Ghostbusters
Columbia Pictures | Release Date: July 15, 2016
2.7
USER SCORE
Generally unfavorable reviews based on 2157 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
444
Mixed:
243
Negative:
1,470
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
0
nooblox85May 11, 2018
Dude after i watched this i want to see some movie named Feminismbuster ffs i hate this movie what is this feminism theater? i hate you
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
2
PurekindJun 10, 2020
Yeah, this movie is genuinely garbage. I watched it a second time too if maybe I was too harsh but it turns out I was spot on, and in some ways maybe even kind. It's trash.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
dazsinJun 1, 2020
I'd heard all about the dreadful way this movie was conceived, but wanted to watch it with an open mind, free of all the controversy. But the movie is abysmal. In fact it's probably one of the worst movies i've seen in the past 10 years. It'sI'd heard all about the dreadful way this movie was conceived, but wanted to watch it with an open mind, free of all the controversy. But the movie is abysmal. In fact it's probably one of the worst movies i've seen in the past 10 years. It's shameless, it's crass, it's unfunny, it's complete nonsense.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
DrD00mJul 17, 2021
Cash grab which wants to take advantage of old-school Ghostbusters fans. Unfortunately they don't stop there. In addition, you'll get brainwashed with feminism ideology. I don't mind a woman cast but when they try to shove it down my throatCash grab which wants to take advantage of old-school Ghostbusters fans. Unfortunately they don't stop there. In addition, you'll get brainwashed with feminism ideology. I don't mind a woman cast but when they try to shove it down my throat this blatantly it doesn't work for me. Sorry. Don't watch!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
GrendizerMay 2, 2021
Bad script, bad jokes, no substance, very superficial, try hard, no guts, no glory.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
FilipeNetoOct 23, 2021
Released almost twenty years late, this is the third film in the "Ghostbusters" franchise. In fact, I only understood the reason for the delay after some reading: a contract specified that a new film would be released if the director and theReleased almost twenty years late, this is the third film in the "Ghostbusters" franchise. In fact, I only understood the reason for the delay after some reading: a contract specified that a new film would be released if the director and the four original protagonists agreed, and that agreement has never been possible until now. On the one hand, I'm glad that this has been surpassed, but on the other hand I confess that I expected something more: this film is good, it entertains and is a visual spectacle, but it has many flaws. For me, the most outrageous is to ignore original films. That is, I would have preferred to see a sequel which continues the story and takes into account the years that have passed, than a pure and simple "reboot" that ignores everything before.

The script begins with the meeting of two old friends, both scientists, who in the past were fascinated by the world of the supernatural. One of them remains connected to this and is head of a university research office, but the other wants to forget about it, and be regarded as a serious academic in the scientific world. However, the way they quickly bridge their differences and re-match efforts is far-fetched, and the film's continuation will not improve that: we have forced, unbelievable, illogical ideas and situations, ill-conceived characters, a constant and irritating obsession with gender issues and political correctness, which keep the quality of the plot below what we can demand. Because of this, and other issues that I will address, I am forced to rate director Paul Feig's performance as an amateur. He seems to have simply let things go by themselves, intervening as little as possible and demanding only the basics of everything and everyone.

The cast has several strong names, starting with the quartet formed by Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Kate McKinnon and Leslie Jones. I really can't say something bad about their work. I think they did the best they could with the material they received, even though the dialogue is fake, the jokes are silly, and the characters are as dense as a cardboard. Jones is the better to handle it, in contrast to a sleepy McCarthy and an exaggerated, histrionic McKinnon. Contrary to what some might have thought, I don't believe the fact that they are women (in the previous films, the Ghostbusters were men) is a special bonus. For me, it's irrelevant, as I care more about character design and the good work of the actors than about gender issues, which only serve to polarize and use cinema for political purposes, taking the focus away from art and of quality entertainment. Instead of using cinema to make politics, empowering women and feminizing men, films should seek to improve their stories, give credibility and depth to the characters, bet on quality. Otherwise, the feeling that pervades is that cinema seeks to do a work of expiation or penance. Maybe that's why I hated Chris Hemsworth: in addition to failing to be a good villain, he's amorphous for most of the movie and has the intelligence of a canary. Neil Casey doesn't even deserve to be mentioned: his work is forgettable. I liked the cameo of the original protagonists, but I regret they couldn't revive the original characters as well. It would have been something more honorable and meritorious.

Technically, the film bets everything on visual effects and an ambitious, expensive, flashy and full of color CGI. This is something really impressive, and on the big screen it has a remarkable impact, but ultimately it gets tedious, excessive and turns the movie into a kind of expensive and noisy video game, an excuse for tons of expensive effects. The film misses the action scenes, which are absorbed by the effects and lack impact. The cinematography is good and impressive, but the editing was poorly done, and I think the cuts were excessive or badly placed. The soundtrack tries to honor the original by updating it, but it ended up making one of the most interesting theme songs in the cinema of the Nineties dull and monotonous.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
FrostormNidheggSep 1, 2020
Чудовищный высер. Вот что случается, если не уничтожать малейшие ростки СЖВ.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
RolandsGunFeb 26, 2019
This only gets three points because the cinematography and editing are fine. It's definitely a movie. Everything else falls flat; the plot, jokes, CG and ugly cameos from the original cast. The acting was like a series of SNL skits, nothingThis only gets three points because the cinematography and editing are fine. It's definitely a movie. Everything else falls flat; the plot, jokes, CG and ugly cameos from the original cast. The acting was like a series of SNL skits, nothing consistent.

I don't even think kids would be engaged by it, and considering the first joke in the movie is about queefs, it's probably not intended for them, anyway.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
Sven381Mar 17, 2019
Ghostbusters -> HORROR-Comedy
Ghostbusters II -> Horror-COMEDY
Ghostbusters (2016) -> Slapstick The basic Story is okay, not great, but the stories of GBI and GBII weren't great also. The visuals were technically okay, but the bubblegumGhostbusters -> HORROR-Comedy
Ghostbusters II -> Horror-COMEDY
Ghostbusters (2016) -> Slapstick

The basic Story is okay, not great, but the stories of GBI and GBII weren't great also.
The visuals were technically okay, but the bubblegum visual apperance is kinda crappy and anoyying.
The maincharacters were ... well not characters but female versions of Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy. What made Paul Feig hate women that much to make direction choises that bad?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
Eaj6Oct 8, 2019
As I always say, "Don't make what's old, new." As many movies and TV shows have possed in this new century is that there is never original movie work, just reproductions of timeless classics that can never be made again. I also wasAs I always say, "Don't make what's old, new." As many movies and TV shows have possed in this new century is that there is never original movie work, just reproductions of timeless classics that can never be made again. I also was disappointed at the idea of why are they making a movie on Ghostbusters with the original themes and stories just with a different gender of cast members. It's beyond me why the director, screenwriter or producer, could have done a movie on before they were the Ghostbusters or fans of the Ghostbusters who try to be in their image.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
Foxdie67Sep 13, 2019
You cast lively, talented women in one of the most loved franchises of all time under the banner of Sony. Why do a remake? Why do fart jokes? Why the incessant insult to the lore? You had such an opportunity, and this under the auspices ofYou cast lively, talented women in one of the most loved franchises of all time under the banner of Sony. Why do a remake? Why do fart jokes? Why the incessant insult to the lore? You had such an opportunity, and this under the auspices of promoting female lead characters. It’s actually a disservice to that cause. Do not watch. The writers shouldn’t be allowed on a movie again. Horrendous. No imagination. A quick cash grab by Sony.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
gt1967May 14, 2020
I think it was after reading critic reviews, then actually watching this film that I realised you really can't trust film critics anymore. I'm not sure what exactly their agenda is, however I'm pretty sure it's no longer about being honest.I think it was after reading critic reviews, then actually watching this film that I realised you really can't trust film critics anymore. I'm not sure what exactly their agenda is, however I'm pretty sure it's no longer about being honest. As this film really is extremely poor in every way. Dull characters, terrible script, poor storyline and absolutely no humour. Simply awful.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
DrKitsune87Dec 10, 2019
I love these ladies, they are so funny, really great comedians but this movie is a dumpster fire fueled by methane extracted from a hungover pig's **** The jokes are **** the story is **** the villain is **** the cameos are **** and it's moreI love these ladies, they are so funny, really great comedians but this movie is a dumpster fire fueled by methane extracted from a hungover pig's **** The jokes are **** the story is **** the villain is **** the cameos are **** and it's more than obvious that they did it for the paycheck. I still love these ladies and I love their comedy but this movie was made as a **** you' to the original story, cast and fans.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
PinballWizard94Feb 17, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The fact this film is certified fresh on Rotten Tomatoes is worrying to me because the film was everything but fresh. I'm not a fan of these all women cast remakes just because they seem very forced and gimmicky. Whatever happened to organic feeling female lead roles like Sigourney Weaver in the Alien series or Geena Davis in The Long Kiss Goodnight? From the start it was clear the humor wasn't going to be subtle, witty or clever and that instead it would substituted this with over the top, slapstick, haha-we-mentioned-Starbucks-how-relevant-because-that's-a-real-thing humor that films seem to go for these days. The whole thing was very confused - the cast all seemed to be constantly vying for the "funny one" spot which just created this very 2D experience, there was no variation in character, the bad guy was completely forgettable and un-intimidating, the story was very "meh". The only thing that was funny was the fact that Chris Hemsworth's character only managed to get the job as the ghosterbusters' receptionist because they found him attractive! Can you imagine for one moment if it was the other way around? Alas, it's an all women cast so it's "empowering". I'd like to comment on the plot a little more but it was honestly that forgettable. Overall, a waste of 2 hours and unfortunately I can't use that thing out of Men in Black to erase this from my memory.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
Tbone3uDec 17, 2019
Literal trash in every aspect. If you are a fan of the originals, do not waste your time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
LancedSoulSep 22, 2021
Who are ya gonna call? Someone else and at least Harold Ramis didn't live to see this garbage ****
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
SrJoseHdezApr 20, 2020
Puedo ver una película sin que me metan ideologías feministas sin sentido.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
Mclovin69Jan 25, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Just stop. Be more original next time, and stop rebooting everything. It doesn't work.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
Pedda11Jan 6, 2022
Improvisation can work in movies, the first Ironman was largely improvised and it's great, this movie is not.
If this movie had a real script written by someone with, well talent an all female Ghostbusters movie could have worked.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
HarryDangerAug 16, 2021
Interesting to see how critics review the movie. It shows me who is actually reviewing the movie objectively and who is blinded by a social agenda. The movie is just not good at all. It's terrible.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
Scorpion1980Jul 19, 2020
fail in so many ways, seriously, i dont mind all female cast, but then the movies has to have a good story, this 'thing' sucked so bad.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
SynthwaveRiderNov 27, 2021
This movie was hot garbage. Never watch this. Such a disgrace to the original, it was making fun of it
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
SergeiZJul 19, 2020
A vulgar comedy with stupid jokes. Absolute squalor. And an indicator of the quality of the modern press, which, in connection with modern trends, high rated any men-hating product.
PS Greetings to all fans of the original dilogy.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
renohataMar 9, 2021
Simply not funny, not cool, not anything, just a waste of time. And I cannot believe I have just lost this time of my life watching it.
When compared to the original, it gets even worse, there is not anything that saves it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
wa3zgtMar 15, 2021
I have read comments about the alleged misogyny based dislikes of the new 2016 Ghostbusters movie reboot…
I can assure you that i am NOT against a re-boot, or a woman lead Ghostbusters team, but i AM against spending time, effort, money andI have read comments about the alleged misogyny based dislikes of the new 2016 Ghostbusters movie reboot…
I can assure you that i am NOT against a re-boot, or a woman lead Ghostbusters team, but i AM against spending time, effort, money and resources just to try to duplicate a classic movie franchise - unless you give the team something better to fight against - and strive for - this time around.
Here's an overview of what a brand new sequel (NOT a reboot) could be:
A team of women Ghostbusters could, for example, NOT [like men tend to] shoot first, but ask questions: WHY is a ghost in disguise attacking us - and why now? Women are 'allowed' to show their feelings; use this too: at least one of the women is 'psychic'; she somehow 'knows' that the *apparently* evil ghost in disguise is actually an innocent victim - who wants the Ghostbusters to help bring her killers to justice.
The women would understand that the ghost 'stereotype' of mindless evil is wrong; *not* all ghosts are bad. Men might have a hard time with that concept.
See? Rather than putting down men, you could elevate women. And these women would have depth and purpose - not be just uncomfortable stereotypes who complain about a lack of wontons in their soup. The character of Patty could *seem* angry because she still has PTSD from her prior career in the US Army during our war with Iraq. So the film could show growth and improvement of the women characters.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
TRANSFORMERSFANMar 11, 2021
this movie was not good! it ruined the original ghostbusters! and i rate this movie a 3/10
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
anfeherle89Jul 30, 2021
bad, bad, bad everything in this movie is bad!!!, don't look it, is better watch growing up the grass and more funny
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
SombreJun 4, 2021
Well. I saw the movie (So i'm not someone who critic a movie than i didn't watch, like the writters & producer accuse people). It’s bad written. It’s just a vessel, an excuse, to make men look like crap & stupid. To make women look likeWell. I saw the movie (So i'm not someone who critic a movie than i didn't watch, like the writters & producer accuse people). It’s bad written. It’s just a vessel, an excuse, to make men look like crap & stupid. To make women look like awesome even if their acting is bad. Only Kate McKinnon play nice in this movie but it’s not enough to save the movie sadly. Even the “evil” guy is bad written. The "background" characters act like vegetables, they are just here to answer to the main characters, they have no mind of their own. And the story is pretty bad. They can say what they want about people making critic without seeing the movie, the fact is if you watch it, it’s even worse. The movie could have been better without all those feminist crap. Making a “normal” movie in hollywood seem difficult in modern times.
I really regret all those insane sexist message. I'm watching movie to relax not to see hollywood pepper me with politics fights.

When i see the choose they made to make this movie, i'm not surprise to see than the movie failed. They deserve what they get. They were lazy and decide freely to bring feminist into a movie. They decide to release a poor movie. That's totally their fault.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
CapnCrunch17Dec 12, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is a terrible movie, where do I begin. First off nobody asked for a reboot, we simply wanted to continue the story from GB2 or the video game (depending on what is considered cannon).
I'm sure the girls are funny, but they felt bland and boring, except for the chick who played Holzman. She made this movie somewhat watchable.
The comedy is forced and not funny, the ghosts look like ghosts from Scooby doo 2. The "epic" battle at the end is with the logo ghost.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
LoneWolfNYCJan 27, 2022
I tried, i swear i really tried. This "movie" is a shame for the cinema industry, a shame for women, a shame for men, a shame for this franchise, a shame for the city of New York, a shame for humor, and a shame for all existing form ofI tried, i swear i really tried. This "movie" is a shame for the cinema industry, a shame for women, a shame for men, a shame for this franchise, a shame for the city of New York, a shame for humor, and a shame for all existing form of intelligence on earth.

It's a kind of analogy of Idiocracy. Take two very good movies of the 80's which are smart, fun and classy and look at what it became few decades later. A totaly dumb and stupid spectacle with terrible jokes and farts.

I facepalmed myself a dozen of times during this "thing". Pathetic.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
BigCrompyJan 1, 2022
Marginally worse, if that’s possible, than the all-male re-boot of Steel Magnolias (Jack Black, Danny Trejo, Pee-Wee Herman, Rob Reiner, Simon Callow) which must logically be just around the corner.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
ReapingSoulsFeb 8, 2022
Bland and failed PR stunt. Poorly scripted, not funny and the acting doesn't suit the characters. For all the hype this film was given, it truly face planted and everybody who came for the experience saw it that way. It's a pity thatBland and failed PR stunt. Poorly scripted, not funny and the acting doesn't suit the characters. For all the hype this film was given, it truly face planted and everybody who came for the experience saw it that way. It's a pity that professional reviewers cast their opinions through a certain optic in today's world. Compare for example the guardians review of this movie vs. Ghostbusters Afterlife.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
moviefanicAug 24, 2023
the only thing that needs to be gotten rid of is the worst reboot of all time, 2016 version of ghostbusters, which is a movie that shoves a middle finger to people who loved the first 2 ghostbuster movies.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
next
Page:
More From This Movie

60 Critic Reviews

2.7 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 71 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL