Columbia Pictures | Release Date: July 15, 2016
2.7
USER SCORE
Generally unfavorable reviews based on 2157 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
444
Mixed:
243
Negative:
1,470
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
8
MacrovJul 15, 2016
For someone like me, who hasn't watched the first or second movies, I really enjoyed it. I obviously am not comparing this movie versus the original. However, as a comedy I thought it was quite funny. Go in expecting the humor to be kind ofFor someone like me, who hasn't watched the first or second movies, I really enjoyed it. I obviously am not comparing this movie versus the original. However, as a comedy I thought it was quite funny. Go in expecting the humor to be kind of childish and strange, and you will love it. The visual effects were nice. I thought the ghosts looked quite nice, and enjoyed the blueish hue that was given to them. The characters for the most part are legit. Holtzmann is easily my favorite. She definitely is the geekiest, strangest one in the movie, and does a good job selling a funny persona. Overall, an 8 out of 10. There isn't anything worthy of a 0. No, I don't think those people are sexist, but I just question what they are watching. There are some horrible movies out there, and this one isn't one of those. I personally enjoyed my time a heck of a lot more than something better reviewed like 10 Cloverfield Lane. But, that is just my personal opinion, and shows that not all people think alike. Expand
24 of 87 users found this helpful2463
All this user's reviews
8
oildboy29Jul 16, 2016
I don't know why I went to see this movie; I already believed it would suck, yet I rushed out to watch it. Ghostbusters is a surprisingly solid and high entertaining movie; it's not perfect, but it's well worth watching.
Very funny movie,
I don't know why I went to see this movie; I already believed it would suck, yet I rushed out to watch it. Ghostbusters is a surprisingly solid and high entertaining movie; it's not perfect, but it's well worth watching.
Very funny movie, with solid acting , and awesome special effects! I watched it in Imax 3D; the special effects takes full advantage of Imax 3D format to create a sort of hyper realism.
Expand
22 of 84 users found this helpful2262
All this user's reviews
8
thejudekingJul 15, 2016
It was funny and had great special effects. I mean honestly, what more do you need? The entire cast is pretty great especially Chris Hemsworth as a pretty yet stupid secretary. I can't wait for the inevitable sequel.
20 of 80 users found this helpful2060
All this user's reviews
8
bkmelleyJul 15, 2016
I had a very good time watching this. I thought it was genuinely funny and would see it again. I was laughing, the rest of the audience was laughing, and it was a pretty packed theater for a 2 o'clock showing on a weekday. It was a good movie.
20 of 80 users found this helpful2060
All this user's reviews
8
GTAYLORJul 16, 2016
FUNNY glad i saw it. No expectations. Ignored all the noise and just said Im gunna go and aee it for myself. Did i say it was FUNNY. I dont care who makes me laugh.
18 of 72 users found this helpful1854
All this user's reviews
8
SkippycoyoteJul 15, 2016
I thought the new Ghostbusters movie was great! I'm not going to give out any spoilers, just a quick review. Overall, it was funny and action packed. There were some amazing special effects! With the exception of a few very minor roles, theI thought the new Ghostbusters movie was great! I'm not going to give out any spoilers, just a quick review. Overall, it was funny and action packed. There were some amazing special effects! With the exception of a few very minor roles, the acting was great. The characters were well developed and unique, not just a rehash of the original cast. In comparing it to the original movies, the plot was actually a bit different. Sure, there were four characters seeking to "bust" ghosts, but the incentive, development, and methods were totally different. There was more emphasis on the development of the tools, more comedy (or maybe just more of my type of humor), and definitely more action. There was less of a focus on book research, and no real romance in the story. It was definitely scarier than the original. For you parents, it is rated PG-13. I will be taking my 7 and 8 year old children to see it, but I will have a talk with them first about how it is just a movie, and the peril is not real. I'm pretty sure the PG-13 rating is due to some smoking seen on screen (which I totally missed), the use of the middle finger as a crude gesture, some mild language, and violence. It was not at all bloody or gory, but there were implied off screen deaths. I laughed out loud several times, jumped a few times in surprise, and was cheering by the end. Those who are fans of the original will likely appreciate that the new movie had several jokes, nods, and references to the originals. I emerged from the theater with my childhood intact, a smile on my face, and a desire to build myself a new proton pack. Expand
27 of 110 users found this helpful2783
All this user's reviews
8
FarhanFirozJul 15, 2016
Ghostbusters is definitely one of the better films of the summer.Great performances from the lead actresses with hilarious one-liners and pays homage to the original with its cameos and easter eggs. The 3rd act is highly entertaining withGhostbusters is definitely one of the better films of the summer.Great performances from the lead actresses with hilarious one-liners and pays homage to the original with its cameos and easter eggs. The 3rd act is highly entertaining with outstanding VFX and brought something new to this reboot franchise. Although the movie suffers from same old plot as the original and some jokes didn't land well. Expand
20 of 82 users found this helpful2062
All this user's reviews
8
eevilaliceJul 15, 2016
The new Ghostbusters is much better than the trailers make it seem: funnier and with great effects, an amazing cast and director. It stands on its own, and if they'd let it, more people would enjoy it if they left the original out of theThe new Ghostbusters is much better than the trailers make it seem: funnier and with great effects, an amazing cast and director. It stands on its own, and if they'd let it, more people would enjoy it if they left the original out of the discussion. You can be a fan of both. I was looking forward to MVP Kate McKinnon the most, which is saying something given the cast. The ladies have excellent chemistry, and the filmmakers are able to nod to the original in different ways without depending on it. I loved how the women functioned as a band of outsiders. It made me wish there'd been films with more women like this when I was young. Expand
21 of 87 users found this helpful2166
All this user's reviews
8
The_ThornJul 16, 2016
I'm a die-hard fan of the original 'Ghostbusters'. I've seen it countless times and it remains one of my all-time favourite comedies. Having said that, I find the sequel lifeless and forgettable. Superfluous, even. I am absolutely notI'm a die-hard fan of the original 'Ghostbusters'. I've seen it countless times and it remains one of my all-time favourite comedies. Having said that, I find the sequel lifeless and forgettable. Superfluous, even. I am absolutely not indiscriminate.

And yet I liked Paul Feig's 'Ghostbusters'.

I really liked it.

Yes, the trailers were lame. Whoever cut them made me want to not see the movie; they really did not do the movie justice. In fact, most (not all) of the gags that fell flat in the trailer worked in their proper context. Even some of the reheated ones.

The cast was pretty good and they had an excellent dynamic. I was most pleasantly surprised by Melissa McCarthy, who isn't all shouty for once (think Ray without the naiveté), and Kate McKinnon, who plays a smart, creative, quirky and bad@$$ chick.

Yes, there are plenty of small bits that I could have done without, including the gimmicky arsenal, the product placement, some of the cameos, an over-the-top, action-heavy finale (as well as Hemsworth's part in it), amongst other things.

But I had a really good time. And, seriously, I would see more of Feig's 'Ghostbusters' if they made more. I would love to see where they take it from here, how the characters evolve, and how they develop the concept. Yes, I will see this one again.

I'd give it a 7.75 out of 10 (not quite an 8, but certainly better than average)
Expand
19 of 79 users found this helpful1960
All this user's reviews
7
FargoUTJul 15, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A decent, good-not-great sequel to the beloved 80s film, this makes plenty of references to the original (too many, actually). Leslie Jones and Kate McKinnon steal the film, while Kristen Wiig and Melissa McCarthy mostly play it straight. I like Chris Hemsworth but feel his character is too cartoonish and doesn't mix well with the rest of the cast. This plays more comedic and light-hearted than the original two did, and the tonal inconsistency will really prevent this from being remembered like the original is today. The visual effects are pretty impressive, especially in 3D, and the neon colors of the ghosts is quite lovely to behold. Hardly the trainwreck everyone was expecting, go see it for Jones and McKinnon, both of whom are hilarious. The ending of the film is the worst part of the film, pulling one of those "reset" conclusions that makes the climactic battle seem exceptionally dull and pointless. Expand
18 of 75 users found this helpful1857
All this user's reviews
7
123456burnJul 16, 2016
Best summer big budget film so far this year. And no I dont watch cartoons. I also ignore obvious attempts to slander other users while a string of zero grade reviews to do it. Its childish and reserved for people that should stick toBest summer big budget film so far this year. And no I dont watch cartoons. I also ignore obvious attempts to slander other users while a string of zero grade reviews to do it. Its childish and reserved for people that should stick to watching cartoons.

I thought acting here was good. The story was loose and didnt feel constrained with too much exposition. The graphics - call them scooby doo if you like kids films, but they worked just fine. NICE one liners. And maybe there was some humor directed at men but guess what. Im a guy and I found the jabs funny cauae im not an over sensitive boy on an internet rampage.
Expand
18 of 75 users found this helpful1857
All this user's reviews
7
blisterronJul 16, 2016
OK Im a guy giving a movie review about Ghostbuster and I dont care about all the back & forth between the haters that never went to the movie vs women that said its was great no matter what. I HAD FUN. laughed a ton and yeah jokes againstOK Im a guy giving a movie review about Ghostbuster and I dont care about all the back & forth between the haters that never went to the movie vs women that said its was great no matter what. I HAD FUN. laughed a ton and yeah jokes against men? they were funny. it felt to me like they totally paid respect to the classic version - the sure as heck didnt turn their back on it. also think Kristen Wiig gets no respect. she's funny but can play it straight-up normal. i recommend. Expand
17 of 71 users found this helpful1754
All this user's reviews
10
mixedupman2000Jul 15, 2016
I would give this an 8 but to many people are under rating this just because they feel entitled to this franchise.
The reviews for this are like the river of hate filled slime from ghostbusters 2
I personally love the original movies and
I would give this an 8 but to many people are under rating this just because they feel entitled to this franchise.
The reviews for this are like the river of hate filled slime from ghostbusters 2
I personally love the original movies and the cartoon series and this is a fine installment to the franchise.
I hope they can find enough encouragement to make a sequel.
Expand
20 of 85 users found this helpful2065
All this user's reviews
10
softscrubJul 16, 2016
I enjoyed it all the way through, more fun than i thought it would be. And I would totally see it again. Thats my review. And thats the only justification I need to score a movie a ten (that plus the actress Kate something; shes fantastic) II enjoyed it all the way through, more fun than i thought it would be. And I would totally see it again. Thats my review. And thats the only justification I need to score a movie a ten (that plus the actress Kate something; shes fantastic) I dont comment on editing, or writing, becaue I have no idea what to look for.

Y
Expand
18 of 77 users found this helpful1859
All this user's reviews
9
PeteyFlipJul 15, 2016
I totally don't get all the hatred! I'm a long time fan of the originals and I watched all of "The Real Ghostbusters" cartoons growing up. I am probably one of the biggest Ghostbusters geeks born to man. You have to go in to the movie openI totally don't get all the hatred! I'm a long time fan of the originals and I watched all of "The Real Ghostbusters" cartoons growing up. I am probably one of the biggest Ghostbusters geeks born to man. You have to go in to the movie open minded and be ready for a new story. Obviously having some doubts and skepticism I went in wanting to be entertained and not looking for an exact sequel or reboot and I REALLY enjoyed it! I saw it in IMAX and the effects were awesome! The cast was totally loveable and super entertaining! I am really hoping for a sequel, I had a blast and think the girls knocked it out of the park! Expand
32 of 137 users found this helpful32105
All this user's reviews
10
KuvuplanJul 15, 2016
It was fun to watch, had interesting characters, and lots of jokes. It really was funny, and good. It had impossible expectations to meet from it's predecessor, but came close! Much better than the 1975 series and Ghostbusters II.
18 of 78 users found this helpful1860
All this user's reviews
10
JerekJul 16, 2016
Ignore the (largely confected) hate-fest around this movie. It's wonderful, with a great cast, terrific FX, lovely cameos from five of the original cast, some gorgeous little references to the original novie and lots of laugh-out-loudIgnore the (largely confected) hate-fest around this movie. It's wonderful, with a great cast, terrific FX, lovely cameos from five of the original cast, some gorgeous little references to the original novie and lots of laugh-out-loud moments. The original movie(s) have been in my top ten movies ever since I saw them as a teenager, and this remake is a worthy addition to the canon. It manages to be very respectful to its much-loved 'parent' as well as a terrific popcorn movie in it's own right. Here's hoping for a sequel! Expand
17 of 74 users found this helpful1757
All this user's reviews
8
JefffjonzeJul 16, 2016
This was okay. Not great and not a patch on 1 but as good if not better than 2. Holtzmann was a good character and Wiig was very likeable. Could have done with a better villain.
21 of 92 users found this helpful2171
All this user's reviews
9
tiger9599Jul 16, 2016
5 stars! There is no fan bigger than I regarding the original 2 Ghostbuster movies. That said, the new movie is an absolute compliment to the originals.
I had hopes for it to be good but went in skeptical. I was very entertained and fell
5 stars! There is no fan bigger than I regarding the original 2 Ghostbuster movies. That said, the new movie is an absolute compliment to the originals.
I had hopes for it to be good but went in skeptical. I was very entertained and fell deep into the movie. I loved the characters and the special effects were great.
I will see it again and buy a copy when available.
Don't listen to the bad reviews.
Go in, enjoy the fact it's a fun movie in the middle of a lot of terror in our present day lives.
Expand
25 of 110 users found this helpful2585
All this user's reviews
10
Dattwood7Jul 15, 2016
This is a great movie. Don't believe the haters. Cast is great, writing is great, it's even a little scary. And it's a fun movie for kids, too. I'd see it again.
17 of 77 users found this helpful1760
All this user's reviews
10
gabriela_gironJul 15, 2016
i love ghostbusters 2016, this movie its just so amazing, i knew from the beginnig this movie was going to be awesome, i mean come on you have an incredible cast the queen of comedy MELISSA MCCARTHY the hilarious KRISTEN WIIG the fireballi love ghostbusters 2016, this movie its just so amazing, i knew from the beginnig this movie was going to be awesome, i mean come on you have an incredible cast the queen of comedy MELISSA MCCARTHY the hilarious KRISTEN WIIG the fireball LESLIE JONES and the dynamite KATE MCKINNON and lets not forget the genius director PAUL FEIG and BTW they and the movie have the endorsement of the original cast of 1984 they loved it and a think this movie has a great story, awesome characters, amazing effects, hilarious and non stopping laughs and i really had great time watching it . Expand
18 of 82 users found this helpful1864
All this user's reviews
9
Dozer-21Jul 16, 2016
I LOVE paul feig movies. He did a great job with this remake. Funny as always. I know I might sound biased but hey, he hasnt let me down yet . Thought the CGI was great in 3D. Not a ton of people in my IMAX show but its expensive, so I getI LOVE paul feig movies. He did a great job with this remake. Funny as always. I know I might sound biased but hey, he hasnt let me down yet . Thought the CGI was great in 3D. Not a ton of people in my IMAX show but its expensive, so I get it. Anyways, probably the funniest movie of the year for me. Expand
16 of 74 users found this helpful1658
All this user's reviews
9
MarkCareyJul 16, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I thought the SNL cast members pulled off a very entertaining movie. It was a good and funny film, and I loved seeing these 4 funny SNL women play leading roles in what is usually male dominated casts in action roles movies. I especially liked Kristen and Melissa, but Jones, and McKinnon were great as well. I thought it was a great mix of pulling from the original, as well as adding new material and great special effects and some pretty scary ghosts in the subway. Don't pay attention to many of the negative reviews, they are probably people who think that any action movie must have males as leading roles. The small cameo roles by Murray and Aykroyd and Weaver were a nice touch. Go see this movie if you liked the first two Ghostbusters, you will not be disappointed! Expand
17 of 79 users found this helpful1762
All this user's reviews
8
misterbearJul 16, 2016
i felt a lot of love went into this film. i appreciated the nods to the original (i saw the first one when i was 12) while infusing the story with some fresh ideas. camaraderie between the main four characters was wonderful. i thinki felt a lot of love went into this film. i appreciated the nods to the original (i saw the first one when i was 12) while infusing the story with some fresh ideas. camaraderie between the main four characters was wonderful. i think ghostbusters belong in the 21st century as a remake, and Feig did the film justice. Expand
18 of 85 users found this helpful1867
All this user's reviews
9
Movie888Jul 16, 2016
The last X Men felt empty. Batman v Superman was WAY too serious and heavy. Warcraft was utter garbage. At least Ghostbusters was fun, which was probably why I enjoyed it more than I should have. Captain America was strong but I only had funThe last X Men felt empty. Batman v Superman was WAY too serious and heavy. Warcraft was utter garbage. At least Ghostbusters was fun, which was probably why I enjoyed it more than I should have. Captain America was strong but I only had fun for about fifteen minutes in the middle. GB was a solid comedy with action. Thats all I got. That, and my grade. Expand
15 of 71 users found this helpful1556
All this user's reviews
8
blizzardblueJul 15, 2016
Really enjoyed it, it was a good time at the movies; the main cast do what they do best but was specially entertained by McKinnon and Hemsworth, I can see the former becoming a movie star in her own right.. This film is one of the best 3DReally enjoyed it, it was a good time at the movies; the main cast do what they do best but was specially entertained by McKinnon and Hemsworth, I can see the former becoming a movie star in her own right.. This film is one of the best 3D movies this year, in this case the 3D is not just a gimmick to get your extra few dollars, also probably the best rolling credits I've seen in a while, it kept the audience 'till they ended. Expand
31 of 152 users found this helpful31121
All this user's reviews
10
vaguepainsJul 15, 2016
This movie is hilarious. I found the character arch of Slimer to be moving. All the haters just need to lighten up and enjoy the ride. And yes it is better than the original.
19 of 95 users found this helpful1976
All this user's reviews
9
phildogJul 15, 2016
The ghosts were actually scary, the comedy was hilarious, and the busting action was great. Don't listen to the haters. I loved this one WAY more original. A brilliant successor more worthy of the moniker more almost everything else it sharesThe ghosts were actually scary, the comedy was hilarious, and the busting action was great. Don't listen to the haters. I loved this one WAY more original. A brilliant successor more worthy of the moniker more almost everything else it shares it with. Expand
30 of 162 users found this helpful30132
All this user's reviews
10
FutureMemeJul 15, 2016
Everyone knew a movie with this creative team was going to be funny. The visual effects (specifically the 3D and what the film does with aspect ratio) was what shocked me. This is clearly in the Scott Pilgrim school of effects, not attemptingEveryone knew a movie with this creative team was going to be funny. The visual effects (specifically the 3D and what the film does with aspect ratio) was what shocked me. This is clearly in the Scott Pilgrim school of effects, not attempting to create an uncanny valley of hyper realism, but instead making something fun, cartoonish, and that fits story being told.

And Kate McKinnon is a comic genius.
Expand
21 of 122 users found this helpful21101
All this user's reviews
9
AZVWJul 15, 2016
Paul Fieg & his cast of women, didn't destroy my childhood. Great homage to the classic original. The pacing is perfect, like the original. Building to an fun visual ghostly climax. See it in 3D if you can.
For all the "Ghostbro" ignorant
Paul Fieg & his cast of women, didn't destroy my childhood. Great homage to the classic original. The pacing is perfect, like the original. Building to an fun visual ghostly climax. See it in 3D if you can.
For all the "Ghostbro" ignorant haters, Ivan Reitman who Directed & Produced the original, is the Producer here too...
A new generation of Ghostbusters is here. Bring on the sequel. You know there will be.
Expand
28 of 170 users found this helpful28142
All this user's reviews
9
AGeekNamedBobJul 15, 2016
Haters be damned and those on the fence be assured: the new GHOSTBUSTERS is a worthy remake. It is 2016 and there is a brand new reboot of the series with new characters, newish plot, new writers and a new director. And you know what: itHaters be damned and those on the fence be assured: the new GHOSTBUSTERS is a worthy remake. It is 2016 and there is a brand new reboot of the series with new characters, newish plot, new writers and a new director. And you know what: it works: both as a remake and as its own film. GHOSTBUSTERS strikes a balance between what worked before and new elements. It neither copies 1984 outright, nor takes the title and runs in a different direction. Like recent (and excellent) sequels STAR WARS: THE FORCE AWAKENS and CREED, GHOSTBUSTERS uses the bones of the first installment to make a new body. The core of the originals is not the ghosts, but the characters by way of dynamic personalities, witty banter, and how the react to the actual events that occur. Those actual events are the burned marshmallow on the cake. This we have in droves. GHOSTBUSTERS is a comedy: and it’s damned funny. It’s continually hilarious both in dialogue in physical comedy – although the dialogue and interaction based humor works better than the physical which sometimes too much slides into over-long slapstick. The characters are not direct copies of their predecessors, even if one can see the basis of each; some traits slide around or are merged. Each of the four Ghostbusters: Kristin Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, Leslie Jones and Kate McKinnon have their times to shine and just about equal play. McKinnon is a scene stealer, her line readings are wonderful and her reactions are even better. But she has a challenger in Chris Hemsworth as Kevin, the dimwitted mixture of Janine, Tully and a little Dana. Hemsworth is worth is muscle weight in comedy gold. With Taika Waititi (WHAT WE DO IN THE SHADOWS and HUNT FOR THE WILDERPEOPLE – two of my favorite comedies of the last two years) holding the hammer for THOR: RAGNAROK, can it just be an outright comedy and allow Hemsworth to keep this up? He’s great at it.
Since we’re talking about actors and performances: yes there are cameos from familiar GHOSTBUSTER faces (more than you’d think too), and they all work, fitting into the film, and are very welcome.

Here’s the biggest surprise: there are many things that this version does BETTER than the original. Wow! Yes! It’s true – this man has no dick! Sorry, back to this movie. This a movie with ghosts, based on horror elements. And there are times it’s actually a bit scary; sequences designed to be horror. Not too scary – just enough that woman to my right was freaking out a little, but the tone is there – particularly in the incredibly well constructed opening scene. By the time those familiar tones start to play, the audience is ready to bounce their heads with a smile as the theme starts, and in my audience they did. The ghosts in this version have bite. They can hurt people, and weirdly enough, able to be affected by physical objects too. This creates higher stakes in each sequence and allows creative interactions of the living and the dead. These dangerous dead look great, too. Physical actors play the majority of the spirits and given CGI enhancements of glowing blue, skeletal features and some rot. They and the non-human ghosts are remincent of the create designs in the REAL GHOSTBUSTERS cartoon (along with McKinnon’s Holtzmann echoing that show’s Egon). However, there aren’t enough of them. Missing is a montage of creative spirits – both in catching them in the 2nd act and when they expected activity bump in the finale. It’s understandable with the way the plot works, though. The plotting 1984 is reactionary: the Ghostbusters have an event then figure out what’s happening. It’s a rather passive plot. 2016 features a more directed, but wider ranging plot with a human villain behind the mayhem, who is followed so there more of a forward motion to the plot. Sorry guys badmouthing women being Ghostbusters – the villain has MRA qualities. He hates everyone but has many barbs at women. He actor of the villain a little weak and doesn’t command much presence but it’s a welcome alteration.

After all the waiting for many and hating for others: GHOSTBUSTERS is a strong new entry into a beloved franchise. The characters are fantastic. The ghosts are well designed and sometimes scary. There is a well-made plot. The cameos and in jokes are welcome and not awkward. Most importantly, GHOSTBUSTERS is a constantly highly enjoyable and continually hilarious film and I give it a very strong recommendation.
Expand
22 of 148 users found this helpful22126
All this user's reviews
10
angie70000000Jul 16, 2016
I loved this movie. The women in it are great together and all bring their own style of comedy that blends well with their cast members. I laughed throughout this film! Who doesn't love a movie that has amazingly smart women who turn-up asI loved this movie. The women in it are great together and all bring their own style of comedy that blends well with their cast members. I laughed throughout this film! Who doesn't love a movie that has amazingly smart women who turn-up as the sheros!

Beyond the great comedic acting, the film makers sprinkled a lot from the previous movie in which was fantastic. There are cameos, there is the famed marshmallow man, basically same events happening. In a brilliant way, they still made the movie have it's own story-line while at the same time bringing back all the old stuff we love about the 1984 classic.

Very well done. I would pay theater money to see it again! Hopefully this cast continues making films together.
Expand
46 of 354 users found this helpful46308
All this user's reviews
8
supemoneylifeSep 23, 2016
After all the hate for this film i had read before I watched it I was expecting it to be far worse than it is. Its a shame they didnt make one with the original cast (Akroyd and Murray at least) as Ghostbusters but this new take on it is fineAfter all the hate for this film i had read before I watched it I was expecting it to be far worse than it is. Its a shame they didnt make one with the original cast (Akroyd and Murray at least) as Ghostbusters but this new take on it is fine and a fun family movie all the same. It certainly deserves a better score than 2.7!! Loads of references to the previous movies and great cameo roles from the old actors. I'm actually hoping they do a sequel :) Expand
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
8
caissaSep 28, 2016
I think this movie is based on a paradigm to revolutionize tradition approach to female category. We need to challenge the ghost of modernism by postmodern facing to some categories such as freedom, democracy, male/female and so on.
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
7
TokyochuchuDec 26, 2016
Ghostbusters is a very good reboot of the long dormant franchise. It was funny and had some cool visuals and action sequences. What's not to like? I have no idea why this film met with such vitriolic hatred upon release. It's a good, funGhostbusters is a very good reboot of the long dormant franchise. It was funny and had some cool visuals and action sequences. What's not to like? I have no idea why this film met with such vitriolic hatred upon release. It's a good, fun film! Oh well... Here's to the internet crazies once again. Expand
5 of 11 users found this helpful56
All this user's reviews
8
Gooieduck1224Nov 17, 2016
i skipped watching this at the theater because of all the bad hype about it, which i regretted after watching online later. found the humor, though not as clever/subtle as the old movies, was more of a laugh-out-loud experience. alot ofi skipped watching this at the theater because of all the bad hype about it, which i regretted after watching online later. found the humor, though not as clever/subtle as the old movies, was more of a laugh-out-loud experience. alot of people criticized the men as being "dumbed down" or purposefully rude/ignorant, but other than Chris' part as the receptionist, they seemed about on par with most of the bit characters in the old movies. and since the receptionist in the old movies was exactly the brightest bulb either, the dumb receptionist theme was okay with me. also like the new ghost catching tools/weapons they made for the movie. all in all, worth adding to the end of my yearly ghostbusters marathons :) Expand
5 of 11 users found this helpful56
All this user's reviews
8
Tiber5Jan 17, 2017
The new Ghostbusters is a pretty funny movie, a goofy take on the goofy original that has some good laughs and a dopey yet absolutely scary and ghost-like story.
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
8
ThisIsSparta666Jan 17, 2017
The new Ghostbusters is a pretty funny movie, a goofy take on the goofy original that has some good laughs and a dopey yet absolutely scary and ghost-like story.
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
8
PAMAJan 17, 2017
The new Ghostbusters is a pretty funny movie, a goofy take on the goofy original that has some good laughs and a dopey yet absolutely scary and ghost-like story.
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
8
Pama300Jan 17, 2017
The new Ghostbusters is a pretty funny movie, a goofy take on the goofy original that has some good laughs and a dopey yet absolutely scary and ghost-like story.
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
8
Creepers200Jan 17, 2017
The new Ghostbusters is a pretty funny movie, a goofy take on the goofy original that has some good laughs and a dopey yet absolutely scary and ghost-like story.
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
7
wholenessAug 3, 2016
The original Ghostbusters movie was one of my favorite movies of all time. This movie pales in comparison. I did not go into the theater with high expectations. The beginning of the movie is kind of boring due to the slow pace. I have nothingThe original Ghostbusters movie was one of my favorite movies of all time. This movie pales in comparison. I did not go into the theater with high expectations. The beginning of the movie is kind of boring due to the slow pace. I have nothing against a nearly full women cast, but it did have a really feminine kind of feel to it which it every much different to the first movie, it felt more like a "chick-flick" than an action movie to some degree. I wish they made the characters a little more gender neutral or less "stereotypical girly". I did enjoy the African American Women's character a bit more however.

The female version of "Egon" kind of lacked in character, the original Egon was a believable nerd, this one was just a bit of an oddball that didn't have much to say but in a way that was not believable. She was
the subject of a humourous jokes, mostly prop comedy which did make me laugh sometimes.

The jokes were hit and miss. I did find some of the joke funny and burst into laughter, other ones, particularly the potty jokes involving speech about a women's genitals, feel flat, they were not funny to me and no one in the theatre around me appeared to laugh at those either.

This is to the original Ghostbusters movie kind of what MacGruber is to MacGyverr. Really this should have been marketed as a parody of the original Ghostbusters movie than a reboot since that is what it really is.

I did enjoy the movie enough that I didn't hate it so I've given it a 7, slightly above average rating. I did like it better than Ghostbusters II but that one was a flop too so that is not saying much.
Expand
6 of 14 users found this helpful68
All this user's reviews
7
EdizAug 19, 2016
La película cumple con su cometido, es graciosa y divertida. Deja muy atrás a lo que los trailers nos mostraba, superándose a si misma. Aunque me haya sorprendido que la película roce a las 2 horas de duración, no se percibe que sea tanLa película cumple con su cometido, es graciosa y divertida. Deja muy atrás a lo que los trailers nos mostraba, superándose a si misma. Aunque me haya sorprendido que la película roce a las 2 horas de duración, no se percibe que sea tan larga. La película se siente fresca, es muy recomendable para ver con la familia o con los amigos.

PD: Lo siento si mi reseña es demasiado positiva, pero es que no he visto las películas originales y me sorprendió bastante para lo que esperaba de ella.

The film fulfills its mission, is funny. It leaves behind all that the trailers showed, outdoing itself. Though i was surprised that the film almost last 2 hours, i not perceive the duration. The movie feels fresh, is recomendable watch with family or friends.

PD: Sorry if my review it's too positive, but i hadn't watched the original movies and i was expecting a bad movie.
Expand
5 of 12 users found this helpful57
All this user's reviews
7
horaticAug 16, 2016
The new Ghostbusters, while not an Oscar-worthy movie, is actually a pretty average, funny comedy and doesn't deserve all the harsh criticism (there are way worse productions that receive higher score, god knows why). Unfortunately, manyThe new Ghostbusters, while not an Oscar-worthy movie, is actually a pretty average, funny comedy and doesn't deserve all the harsh criticism (there are way worse productions that receive higher score, god knows why). Unfortunately, many people hated the idea of a remake from the beginning and the movie was further sabotaged by the awful trailer. I grew up watching the original movies and when it comes to plot and humor the remake is more or less on the same level as the originals. The characters are not flat, the cast did great job, the plot (although predictable) isn't overly boring, despite the fact I was preparing for the worst. Unfortunately, the low score is mostly caused by the viewers' negativity. If this movie wasn't a remake but an original made in the 90s, people would've loved it. It's a solid 7 from me and I'd gladly watch it again. Expand
5 of 12 users found this helpful57
All this user's reviews
8
AsadarOct 12, 2016
So far, 2016 seems to be a very bad year for movies, but Ghostbuster, despite its deplorable marketing, is a good surprise. The movie is not perfect, but I had a good moment watching it. So why ask for more ? I still love the originalSo far, 2016 seems to be a very bad year for movies, but Ghostbuster, despite its deplorable marketing, is a good surprise. The movie is not perfect, but I had a good moment watching it. So why ask for more ? I still love the original movies, and I like this one too.

Nice and funny movie.
Expand
4 of 10 users found this helpful46
All this user's reviews
7
robertoiglesiasOct 16, 2019
I give it a 6.5/10. Some jokes fell flat, and some scenes don’t add anything important. But tbh, I enjoyed watching female Ghostbusters. Why is that a bad thing? The action was fun and the new stuff was pretty good. Some performances wereI give it a 6.5/10. Some jokes fell flat, and some scenes don’t add anything important. But tbh, I enjoyed watching female Ghostbusters. Why is that a bad thing? The action was fun and the new stuff was pretty good. Some performances were great.
It’s not perfect and it’s not as good as the original. But I respect having this film here. Don’t dislike my review because I have something called an opinion
Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
7
SherlocksAug 12, 2016
Can't see its as bad as some would have you believe, the story was some what original in that it was the ghosts doing all the bad things. The new ghostbusters worked well together, most people seem to have issue with the fact it wasn't aCan't see its as bad as some would have you believe, the story was some what original in that it was the ghosts doing all the bad things. The new ghostbusters worked well together, most people seem to have issue with the fact it wasn't a continuation of the original and getting mad over how they would have done it. Well its new universe for and its like the first trailer 30 years have past since that came out things have indeed changed. It was nice to see the camos from other actors.

The ending for me was the weakest part and very rushed with the final scenes being all too much CGI . I will be getting this on blueray
Expand
5 of 13 users found this helpful58
All this user's reviews
7
theRooikatSep 5, 2016
I've given myself a month to think about how I really and truly feel about this reboot. Firstly, I should clarify that the original Ghost Busters is one of my all time favorite movies but because I truly love the film, I can also acknowledgeI've given myself a month to think about how I really and truly feel about this reboot. Firstly, I should clarify that the original Ghost Busters is one of my all time favorite movies but because I truly love the film, I can also acknowledge it's own faults. Exactly like with this new Ghostbusters. It is not good movie. It definitely could've been yet not as iconic nor groundbreaking like the original. That problem is due to the fact that Sony wanted it to make so many callbacks so that the movie could appease the fans. It is a shame that Paul Feig did not have complete creative control over this reboot because this movie could've been really good plus some possibly interesting future films in the franchise. So the nonetheless I loved it and I liked a tad more than Ghostbusters 2. It is disappointing to know that this is the only Holtzman we get in movie form. Expand
4 of 11 users found this helpful47
All this user's reviews
7
smiyamotOct 14, 2016
Okay, it's a remake of a classic so it's going uphill from the start, but taken by itself, it was pretty good. Plus we had Bill and Sigorney do cameos, there were ties to the old film with the fire station. For the 4 women to hire a hunkyOkay, it's a remake of a classic so it's going uphill from the start, but taken by itself, it was pretty good. Plus we had Bill and Sigorney do cameos, there were ties to the old film with the fire station. For the 4 women to hire a hunky blond as the receptionist was reverse sexism at it's best. Expand
4 of 11 users found this helpful47
All this user's reviews
7
imoviesreviewAug 19, 2016
While the story and characters are kinda bland. The movie makes up for it with funny jokes and good action scenes. I would suggest you go see this movie.
4 of 11 users found this helpful47
All this user's reviews
9
listenlearnAug 13, 2016
Saw it opening night! I know I'm in the minority here, but I liked it better than the old one! It was entertaining to watch and I loved all the actresses! I was already a fan of Melissa McCarthy, but I really liked Kate McKinnon and LeslieSaw it opening night! I know I'm in the minority here, but I liked it better than the old one! It was entertaining to watch and I loved all the actresses! I was already a fan of Melissa McCarthy, but I really liked Kate McKinnon and Leslie Jones performances too. OMG, McKinnon's smiles and winks! (female reviewer here, but my husband who's a huge fan of the old ghostbusters really enjoyed the new one too!)
Ignore the troll hordes, they are just angry (and often sexist)!
Expand
5 of 14 users found this helpful59
All this user's reviews
10
Movielover2400Nov 6, 2016
I loved this movie!! It was funny and has awesome effects. The cast was perfectly picked and it was worth buying. I hope they make another one! The only down side was I know that women get shown as dumb and only wanting to look good inI loved this movie!! It was funny and has awesome effects. The cast was perfectly picked and it was worth buying. I hope they make another one! The only down side was I know that women get shown as dumb and only wanting to look good in movies, but i felt like the guy was a little too dumb. It was funny though and he had a good time playing the role. It would have been fun to play coming from a stage actress opinion. in all i couldn't be happier with the results. Expand
5 of 14 users found this helpful59
All this user's reviews
9
andinelJul 29, 2016
I think it's a good sign that I started laughing pretty much immediately, and I basically didn't stop until the first act of the movie ended. The scriptwriting and casting were both fantastic, and all four leading ladies did an excellent job.I think it's a good sign that I started laughing pretty much immediately, and I basically didn't stop until the first act of the movie ended. The scriptwriting and casting were both fantastic, and all four leading ladies did an excellent job. The movie separates itself from the original with strong, unique characters and a new plot but stays recognizable. My only complaint is that the second act of the movie, setting up the villain for the final conflict, seemed to drag on for a bit, but it was short enough before the action got started and everything was back to being a joy to watch. Expand
7 of 20 users found this helpful713
All this user's reviews
8
PfilipJul 23, 2016
Less a reboot than a re-imagining, Ghostbusters works primarily because of the amazing chemistry of the four leads, who keep us invested (and laughing) from start to finish. While McKinnon does steal a couple scenes (and is on fire all overLess a reboot than a re-imagining, Ghostbusters works primarily because of the amazing chemistry of the four leads, who keep us invested (and laughing) from start to finish. While McKinnon does steal a couple scenes (and is on fire all over the internet because of it), all four of these new characters are given plenty of time to shine and endear themselves to us, and by the end I found myself eager to see them regrouped for a sequel. Admittedly, the film has a bit of a weak antagonist character, and the challenge our heroes face feels less weighty than ol' Gozer did back in 1984, even if its talked of in terms of cataclysmic importance. But the film makes no illusions: it happily leans far heavier on the jokes than the scares, and works beautifully as an establishing origin story. Expand
10 of 29 users found this helpful1019
All this user's reviews
8
friskypaletteJul 24, 2016
This is a fun movie, with many funny performances. Chris Hemsworth is great as a dumb blonde secretary, and the all-women ghostbuster crew turn in a solid ensemble performance. Don't let the trolls muddy the water. If you like Paul FeigThis is a fun movie, with many funny performances. Chris Hemsworth is great as a dumb blonde secretary, and the all-women ghostbuster crew turn in a solid ensemble performance. Don't let the trolls muddy the water. If you like Paul Feig movies, you'll like this one. Expand
10 of 29 users found this helpful1019
All this user's reviews
10
ChowdaAug 3, 2016
I would rate this an 8/10....but I will give it a 10 to balance the zeros.

Is it funny yes! Is it good yes! Is it entertaining! Wiig, McCarthy(?), and Thor are hilarious. And just a side note....I went back and watched the 1984
I would rate this an 8/10....but I will give it a 10 to balance the zeros.

Is it funny yes!
Is it good yes!
Is it entertaining!

Wiig, McCarthy(?), and Thor are hilarious.

And just a side note....I went back and watched the 1984 Ghostbusters....nostalgia....I think in general we should erase the 1980s from human history. Forget it ever happened....it was an awful time full of bad movies and embarrassing photos.......

Except for Guns N Roses......let's just pretend they started in the 90s.
Expand
5 of 15 users found this helpful510
All this user's reviews
10
SimpsonFansAug 11, 2016
I love this movie. The women in it are great together and all bring their own style of comedy that blends well with their cast members. I laughed throughout this film! Who doesn't love a movie that has amazingly smart women who turn-up as theI love this movie. The women in it are great together and all bring their own style of comedy that blends well with their cast members. I laughed throughout this film! Who doesn't love a movie that has amazingly smart women who turn-up as the heroines!

Beyond the great comedic acting, the film makers sprinkled a lot from the previous movie in which was fantastic. There are cameos, there is the famed marshmallow man, basically same events happening. In a brilliant way, they still made the movie have it's own story-line while at the same time bringing back all the old stuff we love about the 1984 classic.

Very well done. I would pay theater money to see it again! Hopefully this cast continues making films together.
Expand
5 of 15 users found this helpful510
All this user's reviews
10
maxhuangAug 14, 2016
so good
The USS Enterprise crew explores the furthest reaches of uncharted space, where they encounter a new ruthless enemy who puts them and everything the Federation stands for to the test.
5 of 15 users found this helpful510
All this user's reviews
10
NoahfenceAug 14, 2016
This movie was absolutely amazing. Special effects, acting, characters, you name it. Judging by the director's statements, it entirely accomplished its goal of being a movie where the audience can have fun and see themselves represented onThis movie was absolutely amazing. Special effects, acting, characters, you name it. Judging by the director's statements, it entirely accomplished its goal of being a movie where the audience can have fun and see themselves represented on screen, and then went far further as a very enjoyable, hilarious movie. Everyone I've spoken to shares a similar opinion - that this movie won't be easily forgotten. Expand
5 of 15 users found this helpful510
All this user's reviews
10
ColbertOct 4, 2016
GHOSTDUMPERS takes a well loved franchise and craps all over it. If the originals didn't exist then this would be an ok kids movie Disney would be proud of. I think Bill Murray insisted his character be killed so he wouldn't have to soilGHOSTDUMPERS takes a well loved franchise and craps all over it. If the originals didn't exist then this would be an ok kids movie Disney would be proud of. I think Bill Murray insisted his character be killed so he wouldn't have to soil himself again by getting involved in any future GHOSTURINATOR movies. If you wanted GHOSTBUSTERS 3 go play or youtube the Ghostbusters 2009 game. It's got the original cast including Harold Ramis. RIP Ghostbusters. Expand
4 of 12 users found this helpful48
All this user's reviews
7
AngusBarbudezAug 26, 2016
Que os den Haters y ****

En general, me ha gustado bastante. Suscribo la critica de Gonzalo muy respetuoso con el original, muchos guiños, es un humor muy de Cazafantasmas. El tercer acto muy bueno, raro de estos films que siempre se me
Que os den Haters y ****

En general, me ha gustado bastante. Suscribo la critica de Gonzalo muy respetuoso con el original, muchos guiños, es un humor muy de Cazafantasmas. El tercer acto muy bueno, raro de estos films que siempre se me atraganta pero aquí no me ha pasado. La pega que le pongo es que la mitad de la peli se estanca y se hace pesado, pero luego arranca y cierra bien.

Muy recomendable.
Expand
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
7
MonkiReviewsMay 28, 2017
I actually liked it. I thought it had good effects and funny moments. I didn't enjoy the cast as much, I think they pushed the all girl cast to much and just picked these people because they are popular. It should have been different people.I actually liked it. I thought it had good effects and funny moments. I didn't enjoy the cast as much, I think they pushed the all girl cast to much and just picked these people because they are popular. It should have been different people. These actors aren't actually very funny at points, sadly. I enjoyed it a lot though, if they fixed the acting a little it would be great. Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
9
MsJaneJul 25, 2016
What an enjoyable, smart, funny summer action movie. I am sad and surprised by the very harsh negative posts and reviews. I know there is a lot of nostalgia for the original-it had it's moments- I watched it just a couple weeks ago but thereWhat an enjoyable, smart, funny summer action movie. I am sad and surprised by the very harsh negative posts and reviews. I know there is a lot of nostalgia for the original-it had it's moments- I watched it just a couple weeks ago but there were numerous cringe worthy moments many by my favorite Bill Murray, odd "plot" twists and special effects that by today's standards are done better on most cellphones. The original GB was a product of it's time which I enjoyed in the 80's , but it was ready to be remade and this was the team to do it! Women working together saving the world and trying to get a decent soup to wanton take out...is that asking to much? Expand
8 of 25 users found this helpful817
All this user's reviews
10
swelleanorJul 30, 2016
I have rarely been so surprised by reviews of a movie from which I have gotten so much enjoyment. I hadn't been sure what to expect, but I and most everyone in the (packed) theater where I saw this was laughing through the whole movie. TheI have rarely been so surprised by reviews of a movie from which I have gotten so much enjoyment. I hadn't been sure what to expect, but I and most everyone in the (packed) theater where I saw this was laughing through the whole movie. The acting was as great as you'd expect with a cast like this, and the jokes were genuinely hilarious. We are fans of the original Ghostbusters and loved this "update," which felt respectful of the original movie while putting a new spin on the premise. Expand
6 of 19 users found this helpful613
All this user's reviews
8
preciouskikiJul 21, 2016
Funnier than I thought it would be. It's so silly that some folks are bashing this movie. There's no reason for the vitriol. It's your basic summer comedy. It's good for a few laughs, and the stars Kirsten Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, KateFunnier than I thought it would be. It's so silly that some folks are bashing this movie. There's no reason for the vitriol. It's your basic summer comedy. It's good for a few laughs, and the stars Kirsten Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, Kate McKinnon and Leslie Jones all do a good job. I haven't been a big fan of Leslie Jones (or anyone else, for that matter) so far on this season's Saturday Night Live, but I did like her in this movie, so it's probably just a matter of her needing better scripts than SNL provides. Most of the original stars of "Ghostbusters" make cameos in this movie, and that adds to the fun. Bill Murray appeared on a talk show and said all good things about how funny and talented the women are. Ignore the nasty commenters, and check out this movie. Is it the best comedy you will ever see? Probably not, but it's not bad. In fact, it's better than a lot of comedies I've seen in recent years. Expand
10 of 32 users found this helpful1022
All this user's reviews
7
analogkid280Jul 18, 2016
Certainly with its flaws it still entertains with its rapid fire cast. It sure does have a lot of misses but the jokes come out so fast you really do not mind quite so much when some fall flat. It seems to be edited way to sharp and the girlsCertainly with its flaws it still entertains with its rapid fire cast. It sure does have a lot of misses but the jokes come out so fast you really do not mind quite so much when some fall flat. It seems to be edited way to sharp and the girls seem to be trying too hard to make this movie entertaining. It is almost like someone was threatening them saying be funny or else. The result is a McCarthy that never seems to break out of her shell. The cameos could of been better. The special effects though are top notch and really bring out the third act with a bang. Expand
11 of 36 users found this helpful1125
All this user's reviews
7
Fergster73Jul 19, 2016
Here's what I don't get about all the negativity being heaped on Ghostbusters (which was a perfectly enjoyable popcorn flick, by the way).

The Force Awakens was a near scene-for-scene remake of the original Star Wars with little more than
Here's what I don't get about all the negativity being heaped on Ghostbusters (which was a perfectly enjoyable popcorn flick, by the way).

The Force Awakens was a near scene-for-scene remake of the original Star Wars with little more than a gender-swapped main character and flashier special effects to update it for modern audiences. It was ultimately a lesser film than the original and yet it's been met with near universal acclaim and abundant goodwill from the movie going public.

Ghostbusters is a near scene-for-scene remake of the original with little more than gender-swapped main characters and flashier special effects to update it for modern audiences. In this case, though, the remake improves on the original in almost every way, and yet it is met with the kind of vitriolic negativity usually reserved for war criminals and politicians.

I really want to believe that this negativity is not simply a reaction to the idea of a movie that features four female leads, but sadly I fear that is exactly the case.

Either way, if you want to see fun, lighthearted, entirely enjoyable movie at the cinema, you won't go wrong in seeing Ghostbusters.
Expand
10 of 33 users found this helpful1023
All this user's reviews
7
VideoGameJunkieJul 18, 2016
If I remove my emotions around the original movie, this reboot is a strong 7. I was against the idea of a reboot and went to see it, because I loved the original and Dan Aykroyd had good things to say about it. We saw it in a packed theatreIf I remove my emotions around the original movie, this reboot is a strong 7. I was against the idea of a reboot and went to see it, because I loved the original and Dan Aykroyd had good things to say about it. We saw it in a packed theatre on Union Square in NYC. There were tons of people laughing at the appropriate times. I didn't find it laugh out loud funny, but it was amusing, like a comic strip. Typical that all the 'good' scenes are from the trailer. Plot was decent, but moved too slowly. Nothing subtle about the switch of female leads with a hot, dumb male which was obvious and in your face. Kate McKinnon is the best part and sadly, her gun licking is her best scene. All the original cast's cameos are brief and shoe-horned in and added nothing special. Based on the audience's reaction, I must say that it felt like a solid 70-75, but my emotions got in the way and I just felt sad and a little foolish that a silly movie from my childhood could evoke such a strong reaction. They chose to do a reboot and not the passing of the torch. I think teens who don't know or care about the original will love this movie and all us 'old people' just have to accept that our pop culture is gone. I've become that old guy who said, "Who's this Indiana Jones? Back in my day, Errol Flynn, now there's a hero!". Go see it, but do yourself a favor and don't compare it to the original. You might like it. If I rate this movie through the lens of the original, it's more like a 3, but I'm just some middle-aged guy who still loves the movies he grew up with... Expand
10 of 33 users found this helpful1023
All this user's reviews
8
dwalk8301Jul 25, 2016
Super funny. Just the right length. True enough to the original but stands on its own. Outstanding comedic acting and great chemistry among costars.

That being said..... The plot is paper thin. I give the film a pass b/c you don't
Super funny. Just the right length. True enough to the original but stands on its own. Outstanding comedic acting and great chemistry among costars.

That being said.....

The plot is paper thin. I give the film a pass b/c you don't expect or require a super compelling story in order for the film to work.

In the end, its still my 3rd favorite Ghostbusters film (that could change over time with more views) but I am super happy with the way it turned out.
The ladies (plus Kevin) are great!
Expand
10 of 33 users found this helpful1023
All this user's reviews
10
Just4thisJul 24, 2016
Very funny and entertaining. I loved watching these smart, strong, funny women kick ass- and it was such a nice change that they managed to do so fully clothed.
8 of 27 users found this helpful819
All this user's reviews
9
WhyteWumperJul 26, 2016
I was reluctant to go see it, not due to the female leads, but because (confession time) I hated the first film and found it unfunny and unlikable. So maybe I had less to lose than others watching but from the first few seconds I was IN. II was reluctant to go see it, not due to the female leads, but because (confession time) I hated the first film and found it unfunny and unlikable. So maybe I had less to lose than others watching but from the first few seconds I was IN. I loved every minute of it, the characters were so great, the comedy so very well done - I laughed my ass off. There was a bit of feminism in there (yay) and I was impressed by how it was worn ever so lightly and completely about moving along the story/character arcs. We also loved there were some clear John Finnemore and also Airplane riffs in the comedy that are very, very hard to pull off but were achieved with great aplomb. Expand
8 of 27 users found this helpful819
All this user's reviews
9
JCH99Jul 24, 2016
The movie is so much better than the trailer. The one-liners are great and there are so many quotable scenes. It has the same sense of absurdity, fast pacing and amusing supporting characters as the original. Also, this is Feig's best movieThe movie is so much better than the trailer. The one-liners are great and there are so many quotable scenes. It has the same sense of absurdity, fast pacing and amusing supporting characters as the original. Also, this is Feig's best movie (its way better than Bridesmaids). The new proton packs are quite cool too and they improve throughout the movie, which is a nice touch. I'm a child of the 80s and 90s and this actually exceeded my high expectations. One minor issue was that I thought Sigourney and Murray's cameos felt a bit forced... Expand
9 of 31 users found this helpful922
All this user's reviews
10
karenboyceJul 19, 2016
This is a very funny film and then scary in parts. I took my 12 year old daughter and her friends and they loved it. Most didn't know the original (mine did!) so comparisons just don't matter. We all loved it.
11 of 38 users found this helpful1127
All this user's reviews
8
sandbornAug 3, 2016
This movie is fantastic! First off, the cast did a great job with their roles. I can't say that one person stood out. Next I want to give props to the director. The movie looks great including the effects. The colors are really vibrant! TheThis movie is fantastic! First off, the cast did a great job with their roles. I can't say that one person stood out. Next I want to give props to the director. The movie looks great including the effects. The colors are really vibrant! The movie isn't full of funny jokes, but it is wildly entertaining, and I really enjoyed it. Totally recommended for the whole family! Expand
6 of 21 users found this helpful615
All this user's reviews
10
RuggsJul 31, 2016
Love the chemistry between the cast. These gals are in for a good time and it's great to go along. It will not win over the pre-haters, but it's a nice film nonetheless.
6 of 21 users found this helpful615
All this user's reviews
7
badgerryan19May 19, 2017
This movie had a lot to live up to with the first Ghostbusters. I genuinely like Paul Fieg's films so this definitely was on my radar. The cast all have worked together in some form so they all gel together nicely but no one overshadowsThis movie had a lot to live up to with the first Ghostbusters. I genuinely like Paul Fieg's films so this definitely was on my radar. The cast all have worked together in some form so they all gel together nicely but no one overshadows anyone. The CGI was a lot better than I expected and the movie was funny. There were a lot of jokes when it hit it hit hard when it didn't hit it was super unfunny. The villain on the other hand does not fit in and isn't remotely funny. They are really pushing feminism with this movie with every male an idiot or a ass and the woman superior in everything. I'm fine with feminism and all but don't constantly throw it in our face. The action scenes where pretty cool and overall I was satisfied. Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
10
swesJul 26, 2016
Wonderful from beginning to end! Of course, it wouldn't be this good without the original, but in 20 years this will be the Ghostbusters movie people are still watching.
7 of 25 users found this helpful718
All this user's reviews
8
C-Dawg86Jul 20, 2016
Not sure I understand all the negative User Reviews. I feel people just hate the idea and are not giving the movie any shot. If you are on the fence, I would go to this movie. I thought it was a fun movie and light hearted. Way more likeNot sure I understand all the negative User Reviews. I feel people just hate the idea and are not giving the movie any shot. If you are on the fence, I would go to this movie. I thought it was a fun movie and light hearted. Way more like Ghostbusters 2 than the original, but I personally liked Ghostbusters 2. Third act is clearly rushed. Everyone in the theater seemed to like it and laughed a good amount. Definitely a movie I want to see again (but probably not in theaters). Expand
10 of 36 users found this helpful1026
All this user's reviews
9
cheroldOct 27, 2016
Really funny movie with great performances from MacKinnon and Jones, although the others are a bit muted. Solid special effects, decent story. Overall I recall enjoying this as much as I enjoyed the original when I watched it a quarter of aReally funny movie with great performances from MacKinnon and Jones, although the others are a bit muted. Solid special effects, decent story. Overall I recall enjoying this as much as I enjoyed the original when I watched it a quarter of a century ago. It's a shame a trolling internet campaign ruined its user ratings and killed the chance of a sequel. Expand
5 of 18 users found this helpful513
All this user's reviews
7
MaverickneoJul 18, 2016
Here is my real deal review. Its going to have a lot of info so bear with me. Im a huge fan of the first two Ghosbusters, that being said lets get on with the review. First let me get this out there. Whoever is in charge of or put togetherHere is my real deal review. Its going to have a lot of info so bear with me. Im a huge fan of the first two Ghosbusters, that being said lets get on with the review. First let me get this out there. Whoever is in charge of or put together the trailer for this movie needs to be fired. The movie is not as bad as some people made it out to be and no, it will not ruin your childhood. The beginning started out strong, then the pacing feels kind of off. The two best things about the movie is Kate McKinnon and Chris Hemsworth. Hands down. Kates chararcter, Jillian Holtzmann, is a character. Chris's character Kevin is very funny. You can tell he had fun playing that part. Here is where I am baffled. Kristen Wiig and Melissa McCarthy are kind of just there. They have no real personality. Patty Tolan played by Leslie Jones, is a very stereotypical African american role. The same role she basically plays on SNL. I admit she did deliver some funny moments but for the "funny" part it really wasn't all that "funny" for a movie that is trying really hard to be funny. I would have rather the funny moments just came naturally. (Like Ghostbusters 1 and 2) I hate to keep comparing it to the originals but we are all human and the originals are cult classics. Of course we are going to compare them. Overall the movie is watchable. Pacing is at times a bit awkward. It's geared towards a different audience. Kids up to age 12 or even teenagers will love the movie. Fans who grew up with Ghostbusters 1 and 2 will probably enjoy the many cameos of the original cast members but here is my gripe. I feel like this movie could have and would have been better and much better received if they had a "passing of the torch" movie with the original cast. Even with the passing of Harold Ramis they would have still pulled it off tastefully all while keeping the same plot and story line. Overall: The originals still stand strong and are better movies. Ghostbusters 2016 is watchable and not "Fant4stic" or "Superman IV" levels of bad. It's not a bad movie, it's not a great movie, it just is. It's watchable, has it's moments and it is definitely not as bad as some "fans" are making it out to be. Expand
10 of 37 users found this helpful1027
All this user's reviews
10
PostercatJul 26, 2016
I really enjoyed this movie. It's a lighthearted action comedy, with enough nods to the original while also striking out on its own. Leslie Jones and Kate McKinnon are particularly hilarious in their roles. Leslie Jones's character was prettyI really enjoyed this movie. It's a lighthearted action comedy, with enough nods to the original while also striking out on its own. Leslie Jones and Kate McKinnon are particularly hilarious in their roles. Leslie Jones's character was pretty stereotyped, and it was at leaste partly tongue-in-cheek, but perhaps not enough to justify itself. Hopefully the sequels will do a better job of showing off her expertise as a history buff and NYC local. I loved Ghostbusters as a kid, but I only wish I'd had this version too. It means a lot that the women are on screen to be funny and goofy and not be anyone's plaything, and the reaction to the film just shows how important movies like this can be. Beyond that, this satire of Ghostbusters reviews by Samuel Priest captures everything I wanted to say and more: "I don’t dislike this new Ghostbusters movie because they’re all women, that’s silly and ridiculous. I can’t believe that’s even a question, with my history. I mean, my mom and sisters are all women and I know them, so how could I dislike other women that are not them? It doesn’t make any sense and, frankly, it’s below the belt. I mean, how dare you?" https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/no-i-dont-dislike-the-new-ghostbusters-movie-because-i-hate-women-its-because-i-strongly-believe-in-hollywood-finance-reform Expand
7 of 26 users found this helpful719
All this user's reviews
10
FatherCriticalJul 18, 2016
Okay. A serious review. The Ghostbusters reboot is a good movie. it`s not going to ruin your childhood memories, it can`t, it`s just a movie. That being said it is a good movie. Could it have been better, possibly. A lot of time was spentOkay. A serious review. The Ghostbusters reboot is a good movie. it`s not going to ruin your childhood memories, it can`t, it`s just a movie. That being said it is a good movie. Could it have been better, possibly. A lot of time was spent setting up the creating of the toys. The villain was not bad but could have been better and the climax of the movie could have been better, however these problems could be said about all the ghostbuster movies. Some movies say that it hates on men. No it does not. It does not portray men in a positive light, but with the exception of the Ghostbusters, it doesn`t paint women in a positive light either.
The problem is that there isn`t a Dana or Rick Moranis in the movie. So everyone not a ghostbuster is initial a sceptic or out to get them, thus people believe it is painting a negative image. Hey its a comedy, nuff said.
Don`t listen to those losers who have rated the movie a Zero without ever having seen it. Go judge for yourself. I did and I liked it!
Go see you won`t be sorry.
Expand
10 of 38 users found this helpful1028
All this user's reviews
10
SimonXXXJul 30, 2016
People, this movie just parody!!! This is not next part , its not somthing like old movie, this absolutle new movie!!! .This film make you laugh and little bit
remember the old movie. STOP HATE THAT MOVIE!!!!! This is my first review.
5 of 19 users found this helpful514
All this user's reviews
8
mynameistakenJul 19, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. So a friend and I went to see Ghostbusters last night. TL;DR version, it was fine and not a waste of money (that popcorn though... such a delicious salty ripoff). There was the standard geeky technobabble explanations of things, a lot of action, very good CGI, and while I felt the villain was a little weak the overall plot seemed solid enough.

I will preface the rest of this by saying... comedies aren't really my thing. I'm weird that way. Also, I will try to not spoil anything really, but there is probably some thematic spoiling going on in this. I'm bad with spoilers because I totally don't care about them, so I can miss them in my own comments... be warned.

As anyone who is on the internet and as seen anything about this movie knows there has been a lot of bad press. I'm willing to bet that a large majority of that bad press comes from people who haven't seen the movie, and are just going on their gut reaction to the fact that women are being cast in a reboot of the franchise.

The humor seemed solid to me. There was some physical stuff, which is totally in line for the original, and I can only think of a single fart joke as far as "gross out" type humor is concerned. I suppose the sliming that happens could fall in that category, but I put it more into the physical side... your millage may vary.

There were numerous little call backs to the previous movies which were all subtle enough that if you hadn't seen the old movies they just seemed like regular dialog, as opposed to weird inside jokes you won't get. Most of the old cast had cameos in the movie, Bill Murray as a debunker, Dan Aykroyd as a cab driver, Annie Potts as a hotel desk employee, Ernie Hudson as the uncle of Patty, Sigourny Weaver as Holtzmann's mentor, and the late Harold Ramis even makes an appearance as a bust that is outside Erin's office when the dean comes to talk to her about her tenure. Rick Moranis does not appear, but he's pretty much kept out of Hollywood since his wife died so that's no surprise.

Character wise Holtzman totally steals the show. To me it felt like the "main" characters were intended to be Kristen Wiig's Erin Gilbert and Melissa McCarthy's Abby Yates but Kate McKinnon as Jillian Holtzmann gets a ton of great lines, gets to be the total tech geek spilling out technobabble like a startrek engineer, and her big action scene in the later third of the movie was extremely well done and fun to watch. Also I'd like to not that while Patty isn't a scientist she is shown as smart and is the group's history geek, so she's not a one dimensional character. Oh and Thor's, I mean Chris Hemsworth's, Kevin is a total send up of the "pretty but dumb secretary" trope. And that is fine.

The villain, to me, was just.... I don't know how to describe it. He reminded me of the 3 geniuses from Buffy. He was creepy, and surely up to no good, but he didn't seem... scary, really. It wasn't a bad villain, exactly, but he felt a bit weak as an antagonist. Like, he would have been fine as an underling to a big bad, but as the main guy... shrug

So all in all, I thought it was a decent film. It entertained me, and that's all I ask of a movie.
Expand
11 of 42 users found this helpful1131
All this user's reviews
7
KKell83Jul 29, 2016
I have no clue why this movie got such negative reviews! It was cute and funny; stop comparing it to the past versions. But yes, there were a lot of "one liners" and they made Chris Hemsworth too stupid in this film. It was more towards theI have no clue why this movie got such negative reviews! It was cute and funny; stop comparing it to the past versions. But yes, there were a lot of "one liners" and they made Chris Hemsworth too stupid in this film. It was more towards the younger demographic versus the original's darker sense which would have been amazing.

But all in all, I went in with an open mind and actually enjoyed it. I wasn't there comparing the two films or anything, I based this review off of video work / CG, as well as, acting and it was better than expected.

Definitely a movie to watch, but not one to buy.
Expand
6 of 23 users found this helpful617
All this user's reviews
9
amikulaJul 18, 2016
The comedy is great, with many laugh-out-loud moments. Funnier than the original in a lot of ways.

The plot isn't quite as good as the original, but way better than Ghostbusters 2. The original cast cameos are delightful. Overall,
The comedy is great, with many laugh-out-loud moments. Funnier than the original in a lot of ways.

The plot isn't quite as good as the original, but way better than Ghostbusters 2. The original cast cameos are delightful.

Overall, highly recommended!
Expand
10 of 39 users found this helpful1029
All this user's reviews
10
CriticAlmightyJul 17, 2016
I haven't laughed this hard since Steve Carell's "Get Smart". The improv in this film is as good as it gets. And callbacks to the original were a welcome treat. Go ahead, see this one in the theater and watch it to the final frame. You're welcome.
10 of 40 users found this helpful1030
All this user's reviews
7
ColginatorJul 17, 2016
Even before it was released, this Ghostbusters reboot had already been the centre of great criticism, even becoming the most disliked trailer in the history of YouTube. But whilst it never feels like this reboot completely escapes the shadowEven before it was released, this Ghostbusters reboot had already been the centre of great criticism, even becoming the most disliked trailer in the history of YouTube. But whilst it never feels like this reboot completely escapes the shadow of the 1984 original, Paul Feig's Ghostbusters has successfully defied it's poor trailer by building on the talents and personalities of its entire cast to create a fun, up-beat and all-round entertaining experience.

It more or less follows most of the basic plot beats of the original film. After ghosts begin to pop up in New York, three scientists (Wiig, McCarthy and McKinnon) begin to investigate and along with a subway employee who witnessed the ghosts called Patty (Leslie Jones) they form a team to start fighting these ghosts. The only major difference is this time the ghosts are being lured in to our dimension by a man named Rowan who detests humanity and wants to destroy everyone. He's a villain so uninteresting and generic you'll forget about him as you're watching it.

Fortunately the rest of the cast are all hilarious. They avoid falling in to the trap of being gender swapped versions of the original Ghostbusters cast and instead let their own comedic styles and personalities form unique dynamics between the new characters without relying on the 1984 original.

Wiig plays Abby, a paranormal expert who loses her tenure due to her belief in the paranormal. She is the most restrained member of the cast whose best strength is playing off the other cast members. McCarthy also does well by moving away from her brash and outspoken performances in films like Tammy and Bridesmaids, instead playing a lovable upbeat scientist, in a role that gives her a good opportunity to show of her physical comedic skills.

Leslie Jones is at her best when she's reacting to the strangeness of everything that's going on like running away from a mannequin that's come to life screaming at it to stop. Chris Hemsworth plays the dim-witted secretary, in what at first could have risked being a one note joke of role reversing the dumb blonde stereotype. But Hemsworth seems to elevate the source material with some great comedic delivery that makes him become a surprisingly likable mascot for the film.

Though the real show stealer is definitely Kate McKinnon whose hyper-energetic style dominates the film whenever she's on screen. Even when she's not the focus she'll be in the background doing loads of visual gags. She's a weird mixture of an oddball personality and some great physical comedy to create one of the most charming and bizarre characters from any of Feig's films.

The film is definitely at its strongest when Feig lets his own style takeover and focuses on letting the casts unique personalities and chemistries lead the film. Some of the films best moments are where the characters are just given an opportunity to hang out, like when McKinnon and Wiig are at their new headquarters and randomly burst out in to a small song and dance number that accidentally sets the place on fire.

In contrast the films weakest moments tend to be when it tries to homage or throw in too many call-backs to the original film. At times these are hilarious with cameos from Akroyd and Slimer being some of the best moments of the film that are bound to appease both fans and newcomers alike. But at other times the filmmakers try so hard to show their love of the original film that they end up turning away from the fun personalities of the characters and instead stop the film dead in its track to directly quote lines like "mass hysteria" from the original film. They do references like this so often throughout that it ends up feeling like the film is unable to stand apart entirely from the 1984 original.

Also Feig does seem somewhat limited when it comes to some of the films big action set pieces and seems uncomfortable working with the heavy amounts of CGI. This is particularly clear in the films finale where the film sways away from the actress's chemistry that made the film fun and replaces it with an extended fight sequence against generic looking ghosts that feels like it drags on for way too long.

Though there are still some creative aspects to these sequences. It is cool to see all the different weapons that the Ghostbusters have including things like whips, pistols and grenades that are something genuinely different to what we saw from the original Ghostbusters. And the film as a whole is definitely a lot of fun to watch. Unfortunately it's not going to be good enough to win over people who go in to the film expecting to hate it, but for anyone hoping for a fun movie this will not disappoint.
Expand
10 of 40 users found this helpful1030
All this user's reviews
7
podunk411Jul 17, 2016
This was a surprisingly fun movie. Yeah, it's not as a funny as the first one, and it's definitely missing that intimate personal story line that the first two had (e.g. Bill Murry & Sigourney Weaver's story) that kind of gave everything moreThis was a surprisingly fun movie. Yeah, it's not as a funny as the first one, and it's definitely missing that intimate personal story line that the first two had (e.g. Bill Murry & Sigourney Weaver's story) that kind of gave everything more stakes. This one is just about the ghostbusting, with the same light-heartedness as the first two. The acting is fine, if anything I wanted more of the four together. Wish it was a better script, but overall totally fun Friday night movie for sure. Expand
9 of 36 users found this helpful927
All this user's reviews
10
MetalXManJul 27, 2016
It's a fun movie!!! We left the theater pumped up and feeling good! People that compare this to the original need to get over it. Reset and move forward. Go see it yourselves! We hope there's another one soon!
7 of 28 users found this helpful721
All this user's reviews
10
TheCatTribeJul 18, 2016
Contrary to the haters who either went to this movie planning to hate or have just reviewed it without seeing, this is a great re-make. No wonder the cast of the original have given it a whole-hearted endorsement. The female Ghostbusters areContrary to the haters who either went to this movie planning to hate or have just reviewed it without seeing, this is a great re-make. No wonder the cast of the original have given it a whole-hearted endorsement. The female Ghostbusters are surprisingly a comedic improvement over the original!! The four stars are simply hilarious throughout the movie, bringing great talent and comedy chops to each role. The story is entertaining and engaging. The special effects are superb. It is a fun ride from start to finish.

Things some might not notice are the way that the body shapes of characters are never the subject of jokes or ridicule. Also, the plot involves a Indian burial ground theme that is based on real-life Native burial ground and does not diminish or stereotype Native Americans or their "ghosts."

I went to this movie with an open mind. Sometimes films you think should be great simply are not. This movie is great. And, although I assume some are genuine, I take many of the negative reviews with a grain of salt. I note that many who give bad reviews (1) recycle the same lines as other bad reviews and (2) object to the "political agenda" of having women as the stars. To me these are red flags that the reviews aren't worth the time to read them. Go see this movie and enjoy yourself!
Expand
9 of 37 users found this helpful928
All this user's reviews
8
ardania22Jul 17, 2016
Ignore the haters, this movie is pretty damn entertaining. All four leads are incredibly funny and memorable characters, and I want a sequel just to spend more time with them. Chris Hemsworth is particularly entertaining as the dimwittedIgnore the haters, this movie is pretty damn entertaining. All four leads are incredibly funny and memorable characters, and I want a sequel just to spend more time with them. Chris Hemsworth is particularly entertaining as the dimwitted secretary. The action, when it comes around, is actually really well-shot and creative, and the 3D effects are taken full advantage of. Downsides include a villain with a better concept than execution, an awkward transition into the final showdown, and an over-reliance on body humor in the first half-hour. But the rest of the movie is really enjoyable, and I recommend it for a lazy summer evening Expand
11 of 46 users found this helpful1135
All this user's reviews
7
eagleeyevikingJul 27, 2016
Not as effective as the original but funny nevertheless, Ghostbusters (2016) is a light and enjoyable reboot.
5 of 21 users found this helpful516
All this user's reviews
9
IGaJul 25, 2016
I know the haters of this film will hate me after this, but this movie is very funny and creative. We can't boycott only one movie if we are angry by the insistence of Hollywood to do remakes and sequels of classic movies. Remember Mad Max,I know the haters of this film will hate me after this, but this movie is very funny and creative. We can't boycott only one movie if we are angry by the insistence of Hollywood to do remakes and sequels of classic movies. Remember Mad Max, Star Wars, Jurassic World, King Kong, and the thousand reboots of Spider-Man. If you want to deslike Ghostbusters just because it's a remake, do it with the remakes that you like too... This film is rather a great choice of entertainment and fun. It is well done, it does justice to the original and captivates not be even a little cliché. Ignore attempts of unfounded boycotts and have fun. Expand
7 of 30 users found this helpful723
All this user's reviews
10
Sphinx347Jul 21, 2016
I loved this movie more than the original. the characters, story, plot, and everything about it was great. I liked it more than Ghostbusters 2 and that is saying a lot because I love that move too. I loved that they dedicated it to HaroldI loved this movie more than the original. the characters, story, plot, and everything about it was great. I liked it more than Ghostbusters 2 and that is saying a lot because I love that move too. I loved that they dedicated it to Harold Ramis and loved the hint at the next possible movie!!! I loved that almost the whole original cast made cameos. R.I.P. Harold Ramis. The Ghosts were amazing!! Expand
9 of 39 users found this helpful930
All this user's reviews
7
Compi24Jul 19, 2016
Ironically neither as good or as bad as anyone wanted it to be, Paul Feig's "Ghostbusters" reboot brings the laughs, scares, and imaginative effects, but to nowhere as high of a degree as its 1984 predecessor did. High marks go to KateIronically neither as good or as bad as anyone wanted it to be, Paul Feig's "Ghostbusters" reboot brings the laughs, scares, and imaginative effects, but to nowhere as high of a degree as its 1984 predecessor did. High marks go to Kate McKinnon and Leslie Jones for giving it their all in almost every scene, but it's the surprisingly well-conceived narrative that just saves this picture from the middling plains of mediocrity. It could have been much better and it could very well have been much worse, but - in the end - the simple fact about "Ghostbusters" still remains: the film just kind of "exists" and doesn't do much more than that. Expand
7 of 31 users found this helpful724
All this user's reviews
8
Jess_HillJul 24, 2016
Who you gonna call? Paul Feig, to deliver a fun remake of a classic film. There are some hilarious moments here, and this remains true to the spirit of the original film, with excellent performances from the entire cast. The pacing is slow inWho you gonna call? Paul Feig, to deliver a fun remake of a classic film. There are some hilarious moments here, and this remains true to the spirit of the original film, with excellent performances from the entire cast. The pacing is slow in some parts, and the storyline lacks coherence occasionally as well, but the visual effects and overarching ideas are well executed and engaging. The script is great and overall this is an entertaining, fun and enjoyable film. 8.14/10 Expand
7 of 31 users found this helpful724
All this user's reviews
10
tripleweeJul 18, 2016
I heard a lot of crap about the new Ghostbusters movie, so I decided I would go into it with an open mind. It made me laugh, smile, and really got me with some jump scares. Overall, it was a great movie. I don't care if it's a remake. II heard a lot of crap about the new Ghostbusters movie, so I decided I would go into it with an open mind. It made me laugh, smile, and really got me with some jump scares. Overall, it was a great movie. I don't care if it's a remake. I didn't use that as a basis for my review. If you go into something with prior expectations, then it's going to be complete crap. Most of the people who rate this as 0 or bad are stuck chasing the past; trying to go back in time. But we can't go back to a time when that movie was super cool and a hit. The "professional" metacritic score is only -7 compared to the original. They tried so hard to give it the look the original had, that they had to hold back some of the effects that we are capable of today unlike the original. The kids in the theater I saw it at had a blast. Those kids... they're you. They are the little kid that saw the original in the trailer with such an open mind full of wonder and excitement. They were screaming and laughing like crazy. The original cast members even made some appearances, so to complain that they weren't in the movie shows you that that person clearly didn't give the movie a chance. I loved the strong performance by the ladies too. It wasn't too girly and cliche that showed a man was writing their characters based off of what he THINKS he knows about women. It was written by a man and woman, so the characters were real. Women in science are often overly sexualized or masculine, but the women I saw will definitely be a strong influence of the future generation of girls in STEM jobs. Chris Hemsworth's character was a little over the top dumb, but it's a comedy! I loved the movie. I didn't want to be the stereotypical girl and like it, but I can't stop myself from wanting to watch it again and again. Expand
9 of 40 users found this helpful931
All this user's reviews
9
drscorpioJul 24, 2016
Hilarious from beginning to end. I was cracking up 30 seconds into the film and never really stopped. The actions scenes are well-done, and the special effects are great. All the main characters have interesting personalities and story arcs.Hilarious from beginning to end. I was cracking up 30 seconds into the film and never really stopped. The actions scenes are well-done, and the special effects are great. All the main characters have interesting personalities and story arcs. Kate McKinnon is flawless from beginning to end as the mad scientist.
If you have daughters or nieces, you need to bring them with you.
Expand
8 of 36 users found this helpful828
All this user's reviews
9
Mando44646Jul 21, 2016
This movie was fantastic. Very well done and very funny, while being respectful of the source material. I highly recommend it; you can't go wrong by seeing it.
8 of 36 users found this helpful828
All this user's reviews