Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

5

AndrewN.Jul 19, 2007

Unfortunately this turned out to be mundane rather than magic. The storyline was too disjointed and poorly paced and at times bulked out by complete filler, house elves and trolls should have been left out altogether. Overall it lacked drama Unfortunately this turned out to be mundane rather than magic. The storyline was too disjointed and poorly paced and at times bulked out by complete filler, house elves and trolls should have been left out altogether. Overall it lacked drama and the climax (usually the best part of each Potter film) was only mediocre. The Dumbledore,voldemort clash was completely undermined. Ironically the people who will enjoy this are the people who have not read the book. For me, its only adequate.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

StephenSJul 18, 2007

The writing style of the books bore and the movies to this point had been little more then good kids movies. Phoenix leave sup to its billy as the most adult oriented Potter and delivers in tone, action story. Easily my favorite Potter movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

ryanbJul 18, 2007

This movie was really good up till the end then it just sucked

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

EricCJul 18, 2007

I was extremely surprised as I sat watching this film. The previous four have been mostly disappointing. The first two were a product of a director who had no idea how to direct children and relied on cheap thrills to cover horrible dialogue I was extremely surprised as I sat watching this film. The previous four have been mostly disappointing. The first two were a product of a director who had no idea how to direct children and relied on cheap thrills to cover horrible dialogue and flow (to which I blame those who adapted the book to film, not the source material). The second was more of the same, with even worse acting from the youngsters (I blame the director again). The third was the best of the four, despite what many will say. Cuaron made Harry Potter in to a respectable movie franchise. His art house style of directing turned off many of the mainstream crowd, but he was able to save a plot that involved nothing more than Harry saving his uncle. The fourth lacked skilled direction, though was exciting enough to be the most enjoyable. I had not expected the fifth to be the most well done and most exciting. The book was easilly the worst of the series, being just an 800 page set up for the next book. But the movie, under a no name director, makes the characters very real and the storyline very relevant. It doesn't take longer than 5 minutes of this film to understand that this fictional England full of fear, disillusion, and paranoia is our world. In terror, we, like the wizard world, give up reason and our trust to authorities, and horrible things can happen. And while the book lacked any real story, the movie moves at such a pase that you never notice, but you get in to the characters. The climax can not be understated. It was amazing. With the showdown at the end, wizard duels have become what they should have been from the beginning. They have done for wizards what light sabers have done for jedi. Despite what those who wish for Harry to live in a wonderful world of magic and tame adventures might tell you, I'm ecstatic to hear that David Yates will be directing the next movie, and possibly the last. He has come the closest to making Harry Potter the movie series it begs to be.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

StanleyF.Jul 17, 2007

I found the movie reasonably enjoyable, with good special effects and action sequences. However, after a good start it quickly became rather jerky and telegraphic in pacing. I suspect many not familiar with the story may find it confusing. I found the movie reasonably enjoyable, with good special effects and action sequences. However, after a good start it quickly became rather jerky and telegraphic in pacing. I suspect many not familiar with the story may find it confusing. Because of the frenetic editing style, character development was limited. I also found the egregious addition of a new type of attack magic detracted from the believability of the climactic sequence.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

DavidKJul 17, 2007

I'm a huge Harry Potter Fan. I have read all the books to date and have also seen all the movies (god knows why as most of them have disappointed me) and this Film has to be the second worst. after the third being the worst. ill explain I'm a huge Harry Potter Fan. I have read all the books to date and have also seen all the movies (god knows why as most of them have disappointed me) and this Film has to be the second worst. after the third being the worst. ill explain my Views. the third being the worst as the main story of the book was twisted and rearranged into the film it screwed up the book. and this new film disappointed me as it missed out much of the plot and most of all the final battle although may have been ok in the film the Book version is longer and more thrilling therefore 3 times better than the film. on there own the harry potter films are all fairly great but. as some one who has read all the books. they are on the bulk unfaithful and miss seriously important parts of the plot. my advice if your one who loves the films read the books. they are much better. if you have read the books but not watched the films. then don't expect much or if possible avoid the films p.s 4th and 2nd films are the best. that saying the second film missed out a vital part of the story that did not add much to the 2nd film/story b But does explain a lot in the 6th book those of you who don't know what I'm on about its the cupboard in the dark shop that harry ends up in that is in fact a teleporter which leads to another teleporter inside the room of requirements.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

DanielD.Jul 17, 2007

Ending was exciting, but the rest of the movie just wasn't good.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

BryanC.Jul 17, 2007

This is the first Harry Potter movie to stand out as a real movie, the Empire Strikes Back of the franchise so far if you will. The new director displayed an understanding that this story isn't all about brightly coloured magic tricks, This is the first Harry Potter movie to stand out as a real movie, the Empire Strikes Back of the franchise so far if you will. The new director displayed an understanding that this story isn't all about brightly coloured magic tricks, but the journey of a boy to a man. It's darker and edgier than it's predessesors and cuts out all the fluff of the source material.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

SamJul 17, 2007

I have not read the books, yet even I could see that there is a large amount missing. There is no progression at all only poorly connected scenes with very little build up to the climax, which, whilst impressive on the special effects, has I have not read the books, yet even I could see that there is a large amount missing. There is no progression at all only poorly connected scenes with very little build up to the climax, which, whilst impressive on the special effects, has no intensity. Overall the film is just too shot and does not cover the subject matter that it is clearly trying too.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

6

BryanN.Jul 17, 2007

Don't get me wrong alright, I'm a harry potter fan, I read all the books. I thought the movie HPPOA was bad, but order of the phoenix was worse. To be honest, the order of the phoenix runs pale in comparison with with he goblet of Don't get me wrong alright, I'm a harry potter fan, I read all the books. I thought the movie HPPOA was bad, but order of the phoenix was worse. To be honest, the order of the phoenix runs pale in comparison with with he goblet of fire and also transformers, seeing that I gave those two movies a 9. Oh yes, you get to reminiscent about some magical melodies just like good old times but the movie was just too cramped up with only stuff needed for plot advancement. Luna was extraordinary interesting to watch though. Probably a 6.5 would suffice.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AnnaR.Jul 17, 2007

ABSOLUTELY FAB! Best one yet. I loved the movie from beginning to end - the acting was great, the story... And my heart melted by the kissing scene. It was certainly my favourite book, so the movie for me was also my favourite! 100% ABSOLUTELY FAB! Best one yet. I loved the movie from beginning to end - the acting was great, the story... And my heart melted by the kissing scene. It was certainly my favourite book, so the movie for me was also my favourite! 100% RECOMMENDED!!! The other reviewers (such as Matt K) you can tell - they just don't have a good taste for movies.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

SamFJul 16, 2007

Movie did a great job of incorporating as much detail & plot as allowed to make a coherent movie. It was a great experience to watch, and at times, almost improved upon the book

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

MattKJul 16, 2007

Plain and simple, it's just a bad cheesy movie. Harry Potter silliness aside, this movie just isn't that good.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ErichS.Jul 16, 2007

I was looking forward to Order of the Phoenix because I knew they'd have to pare down what to me was a mess of a book. Poorly written, painfully protracted and inflated, overly sadistic, repetitious and boring. And I was right. This is I was looking forward to Order of the Phoenix because I knew they'd have to pare down what to me was a mess of a book. Poorly written, painfully protracted and inflated, overly sadistic, repetitious and boring. And I was right. This is the best of the films so far. Although I also loved #3. For all it's running time it was fast and enthralling and was never boring. The closing battle was beautiful and thrilling to watch.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SethWJul 16, 2007

Best of the movies so far. They did a great job.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

BrianJul 16, 2007

As a harry potter virgin, i was a little bit lost and a bit unsure as to what all the hype was about. its an entertaining movie with nice special effects and a beautiful setting but thats about it. its nothing special.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SophieJul 16, 2007

One of the hardest books to transfer to the scree made into an awesome film for book lovers and movie-goers alike. The cuts, for the most part, are acceptable this time. By far the best HP movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

[Anonymous]Jul 16, 2007

While it was a bit too fast paced, I think the filmmakers did an awesome job of taking a 900 page book and turning it in a tight, psychological thriller. The acting was top notch, especially from Imelda Staunton and Daniel Radcliffe, who While it was a bit too fast paced, I think the filmmakers did an awesome job of taking a 900 page book and turning it in a tight, psychological thriller. The acting was top notch, especially from Imelda Staunton and Daniel Radcliffe, who gives a powerful, emotional performance. This is a film that leaves you wanting more, which is both criticism and praise. Bring on the Half Blood Prince, Mr Yates.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DoloresUmbridgeJul 16, 2007

Daniel Radcliffe CAN'T act, he just doesn't have talent he can't learn it. Dolores Umbridge is THE MOVIE. Good movie inspite of the main character.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

lauraJul 16, 2007

Fast-paced, dramatic, moving.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JosephA.Jul 16, 2007

As a reader of the books I haven't really been impressed by any of the movies save Prisoner of Azkaban. The first 2 were boring, and the 4th was way to abbreviated for a book with so much going on. It was like Cliffs notes. With "Order" As a reader of the books I haven't really been impressed by any of the movies save Prisoner of Azkaban. The first 2 were boring, and the 4th was way to abbreviated for a book with so much going on. It was like Cliffs notes. With "Order" however you get that same painful abbreviation but book 5 itself was a bit drawn out and boring in that it was bloated with superfulous nonsense more than half the time so there is plenty of fat to trim away, leaving the movie as a more focused, sleeker version of the main story. Is it better than the book? No, absolutely not. One of the biggest problems with the "trimming" is that as emotions run high in book 5 and the movie focuses on action and Voldemort (the main story if you will) the emotional build up of Harry's struggle with his destiny and just growing up is lost in the fold leaving you a bit empty by the end, however not nearly as empty as the unimpactful death of Cedric @ the end of "Goblet", so it is an imporvement. The movie cerainly has it high's and low's but I would say "Order" is easily my second favorite of the movie franchise after "Azkaban". Which says alot as "Order" is my least favorite of the books.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

MattBJul 16, 2007

This movie was a horrible addition to the series. We are not talking about minor adjustments to plot, which is, as I think all of us can agree, a neccessary evil for transforming a 900pg book into a 100-200pg script. I am by no means a This movie was a horrible addition to the series. We are not talking about minor adjustments to plot, which is, as I think all of us can agree, a neccessary evil for transforming a 900pg book into a 100-200pg script. I am by no means a die-hard fan, but felt that the director over-emphasized the smallest of scenes in an effort to make the more more appealing to the usual "dumb movie-goer" audience. Take the Harry/Cho kiss. This wasn't even talked about in the book, yet was by far the longest single shot of the movie. It was the the rush rush rush of the movie was suddenly slowed-down for this one really unimportant moment. I wouldn't complain if that was an addition to an already true-to-the-story film. Changing the plot, as well, for unnecessary reasons is just pompus. I felt that by-far the acting in this movie was the worst, and that falls entirely on the director, not the actors, as we know they have done better. The young actors said they liked this director the best, which means he was probably the most laid back, which is obviously shown on screen in their portrayal. Evanna Lynch's pausing in between phrases was something that could have easily been fixed by building confidence with the character and the lines, another job that lies solely on the director. I have been told that the movie was easy to follow for someone who did not read the books, but I'm not sure how it's possible as I just read the book a few days ago, so it is fresh in my mind, and I could barely follow it myself. A waste of time and money. Next!… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful

4

sueo.Jul 15, 2007

A disappointment i must say.sorry to all fans who think the 5th installment is great. I've read the book,and would understand if the director can't make the movie 100% like what was written in the book, however, most things haveA disappointment i must say.sorry to all fans who think the 5th installment is great. I've read the book,and would understand if the director can't make the movie 100% like what was written in the book, however, most things have been changed and character development seems lacking, so does the actions. I just hope that the 6th movie would be the greatest as it is even more messier and more complicated that the rest.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

JamesF.Jul 15, 2007

Slow. Joyless. Humorless. Slow.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

SamBJul 15, 2007

I don't usually like the HP films, as I feel kinda silly watching them, as they bombard your with corniness and love etc. but I think that Order of the Phoenix did a really good job of turning my favorite of the books into a well I don't usually like the HP films, as I feel kinda silly watching them, as they bombard your with corniness and love etc. but I think that Order of the Phoenix did a really good job of turning my favorite of the books into a well scripted movie. Of course, there was definitely room for improvement, for example the lack of a better fight scene at the end, and Dumbledore being completely different to the book. I wish Richard Harris (Dumbledore in the first two movies) was still with us, he did a much better job. Apart from the few negatives though, I think Yates did a really good job of balancing pure film-making creative license, i.e. choosing which parts of the book to exclude, and staying true to the book. It couldn't have been any longer or it would have started to bore people, and I think each of the important bits of the book were touched upon FLUENTLY. Compared to other movies where scenes tend to jump around alot, this movie was very fluid. Not a 10 for the reasons stated, but definitly a solid 9.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

JacquiHJul 15, 2007

The performance was good, but did the writer even read the book? Things were out of order, not explained, and nominal events are in the movie which shouldn't be or were emphasized. I realize year 5 is complex, but did they have to cut The performance was good, but did the writer even read the book? Things were out of order, not explained, and nominal events are in the movie which shouldn't be or were emphasized. I realize year 5 is complex, but did they have to cut so much out of the story line? It's a tragedy really.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

JohnP.Jul 15, 2007

This was by far the worst of the movie series. I know every corner and every word of the books. This movie was rushed and a lot of scenes were out of order. I give this a movie a complete thumbs down. It was worse than Goblet of fire and This was by far the worst of the movie series. I know every corner and every word of the books. This movie was rushed and a lot of scenes were out of order. I give this a movie a complete thumbs down. It was worse than Goblet of fire and this director is going to do Half blood prince. What a loss to a great series.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

ChristopherW.Jul 15, 2007

The Harry Potter franchise has hit a wall with this one. The momentum that has been building through the previous 4 films lags in this disappointing film adaptation. The plot is so creaky and uninvolving that you may have to check your pulse The Harry Potter franchise has hit a wall with this one. The momentum that has been building through the previous 4 films lags in this disappointing film adaptation. The plot is so creaky and uninvolving that you may have to check your pulse at some point. The new 'headmaster from hell' is not all that scary, just really annoying. And, the final climactic battle is well choreographed, but it feels like it inhabits an all togetter different film. Also, many of the actors appear bored with reprising their roles for the fifth time. In addition, the greatest crime this installment commits is that it isn't any fun. Its downbeat tone and grim portents just make you want to see all of this wrapped up very soon. Not recommended!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

SBJul 14, 2007

My favourite of the Harry Potter books ruined on the screen. I don't understand it when movie makers play "artistic licence" when it comes to translating books onto screen. In the end if they decide to chop and change a book to adapt it My favourite of the Harry Potter books ruined on the screen. I don't understand it when movie makers play "artistic licence" when it comes to translating books onto screen. In the end if they decide to chop and change a book to adapt it to the screen, they may as well not have based it on any book in the first place.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DaveFJul 14, 2007

I'm not going to say that the magic is back. It's finally arrived. The cinematography in Phoenix is astounding--scenes ebb and flow like the spells they're depicting. The effects for these spells embody the themes rather than I'm not going to say that the magic is back. It's finally arrived. The cinematography in Phoenix is astounding--scenes ebb and flow like the spells they're depicting. The effects for these spells embody the themes rather than distract from them. Watch the elemental opposites, the dark and light dancing together in the battle scene. Call me a heretic, but the lyricism of Fred and George's flying-the-coop sequence anything in Lord of the Rings. Even Creatur delights in his Dobby-antithetical mumblings. The first Potter film that made me want to pick up the books again.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

MichaelL.Jul 14, 2007

Does not follow the book, characters too flat not developed. Story line too rushed.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

TimSJul 14, 2007

As a movie, this may be the strongest of the series. Visually impressive, with some strong emotional moments (and a handful that try, but end up sounding silly), the plot is far less confusing to the uninitiated than its immediate As a movie, this may be the strongest of the series. Visually impressive, with some strong emotional moments (and a handful that try, but end up sounding silly), the plot is far less confusing to the uninitiated than its immediate predecessor. Still, a lot was cut from the books, which is sure to dissapoint the die-hard readers. Regardless, a very strong movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

AmandaGJul 14, 2007

This movie seemed like it was going to be great..but after watching it I am truley let down! Not only did it not follow the book..it just did not compare to the other HP movies..I mean harry potter faced true battles int he other movies but This movie seemed like it was going to be great..but after watching it I am truley let down! Not only did it not follow the book..it just did not compare to the other HP movies..I mean harry potter faced true battles int he other movies but nothing in this one!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JohnN.Jul 14, 2007

The worst of the 6 books so far. The best of the 5 movies so far. Hands down. Everyone complaining that it wasn't faithful to the book should remember that the book was loaded with unnecessary crap. This weeded all that out and made a The worst of the 6 books so far. The best of the 5 movies so far. Hands down. Everyone complaining that it wasn't faithful to the book should remember that the book was loaded with unnecessary crap. This weeded all that out and made a dark, exciting movie. 100 times better than the other films that were WAY TOO faithful to the books.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

guy!Jul 14, 2007

This movie was great, but could've been better. All it needed was more stuff from the book.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

RyanDJul 14, 2007

When are directors gonna stop improving and follow the story so as to not ruin future films and story lines?

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JimHJul 14, 2007

An intelligent film where character development takes precedence and special effects fade into the background. Could also be read as subversive of Blair's UK and Bush's US and that aint bad. Probably the weakest Potter book is An intelligent film where character development takes precedence and special effects fade into the background. Could also be read as subversive of Blair's UK and Bush's US and that aint bad. Probably the weakest Potter book is certainly a worthy installment in the film series.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AnthonyB.Jul 14, 2007

Well, I dont think its the best movie in the series. Im just to disappointed because my favorite scene in the book was not included ( The Prophecy Chapter ). Thats the part where Harry is shouting at Dumbledore. Although I love the effects, Well, I dont think its the best movie in the series. Im just to disappointed because my favorite scene in the book was not included ( The Prophecy Chapter ). Thats the part where Harry is shouting at Dumbledore. Although I love the effects, most specially the match between Dumbledore and Voldemort. I love the concept of Black VS White, as in literally! But the emotions that the novel brought, it was not totally depicted in the movie. Overall, its a good one! Plus, in fairness, Harry and Cho knows how to kiss!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

BrandonJul 14, 2007

This is only a so so film, and that's the honest truth. This is the fifth Potter film, and so anyoen walking int othe theatre is gong to know what they are in store for. Also anyone who has read the book knows the material already, so This is only a so so film, and that's the honest truth. This is the fifth Potter film, and so anyoen walking int othe theatre is gong to know what they are in store for. Also anyone who has read the book knows the material already, so all we can really rate is the direction and the adaptation of the story. The direction is capable, but at times puzzing with eiditing that is breaknect during important scenes and laxadaisical when languishing on unimportant special effects. (Is it more important to spend 30 seconds on watching the kids make animated paper airplanes, or explaining how Harry feels about Cho in the third act of the film?). The adaptation was also weak, choosing to make the main story of the film about hte rise and fall of Delores Umbridge instead of about the feeling of hopelessness and insecurity at Hogwarts as the students have everything that makes them feel safe systematically stripped away. Harry choosing to form the D.A. and effectively fight BACK is supposed to be a big moment in his character and the story. This is not handled well in the film, I think, and thereby make the whole Order of the Phoenix story into a filler. This was an important chapter to nail, and it's sad that it was mishandled. Especially after how amazing the last two films have been. I'm sad to hear the director will be back again for the next Potter film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

DanJul 14, 2007

Tolerable as a movie, but it strays too far from the book. Scenes were changed around and whole scenes that I found to very important to the story were left our, which, frankly, pissed me off.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

DavidMJul 13, 2007

The movie really missed so much of the stuff in the books that it wasn't good. Yes, the book dragged out a lot. Unfortunately, a lot of what made the book so good was the multiple subplots, and great setup for the final battle. For The movie really missed so much of the stuff in the books that it wasn't good. Yes, the book dragged out a lot. Unfortunately, a lot of what made the book so good was the multiple subplots, and great setup for the final battle. For example, when Snape throws Harry out of Occlumency lessons after Harry sees his father bullying Snape, there's a huge sense of desperation in the book - not in the movie. There's also an incredibly important subplot of Ligilimency being used to trick Harry into the whole thing, and so on and so forth. Even aside from that kind of stuff that only people who either are huge fans of HP or have great factual recall will care about, the whole movie seemed rushed. The entire part prior to Dumbledore leaving was basically a bunch of snapshots of various events, with no cohesion in my opinion. Mediocre movie at best, absolutely terrible in comparison to the books.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

ChrisWJul 13, 2007

It's like Dolores Umbridge had a hand in making this movie--the kids (or teens now, I guess) barely register except for Luna and Harry, and all the teachers are kept out of the film as much as possible. Ron gets about five sentences and It's like Dolores Umbridge had a hand in making this movie--the kids (or teens now, I guess) barely register except for Luna and Harry, and all the teachers are kept out of the film as much as possible. Ron gets about five sentences and otherwise is forced to lurk in the background. Hermione just seems pointless, when she's so important in the books. And I think if you added up all the seconds the Hogwarts staff appear in this movie, you'd have, like, two minutes tops. The direction is a mess--really choppy and taking great big leaps in story so that you're left wondering why or how they got from point A to point D. It's like it wants to be a sleek and sophisticated action movie, and forgets that these stories take place in a richly imagined world of magic, where KIDS are supposed to be the heroes. Dumbledore and Voldemort fight like Yoda and that Christopher Lee character in Episode 1. Why? I've seen that fight already. This should look more interesting and new. The movie also looks cheap! (I mean, compared to the last two films.) It looks like they skimped on the effects budget. The final Ministry of Magic sequence is mostly black backgrounds and receding rows of orbs, like a big black storage buliding. The last 20 minutes were also shot to be shown in 3D on Imax screens and you can tell that they sacrificed making a good action sequence to just churn out "it's coming at you!" shots of magic wands and Death Eaters. Staunton and Rickman (Umbridge and Snape) both rock, though, and Luna looks and sounds exactly like I thought she should. I don't think this director knows or likes the Harry Potter books, deep down inside.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AzrielM.Jul 13, 2007

Harry's 5th year on the big screen has been the greatest of all so far if you ask me. As a matter of fact, I can't think of a better movie adaptation that the one that David Yates just did with the Order of the Phoenix. He just Harry's 5th year on the big screen has been the greatest of all so far if you ask me. As a matter of fact, I can't think of a better movie adaptation that the one that David Yates just did with the Order of the Phoenix. He just made a 2h18 movie -the shortest Harry Potter movie so far- from the thickest Harry Potter novel. Yates condensated the essential elements of the novel, and filled the movie with a lot of non-spoken and subtle details not only taken from the book, but also setting up the table for what's about to come... Every single actor has been wonderful (except Daniel Radcliffe... sorry, but he really sucks). Especially Umbridge and Luna Lovegood; even if they didn't fit the mental image I had of them both, they were brilliant. and I'm glad that Dumbledore finally took his Ritalin... Those who red the book will probably agree that, among the 5 movies that came out, we just saw the best one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

MikeH.Jul 13, 2007

The worst potter movie made. For a book the same size and complexity as Goblet of Fire, it had none of the arch of story and at the end you don't care who lives or dies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

WesleyJul 13, 2007

I have to disagree with the large amount of votes here and say this was the worst of the Potter films so far. Even if you excuse the very slow start, the pacing was way off, and many characters were left just worrying about Harry rather than I have to disagree with the large amount of votes here and say this was the worst of the Potter films so far. Even if you excuse the very slow start, the pacing was way off, and many characters were left just worrying about Harry rather than being developed at all. I place a lot of the blame on the fact that screenwriter Steve Kloves was apparently moved forward to the more important sixth movie, and this movie was put in the hands of "Bed of Roses" and "Contact" screenwriter Michael Goldenberg. The choppy direction by David Yates does little more than attempt to sloppily mimic the two great directors that preceded him. Let's hope for better in the future. I left the theatre for the first time disappointed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

SebastianJul 13, 2007

If you're judging the cumulative user score for Phoenix as a movie, you might want to add 1-2 full points. Nearly without exception, all of the low scores justify their assessments as reflections of the movie's failure to adhere to If you're judging the cumulative user score for Phoenix as a movie, you might want to add 1-2 full points. Nearly without exception, all of the low scores justify their assessments as reflections of the movie's failure to adhere to the book (and even change the book in parts). Well, kids, I'll tell you what a "4"-rated movie would be--an 81/2 hour visual carbon copy of the Rowling written work. Good heavens that would suck (and would lack any creative exercise). Anyway, after 4 movies, one would think the kids would understand the necessary challenge of altering a book to become a movie. Now, for my assessment of the movie as a movie: It's the best Potter film yet. "Phoenix" is the first movie to really grasp the main characters as living, breathing, modern humans--rather than as transposed caricatures--and connect their humanity to the viewer. It was more than fun or entertaining--it was emotionally charged and compelling. Book lovers (of whom I am one) should be able to separate themselves from movie lovers and judge each on its own merits.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JennPJul 13, 2007

It was an overall good movie. However, the movie left out great story lines that were in the book. It is too bad J.K. Rowlings writing was not developed into its fullest visual extent.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

ChrisDJul 13, 2007

Oh noes! The first negative review not complaining about how it isn't faithful to the book?!?!? The script in the film was awful. Diabolical. At the end when Harry tells them what Dumbleydore said, was painful to anyone who has seen Oh noes! The first negative review not complaining about how it isn't faithful to the book?!?!? The script in the film was awful. Diabolical. At the end when Harry tells them what Dumbleydore said, was painful to anyone who has seen movies with good dialogue. The acting for the most part was substandard, especially Harry (again) The praise Staunton has received has perhaps been unwarranted as Umbridge. I got the impression she really overplayed it, and that is easier than playing someone more complex and middle of the road. She aslo got way too much screentime compared to all the other adult actors, who were largely reduced to cameos. Also when Ron said, "WHo are you... Hermione Granger" it was as laughable as the "Get me a laptop" line from oceans 13. The effects were good obviously, but at the fight at the end, seeing as practically nothing had happened til then they just decided to pour all the effects in then and hope to wow people with that rather than making a good action scene. There was no artistic style lent to this film by the director unlike the 3rd film, and generlally not that good.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

LeahJul 13, 2007

It was an all right movie, but the "rushed" factor is definitely becoming a problem as the books get longer and more complex. It bothers me when in a movie transcribed from a book, little details are rearranged and altered for no reason, and It was an all right movie, but the "rushed" factor is definitely becoming a problem as the books get longer and more complex. It bothers me when in a movie transcribed from a book, little details are rearranged and altered for no reason, and that seemed to happen constantly in this movie. I know that for times sake this must be the case, but why couldn't Moody show Harry the photo of the Order, and why did Cho rat the DA out, and why wasn't Sirius simply stunned instead of Avada Kedavra'ed, and why hasn't Peeves been in any of the movies, therefore preventing the Weasley's from uttering what is arguably the best line of the book, "give her hell from us, Peeves." The entire end of the movie was terrible. What happened to Harry screaming at Dumbledore in his office? What happened to, "Harry, I'm going to tell you everything." These were big moments in the book, and some of the most emotional, and they were reduced to nothing. The thing that probably bothers me the most, however, is Dumbledore. He has none of the wit and charm he possesses in the book. Bellowing "don't you have studying to do?" and being visibly pissed off in front of students is nothing something that is completely uncharacteristic of Dumbledore.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

abcdjkl;Jul 12, 2007

I give it a 3 because I like the Potter series. I wasn't expecting much going into this movie as I thought this was the most boring book so I wasn't shocked that the movie followed suit.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

jenbJul 12, 2007

'Ho Hum' is the only phrase I can use to describe this movie really which is in the end left me feeling disappointed. Of course the book went on for far too long but the ending of HP and The Order of The Phoenix was it's 'Ho Hum' is the only phrase I can use to describe this movie really which is in the end left me feeling disappointed. Of course the book went on for far too long but the ending of HP and The Order of The Phoenix was it's strong point, very emotional and shocking, something which was not conveyed in the movie adequately. When Sirius dies in the book it is one of the saddest parts of all the HP books, and the emotion just didn't come through. Whether that is from bad directing or acting... maybe a combination of the two I don't know. On a brighter note, I thought Imelda Staunton, Gary Oldman and Evanna Lynch were all impressive. I hope this director 'gets it' for the next one. He has far better material to work with so you would bloody well hope so.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

GodComplexJul 12, 2007

Not good. Not bad. Suprisingly mundane. Save your time and read the books...

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ryanc.Jul 12, 2007

I think this was the best Harry Potter yet! Although I didn't read this book, but read the first four, I wasn't confused at all. It was very well made and extremely entertaining. The action was great in the end. It had a perfect I think this was the best Harry Potter yet! Although I didn't read this book, but read the first four, I wasn't confused at all. It was very well made and extremely entertaining. The action was great in the end. It had a perfect balance of humor and seriousness. The acting was much better!!!! Finally, this was the first movie in the franchise to stray away from the juvenile parts of the other films. Excellent MOVIE!!!!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MikeJul 12, 2007

being a huge fan of the books, every single movie has been a dissapointment, with the exception of the Order of the Phoenix. By far the best one yet, the acting, the special effects, and the loyalty to the book has made it fun and a good being a huge fan of the books, every single movie has been a dissapointment, with the exception of the Order of the Phoenix. By far the best one yet, the acting, the special effects, and the loyalty to the book has made it fun and a good movie for a change. Props to the makers.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

ChadM.Jul 12, 2007

This movie fails to bring all of the important sub-plots of the book to screen, as scene after scene of shallow acting and poor writing are thrown together. One would think that after playing the same character for four straight movies that This movie fails to bring all of the important sub-plots of the book to screen, as scene after scene of shallow acting and poor writing are thrown together. One would think that after playing the same character for four straight movies that these young actors would have identified more with the frustrations of the declining state of Hogwarts along with pressures of tests that define their careers and tension of struggling friendships, but instead we are left with bland, confused faces as if trying to remember their lines in each scene. Not entirely their fault however as the performances of the young cast are only out-stunk by the terrible script. Again, it must've been a tough feat to fit roughly 900 pages into a 2+ hr movie, but not only does the story not incorporate the tension between Dumbledore and Poter, an important tone to the mood of the book, but each scene comes off entirely too serious without any emotion and not in the least bit connected. Boo David Yates!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

HadeethZ.Jul 12, 2007

I saw the movie on opening day and I think it's the best Harry Potter film so far! I loved every second of it and I think all the actors were brilliant in it!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

BrendanNJul 12, 2007

Those critics who like to complain about the new Harry Potter losing the innocence and charm of the past installments would do well to remember the ages of these characters at present, not how old they were during the first year. When was Those critics who like to complain about the new Harry Potter losing the innocence and charm of the past installments would do well to remember the ages of these characters at present, not how old they were during the first year. When was the last time you met an innocent teenager?? I mean, a genuinely innocent teenager with a heart of pure gold? They make mistakes, hurl insults, and think independently just like adults. You better get used to the lack of innocence in future films, also, because the characters are only getting OLDER.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

joshf.Jul 12, 2007

Second best in the series after Prisoner of Az. It was a real experience. Meditative really. It cant be judged as a Movie alone. It is a piece of the potter. 2 hours of over 15. If you view it this way it's weak points become minor. The Second best in the series after Prisoner of Az. It was a real experience. Meditative really. It cant be judged as a Movie alone. It is a piece of the potter. 2 hours of over 15. If you view it this way it's weak points become minor. The adaptation and directing do what many of the previous films have failed to do, make the viewer feel involved and with just as much at stake as the characters in the story. Well done. A huge step in the right direction away from Goblet.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JoeP.Jul 12, 2007

The movie, though a bit rushed, was awesome. The end could have been longer, but it was still great!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

AMovieCriticJul 12, 2007

David Yates......why? You made nearly the PERFECT HP movie. For once in this film series, these characters felt like real characters and they finally resembled their book counterparts. For once we have a coherent story that doesn't just David Yates......why? You made nearly the PERFECT HP movie. For once in this film series, these characters felt like real characters and they finally resembled their book counterparts. For once we have a coherent story that doesn't just jump from scene to scene. Finally we have characters who talk and act like real kids.Yes, this is a slower, more character-driven film than past ones (like the book,) but it all builds tension and dramatically builds up to huge action scenes at the end. Supposedly. And that's where director David Yates, unfortunately, dropped the ball. The action scenes at the end, meant to be a huge battle and the big stand of good vs. evil, is entirely ruined in the film. The main characters spend the entire movie preparing for a final battle that lasts...what...2 minutes? Similarly, the fight of 2 powerful wizards also goes by way too quickly and lacks intensity. And the explanations that take place after this big "finale" are probably the quickest and most inadequate in this film series so far, leading up to a tacked on ending. I don't know what happened. The movie was perfect, the last half hour was just entirely ruined. David Yates had better learn how to craft strong action scenes, because he's returning for Half Blood Prince. (Something I was thrilled about until I saw how he ruined the Ministry of Magic scenes.) And will these film people finally get Dumbledore right? He does not yell at students, EVER, and his facial expressions during the big battle at the end didn't fit his character at all.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MattAJul 12, 2007

Best one yet... I've really come to expect less out of the movies in relation to the books, and going in with low expectations help as well. The movie was entertaining, and the acting was great. (Dorles Umbridge was Perfect). I can Best one yet... I've really come to expect less out of the movies in relation to the books, and going in with low expectations help as well. The movie was entertaining, and the acting was great. (Dorles Umbridge was Perfect). I can never give one of these movies a ten...but this one almost deserves it. almost.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JonD.Jul 12, 2007

This movie was easily the best of all the movies, there wasn't all that much filler compared to the book, they cut a lot of stuff out. But the action sequences are amazing, and this movie finally shows how harry potter isn't a This movie was easily the best of all the movies, there wasn't all that much filler compared to the book, they cut a lot of stuff out. But the action sequences are amazing, and this movie finally shows how harry potter isn't a children's book, goblet of fire started that but it still had some childish aspects. This movie between the opening scene to the final battle was dark, and very intense and in my opinion a very good movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

AmberL.Jul 12, 2007

The movie butchered the book and changed things ,not just left out, of the story. Someone who never has read the books will be fine watching this movie, but the rest of us will be highly disappointed.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

andret.Jul 12, 2007

I left the movie theater satisfied with HP:OP. Overall the movie is unequal in terms of rhythm, but much more believable in terms of presentation. The story shows a more internal side of Harry, and the movie as more decent special effects. I left the movie theater satisfied with HP:OP. Overall the movie is unequal in terms of rhythm, but much more believable in terms of presentation. The story shows a more internal side of Harry, and the movie as more decent special effects. During all the movie you want to help Harry and his friends against the Ministry, and that's a good thing...that means the story holds up emotionally. The special effects, the music are there for the story. Not the other way around. However, I am unsure if young kids would appreciate this movie because it has a underlining political scheme to it. It might not be entirely understandable to them...A very good movie with a more mature tone to it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

hollycJul 12, 2007

I basically agree with Stephanie Zacharek's review from Salon.com. If you haven't read the book, I'm not sure this film will work that well for you. But if you have read it, this is film is pretty good (at least I thought so). I basically agree with Stephanie Zacharek's review from Salon.com. If you haven't read the book, I'm not sure this film will work that well for you. But if you have read it, this is film is pretty good (at least I thought so). It's successful parts really made up for some of the bad screenwriting/editing (ugh, and some of the choices the screenwriter made were total crap) but I loved Umbridge, Luna and Bellatrix--perfectly cast. Even little Ginny was pretty prominent in certain scenes (hint hint). Harry's emotional "growing" is still the centerpiece as in the book. Plot-wise, unless you read the book, you'll have no idea what ground was made as they really don't go that far (or show it anyway) & ironically the "Order of the Phoenix" is largely cut out of the film. The end climax scene in the Ministry is done very well though. I still think PoA might be the better Potter film so far, but OotP is definitely vying for the top.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

EmmaJul 11, 2007

Great effects, it got the story across really good but still not as good as the book! psst, they could of explained the prophecy better in the movie for the people who didn't read the book!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

J.KChanJul 11, 2007

The special effects n CGI WOW me sooooo Much!!! WOW its the fifth of the movie... n still never show any improvement.... when order of phoenix brought harry fly with the brooms, can they NOT SO OBVIOUS telling us that they are using blue The special effects n CGI WOW me sooooo Much!!! WOW its the fifth of the movie... n still never show any improvement.... when order of phoenix brought harry fly with the brooms, can they NOT SO OBVIOUS telling us that they are using blue screen~~ anyway Dolores Umbridge was great on acting.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

LarryH.Jul 11, 2007

Completely unfaithful to the book. I love the HP books as well as the movies. But this was a complete bastardization. I sure hope the 6th and 7th movies will be better than this.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

PaulK.Jul 11, 2007

Worth it for the spectacular dual between Dumbledore and Voldemort. A great supercharger for the insanely anticipated Deathly Hallows. Best seen on the big screen.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

EvaJ.Jul 11, 2007

I loved loved this movie. I think it remained pretty true to the book. I loved it!!!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RickyH.Jul 11, 2007

The Best Movie out of all five. The special effects and the great plot make this one of the best Harry Potter films yet. Definitely a MUST SEE!!!!!!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

BradJul 11, 2007

The best Harry potter yet. Strays a bit from the book, and cut's quite a load out, but that's to be expected in cinema, after all. A proper emotional tribute to the novel all around.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SteveT.Jul 11, 2007

Met all expectations.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MattL.Jul 11, 2007

This movie is almost perfect. There are only two problems with it and neither of them is unavoidable. The first is how much from the original book was taken out, which, as it has to be under 3 hours, is necessary. And the only other problem This movie is almost perfect. There are only two problems with it and neither of them is unavoidable. The first is how much from the original book was taken out, which, as it has to be under 3 hours, is necessary. And the only other problem falls with how certain things, such as the apparation of the death-eaters, are depicted differently than J.K. Rowling said. Overall a very well put together movie that is recommended to all fans of the genre.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

AaronR.Jul 11, 2007

The second best (after Goblet of Fire) in regards to film quality. The worst in regards to following the book. Huge changes to the last scene at the ministry were unnecessary and not nearly as interesting or exciting as in the book. Umbridge The second best (after Goblet of Fire) in regards to film quality. The worst in regards to following the book. Huge changes to the last scene at the ministry were unnecessary and not nearly as interesting or exciting as in the book. Umbridge and Luna were amazing, but the rest of the adult cast was given too little screen time. Disappointing in the end.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

CoryG.Jul 11, 2007

Very good. Book was better, but then again, they always are.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JulieJul 11, 2007

This movie was great! However so many things were left out of the books it's hard to understand if you've never read them. I like watching as the characters get older through out the movies, but they can't change things from This movie was great! However so many things were left out of the books it's hard to understand if you've never read them. I like watching as the characters get older through out the movies, but they can't change things from movie to movie that didn't change in the books.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

BobS.Jul 11, 2007

Kind of crappy. i realize that to make the movie watchable, they have to take out a bunch of things that are in the book, and hey, thats alright. but you don't have to change what you do keep in the film. there were a lot ofKind of crappy. i realize that to make the movie watchable, they have to take out a bunch of things that are in the book, and hey, thats alright. but you don't have to change what you do keep in the film. there were a lot of inconsistencies between the movie and the film, for instance the prophesy getting in lucius malfoys hands and telling him the prophecy, the fountain not coming to life, the way trelawny gets fired, etc etc. pretty crappy stuff.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AndrewGJul 11, 2007

Easily the best Potter movie, and much better than the book. I am glad that Harry's lameness/annoyingness in this story was not highlighted in the movie to the same extent that it was in the book.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

NathanielJul 11, 2007

I thought this was a really great movie! It had more story background than action, but I cared more to find out about background than having an action packed movie. This movie is a lot better than the previous film, Goblet of Fire. I liked I thought this was a really great movie! It had more story background than action, but I cared more to find out about background than having an action packed movie. This movie is a lot better than the previous film, Goblet of Fire. I liked the darkeness the movie had; reminded me of Prisoner of Azakaban. I can't wait for the next movie to come out. Hopefully, it'll be as good or better as the Order of the Phoenix!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MichaelFazioJul 11, 2007

Solid movie, definitely the best HP movie so far.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

RobertGoodmanJul 11, 2007

A great film but leaves out much from the Canon of the book. Dark & gritty. Umbridge is amazing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

SusanM.Jul 11, 2007

By far the best of the lot so far!! Caught a midnight showing last night and was pleasantly surprised. There were changes, so hardcore HP fans may be upset about that, but I thought they were good, added to the film and dare I say...may have By far the best of the lot so far!! Caught a midnight showing last night and was pleasantly surprised. There were changes, so hardcore HP fans may be upset about that, but I thought they were good, added to the film and dare I say...may have even been an improvement over the book. Umbridge is also dynamic! You hate her and love her at the same time...she completely embodied the character. I can't believe the adventure will be over in less than two weeks when the book comes out.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

CraigS.Jul 11, 2007

This movie was the best so far, the director cut the right story lines and combined appropriate story lines to create a solid, condensed film that should leave most Harry Potter fans happy.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JennyJul 11, 2007

They left out the swamp. They left out a lot of things, but I was still pretty happy, because it's not going to be perfect no matter what.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

JohnS.Jul 11, 2007

This film was about half the length needed to do the book justice. Rushed and disjointed, missing some of the best scenes from the book and drastically reworking what was left in. The most unrealized potential of any of the films... tragic.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

AndreaF.Jul 11, 2007

Best of the Harry Potter films. The acting (especially Umbridge and Snape) was great, and the new writer seemed to finally figure out how to compress the story in a way that was brisk but true to the source.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

TJWJul 11, 2007

the third is still the best in the series, but this definitely gives it a run for the money. definitely the darkest of the series, and book purists will probably be pissed about some stuff that's left out (but what did you expect when the third is still the best in the series, but this definitely gives it a run for the money. definitely the darkest of the series, and book purists will probably be pissed about some stuff that's left out (but what did you expect when you adapt a nearly 900 page book into a 2 1/2 hour movie?) and the movie purists (or whatever you want to call them) will probably be upset at the lack of whimsy or whatever, but i felt that the lack of whimsy was necessary. as harry gets older the story gets darker, so you shouldn't expect to have as much fun at the films. and the icing on the cake was the elimination of all Quidditch.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

VilmaD.Jul 11, 2007

being a big fan of the books, I was very very disappointed that they did not stay true to the book. changed things around and went from one thing to the next jumping around so much and didn't connect it smoothly.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

7

ChristopherDavisJul 11, 2007

Falls into the middle of the Potter films. Better than Sorcerer's Stone and Chamber of Secrets, y et pales in comparison to Goblet of Fire and Prisoner of Azkaban (the best still). Definitely enjoyable to watch Harry and the rest of the Falls into the middle of the Potter films. Better than Sorcerer's Stone and Chamber of Secrets, y et pales in comparison to Goblet of Fire and Prisoner of Azkaban (the best still). Definitely enjoyable to watch Harry and the rest of the cast age, but I still felt this movie lacked a certain coherence and felt rushed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MichaelP.Jul 11, 2007

Awesome movie, it really captures the essence of the film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

ShoR.Jul 11, 2007

This film was a major disappointment to this die-hard fan of the Harry Potter book and movie series. Big booms, no chemistry. Daniel Radcliffe's acting was good. Everyone else's was uninspired, except the Luna Lovegood role which This film was a major disappointment to this die-hard fan of the Harry Potter book and movie series. Big booms, no chemistry. Daniel Radcliffe's acting was good. Everyone else's was uninspired, except the Luna Lovegood role which was played badly. The director fell down on the job. This cast can do and has done so much better in the past. There were major plot holes due to poor choices of what to keep and what to cut from the original story. Bellatrix LeStrange's costumer should beg for forgiveness.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

KevinRJul 11, 2007

While the absence of Steve Kloves as screenwriter is noticeable, the cinematography more than makes up for it, as sweeping shots of the castle and touching emotional shots enhance this chapter of the series. All the actors turn in great While the absence of Steve Kloves as screenwriter is noticeable, the cinematography more than makes up for it, as sweeping shots of the castle and touching emotional shots enhance this chapter of the series. All the actors turn in great performances, notably Dan Radcliffe, who is becoming quite the skilled actor. Finally, the story, while straying a little from the book, remains good, focusing on Harry and Voldemort's connection and how it affects Harry and those around him.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

KrysA.Jul 11, 2007

This is the best Harry Potter film yet and should not be missed by the fans of the series or anyone who enjoys fantasy thrillers.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

FrankJul 11, 2007

Very well adapted... great special effects!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

MikeJ.Jul 11, 2007

Fun film, Yates took some steps away from Curon and Columbus- but overall a nice dark tale with excellent shots.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

NathanC.Jul 10, 2007

A great adaptation. The true magic here is squeezing this massive story into just over two hours of fun. For true Rowling fans, a true delight. For the rest, a solid film, and visual treat.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

ZoeyJul 10, 2007

I think this was a great movie. Though I didn't really care for the ending, the movie had great effects and kept you on the edge of your seat.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ChrisB.Jul 10, 2007

the harry potter books are amazing and the films (although not near as good as the books) still follow the basic thrill and excitement of the marvelous story.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

owenp.Jul 10, 2007

By far the best harry potter film yet.... simply stunning. all the adult actors are amazing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

User Reviews