Netflix | Release Date: November 23, 2022
6.0
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 539 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
294
Mixed:
127
Negative:
118
Watch Now
Stream On
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
6
43in2014Jan 13, 2023
The short review: Not as good as Knives Out (KO). Glass onion (GO) is dull and it lacks the twists and turns of KO. Netflix making me watch it on TV probably made it less good. Related media: KO. KO is a great mystery film. Negatives: 1)The short review: Not as good as Knives Out (KO). Glass onion (GO) is dull and it lacks the twists and turns of KO. Netflix making me watch it on TV probably made it less good. Related media: KO. KO is a great mystery film. Negatives: 1) The story just isn't as good as KO. KO is twisting and turning all the way to the end, but GO seems to have only one major twist and it isn't that great. I was hoping for a counter-twist, but there isn't any. 2) Edward Norton is an irritating character and most of the others are not much better. Unlike KO, there is no true likeable characters to root for. 3) The mystery isn't great, the detective just solves the mystery without much surprise and the ending is uninspiring. How would the different age groups rate this: Children: They won't get it. Teens: Boring. Young adults: Meh. Medium-age adults: Meh. Older adults: Don't care about these people. My rating: 3/5 (no half scores). Save your money and watch it on TV. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
6
SadamityDec 25, 2022
I didn’t like any of the characters. It was painful to watch. A mystery that I don’t care at all. First one is way better.
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
6
JLuis_001Nov 30, 2022
If a joke has already been told on other occasions and with more grace, in these cases it cannot really be said that he who laughs last laughs best, no, here the one who made you laugh first wins.

Knives Out didn't try anything new when it
If a joke has already been told on other occasions and with more grace, in these cases it cannot really be said that he who laughs last laughs best, no, here the one who made you laugh first wins.

Knives Out didn't try anything new when it was released two years ago, but the film had a very strong identity, as well as a killer cast that, despite their small interventions, all left their mark.

That doesn't happen with Glass Onion, and yes, I am fully aware that everything rests on our criteria, but I felt that, in this installment neither the mystery, nor the characters had the same plot weight of its predecessor, which I found quite conflicting because no matter how hard I tried I couldn't immerse myself in the plot in the same way.

It's an entertaining film, if expectations cease in the comparisons, because Glass Onion may not be a waste, but against its predecessor, it loses out in every situation.
Expand
7 of 12 users found this helpful75
All this user's reviews
6
IsteffyDec 27, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A mystery film spoiled by political cliches.

I'm going to assume that you've seen the first one and liked it like I did. Why else watch this one although this could be a standalone film for the most part. This is a good film with a potentially good plot, but the film tries much harder to push a political agenda and an estut person will easily figure out the 'evil rich white man bad' "twist".

The movie itself has some great shots, clever dialogue, and stellar acting. Unfortunately, every evil character is some caricature of what the director Rian Johnson, thinks a republican is. One is tatooed 'F YEAH MURICA!' gun carrying dumb dumb, the blonde woman is basically Trump tweeting stupid stuff and not taking the virus seriously, Edward Norton is the rich white man who wants to oppress black people. Rian is not subtle with these characters and thus it is obvious from very early on that the rich white guy who likes to oppress black people and funds republican stereotypes has an evil plan to *surprise* oppress black people and steal their work. Were the acting not good, the characters would be laughably one dimensional. Rian, I don't want to know who the bad guy is after meeting him for five minutes. Learn subtly. The best is when you give these evil characters redeeming qualities so they don't become blaring stereotypes with evil intentions. You know? Like in the first movie!

The climax of the film is extra cringe. The hide-away virtuous victim holds the 'evidence' to lock up the evil racist white man in his face (like the first movie), and of course, he lights it on fire. I awaited for her to pull some clever trick, but instead she decides to just start rioting and destroying all of evil rich man's stuff. For some reason, the evil republican lackeys start to cheer her on and do it themselves. Evil rich white man of course wasnt smart enough to install a camera where he holds the mona lisa, so they get away with it. Rian clearly wants to portray a 'pro-riot' message for BLM. It just feels out of place and cringe.

It's really too bad because the first Knives out also had some political agenda but it never interfered with the plot or made the characters too shallow. The first one would get an 8/10. This gets a 6 because i was at least entertained
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
CthulhuReviewsDec 25, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Really enjoyed the first one.

This one was funny but not less a WhoDunit and more a HeDidIt. Very predictable and very heavily signposted.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
6
algajardDec 25, 2022
Wokish version of Clue. Great cast. Plot twist that I didn't see coming entirely.
4 of 11 users found this helpful47
All this user's reviews
6
HerickDienerDec 29, 2022
Tudo parece exageradamente um nível a acima, principalmente a costura que promete unir todas as linhas do roteiro, algo que foi o trunfo do primeiro filme. A cena do molho picante foi o fim. Pelo menos "Glass Onion" nos ajuda a concluir queTudo parece exageradamente um nível a acima, principalmente a costura que promete unir todas as linhas do roteiro, algo que foi o trunfo do primeiro filme. A cena do molho picante foi o fim. Pelo menos "Glass Onion" nos ajuda a concluir que Janelle Monáe é realmente uma artista completa. Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
6
booondDec 25, 2022
A bit boring. Craig's character is fine but the story was dull and had far more tepid talk than action.
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
6
Wwilliams23Nov 30, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Knives Out was a solid 8/10. Great mystery and very fun. Beautiful setting with the manor in autumn. Glass Onion is more of the same, but throws in politics and wokeness here and there. All straight white men are bad. They made one character gay, when there was no indication of that before. Powerful black leading woman that we must be in awe over for no apparent reason. CNN and Fauci on TV. Stupid, buff, straight white man that lives with his mother and reeks of toxic masculinity (spoiler alert: He is the first to die). It's very clear what they were trying to go for. But the mystery itself was still fun to watch unfold. It's a well done story and the setting is cool. Expand
7 of 18 users found this helpful711
All this user's reviews
6
Mack9393Dec 24, 2022
Daniel Craig is the only part of this film that works. It’s more of a social/political statement than a clever “who done it.” Actor’s primarily played themselves to 1000%, the plot was weak, and there were far too many cameos from randomDaniel Craig is the only part of this film that works. It’s more of a social/political statement than a clever “who done it.” Actor’s primarily played themselves to 1000%, the plot was weak, and there were far too many cameos from random famous people. Craigs comedic delivery was top notch and makes it worth a watch. They should’ve spent more time writing a good case rather than “no case” being the reveal. Expand
8 of 13 users found this helpful85
All this user's reviews
6
Sphinxty9Jan 5, 2023
Full of plot holes and dumb writing, who the **** said this movie was a masterpiece.
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
6
greislDec 26, 2022
The first movie is better in every aspect of it, it's less silly, more complex, better characters, and overall a better movie. It's just so silly, and this movie tries to acknowledge it by saying it over and over again, but it doesn't make itThe first movie is better in every aspect of it, it's less silly, more complex, better characters, and overall a better movie. It's just so silly, and this movie tries to acknowledge it by saying it over and over again, but it doesn't make it better, but don't get me wrong, being this dumb is trully a good ideia, but it didin't work as well as it could be, and besides, the direction it's on point again, this movie had good and remarkable scenes, but it doesn't make up for this dumb movie, that could've been so much better Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
6
painkulerJan 31, 2023
Первая чать была явно лучше. Ну что поделать, лишь смотреть на интересные интерьеры)
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
quisquousNov 30, 2022
Fun but forgettable. Not in the same league as Knives Out. Daniel Craig still can't pull off the accent, but he looked like he had fun trying. Edward Norton is always a win.
5 of 12 users found this helpful57
All this user's reviews
5
TVJerryDec 26, 2022
The original Knives Out was surprising, smart and stylish (my review). This sequel only has one of those adjectives going for it (read on to see which one). Daniel Craig returns as the extremely Southern gentlemen detective (with a surpriseThe original Knives Out was surprising, smart and stylish (my review). This sequel only has one of those adjectives going for it (read on to see which one). Daniel Craig returns as the extremely Southern gentlemen detective (with a surprise roommate cameo). This case brings him to an isolated island owned by a tech billionaire (Edward Norton), who has assembled a group of mildly eccentric friends for a murder mystery game. Unlike the previous film, the oddball characters aren't especially fun or even odd. Writer/director Rian Johnson has loaded this script with too much dialogue…it's an hour before anyone dies. Even afterward, there's more focus on justification for the crime , instead of action or even interaction. Since the locale is new, it's provides some opportunities for stylish design. Otherwise, this sequel is too talky, rather slow and lacks many surprises. (Look for the late Angela Lansbury & Stephen Sondheim in a brief Zoom sequence.) Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
5
andy_indierockDec 25, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Funny but mediocre. Edward character already killed the girl but when the girl's twin sister disguised as the victim show up, how come Edward no reaction. Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
5
GameAnalyzerDec 28, 2022
Glass Onion takes a cue from the Knives Out mystery and tries delivering the best it could. The issue is with its lazy writing for the characters and the annoying tropes that come along. They don't work mostly. The humor doesn't find itsGlass Onion takes a cue from the Knives Out mystery and tries delivering the best it could. The issue is with its lazy writing for the characters and the annoying tropes that come along. They don't work mostly. The humor doesn't find its landing. There is a pan-cake delicacy that aims for the laughs, but it does nothing. With the annoying tropes come plot devices expecting viewers weren't predicting the same. That makes the whole experience an underwhelming ride in comparison to the surprises that the predecessor had in store while it laid out the plot in favor of the investigative approach. Daniel Craig playing Among us online? Okay let's weigh down on better introduction for key characters in the sequels that follow. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
5
kidcassidy14Dec 24, 2022
Started of interesting but lost my interest after basically 1 hour. Not even close to the quality of the first one. My wife enjoyed it more, so we did finish watching it. But if it was up to me, i would have turned it off.
11 of 16 users found this helpful115
All this user's reviews
5
elecit3Feb 9, 2023
This sequel is a disappointment not because it is a bad movie, which it's not, because it does not live up to the promises of the original movie. Onion Glass is quite unrelated to Knives Out, and the only thing left from the former is BenoitThis sequel is a disappointment not because it is a bad movie, which it's not, because it does not live up to the promises of the original movie. Onion Glass is quite unrelated to Knives Out, and the only thing left from the former is Benoit Blanc and its brief detective show albiet not very surprising. The director has unfortunately pursued a completely different goal here while the audience was after something else. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
pedvieDec 28, 2022
Let me begin by giving movie creators the benefit of the doubt in that all this slavish devotion to progressive orthodoxy is really the only way to garner high praise from movie critics these days? This movie is watchable and generally wellLet me begin by giving movie creators the benefit of the doubt in that all this slavish devotion to progressive orthodoxy is really the only way to garner high praise from movie critics these days? This movie is watchable and generally well acted by enjoyable actors executing reasonable direction. That's why I gave it a 4 (+1 for sympathy). However, the predictable, seen that, stereotypical plot/dialogue is difficult to stomach...after it's been processed at the woke-think sausage factory. The biggest knee slapper in all this is that Hollywood originally did much to push many of the very same stereotypes they now virtue signal tirelessly against. Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
5
moviesoulDec 31, 2022
Considering how brilliant the first movie was, this was a great disappointment. The first move was funny, quirky, with an interesting cast of characters. This sequel has none of that. Most of the characters are loathsome, the is very littleConsidering how brilliant the first movie was, this was a great disappointment. The first move was funny, quirky, with an interesting cast of characters. This sequel has none of that. Most of the characters are loathsome, the is very little to laugh about, and the wonderful eccentricities of Benoit Blanc are minimized here. This leaves the viewer with a plot that isn't really all that interesting. The cast does it's best with mediocre material. Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
5
steveymeJan 3, 2023
Started off loving this movie, really enjoyed character intros. By the end I was disappointed, the plot is contrived and overwritten. The best mysteries have an elegance, where a reveal makes you go 'how did I not see that?!', this is NOT that movie.
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
5
SandyCameronJan 6, 2023
Knives Out was a well-told whodunnit, suspenseful, amusing, just this side (the right side) of clever. The characters were interesting, and in the case of Daniel Craig, cast against type to great effect.

Glass Onion was none of these things.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
5
Mauro_LanariDec 25, 2022
(Mauro Lanari)
"Quandoque bonus dormitat Lennon". I had already forgotten the first episode and I already remember nothing about this. It may well be a "parody of a classic detective fiction and also a social criticism" (Francesca Lombardo),
(Mauro Lanari)
"Quandoque bonus dormitat Lennon". I had already forgotten the first episode and I already remember nothing about this. It may well be a "parody of a classic detective fiction and also a social criticism" (Francesca Lombardo), but it is even more "Agatha Christie reloaded" (Mariarosa Mancuso) at the time of the "decline of Western filmmaking" with its "ultra-binge watching in streaming" (Gianluigi Negri). A necessary clarification: when I speak of drift, decline, low empire, I'm not an inconsolable nostalgic. I would hope, however, that the new, the different, the change were also bearers of improvement.
Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
5
Lord_VoltaDec 23, 2022
The movie is fine, but it doesn't come close to the first, which is why they had to reference it in the title. After a few awkward scenes showing lockdown, the movie introduces several character with vague personalities that all scream ****The movie is fine, but it doesn't come close to the first, which is why they had to reference it in the title. After a few awkward scenes showing lockdown, the movie introduces several character with vague personalities that all scream **** Eventually, we come to "the big twist", but something's missing. Knives Out gives us a protagonist early in the movie who we then follow for the rest of the film. Glass Onion has its own protagonist, but we don't find out who that is until the film is almost over. After his/her cliche introduction, one unbelievable event happens after another which lead too ... nothing. There is no epiphany to this story, it just ends. Expand
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
5
ElthanJan 9, 2023
Es una pelìcula sin pena ni gloria, rescato la narrativa, los personajes simplones. Tiende a ser tediosa, intenta lograr un ritmo sin alcanzarlo
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
5
ThisGuy1Jan 17, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I genuinely don't understand the hype hear. It's the exact same movie as the first - which I loved, but don't wish this could have been more (or at least different). The main character literally calls the plot of the movie dumb, in an incredibly meta moment of the film, and people cheered it to be a triumph. It was lazy and made no sense in the end.

Nobody likely cares, but I think there was a better movie that could have been and it really sours this movie as a wasted opportunity...

Andi should have been the villain. You don't have to change her backstory. Miles and everyone stole her idea and blocked her out. However, a napkin is hardly evidence of this. So, she spends years with hate, watching these people get rich off her ideas. She receives the puzzle box from Miles - which she destroys with a hammer - and this sets her plan in motion. Andi pretends to be her own twin and the movie plays out almost exactly as it already does. Her goal is to kill Miles, framing Duke for the murder, except her plan is foiled when Duke ends up drinking the poison in Miles' glass. No stupid miracle with the thin notebook stopping a bullet or hot sauce fake blood. Instead, contrary to Knives Out, Benoit actually misses this one - until the very end where she makes one critical mistake (it would be funny - given how much Craig has said to struggle with his southern accent - if her accent gave her away). He realizes it was Andi and although he gets credit for stopping her plan, he is distraught because his blindness for the damsel in distress - stemming from his experience in Knives Out - led to the death of an innocent man. This would have been the perfect place to leave Benoit for the inevitable end to the trilogy (or threequel if they continue to milk this dry). Self-doubting and unsure. Glass Onion would have been the antithesis to everything Knives Out got right and would have been far better, in my opinion.
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
5
Mak234Dec 24, 2022
The first movie wasn’t perfect but it was much better. Just like Miles Bron (Edward Norton’s character ) is using money to mask his deficiencies, Rian Johnson did the same with this sequel. The movie is relying too much on special effects andThe first movie wasn’t perfect but it was much better. Just like Miles Bron (Edward Norton’s character ) is using money to mask his deficiencies, Rian Johnson did the same with this sequel. The movie is relying too much on special effects and glamorous sets allowing for the story to suffer. The first third is interesting and promising. There is a cleaver solve ,early in the film, made by detective Benoit Blanc. However, shortly after that scene, everything turns into never-ending flashbacks. Second half is less engaging and repetitive allowing us to know exactly who did it one hour before the end. From that moment on it felt like someone is trying to tell you something you already know. I think that the third sequel they are preparing should be made on a much lesser budget that would challenge writing and story structure instead of focusing on explosions. Expand
9 of 15 users found this helpful96
All this user's reviews
5
boltronJan 2, 2023
This is how we're making movies now, an endless stream of tweet-format dialog, memes, and scandal references so the millennials will feel included. Hurry up and watch, this movie is going to feel dated in a few months.
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
5
BillHimmelJan 6, 2023
It‘s an ok watch, but better don‘t think too hard about it. Lot‘s of things don‘t make too much sense looking back.
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
5
yanis_rtxDec 26, 2022
A bunch of good/ok ideas (love/hate relationships, dumbness appearing as talent in contemporary world, big flashback for the third act...) mixed together without a real binder, sometimes entertaining but mostly forgettable due to averageA bunch of good/ok ideas (love/hate relationships, dumbness appearing as talent in contemporary world, big flashback for the third act...) mixed together without a real binder, sometimes entertaining but mostly forgettable due to average acting (except for Norton) and lack of real directing ambition. Pretty different from knives out as it is less a murder mystery plot rather than a satiric comedy.
And also wtf with the accents...
Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
5
RobMarr75Jan 26, 2023
Disappointing because, for me, the movie starts out as a lot of fun. I expect and can forgive the "surprise! Here's everything you would have had to have known that I didn't tell you!" but the climax/resolution is long, painful and unfun.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
5
Azul55Jan 13, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Woke nonsense virtue signaling at its worst. Turns James Bond gay, Bautista into a bumbling frat boy, it has social justice scientist, magical negro, evil super villain is of course white man who steals the McGuffin and is defeated by country bumpkin destroying the patriarchy via art destruction. Lame. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
5
Bek_Feb 1, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. among us solved the movie before themovie did>?????????????? mongus sus?>? susyt/??? sussy? mognus????? Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
YafoolofaTookFeb 28, 2023
Unlike the first film, this one fails at shaking you up by letting you in on the twist half-way through. This takes it in a new direction; you know "who did it", you're just along for the ride. Not much mystery in this mystery. Besides BenoitUnlike the first film, this one fails at shaking you up by letting you in on the twist half-way through. This takes it in a new direction; you know "who did it", you're just along for the ride. Not much mystery in this mystery. Besides Benoit Blanc (bless him) all the characters are whomever you want to portray onto them; I believe they're meant to be unlikable and a bit dumb, and they are. The ending is pretty shallow. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
corrodedDec 24, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It's ... OK ish. I expect if you turn off your brain and don't mind it wastes the first hour on almost nothing and then not realising the 'Worlds Greatest Detective' discounted 50% of the people on the island from the suspect pool, including somewhat strangely the obvious prime suspect, who it turns out to be, then you will probably have an ace time.

Not even in the same universe of quality as Knives Out
Expand
7 of 10 users found this helpful73
All this user's reviews
4
NavyBeanNov 27, 2022
meh. tons of coincidence and contrivance to further the plot. obvious humor that doesn't work. how these people ever come together to become friends makes zero sense.
23 of 35 users found this helpful2312
All this user's reviews
4
FranzHcriticJan 8, 2023
The coincidences in this whodunit are so forced that it spoils any creative structuring that would have otherwise elevated this film. Rian Johnson hasn't had a financial flop so he hasn't gotten the hint that his craft is predictable andThe coincidences in this whodunit are so forced that it spoils any creative structuring that would have otherwise elevated this film. Rian Johnson hasn't had a financial flop so he hasn't gotten the hint that his craft is predictable and quite frankly subpar. And 'Glass Onion' tries even harder than its predecessor to make some kind of political statement about class and race, coming off even more ham-fisted (which was the first film's biggest fault). Every character is an unrealistic, unbelievable cliché and caricature. And Benoit Blanc's flamboyance is dialed up to eleven, making it just a distraction. I only saw this in theaters because there was nothing else. I should have probably just waited until it came out on Netflix. Or better yet, not see it period. Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
4
afrikabrentJan 2, 2023
It was okay but the first one was much better in my opinion. Most of the characters were very cringeworthy, jokes very flat and the mistery felt quite shallow.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
4
Eman0221Jan 8, 2023
I thought it was just average. It starts off rather strong, but then it goes way off the rails into mediocrity really quick and it's all downhill from there into that rather bad ending. Johnson makes it way too obvious who the bad guy is fromI thought it was just average. It starts off rather strong, but then it goes way off the rails into mediocrity really quick and it's all downhill from there into that rather bad ending. Johnson makes it way too obvious who the bad guy is from the beginning and that’s just one of the many problems with this movie. Another thing is that the big, mid-movie plot twist doesn't make any sense. It also doesn't help that all of the characters are just unlikable. None of them have any redeeming qualities or the depth of humanity that De Armas and Plummer conveyed in the first one, and by the end you just want the story to get it over with which is kind of the way Benoit Blanc acts like if one were to be honest. Also, no spoilers, but lets just say some of the characters didn’t deserve the ending they got. I’d rate it a C at best and would not go to a theater to see this. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
4
sumochriZzZJan 7, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The first movie was one of my favourite movies in the last years. This one was going pretty well fromt the start but then they´re started working with flashbacks. Going back and fourth and using one of **** tools of story telling. Despite the massive pacing issues from this point on. The first movie at least got some relatable characters or story parts but in this movie you can't relate to a single thing. This movie just looks like a big money show off. The last half hour is just boring, disturbing and not even the logical end of the story. If the two main characters would just have lost the game, it could have been still a good movie. But moving it to a happy end, not breaking the viewers expectations even once in the whole movie, is just bad writing. I think they had no final ending at all and decided to use pretty bad cgi to impress people who don't know any better. Hopefully there will be another movie with Daniel Craig as Benoit Blanc because this role is made for him. But they clearly should do some more work on the story and not the style. First movie had both but it was only good because there was also a good story with substance behind the style. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
4
carlossolracDec 29, 2022
Maybe it's just me but seemed a little washed by the cultural spirit that pervades the Hollywood elite. The mystery wasn't a great mystery either.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
4
TomMondayDec 4, 2022
Actor playing protagonist lacks the ability to act. Also boring to watch a character with no flaws. I saw the film with Rian Johnson actually in the cinema; the audience laughed uproariously at the movie’s other absurd, flawed, deeply humanActor playing protagonist lacks the ability to act. Also boring to watch a character with no flaws. I saw the film with Rian Johnson actually in the cinema; the audience laughed uproariously at the movie’s other absurd, flawed, deeply human characters. But every scene with the protagonist was dead silent – even though this biased audience was there for a post-show Q&A with Johnson. In my memory since, the picture has aged like a banana in the sun. It’s just no fun to keep watching films interested in featuring underrepresented characters that have no interest in exploring what makes them human. Expand
11 of 20 users found this helpful119
All this user's reviews
4
alexegiyanDec 23, 2022
Entertaining, but this movie is simply mediocre and cringy. The first one was much better.
10 of 16 users found this helpful106
All this user's reviews
4
koen200792Dec 26, 2022
famous detective and some idiots solving silly puzzle, nothing interesting.
6 of 9 users found this helpful63
All this user's reviews
4
Mhamblin79Dec 25, 2022
A bit long, boring, and tedious. I enjoyed the first one a whole lot better, this one tries to be a little more preachy, I guess to appeal to a younger crowd. It’s a Netflix movie for sure and it shows. The actors seemed dull andA bit long, boring, and tedious. I enjoyed the first one a whole lot better, this one tries to be a little more preachy, I guess to appeal to a younger crowd. It’s a Netflix movie for sure and it shows. The actors seemed dull and uninteresting. Maybe if I hadn’t seen the first Knives Out I wouldn’t be expecting as much from this one. Expand
5 of 7 users found this helpful52
All this user's reviews
4
KrazerackJan 16, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Is it funny?
YES!
Is it well told?
NO
I think there are a lot of logical gaps and some bad storytelling. some of the actors seem to have too much makeup on their faces. as good as I found the 1 part. so disappointed I was by this. a 4/10
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
4
FenixnegroDec 26, 2022
Mucho mejor la primera. Esta es como una parodia de su predecesora. Salvo unos escasos momentos , el resto es aburrido
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
4
alicetestDec 26, 2022
Brilliant film, great cast and an excellent follow up to the previous film.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
4
TylerDurden64Jan 2, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. start was super cringe with all the covid references... i think everyone on earth is sick of hearing about covid, we dont need reminders in our movies. After the cringe was over... we get a promising premise of a murder mystery game on a beautiful island with some great actors like Edward Norton and Daniel Craig. After patiently waiting for over 30 minutes of build up, our detective ruins the fun mystery for everyone and deflates not only the murder mystery game by solving it instantly, but the movie also deflates like a sad whoopee cushion for the entire second half afterwords. Predicable plot, mostly poorly acted uninteresting characters, disappointing nonsensical ending... doesn't live up to the first movie at all. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
4
fluffyhatmagicJan 12, 2023
Rich people are stupid and terrible. LOL. So grateful there is a movie to tell us plebs about this important information.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
4
The___TruthJan 23, 2023
I am not American, I am a New Zealander, so here is a proper review of the film for the other few hundred nations on earth they forgot about.
What I mean by that is, as per my handle and as per my predictions years out on America's culture
I am not American, I am a New Zealander, so here is a proper review of the film for the other few hundred nations on earth they forgot about.
What I mean by that is, as per my handle and as per my predictions years out on America's culture war, the conning of the Right from within and without... plus that the Right would storm the Capitol (two years out), I just know a thing or two.
Unfortunately, many stateside do not.
Like a good murder-mystery, I am on the outside looking in. I can judge you and objectively so.
Firstly, opinions are not equal. If they're word for word? Then sure. Otherwise, the repeated sermons and idiocy of the Right could just be summed down to one comment and a zero and you should not publish their reviews metacritic. It destroys your credibility by virtue of the fact that they have none - and no scruples. Pure freedom is abuse.

Anyhoo....

So, is Glass Onion good (rather than enjoyed because you are you a liberal or disliked because you are a sociopath trying to make America great and glorious, um, again... hang on, when was that again? When it was terrible for everyone but white men like me? Yeah, that is what you regressives mean... Evolve or become inconsequential at best.. that's what I would say to you dying horses)? Or disliked as Right Wingers hate Star Wars' recent updates (fair enough) for being too "woke" (unfair, they're just okay, bad, really bad as movies... not MandMs being too lezzy for you - women hold hands, deal with it and stop watching porn incels, you're just awful people who don't know it, no one owes you punks anything), not Winnie the Pooh or whoever you have next in line to whinge about because you confuse virtue-signalling, woke, social justice warriors and whatever else you project out of the embers of your total lack, for what is effectively your own refusal to understand you're a worse person and a Right Wing moron... it's basic stuff of course but 'cos you got played by the Right, needing the working class to elect them / to vote 'em in, to avoid education and the 'lying mainstream media' i.e. reality, lol... You've been prevented from epiphany both openly and stupidly.. Then you worship your abusers?... Bit sad and pathetic, just saying).
Truth is though, deeply ironically, on this film, they're right, the Right, on this one and only occasion that I can recall out of about 67,832... Not the greatest strike-rate...
I mean, give a monkey a typewriter.
But it isn't bad for their reasons. It just isn't very good. For comparison, I would give the first one 8/10. Their (Right Wing sheep) low scores are a reflection of how much their defence-mechanisms have forced them to hate anything but themselves for losing their way and becoming monsters condemning their very own, but it would just go over their heads to explain that to planks of wood well past the point of no return.
But you are in an awful mess.... and the Right are to blame. Their voters are victims but complicit enough that all must now suffer the same fate. That is very sad, but true and now necessary.
Anyway, sorry if my opinion on all that upsets or angers, to alleviate somewhat any of your strong reactions necessary to conceal self-awareness, all I can offer is that it is entirely fact and only my opinion as it is fact. Rather than offer instinct and repeat brain-washings, I just have facts entirely occupy my opinion, then my opinion is fact.
So, unfortunately, or fortunately if you still have your soul intact... I am indisputably right. And you lose. I hope that doesn't upset the overwhelming majority of incel males on the Right Wing who angrily sit at their keyboards and bring down user scores on MOST occasions because the film has a 'massage they do not like" i.e. it reminds them they are awful. Ah well, suck it up buttercup.
Enjoy the film... or not. It is okay at best and has glaring issues with plot and contrivance that, as a writer, I find spoil the whole thing for me. I was also pretty sure who the 'killer(s)' was/were. Those are the faults.
The stupidity, racism , projections and backwardness of the sheeple on the Right are alternatively far, far more frequent and far less forgivable.

You're religious because you are 'conservative' (translation: extreme)? Then I would be very, very worried about that.

You can go home now Right. This case has been solved.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
3
ScraperDec 26, 2022
I think it thinks it's more clever and funny than it really is. The humor is really for the easily-amused Leno crowd. This menagerie of dunces will impress your parents but to me it's just dull.
11 of 15 users found this helpful114
All this user's reviews
3
DruganovJan 1, 2023
A movie made especially for the Tiktok, ADHD and twitter generation. awful.
10 of 15 users found this helpful105
All this user's reviews
3
zerobaneDec 24, 2022
Flat and un-inspiring with a simple to predict mystery (if you can even call it that). Bright side, first 10-15mins was an epic build up and they had a great cast. Then basically nothing happens for rest of movie until they do a flashbackFlat and un-inspiring with a simple to predict mystery (if you can even call it that). Bright side, first 10-15mins was an epic build up and they had a great cast. Then basically nothing happens for rest of movie until they do a flashback wrap-up at the end. Typical grade B trash that passes for movies now; checked the right boxes for lead character and correct "bad guy" = instant green light. Bonus points for fauci, covid reminders and masks; because those will age well.

I guess the play here is the plot and mystery is so obvious you would never guess it? The reactions and "tense scenes" were cringe inducing; guess it was suppose to be an obvious mystery comedy with no laughs? Odd bold choice... Just odd...
Expand
14 of 22 users found this helpful148
All this user's reviews
3
ComandanteCobraApr 1, 2023
I liked the first Knives Out, but not this one.
The first one was clever this is parodistic, exaggerated, full of himself and filled with memes and stereotypical characters.
Terrible, cheap and "modern" ending also. For me It feels like an
I liked the first Knives Out, but not this one.
The first one was clever this is parodistic, exaggerated, full of himself and filled with memes and stereotypical characters.
Terrible, cheap and "modern" ending also.
For me It feels like an humorous fan fiction of the first one
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
viewershipJan 10, 2023
The emperor isn't wearing a whole lot of clothes. I'm not trying to be contrarian when I say this was nearly unwatchable for me. So overblown, cartoonish and self-satisfied. Seeing the critic reviews makes me believe in conspiracy theoriesThe emperor isn't wearing a whole lot of clothes. I'm not trying to be contrarian when I say this was nearly unwatchable for me. So overblown, cartoonish and self-satisfied. Seeing the critic reviews makes me believe in conspiracy theories for the first time in my life. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
3
GlassoDec 28, 2022
This movie may very well serve as the ultimate exemplar for style over substance. It comes across as indulgent and most bothersome of all - just downright boring.
The best thing about the ending was that it was over.
9 of 12 users found this helpful93
All this user's reviews
3
EFRAMJan 13, 2023
A waste of time. I thought this was going to be at least entertaining, but after an hour of pablem and ring around the mystery idiocy, I just stopped watching. I have no idea what the "Pro" reviewers were smoking when they watched the sceneryA waste of time. I thought this was going to be at least entertaining, but after an hour of pablem and ring around the mystery idiocy, I just stopped watching. I have no idea what the "Pro" reviewers were smoking when they watched the scenery chewing performances by everyone except maybe Janelle Monae, but they obviously drank the cool aid and then smoked it. If a mystery doesn't grab you in the first 15 minutes and this one didn't. Move on. This guy is no Agatha Christie. let alone P.D.James, Arthur Conan Doyle, Stieg Larsson, Steven King or Patricia Cornwell. Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
3
snorkissJan 6, 2023
Started off interestingly, but the further it got the more convoluted and irksome it became until I just wanted to escape into a good nap - 3 stars for Kate Hudson in a bikini
7 of 17 users found this helpful710
All this user's reviews
3
evieHDec 24, 2022
It takes FOREVER to get going. The first half was painfully dull. The second half was better but definitely not worth sitting through the first 70 minutes or so. Ending was obvious and the group of friends was just not believable as a groupIt takes FOREVER to get going. The first half was painfully dull. The second half was better but definitely not worth sitting through the first 70 minutes or so. Ending was obvious and the group of friends was just not believable as a group who would have ever been friends. The characters acted like caricatures. All around a huge disappointment compared to the first film. Expand
12 of 21 users found this helpful129
All this user's reviews
3
DeralacJan 8, 2023
It was watchable. Not great, but ok. The first movie was better and the difference boils down to the characters. The characters in the first movie were better than the ones in the sequel. Daniel Craig's version of Sherlock Blanc was good andIt was watchable. Not great, but ok. The first movie was better and the difference boils down to the characters. The characters in the first movie were better than the ones in the sequel. Daniel Craig's version of Sherlock Blanc was good and I liked Edward Norton's Miles Zuckerberg and Janelle Monae's Andi Brand. The rest of the characters were mediocre, except for Birdie, who was obnoxious, loud and annoying. She screamed way too much. Way too much! She was pointless, tedious and loud. The movie would have been better without that character. Well definitely without her screaming so much. It interfered with my enjoyment of the film. I lowered my rating by one point because that character kept making me cringe just by being loud. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
3
bor1337Dec 28, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This film is a big disappointment compared to the first one, and the first film was good but not great. The ending is so obvious, some parts are just stupid and don't make any sense. This is NOT a clever detective film! It's a film about a really stupid billionaire and his fake friends. The first 20 min are great!
But Rian Johnson movies are not the best (that Star Wars film was easily the worst ever, holy ****
Expand
9 of 12 users found this helpful93
All this user's reviews
3
NeedFictionJan 1, 2023
I went into this film with no expectations at all, as I didn't even see the original either. I don't understand the positive reviews to be honest, and looking through them I have my doubts that all of them are legit. Sorry to those thatI went into this film with no expectations at all, as I didn't even see the original either. I don't understand the positive reviews to be honest, and looking through them I have my doubts that all of them are legit. Sorry to those that enjoyed this one, but 20 minutes into the film, and I'm struggling to hang on. It just wasn't entertaining. The script is average at best, and Daniel Craig just seems to be miscast, as I really thought his performance was flat. One other thing I noticed, and then confirmed only after I saw the film- is the attempt at social commentary. Rian Johnson and I would probably agree on 90% of political issues, however, I think he is thinking of the commentary first, and story second. It seems that his thinking while writing goes something like, "This would make a good parody of so and so hated politician, and boy, that would be funny in this story." It is too much of a sledge hammer so it isn't subtle at all, and that just makes it unenjoyable when the rest of the film is already struggling. Overall, I just couldn't recommend this as I thought it doesn't meet the hype by a long shot. Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
3
AterriblemsteryFeb 26, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is not a good movie. It earns two points from the fact that it's atleast visually appealing. First off all how is a detective as bad as blanc famous enough where people recognize him in a mask glasses and hat. Don't know. Why didn't miles kick him off the island. Don't know. Why didn't miles try to kick andie (helen) off the island despite they not being much of friends anymore and the fact that her 'ghost' has appeared on the island with the world's most famous detective. Don't know. Why doesn't miles have security cameras. Don't know. How did Duke not notice his gun being pulled off him. Don't know. How does Helen perfectly imitate andie to the point where andies friends of nine years sense that its not andie. Don't know. How did miles shoot exactly where the note book is. Don't know, how did the note book stop the bullet. Don't know. also shooting through glass would change the direction of the bullet. Why did blanc carry the hot sauce the entire time instead of putting it in his room or put it down somewhere. Don't know. Why does Rian blatantly refilm scenes. Don't know. Does rian blatantly refilm scenes. Yes. The twist of a twin is stupid as hell. Yes. This movie is full of contrivances and coincidence. Yes. This movie is bad. Yes.

Not saying you can't enjoy it. I'm just saying I didn't.

Among us reference. Yes.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
adverbFeb 5, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I thought it was brilliant--tight writing, a compelling and logical story, excellent acting--UNTIL the final act. At which point the writers decided to ruin it! This would be the first whodunit I've ever heard of in which the villain is not held accountable (yes, he loses money; not the same thing as incarceration). Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
2
imthenoobJan 6, 2023
While the first film featured a studded cast, fleshed-out characters, and an actual mystery at the heart of things. Glass Onion feels like a shallow sequel that pales in comparison to its predecessor in every way. This is definitely one ofWhile the first film featured a studded cast, fleshed-out characters, and an actual mystery at the heart of things. Glass Onion feels like a shallow sequel that pales in comparison to its predecessor in every way. This is definitely one of the most overrated films of the year IMO.

Its biggest and most glaring problem is that it is just too boring. Things take forever to unfold, The mystery isn't all that much of a mystery, it is simply a matter of figuring out the why and not the who.
Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
2
johndoe2014Jan 18, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I don't like writing bad reviews. But I am not sure how so many critics liked this. I know they were all supposed to be unlikable, but still they all were. And so - so what. Why do we care about these people? And if you break it down, the plot is the most obvious person killing the most obvious person in a predicable way. Perry Mason gets 10X more done in an hour. What was the mystery? Soap Opera dramatics among the cast is not a mystery. And the end, what is the message - if you can't put the rich guy in jail, at least you can break all his stuff? Is breaking things how you end a mystery story? Have we decided that audiences are too stupid to get detective work, so we just end it with "things blowing up real good." Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
2
argonsteeleDec 25, 2022
Wow. Glass Onion is almost as non-sensical as The Last Jedi. Rian Johnson is truly an embarrassing hack who should be writing/directing kid's shows for Nickelodeon. And honestly it reflect poorly on all the actors who are involved in the nonsense.
9 of 15 users found this helpful96
All this user's reviews
2
mustang8Dec 27, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Who even approved this ending? Incredibly mediocre and leaves the viewer unsatisfied, knowing that the antagonist will eventually get out of this and the “justice dealt” is nothing but a scratch in the grand scheme of things. Expand
8 of 11 users found this helpful83
All this user's reviews
2
danial_vosoughiDec 24, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Just one question.
How can you be friends with someone for such a long time and not know that she has a twin sister?
Expand
7 of 13 users found this helpful76
All this user's reviews
2
kevinCHONJan 9, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Predictable garbage. Go figure the 2 main villains are the only straight white males. Another Rian Johnson suck fest Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
2
JeffRsonDec 27, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Rian Johnson is now remembered as the director who destroyed the Star Wars franchise instead of achieving to be the new George Lucas. Precisely just like his Glass Onion character who will be remembered for burning the Mona Lisa instead of creating a new one - at least Rian Johnson has some self awareness. But this movie goes beyond being a response to his poorly received Last Jedi and to the downfall of his promising career, Rian Johnson also destroys his own franchise by giving us a mediocre sequel with cheap jokes and (already) outdated references to current events. Expand
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
2
AkramfvDec 24, 2022
Not even half as good as the first film. Sluggish start and obvious ending aside, I am sick of perfect main characters. And the main character here is not the eccentric detective (who is left to play second banana to our true hero/victim).Not even half as good as the first film. Sluggish start and obvious ending aside, I am sick of perfect main characters. And the main character here is not the eccentric detective (who is left to play second banana to our true hero/victim). Our true hero/victim has no flaws whatsoever. She is a genius, who can make billions in a few short years, and is somehow totally and completely without fault. She’s also the most boring one. Blah. Expand
12 of 19 users found this helpful127
All this user's reviews
2
DolphinReviewsDec 30, 2022
Nowhere close to the first film. A complete cringe fest all the way through.
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
2
matthias17Dec 27, 2022
first one was way better, this one was uneventful and disappointing, and it was very predictable anyhow
5 of 8 users found this helpful53
All this user's reviews
2
gratefulrNov 27, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie is a massive disappointment considering it departs from everything that made the original movie a near perfect murder mystery. The central idea of the movie is a glass onion, something that seems like it has many layers, while at the same time you can see the center clearly from the beginning. That is the premise they used for the mystery, but what they failed to think through is that just leaves you with a boring and predictable story that has to be carried by the over the top extravagance that ruins the immersion. While it is still a pretty movie, the scope undermines whatever pretty shots and cinematography that carried over from the original. More and more Craig's character felt like the only change from Agatha Christie's creation was a change of accent. Not worth watching Expand
17 of 28 users found this helpful1711
All this user's reviews
2
B4B8Jan 3, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. No character development. A lame twist with the identical twin is not believable. Daniel Craig solves the mystery in 3 seconds. The movie feels rushed. Mostly directors fault as the actors are great in other roles. Completely different than the original. Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
2
goodnightoppyFeb 16, 2023
Predictable, pretentious, boring, uninspired, contrived. A mess. Don't beleive the hype. Nothing of the first comes through here. The only similarity is the title.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
2
Gabbleny23Dec 29, 2022
Huge huge disappointment!! I cant understand the good reviews..a dumb boring nothing..
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
2
barbara12345Jan 21, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Annoying wannabe movie. Hated the script, the direction, the sound and the acting. As it was written, style over content. As too often happens lately. Enough. Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
1
PavchrisApr 7, 2023
Wow, I can see why metacritic is the better audience indicator than RottenBoughtTomatoes. Yep, it's crap no question. Somehow their just gonna keep giving Johnson more money, letting the critics fluff each other over it, and we're probablyWow, I can see why metacritic is the better audience indicator than RottenBoughtTomatoes. Yep, it's crap no question. Somehow their just gonna keep giving Johnson more money, letting the critics fluff each other over it, and we're probably gonna get more studios flooding the reviews sites to dilute the scores. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
ScienceAdvisorJan 8, 2023
Contrivances, expositions, contradictions and coincidences the script. Rian Johnson showing he cannot write to save his life, with a murder story that forgets the mystery, and has to cheat by reshooting scenes from a slightly differentContrivances, expositions, contradictions and coincidences the script. Rian Johnson showing he cannot write to save his life, with a murder story that forgets the mystery, and has to cheat by reshooting scenes from a slightly different angle, even though it was clear from the original angle that this is NOT what happened. To make it worse there are multiple key aspects of the movie that would never have happened (allowing a character to even join the weekend) without random characters suddenly acting as dumb as Rian truly is. This is a movie for people to pretend they solved something when it was never really a puzzle, so they can pat themselves on the back for finally solving one. That is the subversion of expectation, but also qualifies for false advertising. At least Batista did not burn his crotch (I hope) when he fired the gun then promptly jammed it into his speedos, because over-exaggerated stereotypes are so funny. Also, the heroine is an attempted murderer and a French death squad will be killing her for her crimes, all with the approval of Benoit simply because the detective is a moron. Everyone ends up in jail in the real world, except they would have died of course, if Rian had a single active brain cell. Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
1
lascottlaJan 11, 2023
Gaudy and gauche. The first Knives Out was far superior. This one felt like it was written on a deadline and Rian Johnson just went all-in on spectacle and heavy-handed doltish “twists” to distract from the lack of good writing. I reallyGaudy and gauche. The first Knives Out was far superior. This one felt like it was written on a deadline and Rian Johnson just went all-in on spectacle and heavy-handed doltish “twists” to distract from the lack of good writing. I really liked Johnson’s Brick. And I thought the original Knives Out was a fun, well constructed, whodunit. But this sequel was lazy, clumsy, simple, and chock-full of lame/cheap plot devices. It seemed as if Johnson built this steaming pile with over the top cliched characters and settings in a futile attempt to disguise the fundamental failings of this movie’s witless writing. I might give this movie 2 stars if it wasn’t written and directed by someone who’s had a track record of producing much higher quality projects in this genre. Given his prior work, one would have expected something MUCH better from Johnson, so one star is all it deserves. Very disappointing. Barely got through it. Felt like a huge waste of time when I finally did. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
1
icotzabbDec 24, 2022
This is the film they truly wanted to make as the original knives out, only audiences would have demanded their money back and smashed up the crystal. Back then they were handcuffed by competency, at least somewhat. Now, however, comes theThis is the film they truly wanted to make as the original knives out, only audiences would have demanded their money back and smashed up the crystal. Back then they were handcuffed by competency, at least somewhat. Now, however, comes the glass onions. Now they got to do it. Only i wasnt prepared for the embarrassing stream of idiodic moments. Daniel Craig has hopped on the same warped and oversimplified childish vehicle Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
JonnyDeanDec 28, 2022
Awful, Awful, Awful. Nothing about this was original or entertaining. Don't understand the good reviews.
10 of 14 users found this helpful104
All this user's reviews
1
AntonyChardDec 28, 2022
First Knives Out was not perfect, but it was a good black comedy. This one - thoroughly disappointed. It looks like a parody of a good movie or real life. ZERO fun.

The storyline is super weak and predicted, acting is terrible - it looks
First Knives Out was not perfect, but it was a good black comedy. This one - thoroughly disappointed. It looks like a parody of a good movie or real life. ZERO fun.

The storyline is super weak and predicted, acting is terrible - it looks like all actors don't want to play in this movie.

Visually it's great to look at, but don't spend your time on this.

I feel sorry for Daniel Craig, who needs to be a part of sh** like this after 007. Movies like this are destroying the careers of actors.

Yes, I know it is Netflix, and you can expect nothing good. But I hoped for some changes after Wednesday.

And yes - terrible, unfunny ending. It looked like an uprising in kindergarten.
Expand
8 of 13 users found this helpful85
All this user's reviews
1
PudgiepandaDec 27, 2022
So disappointed with this film, had a stellar cast but this film is as dull as dishwater with over the top story which just isn’t engaging. I made it to about 1 hour in and I disliked most of the characters so didn’t waste my time watchingSo disappointed with this film, had a stellar cast but this film is as dull as dishwater with over the top story which just isn’t engaging. I made it to about 1 hour in and I disliked most of the characters so didn’t waste my time watching anymore Expand
7 of 10 users found this helpful73
All this user's reviews
1
kiwikskiJan 2, 2023
I was already skeptical about naming a sequel movie "A Knives Out Mystery" simply because Knives Out was amazing. It felt like trying too hard, which was exactly what this movie was. The characters were the opposite of subtle, when subtletyI was already skeptical about naming a sequel movie "A Knives Out Mystery" simply because Knives Out was amazing. It felt like trying too hard, which was exactly what this movie was. The characters were the opposite of subtle, when subtlety is what the original movie thrived on. Everyone acted completely illogically, the character's motivations and relationships didn't make sense. Even Benoit Blanc fell prey to the poor writing epidemic once or twice, although he was the best part of the show. Overacting reigned supreme and I guess the producer thought if there were enough off-color jokes, attractive people, and beautiful CGI, we might not notice that the movie doesn't begin to attain to the title "Mystery". Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
1
pangipinguDec 31, 2022
Proof that star-studded box office hits should be avoided at all costs. Now you're the one pushing it, Rian!
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
1
JohnniesbeefDec 29, 2022
An insultingly-shallow disappointment: Knives Out was clever, creative, and crafty; Glass Onion turns out to be a cynical money-grab void with precisely 0 of the 3 C’s noted above. The writing is just plain bad. Total waste of time. The onlyAn insultingly-shallow disappointment: Knives Out was clever, creative, and crafty; Glass Onion turns out to be a cynical money-grab void with precisely 0 of the 3 C’s noted above. The writing is just plain bad. Total waste of time. The only reason we watched for 25-min was due to being too stunned to push a button to make it stop. Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
1
FordFordFord1Jan 23, 2023
A really dumbed-down version of the original. Relies on a star-studded cast but has no substance or intrigue. Just boring
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
1
BananaFish99Feb 17, 2023
Disappointing, i have never seen as much of a predictable movie plot as this one, it delivers no plot twist or joy and is completely vein
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
cloudyHazeDec 24, 2022
This movie is just twitter the movie. Im thinking I’m in for a cool murder mystery and it starts with current polotics and NFTs? Rian Johnsons, or whatever his name is, is a hack. Save yourself the trouble and watch a foreign film thatThis movie is just twitter the movie. Im thinking I’m in for a cool murder mystery and it starts with current polotics and NFTs? Rian Johnsons, or whatever his name is, is a hack. Save yourself the trouble and watch a foreign film that actually provides an escape from the crap we see in our news feeds 24/7. It’s actually getting so pervasive how these people throw this stuff in our faces 30 times a day, no wonder mental health is at an all time low Expand
7 of 17 users found this helpful710
All this user's reviews
0
paulraisedDec 25, 2022
Incredibly boring and tepid beyond belief. Much like the first one it’s a mess of bad takes from Poirot and an assortment of horrible decisions. From the script, to the editing, the cast, just awful. Avoid like the plague.
9 of 14 users found this helpful95
All this user's reviews
0
Voodoo123Jan 5, 2023
Opening scene of the movie makes reference to COVID mask protection myth - instant 0/10 from me
3 of 10 users found this helpful37
All this user's reviews
0
enut_butterDec 24, 2022
Custom made for r*dditor midwits, by a r*dditor midwit. The dialogue is awful, the acting is stiff, the writing is childish and the direction is just a mess. Worst yet, the killer is obvious, removing any air of mystery. As far as holidayCustom made for r*dditor midwits, by a r*dditor midwit. The dialogue is awful, the acting is stiff, the writing is childish and the direction is just a mess. Worst yet, the killer is obvious, removing any air of mystery. As far as holiday movies go you would be hard pressed to find something worse to watch. Expand
9 of 20 users found this helpful911
All this user's reviews
0
Tony1984Jan 2, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. If it wasn't for the ending I'd have rated 5/10. A pretty mediocre affair with the usual in jokes, mockery sneering and ham fisted social commentary. But really nice wardrobe and sets. Yeah, whatever, but they burnt the Mona Lisa. WtF? The hero burnt the Mona Lisa and it's supposed to be cool. WTaF? Horrendous. What's going to happen in the next movie? Killing puppies?
And they could have just have hired an actor from the Southern United States with a natural accent instead of Daniel Craig. There's tons of them. Sad and pathetic
Expand
6 of 9 users found this helpful63
All this user's reviews
0
OlivierPielDec 25, 2022
Do people who rate it above 8 do it out of cognitive dissonance because they can't cut Netflix? That's the only thing I can take from this trite copy of Agatha Christie, who was a very minor writer herself. You know a "movie"is bad when itDo people who rate it above 8 do it out of cognitive dissonance because they can't cut Netflix? That's the only thing I can take from this trite copy of Agatha Christie, who was a very minor writer herself. You know a "movie"is bad when it can be reduced to a 200-word synopsis as fellow user Vulgaris did us the favour to expose. Some people rate this 10. Perfection? Like Michelangelo or Bach or Tarkovsky? Poor 'Meuricans. Expand
6 of 15 users found this helpful69
All this user's reviews
0
bhappenstanceDec 23, 2022
Rian Johnson is a vastly overrated hack, and GO is borderline unwatchable. The cinematic equivalent of being stuck in a room with grating, preening morons for two hours.
17 of 27 users found this helpful1710
All this user's reviews