Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: July 11, 2007
7.3
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1137 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
846
Mixed:
175
Negative:
116
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
8
marnee96Nov 4, 2011
There is no question that the Harry Potter films have gotten darker and more interesting each time. But this one is probably the most dark, intense and interesting out of all of them. The innocence within Harry Potter and his friends hasThere is no question that the Harry Potter films have gotten darker and more interesting each time. But this one is probably the most dark, intense and interesting out of all of them. The innocence within Harry Potter and his friends has completely vanished. This film is a real character study of Harry, but only Harry. There is very little development for the other characters. They for the most part serve as nothing more but a supporting cast, unlike previous chapters, which weakens the film. But overall, it's entertaining and remarkably acted, especially Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter) and Imelda Staunton (Dolores Umbridge). Helena Bonham Carter was remarkable as well, but I felt her character (Bellatrix Lestrange) was very much underused. 3/4 stars.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
grandpajoe6191Sep 23, 2011
With newbie director David Yates in control of the Harry Potter franchise, the movie's 'order' has been severely complex, making the wonderful acting from the potter trio & the marvelous CGI kinda hard to follow.
7 of 9 users found this helpful72
All this user's reviews
8
JawsPapi87Aug 9, 2011
It was a solid movie. There's not much to say about it. It is in the dead center of the Harry potter movies. The wickedness of Umbridge is probably the best part of it
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
7
tbagurdrumset94Jul 30, 2011
While without a doubt being the most well-acted and action packed Potter adaptation at the time, Order of the Phoenix is also the worst adaptation. Yes, even worse than Prisoner of Azkaban. But, it was Prisoner of Azkaban that prepared me forWhile without a doubt being the most well-acted and action packed Potter adaptation at the time, Order of the Phoenix is also the worst adaptation. Yes, even worse than Prisoner of Azkaban. But, it was Prisoner of Azkaban that prepared me for future films. Goblet of Fire may have been a very faithful adaptation of the book, but I didn't let my guard down. I knew that there was a good chance that there would be another film that would be rather thin in the loyalty department. Therefore, I was able to enjoy Order of the Phoenix. I'll start with the positives. Like I said, the acting is great; the main 3 had really come into their own at this point. Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes), despite the brief role, is just as diabolical as before. Umbridge (Imelda Staunton) might be the best character in the film, as you will hate her from the get-go. Visually, it is also very impressive. Beautiful, actually. Next, come the complaints. By being thin in the loyalty department I MEAN thin. David Yates condensed a 760 page book into a 139 minute film (shortest in the series if you don't count Deathly Hallows Part 2). This creates a few problems... First of all, the secondary characters get very little screen time. Ginny Weasley actually has about 2 lines in the whole film (although she is in most of it), and she is an important character. A scene that would have been awesome was the Quidditch scene, where Harry punches Malfoy. If they had shown a little more of the Ministry scene (the magical rooms in the department of mysteries), that would have let me give this film at least an 8... maybe a 9. I know that people have complained about the films' lengths, but what's an extra 15 minutes?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CRLJul 27, 2011
This film was not loyal to the book, but like its predecessor there was so much in that book that it almost needed to be cut down to size. What Order of the Phoenix becomes is an often funny yet extremely dark thrill ride, much unlike itsThis film was not loyal to the book, but like its predecessor there was so much in that book that it almost needed to be cut down to size. What Order of the Phoenix becomes is an often funny yet extremely dark thrill ride, much unlike its long and drawn out source. The new political themes are handled well, and as always in this series the actors did a phenomenal job. Its climax is also one of the series' best, with a dazzling battle between Dumbeldore and Voldemort amid a hail of shattered glass. In the end, Order of the Phoenix manages to do the impossible and be almost better than the book it was based on.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
HasrionaJul 20, 2011
A relatively poor entry, to be frank. Doing no justice to the book, Order of the Phoenix consists of nothing more but disappointment after disappointment. Sure, they are some positive features, namely the acting of the older cast and theA relatively poor entry, to be frank. Doing no justice to the book, Order of the Phoenix consists of nothing more but disappointment after disappointment. Sure, they are some positive features, namely the acting of the older cast and the effects, but this probably the worst Harry Potter film in the franchise, and only gets really going in the last thirty minutes or so.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AlnORTIZJul 11, 2011
Order of the Phoenix is definitely the breakout film in the Harry Potter series you'll come across because of how this goes from beginning to end. The performances are top notch here and the story sticks to the main plot if the book. TheOrder of the Phoenix is definitely the breakout film in the Harry Potter series you'll come across because of how this goes from beginning to end. The performances are top notch here and the story sticks to the main plot if the book. The visuals are amazing, especially near the very end. With everything mentioned beforehand mixed with the magic of Harry Potter, you get an above average addition to the series.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
filmtrashreviewJul 10, 2011
A huge step up from Goblet of Fire, Phoenix has a great story line that is easy to follow. Dedicated to staying true to the novel in every way and by far the best acted film of the franchise thus far. The only problem with the film is thatA huge step up from Goblet of Fire, Phoenix has a great story line that is easy to follow. Dedicated to staying true to the novel in every way and by far the best acted film of the franchise thus far. The only problem with the film is that the end seems to abrupt and the final climatic moments were simply, boring.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MovieLonely94Jul 5, 2011
The fifth installment of the series continues the adventures of Harry Potter and his friends as little do they know that their new teacher Professor Umbridge forbids them to ever use magic. When Lord Voldemort is already having armies at hisThe fifth installment of the series continues the adventures of Harry Potter and his friends as little do they know that their new teacher Professor Umbridge forbids them to ever use magic. When Lord Voldemort is already having armies at his command, Harry, Ron, Hermoine, and gang battle against him as they encounter new enemies and old enemies before Harry learns that "neither one can live while the other survives". I've saw this in a theater in Fredericksburg, Virginia, enjoyed it and now time for my opinion to make this review a little bit short. The fantasy action was amazing, the acting was neat and entertaining, the characters were a little bit developed, the villian Lord Voldemort was intimidating, but a lot of fun thanks to Ralph Fiennes' amazing performance, and the storyline was well-paced. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is an entertaining entry of the fantastic series. Next two reviews are HP6 and HP7 Part 1. 8/10… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
7
jimmytancrediMay 29, 2011
I consider the great number of different views in relation to the movie, some people say that this is the best of the franchise, others claim standing beside it was the worst, we also compared the book, and some think that this was the bestI consider the great number of different views in relation to the movie, some people say that this is the best of the franchise, others claim standing beside it was the worst, we also compared the book, and some think that this was the best adaptation ever achieved even if the book is a bit drab, others think the book is the best, and that adaptation was the worst, finally, the most varied opinions, this is great. Another important thing is the new director, David Yates, who will close this saga, the last being the division of the seventh book. Some dislike it, hated the choice, they argue that the return of Alfonso Cuaron would have been a better choice, do not know the reasons for this has not been done but we agree with that thought. Want to know what to think of it? Wonderful, this means that Harry Potter, even in his fifth film, has the chops to stay in front, with people debating its positive and negative, it just proves the success of the series. The most interesting is that it will continue delighting every fan spread across the planet, each person, like me, who believe that Harry Potter is not just a passing fad, and that is very, very much further.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
gm101Mar 21, 2011
My personal favorite of the movies, the one I believe is most faithful to the books (while taking into consideration the changes made in the previous movies as well). The final battle between Voldemort and Dumbledore is one of my favoriteMy personal favorite of the movies, the one I believe is most faithful to the books (while taking into consideration the changes made in the previous movies as well). The final battle between Voldemort and Dumbledore is one of my favorite moments fom the whole Harry Potter franchise.… Expand
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
4
TheQuietGamerMar 19, 2011
This has to be the worst Harry Potter movie I've seen so far, the darker tone makes this unenjoyable, the story is good but nowhere near what the others were, and the humor that was in the other movies is completely absent making this unenjoyable.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
lumitoNov 26, 2010
good game:)
I love the ability of being able to walk all over school-grounds.
nice way to cast spells:) I think it is attached to the storyline of the book.
mute-button for Hermione?

Score: 10.0
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
9
Film_Fanatic_15Nov 22, 2010
Director David Yates takes control of the currently one of the world's most successful franchises, and he does it well. Well written, great acting, amazing production, and a moving emotional plot that fans will be pleased with. It wasn'tDirector David Yates takes control of the currently one of the world's most successful franchises, and he does it well. Well written, great acting, amazing production, and a moving emotional plot that fans will be pleased with. It wasn't perfect, but it's the closest movie in the entire franchise up to this point that was close to perfection. As for every Harry Potter movie, every character has a unique role and every actor plays their part well. The film like all the others, has a natural tendency to not be perfect. David Yates has put the franchise where it needs to be, and where fans want it. He has adapted the 5th book in the best way possible and with the technology that stands as of 2007, the effects are impressive. This movie stands out more than any other film up to this point, and I hope the fans feel the same thing.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
JudddyOct 3, 2010
In my opinion, this is the second best made Harry Potter film to date (behind Half Blood Prince). The films are getting darker and more exciting and the storyline is brewing along nicely as we get closer to the great finale. VoldeemortIn my opinion, this is the second best made Harry Potter film to date (behind Half Blood Prince). The films are getting darker and more exciting and the storyline is brewing along nicely as we get closer to the great finale. Voldeemort remains one of the greatest movie villains of all time, and the young ensemble cast prove that they are maturing into fine young actors. Imelda Staunton is terrific at Professor Umbridge as well. The storyline is well adapted from the book and the production is stunning. When David Yates took over, these films just started to get better.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
GoldenEye16Aug 21, 2010
Aside from the fantastic dementor attack at the beginning, this movie was pretty much not good. WHAT happened at the end in the department of mysteries? All of the shelves just start falling down and there was no cool wand battling in theAside from the fantastic dementor attack at the beginning, this movie was pretty much not good. WHAT happened at the end in the department of mysteries? All of the shelves just start falling down and there was no cool wand battling in the different rooms like in the book. That was the best part of the book and they left it out. The fifth book has a lot of really good important stuff and moments that they either butchered or just left out.… Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
6
nboley08Aug 16, 2010
I feel bad for reviewing this film so low, because it was done pretty well and the performances were very good for the first time in the series. However, the plot is so boring and so ridiculously "unmagical" that it makes liking this filmI feel bad for reviewing this film so low, because it was done pretty well and the performances were very good for the first time in the series. However, the plot is so boring and so ridiculously "unmagical" that it makes liking this film nearly impossible. Umbridge is just annoying rather than her evil version that is in the book, and the movie fails to put many of the gigantic book's minor plot points into the film. The fact that Sirius died in this film didn't help my opinion either.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
PeteEAug 10, 2009
Amazing, from the dementor attacks all the way through to Sirius' death.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
GavinCJul 26, 2009
This film seems to leave out elements from the book that shocked the reader, which leads to the film being only above average.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
HelpUJul 19, 2009
Heeeeey. a movie about the most popular, lamest book ever created. I actually had enough time on my hands and I was so bored I actually read them all. Something I noticed is that without the book you are lost beyond belief, but it is mildly Heeeeey. a movie about the most popular, lamest book ever created. I actually had enough time on my hands and I was so bored I actually read them all. Something I noticed is that without the book you are lost beyond belief, but it is mildly entertaining, when i say that i mean the last action scene where everything goes crazy.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AndrewG.Jul 8, 2009
The best one so far. Yes, it was too short, but other than that, it was wonderful.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JonLJul 6, 2009
Probably the first genuinely great film in the series, despite having the episodic problem that plagued the last two films. Goblet had a rather bland visual style and a narrative where little seemed to have actually happened. Yates manages Probably the first genuinely great film in the series, despite having the episodic problem that plagued the last two films. Goblet had a rather bland visual style and a narrative where little seemed to have actually happened. Yates manages to spike it up with a new visual look and add to the budding sexuality of the characters. Still, it could go further, as like all the films, it seems to hint at greater things to come.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
BenF.Jan 14, 2009
A bad movie. THEY SHOULD FIRE YATES! i can't believe he totally ruined this movie. They took out some of the best parts and made it like a short movie. F**k the makers. The previous ones were one hell of a lot better. They should bring A bad movie. THEY SHOULD FIRE YATES! i can't believe he totally ruined this movie. They took out some of the best parts and made it like a short movie. F**k the makers. The previous ones were one hell of a lot better. They should bring back Newell or Yates. They only got a few scenes right.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
XeannahL.Oct 28, 2008
Really, it has too many problems but nevertheless, having the movie is better than having none at all. If you have read the book first, you'd say it's not very good (and I say that). There were a lot of deleted scenes that were Really, it has too many problems but nevertheless, having the movie is better than having none at all. If you have read the book first, you'd say it's not very good (and I say that). There were a lot of deleted scenes that were vividly described in the book. However, taking the book's length into consideration, the movie was a fine one--and given this observation, I'd expect the upcoming HP Movies to be very much the same as this (since the two remaining books are about as thick as The Order of the Phoenix. So I guess I'd better watch the movie first before reading it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RobertG.Aug 20, 2008
The best and most consistant so far of the Harry Potter films. It hits the nail on the head in the tone of the book and by far the best peformances by the actor, and are spot on playing their characters. Many would argue that too much has The best and most consistant so far of the Harry Potter films. It hits the nail on the head in the tone of the book and by far the best peformances by the actor, and are spot on playing their characters. Many would argue that too much has been cut out, but this is a film, and films can't include all our beloved scenes. Yates and Goldenburg has captured the emotional journey of Harry Potter as he slowly evolves into the hero who will challenge the Dark Lord.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
AdnanA.Jul 19, 2008
This was the worst Harry Potter movie! Everything except the acting was boring. The longest novel has been made into the shortest movie! What the hell has happened to Warner bros!!?? This movie puts a masterpiece novel to shame. The only This was the worst Harry Potter movie! Everything except the acting was boring. The longest novel has been made into the shortest movie! What the hell has happened to Warner bros!!?? This movie puts a masterpiece novel to shame. The only similarities between the novel and the movie are the names of the characers and places. Nothing else! Music (if there was any) is the weakest point of the movie!! Story... I'm a die hard fan of Harry Potter but watching this movie makes me very drowsy. The ootp novel is one of the best but looks like this movie has been made by a bunch of people who have just lost everything. It's so dull!! Acting... This time Daniel has improved a lot. Rupert and Emma were good as usual. Imelda as Umbridge rocked but I think she was given more than enough screen space. At the end of the movie I was tired of watching her but it's the fault of the newbie screenwriter and director. Gary Oldman as Sirius was fabulous. Watching Harry and Siruis together was a real enjoyment. Michael Gambon as Dumbledore was a little better but still Richard Harris was the true Dumbledore. May he rest in peace. Direction... I'd only say that David Yates ruined it! Visuals... They were ok. Nothing extraordinary. The end fight which was the most hyped was the most boring in the movie especially the fight between Dumbledore and Voldemort. Why don't they stick to the book?! I feel like crying!!!! The only nice thing about this movie is the acting and the scene when Voldemort gets inside Harry.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
LauriR.Mar 15, 2008
The problem with this movie is, and has been for the last few Potter films, that it's a compromise. It's not advisable to make a movie over three hours long, because after that it's a wee bit too much to watch on one sitting, The problem with this movie is, and has been for the last few Potter films, that it's a compromise. It's not advisable to make a movie over three hours long, because after that it's a wee bit too much to watch on one sitting, but ironically three hours of movie isn't quite enough to sum up the plot of a book as long as The Order Of Phoenix. Despite it's length, in many parts it feels like the story is rushed to the next key point, and many aspects of the book (f.ex. quidditch) have been completely dropped off. Because the storytelling in the movie is processing with such fast pace, it may be hard for people who have not read the actual book to follow the quick advancing of the story. You should judge the movie by it's own merits, it is decent work as a visual captivation of the Harry Potter- universe, and a nice supporting view in parallel with the one you yourself have created in your mind while reading the book. As a stand-alone movie experience however, without reading the book, it is merely an average piece of work.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
FredFMar 8, 2008
What a mess - surely the most apalling of all the Potter films, and that's saying something because they are all pretty awful. I hated every minute of this crappola.
1 of 2 users found this helpful
3
ArielB.Feb 26, 2008
The film was good but it wasn't great. I've seen better and I was quite disappointed when I fist saw the movie. I though it would look great after the goblet of fire, but still the forth is the best Harry Potter movie although a The film was good but it wasn't great. I've seen better and I was quite disappointed when I fist saw the movie. I though it would look great after the goblet of fire, but still the forth is the best Harry Potter movie although a lot of stuff had been left out. It's a shame that they left out Quidditch and Ron and Hermione becoming a prefects. When you see it several times it clearly shows that it isn't great. Good,maybe even average, but not great. The best thing in the film is battle between Voldermort and Dumbldor, and the character of Dolores Umbridge. If the half blood prince turns out as his predecessor I very much doubt it that I'll buy that dvd.… Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful
9
DavidC.Feb 14, 2008
Reading some of the other comments about this movie I can only assume that some people just like to hear their own voice without giving much thought to what they are saying. This movie was clearly up there with the others despite the fact Reading some of the other comments about this movie I can only assume that some people just like to hear their own voice without giving much thought to what they are saying. This movie was clearly up there with the others despite the fact that so much had to be left out. This is not the fault of the director; more the incredible literary ability of JK Rowling who is able to fill every chapter with an exciting event.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
R.A.L.Jan 22, 2008
The best Harry Potter film so far. Precise balance between action, mystery and drama add up to a pretty wonderful and magical movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
ParryO.Jan 19, 2008
The worst HP movie yet. Absolutely horrible acting; but, nice special effects as usual.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
KentC.Jan 13, 2008
Boring. I've never read the books, but I've seen every movie except prisoner of Azkaban, and most of those had some kind of purpose. This movie didn't seem to be anything more than a filler. Although one important figure dies Boring. I've never read the books, but I've seen every movie except prisoner of Azkaban, and most of those had some kind of purpose. This movie didn't seem to be anything more than a filler. Although one important figure dies (everyone in the audience literally cried, which was very awkward for me) there was nothing else that really happened in this movie. The movies seem to be declining in terms of quality, with chamber of secrets being the best and this being the worst, in my opinion.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
CherayeE.Jan 4, 2008
This was my favorite book and the movie ruined that for me. It was horrible that fact that were changed didn't make sense. They left out to much and it was not dark enough. It seemed like a bad summary rather than the harry potter This was my favorite book and the movie ruined that for me. It was horrible that fact that were changed didn't make sense. They left out to much and it was not dark enough. It seemed like a bad summary rather than the harry potter movies that we are used to. Bring back director form 3 and 4 please.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
EvanO.Dec 29, 2007
This movie is horrible and depressing. it could have been in black and white and it would have looked the same.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
ZiftKDec 26, 2007
Laughable at best. With poor acting, and drama beyond drama queen, this movie was utter garbage. They had scenes that were irrelevant beyond imagination. IE) That dumb Voldemort smiling and stretching his arms out vividly. All in all, poor Laughable at best. With poor acting, and drama beyond drama queen, this movie was utter garbage. They had scenes that were irrelevant beyond imagination. IE) That dumb Voldemort smiling and stretching his arms out vividly. All in all, poor excuse for a movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
M.Dec 24, 2007
you know whut Simon M. and Ian B.? You are both retards!! HATE YOU!!!! This movie was totally fun!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
FreaksDec 21, 2007
This film was decent. It did not do the books justice as it was far too short and did not include some main elements, such as the wit that Rowling manages to carefully exert into her books. It somehow manages to keep our interests though, This film was decent. It did not do the books justice as it was far too short and did not include some main elements, such as the wit that Rowling manages to carefully exert into her books. It somehow manages to keep our interests though, because as the movie goes on, we find ourselves hoping for more. The ending was...understandable, although I would have preferred the ending written in the book. Nobody other than Harry was supposed to find out the prophecy, and I believe that this is a key feature in the books as Harry in later books learns how important love is. Although the ending made me cry as it really was great (when he was saved by love through his friends), it wasn't as written and Rowling was spot on originally.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
WilliamTDec 21, 2007
The fifth film's decent but it feels rushed and doesn't seem to flesh out the story as well as the others. Still worth watching if you're mad about all things Potter.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
GeoffbDec 16, 2007
The script pulls every single interesting aspect from the novels and throws it down the drain. No Neville seen as who he really is with his parents, or Harry's emotional breaking point that was supposed to be in the end, every magical The script pulls every single interesting aspect from the novels and throws it down the drain. No Neville seen as who he really is with his parents, or Harry's emotional breaking point that was supposed to be in the end, every magical rule laid down by the books broken, ugly single-tone sets, and the battle near the end removed of any tension and set in a flat-out horrid environment that has no light source but from the characters themselves. The points are for Radcliffe in the sections where he expresses his frustration of Dumbledore's lack of attention, and Umbridge, who is just as evil as I pictured her.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
FurbydudeDec 14, 2007
the Harry potter movies were amazing and they were VERY good and detailed and, best of all, exciting despite the separation from the JK Rowling books which resulted in drastic changes to the series, although the movie is better
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
FredD.Dec 13, 2007
For me this is the best Harry Potter yet , i don't get how people can rate this a 0 or 1.Cant wait to see the next sequel.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
GrimR.Dec 10, 2007
What happened to Dark and twisted, the last one has more action and darkness than this. This film was boring, besides I read the ending to the final book and it was totally crap.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JoyceC.Dec 9, 2007
Crisper and more phenomenon than the previous installments.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
SebB.Oct 27, 2007
Harry Potter and the order of the phoenix was mind blowing in my eyes. David Yates really captured the spirit of Harry Potter and the way J.K has written it. The only down fall is Daniel Radcliffe as I do not think his standard of acting is Harry Potter and the order of the phoenix was mind blowing in my eyes. David Yates really captured the spirit of Harry Potter and the way J.K has written it. The only down fall is Daniel Radcliffe as I do not think his standard of acting is at the same level as Emma Watson and Rupert Grint, as they both so real flair in there rolls in the film. As well I think the film should be a little longer as its virtually 10 - 20 minutes shorter than the rest and it seemed that the film had ended in no time at all. Another draw back was seeing that it was the longest book out of the 7 why wasn't it the longest film out of the 5 made so far, clearing showing not enough information was put in as a lot of unexplained answers will not been given to use, such as in the 5 book the lockets is in headquarters even though they didn't no of its importance. Even though I've given a lot of bad points i still think David Yates has done well and acting has improved over the cause of time from all characters and is only going to improve as the series continues.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
NuggetsOct 2, 2007
The film is largely guilty of failing to remain faithful tto the novel with too many changes, often for the worse, and the fact the film often fails to explain what is happening ruins the beauty, drama and superb acting from all the main The film is largely guilty of failing to remain faithful tto the novel with too many changes, often for the worse, and the fact the film often fails to explain what is happening ruins the beauty, drama and superb acting from all the main characters in one of my favourite Harry Potter books. As usual, the acting and CGI is decent enough and especially Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint who continue to widen their reputation as decent British actors. The cast once again make the film almost believable and the portrayal as Lord Voldemort is captured perfectly. The plot, though one of the finest in the book series as the teenagers go through dark times as the Death Eaters rise, often misses out explaining key details with the film missing out parts of the book altogether making it hard to follow and hurried. Firstly, for whatever reason, the film was too short, as a result key parts would be ignored in order to make the film giving it a broken plot look. For those who have read the Harry Potter book, the film lives up to a majority of fans expectations with David Yates delivering a realistic, decent experience of the Harry Potter universe, switching between the happy times of Harry Potter series to more dark and sinister plot elements with apparent ease.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
IanB.Sep 29, 2007
This series keeps getting worse and worse. It just keeps falling away from the book and into its own weird void. By far the worst movie of the summer and worst harry potter movie so far. I laughed at all the bad acting the post puberty This series keeps getting worse and worse. It just keeps falling away from the book and into its own weird void. By far the worst movie of the summer and worst harry potter movie so far. I laughed at all the bad acting the post puberty actors that were once humorous children are now adolescent teenagers trying to act young but are just annoying high school to college kids that want something else, but this movie, and you can see it in their acting.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
JGMSep 17, 2007
Perhaps the Harry Potter saga took seven books to tell; it sure isn't supporting as many movies. This is easily the worst of the Potter films, full of moments that feel been-there, done that both within and outside the series itself. Perhaps the Harry Potter saga took seven books to tell; it sure isn't supporting as many movies. This is easily the worst of the Potter films, full of moments that feel been-there, done that both within and outside the series itself. The narrative structure is identical to the last two films and is tired here; Harry and company endure trials leading up to a confrontation with Voldemort. But the writing and directorial approach is a step backwards from the increasingly grown-up and complex execution of the previous installments. Harry's centralization feels forced and false, while the previously razor-sharp Hogwarts faculty seems to have been lobotomized and de-fanged in the face of a silly foil. The climactic wizard-battle is poorly executed, feeling like an out-take from a Star Wars prequel before the CGI backgrounds were finished; the death of a key character -- which should be the emotional punch the movie needs -- carries little emotional resonance. Of course the basic premise is still hugely appealing, and the actors continue to grow into their roles, but overall this is a huge disappointment.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
CoffeeS.Sep 9, 2007
this is a great movie with a great emotional pull at the end. great movie only (minor) problem is a few events from the book are left out here. but that might be a good thing seeing as ootp was the weakest book (but still pretty good this is a great movie with a great emotional pull at the end. great movie only (minor) problem is a few events from the book are left out here. but that might be a good thing seeing as ootp was the weakest book (but still pretty good especially towards the end) in the series. either way great movie with great performances all around. see it, own it, love it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
G-RadC.Sep 3, 2007
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is one of the best of the series so far, followed by Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. The ending action/fantasy scene in the end was amazing and had spectacular visuals and graphics. This Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is one of the best of the series so far, followed by Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. The ending action/fantasy scene in the end was amazing and had spectacular visuals and graphics. This one's intense and powerful. The acting was dazzling throughout all the cast. There's nothing wrong about this Harry Potter episode.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
SimonM.Sep 3, 2007
Another year same boring movie. I've seen every Potter movie once despite the fact that I am no fan of the series ( I keep hoping there's a reason for the legions of fanatics, this time i was had by promises of a darker story line) Another year same boring movie. I've seen every Potter movie once despite the fact that I am no fan of the series ( I keep hoping there's a reason for the legions of fanatics, this time i was had by promises of a darker story line) I guess I'm a sucker for epic special effects movies. I'm going to avoid the Half Blood Prince and maybe see Deathly Hollows depending on the word.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
GatsbyJ.Sep 2, 2007
-Love the books; 1st, 2nd, and 4th movies were great. 3rd one was the weakest, and Order the second weakest. This movie did some things very well, and others not so well. I thought the acting was good, the atmosphere was dark and foreboding -Love the books; 1st, 2nd, and 4th movies were great. 3rd one was the weakest, and Order the second weakest. This movie did some things very well, and others not so well. I thought the acting was good, the atmosphere was dark and foreboding as it's supposed to be, the special effects were great (I don't know what Charles C. is complaining about), but they messed up on the story, which is the biggest disappointment. -It was great that a lot of the unneeded parts were cut from the book, which was far too long (even J.K. Rowling admits this), and in terms of plot, the fifth book had the least going on. BUT, they had only two parts that they needed to truly get right for the movie, which they messed up. [***SPOILER**] 1) The battle between Dumbledore and Voldemort. It could have been a bit longer and more imaginative. True, they didn't need to follow the fight exactly like in the book because it's just a fight scene and doesn't develop the story, but having Dumbledore bring those statues to life as in the book would've rocked (or they could have expanded the fight in their own way). 2) The prophecy. This is the MOST important part of book 5; it's the climax and moment of revelation. This is one of the few parts of the book where something actually happens and affects the overall stories. But all we get in the movie is some obscure voice (not knowing it's professor Trelawny makes her character pointless in the movie because her importance in the book was that she made the prophecy. So why is she in the movie if it's never explained she made the prophecy?) saying a few lines about Harry and Voldemort having to kill each other. Even if you like the movie better than the book, you have to admit that this was the most important moment of the story, and they did in fact ruin it. The prophecy serves not only to explain what happened in the prior stories, but also sets up what's to come. I.E. We learn that Neville will play a big role in the future (which he does). People who've never read the books thus miss out on a huge chunk of plot, especially why Voldemort chose to kill Harry. -So overall a good movie, but not spectacular.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
MaxS.Sep 2, 2007
Worst in the series. Its over before it gets going, and leaves a lot of content from the book out.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
NikoMSep 1, 2007
As a harry potter fan, having read all the books more than once this movie offers none of the wonders and mysteries J.K. Rowling has engulfed us in. Yates is a horrible directing with the beginning scene nothing more than a child can As a harry potter fan, having read all the books more than once this movie offers none of the wonders and mysteries J.K. Rowling has engulfed us in. Yates is a horrible directing with the beginning scene nothing more than a child can portray. [***SPOILER**] The script and scene writers have ridiculed the book leaving out every single point exept the battle between voldemort and Potter. Within the first few minutes Potter was safe again at his poor Sirius house, this angered me with this taking over 80 pages which showed Harry confusion and anger towards his situation, Quidditch plays no further part in this movie which is also a large majority of the book. Hagrid sudden intrusion into the centre stage is not stabilised as there is little communication with Potter, Weasley and Granger showing why he wasn't there. Also this scene takes place during Quidditch is on in the book. Cho is portrayed as the traitor when it was actually Marrietta, Cho's friend who betrays harry to the ministry official, Dolores Umbridge. Cho is not shown as a very emotional person throughout the novel exept during their defensive class and their meating at Hogsmeade with Rita Skitter is also absent in the movie. With the expectation people had to viewing this film many of our expectations have been thrawted by the way this movie was shown and its less than proffesional director. I for one felt very upset with the way this movie was portrayed and this has led me to the aligations I have put foward in this text. This is no joke, nor a contest, I am just dissapointed by this performance of the world's greatest book.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
JonnyF.Sep 1, 2007
It had it's moments, but Goldenberg's screenplay was laughable. A confused mess. Very few of the children have improved as actors. I am not anticipating the next movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
OligamiSep 1, 2007
I liked the opening scene and that duel between Voldemort and Dumbledore near the end, it really saved the movie from being forgettable.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
CharlesC.Aug 27, 2007
The special effects ruin the movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
SamJ.Aug 24, 2007
I thought it was the best one because there was darker magic involved and Harry, Ron And Hermione are getting older so there is a lot more humour in it. Because they are getting older they are becoming scarier and older.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JodyD.Aug 24, 2007
A good movie. Very different to the book, but still had some good parts in it. Its sad though that the movie is M (even though the movie does match its rating), i know lots of little kids who love harry potter, and are horribly disappointed A good movie. Very different to the book, but still had some good parts in it. Its sad though that the movie is M (even though the movie does match its rating), i know lots of little kids who love harry potter, and are horribly disappointed in not being able to see it (in the cinema anyway). But for all the people who are allowed, i think they would quit enjoy this years Harry Potter Movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
FrancisV.Aug 22, 2007
A 5-STAR creation: both the book and the movie. If you have read the book, you can understand and pin-point which is which, the differences and the additions. VERY GOOD HEM, HEM... Dolores UMbridge you were the very best in that movie. ITS A 5-STAR creation: both the book and the movie. If you have read the book, you can understand and pin-point which is which, the differences and the additions. VERY GOOD HEM, HEM... Dolores UMbridge you were the very best in that movie. ITS THE MOST ACTION PACKED MOVIE CREATED SO FAR, but many were missin.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AmandaS.Aug 21, 2007
I thought this movie was great. It's not like the book 100% but what can you expect. Still a very good movie. My children loved it and can't wait for the next one.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
DanielM.Aug 21, 2007
This movie constitutes, with the forth one, the worst film in the series. It was extremely difficult to do such a bad film from such an outstanding novel. It is absolutely unfair for the book. Maybe the direction is acceptable, but the This movie constitutes, with the forth one, the worst film in the series. It was extremely difficult to do such a bad film from such an outstanding novel. It is absolutely unfair for the book. Maybe the direction is acceptable, but the soundtrack is horrible, and the screenplay by Michael Goldenberg is even worse. Pity.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
BEnJiD.Aug 19, 2007
1! did not understand a bit of it. [***SPOILER***] When Sirius died, they weren't emotional at all. It was like Sirius died, oh well, yay' no good. No humour all gloomy and sad! Goblet of fire was way better and more humorous. DO 1! did not understand a bit of it. [***SPOILER***] When Sirius died, they weren't emotional at all. It was like Sirius died, oh well, yay' no good. No humour all gloomy and sad! Goblet of fire was way better and more humorous. DO NOT WATCH IT.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
PaulF.Aug 19, 2007
The current Harry Potter is the best of the lot and that's saying a lot because the others were pretty hard to beat as they were. What made this one so good was the emotional range of the acting as well as the script which allowed such The current Harry Potter is the best of the lot and that's saying a lot because the others were pretty hard to beat as they were. What made this one so good was the emotional range of the acting as well as the script which allowed such acting to take place. I thought for a while that this movie might actually make it to perfection with its perfect special effects and its depth of characters. There were however a few small flaws. One was they totally glossed over how Potter and gang out into the Ministry of mysteries department. Two was his new love was never reconciled with nor included in his support at the climax of the movie. Lastly after all battles were fought won and cried over the emotional verve just seemed to wane away. Now I don't want you to get the impression this was not a outstanding movie cause it was. It's just that it was not perfect. Oh well, it will give them something to strive for in the next movie. I have high hopes after seeing the characters really blossom in there roles. Good Job guys, gals, and all who were involved. There's a lot to be proud of.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
NeedButterAug 19, 2007
I was prepared to love this movie and try as I might I can't. I read all the hype and believed it. I even thought the reason why they asked David Yates to do Movie 6 is because he kicked butt on this one. No way. Why did they ask him I was prepared to love this movie and try as I might I can't. I read all the hype and believed it. I even thought the reason why they asked David Yates to do Movie 6 is because he kicked butt on this one. No way. Why did they ask him back? Are his rates cheap? I am a huge Harry Potter book fan. I am one of the weirdoes that actually like Book 5 but Mr. Yates and his screenwriter trashed this adaptation. It was over edited, rushed and choppy. It failed to tell a good story. While Radcliffe's acting has improved, he is still lacking in emotional range. Is Harry a one dimensional character? Radcliffe's facial expressions are so limited it is either blank or he's yelling (with blank looking eyes). I saw Equus and it was the same. I suspect he gets critical acclaim because so many people are cashing in on his coattails. I want him to truly earn the millions he's making. Even the fabulous performances of Imelda Staunton and Alan Rickman (he can do so much with so little screen time) couldn't save this movie for me. Do me a favor Warner Bros., buy David Yates out and get another director for HBP. And Daniel, I think you are a generally cool kind but acting lessons would not hurt. Check into a drama college.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
MichaelF.Aug 17, 2007
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is the worst of the 5 movies so far. It was the longest book, yet the shortest movie. The previous four movies left things out and changed some things around, but i feel they did so without Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is the worst of the 5 movies so far. It was the longest book, yet the shortest movie. The previous four movies left things out and changed some things around, but i feel they did so without compromising the integrity, plot, and accuracy of the book. But OOTP changed way too much. Some little things were only changed for the sake of changing and would have taken about thirty seconds longer to do it the correct way (a.k.a. in the movie neville finds the room of requirement by chance, when in the book harry asks dobby if he knows of a place where they can go, and dobby suggests it). And some bigger aspects of the book were also changed to fit the movie (a.k.a how Cho Chang was blamed for telling Umbridge about Dumbledore's Army, when it was really her friend Marietta who was nervous about getting caught. This is a major plot change, because in the Sixth book Harry has another thing with Cho, which according to the movie would be highly unlikely now that he thinks shes a traitor)(in the battle at the department of mysteries Lucius Malfoy never has his hands on the prophecy and Neville is the one who drops it causing it to break so no one can hear it. oh and also at that moment in the movie, Sirius punches Malfoy? I'm pretty sure he has a wand and could have done much more with a simple Stupefy!) Also things were changed that were pre-established in the previous movies (the look of Sirius' face in the fire when talking to Harry in his dorm. the look of the dementors). I feel the new director really let the die-hard harry potter fans down with this poor excuse for a harry potter movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
AliM.Aug 17, 2007
The only thing that has stopped me from giving this film a 1 is that my friends, who have not read the Harry Potter books, insist that they enjoyed it! I found the film boring and very badly edited. the script writing leaves it feeling like The only thing that has stopped me from giving this film a 1 is that my friends, who have not read the Harry Potter books, insist that they enjoyed it! I found the film boring and very badly edited. the script writing leaves it feeling like a first school play and the acting from the lead role (harry) is wooden and uncharasmatic. I found myself wanting Lord Voldemort to win just to shut him u. David Yates has taken it upon himself to add new ideas and change the story line, mostly for the worst. This really is a truly appaling adaptation. the only reason that i can think of for the above 'critics' scoring the film 100 is that they wanted to see their review top of the list and so increase publicity for themselves.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
MikeN.Aug 15, 2007
The first hour is gripping, thanks largely to Radcliffe.. The final forty-five minutes are also excellent, displaying superb effects and cinematography. Especially effective at the end is the gradual broadening of the field of vision, which The first hour is gripping, thanks largely to Radcliffe.. The final forty-five minutes are also excellent, displaying superb effects and cinematography. Especially effective at the end is the gradual broadening of the field of vision, which makes the final fight sequence seem positively titanic. Unfortunately the middle of the film is an awkward montage of plot points and snippets of dialogue culled from the book. It is fairly amusing and cleverly done, but it is no substitute for an actual story.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
BrutusO.Aug 14, 2007
Wow! Talk about a backlash. Did nobody like this film? This film is OK, despite all the naysayers. Given it is based on the worst book of the lot, it works surprisingly well. Admittedly, it would not have mattered much if it had never been Wow! Talk about a backlash. Did nobody like this film? This film is OK, despite all the naysayers. Given it is based on the worst book of the lot, it works surprisingly well. Admittedly, it would not have mattered much if it had never been made, because the overall plot does not advance all that far. Basically Harry worries about Voldemort for a while, irritates everyone, and then has another interminable face-off with the bad flunkies. But as far as these things go, not bad. I have to admit I did get the feeling there were too many British character actors (wonderful as they are) racing around doing nothing terribly significant. Imelda Staunton deserves special credit for bringing the delightfully awful Dolores to life. The principals were good, the sets were good, the script was ...OK. Bring on the next one.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
JasonE.Aug 13, 2007
Think Lucinda Williams & it's the fifth out of seven...what do you think it means?! Ahhh... got to be the only schmuck with a subject line like that for a 'Harry Potter' movie - but think of the intent behind "Joy" and Think Lucinda Williams & it's the fifth out of seven...what do you think it means?! Ahhh... got to be the only schmuck with a subject line like that for a 'Harry Potter' movie - but think of the intent behind "Joy" and you've captured much of the feeling of the audience's reaction walking out of the latest 'Harry Potter.' Though it's madly efficient and quite often exciting, squeezing in 850 pages of text into the shortest Potter yet, less than 140 minutes, this fifth installment is decidedly more dour and grim than the previous installments. A recurring theme of the past films has been the teamwork that has made Harry, Hermoine and Ron such a formidable trio. The later two take a backseat in this story so that the depiction of Harry's melancholic internal struggle can be front and center. Thankfully, the prevalency of the book's most devious and clever creation, the fascist middle-manager Delores Umbridge, has remained intact. Imelda Staunton, her family name quite appropriate for such a niggling squat character. Gosh, how I adored the emittance of her high-pitched squeal - intended to be friendly...instead such an assault. Also, like always, the film makes grand usage of its exemplary all-star British cast - everyone getting an opportunity to interact within the rich Hogwarts universe. Especially noteworthy are watching Branagh's old flames mug it up under heavy makeup. Never dull, the film flies by... but by the end of a special effects laden climactic battle we realize how unimportant this story in the grand scheme. In effect, I felt a bit used, and my urgent desire to want more from Rowling waned.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
PaulD.Aug 11, 2007
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix fails on many levels. To put things simply, shoddy writing is the film's major flaw, but not the only one. Uninspired and ultimately weak (And often awkward) direction is not helped in the task Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix fails on many levels. To put things simply, shoddy writing is the film's major flaw, but not the only one. Uninspired and ultimately weak (And often awkward) direction is not helped in the task of making up for a lackluster script (More interested in ripping basic ideas from the book than exploring them in any detail) by an uninspired performance by an increasingly useless lead. Radcliffe's performance is stiff and lifeless, particularly in emotional scenes, such as those where has a go at this friends. Meanwhile, Warner Brothers set design continues their desire to make the mundain extraordinary, by making the Ministry of Magic - a conceivably dull place (Being a Governmental building) perhaps more impressive that Hogwarts itself. A big no-no. The book's most important scene, one in which Dumbledore shows Harry the Prophecy and tells him "everything", is butchered in a couple of awkward and considerably less well-conceived scenes. One scene in this set is considerably awkward and difficult to watch, being as it is so clearly out of place. It seems that after the series' superb fourth chapter, things have slipped to previously unheard of lows for Harry Potter. Even strong appearances from new cast members Imelda Staunton and Evana Lynch cannot rescue this train wreck. Avoid this movie at all costs.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
0
RjKAug 10, 2007
There were to many thing missing. It went from discussing about the DA and then into getting into it. This harry potter movie was by far one of the worst because of all the crucial pieces of information that were missing. I sat through the There were to many thing missing. It went from discussing about the DA and then into getting into it. This harry potter movie was by far one of the worst because of all the crucial pieces of information that were missing. I sat through the whole confused even though i just read the book before the movie. It doesn't even tell how they found the room of requirement… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful
2
NavinR.Aug 8, 2007
This movie was terrible.Other than the brilliant performances put down by Luna, Umbridge and Harry, there really wasn't anything good about it.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
3
RexAug 6, 2007
This was a tough book to make into a movie because the book was over 900 pages long. I feel for the director because no matter what he decided to include or exclude from the book was going to upset a percentage of people. But like
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
NopieT.Aug 4, 2007
I was going to write that this is the best of the HP films, but as I reflect further, I think that sentiment arises chiefly from lowered expectations brought on by how disappointing the first four movies have been. Each of them, including I was going to write that this is the best of the HP films, but as I reflect further, I think that sentiment arises chiefly from lowered expectations brought on by how disappointing the first four movies have been. Each of them, including Order of the Phoenix, leaves me shaking my head thinking of opportunities lost. It seems like the various directors have a check list of plot points from the books that they feel must be covered, regardless of whether they work cinematically. Again, Order of the Phoenix is no exception. I wish at least one of the directors would have had the courage to try to make a great movie rather than make a film of a Harry Potter book. For a "good vs. evil" film to really work, the audience must have an opportunity to get to know and detest the villain. On a day-to-day basis, the most constant villain in Harry's life is Snape. Yet he rarely gets a line and never gets screen time without Harry. As a consequence, he never becomes anything more than a stick figure - certainly he is no where near "real" enough to hate. The same goes for Draco Malfoy. If the movies spent as much time developing the dark side of life at Hogwarts, Harry's victories at the climax of each book would be much more significant and moving to the audience. On the plus side, I thought Radcliffe's acting was much improved, Helena Bohnam Carter was a welcome addition, and the cinematography was excellent (best since Prisoner of Azkaban). Sadly, the actors playing Ron and Hermione are still terrible, and Michael Gambon completely fails in showing the wisdom, kindness, and wit that make Dumbledore such a delightful character.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
BerogTheDragonAug 3, 2007
What a waste of money.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
RoryT.Aug 1, 2007
Herminie is really hot but she didnt go naked or anything like it says in the book she does. So overall it was shit a movie, there was no nudity at all and thats all i watch movies for!!!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JoeJul 31, 2007
Darker than the previous four films, this episode in the Harry Potter series is pretty good--the plot, although shortened from the book (as would be expected), was tight and easy to follow. The theme was well-developed, even if it strayed Darker than the previous four films, this episode in the Harry Potter series is pretty good--the plot, although shortened from the book (as would be expected), was tight and easy to follow. The theme was well-developed, even if it strayed from its source material. And Imelda Staunton was incredible as Dolores Umbridge. If nothing else, you have to appreciate her performance.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
DanielC.Jul 30, 2007
HPOTP was in my mind, a healthy combination of the complexity and plot lines of the POA and action and romance of GOF. While it missed key scenes and emphasized plot lines not really that emphasized at the time (such as romance) it did a HPOTP was in my mind, a healthy combination of the complexity and plot lines of the POA and action and romance of GOF. While it missed key scenes and emphasized plot lines not really that emphasized at the time (such as romance) it did a good job of representing the overall themes of the book and the continuation of the series. For mine, it was too short. Yates tried to make this a kid friendly length but in the process, rushed one of the key moments of the series in the end part. The book also failed to explain the prophesy point and the link between Harry and Voldermort which would explain a lot to people who haven't read the books. However, the movie was well acted, generally well structured and flowed well. It's humor sections and drama sections were well achieved, cinematography and editing were adequate. You can see the development of the young actors in this film, this is by far the best acted film by the young players in the series. For all those complaining, read the book first. My verdict, good, not very good, not average, but good.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
sabretoothJul 30, 2007
For the first time in the series, the Film improves on the book. I'm a big Harry Potter fan and just finished up book 7 last week. Order of Phoenix novel was long, drawn out with a very annoying, teenage angst Harry Potter. The film For the first time in the series, the Film improves on the book. I'm a big Harry Potter fan and just finished up book 7 last week. Order of Phoenix novel was long, drawn out with a very annoying, teenage angst Harry Potter. The film directed by David Yates (britsh TV director) surpasses the JK Rowlings book. OH yes there are unnecessary deviations from the book but overalll the film ehances the story. For the first time a Harry Potter movie moves briskly and is well paced. Yates cuts film sharp but leaves in the necessary elements. THe acting is the best we have seen in a Potter film, Radcliffe, Watson and Grint are all at their best along with well cast new comers of Umbridge and Luna. Gary Oldman is still a little off cast as Sirius Black but he manages well enough. My only disapointment is that the final battle is a little rushed and doesn't capture the struggle as nearly as well as the novel. Overall the best Harry Potter film yet followed in descending order by HP3, HP2,HP4 and then HP1. Much greater rewatch ability then previous Potte films, umbridge is used just enough to get the feel of her annoying ways without being over used in the film and becoming annoying.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
RichardSJul 30, 2007
The Potter series can be divided into 2 - 1. the first four books which were each lean, full of mystery and adventure - each was a standalone story of merit and 2. the last three books which have a single story laboriously told across the The Potter series can be divided into 2 - 1. the first four books which were each lean, full of mystery and adventure - each was a standalone story of merit and 2. the last three books which have a single story laboriously told across the three books. As a result the last 3 books are pretty boring, longwinded, and crucially bereft of new magic and thrills. TOOTP has no central storyline, unless you think that the revelation that Voldemort is back is actually a story in itself. As a result the story is really lacking. True to the last 3 books Harry is crushingly dull - one-note whinging and feeling story for himself all the time. God help us when book 7 comes to the screen. Having a "bleak" or "dark" story doesn't make it better - just bereft of fun. The good news is that the acting from the adults is first rate. Oldman and Staunton are superb. Just a shame we can have more Thewlis, Smith, Gleeson and others. Gambon is great as usual too. The kids aren't too bad. JKR cannot write action scenes at all - they play so much better on screen than on the page. The battle scene at the end is far better than anything JKR has written. The Army practice scenes also have great effects. A better film than I feared since the book is almost unfilmably dull - top effects, good acting, snappy direction and no Quidditch!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
GloriaBJul 30, 2007
This move stank. Beginning with HP himself, Daniel Radcliffe. This guy is probably the worst actor on the planet despite his butt naked performance on stage to try and garner some acclaim. It was a cheap shot and it did not work apparently. This move stank. Beginning with HP himself, Daniel Radcliffe. This guy is probably the worst actor on the planet despite his butt naked performance on stage to try and garner some acclaim. It was a cheap shot and it did not work apparently. So glad I didn't see that. You'd think Daniel would invest in some acting lessons but more likely his problem is deeper. He is devoid of talent. He hasn't got IT. I'm sure they lose millions because of him, so why haven't they replaced him? Nobody knows, but I'll dance in the street if they do. And while they are replacing people they should re-cast Lupin. Who the hell is that puffy-faced actor? Lupin should look thin, tattered and tragically handsome--not like a puffer fish. Tonks was nicely cast though. I've always felt that Minerva looked much younger than the actor who portrays her. Nobody has mentioned how wasted Emma Thompson's performance iwas amongst that mess of a movie. You tend to forget the highlights because the rest was so overwhelmingly depressing. The movie is a shame, but I knew it would be since I have the fake screams of Daniel from the other movies (Aaaaahhhhhhh....Aaaahhhhh....Aahh....Ah) still ringing in my head. How stupid do these movie makers think we are? Plenty--we keep going to see this trash.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
TomKJul 30, 2007
Order of the Phoenix is the best harry potter movie, yet. it's matching the book in spirit and the actors are great (especialy Helena Bonham Carter, Evanna Lynch and Rupert Grint)
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
DanaMJul 29, 2007
Boring and depressing. My wife fell aseep and folks were leaving halfway through. Stuck it out but wished I'd seen something else. And for the record I've seen them all.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
JaredCJul 29, 2007
I haven't read the book and I can understand why its nothing like it. First of all, JK Rowling keeps the story with the same amount of character development and lets them have roles. In this, its just The Order of the Phoenix and Harry I haven't read the book and I can understand why its nothing like it. First of all, JK Rowling keeps the story with the same amount of character development and lets them have roles. In this, its just The Order of the Phoenix and Harry Potter's army of 5. Cho Chang is like being bullied with Harry who kissed her violating her. Its a powerfull movie but I didn't get much out of it, it got annoying, the 3D sequence in IMAX was great, but all the movie is is training for a powerfull army to kill voldamort's, and the battle just begins at the very end. The movie felt so short, Most of the supporting roles are like taken out of the whole story. I am very dissapointed, it could have had more story.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
cristinaJul 28, 2007
The book was sooooo much better. it dissappoints me to think how much better the movie could have been. it was rushed and was not faithful to the book. if someone watching the movie had not read the book they would not have been able to The book was sooooo much better. it dissappoints me to think how much better the movie could have been. it was rushed and was not faithful to the book. if someone watching the movie had not read the book they would not have been able to understand the movie whatsoever.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AdamLJul 27, 2007
This movie is the best Harry Potter movie yet. It is darker and more action packed. The overview shots of the lake and Hogwarts and the mountains in this movie are spectacular. The best thing about this movie is that they have more stuff This movie is the best Harry Potter movie yet. It is darker and more action packed. The overview shots of the lake and Hogwarts and the mountains in this movie are spectacular. The best thing about this movie is that they have more stuff from the book in here than any other Harry Potter movie yet.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JackBJul 26, 2007
This was probably my favorite Harry Potter movie, except the battle in the end wasn't long enough.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
CSJul 25, 2007
This film can be rated in two ways: how good a Harry Potter film it is and how good a film it is. A Harry Potter film is never going to get a 10 on metacritic-its just too shallow. but based on the source material the producers and director This film can be rated in two ways: how good a Harry Potter film it is and how good a film it is. A Harry Potter film is never going to get a 10 on metacritic-its just too shallow. but based on the source material the producers and director had to work with, I don't think they could have done much of a better job. Sure, there were moments where some short scenes seemed unnecessary, but mistakes have to expected in films. And so i were rating this as a harry potter film, it would get a 10,, but, as a film, it's only a 7. Some of the reviewers need to sort that distinction out.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BryantRJul 24, 2007
The best Harry Potter yet! The special effects, acting and everything else. Especially the battle between Dumbledore and Voldemort was the best part. I can't wait until the next one and the last book
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
MortezaHJul 24, 2007
Lacks the quality of the previous movies in the series. The acting of the three main characters is immature and makes you want to vomit halfway through the movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
JasonUJul 23, 2007
This movie is the very meaning of the phrase "the book was better". Jumpy scenes; legions of characters introduced for seemingly no reason other than 'they were in the book', even though they contribute very little to the movie; This movie is the very meaning of the phrase "the book was better". Jumpy scenes; legions of characters introduced for seemingly no reason other than 'they were in the book', even though they contribute very little to the movie; pointless special effects scenes (how many times do we need to see Potter and his friends flying around?)... the list just goes on. Potter directors need to stop trying to wow us with special effects, because modern movies CANNOT be carried by CGI. Try inserting some flowing plot or intelligent dialouge next time, instead throwing together of this disjointed, boring, mess of a movie. I'm wondering if the critics saw a different version of this movie, because I don't understand how anyone but the most die-hard Potter fan could rate this anything higher than a 5/10 at most.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DanielSJul 21, 2007
Probably the best Potter film to date. It was epic in scale, and the movie never really lost momentum (except for a few minor parts). The battle scenes in particular were well-done. I have not read any of J. K. Rowling's books, but I Probably the best Potter film to date. It was epic in scale, and the movie never really lost momentum (except for a few minor parts). The battle scenes in particular were well-done. I have not read any of J. K. Rowling's books, but I have seen all of the films, and this one was my favorite of the bunch.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
BillbJul 21, 2007
I saw this movie in 3D and the fight scene at the end was absolutely spectacular with or without the 3D experience. And not only was the end great, but the acting is a lot better in this movie, since the actors have matured compared to the I saw this movie in 3D and the fight scene at the end was absolutely spectacular with or without the 3D experience. And not only was the end great, but the acting is a lot better in this movie, since the actors have matured compared to the last 4 movies. overall it was just a well made movie and it just makes me even more excited for the next one… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
AlecBJul 21, 2007
yea i agree with what Ryan B. said How can this shitty movie make it in the green score level when it was probably the worst movie in the series. It was dull and boring. Way to long and worst of all there was no action at all. Terrible movie
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
ShaneSJul 20, 2007
Books are not films, of course, and that's why films should always take liberties with the source material. I've never been one to deny it. One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest is an example of a film that acted as an Books are not films, of course, and that's why films should always take liberties with the source material. I've never been one to deny it. One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest is an example of a film that acted as an interpretation and not a flat-out cut-and-paste to screen. The latter is lazy film making. This fifth Harry Potter was rife with choices, but most of them were poor choices. Characters are left underdeveloped, suspense is nowhere and--as opposed to, say, Prisoner of Azkaban--it lacks imagination and the visual verve that should define the series. One might gather that the film's largely expository parts act solely as necessary buildups to some climax and they never act on their own. A film should never, ever, be about the payoff: everything in-between matters just as much as the fireworks finish. And Rowling has a fundamental difficulty with her imagination that I cannot ignore and that I have long wanted to point out. She only plays at knowing her world, but when she hits a creative wall, she inserts some magnificent and magical plot device to move along the action and stir some tension. By that method, she leeches and manipulates us all into believing her world. She did it in Goblet of Fire with the triwizard tournament. Somehow a large maze appeared and there were other massive geographical elements that had heretofore been absent. To me, that's inept storytelling and, in fact, it cheats not only her readers, but her otherwise imaginative self. Now I can understand to an extent because people often rush her creative process along, but the effect is diminished by it and the story's credibility disintegrates evermore because of it. In Order of the Phoenix she added "the Room of Requirement," which I'll refrain from explaining in the interest of people who have yet to see the film--just take my word for it. But most importantly, the characters needed some development to make the themes more potent. The book exceeded 800 pages and clearly that complicates matters. A solution would be to break the film into two parts and release them separately. Ironically, the fifth book was my favorite in the series thus far (the seventh to be completed soon), but the adaptation was my least favorite of all.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
TonksSJul 19, 2007
I LOVED IT!! It was by far the best! The ending when Harry is controlled by Voldemort is so awesome!! It was spectacular!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
AlexJul 19, 2007
Overall a good movie. Compared to the last two, this is a significant drop in quality. It got very slow in the middle, and was very confusing at parts ( as I am not a reader of the books yet). The acting was mediocre with a couple Overall a good movie. Compared to the last two, this is a significant drop in quality. It got very slow in the middle, and was very confusing at parts ( as I am not a reader of the books yet). The acting was mediocre with a couple exceptions. After seeing Goblet I was dying to see it again. After this one, I'm just going to wait to see Blood Prince.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ZeppyR.Jul 19, 2007
Wow, I'm really surprised by the reviews on this. This is one of my favorite Harry Potters, I have a feeling many of the reviews by user are younger and yes this is a darker movie. which goes to show how this movie is meant for 10 year Wow, I'm really surprised by the reviews on this. This is one of my favorite Harry Potters, I have a feeling many of the reviews by user are younger and yes this is a darker movie. which goes to show how this movie is meant for 10 year olds. The special effects are great and it was a very fun serious and actually funny movie, reading this book helps understand some little things the non readers may not get. So if your older and can get past the dark violent parts this is a movie for you, don't listen to the young people, lol. Great Movie!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
RyanB.Jul 19, 2007
This movie was absolutely awful, and it makes me sad to see Metacritic has granted such an awful movie a green score. The movie itself centered far to much around pointless scenes that did nothing to help the plot. For example, the scene This movie was absolutely awful, and it makes me sad to see Metacritic has granted such an awful movie a green score. The movie itself centered far to much around pointless scenes that did nothing to help the plot. For example, the scene with Harry kissing that girl. The movie put atleast 80% of the important information into corny, cliche spinning news paper montages. For example, nearly half of the movie went by when they explained Umbridge (or whatever her name was) was arrested, and that Dumbledoor had been reinstated. That was not content worthy for new paper headlines. That deserved full scenes. Don't bother with the movie if you are a movie fan. You will spend the whole time pulling out huge plot holes, and shameless directing. Thanks for reading, hope this helps!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
Page:
More From This Movie

71 Critic Reviews

7.3 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL