but if you were looking for a more serious and somber biopic then you may have to lookIt's not just some of the food featured that's light and fluffy, but rather the context of this film. That's not to say Julie & Julia is a bad movie but if you were looking for a more serious and somber biopic then you may have to look elsewhere. The acting is marvelous with Meryl Streep the standout, however that is to be expected by now. I do have another bone to pick though and it relates to the feeling that there's two features in one. I perhaps would have rated this flick much higher if the Julie Powell storyline was wiped altogether.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
beingryanjudeAug 27, 2014
Streep brilliant portrayal of Julia Child aside, Julie & Julia is a foodie with a twist. Nora Ephron beautifully paints two different lives and perspectives to create one fascinating story.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
worleyjamersJun 19, 2013
Julie & Julia is a mostly average film, but the reason I rate it so high is because it is teeming with the joy of life. Bolstered by a brilliant lead performance from Meryl Streep, but also by Amy Adams who does a lot with very little, theJulie & Julia is a mostly average film, but the reason I rate it so high is because it is teeming with the joy of life. Bolstered by a brilliant lead performance from Meryl Streep, but also by Amy Adams who does a lot with very little, the film manages the capture the spirit of these women. Sweet, charming, well-done, and entertaining, J&J is a film I'd recommend to anyone and everyone.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
FreedomFightersNov 21, 2016
Making a film based on a blog may not sound like the most interesting idea in the world, and it might be a turn-off for many filmgoers, but somehow, "Julie & Julia," what is apparently the first major motion picture based on a blog, is prettyMaking a film based on a blog may not sound like the most interesting idea in the world, and it might be a turn-off for many filmgoers, but somehow, "Julie & Julia," what is apparently the first major motion picture based on a blog, is pretty entertaining. It decently mixes two plots together, has some interesting charm to it, and it's well-acted (Meryl Streep steals the show as Julia Child). It's not the most brilliant film you'll ever watch, but it's sweet, light, and fun, and overall, worth watching.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
marcmyworksJun 16, 2016
This film could have been so much better as just a portrayal of the life and times of Julia Child. Amy Adams portrayal of Julie Powell (which is the centre of this film) is flat, boring and lifeless.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
lukechristianscMar 21, 2014
this is quite interesting film about two woman who are trying to be the perfect cook and there so passinate about cooking . i kinda made me hungry . Meryl Streep was a passionate actress when he deciding to be in this film so did amy adams
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
amheretojudgeJun 15, 2018
a bit undercooked yet utterly appetizing..

Julie And Julia Even though the performance is up to the mark, the chemistry among the characters isn't impactful or communicated to the audience and the primary reason would be the two differenta bit undercooked yet utterly appetizing..

Julie And Julia Even though the performance is up to the mark, the chemistry among the characters isn't impactful or communicated to the audience and the primary reason would be the two different tales set back in a similar background yet fails to connect each other. As much as writing is appreciative and finely detailed, it certainly isn't smart or sincere enough to breed the crisp out of it. It is rich on technical aspects like background score, sound department and art design but could have been edited a lot better with appropriate supervision. Nora Ephron; the screenwriter and director, has done a plausible work but fails to project the anticipated vision on screen which is clearly visible as she sweats behind the camera with all her effort to factor into the bigger picture. There never was any doubt on performance level and the expectations are fulfilled completely by both the lead actresses (Amy Adams and Meryl Streep) in their parallel role. The camera work is immensely pleasing especially all the recipe cooking, which is shot beautifully. Julie And Julia is a bit undercooked yet utterly appetizing on terms of character's perspective as the audience feels disconnected throughout the course of it despite of having multiple mutual things to connect to.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
67uynvcwFeb 7, 2020
Heartwarming popcorn movie that deliver stellar performances from both lead actresses (Amy Adams especially)
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ocemakcaMar 12, 2021
Stanley Tucci ve Meryl Streep' in oyunculukları oldukça dokunaklı ve inandırıcıydı. Ne yazık ki bugüne dek- ta ki filmi izleyene kadar-, Julia Child hakkında bir fikir sahibi olmamıştım. Bu film, onun yılmaz iyimserliğini ve cömertliğini önStanley Tucci ve Meryl Streep' in oyunculukları oldukça dokunaklı ve inandırıcıydı. Ne yazık ki bugüne dek- ta ki filmi izleyene kadar-, Julia Child hakkında bir fikir sahibi olmamıştım. Bu film, onun yılmaz iyimserliğini ve cömertliğini ön plana çıkardı ve harika yemek yaratma dürtüsünün nasıl manevi bir çağrı haline geldiğini gösterdi.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
More From This Movie

66 Critic Reviews

7.3 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL