Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: July 11, 2007
7.3
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1137 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
846
Mixed:
175
Negative:
116
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
3
MattBJul 16, 2007
This movie was a horrible addition to the series. We are not talking about minor adjustments to plot, which is, as I think all of us can agree, a neccessary evil for transforming a 900pg book into a 100-200pg script. I am by no means a This movie was a horrible addition to the series. We are not talking about minor adjustments to plot, which is, as I think all of us can agree, a neccessary evil for transforming a 900pg book into a 100-200pg script. I am by no means a die-hard fan, but felt that the director over-emphasized the smallest of scenes in an effort to make the more more appealing to the usual "dumb movie-goer" audience. Take the Harry/Cho kiss. This wasn't even talked about in the book, yet was by far the longest single shot of the movie. It was the the rush rush rush of the movie was suddenly slowed-down for this one really unimportant moment. I wouldn't complain if that was an addition to an already true-to-the-story film. Changing the plot, as well, for unnecessary reasons is just pompus. I felt that by-far the acting in this movie was the worst, and that falls entirely on the director, not the actors, as we know they have done better. The young actors said they liked this director the best, which means he was probably the most laid back, which is obviously shown on screen in their portrayal. Evanna Lynch's pausing in between phrases was something that could have easily been fixed by building confidence with the character and the lines, another job that lies solely on the director. I have been told that the movie was easy to follow for someone who did not read the books, but I'm not sure how it's possible as I just read the book a few days ago, so it is fresh in my mind, and I could barely follow it myself. A waste of time and money. Next!… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful
0
RjKAug 10, 2007
There were to many thing missing. It went from discussing about the DA and then into getting into it. This harry potter movie was by far one of the worst because of all the crucial pieces of information that were missing. I sat through the There were to many thing missing. It went from discussing about the DA and then into getting into it. This harry potter movie was by far one of the worst because of all the crucial pieces of information that were missing. I sat through the whole confused even though i just read the book before the movie. It doesn't even tell how they found the room of requirement… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful
1
FredFMar 8, 2008
What a mess - surely the most apalling of all the Potter films, and that's saying something because they are all pretty awful. I hated every minute of this crappola.
1 of 2 users found this helpful
3
ArielB.Feb 26, 2008
The film was good but it wasn't great. I've seen better and I was quite disappointed when I fist saw the movie. I though it would look great after the goblet of fire, but still the forth is the best Harry Potter movie although a The film was good but it wasn't great. I've seen better and I was quite disappointed when I fist saw the movie. I though it would look great after the goblet of fire, but still the forth is the best Harry Potter movie although a lot of stuff had been left out. It's a shame that they left out Quidditch and Ron and Hermione becoming a prefects. When you see it several times it clearly shows that it isn't great. Good,maybe even average, but not great. The best thing in the film is battle between Voldermort and Dumbldor, and the character of Dolores Umbridge. If the half blood prince turns out as his predecessor I very much doubt it that I'll buy that dvd.… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful
3
SamJul 17, 2007
I have not read the books, yet even I could see that there is a large amount missing. There is no progression at all only poorly connected scenes with very little build up to the climax, which, whilst impressive on the special effects, has I have not read the books, yet even I could see that there is a large amount missing. There is no progression at all only poorly connected scenes with very little build up to the climax, which, whilst impressive on the special effects, has no intensity. Overall the film is just too shot and does not cover the subject matter that it is clearly trying too.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
0
BerieJul 10, 2007
A Grave disappointment to Harry Potter fans everywhere.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
2
NavinR.Aug 8, 2007
This movie was terrible.Other than the brilliant performances put down by Luna, Umbridge and Harry, there really wasn't anything good about it.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
3
VilmaD.Jul 11, 2007
being a big fan of the books, I was very very disappointed that they did not stay true to the book. changed things around and went from one thing to the next jumping around so much and didn't connect it smoothly.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
3
ChrisDJul 13, 2007
Oh noes! The first negative review not complaining about how it isn't faithful to the book?!?!? The script in the film was awful. Diabolical. At the end when Harry tells them what Dumbleydore said, was painful to anyone who has seen Oh noes! The first negative review not complaining about how it isn't faithful to the book?!?!? The script in the film was awful. Diabolical. At the end when Harry tells them what Dumbleydore said, was painful to anyone who has seen movies with good dialogue. The acting for the most part was substandard, especially Harry (again) The praise Staunton has received has perhaps been unwarranted as Umbridge. I got the impression she really overplayed it, and that is easier than playing someone more complex and middle of the road. She aslo got way too much screentime compared to all the other adult actors, who were largely reduced to cameos. Also when Ron said, "WHo are you... Hermione Granger" it was as laughable as the "Get me a laptop" line from oceans 13. The effects were good obviously, but at the fight at the end, seeing as practically nothing had happened til then they just decided to pour all the effects in then and hope to wow people with that rather than making a good action scene. There was no artistic style lent to this film by the director unlike the 3rd film, and generlally not that good.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
ChristopherW.Jul 15, 2007
The Harry Potter franchise has hit a wall with this one. The momentum that has been building through the previous 4 films lags in this disappointing film adaptation. The plot is so creaky and uninvolving that you may have to check your pulse The Harry Potter franchise has hit a wall with this one. The momentum that has been building through the previous 4 films lags in this disappointing film adaptation. The plot is so creaky and uninvolving that you may have to check your pulse at some point. The new 'headmaster from hell' is not all that scary, just really annoying. And, the final climactic battle is well choreographed, but it feels like it inhabits an all togetter different film. Also, many of the actors appear bored with reprising their roles for the fifth time. In addition, the greatest crime this installment commits is that it isn't any fun. Its downbeat tone and grim portents just make you want to see all of this wrapped up very soon. Not recommended!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
RyanB.Jul 19, 2007
This movie was absolutely awful, and it makes me sad to see Metacritic has granted such an awful movie a green score. The movie itself centered far to much around pointless scenes that did nothing to help the plot. For example, the scene This movie was absolutely awful, and it makes me sad to see Metacritic has granted such an awful movie a green score. The movie itself centered far to much around pointless scenes that did nothing to help the plot. For example, the scene with Harry kissing that girl. The movie put atleast 80% of the important information into corny, cliche spinning news paper montages. For example, nearly half of the movie went by when they explained Umbridge (or whatever her name was) was arrested, and that Dumbledoor had been reinstated. That was not content worthy for new paper headlines. That deserved full scenes. Don't bother with the movie if you are a movie fan. You will spend the whole time pulling out huge plot holes, and shameless directing. Thanks for reading, hope this helps!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
JaredCJul 29, 2007
I haven't read the book and I can understand why its nothing like it. First of all, JK Rowling keeps the story with the same amount of character development and lets them have roles. In this, its just The Order of the Phoenix and Harry I haven't read the book and I can understand why its nothing like it. First of all, JK Rowling keeps the story with the same amount of character development and lets them have roles. In this, its just The Order of the Phoenix and Harry Potter's army of 5. Cho Chang is like being bullied with Harry who kissed her violating her. Its a powerfull movie but I didn't get much out of it, it got annoying, the 3D sequence in IMAX was great, but all the movie is is training for a powerfull army to kill voldamort's, and the battle just begins at the very end. The movie felt so short, Most of the supporting roles are like taken out of the whole story. I am very dissapointed, it could have had more story.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
GloriaBJul 30, 2007
This move stank. Beginning with HP himself, Daniel Radcliffe. This guy is probably the worst actor on the planet despite his butt naked performance on stage to try and garner some acclaim. It was a cheap shot and it did not work apparently. This move stank. Beginning with HP himself, Daniel Radcliffe. This guy is probably the worst actor on the planet despite his butt naked performance on stage to try and garner some acclaim. It was a cheap shot and it did not work apparently. So glad I didn't see that. You'd think Daniel would invest in some acting lessons but more likely his problem is deeper. He is devoid of talent. He hasn't got IT. I'm sure they lose millions because of him, so why haven't they replaced him? Nobody knows, but I'll dance in the street if they do. And while they are replacing people they should re-cast Lupin. Who the hell is that puffy-faced actor? Lupin should look thin, tattered and tragically handsome--not like a puffer fish. Tonks was nicely cast though. I've always felt that Minerva looked much younger than the actor who portrays her. Nobody has mentioned how wasted Emma Thompson's performance iwas amongst that mess of a movie. You tend to forget the highlights because the rest was so overwhelmingly depressing. The movie is a shame, but I knew it would be since I have the fake screams of Daniel from the other movies (Aaaaahhhhhhh....Aaaahhhhh....Aahh....Ah) still ringing in my head. How stupid do these movie makers think we are? Plenty--we keep going to see this trash.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
BerogTheDragonAug 3, 2007
What a waste of money.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
SimonM.Sep 3, 2007
Another year same boring movie. I've seen every Potter movie once despite the fact that I am no fan of the series ( I keep hoping there's a reason for the legions of fanatics, this time i was had by promises of a darker story line) Another year same boring movie. I've seen every Potter movie once despite the fact that I am no fan of the series ( I keep hoping there's a reason for the legions of fanatics, this time i was had by promises of a darker story line) I guess I'm a sucker for epic special effects movies. I'm going to avoid the Half Blood Prince and maybe see Deathly Hollows depending on the word.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
CherayeE.Jan 4, 2008
This was my favorite book and the movie ruined that for me. It was horrible that fact that were changed didn't make sense. They left out to much and it was not dark enough. It seemed like a bad summary rather than the harry potter This was my favorite book and the movie ruined that for me. It was horrible that fact that were changed didn't make sense. They left out to much and it was not dark enough. It seemed like a bad summary rather than the harry potter movies that we are used to. Bring back director form 3 and 4 please.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
JohnP.Jul 15, 2007
This was by far the worst of the movie series. I know every corner and every word of the books. This movie was rushed and a lot of scenes were out of order. I give this a movie a complete thumbs down. It was worse than Goblet of fire and This was by far the worst of the movie series. I know every corner and every word of the books. This movie was rushed and a lot of scenes were out of order. I give this a movie a complete thumbs down. It was worse than Goblet of fire and this director is going to do Half blood prince. What a loss to a great series.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
MattKJul 16, 2007
Plain and simple, it's just a bad cheesy movie. Harry Potter silliness aside, this movie just isn't that good.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
AlecBJul 21, 2007
yea i agree with what Ryan B. said How can this shitty movie make it in the green score level when it was probably the worst movie in the series. It was dull and boring. Way to long and worst of all there was no action at all. Terrible movie
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
JasonUJul 23, 2007
This movie is the very meaning of the phrase "the book was better". Jumpy scenes; legions of characters introduced for seemingly no reason other than 'they were in the book', even though they contribute very little to the movie; This movie is the very meaning of the phrase "the book was better". Jumpy scenes; legions of characters introduced for seemingly no reason other than 'they were in the book', even though they contribute very little to the movie; pointless special effects scenes (how many times do we need to see Potter and his friends flying around?)... the list just goes on. Potter directors need to stop trying to wow us with special effects, because modern movies CANNOT be carried by CGI. Try inserting some flowing plot or intelligent dialouge next time, instead throwing together of this disjointed, boring, mess of a movie. I'm wondering if the critics saw a different version of this movie, because I don't understand how anyone but the most die-hard Potter fan could rate this anything higher than a 5/10 at most.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
RoryT.Aug 1, 2007
Herminie is really hot but she didnt go naked or anything like it says in the book she does. So overall it was shit a movie, there was no nudity at all and thats all i watch movies for!!!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
AliM.Aug 17, 2007
The only thing that has stopped me from giving this film a 1 is that my friends, who have not read the Harry Potter books, insist that they enjoyed it! I found the film boring and very badly edited. the script writing leaves it feeling like The only thing that has stopped me from giving this film a 1 is that my friends, who have not read the Harry Potter books, insist that they enjoyed it! I found the film boring and very badly edited. the script writing leaves it feeling like a first school play and the acting from the lead role (harry) is wooden and uncharasmatic. I found myself wanting Lord Voldemort to win just to shut him u. David Yates has taken it upon himself to add new ideas and change the story line, mostly for the worst. This really is a truly appaling adaptation. the only reason that i can think of for the above 'critics' scoring the film 100 is that they wanted to see their review top of the list and so increase publicity for themselves.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
DanielM.Aug 21, 2007
This movie constitutes, with the forth one, the worst film in the series. It was extremely difficult to do such a bad film from such an outstanding novel. It is absolutely unfair for the book. Maybe the direction is acceptable, but the This movie constitutes, with the forth one, the worst film in the series. It was extremely difficult to do such a bad film from such an outstanding novel. It is absolutely unfair for the book. Maybe the direction is acceptable, but the soundtrack is horrible, and the screenplay by Michael Goldenberg is even worse. Pity.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
CharlesC.Aug 27, 2007
The special effects ruin the movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
RexAug 6, 2007
This was a tough book to make into a movie because the book was over 900 pages long. I feel for the director because no matter what he decided to include or exclude from the book was going to upset a percentage of people. But like
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
NikoMSep 1, 2007
As a harry potter fan, having read all the books more than once this movie offers none of the wonders and mysteries J.K. Rowling has engulfed us in. Yates is a horrible directing with the beginning scene nothing more than a child can As a harry potter fan, having read all the books more than once this movie offers none of the wonders and mysteries J.K. Rowling has engulfed us in. Yates is a horrible directing with the beginning scene nothing more than a child can portray. [***SPOILER**] The script and scene writers have ridiculed the book leaving out every single point exept the battle between voldemort and Potter. Within the first few minutes Potter was safe again at his poor Sirius house, this angered me with this taking over 80 pages which showed Harry confusion and anger towards his situation, Quidditch plays no further part in this movie which is also a large majority of the book. Hagrid sudden intrusion into the centre stage is not stabilised as there is little communication with Potter, Weasley and Granger showing why he wasn't there. Also this scene takes place during Quidditch is on in the book. Cho is portrayed as the traitor when it was actually Marrietta, Cho's friend who betrays harry to the ministry official, Dolores Umbridge. Cho is not shown as a very emotional person throughout the novel exept during their defensive class and their meating at Hogsmeade with Rita Skitter is also absent in the movie. With the expectation people had to viewing this film many of our expectations have been thrawted by the way this movie was shown and its less than proffesional director. I for one felt very upset with the way this movie was portrayed and this has led me to the aligations I have put foward in this text. This is no joke, nor a contest, I am just dissapointed by this performance of the world's greatest book.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
BenF.Jan 14, 2009
A bad movie. THEY SHOULD FIRE YATES! i can't believe he totally ruined this movie. They took out some of the best parts and made it like a short movie. F**k the makers. The previous ones were one hell of a lot better. They should bring A bad movie. THEY SHOULD FIRE YATES! i can't believe he totally ruined this movie. They took out some of the best parts and made it like a short movie. F**k the makers. The previous ones were one hell of a lot better. They should bring back Newell or Yates. They only got a few scenes right.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
GrimR.Dec 10, 2007
What happened to Dark and twisted, the last one has more action and darkness than this. This film was boring, besides I read the ending to the final book and it was totally crap.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
AaronR.Jul 11, 2007
The second best (after Goblet of Fire) in regards to film quality. The worst in regards to following the book. Huge changes to the last scene at the ministry were unnecessary and not nearly as interesting or exciting as in the book. Umbridge The second best (after Goblet of Fire) in regards to film quality. The worst in regards to following the book. Huge changes to the last scene at the ministry were unnecessary and not nearly as interesting or exciting as in the book. Umbridge and Luna were amazing, but the rest of the adult cast was given too little screen time. Disappointing in the end.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
abcdjkl;Jul 12, 2007
I give it a 3 because I like the Potter series. I wasn't expecting much going into this movie as I thought this was the most boring book so I wasn't shocked that the movie followed suit.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
MikeH.Jul 13, 2007
The worst potter movie made. For a book the same size and complexity as Goblet of Fire, it had none of the arch of story and at the end you don't care who lives or dies.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
ChrisWJul 13, 2007
It's like Dolores Umbridge had a hand in making this movie--the kids (or teens now, I guess) barely register except for Luna and Harry, and all the teachers are kept out of the film as much as possible. Ron gets about five sentences and It's like Dolores Umbridge had a hand in making this movie--the kids (or teens now, I guess) barely register except for Luna and Harry, and all the teachers are kept out of the film as much as possible. Ron gets about five sentences and otherwise is forced to lurk in the background. Hermione just seems pointless, when she's so important in the books. And I think if you added up all the seconds the Hogwarts staff appear in this movie, you'd have, like, two minutes tops. The direction is a mess--really choppy and taking great big leaps in story so that you're left wondering why or how they got from point A to point D. It's like it wants to be a sleek and sophisticated action movie, and forgets that these stories take place in a richly imagined world of magic, where KIDS are supposed to be the heroes. Dumbledore and Voldemort fight like Yoda and that Christopher Lee character in Episode 1. Why? I've seen that fight already. This should look more interesting and new. The movie also looks cheap! (I mean, compared to the last two films.) It looks like they skimped on the effects budget. The final Ministry of Magic sequence is mostly black backgrounds and receding rows of orbs, like a big black storage buliding. The last 20 minutes were also shot to be shown in 3D on Imax screens and you can tell that they sacrificed making a good action sequence to just churn out "it's coming at you!" shots of magic wands and Death Eaters. Staunton and Rickman (Umbridge and Snape) both rock, though, and Luna looks and sounds exactly like I thought she should. I don't think this director knows or likes the Harry Potter books, deep down inside.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
JacquiHJul 15, 2007
The performance was good, but did the writer even read the book? Things were out of order, not explained, and nominal events are in the movie which shouldn't be or were emphasized. I realize year 5 is complex, but did they have to cut The performance was good, but did the writer even read the book? Things were out of order, not explained, and nominal events are in the movie which shouldn't be or were emphasized. I realize year 5 is complex, but did they have to cut so much out of the story line? It's a tragedy really.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
JamesF.Jul 15, 2007
Slow. Joyless. Humorless. Slow.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
cristinaJul 28, 2007
The book was sooooo much better. it dissappoints me to think how much better the movie could have been. it was rushed and was not faithful to the book. if someone watching the movie had not read the book they would not have been able to The book was sooooo much better. it dissappoints me to think how much better the movie could have been. it was rushed and was not faithful to the book. if someone watching the movie had not read the book they would not have been able to understand the movie whatsoever.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
MichaelF.Aug 17, 2007
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is the worst of the 5 movies so far. It was the longest book, yet the shortest movie. The previous four movies left things out and changed some things around, but i feel they did so without Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is the worst of the 5 movies so far. It was the longest book, yet the shortest movie. The previous four movies left things out and changed some things around, but i feel they did so without compromising the integrity, plot, and accuracy of the book. But OOTP changed way too much. Some little things were only changed for the sake of changing and would have taken about thirty seconds longer to do it the correct way (a.k.a. in the movie neville finds the room of requirement by chance, when in the book harry asks dobby if he knows of a place where they can go, and dobby suggests it). And some bigger aspects of the book were also changed to fit the movie (a.k.a how Cho Chang was blamed for telling Umbridge about Dumbledore's Army, when it was really her friend Marietta who was nervous about getting caught. This is a major plot change, because in the Sixth book Harry has another thing with Cho, which according to the movie would be highly unlikely now that he thinks shes a traitor)(in the battle at the department of mysteries Lucius Malfoy never has his hands on the prophecy and Neville is the one who drops it causing it to break so no one can hear it. oh and also at that moment in the movie, Sirius punches Malfoy? I'm pretty sure he has a wand and could have done much more with a simple Stupefy!) Also things were changed that were pre-established in the previous movies (the look of Sirius' face in the fire when talking to Harry in his dorm. the look of the dementors). I feel the new director really let the die-hard harry potter fans down with this poor excuse for a harry potter movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
NeedButterAug 19, 2007
I was prepared to love this movie and try as I might I can't. I read all the hype and believed it. I even thought the reason why they asked David Yates to do Movie 6 is because he kicked butt on this one. No way. Why did they ask him I was prepared to love this movie and try as I might I can't. I read all the hype and believed it. I even thought the reason why they asked David Yates to do Movie 6 is because he kicked butt on this one. No way. Why did they ask him back? Are his rates cheap? I am a huge Harry Potter book fan. I am one of the weirdoes that actually like Book 5 but Mr. Yates and his screenwriter trashed this adaptation. It was over edited, rushed and choppy. It failed to tell a good story. While Radcliffe's acting has improved, he is still lacking in emotional range. Is Harry a one dimensional character? Radcliffe's facial expressions are so limited it is either blank or he's yelling (with blank looking eyes). I saw Equus and it was the same. I suspect he gets critical acclaim because so many people are cashing in on his coattails. I want him to truly earn the millions he's making. Even the fabulous performances of Imelda Staunton and Alan Rickman (he can do so much with so little screen time) couldn't save this movie for me. Do me a favor Warner Bros., buy David Yates out and get another director for HBP. And Daniel, I think you are a generally cool kind but acting lessons would not hurt. Check into a drama college.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
BEnJiD.Aug 19, 2007
1! did not understand a bit of it. [***SPOILER***] When Sirius died, they weren't emotional at all. It was like Sirius died, oh well, yay' no good. No humour all gloomy and sad! Goblet of fire was way better and more humorous. DO 1! did not understand a bit of it. [***SPOILER***] When Sirius died, they weren't emotional at all. It was like Sirius died, oh well, yay' no good. No humour all gloomy and sad! Goblet of fire was way better and more humorous. DO NOT WATCH IT.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
IanB.Sep 29, 2007
This series keeps getting worse and worse. It just keeps falling away from the book and into its own weird void. By far the worst movie of the summer and worst harry potter movie so far. I laughed at all the bad acting the post puberty This series keeps getting worse and worse. It just keeps falling away from the book and into its own weird void. By far the worst movie of the summer and worst harry potter movie so far. I laughed at all the bad acting the post puberty actors that were once humorous children are now adolescent teenagers trying to act young but are just annoying high school to college kids that want something else, but this movie, and you can see it in their acting.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
ParryO.Jan 19, 2008
The worst HP movie yet. Absolutely horrible acting; but, nice special effects as usual.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
GeoffbDec 16, 2007
The script pulls every single interesting aspect from the novels and throws it down the drain. No Neville seen as who he really is with his parents, or Harry's emotional breaking point that was supposed to be in the end, every magical The script pulls every single interesting aspect from the novels and throws it down the drain. No Neville seen as who he really is with his parents, or Harry's emotional breaking point that was supposed to be in the end, every magical rule laid down by the books broken, ugly single-tone sets, and the battle near the end removed of any tension and set in a flat-out horrid environment that has no light source but from the characters themselves. The points are for Radcliffe in the sections where he expresses his frustration of Dumbledore's lack of attention, and Umbridge, who is just as evil as I pictured her.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
EvanO.Dec 29, 2007
This movie is horrible and depressing. it could have been in black and white and it would have looked the same.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
LordOFlibertYJan 21, 2012
I'm actually a fan of Potter, I've read the 1st, 4th and 7th book (weird order I know) and thoroughly enjoyed the first four films and the last one. But this was is the WORST Potter film I have EVER seen tied with the Deathly Hallows Part 1I'm actually a fan of Potter, I've read the 1st, 4th and 7th book (weird order I know) and thoroughly enjoyed the first four films and the last one. But this was is the WORST Potter film I have EVER seen tied with the Deathly Hallows Part 1 and closely followed by The Half-Blood Prince. I am disapointed that the film makers are unable to create a good Potter movie at a consistent basis like the LotR movies. The characters were extremely hollow, not enough interesting lines and so many forced and boring moments. pacing, the pacing was terible.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
csw12Mar 25, 2012
What is this. Director David Yates (new to Harry Potter) has messed up this chapter in Harry Potter so badly it would take me a year to write out. The worst part was it is the longest book and the shortest movie which means Yates and his teamWhat is this. Director David Yates (new to Harry Potter) has messed up this chapter in Harry Potter so badly it would take me a year to write out. The worst part was it is the longest book and the shortest movie which means Yates and his team are misisng vital information in the story. Nice way to start off David Yates.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
joao1198pedroNov 28, 2013
the worst harry potter movie ever made,this was an piece of crap David Yates was an douchbag to make this movie,the scenes was without emotion and it was the worst disapointmnent of 2007.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
_KeikoAug 1, 2017
not good .
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
More From This Movie

71 Critic Reviews

7.3 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 63 Normal
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL