Read Mixed User Reviews for Godzilla (2014)

6

JacobJun 9, 2015

Godzilla is great when it is what the trailers said it would be. The effects on Godzilla are amazing, the atmosphere created is perfect, and the action sights are some of the best to grace the cinema this summer. With the film nailing theGodzilla is great when it is what the trailers said it would be. The effects on Godzilla are amazing, the atmosphere created is perfect, and the action sights are some of the best to grace the cinema this summer. With the film nailing the elements of a Godzilla movie it is baffling while this is shoved into the background. The film instead focuses on a bunch of human characters who the audience is supposed to care about but it is difficult to when they are poorly developed and when you see glimpses of amazing fight scenes in the background you are screaming for the film to focus on that. Had the film cut down on the lengthy build up and just give us a straightforward monster fighting movie this could’ve been one of the highlights of the summer. Instead, the film makes the bizarre choice to not focus on those elements much resulting in a film that is sometimes awesome. This is a frustrating film as the atmosphere, build up, and payoff created are amazing but the film doesn’t seem interesting that. Why would you make a Godzilla movie if you aren’t going to focus on Godzilla? I am open to new interpretations of the story but it feels like a tease to provide such amazing action scenes but show not much interest them. Maybe I’d be more excepting if this film wasn’t called Godzilla. The film could’ve used any other random monster and the film would’ve meant even less. The action is amazing but unlike Pacific Rim I felt like it never got to fully payoff. I’m not really sure whether or not to recommend this because when this film is amazing it is amazing but those moments are mere seconds apart.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Ansatsu83Jul 27, 2014

Not enough monster stomping fun. Only about 30 to 40 minutes of the movie involves Godzilla on a rampage!!! The rest is a story about a character I could personally care less about. Insert John Doe, with a crazy conspiracy (yet accurate)Not enough monster stomping fun. Only about 30 to 40 minutes of the movie involves Godzilla on a rampage!!! The rest is a story about a character I could personally care less about. Insert John Doe, with a crazy conspiracy (yet accurate) father, and thats your main character. More monsters, more radiation breath, less story, please...… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

TokyochuchuJul 27, 2014

Godzilla is really good fun whenever Godzilla is on screen. When he's not, however, and Aaron Taylor Johnson is taking the lead, the film becomes significantly more boring. But at least they knocked the CGI monsters out of the park. ThoseGodzilla is really good fun whenever Godzilla is on screen. When he's not, however, and Aaron Taylor Johnson is taking the lead, the film becomes significantly more boring. But at least they knocked the CGI monsters out of the park. Those things rock!… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

DPadsMay 19, 2014

Dear Godzilla,

I really wanted to like you, like, like you like you, but I'm not so sure anymore. We had a good time though! I might have almost fallen asleep in the middle, but I was pretty tired from studying for finals. Still, theDear Godzilla,

I really wanted to like you, like, like you like you, but I'm not so sure anymore. We had a good time though! I might have almost fallen asleep in the middle, but I was pretty tired from studying for finals. Still, the last third of was SO awesome and fun that it almost made up for it. Almost. See, the problem is, I can't shake the feeling that you weren't... yourself the whole time. You were pleasant, and enthusiastic, and easy to follow, but the whole time I thought you were just hiding the whole story. You made sure to tell me you were sensitive, and caring, and had your heart in the right place, and that you have some of these crazy experiences in your life! But they're not that crazy so you might not want to hear about all of them but to trust you, because they're crazy. I don't care about how crazy these stories are, I care about the stories themselves, and how they affected you. But you insisted on moving on, and that was ok, and it was just ok. But when the whole thing was over, I felt like I'd seen all there was to see, but clearly that's not the case. Is it? If we ever do this again, which we should, I know you really want to, just be yourself. Don't hide what you think I might think is weird, stop telling me about things to impress me and just tell me things, and stop pretending to know what I care about so I can get a chance to know and care about you. Again, I did have fun, and I like you, but I don't see this really working out right away. Take a little while, figure out what you want, and maybe we can give this another chance.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

6

Just1nsaneMay 16, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Ok, This movie started out reallly interesting Bryan Cranston killed the first 1/4th of the movie then....he dies....WTF. Kick ass dude is the lead and dude is BORING so many scenes im like wtf is even going on. The humans has such poor connection. There was tease actions scenes then the ending was good the last 20 mins was good action with old school vibe and old school music loved that. But THAT STORY wtf was so out of place the actors were so off putting. Its bad guys im sorry. 2 dudes I went with the movies with we were roasting on this movie all night long it was that bad. Let me add if I see that asian man open his mouth ONE MORE TIME BY THE HEAVEN I WILL PUT SOMETHING IN IT. They barley even explained what godzilla was or where he even came from. The kick ass dude like didnt even feel like he cared at all.… Expand

7 of 16 users found this helpful79

All this user's reviews

6

ThinkSamichJun 21, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The movie is nothing special, something that will be forgotten by the end of the Summer. It falls into the cookie-cutter action movie mold. The majority of screen time is spent following the military to ridiculous extremes. In one scene Godzilla is actually traveling with aircraft carriers and other battleships as he "hunts"... military propaganda all around. You get the cliche tension between military/scientist as the military ignore multiple warnings regarding their impending f-up. The protagonist(a random civilian) constantly hitches rides with random units of the military, breaking every protocol imaginable. This happens over and over again until suspension of disbelief is near impossible. At one point in the movie the military decide to set off a nuke 20 miles off the coast to lure and kill the monsters, but for some reason they decide to arm the bomb in the San Francisco Bay... I just don't even...

The monster battles are pretty cool, but not worth sitting through two hours of garbage to see.

meh/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

grandpajoe6191Aug 27, 2015

"Godzilla", a reboot of the legendary 1957 film and the god awful 1998 film, is a great summer disaster film to forget its flaws and enjoy the extraordinary visuals the movie has to boast.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

jlplattenMay 19, 2014

The trailer for this film is very deceiving. I was expecting a serious reboot of the Godzilla films, however this film kept the same hokey tone of the originals. The over-the-top soundtrack while people were simply walking around took meThe trailer for this film is very deceiving. I was expecting a serious reboot of the Godzilla films, however this film kept the same hokey tone of the originals. The over-the-top soundtrack while people were simply walking around took me right out of the film. It's alright... I can see why fans of the original Godzilla would love this movie. I'm just not a Godzilla fan to begin with. I just wish humans had a bigger role in this film to save themselves. At least it wasn't terrible... also, I didn't realize that Godzilla likes to constantly take naps. He wakes up from the sea, fights, sleeps, fights some more, takes another nap, wins the last battle, and then goes back into the ocean to sleep until another giant monster appears.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

quincytheodoreMay 17, 2014

Returning to his original fire hazard gigantic form, Godzilla delivers roaring monster mayhem despite some uneven pace and thin script. In a polar opposite of the lighthearted rendition 16 years ago, Godzilla is now radioactively gloomy,Returning to his original fire hazard gigantic form, Godzilla delivers roaring monster mayhem despite some uneven pace and thin script. In a polar opposite of the lighthearted rendition 16 years ago, Godzilla is now radioactively gloomy, bringing a more nuclear oriented plot. It opens well with good human interaction for first half, but sadly the momentum dies down in lieu of gargantuan fight, which is somewhat acceptable and expected just by looking at the title.

The cast looks a bit stumbled with the sparse dialogue and repetitive scenes. Aaron Taylor-Johnson as Ford Brody does look the part of a marine with ancient history with unnatural disaster. He carries himself decently until the last act where he stares into the ruins or eyes of behemoth far too often. Ken Watanabe is utterly underutilized, channeling Mark Wahlberg from The Happening. He seems so confused the entire time, even at ordinary moments, and at rare scenes where he's given script, his role is reduced to giving catchphrases.

Bryan Cranston as Ford's father does a fine performance setting the somber tone at first half. His part is by far the most emotional one; it's a good set-up for the reveal and sells the menace of the creature. The movie works by building the anticipation and not prematurely showcasing the giant, although in some scenes the story progress is told by exposition, either by news or reports. It makes the encounters feel rather cut short, it could've used more visual delight before switching gear to next sequence.

Graphic has more somber atmosphere, at later parts the movie even embraces horror vibe, completely with eerie humming. The drab color palette adds more terror, there's little quizzical tone to be had here. While it's not as colorful as the recent monster movie Pacific Rim, the theme holds consistently. Effects are put to good use; unworldly battles are done with powerful impact. Camera angles often tease the massive beast, occasionally focusing on its scale or eye to enhance the size. Contrasting color, with each passing setting, delivers the solemn ambiance.

There is discrepancy while the story moves forward, human interaction is increasingly reduced towards the end. The movie could've maintained the relationship, but it is certainly lacking at last act. No amount of child actors put in dire situations, and one dog, can bait more sympathy from audience. Script itself is lacking, often leaving the characters glaring emotionless to the screen. A bit coincidence or plot luck is also at played to fit Ford Brody to the scenes, which understandable in disaster movie. Regardless of the flaws, Godzilla serves as a colossus carnage leaving destruction on its wake but not on the original material.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

6

Bruce722Nov 28, 2014

Godzilla was a fairly decent film but it had so much unfulfilled potential. The first flaw in the film is that the protagonist of the film was a miserable fail because Aaron Taylor-Johnson simply cannot act. Sure, he did great in Kick-Ass butGodzilla was a fairly decent film but it had so much unfulfilled potential. The first flaw in the film is that the protagonist of the film was a miserable fail because Aaron Taylor-Johnson simply cannot act. Sure, he did great in Kick-Ass but the reality is that those films are more silly in nature. Godzilla required him to deliver a few scenes that were more serious and emotional and he simply couldn't do it. Making his lack of acting chops even more apparent was the incredible acting of Bryan Cranston and Elizabeth Olsen. The other fail in the film was that they tried to artificially manufacture drama in order to add intrigue. All those things did was take away from the film. Honestly, I feel that this movie would've been so much better if it was about 30 minutes shorter. Johnson's lack of acting ability wouldn't have been so pronounced and the ridiculousness of the unrealistic drama wouldn't have existed. Those two adjustments and now we have a legitimately awesome Godzilla film.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

lasttimeisawMay 19, 2014

A 3D screening in the multiplex, overall impression is that the screen is a bit murky, and the images are slightly muted, less natural than THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAM 2 (2014, 6/10). 2014 marks the 60th birthday of this made-in-JapanA 3D screening in the multiplex, overall impression is that the screen is a bit murky, and the images are slightly muted, less natural than THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAM 2 (2014, 6/10). 2014 marks the 60th birthday of this made-in-Japan mega-monster, GODZILLA, a Hollywood revival directed by Gareth Edwards, whose mini-budget feature debut MONSTERS (2010) secures him the foray into presiding a mammoth mainstream production and the upshot is a satisfactory visual spectacle, potently depicts an catastrophic final melee in San Francisco but a flaccid script shortchanges its solid cast.

read rest of the review on my blog, goggle cinema omnivore.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

skyminsterJan 6, 2016

Godzilla has some good things about it. The film has a great score, there are cool bits here and there, and there is a great climax towards the end, Pacific Rim style if a bit less ridiculously cool and the start of the film is great.Godzilla has some good things about it. The film has a great score, there are cool bits here and there, and there is a great climax towards the end, Pacific Rim style if a bit less ridiculously cool and the start of the film is great.

But no one can argue that it's a flawed film. It is too long, with too little Bryan Cranston, Japan, and Godzilla; and too much random military guys who do nothing - like good ol' Aaron Taylor-Johnson.

It's not a glowing endorsement of Gareth Edwards, but I don't understand some of the slating it's got -- or some of the praising it's got. Godzilla is an alright film.

60/100.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ROFLoomJun 8, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Not in any way a bad adaption to the never-fading saga of the world's most famous monster. All I can say is there were great fight scenes, remarkable performance by Bryan Cranston, a somewhat back story. It is an enjoyable watch, there are parts at the end that will make most any viewer drop their jaw in awe of bad-assness. The real errors they made is killing off Cranston early on, could have ended up being a great father-son film rather than a separated husband-wife one, and they need to focus less on the military. I mean obviously the military is going to be largely involved, but it is in every movie like this. I love our troops, bravest men out there, but I came to watch a movie about this creature. Obviously there has to be some random made-up character's back story in order to get a point of view from someone and to fill two-thrids of the movie. Too bad the lead character was so bland, unmotivated and forgettable though. Like I said, it is an enjoyable watch. Godzilla himself definitely makes up for it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

anshimanMay 16, 2014

Godzilla shines like a flickering flame, with a few glorious moments, which are unfortunately not enough to redeem its sub-par dialogue, meaningless plot progression and general predictability. The most frequent thought approaching anyGodzilla shines like a flickering flame, with a few glorious moments, which are unfortunately not enough to redeem its sub-par dialogue, meaningless plot progression and general predictability. The most frequent thought approaching any individual with a respectable taste in films will be "I've seen this before." It may show off its visual brilliance in parts that mimic the brainless god-size conflicts in Pacific Rim, but in the end it feels cartoonish, fake and ultimately not as awe-inspiring as it could've been.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

6

ToffenuffJul 2, 2014

Not enough Godzilla screentime, or the other beasts for that matter. Decent action and some cool scenes, but for the most part it was rather boring as I looked forward to the next time I saw the giant beasts in action. Didn't care much forNot enough Godzilla screentime, or the other beasts for that matter. Decent action and some cool scenes, but for the most part it was rather boring as I looked forward to the next time I saw the giant beasts in action. Didn't care much for the actual plot, particularly because the main character is rather dull and extremely lucky having escaped imminent death several times - it's a recurring theme (particularly with the helicopter rescues). Not terrible, but nothing I'd really recommend either.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Rox22Sep 29, 2014

I had expected so much more going in, from all the hype and glowing reviews, I had thought it would be something of a masterpiece (as far as Godzilla movies are concerned.)

But its not (at least not for me.) For a movie called Godzilla,I had expected so much more going in, from all the hype and glowing reviews, I had thought it would be something of a masterpiece (as far as Godzilla movies are concerned.)

But its not (at least not for me.) For a movie called Godzilla, Godzilla is barely in it. I'm aware that it was the same in the original (the original original, not the Broderick one) but the original was due to budget and the effects available at the time. 2014 Godzilla does not have that luxury. Even the Broderick Godzilla had more screen time.

Still when Godzilla is there, he's F**KING AWESOME!! I guess that is why it annoys me that he isn't in the movie more. Godzilla was done right. *sigh*

As for the non-Godzilla moments: Cranston is fantastic, I really wonder why on earth he wasn't in the movie more? Had he been a more central character for the whole movie, then this movie would have been absolutely brilliant. Watanabe is also great, but again, he's barely in the movie and his role feels mostly needless. As for the rest of the cast: *meh* nothing special.

Overall:
I guess as far as modern Godzilla movies are concerned this is the best we are going to get. I hope for the sequel they remember who the star is (see title for hint.)… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

sanyrubJan 25, 2015

Great version. It gives everything this type of film can give. The special effects are pretty moving and the first couple of times Godzilla appears on screen are hair raising. The complaints about not having enough Godzilla are not valid,Great version. It gives everything this type of film can give. The special effects are pretty moving and the first couple of times Godzilla appears on screen are hair raising. The complaints about not having enough Godzilla are not valid, usually the less you see the monster the more intrigued and kind of scared you are. Not only that but the whole final act shows a lot of Godzilla (in fact, the less interesting part to me). However, a movie like this can not offer character development or a great plot, it´s not its nature, so I cannot give it more than a 6 out of 100. Still, the performances are ok for this type of blockbuster. See it!… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

TrilobiteGJun 13, 2015

Despite having one of the best movie scenes of 2014 (Godzilla's kiss of death). Bryan Cranston's character felt too disposable and unnecessarily there (like his face was used for promotion). Some of the action scenes do hit you hard withDespite having one of the best movie scenes of 2014 (Godzilla's kiss of death). Bryan Cranston's character felt too disposable and unnecessarily there (like his face was used for promotion). Some of the action scenes do hit you hard with awesomeness, but there is too much dawdling to be a very good monster movie. This just about gets a 6/10 in my book, barely.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

unluckydiceJul 21, 2014

4 things that work in this movie are Bran Cranston, Godzilla's Roar, Ken Watanabes voice and the last 20 to 30 minutes of the movie, the rest is just filled with characters we don't care about and a lifeless protagonist.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

asjklasjklasMar 2, 2015

If 2014’s Godzilla—simultaneously being Hollywood’s second attempt at Westernizing the Japanese monster for a contemporary audience and first attempt at making contemporary audiences forget about 1998’s first attempt, which is a monstrosityIf 2014’s Godzilla—simultaneously being Hollywood’s second attempt at Westernizing the Japanese monster for a contemporary audience and first attempt at making contemporary audiences forget about 1998’s first attempt, which is a monstrosity in its own right—has any major qualms with me as a longtime follower of the franchise, it surprisingly isn’t the lack of emphasis on Godzilla’s screentime—because, albeit brief, his appearance and iconic roar slightly sequenced to sound much, much more modern is both visually and aurally exciting—more than it is the director Gareth Edwards’s overemphasis on the story’s human characters, played by overall well-respected young actors (Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Elizabeth Olsen). Unenthusiastically voluntary to the story’s development and cardboard at their worst, it makes the overacted presence of the original films’ characters feel like Academy Award-worthy performances compared to these “characters”, who tend to take a lot from the film it really, really could’ve used. It’s not a bad film by any means and the breathtaking visual effects and setting still makes me excited for upcoming entries. But I wouldn’t nearly award the film as many re-views as I’ve given to even some of the least likable Gojira films that make up a lot of my childhood.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

GTAFANBOYMay 27, 2014

Amazing show, Brian Cranberry stars as a meth baking reptilian alpha creature based in Japan, Tokyo, and whenever he appears the theme to Malcolm in the Middles starts to play, which I found to be a rather cheeky and nice nod to the fans ofAmazing show, Brian Cranberry stars as a meth baking reptilian alpha creature based in Japan, Tokyo, and whenever he appears the theme to Malcolm in the Middles starts to play, which I found to be a rather cheeky and nice nod to the fans of his previous works.

But in all seriousness, it's a very good film, and stars such notable creatures such as Godzilla, Ken Watanabe, and Kira from "Deathnote", it's a nostalgic tribute with a modern twist, and Bryan from Tekken plays his role as Walter White Spirit in ITV's "Breaking Dead"
After watching this, I say bring on "Better Call Saul!"
I give it a six.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

francisrgoMay 23, 2014

The movie started off slow and picked up right in the middle where MUTO hatches. Even as a kid, all I really wanted to see was Godzilla fight huge creatures. Bryan Cranston and Elizabeth Olsen gave great performances. Overall the movie was soThe movie started off slow and picked up right in the middle where MUTO hatches. Even as a kid, all I really wanted to see was Godzilla fight huge creatures. Bryan Cranston and Elizabeth Olsen gave great performances. Overall the movie was so so, great action scenes and not much else.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

marcmyworksMay 16, 2014

The strength in Godzilla is the monster itself when we the audience are finally allowed to see him use his brute force and show us why he is the ‘God’ everyone claims him to be. The weakness? This film is about twenty minutes too long andThe strength in Godzilla is the monster itself when we the audience are finally allowed to see him use his brute force and show us why he is the ‘God’ everyone claims him to be. The weakness? This film is about twenty minutes too long and contains so many clichéd lines, characters, situations and Transformer-esque action sequences that its boggles the mind as to why it took so long to retool this series.… Expand

5 of 15 users found this helpful510

All this user's reviews

6

moviemitch96May 22, 2014

There's really not much to say on this one other than it didn't really live up to the hype in my opinion. Despite a name cast of Aaron-Taylor Johnson, Ken Watanabe, Julliete Binoche, Bryan Cranston, etc, the film was just as silly as I fearedThere's really not much to say on this one other than it didn't really live up to the hype in my opinion. Despite a name cast of Aaron-Taylor Johnson, Ken Watanabe, Julliete Binoche, Bryan Cranston, etc, the film was just as silly as I feared it would be. There's little to no story, just action, explosions, and CGI monsters (oh my!) Overall, if you're expecting anything groundbreaking in terms of the Godzilla films, I think you'll be quite disappointed. It's good but it's not great.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

6

SnoracksMay 20, 2014

Not a bad movie and it delivers everywhere it needs to, yet the ensemble nature of the cast felt forced and underwhelming. The fight scenes with Godzilla should have been more plentiful, but I understand budget concerns. The amount ofNot a bad movie and it delivers everywhere it needs to, yet the ensemble nature of the cast felt forced and underwhelming. The fight scenes with Godzilla should have been more plentiful, but I understand budget concerns. The amount of Godzilla fighting could have been fine if they had created a more interesting story with a familiar villain to fill the gap. Or, the editors made some deep cuts to shorten the movie to a 90 minutes run time.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

6

AGarcia732May 20, 2014

You know what made movies like King Kong, the first Jurassic Park, Cloverfield, and Jaws great monster films? All the movies build suspense and show us glimpses of the monster throughout the film. Then, before we get too bored, they revealYou know what made movies like King Kong, the first Jurassic Park, Cloverfield, and Jaws great monster films? All the movies build suspense and show us glimpses of the monster throughout the film. Then, before we get too bored, they reveal the creatures. With these movies, the main monsters drive the films plot and story. Godzilla, however, doesn't really do that. The whole plot is driven by the film's antagonists: the MUTO's (Massive Unidentified Terrestrial Organisms). The MUTO's cause most of the film's destruction and terror. And, in my opinion, the MUTO's are too generic and forgettable. I don't have a short attention span, Godzilla just isn't in the movie. The MUTO's look too much like the Cloverfield monsters. If Godzilla is supposed to be an allegory for nuclear destruction, or the destructive force of nature, well it doesn't really work out in my opinion. If the focus of the originals was to show how Godzilla affected peoples lives, they didn't really show that in this reboot. Most of the movie was about a generic mission to stop Godzilla and the MUTO's.

That wouldn't be too bad if we had Godzilla for more than 15 minutes (give or take) in the movie. I really would've liked to see more of "The King Of Monsters". The film torments us with glimpses of Godzilla and shows him fighting the MUTO's. Then the movie changes to another scene. It avoids what could've been spectacular battles. Really? WTF?

To add to the other dilemmas, the cast is a bit too generic. The soldier, the wife, and the conspiracy nutjob. Bryan Cranston (who evidently has given up being a drug kinpin after faking his death) is the most interesting character, and he extremely underused. (--SPOILER ALERT: He was killed off way too quickly.--) Aaron Taylor Johnson (who I guess has given up his costumed identity as Kick-Ass) and Elizabeth Olsen are fine, but like the MUTO's, are forgettable. (Did anyone get my Kick-Ass and Breaking Bad reference? Also, how weird must it be for the two to be a married couple in this film, and then a pair of superhero siblings in The Avengers 2: Age of Ultron? Might I add they are sometimes an incestuous couple in the comics?) Ken Watanabe is only there to tell us important plot details. The Army is not entertaining enough and just a distraction, especially in a film that should star the King Of Monsters. Most of the movie is filled with boring sublots. The move makers didn't want to oversensitze us to too much CGI, so I feel they crammed in human drama.

The film starts out interesting, but after SPOILER ALERT Joe Brody dies, the film goes downhill from there. There is a lot of exposition and, as we are taught in school, "rising action".

Visually, it looks great. But in these days of CGI spectacle, that is the norm for Hollywood blockbusters. The final 15 minutes are good, and the scene where SPOILER ALERT Godzilla shoots atomic breath down the MUTO's throat is awesome. But even that, yes even that, isn't enough to save the Americanized "Super-Sized" Godzilla and his movie. Just kidding, Godzilla's design is great. (Maybe a bit too bulky? But the scales on his back are great, especially in the swimming scenes.

Ultimately, IMO the movie falls short in all aspects. However, I'm glad others seemed happy with the film. 10 years after the last official Godzilla movie, the King Of Monsters is back! And that roar is so iconic. Godzilla is very badass, lol. Can't wait for the sequel! I welcome Godzilla's return into movies, even if it was a bit underwhelming.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

6

ghost-nappa56Aug 16, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Honesty I was expecting better. Even though the CGI was great the acting was really bland except 1 or 2. I know you can argue that the Toho movies had bad acting to but at least they were interesting. If the humans aren't interesting in a monster where 90% of the movie is bored humans failing to act scared. I actually don't mind that much that Godzilla isn't in it that much since in some of the great Godzilla movies he doesn't show for a while, but what those movies did that this one doesn't was give some great battles when he is there. Seriously the movie has 1 fight scene and while it was great it set up 2 more but makes you watch more of the boring humans. I would have understood if there was only one conflict but don't tease me. I hope the sequel will improve upon these mistakes.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

googolendtimesMay 18, 2014

The story may be a bit thin, but "Godzilla" is living, radioactive fire breathing proof that a wrestling match between gargantuan reptilian beasts destroying multiple buildings in the process can be an extremely entertaining cinemaThe story may be a bit thin, but "Godzilla" is living, radioactive fire breathing proof that a wrestling match between gargantuan reptilian beasts destroying multiple buildings in the process can be an extremely entertaining cinema experience. The acting is generally solid, the special effects are extraordinary and the film itself is an entertaining thrill-ride. A summer blockbuster done right.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

BadAidsMay 22, 2014

From the offset, Gareth Edward's Godzilla sets forth to distance itself from the perpetual laughing stock that was Roland Emmerich's previous attempt at bringing the Japanese icon to life on the big screen. This is successfully achieved asFrom the offset, Gareth Edward's Godzilla sets forth to distance itself from the perpetual laughing stock that was Roland Emmerich's previous attempt at bringing the Japanese icon to life on the big screen. This is successfully achieved as the film proposes a darker, grittier and more authentic feel than its predecessor.
Godzilla is sleek ,beautifully crafted and it's obvious that the studio spared no expense in rendering a Hollywood monster that would leave audiences wanting more. Unfortunately this is to the detriment of the film itself as the title character is more often than not overshadowed by both it's Kaiju and human opposition.
Edwards' attempt at blending both monster porn and a compelling story of human courage ultimately misfires as he fails to strike the mean between both approaches. These two primary concepts are underdeveloped and Aaron Taylor-Johnson's bland cliched performance highlights the lack of attention given to characters who show less life than there primordial counterparts.
However Edwards does step up to the mainstream with confidence and his Spielbergian influences add some degree of quality to an altogether under-whelming experience. The slow tease introduction of the showpiece à la Spielberg's Jaws is certainly a step in the right direction but the lack of a payoff ultimately negates the positive intentions. This along with the never thoroughly explored 'Man versus Nature' angle only aids in emphasizing how much more this film could and should have been.
Although sandwiched between some heavy hitting summer blockbusters, such as X-men, Godzilla is sure to attract significant audience numbers but with the final product delivering less Jurassic Park and more Lost World, it is undecided as to whether or not this is the film that will resurrect a franchise already dead in the water.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

jacked_beastSep 24, 2014

Overall, I somewhat enjoyed this movie. However, the plot was quite weak and there just wasn't enough action as I was expecting. Also the ending was pathetic and the monster battles could of been way more epic. This movie had potential but IOverall, I somewhat enjoyed this movie. However, the plot was quite weak and there just wasn't enough action as I was expecting. Also the ending was pathetic and the monster battles could of been way more epic. This movie had potential but I feel like it failed in many ways. However, it was way better than the 1998 Godzilla.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

TheCartoon77Jul 21, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This film is exactly as I thought it would be. A more realistic look of the most famous movie monster therefore distancing itself from Godzilla's much earlier films. If your expecting Bryan Cranston as some sort of lead role then turn back now because he's not in it for that long. Its a shame really because the trailer portrayed him very well. I can't help thinking he was only in this as a selling point because he was in Breaking Bad. Instead they make us sympathise with a dull and unrelatable marine soldier. This brings the film down further because he's terrible in this. Honestly the most blatant and obvious example of a bad main character. The most interesting character (next to Bryan Cranston) is Godzilla himself. At the end of the film, he's treated as some sort of hero for defeating the enemy MUTO's. But here's the thing in every film he's portrayed in Godzilla only serves himself and nothing else. I only thought that Godzilla defeated the MUTO's because he wanted to reclaim his territory which is cool but the film ultimately wants to express Godzilla as a saviour of the people instead of an uncaring and unfeeling atrocitie of humankind. Overall Godzilla is a good watch if not a little dull in parts. But if the perfectly executed fight scenes sell it to you then this film could be forgiven for a lot.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

diogomendesDec 30, 2014

It isn't quite compelling as it should be, especially after being approached by the sh*tty Godzilla back in the 90's, but this reboot provides enough action and suspense to anyone who can stomach it.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

TBrianBryanMay 16, 2014

A modern day attempt to remake the Godzilla of the 1960-1970's. Special effects were solid, no doubt. But a standard Godzilla monster plot with 100 minutes of bad acting and 20 minutes of monster. I get the impression that the director hasA modern day attempt to remake the Godzilla of the 1960-1970's. Special effects were solid, no doubt. But a standard Godzilla monster plot with 100 minutes of bad acting and 20 minutes of monster. I get the impression that the director has great special effect skills but poor directing skills. I actually enjoyed the 2006 Godzilla movie more, but even with the "mixed" review, its worth the ticket price. Family safe - go enjoy the special effects.… Expand

7 of 15 users found this helpful78

All this user's reviews

6

ChristmassMay 16, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. it's a it's a ... hátnem is tudom mit kellene egy középkategóriás filmről mondani . Talán azt , hogy ez volt az egyetlen egy olyan film aminél azt éreztem hogy "Kérem vissza a pénzem" . Szerintem ennyit elég is mondani . Talán még annyit hogy 3D-ben neméri megnézni , mert nagyon sok helyen nincs oda fokuszálva ahova kellene.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

6

KameronAug 24, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Let me Go with the BAD stuff first.

The Trailers of the film are mostly false advertising, and the movie does not really portray GODZILLA the way it did in the trailers......
and the King himself receives a very poor amount of screen time for a 2 hr movie, and they cut away a couple times, up to the point where it will frustrate you.
Most of the human characters are bland, But they're not bad either, just not good to the point where you would care for them.
Only one I actually cared for was Bryan Cranston but he sadly doesn't get a whole lot of screen time either.

The GOOD parts:
The CGI, animation is done very well, even sometimes where they are shown in the dark, looked pretty good for my taste.
The monster designs are GREAT ,The MUTOs that Godzilla fight may have some simularities with CLOVERFIELD, but I find them interesting.
The monster fight scenes are great as well at the end.
Some of the tension build up is also pretty good.
And the humans encountering with the monsters is also GREAT.

Bottom Line
It stands good as a GODZILLA movie which is why I give it a 7/10

but as a film that lives up to the trailers I give it a 5/10.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

mlaimlaiMay 17, 2014

First the good news...spectacular visual and sound effects and editing accompanied by a rousing music score, with well-filmed scenes of destruction of places like Las Vegas, plus an excellent performance by Bryan Cranston from "Breaking Bad".First the good news...spectacular visual and sound effects and editing accompanied by a rousing music score, with well-filmed scenes of destruction of places like Las Vegas, plus an excellent performance by Bryan Cranston from "Breaking Bad". Unfortunately, the scenes of destruction don't occur until about halfway through the film and Bryan Cranston doesn't appear for long. Also, much of the film is shot at night so it's very difficult to see the mayhem created, so don't bother with seeing this in 3D as the images will be rendered useless. The build-up to the tension is extremely long so you might be bored by the exposition where only Cranston out of all the humans characters, injects energy. One also wonders if this movie should be called "Muto" because these creatures seem to feature more in the film than Godzilla. It doesn't matter what the critics say anyway because "Godzilla" will still be a huge international box office hit.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

6

IncendidMay 17, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I went to my local cinema who had just received 3D and i watched what i though was going to be one of the better movies of the year. I don't know why i got myself hyped up so much because i just feel even further, so here is my review of Godzilla. Let's start with the acting with Johnson as our lead he really doesn't say much..at all, and when he does speak it is literally five words- now this didn't bother me too much just it did get annoying. Wantanabe provided a decent performance and he didn't say much either, heck pretty much nobody said much in this film, i think the only person who said anything more than five words was Cranston who was axed before the 30 minute mark. Now we move onto the CGI, and boy it was impressive, no flaws and actually quite convincing, except for maybe the flood scene, even so i am glad to see that the money went to the department that is needed the most in a film like this. Now onto the writing, what can you expect from a monster film, poor writing and not the greatest explanation for a story, the film itself was so predictable and so stereotypical it wasn't even funny, i just feel the movie could have been better if the writers (who also wrote Doom and The Expendables) could have put some more effort into their work. Now i come to the final and most important component, the action and it really did work, it was perfect, Godzilla's reveal- perfect, the fight scene in Hawaii- awesome and final battle in San Fransisco, well it was a little bit overdone but still i can bypass that and say with confidence that this remake was better than the 1998 version. I highly recommend you watch Godzilla as it is awesome just not a great film therefore it receives a 6/10.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

6

BlackHorseMediaMay 18, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I just love the way they casually set off a nuclear device off the coast of San Francisco. That would cause more damage than Godzilla ever did. Too many people, and not enough kaiju. It has been said "a camel is a horse designed by a committee." Way too much "plot:" not nearly enough action. Too much military nonsense (although the "insertion" from 30,000 feet was cool-looking, but not really how they'd do it). And what were those pathetic creatures? The writers couldn't decide if they wanted Rodan or Mothra, so they created a.....bat with a human butt. Gareth Edwards used the same blinking lights he used in "Monsters," (which also could have been a lot better with more monsters and less human "interaction"). Am I the only one who noticed they stole King Kong's nose and facial expressions? They had the opportunity to make a movie using real science to advance the plot (archeologists do keep finding bigger and bigger dinosaurs), but no, they had to go all Hollywood on us and make a movie somebody thought would appeal to the widest audience. And so they got plain vanilla. Not even vanilla bean, just vanilla.....… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

flametail23Oct 24, 2014

A Godzilla movie with about 11 minutes of Godzilla in it, genius. This movie wasn't all bad but when your movie is called Godzilla I expect to see Godzilla. This is the most disappointing movie I have seen all year, it's alright. It's not asA Godzilla movie with about 11 minutes of Godzilla in it, genius. This movie wasn't all bad but when your movie is called Godzilla I expect to see Godzilla. This is the most disappointing movie I have seen all year, it's alright. It's not as bad as Godzilla 1998.
6/10… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

IKronikzMay 21, 2014

I give it a 6 because 1. It has one of the best acting and plots 2. Godzilla was extremely detailed. But the downsides 3. It constantly cut away from all the crazy fights to some worthless marine with a big heart. 4. It took an hour and aI give it a 6 because 1. It has one of the best acting and plots 2. Godzilla was extremely detailed. But the downsides 3. It constantly cut away from all the crazy fights to some worthless marine with a big heart. 4. It took an hour and a half to get to the wrath of godzillas fights 5. It just lacks action people paid to see godzilla blow stuff up but know you done f****d it up. SAVE YOUR MONEY… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

NotRogerEbertMay 26, 2014

The trailers are somewhat deceiving in this movie. Bryan Cranston is the only character we connect with emotionally, and yet he only appears in the first half-hour or so. I couldn't care less about anybody less. The emotional disconnectThe trailers are somewhat deceiving in this movie. Bryan Cranston is the only character we connect with emotionally, and yet he only appears in the first half-hour or so. I couldn't care less about anybody less. The emotional disconnect and the way the characters react so unaffectedly to giant monsters really pulled me out of the experience. Also, Godzilla was severely underused and should've fought less generic CGI monsters. They should've pitted him against another iconic Godzilla monster, or make Godzilla the bad guy. All I can say is I was disappointed with the execution of the movie. It's not a bad movie; it's shot quite well and has interesting audio/visual techniques, but overall it's not worth seeing.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

6

0akyMay 28, 2014

Godzilla is absolutely awesome when he is beating the crap out of something so why then did they make him feel like a supporting role. If the film had more of this it would have been at least a nine. There are some good bits without himGodzilla is absolutely awesome when he is beating the crap out of something so why then did they make him feel like a supporting role. If the film had more of this it would have been at least a nine. There are some good bits without him though especially at the beginning where a lot of the tension is being built and there are some good proformances there but then when it feels like it's godzilla time to take the stage we instead get another boring story line following a soldier as we have seen many times before. The reason I am so sad about it is that there seems to be so much potential that just isn't realised and so I would love to see a sequel as I believe there is real potential here.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

Dkay7777777Jun 1, 2014

Godzilla is a movie with great visuals and sound, but suffers from awful characters and a mediocre story. For the reviewers who are saying that the original Godzilla movies are not so much about the monster, as they are about the humanGodzilla is a movie with great visuals and sound, but suffers from awful characters and a mediocre story. For the reviewers who are saying that the original Godzilla movies are not so much about the monster, as they are about the human element of survival, I agree. However, this movie doesn't have strong enough characters or story to make up for the lack of Godzilla in the movie.
Overall, this movie is worth seeing for the sheer spectacle of it, but not for anything more than that.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

dagirlsJun 2, 2014

I went to see this film just for fun not expecting anything much. It was OK but considering it was primarily aimed at kids. It was not something that I saw as necessarily good for them. If anything it would give the really young kidsI went to see this film just for fun not expecting anything much. It was OK but considering it was primarily aimed at kids. It was not something that I saw as necessarily good for them. If anything it would give the really young kids nightmares for about a month and make older kids more hyper-and probably the young ones also. The audience was mostly fathers with young kids in tow. What can you say about a remake of a not so classic monster movie?-well, what I said works for me.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

MithrilJun 3, 2014

The movie contains a lot of action and is often entertaining but I think that there could have been more. After i had seen the trailer I thought it would be a new masterpiece. I was a bit disappointed.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

NeekReviewsOct 28, 2014

I, along with the rest of mankind waited anxiously for the new Godzilla movie to break. After the dreadful 1998 debacle with Matthew Broderick (where’s he been?), Hank Azaria (where’s he been?) & Jean Reno, I’m confident saying the GodzillaI, along with the rest of mankind waited anxiously for the new Godzilla movie to break. After the dreadful 1998 debacle with Matthew Broderick (where’s he been?), Hank Azaria (where’s he been?) & Jean Reno, I’m confident saying the Godzilla freaks were chalking off days on their calendar like a prisoner chalks off his days on his cell wall. With all this anticipation the new movie had to be a sure hit, if not with the industry then with its fans…Well, let’s take the tour.

The movie should have opened with a disclaimer informing everyone who paid their hard earned cash, or stolen cash, depending on your place in society, that the first 50 minutes or so was going to lull you into dream state where you swear you could hear those 2 adorable Asians twins singing “Mothra, Mothra” At any point during the first hour of this movie of the movie I would have loved to have seen Mothra jump on screen and start kicking ass, not Godzilla’s but Gareth Edwards who directed this movie. Listen, I know the diehard Godzilla fans will say “if you look at all the Godzilla movies you’ll notice the Mean Green stomping Machine has minimal screen time in all of them” Really?? So 28 wrongs shouldn't make a right!

I plopped into my nice comfortable recliner, I’m all comfy eating my popcorn, when, what the hell, It’s the guy from Breaking bad! Hey, I have nothing against Bryan Cranston but at about the time he realizes his on screen wife, Juliette Binoche’ ass is soon going to be a bright nuclear red, I was hoping the rage he was feeling was going to make him shave his head and revert back to his Walter White character if for nothing else but to keep the audience’s attention, which I could swear was starting to hum “Mothra, Mothra”.

Alright, enough of the bashing. All I’m trying to say is that studios spend more money promoting their movies than some small countries spend on keeping their people alive! When the movie does end you leave scratching your head wondering if I just saw a ‘monster” movie or the remake of “A Love Story”? However, a “monster” movie with a plot involving characters that fall in love with each other can work & has. Can you say King Kong? Yes, the beginning of that movie also dragged along a bit in the beginning but Peter Jackson was smart enough to use beauty to keep your attention until Kong arrives, both in the female form, Naomi Watts & in scenery, New Zealand. By the time Kong arrives you’re heart starts to pump just as mine did when I saw Godzilla making waves waiting for him to come on shore and start wreaking havoc. But then all I got was Godzilla walking with his back to the viewers! What the what?? Hell, my heart wasn’t pumping anymore, it was barely beating.

Jackson had enough sense to hit you full blast with Kong, taking no prisoners. Had Jackson taken Edwards approach just showing Kong’s ass, we would have been wondering why only his ass & was Kong going to take a sh!t on some of the tribesmen? Here is my thought to the studios that are willing to spend millions on strategy & concept and have no sense on what the public wants. We came to see Godzilla!

Let me put it to you this way. Would Paramount or Universal do a remake of the Godfather using Judd Apatow as their director? Hell no! They would track down Ridley Scott or Martin Scorsese. So why would Warner Brothers sign an unknown director with minimal experience to direct a nostalgic “Monster” movie we all grew up with? Godzilla deserved better! This one should have been a 9 or 10 but ends up with a 6.

- Vigo… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

MovieGamerJul 11, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I saw goddzilla about a month ago now and I thought it was an ok film. But the majority of it was military based and that ruined the film for me. The ending was predictable and having a huge fight at the end was also but I loved the characters. It was just too Military based and more for boys (eventhough I am one)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

grim977Jul 13, 2014

not as much action as you would expect, this movie is more of Godzilla screaming and buildings being destroyed. this movie wasn't bad it just wasn't really good. thank goodness for the special effects. theres not mush to say because not muchnot as much action as you would expect, this movie is more of Godzilla screaming and buildings being destroyed. this movie wasn't bad it just wasn't really good. thank goodness for the special effects. theres not mush to say because not much happened. really you only saw Godzilla 4 times.

on a scale on 1-10 id have to say i rather watch honey boo boo complain about how she didn't get that pink bike she wanted. if you really want to see it do it but it's nothing special.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

Mosh603Mar 9, 2015

This movie was pretty weak. I was really expecting more out of it. The acting was pretty bad, other than Bryan Cranston, for the short time he was even in it. There wasn't really a lot of action either.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

phatsno20Sep 22, 2014

Although I admit I was really excited to see this movie, I can honestly say that I was very disappointed. The creators spent a lot of the movie explaining the existence of Godzilla and his origin. Of course it is logical to tackle thatAlthough I admit I was really excited to see this movie, I can honestly say that I was very disappointed. The creators spent a lot of the movie explaining the existence of Godzilla and his origin. Of course it is logical to tackle that subject and explain why and how Godzilla came to be on earth and what awoke him to begin with. The movie leaves the viewer constantly deciding to love or hate Godzilla in respect - or fear - of his awesome power and dangerous presence. In the end, Godzilla unfortunately is a bit camera shy and doesn't make much of an appearance. Overall, the quality of the movie is great and goes much beyond action and explosions. The good thing about the story-telling style of this film is that if there is ever a sequel (for some reason) then Godzilla will not need any more explanation as to why he is on earth. There are characters throughout the movie as well but they all fail to captivate the viewer, but instead are simply tools used to drive the plot further. There is not much of an emotional attachment to the main character, instead I felt more attachment to Godzilla himself - not to mention I am sure that we were all cheering him on at some point - knowing full well that the main character consistently remained virtually powerless against the odds.

If you watch Godzilla, expect a lot of amazing detail, graphics, explosions, and talking! If you are a fan of Godzilla (or just want to wash the bad taste of the 1998 release "Godzilla" out of your mouth) then this movie is definitely for you!… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

RockMetalDudeSep 28, 2014

Pros: Godzilla is spectacular, the MUTOs are convincing villains (even though the similarities with the Cloverfield monster are disconcerting at times), Bryan Cranston is Walter White on crack, Ken Watanabe does an actually quite good job,Pros: Godzilla is spectacular, the MUTOs are convincing villains (even though the similarities with the Cloverfield monster are disconcerting at times), Bryan Cranston is Walter White on crack, Ken Watanabe does an actually quite good job, the build-up is well-made, and the movie lays all the imaginable groundwork for sequels.

Cons: Aaron Taylor-Johnson is nothing more than a discount Channing Tatum/James Franco combination with a horrific US accent, most of the other characters are two-dimensional at best, Gareth Edwards or whoever the photography or editing team seem to be obsessed with using too many filters at the same time to create seemingly nice but ultimately hard to look at pictures, and the mere fact that we barely see any fights until the very end gets frustrating in the end.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

skorpyoOct 17, 2014

The movie was alright. I am sure I would have enjoyed it more if There's more light. I know its suppose to be dark and gloomy. But hey, you can't see anything!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

HotelCentralJan 22, 2020

As the first thirty or forty minutes of Godzilla (2014) played out, I thought this was going to be a pretty good film, maybe even a really good film. Cranston is intense and the story moves right along. I was very engaged. Only then,As the first thirty or forty minutes of Godzilla (2014) played out, I thought this was going to be a pretty good film, maybe even a really good film. Cranston is intense and the story moves right along. I was very engaged. Only then, things happen. Basically, the military takes over the film and from then on it's boom bang bam. And I am left with certain complaints:

1) Let's put the SWAT team on the roof of a hotel so they have a clear line of fire because bullets out of assault rifles are really going to have an big impact on a monster the size of a small skyscraper.

2) So, we've got these helicopters, and they're packed with machine-guns, but let's fly in real real close so the even the monster with no wings has an even chance of reaching out and knocking the helicopters out of the sky.

3) We need to keep a close eye on Godzilla as he swims across the sea, because who knows if he's a good monster or a bad monster. So let's sail our aircraft carrier like 200 yards away from Godzilla's tail, even though Godzilla might sink the carrier just by brushing against it accidentally.

4) So we've got all these giant monsters popping up and threatening to destroy civilization but for some reason one of our main characters never catches an announcement via TV, radio or cell phone, like, hey y'all, if you're in the military report to your command immediately because it's a code red ultra emergency.

5) OK, like, we tried nuking Godzilla, or something, way back when, and that didn't work, and apparently we still haven't asked the question: "How could that not work?" And despite not asking that question we're still pretty darn sure that another nuke, just bigger and badder, is almost certainly going to work. Because, I guess, just the fact that you survived a nuclear blast doesn't mean you can do it again.

6) An Abrams tank can sit on the San Francisco shoreline and shoot targets at the far end of the Golden Gate Bridge but let's run those tanks out onto the bridge so they'll get a better view of monsters standing in the water beside the bridge. Sure, the tanks might go for a swim but what are you gonna do?

7) To judge by the closing credits it appears like the entire US Department of Defense provided technical advice on the making of the film so you'd probably be justified in assuming that everything in the film concerning the military is absolutely 100% accurate and correct. Well, maybe not.

On the whole this is not a bad entry into the giant monsters attacking civilization film genre, but it could've been a lot better. I mean it's almost like they had one set of writers and directors for the Bryan Cranston part of the film, and the B Team handled the rest of the film. Or maybe the C Team. You decide.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

Scout523Jun 20, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Looking back at this movie, the characters actually all fall flat. Some are just there cuz plot, whereas the ones that serve importance just sort of stand around planning how to kill Godzilla and the other two monsters. Elizabeth Olsen is only there to make you care about whether or not Aaron Taylor-Johnson's character survives to the end, which is something that Bryan Cranston's character did not succeed in doing, even though he should've. In my opinion, he was the best character in the movie, as he predicted that the monsters would eventually overpower the humans, but, when they did, he ended up getting killed. What? Why? I wish his character would've lasted longer just to see what he could've done. In the final battle scene, Godzilla does all the work in killing the two monsters, whereas the other soldiers all get themselves killed, and Aaron Taylor-Johnson runs off and tries to fight the monsters himself, but realizes how stupid he is being and cowers in fear, waiting for help to arrive. The only reason he survived is because his father was already dead and he had a wife and young son, however, if he didn't have that, and his character was just a miserable loser, the movie could've gotten away with killing him off. The special effects in this movie were absolutely phenomenal, and whoever edited this film should've won Best Editing at the Oscars. So, the characters just fall flat completely, but the special effects and monster scenes make up for that loss with their sheer scale and awesomeness.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Brandon3685Nov 8, 2016

Ok movie...................................................................................................................................................

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SoulWarfareMar 30, 2021

In anticipation of Godzilla vs Kong, I've decided to rewatch all the previous Monsterverse movies. I've watched this when it first came out in Cinemas and I came out slightly disappointed. Now that I decided to finally rewatch it after 7In anticipation of Godzilla vs Kong, I've decided to rewatch all the previous Monsterverse movies. I've watched this when it first came out in Cinemas and I came out slightly disappointed. Now that I decided to finally rewatch it after 7 years, I wonder if my opinions will change or not? The premise is "Ford Brody (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), a Navy bomb expert, has just reunited with his family in San Francisco when he is forced to go to Japan to help his estranged father, Joe (Bryan Cranston). Soon, both men are swept up in an escalating crisis when Godzilla, King of the Monsters, arises from the sea to combat malevolent adversaries that threaten the survival of humanity. The creatures leave colossal destruction in their wake, as they make their way toward their final battleground: San Francisco". So is it actually better than I thought or is still as disappointing as I remember it?

Firstly, I actually really like the tone of this movie. After watching all the new Monsterverse movies and now going back, I think the serious and grounded nature are wonderful. It shows these Titans from the perspective of humans and makes them seem more fearsome and majestic. The original Japanese Godzilla portrayed the titular character as a force of nature and Gareth Evans (the director) perfectly captures this as well. I also really like the cinematography by Seamus McGarvey. The more tame colours really work in the movies favour by really giving it a war-like and disaster style feel to the movie. Additionally, there are some gorgeous shots in the movie and some stunning visual spectacles. The score by Alexandre Desplat is actually pretty good and at some parts such as the HALO jump is where the score really stands out. The final climax is also very thrilling to watch even though it is kind of dark though.

The biggest complaint I had with this movie is the severe lack of Godzilla. He is the titular character but is barely even in it. Heck, the villain monster, the MUTOs, appear more than him. I think what is really jarring is that when Godzilla appears they then cutaway to something else. For example, when Godzilla arrives near the airport and about to fight a MUTO but it then cutaways to some boring human characters who see it on TV. It felt quite insulting that they wouldn't show these fights and instead just telling us the conclusion from some human characters. I was screaming internally throughout the movie, "Let Them Fight". On that note, the human characters really suck. I think all the actors do a fine job although Aaron Taylor-Johnson who plays the main lead, Ford Brody, is quite lacking in a lot of personality in most of his scenes. Not entirely his fault as the character is written to be quite boring. Elle Brody (Elizabeth Olsen) is just playing the trope of wife and mother character, Dr. Ishirō Serizawa (Ken Watanabe) is a monster expert, Dr. Vivienne Graham (Sally Hawkins) is monster expert right-hand person. This is literally their personality and nothing else which makes all the characters very uninteresting. There is one interesting character Joe Brody (Bryan Cranston) who is the father of the main lead who also lost his wife due to unusual seismic activity and is trying to determine the cause of the meltdown that killed his wife. This screams main character as there is a backstory that is making us root for him. Plus he is played phenomenally by Bryan in every scene. However, they decide to kill him 30 minutes into the movie and replace him with his boring son. What a waste of a character and there was no real reason to kill him so early.

Overall, it's an all right movie. I don't agree with a lot of the decisions made in terms of story and characters but it nails the tone, atmosphere and visuals completely. It's a good monster movie and also a good start to the "Monsterverse".… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

BerikNov 6, 2018

It kinda succeeds at what it wants to do, but only barely. The acting in the movie is great, but the plot itself hangs by a thread and has some plotholes in it. Visually it impresses, or at least when something is visible because a lot of itIt kinda succeeds at what it wants to do, but only barely. The acting in the movie is great, but the plot itself hangs by a thread and has some plotholes in it. Visually it impresses, or at least when something is visible because a lot of it is filmed pretty dark.

During the movie humans try to intervene, but it seems the monsters hardly notice them when they aren't handing nuclear bombs on a platter, or when they aren't about to kill their babies. Godzilla is hardly in the movie, which should send red flags straight away. It is hard to keep your attention while watching this movie.

It's an average movie, it earns a 6/10 from me.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

SerchvazJul 2, 2019

This is a good Godzilla movie, but not a masterpiece Godzilla film, it has a good history with the human characters, but in the whole movie Godzilla appears a few moments, yeah, Godzilla should not be in the whole movie, but the human historyThis is a good Godzilla movie, but not a masterpiece Godzilla film, it has a good history with the human characters, but in the whole movie Godzilla appears a few moments, yeah, Godzilla should not be in the whole movie, but the human history showed is awful, they couldve made a better movie with the human characters related to the Godzilla history.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ProVConReviewsMay 28, 2019

Godzilla 2014 (5/28/19)

Pros Taking a more symbolic disaster-flick approach to the title rather than the giant monster all-out smackdown as some of its predecessors had done; Godzilla 2014 shines the best when it comes to showing theGodzilla 2014 (5/28/19)

Pros
Taking a more symbolic disaster-flick approach to the title rather than the giant monster all-out smackdown as some of its predecessors had done; Godzilla 2014 shines the best when it comes to showing the aftermath of nature’s wrath on mankind and using imagery from tragic events known to viewers at the time of release to show a message of nature’s power over us. It has genuinely great cinematic moments that leave me in awe and a soundtrack that leaves a powerful impression as these creatures wreck havoc in unique ways. When the creatures are on the screen all attention is properly directed towards them, as the effects used to portray their size, and to give them a feeling of being part of the natural world, still works today as it is truly cutting edge with what they pulled off. The sound design as well demands to be played in surround sound as the film uses each roar to build the tone and to set the scene as even the creatures themselves prove to show some genuine symbolism that leaves the viewer to think a bit more than they thought to. And while the total screen time for all creatures totals to around twenty minutes, their devastation is known through the beautifully shot destruction. Regardless the movie does have genuine shortcomings that take away a lot of what the effort was made towards and stains the movie with genuine disinterest throughout several portions of the film, which is to be discussed in the cons. + The aftermath of nature is this films strong suit
+ Outstanding effects both visual and auditory
+ Wonderful soundtrack
+ Intriguing creatures
+ Wonderfully done metaphors and symbolic imagery
+ “Kiss of Death”
+ Great cinematography
+ Creature’s presence when on screen can’t go ignored

Cons
To pull this iteration of Godzilla off in a disaster-flick, Spielberg approach; you have to have well written characters that one can emotionally attach to which this film sadly fails to provide. I could never feel for the characters, the emotion was there to feel for them and sometimes they genuinely have good moments of character but it never pays off nor does it leave me rooting for any of them. Even with the title character himself, which pains me to say because I have loved the character ever since I was a toddler, as they don’t develop his character outside of his origins and his purpose. They try to but it falls flat due to the interest being directed towards the villains of the movie which is honestly where the films development and true efforts into writing something actually extremely interesting go into play by showing a basis for the creature’s full life cycle. But with Godzilla, that isn’t provided unless you read up online on this iteration or look deeper into his actions. But the biggest problem is the film’s main character and focus of the story regarding him. It is painfully generic, and just takes away from some of the coolest portions of the film because the film decides to maintain the focus on this generic storyline regarding the character. Who, like most everything else, is underdeveloped. Another huge issue with the film is the lighting which makes some scenes or shots almost impossible to view which is an absolute shame as most of the action takes place at night and the use of strictly natural lighting is intensely present. There is a lot wrong with this film and for the sake of time, I would rather just save it for a separate piece.

- Poorly written - Emotional disconnected
- Focus of the film is generic and takes away from the greatest portions of the film
- Pitch-black lighting
- Characters are underdeveloped
- Off pacing

Overall
Godzilla 2014 does have some great parts to it and genuinely fantastic effects that still hold up to this day. But it is sadly held back by so many flaws that make a lot of it just forgettable and that is no way to treat a king.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

FreddoFazbeardoApr 15, 2020

I did not like this movie so much, I liked King of the monsters much more, in summary part 2 ...

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Cementer200Sep 22, 2020

Godzilla is an ok movie. it's a good reboot of Godzilla but the movie was a bit to long

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Lia_CApr 3, 2021

There's more plot here than I was expecting, but also a lot of futile action which depending on what you're looking for can be frustrating. It's a pretty good crash bang monster flick but I wish the antagonist monsters looked a little cooler.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

atabeyordekciAug 18, 2021

The world is beset by the appearance of monstrous creatures, but one of them may be the only one who can save humanity. (6)

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

PeteyPirahnaFeb 7, 2022

6/10
Weakest Monsterverse movie easily. But it is still... fine. (Nevermind, 0/10. barely any Godzilla.)

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

NRG_MHJun 29, 2023

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I mean I've seen worse movies in my lifetime. The plot was actually quite decent with the whole thing about the MUTOs wanting to lay their eggs and the US Military trying to stop that because it could kill millions of innocent civilians and the human characters were alright espeially for a movie where the main attraction is the Titans. But the thing I liked about it the most was the atmosphere and tone with it feeling way darker than most other Godilla movies in existance, that and you could actually feel about how dangerous these monsters would be if they were real because of how the camera angles were done making you feel like you're their with the characters experiencing everything they are, the ending also felt quite bitter sweet because they did kill the MUTO and destroyed the eggs so that way there isn't hundreds of them to deal with in a few years but they also destroyed most of San Francisco while doing so.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Billyliar87May 18, 2014

I was hoping for a better film, but was unfortunately left underwhelmed. The effects were beautiful, as well as cinematography. The idea of a modern take on Godzilla was also fleshed out (albeit to the extreme of over-exposition). Lastly,I was hoping for a better film, but was unfortunately left underwhelmed. The effects were beautiful, as well as cinematography. The idea of a modern take on Godzilla was also fleshed out (albeit to the extreme of over-exposition). Lastly, the fight scenes between the monsters were brief moments of splendor.
Alas, the lack of an inspired screenplay wiped all of these pros clean off the table and left this as a mediocre monster flick with severely underdeveloped characters. The talent was there! Yet, the main character (Johnson) had "motivation" that felt forced and his character's arc was practically non-existent! Bryan Cranston was sadly underused and could have been more interesting given more screen time. Ken Watanabe and his team served absolutely no purpose to the plot, as he just follows the monster around with his mouth open in awe of the creature the whole time. The more I think about what the characters were "doing" the more angry I get and the less I like the movie because I feel like every human character wasted my time. The film also took itself way too seriously, and lacked any sense of humor or fun. (see Pacific Rim) The intention was well put in this reboot... but in the end, the script was not there. I really really wanted to like this movie, but was left sadly disappointed. Sad times.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

5

HomeCriticMay 18, 2014

I'm somewhat mixed about this film. It's a film that likes teasing main event, building expectations. But the problem is, that almost everything else feels like a filler because of it. Besides Godzilla and other creatures and theirI'm somewhat mixed about this film. It's a film that likes teasing main event, building expectations. But the problem is, that almost everything else feels like a filler because of it. Besides Godzilla and other creatures and their spectacular confrontation, this film has little to offer:
Characters are bland and uninspired, except Bryan Cranston, whose character had at least some emotion behind him. The son (played by Aaron Johnson) who is the main protagonist in the second act of the movie has none of that.. Mind as well be a faceless brick...
The film can be just split into three parts: first, containing Cranston is actually an engaging character study and mystery plot. After Cranston leaves the movie, interest starts to fall apart, mainly because of dull characters and the anticipation of Godzilla. Human drama wasn't important to me, because these people had no emotional weight to it (except the first act).
The third act is actually hurt after all that tedious teasing in the second act, but it is still enjoyable and is the highlight of the movie. This part saves the film from being a complete disaster.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

5

AaronTuckMay 17, 2014

Hollywood has once again taken a classic story and made it all about America. The trailers looked amazing but the reality of the film is a Greys Anatomy type want to be tear jerker about a family who is torn apart.

It was like someone saidHollywood has once again taken a classic story and made it all about America. The trailers looked amazing but the reality of the film is a Greys Anatomy type want to be tear jerker about a family who is torn apart.

It was like someone said "hey, lets make an awesome Godzilla trailer,with all the best parts of the movie and then pad the movie out with lots of daytime tv quality acting and script writing to save money. Also, lets put heaps of Bryan Cranston in the clip but only get him on set for 6 weeks to get enough shots for a trailer because that will sell tickets. People love Bryan Cranston. He's so hot right now."

The problem is that the set up of the characters relationships isn't substantial enough, and you just don't care. I wasn't worried for the well being of the characters, and didn't really care what was happening to anyone in the cities. There were no moments when my heart was beating faster or where I gripped by bag of popcorn even slightly.

As others have said, watch Cloverfield again. That was a real monster movie.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

RtheomMay 16, 2014

I wanted to post another review because I just watched the original Godzilla (without Raymond Burr) and the people claiming that this new movie is close to the source material are DEAD WRONG. The original Godzilla had a ton of satisfyingI wanted to post another review because I just watched the original Godzilla (without Raymond Burr) and the people claiming that this new movie is close to the source material are DEAD WRONG. The original Godzilla had a ton of satisfying destruction caused by the King himself. He tears into the city, and even in all its rubber-suited glory, it is so much more enjoyable. Don't go see this new film, just rewatch the original. So much better.

I think the big area the new Godzilla fails in is that it tries to focus on one guy and his struggles with the situation. The original shows us a wide mix of people with all different backgrounds and their reaction to it, making the whole thing feel so much more real. And then there's also the super awesome scenes of destruction. I remember what made me fall in love with Godzilla in the first place. America needs to give up. We'll never even come close to matching what Japan has done.… Expand

7 of 16 users found this helpful79

All this user's reviews

5

sepehrOct 5, 2014

The Movie Is About a Man Who Try To Protect His Family .I Think The Biggest Problem Of Movie Is That There Is No Godzilla In It 90 Minutes Pass From The film And We Saw Godzilla For 20 Seconds.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

EludiumQ36Oct 5, 2014

Great story but executed poorly as a movie. The screenwriting is paced as a tv mini-series, which means the payoff is delayed till Act III. And why are there still plausibility problems in 2014?! Take Honolulu being over-run by the MUTO, andGreat story but executed poorly as a movie. The screenwriting is paced as a tv mini-series, which means the payoff is delayed till Act III. And why are there still plausibility problems in 2014?! Take Honolulu being over-run by the MUTO, and the lieutenant's wife is oblivious until her child clues her in, really?! These and other dumb scenes should've be cut to trim this down from 2hrs to a faster-paced 90-mins.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

5

Trev29Nov 15, 2014

This movie should be renamed anything else beside Godzilla. Where was it? Bland story with no real excitement. The visuals were good, but I just wish the movie focused on the big lizard instead of those other things.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

5

UrillusionMay 16, 2014

As a lifelong, 30+ year fan of everything Godzilla, I can not help but feel disappointed in what we have been presented after 5 years of anticipation and Hype.

First of all, Godzilla himself is glorious! The MUTOs look great, but I amAs a lifelong, 30+ year fan of everything Godzilla, I can not help but feel disappointed in what we have been presented after 5 years of anticipation and Hype.

First of all, Godzilla himself is glorious! The MUTOs look great, but I am still unsure of exactly they are supposed to be. They are imaginative yes, but I am unsure how such an alien creature can be a product of prehistoric radiation. They could have used some color or markings as well to make them look more natural.

The battle scene (notice no plural, because there is only one battle that you see more than a glimpse of) is fantastic, and is the only part worthy of the Godzilla name. His breath weapon was a bit underwhelming, but solid for an attempt at a realistic version.

The introduction of Godzilla is very lackluster. He just sort of shows up, and we track him moving along for almost an hour in the water. He finally makes his big entrance in Hawaii, only to disappear within seconds of exposure, literally. They should have really gave the audience more at the airport battle.

There is no terror in the eyes of the people witnessing this. The few shots that they attempted this, the extras looked like they were running for the catering truck for lunch. No horror, no urgency, no giant foot coming down within inches of a terrified populace. Godzilla did not spank us for our arrogance, not once; the MUTOs tried, but they were more concerned for with one another. When it comes to the Monsters' interactions with humanity, they were just doing their own thing that happened to be in the middle of a city.

Notice how first and foremost, this review has contained the monsters. Not so with this movie. They build up this story with the help of Brian Cranston for almost an hour until the writers decide "Okay... his job is done" and the rest of the movie just continues as if he never existed. His son Ford certainly doesn't care. Note to the writers: If you want the audience to invest in a character, don't make them almost pointless. It seems that this movie just tried to force character driven drama so bad, that they just shoved it in where ever they could, and forgot to include GODZILLA! If you think the big man had enough screen time, I have no idea why you watch Godzilla movies in the first place. I can understand a dramatic build to the reveal, but that was not a dramatic reveal. That was 60 minutes of build - to 30 seconds of Godzilla - to another 40 minute build to the actual part of the movie worth watching. One can argue that "it worked in cloverfield", but cloverfield was much more suspense driven from a POV that was built for the long reveal. This is the best 20 minute Godzilla movie ever hidden deep within 100 minutes of something else.

This movie could of, and SHOULD of been leaps and bounds better. So much potential wasted on trying to force drama. The awesomeness that was the creature Godzilla should have been more than a cameo in his own movie. I don't need tons more... Just a secondary battle in the second act, and a bit more instrument of destruction as his motivation. I can't help but feel like this lack of substance stems from the novice writer and director.… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

5

Mazmorrero47May 16, 2014

I appreciate the filmmakers' effort to create a more dramatic take on Godzilla. However, they forgot that in order to achieve that, they needed to make the characters interesting and develop them. Giving the lead role to Aaron Taylor-JohnsonI appreciate the filmmakers' effort to create a more dramatic take on Godzilla. However, they forgot that in order to achieve that, they needed to make the characters interesting and develop them. Giving the lead role to Aaron Taylor-Johnson was a huge mistake, because the guy can't act to save his life. He plays just another stereotypical soldier with a nurse as a romantic interest. And if you watch the film because of Bryan Cranston, you're going to be sorely disappointed, because he doesn't have much screen-time; same thing for Juliette Binoche. Talk about wasting talent.

Technically speaking, the film is stunning. It should get Oscar nominations for visual effects, sound (seriously, Godzilla's scream is one of the best sound effects ever) and cinematography. Unfortunately, when a cool action sequence is about to happen, the story immediately moves away to throw boring exposition and cliches.

Sure, it's better than the Roland Emmerich train wreck, but that doesn't make it a great movie either.… Expand

13 of 20 users found this helpful137

All this user's reviews

5

StaticSpineMay 17, 2014

This is not a movie about Godzilla, it is about the brave American soldiers. The action scenes take about 20 of 100 minutes total, everything else is pretty stupid dialogues, predictable story, "drama" and patriotism. The actors are decent,This is not a movie about Godzilla, it is about the brave American soldiers. The action scenes take about 20 of 100 minutes total, everything else is pretty stupid dialogues, predictable story, "drama" and patriotism. The actors are decent, but I dot like the recent tendency of turning blockbusters into "something more" mixing action with some family values stuff etc. Godzilla is a great example of doing this kind of thing.… Expand

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

5

scartezzSep 1, 2014

Just forget godzilla(1999).
This new godzilla it' s completely another thing.
The main problem is that now godzilla is a strange creature between dragon and dinosaur.
the twists are also too much foregone.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

JamesCannonMay 22, 2014

Spoiler Alert at the end. The Monster Movie is still a genre that has yet to be mastered. For me we've seen this before and what I thought was more entertaining sci fi in Pacific Rim. Though that movie was from perfect as well. It seemsSpoiler Alert at the end. The Monster Movie is still a genre that has yet to be mastered. For me we've seen this before and what I thought was more entertaining sci fi in Pacific Rim. Though that movie was from perfect as well. It seems that directors cannot quiet please everyone on these monster movies or strike a balance with how much a monster should be shown. I like how Pacific Rim came right out the gate and got into the monsters. Then you have Peter Jackson King Kong..which practically ran an hour and half until you saw the Monster. True character development is important but uninteresting character development can a weigh a movie down. I thought this was the case with Godzilla, it seemed that there were much more interesting things going on than what Aaron Taylor was talking about. He seemed like a very straight forward lead, where as Byron Cranston was much more colorful but was killed in the first 1/4 of the movie.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

EdorkMay 17, 2014

The last 30 minutes are what I payed for, NOT the first 90 minutes of boring characters, frustrating teasing, (Gozilla only has like 12 minutes of screen time in his own movie!), and overall lack of fun! There's absolutely no reason to viewThe last 30 minutes are what I payed for, NOT the first 90 minutes of boring characters, frustrating teasing, (Gozilla only has like 12 minutes of screen time in his own movie!), and overall lack of fun! There's absolutely no reason to view this in 3D or IMAX given that there is so little action. Wait for the DVD.
Better yet, just watch Cloverfield or Pacific Rim again. They're essentially the same movie, only less dull.… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

5

heegsMay 17, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. To go in with tempered expectations is wise here. This is by no means a bad movie, but for how long the movie was compared to how little we saw Godzilla, I was left wanting more and feeling somewhat robbed. That being said, the scenes Godzilla WAS in (chiefly those near the end) were some of the best I've seen on the big screen in quite some time. The reason my score is a 5, however, has more to do with the awful cliched bits forced in throughout the movie. I realize this movie was a big nod to the Godzilla movies of old (which was, admittedly, well done) but that doesn't mean we can't have character development and deeper plots than: hero soldier torn from wife and child and does heroic deeds only to be reunited with them against all odds. Sadly are left with 10 minutes of awesome Godzilla footage and an hour and 50 minutes of shallow, plotless nonsense. To cap it all off, the money maker, Brian Cranston, is on screen for about the same amount of time as Godzilla... why even cast him at all if not to lure Breaking Bad fans into theaters if you're not even going to give him ample time to help drive the plot?… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

5

GinaKMay 17, 2014

This Godzilla was not really boring, but it was a huge disappointment most of the time, especially compared to the other Godzilla films I’ve seen. My favorite is still the original Japanese version (Gojira) and although I never thought IThis Godzilla was not really boring, but it was a huge disappointment most of the time, especially compared to the other Godzilla films I’ve seen. My favorite is still the original Japanese version (Gojira) and although I never thought I would say this, the 1998 version was better in many ways. A lot of the acting in the 1998 version was downright silly, especially the “love story,” but one thing that movie did was exploit New York as a setting and that was fun to watch – Madison Square Garden, the Brooklyn Bridge, etc. In this current version, Honolulu and Las Vegas could have been almost anywhere (we saw a lot of American tourists and some slot machines) and San Francisco was totally wasted (don’t they have hills there?). Also much was made of having quality actors like Juliette Binoche, Bryan Cranston, and Elizabeth Olsen, but you don’t see them very much (don’t blink or you will miss Binoche entirely) and a lot of what the others do is silly or insipid. On the other hand, we see much too much of Aaron Taylor-Johnson who looks dazed and confused most of the time (a hero he ain’t -- not that he runs away, but mostly he is either complaining or being ineffectual). I thought the monsters were good, and so were their battle scenes – and yes, the idea was good, but really do you want to go to a serious Godzilla film? The audience applauded when Godzilla finally breathed fire, but the applause at the end was tepid. In many ways, I found this film unimaginative and mediocre.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

5

shpreaJul 9, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The movie as a whole just really bummed me out.
For starters, they barely show Godzilla. I know people say it was to build tension, but there comes a point where you stop building tension and just start pissing off the audience.
Even ignoring that fact, the movie is annoying. It focuses more on the humans than the monsters. That would be fine if the human characters were interesting. They kill off Bryan Cranston, the best character, early off in the movie. All of the other characters are uninteresting.
I was just very disappointed with this film. There is one scene at the very end of the movie that bumps my score up 2 points, but if not for that I would have given this film a 3.
Hopefully the next Godzilla film will be good.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

TroaJun 9, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Godzilla sold itself on Godzilla, not the slim Americanized version from the last US Godzilla movie, but a much closer to true version, roaming. All in all, there was an okay amount of action involving Godzilla. There was a lot more action not involving him, however. While the focus could have been Godzilla, it felt much more to be on a single soldier who happened to find himself in bad situations over and over, and still somehow live. Simply put, there was not enough lizard, and too much talking.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

5

BrosmanJun 1, 2014

The movie focuses too much on the human characters to the point where Godzilla, the title character and focus of the film, becomes a supporting character who rarely appears on screen at all. There are many times that the film builds up anThe movie focuses too much on the human characters to the point where Godzilla, the title character and focus of the film, becomes a supporting character who rarely appears on screen at all. There are many times that the film builds up an epic fight between Godzilla and the two other monsters, yet the film will cut away and the entire fight will be off screen. When Godzilla is finally allowed to fight on screen, not only is it spliced with the human story so much that it becomes anticlimactic, but Godzilla spends the entire fight on his heals getting his butt kicked until the human character saves him. There is a disturbing lack of Godzilla, and when he even shows up you wish you were watching a better Godzilla movie as he is portrayed to be incompetent.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

InlikeflynnJun 8, 2014

This movie... really lacks something...

I am not complaining about the lack of Godzilla in the movie or anything like that... but general choices that makes me scratch my head and ask "why?". Why do we need an American family living inThis movie... really lacks something...

I am not complaining about the lack of Godzilla in the movie or anything like that... but general choices that makes me scratch my head and ask "why?". Why do we need an American family living in Japan? Did the movie makers though that we wouldn't sympathize with the characters unless they where generic American stereotypes? Why a forced death scene? Oh yeah... because we need to have one of our characters being obsessed about his wife's death trying to find this monster, of course... Why treat the movie like it's "Transformers"? and like that I have many more "why's"...

Is not a BAD movie ok?... I know the directer is very good at working on special effects and it shows, the monster design is great and... yeah... I think I get why some people were calling this Godzilla "fat".

The original Godzilla movie was not just a monster movie, it was a tragedy and it shows in the way that movie portraits the situation and that is what I expected from this one... maybe I expected too much from it...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

BillzHereJul 22, 2014

What happens when you take a badass monster like Godzilla and put him into an American film? You get Godzilla (2014). This movie would be good, if they actually focused on Godzilla. A majority of this movie is spent on watching the soldiersWhat happens when you take a badass monster like Godzilla and put him into an American film? You get Godzilla (2014). This movie would be good, if they actually focused on Godzilla. A majority of this movie is spent on watching the soldiers activity throughout the movie. That is not how a Godzilla film is made. You go see this movie to see the second hour of the film, where Godzilla fights the opposing giant monster, destroys the city, and just be an overall badass. The effects in this film are great no question, but they needed to focus on the main character of the movie more than anything, that is Godzilla and no one else.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

FlyToRainbowRayMay 19, 2014

I just didn't care at all by the end. The first half or so was pretty good but It wasn't great. The plot started out somewhat interesting, but then it lost everything it had going for it. The characters were mostly boring and one dimensionalI just didn't care at all by the end. The first half or so was pretty good but It wasn't great. The plot started out somewhat interesting, but then it lost everything it had going for it. The characters were mostly boring and one dimensional and I had no emotional attachment to them at all.

I appreciated the fact that Godzilla wasn't shown for quite awhile into the movie and that the movie did have a bit of a slower pace compared to most blockbusters. But whenever they had Godzilla on screen, the movie felt so silly and absurd and not in a good way. This is Godzilla! He's suppose to be epic and cool. And when he bashing the other monsters I should be cheering him on in awe. But instead I get some very hokey moments between the monsters. The whole battle at the end had no weight to it and bored the hell out of me.

What this movie needed were some more human elements, more story, and maybe not to take itself quite so serious because doing so made certain parts just silly instead of fun.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

5

BrutalBran95May 18, 2014

wasnt that good tbh i really excepted total world war 3 going off but it was just monster vs monster for 15 mins and rest just talking with A HINT of action alot was avoided i wouldnt buy and dont really recommend its average 6/10 dont knowwasnt that good tbh i really excepted total world war 3 going off but it was just monster vs monster for 15 mins and rest just talking with A HINT of action alot was avoided i wouldnt buy and dont really recommend its average 6/10 dont know why people are giving it Best film of 2014 what a load of crap like most films its dissapointing / bad neighbours again was crap and people say best film ever seen just some people are morons… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

5

MovieGuysMay 17, 2014

Godzilla's story is lacking, as expected, and predictable, even more expectedly, but some of the action are truly visual marvels. Now. if only the movie could keep a consistent pace and tone, and if only it didn't feel like one big actionGodzilla's story is lacking, as expected, and predictable, even more expectedly, but some of the action are truly visual marvels. Now. if only the movie could keep a consistent pace and tone, and if only it didn't feel like one big action scene. But. it's better than 1998's "God-it's-awful-zilla", so that's a plus.… Expand

4 of 13 users found this helpful49

All this user's reviews

5

travellynMay 28, 2014

While this movies story is scrambled the strong performance of alan Taylor Johnson and the special effects is enough pass although old Godzilla fans may not be so satisfied

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

BasiltheBatLordMay 18, 2014

Despite it's title, this film is not about Godzilla. The focus of the film highly lies with the other two antagonist monsters and with the awfully cliched military-man protagonist. Godzilla has absolutely no depth whatsoever to hisDespite it's title, this film is not about Godzilla. The focus of the film highly lies with the other two antagonist monsters and with the awfully cliched military-man protagonist. Godzilla has absolutely no depth whatsoever to his character and exists purely to serve the role of absolute and total savior. He submerges for the first time in 60 years just to kick the bad guys butts and then immediately leaves as soon as the job was over as if he was just waiting to be a good guy. Some criticize this film for lacking action but I actually found that to be a great relief in the days where every blockbuster movie must spend 45 minutes of the film blowing things up for no reason. To discuss the positive aspects of the film, the CGI monsters really do look fantastic and some scenes of the fight sequences were genuinely very cool but what drags this movie down is how Godzilla is almost a supporting character whose only role is to save the day when needed. This film should have just concentrated on one kaiju, that being Godzilla. Other monsters should have waited for inevitable cash-in sequels.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

5

epocMay 24, 2014

Why and how is this film getting such good scores? Don't get me wrong its not a bad film by any stretch of the imagination, but it doesn't deserve 9's or even 10's! On the contrary, we have hurt action fan boy's giving it 1's and 0's! IfWhy and how is this film getting such good scores? Don't get me wrong its not a bad film by any stretch of the imagination, but it doesn't deserve 9's or even 10's! On the contrary, we have hurt action fan boy's giving it 1's and 0's! If there's one thing this film does right its building tension. At the centre of this is Brian Cranston's brilliantly developed and well acted character. However they kill him of so quickly he might as well not of been there... Which is a shame because he's the only interesting character in the film! Everyone else is a generic, one dimensional stereotype, devoid of any character or personality. This is made even worse by the fact you'll be spending 3 quarters of the film with them! And that's not cool. The problem is there's no payoff. While the last fight scene is good, it just feels unsatisfying, which then leads to a rushed ending that's obviously setting up a sequel. Overall its jut mediocre.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

5

MagicManRAWJun 30, 2014

Classic monster movie in a modern age. It is ok. Just ok. Way, way better than the last Godzilla, but still was very weak. The story put up is ok. The concept that is. I really hate it when the main character just happens to always beClassic monster movie in a modern age. It is ok. Just ok. Way, way better than the last Godzilla, but still was very weak. The story put up is ok. The concept that is. I really hate it when the main character just happens to always be in the right or wrong place at the right or wrong moment. It is forced. In a big wide world, it just happens that this one guy is always near where the monsters are and he come sup with answers. Boring. I am talking about Aaron Johnson. Very boring and bland character. The story should have been better. I just did not buy the whole "world order" thing. The real 'bad guy" should have been the backstory. I would have lived with it if they spent 10 mins to touch upon the next movie and this was just a set up for the next film. Sadly, they did not and I doubt they will come up with a new one or if they do it will be any good… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

5

MinosOfCreteJun 2, 2014

Awesome trailer, lacklustre film. This is a film which is supposed to be about monsters fighting monsters, but seems intent on focusing as little attention as possible on the incredible struggle between two monoliths, to concentrate on aAwesome trailer, lacklustre film. This is a film which is supposed to be about monsters fighting monsters, but seems intent on focusing as little attention as possible on the incredible struggle between two monoliths, to concentrate on a decent, but far from original story of a 'man torn away from family, and suffering to fight for his family' tale. The craziest part of this whole film isn't what's in it, but rather, what ISN'T in it, primarily Godzilla himself. Like seriously, they mention godzilla a few times at the start of the film, but the next 40 mins isn't even about Godzilla, it's about some other plot instead. Godzilla then briefly appears, and boy when he appears for his 4 minutes, he sure is an awesome sight to behold...until we switch back to some annoying plot about how the military keep on angsting like a teenage girl before prom about how they can't kill the beast, and how ineffective they are, and so on and so forth. For me personally, this feels like a few parts of an A+ film sprinkled over what is essentially a B movie. Bryan Cranston is awesome(as always), making his personal tragedy felt even across the screen, and portraying his role as haunted paranoid in a brilliant fashion...which makes everything else look ridiculous when you see how unenthused the other actors seem to be in their roles. Even the Godzilla special effects are amazing, when they actually show them...but that makes the 90% of the film where Godzilla is absent(and he is absent, not like a 'i'm doing something awesome' absent, but more like a 'I show up, wreck **** for 5 mins, then return back to the sea for some relaxing swimming for the next 50 mins' absent) feel so incredibly dry and sterile. For the action sequences, I hope you enjoy watching 100 foot lizards wrestling with 80 foot monsters...ON A CRAPPY TV FOR 30 SECONDS(seriously, look at the movie where Godzilla first appears and the kid is watching TV, and that is how long it's shown for).

Don't be enticed by the A+ special effects or 20 mins of Bryan Cranston into looking at 60 minutes of essentially nothing of note. This is not worth your time, and should be renamed from 'Godzilla' to 'Walking with MUTOs', because the only thing this documentary(not action film) is lacking is a David Attenborough voiceover.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

5

B-RAXJul 1, 2014

Walking out of this movie I have to say disappointment seemed to overwhelm any redeeming quality. The movie wasn't a total flop, it had it’s pros and many cons. On the big screen, the film looked amazing and the attention to detail reallyWalking out of this movie I have to say disappointment seemed to overwhelm any redeeming quality. The movie wasn't a total flop, it had it’s pros and many cons. On the big screen, the film looked amazing and the attention to detail really showed in the CGI. Set pieces looked spectacular and were very believable throughout the whole film. Bryan Cranston did an excellent job and in my opinion saved the movie from being a complete fail; he interjected feeling into the show that other characters struggled with–this made for a strong start. Cranston’s character did not get as much screen time as I would have liked to see and the protagonists roll was passed down to a much harder character to follow. At that point, about forty-five minutes in, the movie became a mess. I spent the remainder of the film trying to ignore simple mistakes that stacked up. There was so much potential in this film to capture the emotions of the people on the ground, witnessing thousands of deaths. Instead of doing so the makers focused on the monster movie element which just became another summer movie blockbuster. Passing realistic time was the biggest con in my opinion, everything happened way too fast and that didn’t help the pacing at all. The last half hour of the movie was pretty shallow with a cookie cutter climax that was not only unrealistic but a compromise to the show's overall potential and integrity. Despite the many problems with what could have been a more meaningful storyline, it looked great on the big screen and kept me entertained for the first forty minutes. In the end Godzilla was loud, flashy, and made out as a hero, even though he likely stomped hundreds of people to death as he made his way through San Francisco. … Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

SpartaCommandMay 16, 2014

I would give this 2 scores if I can... As a movie it is epic one of the best out there right now. Yet as a Godzilla movie it falls flat on its face. Seriously How does Godzilla get a bit part in a GODZILLA movie. WE go to see GODZILLA destroyI would give this 2 scores if I can... As a movie it is epic one of the best out there right now. Yet as a Godzilla movie it falls flat on its face. Seriously How does Godzilla get a bit part in a GODZILLA movie. WE go to see GODZILLA destroy stuff fight monsters and roar in our face. NOT be danced around while we watch the lead actor be even flatter and more One Dimensional then the MONSTERS! Soo If I could Godzilla as a movie is a 7.5 as a Godzilla movie.. 3!… Expand

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

5

SothMay 16, 2014

This movie felt like going to wrestle mania and watching a member of the audience travel from the ticket counter to his seat with a few events along the way and finally make it to his seat to catch the last match and then its over toThis movie felt like going to wrestle mania and watching a member of the audience travel from the ticket counter to his seat with a few events along the way and finally make it to his seat to catch the last match and then its over to quickly. Godzilla wasn't the main character in my opinion, nether were the other monsters. They said that when they did the fight scene they look at bears fighting. Really!!! If you look at other Godzilla movies it was more closer related to wrestling, dramatic over the top fights. Very disappointed.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

5

ManToastMay 21, 2014

As someone who's first Godzilla film was this one, I was severely disappointed.
Fresh out of Pacific Rim, where the battles were intense and the chaos was satisfying, this one seemed lacking and confused in aim. The film suffers immediatelyAs someone who's first Godzilla film was this one, I was severely disappointed.
Fresh out of Pacific Rim, where the battles were intense and the chaos was satisfying, this one seemed lacking and confused in aim. The film suffers immediately with the cliched military man and his 'save my family' story we've seen a million times. The only good acting was from Bryan Cranston, but he's not even in the movie for long. Oddly enough, the movie seems devout on maintaining focus on Aaron Taylor-Johnson and not, well you know, Godzilla!? Every bit of tension in the film is either without a satisfying payoff, or is cut short with a transition to Mr and Mrs. Cliche. Three times too many you expect Godzilla to do his thing, but nope, just a tease. It's frustrating to endure as you are expected to just shrug off potential epic monster battles.

Many are comparing this film to Pacific Rim, saying the action there was frequent but the story was lacking and Godzilla is the opposite. I agree with this, but even in this regard I prefer Pacific Rim far more. It's a monster film, so it's fair to expect it to be about monsters wrecking cities and not whether one guy saves his family. The film plays with your expectations like crazy, ultimately driving you crazy.

To its credit, the visuals are amazing and the cinematics spectacular. Godzilla himself looks and moves exactly as you would expect. The new kaiju are sinister looking and cool as hell, but it feels as though they steal the show from The King of Monsters, especially when Godzilla is way too late to the party. In the couple of fight scenes that he's in you barely feel the need to root for him because the film's excuse for him being there is simply ridiculous. I feel the story is the worst part about the film despite it being the main focus, and the action alone fails to carry the entire movie.

Great visuals with a brilliant Godzilla rendition, but the story is cliched and a chore to watch, while the action struggles to generate any tension and even when it does it always falls flat. Usually I wouldn't recommend a film I dislike, but audiences seem to be completely split down the middle (even some extreme Godzilla fans dislike it) so I would say watch it as a gamble just to see whether or not you like it. If you expect action and epic destruction though, go see Pacific Rim instead.… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

5

MedoRefaeeMay 21, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Godzilla wow without story
The Godzilla movie reaching 93 million dollar in 4 days that is success for the film but there is a question here how the movie get this number?
The first reason of course the name of movie and the second reason is the film Depends on Technique, Technology and tricks But there are Negative side in the movie the story is weak without content and when you see the film you feel like see film build from rocks without happiness or sadness feelings and the Plot is so weak Which gave the impression the film production just for money not for the Entertain audience or to send a good message and there Confirmation on the global Level and local level the Cinema now is just for the money not for the Art
Mohammed Refaee (MEDO)… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

RamyoMay 26, 2014

I had such high hopes for this movie but found that it was a disappointing rendition of Godzilla's return to the big screen. The movie is called Godzilla but its really the story of Aaron Taylor Johnson. He has 4x more screen time than theI had such high hopes for this movie but found that it was a disappointing rendition of Godzilla's return to the big screen. The movie is called Godzilla but its really the story of Aaron Taylor Johnson. He has 4x more screen time than the titular character and despite being a good actor, I think most of his scenes did nothing to advance the plot. When you have a larger than life character like Godzilla, you focus on him because that is whom your audiences came to see. The Godzilla reveal took far to long to happen, and by the time it did, he only gets a few seconds of screen time before the camera pans to a long scene with the human actors.

There is a line from Ken Wanatabe in the movie that perfectly sums up what the audience was denied: "Let them fight". It was that simple. While hoping for a slugfest between kaiju where Godzilla shows why he is the King of the Monsters, we were instead given a frustrating tease of a movie that could have been something truly epic. If the makers of Godzilla want to know how to do a Kaiju movie right, they should go watch Pacific Rim.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

5

TheCritic23Jun 28, 2014

I've waited a long time to give my first ever metacritic review, so it's only fitting it be served up to an institution in film making which has been entertaining me since I was first born. Godzilla has been burnt into my subconscious for asI've waited a long time to give my first ever metacritic review, so it's only fitting it be served up to an institution in film making which has been entertaining me since I was first born. Godzilla has been burnt into my subconscious for as long as I can remember. Jung would probably call her (yes Godzilla is female) my inner Goddess, but enough about my personal relationship with a giant anthropomorphic lizard . If you are a Godzilla fan, you will move through several stages in the viewing of this movie.

First you will experience hope. The opening credits are creative and original and immediately open into Bryan Cranston and Juliet Binoche acting superbly. Characters are being developed, plot points are being leveraged, foreshadowing is in abundance. Then, it changes, (no spoilers here).

Second you will experience fear. The realization that all your previous hopes have been abandoned and you are actually, yes, stuck inside an American military propaganda film. I can't think of a more heinous skin within which a Godzilla film might be wrapped. At it's core Godzilla is a modern archetype representing a reaction to the military industrial complex and radioactive pollution. Remember all the model tanks being smashed in the original Godzilla movies? Remember how Godzilla was reawakened by nuclear tests in the pacific? Not anymore. Now it's all, "Yay Marines! How can I be of service to the United States Army!"

Third you will experience disappointment. Regardless of the political sandbagging, you will still want to see a big monster fight. You will, and it will not be very good. It will also take a long, long, long, time to get there, with 2 or 3 fake-outs. Also, if you enjoyed Godzilla having a personality, you can forget it. Personally I feel as though the "evil" monsters (MUTO's as dubbed by the military in one of the most painful pieces of exposition ever to grace a film since "unobtainium" in Avatar) had the most personality in the entire film, yes even compared to Cranston and Binoche.

On a positive note, the FX are absolutely amazing. The physics of the giant creatures are perfect and the movie never shies away from a long shot which is a real breath of fresh air in the current climate of cinematic, close-up, shaky camera antics. It really has amazing production values and the team behind the visuals/editing/cinematography should be very proud.

Some might say I'm taking this film to seriously, but considering the dark tone set by the film, I think I'm on point with it's shortcomings. And honestly, Compared to most of the sci-fi / adventure films on the landscape (Transformers), this movie is practically "City of Lost Children".

So take your 10-12 year old children to see it, the enjoyment they will have will more than make up for all the films flaws, maybe. Just make sure you wake them up when the exciting stuff is happening.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews