Ghostbusters

9

dokyacapJul 17, 2016

It's very very awesome movie for ghostbusters franchise. hilarious, high-tech gadgets, and brilliant. I love story, CG, 3D technology especially all original casts in old ghostbusters come back to cameo. I lovin it!!

10 of 57 users found this helpful1047

All this user's reviews

0

kon4akJul 17, 2016

That whole movie is just a guide to how convert 144 million $ into the pile of sh*t. And a queef joke of course. Call me misogynistic but i found this kind of jokes is disgusting. If you laugh at this you have a serious mental problems.

24 of 36 users found this helpful2412

All this user's reviews

0

FantastitchJul 17, 2016

Well then, I don't know why I believe any of the hype when I should have known better....... This movie had perhaps the worst comedic chemistry I have ever seen. Bad jokes, bad CGI, and an incoherent nonsensical plot. Don't even get meWell then, I don't know why I believe any of the hype when I should have known better....... This movie had perhaps the worst comedic chemistry I have ever seen. Bad jokes, bad CGI, and an incoherent nonsensical plot. Don't even get me started on the estrogen based man-hating which seethed from this movie like the ever present CGI fog in the ghost scenes. 0/10… Expand

24 of 37 users found this helpful2413

All this user's reviews

2

JackintheBox333Jul 17, 2016

To get this out of the way at the beginning, yes this movie is bad. Real bad. However I then I have to ask the question: Does this movie deserve a 0. The answer to that, in my opinion, is no.

The movie itself, while not a 100% completeTo get this out of the way at the beginning, yes this movie is bad. Real bad. However I then I have to ask the question: Does this movie deserve a 0. The answer to that, in my opinion, is no.

The movie itself, while not a 100% complete beat for beat retread of the original movie story wise, still manages to offer no new story bits while managing to not even prevent obvious plot holes in its own retreaded narrative. While there are a few comedy bits that do land, most do not, and leave the audience just groaning at how bad they are.

The CGI effects have been compared very unfavorably to the Eddie Murphy movie The Haunted Mansion, and I have to agree. The effects are not good and took me out of the movie. There was no suspension of disbelief, no feeling that what was appearing on the screen was anything other than fake.

The question then becomes, if the movie is this bad, how do I score it? The only real positive I can give this movie is that I did not have to resort to alcohol to finish watching the movie. Because of that, and the problems I noted, the only possible score I can give this movie is a 2, which is the lowest possible score I can give to an alcohol free movie. This is no Dragonball Evolution or Double Dragon, but its dang close.
It's a shame really. This movie could have been good. The terrible storyboarding and epically awful directing made sure it wasn't.… Expand

40 of 57 users found this helpful4017

All this user's reviews

0

SarahAlduinJul 17, 2016

This was a complete let down.......... I think I laughed once, and it was probably driven by desperation. Truly terrible movie. I can't see how any person could honestly call this good.

38 of 54 users found this helpful3816

All this user's reviews

3

doug_quaidJul 17, 2016

The Good: the effects are pretty cool - the CG is layered, cloth, translucent skin, bones, particle effects and little glowy bits. There's a couple of kinda funny jokes, particularly in the intro.

The Bad: Most jokes, dialogue, locations,The Good: the effects are pretty cool - the CG is layered, cloth, translucent skin, bones, particle effects and little glowy bits. There's a couple of kinda funny jokes, particularly in the intro.

The Bad: Most jokes, dialogue, locations, gear, outfits, weapons, traps, ghosts and well... the plot is 80% recycled from the first movie. There's an awful lot of stereotyping going on, from a cookie-cutter villain to a dumb-as-rocks secretary doing his best Zoolander impression, to feel-good 'girl bonding' moments that feel straight out of Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants. The entire concert and several other shots are clearly pieced together from green screen takes. The cameos with Ackroyd, Weaver and Murray, are... well unnecessary. You just sort of go 'holy **** I had no idea they were *that* old!'

The Ugly: I consider the original Ghostbusters to be one of the funniest movies made. It's painful watching highly skilled actresses with years of SNL, stand up and improv experience try desperately to do something, anything, with what is *really* bad writing. Bad writing means no foreshadowing, no figuring out the plot or backstory, no interesting, warm human connection moments, you stop caring about the characters, then the plot, then things really just start falling apart as you realize with no small amount of horror that you're watching Ghostbusters shake their butts to DMX's Up in Here.

I'm giving this movie a three. And that's being generous.… Expand

30 of 45 users found this helpful3015

All this user's reviews

10

nyxe12345Jul 16, 2016

Movie was awesome! I keep hearing people claim that their theaters were empty and no one laughed, but nearly every seat was filled at the showing I went to and it was filled with laughter. I loved seeing strong, intelligent women as the leadsMovie was awesome! I keep hearing people claim that their theaters were empty and no one laughed, but nearly every seat was filled at the showing I went to and it was filled with laughter. I loved seeing strong, intelligent women as the leads of the movie, because a movie with this many female leads is hard to come by. Hope there's a sequel!… Expand

10 of 53 users found this helpful1043

All this user's reviews

10

ArachamJul 16, 2016

A surprising number of the 0-2 point reviews remind me of a certain character in this film... that said:

I never see a movie on opening weekend, ever. For this movie I made an exception and I was not disappointed. This movie had everyA surprising number of the 0-2 point reviews remind me of a certain character in this film... that said:

I never see a movie on opening weekend, ever. For this movie I made an exception and I was not disappointed.

This movie had every member of our group in hysterics the entire way through. If you're looking for a film with the right peppering of subtle callbacks to the original, yet entirely its own movie, this is it.

This is a more coherent telling of the Ghostbusters story than the original, with a dynamite cast and an excellent script. Go see it, you won't be disappointed.… Expand

10 of 51 users found this helpful1041

All this user's reviews

7

MadMaxFuryRoadJul 16, 2016

Ghostbusters isn't a bad movie, but it isn't great either. I guess it was watchable, but I can understand why people hate it. For me, I haven't seen the original, so I wasn't really expecting much. What I got was kind of what I expected. NowGhostbusters isn't a bad movie, but it isn't great either. I guess it was watchable, but I can understand why people hate it. For me, I haven't seen the original, so I wasn't really expecting much. What I got was kind of what I expected. Now I love Melissa McCarthy, Paul Feig films (The Heat, Spy) and I think she has a humorous personality. In this movie she kind of was the same character as before. The other three ghostbusters were fine and they were entertaining for the most part. Chris Hemsworth kind of felt like an idiot in this film, but that was okay although it felt like he was just an additional character casted into the film. The film itself had a pretty strong beginning and then it just kind of dragged. However, the film itself had some pretty good elements and this film kinda reminded me of TMNT2. Ghostbusters was overlong and did feel like a cash grab remake, but it's watchable for the most part and it certainly doesn't deserve a 2.3 user score. (69/100)… Expand

9 of 49 users found this helpful940

All this user's reviews

10

TTReviewsJul 16, 2016

I didn't expect to find Ghostbusters to be my humor at all but I was pleasantly surprised. I'd totally see it in theaters again and I'm not one for rewatching them at box office price ever.

11 of 51 users found this helpful1140

All this user's reviews

10

dream-kingJul 16, 2016

I watched it. It was a lot of fun. The fan service/homage to the first movie was quality for the most part, and probably too much of it was done, but it didn't distract from the entertainment experience. It's not The Bicycle Thief. It's notI watched it. It was a lot of fun. The fan service/homage to the first movie was quality for the most part, and probably too much of it was done, but it didn't distract from the entertainment experience. It's not The Bicycle Thief. It's not even Sex Lies and Videotape. But it was worthwhile and fun summer movie, especially to watch characters in a movie just be characters in a movie who just happen to be women.… Expand

11 of 53 users found this helpful1142

All this user's reviews

10

pwanchJul 16, 2016

I really enjoyed this movie. It pays homage to the original (not counting the second movie because that was absolutely terrible) while being able to stand on its own. It was funny, the fight scenes were badass and I even got scared at times.I really enjoyed this movie. It pays homage to the original (not counting the second movie because that was absolutely terrible) while being able to stand on its own. It was funny, the fight scenes were badass and I even got scared at times. Each of the ghostbusters were emotionally complex and had distinct personalities and I enjoyed seeing their dynamic on screen. All in all this reboot fit the spirit of the series in "dumb fun".

I also assume that about 99.99% of the negative reviews haven't even seen the movie, could be effectively tossed out, and are only rating it bad because its popular to do so.… Expand

11 of 53 users found this helpful1142

All this user's reviews

1

Grimlock047Jul 16, 2016

It's beginning to look like Christmas, at least for all the "professional" critics who may be getting a nice bonus in order to give this "movie" a good review.

The quick review: This is not "The Heat", this is "Scooby-Doo the Movie"(liveIt's beginning to look like Christmas, at least for all the "professional" critics who may be getting a nice bonus in order to give this "movie" a good review.

The quick review: This is not "The Heat", this is "Scooby-Doo the Movie"(live action) with the worst jokes from "Spy". Unfortunately for the cast there's no Sandra Bullock this time to keep the movie afloat.

The sad part: It's unbelievable how Magazines and TV channels can publish/broadcast such blatant attempts to please their Hollywood overlords.

I understand that some people may like the kind of "humour" portrayed in the movie, I personally find it repugnant, but to give this movie an 8 or 9 out of 10 or an A/A- is just a disgrace for the reviewers and their employers. Some of the worst like Mark Kermode from the BBC who in his review you can see struggles to find something positive to say about the movie even implies that people who don't like the movie are "misogynists" right off the bat . How can someone like that clown be allowed to work on TV?… Expand

56 of 75 users found this helpful5619

All this user's reviews

1

McNastyFilthJul 16, 2016

This movie is absolutely atrocious. Outside of the soulless "fancy" CGI - the comedic crew is pathetic this time around. I never thought I'd see a worse installment to this franchise after watching #2. Boy, was I wrong.

43 of 60 users found this helpful4317

All this user's reviews

3

the12blackJul 16, 2016

Ugh.

Ghostbusters (1984) was a light-hearted sci-fi picture featuring the right balance of comedy, action, creep and drama. The iteraction between the original cast and the ambiance of the film set by the music and pacing was masterful.Ugh.

Ghostbusters (1984) was a light-hearted sci-fi picture featuring the right balance of comedy, action, creep and drama. The iteraction between the original cast and the ambiance of the film set by the music and pacing was masterful.
Sadly, Ghostbusters (2016) has none of these things. The cast has no cohesion, the special effects are out of control, and the film feels souless and ill conceived. Most of the performances (from actors who have proved their worth in other films) are hollow and without connection.

Save your friday night for another film. This one is a rent or wait-for-HBO.… Expand

63 of 85 users found this helpful6322

All this user's reviews

0

XiongmaoMacaoJul 16, 2016

If you like cheesy SNL actors, a political agenda, man hating, Scooby Doo CGI effects and terrible editing..... you will love this movie BUT if you have a brain an enjoy a movie with a great story and a plot that makes sense THEN AVOID thisIf you like cheesy SNL actors, a political agenda, man hating, Scooby Doo CGI effects and terrible editing..... you will love this movie BUT if you have a brain an enjoy a movie with a great story and a plot that makes sense THEN AVOID this piece of cinematic poop at ALL COSTS! horrible...just horrible!… Expand

45 of 64 users found this helpful4519

All this user's reviews

0

memzJul 16, 2016

Nobody should be forced to watch this garbage. It is an insult to the original films. I have nothing against the all female cast, but none of them were able to make me laugh once. Don't waste your money on this movie.

48 of 68 users found this helpful4820

All this user's reviews

10

FullOfGraceJul 16, 2016

Best summer movie hands down. At least as far as b!ockbusters. And stay past the credits. Theres a little something extra at the end? Would i see this movie again? Nope. But then again, I only saw the original once.

12 of 69 users found this helpful1257

All this user's reviews

0

out2killJul 16, 2016

I nearly walked out of the theatre. This movie has some of the worst writing in the history of cinema. Maybe in 30 years we can get a decent reboot of this reboot, one can only hope.

54 of 73 users found this helpful5419

All this user's reviews

10

404040Jul 16, 2016

Had a blast! This review is partly based on the reactions of my two little girls, who were amped up to see this . And they were not dissapointed. Ghostbusters is now theyre favorite movie. So happy :)

13 of 65 users found this helpful1352

All this user's reviews

9

Movie888Jul 16, 2016

The last X Men felt empty. Batman v Superman was WAY too serious and heavy. Warcraft was utter garbage. At least Ghostbusters was fun, which was probably why I enjoyed it more than I should have. Captain America was strong but I only had funThe last X Men felt empty. Batman v Superman was WAY too serious and heavy. Warcraft was utter garbage. At least Ghostbusters was fun, which was probably why I enjoyed it more than I should have. Captain America was strong but I only had fun for about fifteen minutes in the middle. GB was a solid comedy with action. Thats all I got. That, and my grade.… Expand

15 of 71 users found this helpful1556

All this user's reviews

2

TSmallsJul 16, 2016

This turns out to be just a really bad movie and an insult to the Ghostbusters franchise. After all the years of Sony saying no to making a new Ghostbusters movie and when they finally decide to this is the result. The actors in this movieThis turns out to be just a really bad movie and an insult to the Ghostbusters franchise. After all the years of Sony saying no to making a new Ghostbusters movie and when they finally decide to this is the result. The actors in this movie just don't create the sort of chemistry and flow that made the original great. That being said it is also not their fault as they are not bad themselves. Kate McKinnon does a good job with what she has to work with as does Leslie Jones even though she is put into such a stereotypical character. I look forward to seeing these two in much better films. The writing in this film is just awful and in large the most atrocious part of this movie. The male characters are horrible and other than Chris Hemsworth are completely forgettable. The cameos by the original cast are absolutely terrible and insulting. I did still enjoy Annie Potts but her cameo could have been much better to. There is just so much in this movie that makes no sense. In the first film since the Ghostbusters were new to this they basically destroyed the hotel with their proton packs just trying to catch Slimer but in this film they are all great shots somehow. The CGI overall was not very good and this movie seemed like it would have been better as a cartoon or a movie for kids. In the end Ghostbusters 2016 is just a bad movie and a cash grab that should have never happened like this. The blame falls on Sony, Amy Pascal, and Paul Feig for how this whole thing turned out. They should be ashamed of themselves and never allowed to touch something like this again. The worst part to me is that I think we could have gotten a good new Ghostbusters film but that would have required getting the right director and choosing the cast because they are right for these parts. Having women Ghostbusters is great but when you start out by making the qualifications for the part to simply be female and that's all that matters then you will never find a great cast capable of giving you that Ghostbusters magic. I wish Sony would have taken the time to do this right and make a great movie instead of worrying about politics and catering to the vocal minority. One last thing that needs to be mentioned is that Sony deleted the comments of a large number of women that were critical of this film to frame it as just men being sexist. Sorry Sony but if you respect women then you don't erase and silence the voices of those that don't agree with you.… Expand

83 of 108 users found this helpful8325

All this user's reviews

7

123456burnJul 16, 2016

Best summer big budget film so far this year. And no I dont watch cartoons. I also ignore obvious attempts to slander other users while a string of zero grade reviews to do it. Its childish and reserved for people that should stick toBest summer big budget film so far this year. And no I dont watch cartoons. I also ignore obvious attempts to slander other users while a string of zero grade reviews to do it. Its childish and reserved for people that should stick to watching cartoons.

I thought acting here was good. The story was loose and didnt feel constrained with too much exposition. The graphics - call them scooby doo if you like kids films, but they worked just fine. NICE one liners. And maybe there was some humor directed at men but guess what. Im a guy and I found the jabs funny cauae im not an over sensitive boy on an internet rampage.… Expand

18 of 75 users found this helpful1857

All this user's reviews

0

Bizz408Jul 16, 2016

Serious contender for worst movie of the year. The comedy was cringeworthy at best. The story was forgettable, absolutely no memorable moments like the Original and it's sequel had.
No quoteworthy lines. I've seen straight-to-DVD movies makeSerious contender for worst movie of the year. The comedy was cringeworthy at best. The story was forgettable, absolutely no memorable moments like the Original and it's sequel had.
No quoteworthy lines. I've seen straight-to-DVD movies make a better effort at producing quality entertainment. This is exactly as I thought it would be: a cheap cash-in on a cult classic aimed solely at making a quick buck off of it and nothing else.… Expand

50 of 69 users found this helpful5019

All this user's reviews

0

JohnGulbonnyJul 16, 2016

In the Immortal words of Kevin Sorbo, I was "DISAPPOINTED!". What a flop, Feig owes me my money back, especially for insulting all those people smart enough not to be duped by this hack.

66 of 88 users found this helpful6622

All this user's reviews

8

GTAYLORJul 16, 2016

FUNNY glad i saw it. No expectations. Ignored all the noise and just said Im gunna go and aee it for myself. Did i say it was FUNNY. I dont care who makes me laugh.

18 of 72 users found this helpful1854

All this user's reviews

0

SammyBiccyJul 16, 2016

Just so bad. Watching paint dry or organising your books according to the Dewey Decimal System would be considerably more entertaining than watching this travesty.

53 of 75 users found this helpful5322

All this user's reviews

9

Dozer-21Jul 16, 2016

I LOVE paul feig movies. He did a great job with this remake. Funny as always. I know I might sound biased but hey, he hasnt let me down yet . Thought the CGI was great in 3D. Not a ton of people in my IMAX show but its expensive, so I getI LOVE paul feig movies. He did a great job with this remake. Funny as always. I know I might sound biased but hey, he hasnt let me down yet . Thought the CGI was great in 3D. Not a ton of people in my IMAX show but its expensive, so I get it. Anyways, probably the funniest movie of the year for me.… Expand

16 of 74 users found this helpful1658

All this user's reviews

0

SNESStarterJul 16, 2016

A horrible movie that was only made to appease SJWs and create diversity for the sake of diversity. The "jokes" are forced, the characters are forced. This film is shameful.

46 of 66 users found this helpful4620

All this user's reviews

7

blisterronJul 16, 2016

OK Im a guy giving a movie review about Ghostbuster and I dont care about all the back & forth between the haters that never went to the movie vs women that said its was great no matter what. I HAD FUN. laughed a ton and yeah jokes againstOK Im a guy giving a movie review about Ghostbuster and I dont care about all the back & forth between the haters that never went to the movie vs women that said its was great no matter what. I HAD FUN. laughed a ton and yeah jokes against men? they were funny. it felt to me like they totally paid respect to the classic version - the sure as heck didnt turn their back on it. also think Kristen Wiig gets no respect. she's funny but can play it straight-up normal. i recommend.… Expand

17 of 71 users found this helpful1754

All this user's reviews

4

SurtJul 16, 2016

This is a SNL parody of ghostbusters. Exactly what many thought it would be. Add on top of that the insult of a pandering cash grab and this movie is just good.

Now I would like someone to say after seeing this that it's not a spice girlThis is a SNL parody of ghostbusters. Exactly what many thought it would be. Add on top of that the insult of a pandering cash grab and this movie is just good.

Now I would like someone to say after seeing this that it's not a spice girl "girl power!" movie, and more obvious at the ending. Pandering is not diversity. You want diversity? then look at the Ghostbusters comics from IDW. Every issue has been amazing.… Expand

33 of 48 users found this helpful3315

All this user's reviews

8

misterbearJul 16, 2016

i felt a lot of love went into this film. i appreciated the nods to the original (i saw the first one when i was 12) while infusing the story with some fresh ideas. camaraderie between the main four characters was wonderful. i thinki felt a lot of love went into this film. i appreciated the nods to the original (i saw the first one when i was 12) while infusing the story with some fresh ideas. camaraderie between the main four characters was wonderful. i think ghostbusters belong in the 21st century as a remake, and Feig did the film justice.… Expand

18 of 85 users found this helpful1867

All this user's reviews

10

softscrubJul 16, 2016

I enjoyed it all the way through, more fun than i thought it would be. And I would totally see it again. Thats my review. And thats the only justification I need to score a movie a ten (that plus the actress Kate something; shes fantastic) II enjoyed it all the way through, more fun than i thought it would be. And I would totally see it again. Thats my review. And thats the only justification I need to score a movie a ten (that plus the actress Kate something; shes fantastic) I dont comment on editing, or writing, becaue I have no idea what to look for.

Y… Expand

18 of 77 users found this helpful1859

All this user's reviews

10

JerekJul 16, 2016

Ignore the (largely confected) hate-fest around this movie. It's wonderful, with a great cast, terrific FX, lovely cameos from five of the original cast, some gorgeous little references to the original novie and lots of laugh-out-loudIgnore the (largely confected) hate-fest around this movie. It's wonderful, with a great cast, terrific FX, lovely cameos from five of the original cast, some gorgeous little references to the original novie and lots of laugh-out-loud moments. The original movie(s) have been in my top ten movies ever since I saw them as a teenager, and this remake is a worthy addition to the canon. It manages to be very respectful to its much-loved 'parent' as well as a terrific popcorn movie in it's own right. Here's hoping for a sequel!… Expand

17 of 74 users found this helpful1757

All this user's reviews

1

ethanttyeJul 16, 2016

this movie was abhorrent, sexist, racist, and stereotypical. All whilst claiming to be progressive. I went in with my wifes kids and we all hated it. 1/10

82 of 110 users found this helpful8228

All this user's reviews

8

oildboy29Jul 16, 2016

I don't know why I went to see this movie; I already believed it would suck, yet I rushed out to watch it. Ghostbusters is a surprisingly solid and high entertaining movie; it's not perfect, but it's well worth watching.
Very funny movie,I don't know why I went to see this movie; I already believed it would suck, yet I rushed out to watch it. Ghostbusters is a surprisingly solid and high entertaining movie; it's not perfect, but it's well worth watching.
Very funny movie, with solid acting , and awesome special effects! I watched it in Imax 3D; the special effects takes full advantage of Imax 3D format to create a sort of hyper realism.… Expand

22 of 84 users found this helpful2262

All this user's reviews

10

angie70000000Jul 16, 2016

I loved this movie. The women in it are great together and all bring their own style of comedy that blends well with their cast members. I laughed throughout this film! Who doesn't love a movie that has amazingly smart women who turn-up asI loved this movie. The women in it are great together and all bring their own style of comedy that blends well with their cast members. I laughed throughout this film! Who doesn't love a movie that has amazingly smart women who turn-up as the sheros!

Beyond the great comedic acting, the film makers sprinkled a lot from the previous movie in which was fantastic. There are cameos, there is the famed marshmallow man, basically same events happening. In a brilliant way, they still made the movie have it's own story-line while at the same time bringing back all the old stuff we love about the 1984 classic.

Very well done. I would pay theater money to see it again! Hopefully this cast continues making films together.… Expand

46 of 354 users found this helpful46308

All this user's reviews

9

MarkCareyJul 16, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I thought the SNL cast members pulled off a very entertaining movie. It was a good and funny film, and I loved seeing these 4 funny SNL women play leading roles in what is usually male dominated casts in action roles movies. I especially liked Kristen and Melissa, but Jones, and McKinnon were great as well. I thought it was a great mix of pulling from the original, as well as adding new material and great special effects and some pretty scary ghosts in the subway. Don't pay attention to many of the negative reviews, they are probably people who think that any action movie must have males as leading roles. The small cameo roles by Murray and Aykroyd and Weaver were a nice touch. Go see this movie if you liked the first two Ghostbusters, you will not be disappointed!… Expand

17 of 79 users found this helpful1762

All this user's reviews

3

thunderbeansJul 16, 2016

What a huge disappointment. I went into this with an open mind and left frustrated and annoyed. There were a few moments that made me chuckle, and I absolutely loved the intro scene, to the point that I turned to my gf and said "if the restWhat a huge disappointment. I went into this with an open mind and left frustrated and annoyed. There were a few moments that made me chuckle, and I absolutely loved the intro scene, to the point that I turned to my gf and said "if the rest is like that I will be soooo happy, that was awesome!". Unfortunately it was not. The plot was absolutely terrible, the forced cameos were completely unnecessary and the ending was horrendous.

The actresses were a bit of a split bag, Melissa Mcarthy and Leslie Jones were actually the funniest out of the bunch, which I was not expecting. The trailers showed Leslie Jones character to be a stereotypical sassy black woman, when instead she played very similar to the originals Winston Zeddemore. Kristen Wigg was ok, however Kate McKinnon's "wacky" character grated from the very start, feeling very forced and irritating.

I really am still scratching my head over a lot of the plot trying to understand it.

Overall this was a below average, poorly written movie that actually showed some potential but couldn't get past the awful plot.… Expand

79 of 102 users found this helpful7923

All this user's reviews

8

The_ThornJul 16, 2016

I'm a die-hard fan of the original 'Ghostbusters'. I've seen it countless times and it remains one of my all-time favourite comedies. Having said that, I find the sequel lifeless and forgettable. Superfluous, even. I am absolutely notI'm a die-hard fan of the original 'Ghostbusters'. I've seen it countless times and it remains one of my all-time favourite comedies. Having said that, I find the sequel lifeless and forgettable. Superfluous, even. I am absolutely not indiscriminate.

And yet I liked Paul Feig's 'Ghostbusters'.

I really liked it.

Yes, the trailers were lame. Whoever cut them made me want to not see the movie; they really did not do the movie justice. In fact, most (not all) of the gags that fell flat in the trailer worked in their proper context. Even some of the reheated ones.

The cast was pretty good and they had an excellent dynamic. I was most pleasantly surprised by Melissa McCarthy, who isn't all shouty for once (think Ray without the naiveté), and Kate McKinnon, who plays a smart, creative, quirky and bad@$$ chick.

Yes, there are plenty of small bits that I could have done without, including the gimmicky arsenal, the product placement, some of the cameos, an over-the-top, action-heavy finale (as well as Hemsworth's part in it), amongst other things.

But I had a really good time. And, seriously, I would see more of Feig's 'Ghostbusters' if they made more. I would love to see where they take it from here, how the characters evolve, and how they develop the concept. Yes, I will see this one again.

I'd give it a 7.75 out of 10 (not quite an 8, but certainly better than average)… Expand

19 of 79 users found this helpful1960

All this user's reviews

5

Ryan_ParkinsonJul 16, 2016

This is a reboot desperate to stand on its own two feet without actually making any attempt to truly progress the franchise. It does a lot of things; some good, some bad, most outright bizarre, and in the end is completely forgettable.

18 of 37 users found this helpful1819

All this user's reviews

3

moondoggieJul 16, 2016

This is sooooo bad. None of the jokes are funny, the characters aren't interesting or memorable (I can only remember Patty's name because she wore a giant gold necklace through the whole movie).

AWFUL AWFUL AWFUL

58 of 80 users found this helpful5822

All this user's reviews

0

rarest_pepeJul 16, 2016

I loved the original when I was a kid, and was pretty hyped for this one despite the haters.
While the actresses are ok and the CGI, while plenty, are not too bad, there is a huge problem : it's absolutely not funny.
The writing isI loved the original when I was a kid, and was pretty hyped for this one despite the haters.
While the actresses are ok and the CGI, while plenty, are not too bad, there is a huge problem : it's absolutely not funny.

The writing is completely flat, delivery feels forced; it looked very amateurish; and after the first 10 minutes you realize you will be bored for the next hour and a half.

Sorely disappointed...… Expand

102 of 130 users found this helpful10228

All this user's reviews

0

mike-hatJul 16, 2016

What happens when you take an original, funny, timeless movie like Ghostbusters(1984) and reboot it, smear it with unfunny one liners, thinly veiled misandry, steal its scenes because you're creatively bankrupt and try to profit on its name?What happens when you take an original, funny, timeless movie like Ghostbusters(1984) and reboot it, smear it with unfunny one liners, thinly veiled misandry, steal its scenes because you're creatively bankrupt and try to profit on its name?

You get Ghostbusters 2016: an insultingly bad cash grab that tries to sell itself as an "upgrade" to the first film, while using gender politics to shield itself from any type of criticism.

Don't waste your money.… Expand

118 of 149 users found this helpful11831

All this user's reviews

2

ShakjaJul 16, 2016

Take a female producer that replaced the original director out of spite, a new director that was bullied into making the film and who demanded full control without the producers interfering, man hating writers that don't understand the sourceTake a female producer that replaced the original director out of spite, a new director that was bullied into making the film and who demanded full control without the producers interfering, man hating writers that don't understand the source material and are genuinely bad at their jobs and a cast that's ad lib-ing through the whole movie while trying to do a decent job.
Add completely overdone special effects and bad timing to the mix and you get mediocre movie that isn't even bad enough to be funny.
Save your money for a movie that won't bore you to tears while preaching "girl power!" and "men are all stupid and/or complete a*holes!" to you.… Expand

63 of 86 users found this helpful6323

All this user's reviews

2

ablemoodJul 16, 2016

I hated to say it, but the haters got this one right. Let me be clear, ripping on a film you haven't even seen is still a bit childish, but the movie is just awful. I took my family to see it last night, and never in my life have I everI hated to say it, but the haters got this one right. Let me be clear, ripping on a film you haven't even seen is still a bit childish, but the movie is just awful. I took my family to see it last night, and never in my life have I ever seen an audience more stone-faced during a comedy. It was a weird almost uncomfortable atmosphere.

It doesn't work as a comedy targeted at adults; many of the jokes are beyond worn out and predictable. The effects are cartoonish. The film doesn't work as a family picture either. Some of the humor actually pretty crude. I can not recommend this for those with younger kids. Throughout the entire film, i sat there wondering: "Who exactly was the target audience for this?"

My girls did not enjoy it, and I was bored out of my skull after about the first half. The only redeeming thing for me was Wiig. She was her usal offbeat, but charming self. McCarthy was just awful. Literally nothing redeeming about her performance. Jones who is usually hilarious, was saddled with a bad script and some truly horrible lines. McKinnon is just kind of there. She was utterly forgettable. The males in the movie don't fair much better. Hemsworth hammed it up, but it was way over the top. Even the usually solid Andy Garcia looked like he was phoning it in. Cameos from some of the original cast members felt shoehorned in as well.

All in all, I wanted to like this, hell I defended this, but it falls well short of the mark. Save your money, and wait for it to hit the bargain bin.… Expand

107 of 137 users found this helpful10730

All this user's reviews

0

dannygardsJul 16, 2016

Against my better judgement i did actually watch this cash grab... all i can say is shame on everone involved, and shame on the politically correct critics who were afraid of a sexism backlash if they reviewed this one honestly... either thatAgainst my better judgement i did actually watch this cash grab... all i can say is shame on everone involved, and shame on the politically correct critics who were afraid of a sexism backlash if they reviewed this one honestly... either that or they were paid well!… Expand

102 of 128 users found this helpful10226

All this user's reviews

9

tiger9599Jul 16, 2016

5 stars! There is no fan bigger than I regarding the original 2 Ghostbuster movies. That said, the new movie is an absolute compliment to the originals.
I had hopes for it to be good but went in skeptical. I was very entertained and fell5 stars! There is no fan bigger than I regarding the original 2 Ghostbuster movies. That said, the new movie is an absolute compliment to the originals.
I had hopes for it to be good but went in skeptical. I was very entertained and fell deep into the movie. I loved the characters and the special effects were great.
I will see it again and buy a copy when available.
Don't listen to the bad reviews.
Go in, enjoy the fact it's a fun movie in the middle of a lot of terror in our present day lives.… Expand

25 of 110 users found this helpful2585

All this user's reviews

2

ArmondpryceJul 16, 2016

Cheesy acting, dumb jokes, cliche and horrible written characters. The GhostBusters Reboot will pass like another failed intent to gained fame at expenses of a classic franchise

103 of 134 users found this helpful10331

All this user's reviews

1

TLHGJul 16, 2016

I think that if you were never that much into the ghostbusters concept in the first place (i.e., you don't care for the original movies and the animated series - which I think are really cool too), then you might have some fun with this 2016I think that if you were never that much into the ghostbusters concept in the first place (i.e., you don't care for the original movies and the animated series - which I think are really cool too), then you might have some fun with this 2016 version in the movie theater and will forget that you ever saw the movie when you wake up the next morning. To give this movie some credit, there are some funny moments that make you laugh, but the jokes here are more like bullets coming out of a machine gun and something like 15% hit the target while the others make you think "Why such a crappy line? Who forgot this one in the script?"
The characters are bad ideas that became even worse realizations with the lame acts - they are pure cartoonish satires (whereas the original ones were quite sensible funny representation of real life archetypes.
The special effects are terrible (looks like we are back to early 2000). Ghosts look like circus characters. And the story-line is just a lazy job.
If I knew better, I would avoid watching it.… Expand

68 of 94 users found this helpful6826

All this user's reviews

6

spinx225Jul 16, 2016

It was an ok movie, not as good as the original two, but not horrible. Definitely not deserving of the horrible reviews some people are giving it. Give the movie a chance.

10 of 49 users found this helpful1039

All this user's reviews

0

SharonCoxJul 16, 2016

I was insulted by this movie as a women. Is this how Hollywood views us? Not to mention I had to explain the queef joke to my child as being something else. This movie clearly had an agenda other than entertainment, and in one word was HORRIFIC!

88 of 118 users found this helpful8830

All this user's reviews

0

evldmnJul 16, 2016

The movie is plain bad. A person would wonder why they even tried. The Ghostbusters were fine as they were, we did not need a new movie. The people who invested in this movie probably didn't understand the reason the first movies were good,The movie is plain bad. A person would wonder why they even tried. The Ghostbusters were fine as they were, we did not need a new movie. The people who invested in this movie probably didn't understand the reason the first movies were good, it was the actors, you can't put some random three nobodies and expect it to work. The jokes were awful and stupid, even worse than something from Adam Sandler. The CGI, weirdly, was beyond awful, just disgusting. This is offensive to the fans and to moviegoers, it feels like they made the Godfather 4 2016.… Expand

57 of 78 users found this helpful5721

All this user's reviews

1

VascoJul 16, 2016

Even without comparing to the original 'Ghostbusters' this movie is absolutely bad, every part of it is painful. Constant jokes (that are not funny), awful script, flat characters and lazy acting. Giant disappointment.

64 of 85 users found this helpful6421

All this user's reviews

8

JefffjonzeJul 16, 2016

This was okay. Not great and not a patch on 1 but as good if not better than 2. Holtzmann was a good character and Wiig was very likeable. Could have done with a better villain.

21 of 92 users found this helpful2171

All this user's reviews

10

gabriela_gironJul 15, 2016

i love ghostbusters 2016, this movie its just so amazing, i knew from the beginnig this movie was going to be awesome, i mean come on you have an incredible cast the queen of comedy MELISSA MCCARTHY the hilarious KRISTEN WIIG the fireballi love ghostbusters 2016, this movie its just so amazing, i knew from the beginnig this movie was going to be awesome, i mean come on you have an incredible cast the queen of comedy MELISSA MCCARTHY the hilarious KRISTEN WIIG the fireball LESLIE JONES and the dynamite KATE MCKINNON and lets not forget the genius director PAUL FEIG and BTW they and the movie have the endorsement of the original cast of 1984 they loved it and a think this movie has a great story, awesome characters, amazing effects, hilarious and non stopping laughs and i really had great time watching it .… Expand

18 of 82 users found this helpful1864

All this user's reviews

3

BrianMcCriticJul 15, 2016

A giant disappointment from many extremely talented people. From the moment that this new cast was announced and Director Paul Feig was brought on board I was excited about this film. I like all the female leads in this film and IA giant disappointment from many extremely talented people. From the moment that this new cast was announced and Director Paul Feig was brought on board I was excited about this film. I like all the female leads in this film and I especially love them working with Feig. From Bridesmaids to The Heat to Spy, Paul Feig really knows how to direct all female casts. Unfortunately he fails to deliver with Ghostbusters, a horribly unfunny waste of time. I've seen worse in 2016 but I haven't seen anything as disappointing. D… Expand

85 of 109 users found this helpful8524

All this user's reviews

6

TRANDO101Jul 15, 2016

As a precurser, I'd like to say that I'm writing this review from a viewpoint of someone who doesn't really have any attachment to the original films, and who went in not expecting all that much (but who was willing to immerse themselves intoAs a precurser, I'd like to say that I'm writing this review from a viewpoint of someone who doesn't really have any attachment to the original films, and who went in not expecting all that much (but who was willing to immerse themselves into the films world and story).

This movie, is both pretty good, and pretty bad. It had a lot of potential to be a really good movie, but the potential that is set up, is sadly left by the wayside, never to be utilized. The backstory had a fairly good start, and had the potential to give some of the characters some good depth, but isn't touched upon, and is there just for the sake of claiming that the characters have a story. This also only applies to Melissa McCarthy's, & Kristian Wiig's characters, as the backstory is only about them, and doesn't include the other two ghostbusters, of whom are essentially thrown in to have 4 ghostbusters. Kate McKinnon's character has backstory that is summed up in one sentence, and Leslie Jone's character has absolutely no backstory (she is literally just a bystander with a ghostbusters uniform). The actual plot, which brings the characters to the point of becoming ghostbusters, is decent at the beginning, but becomes very stale, as it consists of the same events occuring, the events being dealt with in the same ways, and with the same outcomes. To make this worse, what the plot leads up to, is really about 10-20 minutes of a climax, which isn't solely about dealing with the villain (instead, a decent chunk of that time is spent chasing ghosts that are unimportant to the film, and don't resolve anything). As a result, the final fight between the villain and the busters, is essentially 5 minutes, and is really, really, rushed. This is really quite a shame, as i thought the final battle, and the resolution wasn't bad at all.

The acting that came from the main characters was fine, and seemed to be the best they could give, with what the actresses were given, which wasn't much. The films script consists of a lot of jokes, which to its credit, were not all bad, i found quite a few to be really funny. With this said, the jokes that fall, really fall, to a cringe worthy point, of which is hard to return from. As well, all of the characters are essentially stereotypes (which is really disappointing, as the backstory could've helped flesh out Kristian's, and Melissa's characters, if it were brought up in more detail, and with better execution).

The special effects in this film are just about as barebones as the plot, although i don't mind them for the actual ghosts, and the ghostbuster's equipment (they are hyperbolic with saturation, and are very cartoony). My real grievance with the effects is that they cram in a bunch of small, horrendous effects, most of which are unrelated to the ghosts or the action, and are just put in to justify you paying more for 3D (fortunately, these are for very small portions of time, and don't take away to much from the experience).

Overall, I can see why many people don't like this film, to many, and I mean many, the original film is an absolute masterpiece, and this one is nowhere near such a level. As well, the plot drags, and a lot of potential this film had is absolutely wasted (even I, a 17 year old saw certain scenes, and immediately knew what they did wrong, and what they should have done instead). On the other hand, if you like Paul Feig's humor, are willing to look past the cons that I've stated, and don't have much attachment to the original films, I don't think you'll dislike this film by any means.… Expand

10 of 51 users found this helpful1041

All this user's reviews

8

bkmelleyJul 15, 2016

I had a very good time watching this. I thought it was genuinely funny and would see it again. I was laughing, the rest of the audience was laughing, and it was a pretty packed theater for a 2 o'clock showing on a weekday. It was a good movie.

20 of 80 users found this helpful2060

All this user's reviews

0

viettungvuongJul 15, 2016

The trailer is awful, and so is the movie. Stupid characters, stupid script, stupid jokes. The original movie is an acclaim one but this remake is awful

53 of 76 users found this helpful5323

All this user's reviews

6

JonZsuJul 15, 2016

Ghostbusters is goofy in a good way. The elements of horror were somewhat highlighted in this CGI-stunning reboot of a more comedic classic, which actually made a good contrast of fear and fun. It's a reasonable excuse to get into theGhostbusters is goofy in a good way. The elements of horror were somewhat highlighted in this CGI-stunning reboot of a more comedic classic, which actually made a good contrast of fear and fun. It's a reasonable excuse to get into the theater, but is not an amazing film in its story or anything else - it's just a SNL laughing gag that's been stretched into a feature film.… Expand

12 of 46 users found this helpful1234

All this user's reviews

0

Costs1129Jul 15, 2016

I have had more entertaining stomach flus. The entire movie felt so... desperate. They were desperate to seem funny, desperate to appeal to nostalgia, desperate to keep our attention. Their desperation become so obvious you begin to pityI have had more entertaining stomach flus. The entire movie felt so... desperate. They were desperate to seem funny, desperate to appeal to nostalgia, desperate to keep our attention. Their desperation become so obvious you begin to pity those involved in its creation.… Expand

68 of 85 users found this helpful6817

All this user's reviews

10

mixedupman2000Jul 15, 2016

I would give this an 8 but to many people are under rating this just because they feel entitled to this franchise.
The reviews for this are like the river of hate filled slime from ghostbusters 2
I personally love the original movies andI would give this an 8 but to many people are under rating this just because they feel entitled to this franchise.
The reviews for this are like the river of hate filled slime from ghostbusters 2
I personally love the original movies and the cartoon series and this is a fine installment to the franchise.
I hope they can find enough encouragement to make a sequel.… Expand

20 of 85 users found this helpful2065

All this user's reviews

0

chronosx5Jul 15, 2016

Horrible movie. Washed out humor, predictable jokes and boring overall. Didn't have high hopes for this, but was disappointed still...like Fantastic Four Reboot disappointed...shame.

87 of 116 users found this helpful8729

All this user's reviews

8

MacrovJul 15, 2016

For someone like me, who hasn't watched the first or second movies, I really enjoyed it. I obviously am not comparing this movie versus the original. However, as a comedy I thought it was quite funny. Go in expecting the humor to be kind ofFor someone like me, who hasn't watched the first or second movies, I really enjoyed it. I obviously am not comparing this movie versus the original. However, as a comedy I thought it was quite funny. Go in expecting the humor to be kind of childish and strange, and you will love it. The visual effects were nice. I thought the ghosts looked quite nice, and enjoyed the blueish hue that was given to them. The characters for the most part are legit. Holtzmann is easily my favorite. She definitely is the geekiest, strangest one in the movie, and does a good job selling a funny persona. Overall, an 8 out of 10. There isn't anything worthy of a 0. No, I don't think those people are sexist, but I just question what they are watching. There are some horrible movies out there, and this one isn't one of those. I personally enjoyed my time a heck of a lot more than something better reviewed like 10 Cloverfield Lane. But, that is just my personal opinion, and shows that not all people think alike.… Expand

24 of 87 users found this helpful2463

All this user's reviews

1

coloradosnowmanJul 15, 2016

I had such high hopes for this. I went in with an open mind, assuming that everyone on the internet was just whining like a crybaby. I just got out of this movie seriously shocked. I'm at a loss for words. Horrible story

48 of 68 users found this helpful4820

All this user's reviews

0

ArkonBladeJul 15, 2016

The movie is nothing but sexist trash. Every man in the movie is either a moron or a AHole. The plot sucks, the comedy sucks, the acting sucks, the CGI sucks. Nothing good about this movie at all. It was made by a bunch of Sexist Pigs andThe movie is nothing but sexist trash. Every man in the movie is either a moron or a AHole. The plot sucks, the comedy sucks, the acting sucks, the CGI sucks. Nothing good about this movie at all. It was made by a bunch of Sexist Pigs and should go back to the hell from which it was spawned.… Expand

46 of 65 users found this helpful4619

All this user's reviews

0

MoviefanartJul 15, 2016

Absolutely horrible.
A waste of money and time.
The characters were hollow , the plot garbage , the FX à la Scoobidoo . Fun? Jokes? get those thing out my movie please !! I've seen bad movies, but this one deserve a special place in myAbsolutely horrible.
A waste of money and time.
The characters were hollow , the plot garbage , the FX à la Scoobidoo .
Fun? Jokes? get those thing out my movie please !!
I've seen bad movies, but this one deserve a special place in my heart as the worst decision i've ever made .
Moreover, the misandry and racism is blatant , purely made to appeal feminist to the point it is **** disgusting....and i'm a **** woman so i know !
I was so shocked , i was ashame to have brought my kids with me and even them (7 and 8) was findind that terrible!

If this the new trend in movies, you can be sure noboby with a sane mind will ever come again in a theatre .… Expand

49 of 69 users found this helpful4920

All this user's reviews

1

sporlockJul 15, 2016

Just got back from seeing this movie, and good Lord is it TERRIBLE! Zero redeeming qualities. If you like CONSTANT jokes about rude vagina sounds, and how stupid and retarded every man on the face of the planet is, then you will LOVE thisJust got back from seeing this movie, and good Lord is it TERRIBLE! Zero redeeming qualities. If you like CONSTANT jokes about rude vagina sounds, and how stupid and retarded every man on the face of the planet is, then you will LOVE this movie. If not, then stay far far away. Just TERRIBLE! The special effects were horrendous and like a cartoon. This has zero relation to the original Ghostbusters, and pretty much gave a giant middle finger to all the fans of the old franchise with missed opportunities to properly pass the touch off to a new generation. Instead, it's basically a 2 hour raunchy Saturday Night Live skit with cartoon ghosts thrown in for no apparent reason. AVOID THIS MOVIE LIKE THE PLAGUE.… Expand

50 of 71 users found this helpful5021

All this user's reviews

1

DaveAusJul 15, 2016

Lazy and unfunny remake that doesn't bring anything new to the table and is short on laughs throughout. The banter and chemistry between the main cast found in the original is long gone. The cast is amazing though!

64 of 86 users found this helpful6422

All this user's reviews

4

TheDorkElfJul 15, 2016

I really don't get it for all the controversy behind the film all the name-calling, the flame wars, and animosity on both sides of the "Social Justice" issue, this film is just plain mediocre. This isn't the worst remake I have ever seen orI really don't get it for all the controversy behind the film all the name-calling, the flame wars, and animosity on both sides of the "Social Justice" issue, this film is just plain mediocre. This isn't the worst remake I have ever seen or didn't anger me like Batman V Superman, but it was just a movie that didn't do much with itself or benefit the license it comes from at all. Sadly, the film's greatest stumbling block is the poorly written script, pointless cameos from original Ghostbuster cast, a really just awful and boring villain, and the fact it is trying to ape the success and nostalgia of the original movie. All female leads you feel do their best with this movie but a good deal of their performances seem stunted by weak material. Most of the males in the movie are either dumb, unhelpful or are just outright jerks. The special effects are a hit and miss with the CG not looking good in the slower parts of the film and actually being entertaining when the faster paced action was happening. I think the biggest offense that this film makes that it expects a sequel to come out of this movie and turn the original Ghostbusters" story into a trilogy of film, nice try Sony but you have yet another mediocre film under you belt. Better luck next time… Expand

29 of 43 users found this helpful2914

All this user's reviews

10

KuvuplanJul 15, 2016

It was fun to watch, had interesting characters, and lots of jokes. It really was funny, and good. It had impossible expectations to meet from it's predecessor, but came close! Much better than the 1975 series and Ghostbusters II.

18 of 78 users found this helpful1860

All this user's reviews

10

Dattwood7Jul 15, 2016

This is a great movie. Don't believe the haters. Cast is great, writing is great, it's even a little scary. And it's a fun movie for kids, too. I'd see it again.

17 of 77 users found this helpful1760

All this user's reviews

0

007jamesbondJul 15, 2016

This movie is one of the worst movies I have ever seen! The jokes in this movie are soooo stupid, not to mention that every guy in this movie is portrayed as a n idiot!!!

45 of 66 users found this helpful4521

All this user's reviews

0

FC2Jul 15, 2016

I really tried to like this film but I came out disappointed. It's not even what I expected. The story/writing was just awful, the humor is way more miss than hit and sometimes just awful. You'll laugh just as much as the Ostrich laugh fromI really tried to like this film but I came out disappointed. It's not even what I expected. The story/writing was just awful, the humor is way more miss than hit and sometimes just awful. You'll laugh just as much as the Ostrich laugh from family guy but never anything worthy more than a chuckle. The overall high points are mediocre too with very little to keep me interested. The visual effects were really nice to see in some areas but even those got annoying at times. The cameos were nice at first glance but to find out they have no relation to being prior Ghostbusters is just another low point in the film. It's really something I'd rather watch being home than in the movie theater as if never really took off as a reboot. To be honest I'd rather watch Independence Day: Resurgence again as bad as that movie was. If you do watch this film be prepared for average movie experience with some titter and more neon ghosts than a rave party but a film that just feels empty and without anything genuine to the Ghostbuster franchise.… Expand

38 of 54 users found this helpful3816

All this user's reviews

1

KielWJul 15, 2016

I'm glad my overly eager friend paid for tickets to see this, because I would have walked out half an hour in and politely requested a refund otherwise. This just wasn't a good movie. I'm giving it a 1 versus a 0 only because it deliveredI'm glad my overly eager friend paid for tickets to see this, because I would have walked out half an hour in and politely requested a refund otherwise. This just wasn't a good movie. I'm giving it a 1 versus a 0 only because it delivered exactly on what the trailer promised - heavy mediocrity.… Expand

50 of 70 users found this helpful5020

All this user's reviews

0

dg54321Jul 15, 2016

Really one of the worst movies, ever. Worse than the recent Independence Day sequel. A careless insult to the many fans of the original in a lame attempt to cash in on man-hate, with horrible CGI, horrible acting, annoying characters (thatReally one of the worst movies, ever. Worse than the recent Independence Day sequel. A careless insult to the many fans of the original in a lame attempt to cash in on man-hate, with horrible CGI, horrible acting, annoying characters (that are all stereotypes), an incredibly intelligence-insulting plot and overall is just painful to sit through. Irritated I was forced to sit through it with my girlfriend. Don't waste your money. Don't go to this movie. Period.… Expand

48 of 70 users found this helpful4822

All this user's reviews

0

John182Jul 15, 2016

If this was not a Ghostbusters film I would give it a 4, but they made a parody and slapped Ghostbusters on the title. Just pretend the movie is called SpecterCatchers or something of the sort if you must watch it.

46 of 65 users found this helpful4619

All this user's reviews

0

cronjobJul 15, 2016

Let me preface my comment by stating that I'm not precious about the original Ghostbusters. While I really enjoyed the original, I've probably only seen it twice in my nearly forty years on this planet. I'm not sure that I'd particularly careLet me preface my comment by stating that I'm not precious about the original Ghostbusters. While I really enjoyed the original, I've probably only seen it twice in my nearly forty years on this planet. I'm not sure that I'd particularly care for a new Ghostbusters under any circumstances, because . . . it's just not a thing I'm that passionate about.

I'd also like to mention that before the new Ghostbusters, I've never heard of the directory "Paul Feig" nor (as per IMDB lookup) have I ever seen one of his movies. I've also never heard of any of the main characters in the cast. I've obviously heard of Andy Garcia and the cameos, but I've never heard of the four Ghostbusters or the dude that plays their secretary.

Anyway, I didn't expect much going in. After all, it's a remake/reboot/sequel/whatever of a franchise from thirty years ago. It's blatant money-grab banking on "hurr durr, that was a thing when I was a kid".

Aaaand.... it met all those expectations. The special effects looked like they were from an earlier season of the "new" Doctor Who. The comedy was . . . flat. The characters were all obnoxious stereotypes. The outfits looked like they took them out of a clown school. The ghosts they fought were . . . uninspired. Honestly, I just regretted everything about attending the film. I desperately longed for something else to do or the ability to run the film at 1.5x speed so I could get through it faster.

Please... don't give this film your money. We need to stop encouraging this kind of crap as the "go-to" over something creative and original.… Expand

39 of 57 users found this helpful3918

All this user's reviews

0

SofaTrooperJul 15, 2016

What the actual f**k is this garbage? This Is a disgrace and tarnishes the original masterpiece. Please erase this monstrosity from human history and never speak of it again.

54 of 77 users found this helpful5423

All this user's reviews

6

RobBob99Jul 15, 2016

Ghostbusters is most controversial and the most talked about movie of the year (right up there with Batman v Superman), it's the most disliked trailer on YouTube and also features maybe the worst marketing I've ever witnessed for a film. NowGhostbusters is most controversial and the most talked about movie of the year (right up there with Batman v Superman), it's the most disliked trailer on YouTube and also features maybe the worst marketing I've ever witnessed for a film. Now I'm saying this now, the first 1984 film is one of my all time favorite comedies and films in general, I love the first film and going into this I was really hoping it was going to be a good movie. So what's the result? Is this a good film? Not necessarily. The first half of the film is stronger than the second, it has the worst villain of the year and the constant cameos and references to the old film got really old really fast. But that being said, I was entertained throughout the course of the film. To my surprise, I found myself laughing throughout the course of the film (mostly through Mckinnon, Jones and surprising from a great comedic performance by Hemsworth who's fantastic). I also found that the four Ghostbusters all had a few great individual moments at one point or another and had really good chemistry as well. It's a sloppy film for sure but it's defiantly not one of the worst movies ever made like how some people are making it out to be.… Expand

12 of 50 users found this helpful1238

All this user's reviews

1

PixelBuffJul 15, 2016

Forced, awkward and often crass humor. All this "It's so little girls can have heros too! It's for little girls!!!" in the marketing but then they have a queef joke 10 minutes in? Yeah sure 10 year old girls love that. The conclusion isForced, awkward and often crass humor. All this "It's so little girls can have heros too! It's for little girls!!!" in the marketing but then they have a queef joke 10 minutes in? Yeah sure 10 year old girls love that. The conclusion is borderline incomprehensible, ends suddenly in a jumbled confusing mess (suddenly within a portal, then suddenly not without seconds?) Gave it a 2 since the effects looked nice in 3D but everything else is cheap, badly written cash grab that pales in comparison to the original.… Expand

53 of 76 users found this helpful5323

All this user's reviews

0

DonMegaJul 15, 2016

Do you like movies that are sexist and racist? If so this movie is for you. Clearly everything about it is some individuals like Paul Feig (the director) pushing their agenda. Why didn't they have a cast of 2 men and 2 women instead?

IDo you like movies that are sexist and racist? If so this movie is for you. Clearly everything about it is some individuals like Paul Feig (the director) pushing their agenda. Why didn't they have a cast of 2 men and 2 women instead?

I went to the movie with my daughter, luckily I didn't have to pay as I had a promotional tickets. My 12 year old daughter didn't enjoy it, she said the vulgar unfunny jokes were too much. There is a queef joke in this movie.
Every single male character in this movie is a dummy or and idiot, the black characters is the stereotypical obnoxious and loud black women.

The cgi is worse than the 1984 ghostbusters movie, not sure how but it is.

Don't waste your money on this, because it is one of the worst movies ever made. I'd say it's up there with united passions.… Expand

54 of 76 users found this helpful5422

All this user's reviews

0

Hasbo11Jul 15, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A Terrible, Unfunny, Man-Hating Mess

Heralded by the most disliked trailer in YouTube history, and an embargo on reviews until pretty much the day of release by a panicked Sony Studios, the "Heaven's Gate" of supernatural horror comedies is finally here, and what a terrible, unfunny, man-hating mess it is.… Expand

91 of 119 users found this helpful9128

All this user's reviews

1

djniceyJul 15, 2016

Absolute tripe. If you thought Pixels was bad, this is even worse. The CGI effects are terrible and the comedy falls flat. Having Paul Feig as the director has ruined what could have been an entertaining film, instead this is just not worthAbsolute tripe. If you thought Pixels was bad, this is even worse. The CGI effects are terrible and the comedy falls flat. Having Paul Feig as the director has ruined what could have been an entertaining film, instead this is just not worth watching, even on DVD or freeview TV.… Expand

62 of 87 users found this helpful6225

All this user's reviews

0

sthomson22Jul 15, 2016

I've been waiting for this for so long..

The Metacritic user reviews, of course (which have ironically become more objective and principled than the reviews of mainstream critics), the movie itself I could not have less of an interest in.I've been waiting for this for so long..

The Metacritic user reviews, of course (which have ironically become more objective and principled than the reviews of mainstream critics), the movie itself I could not have less of an interest in. I could go on a 10000 word essay about why this film is, in a word, an abomination, but I won't (partially because there is a 5000 character limit, partially because I am very lethargic and partially because I'm not a pretentious, preening, poseur liberal arts/gender studies graduate pretending to identify with and enjoy cult movies/nerd stuff just so I can then **** all over everything and ram my toxic, inane, nihilistic agenda down everyone's throat to feel superior, because mommy gave me just a little too much attention and praise for my own good growing up).

What is this movie? It's Bridesmaids with a Ghostbusters veneer. It's the same, tired, generic "female comedy" that is churned out every time women are given a damn chance to try and make a funny, which is far, far too often.

Don't give them your money, don't give them your time, this is an inferior charity product that participants will try to guilt trip and shame you into watching and pretending to enjoy in the name of social "justice".

Women's comedy is effectively the WNBA, let's be **** honest, shall we?!… Expand

39 of 56 users found this helpful3917

All this user's reviews

9

AZVWJul 15, 2016

Paul Fieg & his cast of women, didn't destroy my childhood. Great homage to the classic original. The pacing is perfect, like the original. Building to an fun visual ghostly climax. See it in 3D if you can.
For all the "Ghostbro" ignorantPaul Fieg & his cast of women, didn't destroy my childhood. Great homage to the classic original. The pacing is perfect, like the original. Building to an fun visual ghostly climax. See it in 3D if you can.
For all the "Ghostbro" ignorant haters, Ivan Reitman who Directed & Produced the original, is the Producer here too...
A new generation of Ghostbusters is here. Bring on the sequel. You know there will be.… Expand

28 of 170 users found this helpful28142

All this user's reviews

0

aregoweJul 15, 2016

An awful mess. Don't see it, don't give them your money. Should've just been a SNL Skit.

Talented actresses, but everything falls flat. Everything is wiped clean from the real Ghostbusters. Replaced good writing & comedy withAn awful mess. Don't see it, don't give them your money. Should've just been a SNL Skit.

Talented actresses, but everything falls flat. Everything is wiped clean from the real Ghostbusters.

Replaced good writing & comedy with mile-a-minute jokes that don't land.

Constantly hating on men and shows men in a negative light. Men characters act absolutely dumb. Absolute garbage.

The original worked because of the great writing. The writing is just not present here.

Only memorable moment is the "from the front" fart joke. And that's because it's so bad.… Expand

85 of 112 users found this helpful8527

All this user's reviews

7

FargoUTJul 15, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A decent, good-not-great sequel to the beloved 80s film, this makes plenty of references to the original (too many, actually). Leslie Jones and Kate McKinnon steal the film, while Kristen Wiig and Melissa McCarthy mostly play it straight. I like Chris Hemsworth but feel his character is too cartoonish and doesn't mix well with the rest of the cast. This plays more comedic and light-hearted than the original two did, and the tonal inconsistency will really prevent this from being remembered like the original is today. The visual effects are pretty impressive, especially in 3D, and the neon colors of the ghosts is quite lovely to behold. Hardly the trainwreck everyone was expecting, go see it for Jones and McKinnon, both of whom are hilarious. The ending of the film is the worst part of the film, pulling one of those "reset" conclusions that makes the climactic battle seem exceptionally dull and pointless.… Expand

18 of 75 users found this helpful1857

All this user's reviews

1

Braquiador55Jul 15, 2016

This movie sucks. It is awful. The plot is awful, the jokes are stupid, the characters are cliches, the dialogue is just horrible. Every single aspect of this movie sucks. Except the CGI effects, those were pretty good.

63 of 88 users found this helpful6325

All this user's reviews

8

eevilaliceJul 15, 2016

The new Ghostbusters is much better than the trailers make it seem: funnier and with great effects, an amazing cast and director. It stands on its own, and if they'd let it, more people would enjoy it if they left the original out of theThe new Ghostbusters is much better than the trailers make it seem: funnier and with great effects, an amazing cast and director. It stands on its own, and if they'd let it, more people would enjoy it if they left the original out of the discussion. You can be a fan of both. I was looking forward to MVP Kate McKinnon the most, which is saying something given the cast. The ladies have excellent chemistry, and the filmmakers are able to nod to the original in different ways without depending on it. I loved how the women functioned as a band of outsiders. It made me wish there'd been films with more women like this when I was young.… Expand

21 of 87 users found this helpful2166

All this user's reviews

8

thejudekingJul 15, 2016

It was funny and had great special effects. I mean honestly, what more do you need? The entire cast is pretty great especially Chris Hemsworth as a pretty yet stupid secretary. I can't wait for the inevitable sequel.

20 of 80 users found this helpful2060

All this user's reviews

8

FarhanFirozJul 15, 2016

Ghostbusters is definitely one of the better films of the summer.Great performances from the lead actresses with hilarious one-liners and pays homage to the original with its cameos and easter eggs. The 3rd act is highly entertaining withGhostbusters is definitely one of the better films of the summer.Great performances from the lead actresses with hilarious one-liners and pays homage to the original with its cameos and easter eggs. The 3rd act is highly entertaining with outstanding VFX and brought something new to this reboot franchise. Although the movie suffers from same old plot as the original and some jokes didn't land well.… Expand

20 of 82 users found this helpful2062

All this user's reviews

0

Ivan_K_MazovJul 15, 2016

As a huge fan of the original, I'm going to judge this as a Ghostbusters film (which is only fair as the studio is trading off the franchise), rather than a generic Hollywood Summer Blockbuster and well... I'm afraid that as a GhostbustersAs a huge fan of the original, I'm going to judge this as a Ghostbusters film (which is only fair as the studio is trading off the franchise), rather than a generic Hollywood Summer Blockbuster and well... I'm afraid that as a Ghostbusters movie, it stinks. It really stinks.

I've read quite a lot of official reviews that say it's better than GB2, in what universe I ask you? GB2 had serious structural flaws compared to the first, there's no doubt, but its jokes and set pieces are still some of the most iconic of the franchise. Seeing as how no one who has made this claim has in any way tried to back it up, let me compare the two right here and now.

First the baddies. Vigo vs Rowan. No contest, Vigo. Rowan is a terrible baddie, he'll be forgotten a few months after the Blu-Ray release, whereas Vigo is iconic and terrifying. So let's compare the good guys. GB2 relies on the magnificent chemistry between Murray, Aykroyd, Ramis and Hudson to drive it along and whatever the structural flaws, the chemistry is as strong as ever. Wiig, McCarthy, McKinnon and Jones do not share any chemistry, it's actually painful to see them on screen together. Even as individuals they fall far short of the original cast. If we take Wiig as an analogue to Murray, there's no contest; Murray gains a flawless victory. People are still quoting Venkman lines from GB2, "bummer", no one will be quoting Erin Gilbert in (nearly) 30 years time. The same is true for the rest of the cast head- to-head. To save time I'll just highlight the example of McKinnon, who I love on SNL, but couldn't bear in this movie. She's clearly the Egon character, but she phones it in, playing a generic 'kook' and going so over the top that it basically ruins half of the scenes that she's in. Again, McKinnon, like Wiig, has no funny or memorable lines such as 'lets see what happens when we take away the puppy' and her humour is weird for the sake of it, rather than the deadpan brilliance of the late Harold Ramis. The supporting characters are just regurgitated, worse versions of people from the originals, there isn't anyone who comes close to the creepy-comedy brilliance of Peter MacNichol's Janosz, one of the greatest, most iconic supporting characters in any comedy!

So let's look at the structure and set pieces. If GB2 was structurally flawed, GB2016 "should be condemned", (see what I did there?) I don't want to spoiler the movie, so I'll keep to scenes and plot devices already revealed by the trailers. Firstly, the rock concert scene falls completely flat compared to the courthouse scene in GB2. The ghosts released by Rowan serve little purpose, look cheap and lack the comedy mischief of the ghosts in the original. Rowan's machine is a lazy cop-out and is in no way comparable to the absolutely terrifying and completely awesome river of slime flowing through the spooky abandoned subway. GB2 was all about creating some legitimate scares (Titanic docking!) and a feelgood factor which it did through some iconic set pieces. There is no feelgood factor to this new movie. It feels cheap in a nasty way and is surprisingly cynical for something that I've read is supposed to be aspirational in some way.

I could go all day comparing the two but let's just say that GB2016 in no way measures up side by side to GB2. I suspect that the reason some reviewers are making that claim is to try and salvage something from this God-awful mess, so people will say 'hey, at least it's not the worst Ghostbusters movie.' It must be shilling because when you put all the elements of the two movies side-by-side, it's clear that despite its flaws, GB2 is simply better in every way than this lazy reboot. But here's the thing, my kid enjoyed it. He didn't like it as much as Ghostbusters, or even Ghostbusters 2, but he thought it was neat regardless. I think kids will like this film because it's flashy and the jokes are crude and obvious; adults who loved the subtle, dry wit of the original will probably be turned off by the listless, rehashed, gross-out humour and half-hearted performances.

I have one more story to share that I think any parent might want to know before taking their child to see this film. When we came out of the cinema, my kid was in a funny mood that I've never seen him in before, half-hyped and half-pensive. I asked him if he was feeling alright and he said 'yeah', then there was this long pause and I could see him struggling with something. Eventually he turned to me and said, 'dad, when I grow up I want to be a lady'. I was pretty taken aback but I tried not to show it, instead I just said to him 'well you know you can be whatever you want to be sport; why do you want to be a lady, is it to be like the new Ghostbusters?'. And he just looked at me with eyes that seemed older than his years and said, 'no dad, it's because this film made me realise all guys are either stupid or evil, so it's better just to be a lady I guess...'… Expand

53 of 74 users found this helpful5321

All this user's reviews

0

DeadlyCarrotJul 15, 2016

This is the most disgusting cash grab I've ever seen. It does nothing right, and ruins every thing that the original movie had. This is absolutely terrible, and you should save your money for something else.

62 of 85 users found this helpful6223

All this user's reviews

5

PapaEmeritusJul 15, 2016

I didn't care it was an all female cast or not. I just wanted to see a good Ghostbusters movie. Well, this isn't a good Ghostbusters movie. At best it is just okay. I can't believe after all these years someone couldn't write a solid newI didn't care it was an all female cast or not. I just wanted to see a good Ghostbusters movie. Well, this isn't a good Ghostbusters movie. At best it is just okay. I can't believe after all these years someone couldn't write a solid new Ghostbusters script. The sad thing is that someone probably did write a good one but , since Hollywood big wigs really don't have a clue what is good or not, it was probably passed on.… Expand

21 of 47 users found this helpful2126

All this user's reviews

1

SIrThinkALotJul 15, 2016

I have been skeptical of this film pretty much from the moment it was announced. And that the trailers/marketing, that god-awful cover of the theme song, and especially the way the cast and crew painted everybody who dared to say they wereI have been skeptical of this film pretty much from the moment it was announced. And that the trailers/marketing, that god-awful cover of the theme song, and especially the way the cast and crew painted everybody who dared to say they were skeptical as sexist trolls, didnt do much to dissuade that. So needless to say, going in my expectations were about as low as as possible for a film.

The good news is, its not AS terrible as I feared. The bad news is, its still pretty terrible.

The biggest problem with Ghostbusters, is that pretty much everything about the movie feels forced. The jokes, the relationships between the four Ghostbusters, the winks and nods to the original, the characterization of the bad guy, the technobabble the big battle sequence at the end. None of it felt genuine. Pretty much everything in the film felt like ‘this is a movie, and this is whats supposed to happen in this movie.’

There’s far too much reliance on zany/wacky humor. Theres very few quotable lines. Certainly none that are as memorable as ‘tell him about the Twinkie.’ Or ‘Dogs and cats living together.’ I guess if like that style of humor(think Bridesmaids, but less crude), you might like the jokes in this film. But its not my thing.

The winks and nods to the original just dont work. They’re not subtle enough to be overlooked(like in say, Total Recall), and pull you out from the movie, forcing you to think about the far superior original. I’m not just talking about the cameos(which this film would be much better without), but also the way that certain scenes are almost shot-for-shot identical to scenes in the original.

Its a bit of departure from a strict review, but I want to talk about the technobabble in this film. Part of what made the original film so great was that Dan Aykroyd is a true-blue believer in the paranormal, and based the story and script on actual pseudo-scientific theories. The result being that for a film about ghosts, it has a real feel of authenticity. When terms that have their origin in pseudo-scientific circles are used in the film, feel like they are legitimate and being used in the proper way.

In the remake though, it feels more like Paul Feig put a bunch of ‘science-y’ sounding words in a hat and drew them out randomly. You know how in Star Trek, the plots are always solved by a series of giberish that sounds almost, though not quite like actual science? Yea thats pretty much what Ghostbusters sounds like too. It was annoying in Star Trek, but we put up with it for the otherwise interesting plots and characters, and this film is lacking in those departments.

So there were good things about this film right? Well yes. Chris Hemsworth was pretty funny as the dopey secretary. Pretty much all of the laughs of the film came from him, and he clearly had a LOT of fun playing the bad guy when his character got possessed. In fact pretty much the entire cast really did seem to be enjoying shooting this film, although in Kate McKinnon ’s her hi-jinks came across more annoying than endearing. But still its just a shame that this film wasnt better so you could enjoy it with them.

TLDR: Dont see this film. I tried to warn you.… Expand

70 of 97 users found this helpful7027

All this user's reviews

0

silvert27Jul 15, 2016

Simply horrible. I decided to to see it before reading an reviews so I wouldn't go in biased and I'm floored that this tripe is currently at 60. Then again...no I'm not. It's depressingly obvious that the "top" reviews are horribly biased,Simply horrible. I decided to to see it before reading an reviews so I wouldn't go in biased and I'm floored that this tripe is currently at 60. Then again...no I'm not. It's depressingly obvious that the "top" reviews are horribly biased, desperately trying to prop up the militant feminist propaganda, which is the sole reason this movie was created.

The entire movie suffered from the same drawback every political agenda driven movie does. So bent on simply pounding a cynical and divisive message into the audience, the movie's characters, plot, setting, scenery, script, and everything else is all secondary. It's all just support for the "message." And it all falls apart. The plot is boring, the characters are forgettable, the script is laughable, and it all just comes across as amateur fanfiction written by hateful feminist with an axe to grind.… Expand

66 of 90 users found this helpful6624

All this user's reviews

0

ToughOnMoviesJul 15, 2016

That was utterly painful to watch. If the US government truly wanted to get the terrorists at Guantanamo Bay to spill the beans, they should sit them in a room and make them watch this movie on repeat.

55 of 78 users found this helpful5523

All this user's reviews

1

dallased25Jul 15, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Not sure how this is getting positive reviews, other than paid people by Sony to do it. This movie was garbage. It is ironic because Sony was accusing all of the people criticizing the movie to be just misogynists. This was one of the most misandrist movies I've ever seen. Every male in the movie was an idiot, a bad guy or a complete jerk. The final boss was even killed by being shot in the "privates" which are assumed that he is a male. The cameos were disrespectful to the old cast and I would more compare it to the cartoon version, rather than the original 1984 film. There were a few funny moments, but that was lost due to overdone stereotypes, such as the "angry black woman with attitude"....very overdone effects and the film doesn't even follow its own rules in regards to how the ghosts are dealt with. Trust me on this...don't see it, wait for redbox or netflix.… Expand

71 of 96 users found this helpful7125

All this user's reviews

Ghostbusters

User Reviews