Netflix | Release Date: August 11, 2023
4.8
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 54 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
16
Mixed:
18
Negative:
20
Watch Now
Stream On
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
4
JLuis_001Aug 12, 2023
In the painful reality in which we are waking up, Heart of Stone emerges as a film that embodies the essence and structure reminiscent of content meticulously crafted by an algorithm, seemingly designed to pave the way for a franchise.

But
In the painful reality in which we are waking up, Heart of Stone emerges as a film that embodies the essence and structure reminiscent of content meticulously crafted by an algorithm, seemingly designed to pave the way for a franchise.

But why do I say this was written by an algorithm? Because the film overall looks and feels like a methodically orchestrated combination of superior films and, as a result, the ensuing work is completely lacking in both originality and true emotion and tension. It is replete with stereotypical characters and the ensemble sails along in a style and tone that is completely locked in, very uninspired and passionless.

This certainly isn't Mission Impossible and Gal Gadot as sure as hell it ain't Tom Cruise.

Another action dud from Netflix being sold as a big blockbuster and for streaming parameters that's enough.
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
10
ArielShalevAug 19, 2023
Great movie. Lots of twists. Gal gadot is as always a pleasure and this I k vue has the makings of a new franchise.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
Ezra80Aug 13, 2023
Bad poker game
 
Well, we've got big explosions, double agents, Gal Gadot as the rookie one with hidden capabilities and a tech nerd behind her, the villain with the accent and a couple of evil pawns within his hands, a highly dangerous
Bad poker game
 
Well, we've got big explosions, double agents, Gal Gadot as the rookie one with hidden capabilities and a tech nerd behind her, the villain with the accent and a couple of evil pawns within his hands, a highly dangerous weapon in the middle of it all, and yeah, it's starting to feel familiar, right?It seems like the recipe for an action-packed flick with a repetitive, superficial plot.big production, big places, but the same empty story with a hint of rough action.
exaggerated ass-kicking from Wonder Woman (Gal Gadot) accompanied by good chemistry between her and Jamie DornanIt takes us to a plot we already know is going to be honest.
Mid-action cheesy lines and laughter weren't at their best, with the dialogue being straight-forward and simple, and a good soundtrack blowing up most of the movie to hype everything up.
It seems like Netflix won't drop this formula for now, and if you aren't full of it yet,Go for the watch that you'll enjoy for the cast and good camerawork, but not anything else, I think.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
owistyAug 12, 2023
You know that movie where you know what's going to happen from the beginning? This is that movie. It's a good movie that goes well in the first half with a big plot twist, but in the second half it goes downhill turning into a typical netflixYou know that movie where you know what's going to happen from the beginning? This is that movie. It's a good movie that goes well in the first half with a big plot twist, but in the second half it goes downhill turning into a typical netflix generic movie, a good potential, but that doesn't go into depth at all. It had great potential but it doesn't take advantage of it, it's average, watch it if you want to spend some time. Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
9
Tsquared44Aug 13, 2023
This one surprised me. If you go into it not expecting much, you get a great experience. If you like movies like Mission impossible, bourne identity etc, these give the feels of what this movie is. Movies in the late 90s - early 2000s had aThis one surprised me. If you go into it not expecting much, you get a great experience. If you like movies like Mission impossible, bourne identity etc, these give the feels of what this movie is. Movies in the late 90s - early 2000s had a more realistic vibe and tech to them which made them more believable but as of late, alot of movies, action especially have scenes that are hokey in parts. This is definitely one of them in certain action scenes but overall, I thought there was a great plot. Political and philosophical thoughts are prevalent after viewing, and the filming locations/setting, which were probably my favorite here, are spot on. Plot was also really good for a weekend action flick. I was truly suprised. Gado is a beauty and as a man who takes a huge liking to her, my 8.5 gets bumped to a 9. Definitely a worth while watch if you like elements of revenge, adventute, coverups and political interpretations. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
3
RazalgulAug 11, 2023
The typical generic Netflix movie you would expect. What a waste of time and money
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
0
yashdan1Aug 11, 2023
Watching it right now.
Gal Gadot starred in a Very bad movie! Very poor acting overall, poor screenplay and plot.
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
8
dharma2Aug 11, 2023
Just to get this out of the way. I review films on the media that it was made for. So a theatrical film may be rated differently as a streaming movie. We can see that Neflix has been at this big scale, straight to to DVD action film for agesJust to get this out of the way. I review films on the media that it was made for. So a theatrical film may be rated differently as a streaming movie. We can see that Neflix has been at this big scale, straight to to DVD action film for ages and somehow has perfected its formula. It's essentially like going to a restaurant that sells a cheeseburger, the most 'generic' type of food out there but doing it so well that they literally made it better than everyone else in the business. This is what Netflix does. Bigger companies such as Disney that followed this formula end up losing so much money that they will probably lease their content back to Netflix in the future. Getting that out of the way, Heart of Stone is literally a movie that was made by an algorithm, which churned out a mix between Bond, MI, Fast and Furious and all other spy movies as of late, mixed in with Gal Gadot, who is literally a 'female Arnold Schwarzenegger', a charismatic 'performer' who are very adept physically. What you get is this movie and the thing is..I dig it. There is a 'twist' to the whole concept that I liked (where the heroine has a 'dual identity'). The action set pieces are well made and choreographed, and obviously, this is meant as a franchise starter for the streaming giant. Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
7
arostislavnaAug 13, 2023
This is a C-tier film, which is probably what you get for Netflix, but it's actually okay considering all the cliches, and has a good moral to the story even if the opening is hypocritical.

One huge mistake, there are no rear sights on the
This is a C-tier film, which is probably what you get for Netflix, but it's actually okay considering all the cliches, and has a good moral to the story even if the opening is hypocritical.

One huge mistake, there are no rear sights on the M4 platform weapons, making it impossible to actually provide accurate fire with them. You would expect Gal Gadot to provide input in these scenes because that is unacceptable.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
0
BroyaxAug 13, 2023
Wonder Woman n’est pas au mieux dans ce nanar démoulé par Netflop… et pourtant on l’aurait bien vue dans un rôle à l’Atomic Blonde par exemple… elle aurait fait l’Atomic Brune avec brio, je pense. Même sans son costume bling-bling !

Enfin,
Wonder Woman n’est pas au mieux dans ce nanar démoulé par Netflop… et pourtant on l’aurait bien vue dans un rôle à l’Atomic Blonde par exemple… elle aurait fait l’Atomic Brune avec brio, je pense. Même sans son costume bling-bling !

Enfin, bref, Wonder nana est en civil certes mais GG n’a pas l’air très à l’aise là-dans, à savoir cette espèce de « Mission Impossible » bas de gamme, cette mauvaise copie mâtinée d’une ambiance de série foireuse, genre ‘Les Experts’ ou autre daube apparentée.. (on ne les compte plus, tellement y en a de ces daubes, soit dit en passant !).

Et donc, c’est catastrophique, dès les premières minutes… on n’a en effet qu’une hâte, une seule : arrêter la lecture du merdier (pour au moins préserver un peu de bande passante). Heureusement que Netflasque n’est pas rempli que de daubes de cet acabit (l’offre reste vaste) parce que sinon, on aurait pas venu, pas vu et surtout pas renouvelé… l’abonnement.

Mais vraiment, que c’est navrant et stupide… et ridicule aussi, ce film de merde ! on n’en croit pas ses yeux, ni ses oreilles (c’est aussi pénible à regarder qu’à entendre : ces dialogues, mon dieu, mon dieu… sauvez-nous !).
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
2
royalguy07Aug 11, 2023
Truly lit and framed like ass. Gadot is just not capable of the role here, lacking the necessary charisma. I don't want to pin too much on her though because this was unsalvageable trash.
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
2
nvballAug 11, 2023
this movie is ludicrously boring. the story is meaningless, the visuals are lame, the action sequences are boring too. they even made AI do one of the visuals because they couldn't spare an iota of effort into making this movie interesting
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
0
GumdropAug 12, 2023
Congratulations Netflix. You've managed to make the most boring action movie in the history of movies.
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
3
MetacriticOnurAug 11, 2023
bad
[ bad ]

adjective, worse, worst;(Slang) bad·der, bad·dest for 36.
not good in any manner or degree.
4 of 11 users found this helpful47
All this user's reviews
2
DikanoAug 12, 2023
Absolutely atrocious. Laughably juvenile script, vapid and disposable characters, convoluted direction and egregious acting. Your-run-of-the-mill Netflix original.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
HealingToolboxAug 11, 2023
The best female James Bond movie to date. For Barbie fans, Lots of effective, not superficial, not Charlie Angels, girl-power. The movie begins with a long, effective action sequence Ala Bond. It world-hops like Bond. It blows things upThe best female James Bond movie to date. For Barbie fans, Lots of effective, not superficial, not Charlie Angels, girl-power. The movie begins with a long, effective action sequence Ala Bond. It world-hops like Bond. It blows things up like Bond. Good acting like best of Bond. Kills deserving villains like Bond. Big technical lair set pieces like Bond. Meaty main villain like Bond. Effective and likable supporting cast like Mission Impossible. Takes off from where Person of Interest TV series left off. The all-seeing AI computer, trying to do good, is built into a franchise premise. Gal Godot working with Skydance producers then take the premise further. For me, Skydance is proving the most reliable content creator of AAA big-budget narratives. Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
5
alanpotter17Aug 17, 2023
Um filme inofensivo, é como se pegasse o objetivo da franquia "Missão Impossível", mas sem o talento de Cruise e com uma direção ainda amadora, mas que, ao menos, consegue fazer manter o interesse.
Gadot está apenas ok, e talvez seja pouco
Um filme inofensivo, é como se pegasse o objetivo da franquia "Missão Impossível", mas sem o talento de Cruise e com uma direção ainda amadora, mas que, ao menos, consegue fazer manter o interesse.
Gadot está apenas ok, e talvez seja pouco para o nível de entrega que o projeto exige. Sua parcera e antagonista, rouba a cena na verdade, o que mostra a fragilidade de Gadot em lidar com um personagem que precisava ser mais marcante.
No entanto, o pior de tudo mesmo é ver o roteiro esquemático sendo posto em prática. O problema dos absurdos e do fato de que os vilões não apresentam nunca real perigo, é que passamos a acompanhar o filme com certo ar de indiferença, pois sabemos que é questão de uns minutos tudo se resolver.
O filme ainda tenta quebrar a expectativa de facilidade que se apresenta ao expectador, com mortes e assassinatos repentinos, por exemplo. Mas ainda assim não é o suficiente para retirar a desconfiança dos atos, como se a verossimilhança fosse algo distante mesmo, mas ao menos consciente disso.
Se está melhor do que "A mãe", é bom falar que está um pouco atrás de filmes como Missão impossível" ou até mesmo "Indiana Jones".
Stone parece a todo instante meio perdida em meio a um jogo de caça e rato que é completamente genérico, com os personagens sendo tratados como meras peças de xadrez.
Algo que me incomodou muito foi a caricatura dos vilões, muito unidimensionais, coisa que qualquer filme da Disney/Pixar já consegue contornar, mesmo feito para crianças. Ao menos isso me incomodou menos que o "girl power" declarado do filme, onde mulheres assumem o protagonismo e lutam no mesmo espaço, o que achei sensacional para marcar que é uma obra contemporânea, ao mesmo tempo que as transições da desconfiança à confiança entre elas tenha soado meio forçada e abrupta.
O filme, então, carece de momentos contemplativos, e como ação não é ruim, mas um tanto limitada.
Enfim, não é um filme que eu assistiria duas vezes, e foi decisão acertada da Netflix no geral, por conversar com seu público e entregar ação mediana, ao nível do que se espera. Ainda falta muito apara a Netflix sair do banal, mas apenas é bom saber as produções tem caminhado para representações mais interessantes.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
0
Broker2022Aug 14, 2023
Booooooring, so boooooring and bland.
Another booooooring and bland movie from Netboringblandflix.
Bloodless boring (did I mention that) movie. Another wannabe Bond knockoff of the worst kind.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
0
NotAName1Aug 13, 2023
Bland and every aspect of the 'hacking' is poorly done.
The acting is shotty and i can only blame the poor script and random uninspired love interests
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
MICHU188Aug 16, 2023
Heart of Stone is allegedly a starter of a new spy thriller franchise, although opinions about this movie vary I personally enjoyed it and would very much like to see the next part.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
TVJerryAug 19, 2023
Gal Gadot plays an intelligence operative who's tasked with saving the world from yet another hi-tech weapon. She's working hard to make a stand in the action arena. As she seems to runs continuously, there are some dazzling stunts and narrowGal Gadot plays an intelligence operative who's tasked with saving the world from yet another hi-tech weapon. She's working hard to make a stand in the action arena. As she seems to runs continuously, there are some dazzling stunts and narrow escapes. The plot and dialogue are average, so it's up to the characters and action to give it umph. Gadot has the swagger to pull this off and Jamie Dornan adds his appeal to the mix. While this attempt at a new spy franchise makes an adequate impression, it lacks sufficient originality or dazzle to make it stand out. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
Nico85Aug 20, 2023
If this is what human writers can concoct we might be better off with a.i. generated scripts.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
MovieReviewMaveAug 31, 2023
IN A NUTSHELL:
The story is about an intelligence operative for a shadowy global peacekeeping agency who races to stop a hacker from stealing its most valuable and dangerous weapon. The film was directed by Tom Harper who is a BAFTA-nominated
IN A NUTSHELL:
The story is about an intelligence operative for a shadowy global peacekeeping agency who races to stop a hacker from stealing its most valuable and dangerous weapon. The film was directed by Tom Harper who is a BAFTA-nominated British film and TV director, writer, and producer.
Writing credits go to Greg Rucka and Allison Schroeder.

THINGS I LIKED:
Gal Gadot. Am I right? She’s gorgeous, talented, and fierce in this role. It’s hard not to see her as Wonder Woman though.
Glenn Close! Fun reveal! No spoilers.
Everyone in the cast did a fantastic job and includes Jamie Dornan, Alia Bhatt, Sophie Okonedo, Matthias Schweighofer, Jing Lusi, and Paul Ready.
The tech shown in the film is ridiculously cool. It makes that Tom Cruise movie look like child’s play.
Great opening song and rolling credits introduction.
We get to travel around the gorgeous world. I always love that. The beautiful cinematography is by George Steel.
Twists and more twists. I love twists.
Poppin soundtrack.
I love movie titles with multiple meanings. Gal Gadot’s character’s last name is Stone and we definitely see her heart in this film. Heart is also the name of an AI system that several groups are trying to take possession of because it will give them the greatest power in the world.
If you enjoy this, you’ll be happy to know that the ending absolutely leaves an opening for a sequel. THINGS I DIDN’T LIKE:
Like all movies these days, all of the heroes are women. The men are either the villains or not as cool or competent as the women.
There are a lot of exciting action sequences, but they’re pretty formulaic.
So many film critics are hating on this movie, but I thought it was a fun diversion. They’re so hard to please sometimes.
While the simplistic set designs aren’t particularly memorable, they do set the tone in each scene.

TIPS FOR PARENTS: Extremely high dead body count.
Various weapons
Tons of violence and fighting
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
JoelitorAug 19, 2023
Perdí la cuenta de las veces que me quede dormido viendo esta porquería sin sentido. No pierdas tu tiempo es solo otra más en la lista de Netflix, basura y más basura, actores de alta talla dando su talento en una historia absurda y aburridaPerdí la cuenta de las veces que me quede dormido viendo esta porquería sin sentido. No pierdas tu tiempo es solo otra más en la lista de Netflix, basura y más basura, actores de alta talla dando su talento en una historia absurda y aburrida con toque de serie de 2 capítulos. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ExceladeogunAug 19, 2023
Heart of Stone

This Gal Gadot-led thriller is styled as a James Bond-type action as it cascades from location to location. Gal Gadot isn't one of the best dramatic actresses, but this is one of her best on-screen acting (her character and
Heart of Stone

This Gal Gadot-led thriller is styled as a James Bond-type action as it cascades from location to location.

Gal Gadot isn't one of the best dramatic actresses, but this is one of her best on-screen acting (her character and acting improve as the movie proceeds). The supporting cast also delivers standard performances.

Heart of Stone is cliché and filled with tropes, but it's entertaining. The storyline isn't grand or fresh, but it is easy to follow, it also avoids being drab by how the action sequences, piling locations, plot twists and callbacks are expertly brought in.

It's quite possible that Gal Gadot has found herself a new franchise to spearhead.

7.5/10
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
JirrKim25Aug 18, 2023
It's a low-budget mission impossible that's it. The action is not that bad, but not good either, the effects are bad, the plot is all over the place, there are some bad actors and acting, etc. I don't know why it's Gadot here.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
TildjaAug 20, 2023
Typical action movie. I loved it. Lots of twists and stuff blowing up. Whats not to like.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews